Trump Border Wall Push Expands Into Big Bend
The Trump administration is moving forward with a major new border security initiative in West Texas, preparing to install 30-foot-tall border barriers, access roads, vehicle obstacles, and sophisticated surveillance systems near Big Bend National Park as part of its continuing effort to strengthen security along the U.S.-Mexico border.
According to the Washington Examiner, construction is scheduled to begin this month in sections of the Big Bend Sector. U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) said the project will feature what it describes as a “Smart Wall,” integrating steel fencing with cameras, sensors, and upgraded road infrastructure in strategically selected locations.
CBP said new border barriers are expected to be built in the Marfa and Van Horn areas, while other parts of the sector will rely largely on surveillance technology and the region’s rugged natural landscape to discourage illegal crossings.
The initiative builds upon approximately 450 miles of border wall constructed during President Trump’s first administration, a central component of his immigration policy designed to combat illegal immigration and the smuggling of narcotics across the southern border.
Agency officials said the project has been designed to improve border security while limiting its impact on the region’s environmentally sensitive terrain.
“CBP is not planning to construct a 30-foot-high barrier in Big Bend National Park, Big Bend Ranch State Park, or the Black Gap Wildlife Management Area,” the agency said, adding that it will coordinate with park officials and use existing roads whenever possible.
The latest plans follow months of discussion over the most effective way to secure one of the most isolated and difficult-to-patrol sections of the U.S.-Mexico border.
The Washington Examiner reported that large quantities of steel wall panels have already been delivered to staging areas near the park in anticipation of the upcoming construction.
Not everyone supports the project. Some area landowners, environmental organizations, and even Republican leaders have questioned whether additional fencing is necessary, arguing that the area’s harsh terrain already serves as a natural barrier and that surveillance technology alone should be enough.
Charlie Angell, a Redford, Texas, property owner and river guide, told the Examiner that the planned route could divide his land and interfere with access to the Rio Grande.
“My home, it’s my retirement, it’s my backyard,” Angell said, expressing concern about losing river access and the impact on his business.
CBP officials, however, insist that technology by itself cannot fully secure the border.
The agency said its strategy combines cameras, sensors, vehicle barriers, and targeted infrastructure upgrades to improve enforcement capabilities while reducing environmental impacts wherever feasible.
Federal officials are continuing to accept public comments on portions of the proposal through July 13.
Backers of the project say blending physical barriers with advanced monitoring technology will better deter illegal immigration and give Border Patrol agents greater visibility across one of the nation’s most remote border regions, despite continued objections from some local residents over the placement of the new infrastructure.
{Matzav.com}
