Feed aggregator

Former first lady Jill Biden is now revealing that she feared her husband, President Joe Biden, may have been suffering a medical emergency during his widely criticized 2024 debate performance against President Donald Trump — despite publicly defending him at the time and dismissing concerns about his condition.

In a new interview with CBS News scheduled to air in full Sunday ahead of the June 2 release of her memoir, “View from the East Wing,” Jill Biden said the debate left her terrified.

“I was frightened, because I had never, ever seen Joe like that before or since. Never,” she said.

“I don’t know what happened,” she added. “As I watched it, I thought, ‘Oh, my God, he’s having a stroke.’ And it scared me to death.”

The June 27, 2024 debate stunned viewers across the country as Biden repeatedly appeared to lose his train of thought, froze mid-answer, stumbled over words, and at times looked disoriented on stage.

Despite the fallout, Jill Biden immediately stepped in afterward to reassure supporters, accompanying the president to an Atlanta Waffle House and praising his debate performance.

“Joe – you did such a great job,” she said during an event with reeling supporters. “You answered every question, you knew all the facts.”

In the days that followed, the first lady continued publicly defending her husband as growing numbers of Democrats and voters questioned whether he was mentally fit to continue his campaign.

Now, some former administration insiders argue that her latest comments come far too late.

“Unfortunately, when you wait this long to tell your own story in your own words, it’s extremely hard to put the toothpaste back in the tube. She owed it to herself to be candid and transparent in the moment or the days after,” said Michael LaRosa, who served as the then-first lady’s communications director during her first year in the East Wing.

“The cake is already baked when it comes to shaping public perception about that time and about her,” he added. “Penning books doesn’t cut it anymore.”

A person close to Jill Biden pushed back on the criticism, saying the memoir and interview simply reflect her effort to address lingering questions surrounding that turbulent period.

“She tried to dig deep and explore the answers to some of the questions she knows that are out there,” this source said.

Several Democrats who worked closely with the administration said they were not surprised by the apparent contradiction between Jill Biden’s public reassurances and her private fears, noting that many inside the White House had long believed she wielded major influence as concerns about the president’s condition intensified.

One former aide mocked the title of her upcoming memoir, joking that a more fitting name would be: “View From the East Wing, Blindfold On.”

“Find it in the fiction aisle of your local bookstore,” this person added.

In the aftermath of the disastrous debate, the White House offered multiple explanations for Biden’s shaky showing. Officials first blamed a cold, later pointed to exhaustion and jet lag from foreign travel weeks earlier, and eventually claimed the president had overloaded himself with debate preparation and mixed up facts.

The political pressure eventually became overwhelming. On July 21, 2024, Biden ended his reelection campaign after mounting calls from within his own party to step aside, later backing then-Vice President Kamala Harris as the Democratic nominee.

Questions surrounding Biden’s age and health had shadowed his campaign from the moment he announced his reelection bid in April 2023. At 81 years old, he was already the oldest person ever elected president.

Throughout that period, Jill Biden remained one of her husband’s fiercest public defenders, repeatedly insisting he was fully capable of serving another term and would “finish the job.”

Privately, however, former White House chief of staff Jeff Zients told congressional investigators that Jill Biden increasingly urged aides to build more rest into the president’s schedule and took on a larger role in managing his daily activities as concerns over his health escalated.

After Joe Biden withdrew from the race, Jill Biden campaigned heavily for Harris, whose eventual loss to Trump included a decisive Electoral College defeat and marked the first time in two decades that a Democratic presidential candidate failed to win the national popular vote.

Neither Jill Biden nor publisher Gallery Books has disclosed the financial terms of the memoir deal.

The Bidens are believed to be relying in part on proceeds from Jill Biden’s memoir and a separate book currently being written by Joe Biden. Financial disclosure forms showed the couple left the White House with liquid assets estimated between $632,000 and $1.38 million, making them among the least wealthy presidential couples in modern history.

At the same time, former first son Hunter Biden accumulated millions of dollars in legal expenses while fighting federal tax and gun-related charges before ultimately receiving a presidential pardon from his father during the closing months of the administration.

President Donald Trump said Wednesday that he remains frustrated with the pace and substance of ongoing negotiations aimed at ending the conflict with Iran, while warning that military action remains on the table if Tehran refuses to comply with U.S. demands.

Speaking during a Cabinet meeting at the White House, Trump said Iran still has not gone far enough in the talks despite showing interest in reaching an agreement.

“They want very much to make a deal. So far, they haven’t gotten there,” Trump said. “We’re not satisfied with it, but we will be. We will be either that, or we’ll have to just finish the job.”

Trump also accused the Iranian regime of mistakenly believing it could pressure Washington by exploiting the American political calendar and concerns surrounding the upcoming midterm elections.

“I don’t care about the midterms,” Trump asserted. “Look, what happened last night. That was the prelude to the midterms. People understand it. They know that very simple: Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon.”

Although the president voiced dissatisfaction with the negotiations overall, he later acknowledged that discussions are moving in a positive direction and suggested Iran may finally be beginning to make concessions demanded by the United States.

At the same time, Trump coupled those remarks with a direct military warning aimed at Tehran.

“If they won’t, then the man on my left is going to finish them off,” Trump warned, pointing directly to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth.

The remarks came as conflicting reports continued circulating regarding a possible diplomatic breakthrough between Washington and Tehran.

Trump said Saturday that final details of a pending agreement with Iran would be announced “shortly.”

However, American officials said Sunday that formal completion of the memorandum of understanding between the two countries may still take several more days.

According to a senior U.S. official quoted by CNN, the delay is tied to a lengthy internal approval process in Tehran as Iranian officials debate the exact wording of the proposed agreement.

One day later, Trump clarified that any final arrangement with Iran must include the supervised destruction of the regime’s stockpile of enriched uranium.

Iranian state media reported Wednesday that the two sides had already drafted a six-point framework agreement under which the U.S. Navy would remove its maritime blockade around key Iranian ports near the Strait of Hormuz.

Two sources inside Tehran who were described as having direct knowledge of the talks also told MS NOW that both sides had accepted the preliminary framework as a temporary arrangement intended to buy time for a broader permanent peace agreement.

The White House, however, forcefully denied the reports.

Administration officials refused to confirm the existence of any memorandum when questioned, and the White House rapid response social media account dismissed the reports outright earlier in the day.

“Nobody should believe what Iranian state media is putting out,” the administration’s post stated. “FACTS MATTER.”

When asked during the Cabinet meeting about the future status of the Strait of Hormuz, Trump made clear that the waterway would remain open to international traffic.

“Is going to be open to everybody,” the president stated, adding that nobody is going to control it, though the US will watch over it.

{Matzav.com}

Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced Wednesday that the United States has reached agreements with 20 foreign governments to take in illegal migrants currently living in the U.S. who decline to return to their native countries, calling the arrangements a major component of the Trump administration’s immigration agenda.

According to Rubio, the agreements give the United States the ability to remove certain illegal aliens to designated third-party nations considered “safe” when deportation to their homeland cannot be carried out.

“A part of securing our border is dealing with the people that are in this country unlawfully, many of whom do not want to go back to the country that they originally came from,” Rubio said during a Cabinet meeting at the White House.

Rubio explained that in some situations, deportations are prevented either because the migrants’ countries of origin refuse to cooperate or because legal rulings slow or halt the removal process.

“One of the key things we have achieved is now 20 countries have signed third-country national agreements,” Rubio said. “These are safe countries where individuals who refuse to go back to their country of origin can be sent to that country instead.”

The new arrangements represent a major escalation in the administration’s deportation campaign as President Donald Trump continues pressing an aggressive immigration enforcement strategy centered on border control and the removal of illegal aliens residing in the United States.

Rubio said the State Department has coordinated extensively with the Department of Homeland Security in carrying out the policy, though he declined to reveal which countries signed the agreements or when they were completed.

The secretary also said the possibility of being deported to a third country has already persuaded some illegal migrants to agree to return home voluntarily.

“What often happens when you go to the person who’s here unlawfully and say, ‘We’re going to send you to this third country,’ is all of a sudden they decide they’d rather go back to their home country instead,” Rubio said.

Immigration enforcement has remained one of the central pillars of the Trump administration, which argues that stricter deportation measures are essential to reducing illegal crossings and restoring control at the southern border.

Administration officials have insisted that the countries participating in the agreements are regarded as secure destinations and that all deportations carried out under the program are being coordinated with U.S. immigration agencies and international partners.

President Donald Trump issued a stark warning Wednesday to Oman, threatening military action if the Gulf nation works with Iran to impose joint control over the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world’s most critical shipping lanes.

The warning followed a report last week by The New York Times that Iran has discussed cooperating with Oman on a plan to levy tolls on vessels traveling through the strategic waterway.

“Nobody’s going to control it. That’s part of the negotiation that we have. They would like to control it,” Trump said during a Cabinet meeting at the White House.

“It’s international waters, and Oman will behave just like everybody else, or we’ll have to blow them up. They understand that. They’ll be fine.”

Oman’s Foreign Ministry did not immediately issue a response to requests for comment following Trump’s remarks.

The U.S. State Department later posted video of the president’s comments on social media, signaling that the administration was not attempting to soften or walk back the warning.

At the same time, American and Iranian negotiators are reportedly working toward a memorandum of understanding that would guarantee unrestricted international shipping through the Strait of Hormuz without the imposition of tolls, while also buying additional time for negotiations over Iran’s stockpile of highly enriched uranium.

Trump, 79, also warned during the Cabinet meeting that if negotiations collapse, military action may follow.

“If a deal is not agreed,” Trump said, “we’ll have to just finish the job.”

Before the launch of Operation Epic Fury on February 28, Oman had served as one of the primary intermediaries between Washington and Tehran.

The Gulf monarchy, which has a population of roughly five million people, hosted unsuccessful nuclear negotiations earlier this year between Trump special envoy Steve Witkoff and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi.

Omani Foreign Minister Badr al Busaidi later helped broker talks held February 26 in Geneva involving Araghchi, Witkoff, and Trump son-in-law Jared Kushner. According to reports, al Busaidi then traveled to Washington the following day for discussions with Vice President JD Vance as diplomatic efforts intensified in an attempt to avert war.

Since the conflict began, Pakistan and more recently Qatar have taken more prominent roles in mediating the ongoing negotiations.

{Matzav.com}

A newly released report alleges that Qatar poured more than $65 million into efforts aimed at influencing American education systems, including public schools and teacher-training programs, while promoting material accused of legitimizing terrorism and weakening support for Israel.

The findings, published Wednesday by Jewish Insider, were based on research conducted by the Institute for the Study of Global Antisemitism and Policy, commonly known as ISGAP.

According to the report, the Qatari government allegedly spent the past 17 years building a broad influence operation through Qatar Foundation International.

The report claims the effort extended well beyond American universities and reached elementary schools, high schools, national education organizations, and official teacher-training initiatives designed to shape how future generations of American students understand the Middle East and related political issues.

Researchers alleged that educational programs funded by Qatar promoted classroom content that questioned Israel’s legitimacy as both a Jewish and democratic state.

The report also claimed the initiatives worked to erode support for peace agreements and normalization efforts between Israel and Arab countries, including the Abraham Accords.

According to ISGAP’s findings, some educational materials allegedly portrayed Islamist terror groups in a more sympathetic manner, describing them as “freedom fighters” rather than terrorist organizations.

The report further alleged that Qatar strategically directed resources toward politically influential states with large immigrant populations in an effort to facilitate the spread of those messages.

Following publication of the findings, ISGAP urged the U.S. government to classify the Qatar Foundation as a foreign agent, a designation that would sharply restrict its ability to spend money on or fund educational programs and institutions inside the United States.

The allegations triggered strong reactions on Capitol Hill from lawmakers in both parties.

Democratic Congressman Jared Moskowitz declared: “Under no circumstances should a foreign government be allowed to shape the educational materials of American students.”

Senior Republican Congresswoman Elise Stefanik responded to the report by describing its findings as simply: “Shocking.”

A new report from the British newspaper The Guardian is drawing attention for arguing that expanded deportation operations carried out by the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency are contributing to worsening global warming because of increased carbon emissions from ICE flights.

The article, published May 26, cited figures from immigration advocacy groups claiming that ICE’s air operations produced significantly more greenhouse gas emissions this year as deportation activity intensified.

“We’ve seen a staggering increase of all U.S. immigration [enforcement] flights,” Savitri Arvey, a research director at the pro-migration organization Human Rights First, told the newspaper.

The Guardian article claimed:

“U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s (ICE) air operations pumped into the air an estimated 335,876 tonnes (370,240 US tons) of carbon emissions in 2025, up 88 percent from the year before.”

The report also acknowledged, however, that emissions tied to ICE flights remain extremely small compared to the broader airline industry. According to the comparison cited, ICE aircraft emissions amount to roughly one-thousandth of the greenhouse gases generated by domestic U.S. airlines and approximately one two-thousandths of total aircraft emissions recorded in 2017.

Supporters of the deportation operations argue that the flights help remove illegal immigrants who entered the country during President Joe Biden’s administration and contend that stricter enforcement brings benefits such as reduced crime, higher wages, cheaper housing, and greater political influence for American citizens.

ICE is currently operating around three times as many monthly flights in 2026 as it did in 2024 — approximately 1,800 flights each month compared to about 600 two years earlier. Part of the increase stems from the agency transporting illegal immigrants from northern states to detention centers in Texas and other southern states while awaiting immigration proceedings.

Migrants are often held for weeks as ICE works through legal and administrative barriers put in place by progressive immigration policies and court requirements.

Immigration advocacy groups continue pushing back aggressively against President Donald Trump’s deportation agenda and are attempting to rally opposition to the administration’s enforcement efforts.

“The pollution that these flights cause is causing harms to every single family in the United States.” Brett Heinz, global policy coordinator at the pro-migration American Friends Service Committee, told Guardian reporter Alexandra Villareal, who previously worked for the pro-immigration National Immigration Forum.

“When we try to inflict suffering on immigrants… it also inflicts suffering on ourselves, on everyone,” he said, adding, “There’s no one that escapes when we’re trying to increase human misery.”

At the same time, critics of illegal immigration argue that American communities continue to suffer from crimes committed by migrants who entered the country unlawfully, an issue they say is frequently minimized by progressive activists and media outlets supportive of expanded immigration.

Housing Minister and United Torah Judaism chairman Yitzchok Goldknopf revealed Wednesday night that he sought the position of deputy prime minister during coalition negotiations after the last election, but claimed that Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu’s wife, Sara Netanyahu, strongly opposed the move and prevented it from happening.

Speaking at the second educational conference in Beit Shemesh, led by Mayor Shmuel Greenberg and Deputy Mayor Itzik Elmalih, Goldknopf shared unusual details from the coalition talks and described efforts by the chareidi parties to secure legislation exempting yeshiva students from military service.

Goldknopf said the Gerrer Rebbe instructed United Torah Judaism representatives to insist during negotiations that Netanyahu pass a draft exemption law.

“We wanted what existed until now to continue,” Goldknopf said. “A yeshiva student comes with a note to his rosh yeshiva, gets it signed, receives approval, and continues learning.”

He added that, as part of the coalition demands, he requested appointment as deputy prime minister.

“The Rebbe of Gur told me to demand the position of deputy prime minister.”

According to Goldknopf, Sara Netanyahu unexpectedly intervened during the discussion with the prime minister and objected to the request.

“When I said this to Bibi, his wife jumped in and said, ‘You’re going to give them a deputy prime minister? Have you gone crazy?’”

Goldknopf said that afterward, alternative positions were offered to him, including what he described as a “double ministry,” but he saw no reason to accept additional titles or benefits.

“I told him, ‘What am I going to do with that? I don’t need more assistants or more rooms.’”

According to Goldknopf, Netanyahu then tried convincing him to accept the Housing Ministry portfolio so he could maintain close and ongoing contact with the Prime Minister’s Office and continue advancing the draft law issue.

“He told me, ‘You’ll be in my building, you’ll constantly be able to remind me that we need to act on the draft issue. You have a free pass — you can come here whenever you want.’”

Goldknopf stressed that throughout the entire period, he continued raising the issue of the draft law directly with Netanyahu.

“There wasn’t a single week that I didn’t put this issue on the table.”

{Matzav.com}

Senior Iranian leaders used Eid al-Adha messages on Wednesday to urge Muslim nations to unite against outside powers, even as many of those same countries remain furious over recent Iranian missile and drone attacks targeting neighboring Muslim states across the Middle East.

Muslims worldwide marked Eid al-Adha on Wednesday following the completion of the annual hajj pilgrimage to Mecca in Saudi Arabia. The pilgrimage, which Muslims are required to perform once in their lifetime if physically able, drew approximately 1.7 million participants this year, according to Saudi officials, representing an increase over 2025 despite extreme desert temperatures.

The Saudi outlet Al Arabiya reported that pilgrims completed the symbolic “stoning the devil” ritual in Mecca, formally ushering in the Eid holiday.

Against that backdrop, Iran’s president, foreign minister, and parliament speaker each released separate statements emphasizing Islamic solidarity and cooperation against non-Muslim powers — widely understood as references to the United States and Israel.

Iran remains locked in a tense unofficial conflict with both countries following the Pentagon’s February launch of “Operation Epic Fury,” a military campaign that killed Iranian “supreme leader” Ali Khamenei along with numerous senior Iranian terrorist figures. While the operation is currently paused under an indefinite ceasefire, Iranian and American officials continue discussing a possible long-term agreement.

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian announced on social media that he had sent Eid greetings to leaders in Iraq, Oman, Qatar, Turkey, Tajikistan, Egypt, Kyrgyzstan, and Azerbaijan.

“I expressed my hope that God may bring the hearts of us Muslims closer together and that we may witness the expansion of cooperation in all areas and comprehensive support for one another in the face of threats,” Pezeshkian wrote.

But Iran’s appeals for regional unity come after months of attacks carried out by the regime’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps against several of those same Muslim nations.

Following “Operation Epic Fury” in March, Iran launched strikes against Iraq, Qatar, Turkey, and Azerbaijan. Iranian forces have also reportedly carried out missile and drone attacks targeting Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Jordan, Kuwait, and Bahrain.

Although Tehran denied responsibility for some of the attacks — including the strike on Azerbaijan — several governments have said they possess evidence linking Iran to the operations.

In April, Iranian officials escalated tensions further by demanding financial compensation from countries that maintained cooperative ties with the United States.

“The aggressors have utilised the territories of the Kingdom of Bahrain, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, the State of Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, and the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan for the perpetration of acts of aggression against the Islamic Republic of Iran,” Iranian Representative to the U.N. Amir Saeid Iravani wrote. “The conduct of those States in allowing their territories to be used by the aggressors against the Islamic Republic of Iran qualifies as an act of aggression.”

Despite the growing regional anger toward Tehran, Iranian officials continued this week to promote the idea of Islamic unity, or the Ummah, against non-Muslim nations.

Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi issued his own Eid message, describing the holiday as “an unparalleled manifestation of sacrifice, devotion, and submission before Almighty God,” according to the state-run Islamic Republic News Agency.

“Araqchi expressed hope that the auspicious occasion would contribute to strengthening Islamic unity and enhancing cooperation and mutual support among Muslim countries in confronting war, discrimination, and occupation, particularly in the West Asia region,” IRNA added.

Parliament Speaker Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf likewise used the holiday to call for closer coordination among Muslim nations.

“Stronger unity among Muslim nations can play an effective role in resolving regional crises,” Qalibaf declared.

Qalibaf specifically pointed to “the criminal aggression of the US and the Zionist regime [Israel]” as a shared challenge facing the Muslim world and argued that Muslim countries should confront those threats together.

He also claimed that Iran emerged victorious in its confrontation with the United States despite the heavy losses suffered by the regime, including the deaths of numerous senior leaders and major damage to its military infrastructure.

That “victory,” he allegedly claimed, “conveyed an important message to Muslims worldwide: that unity and solidarity in confronting the enemies of Islam, especially the Zionist regime and its supporters, can lead to victory.”

Meanwhile, several of the region’s most influential Muslim governments have made clear that trust in Tehran has largely collapsed.

In March, amid the first wave of Iranian strikes against Gulf states, Saudi Arabia convened regional talks aimed at coordinating a response to Iran and addressing the growing threat to regional stability and commerce.

At the gathering, Saudi Foreign Minister Faisal bin Farhan openly acknowledged the deep deterioration in relations with Tehran.

“What little trust there was before has completely been shattered,” Prince Faisal lamented at the time. “So when this war eventually ends, in order for there to be any rebuilding of trust, it will take a long time.”

“If Iran doesn’t stop… immediately, I think there will be almost nothing that can re-establish that trust,” he predicted.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has appealed directly to President Donald Trump and members of Congress for additional Patriot missile interceptors, warning that Ukraine’s air defenses are struggling to withstand a growing wave of Russian ballistic missile strikes.

According to Politico, Zelenskyy sent a letter Tuesday describing the worsening situation after Russia launched more than 90 missiles over the weekend in one of the war’s heaviest bombardments.

“For us — for a nation fighting for its survival — there is hardly anything more painful to see than Patriot batteries with no missiles loaded,” Zelenskyy wrote. “I ask for your help in protecting Ukraine’s skies from Russian missiles.”

Zelenskyy acknowledged that demand for Patriot missile systems has surged globally because of escalating tensions and military operations in the Middle East. He also indicated agreement with Trump’s long-held argument that European countries should shoulder more responsibility for regional defense.

In the letter, Zelenskyy described Russian ballistic missiles as one of President Vladimir Putin’s final significant military advantages in the conflict.

“They can be intercepted,” he added. “With Patriots. With your help. And you have the power to help.”

American-made PAC-3 interceptor missiles, which are used in Patriot defense batteries, remain Ukraine’s most effective tool for shooting down incoming Russian ballistic missiles.

The Trump administration has reportedly slowed the transfer of additional Patriot interceptors to Kyiv as U.S. allies in the Middle East continue consuming large quantities of the missiles during ongoing regional conflicts.

Last week, however, the United States Department of State approved a proposed $108.1 million assistance package aimed at sustaining Ukraine’s current HAWK missile defense systems.

The proposed package includes replacement components, engineering assistance, software maintenance, and technical support designed to keep the systems functioning.

In a statement, the State Department said the sale would advance “the foreign policy and national security objectives of the United States by improving the security of a partner country that is a force for political and economic stability in Europe.”

The Defense Security Cooperation Agency has formally notified Congress about the proposed transaction, though lawmakers still must approve the deal before it can move forward.

Russia currently occupies roughly one-fifth of Ukrainian territory after more than four years of fighting. Still, Moscow’s recent advances have slowed considerably, and some military assessments indicate Russian forces have suffered net territorial setbacks in recent months.

The war has exacted devastating costs on both sides. Estimates place Russian military casualties above one million, while Ukraine has endured tens of thousands of combat deaths.

The conflict has also devastated Ukrainian civilian infrastructure and forced millions of Ukrainians from their homes.

{Matzav.com}

More than $20 billion in tariff repayments have already been returned to American importers after the U.S. Supreme Court dismantled the central pillar of President Donald Trump’s tariff program earlier this year, according to newly released court documents.

Court filings show that U.S. Customs and Border Protection has processed approximately $20.6 billion in refunds so far, while another estimated $85 billion in additional repayments remain either pending or certified for future distribution, according to reporting first highlighted by NBC News.

Among the companies receiving repayments is toy manufacturer Basic Fun, which says it has so far recovered only a small fraction of the money owed to it.

The company’s CEO, Jay Foreman, said Basic Fun has received just $525,000 out of roughly $7.4 million in tariff repayments owed by the government, with the funds arriving sporadically throughout the month.

“It seems there is no method to this and no statements of why, how and when they are paying,” Foreman told The Post.

“It’s time to release the funds back into the economy, especially given how much we and others need these funds to support our businesses and fund our operations,” he added.

Most companies that have already received repayments have not yet been publicly identified.

However, major corporations and shipping firms including Costco, Walmart, Home Depot, Target, General Motors, Ford Motor Company, FedEx, UPS, and DHL had previously sought recovery of tariff payments collected under Trump’s trade policies.

The repayments stem from the Supreme Court’s major February ruling striking down Trump’s use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, known as IEEPA, to impose broad tariffs on imports from China, Canada, Mexico, and numerous other nations.

In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that IEEPA does not grant presidents authority to impose tariffs, delivering a significant setback to Trump’s trade agenda and forcing the administration to begin refunding billions of dollars already collected from importers.

The White House said many companies still have not received payments because they failed to provide the federal government with the banking information needed to process electronic refunds.

According to the latest court filings, “4,185 consolidated refunds have not been transmitted to Treasury” because the importers requesting repayments had not submitted account details necessary for wire transfers.

The now-invalidated IEEPA tariff framework had included a baseline 10% reciprocal tariff on most imports, along with significantly higher country-specific tariffs that at times climbed as high as 125% on Chinese goods.

Trump’s tariff structure was created through a series of executive orders beginning in February 2025, when duties were first imposed on imports from Canada, Mexico, and China under the emergency-powers law.

The White House later dramatically expanded the program through Trump’s April 2025 “Liberation Day” order, which established a broad 10% tariff on most imported goods while threatening substantially higher tariffs against dozens of countries.

Ultimately, the Supreme Court sided with importers who argued that tariff authority belongs to Congress unless lawmakers explicitly delegate that power to the president.

Chief Justice John Roberts wrote that tariffs constitute a form of taxation and emphasized that Congress historically “speaks clearly” when granting presidents authority to impose such measures.

The ruling forced Customs and Border Protection to launch one of the largest refund operations in American customs history.

To manage the process, the agency established a new refund-processing system known as CAPE to handle repayment claims tied to the overturned tariffs.

Under current federal guidance, importers may seek refunds for many unliquidated import entries as well as certain entries finalized within the previous 80 days, though more complex claims have been pushed into later phases of the refund program.

Despite the Supreme Court defeat, Trump has continued imposing tariffs through a different legal mechanism.

Immediately after the ruling, the administration shifted to Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, which authorizes presidents to impose temporary worldwide tariffs of up to 15% for a period lasting as long as 150 days.

A separate 10% global tariff imposed under that authority remains in effect.

{Matzav.com}

[COMMUNICATED]

What sweeter words can a parent hear than, “I love learning Gemara”? 

Unfortunately, for many boys, those words feel far from reality. When a child struggles to understand his learning or lacks confidence in his abilities, the sweetness of Torah can become difficult to access. Too often, boys who feel disconnected from the beis medrash begin searching elsewhere for fulfillment and belonging. 

This is where Lamdeini has been making a remarkable difference. 

Based in Yerushalayim and directed by Rabbi Meir Oratz under the guidance of הגאון הגדול רבי יצחק ברקוביץ שליט״א and leading Rabbonim and mechanchim, Lamdeini is dedicated to helping talmidim develop a genuine connection to Gemara learning. Through individualized techniques and one-on-one learning with specially trained avreichim, the organization gives each child the tools, confidence, and encouragement needed to succeed. 

Working together with mosdos Torah across Eretz Yisroel, Lamdeini has already seen tremendous success in more than twenty-five schools throughout Yerushalayim, with many more hoping to join the program. 

That spirit of growth and אהבת התורה was clearly felt at Lamdeini’s recent annual event, held on Erev Rosh Chodesh Sivan, where nearly 200 talmidim and fathers gathered for an unforgettable evening of inspiration and chizuk. 

The evening opened with an engaging educational program and interactive activities centered around Gemara and Chag HaShavuos, creating an atmosphere filled with excitement and genuine enthusiasm for learning. This was followed by a special Avos u’Bonim learning session, as the קול התורה echoed throughout the room with warmth and energy. 

A major highlight of the event was the participation of many Gedolei Yisroel, including  

מרן הגאון הגדול רבי דן סגל שליט״א 
הראשון לציון הגאון רבי דוד יוסף שליט״א 
 שליט״א הגאון הגדול רבי יוסף אפרתי 
הגאון הגדול רבי יצחק ברקוביץ שליט״א 
הגאון הגדול רבי יצחק קולדצקי שליט״א 

The Gedolim shared heartfelt words about the eternal greatness of Torah learning and the responsibility to pass the mesorah on to the next generation. Maran HaMashgiach, shlita, spoke passionately about the immeasurable value of Torah and praised the extraordinary efforts being invested in helping talmidim connect to learning. Rav Yitzchok Kolodetsky, shlita, emphasized that true simcha and fulfillment can only be found through dedication to Torah. 

One of the evening’s most emotional moments came during the recitation of Pirkei Tehillim led by Rav Yitzchak Berkovits, shlita, followed by the moving amiras Tefillas HaShlah. The atmosphere reached a powerful peak during the heartfelt Kabbalas Ol Malchus Shamayim led by Maran HaMashgiach, shlita, as the entire crowd responded together with deep emotion and sincerity. 

Following the program, each talmid was given the opportunity to receive a personal bracha from the Gedolim — a moment that left a lasting impression on the boys and their families. 

The Rishon LeTzion, Rav Dovid Yosef, shlita, encouraged the tzibbur to remain steadfast in strengthening Torah learning and transmitting its values to future generations, while expressing gratitude to the Ribbono Shel Olam for the gift of Toras Emes. 

The impact of the event continues to resonate deeply among the talmidim and parents, many of whom left uplifted and inspired by the warmth, encouragement, and powerful messages shared throughout the evening. More than just an annual gathering, the event reinforced the feeling that every talmid is part of something greater — a growing community devoted to nurturing the next generation of lomdei Torah. 

President Donald Trump has further cemented his status as the dominant force inside the Republican Party, boasting a flawless endorsement record so far in Republican House, Senate, and gubernatorial primaries this election cycle — a sign that his influence over the GOP may be stronger now than at any point in his political career.

“After years of weak globalists and elitists leading our party, President Trump transformed the GOP into the party of the working class,” Bernie Moreno told The NY Post on Wednesday. “Newsflash to those who still have not caught on: Support the America First agenda or lose your election.”

Although only about one-third of Republican primaries for the 2026 cycle have concluded, candidates endorsed by Trump have already secured victories in 110 congressional contests — including 101 House races and nine Senate races — along with eight gubernatorial primaries, according to a Fox News tracker. Many of those victories came in some of the most closely watched races of the cycle.

Among the prominent Republicans defeated after drawing Trump’s opposition were Sens. John Cornyn and Bill Cassidy, as well as Rep. Thomas Massie, one of Trump’s most vocal critics in the House.

Cassidy’s loss on May 16 marked the first time since 2012 — when Indiana Sen. Richard Lugar lost renomination — that a sitting Republican senator failed to win renomination from GOP primary voters during a regular election cycle.

Trump’s influence has extended beyond federal races into state-level contests as well, where his endorsements have increasingly become political make-or-break moments.

Earlier this month, candidates backed by Trump defeated five out of seven Indiana state senators who had opposed him on mid-decade redistricting issues, though one of those races remains subject to a recount.

“The Republicans have real leadership — that’s unquestionable,” said longtime Democratic strategist Hank Sheinkopf. “And the party faithful respond to him, respond to that leader, Donald Trump, and it’s his political party.”

Overall, Trump has endorsed Republican candidates in 295 primaries for the 2026 cycle, and additional loyalty battles may still lie ahead after the president recently threatened Rep. Lauren Boebert with a possible primary challenge over her support for Massie.

Still, a source familiar with Trump’s thinking claimed Wednesday that the president is currently “not focused on Boebert right now.”

“That’s a next-cycle [2028] thing,” the source said. “He may or may not weigh in on the Georgia Senate race and a number of other target House races. Probably some statewides, too.”

Trump’s spotless primary record this cycle far surpasses his performance during the 2018 midterms, when he achieved a 95% success rate based on only 37 endorsements, according to Ballotpedia.

Even while out of office in 2022, Trump-backed candidates posted a 93% primary win rate, which later climbed to 96% in 2024, according to Ballotpedia.

Henry Olsen, an elections analyst and senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center, argued that Trump’s role as the Republican Party’s chief kingmaker is likely to continue at least through the end of his second term in January 2029.

Olsen said Trump successfully “married a charismatic personality with a worldview that was represented by people who had not had that view represented before.”

According to Olsen, candidates endorsed by Trump tend to embrace an “aggressive” form of nationalism centered on “pursuing American interests but not international alliance interests,” while also seeking to root out what he described as “non-American” cultural values promoted by both governmental and private institutions.

“That is now a majority view among Republicans,” he added. “That philosophical change will outlast Trump’s personal endorsement … Nothing is permanent, but for the foreseeable future, which is, say, the next two to eight years, that is the dominant feature of the Republican primary process.”

Olsen, who hosts the politics podcast “Beyond the Polls,” added that Trump maintained his endorsement power even after the January 6 Capitol riot.

“Maintained his strong personal endorsement brand even after January 6th, before his return to strong popularity, he was able to push most of his choices through in the 2022 primaries, and I think we just need to remember that this is a long standing ability of his, and so there’s no reason to think that it will decline any time before he leaves the Oval Office.”

Trump has increasingly used his endorsement power both to avoid divisive Republican primary fights and to punish internal party opponents.

One example came in Michigan, where Trump endorsed Republican Senate candidate Mike Rogers early, effectively discouraging Rep. Bill Huizenga from entering the race and allowing Republicans to focus on what they see as a major pickup opportunity.

Facing difficult historical trends ahead of the November 3 midterms, Trump’s political team has reportedly become more selective about endorsements after concerns from Republican strategists that weaker candidates hurt the party during the 2022 midterms.

Potential endorsees are now frequently vetted by White House political advisers before Trump formally gives his backing.

Whether that strategy will translate into general election victories remains uncertain.

According to Ballotpedia, Trump-backed candidates won general elections at rates of 89% in 2024, 83% in 2022, and 78% in 2020. During the 2018 midterms, only 59% of Trump-endorsed candidates ultimately prevailed.

“This [2026] is a referendum on him,” Sheinkopf said. “It’s not even a referendum on policies. Now in his own party, the referendum on him was played out in Texas … and he won that argument.”

“But when it comes to the referendum on him nationally, well, that’s a different question,” he added. “It’s about Donald Trump … the same way in ’94, it was about [President Bill] Clinton and the healthcare plan. Now it’s about Trump, the [Iran] war, and costs.”

“Larger figures in history tend to dominate the argument — and he’s a large historical figure.”

Trump’s endorsement dominance has also become a powerful weapon against Republicans in Congress who consider opposing him on key issues.

In the short term, that influence has created tensions within the Senate Republican conference, particularly as Cassidy and retiring Sen. Thom Tillis have become increasingly willing to criticize Trump publicly after falling out of favor with him.

Still, Trump’s demonstrated ability to politically destroy Republican rivals continues to give him immense leverage inside the GOP, sending a clear warning to potential dissenters that crossing him could carry severe political consequences.

{Matzav.com}

New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani is facing growing criticism over a proposal to open a $30 million city-owned grocery store in East Harlem after it emerged that the same location had already secured $25 million years ago for a separate taxpayer-funded redevelopment project — creating what critics describe as an extraordinarily expensive and confusing overlap of public spending, the New York Post reports.

The proposed supermarket would be built at La Marqueta, the longtime food market stretching beneath the elevated Metro-North tracks along Park Avenue between East 111th and East 119th Streets. Mamdani announced last month that the city intends to establish a government-run grocery store there that would be able to undercut surrounding businesses because it would not be responsible for paying rent or taxes.

But city officials confirmed that La Marqueta had already been approved nearly a decade ago for a separate $25 million overhaul through the city’s New York City Economic Development Corporation, meaning the total public investment tied to the site could balloon to $55 million.

“The $30 million is an outrageous number” by itself, said Stephen Zagor, an adjunct associate professor of food studies at Columbia Business School. “You’d expect the doorknobs and cash registers to be solid gold.”

“And to think there is another $25 million allocated years ago for the rest of La Marqueta, which is well past its prime, I’d think they would have to revisit that,” Zagor added.

Under the original 2017 redevelopment blueprint, which EDC officials recently presented to local business leaders, La Marqueta was slated for major upgrades that included a playground, outdoor dining areas, a dog park, and a revamped market space featuring fresh produce, groceries, prepared foods, and communal seating in a food hall-style setup.

Anthony Pena said Mamdani failed to mention the earlier EDC redevelopment plan when unveiling the city-run grocery proposal last month.

City officials have “not been transparent and open about anything they are doing,” Pena said of the La Marqueta plans.

One aspect of the proposal that has drawn particular criticism is a planned parking lot equipped with electric vehicle charging stations.

“Electric vehicles tend to be more expensive so are they catering to a higher-income market?” Zagor said. “It sounds like they aren’t focused on what they are trying to do in serving East Harlem residents.”

Mamdani has earmarked a total of $70 million for five city-operated grocery stores — one in each borough. With the remaining four stores averaging roughly $10 million each, critics say the East Harlem project’s $30 million price tag appears especially difficult to justify.

Pena pointed to another recently announced city grocery project in the Bronx as an example of the discrepancy. On May 18, Mamdani revealed plans for a 20,000-square-foot public supermarket in Hunts Point, located within a residential redevelopment at the former Spofford Juvenile Detention Center site, which closed in 2011.

Industry executives say a typical 9,000-square-foot grocery store in Manhattan would normally cost only a fraction of what the city is proposing for the East Harlem location. The concerns are heightened by the fact that the neighborhood already contains more than a dozen grocery stores.

“They are going to spend $10 million on a 20,000-square-foot store and $30 million on a 9,000-square-foot store],” Pena said. “There is a massive disconnect right now and there are more questions than answers.”

Responding to inquiries from The New York Post, the Economic Development Corporation acknowledged that Mamdani’s proposed $30 million grocery store and the previously approved $25 million La Marqueta redevelopment are entirely separate projects.

According to the agency, the $30 million allocation would fund “the ground-up construction and fit-out of the public grocery store as well as back-of-house needs and parking with EV charging capability,” though officials declined to provide a more detailed breakdown of the costs.

The EDC also clarified that none of the original $25 million redevelopment funding would go toward the grocery store itself. Officials said the supermarket and adjoining parking lot are expected to occupy the northern end of La Marqueta between East 117th and East 119th Streets.

Earlier this month, city officials met with a grocery industry trade organization and presented a redevelopment proposal that had originally been drafted before the COVID-19 pandemic. According to presentation materials reviewed during the meeting, funding for the project “have already been committed” through the EDC, the City Council, and the city’s Neighborhood Redevelopment Fund.

Sources familiar with the planning process said the redevelopment stalled for years because of pandemic-era suspensions of nonessential projects and later due to a major Metropolitan Transportation Authority infrastructure project above La Marqueta that began in 2023.

“NYCEDC is working with the East Harlem community and relevant stakeholders including small businesses to help inform how La Marqueta’s public grocery store can help strengthen neighborhood food access, provide quality jobs and make New York City more affordable for everyone,” the agency said in a statement.

“NYCEDC is also working on the redevelopment of La Marqueta’s retail market and looks forward to sharing more information soon.”

Meanwhile, many current tenants at the historic market say they still have little understanding of the city’s long-term intentions for the property, which was first opened in 1936 by Mayor Fiorello La Guardia as a marketplace for pushcart vendors.

“The EDC’s plans for the spaces have changed so many times,” said Bella Karakas, whose shared commercial kitchen business Eterra opened at La Marqueta four years ago between East 113th and East 114th Streets.

Another longtime tenant, the Urban Garden Center, now faces growing uncertainty as the project evolves.

The business was relocated several blocks south in 2023 from its original 20,000-square-foot location between East 116th and East 118th Streets because of the MTA’s Park Avenue Viaduct reconstruction project.

Its owner, Dimitri Gatanis, said the relocation cut his space in half and severely damaged sales. He remains unsure whether he will ever regain access to his former location and fears additional competition from the city-owned grocery operation.

“Are they going to start selling potted herbs or plants as most grocery stores in the city do?” Gatanis told The Post. “It’s all very murky.”

Chareidi members of the Knesset launched a fierce public assault Wednesday against the Religious Zionist Party after the party refused to support legislation aimed at preserving daycare subsidies for yeshiva families affected by the Supreme Court’s ruling on draft exemptions.

Despite opposition from the Religious Zionist Party, the proposed law succeeded in passing its preliminary reading in the Knesset plenum.

Finance Minister Betzalel Smotrich reportedly ignored repeated requests from Prime Minister Binyomin Netanyahu to back the measure, insisting that until the chareidi factions cooperate on military conscription legislation, his party would not assist them.

“The Religious Zionists are not participating,” Smotrich declared, according to the report, referencing the ongoing dispute surrounding a draft law.

In response to the backlash, the Religious Zionist Party issued a statement defending its position and accusing parts of the chareidi political bloc of undermining coalition unity while simultaneously resisting compromise on enlistment legislation.

“While some of the chareidi parties are politically flirting with the left-wing bloc and simultaneously opposing a serious conscription framework, you can’t demand the Religious Zionists to be the sucker on call,” a statement on behalf of the party read.

The party further argued that Israelis serving in the reserves and bearing the burden of the war effort would not tolerate a situation in which chareidi parties reject a conscription arrangement while still expecting financial benefits from the government.

Moshe Gafni, chairman of Degel Hatorah, fired back sharply at his coalition partners, accusing them of acting out of hostility toward the chareidi community.

“The hatred against the chareidi public drives them crazy and also hurts the working and weak public.”

Gafni escalated his criticism further, accusing the Religious Zionist Party of betraying the very coalition that helped strengthen its political standing.

“Their partners in their worldview in the Religious Zionist Party act with distortion and ingratitude. We gave them everything, with settlements, funding, and positions, and when it comes to issues that are important to the chareidi public, they turn their back and work against us. They lack integrity and values. We will take that into account from now on with anything concerning religious Zionists.”

Yitzchok Goldknopf also joined the attacks, targeting Smotrich directly over his failure to support the bill.

“Bezalel Smotrich’s absence from the vote on the daycare bill exposes his true face. When he tries to get votes from the chareidi sector, the public will remember that at the moment of truth, he couldn’t care less about chareidi families. As far as he’s concerned, the chareidi children are another tool in the political game to pass the electoral threshold.”

Meir Porush likewise condemned both the vote and the broader legal campaign surrounding the daycare subsidies.

“It’s shameful that opposition MKs, along with individuals from the coalition, chose to hurt little children. I call on the judicial system to stop this persecution of innocent children. United Torah Judaism will continue to fight with all means available to protect Torah students.”

{Matzav.com}

Iranian state-linked media outlets claimed today that President Donald Trump could soon independently declare the completion of a major agreement between the United States and Iran, despite mounting signs that negotiations between the two countries remain deadlocked.

Iran’s Fars News Agency reported that Trump may move ahead with a unilateral announcement regarding a deal, while Iranian state television simultaneously claimed that officials in Tehran and Washington had already drafted a memorandum of understanding.

According to the Iranian report, the proposed framework would require the United States to pull all military forces out of the region and fully lift the naval blockade around the Strait of Hormuz. In return, Iran would guarantee the restoration and long-term security of international shipping traffic through the strategic waterway.

The White House quickly pushed back on the reports, dismissing the claims coming from Iranian media outlets.

“No one should believe what was published in the Iranian media. The facts are what matter.”

Iranian outlets went even further, publishing details of what they described as an agreed structure governing the Strait of Hormuz, the narrow shipping corridor through which nearly 20 percent of the world’s oil supply travels.

Under the reported arrangement, authority over the strait — including the management of shipping lanes and maritime navigation routes — would allegedly be handled solely through joint coordination between Iran and Oman, effectively eliminating American involvement in the area.

The sudden flood of reports from Tehran comes only days after The Wall Street Journal reported that direct talks between Washington and Tehran had slowed dramatically, with both sides hardening their positions as negotiations dragged on.

Sources familiar with the discussions told the newspaper that talks have effectively stalled for the time being because of major disagreements surrounding Iran’s nuclear ambitions and the scale of sanctions relief the regime is demanding.

The United States has reportedly insisted on firm and independently verifiable commitments from Iran to halt its nuclear activities and sharply curb uranium enrichment.

Inside the Trump administration, officials are said to be increasingly worried that Tehran could exploit negotiations as part of a broader delaying tactic. According to those concerns, Iran may seek immediate economic concessions and sanctions relief early in the process, while later dragging out talks over dismantling its nuclear infrastructure — all while preserving the ability to rapidly produce a nuclear weapon if it chooses.

President Donald Trump issued a blunt warning to Iran on Wednesday, signaling growing frustration with ongoing negotiations and cautioning that the United States could “finish the job” if Tehran fails to agree to acceptable terms.

During a Cabinet meeting, Trump cast doubt on reports circulating in Iranian media claiming that a major diplomatic breakthrough between Washington and Tehran was close at hand. Earlier in the day, the White House had already denied the reports outright.

“Iran is very much intent. They want very much to make a deal. So far, they haven’t gotten there,” Trump said. “We’re not satisfied with it. But we will be. Either that or we’ll have to just finish the job.”

Trump also pointed to what he described as the near destruction of Iran’s military capabilities following recent hostilities.

“Their Navy is gone, as I’ve said a thousand times. Their air force is gone. Everything’s gone, and they’re negotiating on fumes,” he said. “Maybe we have to go back and finish it.”

According to reports carried by Iranian state media, the proposed arrangement under discussion would involve Iran restoring commercial shipping traffic through the Strait of Hormuz to prewar levels within one month. In exchange, the United States would reportedly remove military forces from areas near Iran and end its naval blockade operations.

Iranian state television claimed the framework was still incomplete and said military vessels would not be included in the Hormuz agreement. The report also stated that Iran and Oman would jointly oversee commercial maritime traffic through the strategically vital shipping lane.

Tehran reportedly insisted that it would not implement any agreement without what it described as “tangible verification” that the United States had fulfilled its obligations.

Iranian outlets further claimed that if negotiators finalize an agreement within 60 days, the deal could ultimately be codified through a binding resolution at the United Nations Security Council.

Despite the wave of reports from Tehran, the White House forcefully rejected the claims, dismissing the alleged agreement as fiction.

Officials described the Iranian account as “not true” and labeled the supposed memorandum “a complete fabrication.”

{Matzav.com}

Pam Bondi is recovering after being diagnosed with thyroid cancer shortly after President Trump removed her from her role as attorney general, according to an Axios report.

Bondi, 60, underwent treatment for the illness and is now said to be recuperating, Axios reported.

The disclosure surfaced as reports emerged that Trump plans to appoint Bondi to a new advisory panel focused on artificial intelligence initiatives.

According to Axios, Bondi — who was dismissed from the Justice Department the same day she joined President Trump at the U.S. Supreme Court for oral arguments in a major birthright citizenship dispute — is expected to serve on the Presidential Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, known as PCAST.

News of Bondi’s diagnosis prompted an outpouring of support online, with many praising the way she handled the health crisis away from the public spotlight.

“Pam has been quietly kicking cancer’s …. the last few weeks,” podcast host and former White House official Katie Miller wrote on X.

“[Bondi] has a heart of gold,” Miller added.

Medical experts say the vast majority of thyroid cancer cases can be successfully treated. According to the Cleveland Clinic, most forms of the disease are considered highly curable.

Doctors note that patients diagnosed with thyroid cancer generally face an “excellent” outlook, with survival rates exceeding 98% after five years.

Bondi is not the only figure tied to Trump’s orbit to confront the disease. Trump’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner, later disclosed in his memoir that he quietly battled thyroid cancer while serving in the White House during Trump’s first administration.

Kushner underwent surgery to remove a tumor from his throat while overseeing Middle East policy efforts for Trump, and later had an additional thyroid-related procedure in 2022 after leaving government service.

Following her removal as attorney general, Bondi publicly pledged to remain loyal to Trump and continue supporting his agenda.

“Leading President Trump’s historic and highly successful efforts to make America safer and more secure has been the honor of a lifetime, and easily the most consequential first year of the Department of Justice in American history,” she posted on X last month.

“I remain eternally grateful for the trust that President Trump placed in me to Make America Safe Again.”

President Trump has since selected Todd Blanche to serve as interim attorney general while a permanent replacement is considered.

{Matzav.com}

Years after leading the Republican charge to impeach President Bill Clinton, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich says the effort backfired because the public came to see it as a personal scandal rather than a serious legal matter involving perjury and obstruction of justice.

Speaking during an interview on the New York Post’s “Pod Force One,” Gingrich said Republicans made a strategic error in how they handled the impeachment proceedings tied to Clinton’s scandal.

“I think it was a mistake because the real problem wasn’t [the person involved],” Gingrich said when asked whether impeaching President Bill Clinton had been the wrong move. “The real problem was he had committed perjury in a case involving … harassment while he was governor.”

Gingrich argued that the public focus drifted away from accusations that Clinton lied under oath and obstructed justice and instead centered almost entirely on the affair itself, weakening Republican arguments.

“In fact, he was stripped of his law license in Arkansas after he left the presidency, and for five years couldn’t practice because he clearly committed a felony,” Gingrich said.

The impeachment case grew out of an investigation overseen by independent counsel Ken Starr, who had originally been appointed in 1994 by Attorney General Janet Reno to examine the Clintons’ involvement in the Whitewater land deal.

Over time, Starr’s inquiry expanded into allegations connected to Clinton’s personal relationships as well as testimony tied to a harassment lawsuit.

During sworn testimony, Clinton denied certain behavior, leading Starr to determine that the president had lied under oath.

That conclusion prompted House Republicans to impeach Clinton on charges of perjury and obstruction of justice, making him only the second president in American history to face impeachment proceedings.

“I always argued the question, ‘Is he allowed to commit felonies?’” Gingrich said. “But by allowing it to be about [the relationship], it trivialized it.”

Gingrich also reflected on a moment during the 1998 impeachment fight when he realized the country — especially younger Americans — viewed the controversy very differently from how Republicans did.

“I realized at that point I had completely misunderstood how the culture was evolving,” he said, recalling a discussion with his daughters at an Atlanta restaurant. They warned him that younger voters would blame Republicans if the impeachment battle hurt the economy or retirement accounts “because of some stupid intern.”

Throughout the scandal, Clinton aggressively fought the allegations.

A federal judge later held Clinton in civil contempt for giving misleading testimony in the Jones case. His Arkansas law license was suspended for five years, and he also lost his privilege to argue cases before the U.S. Supreme Court.

Despite the impeachment vote in the House, the Senate acquitted Clinton on both counts in 1999, allowing him to remain in office through the end of his second term.

Gingrich himself stepped down as speaker shortly before the Senate trial concluded, following disappointing Republican results in the 1998 midterm elections and growing scrutiny tied to ethics allegations against him.

{Matzav.com}

The Trump administration is preparing to establish a new Ebola quarantine and treatment center in Kenya for Americans exposed to the deadly virus, bypassing the need to transport patients directly back to the United States, according to an administration official familiar with the plan.

The facility, being organized jointly by the War Department, the State Department, and the Department of Health and Human Services, is intended to serve Americans who may contract Ebola while in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Officials say the goal is to provide rapid treatment closer to the outbreak zone while avoiding lengthy emergency evacuation flights to the U.S.

An administration official speaking Wednesday on condition of anonymity said the new center would handle Ebola patients requiring urgent medical attention after leaving Congo. The person said the plan would help patients avoid an hourslong medical evacuation to the U.S.

Authorities have not yet disclosed the exact location of the facility inside Kenya, and it remains unclear whether the Kenyan government has formally approved the project.

According to the official, the center is expected to be equipped to treat every stage and severity of Ebola, which remains one of the world’s deadliest infectious diseases. The official added that patients could still be transferred elsewhere if more specialized treatment becomes necessary.

The move comes as health officials in Congo struggle to contain a rapidly worsening Ebola outbreak that the World Health Organization says is spreading faster than response teams can control. The crisis intensified after the rare Bundibugyo strain of Ebola was identified only weeks after infections had already been spreading, due in part to early testing being focused on a more common Ebola variant.

Suspected Ebola infections in eastern Congo are now approaching 1,000 cases, with at least 220 suspected deaths reported so far. Congo’s Health Ministry announced Tuesday that 101 cases have already been officially confirmed, while authorities are currently monitoring more than 3,000 possible contacts tied to the outbreak.

Containment efforts have been complicated by severe instability throughout eastern Congo, including armed militias operating in the region, widespread displacement of civilians, and crumbling infrastructure that has made medical response efforts far more difficult.

A heavy pall descended this week over the Boyaner chassidus and the broader Ruzhiner Dynasty court in both Eretz Yisroel and the United States following the passing of three prominent chassidim and talmidei chachamim who were deeply connected to the late Boyaner Rebbe, Rav Mordechai Shlomo Friedman.

The three men — Reb Nochum Halevi Schorr zt”l, Reb Chaim Dovid Ullman z”l, and Rav Eliyahu Shmuel Heftler zt”l — were regarded as remnants of an earlier generation of devoted chassidim who remained unwaveringly attached to the rebbes of the Ruzhiner dynasty throughout their lives.

Reb Nochum Halevi Schorr zt”l Passes Away Suddenly on Shavuos

The first heartbreaking news came on Motzoei Chag HaShavuos with the sudden passing of the esteemed chossid Reb Nochum Halevi Schorr zt”l, son of Reb Chaim Yehoshua zt”l and son-in-law of Reb Shraga Feitel Kahana zt”l.

Those who knew him described him as a refined and noble individual whose entire life reflected humility, sincerity, and quiet devotion. A talmid chacham with broad Torah knowledge, he was known for conducting himself with simplicity and purity, never seeking recognition or honor for himself.

He greeted every person warmly and radiated joy and kindness. Deeply connected to Torah, avodas Hashem, and all matters of kedusha, he maintained a lifelong bond with the rebbes of the Ruzhin-Boyaner dynasty.

Reb Nochum was especially attached with complete devotion to the Boyaner Rebbe zt”l and later to his son, the current Boyaner Rebbe shlit”a, beginning from the start of the latter’s leadership in 1988.

He passed away suddenly during Shavuos. His levayah was held Sunday afternoon from Shamgar Funeral Home to Har Hamenuchos, where he was laid to rest.

A Pillar of the Boyaner Kloiz in Beitar: Reb Chaim Dovid Ullman z”l

On Sunday, word spread of the passing of the distinguished chossid Reb Chaim Dovid Ullman z”l of Los Angeles and Beitar Illit, one of the elder and respected members of Boyan chassidus. He was the son of Rav Moshe Naftali zt”l and son-in-law of Reb Simcha Bunim Schatz z”l.

Reb Chaim Dovid was admired as an upright and G-d-fearing Jew who dedicated fixed times to Torah study and devoted himself wholeheartedly to Torah and chassidus. He was known for his acts of kindness, generosity, and constant efforts on behalf of Torah institutions and communal causes.

Those close to him recalled his warm smile and welcoming demeanor, along with his complete humility and bitul before his rabbeim — the late Boyaner Rebbe zt”l and the current Boyaner Rebbe shlit”a — from whom he drew tremendous inspiration.

After relocating from Los Angeles to Beitar Illit, he became one of the founders and primary supporters of the Boyaner kloiz “Tiferes Aharon” in the city, helping establish it as a central makom Torah and tefillah for local chassidim.

His levayah took place Tuesday evening from Shamgar Funeral Home, proceeding through the central Boyaner kloiz on Malchei Yisroel Street before continuing to Har Hamenuchos for kevurah.

Holocaust Survivor and Veteran Rav of Manhattan: Rav Eliyahu Shmuel Heftler zt”l

On Tuesday, the Boyaner community in America was shaken by the news of the passing of Rav Eliyahu Shmuel Heftler zt”l, av beis din of Dukla on Manhattan’s Lower East Side and one of the most respected rabbinic figures in Boyaner circles in the United States. He was in his nineties.

Rav Heftler was counted among the dwindling survivors of the prewar Torah world. A Holocaust survivor who endured the horrors of the war and rebuilt his life afterward in America, he established his home and led the Dukla kehillah in Manhattan with warmth, righteousness, and grace.

For decades, he stood as one of the most distinguished figures in Boyaner chassidus in America. He also maintained exceptionally close ties with the courts of Skulen Hasidic Dynasty, Ruzhin, and numerous revered tzaddikim and rebbes who held him in the highest esteem.

He was especially beloved as a veteran mechanech who taught generations of students as the cherished rebbi of a third-grade class at Bobov Yeshiva, where he left a lasting impact of Torah and Yiras Shomayim upon countless talmidim. His brother, Rav Avrohom Heftler zt”l, was likewise a renowned talmid chacham and longtime fourth-grade rebbi in Bobov.

The levayah departed from the Boyaner kloiz in the Borough Park section of Brooklyn, where many accompanied him on his final journey.

T’hei Nishmasam Tzerurah B’Tzror HaChaim.

{Matzav.com}