Feed aggregator

Secret Sardinia Talks: Witkoff Met UAE Security Chief as U.S. Tightens Noose on Iran

Matzav -

White House envoy Steve Witkoff secretly met with United Arab Emirates National Security Adviser Sheikh Tahnoon Bin Zayed al Nahyan last weekend to discuss the Iranian crisis, as the Trump administration seeks to restore normal shipping through the Strait of Hormuz while dramatically increasing economic pressure on Tehran, Axios reported, citing two sources familiar with the talks.

The previously undisclosed meeting was held on the Mediterranean island of Sardinia and had neither been announced nor publicly acknowledged by the White House. It took place amid an expanding U.S. campaign aimed at reopening the critical waterway to oil traffic and financially isolating the Iranian regime.

The UAE has become an important participant in Washington’s effort to restore maritime traffic through the Strait of Hormuz, including the movement of oil tankers. The Gulf nation is also viewed by the administration as a critical player in its broader strategy of squeezing Iran economically.

Sheikh Tahnoon, commonly referred to as TBZ, is one of the UAE’s most powerful figures. The brother of UAE President Mohammed bin Zayed, he serves as national security adviser and deputy ruler of Abu Dhabi while also wielding significant influence over the country’s sprawling technology and investment interests.

The two officials discussed potential next moves in dealing with the Iranian crisis, along with other issues, according to the sources cited by Axios. The White House did not respond to the outlet’s request for comment about the meeting.

The secret talks occurred only days after Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent announced “Operation Economic Outcast,” an aggressive sanctions initiative aimed at countries and entities that continue doing business with Iran.

Bessent spoke with TBZ before publicly unveiling the new campaign, a person familiar with the discussions told Axios.

The Treasury Department also acted on the same day as the Witkoff-TBZ meeting to move toward cutting the UAE branches of Egypt’s Banque Misr off from the American financial system because of their transactions involving Iran. Under the proposed action, the branches would be barred from carrying out transactions in U.S. dollars.

In response, the UAE central bank announced that it would conduct an “urgent examination” of transactions involving Iran and the Egyptian bank’s branches.

The Emirates had already taken a sweeping step against Tehran several days before Washington announced its sanctions campaign, suspending all trade, commercial exchanges and financial transactions with Iran.

That decision represented a major change in the economic relationship between the two countries. Dubai and other parts of the UAE have long functioned as significant trading and re-export hubs for Iranian goods, with bilateral commerce between Iran and the UAE reaching $28 billion in 2024.

Another source familiar with the discussions told Axios that Emirati officials had cautioned the Trump administration that any attempt to economically isolate Iran would have to encompass all of the major countries that continue trading with Tehran if it were to be effective.

Bessent said Tuesday that the Trump administration plans to continue escalating the financial pressure on Iran until Tehran agrees to a peace agreement with President Donald Trump. He said Washington is also going after Iranian assets held overseas that are tied to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC).

Ahead of meetings with G20 finance ministers in Asheville, North Carolina, Bessent said U.S. officials are identifying Iranian assets around the world with the goal of freezing them. Those assets include accounts held in the British Virgin Islands as well as high-value real estate in various countries.

“We are going to economically asphyxiate this regime,” Bessent said during a discussion moderated by economist and Fox Business Network host Larry Kudlow, as quoted in The New York Post.

“My job is to make sure that they want to have a deal, and they will want to have one,” he added.

Bessent said Treasury officials have been tracing assets associated with the IRGC and made clear that Washington intends to pursue those holdings as part of its widening campaign against Tehran.

“We are tracking down the IRGC’s assets, and I will say it on worldwide TV, just so you know: We know where in the British Virgin Islands your accounts are at these trust companies,” he stated.

{Matzav.com}

Major Shakeup Under Consideration in Degel HaTorah: Gafni and Maklev Could Be Replaced

Matzav -

A dramatic changing of the guard may be taking shape within Degel HaTorah, with serious discussions underway in the homes of Gedolei Yisroel over the possibility of replacing longtime MKs Moshe Gafni and Uri Maklev ahead of the upcoming elections.

Political commentator Avi Ravina said Wednesday evening that the possibility of removing the two veteran lawmakers from the party’s Knesset slate has moved beyond political speculation and is now the subject of substantive discussions.

“This event is real; this event is happening,” Ravina said during a panel on Kol Chai’s main evening news program.

According to Ravina, the key question is whether Gedolei Yisroel will ultimately decide that the parliamentary careers of Gafni, the chairman of Degel HaTorah, and Maklev should come to an end. He cautioned that even if there is considerable support among party activists for bringing in a younger generation, nothing will be final until the matter is decided by the party’s Gedolim.

The discussions are reportedly being framed as an effort to refresh Degel HaTorah’s representation rather than as a personal campaign against Gafni or Maklev. The deliberations come after a Knesset term in which the status of bnei yeshivos and their exemption from military service remained unresolved.

Political commentator Mani Gira-Schwartz said that “the public is disappointed,” but stressed that the possible replacement of veteran lawmakers is not being presented as “revenge or reward and punishment.” Instead, he said, the discussion is centered on a broader generational transition within the party.

The timing could make the deliberations especially significant. Degel HaTorah’s Moetzes Gedolei HaTorah is expected to convene this coming Sunday, in a meeting that could prove decisive as the deadline for finalizing electoral slates approaches.

Until the Gedolim issue their decision, however, all possibilities remain open.

Several names have reportedly surfaced as potential candidates for places on a revamped Degel HaTorah slate, including Dudi Zaltz, deputy mayor of Beitar Illit; Gudi Silman of Bnei Brak; and Yehuda Weissfish of Modiin Illit.

Weissfish reportedly does not want the position, although the panel said that some among the Gedolei Yisroel would like to see him join the party’s Knesset slate.

Ravina also described differing attitudes within the homes of two of Degel HaTorah’s leading Gedolim. According to him, there is greater openness in the home of Rav Dov Landau to replacing the current representatives.

In the home of Rav Moshe Hillel Hirsch, however, there is reportedly greater reluctance to attribute the failure to resolve the status of bnei yeshivos directly to the party’s Knesset members.

The potential shakeup comes amid broader tensions within United Torah Judaism and recent reports of new demands being made by Degel HaTorah in its negotiations with Agudas Yisroel.

Any significant change to Degel HaTorah’s slate could also have broader ramifications for the makeup and leadership of United Torah Judaism, including the political standing of Agudas Yisroel chairman Yitzchok Goldknopf, as the two factions prepare to determine who will represent them in the next Knesset.

With the party lists set to be submitted next week, the coming days could determine whether Degel HaTorah enters the election with its longtime parliamentary leadership intact or undertakes one of the most significant generational changes in its political representation in years.

{Matzav.com}

Netanyahu Draws Chareidi Criticism for Giving Interview Set to Air on Shabbos

Matzav -

Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu is facing criticism in the Chareidi community after giving an extensive prerecorded interview to i24NEWS that the network plans to broadcast on Friday night, during Shabbos.

Although the interview itself was recorded in advance and Netanyahu did not participate in any broadcast on Shabbos, critics contend that the prime minister knowingly provided exclusive material intended to serve as a centerpiece of a program airing during Shabbos.

The interview, conducted by i24NEWS journalist Neve Dromi, is scheduled to air on the network’s “Friday Cabinet” program.

According to i24NEWS’s published schedule, the program airs on Friday evenings from 7:53 p.m. until 10 p.m. The network describes the show with the phrase, “Neve Dromi welcomes Shabbat,” and promotional material for recent broadcasts has similarly referred to “opening Shabbat with Neve Dromi and ‘Friday Cabinet.’”

The decision has drawn particular attention because Netanyahu has generally avoided directly associating himself with interviews specifically produced for Shabbos broadcasts during his many years in public life. Emess reported that it was unable to find a similar precedent involving Netanyahu.

Netanyahu has also spoken publicly in the past about the significance of Shabbos. During an American interview, he once described it as “our day off” and discussed his family’s practice of studying Tanach together on Shabbos.

Critics argued that those circumstances make the latest interview especially troubling. The interview was planned, recorded and edited in advance and was specifically intended as major content for a Friday-night program, rather than footage from an urgent breaking-news event being aired by a network because of immediate public importance.

The interview itself contains several significant statements concerning Israel’s wars against Hamas and Iran.

In excerpts released by i24NEWS ahead of the full broadcast, Netanyahu said that Israel “has complete control over more than 60% of the Gaza Strip.”

Netanyahu also made a striking declaration regarding the Iranian regime.

“We will defeat this regime. It will fall; we will bring it down,” Netanyahu said.

The prime minister said that Israel’s various systems are operating under his direction against the Iranian regime and indicated that the campaign remains unfinished.

“We have not yet completed the job,” Netanyahu said.

While Netanyahu’s comments on Gaza and Iran are expected to generate attention in their own right, the planned timing of the broadcast has become a source of controversy within the Chareidi community.

Critics noted that Netanyahu has repeatedly sought the political support of the Chareidi parties and the broader Torah-observant public, arguing that a prime minister who seeks that community’s backing should recognize the sensitivity surrounding Shabbos and avoid deliberately providing exclusive content for a program scheduled to air during the holy day.

{Matzav.com}

Rubio Draws Red Line on Iran: ‘Never’ a Nuclear Weapon as U.S. Vows More Strikes if Needed

Matzav -

Secretary of State Marco Rubio declared Wednesday that the United States will not permit Iran to acquire a nuclear weapon and will continue using military force against Iranian threats to American troops and international shipping, even as Washington relies heavily on economic pressure to weaken Tehran and restrict its ability to finance terrorism.

In an interview with Fox News, Rubio said preventing a nuclear-armed Iran remains at the heart of the Trump administration’s policy toward the Islamic Republic.

“Well, first of all, I’ll remind everybody that, at the end, the core and central issue here is the following: Iran will never be allowed to possess a nuclear weapon, certainly not as long as President Trump is in office. So that’s first and foremost.”

Turning to the ongoing confrontation in the Strait of Hormuz, Rubio accused Iran of continuing to threaten commercial vessels and said the U.S. will strike Iranian assets that endanger American personnel or international maritime traffic.

“So we will continue to target those things that pose an imminent threat to our forces and to global shipping in the straits. The straits will remain open, and they will not be under Iranian control. And that’s what you’re seeing the President carrying out right now.”

Rubio said Washington has no intention of simply reverting to its previous relationship with Tehran. He argued that Iran’s already troubled economy will remain under intense pressure as long as the regime pursues nuclear weapons and directs its resources toward terrorist organizations and regional militias rather than its own population.

“So as far as the differences in their system, here’s the bottom line – their economy’s a disaster. It was a disaster before all of this, right, because they – if you think about it, Iran – every penny they get, be it through sanctions relief or whatever – every penny they get, they don’t spend it on the Iranian people. They don’t spend that money on their country. They use that money to fund Hezbollah and Hamas and terrorist organizations and militias in Iraq to threaten us and threaten the world. If they spent a fraction, just half the money that they’re spending on these militias – if they spent it on their own people, the Iranian people would be better off.”

According to Rubio, the administration’s economic campaign is designed both to increase pressure on the Iranian regime and to deny it the financial resources needed to support terrorism and advance its nuclear ambitions.

“So they’re going to continue to feel the squeeze, because understand that this is not just about punishing Iran, the Iranian regime. It’s about preventing them from having access to money that will then be used to sponsor terrorism, which is what they’ve always done. They want money for two things – to sponsor terrorism and ultimately to have a nuclear weapon. And we can’t allow that to happen.”

The secretary of state also put other countries on notice, warning that governments that assist Tehran in evading American sanctions or developing alternative methods of generating revenue could themselves face U.S. sanctions.

“I think what ultimately happens though is – and the President’s been very clear – is no country should be helping Iran evade sanctions. No country should be out there helping them create mechanisms by which they can generate revenue that they will then use to sponsor terrorism and try to build a nuclear weapon. And if countries decide to do that, then we’re going to have to sanction them too.”

Asked about Russian backing for Tehran, Rubio acknowledged that Moscow and Washington have sharply different positions on Iran but said foreign assistance to the Islamic Republic has not restricted America’s ability to take whatever action it considers necessary for its defense.

“Nothing that anyone is providing Iran is in any way impeding our ability to act as necessary to protect the United States.”

Rubio’s comments came days after the Treasury Department unveiled “Operation Economic Outcast,” a new initiative aimed at further isolating Iran and intensifying the financial pressure on the regime.

Economic measures, however, have not replaced the threat of military force. Secretary of War Pete Hegseth said last week that the Trump administration continues to consider military strikes in and around the Strait of Hormuz among its available options.

That threat was put into action Wednesday, when U.S. forces struck Iranian military equipment positioned near the Strait of Hormuz. Iran responded by firing ballistic missiles toward American military bases in Jordan.

President Trump said the U.S. operation was launched in retaliation for Iranian actions in the Strait of Hormuz and an earlier Iranian missile attack targeting a U.S. military base in Jordan. He also warned Tehran that any further retaliation could trigger even more powerful American strikes.

{Matzav.com}

Choose Life

Matzav -

By Rabbi Pinchos Lipschutz

What separates man from beast? Well, there are many things that separate man from beast, but one of them is the ability to make choices. We call that bechirah.

An animal is governed by its nature and instincts. When it is hungry, it seeks food. When it is tired, it seeks rest. When it senses danger, it seeks safety. A person, however, can experience an impulse and choose not to act upon it. He can be angry and decide to remain silent. He can be tired and nevertheless get up to daven. He can be tempted to sin and choose to walk away. He can be hurt by another person and decide that he will not allow the hurt to determine how he treats others. The ability to stop, consider, and choose a different course is one of the defining qualities of a human being.

Rabbeinu Yonah writes in Shaarei Teshuvah (3:17) that the loftiest spiritual values we are to strive to attain were imparted to us through mitzvos. He cites as an example the mitzvah in this week’s parsha of choosing good over bad. Every person is given the opportunity to choose what type of life he wants to lead and what he wants to do with his life. The Torah commands us, “Uvocharta bachaim — And you shall choose life.”

The Torah does not merely tell us that we possess the capacity to choose. It instructs us to use that capacity properly. The Torah tells us that when we stand at the crossroads and are confronted with alternatives, we must recognize that the choice is ours and that our choices have consequences. A good life does not simply happen. It is built through decisions, some large and consequential and many so small that we barely notice them at the time.

We tend to think of the important choices in life as the major decisions that require careful thought and planning: whom we will marry, where we will live, where we will send our children, and which path we will take in life. These decisions are certainly important, but there is another category of choices that quietly shapes us every day: how we speak to our spouse when we are tired, how we respond when someone has offended us, whether we use our time productively or allow it to slip away, whether we complain about what we lack or appreciate what we have, and whether we respond to a difficult situation with emunah or with frustration. These choices become the building blocks of our character.

A person becomes who he is through the choices he makes. Each time he chooses patience over anger, he strengthens his capacity for patience. Each time he chooses Torah over distraction, he becomes more attached to Torah. Each time he restrains himself from saying something hurtful, he develops greater control over his speech. Conversely, when a person repeatedly gives in to an impulse or temptation, he is also making a choice, and each time a person gives in to his yeitzer hora, it becomes that much more difficult to do the right thing the next time he has to make a choice.

There is tremendous power in the concept of bechirah. We are not merely choosing what to do in a particular moment. In a very real sense, we are choosing what kind of person we will become.

I met a delightful Yerushalmi Jew who told me about his Hungarian grandfather, a Jew from Toshnad who met the same fate as the overwhelming majority of Hungarian Jewry. He was taken to the concentration camps with his wife and children, and only he survived.

Years later, the grandson asked him, “Of all the awful experiences of the war, which was the worst?”

The grandfather’s answer was unexpected. He said that, for him, the worst moment came after the war had ended, when he had been freed from the camps.

He emerged alone, barely alive, with the people he had loved most in the world gone. Seeking some measure of solace, he made his way back to his hometown of Toshnad, hoping to see the home in which he had once lived with his family. But the Jews of the town were all gone, and a non-Jewish family had assumed ownership of his house.

He walked up to the door, simply wanting to take one final look at the place he had once called home. He had left that house without saying goodbye, never imagining that he would one day return to it alone.

Then he noticed that the family nameplate was still firmly fastened to the door.

Seeing his family’s name on the door gave him the courage to knock. The occupant was kind enough to allow him inside. He entered and looked around at the walls that had absorbed the laughter and songs of his murdered family. Everything seemed just as he remembered it. The dining room table, around which his family had gathered for festive meals and sung zemiros on countless Shabbosos and Yomim Tovim, was still there. Even the leichter on which his wife had lit the candles for so many years remained in its familiar place.

He stood there, overwhelmed by memories, when suddenly the man who had taken possession of the house told him that his time was up.

“Okay, Jew,” he commanded. “Your time is up. Get out.”

The grandfather walked out of the house and stood on the street. Decades later, he told his grandson that he had never felt so degraded and distraught in his entire life. All the pain and heartache he had endured seemed to converge in that one moment. He had survived the war, but now he was standing outside the home that had once belonged to him, looking at a life that no longer existed.

And then, standing there at the gutter, he realized something.

He had a choice.

He could allow the anguish to pull him down and give it all up or he could summon whatever strength remained within him and rise above what had happened to him.

He chose to rise.

He made his way to Yerushalayim, remarried, built a new home, and was blessed with a new family. In time, that family grew to include children and 150 grandchildren.

Think about the magnitude of that choice. He could not change what had happened. He could not bring back his wife and children. He could not restore the Jewish community of Toshnad or reclaim the years that had been stolen from him. None of those things were within his power. But there was one thing he could determine, and that was whether the tragedy would be the end of his story or whether he would pick himself up and start again.

He followed the posuk of “uvocharta bachaim” and chose life.

That decision gave him the strength to move forward. It enabled him to rebuild his life, to establish another Jewish home, and to create a future that would eventually include generations of descendants. The tragedy remained part of his story, but it did not become the entirety of his story.

That is the power of bechirah.

Thankfully, we are not generally confronted with choices remotely resembling the one that lonely survivor had to make. Our challenges are usually much smaller and our decisions far less dramatic. Yet, the principle is the same. We may not always be able to choose what happens to us, but we can choose what we will do with what happens to us.

A person may be disappointed, but he can choose whether to become embittered or to strengthen his emunah. He may experience failure, but he can choose whether to view it as proof that he cannot succeed or as an opportunity to learn and try again. He may encounter a difficult period in his life, but he can choose whether to spend his days asking, “Why me?” or to ask, “What does Hashem want from me now?”

This does not mean that pain is not real or that difficult experiences should be dismissed with simplistic answers. The Toshnad survivor knew pain in a way that few of us can comprehend, yet he refused to surrender his future to his suffering.

The Rambam makes this point especially clear in Hilchos Teshuvah (5), where, in the midst of his discussion of teshuvah, he stops to establish one of the fundamental principles of bechirah: Every person has the ability to choose whether to follow the good path and become a tzaddik or to follow the bad path and become a rosha. Man is unique in creation in possessing this ability to act according to his own will and to determine whether he will be good or bad. Nothing is predetermined. Each person has the ability to decide what he wants to become and how he wants to live his life. As the Rambam writes, a person can be as righteous as Moshe Rabbeinu or as wicked as Yerovom.

This is the choice that Moshe Rabbeinu placed before Klal Yisroel in Parshas Re’eh (Devorim 11:26-28): “Re’eh, see, I am placing before you today two paths, two ways in which you can live your life, es habrocha, the path of blessing, asher tishmeun, if you listen to and observe the Torah, and es haklolah, the path of curse, if you choose not to follow the Torah.”

And this is the choice Moshe presents to the Jewish people in this week’s parsha as well. He told the Jewish people (Devorim 30:15-19), “Re’eh nosati lifonecha es hachaim v’es hatov, v’es hamoves, v’es hora… Hachaim vehamoves nosati lifonecha habrocha v’haklolah uvocharta bachaim lema’an tichye atah v’zarecha, See, I have set before you life and good, and death and evil. I have set before you life and death, blessing and curse. And you shall choose life so that you and your children shall live.”

The choice is placed before us. Which path we take is up to us.

The nisayon of bechirah is constantly before us. It is not reserved for the rare dramatic moment when a person is forced to make a life-altering decision. It is present in the ordinary moments of every day: Do we follow the yeitzer tov or do we allow the yeitzer hora to convince us and guide us?

The lonely survivor standing outside his former home in Toshnad could not have known what his choice would eventually produce. He could not have envisioned a new home in Yerushalayim, a new family, children, grandchildren, and 150 descendants. He could only choose what to do with the next moment.

He chose life.

And that is the choice Hashem places before each of us as well.

Uvocharta bachaim. Hashem tells us that we should always choose the option that grants us life.

This past Sunday, the 17th of Elul, the Rajchenbach family dedicated the new Kollel Zichron Eliyohu building in Chicago, marking yet another milestone in the remarkable growth of the Torah community in that Midwestern bastion of Yiddishkeit. It was a day of celebration, a day on which the fruits of decades of mesirus nefesh and dedication to Torah were made visible in bricks, mortar, and a beautiful new building.

But there was another facet to that dedication that surely would have been on the mind of the patriarch of the Rajchenbach family, the beloved Reb Yankel, had he merited to be there.

The 17th of Elul is a date that carries a very different memory for the Jewish people. Eighty-seven years ago, in September 1939, Poland was invaded by Nazi Germany, and the inferno that would engulf European Jewry had begun. Within days, the Second World War had spread across Europe, and the destruction of Polish Jewry and, ultimately, the great communities of Eastern Europe was underway. The Jews of Poland, who had built some of the greatest Torah communities the world had ever known, were decimated. Families were torn apart, communities were erased, and an entire world was destroyed. Millions were murdered, many in the concentration camps and ghettos, while those who survived often emerged with little more than their lives. Their homes were gone, their possessions were gone, their families and friends were gone, and the world they had known had disappeared.

Some survivors were so broken that they lost their faith or their connection to Yiddishkeit. Others simply lost the will to live. But there were also those who made a different choice. They chose to live. They chose to cling to Hakadosh Boruch Hu. They chose to rebuild Jewish homes, to raise children, and to recreate, as best they could, the world that had been destroyed.

One of those people was Yitzchok Rajchenbach of Lodz, Poland.

A simple Yid, he lost his wife and children in the war, yet he made the choice to begin again. He married a woman who had lost her husband during the war, and together they settled in Lodz. There they had a son whom they named Yaakov Eliezer.

Eventually, the antisemitism and difficult conditions in postwar Poland became too much and they made another choice: to leave. They eventually settled in Omaha, Nebraska.

Their son Yankel was then eleven years old. He had been sent to public school, but when he became bar mitzvah, his father turned to his only son and told him, in his Poilishe Yiddish, “Du kenst ir nisht bleiben ah Yid. Mir darfen dich shiken in yeshiva. You won’t remain a Yid if you stay here. We have to send you to yeshiva.”

Yitzchok Rajchenbach made his choice. He took his young son to the bus station and put him on a bus for the thirty-four-hour journey to New York City, where the boy would enter yeshiva.

A refugee who had already lost almost everything was making another sacrifice because he understood that what mattered most was that his son have a life of chaim.

That boy grew up to become one of the spiritual fathers of the Chicago Torah community. The city that today boasts a magnificent new Kollel Zichron Eliyohu building owes a portion of its Torah landscape to the choice made by a Polish refugee who understood that if his son was to remain a Yid, he needed to give him a Torah education.

Hitler sought to destroy the Jewish future. Yitzchok Rajchenbach chose to rebuild it.

And so there is something deeply moving about the fact that on the 17th of Elul, a date forever associated with the beginning of the destruction of the Jewish world of Poland, a new Torah building was being dedicated in Chicago by children and grandchildren of Lodzer Yidden who were mekayeim the posuk of uvocharta bachaim lema’an tichye atah v’zarecha.

Interestingly, my grandfather, Rav Eliezer Levin, the late rov of Detroit, made a similar choice. He told me that when he arrived in Detroit in 1939 to serve as a rov, there were already thirty-three other rabbonim in the city, and some of them were not pleased about the arrival of another rov. “Who needs another rov here?” they wondered, particularly another greener, a newcomer who had recently arrived from Lithuania.

Years later, Rav Levin told me, “Uber fun zei alleh iz gornit gebliben. But there is nothing left of all those rabbonim.”

He was not criticizing them. He was making a point about a difficult decision that he made.

“Those rabbonim did not have the strength to send their sons away to yeshiva,” he explained. “They kept their sons at home. But I sent my only son to yeshiva.”

It was an extraordinarily difficult choice. Rav Levin was a refugee, trying to establish a life and a rabbinic career in a new country. He had only one son, and sending him away was hard. We certainly cannot judge those who made a different calculation under circumstances that were extraordinarily difficult.

But Rav Levin made his choice.

He followed the posuk of “uvocharta bachaim lema’an tichye atah v’zarecha,” and chose life for his son.

And that son was Rav Avrohom Chaim Levin.

Rav Avrohom Chaim went on to found the Telzer Yeshiva in Chicago, which became a pillar of Torah in the city. The yeshiva helped establish the Torah infrastructure and leadership that built the Chicago Torah community and made possible the establishment and expansion of Kollel Zichron Eliyohu.

And so the chain continues.

We often think that our choices affect only ourselves. We make a decision and imagine that its consequences end with us. But that is rarely true. A parent’s choices affect his children. A mechanech’s choices affect his talmidim. A community’s choices affect the generations that follow. One person’s decision to sacrifice for Torah can become the foundation upon which thousands of others eventually build.

Choices lead to life, not only for the person making the choice, but for his children, his grandchildren, his community, and, ultimately, for the entire world that benefits from another generation of Torah.

Hopefully, we will never be confronted with a choice as monumental as the one that stood before that lonely survivor on the streets of Toshnad. Most parents will never face the decision that confronted Yitzchok Rajchenbach when he placed his young son on a bus and sent him thousands of miles away to yeshiva. We will, thankfully, not have to rebuild our lives from the ashes of the Holocaust, nor will we have to make decisions under circumstances in which the future of our Yiddishkeit seems to hang in the balance.

But we should not conclude that bechirah is less relevant to us. Our lives are filled with choices, but they are simpler. In every instance, in every choice, the Torah tells us, “Uvocharta bachaim.” Choose life. Choose the right path, the path of goodness.

A person wakes up in the morning and is faced with a choice about how he will begin his day. He can approach it with gratitude or with complaints, with zerizus or with sluggishness. During the day, he will encounter people who test his patience and situations that do not proceed as he would like. He will have opportunities to speak and opportunities to remain silent, opportunities to be helpful and opportunities to walk away, opportunities to use his time well and opportunities to allow it to disappear. He will encounter temptations that nobody else sees and nisyonos that perhaps nobody will ever know about. Each time, he is being asked, in one form or another, to choose.

And because these choices are so ordinary, we sometimes fail to appreciate their significance. But greatness is built when a person chooses what is right over what is convenient, what is meaningful over what is immediately pleasurable, and what will bring him closer to Hashem over what merely feels good for the moment.

The decision to spend another few minutes learning instead of reaching for the phone may not seem like a historic event. Choosing not to answer an insult may not make the newspapers. Not allowing our taavos to control us, choosing to help a poor Yid from Eretz Yisroel or from around the corner — all these things mean choosing life.

Hashem does not want us to drift through life. He wants us to recognize that we have been given the ability to direct ourselves. We are not simply products of our circumstances, our personalities, or our inclinations. We possess the ability to choose what we will do with them.

There is a path called chaim, and we possess the ability to choose that path.

The world around us constantly encourages us to make choices based on what is easiest, fastest, and most enjoyable. The Torah asks us to consider something deeper: What is true? What is right? What does Hashem want from me? What kind of person will this decision make me? Is this the path of brocha or the path of klolah? Will this action bring me closer to being like Moshe or like Yerovom?

The most encouraging aspect of bechirah is that we are never trapped by yesterday’s choices. As long as we are alive, we can choose again. That is the gift of teshuvah.

Hakadosh Boruch Hu, in His compassion, has provided us with teshuvah, giving us the opportunity to reverse course and begin again. We are not condemned to remain where our previous choices have brought us. We can undo our mistakes and return to where we belong.

On Rosh Hashanah, we are judged according to the choices we made throughout the past. Yet, out of His deep and enduring love for us, Hashem gives us the opportunity to change that judgment.

Lo nifleis hee mimcha velo rechokah hee” (Devorim 30:11). In this week’s parsha, the Torah tells us that teshuvah is within everyone’s reach. When we recognize that we have made bad choices and wish to rectify them, Hashem reaches out to us. He invites us to come closer and helps us repair what has been damaged.

Whether we earn the good life we all seek is ultimately up to us. It requires us to recognize the truth contained in the words of the pesukim, in the teachings of Chazal, in the words of the Rambam, and in the mussar seforim we should be reviewing during these days leading up to the Yomim Noraim.

The more we align our lives with the path He has laid out for us, the more we merit the brachos and goodness for which we yearn.

Let us all use the gift of bechirah wisely and, in the instances when we haven’t, merit to do teshuvah, so that together with all of Klal Yisroel, we will be inscribed and sealed for a kesivah vachasimah tovah, a year of brocha, yeshuah, refuah, parnossah, nachas, and the coming of Moshiach Tzidkeinu bekarov.

{Matzav.com}

Trump: Iran’s Economy Is Totally Shot, It’s Just a Question of Time

Matzav -

President Donald Trump said Wednesday evening that Iran has been left militarily weakened and economically devastated by the latest wave of U.S. strikes, declaring that American forces now control the Strait of Hormuz and predicting that Tehran may not be able to withstand the pressure much longer.

Speaking during an event in the White House Rose Garden, Trump singled out Secretary of War Pete Hegseth for praise following the previous night’s U.S. military operation against targets in Iran.

“You did a good job last night in Iran, by the way. You knocked the hell out of them. Very good.”

The president portrayed the campaign as overwhelmingly successful, saying Iran has been stripped of much of its naval and air power and has suffered extensive losses to its military leadership, weapons and technology.

Trump to Hegseth: You did a job in Iran last night. You knocked the hell out of them. We’re winning that one very big btw. They don't have any aircraft, anything having to do with aircraft or ships. They're all at the bottom of the sea or at the bottom of a runway pic.twitter.com/VydLK50Wdw

— Acyn (@Acyn) September 2, 2026

“We’re winning that one very big, by the way, in case you haven’t noticed. They don’t have a Navy. They don’t have an Air Force. They don’t have any aircraft. Anything having to do with aircraft or ships, they’re all at the bottom of the sea or at the bottom of a runway. Their leaders are gone. All of their technology is gone. Their weapons are largely gone. Other than that, they’re doing quite well.”

Trump said Iran’s problems extend far beyond the battlefield, pointing to soaring inflation, a collapsing currency and severe deterioration throughout the country’s economy.

“Their economy is totally shot. Their economy is the worst anywhere in the world, they said this morning. They have close to 300% inflation, their money is valueless. They’re not doing well at all, so it’s just a question of time,” added the President.

According to Trump, the U.S. military effort is aimed at defending Israel and the broader Middle East while also preventing Iran from eventually threatening Europe and American cities.

“We’re doing it to help the Middle East, we’re doing it to help Israel, we’re doing it to help ourselves, because after they annihilate Israel, which they would’ve done very gladly, and then the Middle East, then they come after Europe and they come after some of our cities before we put them away.”

The president also addressed the strategically critical Strait of Hormuz, asserting that the United States has established control over the waterway and that oil tankers are continuing to travel through despite Iran’s attempts to interfere with maritime traffic.

“But we’re doing really well with Iran. We now control the Hormuz Strait. We have many boats going through that every day, every night. Many boats loaded up with oil. So far they’ve done very little to be able to stop it.”

Trump’s comments in the Rose Garden followed remarks he made several hours earlier to reporters in the Oval Office, where he suggested that the renewed fighting with Iran may be relatively short-lived.

When questioned about how long he expected the latest round of hostilities to continue, Trump replied, “Not too long”. He followed that assessment by questioning Iran’s ability to absorb much more punishment from the United States.

“I don’t think it will be very much longer. I don’t know how much more they can take,” Trump said of Iran.

The president also provided details about the U.S. strikes carried out the previous night, saying American forces destroyed recently constructed Iranian military equipment deployed around the Strait of Hormuz, including both offensive and defensive systems.

“We hit them very hard last night. We took out all of the new equipment that they tried to build along the Strait of Hormuz, some defensive, some offensive. They were trying to see the ships because they can’t see the ships. They can’t see them because they have no radar, because we blew it up.”

Trump made clear that Washington remains ready to launch further attacks should the administration determine that additional military action is required.

“It was a very heavy attack last night, and we are prepared to do another one anytime we want,” he stressed.

The renewed U.S.-Iran fighting comes amid warnings from Israel’s defense establishment that another direct clash involving Tehran may be increasingly likely.

Defense Minister Israel Katz said Wednesday that Iran’s worsening economic situation, coupled with growing pressure on the regime, could prompt Tehran to initiate a direct military confrontation with Israel. Katz said Israeli forces are prepared for such a possibility.

“We are prepared for both defense and offense, in coordination with the United States,” he said.

Katz said Israel is prepared to act regardless of what ultimately prompts an Iranian attack, citing several possible regional flashpoints.

“If they attack because of Lebanon, because of Samaria, because of Gaza, or simply because they feel like it, our planes are ready to take off.”

{Matzav.com}

Sons of Vizhnitzer Rebbe Issue Urgent Call for Mass Tefillah Amid Concern Over His Health

Matzav -

Amid continuing concern over the health of the Vizhnitzer Rebbe, his three sons issued an emotional and unusual appeal Wednesday to tens of thousands of Vizhnitzer Chassidim and supporters around the world, calling for an intensive day of tefillah, Tehillim and Torah learning for the Rebbe’s refuah sheleimah.

The Rebbe’s medical condition in recent weeks has caused considerable concern among his Chassidim and Jews around the world, with many continuing to daven for his complete and speedy recovery.

The letter was signed by the Rebbe’s three sons: Rav Chaim Meir Hager, av bais din of Vizhnitz; Rav Yitzchok Yeshaya Hager; and Rav Yaakov Mordechai Hager, av bais din of Vizhnitz in Elad.

In their appeal, the Rebbe’s sons urged the public to increase their tefillos and beseech the Ribbono Shel Olam to have mercy and send a speedy refuah sheleimah to their father.

They announced that this Sunday, the first day of Selichos, will be designated as a major “day of tefillah and hisorerus.” Vizhnitzer Chassidim will gather in communities in cities around the world to recite the entire Sefer Tehillim and participate in an uninterrupted two-hour seder of Torah learning as a zechus for the Rebbe’s recovery.

The extraordinary call comes as Vizhnitzer Chassidim are simultaneously preparing with great anticipation for the approaching Yomim Noraim.

The Rebbe is expected to appear at the main bais medrash in Kiryas Vizhnitz in Bnei Brak this coming Motzoei Shabbos at 11:30 p.m. for the recitation of the first Selichos.

In recent days, the Rebbe has been receiving members of the community at Moshav Ora, where large numbers of Chassidim have been passing before him to receive a bracha ahead of the new year.

Thousands of Vizhnitzer Chassidim from around the world are expected to travel to Eretz Yisroel next week to spend Rosh Hashanah and the Yomim Tovim of Tishrei in the presence of the Rebbe.

The public is asked to continue storming the heavens with tefillos for the complete and speedy recovery of Rav Yisroel ben Leah Esther, b’soch she’ar cholei Yisroel.

{Matzav.com}

Massive Data Breach May Have Exposed Tens of Millions of U.S. and Canadian Driver’s Licenses

Matzav -

The FBI is investigating a potentially massive data breach involving digital copies of tens of millions of driver’s licenses belonging to people across the United States and Canada, after the documents were reportedly discovered for sale on the dark web.

Independent cybersecurity journalist Brian Krebs disclosed Tuesday that he had located a dark web marketplace offering scans of millions of driver’s licenses from American and Canadian residents. Krebs said he was able to verify that the information was genuine by checking the records with nine individuals whose documents appeared in the database.

The FBI confirmed Wednesday that it had opened an inquiry into the reported breach. In a brief statement, the bureau said it was “looking into the incident” but could not comment “due to the ongoing nature of the investigation.”

Should the reported scale of the compromise be verified, it could rank among the largest known breaches involving government-issued identification documents in North America. The exposure of driver’s licenses on such a scale could potentially leave tens of millions of individuals vulnerable to identity theft, financial fraud and other forms of criminal exploitation.

According to Krebs, he first became aware of the marketplace after it was promoted on a Russian cybercrime forum. In an extraordinary twist, his own driver’s license was reportedly displayed as a free sample of the stolen material. The operation, known as Nexus, claimed to possess tens of millions of U.S. and Canadian driver’s licenses, along with millions of additional identification cards and travel documents and hundreds of thousands of medical records. Krebs also reported that the database appeared to be receiving newly stolen information in real time, raising the possibility that the underlying security breach remained active.

Zach Edwards, a threat researcher with cybersecurity firm Infoblox, said the apparent size and ongoing nature of the compromise made it unlike previous driver’s license breaches.

“There’s never been a breach of driver’s licenses at this scale,” said Edwards, who added that his own license was available for sale on the site. Edwards said that the ongoing nature of the breach “means that this attack created legitimate national security risks for high-profile individuals.”

The origin of the compromised information has not yet been established. Reuters reported that Krebs cited a representative of New Orleans-based identity-verification company IDScan.net as saying the company was examining the matter. IDScan.net, which describes its services as providing “ID fraud prevention at scale,” did not respond to repeated requests for comment from Reuters.

Krebs subsequently reported that the dark web marketplace selling the driver’s license records disappeared shortly after publication of his report.

{Matzav.com}

Skverer Yungerman Released From Military Prison in Time for Son’s Bris, as Rebbe’s Son Prepares for Trump Meeting

Matzav -

A Skverer yungerman who was arrested earlier this week while attempting to resolve his military status was released from an Israeli military prison on Wednesday, allowing him to return home just one day before the bris of his firstborn son.

The release of Yitzchok Cohen brought considerable relief and simcha to the Skverer community after several tense days during which there were fears that he would remain incarcerated and miss his son’s bris, scheduled to take place Thursday in Yerushalayim.

The episode began when Cohen traveled to Camp Yotam in Eilat in an effort to regularize his status with the military. He hoped to resolve the matter so that he would be permitted to travel abroad for the upcoming Yomim Tovim and spend the Yomim Noraim in the presence of the Skverer Rebbe in the United States.

Instead, Cohen was arrested at the military facility and transferred into military custody. He was subsequently sentenced to seven days in Prison 10.

His arrest immediately raised concerns that his incarceration would prevent him from attending the bris of his first child.

Over the ensuing days, askanim and attorneys became heavily involved in the case, undertaking intensive efforts to secure Cohen’s early release and emphasizing the urgency of allowing him to participate in his family’s simcha.

Those efforts ultimately succeeded. Cohen was released Wednesday, several days before his sentence was scheduled to end, and returned home to his family.

On Thursday morning, he is expected to stand alongside his family in Yerushalayim as his firstborn son enters the bris of Avrohom Avinu.

The development comes as the Skverer Rebbe himself has been invited to participate Thursday in a meeting with President Donald Trump as part of a delegation of Admorim and rabbonim.

It now appears that the Rebbe will send his eldest son, Rav Aharon Mendel Twersky, to participate in the meeting, while the Rebbe’s own attendance remains uncertain.

{Matzav.com}

Rav Yisroel Meir Yosef Fadida zt”l, Beloved Mashgiach Who Endured Years of Suffering, Passes Away at 58

Matzav -

Rav Yisroel Meir Yosef Fadida zt”l, the longtime mashgiach of Yeshivas Ohel Yosef Heichal Tzvi, part of the Ohr Gaon mosdos in Bnei Brak, was niftar on Wednesday following years of severe physical suffering. He was 58.

Rav Fadida was known as an exceptional marbitz Torah who inspired generations of talmidim. Throughout years of serious medical challenges, including the amputation of a leg and kidney transplants, he maintained his characteristic simcha and warm countenance, accepting his suffering with remarkable emunah and love.

Earlier Wednesday, Rav Fadida suddenly collapsed at his home on Rav Ashi Street in Bnei Brak. Emergency medical personnel were summoned and performed prolonged resuscitation efforts before transporting him to Mayanei Hayeshua Medical Center, where he was niftar.

The levayah was held at Yeshivas Ohr Gaon at 3 Shlomo Hamelech Street in Bnei Brak. The procession passed his home at 13 Rav Ashi Street before continuing to the Ponevezh Bais Hachaim for kevurah.

Rav Fadida was born in Bnei Brak on 13 Iyar 5728 to his father, Rav Tzvi Elyakim Fadida, rosh yeshiva of Yeshivas Heichal Tzvi and head of the Ohr Gaon mosdos in Bnei Brak, and his mother, Mrs. Esther Fadida a”h.

As a bochur, he learned at Yeshivas Ateres Yisroel in Yerushalayim, where he was privileged to learn under the rosh yeshiva, Rav Boruch Mordechai Ezrachi zt”l, and absorbed his approach to Torah and avodas Hashem.

Upon reaching marriageable age, Rav Fadida married his wife, a member of the Ohana family, and the couple established their home in Bnei Brak.

In later years, Rav Fadida developed diabetes and ultimately had to undergo the amputation of a leg. Despite the tremendous suffering that accompanied his illness and subsequent medical ordeals, those around him recalled that he continued to radiate simcha and warmth.

For decades, Rav Fadida devoted himself to spreading Torah and yiras Shomayim at Yeshivas Heichal Tzvi in Bnei Brak, under the leadership of his father. As mashgiach, his illuminating shmuessen and personal guidance helped shape generations of talmidim in Torah and avodas Hashem. With a deep understanding of people and their struggles, he worked to uplift and strengthen those who turned to him, young and old alike, drawing upon the wisdom and guidance he had received from his own rabbeim.

Rav Fadida enjoyed close relationships with gedolei Torah who drew him near and treated him with extraordinary affection. From them, he absorbed and subsequently transmitted to others their approaches to avodah, Torah and personal growth.

Even as his physical condition deteriorated, Rav Fadida continued learning and teaching Torah in every circumstance until his final day. His home remained open to anyone in need, whom he received with a welcoming countenance and generous heart. Through years of intense and painful suffering, he accepted his circumstances with simcha, profound emunah, ahavas Hashem, tzidduk hadin and yiras Shomayim.

Rav Fadida leaves behind a distinguished family, including his father, Rav Tzvi Elyakim Fadida; his wife; his children; and his brother, noted producer R’ Dovid Fadida.

Yehi zichro baruch.

{Matzav.com}

Ofer Winter Reverses Course on Chareidi Draft: Now Demands Law After Saying ‘No Law Is Needed’

Matzav -

Ofer Winter, chairman of the Amcha Yisrael party and a retired IDF brigadier general, announced Wednesday that passage of a Chareidi draft law will be a firm condition for his party to join Israel’s next government — a position that appears to mark a significant shift from repeated statements he made over the past year opposing coercive legislation and insisting that Chareidim could be brought into the IDF without a new law.

“We will not join a government that does not pass, before its formation, a law that puts an end to draft evasion and requires everyone to report and contribute,” Winter declared Wednesday evening. “Without that, we will not sit in the government. Period.”

Yet in May 2025, while discussing how the IDF could attract Chareidi recruits, Winter explicitly argued that legislation was unnecessary. Instead, he said the military should establish units designed to accommodate the religious requirements of Chareidi soldiers.

“Establish kosher units, insist that they be suitable for the Chareidi public, and you will see that no law is needed. They will come on their own,” Winter said.

At the time, Winter also warned against transforming the Chareidi draft controversy into a political battle, arguing that doing so would make successful recruitment even less likely.

“Every time this issue comes up again in political discourse — and this is another thing I have learned — there will be no Chareidi enlistment. Do you know why? In Judaism, this is called decrees of religious persecution.”

Winter’s proposed approach at the time centered on creating military frameworks tailored to Chareidi needs and rebuilding trust with the community rather than attempting to force enlistment through legislation.

That was not an isolated statement. About six weeks earlier, in March 2025, Winter had spoken out explicitly against compulsory Chareidi enlistment.

“You don’t carry out judicial reform by force, and you don’t draft Chareidim by force,” he said.

Winter added that elected officials have a responsibility “to find solutions and work things out, rather than bring us to a civil war.”

Even as Winter moved closer to formally entering politics, he continued expressing similar views. During a private gathering in June, he said the IDF itself bore some responsibility for its failure to successfully integrate Chareidim into the military.

“The army failed in integrating Chareidim because it violated the rules we established, and the trust was broken,” Winter said.

He nevertheless predicted that large numbers of Chareidim would ultimately serve, saying, “Masses of Chareidim will come to the army; it will happen through love and trust.”

Winter sharpened his criticism of legislation addressing the issue in July. Discussing both the Basic Law on Torah Study and the draft law, he said that “all this legislation is offside when compared with the reality we face.”

He also warned that coercion would backfire.

“If you force it, you will get the opposite result. And the same goes for this draft-dodger law. What happened to us?”

Winter’s strongest criticism of the political handling of the Chareidi draft issue came just three weeks ago. On Aug. 13, with the approaching election already looming over Israeli politics, Winter sharply attacked politicians who had made Chareidi enlistment a central political issue.

“All those who have been in politics over the last 20 years, and those who were politicians in uniform over the last decade — how many Chareidim did you bring into the IDF during all the years that you have been fighting over who will bring in more?” Winter asked. “What have you done, other than trying to rake in political capital on the back of the people of Israel while producing zero results and zero solutions?”

At the time, Winter insisted that successful Chareidi recruitment would come through direct engagement and trust-building rather than political rhetoric.

“Chareidi enlistment and their integration into the IDF will not be accomplished through populism, but through hard work and building trust. Through working with the Chareidi public itself,” he said.

Winter concluded with an especially pointed dismissal of the political debate: “Come on, enough with all this false populism.”

Less than three weeks later, however, Winter has now made passage of a draft law an explicit political prerequisite for joining Israel’s next coalition. The politician who previously maintained that “no law is needed,” warned that coercion would produce the opposite result and accused politicians of exploiting Chareidi enlistment for political gain is now declaring that his party will refuse to enter a government unless such legislation is passed.

{Matzav.com}

Poll: Surprising Percentage of Democrats Say Americans Spend Too Much Time Focusing on 9/11 Terrorist Attacks

Matzav -

A new YouGov survey conducted ahead of the 25th anniversary of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks found that 13% of Democrats believe Americans devote too much attention to 9/11, more than double the share of Republicans or independents who expressed that view.

The poll, conducted as the nation prepares to mark 25 years since the attacks that killed nearly 3,000 people on American soil, asked respondents to assess the place 9/11 continues to occupy in American life. Specifically, participants were asked, “Do Americans focus too much or too little on 9/11?”

Across all respondents, 46% said Americans give the attacks the “right amount” of attention. Another 28% said 9/11 receives “too little” attention, while 19% were unsure. Just 6% of those surveyed said Americans focus on the attacks “too much.”

The partisan breakdown showed significant differences. Among Republicans, 44% said the country gives 9/11 the “right amount of focus,” while nearly as many — 43% — said the attacks receive “too little” attention. Only 5% of Republicans said there is “too much” focus on 9/11. Among independents, 44% said the current level of attention is appropriate, 21% said there is too little focus, and 6% said there is too much.

Democrats were considerably more likely to say the attacks receive excessive attention. Thirteen percent — more than one in eight — said there is “too much” focus on 9/11, the highest percentage among the three political groups. At the same time, 51% of Democrats said the attacks receive the proper amount of attention, while 19% said Americans focus on them too little. That 19% figure was lower than the corresponding share among both independents and Republicans.

The survey also found widespread concern about how well younger generations understand what occurred on Sept. 11, 2001. Fifty-four percent of respondents said Americans who were born after 2001 generally “do not have a good understanding” of the attacks.

YouGov also found partisan differences in how Americans view the lasting effects of 9/11:

Democrats are more likely than Republicans to say the Sept. 11 attacks are affecting a lot today the way Muslims are treated in the U.S. (71% vs. 42%) and U.S. immigration policy (58% vs. 45%). Republicans are more likely than Democrats to say the attacks affect a lot today how patriotic Americans feel (51% vs. 29%) and national unity (35% vs. 24%).

The survey additionally examined attitudes toward the military campaigns, heightened security measures and expanded surveillance adopted by the United States in response to the threat of terrorism following the attacks.

Since Sept. 11, 2001, the U.S. has fought against the threat of terrorism through military operations abroad and increased security and surveillance inside of the U.S. About half (48%) of Americans — including 71% of Republicans and 37% of Democrats — think these actions have been worth the cost. 25% say they have not been worth the cost. 35% of Democrats and 12% of Republicans hold this view.

YouGov conducted the survey from Aug. 20 through Aug. 23 among 1,098 U.S. citizens. The poll carries a margin of error of plus or minus 4.1 percentage points.

President Donald Trump, meanwhile, is expected to commemorate the 25th anniversary of the attacks at the Pentagon in Washington, D.C., where he is reportedly scheduled to deliver remarks.

{Matzav.com}

Matzav Inbox: A Different Perspective On the Litvishe Demographic Question

Matzav -

Dear Matzav Inbox,

I read the recent piece about President Trump’s rabbinic guest list and the wake-up call it supposedly represents for the Litvish world. I thought it was a very interesting and thought-provoking article, and I appreciate the writer bringing the issue of demographics and marriage age to the forefront.

That being said, I think the writer is making a very significant mistake in the basic premise of the article.

The fact that President Trump invited five Chassidishe Rebbes and one Litvishe Rosh Yeshiva does not, by itself, tell us that the Chassidish world has grown because of no freezer……., or that the Litvish world has somehow shrunk because boys are getting married later.

There is a huge historical factor that cannot be ignored when comparing these two populations: the Holocaust.

Lithuanian Jewry was devastated almost beyond comprehension. Approximately 90% of Lithuanian Jews were murdered during the Holocaust, with the overwhelming majority of the killings taking place already in 1941 and 1942. The Lithuanian Jewish population was therefore almost completely wiped out before the postwar Torah world had a chance to rebuild.

Hungarian Jewry suffered terribly as well, and it is important not to minimize that for even a moment. But the timeline was dramatically different. Germany occupied Hungary only in March 1944. The mass deportations began in May 1944 and were halted in July. Approximately 250,000 Hungarian Jews survived the Holocaust.

That difference is enormous.

When the war ended, the different segments of European Jewry were therefore starting from radically different demographic positions. A disproportionately large remnant of Hungarian Jewry was still alive and able to rebuild their communities, while Lithuanian Jewry had been decimated.

That has to be taken into consideration when looking at the size of the respective communities in America today.

Of course, marriage age is a factor. Family size is a factor. Community structure is a factor. Immigration patterns and many other factors are factors as well. There is certainly room for an honest discussion about whether the Litvish community should reconsider aspects of its approach to shidduchim and marriage age.

But to look at the demographic picture today and essentially attribute it to “freezerism” is far too simplistic.

We have to remember that the communities we are comparing did not emerge from the Holocaust from anything close to the same starting point. Before we draw conclusions about what happened to the Litvish world over the past eighty years, we have to remember what happened to the Litvish world during those years of the Holocaust.

The writer may very well be correct that demographics deserve our attention. But I think the historical premise needs to be reconsidered very carefully.

We cannot explain the demographic differences of the postwar Torah world without first accounting for the radically different demographic destruction suffered by the Jewish communities of Europe.

Signed,

A Yid from Lita

To submit a letter to appear on Matzav.com, email MatzavInbox@gmail.com

DON’T MISS OUT! Join the Matzav Status by CLICKING HERE. Join the Matzav WhatsApp Groups by CLICKING HERE.

The opinions expressed in letters on Matzav.com do not necessarily reflect the stance of the Matzav Media Network.

Elon Musk Predicts 1 Billion Humanoid Robots Could Outproduce Humanity Within a Decade

Matzav -

Elon Musk predicted during a virtual appearance at the G20 that more than 1 billion humanoid robots could be operating within the next decade, with their combined productivity eventually exceeding that of the entire human population.

During his remarks, Musk focused on four major areas shaping the development of artificial intelligence: the enormous electricity requirements of AI systems, their potential impact on the global economy, the emergence of humanoid robots and the question of how governments should regulate rapidly developing technologies.

Musk offered some of his most dramatic predictions while discussing robotics. He said the usefulness of humanoid robots will depend primarily on three rapidly advancing components: artificial intelligence software, onboard AI processors and electromechanical capabilities, particularly the dexterity of robotic hands. Musk argued that once robots become capable of building additional robots, production could become self-reinforcing, beginning gradually before accelerating dramatically. He described his own 10-year projection as conservative, saying the world could have well over a billion humanoid robots, each capable of producing approximately five times as much as a human worker. Taken together, he said, those machines could generate more output than all humans combined. Musk predicted that this expansion of AI into the physical economy could ultimately increase total economic output tenfold or more.

Another major obstacle, Musk said, will be finding enough electricity to power the rapidly growing AI industry. He cited estimates projecting a shortage of at least 15 gigawatts of power for AI chips by 2027. While production of AI processors is increasing at approximately 40% to 50% annually, he said, electricity generation outside China is expanding by only about 10% to 20% per year. Musk argued that electricity, rather than the availability of chips, is therefore likely to become the primary constraint on AI expansion. He said Google, Anthropic and other companies are leasing computing capacity from SpaceX, which constructed its own power-generation facilities to quickly increase capacity. China, Musk noted, has plentiful electricity but faces restrictions on obtaining the most advanced processors because of GPU export controls. He urged countries seeking to capitalize on the AI boom to expand electricity generation, attract AI data centers and then generate government revenue through taxes or other fees.

Musk also predicted enormous economic gains from artificial intelligence even before humanoid robots become widespread. Digital AI alone, he said, could expand the worldwide economy by 20% to 30%, representing approximately $20 trillion to $30 trillion in additional annual economic activity. Musk predicted that by the end of next year, artificial intelligence will be capable of performing virtually any digital task that does not require physically manipulating matter. In software development, he predicted AI would reach “Stockfish-level” capability within roughly 12 to 18 months, referring to the powerful chess engine while also invoking five-time World Chess Champion Magnus Carlsen as a point of comparison. Musk said similarly dramatic advances should occur during that period in engineering and other forms of digital work. He also promoted X, which he owns, as the platform where he said nearly all substantive discussion about artificial intelligence is taking place.

Turning to government oversight, Musk argued that emerging technologies should generally be presumed legal unless regulators establish a reason to restrict them, rather than forcing innovators to prove that new technologies should be permitted. He pointed to the European Union as an example of a regulatory system that, in his view, inhibits technological development without preventing it altogether. Musk compared young companies to small saplings competing for sunlight alongside established trees, saying governments frequently give too much assistance to major corporations while making life more difficult for startups. Large businesses generally enjoy access to government leaders that fledgling companies lack, he said, arguing that policymakers should intentionally give younger companies greater advantages to compensate for that disparity.

Musk has previously made similarly sweeping predictions about how artificial intelligence could transform everyday economic life. Earlier this year, he suggested that the coming technological revolution could eventually make conventional retirement savings largely irrelevant.

Appearing on the Moonshots with Peter Diamandis podcast, Musk stated: “Don’t worry about squirreling money away for retirement in 10 or 20 years. It won’t matter.”

Those comments echoed Musk’s earlier prediction that advances in artificial intelligence and robotics could eventually make conventional employment “optional,” with people approaching work more as a hobby than an economic necessity.

Musk’s forecasts remain extraordinarily ambitious, and whether humanoid robots and artificial intelligence develop as quickly as he expects remains uncertain. His latest remarks nevertheless underscore the enormous technological and economic transformation he believes is approaching as companies and governments race to develop increasingly powerful AI systems.

{Matzav.com}

Deleted Email Details Alleged Trump-Targeting Push Inside Letitia James’ Office: “Find and Pursue Crimes”

Matzav -

A New York prosecutor has accused state Attorney General Letitia James’ office of instructing employees to seek out potential crimes involving President Donald Trump and organizations associated with him, according to a new report involving an internal email that was allegedly later deleted from agency servers.

The allegations center on Assistant Attorney General Daniel Wiesenfeld, a prosecutor in the New York Attorney General’s Investor Protection Bureau. According to the Times Union, Wiesenfeld sent the email concerning directives he said came from Shamiso Maswoswe, who heads the bureau. The newspaper reported that the message was subsequently removed from the office’s servers. James’ office has characterized the dispute as a personnel matter and denied that individuals are targeted because of their political views.

According to the Times Union, Wiesenfeld claimed Maswoswe had instructed him to investigate “Trump himself, Truth Social, Hewlett Packard (DOJ approved merger)… without having a credible reason for targeting [these] organizations and individuals.”

Maswoswe previously served as a trial attorney with the Justice Department’s Public Integrity Section beginning in January 2016 and remained there until she was terminated in December 2017, during Trump’s first term in office. She later sued the Justice Department in February 2021, alleging that her dismissal was improper and that she had faced discrimination related to her race, pregnancy and responsibilities as a caregiver.

The controversy erupted after Wiesenfeld reportedly sent an email throughout the attorney general’s office on Friday alleging that employees had been instructed “to find and pursue crimes committed by specific individuals and organizations affiliated with Donald Trump,” according to the Times Union.

That message was subsequently allegedly removed from the office’s servers. James’ general counsel, Kumiki Gibson, then reportedly circulated another email informing employees that the situation was an “internal” matter and assuring them that no employees were “in danger,” according to the report.

“This is a personnel matter. The Office of the Attorney General is committed to upholding New York’s laws and protecting the rights and freedoms of all New Yorkers, regardless of political beliefs. We strongly reject any assertion to the contrary,” a spokesperson for the Office of the New York Attorney General told Fox News Digital.

The New York Post reported that Wiesenfeld was subsequently placed on paid administrative leave.

The White House seized on the allegations as further evidence of what it described as politically motivated use of the legal system against Trump and those associated with him.

“This is more proof of the weaponization of the justice system by Letitia James to target President Trump and her political opponents. The far-left Democrats lawfare against President Trump, his family, and allies must stop,” White House spokesperson Lauren Bis told Fox News Digital.

Maswoswe’s previous dispute with the Justice Department began before she joined James’ office in February 2022. She filed her discrimination lawsuit against the DOJ in February 2021.

In that complaint, Maswoswe alleged that her 2017 firing during the Trump administration was unjust and that she had been discriminated against because she is Black and had a child.

Court documents show that Maswoswe, who is of Zimbabwean descent, accused the Justice Department of racial discrimination and alleged that she had faced scrutiny related to her pregnancy, breastfeeding and caregiving obligations. She sought reinstatement to her position along with back pay and damages.

The dispute was settled in 2023, with Maswoswe receiving $795,000 to resolve the claims connected to her employment and lawsuit.

The Justice Department expressly denied the truth of Maswoswe’s allegations. The settlement agreement characterized the payment as a compromise resolving disputed claims rather than an admission that discrimination or retaliation had taken place.

James has long been one of Trump’s most prominent legal and political adversaries. After campaigning on promises to scrutinize Trump’s business dealings, she brought a civil fraud lawsuit against Trump and the Trump Organization in 2022.

That case initially produced financial penalties exceeding $450 million. An appeals court subsequently left Trump’s liability finding in place while throwing out the monetary penalty.

{Matzav.com}

Lawyer Blasted for Calling Charlie Kirk ‘Hateful’ While Defending Accused Assassin Tyler Robinson

Matzav -

PROVO, Utah — An attorney representing accused Charlie Kirk assassin Tyler Robinson came under sharp criticism Tuesday after telling a Utah court that Kirk had spoken “hatefully” about certain groups, remarks that drew an immediate rebuke from prosecutors, the Kirk family’s attorney and an outside criminal defense lawyer.

“I think what the defense attorney said regarding Charlie Kirk and that he was full of hate, that was so unprofessional,” said David Gelman, a New Jersey-based criminal defense attorney who has been following the case. “That was so out of left field that he honestly — he should be embarrassed of what he said.”

Robinson, 23, is charged with assassinating Kirk, the 31-year-old father of two and Turning Point USA founder, while Kirk addressed a crowd of thousands at Utah Valley University on Sept. 10, 2025.

During arguments over whether Robinson’s case should proceed to trial, California defense attorney Richard Novak focused in part on the ideological differences between Kirk and Robinson.

“Mr. Kirk spoke hatefully of certain groups of people,” Novak told the court. He also argued that a “significant gap” existed between Kirk’s views and Robinson’s feelings about him.

Kirk’s parents, widow and other relatives were sitting in the courtroom as Novak repeatedly invoked the idea of hate. Members of the family exchanged glances, with some becoming emotional, while Kirk’s widow, Erika Kirk, leaned forward and spoke to an aide from the county attorney’s office.

Gelman said Novak’s decision to characterize the murder victim in those terms during a preliminary hearing crossed a line.

“You don’t ever and I mean ever say that, No. 1, as a defense attorney or a prosecutor, especially not even at a trial,” Gelman said. “If you want to paint Charlie as a bad person in front of the jury, knock your socks off. Do whatever you think you have to do. But to do that at a preliminary hearing…when you have the victim’s family all there, that was totally uncalled for.”

Chief Deputy Utah County Attorney Chad Grunander and attorney Jeffrey Neiman, who represents Kirk’s family, also challenged Novak’s characterization before the judge.

“The state takes great exception with Mr. Novak attributing all of this ‘hate’ to Mr. Kirk during his argument today,” Grunander said in his rebuttal. “None of what was presented during the preliminary hearing [shows] that he is hateful towards this group or hateful towards that group. He had an opinion that he would express on politics and religion. That doesn’t make it hate, but the fact that Mr. Novak even considered as hate makes the case for the state in his client’s own words, he hated what Mr. Kirk stood for.”

Neiman told the judge that Kirk had built his public career around engaging in “hard conversations” about contentious issues and rejected the suggestion that Kirk had been motivated by hatred.

“Charlie was the opposite of hate,” he said. “Firing a bullet into a crowd and assassinating him. That is hate.”

The issue of hatred also surfaced in text messages that prosecutors say Robinson sent after Kirk’s killing. Authorities allege that Robinson himself used “hate” to describe Kirk when discussing his purported motive.

Prosecutors have identified Lance Twiggs, Robinson’s roommate and romantic partner at the time of the killing, as a central witness in the case. They say Robinson confessed to Twiggs and explained why he had targeted Kirk.

“Why did I do it?” Robinson allegedly wrote to Twiggs after the slaying. “I had enough of his hatred. Some hate can’t be negotiated out. If I am able to grab my rifle unseen, I will have left no evidence.”

Robinson’s defense team has been contacted for comment regarding the controversy over Novak’s remarks.

Gelman, meanwhile, strongly rejected the defense attorney’s description of Kirk and argued that Kirk’s public appearances were intended to encourage political discussion.

“Charlie Kirk was not full of hatred,” Gelman said. “If anything, he was full of love…He brought people together. He was there doing a free speech event, all right? He’s trying to bring people on the left on the right together.”

Judge Tony Graf Jr. ruled Tuesday that all of the charges against Robinson will proceed to district court for trial, including an aggravated murder count that makes him eligible for the death penalty.

Robinson is scheduled to return to court Oct. 23 for a pretrial conference, at which Graf could establish a date for the trial.

At Tuesday’s arraignment, defense attorney Kathy Nester entered pleas of not guilty on Robinson’s behalf to all charges.

{Matzav.com}

Pages

Subscribe to NativUSA Portal aggregator