Feed aggregator

Israeli Prime Minister Binyomin Netanyahu delivered a forceful defense of Israel’s wartime strategy on Wednesday, declaring that the country’s military successes were achieved because it ignored calls for restraint and acted decisively in Gaza, Lebanon, Syria, and Iran. He also revealed that while he informed President Donald Trump before launching Israel’s operation against Iran, he never sought American approval.

Addressing the Federation of Local Authorities in Israel Conference, Netanyahu argued that Israel’s willingness to take bold military action fundamentally altered the strategic landscape and prevented far greater threats from materializing.

Focusing first on Lebanon, Netanyahu said Israel’s campaign against Hezbollah has transformed conditions along the northern border and created a buffer against future attacks.

“It’s true, Hezbollah is still in Lebanon, but there is something else there now. Today, there is a security zone there that prevents Hezbollah and its remnants from invading the Galilee, because that was the plan,” Netanyahu said.

According to the prime minister, Israeli forces have been systematically dismantling Hezbollah’s underground infrastructure, dramatically reducing the terror group’s capabilities.

“We are destroying all of this underground infrastructure. I was there in southern Lebanon and I saw it; it’s unbelievable. It is simply different,” he added.

Netanyahu acknowledged that significant security threats remain, pointing specifically to the growing danger posed by armed drones, which he described as one of the next major challenges facing Israel.

“We still have work to do, especially on what I call the ‘Manhattan Project’ – we will be the first in the world to solve the explosive drone problem, which is a global issue, and we are solving it,” he stated.

The prime minister argued that Israel’s battlefield accomplishments were possible only because it rejected demands to halt military operations before key objectives had been achieved.

“If we had followed your suggestion to stop at Rafah, we would have gotten nada, zero, gornisht, nothing. Zero. That is not who we are,” he said.

Turning to Syria, Netanyahu said critics had similarly urged Israel to avoid intervention there, advice he said would have been a mistake.

“They told us not to enter; they said it wasn’t wise. We entered with all our might, and we also saved our Druze brothers, whom I salute,” he said. “We will protect our Druze brothers and we will never abandon them.”

Netanyahu devoted considerable attention to Iran, describing the effort to prevent Tehran from obtaining nuclear weapons as the central mission of his political life.

“Over the years, I have dedicated most of my adult life to preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons; I saw it as an existential threat to our survival,” he said.

“I do not want the thousands-of-years-old existence of the Jewish people to be cut short by these Ayatollahs acquiring nuclear weapons.”

While highlighting years of covert Israeli activity inside Iran, Netanyahu said he eventually concluded that direct military action was necessary despite fierce opposition from skeptics.

“They told us: ‘A military operation in Iran? You are forbidden from doing that. Eliminating the leadership of Iran? No, no, not that.’ So I did not listen to them, and I led Operation Rising Lion,” Netanyahu said.

The prime minister said he personally selected the name of the operation to reflect what he views as the determination and courage of the Israeli people and military.

“I chose this name, ‘A people shall rise like a lion’ – because we have a nation of lions and an army of lions.”

Netanyahu also disclosed details of his communication with Trump before the operation began, stressing that Israel acted independently.

“I told him: ‘We are going into Iran, because I am not waiting for these oppressors who declare openly that they want to destroy us. I will not let that happen. Therefore, we are taking action.’ I didn’t ask for permission; I simply informed him of our plan,” he said.

The prime minister compared that decision to his earlier dispute with the Biden administration over Israel’s operation in Rafah, recalling warnings that military aid could be suspended if Israel proceeded.

“When they told me, ‘Do not enter Rafah,’ the President of the United States said he would halt the weapons supply,” Netanyahu said. “I said I respect him very much, and he even came here at the beginning of the war, but we have no choice, we will enter – and if we must, we will fight with our fingernails.”

Netanyahu said moments arise when Israel must stand firm regardless of outside pressure, even from its closest allies.

“Because there are moments when you must know how to tell even the President of the United States what we stand for,” he added.

The prime minister concluded by criticizing opponents who, he said, spent months urging Israel not to act and are now complaining that military victories were incomplete.

“The very same people who told us don’t enter Gaza, don’t enter Rafah, don’t enter Lebanon, don’t enter Syria, don’t enter Iran… today, they come and tell us, ‘But you didn’t finish the job,'” he said.

Arguing that critics would never have supported the operations that produced Israel’s gains, Netanyahu added: “They, who wanted zero, come and tell us, ‘You didn’t achieve 100%, only 80-90%.'”

{Matzav.com}

Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Wednesday that Israel’s continued military operations in southern Lebanon are solely a response to Hezbollah attacks, while emphasizing that the United States is working to strengthen Lebanon’s ability to police its own territory and prevent future threats against Israel.

Speaking to reporters before departing Kuwait, Rubio discussed ongoing American-mediated talks between Israel and Lebanon, describing the negotiations as part of a broader effort to reduce Hezbollah’s influence and expand the authority of Lebanon’s official government and military.

“The whole purpose, the only reason Israel is in Lebanon is because Hezbollah launches rockets and drones from there,” Rubio said. “The reason why they’re involved there is because territory of Lebanon is being used to launch drones and missiles against Israel.”

According to Rubio, the long-term objective is to place more areas of southern Lebanon under the control of the Lebanese Armed Forces rather than Hezbollah.

“Our hope [is] that the Lebanese armed forces and the legitimate, sovereign Lebanese government will continue to be able to control and secure more and more of their own territory, because that’s who needs to control Lebanese territory, not a terrorist group like Hezbollah,” he stated.

While expressing confidence in the intentions of Lebanon’s government, Rubio acknowledged that its military still requires significant development before it can fully assume responsibility for security in the region.

“We have to build up that capacity. That’s been a longstanding challenge. I think the willingness is there. I think we need to help build up that capacity,” he said.

Rubio explained that current discussions include the possibility of establishing limited “pilot zones” where Lebanese forces would first assume responsibility before the concept is expanded elsewhere.

“This is not going to happen overnight,” he said.

The secretary also stressed that Israel has no desire to retain Lebanese territory and has repeatedly conveyed that its presence is tied exclusively to security concerns.

“I want to reiterate what the Israelis have told us, and that is the only reason why they’re there is because Hezbollah’s launching against their people. If Hezbollah wasn’t launching against them, they wouldn’t be there,” Rubio said.

A substantial portion of Rubio’s remarks focused on the ongoing diplomatic effort between Washington and Tehran.

Asked about the administration’s decision to provide a temporary 60-day waiver easing certain sanctions on Iranian oil exports, Rubio characterized the move as a tactical element of the negotiation process rather than a permanent policy shift.

“Anytime you enter into a negotiation, it’s a process of give and take. This is a temporary measure. It’s for 60 days,” he said.

Rubio warned that the sanctions relief is contingent on Iran honoring commitments it made during recent discussions in Switzerland and suggested that President Donald Trump retains a wide range of options if Tehran fails to comply.

“We expect them to live up to the commitments they made in Switzerland,” he said. “If they don’t live up to those commitments, the President has a lot of options at his disposal, including, I’m not saying he’s going to do it, I’m saying including reversing these sanctions.”

Emphasizing the administration’s expectations, Rubio added, “They’ve made very straight-up commitments in Switzerland, and the President has been very clear they need to keep those commitments.”

When asked about the timeline for allowing international inspectors access to Iran’s nuclear facilities, Rubio indicated that inspections should begin immediately.

“As soon as possible.”

“That needs to happen. That’s a commitment they made, and it’s one they need to keep,” he said.

Rubio also made clear that any eventual agreement must be comprehensive and enforceable, signaling that Washington will not settle for a symbolic arrangement.

“If we’re going to get a deal, it has to be a real deal, and it has to be a good deal,” he said. “If Iran wants to make a good and real deal, the United States is open to that. If they’re not, then, of course, the President has options.”

The secretary dismissed speculation that Israel is attempting to derail the current memorandum of understanding that governs the negotiations, insisting that Jerusalem remains fully informed regarding the administration’s efforts.

“We’re working on this. The Israelis exactly know what we’re working on. All of our partners in the region know what we’re working on. Everybody understands what the President’s red lines and positions are on this,” he said.

Rubio further revealed that negotiations will continue next week, with technical experts scheduled to resume discussions as diplomats work through a range of complex issues.

“The technical group will return on the 30th next week to continue those talks,” he said, explaining that the negotiations have been divided into multiple tracks addressing different components of a potential agreement.

Addressing concerns among Gulf Arab nations, Rubio pledged that the administration would remain in close contact with regional partners and would not pursue an arrangement that jeopardizes their security.

“We’re not going to do anything that undermines the security of our allies, our long-standing allies in the region,” he said.

{Matzav.com}

Sen. Rand Paul is intensifying his long-running battle with Dr. Anthony Fauci, accusing the former top federal health official of wielding extraordinary influence over government research, scientific publications, and intelligence assessments during a decades-long tenure in Washington that Paul says amounted to a massive abuse of power.

Speaking with Miranda Devine on “Pod Force One” in an interview released Wednesday, the Kentucky Republican argued that Fauci built an extensive network of allies throughout the federal government during his more than four decades at the National Institutes of Health and related agencies.

According to Paul, Fauci’s reach extended far beyond overseeing medical research grants. The senator pointed to whistleblower accounts and internal government communications that have emerged since the COVID-19 pandemic, alleging that Fauci played a significant role in shaping scientific discourse surrounding the coronavirus and influencing government efforts to determine how the outbreak began.

“People talk about J. Edgar Hoover,” Paul said. “J. Edgar Hoover has nothing on Anthony Fauci — 40 years of placing all his lieutenants in all the positions, and then after 9/11, the funding for bio-research and bio-terrorism went through the roof, and he became the kingpin that had access to all of that money.”

Fauci previously told lawmakers that he maintained a “pretty high level” security clearance beginning in 2004 while helping establish federal biodefense programs following the anthrax attacks. He also acknowledged that, during his tenure as director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases from 1984 through 2022, he possessed broad authority to approve thousands of government-funded research grants each year.

One of the central disputes between Paul and Fauci has involved research conducted at China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology and whether U.S.-funded experiments there constituted gain-of-function research that could have contributed to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Fauci has consistently rejected suggestions that American-funded research in Wuhan triggered the global outbreak and has maintained that the virus most likely emerged naturally through animal-to-human transmission.

During a contentious Senate hearing in May 2021, Fauci firmly rejected Paul’s allegations, stating: “The NIH has not ever and does not now fund gain-of-function research in the Wuhan Institute.”

That assertion later became the subject of renewed scrutiny during a May 2024 House hearing, when NIH Principal Deputy Director Lawrence Tabak offered a different assessment of the issue.

“It depends on your definition of gain-of-function research,” Tabak answered. “If you’re speaking about the generic term, yes, we did.”

“This is research, the generic term [gain-of-function], is research that goes on in many, many labs around the country. It is not regulated. And the reason it’s not regulated is it poses no threat or harm to anybody,” he added.

Supporters of the lab-leak theory have argued that such distinctions are significant. Among them is former CDC Director Dr. Robert Redfield, who has contended that even projects that do not receive direct funding can sometimes be pursued under broader grants that receive federal support. Redfield made those remarks during a biosecurity panel discussion in October 2024.

Paul has repeatedly maintained that Fauci misled Congress during their early exchanges over gain-of-function research. The senator has twice referred Fauci to the Department of Justice for possible prosecution, alleging both false testimony and improper handling of federal records.

When Fauci appeared before a House subcommittee in June 2024, he again rejected the characterization that certain NIH- and USAID-funded experiments met the definition of gain-of-function research, which generally refers to work that increases a virus’s transmissibility or infectiousness.

Paul’s allegations regarding federal records stem from emails he obtained showing Fauci directing then-NIH Director Francis Collins to “delete this e-mail after you read it.”

“I referred him twice to the DOJ under Biden for criminal prosecution. They never acted on it. I referred him twice to the Trump DOJ without action on it,” Paul said.

Despite his frustration with the lack of action, Paul indicated that questions remain about whether Fauci could still face legal jeopardy because of a pardon granted by President Joe Biden shortly before leaving office.

“They may say because of his pardon, they can’t prosecute him. I think that’s an open question. I think the courts, in all likelihood, probably will side with the pardon, but there are some questions.”

On his final day as president, Biden granted Fauci a sweeping pardon, praising him as a dedicated public servant and shielding him from prosecution for potential federal offenses dating back more than a decade.

The pardon provided Fauci with a “full and unconditional pardon” covering “for any offenses against the United States which he may have committed or taken part in” between Jan. 1, 2014, and Jan. 19, 2025.

Paul questioned whether such a broad grant of clemency could withstand legal scrutiny.

“Can you pardon somebody for a nonspecific crime? Is it too vague to say, ‘I’m going to not prosecute you and pardon you for anything you did in the last ten years?’ I think there’s a possibility the court says that’s vague and not specific, and you can’t give people some kind of pardon for everything and over such a long period of time,” Paul mused.

“I think there’s a chance we’d win that. I think it ought to be fought,” he added.

The senator is now pressing forward with additional congressional scrutiny. On Monday, Paul issued a subpoena compelling Fauci to testify before the Senate Homeland Security Committee, which Paul currently chairs.

The move followed the release of a collection of internal government emails by Paul and outgoing Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard. According to Paul, the communications suggest Fauci worked alongside scientists and senior government officials to minimize discussion of the lab-leak theory and suppress concerns raised by a whistleblower.

Paul argued that the newly disclosed records reinforce his belief that Fauci played a central role in shaping both scientific and intelligence narratives surrounding the pandemic.

“Anthony Fauci has been influencing the process, and from the very beginning, it looks like his interference in a lot of different segments — his interference in the scientific journal articles, interference in intel — but he had a 40-year abuse of power career,” Paul said.

“Really, he orchestrated a cover-up that involved, if not dozens, hundreds of people in government that were loyal to him that went to bat because they also were part of the funding stream going to Wuhan, China, and they would suffer the same sort of culpability.”

{Matzav.com}

United Torah Judaism chairman MK Yitzchak Goldknopf has significantly intensified his criticism of Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, declaring that he no longer believes promises regarding legislation protecting bnei yeshivah from military conscription and warning that future coalition negotiations will require concrete guarantees rather than commitments.

In an interview with Avi Mimran on Kol Chai’s Hamehadurah Hamerkazis, Goldknopf explained why he did not attend the recent meeting between Netanyahu, Shas chairman Aryeh Deri, and Degel HaTorah chairman MK Moshe Gafni.

“I said that I do not view this meeting as a real meeting, but rather a meeting for a photograph or to make a joke out of us,” Goldknopf said.

Expressing frustration over the repeated delays surrounding draft legislation, he added, “They have given us nothing until today. Apparently there are still those who have hope. I have lost my confidence and hope in those promises.”

Goldknopf suggested that, from his perspective, the current government has effectively reached the end of its lifespan.

“Let’s not throw sand in anyone’s eyes. This term is over,” he said, referring to growing discussions about dissolving the Knesset and heading to new elections.

While emphasizing that he would support any genuine legislative progress, Goldknopf made clear that he is no longer interested in symbolic gestures or political theater.

According to the UTJ leader, Agudas Yisroel remains firmly opposed to any draft legislation that includes sanctions or penalties against Torah learners.

“We did not support this draft law at all, and we will not support it in the next term either,” he said.

Looking ahead to future coalition negotiations, Goldknopf said the chareidi parties will insist on securing legislation before agreeing to join a government.

“In the next term we will demand a guaranteed check for the draft law. Before the government is formed, a draft law will pass—and if not, we will not enter any government.”

He further indicated that his party does not view itself as permanently committed to any particular political bloc.

“If someone comes and gives us the draft law before the government is formed—we will not hesitate,” he said, suggesting that support could be extended to whichever coalition is prepared to satisfy the demands of the Gedolei Yisroel.

Goldknopf also criticized what he described as a steady stream of measures targeting the chareidi community.

“Without sanctions, without beatings, without daycare cuts, without cuts to yeshivos, without removing Section 46, tax credits and municipal tax benefits. Where are we today?” he asked.

Responding to concerns that leaving the coalition could result in a government less favorable to the chareidi public, Goldknopf expressed confidence that the Torah community would endure regardless of political developments.

“Hashem will not abandon His people and will not forsake His inheritance. We have faced stronger threats than these. ‘Give me Yavneh and its sages’ remained and will remain.”

Toward the end of the interview, Goldknopf acknowledged what he sees as a major weakness in the chareidi community’s public-relations efforts.

“We lack public relations, and we also lack funding for public relations,” he said.

He added that discussions are underway about raising resources, including from supporters abroad, to build a broader campaign aimed at explaining the importance and value of Torah study to the wider public.

{Matzav.com}

President Donald Trump today took aim at what he described as disproportionate media attention surrounding New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani, while highlighting what he said was a near-perfect record of success for candidates he endorsed in recent elections.

In a post published on Truth Social, Trump contrasted the widespread coverage of Mamdani’s recent political success with what he characterized as a lack of media interest in his own influence on Republican primary races across the country.

“Mayor Mamdani pulled through 3 solid Communists, and has received loud and universal applause from the Fake News Media,” Trump wrote. “Congratulations Mr. Mayor!”

Trump then shifted focus to a slate of primary elections held Tuesday night, claiming that all 16 candidates he backed emerged victorious.

“I went 16-0 last night, helping to elect wonderful American Patriots, and the Media doesn’t say a word,” he wrote.

The president further argued that his endorsements have consistently translated into electoral success over the past two years, citing a record of 259 primary victories.

“Over the last two years, my endorsement has netted 259 Primary WINS, and almost no losses, with Zero media attention!!!” Trump stated.

The post concluded with one of Trump’s longstanding criticisms of mainstream news outlets, writing simply: “FAKE NEWS. President DJT.”

{Matzav.com}

Aviel Cohen, the yungerman whose arrest by military authorities sparked widespread public outcry, has spoken publicly for the first time since his release from military prison, describing the dramatic moments of his detention, the challenges he faced behind bars, and the faith that sustained him throughout the ordeal.

Cohen, who was released on Erev Shabbos after spending four days in military custody, shared his story in an interview with Nati Kalish on Chadashos Anash on Kol Chai. Looking back on the experience, he said he felt as though he had been forcibly taken away without warning.

“That’s how I would describe it—that I was simply kidnapped,” he said.

According to Cohen, the arrest occurred while he was traveling with his wife near Netivot on his way to arrange enrollment in a new kollel. He said that after noticing a police checkpoint, he altered his route and was later stopped near the Gilat Junction by traffic police and military police officers.

“Within seconds they took my ID card, driver’s license, and phone. They put handcuffs on me, and I didn’t even have a chance to say goodbye to my wife,” he recalled.

Cohen further alleged that when his wife attempted to notify family members about what had happened, one of the officers threatened to confiscate her phone as well.

He said he was initially transported to a military facility in southern Israel and later transferred to military prison, remaining handcuffed for extended periods throughout the process.

According to Cohen, the journey was accompanied by difficult conditions, including going an entire day without food and experiencing repeated difficulties obtaining permission to stop for a restroom break.

“They told me it was procedure and that they couldn’t stop,” he said.

Once inside the prison, Cohen said one of the most difficult aspects of his confinement was not knowing what had happened to his wife after the arrest.

“The last time I saw her was at the Gilat Junction, and after that I had no idea what was happening with her,” he said.

He also recounted that during the early days of his incarceration, detainees were not permitted to participate in a minyan. According to Cohen, one prison guard bluntly told him, “You’re in prison, not in yeshivah.”

Despite those challenges, Cohen said conditions later improved, allowing detainees to organize prayer services, learn Torah together, and provide spiritual encouragement to fellow inmates.

He described his release as a personal miracle. Cohen said he had prayed intensely to be freed before Shabbos so he could spend time with his wife during their first year of marriage.

According to Cohen, he was unexpectedly informed that he would be released the following morning.

Following his release, he expressed gratitude to Hashem, to his wife for tirelessly advocating on his behalf, to his family members, and to those who assisted him throughout the process. He specifically thanked attorney Rabbi Shlomo Haddad and MK Moshe Abutbul, whom he credited as being among the key figures who worked for his release and even visited him while he was incarcerated.

Concluding the interview, Cohen offered words of encouragement to others facing similar circumstances.

“The first days are difficult, but with faith and joy you can get through anything. Someone who remains steadfast in his path can make it through.”

{Matzav.com}

Thousands of vehicles poured onto roads across Israel this afternoon as large-scale protest convoys departed from 19 cities nationwide toward Military Prison 10, in a mass demonstration against the arrest of bnei Torah who have been detained over military draft-related issues.

Organizers estimated that tens of thousands of drivers would ultimately participate in the coordinated protest, which began at approximately 4:00 p.m. and quickly led to major traffic disruptions on key highways throughout the country.

According to figures released by the protest organizers’ command center, more than 7,000 vehicles had already joined the demonstrations by 5:00 p.m. Heavy congestion was reported on Highway 1, Highway 6, Highway 4, Highway 2, and numerous additional routes as convoys made their way toward the military detention facility.

The protest was organized following calls from leading gedolei Torah to publicly demonstrate against the imprisonment of yeshivah students classified by authorities as draft evaders. Convoys departed from cities including Yerushalayim, Bnei Brak, Ashdod, Beitar Illit, Kiryat Gat, and others.

Several senior chareidi political figures joined the demonstrations. Housing Minister Yitzchak Goldknopf led the Yerushalayim convoy, while MK Meir Porush and Deputy Minister Yisrael Eichler participated from other protest hubs. In Bnei Brak, former MK Moshe Shimon Roth joined the convoy departing from the city.

Earlier in the day, organizers announced that Slabodka Rosh Yeshivah Rav Moshe Hillel Hirsch had given his blessing to participants. Shas also formally joined the protest after statements from senior Torah leaders emphasizing the obligation to demonstrate against the arrests.

At one protest gathering, MK Meir Porush declared, “Only in the State of Israel are Torah learners arrested. We must protest.”

Members of Shas, including MK Michael Malkieli, Health Minister Uriel Bussu, and MK Yonatan Mashriki, attended one of the convoys and voiced support for the campaign. Malkieli stated, “In the State of Israel, they should protect Torah learners, not persecute Torah learners.”

As the convoys progressed, several incidents of violence were reported.

One of the most serious occurred on Highway 7 near Ashdod, where participants alleged that a motorist blocked a protest vehicle, attempted to assault the driver, and then smashed a window after the driver closed it. Protesters further claimed that threats were made against the vehicle’s occupants. No injuries were immediately reported.

Another confrontation took place on the Ayalon Highway near Tel Aviv. According to participants, a truck driver exited his vehicle and approached one of the convoy cars while allegedly carrying a knife and clubs. Protesters claimed he struck the vehicle and pounded on the windows while the occupants remained inside. Police were notified, and the incident remains under investigation.

In Beitar Illit, Deputy Mayor Gedalyahu Eisenstein, who also heads the city’s chasidic faction, was reportedly attacked during the convoy. Witnesses claimed that an individual rammed his vehicle and then physically assaulted him, including attempting to choke him.

Additional clashes were reported in Arad, where confrontations broke out between local secular residents and members of the Ger chasidus participating in the demonstration.

The organizing committee accused police of attempting to undermine the protest by issuing traffic citations to participants. In a statement released during the evening, organizers said they had received multiple reports from drivers alleging interference with their right to protest.

“This constitutes a serious attempt to infringe upon a fundamental right in a democratic state, and we will not remain silent,” the committee said, adding that its legal team would pursue all available avenues to combat what it described as a violation of freedom of expression and protest.

The organizers also expressed gratitude to non-chareidi Israelis who spontaneously joined the convoys.

“We are receiving moving reports about many drivers and members of the general public who are not part of the chareidi sector but chose to identify with the struggle, join the vehicle protest, and strengthen it,” the committee said. “Their participation increases the public impact of the demonstration. We thank them deeply for their solidarity at this critical moment for the honor of Torah.”

Israeli police, meanwhile, warned that some protesters were not adhering to agreements reached in advance with organizers. Authorities reported significant traffic congestion and stated that in some locations demonstrators had exited their vehicles and entered active traffic lanes, creating safety hazards.

Police emphasized that while the roads had not been completely shut down at that stage, the demonstrations were causing substantial disruptions to traffic flow. Authorities reiterated that they respect the right to protest but warned that unlawful road blockages or dangerous conduct would result in enforcement measures, including fines, towing of vehicles, digital enforcement tools, and other tactical responses.

Political reactions were swift and sharply divided.

Yisrael Beiteinu chairman MK Avigdor Lieberman blasted the chareidi leadership, accusing Shas and United Torah Judaism officials of “holding the chareidi public hostage” and creating resentment among the broader population.

National Unity leader MK Gadi Eisenkot also criticized the demonstrations, stating that “the non-working and non-serving public is paralyzing the state and shutting down the working and serving sector at the end of the workday,” while blaming Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu and chareidi party leaders for the situation.

Porush responded by accusing government officials and public figures of contributing to hostility against the chareidi community. Referring to reports of attacks on demonstrators, he called on police to act forcefully against violent individuals and said the incidents were the result of ongoing incitement against bnei Torah.

By early evening, highways throughout central Israel remain heavily congested as thousands of vehicles continue their slow march toward Prison 10, turning what organizers described as a protest for the rights of Torah learners into the largest vehicle demonstrations the chareidi community has mounted in recent years.

{Matzav.com}

A sharp dispute has emerged within Israel’s law-enforcement leadership following last week’s violent clashes between police and chareidi protesters at the entrance to Bnei Brak, with Police Commissioner Danny Levy publicly backing local commanders even as National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir considers removing those involved.

The controversy follows widespread outrage over footage showing officers using force against demonstrators during anti-draft protests. Despite mounting criticism from politicians and community leaders, Levy indicated Tuesday that he supports the decisions made by commanders on the scene.

In a statement released by police, the commissioner said he had spoken with both the district commander and the station commander, reviewed the circumstances of the incident, and accepted their assessment that strong police intervention had been necessary.

According to the statement, Levy agreed “that under the circumstances of the serious incident, during which a major traffic artery was blocked during the early morning hours, causing disruption to public order and affecting the daily lives of tens of thousands of citizens, significant police action was required to restore public order.”

At the same time, police said the commissioner had instructed officials to conduct a professional review of the incident, as is customary following major operational events.

The statement further emphasized Levy’s support for officers and commanders operating in the field.

“The commissioner expressed his appreciation and support for the commanders and officers working on the ground to protect public safety and maintain public order, while making real-time decisions in a complex operational environment, and will continue to stand by them in carrying out their duties on behalf of the citizens of Israel.”

The commissioner’s remarks came just hours after Ben Gvir sent a letter demanding a thorough review of the incident and signaling that disciplinary action could follow.

In his letter, the minister cited video footage that allegedly shows officers deploying stun grenades contrary to police regulations, using excessive force against demonstrators, and humiliating civilians. Ben Gvir argued that the allegations warrant a comprehensive investigation and accountability for anyone found to have violated procedures.

The minister stressed that while he fully supports police officers who act courageously in defense of public safety, there can be no tolerance for excessive force or conduct that violates the law or the values of the police service.

As part of that review, Ben Gvir announced that he is considering using his legal authority to permanently remove officers and commanders involved in the incident, including the commander of the Bnei Brak–Ramat Gan police station, should the investigation confirm serious misconduct.

Ben Gvir is expected to convene an emergency meeting on the matter later this week before making a final decision.

“My duty is to support police officers who work to protect the public,” Ben Gvir said, “but also to act decisively when officers cross the line and harm citizens. No one is above the law, and commanders will also be required to answer for their actions.”

The episode has intensified criticism of police conduct within the chareidi community, where anger has been building over law-enforcement responses to demonstrations against the draft decree.

For many, the scenes captured in Bnei Brak—where officers were filmed tearing protesters’ pants and using what critics described as excessive force—marked a breaking point.

In response, United Torah Judaism faction chairman MK Uri Maklev has launched an effort to establish a parliamentary commission of inquiry into police conduct during anti-draft protests.

For the first time, political observers believe the proposal may have a realistic chance of passing, as opposition lawmakers who have clashed with Ben Gvir could potentially join chareidi parties in supporting the initiative.

In the explanatory notes accompanying the proposal, Maklev wrote that recent incidents demonstrated that “all red lines have been crossed” and described the police response as “severe, unrestrained and deliberate brutality against civilians.”

The proposed inquiry would examine the chain of command behind the operations, the directives issued to officers in the field, and broader policies governing the use of force against demonstrators.

Maklev has also accused authorities of selective enforcement against the chareidi public and argued that existing oversight mechanisms, including the Police Internal Investigations Department, have failed to adequately address complaints.

A recent investigative report published by Matzav.com alleged that police have repeatedly violated operational procedures during chareidi demonstrations, including the improper use of stun grenades and the direct deployment of such devices toward protesters.

{Matzav.com}

Two young chareidi women from Israel were arrested at Poland’s Krakow Airport after authorities allegedly discovered approximately 50 kilograms of khat in their luggage, exposing what advocates say is a growing pattern of young Israelis being recruited as drug couriers by smuggling networks.

The women, ages 23 and 24, arrived on a direct flight from Israel and were detained immediately upon landing Friday, according to a report published Tuesday. They now face criminal proceedings in Poland, which is considered among the strictest European countries when it comes to the importation of khat, a substance classified there as an illegal drug.

The incident has once again drawn attention to criminal organizations that reportedly target young men and women—often from the chareidi community—and persuade them to transport khat into Europe, where demand for the plant remains high and profits can be substantial.

According to reports, recruiters entice potential couriers by offering free airfare and promising cash payments of roughly 5,000 shekels in exchange for carrying luggage containing the substance.

To ease concerns, the organizers allegedly assure participants that the risks are minimal, claiming that even if they are stopped by customs officials, the worst outcome would be the confiscation of their luggage or a relatively small fine that the smuggling network would cover.

Attorneys familiar with such cases say those promises bear little resemblance to reality.

Attorney Mordechai Tzivin, who has represented Israelis arrested in Europe on khat-smuggling charges, told Ynet that “the concept of ‘at worst they’ll confiscate my suitcase and send me home’ has completely collapsed in recent years.”

According to Tzivin, Poland and several other European countries treat the importation of khat as a serious criminal offense. Once suspicious luggage is discovered, suspects are often arrested immediately and held in detention facilities for extended periods—sometimes weeks or even months—before formal legal proceedings begin.

Legal experts say Polish authorities intentionally employ lengthy pretrial detention as both a deterrent and a punitive measure aimed at discouraging future smuggling attempts from Israel.

For those who agree to participate in such operations, the consequences can be devastating. Many find themselves isolated from their families, incarcerated in a foreign country under difficult conditions, and confronting an unfamiliar legal system, only to realize too late that they were lured into a scheme that may permanently alter the course of their lives.

{Matzav.com}

Supreme Court Deputy President and Central Elections Committee Chairman Justice Noam Solberg said that postponing national elections during an extreme emergency could be justified under certain circumstances, while emphasizing that any such move would require strict safeguards and oversight.

Speaking at a closed conference hosted by Hebrew University, Solberg disclosed that election officials are actively examining emergency scenarios in which free and accessible elections may become impossible to conduct. In such cases, he said, a limited and carefully supervised postponement of elections could be warranted.

The remarks came during a presentation of a joint academic paper authored by Solberg and Central Elections Committee Acting Director-General Attorney Din Livneh. The paper examines how democratic elections should be managed during severe national crises and emergency situations.

According to Solberg, any decision to postpone elections must be governed by six strict principles designed to ensure that such an extraordinary measure cannot be exploited for political purposes. He stressed that the primary objective is to prevent election delays from becoming a tool that allows a government to prolong its time in power.

Under the first principle, which Solberg referred to as the “principle of necessity,” the burden of proof rests entirely on those seeking to postpone elections. He explained that the existence of a national crisis alone would not be sufficient justification. Rather, it would need to be demonstrated that the emergency substantially impairs the ability to hold free, fair, and equal elections.

Solberg also outlined what he called the “principle of temporariness,” under which any postponement would have to be limited in duration and accompanied by a specific and clearly defined replacement election date.

One of the most important standards, according to Solberg, is the “principle of last resort.” Before considering a postponement, authorities would be required to exhaust every available alternative, including early voting, mobile polling stations, and special voting arrangements for soldiers, evacuees, and other affected populations.

He emphasized that because delaying elections is such a significant step, any decision would have to be accompanied by complete transparency, including publicly available facts and explanations that would allow for rigorous public and judicial scrutiny.

Toward the end of his remarks, Solberg revealed that the Central Elections Committee has already begun preparing for a range of emergency scenarios behind the scenes.

“To minimize harm and prepare properly, we are thinking in the committee, and practicing, different scenarios and responses, including elections during an emergency.”

He explained that the committee is examining some of the most complex constitutional and logistical questions that could arise during a national crisis. At the same time, Solberg expressed hope that Israel would never find itself in a situation requiring such contingency plans to be implemented.

{Matzav.com}

A legislative initiative championed by Shas chairman Aryeh Deri to end the arrest of bnei yeshivah is facing significant legal obstacles, with senior legal officials reportedly expressing skepticism that the proposal can withstand judicial scrutiny.

According to a report by Kan News, legal experts believe the proposed legislation fails to meet the legal standards and principles required for proper lawmaking. As a result, there is growing speculation that the Knesset’s legal advisers will decline to support the measure.

“This legislative move has no legal viability and is not expected under any circumstances to withstand a High Court challenge,” legal sources reportedly assessed. Based on that evaluation, officials believe the Knesset’s legal counsel is unlikely to back the proposal, which is expected to be advanced as a temporary emergency measure.

The issue of arrests has become a central point of contention between the chareidi parties and Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu. On Monday, a high-stakes meeting took place between Deri, Degel HaTorah chairman MK Moshe Gafni, and Netanyahu, during which the two chareidi leaders demanded rapid advancement of both the Basic Law protecting Torah study and legislation designed to halt the arrests of Torah learners.

During the meeting, Deri and Gafni reportedly pressed Netanyahu for an explicit commitment that sufficient support would be secured to pass the legislation in the Knesset. The two leaders also warned that if the government failed to move forward immediately on the chareidi legislative agenda, their parties would support dissolving the Knesset and triggering new elections.

At the conclusion of the meeting, Deri and Gafni issued a joint statement declaring: “Today we met with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and conveyed to him, in the name of the Gedolei Yisroel, an unequivocal demand to immediately advance the Basic Law of Torah Study and the law to halt the arrests of Torah learners, by convening the Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee and the House Committee already this week.

“We made it clear that if we do not see practical action as we demanded, we will support dissolving the Knesset as early as next week. The Prime Minister made clear during the meeting that he is committed to approving the laws and will act to advance them quickly.”

As previously reported, Deri has spent recent weeks promoting a plan aimed at stopping the arrests by separating portions of the draft law and advancing temporary transitional provisions through expedited legislation.

Under the proposal, the draft law currently before the Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee would be split, with a one-year temporary measure enacted containing only the transitional provisions. Those provisions would preserve existing economic sanctions while ending arrests and criminal enforcement actions.

According to the Shas proposal, criminal proceedings against Torah learners would be frozen, addressing the situation in which many bnei yeshivah have become classified as lawbreakers due to the absence of legislation regulating their status. Supporters of the plan argue that, given the current political reality, no comprehensive draft law is likely to pass during the coming year and that the issue will ultimately be left for a future government formed after elections.

Deri hopes to advance the temporary measure by splitting it from the broader draft legislation already moving through the legislative process. By doing so, supporters believe the proposal could proceed directly to its final readings in the Knesset rather than beginning an entirely new and potentially lengthy legislative process.

Conservative commentator Mark Levin, known as “The Great One,” launched a fierce attack Tuesday against the new U.S.-Iran agreement, arguing that the deal would funnel enormous sums of money to Tehran while weakening Israel’s position and security.

In a social media post, Levin contended that the financial benefits Iran stands to receive under the agreement far exceed the aid Israel receives from the United States over an extended period.

“The Iranian regime will now receive more money from this deal in a single year than Israel receives in 10 years (nearly all of which buys military equipment from American companies),” Levin wrote in a post on social media.

Levin went on to praise Israel’s efforts to reduce its dependence on foreign support, while expressing frustration with what he views as the country’s treatment by allies and critics alike.

“Israel is actively and aggressively focused on complete economic and military independence. It does not want to be treated as a sterling partner in war but a belittled punching bag the rest of the time.”

He also voiced concern over what he described as growing hostility toward Israel from various political and media figures, while warning about closer ties with several Middle Eastern countries involved in regional diplomacy.

“Just listen to what’s said about Israel by Democrats, Woke Reich podcasters, TV hosts, and even some of our friends. I fear we will regret this as we grow closer to countries like Qatar, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and Pakistan and go down a narrow and dark path,” concluded Levin.

Earlier in the day, Levin directed his criticism at diplomatic discussions involving Hezbollah, questioning why Israel and Lebanon were reportedly not participating directly in talks that could significantly affect their future.

“Has anybody ever heard of a negotiation where the two countries directly affected, Israel and Lebanon, are left out of the negotiation?” Levin wrote, referring to what he described as a Hezbollah renewal negotiation involving Qatar, Pakistan, and the United States.

According to Levin, any agreement reached through such negotiations would effectively be imposed on Israel and Lebanon without their direct involvement. He also questioned the wisdom of pressuring a democratic ally to accept outcomes that could threaten its citizens.

“Have we ever forced a democratic ally to endanger its own citizens by supporting a terrorist organization that has murdered Americans?”

Levin did not hide his outrage over the reported diplomatic efforts.

“Honestly, this is an abomination. What kind of [rubbish] is this,” he continued.

The longtime broadcaster further accused negotiators of disregarding Israel’s security concerns while allowing Iran to maintain and expand its influence in Lebanon through Hezbollah.

“Even worse, we are smearing Israel for refusing to abandon its security, we ensure Iran’s control over Lebanon via Hezbollah, and we have done absolutely nothing over the 45 year period Hezbollah has slaughtered Americans,” he wrote. “Only Israel has. Why are we helping Hezbollah? Pure appeasement to Iran.”

Levin also suggested that lawmakers in Washington should closely examine the negotiations and their implications, expressing skepticism that the matter would avoid congressional scrutiny.

“I wonder how many congressional Republicans support this? No way this escapes scrutiny. Something is going on here that stinks to high heaven,” he wrote.

{Matzav.com}

A large-scale vehicle protest in support of imprisoned bnei Torah is set to take place this afternoon, with thousands of drivers expected to depart from 19 locations across Israel and travel in organized convoys toward Military Prison 10.

Organizers say the demonstration will begin at 4:00 p.m. and is intended as a show of solidarity, protest, and unity on behalf of those they describe as “prisoners of the Torah world.” Participants will carry the message: “Enough is enough! There is no path without the path of Torah!”

Calls to participate have been issued by numerous major chassidic courts and organizations. The Eidah HaChareidis has also encouraged participation. Within Shas, senior Moetzes member Rav Moshe Maya stated that participation was obligatory, while party officials themselves have refrained from endorsing the event.

According to organizers, the protest’s objectives are clear: the immediate release of all detained bnei Torah, an end to what they describe as unjust arrests, and the cancellation of all government measures targeting lomdei Torah and their families.

“We will not remain silent while our brothers sit behind bars for the ‘crime’ of learning Torah, and while bnei yeshivah and avreichim are pursued in the streets,” organizers said, urging the broader public to join the demonstration and voice opposition to what they characterize as the persecution of Torah learners in Eretz Yisroel.

Thousands of drivers have already registered through the protest’s internal hotline. Organizers said detailed instructions have been distributed to participants ahead of the journey to the military prison.

In recent hours, the organizing committee reported an unusually high volume of registration requests. The surge in calls from drivers seeking to finalize their participation reportedly caused temporary technical disruptions and a partial system crash, which communications teams were working to resolve.

Ahead of the event, organizers released a comprehensive set of guidelines for participants and encouraged drivers to decorate their vehicles with signs, banners, and informational materials supporting the cause. Volunteers will be stationed at departure points to assist with the installation of flags and signage in a safe and secure manner.

Participants have also been instructed to connect to the protest’s internal command hotline before departure. Organizers emphasized that all official updates, route changes, and emergency instructions will be communicated exclusively through that channel.

The committee stressed that the convoy has been fully coordinated with Israeli police and urged participants to avoid confrontations with law enforcement officers, bystanders, or other motorists. Drivers were specifically instructed not to engage in arguments, provocations, or any behavior that could lead to conflict.

Organizers further emphasized that roadways and intersections must not be blocked under any circumstances. The goal, they said, is to express protest in a dignified and lawful manner while avoiding physical or verbal altercations. Drivers were also instructed to cooperate respectfully with police officers and comply calmly with any requests made during the event.

The convoys are expected to travel at a steady speed of approximately 50 kilometers per hour, subject to traffic and road conditions. Participants have been instructed to maintain greater-than-normal following distances to reduce the risk of accidents and sudden braking.

Drivers were warned not to stop their vehicles along the route, as doing so could create dangerous conditions and potentially expose participants to fines or enforcement actions. Organizers also instructed participants to remain in the right lane, noting that slow travel in the left lane would violate traffic regulations and interfere with normal traffic flow.

Because the demonstration could last several hours and may involve extended delays, participants have been advised to prepare accordingly by bringing water, food, a full tank of fuel, and Torah study materials or other appropriate activities for waiting periods.

Organizers added that a central command center will remain available throughout the event to assist with emergencies, technical issues, and logistical needs. They noted that all operational guidelines and legal instructions for the protest were reviewed and approved by attorney Nosson Rosenblatt.

{Matzav.com}

Fresh off his primary victory over Rep. Dan Goldman, New York Democrat Brad Lander argued Tuesday night that voters are demanding a more aggressive Democratic Party, including a fundamental shift in the party’s approach toward Israel and its relationship with the United States.

Appearing on CNN’s The Source, Lander framed his victory as part of a broader movement within the Democratic Party, saying voters are looking for leaders willing to challenge both President Donald Trump and powerful economic interests.

“want leaders who are going to fight, not just Donald Trump, but the billionaires who are rigging the economy against us. And that’s what I think tonight’s election is about.”

Lander said recent primary results demonstrate growing support for progressive candidates who reject major corporate donors and advocate a more confrontational political style.

“who say we want to see a Democratic Party that’s fighting harder. We shouldn’t be taking corporate PAC money from Wall Street and crypto and AI and AIPAC, we’ve got to fight harder for working families and have people see us fighting for them, and we have to reset the U.S. relationship with Israel.”

Discussing his campaign against Goldman, Lander said voters were looking for change across a range of issues, including campaign financing, healthcare, housing, and U.S. support for Israel.

“a corporate incumbent Democrat to say voters want change on a range of issues, on corporate money, on fighting, on housing, and healthcare, and yes, on not sending any more money for Netanyahu’s wars.”

According to Lander, the divide within the Democratic Party is not primarily ideological but rather comes down to determination and political will.

“fighters and folders.”

CNN host Kaitlan Collins then raised comments made by Sen. John Fetterman of Pennsylvania, who has referred to the progressive wing of the party as the “dirtbag left.”

When asked whether Fetterman was wrong, Lander responded with a remark that quickly drew attention.

“I’m not sure if Fetterman is in our party any more, to be honest. Democrats are having primaries to determine what kind of candidates we want to put on the field, and there’ll be a diverse array of candidates because they reflect and represent a diverse array of districts. Primaries are a time to have those fights out, and then, as we head toward the fall, it’s a time of unity. I will try to be a force of unity. I hope Sen. Fetterman will stop attacking other Democrats and decide to rejoin the fold, but if he wants to leave the party, we’ve got a lot of great fighters who can show up and fight for working families.”

After CNN formally projected Lander as the winner, Collins asked what message he believed the election results sent about the Democratic Party.

Lander replied that voters are increasingly rejecting candidates tied to major outside political organizations and want leaders focused on everyday concerns.

“Look, I think it says people want fighters, they want people who reject corporate PAC money from private equity, Wall Street and crypto and AIPAC, it wants people who center the real felt needs of working families and go out and fight and deliver for them, like I’ve been doing for 30 years, protecting tenants and building affordable housing. And I do think it says Democratic voters want to reset the U.S. relationship with Israel, they don’t want a foreign policy that compromises on anyone’s humanity.”

Collins then asked whether positions on Israel were becoming a litmus test within Democratic politics.

Lander suggested the issue remains far from settled but said he believes voters are increasingly pushing the party in a new direction.

“Well, I don’t know that it’s a litmus test. There’s still a majority of Democratic members of Congress who take money from AIPAC, and a majority of Democrats, in the House at least, have continued to vote for military aid. I think it says Democratic voters want to see that change.”

The conversation then turned to New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani and his criticism of AIPAC during the campaign.

Asked whether he agreed with Mamdani’s characterization of the pro-Israel organization, Lander broadened his criticism to include other large political action committees that operate with substantial financial influence.

“Look, there are voters who have a lot of concerns with AIPAC and the way, but it’s — that’s true of other super PACs as well, that spend money in dark ways, that don’t even talk clearly about the issues that they’re focused on. So, it was an important part of my campaign. At the same time, like, I’m a proud Jewish New Yorker. Antisemitism is surging. It is important for us to be clear that the Democratic Party is not going to compromise on anyone’s human rights, not Palestinians in Gaza, and not Jews in New York City or the United States of America, like, that’s not two separate jobs. That’s the same job.”

{Matzav.com}

Sen. John Fetterman blasted a rising group of progressive Democratic candidates in New York on Tuesday, accusing them of harboring hostility toward Israel, embracing radical policies, and steering the Democratic Party in a dangerous direction.

Speaking on Fox News Channel’s Hannity, the Pennsylvania Democrat expressed alarm over the success of several left-wing candidates in New York and suggested that traditional Democrats are being pushed aside by a more extreme faction.

“These are the kind of people that are trying to run out of office, I mean, they’re just good traditional kinds of Democrats. You would have expected it in New York City. And now this has just become really, it’s just the dancing days of the dirtbag left. You know, with some of these outrageous candidates. You know, you have candidates. They’re here to abolish ICE, abolish the police, abolish the border, and she even said, F Kamala Harris and more of these outrageous kinds of things.”

Fetterman went on to argue that many of the candidates gaining momentum within the party represent a deeply anti-Israel movement that is increasingly at odds with mainstream Democratic voters.

“I mean, these are the emerging full pro-Hamas wing. You know, a lot of these candidates that very likely are going to win tonight, just declaring a war on just regular Democrats.”

Host Sean Hannity then asked Fetterman why he believes some progressives display such strong opposition to Israel.

“Let me ask this: Why the deep hatred for Israel? Why?”

In response, Fetterman linked anti-Israel sentiment to broader opposition toward the United States and Western values.

“Because I mean, you have such contempt for Israel, I mean, of course, you’re also anti-American, and you’re anti-Western civilization. And you’re anti-capitalism and the American way of life.”

The senator also criticized what he described as the growing embrace of socialist, communist, and Marxist ideologies among some figures on the political left.

“Now, I mean, they’re all socialists, of course. Now there is communists and now Marxists and now they’re proud of this.”

{Matzav.com}

United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres called Tuesday for a sweeping increase in global climate spending, urging governments, development banks, and financial institutions to dramatically expand investments aimed at combating climate-related challenges and supporting developing nations.

Speaking during London Climate Action Week, Guterres argued that the world is not investing enough to address the growing effects of climate change and warned that communities across the globe are already experiencing its consequences.

“We must do far more to protect people and communities from the here-and-now effects of climate chaos,” Guterres said. “Because even at full speed, we cannot outrun climate change. Its impacts are already here, compounding and cascading.”

The U.N. leader also focused attention on Africa, describing the continent as rich in energy resources but largely overlooked by international investors despite its enormous potential.

“Africa is home to 60% of the world’s best solar resources, 30% of critical minerals, 1/5 of humanity,” Guterres continued. “Yet it receives just 2% of global clean energy investment. At the same time, more than 600 million Africans still lack access to electricity. This is unjust and a lost opportunity for Africa and the world.”

Guterres called on wealthier nations to fulfill their climate-financing obligations and significantly increase support for developing countries, arguing that existing commitments must be transformed into far larger long-term investments.

“Developed countries must keep their promises, including support to the Fund for Responding to Loss and Damage and the Green Climate Fund. The $300 billion pledged to developing countries must be delivered with concrete steps to mobilize the $1.3 trillion a year by 2035,” Guterres said. “In a world of shrinking aid, we must also unleash the catalytic role of multilateral development banks and the wider development finance system to help fund long-term infrastructure such as grids, mass transit, and water systems.”

The secretary-general further pressed international lending institutions to take a more aggressive role in funding major infrastructure projects and climate adaptation efforts, arguing that recent reforms have given them the financial capacity to do much more.

“Recent reforms and policy decisions have increased the lending capacity of multilateral development banks by 600 to 800 billion U.S. dollars. They must use it aggressively to finance the infrastructure of the future and climate adaptation,” Guterres continued. “They must also adapt their instruments to match the scale and time frame of the challenge, including 50-year finance where needed.”

Guterres’ remarks reflected the United Nations’ continuing push for large-scale international funding commitments as global leaders debate how to finance climate initiatives, energy transitions, and infrastructure projects in developing regions over the coming decades.

Why is there so much more Beis Yosef meat available today? What does “glatt” really mean? And are all glatt and Beis Yosef standards the same? Rabbi Zvi Fishbane, Rosh HaShochtim of the cRc, takes us inside the world of shechita, tracing the evolution of kosher meat standards and explaining what consumers should know.

WATCH:

View it in its entirety at: https://www.kashrusawareness.com/post/how-glatt-is-glatt

Listen wherever you get your podcasts!

https://open.spotify.com/show/6Rj5rIndHc886Fblqh8U49 

https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/lets-talk-kashrus/id1631553497 

https://24six.app/app/podcast/collection/985

https://mytat.me/o112

https://www.kosher.com/shows/lets-talk-kashrus-73

CLICK HERE to watch more episodes of Let’s Talk Kashrus

______

We invite your questions, comments, or feedback. If there’s a specific kashrus topic you’d like to bring to public attention, feel free to contact us by email: info@kashrusawareness.com

Message or call: 678-8-Kosher

You can also visit our website  www.kashrusawareness.com for a growing list of resources, timely conversations, and to watch episodes of the Let’s Talk Kashrus audio-visual series.

Join a Let’s Talk Kashrus WhatsApp Group for educational content and kashrus updates

Click here to Join a LTK WhatsApp Group

Transcription

R’ Yitzchok Hisiger: Hello everyone and welcome back to Let’s Talk Kashrus, presented by the Kashrus Awareness Project in conjunction with the CRC of Chicago. Today I am privileged to be joined by Rabbi Zvi Fishbane, long-time Rosh Hashochtim at the CRC of Chicago. Rabbi Fishbane, welcome. 

R’ Zvi Fishbane: Thank you, Shalom. 

R’ Yitzchok Hisiger: I’ve been privileged in the past to talk to your son, Reb Sholem. 

R’ Zvi Fishbane: Yes, Baruch Hashem, we’re very proud. 

R’ Yitzchok Hisiger: And today we are zocheh to have you after all this time. 

So you’ve been the Rosh Hashochtim at the CRC of Chicago. You’ve basically seen everything in the field of shchita. 

R’ Zvi Fishbane: I joined the world of shchita more than fifty years ago. And Baruch Hashem, I’ve seen a transition of the shchita standards from fifty years ago from the old time until today, and I’ve seen the transition to be on a higher and going on a higher, higher madreiga, then always looking for more hiddurim and more availability on a higher standard of kashrus, Baruch Hashem. 

R’ Yitzchok Hisiger: Very often when we hear people reminisce about the old times, they like to say how great things were back then. In the field of kashrus and specifically shchita, what do you see as the primary difference, or at least maybe even take us down memory lane, walk through what it was like five decades ago and then gradually to where we are today? 

R’ Zvi Fishbane: Well, it’s just very simple is that today, Baruch Hashem, the Olam HaTorah and even the Olam HaChassidus is much more learned and much more broaderthan it was for the people who were living in America before the war. And because they are such on a higher and they’re more learned with such a higher learning background, they understand more and they are demanding more. Once you’re demanding more, so therefore the industry has to keep up with the demands. 

I’ll give you a very simple example is that when there was a controversy of nikur or a controversy of chalav Yisrael, what happened? People would rather abstain from eating than get into shailos and look for heterim. So mimaila that itself was a reason that they upgraded the standards to supply the demands of the tzibur, Baruch Hashem. And that’s when I started the shchita world over fifty years ago, the idea of Glatt Kosherwas just very didn’t wasn’t the norm. But like I say, the demand became bigger, so they had to find a higher standard of Glatt Kosher. 

But this is where the problem comes in. Was there enough to supply the tzibur for everything that they were asking for? So then already you have to look on the other side to find more Glatt Kosher. And that’s where the standard already became a little lenient to find more Glatt Kosher. For example, there is there was a when we started out, real Glatt Kosher was 100% Glatt Kosher, there was nothing more or less, you had to have Glatt Kosher if there was a request for it. 

Today, everything has to be Glatt Kosher and so they use the term today as being commercial glatt. It’s not the real glatt, it’s just called commercial glatt. Now you can stretch that to whatever it means. There is a sefer called Mateh Asher that people use to say up to three—I’ll explain what that is—three ririn, which is basically three sirchos, whatever it may be. 

We can still call that Glatt Kosher. So it became lenient. All of a sudden, the olam woke up to that and said, hey, this is not what we want. We want the real thing or else we’re just not interested in eating your product. 

We don’t need it. We’d rather have what we want. So we start asking for Bais Yosef. Bais Yosef is supposed to mean that the Bais Yosef said that we don’t take anything, so therefore the Bais Yosef is supposed to be without anything, nothing on it, no rir, no sircha, nothing, you didn’t play around with the lungs, you didn’t look at it. 

Okay, all of a sudden the demand for this Bais Yosef standard became higher. So we got to supply the Klal Yisrael with BaisYosef. Right. Once again, we had to find heterim. 

R’ Yitzchok Hisiger: So let’s start at first base for listeners who are watching—listeners are listening, watchers who are watching—who are not shochtim, they don’t know anything about shchita, they’re relying on wonderful hashgacha. like the CRC and others for their, for their meat. What, what does glatt kosher mean in layman’s terms? 

R’ Zvi Fishbane: Let’s, let’s go back and discuss the origin of what glatt kosher means. There’s basically, without going into all the background of all the lomdus in the Gemara, basically we’re talking about a machlokes of Rashi and Tosafos. 

It goes like this. If you find a something in the on the lung, it’s called a sircha. Sircha is somewhat of a thin membrane that develops and it’ll develop on the lung. So the question is, why as Chazal say, we don’t take this. 

If it’s in a certain position on the lung, we cannot accept this as kosher. So it’s a machlokes Rashi and Tosafos as to why we don’t accept it. Rashi says because anything you find on the lung, it’s indicative, it shows that there must be a hole inside the lung, and we know that a nekev mashehu is going to passul the, is one of the treifos, it’s in the nekev mashehu in the reiya, in the lung, it’s going to passul. Tosafos is cholek on Rashi and says if you find something on the lung, it’s not necessarily there’s a hole in the lung, it means that there is a, it’s going to eventually, since the lung is breathing and it’s expanding and it’s detracting, so because of the movement of the lung, it’s going to eventually make a hole, sof lei l’nakev. 

That’s why certain sirchos you would find on the lung, which would be 100 percent muttar because it’s not part of the expansion of the lung. So that’s already extended halacha in Yoreh Deah. But this machlokes of Rashi and Tosafos, how does, how does it affect, is that affect everything you find on the lung or not? So there was a time there was called the BeisYosef and the Rema were talking about a certain procedure that they saw a adhesion, a sircha, an adhesion on the lung, and they would determine if this is what Chazal meant. Meaning like this: they would take this sircha in their hands and they would rub it and expand it, and if it dissolved, oh, it dissolved, so it’s going to eventually dissolve anyway, and we’re going to call it a sircha bas yoma and it’s anyways going to dissolve anyway, so mi-mah nafshach according to Rashimeans it never made a, it was never a nekev there in the first place because something that’s going to dissolve on its own, it’s not, it’s indicative there’s nothing really there, and according to Tosafos it’s going to dissolve anyway, it’s, once you make this miyuch u-mishmush on this reiya, so then we’re going to, it’s not going to be sof lei l’iparek. 

So this idea of miyuch u-mishmush, it became a machlokesbetween the Beis Yosef and the Rema. The Beis Yosef says, no, we can’t accept such a bedika. And the, and that’s where the idea of Beis Yosef means it has to be completely clean without follow up with any type of bedika. The Rema says, no, our minhag in Klal Yisrael to do miyuch u-mishmush. 

That was fine and dandy, that was beautiful until about approximately 150 years ago, whatever it may be, that they discovered a different way of being bodek the lung. It’s called klipa. Klipa means that they took the sircha and with an expert way they can peel the sircha, the adhesion off the lung and check it: is there a hole underneath it or is there not? So that became the norm of how to check. The idea is, if you want to put it in layman’s term, the miyuch u-mishmushprocess was a bedika on the sircha, is this what Chazalwanted, were referring to. 

And the bedika of klipa is not a bedika on the sircha but it’s a bedika on in the lung, what the lung is once you peel it off. Once you peel it off, we’re checking the lung. So that’s the major difference of klipa and miyuch u-mishmush and it makes a whole difference in what kind of sircha, what’s a sircha, how it, but that’s, that would be the difference. The problem really is that hayos that it’s a machlokes Rashi and Tosafos what the origin of the sircha is, so this idea of klipa is only according to Rashi because what are you doing you’re checking for the hole in the lung but according to Tosafos that says it’s soifa liporek you’re not accomplishing anything with this kleipa. 

You don’t know what’s going eventually what’s going to happen. And the Simla Chadasha who is the of course the posek acharon in Hilchos Shechita and Bedika says since it’s a machlokes Rishonim we have to be machmir like both. So here we got a problem over here that everybody’s doing kleipaand that became the minhag in Klal Yisrael but it’s not according to all the shitos so it doesn’t fit in according to Tosafos mostly according to Tosafos because of this reason because of soifa liporek. So everyone’s that’s where glattkosher comes in. 

Glatt kosher comes in and says listen we’re going to we’re going to not have anything on the lung so you don’t have a problem with Rashi and Tosafos and everybody will be happy. That’s good if the glatt kosher is nothing on the lung. But if there’s something a little bit on the lung and you’re finding a heter is this a sircha this is what the Beis Yosef meant and go through that whole procedure of thought how does it fit in according to Rabbeinu Tam? That’s how it that’s where the major problem comes in. So what became a glatt kosher standard lowered itself to commercial glatt which you find something there and maybe we can take it maybe we can’t. 

People woke up to that. That’s not what we’re looking for. We want nothing on the lung. Okay we’ll give you Beis Yosef. 

The demand for Beis Yosef was overwhelming. 

All of a sudden the market is flooded with Beis Yosef. What’s going on here? I had the opportunity to speak to one of the rabbonim machshirim and he explained to me not every BeisYosef is the way I explained it. Vos heist? What’s the makorBeis Yosef? It’s from the acheinu haSephardim they have their masorah. And according to their masorah you can do certain things and you can accept certain things and certain sirchosyou could accept it according to their masorah. 

I’m not familiar with it but this is the way it was explained to me. So according to their masorah this is called Beis Yosef. Oh we could go with their masorah and call things Beis Yosef. I looked at him I said that’s what you’re doing? We’re talking about yungeleit we’re talking about people who are choreidlidvar Hashem they don’t want anything and you’re giving you’re saying I’m only giving it to a masorah. 

R’ Yitzchok Hisiger: It’s like a chumra habah lidei kulabecause not only that if you would try and sell kitniyos on Pesach and not put on it Sephardim only try that it doesn’t work. 

R’ Zvi Fishbane: So mimmiela that’s what’s happening basically right now. I’m not saying all the machshirim have this lenient standard but if you find a influx of Beis Yosef meat in the market and on the shelf you have to be choshesh for it. 

R’ Yitzchok Hisiger: Choshesh for what? What practically? 

R’ Zvi Fishbane: That they’re not using the standard that you want but rather a standard let’s say that this acheinuhaSephardim have a masorah for and they would take certain things off the lung. 

R’ Yitzchok Hisiger: So are you better off not buying BeisYosef or is that what you’re insinuating? 

R’ Zvi Fishbane: I’m not saying what better off what to do. I’m telling you everyone has to go and determine what where the meat is coming from what they want have be educated and follow accordingly. I’m not here to. 

R’ Yitzchok Hisiger: But if people who are not shochtimthey’re not experts at shechita they don’t know the minutiae of or they don’t know the details so what should someone do? If they want to be machmir betachlis hahiddur they want to get the?

R’ Zvi Fishbane: There is a standard in the slaughterhouse today it’s called Shaish Beis Yosef Shaish. So the sellers are developing what Beis Yosef is this is for the hamon am but the Shaish means Shaish is the highest standard Beis Yosef highest standard and there is a they do mark that but the question how much can you get? Shaish you can’t play around with. Once you’re calling something Shaish it means it’s complete. It’s perfect. 

R’ Yitzchok Hisiger: It’s perfect. So the question is if you’re able to get that upon your request or not depending on the. And obviously you might have to pay the price for it because if well I’m not going yeah it’s gonna cost perhaps more depending on what the market could supply. Or else this community they keep it for themselves. 

Let’s say you have a certain community that has their own shechita they’re rest assured they’re going to take care of their own community before although like you say they can get a better price. So you mentioned acheinu hasfaradim. When you’re referring to our Sephardic brethren with regard to BeisYosef and standards of shechita, are you talking about all Sephardim, are you talking about certain segments of Sephardim, if you could clarify that? 

R’ Zvi Fishbane: I’m, well let’s put it this way, I know that Hacham Rabi Ovadia was very makpid in what you call BeisYosef. This is what we were saying was shaish Beis Yosef. 

He wouldn’t settle for anything less and that’s the way he instructed his talmidim and his tzibur. But there are other mesoras. I’m not familiar, I didn’t go personally, I didn’t interview other people, but this is what we’re told in the industry, that there are machshirim from acheinu hasfaradimthat said in that’s the they have a different mesora and this is what they’re transmitting and telling our machshirim who are copying that standard and giving using that as a standard for Beis Yosef. So it’s not necessarily by everyone. 

R’ Yitzchok Hisiger: It’s only by certain ones. Now, to clarify also, tell me if I’m right about categorizing like this. Our whole conversation here is about a mehadrin level. We’re talking about those who desire the highest level of purity in shechita. 

So we shouldn’t mislead people. We’re talking about people who want Beis Yosef because it’s a higher level. And within Beis Yosef what you’re saying is because there became such a high demand for Beis Yosef, so whatever the providers of meat have found ways for the meat to be considered Beis Yosef. So we’re talking about within that realm of mehadrin, what is mehadrin, what may be mehadrin min hamehadrin and things of that sort, if you could elaborate on that? Exactly. 

R’ Zvi Fishbane: I just want to explain before the shechitastandards have definitely been improved. The quality, the standard of the shochet himself that should be on a ben Torah-dik level at least. I know by the Chassidish communities they have to meet their standards as being a representative of their community and a representative of Torah and what they stand for. 100%. 

It’s on a but to say that it’s not acceptable, chas veshalom, everything is beautiful according to but I’m just bringing out this nekuda because the demand is so great as compared to years before, so this demand has brought them to want to supply the tzibur and in that nekuda the hiddur demand has lessened the standard that people may want to accept. But it’s 100% there’s no problem, it’s 100% beautiful kosher shechitaon all the basically in all the machshirim today and it’s a kavod for the tzibur that the machshirim are well aware of the to keep everything on a higher standard with higher chumrasand aderaba yochlu anavim veyisbau. Right. So, you know, we like to provide a takeaway for those who listen and watch Kashrus Awareness, let’s talk Kashrus. 

R’ Yitzchok Hisiger: And so I’d like to distill everything that you said into perhaps a practical takeaway. If someone wants the highest level of shechita today, so a two-part question: should they look specifically for Beis Yosef and if they should, how do they determine that it’s the highest level of Beis Yosef? What would you say? 

R’ Zvi Fishbane: I would say basically learn through the sugya. No, basically I would… 

R’ Yitzchok Hisiger: No, on a serious note, people are not necessarily able to learn through the sugya. 

Those who learn Chullin in Daf Yomi may have a little more knowledge of what we’re talking about, but on a serious note, if someone really wants the highest level, what should they look for? 

R’ Zvi Fishbane: So basically what I’m saying is since the standards differ from one community from one shlachtoisfrom one hechsher to the other, it would be a responsibility of the rav of a community to be able to advise his tziburaccordingly. 

R’ Yitzchok Hisiger: Aha. So you go to your rav and you say to your rav I want the highest level of shechita, he’ll tell you which specific shechita, which store, which shlachtois and so on. Yes, I would think that should be the derech, yes. 

Rabbi Fishbane, thank you for being here. 

R’ Zvi Fishbane: It’s been my honor. 

R’ Yitzchok Hisiger: It’s a zechus to be able to sit with you and on behalf of all those who have benefited from your dedication and devotion to the world of shechita for half a century, we say thank you, thank you for enhancing the world of kashrus as you have and for all your wonderful avodas hakodesh, thank you so much.

{Matzav.com}

WATCH:

LISTEN:

​​For more info, email bitachon4life@gmail.com.

LISTEN: