U.S. Stands Alone as UN Backs New World Map in 164-1 Vote
The United States cast the lone vote against a United Nations resolution encouraging governments, schools and other institutions to move away from the centuries-old Mercator world map in favor of projections that more accurately portray the relative size of continents, particularly Africa. The General Assembly approved the measure Friday by a 164-1 vote.
Six countries — Estonia, Georgia, Lithuania, Moldova, Serbia and Ukraine — abstained from the vote, leaving the U.S. as the only nation to formally oppose the resolution.
The measure encourages U.N. member states to adopt the “Equal Earth” projection or similar maps instead of relying on the widely used Mercator projection, which dates to the 16th century. The Mercator map was originally developed for navigation but significantly enlarges land masses farther from the equator.
The resolution followed the African Union-backed “Correct the Map” campaign, led by Togo, which has argued that the map created by Flemish cartographer Gerardus Mercator inaccurately minimizes Africa’s enormous geographic size and influences perceptions of the continent.
“For over 450 years, we have based our understanding of Africa, and the world, on a map that is wrong!” the campaign said. “In fact, you could fit the United States, China, India, Japan, Mexico and much of Europe into Africa and still have land to spare.”
Yaryna Ferencevych, the U.S. deputy representative to the U.N. Economic and Social Council, sharply criticized the measure while explaining Washington’s decision to vote against it, arguing that the issue went beyond simply choosing a different method of displaying the globe.
Ferencevych said the resolution “mocks the work and purpose of this institution.”
“While this initiative is presented as an anodyne effort to update cartographic proportions, the United States clearly sees it cannot be separated from the much larger and more radical ideological project it belongs to – as its most vocal and committed proponents plainly and openly state,” Ferencevych said in explaining the U.S.’ no vote.
She argued that the General Assembly should be devoting its attention to more consequential international matters rather than debating the political and ideological implications of mapmaking.
“Instead of focusing on genuine problems of international peace, prosperity, or good relations, this body is debating map projects from the 16th century, and their role in promoting reparations and “cognitive justice,” Ferencevych added.
Ferencevych further contended that measures of this kind contribute to declining confidence in the United Nations.
“Resolutions like this and the ideological agenda they promote, are barnacles on our work here, and the reason this institution is losing its credibility,” Ferencevych continued. “When the United Nations questions why it is losing legitimacy in the world, and is not taken seriously, time and again, we point to resolutions such as this.”
The resolution does not prohibit countries or organizations from continuing to use the Mercator projection, nor does it mandate a single replacement. Instead, it encourages governments, educational institutions, international organizations and technology companies to use the Equal Earth projection or other maps that more accurately depict the relative sizes of the world’s land masses.
Togo Foreign Minister Robert Dussey welcomed the General Assembly’s decision, portraying the effort as having significance beyond the technical question of cartography.
“It is about justice, dignity, equality and the way we represent our world,” he wrote on X. “For too long, inherited cartographic representations have distorted our perception of the true size and place of Africa and other regions of the world. Correcting the map means correcting the way we see the world.”
{Matzav.com}
