Attorney General Blocks IDF Plan: No Reserve Duty Reform Without Drafting Chareidim
A major initiative proposed by the IDF together with the Finance and Defense Ministries—intended to cancel extended emergency call-ups (known as “Tzav 8”) and cap annual reserve service at approximately 70 days—is now at risk of collapse. The plan has been halted by Attorney General Gali Baharav-Meara, who insists that no change to the reserve system can move forward unless it is directly tied to a new draft law that requires equal military service for chareidim.
According to officials involved in the discussions, the attorney general warned that pushing through a quick amendment to the Reserve Duty Law as part of the government’s economic legislation would violate constitutional principles of equality set by Israel’s High Court.
Legal Dead End: Reserve Duty Law Linked to Draft Law
In meetings between government ministries and the Attorney General’s Office, legal advisers said that there is a severe legal obstacle to modifying the reserve system without addressing the long-standing exemption for chareidi men.
The attorney general’s position is firm: allowing reservists to be called for up to 70 days a year—far longer than the norm in most Western armies—cannot be justified while one segment of the population remains fully exempt from service. In her view, increasing the burden on those who currently serve while maintaining a sweeping exemption for chareidim is unconstitutional.
Budget Battle: 60,000 Reservists and a Massive Cost Dispute
This legal confrontation is unfolding alongside a fierce budget fight between the Defense and Finance Ministries over the needs of the 2026 fiscal year.
The IDF is asking for funding for 60,000 reservists, estimating the cost at 37 billion shekels. The Finance Ministry argues the number is inflated, noting that only 50,000 were planned for 2025, and claims the real cost should be between 10 and 15 billion shekels.
The National Security Council is now reviewing the numbers. Whatever number they settle on will determine how many days each reservist will need to serve—bringing the question of unequal burden back to the center of the debate.
Smotrich Attacks: “A Political Decision With No Authority”
In response to the attorney general’s refusal, Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich launched a blistering attack, accusing her of overstepping her authority and harming national interests.
He stated that “in a political decision she is harming the army, harming reservists, and harming the state budget and the country’s economy, without having any authority.”
Smotrich added that “there is not a single serious legal expert who believes the Knesset lacks the authority to legislate limits on reserve duty.” He claimed the attorney general’s position would force Israel to continue unlimited emergency mobilizations, asking, “How does she dare take responsibility for the economy and security when she has no authority?”
He vowed to bring the law to the cabinet and the Knesset despite her objections, arguing she has “gone beyond her authority.”
Headed Toward a Supreme Court Showdown
With the attorney general blocking the reform, the changes to reserve duty will likely be removed from the government’s economic legislation package. That will force the Finance Ministry to find another immediate path to move the plan forward.
The disagreement now seems poised to end up before the Supreme Court, which may need to untangle an unprecedented clash involving military needs, economic pressures, and the long-running issue of chareidi enlistment.
{Matzav.com}
