Feed aggregator

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer is confronting the greatest political crisis of his career as mounting pressure from within the Labour Party fuels speculation that he could soon step aside rather than face a potentially bruising leadership battle against rising rival Andy Burnham.

Although Starmer has publicly insisted that he intends to remain in office, growing numbers of Labour lawmakers reportedly believe his tenure is nearing its end. Expectations are mounting that he could announce a timetable for his departure as early as Monday, the same day Burnham is scheduled to take his seat in the House of Commons following last week’s special-election victory.

Business Secretary Peter Kyle acknowledged Sunday that the prime minister is taking stock of his political situation amid the escalating turmoil.

“making time to reflect on the political realities, challenges and opportunities that he finds himself in.”

Kyle defended Starmer’s leadership while cautioning against drawing conclusions from reports of an imminent resignation.

“I know he is a prime minister who always puts his country first,” Kyle told the BBC, though he said that reports that Starmer will resign are “speculation.”

The prime minister spent the weekend at Chequers, the official country residence used by British prime ministers, alongside his family. While avoiding any public discussion of his political future, Starmer did post a Father’s Day message on social media.

“Being a dad is my greatest joy. Today, I’m thinking about my dad, and the father I am to my children because of him,” he wrote on X.

President Donald Trump weighed in on the uncertainty before any official announcement had been made, arguing that Starmer’s troubles stemmed from policy failures on immigration and energy.

“Keir Starmer will resign as Prime Minister of The United Kingdom. He failed badly on two very important subjects- IMMIGRATION AND ENERGY (OPEN NORTH SEA OIL!). I wish him well! President DJT,” Trump posted on his Truth Social network.

Should Starmer leave office, he would become the sixth British prime minister to exit Downing Street in just a decade, underscoring a period of extraordinary political instability in the United Kingdom.

Frustration with Starmer has reportedly been building for months as Labour lawmakers seek ways to halt the government’s declining popularity following the party’s sweeping election victory in July 2024.

Critics point to slow economic growth, continued pressure on household finances, struggles within public services, and a series of political controversies that have damaged the government’s standing.

Among the most contentious decisions was Starmer’s appointment of Peter Mandelson as Britain’s ambassador to the United States, a move that sparked criticism because of Mandelson’s past association with Jeffrey Epstein.

Labour has also found itself squeezed politically from both sides, losing support among progressive voters to the Green Party while simultaneously facing the growing strength of Reform UK, Nigel Farage’s anti-immigration movement, which has been performing strongly in national polls.

Burnham’s decisive victory in the Makerfield by-election has only intensified speculation about a potential leadership challenge. The former mayor of Greater Manchester captured nearly 55 percent of the vote, finishing more than 9,000 votes ahead of Reform UK’s candidate.

With his return to Parliament, Burnham is now positioned to launch a formal bid for Labour’s leadership should an opportunity arise.

His victory speech did little to dampen speculation about his ambitions.

“Everyone knows that politics isn’t working,” he said. “Everyone can feel that the country isn’t where it should be. Tonight could, just could, be the turning point.”

Questions remain about whether Burnham would face opposition in a leadership race. Former Health Secretary Wes Streeting, who resigned last month in protest over Starmer’s leadership, has already indicated that he would enter the contest if one takes place.

For his part, Starmer has continued to insist that he has no intention of surrendering his position without a fight.

“I will run, I will stand,” if there is a Labour leadership contest, Starmer said. “I’ve said repeatedly I’m not going to walk away from that.”

Yet some senior Labour figures believe the prime minister’s position has become untenable.

Charlie Falconer, a prominent Labour member of the House of Lords, argued Saturday that Starmer’s authority has effectively evaporated and suggested an orderly transition should begin.

“There should be an agreed transition process in which Andy and Keir cooperate as to when the handover should take place,” he told the BBC.

As pressure mounts and Labour’s internal divisions deepen, all eyes are now on Starmer and whether he chooses to fight for survival—or begin planning his exit from Downing Street.

A total of 46 bnei yeshivah were detained over Shabbos after being classified by the military as failing to comply with enlistment directives, according to IDF figures. The number marks a significant increase in arrests over a short period and comes amid intensified enforcement efforts targeting bnei Torah who have not reported to military recruitment offices.

The arrests have sparked sharp criticism throughout the chareidi world. Rabbanim and public figures described the developments as a serious deterioration in the relationship between the state and the olam haTorah, arguing that bnei yeshivah and avreichei kollel are being placed in detention facilities instead of being allowed to continue their limud haTorah.

Last Thursday, a 26-year-old ben yeshivah was arrested. Following hours of intervention by askanim and chareidi representatives, he was released to his home on Friday, just hours before the onset of Shabbos.

In a separate incident, a ben yeshivah was detained upon arriving at Ben Gurion Airport after returning from an extended period of learning in a yeshivah in the United States. He was subsequently transferred to military authorities for further processing.

Another detainee, 22-year-old ben yeshivah Aviel Cohen of Netivot, a graduate of Yeshivas Be’er HaTalmud, was released before Shabbos. His arrest generated widespread outrage throughout the chareidi community.

Cohen was taken into custody at a gas station near the Gilat Junction while sitting in a vehicle with his wife. His detention prompted demonstrations and a broad public effort by askanim and community activists seeking to secure his release.

Chareidi sources said the growing number of arrests is expected to lead to expanded protest activity in the coming days, including demonstrations and additional measures demanding an end to the detention of bnei yeshivah.

Community representatives warned that “a situation in which dozens of bnei yeshivah are being held in military prison is a warning sign for the entire public,” and expressed concern that the recent wave of arrests could further inflame tensions between the authorities and the olam haTorah.

{Matzav.com}

Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir launched a sharp attack Sunday against Israel’s decision to accept the U.S.-Iran memorandum of understanding and ceasefire arrangements in Lebanon, arguing that Israeli leaders should have resisted American pressure and continued military operations.

The comments mark one of the strongest public criticisms yet from within the coalition regarding the government’s handling of the post-war diplomatic process and its cooperation with the Trump administration’s regional strategy.

Speaking in a heated interview with Army Radio, Ben Gvir argued that Israel must be willing to reject American demands when vital national interests are at stake.

“One must know how to tell the President of the United States ‘no’ when it comes to the existential interests of the State of Israel,” Ben Gvir said. “It was a serious strategic mistake to stop the fighting at this point. With all due respect to friendship, President Trump will not go and comfort the families of soldiers during shivah.”

The minister contended that decisions regarding Israel’s security should be based solely on the country’s long-term strategic needs, regardless of pressure from allies abroad.

Ben Gvir also directed criticism toward ongoing diplomatic contacts between Israel and Lebanon, which have reportedly continued alongside the deployment of IDF forces in the security zone in southern Lebanon.

The minister said he strongly opposes any negotiations with Beirut while Hezbollah remains active and influential inside the country.

“There should be no negotiations whatsoever with the Lebanese government as long as the Hezbollah terrorist organization remains there and continues to wield influence,” he declared.

Warning against what he views as a repeat of past mistakes, Ben Gvir argued that failing to decisively defeat Hezbollah now could create even greater dangers in the future.

“If we compromise now and do not decisively defeat them, they will try to carry out another October 7 against us across the border in a few years,” he said. “We must not return to the conception.”

His remarks come as debate intensifies within Israel over the U.S.-Iran agreement, the ceasefire framework in Lebanon, and the broader question of how aggressively Israel should confront Hezbollah and other Iranian-backed forces in the region.

While supporters of the agreement argue that it provides an opportunity for stability and prevents a wider regional war, Ben Gvir and other critics contend that the current diplomatic track risks allowing Israel’s enemies to regroup and prepare for future attacks.

{Matzav.com}

[COMMUNICATED]

The Gedolei Eretz Yisroel are sharing one urgent message: the Olam HaTorah in Eretz Yisroel is standing on a precipice, and every single one of us is needed to help save it.

Shutfei Olam HaTorah is live now! a historic campaign through Keren Olam HaTorah to raise $12 million and cover one month of support for 120,000 bochurim and avreichim.

Today is the moment for Klal Yisroel to join together and make it happen. Every Yid has a cheilek. Every dollar counts. Together, we can reach the $12 million goal.

Rav Dov Landau shlit”a has said:

“Give and give, and Hashem will give you back doubly multiplied — abundance, nachas from the children, health, and all good things.”

Grab this opportunity now and be part of history today.

A sweeping U.S. Justice Department investigation is reportedly examining allegations that Iran’s Supreme Leader, Mojtaba Khamenei, secretly built a vast international investment portfolio with exposure to some of the most powerful financial institutions on Wall Street, raising new questions about the Islamic Republic’s financial operations and potential sanctions violations.

According to reports, the investigation is part of a much broader inquiry into suspected corruption and money-laundering activities linked to entities allegedly controlled or overseen by Khamenei. American investigators are reportedly reviewing a complex web of transactions conducted through shell companies believed to have operated under his influence.

The probe is said to extend far beyond Tehran. U.S. authorities are reportedly scrutinizing the role played by major American financial institutions through which funds allegedly moved, including banking giants JPMorgan Chase and Citigroup.

Sources familiar with the matter emphasized that the investigation is currently focused on Khamenei’s financial activities and that the existence of the inquiry does not necessarily mean criminal charges will ultimately be filed.

The reported investigation has sent shockwaves through both financial and political circles, given Khamenei’s central role in the Iranian regime and the potential implications of any findings involving major Western banks.

Mojtaba Khamenei assumed Iran’s highest leadership position following the death of his father, Ali Khamenei, who was killed in an Israeli strike during Operation Rising Lion.

As Supreme Leader, Khamenei now wields ultimate authority over the Islamic Republic’s most sensitive and consequential decisions, including foreign policy, national security matters, and oversight of Iran’s nuclear program.

The reported discovery of a financial network allegedly tied to Khamenei and operating within the Western financial system could provide Washington with a powerful new source of leverage at a time of heightened tensions between the United States and Iran.

If the allegations are substantiated, the investigation could expose significant vulnerabilities within Iran’s leadership and potentially reshape the financial and diplomatic pressure campaign being waged against Tehran. For now, however, U.S. authorities continue to examine the evidence as part of what appears to be one of the most consequential financial investigations involving Iran in recent years.

{Matzav.com}

Political turmoil erupted in Iran after a hardline member of parliament publicly read excerpts from what he claimed were highly classified communications from Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei during a live state television broadcast, alleging that the Iranian leader opposed negotiations with the United States. The program was abruptly cut off moments later.

Mahmoud Nabavian, a member of the Iranian Parliament’s National Security and Foreign Policy Committee, claimed during the broadcast that Khamenei repeatedly objected to the ongoing negotiations with Washington and had established conditions that were ultimately omitted from the memorandum of understanding recently signed between Iran and the United States.

The comments came as Iran’s negotiating team traveled to Switzerland for another round of technical talks with American officials, days after Tehran and Washington signed an agreement intended to end the conflict between the two countries and pave the way for broader negotiations.

According to Nabavian, Khamenei privately expressed dissatisfaction with the direction of the talks and questioned why his demands had not been met.

“The Supreme Leader explicitly expresses his dissatisfaction,” Nabavian said during the program. “He asks, ‘Why were the conditions not met?’”

Nabavian further claimed that Khamenei wrote that Iran “is neither in a hurry nor under any pressure to negotiate or reach an agreement,” and insisted that any discussions should focus on ending the war and securing compensation rather than addressing Iran’s nuclear program.

He also alleged that Khamenei instructed negotiators not to discuss what he described as “the central issue,” an apparent reference to Tehran’s nuclear activities.

At one point, Nabavian told viewers he intended to reveal a portion of the alleged correspondence.

“I will read one sentence. There is no other choice,” he said before quoting what he claimed was a message from Khamenei: “What took shape in the negotiations with Pakistan is fundamentally different from what was supposed to happen and from what constituted the condition for the legitimacy of the negotiations.”

According to Nabavian, Khamenei subsequently called for negotiations to be halted.

The lawmaker further asserted that Khamenei repeated his position on multiple occasions throughout April, insisting that Iran must emerge victorious by forcing the United States to fully recognize Tehran’s right to enrich uranium or remove the nuclear issue from future negotiations permanently.

Nabavian also claimed that Khamenei views the Strait of Hormuz as one of Iran’s most powerful tools of leverage against Washington.

“Strait of Hormuz is a very important key,” Nabavian quoted him as saying. “If the Americans want to remove pressure from their throat, they must first implement prerequisites, foremost among them the payment of compensation and debts.”

He argued that none of those conditions were incorporated into the memorandum signed with the United States.

According to Nabavian, Khamenei insisted that control over the Strait of Hormuz must remain exclusively in Iranian hands and not be shared with Oman or any other country.

He further alleged that Khamenei outlined a system under which some ships would be completely barred from transit, others would be required to pay fees, and vessels belonging to Iran’s allies would be allowed to pass freely.

As Nabavian continued discussing the alleged documents, the state television broadcast was suddenly interrupted and brought to an abrupt end, according to reports from Iran International.

Iran’s state broadcaster later condemned the lawmaker’s actions, describing them as a legal violation that could warrant prosecution.

The network said Nabavian’s references to classified documents and confidential communications between senior officials violated Iranian law. Officials also announced that one senior executive had resigned following the incident and that disciplinary measures would be taken.

The episode quickly triggered criticism even among conservative circles in Iran, with some accusing Nabavian of selectively presenting portions of a much larger body of correspondence in order to support his political arguments.

“Why don’t you say that these selective excerpts of yours were taken from about 20 communications and, in fact, from the earliest ones?” wrote prominent Iranian media figure Hossein Soleimani in a public rebuke directed at Nabavian. “Since you exposed and published the secret and top-secret documents of the system, you should at least have revealed them correctly and accurately.”

Nabavian and other hardline figures have sharply criticized the U.S.-Iran memorandum of understanding in recent days, accusing President Masoud Pezeshkian, Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, and Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi of making dangerous concessions to Washington during the negotiations.

{Matzav.com}

Vice President JD Vance is shedding new light on President Donald Trump’s expectations for members of his administration, revealing a strict and decidedly old-school approach to professional appearance that extends all the way down to the color of a Cabinet member’s shoes.

Speaking on the “Hang Out with Sean Hannity” podcast, Vance said Trump believes public officials have a responsibility to show respect for the offices they hold, and that dressing appropriately is part of that obligation.

“The president has a certain sense that you ought to respect the place, you ought to respect the institution, respect the office. And one of the ways you do that is by dressing like a normal person,” Vance said in the episode released Thursday. “And I think that’s — it’s a very old-fashioned thing.”

According to Vance, Trump places a high value on professionalism and expects those around him to reflect that standard in their appearance. He contrasted the president’s preferences with what he sees as the more casual style adopted by many contemporary politicians.

Describing Trump’s own wardrobe formula, Vance said the president rarely strays from a familiar look.

“Well, I mean, he always has — it’s always a navy suit. It’s almost always a solid tie. It’s always black shoes,” Vance said. “Like, he’ll bust the chops of some of the Cabinet members if they’ve got brown shoes on.”

Trump’s attention to footwear apparently goes beyond criticism. Earlier this year, the president revealed that he has occasionally purchased shoes for administration officials.

“When they tell me they have a problem, I say, ‘Let me get you a pair of shoes,'” Trump told Kilmeade in March.

Vance said the president frequently notices and comments on the attire of people around him, including foreign leaders and even members of his own family.

Among the examples he cited was the now-famous “Zelensky moment,” when Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy faced questions during an Oval Office meeting about why he was not wearing a suit.

Months later, when Zelenskyy appeared at a White House meeting dressed more formally than usual, one reporter complimented his appearance.

A reporter told Zelenskyy he looked “fabulous in that suit,” before Trump added, “I said the same thing.”

Reflecting on the earlier controversy, Vance suggested the incident had not gone particularly well for the Ukrainian leader.

“That was not a good moment for him,” Vance said of Zelenskyy, referring to the tense exchange between the Ukrainian president and U.S. officials. “And it’s funny because things kind of worked out. I think, you know, we were able to repair that relationship.”

Vance also recalled a lighter moment involving Donald Trump Jr. during a September 11 memorial event while on the 2024 campaign trail.

“They’re reading out the names. But there’s — at one point, the president turns around and looks at Don Jr. And Don has like, a spread collar on. And the president’s like, ‘Oh, that’s a pretty wide collar there, Don,’” Vance said.

The vice president said the comment was clearly intended as a playful jab and illustrated how closely Trump pays attention to appearance.

“And you can tell, like, it just was absolutely a dig. So I’ve always — navy suit, black shoes and a conventional collar,” he added.

Taken together, Vance’s stories paint a picture of a White House where traditional dress standards remain firmly in place and where even the smallest fashion choices may not escape the president’s notice.

{Matzav.com}

Senior officials in Shas and United Torah Judaism were reportedly stunned over the weekend after learning that Prime Minister Binyomin Netanyahu is considering dissolving the Knesset as early as this week without advancing any of the major pieces of legislation sought by the chareidi parties, including the Daycare Subsidy Law, the Arrests Law, and the proposed Basic Law protecting Torah study, Matzav.com has learned.

The development has triggered deep frustration within the chareidi political camp, with some senior figures privately acknowledging what they view as a complete failure to secure their legislative priorities before the government heads to elections.

According to party insiders, Shas leaders had hoped that even if the controversial Daycare Subsidy Law could not be passed, Netanyahu would still advance Shas chairman Aryeh Deri’s proposed Arrests Law, along with the Basic Law on Torah Study. However, reports emerging overnight indicated that Netanyahu has already begun preparing for a rapid dissolution of the Knesset without bringing any of those measures to a vote.

“We no longer have anything with which to threaten him,” one senior chareidi official said. “The moment United Torah Judaism agreed to elections on October 20, as Netanyahu requested, we lost our leverage. We were left with nothing, and now he is the one deciding when the Knesset will be dissolved.”

The growing sense of disappointment has led some chareidi lawmakers to openly question their political strategy during the current coalition.

Another senior figure expressed sharp frustration with the outcome.

“We failed in everything. We have nothing to show our voters. We failed. Even in our final attempt we failed. What are we supposed to go into an election with? Netanyahu played us and played us, and we followed him like a blind goat.”

The anger comes after Netanyahu informed coalition leaders last week that the Daycare Subsidy Law would not pass during the current Knesset session because of opposition from coalition rebels.

That announcement sparked outrage among chareidi lawmakers, who viewed the move as a violation of coalition commitments. In response, Degel HaTorah chairman MK Moshe Gafni announced that his party’s representatives on the Knesset Finance Committee would vote against all budgetary transfers.

Degel HaTorah issued a strongly worded statement insisting that Netanyahu and Likud had explicitly committed to passing the legislation.

“There was a commitment by the prime minister and Likud to bring the Daycare Subsidy Law for approval. We insist on this firmly and will not accept any delay or retreat from that commitment.”

Agudas Yisrael issued a similar warning, arguing that failure to pass the law would signal that Netanyahu had already decided to bring down the government.

“Failure to pass the law means an admission by the prime minister that he has definitively chosen to dissolve the Knesset and go to elections.”

Adding to the uncertainty, political commentator Amit Segal reported Saturday night that senior coalition officials have been increasing pressure on Netanyahu to dissolve the Knesset immediately rather than wait several more weeks.

According to the report, coalition figures have warned the prime minister that continued delays could allow disputes over chareidi legislation to become an even greater political liability.

“The longer you delay, the more the chareidi legislation will hurt you. It is better for you to dissolve the Knesset this week and move into a caretaker government.”

Despite the mounting pressure, Netanyahu has reportedly not yet made a final decision regarding the exact timing of the Knesset’s dissolution. The prime minister is said to be weighing competing political considerations while deciding how to proceed.

{Matzav.com}

[Video below.] Late-night television host Bill Maher blasted President Donald Trump’s newly signed agreement with Iran on Friday, arguing that the administration gave away too much while receiving little in return as the United States enters a critical 60-day negotiation period with Tehran.

During his opening monologue, Maher mocked Trump’s reputation as a master negotiator and questioned the value of the recently signed 14-point memorandum of understanding between Washington and Tehran.

“Where is the big deal maker? What happened to the art of the deal?” Maher asked during his opening monologue on Friday evening, referencing the title of Trump’s 1987 book.

The memorandum launched a two-month diplomatic window designed to produce a broader agreement between the two countries. Among its provisions are measures intended to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world’s most important energy shipping routes.

The agreement also includes a framework for lifting American sanctions on Iran and establishing a massive $300 billion reconstruction fund for the country, provisions that have already generated criticism from a number of Republican lawmakers.

Maher argued that the United States emerged from the agreement with little to show for its concessions.

“We didn’t get anything. I just hope we play Iran in the World Cup so we can beat them at something,” Maher said.

The administration quickly pushed back against criticism surrounding the reconstruction fund.

Appearing Saturday morning on Fox News, Vice President JD Vance insisted that American taxpayers would not finance the project and emphasized that any release of funds remains dependent on Iran meeting its obligations under the agreement.

According to Vance, a U.S. negotiating team led by special envoy Steve Witkoff and presidential adviser Jared Kushner is currently in Switzerland conducting technical discussions aimed at implementing the accord.

The vice president expressed confidence that the ceasefire framework underpinning the agreement would remain intact despite ongoing regional tensions.

“There’s a fork in the road here,” Vance said, referring to the upcoming negotiations. “The United States wins either way, but I think that what ultimately happens from here is very much up to the Iranians.

“Do they want to behave better? If so, great,” he continued. “If they don’t want to behave better, the president of the United States still has a whole lot of options from here.”

Even as negotiations continue, the agreement faced an immediate challenge when Iranian military officials announced Saturday morning that the Strait of Hormuz would be closed.

Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters said the move was a response to Israeli military operations against Hezbollah in Lebanon, raising fresh concerns about the durability of the accord.

American military officials appeared to dispute Iran’s position and signaled that the United States still considers the agreement fully operational.

“U.S. forces remain present and vigilant to ensure all aspects of the agreement with Iran are adhered to, obeyed, and in full force and effect,” the military command said.

The conflicting messages highlighted the uncertainty surrounding the new agreement, as supporters argue it offers a pathway to long-term stability while critics contend it grants significant concessions to Tehran before securing meaningful guarantees in return.

WATCH:

{Matzav.com}

A growing rift between President Donald Trump and Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni intensified over the weekend as Trump renewed his claim that the Italian leader repeatedly sought a photo opportunity with him during the recent G7 summit, further escalating a dispute that has strained what was once considered a strong political relationship.

The clash comes after the two leaders found themselves at odds over the conflict involving Iran. Both attended the Group of Seven summit in Évian-les-Bains, France, where world leaders met to discuss international security challenges, ongoing conflicts, and coordinated global initiatives.

In a Truth Social post on Shabbos, Trump repeated allegations he had made earlier in the week regarding his interactions with Meloni during the summit.

“Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni asked, over and over, for a picture with me during the G-7 meeting in France,” Trump wrote in a Truth Social post on Shabbos, repeating his previous accusation about the Italian leader.

Trump also suggested that Meloni’s political standing at home has suffered because she refused to support his administration’s requests that European allies assist American military operations against Iran.

The president claimed the Italian leader was “doing poorly” in domestic polling “because she turned down” his administration’s calls for European allies to aid its military efforts against Iran.

Meloni has been among the European leaders expressing concern over aspects of the conflict, including reports involving an attack on an Iranian school. She also publicly defended criticism of the war voiced by the Vatican.

Trump argued that circumstances had changed after recent military developments involving Iran and suggested that Meloni was now seeking to repair relations with Washington.

“Now, after the United States defeated Iran militarily, she wants to be friends again in order to get her ‘numbers up.’ No thanks!!!” Trump wrote in the post.

Meloni responded forcefully on Friday, rejecting Trump’s account of events and accusing him of misrepresenting what occurred during the summit.

On social media, she described the president’s version of events as “completely fabricated” and said she was shocked by the accusations.

“I do not know why the president of the United States behaves this way toward his allies — it is certainly not the first time this has happened,” Meloni said.

The Italian prime minister went on to criticize what she sees as a disparity between Trump’s treatment of allies and his approach toward America’s adversaries.

“I can only say it is regrettable that he does not show the same determination against the enemies of the West and the United States — against leaderships with whom he actually proves to be much more accommodating,” she continued.

The dispute has already begun producing diplomatic consequences.

Italian Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani announced Friday that he was canceling a planned trip to the United States scheduled for next week in protest over the controversy.

In a social media statement, Tajani said the president’s “serious and offensive words” about the Italian leader “offend all of Italy.”

{Matzav.com}

A chapter in presidential aviation history came to a close this week when President Donald Trump became the final commander in chief to travel aboard one of the iconic Boeing 747-200 aircraft that have served as Air Force One for decades.

The aircraft completed what officials described as its final presidential mission when it transported Trump back to the United States following his trip to Europe earlier this week.

Members of the administration marked the occasion with tributes on social media, celebrating the retirement of one of the most recognizable aircraft in the world.

“Well done, good and faithful servant,” White House communications director Steven Cheung wrote early Thursday on the social platform X, sharing a picture of the plane. “The Last Ride.”

White House Deputy Chief of Staff Dan Scavino also honored the aircraft, posting a video and reflecting on his years traveling aboard the presidential jet.

“I have been fortunate to fly around the world on this iconic plane for 5 ½ years — of the 35 years it has been serving the U.S. Presidents…THANK YOU…,” he wrote.

Known within the Air Force as the VC-25A, the aircraft is one of two heavily modified Boeing 747-200s that have carried American presidents around the globe. The aircraft that completed its final mission bears tail number 29000, while a second aircraft, tail number 28000, remains part of the presidential fleet.

The first president to fly aboard aircraft 29000 was President George H.W. Bush in 1990, beginning more than three decades of service at the highest levels of government.

Its retirement comes as the Air Force moves forward with a new generation of presidential aircraft.

Three Boeing 747-800s are currently being prepared for executive transport duties. Among them is a luxury aircraft donated by the government of Qatar, which the Air Force has designated as a VC-25B and informally refers to as a “bridge” aircraft.

Military officials indicated earlier this year that the Qatari jet could enter service as a temporary Air Force One as soon as this summer after completing extensive modifications and testing.

According to defense officials, the aircraft is intended to help ease the burden on the aging presidential fleet while longer-term replacements continue to face delays.

The plane will be used to “relieve pressure on the aging VC-25A fleet,” said Gen. Dale White, the Department of Defense’s direct reporting portfolio manager for critical major weapons systems, in a May statement.

Despite the retirement of one aircraft, Air Force officials emphasized that the remaining VC-25A planes are not disappearing immediately.

An Air Force spokesperson told NBC News last week the “VC-25As will continue to serve in the executive fleet and could still be used by the president as Air Force One.”

The transition to the next generation of presidential aircraft has taken far longer than expected. The two primary replacement aircraft being built by Boeing were originally scheduled to enter service in 2024 but are now not expected to be delivered until sometime in mid-2028.

When the new aircraft eventually arrive, they will feature a dramatically different appearance from the traditional Air Force One design. The familiar light-blue color scheme used for decades will be replaced by a new red, white, gold, and navy-blue livery favored by Trump.

The change will mark not only the arrival of a new presidential fleet but also the end of one of the most recognizable symbols of American leadership in the modern era.

{Matzav.com}

The IDF announced that it has killed Ahmed Samir Mohammed Washah, a Hamas terrorist operative who allegedly served in the group’s military wing while simultaneously working as a cameraman for the Qatar-based Al Jazeera network.

According to the military, Washah was killed in a precision airstrike in central Gaza alongside two other Hamas operatives. Israeli officials said he had recently been involved in planning and advancing sniper attacks and other terrorist operations against IDF forces operating in the Strip.

The IDF stated that although Washah worked as a journalist and cameraman for Al Jazeera in recent years, he was also an active member of Hamas’s military apparatus and posed an immediate threat to Israeli troops.

Military officials said the strike was carried out specifically because of his recent operational activities and the danger he allegedly presented to forces on the ground. The military described him as the most prominent target among the three terrorists killed in the operation because of his dual role as both a media figure and a Hamas operative.

Washah’s death comes just months after the elimination of his brother, Mohammed Samir Mohammed Washah, whom Israel identified as a senior operative in Hamas’s rocket and weapons-production network.

According to Israeli officials, the younger Washah also operated under the cover of an Al Jazeera journalist while carrying out terrorist activities. He was killed in April during IDF operations targeting threats to Israeli forces.

The latest strike is part of what Israel says is a broader campaign against Hamas operatives who allegedly use journalistic credentials or media positions as cover for terrorist activity.

Israeli officials noted that in recent months the military has targeted and eliminated several Hamas members accused of participating in attacks against Israel, including operatives involved in the October 7 massacre and others allegedly connected to the holding of hostages in Hamas tunnel networks.

The report also renewed criticism of Al Jazeera, which Israeli officials have long accused of maintaining close ties to terrorist organizations operating throughout the region.

In recent months, reports have surfaced alleging contacts between Qatar and Iran that resulted in a reduction of Iranian pressure on Doha in exchange for what critics describe as a softer editorial approach toward Tehran and increased exposure for Iranian officials and spokesmen.

The IDF said forces under Southern Command remain deployed throughout the area in accordance with operational requirements and will continue taking action against any immediate threats to Israeli troops.

Military officials added that the elimination of Washah is one of several recent operations targeting senior Hamas figures as Israel continues its campaign against the terrorist organization.

According to the IDF, recent weeks have seen the elimination of multiple key Hamas operatives, including individuals accused of involvement in the October 7 attacks and the captivity of Israeli hostages. Israeli officials said those operations are part of an ongoing effort to dismantle Hamas’s terrorist infrastructure, eliminate threats emanating from Gaza, and safeguard Israeli civilians.

{Matzav.com}

LISTEN:

​​For more info, email bitachon4life@gmail.com.

LISTEN:

[Video below.] Conservative commentator Mark Levin delivered a fiery defense of Israel, sharply criticizing what he described as growing attacks on the Jewish state from figures within President Donald Trump’s orbit and warning against efforts to rehabilitate the image of Iran’s regime following the recent U.S.-Iran agreement.

Speaking during a passionate monologue, Levin expressed outrage over what he characterized as attempts to pressure Israel into accepting policies that could compromise its security, while simultaneously portraying Tehran as a more acceptable partner on the world stage.

“Stop trashing, smearing & bullying The Little State of Israel,” Levin declared, accusing critics of unfairly targeting one of America’s closest allies in the Middle East.

Levin reserved particular criticism for those advocating a softer approach toward Iran, arguing that recent diplomatic developments should not obscure the nature of the Islamic Republic or the threats it continues to pose.

“Stop cozying up to and telling us that the enemy regime in Iran is now more rational, more moderate, and a regime that we can deal with,” he said.

The longtime radio host and author rejected suggestions that Israel should be pressured to scale back its military posture or rely on international guarantees for its security. He argued that Israel’s history and unique geopolitical challenges require it to maintain the ability to defend itself independently.

“If people think they can bully a little country and people who’ve existed 4,000 years into surrendering their defense… they got another thing coming,” Levin declared. “I think it’s outrageous.”

Throughout his comments, Levin emphasized the decades-long strategic relationship between Washington and Israel, praising the close military and intelligence cooperation that has long defined the alliance.

He said he was “appalled” by the rhetoric being directed at Israel and expressed hope that the current disputes would soon come to an end.

WATCH:

{Matzav.com}

Sen. Cory Booker launched a blistering attack on President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Binyomin Netanyahu during a CNN interview, accusing both leaders of making disastrous decisions that have left their countries less secure and weakened the U.S.-Israel relationship.

Appearing on CNN’s Inside Politics with host Phil Mattingly, the New Jersey Democrat was asked about the recent conflict involving Iran and Israel and whether he agreed with criticism of Israeli actions voiced by Trump administration officials. Booker responded with some of his sharpest remarks yet against both leaders.

“The two of the worst administrations of all democratic governments on the planet Earth right now are the Netanyahu administration and the Trump administration, both led by criminals. Remember our president, first in history to have dozens of felony convictions. So we have two criminals leading — leading nations and acting in deeply immoral ways. And so this to me is the chickens coming home to roost. Israel is less safe and America is less safe, because of immoral leaders that made horrible decisions.”

Booker argued that the turmoil engulfing the Middle East is not simply the result of longstanding regional tensions but also stems from what he described as poor leadership decisions made in both Washington and Israel.

The New Jersey senator has become increasingly critical of Netanyahu in recent years, contending that the Israeli prime minister’s policies have harmed both Israel’s democratic institutions and its international standing. At the same time, Booker has repeatedly accused Trump of pursuing foreign policies that undermine American security and global influence.

During the CNN interview, Booker went even further, arguing that the consequences of decisions made by both governments are now becoming evident.

He later stated that “Bibi and Donald Trump are awful leaders that have ultimately come out not only making both of their nations weaker and more at risk as a result of this war in Iran, but in a cancerous way have eroded the U.S.-Israel relationship in a way that should make everyone concerned.”

{Matzav.com}

Kamala Harris is facing renewed criticism after a lengthy answer she gave about the meaning of hope during an interview with Don Lemon went viral online, with critics branding the response a classic example of a political “word salad.”

During a Friday podcast appearance with Lemon, Harris was asked about hope and offered a philosophical reflection that centered on inner strength and personal resilience.

“I really, truly believe this,” Harris said. “We each have light inside of us. And we need to know that that is what inspires our hope as much as anything external to ourselves.”

The former vice president went on to encourage Americans not to allow political setbacks or personal disappointments to extinguish their optimism about the future.

“And when we feel that and and and not allow an election or an individual to dampen that light, and instead light, let that light kind of carry us in particular through moments of darkness, that that we not only act on that hope, but we inspire that hope in each other,” Harris added.

“And, in particular, at this moment, it is so important that we not only have hope, but that we understand that that should be a verb.”

The remarks quickly spread across social media platforms, where many users mocked the answer as overly complicated and difficult to follow.

“Good word salad answer that can be summed up in two words: stay positive,” one user wrote on X.

Another commenter joked, “When the teacher told you to write a 300 word essay but you could only think of 100 words.”

Other critics focused on Harris’s suggestion that hope should be viewed as a verb, noting that the word is commonly used as both a noun and a verb.

“It’s a noun: ‘I have hope that she never runs for any government office again,'” a user posted to X. “And it is a verb: ‘I hope she never runs for any government office again.'”

The interview also touched on Harris’s political future. Lemon asked whether she intends to seek the presidency again in 2028.

“I have not decided, to be honest with you,” Harris replied, leaving the door open to a possible campaign.

She said she has spent recent months traveling across the country and speaking with Americans about their concerns and expectations for political leadership.

“I’ve been spending a lot of time traveling the country [and] listening to folks,” she continued. “I think that people want a leader who is willing to take risks, as opposed to just doing what is popular.

“I think people want to know that they are being seen and heard, and that their leaders — whether they’re at the local, state, federal level or in the White House — are looking first at the people. You know, not looking at themselves in the mirror.”

While Harris did not commit to another White House bid, her comments ensured that speculation about her political future—and scrutiny of her public remarks—will likely continue.

WATCH:

{Matzav.com}

Although President Donald Trump has declared the Strait of Hormuz reopened under the terms of the U.S.-Iran ceasefire agreement, major obstacles continue to prevent a full return to normal commercial shipping, with naval mines, security concerns, and conflicting messages from Tehran still disrupting one of the world’s most vital maritime routes.

According to multiple reports, commercial traffic is unlikely to fully recover until Iranian naval mines scattered throughout key shipping corridors are located and removed. Maritime experts say the cleanup effort is expected to be lengthy, technically complex, and potentially dangerous.

The Guardian reported that approximately 80 naval mines remain in or near major transit lanes used by commercial vessels traveling through the strategic waterway.

Shipping and naval officials say clearing the mines will require specialized vessels and painstaking mine-sweeping operations before maritime traffic can safely resume at pre-war levels.

“The main route … through the middle of the Strait of Hormuz, that’s closed, that’s dangerous,” said Phil Belcher, marine director at Intertanko, the tanker owners’ association, according to the Guardian.

The publication also reported that nearly 600 vessels remain stranded in the Persian Gulf after spending months at anchor, creating a significant backlog that could take considerable time to clear even if conditions continue to improve.

Richard Meade, editor-in-chief at maritime intelligence provider Lloyd’s List, warned that the shipping industry is facing unprecedented uncertainty.

“We are in uncharted territory. I don’t think [shipping in the strait] is getting back to normal this year,” according to the Guardian report.

Complicating matters further are mixed signals coming from Iran regarding the status of the waterway.

While Iranian Foreign Ministry officials have insisted that the Strait of Hormuz remains open and that shipping is proceeding normally, statements from the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps have painted a far different picture, suggesting that access remains subject to strict conditions.

According to reports, an IRGC message broadcast over maritime radio channels warned vessels against entering the strait until Tehran’s demands are met.

“Since Israel’s withdrawal from Lebanon, the complete lifting of the naval blockade, and the withdrawal of American terrorist forces from the Persian Gulf and the region are among the main conditions of the agreement between Iran and the United States, the Strait of Hormuz will remain closed until these conditions are met,” that Revolutionary Guards statement said. “All ships are requested, for the sake of their security and safety, not to approach the Strait of Hormuz.

“Any vessel that defies this directive will be targeted.”

Those warnings stand in sharp contrast to the Trump administration’s public assessment of the situation.

Trump has repeatedly stated that the maritime passage has reopened under the ceasefire framework and that commercial energy shipments are once again moving through the region. Administration officials have similarly described shipping activity as resuming.

The president has characterized the waterway as “completely open” and “safe” for international commerce, arguing that the agreement has restored stability to a critical global trade route.

Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei also sought to reassure shipping companies and trading partners.

“Iran has taken the necessary measures to ensure the safe passage of merchant ships through the Strait of Hormuz, in accordance with the memorandum of understanding on the end of the war, and maritime traffic continues on this route,” he said.

Despite those assurances, shipping activity remains far below normal levels.

Industry data show that vessel traffic has recovered somewhat from wartime lows, with roughly 25 ships now passing through the strait each day. However, that figure remains dramatically below the pre-crisis average of approximately 125 to 140 daily transits.

At the height of the disruption, traffic reportedly fell to only a handful of ships per day as insurers, shipping companies, and energy traders pulled back amid fears of naval mines, electronic interference, and broader regional conflict.

Even as traffic gradually rebounds, many major shipping firms remain cautious. Insurance costs continue to reflect elevated risks, while some operators are still rerouting vessels or delaying voyages until security conditions improve further.

The stakes remain enormous. The Strait of Hormuz serves as one of the most important energy chokepoints on earth, carrying roughly 20 percent of the world’s oil supply along with a significant portion of global liquefied natural gas exports. Until the remaining security threats are eliminated, industry leaders warn that a full return to normal operations remains far from certain.

{Matzav.com}

The Trump administration is developing a financial arrangement with Qatar that would allow Iran to access approximately $6 billion in frozen oil revenues for the purchase of food, medicine, and other humanitarian supplies, marking one of the first tangible incentives included in the 14-point memorandum of understanding signed this week between Washington and Tehran.

According to individuals familiar with the negotiations, the proposal remains incomplete and still requires approval from Iranian officials. Under the framework being discussed, transactions would be conducted through Iran’s central bank, creating a model that could eventually be expanded to unlock portions of the estimated $100 billion in Iranian assets frozen around the world.

The initiative would release funds that Tehran has spent years demanding access to and represents one of the most significant economic elements of the new agreement.

Iranian officials are reportedly pressing for substantially larger sums. Tehran is seeking at least $24 billion in initial asset releases, while state-linked media outlets have indicated that Iranian leaders expect roughly $12 billion to become available during the 60-day interim period established by the agreement, with future payments dependent on progress in negotiations.

As part of the memorandum, the United States agreed to work toward making Iran’s frozen assets available for use and to establish a mechanism governing how those funds would be released.

The proposed Qatar-based channel is not without precedent.

In 2023, the Biden administration authorized the transfer of $6 billion in Iranian oil proceeds from South Korea to accounts in Qatar as part of a prisoner exchange agreement. Following the Hamas attack on Israel on October 7, however, those funds were frozen once again.

Efforts to revive discussions surrounding the money gained momentum in late May when Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf traveled to Doha with a delegation, helping pave the way for this month’s broader agreement between the United States and Iran.

The financial negotiations are unfolding even as tensions surrounding the deal continue to mount.

Iranian Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei, who assumed power following the assassination of his father earlier this year, criticized the agreement on Thursday in a series of posts on X, arguing that President Trump had sought the deal from a position of weakness and saying he approved it only after receiving assurances from Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian.

Trump responded forcefully the following day on Truth Social.

“We didn’t meet out of desperation, Iran did. They are FINISHED! We’ll play out the 60 days. They get no money, not ten cents!”

Meanwhile, one of the key foundations of the agreement remains in doubt as the Strait of Hormuz continues to face disruptions.

The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps has stated that the strategic waterway will remain closed as long as Israeli military operations continue in southern Lebanon. At the same time, Swiss officials confirmed that the next round of U.S.-Iran negotiations scheduled to take place in Burgenstock has been postponed.

Vice President JD Vance had been expected to head the American delegation at those talks but ultimately did not make the trip. The White House attributed the change to logistical complications.

The prospect of releasing billions of dollars to Tehran has generated criticism from both Republicans and Democrats, many of whom argue that Iran is being rewarded before making any verifiable concessions regarding its nuclear program.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer was among the deal’s most vocal critics, saying the United States “is worse off than before the war started,” and characterizing the agreement as a surrender to Iranian demands.

Supporters of the administration’s approach argue that the proposed mechanism contains strict safeguards. They note that the funds would be limited to humanitarian purchases exempt from sanctions, that Washington would be able to monitor how the money is spent, and that any future asset releases would remain tied to Iranian compliance with obligations outlined in the memorandum, including requirements related to enriched uranium.

As of Saturday, the U.S. Treasury Department had not publicly issued any waiver authorizing the release of additional funds from the Qatari accounts, leaving the future of the plan uncertain as negotiations continue.

{Matzav.com}

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer is reportedly weighing his future and could announce plans to step down as early as Monday, according to multiple reports, although allies insist he remains fully focused on leading the government.

Reports indicate that Starmer has been privately discussing his next steps with his wife, Victoria, and is considering a timeline for departing 10 Downing Street. Sources cited by The Observer claim an announcement regarding his future could come in the coming days.

The speculation intensified after political rival Andy Burnham secured a seat in Parliament in a special election in Greater Manchester, strengthening his position within the Labour Party and fueling talk of a potential leadership challenge.

Despite the growing rumors, a senior government official pushed back strongly on suggestions that Starmer is preparing to leave office, telling Reuters that the prime minister remains concentrated on governing and has no plans to step aside.

According to reports, Burnham enjoys the backing of more than half of Labour’s parliamentary members and is viewed by many within the party as a viable alternative to Starmer. The two politicians are expected to meet next week amid mounting questions about Labour’s future direction.

“Keir has realised the game is up and it’s got to be a graceful exit,” a senior Labour figure told Reuters The Observer.

“What he rightly wants to avoid is humiliation, but the worst humiliation for Keir personally would be if he stands in a leadership election and is heavily beaten.”

Burnham, who served as Mayor of Greater Manchester from 2017 until 2026, has undergone a significant political evolution. Once associated with Labour’s centrist, business-friendly wing, he has increasingly embraced a populist style and has become known for his street-level social media presence and direct voter engagement.

In the recent special election, Burnham captured 55 percent of the vote, delivering a decisive victory over Labour’s principal challenger, the Reform Party, led by Nigel Farage.

Starmer’s government has struggled with declining public support as Britain continues to grapple with economic pressures and immigration concerns, issues that have weighed heavily on his approval ratings.

The prime minister has also found himself at odds with President Donald Trump on several major international issues, particularly following Britain’s decision not to participate in offensive military operations during the conflict involving Iran.

“I’m not happy with the UK either… this is not Winston Churchill that we’re dealing with,” Trump said of Starmer in March after tensions between the two leaders came to a boil.

Trump’s frustration reportedly centered on Starmer’s reluctance to allow American military aircraft to launch operations from the joint U.S.-U.K. base at Diego Garcia and other British facilities in the region.

Although Britain eventually granted access to Diego Garcia, the decision came only after significant public criticism from the president.

“We were not involved in the initial strikes against Iran, and we will not join offensive action now. But in the face of Iran’s barrage of missiles and ⁠drones, we will protect our people in the region,” Starmer said in March.

{Matzav.com}