Inside the Kiryat Gat Rift: U.S. Personnel Accuse IDF of Monitoring Allies at Gaza Ceasefire Hub
Reports emerging from Kiryat Gat claim that American forces stationed at the facility overseeing the Gaza ceasefire have voiced serious concerns about Israeli military personnel allegedly tracking and monitoring activity inside the joint base. The accusations, first published by the Guardian, were swiftly rejected by the Israel Defense Forces as “absurd.”
According to the report, individuals familiar with the internal workings of the Civil-Military Coordination Center — the CMCC — say Israeli personnel have routinely documented conversations taking place there. Some recordings were said to be done out in the open, others more discreetly, stirring frustration among American personnel and several other participating nations.
The sources cited insisted that the pattern of intelligence gathering grew concerning enough that the base’s American commander, Lt. Gen. Patrick Frank, called in his Israeli counterpart for a direct conversation. During that exchange, he reportedly made it clear that “recording has to stop here.”
The situation allegedly prompted some countries to warn their teams inside the building not to discuss sensitive matters, worried that information could be “collected and exploited,” as the report put it.
While declining to comment on whether Frank issued such a warning, the IDF emphasized to the Guardian that nothing spoken inside the CMCC is classified. It added that taking notes and summarizing discussions is standard procedure for any serious organization. “The IDF documents and summarizes meetings in which it is present through protocols, as any professional organization of this nature does in a transparent and agreed-upon manner,” the military said. It reiterated that “The claim that the IDF is gathering intelligence on its partners in meetings in which the IDF is an active participant is absurd.”
The U.S. military, approached with the same allegations, declined to address them.
Established under American leadership shortly after the current ceasefire took effect, the CMCC functions as the central hub for coordinating humanitarian flows into Gaza while managing the broader stabilization effort for the enclave. It operates out of a logistics company building in Kiryat Gat, around 20 kilometers from Gaza.
The compound divides its space by floor: Israel occupies the first, the U.S. operates from the third, and a shared international operations arena spans the second level, where representatives gather around expansive screens and planning boards. Those with a presence at the base include Israel, the U.S., Jordan, the UK, Germany, Denmark, Canada, Australia, France, Spain, and the United Arab Emirates.
Despite being on home turf, Israel has not been driving the decision-making, according to an Israeli official who told The Times of Israel in November that Washington has effectively taken the lead — including on issues tied to humanitarian aid deliveries. Israel has charged that Hamas has repeatedly hijacked or manipulated aid convoys, prompting Jerusalem to restrict certain goods.
A U.S. official speaking anonymously to the Guardian disputed the notion that America holds unilateral authority over aid. The relationship, the official said, operates “hand in glove,” explaining that Israel functions as the hand, while the CMCC is “the glove over that hand.”
Diplomats quoted in the article said that ongoing discussions at the center have resulted in Israel easing limits on several previously banned items it had categorized as having “dual use” potential — materials it feared Hamas could exploit.
CMCC officers last month reported that roughly 800 aid trucks per day have entered Gaza since the ceasefire began, marking the highest sustained flow of humanitarian assistance since the war broke out.
But while the center has been operating since October, its organizational structure and legal framework remain undefined. This ambiguity persists even as the initial phase of U.S. President Donald Trump’s 20-point outline for Gaza approaches completion.
Under the second phase of Trump’s plan — which is expected to roll out soon — a new administrative model for Gaza is supposed to take shape. That stage is not slated to begin until Israel completes the return of the last fallen hostage, Master Sgt. Ran Gvili.
Trump’s blueprint envisions Hamas disarming and Israeli forces pulling back while a multinational contingent moves in. At the same time, a Palestinian technocratic authority would step in to handle the day-to-day governance of Gaza, as the Strip transitions to its postwar framework.
{Matzav.com}
