CHALLENGED ON THE AIR: Independent Chareidi Candidate Pressed to Name Rabbonim Supporting His Election Bid
Moti Leitner, the head of the independent Chareidi Public party, faced pointed questions during a radio interview over his decision to challenge the established chareidi political parties in Israel’s upcoming Knesset elections, with the interviewers repeatedly demanding to know which rabbonim had authorized his candidacy.
The confrontation took place on Kol Chai radio, where veteran broadcasters Betzalel Kahn and Dovid Chacham questioned Leitner about the rabbinic backing for his new political movement and whether his decision to run independently was consistent with the longstanding practice of chareidi political parties operating under the direction of gedolei Yisroel.
Leitner insisted that his party has the support of a rabbinical committee, but his responses failed to satisfy the interviewers, who pressed him to identify the rabbonim involved.
The exchange reflected broader tensions within the chareidi political community ahead of the October 27 elections, particularly as new political initiatives seek to attract voters dissatisfied with the existing parties.
“WHO ARE YOUR RABBONIM?”: Independent Chareidi Candidate Moti Leitner Grilled in Heated Radio Confrontation Over Challenge to Gedolei Yisroel
Moti Leitner, chairman of the independent Chareidi Public party, found himself at the center of a heated confrontation Tuesday morning when two prominent chareidi radio hosts challenged his decision to run for the Knesset independently of the established chareidi parties and demanded to know which gedolei Yisroel had authorized his political campaign.
The contentious exchange unfolded during Kol Chai’s morning news program, hosted by Betzalel Kahn and Dovid Chacham, who accused Leitner of undermining the authority of gedolei Torah and challenging the established leadership of the chareidi community just one week before Israel’s October 27 elections.
Leitner rejected the accusations, insisting that his political movement operates under rabbinic supervision and arguing that publicly identifying its rabbinic supporters would expose them to intimidation and harassment.
The interview quickly developed into a sharp argument over the legitimacy of an independent chareidi political movement, with the hosts questioning whether Leitner had any recognized Torah authority behind his candidacy.
Opening their challenge, Kahn and Chacham argued that the chareidi community had survived generations of persecution through its commitment to Torah observance and adherence to gedolei Yisroel.
“The chareidi public survived decrees and persecution throughout history solely through observance of Torah and mitzvos and uncompromising obedience to gedolei Yisroel throughout the generations,” the hosts said.
They then directly challenged Leitner’s authority to establish a competing political party.
“By what spiritual, moral or educational authority do you get up and decide that you know better than hundreds of thousands of chareidim and all the gedolei hador?” they demanded.
“All the chareidi representatives operate as direct emissaries of recognized gedolei Torah and rabbonim. Which gedolei Yisroel, exactly, stand behind you and give you their backing?”
Leitner responded that the premise of the question was itself insulting to the many chareidim who support his movement.
“This question expresses patronizing arrogance and contempt for hundreds of thousands of chareidim,” he said.
“The Derech movement was not established on its own initiative, but under the close supervision of a committee of rabbonim, community rabbonim and various dayanim.”
He argued that identifying the rabbonim publicly would subject them to pressure from opponents of his political movement.
“Revealing the names of rabbonim during a live broadcast would only expose them to pressure and bullying, as we have seen happen to others who departed from the established line,” Leitner maintained.
The hosts refused to accept that explanation and continued pressing him to identify recognized gedolei Torah who had endorsed his candidacy.
They argued that the rabbonim associated with his movement did not represent the mainstream chareidi leadership and accused him of presenting himself as a representative of the community without the backing of its established rabbinic authorities.
“The few names you have cited are completely unknown to the chareidi mainstream, and there is no recognized gadol Yisroel standing behind you,” they charged.
“It is arrogance and audacity to use the name of the chareidi public when no prominent chareidi figure supports you, and those cheering your movement are primarily people on the left and the general media.”
The hosts further accused Leitner of encouraging opposition to the authority of gedolei Yisroel at a particularly sensitive time for the community.
“You are taking upon yourself a serious rebellion against gedolei Yisroel and endangering the entire chareidi public,” they declared.
The confrontation comes amid growing controversy surrounding Leitner’s party, which is seeking to offer an alternative to Shas and United Torah Judaism.
The Chareidi Public party has advocated changes in chareidi education, including expanded instruction in English and mathematics, and supports greater military participation among chareidi men who are not engaged in full-time Torah study.
Those positions have generated considerable debate within the community, particularly as the military draft controversy continues to dominate the election campaign.
Leitner has argued that the established chareidi parties have failed to adequately represent segments of the community seeking different approaches to education, employment and military service.
Earlier this month, his party publicly identified a rabbinic committee overseeing its activities, headed by Rav Yehoshua Pfeffer of Yerushalayim.
The announcement, however, did little to quiet criticism from opponents who argued that the committee did not include recognized members of the established chareidi rabbinic leadership.
The party’s published list of rabbinic supporters also drew attention because Rav Dovid Leibel, founder of Achvas Torah, was not among its signatories.
At a campaign gathering in Yerushalayim on Motzoei Shabbos, Leitner sharply criticized the existing chareidi political establishment, accusing its representatives of failing to address violence directed at chareidi soldiers and other problems confronting the community.
His movement has also faced criticism from individuals previously associated with its municipal political activities.
Yisrael Schweibel, who was involved in establishing the Derech municipal list in Beit Shemesh, said in a separate interview that he was concerned about the consequences of an independent national campaign and questioned whether Leitner was free to withdraw from the race.
The party rejected Schweibel’s criticism and accused him of attempting to pressure its leadership into abandoning the campaign.
Tuesday’s Kol Chai interview ended without agreement, as Kahn and Chacham maintained that Leitner’s candidacy lacked the authorization of recognized gedolei Yisroel, while Leitner continued to insist that his movement was operating with rabbinic guidance.
{Matzav.com}
