Feed aggregator

In what chassidim of Toldos Aharon are calling an extraordinary miracle, Rav Yisroel Yosef Kohn, the eldest son of the Toldos Aharon Rebbe, escaped without injury from a serious car accident while traveling from Tzefas back to Yerushalayim.

Rav Yisroel Yosef, who serves as the head of the Be’er Yosef kollel network, spent the past Shabbos together with his father, the Toldos Aharon Rebbe, who is currently staying in Tzefas for rest. Last Thursday, Rav Yisroel Yosef traveled north together with a group of kollel members ahead of the upcoming wedding of his son, which is scheduled to take place next week at the central Toldos Aharon beis medrash in Meah Shearim.

Late Motzoei Shabbos, while making his way back to Yerushalayim, the vehicle carrying Rav Yisroel Yosef was involved in a severe accident. Emergency personnel arrived quickly and transported him to the hospital, where he underwent a series of medical evaluations.

To the amazement of family members and chassidim, Rav Yisroel Yosef was released from the hospital Sunday morning in good condition. The driver and everyone else in the vehicle also emerged unharmed in what many described as miraculous circumstances. The car itself was completely crushed and destroyed.

Following his release, Rav Yisroel Yosef returned to the residence where his father is staying in Tzefas. During the Rosh Chodesh Sivan davening, he recited Bircas Hagomel with great emotion, thanking Hashem for the tremendous miracle.

Chassidim have also been stirred by what they describe as a remarkable occurrence during the Torah reading this past Shabbos. While with his father, Rav Yisroel Yosef received the final aliyah of the parsha, which concludes with the words, “And they shall not come to see when the holy vessels are covered, lest they die.” Immediately afterward, the Rebbe reportedly called him over and pointed out that the Targum translates the passage with the phrase “and they shall not die,” emphasizing the words: “and they shall not come to see when the holy vessels are covered, and they shall not die.”

{Matzav.com}

Following the Knesset’s approval of a law authorizing the death penalty for terrorists, Hamas leadership in Gaza circulated an internal message among operatives calling for the kidnapping of Israeli soldiers and urging the group’s military wing to escalate active operations.

According to the contents of the document, which were published Monday evening by Israeli media outlet Kan News, Hamas described the newly approved legislation as the only proof that abducting Israeli soldiers remains the sole effective means of securing the release of Palestinian prisoners.

In the message, Hamas sharply condemned the law, referring to it as a “fascist law” and accusing Israel of acting like a violent criminal organization.

The document described the legislation as a “fascist law that is nothing but a reflection of the blood-soaked nature of this occupation… and embodies the mentality of bloodthirsty criminal gangs.”

The letter also invoked the legacy of Hamas founder Ahmed Yassin and former Hamas military commander Mohammed Deif, presenting the kidnapping of Israeli soldiers as a core strategic doctrine of the organization.

“From the will of Sheikh Imam Ahmed Yassin, who outlined with blood and unwavering faith the strategy of ‘kidnapping soldiers’ as the sole path to freedom… and remember the martyr commander Mohammed Deif, who turned the release of prisoners into a doctrine of warfare,” the document stated.

Hamas leadership also warned that any harm to Palestinian prisoners would trigger a broad regional escalation, while claiming the organization had already prepared military responses.

“Any harm to the life of a prisoner is an explosive charge that will trigger the eruption of a comprehensive volcano, which will leave nothing and spare nothing… through what this pure land conceals in its depths, ‘hidden secrets’ that will shake the earth beneath their feet.”

Toward the end of the letter, Hamas called on its armed wing to raise its level of readiness and move from preparation to direct action, insisting that freedom can only be achieved through force.

“The battle against the jailers is not being fought only within prison walls, but is your battle in the field. Raise the level of alertness, and let our response be an act the enemy will see with its own eyes before hearing about it, for freedom is taken by force of arms.”

{Matzav.com}

While several leading Jewish organizations are planning to boycott New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s Jewish Heritage Month celebration at Gracie Mansion over his anti-Israel rhetoric, Satmar askan Rabbi Moshe Dovid Niederman confirmed he will attend the gathering, the NY Post reports.

At least three prominent Jewish figures and organizations have decided to skip the event, arguing that Mamdani’s statements regarding Israel and Zionism are incompatible with a celebration of Jewish heritage.

In a statement, the UJA-Federation of New York, which describes itself as the world’s largest local philanthropy, announced it would not participate.

“We will not be attending the Jewish American Heritage Month celebration at Gracie Mansion being hosted by a mayor who denies a core pillar of our heritage — the State of Israel as the homeland of the Jewish people,” the organization said.

Mark Treyger, whose organization oversees the annual Israel Day Parade, also said he would not attend the mayor’s event.

“It’s a really telling and concerning sign of where things stand in New York City right now,” Treyger, a former Brooklyn councilman, told The NY Post on Sunday.

Treyger accused Mamdani of further escalating tensions Friday after releasing a social media statement criticizing the founding of Israel shortly before many Jewish New Yorkers began observing Shabbos.

Mamdani, who has long been outspoken in his criticism of Israel, marked “Nakba Day” — commemorated by Palestinians as the “catastrophe” surrounding Israel’s establishment on May 14, 1948 — with a Friday evening social media post featuring a professionally produced interview with city resident and “Nakba survivor” Inea Bushnaq.

“The mayor issued a social media production which omitted significant parts of history. It only inflamed tensions further,” Treyger said.

He added that the post came immediately after anti-Israel demonstrations outside a prominent Park Avenue synagogue in Manhattan and outside Young Israel Senior Services in Midwood, Brooklyn.

Treyger also pointed to Friday’s arrest of a suspected terrorist allegedly linked to Iran’s military who authorities say was planning an attack targeting a synagogue in New York City.

“We’re looking for leadership that New Yorkers deserve to lower the temperature and bring people together — now more than ever,” Treyger said.

Joseph Potasnik likewise announced he would not attend the Gracie Mansion event.

“Jewish heritage should include recognition of the state of Israel,” Potasnik said. “Jewish history didn’t end in 1946 … We will be marching in the Israel Day Parade to express our support for Israel.”

Last week, former Brooklyn Assemblyman Dov Hikind publicly urged Jewish leaders to boycott the event as tensions between Mamdani and segments of the Jewish community continue growing.

Despite the backlash, Rabbi Moshe Dovid Niederman, head of Satmar’s United Jewish Organizations of Williamsburg, confirmed that he intends to participate.

“I am going. It’s right and appropriate,” Niederman.

Niederman previously met with Mamdani at City Hall in March.

Mamdani’s office defended the mayor’s relationship with Jewish communities across the city, insisting he has made outreach and security a major priority since entering office.

“Since taking office, Mayor Mamdani has made it a priority to consistently show up for and build relationships across New York City’s Jewish communities — celebrating holidays and engaging with Jewish life across neighborhoods and traditions while taking steps to keep Jewish New Yorkers safe,” Mamdani spokesman Sam Raskin said.

“Monday’s Shavuot celebration at Gracie Mansion is one of many ways the mayor is engaging with Jewish New Yorkers, and he looks forward to welcoming the full breadth of the Jewish community, across the political and religious spectrum, on Monday.”

City Hall said approximately 150 attendees representing a broad range of New York’s Jewish community are expected to participate in Monday’s celebration.

Mamdani’s administration also pointed to its budget proposal allocating $26 million toward hate-crime prevention programs — an increase of more than 800 percent — which officials say fulfills a campaign pledge to combat antisemitism.

At the same time, the mayor recently confirmed he will not attend this year’s Israel Day Parade.

Mamdani supports the boycott, divestment and sanctions movement against Israel and does not recognize Israel as a Jewish state. Critics have also accused him of associating with individuals they consider antisemitic.

{Matzav.com}

Mark Fuhrman, the former Los Angeles police detective whose role in the O.J. Simpson murder trial became one of the most controversial chapters in the case, has died at the age of 74.

According to TMZ, which first reported the story, a close friend said Fuhrman passed away on May 12 after battling what was described as an “aggressive form of cancer.”

Fuhrman became a central figure in the highly publicized prosecution of O.J. Simpson after discovering the bloody glove investigators claimed connected Simpson to the 1994 murders of his former wife, Nicole Brown Simpson, and her friend Ron Goldman outside Brown Simpson’s Los Angeles residence.

At the time, Fuhrman’s testimony was expected to play a major role in securing a conviction against Simpson, once one of America’s most celebrated sports figures.

But the prosecution’s case was severely damaged after Simpson’s defense team introduced audio recordings in which Fuhrman used the N-word, contradicting his sworn testimony in court that he had never used the racial slur.

The revelation transformed Fuhrman into one of the most controversial figures in the trial and became a major issue for the defense as it argued that racism within the Los Angeles Police Department had tainted the investigation.

Fuhrman retired from the Los Angeles Police Department two months before Simpson was acquitted in October 1995 in a verdict that stunned much of the country.

The following year, Fuhrman pleaded no contest to a felony perjury charge after admitting he lied under oath during his testimony in the case.

His conviction ultimately made him the only individual criminally convicted as a direct result of the Simpson trial.

{Matzav.com}

A 22-year-old Israeli man was violently attacked in London early Monday morning after being heard speaking Hebrew, in what police are investigating as an antisemitic hate crime.

The victim, identified as Shalev Ben Yakar, suffered serious bruising and cuts to his face and body during the assault, which took place in the heavily Jewish neighborhood of Golders Green. Authorities said they are searching for the suspects involved in the attack.

Ben Yakar, who regularly visits London to spend time with relatives, reportedly stepped outside his apartment around 2 a.m. to make a phone call without disturbing those inside.

Speaking to Ynet, Ben Yakar said a group of five or six Arabic-speaking men approached him after overhearing him speaking Hebrew and asked whether he was Jewish. According to Ben Yakar, once he answered yes, the group immediately became violent.

After Ben Yakar replied in the affirmative, he said, the men began “punching me, kicking me,” and screaming “Jew, Jew” in Arabic.

Ben Yakar said the attackers dragged him across the street and ripped at his clothing during the assault.

Reflecting on the atmosphere in London, he warned that conditions for Jews in the city appear to be deteriorating rapidly.

“It’ll get worse. For sure. Something needs to be done here,” he said.

According to reports, police informed Ben Yakar that some of the suspected attackers are already known to law enforcement.

Sarah Sackman, the local lawmaker representing Golders Green, condemned the attack and said she personally discussed the matter with Metropolitan Police Commissioner Mark Rowley.

“The recent spate of antisemitic attacks and terror have struck fear into the heart of our community and I am pushing for more action at every level,” she added.

The Jewish Leadership Council also reacted publicly, calling the incident another deeply disturbing attack targeting Jews in the neighborhood.

“this is yet another appalling attack in the heart of the Jewish community in Golders Green. Our thoughts are with the victim and his family. There must be a robust response from law enforcement which demonstrates that those who violently attack Jews will face the full force of the law.”

A spokesperson for the Community Security Trust said the organization is assisting the victim following the assault.

“This was a violent and appalling attack in the heart of Golders Green. The incident is being treated by the Metropolitan Police as an antisemitic hate crime, and we thank them for their swift response. At a time of heightened antisemitism, incidents like this underline the very real dangers facing Jewish communities,” the group said in a statement.

{Matzav.com}

Authorities in San Diego said this afternoon that an active shooter situation at a complex housing a mosque and Islamic school has been brought under control after police “neutralized” the threat.

The incident took place at the Islamic Center of San Diego, prompting a massive law enforcement response and heavy emergency activity throughout the area.

Following the shooting, ICSD imam Taha Hassane released a message on social media assuring the public that children at the facility were safe, while urging people not to approach the scene.

“We are safe,” Hassane said in a recorded message on social media. “We have a few casualties, not confirmed yet. There is no threat at this moment.”

Officials have not yet released confirmed casualty figures. However, the Associated Press cited officer Anthony Carrasco as saying he believed multiple people had been shot during the incident.

Later Monday, the San Diego Police Department announced that the threat had been “neutralized,” though authorities did not immediately provide further information about the suspect or how the situation ended.

“We have significant resources on scene at this time,” the department said.

Television helicopter footage showed a large police deployment surrounding the mosque complex as officers secured the area and emergency crews responded.

San Diego Mayor Todd Gloria praised the actions of first responders, saying police officers “responded quickly to protect lives and secure the area”.

Authorities have not yet publicly identified the shooter, and investigators have not released any information regarding a possible motive.

The office of Gavin Newsom said the governor is monitoring developments closely and coordinating with local agencies responding to the incident.

“We are grateful to the first responders on the scene working to protect the community and urge everyone to follow guidance from local authorities,” the office said in a statement.

The Islamic Center of San Diego is situated in the Clairemont neighborhood, a residential section north of downtown San Diego.

Police also established a reunification center for families and community members affected by the shooting. The mosque announced on social media that children from the school could be picked up safely at a nearby church.

it is with great sadness that Matzav.com reports the sudden petirah of R’ Muti Feldbrand z”l, who was niftar just hours after joyfully celebrating the vort of his daughter. He was 47 years old.

According to family members, R’ Muti collapsed suddenly earlier today and was rushed to the hospital, where efforts to save him were unsuccessful.

R’ Muti z”l worked professionally as an architect and was widely respected not only for his abilities and professionalism, but for the pleasant and caring way he interacted with people. For many years he lived in The Villas neighborhood of Lakewood before relocating to Toms River.

Those who knew him describe a person with a constant smile and a sincere concern for others. He had an easygoing and friendly personality that enabled him to connect naturally with people from all walks of life, and he was beloved by many throughout the community.

He is survived by his wife, Bruchy, and their children, along with many grieving relatives and friends.

The levayah will take place tonight at 9 p.m. at Congregation Sons of Israel Holocaust Memorial Chapel, located at 613 Ramsey Avenue in Lakewood, New Jersey.

Yehi zichro boruch.

{Matzav.com}

Iran permitted roughly 30 vessels — including several reportedly linked to China — to pass through the Strait of Hormuz between Thursday night and Friday morning under what Tehran called “Iranian-managed transit protocols,” according to Iranian state-connected media outlets and statements attributed to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.

The decision marked a partial loosening of Iran’s grip over one of the world’s most vital maritime corridors while also highlighting increasingly close cooperation between Tehran and Beijing as instability in the Middle East continues affecting international energy markets.

Iranian officials said the ship movements took place in “close coordination” with China and under security rules imposed by Tehran after Iran effectively established operational control over the waterway following the outbreak of the regional war earlier this year.

The state-linked Tasnim News Agency described the arrangement as part of the “strategic partnership” between Iran and China, while Iranian military figures stressed that vessels can only pass through the strait with Tehran’s approval.

The Strait of Hormuz, which serves as the narrow maritime link between the Persian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman leading into the Arabian Sea, normally carries about 20 percent of the global oil supply.

Since fighting erupted, Iran has repeatedly declared that commercial ships would need authorization from Iranian authorities before entering the corridor.

According to reports, an IRGC commander said ships connected to what Iran defines as “hostile states” are still prohibited from crossing, suggesting Tehran continues using control of the waterway as leverage against the United States and its allies.

The controlled reopening has also fueled renewed attention on allegations that Iran may be financially benefiting from the restricted shipping system.

Earlier reports suggested Tehran could be charging up to $2 million per vessel in exchange for secure passage through the strait, although Iranian officials have not publicly acknowledged any such payment structure.

The developments have also intensified criticism of Washington’s inability to fully restore unrestricted maritime traffic through the strategic corridor despite repeated U.S. military deployments and international demands for open navigation.

The United States Navy has continued operating with an elevated presence in the region, but Iran’s practical authority over transit approvals has largely remained in place.

Analysts say Tehran’s ability to impose operational control over one of the world’s most important energy chokepoints amounts to a major strategic gain for the Iranian regime.

The issue reportedly surfaced during discussions this week in Beijing between President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping, where reopening the strait became a central subject of conversation.

According to the White House, both leaders agreed that the shipping lane must remain accessible for global energy transport. Trump later said Xi offered China’s help in restoring regional stability and reopening commercial maritime routes.

After the meeting, Trump said Xi assured him Beijing would not supply Iran with military hardware.

“He said he’s not going to give military equipment … he said that strongly,” Trump told Fox News. Trump added that Xi also told him, “If I can be of any help whatsoever, I would like to help.”

At the same time, the broader ceasefire across the region remains highly unstable.

The United States has been working to preserve a temporary truce between Israel and Lebanon before it is scheduled to expire Sunday.

Israeli and Lebanese representatives met this week in Washington in an attempt to prevent the conflict from widening further, even as clashes along the border continued.

Israel said Thursday that it carried out strikes against more than 65 Hezbollah targets across Lebanon, while Hezbollah claimed responsibility for launching a drone attack against Israeli troops in northern Israel.

The ongoing fighting has increased fears that the ceasefire could completely unravel, potentially causing even greater regional instability and further complicating efforts to restore normal shipping activity through the Strait of Hormuz.

{Matzav.com}

President Donald Trump announced Monday that he is postponing a planned military strike against Iran that had been scheduled for Tuesday, saying leaders from across the Middle East urged him to give diplomacy additional time.

In a post on Truth Social, Trump said negotiations were actively underway and suggested optimism that a diplomatic resolution could still be achieved.

“Serious negotiations are now taking place,” he wrote on Truth Social.

Trump added that regional leaders convinced him there remains a realistic chance for an agreement acceptable to both the United States and countries throughout the Middle East.

He said the leaders believed “a Deal will be made, which will be very acceptable to the United States of America, as well as all Countries in the Middle East, and beyond. This Deal will include, importantly, NO NUCLEAR WEAPONS FOR IRAN!”

According to Trump, the appeals came directly from Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani, Mohammed bin Salman Al Saud, and Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, all of whom asked him to delay military action.

At the same time, Trump emphasized that the United States remains prepared to move forward militarily if negotiations collapse or fail to produce an agreement acceptable to Washington.

Trump said he instructed Pete Hegseth and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Gen. Daniel Caine “that we will NOT be doing the scheduled attack of Iran tomorrow, but have further instructed them to be prepared to go forward with a full, large scale assault of Iran, on a moment’s notice, in the event that an acceptable Deal is not reached.”

Earlier Monday, Trump told The NY Post that he could not discuss Iran in detail because “too many things are happening.”

Still, he warned that Iranian leaders are fully aware of the danger facing them if diplomacy fails, saying Tehran understands “what’s going to be happening soon,” while also stressing that he was “not open” to offering concessions.

The administration has continued pressuring Iran to accept Trump’s demands regarding the dismantling of its nuclear program.

On Sunday, Trump warned that Iran needed to act quickly “or there won’t be anything left,” while adding that “the Clock is Ticking.”

Last week, Trump hinted to reporters that he might consider allowing Iran to suspend its nuclear program for 20 years rather than dismantling it completely, though it remains unclear whether that possibility is still under consideration as negotiations continue.

{Matzav.com}

Iran has delivered an updated proposal to the United States in an effort to ease tensions and bring an end to the ongoing confrontation between the two countries, but the White House reportedly dismissed the offer outright, according to a report by Axios citing unnamed sources.

The report said President Donald Trump remains interested in reaching a diplomatic agreement with Tehran, even as senior administration officials are simultaneously considering renewed military strikes following Iran’s reported refusal to accept several American demands connected to its nuclear activities.

According to Axios, Trump is expected to convene with his national security advisers on Tuesday to review possible military responses. The report cited two unnamed U.S. officials familiar with the discussions.

One source quoted in the report said that if Tehran refuses to soften its position, negotiations may continue “through bombs.”

Before receiving the latest Iranian proposal, Trump spoke by phone with Axios on Sunday and warned that time was running out for Tehran to change course.

Trump also cautioned that Iran would be “hit much harder” unless it became more flexible in negotiations.

According to the report, the revised Iranian proposal was transmitted Sunday night through Pakistani mediators and included new wording asserting that Iran has no intention of developing a nuclear weapon.

However, the proposal reportedly stopped short of offering specific commitments regarding uranium enrichment or Iran’s existing stockpile of highly enriched uranium.

The report further stated that Iranian state-controlled media claimed the United States had agreed during talks to ease certain oil sanctions. But an unnamed source told Axios that Washington has no intention of granting sanctions relief unless Iran first takes reciprocal steps.

Axios reported that the United States and Iran are still not engaged in direct negotiations over the substance of a final agreement. Instead, the current discussions are indirect and largely focused on establishing the framework for future negotiations.

Some officials within the administration reportedly believe Iran’s decision to submit another proposal reflects growing concern in Tehran about the possibility of additional American military action.

Trump intensified his rhetoric Sunday, warning that Iran would be “hit much harder than before” if it does not quickly return with a stronger proposal aimed at ending the conflict.

The warning followed a Truth Social post earlier Sunday in which Trump wrote: “For Iran, the Clock is Ticking, and they better get moving, FAST, or there won’t be anything left of them. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE!”

{Matzav.com}

Lindsey Graham called Monday for President Donald Trump to take stronger military action against Iran, arguing that Tehran’s latest conduct and refusal to negotiate seriously require an immediate response from Washington.

In a message posted on X, Graham said Iran has continued escalating tensions across the region despite suffering significant military and economic damage during the conflict involving the United States and Israel.

“I have every confidence that President Trump fully understands the situation with Iran and will not continue to tolerate a refusal to negotiate in good faith along with Iran’s defiant aggression in the Strait of Hormuz and throughout the region,” Graham wrote.

The South Carolina Republican said Iran’s regime has only become more confrontational despite the pressure it has faced in recent months.

“A short but forceful response now would reset the conflict in all the right ways,” Graham added. “When it comes to Iran, it is imperative that we negotiate from a position of strength and dominance. We must finish what we started.”

Graham’s remarks came as diplomatic efforts between Washington and Tehran appeared to be stalling, with both sides remaining far apart on key issues tied to Iran’s nuclear program and regional aggression.

Trump warned Sunday that time was rapidly running out for Iran after rejecting what he reportedly viewed as an unacceptable response to a proposed peace framework from the White House.

“For Iran, the clock is ticking, and they better get moving, FAST, or there won’t be anything left of them,” Trump wrote on Truth Social.

Trump also recently characterized the fragile ceasefire between the United States and Iran as being on “life support” amid rising instability throughout the Middle East, according to a report by The Hill.

The ongoing confrontation has also shaken global energy markets, particularly following disruptions tied to Iran in the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world’s most important oil transit routes. The tensions have driven oil and gas prices sharply upward.

According to AAA, the national average price for regular gasoline reached approximately $4.52 per gallon on Monday, compared to roughly $3.18 during the same period last year.

Drivers in California were reportedly paying an average of more than $6 per gallon.

Appearing Sunday on Meet the Press on NBC News, Graham reiterated his argument that military pressure on Iran should be intensified, saying the regime remains committed to sponsoring terrorism and destabilizing the region.

“The longer the Strait of Hormuz is closed, the more we try to pursue a deal that never happens, the stronger Iran gets,” Graham said.

While praising Trump’s military decisions so far, Graham argued that additional targets and pressure options remain available to the United States.

“What President Trump has done has been amazing militarily, but there’s more targets to be had, and there’s things we can do to hurt [Iran],” Graham said.

Trump has consistently maintained that Iran must never be permitted to acquire nuclear weapons, even as some Republicans have privately expressed concern that a prolonged conflict could hurt GOP candidates politically ahead of the upcoming midterm elections.

Graham brushed aside those political concerns during the NBC interview.

“It’s worth losing my job,” Graham told NBC News. “If I had to give my job up to make sure Iran would never have a nuclear weapon, I would do it.”

{Matzav.com}

A federal jury on Monday dealt a major setback to Elon Musk in his closely watched courtroom fight against OpenAI, ruling that the billionaire brought the lawsuit after the legal deadline had already passed.

The decision was unanimous and came quickly, with the nine-member federal jury reaching its conclusion in under two hours after deliberations began Monday. Jurors determined that Musk’s claims were barred because the statute of limitations had expired before the case was filed.

Musk’s attorney told the court following the verdict that the legal team plans to preserve its ability to appeal. The ruling concludes three weeks of testimony and arguments that drew widespread attention throughout Silicon Valley and the broader technology world, featuring several of the industry’s most recognizable figures.

Among those who testified were OpenAI chief executive Sam Altman, OpenAI president Greg Brockman, Musk himself, Musk adviser and partner Shivon Zillis, OpenAI co-founder Ilya Sutskever, and Satya Nadella, who leads Microsoft.

The jury’s ruling prevents what could have been a major upheaval in the artificial intelligence sector at a particularly sensitive moment. Musk is preparing a public offering tied to SpaceX after its merger with his AI company, while OpenAI is also moving aggressively toward an IPO of its own.

Musk, who contributed approximately $38 million to OpenAI before launching his separate AI venture xAI, had been seeking roughly $150 billion in damages. He also asked the court to dismantle OpenAI’s for-profit structure.

The lawsuit claimed that Brockman, Altman and OpenAI abandoned the organization’s original charitable purpose when they created a for-profit division and later secured billions of dollars in funding that transformed the company into one of the dominant forces in artificial intelligence. The complaint further alleged that Microsoft assisted the effort by investing approximately $13 billion into OpenAI’s commercial arm.

While testifying during the first week of the trial, Musk repeatedly summarized the case in blunt terms, telling jurors: “This lawsuit is very simple: It is not OK to steal a charity.”

At another stage of the proceedings, evidence showed Musk sending a message to Altman after details of one of Microsoft’s investments in OpenAI became public, describing the arrangement as a “bait and switch.”

Altman and the other defendants argued throughout the trial that Musk knew about — and even supported — OpenAI’s move toward a profit-driven model. Lawyers for Altman introduced evidence that appeared to show Musk agreeing that the company needed a structure capable of attracting traditional venture capital funding in exchange for equity in order to finance the enormous computing demands required to compete with companies such as Google.

Brockman also testified about a 2017 gathering at one of Musk’s homes attended by senior OpenAI executives, including Altman, Murati and Zillis. Brockman recalled that it was “clear there was a party there the night before,” with the home scattered with “confetti and cups.”

According to Brockman, whiskey was served during the meeting, and discussions surrounding a for-profit structure took place in what he described as a “celebratory” setting.

One attorney who frequently represents major technology companies, though not involved in the case, said he believed Musk’s position appeared to improve as the trial unfolded. The lawyer specifically pointed to Altman’s cross-examination, during which Musk’s legal team aggressively challenged his credibility.

“Musk has more of a case here than previously thought,” said the expert, who attended most of the proceedings. “The first 15 minutes of Altman’s cross-examination were devastating.”

Questions surrounding Altman’s honesty became a central issue for Musk’s legal team. Attorneys for Musk relied heavily on testimony from former OpenAI insiders, including former board members Tasha McCauley and Helen Toner, along with former chief technology officer Mira Murati, all of whom suggested Altman was not always truthful.

“My concern was about Sam saying one thing to one person and completely the opposite to another person,” Murati said in prerecorded testimony played before a packed federal courtroom in Oakland, California.

During closing arguments last week, Musk attorney Steven Molo attempted to reinforce that point with a vivid analogy directed at jurors.

“Imagine that you’re on a hike, and you come upon one of those wooden bridges that you see on a trail and it’s over a gorge,” Molo said inside the federal courtroom.

“There’s a river that’s 100 feet below and it looks a little scary, but a woman standing by the entry to the bridge says, ‘Don’t worry, the bridge is built on Sam Altman’s version of the truth.’”

“Would you walk across that bridge? I don’t think many people would,” the lawyer added.

Altman pushed back on Musk’s repeated accusation that OpenAI had improperly transformed a charitable organization, responding during his testimony last week: “It feels difficult to even wrap my head around that framing.”

{Matzav.com}

Federal authorities have arrested a San Diego County man accused of attacking a Jewish individual during a heated anti-Israel protest outside a synagogue in the Pico-Robertson section of Los Angeles, where an event promoting Israeli real estate was taking place.

According to the United States Department of Justice, 28-year-old Zaid Gitesatani of Carlsbad, California, was charged by federal grand jury indictment with one count of committing a hate crime. He was scheduled to appear Thursday afternoon in federal court in Los Angeles.

“The defendant’s conduct, if proven, is a serious violation of the law – every American deserves to live without fear of violence based on who he is or how he worships,” Assistant Attorney General Harmeet K. Dhillon of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division said. “The Justice Department is committed to vigorously prosecuting such crimes of hate and violence.”

Federal prosecutors said the indictment, returned on May 5, stemmed from a June 23, 2024 gathering organized by a company known as “My Home in Israel,” which held an event at Adas Torah Synagogue to market property available for purchase in Israel.

Authorities said several pro-Palestinian organizations publicized demonstrations against the event, including one group that urged supporters to “stand against settler expansion.” Investigators allege Gitesatani traveled to Los Angeles specifically to participate in the protest.

According to prosecutors, a Jewish man identified in court papers only as “Victim A” was walking his dog near the synagogue during the protest when Gitesatani allegedly came up behind him and struck him in the jaw. The victim reportedly suffered pain, swelling and redness from the blow. Investigators said the suspect then blended back into the crowd after the alleged attack.

The indictment further alleges that Gitesatani later uploaded to Instagram a screenshot related to the incident alongside the statement, “Whooped the Zios today and we took their flag,” while also posting photographs of bruises on his knuckles.

Federal prosecutors also cited additional Instagram conversations allegedly sent by Gitesatani in the days afterward, in which he wrote, “I whopped 2 zios,” “whooped,” “I swung good on them,” “It was satisfying,” and “I [sic] hand it [sic] numb from punching him so hard.”

Court documents additionally allege that he shared another image from the confrontation on Instagram with the caption, “The Chosen People sometimes need a good smack to wake up.”

If convicted on the federal hate crime charge, Gitesatani could face up to 10 years behind bars.

Accounts from the June 2024 demonstration said anti-Israel protesters surrounded the synagogue and blocked Jewish attendees from entering. Pro-Israel demonstrators also arrived at the scene, and tensions escalated into physical confrontations involving pushing, shoving and punches between members of both groups.

Authorities also alleged that one anti-Israel protester used bear mace against counterprotesters and an independent journalist covering the scene. Police officers wearing riot gear eventually moved in and arrested one individual accused of carrying a “spiked flag” during the unrest.

Following the clashes, President Joe Biden denounced the violence in a post on X, writing, “I’m appalled by the scenes outside of Adas Torah synagogue in Los Angeles. Intimidating Jewish congregants is dangerous, unconscionable, antisemitic, and un-American.” He added, “Americans have a right to peaceful protest. But blocking access to a house of worship – and engaging in violence – is never acceptable.”

After the incident, then-Attorney General Merrick Garland announced that the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the US Attorney’s Office for the Central District of California had opened a formal investigation into the violence outside the synagogue.

{Matzav.com}

A federal jury on Monday ruled against Elon Musk in his closely watched legal battle over the future of OpenAI, concluding that the lawsuit had been filed after the legal deadline had already passed.

The decision came swiftly, with the nine-person federal jury reaching a unanimous verdict in under two hours of deliberations. Jurors determined that Musk waited too long to bring the case, causing it to fall outside the applicable statute of limitations.

Following the ruling, Musk’s attorney told the court that the legal team intends to preserve its option to challenge the outcome on appeal. The verdict brings an end to a three-week courtroom showdown that drew intense attention across Silicon Valley and the tech industry, with several major figures taking the witness stand.

The trial included testimony from OpenAI chief executive Sam Altman, company president Greg Brockman, Musk himself, Musk adviser and partner Shivon Zillis, OpenAI co-founder Ilya Sutskever, and Satya Nadella, the head of Microsoft.

The outcome spares the artificial intelligence industry from a potentially massive disruption at a pivotal time for the sector. Musk is preparing a public stock offering for SpaceX following its merger with his AI venture, while OpenAI is likewise moving toward its own anticipated IPO.

Years before launching xAI, Musk contributed roughly $38 million to OpenAI and later sued the organization seeking approximately $150 billion in damages, along with a court order reversing the company’s transition to a for-profit structure.

The lawsuit accused Altman, Brockman and OpenAI of abandoning the nonprofit mission on which the organization was founded by creating a for-profit arm that later secured billions in investment funding. The complaint also alleged that Microsoft helped facilitate the arrangement by investing around $13 billion into OpenAI’s commercial operations.

During testimony in the opening week of the trial, Musk repeatedly framed the case in stark terms, telling jurors: “This lawsuit is very simple: It is not OK to steal a charity.”

At another point during the proceedings, evidence showed Musk messaging Altman after one of Microsoft’s investments became public, describing the arrangement as a “bait and switch.”

Altman and the other defendants argued throughout the trial that Musk fully understood — and at times encouraged — OpenAI’s shift toward a profit-driven structure. Attorneys for Altman presented communications suggesting Musk agreed that attracting conventional venture capital investment in exchange for equity was necessary to finance the enormous computing infrastructure needed to compete with companies such as Google.

Brockman also testified about a 2017 gathering at one of Musk’s homes attended by senior OpenAI leadership, including Altman, Murati and Zillis. According to Brockman, it was “clear there was a party there the night before,” with the residence covered in “confetti and cups.”

Brockman said whiskey was served during the gathering and testified that discussions about creating a for-profit entity took place in what he described as a “celebratory” atmosphere.

One attorney who regularly represents large technology firms but was not involved in the litigation said the case appeared to gain momentum for Musk as the trial progressed. The lawyer pointed specifically to Altman’s cross-examination, during which Musk’s legal team aggressively challenged his credibility.

“Musk has more of a case here than previously thought,” said the expert, who attended most of the proceedings. “The first 15 minutes of Altman’s cross-examination were devastating.”

Questions surrounding Altman’s honesty became a major focus for Musk’s attorneys. The legal team relied heavily on testimony from former OpenAI insiders, including ex-board members Tasha McCauley and Helen Toner, as well as former technology chief Mira Murati, all of whom suggested Altman was not always forthcoming.

“My concern was about Sam saying one thing to one person and completely the opposite to another person,” Murati said in taped testimony played before a packed federal courtroom in Oakland, California.

Musk attorney Steven Molo returned to that theme during closing arguments, using a vivid analogy to challenge Altman’s credibility before the jury.

“Imagine that you’re on a hike, and you come upon one of those wooden bridges that you see on a trail and it’s over a gorge,” Molo said inside the federal courtroom.

“There’s a river that’s 100 feet below and it looks a little scary, but a woman standing by the entry to the bridge says, ‘Don’t worry, the bridge is built on Sam Altman’s version of the truth.’”

“Would you walk across that bridge? I don’t think many people would,” the lawyer added.

Altman responded directly to Musk’s repeated accusation that OpenAI had effectively stolen a charitable organization, telling jurors last week: “It feels difficult to even wrap my head around that framing.”

President Trump indicated Monday that negotiations with Iran may be nearing a breaking point, saying he is “not open” to any new concessions after Tehran’s latest response failed to satisfy the White House during ongoing discussions over a possible agreement.

In comments to The NY Post, Trump also issued a vague but pointed warning, suggesting Iran is aware that significant developments could soon unfold.

The president appeared to dismiss Iran’s proposal from Sunday aimed at reviving diplomatic discussions, signaling a tougher stance as tensions continue to rise.

When reminded of his statement Friday that he could consider a 20-year freeze on Iranian uranium enrichment, Trump cut off the idea quickly, saying: “I’m not open to anything right now.”

He declined to elaborate further on the administration’s plans or the current state of discussions.

“I can’t really talk to you about it. Too many things are happening,” he said.

After returning from a fast-paced trip to China, Trump reportedly spent much of the weekend meeting with members of his national security team at his golf club in Virginia to discuss possible next moves regarding Iran. Additional discussions are reportedly scheduled for Tuesday, as several allies pushing for a more aggressive approach — including Sen. Lindsey Graham — continue urging the administration to restart military action if negotiations collapse completely.

Despite the stalled diplomacy, Trump insisted he is not irritated with Tehran, though he stressed that Iranian leaders understand the consequences the United States is capable of imposing.

“I can tell you they want to make a deal more than ever, because they know we’re—what’s going to be happening soon,” Trump said.

Asked about reports from regional sources claiming Iran may be trying to delay both nuclear negotiations and discussions over reopening the Strait of Hormuz, Trump said he was unfamiliar with those claims.

“I’m not hearing anything,” he said. “I can’t talk to you about it.”

Trump added that the high-stakes nature of the talks requires caution and restraint in public comments.

“It’s a negotiation. I don’t want to be stupid.”

A special rischa d’Oraisa gathering took place this week at the home of Rav Dov Landau, as talmidim of the younger division of Yeshivas Heichal Shmuel, led by Rav Avrohom Yeshaya Prober, arrived together with their rabbeim for an uplifting Torah discussion with the Slabodka rosh yeshiva.

The room came alive with energetic Torah debate as the bochurim engaged with the Rosh Yeshiva in spirited back-and-forth learning. Rav Landau challenged the talmidim with questions, and the talmidim responded with enthusiasm and depth.

During the gathering, Rav Landau delivered strong guidance about the proper approach to learning Torah.

“This is a major yesod in learning — to think,” the rosh yeshiva told the young bochurim. “Someone who thinks knows how to learn. Someone who doesn’t think only knows how to shout. A person has to think. Even if someone thought and made a mistake, that’s not terrible. But if he never thought in the first place, what was accomplished? A lamdan is someone who thinks. He can make mistakes. It’s permitted to make mistakes. It is not an avlah to make a mistake. The real avlah is not admitting to the truth.”

At the conclusion of the gathering, Rav Landau again stressed the importance of slow, thoughtful iyun and becoming immersed in Torah.

“Hashem should help that they should learn and delve deeply into learning, to be completely immersed in learning. The less rushed a person is, the healthier it is. Think about everything. And if someone makes a mistake once or twice, that is not terrible. What is terrible is when a person refuses to admit the truth,” he said.

“Learning has to be with immersion, the way a person becomes immersed on the night of the Seder. Completely absorbed. To be fully involved in the learning — that is the essence of learning. To think again and again. Making mistakes is not terrible. The Chazon Ish wrote to someone who did not want to admit the truth: ‘I am full of mistakes — sometimes in Gemara, sometimes in logic — and mistakes do not diminish the honor of the learner.’”

Rav Landau continued by emphasizing that genuine Torah understanding comes through straight thinking and honest pursuit of truth.

“To know how to learn means to think, to analyze, and then to think again. The main thing is what Rav Chaim Volozhiner already said: ‘The earlier generations were praised only for straight reasoning.’ The straighter a person is in his thinking, the greater he is,” the rosh yeshiva said.

“There can be arguments over what is considered straight thinking, but a person must strive for sevara yesharah. Cleverness and sharp ideas are wonderful — but only if they are grounded in deep thought and iyun. One must seek the truth. Sometimes you are right, sometimes the other person is right. The important thing is that the truth is right.”

The rosh yeshiva also urged the bochurim to listen carefully to one another and to their rabbeim.

“You must listen well to what the rabbeim teach you. Even when arguing with another person in learning, hear what the other person is saying. ‘Ve’ahavta l’rei’acha kamocha’ is not a song. It is a major rule in Torah learning,” he said.

He pointed to Rav Akiva Eiger as an example of a gadol who readily admitted when another talmid chochom was correct.

“How many times did Reb Akiva Eiger admit that the other side was right? The main thing is seeking truth,” Rav Landau said. “Hashem should help us learn Torah with a search for truth and succeed in that.”

Rav Landau also encouraged the talmidim to remain focused on Torah despite outside distractions.

“Other things are hevel havolim,” he declared. “We know that the truth is Torah. That is everything. That is our essence. Learn, succeed, and grow in Torah learning, in Yiras Shomayim, in proper behavior, in listening to your rabbeim and honoring them.”

Toward the end of the gathering, Rav Avrohom Yeshaya Prober shared a well-known story about Rav Boruch Ber Leibowitz. He recounted that Rav Boruch Ber once answered a question immediately, then retracted the answer, thought deeply about it, and afterward repeated the exact same answer — explaining that now it was an answer that came through genuine thought.

Rav Landau reacted warmly, saying, “Tanya nami hachi — Reb Boruch Ber says the same thing. Extraordinary. A person has to think.”

The rosh yeshiva concluded with heartfelt brachos for the talmidim as they prepare for entrance exams to major yeshivos.

“All yeshivos are good,” he told them. “But each person needs the place that fits him. One place fits this person, another place fits someone else. Hashem should help that each person should find the place suited for him. Kol tuv to everyone — rabbanan and talmideihem.”

{Matzav.com}

[COMMUNICATED]

Dear Community Members,

We are reaching out on behalf of a family in our Lakewood community who is facing an urgent crisis that requires immediate assistance.

A local family is currently going through an eviction (in three days from now!) while simultaneously dealing with serious medical challenges. The father is experiencing health issues that have affected the family’s ability to maintain stability during this difficult time. They are in immediate need of approximately $13,000 to prevent displacement from their home.

Out of respect for the family’s dignity, we are not sharing all details publicly, but those who know the situation understand this is a genuine emergency involving real people in our community who need our help right now.

This is more than just a financial crisis, it’s about keeping a family together and housed during one of the most vulnerable moments of their lives. No family should face homelessness while also managing serious health concerns.

How You Can Help:

• Financial contributions of any amount will make a direct difference

• Share this appeal with others who might be able to help

Time is critical. This family needs our help now.

For those wishing to contribute or learn more about how to help, please visit: https://thechesedfund.com/oht/save-a-mishpacha-from-eviction

Please see the letter of support from the Roshei Yeshiva below.

May we all be blessed with health, success, and the ability to help one another in times of need.

Your fellow community members 

During his weekly shiur on Motzaei Shabbos, Rav Yitzchak Yosef spoke at length about the holiness of Shavuos night and the importance of remaining awake to learn Torah throughout the night with focus and dedication. The rav urged the public to treasure every moment of the night and avoid wasting time with unnecessary interruptions or conversation.

Drawing from the words of Chazal and the introduction to the Zohar, Rav Yitzchak explained the tremendous greatness of Leil Shavuos. According to the Zohar, the early chassidim would remain awake throughout the night immersed in Torah study with joy and enthusiasm.

“Anyone who learns Torah on this night is written and recorded in the Book of Remembrance before Hashem, and Hakadosh Boruch Hu Himself blesses them with seventy blessings and crowns from the upper world,” the rav said. He added with a smile, “There is no need to travel to rebbes or mekubalim — the Ribbono Shel Olam Himself blesses the person who learns.”

The rav also cited the Pirkei D’Rabbi Eliezer, which explains that learning throughout Shavuos night serves as a rectification for Klal Yisroel having overslept on the night before Mattan Torah, requiring thunder and lightning to awaken them. Rav Yitzchak encouraged listeners — especially yeshiva bochurim — to rest properly on Erev Shavuos so they could arrive fully alert and spend the night learning seriously without bitul Torah.

The Rishon Letzion then discussed the longstanding debate among the poskim regarding the preferred form of learning on Shavuos night. On one side stand the Chok Yaakov and the Vilna Gaon, who favored intensive study of Gemara and Shulchan Aruch over reciting the traditional Tikkun Leil Shavuos. On the other side are the Chida and the mekubalim, who emphasized reading the established tikkun based on the teachings of the Arizal.

Rav Yitzchak suggested a practical compromise that he said was followed in his yeshiva and approved by his father, Rav Ovadia Yosef.

According to that arrangement, the first half of the night — from after the Yom Tov meal until midnight — should be devoted to serious Gemara and halacha learning while a person’s mind is strongest and sharpest. The second half of the night — from midnight until sunrise — should then be dedicated to reciting the traditional tikkun together with a group, which helps keep people awake and energized.

The rav also clarified that women are completely exempt from both Sefiras HaOmer and the custom of reciting the tikkun on Shavuos night, adding that there is no reason for women to force themselves to remain awake all night.

During the shiur, Rav Yitzchak also addressed a practical halachic question involving tea and coffee consumed during the overnight learning session. Referring to a ruling that appears in Chazon Ovadia, he noted that the accepted ruling had been that a person who leaves to use the restroom in the middle of drinking tea or coffee must recite a new shehakol upon returning, since the interruption was viewed as a complete break.

However, Rav Yitzchak revealed that during one of his private learning sessions with his father, he pointed out a Ramban in Maseches Pesachim that appears to indicate clearly that using the restroom does not constitute an interruption regarding eating or drinking.

“My father read the Ramban twice, looked at me, and said: ‘Correct, you are right. Tell them that you showed me the Ramban and I agree with you,’” Rav Yitzchak recalled emotionally.

As a result, he ruled that someone who leaves באמצע drinking a cup of tea or coffee and later returns to continue drinking from the same cup does not make a new bracha, since using the restroom is not considered a halachic interruption for that purpose.

The rav also expanded on the halachos of changing rooms during a bread meal and the principle of safek brachos lehakel. He explained that although the Shulchan Aruch, Rif, and Rambam maintain that moving from one room to another during a meal can require a new hamotzi, the Rema and Tosafos disagree.

Rav Yitzchak ruled that despite the general practice of following Maran, because there is uncertainty in the matter, the rule of safek brachos lehakel applies and one should not make a new bracha after changing rooms.

He further rejected the extreme interpretation that eating without a bracha in cases of uncertainty constitutes “misappropriating holy property,” explaining in the name of the Rivash that such expressions were intended only to emphasize the seriousness of the matter. In practical halacha, he said, whenever doubt exists, the Torah’s rule is to refrain from making an unnecessary bracha.

Israeli police arrested five suspects Sunday in connection with an alleged large-scale fraud operation that investigators say targeted elderly victims, banks, credit card companies, and communication providers in a scheme estimated at roughly 10 million shekels.

The arrests were carried out in a joint operation involving the Tel Aviv District Fraud Unit together with Border Police forces operating in the Tel Aviv area. According to investigators, the suspects are believed to have committed serious fraud offenses, conspiracy, identity theft, burglary, and forgery on a massive scale.

Police say the investigation, which had been conducted covertly for several months, uncovered an elaborate operation focused primarily on vulnerable elderly individuals — including both living victims and deceased individuals whose identities were allegedly exploited by the suspects.

According to the allegations, members of the network broke into victims’ homes, impersonated them, and carried out financial transactions in their names, at times using the personal information of people who had already passed away.

The case reportedly began after complaints were filed by relatives of the victims as well as representatives of banks and credit card companies. Investigators gathered evidence from multiple incidents across the country, eventually connecting the separate cases and identifying the alleged members of the operation.

After the investigation moved into its overt phase, police raided homes in Hadera and Ashdod early Sunday morning. During the operation, officers conducted searches and detained five suspects for questioning, including two men in their 50s, two suspects in their 30s, and a 15-year-old minor.

All of the suspects were transferred for interrogation, and police said they are expected to be brought Monday before the Tel Aviv Magistrate’s Court for hearings on extending their detention as the investigation continues.

{Matzav.com}

The American-backed regional alliance aimed at countering Iran is showing signs of internal tension following a dispute between Israel and the United Arab Emirates over a reported meeting involving Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu, according to a Middle East analyst, as concerns mounted Sunday over the possibility of renewed conflict with Tehran.

The controversy began on May 13, when Netanyahu’s office announced that the Israeli leader had held what it described as a “historic breakthrough” meeting with UAE President Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan during a “secret visit” to the city of Al Ain near the Omani border.

Shortly afterward, the UAE Foreign Ministry publicly rejected the Israeli announcement.

The ministry stated, “Its relations with Israel are public and were established within the framework of the well-known and publicly declared Abraham Accords. These relations are not based on secrecy or clandestine arrangements.”

The UAE added, “Therefore, any claims regarding undisclosed visits or arrangements are baseless unless issued by the relevant official authorities in the UAE.”

Middle East Institute analyst Natan Sachs told Fox News Digital that the fallout could carry significant consequences.

“The stakes are high,” Sachs said.

“I imagine the Israelis are working overtime to mend relations with the UAE, but it is too early to tell,” he added.

President Donald Trump spoke Sunday with Netanyahu as tensions involving Iran continued to intensify, with the Israeli premier declaring that Israel was “prepared for every scenario.”

According to the Times of Israel, the two leaders discussed the possibility of renewed military action against Iran as well as Trump’s recent trip to China.

Sachs, who serves as a senior fellow at the Middle East Institute, said the Israeli announcement appeared to create unnecessary diplomatic complications for the Emiratis.

“This seems like a diplomatic blunder because it embarrasses the UAE,” he said.

“This was an odd move to make since the UAE has been a close partner of Israel, even during this war,” Sachs continued.

“Either Netanyahu didn’t think, or he was thinking about something else — domestic politics. It would not be the first time he did that.”

Sachs also suggested that the leak itself may have damaged trust between the two countries.

“To the degree that the Emirati anger is genuine, it would have meant working to preserve trust with their Gulf Arab ally,” he said.

“I would also not rule out Emirati anger at the leak itself, which could be seen as a break of trust — something very important to the Emirati leadership.”

The Abraham Accords, arranged by the United States in 2020, reshaped diplomatic ties across the region by establishing formal relations between Israel and the UAE, Bahrain, Morocco, and Sudan.

Since then, cooperation on security matters has grown considerably due to shared fears regarding Iran’s military capabilities and regional ambitions.

That partnership came under pressure after Iran reportedly targeted UAE military and energy sites during Operation Epic Fury.

According to U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee, Israel deployed Iron Dome defense systems and personnel to assist the UAE. Emirati officials confirmed Sunday that three drones approaching from the west had been intercepted.

“The UAE received much of the fire from Iran. It is the most vulnerable to Iranian short-range missiles, which are more plentiful and cheaper than the medium-range missiles fired at Israel,” Sachs explained.

“While short-range missiles can be intercepted, Iran has many more of them. The UAE took the most hits, yet it stood out by sticking most clearly to its strategy of open partnership with Israel.”

“But the public disclosure that Netanyahu himself visited may have just been seen as a step too far,” Sachs added.

{Matzav.com}