Feed aggregator
COOL COUPLE: Israeli Husband and Wife Pilots Led Deadly Iran Bombing Raids as Children Waited at Home
Israel And Syria To Sign Historic Peace Deal By End Of Year, Report Claims
Ministers Silman and Shikli Slam Bennett After His Iran Strike Claims: “Ludicrous Beyond Words”
In the wake of Naftali Bennett’s recent interview, in which he claimed credit for Israel’s strike on Iran and blamed MK Idit Silman for the failure to eliminate Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar, two of Bennett’s former allies—Silman and Amichai Shikli—fired back with strongly worded public statements, accusing him of shameless self-aggrandizement and distortion of history.
Environmental Protection Minister Idit Silman began her blistering response by noting the timing of the interview. “It’s amazing that Bennett chose to speak out during Parshas Korach,” she wrote. “It suits him perfectly—his style, his political path. No remorse, no apology to the voters he betrayed—just blind arrogance and a burning envy of Netanyahu’s historic achievements. Unlike him, I apologized for my role in that fraudulent coalition. But he? He carries on as if nothing happened. Not a single word of regret to the people he deceived.”
Silman continued: “What value do the words of a man hold when the entire nation and the whole world saw that he keeps no commitments, not even to his own signature? The sad truth is plain: a man who has no integrity, who outright says he won’t even promise things to his own children. When there’s no truth, there are no limits, no values, no red lines.”
She accused Bennett of rewriting the facts: “None of what he said is true. This is the same man who subordinated Israel to the Shura Council, funneled billions to the Muslim Brotherhood—funds that were later found to have reached Hamas-affiliated organizations. This is the man who built a government on the votes of Ra’am, a party that on Israel’s most vulnerable day accused it of war crimes. And he has the audacity to claim he would have taken out Sinwar? That government bent over backwards to appease the Muslim Brotherhood. It nearly collapsed over tree-planting in the Negev—so now he wants us to believe it would have ordered a strike in Gaza or Iran?”
Silman then pointed out the flaw in Bennett’s narrative: “Let’s not forget: the government remained in power for nine months after I resigned. Why didn’t it act then? His talk of ‘unity’ is a pathetic mask. A man who declares he will boycott a Netanyahu-led government, but happily sits with terror supporters, shows who he really is. His attempt to grab credit for the Iran strike is beyond absurd. Like a fly on an elephant’s back shouting, ‘We won!’ This is a man who couldn’t even manage his own office. Not a week went by without infighting and accusations.”
She concluded: “It was an honor for me to bring down the left-wing-Arab coalition and save the State of Israel from the dangerous hands that were steering it toward disaster. Yes, the polls always showed him as strong. And yet we all know how that ended.”
Diaspora Affairs Minister Amichai Shikli followed up with a fact-based rebuttal titled “A Quick Fact Check for Mr. Bennett.”
“A. The Hamas attack was planned during the tenure of the ‘government of change.’ While it’s possible that the exact timing was influenced by protests or mass refusal to serve, the plan would have been executed regardless—months before or after.
B. During that government’s term, several dangerous precedents were set:
-
Increasing the quota of Gaza work permits to 20,000. Then-Minister of Regional Cooperation Issawi Frej said at the time that ‘economic prosperity promotes security stability.’
-
For the first time, an Israeli government entirely refrained from action against Hamas. The Bennett-Lapid administration only targeted Islamic Jihad, under the mistaken belief that Hamas was interested in ‘stability and economic growth.’
-
Bennett served as foreign minister in the Lapid-led transitional government. When Hezbollah launched three drones toward the Karish gas rig just days after he took office, Lapid panicked and launched hasty negotiations to redraw the maritime border with Lebanon, ultimately conceding key Israeli assets. Signing that deal days before Israel’s elections portrayed Israel as weak and fearful and severely damaged our deterrence.
C. The ‘government of change’ had a year and a half to carry out targeted assassinations of Hamas leadership. Blaming Silman’s resignation as the reason they didn’t is a pitiful excuse.
D. Had the Hamas massacre occurred under Bennett and Lapid:
-
It’s doubtful a large-scale ground operation would have been launched—certainly not in Rafah—due to the Biden administration’s staunch opposition.
-
Bennett and Lapid would have insisted on receiving prior American approval for any strike on Hezbollah leadership, which likely would have meant the operation never materialized.
-
As for Iran, Bennett himself recently said that his approach to neutralizing the Iranian threat was not through military strikes on nuclear facilities, but rather through ‘weakening the regime—not necessarily kinetic (military) action…’”
Shikli concluded his statement by saying, “The attempt to rewrite history and claim victory where there was failure is not only misleading. It is dangerous.”
{Matzav.com Israel}
Shin Bet Busts Iranian Plot to Assassinate Defense Minister At His Home With Powerful Bomb
Massive Hamas Terror Network in Chevron Plotting Imminent Attacks Busted by Shin Bet
Report: Hamas Presents Ceasefire Demands, US Offers 70-Day Guarantee
A high-ranking Palestinian Arab source speaking to the Arabic-language Sky News outlet revealed that Hamas has submitted a series of conditions as part of the ongoing discussions aimed at securing a truce in Gaza.
As per the report, Hamas has requested several key guarantees, including protection from targeted strikes on its political bureau and top exiled leadership. The group is also seeking assurance that its financial assets will remain untouched and that no limitations will be imposed on its external operations beyond Gaza.
The same report notes that Hamas is pushing for its members and affiliated individuals to be incorporated into a newly established civil and security infrastructure that would govern the Gaza Strip in the future.
According to the official cited by Sky News, the United States has conditionally backed a cessation of hostilities. However, this endorsement comes with a stipulation: if a comprehensive deal is not signed within 70 days of the ceasefire, Israel would retain the right to resume full-scale military operations.
In reaction to the report, senior Hamas leader Sami Abu Zuhri issued a sharp denial, rejecting the details entirely. He referred to the claims as “baseless accusations” and said they “serve Israel and undermine Hamas’ legitimacy.”
{Matzav.com Israel}Chief Justice John Roberts: Politicians’ Words Putting Judges at Risk of Violence and Murder
Trump Denies Reports US Looking At $30B Nuclear Deal With Iran: ‘These People Are SICK’
President Trump fired back at media claims that his administration was contemplating a $30 billion nuclear agreement with Iran, slamming the reports as false and inflammatory — just days after hinting that a deal with Tehran might not even be needed.
“Who in the Fake News Media is the SleazeBag saying that ‘President Trump wants to give Iran $30 Billion to build non-military Nuclear facilities.’ Never heard of this ridiculous idea,” Trump wrote on Truth Social.
“It’s just another HOAX put out by the Fake News in order to demean. These people are SICK!!!” he added, rejecting the report outright.
CNN was the first to break the story, citing sources familiar with the alleged back-channel proposal. According to the outlet, details of the initiative were worked out during a confidential and extended meeting last week between U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff and regional Gulf partners.
CNN also reported that the proposal was finalized just a day before the U.S. launched coordinated strikes on Iran’s nuclear sites at Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan.
On Friday, prior to the report’s release, Trump had already suggested that sanctions on Iran might be lifted — especially in light of U.S. claims that recent airstrikes had severely crippled Iran’s nuclear infrastructure. His remarks came alongside harsh criticism of Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, who had publicly declared that Iran emerged “victorious.”
“During the last few days, I was working on the possible removal of sanctions, and other things, which would have given a much better chance to Iran at a full, fast, and complete recovery — The sanctions are BITING!” Trump posted. “But no, instead I get hit with a statement of anger, hatred, and disgust.”
He went further in the same post, accusing Khamenei of ingratitude and referencing Israel’s previous intentions to pursue regime change.
“His Country was decimated, his three evil Nuclear Sites were OBLITERATED, and I knew EXACTLY where he was sheltered, and would not let Israel, or the U.S. Armed Forces, by far the Greatest and Most Powerful in the World, terminate his life,” Trump wrote. “I SAVED HIM FROM A VERY UGLY AND IGNOMINIOUS DEATH, and he does not have to say, ‘THANK YOU, PRESIDENT TRUMP!’”
In the days since the airstrikes, conflicting assessments have surfaced over their long-term effectiveness. Several intelligence-based analyses claim Iran’s nuclear ambitions have only been temporarily delayed. However, both Israel and the Trump administration maintain that the sites were effectively “destroyed” and have criticized media outlets for downplaying the damage.
Despite the conflicting evaluations, Trump has pointed to the tenuous ceasefire currently in place between Iran and Israel as evidence of progress. He expressed confidence that the strikes succeeded in dissuading Iran from further developing its nuclear arsenal.
“The way I look at it, they fought the war is done. I could get a statement that they’re not going to go nuclear. We’re probably going to ask for that,” Trump said on Wednesday after the NATO Summit in the Netherlands. “But they’re not going to be doing it.”
He also mentioned that discussions with Iran were expected to continue, though he downplayed the importance of formalizing an agreement.
“We’re going to talk to them next week with Iran, we may sign an agreement. To me, I don’t think it’s necessary,” he said.
Nevertheless, Trump made it clear that if Iran again poses a threat, he would not hesitate to authorize additional military action.
{Matzav.com}
Trump: “Make The Deal In Gaza. Get The Hostages Back!!!”
President Donald Trump took to social media late at night to call on both Israel and Hamas to finalize an agreement in Gaza that would bring about the release of hostages taken during the October 7 attacks.
“MAKE THE DEAL IN GAZA. GET THE HOSTAGES BACK!!! DJT,” he posted on his Truth Social platform, delivering a clear message that appeared directed at Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to move forward with the ceasefire deal. Trump had previously predicted that an agreement would be finalized within the week.
The post lacked additional context or explanation, but it followed an earlier statement from Trump in which he again urged Israeli authorities to drop legal proceedings against Netanyahu. “He is right now in the process of negotiating a Deal with Hamas, which will include getting the Hostages back,” Trump said.
{Matzav.com}Musk Blasts Trump’s “Big Beautiful Bill” as “Political Suicide” for Republicans in Scathing Critique
Listen: The Daily “Bitachon 4 Life” Burst of Inspiration on Matzav.com: Is It Possible?
LISTEN:
https://matzav.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Bitachon4Life-Shiur-1529-Tocheles-Part-49-Moshe.mp3For more info, email bitachon4life@gmail.com.
Listen: Stories4Life Shiur On Matzav.com: Where Will It Happen?
BIRDS OF A FEATHER: Zohran Mamdani Tours Harlem With Crown Heights Riot Provocateur Al Sharpton
President Trump’s “One Big Beautiful Bill” Clears Nail-Biter Senate Vote After Marathon Showdown
FOR REAL: Muslim Socialist NY Mayoral Candidate Would Raise Taxes On ‘White Neighborhoods’
Zohran Mamdani, who recently won the Democratic primary for New York City mayor, has vowed to increase property taxes in what he calls “whiter neighbourhoods” as part of his broader economic plan.
The 33-year-old Democratic Socialist defeated former Governor Andrew Cuomo in Tuesday’s primary, securing the party’s nomination for the November general election. Following his upset victory, new information has emerged highlighting the more radical aspects of his platform — including a pledge to “shift the tax burden” toward wealthier, predominantly white areas of the city.
On his campaign website, a housing policy memo titled “Supporting homeowners and ending deed theft” outlines his proposed tax overhaul. It states that, if elected, Mamdani plans to “shift the tax burden from overtaxed homeowners in the outer boroughs to more expensive homes in richer and whiter neighbourhoods.”
The memo criticizes the current structure of the city’s property tax system, calling it unfair and outdated. “The property tax system is unbalanced because assessment levels are artificially capped, so homeowners in expensive neighbourhoods pay less than their fair share,” the document says.
According to the proposal, Black and Latino neighborhoods — including Jamaica, Brownsville, and Tremont — bear a heavier tax load than affluent areas, due to a decades-old law passed in 1981. That law allows property taxes to be based on imputed rental income instead of market value, which benefits high-value properties in wealthier areas.
As a result, properties of significantly higher value in upscale neighborhoods often pay far less in property tax than modest homes in lower-income communities. For example, Bloomberg reports that a $2.15 million home in Williamsburg could carry a $157 annual tax bill, while a $234,840 home in the Bronx might owe $3,917 each year.
Mamdani, who identifies as “anti-Zionist” and strongly supports the Palestinian cause, recently faced criticism for refusing to condemn the slogan “globalise the intifada,” a move that led to backlash within his own party. Democratic Congresswoman Laura Gillen called his stance part of a “deeply disturbing pattern of unacceptable anti-Semitic comments.”
Beyond his tax proposals, Mamdani has put forward a slate of progressive policy ideas, including the creation of municipally run grocery stores, universal free childcare, and tax increases on all individuals earning more than $1 million annually. These proposals have stirred alarm among members of New York’s business community.
Kathryn Wylde, president of the Partnership for New York City — an organization representing major employers and industries — said the corporate sector is “terrified” by Mamdani’s rapid political ascent.
Mamdani has also made headlines for calling capitalism “theft” and for expressing support for efforts to “defund the police” following the Black Lives Matter protests.
Since his primary win, the race for City Hall has grown increasingly contentious. Republicans have circulated inflammatory messages targeting Mamdani’s Muslim identity and immigration background.
“Zohran ‘little Muhammad’ Mamdani is an anti-Semitic, socialist, communist who will destroy the great city of New York,” posted Tennessee Congressman Andy Ogles on X. “He needs to be DEPORTED. Which is why I am calling for him to be subject to denaturalisation proceedings.”
{Matzav.com}
51-49 SQUEAKER: Senate Ekes Out Late-Night Win On Trump’s “Big, Beautiful Bill”
Senate Republicans took a major step late tonight by advancing President Trump’s sweeping legislative package, dubbed his “big, beautiful bill,” putting the chamber on track for a marathon weekend session aimed at pushing it through.
Despite ongoing disputes and behind-the-scenes negotiations, Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) pressed ahead with efforts to secure passage of the bill—which includes provisions on taxes, border policy, military support, and raising the debt ceiling—by Independence Day.
A handful of GOP lawmakers initially resisted, holding up the process for more than three hours while discussions continued with party leaders. In the end, only Senators Rand Paul (R-Ky.) and Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) voted against moving forward.
The motion to proceed passed narrowly with a 51-49 vote, moving the bill into the formal debate and amendment phase.
Vice President JD Vance arrived on Capitol Hill in case a tie-breaking vote was necessary, but his services were ultimately not required.
Now that the procedural vote is complete, the Senate will enter a lengthy debate period followed by a series of amendment votes—commonly referred to as a “vote-a-rama”—before the final vote on the bill.
Democratic lawmakers have vowed to slow the process by insisting that all 940 pages of the legislation be read aloud on the Senate floor before any amendments are considered, which could take over ten hours.
Among the proposed changes, Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) is planning to introduce an amendment that would eliminate a temporary block on states enacting their own artificial intelligence laws.
That proposal appears to have momentum, with other Republicans, including Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), also critical of the restriction.
Meanwhile, Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah), who had introduced a controversial provision to sell public lands to private developers for housing, announced during the vote that he would retract the plan.
Several GOP members—among them Sens. Steve Daines (R-Mont.) and Mike Crapo (R-Idaho)—had voiced strong opposition to Lee’s proposal.
Earlier in the day, President Trump increased the urgency, distributing a formal statement from his administration emphasizing the importance of passing the legislation.
“President Trump is committed to keeping his promises, and failure to pass this bill would be the ultimate betrayal,” the statement read.
{Matzav.com}Sen. Michael Testa Proposes Renaming Delaware Bay To ‘The Bay Of New Jersey’ As Inspiration To Trump’s Gulf Of America
A New Jersey state senator is pushing for a bold renaming of the Delaware Bay, proposing that the iconic body of water be officially dubbed “The Bay of New Jersey,” in a move reminiscent of President Donald Trump’s decision to rename the Gulf of Mexico as the “Gulf of America.”
The legislation, introduced on Thursday by Republican State Senator Michael Testa, would require all state agencies to begin using the term “The Bay of New Jersey” across official platforms, including signage, state publications, websites, and public communications, according to NJ.com. It also mandates that federal authorities be notified of the change.
“I look at the robust fishing industry — commercial fishing industry and recreational industry of the State of New Jersey,” Testa told the outlet. “I think that the fact that we have to call the bay that we fish in the Delaware Bay – they’ve had a claim to that long enough.”
The bay, which plays a crucial role in New Jersey’s economy through tourism, shipping, and fishing, has carried the name “Delaware Bay” since 1610. The designation honors Thomas West, the third Baron De La Warr, who served as governor of the Virginia colony. That history is noted on Delaware’s official government website.
Testa, a longtime backer of President Trump, promoted his renaming effort on social media with a nod to Trump’s campaign slogan, posting, “Make New Jersey Great Again!” on X.
His proposal follows a headline-grabbing move by Trump about six months ago, when he declared the Gulf of Mexico should now be referred to as the “Gulf of America.” That announcement drew both support and satire, including a playful response from Connecticut Governor Ned Lamont, who suggested renaming the Long Island Sound.
“While the maps are changing, here’s an idea,” Lamont posted on X, sharing an edited map renaming the waterway the “Connecticut Sound” and tagging New York Governor Kathy Hochul.
In addition to the renaming measure, Testa introduced a second bill this week proposing that New Jersey reclaim a piece of land along the Salem County coastline that had been ceded to Delaware under a decades-old border agreement.
{Matzav.com}
Trump Blasts GOP Senator Thom Tillis As Vote To Advance ‘Big Beautiful Bill’ Stalls In Senate: ‘BIG MISTAKE’
President Donald Trump launched a sharp rebuke of Senator Thom Tillis of North Carolina on Saturday night, slamming the Republican lawmaker for opposing his sweeping tax-and-spending proposal, as a crucial procedural vote in the Senate stalled and GOP leadership scrambled to lock down support.
“Looks like Senator Thom Tillis, as usual, wants to tell the Nation that he’s giving them a 68% Tax Increase, as opposed to the Biggest Tax Cut in American History!” Trump wrote on Truth Social, as Senate leaders struggled for hours without concluding a vote to advance the massive bill.
Trump touted the bill’s benefits in his post, writing, “America wants Reduced Taxes, including NO TAX ON TIPS, NO TAX ON OVERTIME, AND NO TAX ON SOCIAL SECURITY, Interest Deductions on Cars, Border Security, a Strong Military, and a Bill which is GREAT for our Farmers, Manufacturers and, Employment, in general.”
He continued by singling out Tillis: “Thom Tillis is making a BIG MISTAKE for America, and the Wonderful People of North Carolina!”
The post came shortly after Tillis officially voted no on the Senate floor, casting a blow to the bill that Trump has urged Republicans in both chambers to fast-track before his self-imposed July 4 deadline.
While the vote remains open and unresolved, two other GOP senators—Ron Johnson of Wisconsin and Rand Paul of Kentucky—have also withheld support during the rare Saturday night session. Still, Trump chose to direct his fury solely at the North Carolina senator.
With a narrow 53-47 majority, Republicans have very little room for defections. Losing more than three votes would tank the bill unless Vice President JD Vance steps in with a tie-breaking vote. Vance arrived on Capitol Hill at approximately 8:30 p.m. and has remained on standby, ready to act if necessary.
Should the bill clear this hurdle, it would head into the debate phase—a potentially lengthy process, as Democratic Senator Chuck Schumer has vowed to demand a full reading of the nearly 1,000-page legislation before any final vote is taken.
Earlier in the day, Trump warned Republicans that a vote against the bill would amount to the “ultimate betrayal.”
The proposed legislation seeks to lock in Trump’s 2017 tax cuts permanently, eliminate federal taxes on tips and overtime pay, significantly boost funding for border enforcement, and repeal clean-energy tax breaks enacted under the Biden administration. To accommodate all its provisions, the bill would require raising the debt ceiling by an estimated $5 trillion.
Tillis had previously signaled his opposition to the current draft, citing concerns over the Medicaid provisions. He has insisted that unless revisions are made to align with what he called a more “commonsense” version from the House, he could not support the package. “We can and must do better than this,” Tillis said in a statement.
In a follow-up Truth Social post, Trump warned that he may back a primary challenger to Tillis in response to his defiance.
“Numerous people have come forward wanting to run in the Primary against ‘Senator Thom’ Tillis,” Trump wrote.
“I will be meeting with them over the coming weeks, looking for someone who will properly represent the Great People of North Carolina and, so importantly, the United States of America. Thank you for your attention to this matter!”
{Matzav.com}Mordechai Keller z”l, 8, Killed in Tragic Car Accident
A terrible tragedy struck the Crown Heights community on Shabbos with the petirah of 8-year-old Mordechai Keller.
Mordechai, a young boy from Crown Heights, lost his life in a devastating car accident that occurred on Eastern Parkway near Albany Avenue on Shabbos afternoon.
According to sources, Mordechai was crossing the street with his sister when he was fatally hit by an SUV. The driver remained at the scene and was not arrested. Police are investigating.
He leaves behind his grieving parents, Avraham and Nechama Dina Keller, and his siblings.
Umacha Hashem dimah me’al kol ponim.
{Matzav.com}Pages
