Feed aggregator

New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani acknowledged that his campaign pledge to make buses free citywide will not be implemented this year, marking a significant shift from one of the central promises of his run for office.

Instead, the mayor said he is now focusing on reviving a scaled-down version of a fare-free bus pilot program, confirming that New Yorkers will not see the full rollout of no-cost bus service in the immediate future.

Despite the change in timeline, Mamdani maintained that he remains committed to the broader goal. “We’re encouraged by the conversations we’re having with the governor and legislative leaders to take action on that in 2026 as a first step,” he said.

He added, “Both legislative houses included language within their one-house budget proposals in support of bringing back a free bus pilot program. That is something that we are encouraged by, and it continues to be part of budget negotiations.”

Governor Kathy Hochul and state lawmakers are currently in the midst of budget talks, where the idea of reinstating a limited free bus program is under discussion, according to state Sen. Michael Gianaris.

Gianaris and Mamdani, then a Queens assemblyman, previously worked together in 2023 to launch a pilot program offering free bus service in parts of Queens as part of that year’s state budget.

The program’s success led Mamdani to advocate for expanding the concept across all five boroughs the following year.

However, efforts to broaden the initiative were halted after a dispute with Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie, who removed the proposal from the budget following disagreements over an unrelated housing issue, according to sources.

Mamdani later ran for mayor in 2025, highlighting the Queens pilot as a model and pushing for a citywide expansion of fare-free buses under the MTA.

Gianaris said the current proposal under consideration would provide free service on three bus routes in each borough at an estimated cost of $45 million.

The idea has received mixed reactions in Albany, with some skepticism from state leaders, including Hochul, who had expressed reservations about the plan even before Mamdani took office.

Metropolitan Transportation Authority CEO Janno Lieber has also criticized the proposal, suggesting it is underdeveloped and could end up costing significantly more than projected.

It remains uncertain whether even a limited version of the program will be included in the state’s $263 billion budget, which is already past its deadline.

Sources indicated that a narrower pilot similar to the earlier Queens program could still be included in the final agreement, despite Hochul’s reluctance to commit additional funding after allocating $1.5 billion to support New York City over the next two years.

Speaking at a separate news conference in Manhattan, Hochul said that housing initiatives and proposed auto insurance reforms are taking priority in the budget discussions over transit changes.

“We’re working on those right now,” she said, adding, “Certainly we have had conversations on some accommodation on the cost of buses.”

MTA officials declined to comment directly, referring inquiries to the governor’s office, which did not respond.

Mamdani’s revised stance on free buses is the latest in a series of policy adjustments during his early months in office.

Last month, he appointed a Deputy Mayor of Community Safety, opting to establish a smaller agency rather than moving forward with his earlier proposal to overhaul how the city handles mental health emergency calls through a new department.

A City Hall spokesperson said the administration remains committed to the long-term goal. “Mayor Mamdani is committed to delivering fast and free buses by the time he leaves office, full stop,” the representative said. “His First Deputy Mayor is in active discussions with the Governor’s office regarding fare free buses. In the meantime, the Mamdani administration will continue to work with our partners at the state and local level to make commutes faster and our transit system more affordable for all New Yorkers.”

A wave of drone attacks struck multiple countries across the region Thursday night, with explosions reported in Dubai and strikes targeting infrastructure in Kuwait and Saudi Arabia.

According to reports from the Iraqi “Sabereen” channel, which is affiliated with pro-Iranian militias, explosions in Dubai were the result of a drone attack on U.S. targets in the United Arab Emirates. At the same time, there were reports that air defense systems were activated in several locations inside Iran.

Kuwait also confirmed that it was under drone attack, stating that its air defense systems had been deployed. While authorities have not officially blamed any party, Iran has carried out multiple attacks on Kuwait during the course of the war.

In a statement, the Kuwaiti military said: “Air defense systems are dealing with hostile drone attacks that penetrated the country’s airspace and struck several vital infrastructures.”

Meanwhile, a Saudi Energy Ministry official told the kingdom’s state news agency that a number of oil and gas facilities, refineries, petrochemical plants, and power stations were targeted in repeated attacks attributed to Iran. The strikes hit areas around the capital Riyadh, eastern regions of the country, and the port city of Yanbu on the Red Sea.

The official also confirmed that an oil pipeline connecting production fields to the port of Yanbu was struck, resulting in a loss of approximately 700,000 barrels of exports per day. In addition, two oil wells were damaged, reducing output by about 600,000 barrels per day.

As Israel prepares to mark Holocaust Remembrance Day alongside the 80th anniversary of the Nuremberg Trials, new figures show that 109,286 Holocaust survivors and related groups are currently living in Israel, with an average age of 88.

Holocaust Remembrance Day this year is being observed against the backdrop of Operation “Shaagas HaAri,” while commemorations around the world are marking eight decades since the Nuremberg Trials, which laid the groundwork for justice following the atrocities of the Holocaust.

Ahead of the memorial day, the Authority for the Rights of Holocaust Survivors in the Prime Minister’s Office released updated data on the final generation that experienced the Holocaust firsthand. The total includes Holocaust survivors, refugees, victims of antisemitic persecution during World War II, and those who suffered disabilities as a result of the war against the Nazis.

This group represents about 34% of all individuals recognized by the authority since its establishment in the 1950s, with a total of 322,997 people acknowledged over the years. More than 50 Holocaust survivors were recently impacted by missile attacks from Iran and Lebanon and were evacuated to hotels or to stay with family members.

The authority currently provides services to three main groups: Holocaust survivors (36,752 individuals) who directly endured the horrors of the Holocaust; Holocaust refugees (38,934 individuals), primarily from the former Soviet Union who immigrated in the 1990s; and victims of antisemitic persecution during World War II (33,521 individuals). Among the latter group are 21,476 people from Morocco and Algeria who faced discrimination and restrictions under the Vichy regime, and 12,045 individuals from Iraq who experienced the Farhud riots in Baghdad.

Additional groups assisted by the authority include 79 individuals recognized as war-disabled due to injuries sustained while fighting the Nazis, whether as part of Allied forces or resistance groups such as the partisans. The authority also supports widows and widowers of Holocaust survivors and war-disabled individuals, providing monthly stipends; currently, 16,190 such beneficiaries receive these payments.

Demographically, approximately 62% of Holocaust survivors in Israel are women (67,555), while about 38% are men (41,652). The proportion of women increases with age, accounting for about 60% of those in their 80s, 65% in their 90s, and roughly 75% among those over 100.

Roughly 70% of survivors are in their 80s, about 29% are in their 90s, and around 1% are over the age of 100. The average age stands at approximately 88, with the youngest group—those aged 80—numbering 775 individuals, and the oldest group—those aged 105—numbering 48.

About 52% of survivors are widowed, while approximately 35% are married. Marriage rates are higher among men than women, at about 69% compared to 31%, while widowhood is more common among women, accounting for 80% compared to 20% among men.

In terms of country of birth, 40,657 were born in the former Soviet Union (about 37%), 18,957 in Morocco (about 17%), 12,045 in Iraq (about 11%), 11,817 in Romania (about 11%), 5,083 in Poland (about 5%), 4,598 in Tunisia (about 4%), 2,987 in Bulgaria (about 3%), 2,780 in Libya (about 2.5%), 2,542 in Algeria (about 2%), and 1,468 in France (about 1%).

Some 96% immigrated to Israel after the establishment of the state. About 30% arrived during the major immigration wave between 1948 and 1951, and roughly 26% came during the 1990s. Since the beginning of this year, three new immigrants in their 80s have arrived in Israel.

The cities with the largest populations of Holocaust survivors include Haifa (7,244), Yerushalayim (6,969), Tel Aviv (5,766), Ashdod (5,513), Netanya (5,452), Beersheva (4,494), Petach Tikva (4,483), Rishon Letzion (4,429), Bat Yam (3,692), and Cholon (3,444).

Regarding health status, about 73% of survivors are classified as requiring nursing care at varying levels. Among those, approximately 75% receive additional support—either nine extra weekly caregiving hours or increased monthly payments—due to higher levels of dependency.

Ronit Rozin, head of the Authority for the Rights of Holocaust Survivors, said: “The rising antisemitism and the threats to the State of Israel in these days remind us every day of the danger that hatred of Jews led to in the past. The authority is committed to caring for Holocaust survivors here and now, and to ensuring that the story of their revival and legacy of hope will never be forgotten and will continue to guide us as a state and as a society.”

House Republicans on Thursday stopped Democrats from advancing a measure aimed at ending U.S. military operations against Iran, continuing to resist efforts to place limits on President Donald Trump’s war powers.

Rep. Chris Smith of New Jersey presided over a brief “pro forma” session and adjourned it before Democrats were able to attempt passage of the resolution through unanimous consent.

In recent months, Democrats in both chambers of Congress have repeatedly tried—and failed—to pass war powers resolutions that would require Trump to obtain legislative approval before initiating military action, including in situations involving Venezuela and Iran.

Concern among Democrats intensified after Trump warned earlier in the week that “a whole civilization will die,” prompting dozens of lawmakers to call for his removal from office. The 1949 Geneva Conventions on humanitarian conduct in war prohibit attacks on sites considered essential for civilians.

“Threatening genocide is not a negotiating tactic,” Rep. Sara Jacobs, D-Calif., said at a press conference outside the Capitol following the pro forma session, which was held while Congress is out of Washington during a two-week Easter recess.

Trump announced Tuesday that he had agreed to a ceasefire in the U.S.-Israel conflict with Iran, doing so less than two hours before a deadline he had set for Tehran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz or face severe strikes on its civilian infrastructure.

The White House has defended Trump’s actions, saying they are lawful and fall within his authority as commander-in-chief to order limited military operations to protect the United States.

Iran has maintained that its nuclear program is peaceful. The Trump administration has described the conflict as a decisive success, even as the top U.S. military officer said American forces remain ready to resume fighting if needed.

Republicans, who hold narrow majorities in both the House and Senate, have largely united behind Trump and backed his policies.

While the U.S. Constitution gives Congress the authority to declare war, that requirement does not apply to short-term military actions or situations involving an immediate threat to the country.

Russian President Vladimir Putin on Thursday declared a temporary halt in fighting in Ukraine to mark Orthodox Easter, stating that Russian forces would pause combat operations from Saturday afternoon through the end of Sunday and calling on Kyiv to adopt a similar approach.

According to a Kremlin statement, “In connection with the approaching holiday of Orthodox Easter, a ceasefire is declared from 1600 on 11th April to the end of the day of 12th April.”

The statement added, “We proceed on the basis that the Ukrainian side will follow the example of the Russian Federation.”

The directive was transmitted through Russia’s military command structure, with Defense Minister Andrei Belousov instructing Chief of the General Staff Valery Gerasimov “to stop for this period military action in all directions,” while also emphasizing that Russian forces should remain prepared “to eliminate all possible provocations by the enemy as well as any aggressive actions.”

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy responded early Friday, indicating that Ukraine would act in line with the proposed Easter truce.

“Ukraine has repeatedly stated that we are ready for reciprocal steps. We proposed a ceasefire during the Easter holiday this year and will act accordingly,” Zelenskyy said on Telegram after the Kremlin ordered troops to observe a 32-hour ceasefire.

He added, “People need an Easter without threats and a real move towards peace, and Russia has a chance not to return to attacks even after Easter.”

The announcement comes as the war between Russia and Ukraine, which began with Moscow’s full-scale invasion in February 2022, continues into its fifth year. Similar ceasefire efforts during religious holidays in the past have largely broken down, with both sides accusing one another of violating the terms.

Israeli Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu expressed frustration over how the results of Operation Shaagas HaAri are being presented to the public, saying the achievements are not being clearly communicated.

During a meeting of the security cabinet, Netanyahu turned to IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir and urged him to improve the military’s public messaging about the operation. “The complex matters need to be simplified,” he said, emphasizing that the public is having difficulty understanding the depth of the accomplishments.

According to sources who were present, other ministers joined in the criticism and called on the IDF to present the results of the operation in a clearer and more organized manner.

Amid these concerns, a special meeting is scheduled for next week with the participation of the chief of staff, IDF spokesperson Brig. Gen. Effie Defrin, and Defense Minister Israel Katz. The meeting is expected to focus on forming a unified messaging strategy and improving how the operation’s achievements are conveyed to the public.

Rep. Nicole Malliotakis sharply criticized New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s proposed Preliminary Citywide Racial Equity Plan on Thursday, warning that the initiative is unconstitutional, deeply divisive, and likely to face significant resistance.

During an appearance on the Newsmax program “Wake Up America,” Malliotakis argued that the proposal reflects what she views as a consistent pattern of race-focused policymaking rooted in socialist ideology.

“Obviously, with everything with Mamdani, it’s always about socialism,” she said. “It’s always pitting people against each other based on race. And it’s awful, actually.”

She contended that the plan—which seeks to incorporate race-based benchmarks into decisions on city spending, policy direction, and allocation of resources in sectors such as housing, education, and economic growth—resembles historical strategies used to divide communities and strengthen political control.

“Look, this is what communists do, what socialists do,” she said. “They always pit people against each other, whether it’s class warfare or racial warfare, dividing the community.”

Malliotakis emphasized her belief that the proposal runs counter to constitutional protections.

“We’re going to push back on this,” she said. “Obviously, it’s unconstitutional.”

“We’ve seen the Democrats do this,” Malliotakis added. “They are constantly using race to force their socialist agenda.”

She cited ongoing political disputes, including controversies over voter identification requirements and redistricting efforts, as part of what she described as a broader push to inject race into public policy decisions.

“Whether it’s denying voter ID for the American people, whether it’s trying to redraw lines like they tried to do … based on race, now trying to tax people based on race,” Malliotakis said. “I mean, you can’t get any more unconstitutional and un-American than that.”

The congresswoman also argued that such policies are contributing to economic strain in New York City and accelerating the departure of residents.

“The bottom line here is not just minorities are being forced out of our city. It is everybody that’s in the middle class, working class,” Malliotakis said. “They’re being pushed out of our city regardless of race, because of these socialist policies and this high taxation.”

Malliotakis said she intends to ensure that the public is made aware of the plan and its implications.

“We’re going to make sure the public knows about it,” she said.

She further suggested that action by the Justice Department under President Donald Trump could be appropriate if the city moves ahead with the proposal.

“If DOJ needs to take action, if they want to go down this unconstitutional route, I believe they should,” Malliotakis said.

President Donald Trump has explored the possibility of reducing the American military presence in Europe, voicing frustration over NATO allies’ lack of support in securing the Strait of Hormuz and stalled efforts related to Greenland, a senior White House official told Reuters on Thursday.

According to the official, no formal decision has been reached, and the Pentagon has not been instructed to begin drafting specific plans for a troop withdrawal. The source spoke on condition of anonymity due to the sensitivity of internal discussions.

Even so, the fact that such talks are taking place highlights a deepening strain between Washington and its European NATO partners. It also indicates that Wednesday’s White House meeting between Trump and NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte did little to ease tensions, which are now being described as the most serious since the alliance was established in 1949.

The United States currently maintains a force of over 80,000 troops across Europe, continuing a decades-long role as a cornerstone of the continent’s security since World War II. Of those forces, more than 30,000 are based in Germany, with additional large deployments in Italy, the United Kingdom, and Spain.

NATO has not issued an immediate response to requests for comment regarding the reported discussions.

The White House official did not provide details on which countries could be affected or how many troops might ultimately be withdrawn if Trump moves ahead with the idea.

Trump’s relationship with NATO has long been marked by friction, as he has repeatedly criticized European nations for failing to meet defense spending commitments. However, the past three months have seen a particularly sharp escalation in tensions.

In January, Trump reignited controversy by again raising the prospect of annexing Greenland, a self-governing territory of Denmark, sparking backlash across the Atlantic.

Since the outbreak of war with Iran on February 28, Trump has also expressed strong dissatisfaction that NATO members have not stepped forward to help reopen the Strait of Hormuz, a critical artery for global energy shipments that has remained largely shut despite this week’s fragile ceasefire.

NATO diplomats have said Washington has not clearly communicated whether it expects any operation in the Strait of Hormuz to take place during the conflict or after it ends. They have also noted that the United States has not outlined what specific roles or capabilities it expects from individual alliance members.

A report in The Wall Street Journal on Wednesday indicated that senior officials had discussed relocating American troops within Europe, potentially moving them away from countries whose leaders have criticized the U.S.-Israeli campaign against Iran and toward nations that have shown stronger support.

However, the White House official told Reuters that Trump’s current focus is on bringing troops back to the United States rather than redeploying them to other European countries.

President Donald Trump said Thursday that Iran must not impose charges on vessels passing through the Strait of Hormuz, as shipping activity remains sharply reduced following the outbreak of war and the waterway’s effective closure.

In a post on Truth Social, Trump addressed reports that Tehran may be seeking to collect fees from tankers navigating the critical passage. “There are reports that Iran is charging fees to tankers going through the Hormuz Strait,” Trump wrote.

He followed with a direct warning, stating, “They better not be and, if they are, they better stop now.”

Speculation has grown in recent days that Iran is considering introducing tolls for ships using the strait, a move that has been firmly rejected by Western officials who oppose paying for passage.

According to a report published Wednesday by the Financial Times, an Iranian official indicated that Tehran intends to require payment in cryptocurrency from ships in order to maintain its grip on the strait during a temporary two-week ceasefire with the United States.

In another message posted Thursday, Trump hinted at developments in global energy flow but did not provide details, writing, “you’ll see Oil start flowing, with or without the help of Iran.”

Earlier this week, Trump declared a ceasefire with Iran, following prior threats in which he warned of catastrophic consequences for the country.

Despite the ceasefire, maritime movement through the Strait of Hormuz remained at less than 10% of typical levels on Thursday. Reuters reported that Iran has continued to assert control over the area, instructing ships to remain within its territorial waters as they transit the route.

Fresh doubts about the durability of the newly arranged ceasefire have emerged as Iran signals it does not intend to fully comply with the agreement, heightening concerns over stability in one of the world’s most vital energy routes.

The truce, which took effect Wednesday after talks spearheaded by President Donald Trump, was meant to calm weeks of hostilities and allow maritime traffic through the Strait of Hormuz to return to normal.

Trump had underscored that the deal would restore “free trade across the Strait of Hormuz,” presenting it as a move to stabilize international supply chains.

Yet as the ceasefire went into effect, Tehran appeared to be adjusting its terms to suit its own interests rather than honoring the intent of the agreement.

Officials involved in mediation efforts, along with shipping experts, say Iran has made clear it will only permit a restricted number of vessels to transit the strait each day.

On Wednesday, just 12 cargo tankers were allowed to pass through the narrow waterway.

That figure stands in stark contrast to conditions before the conflict, when more than 100 ships could move through the corridor daily without obstruction.

These limitations have triggered serious concern in global energy markets, which rely heavily on uninterrupted shipments of oil and liquefied natural gas through the region.

Adding to the tension, Iran is reportedly imposing charges on ships seeking passage, effectively converting the international waterway into a tightly controlled and revenue-generating bottleneck.

Those fees, which can climb as high as $2 million for large oil carriers, are reportedly arranged ahead of time and paid using alternative methods such as Chinese yuan or cryptocurrency.

International observers have criticized the move, arguing that it violates long-established maritime rules that guarantee freedom of navigation.

Under widely accepted international conventions governing waterways, nations are not allowed to levy fees for transit through natural chokepoints like the Strait of Hormuz.

As a result, Iran’s conduct is being viewed not only as a violation of the ceasefire but also as a broader challenge to global legal standards.

Despite public messaging suggesting a willingness to pursue calm, Tehran appears to be using the pause in fighting to deepen its control over the strait.

Iran’s Revolutionary Guard has assumed a leading role in regulating maritime traffic, requiring ships to coordinate their passage directly with its naval units.

Broadcast warnings directed at vessels in the area have reinforced the risks, with Iranian forces cautioning that ships attempting to pass without approval could be targeted.

Only a small number of vessels made it through on the first full day of the ceasefire, marking one of the lowest levels of traffic seen in recent weeks.

The reduced volume has effectively prolonged the disruption caused by the conflict, preventing a meaningful return to normal commercial activity.

Although the ceasefire remains in effect on paper, conditions on the ground indicate that free navigation is still severely limited, with Iran dictating access and pricing.

Oil-producing nations in the Gulf have voiced strong objections to any arrangement that requires payments to Tehran, warning that such a system could establish a dangerous precedent.

They argue that allowing these practices would legitimize economic pressure tactics and erode the rules-based global order.

Analysts say Iran’s approach reflects an evolving strategy, using its geographic position to exert influence rather than relying solely on military force.

By controlling the strait, Tehran gains immediate leverage over global markets, particularly the pricing and flow of oil.

This influence is significant given that roughly 20% of the world’s oil supply passes through the narrow channel.

Even limited disruptions can cause sharp price swings, with far-reaching consequences for economies worldwide.

Shipping firms are proceeding cautiously, wary of resuming normal operations amid uncertainty about enforcement and safety conditions.

Many companies are holding vessels back, waiting for clearer direction before committing to regular transit schedules.

U.S. officials have acknowledged the complications arising from Iran’s actions, with Secretary of State Marco Rubio warning that tolls would be both illegal and dangerous.

He stressed that stopping such measures would likely require a coordinated international effort, especially from nations that rely heavily on the strait.

At the same time, the United States has not yet laid out a specific plan for enforcing compliance.

For now, the ceasefire remains nominally in place, but questions about its effectiveness continue to grow.

As long as restrictions and fees remain, the agreement falls short of delivering the open and secure passage it promised.

With Vice President JD Vance scheduled to hold direct talks with Iranian officials in Islamabad on Friday, the coming days are expected to be decisive in determining whether diplomacy can restore genuine freedom of navigation or whether tensions will escalate once again.

Rom Braslavski, a survivor of Hamas captivity, said he has been subjected to curses and threats after sharing a personal story about helping Arab municipal workers near his home, sparking a heated public debate online.

In a post published Thursday, Braslavski described an encounter that took place earlier in the day and said he has since faced backlash. “They’re attacking me with curses and threats just because I shared something from the heart,” he wrote.

According to Braslavski, the morning began with the sound of cleaning and gardening work outside his home. At around 9 a.m., he noticed older Arab municipal workers continuing their labor throughout the day and decided, on his own initiative, to approach them. “Something in my instinct was to feel compassion for an older person working so hard,” he wrote.

He said he went into a nearby store to buy a few items and chose to purchase cans of soda and cigarettes for the workers. He then approached them and spoke in Arabic. “They were in shock, they didn’t understand why I bought for them, and how I speak such good Arabic,” he recalled, noting that his wearing a kippah while offering help added to their surprise.

“The looks on their faces—that I’m wearing a kippah, not hating them, and on the contrary wanting to help—were total shock,” he added.

In his post, Braslavski raised broader questions about the state of society, writing: “Why has helping another person become something unusual and out of the ordinary? Why would an older Arab be shocked that a young Jewish man cares for him? Have we become a society with that much hatred between Arabs and Jews?”

He also reflected on his own past, including his experience being kidnapped, but said that should not erase basic humanity. “I was kidnapped by Arabs. Am I in love with them? No. But we must leave room for humanity within all this chaos that we live in,” he wrote.

Braslavski emphasized that he did not seek attention for his actions. “I didn’t tell them who I am, I didn’t take a picture with them. I gave them the can, wished them peace, and left.”

Despite that, he said that once the story became public, he was met with harsh reactions online, including insults and threats. “I did nothing wrong,” he wrote in a follow-up post, expressing frustration over the response.

He concluded with a message directed at both communities: “I wish for Jews to start being humane toward Jews first. And for Arabs—not to see Jews as their enemy. Have a good Thursday.”

The Trump administration is preparing to implement a new system that would automatically register eligible men for the military draft beginning in December, a move aimed at simplifying the process should conscription be reinstated for the first time in more than five decades.

Under the proposal, the Selective Service System would directly enroll “every male citizen of the United States” between the ages of 18 and 25 into its database, replacing the current requirement that individuals sign up on their own.

Although the United States has not used a draft since 1973 during the Vietnam War, the potential for a prolonged conflict with Iran has raised concerns that conscription could return, prompting the policy shift.

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt addressed the issue last month, telling reporters that a draft is “not part of the current plan” but emphasized that Trump “wisely keeps his options on the table.”

“There’s no greater priority or responsibility to this president than, of course, protecting the American people and protecting our troops,” she said.

Officials say the change is intended to make registration more efficient. However, reinstating an active draft would still require Congress to revise the Military Selective Service Act to give the president authority to draft civilians during a national emergency.

Federal law already requires all male U.S. citizens between 18 and 25 to register with the Selective Service System, which maintains a list of individuals eligible for potential military service.

The requirement also applies to male immigrants, including those without legal status and refugees, as well as transgender individuals who were born male, dual citizens, Americans living abroad, and individuals with disabilities.

Women are currently excluded from registration under existing law, which only authorizes the enrollment of “male persons.”

However, the Selective Service System has indicated it “is prepared to expand registration” if Congress enacts legislation that would include women in mandatory service.

Certain groups are exempt from registering, including those already serving on active duty, some individuals with disabilities, and those who are incarcerated. Men who previously served but were discharged before turning 26 must still register.

Individuals who claim conscientious objection are still required to register.

Participation in the system has declined in recent years, partly due to the removal of draft registration from federal student loan applications in 2022, according to reports.

Failure to register remains a felony offense.

Those who do not comply can face fines of up to $250,000 or up to five years in prison, and may also lose access to student loans, government employment at all levels, and U.S. citizenship if they are immigrants.

Men are expected to register within 30 days of turning 18, though late registration is accepted until age 26.

If a draft is activated, those registered would be entered into a lottery system, where birthdays are randomly selected to determine the order of induction.

Individuals turning 20 in the year of the lottery would be called first, followed by those aged 21 through 25, then 19-year-olds, and finally those who are 18-and-a-half.

Those selected would be able to request deferments, postponements, or exemptions before reporting to a Military Entrance Processing Station for physical, mental, and moral evaluations.

After completing the process, they would either be inducted into military service or released.

Congress approved automatic draft registration last December as part of the 2026 National Defense Authorization Act, a key annual measure that funds military operations and personnel.

Currently, 46 states and territories already have systems in place that automatically register eligible men when they apply for driver’s licenses or identification cards.

The Selective Service System submitted its proposed “automatic registration” rule to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs on March 30.

According to the agency, the change will result “in a streamlined registration process and corresponding workforce realignment.”

Deep sorrow descended on Beit She’an Thursday as hundreds gathered to accompany Sergeant First Class Tuvia Lipschitz Hy”d, a Golani Brigade soldier who was killed in battle in southern Lebanon on Erev Yom Tov, to his final resting place.

Family members, friends, and fellow soldiers came in large numbers to pay their last respects and escort him on his final journey at the city’s cemetery.

His mother, Shadmit Hodaya, delivered a tearful hesped at the fresh kever, saying: “Tovi, we walked with you the entire way. We tried to teach values and good middos, and you absorbed everything. But you should know, the choices were yours, the strengths were yours, and the bravery is all yours. Everything is yours, Tovi. Tov El Yosef, just like your name, it fits you so precisely. Your entire being was good.”

Through tears, she continued: “We stand here with broken hearts, struggling to grasp the magnitude of the loss, and we part from you, a beloved and pure child.”

The deputy commander of the Golani Brigade, Lt. Col. Naor Amichai, also spoke, saying: “Tuvia was a beloved son, a remarkable brother, a true friend, and a courageous and devoted soldier. He insisted on joining the Golani Brigade, continuing the path of his father and brother, and enlisted in August 2024. After completing his training, he joined Battalion 13 and became a top-tier fighter, someone you could rely on with your eyes closed.”

The commander added: “Tuvia’s image will remain etched in the hearts of his friends and commanders. His courage and spirit will accompany us for many days to come.”

His older brother, Shilo, spoke with anguish, saying: “There are not enough words in the world to describe you. I failed in my role, to protect you, to guard you. We grew up together with only 11 months between us, my little brother. I cannot comprehend how this happened in our home. You used to tell Mom that there is a lot of work to do. You came home and the work was not finished—there is still much work. Dear Golani soldiers, finish the work.”

Another brother, Argaman, also delivered a hesped: “My big brother, something is missing in me, my brother. I am trying to walk in your path, to be strong, but I am broken. Broken from the fact that you are not here, from this void left in the family, that has opened in my heart. You always jumped in first—what a childhood we had together. I always knew my big brother would protect me. I will always be your younger brother and you will always be my big brother. You were a brother, a friend, full of life and strength.”

His sister, Rimon, parted from him with heartbreaking words: “Our Tovi, I never imagined you would return to us in a coffin. I promise that our family will stand back up on its feet, because that is what you would want. I know you are sitting close to the kisei hakavod and raising a l’chaim with all our malachim. You were better than all of us—Hashem truly takes the best.”

{Matzav.com}

President Donald Trump on Thursday pointed to immigration policies under the Biden administration following the arrest of a Haitian migrant accused of fatally attacking a Florida mother in a shocking broad-daylight assault, and shared graphic footage of the incident.

According to court records, Rolbert Jaochin, 40, is accused of beating a 51-year-old mother of two with a hammer outside a Chevron gas station in Fort Myers on Friday morning, leaving her mortally wounded in the parking lot.

In a lengthy Truth Social post, Trump denounced the suspect, referring to him as an “animal” responsible for the gruesome killing.

The post also included an uncensored video of the attack, which Trump described as “one of the most vicious things you will ever see.”

“To my fellow Republicans, and frankly all Common Sense Americans, NEVER FORGET that Joe Biden and the Democrat Party turned the United States of America into a dumping ground,” Trump seethed.

“Please say a prayer for this innocent woman’s family. We will ensure quick and severe JUSTICE is served in this case!” he added.

Trump acknowledged the disturbing nature of the footage, saying he would not advise people to watch the roughly 20-second clip but felt compelled to share it so the public could understand “what Democrats are protecting.”

The video shows Jaochin striking the windshield of a black SUV in the gas station lot before the victim, who worked at the station, exits a nearby store and appears to say something to him.

The suspect then responds and quickly approaches her. As he reaches the woman, he leaps forward and strikes her in the face with a hammer, according to the footage.

She collapses onto the pavement, where he continues to hit her multiple times while she lies defenseless, the video shows.

After the attack, he steps over her and leaves the scene, according to the footage.

Emergency responders later found the victim lying on the ground in a pool of blood, and she was pronounced dead at the scene, court documents indicate.

Authorities apprehended Jaochin later that same day, with officers reportedly recognizing him from prior encounters.

Investigators say he admitted to the killing. He now faces charges including homicide, criminal mischief, and property damage exceeding $1,000.

Officials have not publicly released the victim’s identity or provided a motive for the attack.

Federal authorities said the suspect, originally from Haiti, entered the United States in August 2022 and was allowed to remain under Temporary Protected Status granted during the Biden administration.

After his arrest, Immigration and Customs Enforcement lodged a detainer against him, with the Department of Homeland Security stating that he will “be deported regardless of the outcome of this case.”

Argentina’s President Javier Milei has been selected to light a torch at the official Independence Day ceremony on Har Herzl, in recognition of his strong and consistent support for Israel on the international stage.

The announcement was made Thursday evening by Culture and Sports Minister Miri Regev, who said she chose Milei for the honor due to his firm backing of Israel through a series of diplomatic and policy decisions.

Milei, who has led Argentina for the past two and a half years, has taken a number of notable steps in support of Israel. These include recognizing Iran’s Revolutionary Guards, Hezbollah, and Hamas as terrorist organizations, advocating for the release of hostages, renaming a street previously called “Palestine” to “Bibas Family Street,” and actively fighting antisemitism in international forums while defending Israel’s right to protect itself.

Regev praised Milei’s leadership and close relationship with Israel, stating: “In these very complex years that we are in the midst of, the State of Israel has found in Buenos Aires a true friend and a devoted partner. President Javier Milei is one of the prominent leaders of the free world and one of Israel’s closest allies, a true friend and a true Zionist, an example of partnership, loyalty, and appreciation for the Jewish people and one of the greatest friends of the Jewish people. Choosing him expresses the tremendous gratitude that all Israeli citizens feel toward his leadership and our immense pride in the warm and close relationship between Israel and Argentina.”

Earlier in the day, additional torch lighters were announced, including hostage and missing persons coordinator Gal Hirsch, as well as Talik Guaili, whose son, police officer Ran Hy”d, was killed on October 7. Also selected was Rabbi Avraham Zarbiv, who is currently serving in the reserves.

Cuban President Miguel Díaz-Canel said he has no intention of stepping down, pushing back on the idea during his first interview with an American television network, portions of which aired Thursday.

In a segment of a longer interview set to be broadcast Sunday on NBC’s Meet the Press, journalist Kristen Welker asked Díaz-Canel whether he would be “willing to step down if it meant saving Cuba.”

Before responding directly, Díaz-Canel challenged the premise of the question, asking whether it had been posed to other world leaders: “Is that a question from you, or is that coming from the State Department of the U.S. government?”

He went on to stress Cuba’s independence, saying, “In Cuba, the people who are in leadership position are not elected by the U.S. government, and they don’t have a mandate from the U.S. government. We have a free sovereign state.”

Díaz-Canel said his leadership was not driven by personal or political ambition but rather by the will of the Cuban people.

“If the Cuban people understand that I am not fit for office, that I have no reason to be here, then I should not be holding this position of president, I will respond to them,” he said.

The interview comes at a time of continued strain between Cuba and the United States, even as both sides acknowledge that discussions have taken place, though no specifics have been made public.

Díaz-Canel accused Washington of maintaining a “hostile policy” toward Cuba and argued that it has “no moral to demand anything from Cuba.”

He also said the U.S. should take responsibility for the impact of its policies, noting “and how much they have deprived the American people from a normal relationship with the Cuban people.”

While criticizing U.S. actions, Díaz-Canel said Cuba remains open to dialogue on any issue, without preconditions, stating it would proceed “not demanding changes from our political system as we are not demanding change from the American system, about which we have a number of doubts.”

Cuban officials continue to attribute the country’s worsening economic situation to U.S. energy restrictions, with fuel shortages affecting healthcare, transportation, and the production of goods.

In late March, a Russian tanker carrying 730,000 barrels of crude oil reached Cuba, marking the first such shipment in three months, with another delivery expected.

Despite earlier threats in January to impose tariffs on countries supplying oil to Cuba, President Donald Trump ultimately allowed the shipment to go forward.

“Cuba’s finished,” Trump said at the time. “They have a bad regime. They have very bad and corrupt leadership and whether or not they get a boat of oil, it’s not going to matter.”

Tonight is known in many circles as “Rumpelnacht,” as the post-Pesach cleanup gets underway. With pots, pans and dishes all over the place and kitchenware being moved from here to there, the name “Rumpelnacht” has been found appropriate by some to describe the hectic atmosphere.

So as you “turn back over” from Pesach to chometz, Matzav.com wishes you bracha and hatzlacha and all the best to your families and loved ones.

We also wish you the customary Motzoei Pesach blessing of “ah gezunte zummer” and pray for only the best for all members of Klal Yisroel across the globe. May we all see yeshuos and refuos, collectively and individually, and may we see an end to the current difficult situation.

Next year in Yerushalayim, be’ezras Hashem.

{Matzav.com Newscenter}

Kamal Kharazi, Iran’s former foreign minister, has died after being wounded in joint U.S.-Israel strikes carried out on April 1, according to reports published Thursday by Iranian media outlets.

Kharazi, who was 81, was serving as chairman of Iran’s Strategic Council for International Relations, an entity affiliated with the country’s foreign ministry, at the time of the attack.

Iranian news agencies Mehr and ISNA reported that the longtime diplomat, “who was wounded in a terrorist attack carried out by the American-Zionist enemy a few days ago, died a martyr tonight”.

Reports also indicated that Kharazi’s wife was killed when their residence in Tehran was struck during the assault.

Over the course of his career, Kharazi held several high-profile diplomatic posts, including serving as Iran’s ambassador to the United Nations in New York before later becoming foreign minister from 1997 through 2005 under President Mohammad Khatami.

President Donald Trump issued a lengthy statement on Truth Social Thursday, taking aim at several well-known conservative commentators who once supported him but are now criticizing his position on Iran.

In his remarks, Trump singled out Tucker Carlson, Megyn Kelly, Candace Owens, and Alex Jones, all of whom have recently spoken out against his handling of tensions with the Islamic Republic.

“They think it is wonderful for Iran, the Number One State Sponsor of Terror, to have a Nuclear Weapon – Because they have one thing in common, Low IQs,” Trump charged.

Carlson and Kelly, both of whom previously worked at Fox News, have been especially outspoken. Kelly reacted angrily to Trump’s earlier warning this week that “a whole civilization will die tonight” if Iran did not agree to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, urging the president to “…shut up about that ….” Carlson, for his part, called Trump’s statement “vile on every level.”

The criticism marks a notable shift, as all four figures had strongly backed Trump during the 2024 presidential race. Speaking at the Republican National Convention, Carlson said that following the assassination attempt against Trump, he “was the leader of a nation.” Kelly, addressing a rally in Pittsburgh, told supporters she preferred “a president who understands how to be strong and how to fight” and encouraged them to “vote Trump and get 10 friends to vote Trump too.”

Responding to their recent comments, Trump suggested that Carlson, Kelly, and others who have turned against him “should see a good psychiatrist.”

Candace Owens fired back on social media, casting doubt on Trump’s mental condition and writing, “It may be time to put Grandpa up in a home.”

Owens has also previously voiced regret over promoting Trump during the campaign. In an interview with Piers Morgan Uncensored, she said: “I don’t regret voting for Donald Trump above [former Vice President] Kamala [Harris]. I think he was the better candidate – certainly a better candidate above [former President] Joe Biden. But what I will say is that he’s been a chronic disappointment, and I feel embarrassed that I told people to go vote for him.”

Trump also took aim at Alex Jones, referring to him as “Bankrupt” and criticizing him for “his horrendous attack on the families of the Sandy Hook shooting victims, ridiculously claiming it was a hoax.”

Jones, who hosted Trump on InfoWars in 2015, responded in a video message expressing disappointment. “I’m just so sad that whatever’s happened to him has totally changed the man he once was. He did so much good.” He added that he feels “sorry for him and pray that God touches his heart and soul and free him from the demonic influences that he’s under.”

Despite claiming he does not care about their opinions, Trump’s post ran close to 500 words and dismissed the group as no longer aligned with his political movement, saying they are “not ‘MAGA,’ they’re losers, just trying to latch on to MAGA.”

Pakistan’s defense minister sparked a diplomatic firestorm on Thursday after issuing a blistering condemnation of Israel, prompting sharp responses from Israeli leadership at a time when Pakistan is attempting to facilitate talks between the United States and Iran and amid ongoing Israeli military operations against Hezbollah in Lebanon.

Khawaja Asif, Pakistan’s Minister of Defense, posted a strongly worded message on X, declaring that “Israel is evil and a curse for humanity, while peace talks are underway in Islamabad, genocide is being committed in Lebanon.”

He went on to escalate his rhetoric further, writing: “Innocent citizens are being killed by Israel, first Gaza, then Iran, and now Lebanon, bloodletting continues unabated. I hope and pray people who created this cancerous state on Palestinian land to get rid of European jews burn in hell.”

Israel’s Foreign Minister, Gideon Sa’ar, issued a forceful response, condemning the remarks and warning that such language undermines any claim of neutrality in mediation efforts. He stated that “Israel views these blatant antisemitic blood libels very gravely from a government claiming to ‘mediate peace.'”

Sa’ar added that “calling the Jewish state ‘cancerous’ is effectively calling for its annihilation.”

“Israel will defend itself against terrorists who vow its destruction,” Sa’ar vowed.

The Israeli Prime Minister’s Office also weighed in, denouncing the Pakistani minister’s comments in strong terms. “Pakistan Defense Minister’s call for Israel’s annihilation is outrageous. This is not a statement that can be tolerated from any government, especially not from one that claims to be a neutral arbiter for peace.”