Federal Court Rules Antisemitic UN Envoy Albanese Can Be Served
A federal judge in the United States has dealt a major legal setback to Francesca Albanese, ruling that the controversial United Nations official can be formally served in a defamation lawsuit brought against her by two Christian pro-Israel organizations.
The decision was handed down May 15 by the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado. The court authorized the plaintiffs to serve Albanese through email and social media platforms, overcoming earlier complications tied to international procedures and her current reported residence in Tunisia.
Under the court order, Albanese now has 21 days to respond to the lawsuit. If she fails to answer the complaint within that timeframe, the court could enter a default judgment against her.
The lawsuit was filed in September by Christian Friends of Israeli Communities and Christians for Israel USA, two Colorado-linked Christian charities that say they were targeted by Albanese in what they describe as a coordinated campaign intended to intimidate and damage pro-Israel groups.
According to the complaint, the dispute began after Albanese sent letters to the organizations ahead of publishing a United Nations report that the plaintiffs characterize as deeply biased against Israel. The charities allege that Albanese threatened them with possible exposure to international criminal proceedings related to alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity.
In the letters, Albanese accused the groups of “knowingly spreading malicious lies” and linked them to allegations involving genocide and war crimes connected to the conflict in Gaza.
The organizations argue that her accusations severely harmed their reputations, interfered with their charitable activities, and were made intentionally to cause damage. The plaintiffs are seeking financial compensation, a formal retraction, and a court order prohibiting Albanese from repeating the statements.
Albanese has repeatedly faced criticism over statements viewed by opponents as hostile toward Israel. More recently, several European foreign ministers condemned remarks she made during an Al Jazeera conference, where she stated: “The fact that instead of stopping Israel, most of the world has armed, given Israel political excuses, political sheltering, economic and financial support … We who do not control large amounts of financial capitals, algorithms and weapons, we now see that we as a humanity have a common enemy.”
She later denied interpreting her remarks as labeling Israel itself a universal enemy.
Albanese later claimed in an interview that she “never, ever, ever said ‘Israel is the common enemy of humanity,'” calling the accusations “completely false accusations.”
Her past comments regarding Israel and Jewish influence have also drawn scrutiny. Social media posts uncovered in 2022 showed Albanese referring to what she described as the “Jewish lobby” controlling the United States.
At the time, Albanese denied that the comments were antisemitic, insisting they had been “mischaracterized,” though criticism over her rhetoric has persisted.
Her remarks about Israel intensified after Hamas’s October 7, 2023 attack, which she said should be understood within “context” and framed as a response to Israeli “aggression.”
Earlier this year, Albanese accused Israel of institutionalizing torture against Palestinians.
In late March, Albanese claimed that the world has given Israel “a license to torture Palestinians”, alleging that “torture has effectively become state policy” in Israel.
Israel’s diplomatic mission in Geneva responded sharply to those comments.
Responding to the comments, Israel’s mission in Geneva said in a statement, “Francesca Albanese is not a promoter of human rights; she is an agent of chaos… and any document she produces is nothing but a politically-charged, activist rant.”
The Israeli statement further charged that Albanese “advocates dangerous extremist narratives to undermine the very existence of the State of Israel,” it said.
{Matzav.com}