Feed aggregator

MK Meir Porush, chairman of the Shlomei Emunim faction, delivered a fiery warning to Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara on Tuesday, threatening an escalation of protests if authorities continue pursuing the arrest of bnei yeshiva over military draft issues.

Speaking at a gathering of Shlomei Emunim representatives in Beitar Illit, Porush told dozens of local officials from across the country that the chareidi community must prepare for an intensified public campaign against what he described as the persecution of Torah learners.

During his remarks, Porush issued his sharpest warning yet, declaring: “If she does not stop persecuting Torah learners, there will be no choice but to use Ehud Barak’s words and drive her out with sticks and stones.”

The meeting, hosted by Beitar Illit Mayor Meir Rubinstein, focused on organizing broader protest efforts in response to the arrests of bochurim and avreichim. Porush said he had specifically convened the gathering to discuss preparations for demonstrations that would, in his words, “shake the foundations.”

Porush pointed to recent efforts led by Rubinstein and other chareidi municipal leaders to suspend cooperation with police authorities, describing the move as a powerful example of what coordinated action can achieve.

“We recently saw the power of united action,” Porush said. “It echoed from one end of the country to the other, and we saw how quickly it caused senior police officials to stop and reconsider their conduct.”

Despite those developments, Porush made clear that he remains deeply dissatisfied with the current situation.

“Can I tell you that I’m satisfied? Calm? Far, far from it. This disgrace of arresting people for learning Torah is a stain and an accusation against us all,” he said.

Porush told attendees that the community must be prepared for what he described as a difficult and prolonged struggle.

“This is a battle over our existence as a nation of Torah,” he said, adding that the community may ultimately need to sever cooperation with additional government agencies and consider economic measures capable of exerting significant pressure.

Referring to past comments by former Prime Minister Ehud Barak about removing Benjamin Netanyahu “with sticks and stones,” Porush said he viewed those remarks as setting a precedent.

“I want to thank Barak for his honesty,” Porush said. “People always say that what is permitted for them is forbidden for us, but no longer. Once a war was declared against the Torah world, everything that is permitted for them is permitted for us, and if necessary, even more than that.”

Porush acknowledged that he would not have spoken in such terms a year ago, but argued that circumstances have changed dramatically.

“A year ago I would not have dared say such things,” he said. “But today there is no alternative: If the attorney general does not stop persecuting Torah learners, there will be no choice but to use Ehud Barak’s words and drive her out with sticks and stones.”

At the same time, Porush stopped short of calling for immediate action, emphasizing that he was speaking about preparation rather than implementation.

“So I’m not yet telling you to prepare sticks and stones,” he said. “But I brought you here to discuss the fact that we must be ready. We must be prepared to lead protest actions that will shake the foundations.”

Porush also revealed that economic pressure is among the options being discussed and presented to senior Torah leaders.

He pointed to the anti-government protests surrounding judicial reform, arguing that their effectiveness stemmed from a combination of public demonstrations and economic leverage.

“We saw during the judicial reform how the Kaplanists brought the government to its knees through two central tools: the protests in the streets, including at Ben Gurion Airport, and the economy,” he said.

Highlighting the size of Israel’s chareidi population, Porush cited official statistics estimating that nearly 1.45 million chareidim lived in Israel in 2025.

“I repeat that this is a dramatic figure,” he said. “The chareidi public today numbers nearly one and a half million people. That is 14.3 percent of the entire population.”

He then issued another warning directed at officials in the Justice and Finance Ministries.

“I strongly advise our pursuers in the Justice Ministry and the Finance Ministry not to test the economic price of one and a half million people deciding that they have reached their breaking point and are prepared to do whatever is necessary to stop this campaign of persecution against Torah learners,” Porush said.

Toward the end of his speech, Porush compared what he sees as threats from secular activists to Israel’s external security challenges.

“I am chareidi, you are chareidi representatives, and we are concerned about Arab terrorism,” he said. “But we are no less concerned about the Kaplanists led by Ehud Barak and those like him.”

He concluded with a particularly sharp comparison.

“The truth is that they want to beat us with sticks and stones and dismantle the Torah world in Eretz Yisroel,” Porush said. “Chazal teach that causing someone to sin is worse than killing him. The Arabs want to kill our bodies; the Kaplanists and the legal establishment want to kill our souls.”

{Matzav.com}

[COMMUNICATED]

by Rabbi Eliezer Sandler

The concept of the Yissachar-Zevulun Torah Learning Pact goes back well over 3,500 years, to the time of Yaakov Avinu and his sons. It is named for the Torah pact between two of his sons – Yissachar the scholar and Zevulun the merchant. Not only was it an equal pact but, Chazal explained, the deed of Zevulun/the Sponsor is considered even greater than that of Yissachar, because without the support of Zevulun, Yissachar would not have had the wherewithal to study Torah undisturbed.”

It is well-known that when it comes to learning Torah, people who sponsor the learning, often do so, not just as a donation. By financially supporting specific Torah scholars, they enter into a binding, written, signed and sealed learning partnership pact whereby the Sponsor (the Zevulun) is deemed by Halacha as if he personally studied the Torah completed by the Scholar (the Yissachar). (See below.) 

Thus, those who support the Talmidei Chachomim at Shas Yiden via a Yissachar-Zevulun Pact merit a portion in every daf of the entire Talmud Bavli and associated texts that they study, and complete the entire cycle in the space of ONE year. Some of the Sponsors opt to continue sponsoring repeat cycles of Shas which accrue to them.

Sar Hatorah, Maran Hagaon Harav Chaim Kanievsky, zt”l, Nasi Shas Yiden, emphasized: The most mehudar Yissachar-Zevulun pact to support in our times is that offered by Shas Yiden – it comprises the entire Shas, Rashi and Tosfos – all in just one year!

Rav Chaim explained why this pact with Shas Yiden is the most mehudar. Chazal say that the highest level of learning is when one understands what he is learning b’iyun u’ve’amkus. However, even higher than that is when one remembers b’al peh all what he has learned. I have farhered the Shas Yiden avreichim geonim many times and can attest ZEI KENNEN SHAS (they know Shas)!

YES! YOU CAN MAKE

The Yissachar-Zevulun Pact in Halacha

The Shulchan Aruch in Yoreh De’ah Chapter 246 regarding the efficacy of the Yissachar-Zevulun Sponsorship Pact for the Zevulun (the Sponsor) states clearly:  It is deemed as if he (the one sponsoring the learning) himself learned all the Torah studied under the pact. 

All the learning under the Shas Yiden Yissachar-Zevulun Pact is yours בעוה”ז ובעוה”ב (in both This World and the World to Come)! Concerning this, the Netziv of Volozhin comments that in Olam Habah, the Zevulun sponsor will sit together with the Gedolei Torah of the past and merit to participate in their discussions and pilpulim on all the Torah learned.

Achieve Almost 7 million Mitzvos in One Year

The Vilna Gaon in Shnos Eliyahu Pe’ah 41 states that one should hold precious every word of Torah that he learns because each word is considered a mitzvah of its own. 

Thus, since in Talmud Bavli, Rashi and Tosfos there are 6,608,891 words, that translates into almost 7 million mitzvos accruing through Yissachar-Zevulun at Shas Yiden. 

Official Shtar from Shas Yiden

Each Yissachar-Zevulun pact is confirmed by an official contract (shtar) from Shas Yiden specifying the learning of the entire Shas, and is witnessed by talmidei chachomim.

All who wish to enter into a Yissachar-Zevulun Pact for the entire Shas during ONE year should contact Shas Yiden to make arrangements: 718-702-1528.

The opportunity to complete the entire Shas has been a cherished way to honor family members and others as a prized achievement. It has also proven to be a source of comfort for mourners to obtain such a zechus for their dear ones during the year of mourning – a siyum of the entire Shas can be completed on the yahrzeit!

Yissachar-Zevulun Pact –

The legendary visionary and “Father of Yeshivos”, Reb Chaim of Volozhin, was the founder of the famous yeshiva in the town of Volozhin and the beloved talmid of the Vilna Gaon. 

Reb Chaim had an ongoing Yissachar-Zevulun pact with a local shoemaker – a man who was not learned but who dearly valued Torah learning. They had a ‘deal’ whereby the shoemaker would pay the monthly financial support needed for Reb Chaim and his family. For this financial support, the shoemaker would have an equal share in all Reb Chaim’s daily Torah study – both in the mitzvah of Torah study בעוה”ז and that the knowledge of the Torah learned would continue to be his בעוה”ב (in the World to Come).

One day the shoemaker passed away suddenly. During the shiva period, Reb Chaim was facing a perplexing halachic question and researched high and low for a solution. That night the shoemaker appeared to him in a dream and gave him the full solution that he sought. Reb Chaim was amazed and commented, “Azoi gich, Azoi Gich – So quickly, so quickly has he acquired the zchus and knowledge of the Torah that I have studied!”

In the words of Gedolei Torah:

Maran Hagaon Harav Chaim Kanievsky, zt”l, Nasi Shas Yiden:

“In just ONE year, through Yissachar-Zevulun at Shas Yiden, you can be zoche to the entire Shas forever – בעוה”ז ובעוה”ב (in olam hazeh and olam habah).

“Moreover, whoever supports Shas Yiden is zocheh to fulfill both Yissachar-Zevulun and support of aniyei (the poor of) Eretz Yisroel in the fullest sense of the word.

“Those who support Shas Yiden will be saved from chevlei (the travails of) Moshiach – spiritually and materially, and will be zoche to have ehrlicher bonim u’vanos yir’eishomayim ”

Maran Hagaon Harav Dov Lando, shlit”a, Rosh Yeshiva, Slabodka:

“Who compares to the Shas Yiden? Incredible talmidei chachomim geonim who raised the bar in limud Hashas b’iyun u’v’amkus. Blessed are those who enter a Yissachar-Zevulun pact with them.”

Hamashpia Hagadol Reb Meilech Biederman, shlit”a:

 “Yissachar-Zevulun at Shas Yiden – best possible deal, and in just 1 year! 100% partnership! 100% Shas x 5 times! 100% Shisha Sidrei Mishna – בעוה”ז ובעוה”ב”

Sanzer Rebbe, shlit”a:

“A first in 2000 years of Jewish history! Until Shas Yiden, never a Torah institution where ALL the avreichim metzuyonim v’geonim know the entire Shas by heart”

Harav Yaakov Hillel, shlit”a:

“Therefore, the great mitzvah to support the efforts [of the Talmidei Chachomim] with generous donations in order that they should continue diligently with their studies to enhance the greatness of the Torah and its glory. 

ShasYiden.com

A major legislative effort aimed at ending the arrests of bnei yeshiva is expected to move forward as early as next week after senior Shas representatives met with Cabinet Secretary Yossi Fuchs to finalize a framework for the proposal.

Former minister Ariel Atias and MK Yinon Azoulay held discussions with Fuchs in recent days in an effort to advance legislation that would stop criminal proceedings against Torah students. According to reports, the meeting concluded with an agreement to begin advancing the measure through the Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee next week.

Under the emerging plan, committee chairman MK Boaz Bismuth is expected to convene the committee to begin deliberations on the legislation.

Senior coalition officials say Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu has assured supporters of the proposal that it will have sufficient backing within the coalition and can be approved in the coming days. At the same time, some lawmakers remain skeptical, noting that Netanyahu previously pledged support for the so-called Daycare Law before ultimately freezing that legislation.

As previously reported, Shas chairman Aryeh Deri has been leading an intensive effort in recent weeks to stop the arrests of bnei Torah by separating portions of the draft law and advancing temporary transitional provisions through emergency legislation.

Deri’s proposal calls for splitting off part of the draft legislation currently under discussion in the Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee and passing a one-year temporary measure containing the law’s transitional provisions.

Under the framework being advanced by Shas, existing economic sanctions would remain in place, but the criminal enforcement measures that have led to arrests would be suspended.

The proposal would effectively freeze criminal proceedings against Torah students who have found themselves classified as lawbreakers due to the absence of legislation governing their status. Supporters of the plan argue that the current situation was created because there is no active law regulating the issue and because political realities make it unlikely that a comprehensive draft law of any kind can be passed before the next election and the formation of a new government.

Deri is seeking to accomplish this through a procedural split of the existing draft bill, allowing the temporary measure to move directly toward second and third readings rather than requiring an entirely new and lengthy legislative process.

{Matzav.com}

Mosab Hassan Yousef, the former Hamas insider known as the “Green Prince,” launched a sharp public attack on President Donald Trump, accusing him of undermining Israel’s military efforts and then criticizing the Jewish state for the results.

“You cannot sabotage a campaign and then blame Israel for the outcome,” Yousef wrote in response to Trump’s recent criticism of Israel’s operations against Hezbollah in Lebanon.

Yousef is the son of Hamas co-founder Sheikh Hassan Yousef and spent roughly a decade working covertly for Israel’s Shin Bet security service. After leaving that role, he converted to Christianity, relocated to the United States, and authored the book Son of Hamas. His nickname, “Green Prince,” reflects both his roots in Hamas’s leadership circles and the movement’s symbolic color. Over the years, he has become one of Hamas’s fiercest critics and a prominent voice on issues involving Gaza and Israel.

In his remarks, Yousef argued that whenever Israel gained significant military momentum—whether in Gaza, Lebanon, or against Iran—Trump stepped in and halted operations at critical moments.

According to Yousef, those interventions prevented Israel from turning battlefield successes into lasting strategic victories.

He singled out Israel’s pager operation against Hezbollah for praise, describing it as “a masterpiece of modern warfare.” He also argued that Israel’s campaign against Iran left the regime reeling after the elimination of senior figures and severe damage to its infrastructure, but claimed the effort was halted before sustained pressure could produce a decisive outcome.

Yousef further asserted that Trump had been advised that defeating Iran would require at least a year of continuous pressure. Instead, he said, the president sought quicker results, altered the original strategy, and transformed what could have become a strategic victory into a strategic setback.

“Now, after signing a humiliating deal that buried the nuclear threat instead of eliminating it, you blame Israel for taking too long and for the way it fought,” Yousef wrote.

He also rejected criticism regarding civilian casualties in Lebanon, arguing that responsibility rests with Hezbollah because the terror group operates from within civilian population centers and uses noncombatants as human shields.

Yousef’s comments came in response to statements Trump made during the G7 summit, where he said Israel’s conflict with Hezbollah had dragged on too long and resulted in excessive loss of life. The president criticized strikes on residential buildings and said Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu should exercise greater restraint in Lebanon.

{Matzav.com}

Former Prime Minister Naftali Bennett declared that Israel intends to help the Iranian people bring down the Islamic Republic, outlining what he described as a detailed strategy to support future anti-regime uprisings and warning Tehran’s rulers that their days in power are numbered.

In an interview with Babak Itzchaki of the opposition outlet Iran International, Bennett addressed growing concerns among regime opponents that a developing agreement between the United States and Iran could strengthen Tehran’s leadership and prolong its grip on power.

“We will do everything we can to ultimately bring down this terrible regime,” Bennett said. “And I want to say to the Iranian people, to the wonderful Iranian nation: Do not lose hope.”

“The terrible, disconnected, corrupt, and evil regime will fall. You will be free,” he added.

Bennett, who has positioned himself as a leading challenger to Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu, argued that the international community must be prepared to assist the Iranian people when they next rise up against the regime.

“What we are going to do is make sure that the next time the Iranian people rise up, we will provide them with the tools to win, communications and other tools,” he said. “This rotten regime will fall at some point.”

“Our role is to accelerate that,” Bennett added.

His comments come as many Iranians opposed to the regime have expressed alarm over the expected signing of a memorandum of understanding between Washington and Tehran later this week. Critics fear that the agreement could preserve the current regime and provide relief to a government they accuse of brutally suppressing its own citizens.

The prospect of a deal has heightened concerns among opposition figures that ordinary Iranians have borne the greatest sacrifices while the country’s hardline rulers survived and may now receive political and economic breathing room through diplomacy.

Seeking to address those fears, Bennett said he has developed what he called a comprehensive strategy designed to bring about the collapse of the Islamic Republic.

“I have formulated a complex and detailed plan whose goal is ultimately to bring down this ayatollah regime,” he said.

According to Bennett, the effort would rely on a broad range of methods beyond military action alone. He cited economic pressure, diplomatic initiatives, covert and overt operations, and efforts aimed at empowering the Iranian public.

Bennett also cautioned against embracing the emerging U.S.-Iran memorandum of understanding unless it ultimately leads to the complete dismantling of Iran’s nuclear and missile programs, as well as its regional proxy network.

“This is an interim agreement. It is far from over,” he said.

“We must make sure that the final agreement is a good agreement,” Bennett added. “That it completely dismantles the Iranian nuclear program, the ballistic missile program, and the regional terror program.”

“That will be the ultimate test,” he said. “We cannot ease the sanctions and all the pressure on this terrible regime until that is achieved.”

Drawing a historical comparison, Bennett likened the Islamic Republic to the Soviet Union in its final years, arguing that authoritarian governments can unravel much more quickly than observers expect.

“This regime will fall,” he said. “It is a corrupt, disconnected, and incapable regime, very similar to the Soviet regime of the 1980s.”

“If you had asked me in 1985 whether the regime would fall, who knew? But only four years later, it collapsed,” Bennett added. “My message to the Iranian people is: Hold your heads high. Be proud. Be strong. We care about you.”

He concluded with a direct warning to Iran’s leadership.

“I would say to those leaders, to those ayatollahs: Your time is running out. We are pursuing you. We know exactly who you are. And you will not remain in power for long,” Bennett said. “It may take a little time,” he added. “But your time is up.”

Amid the latest wave of arrests targeting bnei yeshiva under Israel’s military draft policies, a sharply worded and highly unusual public letter from leading Torah authorities was published Wednesday morning on the front page of Hamodia, which devoted its entire cover to the growing campaign against the arrests and to protests scheduled for later in the day outside Prison 10.

The newspaper describes the detained bochurim and avreichim as being held under conditions of emotional distress and persecution that evoke dark chapters of Jewish history.

The letter was drafted at the personal request of the Gerrer Rebbe and carries the signatures of rabbonim from across the Torah world. Among those signing are Rav Meir Tzvi Bergman; Rav Yitzchak Yosef, nosi of Shas’s Moetzet Chachmei HaTorah; the Modzitzer Rebbe; and other leading gedolei Torah.

The full text of the letter reads:

“To our brethren, the Bnei Yisroel, may Hashem grant them life.

“With the intensification of the persecution of the world of Torah and Judaism by the state authorities, who seek, Heaven forbid, to uproot Yavneh and its sages and its batei medrash from among the Jewish people, and who refrain from no means in their efforts to harm those who study Torah and preserve it in purity, including through attacks on their livelihoods, their children, and every aspect of their lives.

“And recently they have gone even further, launching a campaign against the cherished students of our holy Torah, uprooting them from their places of learning and casting them into detention centers solely because of their desire to engage in Torah study and to maintain holiness without foreign influences. The honor of the Torah has been trampled, as ‘This is the statute of the Torah—this is a decree of the Torah,’ while new decrees are enacted to restrict those who learn Torah, and the dwellers of the tents of Torah are made vulnerable. The Name of Heaven is desecrated in a terrible manner when one Jew imprisons another Jew for this ‘offense,’ something not found even among the nations in any country where our Jewish brethren reside.

“We therefore declare the position of our holy Torah according to halachah: There is great reason to fear that Heavenly judgment may rest upon anyone who has a hand or involvement in these persecutions and in the arrests of avreichim and bochurim engaged in Torah study, lest he inherit Gehinnom and lose his share in the World to Come. The Rambam has already ruled (Hilchos Talmud Torah, Chapter 1, Halachah 11): ‘Whoever degrades the sages has no share in the World to Come and is included among those of whom it is said, “For he has despised the word of Hashem.”’ And Chazal warned (Shabbos 119b): ‘Rav Yehudah said in the name of Rav: Whoever degrades Torah scholars has no cure for his affliction… What is the meaning of the verse “Touch not My anointed ones”? These are the schoolchildren. “And do My prophets no harm”—these are the Torah scholars.’

“We are confident in the power of Torah and place our trust in the Giver of the Torah, that the Divine promise will be fulfilled for us: ‘No weapon formed against you shall prosper, and every tongue that rises against you in judgment you shall condemn. This is the heritage of the servants of Hashem, and their righteousness is from Me, says Hashem’ (Yeshayah 54:17).”

The letter is one of the strongest public condemnations issued by senior Torah leaders since the current draft crisis escalated and comes as demonstrations continue over the arrests of bnei Torah across Israel.

{Matzav.com}

The rabbanim and leadership of Yeshivas Ponevezh have issued a stirring letter urging talmidim to intensify their Torah learning on behalf of Ponevezh masmid Rav Chaim Berman, who remains in extremely critical condition at Sheba Medical Center in Tel Hashomer.

Rav Berman, regarded as one of the central pillars of the yeshiva for decades, is currently hospitalized while sedated and on a ventilator. In response to his condition, the yeshiva’s roshei yeshiva and rabbanim are calling on students to undertake a special commitment in his merit: adding at least fifteen minutes of learning to each seder.

The letter describes Rav Berman as a singular figure in the Torah world, praising a level of diligence and consistency that the authors say has been unmatched for generations. The rabbanim urge every bochur to strengthen his commitment to Torah study as a source of merit for Rav Berman’s complete recovery.

The letter bears the signatures of Rav Chaim Peretz Berman, Rav Dovid Levy, and yeshiva nosi Rav Eliezer Kahaneman.

Rav Chaim’s condition is reported to be extremely serious. He remains hospitalized at Tel Hashomer, where he is receiving intensive medical care.

The letter states in part:

“Since our master, the true gaon, the righteous foundation of the world, the holy figure Rav Chaim Berman, shlit”a, became ill recently, a great glory has been removed from the house of our lives. He is a living Sefer Torah, an eternal light in our holy yeshiva for more than seventy years, from his youth until this very day.

“And with Hashem’s help, there are medical avenues that can assist in extending his years and enabling him to continue learning Torah and serving Hashem. Our responsibility is to aid him through prayer and the accumulation of merits.

“And since the greatest influence visible to every member of the yeshiva is his extraordinary diligence and exceptional devotion to maintaining the sedarim without interruption, day and night, every learning session and every fixed shiur, and he is unique in this generation in this regard for seventy years, without equal, and perhaps even among previous generations, and now the yeshiva lacks the tremendous merit of having such a righteous person in our midst, whose presence strengthened us constantly, it is incumbent upon each of us to increase our efforts in this area. This will be a tremendous merit for him, that we strengthen ourselves in his avodah so that the continual service not cease, and that the yeshiva continue to be a place of Torah labor and faithful observance of its schedules.

“We ask every member of the yeshiva to accept upon himself to strengthen his observance of time and diligence. Each person should undertake, at the very least, to begin learning fifteen minutes earlier each day during one of the sedarim than he has done until now. In addition, every individual should consider other ways in which he can grow stronger.

“And through this may the verse be fulfilled: ‘He has redeemed my soul in peace, for many were with me.’”

All are asked to daven for Rav Chaim ben Reisha Reizel.

{Matzav.com}

Yanky Deri, the son of Shas chairman Aryeh Deri, is expected to be appointed associate chairman of Keren Kayemet L’Yisroel (KKL-JNF), according to a report by Channel 12 News on Tuesday.

As part of the position, Deri is expected to receive an office, a vehicle, and support staff, and will oversee matters related to KKL land holdings.

The appointment is drawing attention in part because a similar role was previously held by Momo Deri, the brother of Shas chairman Aryeh Deri.

Officials in Deri’s office stressed that the position is unpaid and that the appointment is intended to be temporary until a permanent candidate is selected.

In a statement, the office of Shas chairman Aryeh Deri said: “This is an unpaid position. The role was originally intended for former MK Moshe Arbel, but due to a conflict of interest he informed us that he would be unable to accept it. The position remained vacant for many months, and it was therefore decided to appoint Yanky Deri on a temporary basis. Yanky Deri has served for years as a member of the board of the World Zionist Organization, and he will fill the role until a permanent representative is appointed.”

{Matzav.com}

A unique and educational Torah event will take place TODAY, Wednesday, June 17, when the Agudath Israel of America Torah Projects Commission presents a special shiur featuring Rav Amitai Ben David, acclaimed author of Sichas Chulin and a renowned expert in the practical and halachic aspects of shechitah.

The program will begin at 12:00 noon at the TA Kollel of Yeshiva Chofetz Chaim, in the Mesivta Dining Room, located at 4445 Old Court Road in Pikesville, Maryland, and is expected to attract Daf Yomi participants, bnei Torah, rabbanim, and members of the broader community seeking a deeper understanding of one of the most fascinating and practical areas of halachah.

What makes this event especially noteworthy is that the shiur will feature a live shechitah and treifos demonstration, offering attendees a rare opportunity to witness firsthand many of the concepts discussed in Maseches Chulin and related areas of Torah study. Through practical examples and real-life illustrations, participants will gain a clearer appreciation of the intricate halachos governing kosher slaughter and the examination of animals.

Organizers explain that the program is designed not only for Daf Yomi learners studying or reviewing the sugyos of Chulin, but also for anyone interested in understanding the halachic foundations behind the kosher food that appears on Jewish tables every day.

Rav Amitai Ben David has earned widespread recognition for his ability to present complex halachic subjects in a clear, engaging, and accessible manner. His sefer, Sichas Chulin, has become a highly regarded resource for those seeking a deeper understanding of shechitah and treifos.

The shiur, as mentioned, will take place today at the TA Kollel of Yeshiva Chofetz Chaim, Mesivta Dining Room, 4445 Old Court Road in Pikesville, Maryland, beginning at 12:00 noon.

{Matzav.com}

The Trump administration is exploring ways to encourage commercial oil tankers to return to the Strait of Hormuz following a tentative understanding with Iran, amid concerns that insurance obstacles could undermine efforts to restore one of the world’s most important shipping routes.

According to a report published Tuesday, administration officials are examining a range of options to reassure shipping companies and insurers as negotiations continue over a broader agreement aimed at ending hostilities between the United States and Iran.

Over the weekend, President Donald Trump, Vice President JD Vance, and Iranian representatives reportedly reached a memorandum of understanding intended to serve as a framework for a possible end to the conflict. A leaked version of the document contains 14 provisions, including the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, the lifting of the U.S. naval blockade of Iran, and at least $300 billion in funding earmarked “for the rehabilitation and economic development of the Islamic Republic of Iran.”

Despite those developments, officials recognize that reopening the waterway may prove difficult if shipping companies remain unwilling to send vessels through an area long viewed as a major security risk. At present, insurers are reportedly refusing to cover losses that might occur in the strait.

According to the report, discussions inside the administration have focused heavily on finding ways to persuade insurance providers to resume offering coverage for ships traveling through a narrow corridor where Iran has repeatedly demonstrated the ability to target commercial vessels.

“The discussions so far have centered on ways to convince insurance companies to offer coverage to travel through a narrow waterway in which Iran has successfully attacked vessels,” Politico reported of the internal discussions being pushed by Trump and White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles.

One source familiar with the matter said Trump and Wiles are pressing officials to quickly develop a solution.

“The President and Susie are giving them explicit orders to figure something out,” said one person familiar with the discussions who was granted anonymity to describe private discussions. “With limited exceptions, every transit [through Hormuz] is violating insurance plans. So what can be done to accelerate the insurers to start insuring again?”

Among the ideas reportedly being examined is a program that would allow commercial ships to purchase expedited passage under the protection of the U.S. Navy.

“There is some talk of some expedited escorted passage by paying the U.S. — like putting a VIP pass on your ship,” one person familiar with the discussions told Politico. “The concept is that there could be a fee for expedited clearance, maybe with military escort.”

However, not everyone believes the proposal is intended to become permanent policy. One former administration official suggested the discussion is primarily a strategic move as Trump participates in the G7 summit in France.

According to that former official, the proposal is “all about creating the space for France, Britain, others to move into the Gulf, take responsibility for maritime safety, security, and create an additional deterrence to the Iranians for trying to go back on the deal, use Hormuz as this long-term extortion racket.”

{Matzav.com}

Former Vice President Mike Pence sharply criticized President Donald Trump’s emerging agreement with Iran on Tuesday, arguing that the proposed arrangement raises serious concerns and resembles a policy of appeasement toward a longtime adversary.

Appearing on CNN’s “The Source,” Pence said he supported Trump’s past decisions to take military action against Iran’s leadership but expressed deep skepticism about any agreement that would ease pressure on the regime.

Pence said, “Iran has been at war with the United States, and our cherished ally Israel, for 47 years. And I strongly supported, the president’s decision for the first time in modern history to take the fight directly to the mullahs in Tehran last year. And then again, this year. And I do believe the president has earned some latitude in negotiating an end to hostilities. But I have very real concerns. I look like apparently an awful lot of people on this, I just don’t trust the Iranians. I’ve been quite close to those issues from my time in the White House, many briefings in the Situation Room, as well as my years on the Foreign Affairs Committee in the House. So I’ve been the Iranians, particularly with regard to their nuclear ambition, have essentially a legacy of lies.”

While acknowledging that Trump has earned the right to pursue diplomatic efforts after confronting Iran militarily, Pence cautioned that Tehran’s long record of deception should make any agreement subject to intense scrutiny.

He added, “At least what we’re hearing echo out of this, this potential memorandum of understanding, it smacks of appeasement. I mean, it sounds a bit like what I write about in my book that, the progressive left has long embraced, appeasement against our adversaries like Iran. But there are voices on the populist right that would have us pull back from our role as leader in the free world. I don’t think this is the time to pull back. I don’t think this is a moment for appeasement. And I think, I would urge the president to stand firm on the fundamental elements that Iran has to dismantle and abandon its nuclear program, dismantle its ballistic missile program, renounce the support of terrorist organizations, and restore freedom of navigation in the Strait of Hormuz.”

Pence argued that the United States should maintain a hard-line approach toward Iran and insisted that any final agreement must require the regime to permanently end its nuclear ambitions, eliminate its ballistic missile capabilities, stop supporting terrorist groups, and guarantee free passage through the strategically vital Strait of Hormuz.

{Matzav.com}

The Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee moved forward Tuesday with legislation that would withhold certain funds destined for the Palestinian Authority and redirect them toward compensating victims of terrorism, including families affected by the October 7 massacre.

The proposal, which cleared the committee for a first reading, was advanced under the leadership of committee chairman MK Boaz Bismuth and sponsored by MK Moshe Passal. Under the bill, Israel would annually freeze an amount equal to the funds the Palestinian Authority transferred to Gaza during the previous year. The withheld money would then be allocated to compensate victims of terrorism originating from the Gaza Strip.

The hearing opened with testimony from bereaved families whose relatives were murdered in the October 7 attacks. Family members urged lawmakers to approve the measure. Following the public portion of the session, committee members held a closed-door discussion in which representatives of relevant government agencies and ministries presented their assessments.

Ben Zoherman, whose father was killed at the Sha’ar HaNegev Junction during the October 7 assault, described the uncertainty his family continues to face. “I don’t know where the terrorist who murdered my father is today. We know that some of the terrorists operating at that junction returned to Gaza that same day. I don’t know if justice will ever be served, and I don’t know who can be held accountable.”

Zoherman also said that some victims’ families fall outside existing support programs, leaving them feeling abandoned and without sufficient assistance. Galit Shopen, whose brother Ziv Shopen was murdered in Kibbutz Be’eri, voiced support for the legislation, saying, “No amount of money will fill the void Ziv left behind, nor can it restore what we lost. But if there are funds originating from entities that for years encouraged, supported, or rewarded terror-related activities, I believe it is right and just that these funds be channeled to compensate the families of terror victims and aid those harmed by acts of terror.”

Moshe Saville of the OneFamily organization told committee members that his group assists thousands of victims of terrorism and war and believes the legislation addresses a real and pressing need among bereaved families.

“Nothing will bring back those we lost. No amount of money in the world can erase the pain or blur the loss. But it can grant the families a modicum of peace, a bit of stability, and some breathing room amid the harsh reality they live in,” said Saville.

During the deliberations, a representative of the Justice Ministry raised several legal concerns regarding the application of the bill to victims of the October 7 attacks. She explained that existing law already allows the Palestinian Authority to be sued for damages when it can be demonstrated that it transferred funds to an individual who carried out a terrorist attack. According to her, court precedents have established that even a single payment to a terrorist may be sufficient to create the legal connection required for liability.

The ministry representative added that significant legal and factual questions remain regarding the Palestinian Authority’s direct connection to the October 7 massacre and whether any of the attackers had previously received payments from the PA. Based on information currently available, she said, many of the terrorists involved in the attack likely did not receive such payments, making it difficult to establish the legal link necessary to connect the frozen funds to those who participated in the massacre.

{Matzav.com}

WATCH:

LISTEN:

​​For more info, email bitachon4life@gmail.com.

LISTEN:

The Senate narrowly rejected an effort Tuesday to limit President Donald Trump’s authority to conduct military operations against Iran without prior approval from Congress, preserving the White House’s flexibility to act in the escalating regional conflict.

Lawmakers backing the proposal sought to require the president to obtain explicit authorization from Congress before launching any additional military action involving Iran.

The measure failed by the slimmest of margins, with senators voting 48-47 against advancing the War Powers resolution for floor consideration. Democratic Senator John Fetterman crossed party lines and voted against the effort, providing the decisive vote. Meanwhile, Republican Senators Rand Paul, Bill Cassidy, Lisa Murkowski, and Susan Collins broke with their party and joined Democrats in supporting the resolution.

Tuesday’s vote represented the Senate’s ninth consideration this year of legislation aimed at reining in presidential war powers related to Iran. Most of those initiatives have fallen short, although one proposal succeeded in clearing the chamber last month by a vote of 50-47.

The debate follows action in the House of Representatives earlier this month, where lawmakers approved legislation intended to restrict Trump’s authority to undertake military operations connected to the conflict with Iran.

That House vote came after three previous attempts to pass similar legislation had failed to gain enough support.

The measure ultimately passed the House by a 215-208 margin. Four Republicans — Representatives Thomas Massie, Brian Fitzpatrick, Tom Barrett, and Warren Davidson — joined Democrats in backing the effort, voting against their party’s leadership on the issue.

{Matzav.com}

Vice President JD Vance sought to ease concerns Tuesday over the emerging agreement between the United States and Iran, arguing that critics are mischaracterizing the arrangement and insisting that Tehran will not gain access to financial benefits unless it demonstrates meaningful changes in behavior.

During an interview with Megyn Kelly, Vance emphasized that any economic incentives tied to the agreement would be conditional and closely tied to Iran’s actions moving forward.

“It is a regional peace deal. It’s going to include the Gulf. It’s going to include Israel. It’s going to include Lebanon,” explained Vance, who also stated, “If Iran is funding Hezbollah, we’re not going to allow a bunch of unfrozen assets to flow to the Iranians.”

To illustrate his point, Vance pointed to the United Arab Emirates, describing the nation as “one of the best allies that we’ve had in the region.”

JD Vance on the Iran peace deal:

Somebody said, I forget who, but somebody said, you know, this is like doing the Marshall Plan when the Nazis are still in control. And that's wrong on a few different ways.

Number one, the Marshall Plan was a lot of American tax money. This is… pic.twitter.com/0zWIhJBh8j

— Clash Report (@clashreport) June 16, 2026

“Let’s say that they want to invest in a nuclear power plant in Iran. They really can’t do that without us lifting some of the sanctions that exist in the global financial system to make that possible. Now, are the Emiratis going to invest in Iran, or is America going to let the Emiratis invest in Iran? Unless the Iranians change their behavior? No.”

Vance argued that opponents of the agreement are incorrectly portraying the arrangement as a direct financial windfall for Tehran.

“So all these people say, ‘Well, you know, you’re giving Iran money.’ No, no, no. We’re saying that if the Iranians change their behavior, we’re gonna let some of these other countries invest in rebuilding their country and creating some prosperity for their people. That’s like a good thing, right?” Vance asserted.

The vice president also dismissed comparisons between the proposed Iran arrangement and the post-World War II Marshall Plan, responding to criticism that has circulated in recent days, including remarks from Lindsey Graham, though Vance did not identify him directly.

“Somebody said, I forget who, but somebody said, you know, this is like doing the Marshall Plan when the Nazis are still in control. And that’s wrong on a few different ways,” said Vance.

“Number one, the Marshall Plan was a lot of American tax money. This is not American tax money. Number two, we’re saying you only get the benefits of the bargain if you change your behavior. If that happens, we’re talking about a transformed Middle East. That’s a great legacy for the president, but more importantly, it’s a great one for the American people,” he stated.

As debate over the agreement intensified, the Saudi-based news outlet Al Arabiya published what it said was the full text of a memorandum of understanding between Washington and Tehran. The document reportedly lays out a broad package of economic incentives and commitments that could significantly benefit Iran.

Among the provisions described in the report are steps by the United States to end restrictions on Iranian maritime activity, facilitate the restoration of shipping routes, and allow the export of Iranian crude oil, petrochemicals, and related products through sanctions waivers that would reportedly take effect immediately after the agreement is signed.

The reported memorandum also outlines a massive economic development initiative, under which the United States and regional allies would help create a reconstruction and investment program for Iran valued at no less than $300 billion.

Additionally, the document claims that Washington would work toward the eventual removal of all sanctions imposed on Iran—including U.S. sanctions and international penalties—according to a schedule that would be negotiated at a later date.

President Donald Trump on Monday forcefully rejected reports claiming that the agreement would provide Iran with an unconditional $300 billion payout.

Writing on Truth Social, Trump also asserted that Iran had committed to permanently forgoing nuclear weapons.

“Iran has agreed to never have a Nuclear Weapon! Also, the story that the U.S. is paying Iran 300 million Dollars is Fake News, put out by the Dumocrats!!! President DJT,” he wrote.

{Matzav.com}

Hillary Clinton is openly blaming President Joe Biden’s decision to seek reelection in 2024 for the Democrats’ loss to President Trump, arguing that his choice damaged both the country and his own historical legacy.

Speaking during a conversation with New Yorker editor David Remnick at the 92nd Street Y in New York, Clinton delivered one of her sharpest critiques yet of Biden’s decision to remain in the race despite growing concerns within his party.

“He made a terrible mistake,” Clinton told Remnick. “He made a terrible mistake for himself, his legacy, and for the country.”

According to Clinton, a competitive Democratic primary would have produced a stronger nominee capable of defeating Trump in the general election.

“We would have had a real contest,” she mused about what would’ve happened if Biden didn’t run. “And very sadly I believe whoever emerged from that contest, whether it was the vice president or a governor or a senator or anybody else, would have beaten Donald Trump.”

She concluded that Biden’s political judgment on the matter was deeply flawed.

“So I think it was a terrible miscalculation on the part of President Biden.”

Clinton’s comments mark a significant shift from her earlier stance. In 2023, when asked whether Biden should pursue a second term, she voiced support for whatever decision he chose to make.

“I think he’s done a really terrific job and so yes, I want him to run if that’s what he wants to do, and of course, I’ll support him,” she told Forbes in 2023.

Even after Biden’s widely criticized debate performance against Trump in 2024 intensified concerns among Democrats, Clinton continued to stand by him publicly while pressure mounted within the party for him to withdraw.

The political backdrop was especially notable given Clinton’s own history with Trump. She was defeated by him in the 2016 presidential election, while Biden later defeated Trump in 2020. Many members of Biden’s inner circle believed he remained the Democrat best positioned to defeat Trump again.

In the months since the election, however, a growing number of Biden allies have acknowledged that seeking another term may have been a mistake.

Among them is former first lady Jill Biden, who recently indicated that, if given another chance, she would have encouraged her husband not to run again.

Clinton also referenced Biden’s pledge during the 2020 campaign that he would serve as a transitional figure for the Democratic Party and help usher in a younger generation of leaders.

“Once he didn’t move and did not admit that he had said he was going to step aside and decided not to and held on for as long as he did, we were in a terrible dilemma,” she stressed.

Biden eventually ended his campaign on July 21, 2024, leaving then-Vice President Kamala Harris just 107 days to mount a presidential campaign against Trump as the Democratic nominee.

{Matzav.com}

As concerns mount over the future of charitable giving to yeshivos, Keren Olam HaTorah is quietly advancing a new strategy designed to preserve financial support for Torah institutions despite the growing controversy surrounding Section 46 tax benefits.

The fund, which has played a key role in helping yeshivos and kollelim offset severe budget cuts resulting from the ongoing battle over the draft law, is now working to ensure that support for Torah institutions continues even as legal and regulatory challenges threaten a major source of donations.

Tax Benefit Freeze Sparks Concern

The current crisis began at the end of May, when Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara ordered an immediate halt to tax credits for donations made to chareidi institutions that include students classified as eligible for military service.

The decision sent shockwaves through the yeshiva world, where many institutions feared a substantial decline in donations tied to the tax incentives provided under Section 46 of Israeli law.

A New Framework Emerges

Now, for the first time, details are emerging about a framework being developed by Keren Olam HaTorah to help prevent disruptions to the flow of charitable contributions.

According to a letter sent to roshei yeshiva and institutional leaders, and obtained by Kikar HaShabbos, the fund consulted extensively with accountants and professionals specializing in nonprofit organizations and tax law before formulating its approach.

The letter explains that institutions which, based on individualized legal advice, choose not to include certain students on reports submitted to government authorities will not lose their eligibility for support from the fund.

Funding Will Continue

According to the letter, even an institution that elects to continue omitting such students from its official enrollment reports will remain eligible for assistance from Keren Olam HaTorah.

The fund indicated that it would explore alternative mechanisms for transferring support to those institutions, ensuring that funding can continue despite the evolving legal landscape.

At the same time, the organization stressed that it is not instructing institutions to adopt any specific course of action.

Providing Options, Not Directives

Fund officials emphasized that the initiative should not be viewed as a recommendation or directive. Rather, they described it as an effort to provide institutions with practical tools to navigate the complex legal realities that have emerged following the attorney general’s decision.

The move comes amid significant disagreement among legal advisers and accountants serving chareidi institutions, many of whom have offered differing opinions regarding how best to respond to the new restrictions.

As uncertainty continues to surround the future of donation-related tax benefits, Keren Olam HaTorah’s proposal represents the first major attempt to establish a broad-based solution aimed at protecting financial support for the yeshiva world.

{Matzav.com}

A fragile agreement aimed at ending the war between the United States and Iran has encountered a major new obstacle after Tehran insisted that any final settlement must include an Israeli withdrawal from southern Lebanon — a demand Israel has already rejected and one that threatens to unravel the entire accord.

Although the proposed U.S.-Iran agreement has not been officially released, portions of what is believed to be a draft surfaced in media reports Tuesday. At the same time, conflicting statements from various officials have fueled uncertainty about the deal’s actual terms.

While Israel is not a signatory to the agreement, it remains deeply involved in the broader conflict after joining the United States in strikes against Iran on Feb. 28. Israel has also been engaged in combat against Hezbollah, the Iranian-backed terror organization in Lebanon, and currently controls significant territory there.

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi declared Tuesday that Israel’s continued military presence in southern Lebanon is incompatible with the proposed agreement.

“Without the withdrawal of Israeli forces from the territories they occupied during this war, the war has not fully come to an end,” Araghchi said.

That position directly contradicts statements from both Washington and Jerusalem. A U.S. official familiar with the framework of the agreement, speaking anonymously, said the deal contains no provision requiring Israeli forces to leave Lebanon. Meanwhile, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu stated Monday that Israeli troops would remain there “as long as necessary.”

Efforts to negotiate an end to the conflict have repeatedly run into disputes of this kind. Previous disagreements resulted in an extended but fragile ceasefire that never evolved into a lasting peace agreement. The uncertainty has also left the Strait of Hormuz — one of the world’s most important energy corridors — effectively closed.

Meanwhile, Switzerland announced that a formal signing ceremony is expected to take place Friday at the Bürgenstock resort near Luzern. Swiss officials said the venue was jointly proposed by mediators from Pakistan and Qatar, along with representatives from the United States and Iran.

Pakistani officials have maintained that the framework agreement requires a halt to military operations across the region, including in Lebanon, a longstanding Iranian demand. Araghchi’s latest remarks, however, suggest that the issue remains unresolved.

The dispute places Israel in a difficult position as it seeks to continue weakening Hezbollah while avoiding a clash with a diplomatic initiative strongly backed by the United States. Israel entered southern Lebanon after Hezbollah launched missile attacks across the border during the opening days of the war. Since then, Israeli forces have expanded their operations dramatically and carried out strikes deep within Beirut.

Despite suffering significant setbacks, Hezbollah retains substantial military capabilities, raising ongoing questions about whether Israel’s campaign has achieved its long-term objectives.

As of Tuesday evening, Netanyahu had not yet reviewed the memorandum of understanding negotiated between Washington and Tehran, according to an individual familiar with the matter who spoke anonymously. A second source said Israeli officials had not requested a copy of the document from American negotiators.

Netanyahu’s office did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The White House likewise declined to say whether Israeli leaders had examined the agreement.

Israeli Ambassador to the United States Yechiel Leiter told NPR that Israel remains unaware of the deal’s full contents but argued that any linkage to Lebanon is “unnecessary and unhelpful.”

The situation has at times exposed tensions between Israeli leadership and President Trump. Speaking to reporters Tuesday, Trump criticized Israel’s conduct in Lebanon and expressed frustration with the ongoing campaign.

“not happy with the way Israel has handled themselves with Lebanon and with Hezbollah.”

“It just goes on forever,” he said of Israel’s strategy.

The fighting has taken a heavy toll. Israeli operations in Lebanon have reportedly killed nearly 4,000 people, including hundreds of civilians, and forced more than one million residents from their homes.

“Israel’s fighting Hezbollah too long, and too many people are being killed,” Trump said.

Separately, Israel and the Lebanese government have held direct talks under American mediation. Hezbollah has not participated in those discussions. Although several ceasefires have been announced through those channels, none have been fully implemented.

At the outset of negotiations, Lebanese officials sought to distance themselves from the broader U.S.-Iran talks, hoping to avoid the perception that Beirut was acting under Tehran’s influence. More recently, however, they have welcomed indications that any regional settlement could include a ceasefire on Lebanese territory.

Araghchi’s comments appear consistent with the understanding of two regional officials who have direct knowledge of the negotiations. According to those sources, the agreement would require Israel to withdraw from nearly all territory captured during the conflict, while allowing it to retain several strategic hilltop positions near the border.

Those officials also said Iran made Lebanon a central issue during the final phase of negotiations and insisted that it be incorporated into the accord.

The United Nations peacekeeping force in Lebanon, UNIFIL, reported that hostilities between Israel and Hezbollah continue, though at a far lower intensity than earlier in the conflict. U.N. spokesman Stephane Dujarric said Tuesday that exchanges of fire remain ongoing but at a “significantly reduced level.”

Lebanon remains just one of several unresolved issues hanging over the proposed agreement before its anticipated signing ceremony.

The accord is intended to halt a months-long conflict that has claimed thousands of lives throughout the Middle East, including senior figures within Iran’s ruling establishment, while also driving up the cost of fuel, food, and other essential goods around the world.

According to a senior U.S. official who briefed reporters Monday, the agreement calls for the “immediate” reopening of the Strait of Hormuz and the removal of the American naval blockade surrounding Iranian ports.

Pakistani officials involved in the negotiations similarly described a coordinated reopening of the strait and an end to U.S. maritime restrictions.

Following that step, the United States and Iran are expected to enter a 60-day negotiating period focused on Tehran’s nuclear program and the possible easing of sanctions, according to Pakistani officials familiar with the unpublished text.

The agreement also reportedly includes provisions that could unlock frozen Iranian assets and establish a $300 billion reconstruction fund for Iran if the regime satisfies specific requirements. Senior U.S. officials discussed those possibilities Monday, though Trump later emphasized that the United States would not “invest” funds in Iran.

Regional officials said the release of frozen assets would be tied directly to Iran’s compliance with the agreement. They added that Gulf Arab nations have committed to investing billions of dollars in Iran’s economy if the accord moves forward.

Questions surrounding Iran’s nuclear activities remain among the most contentious aspects of the deal. U.S. officials have yet to explain how compliance would be verified, who would oversee inspections, or how highly enriched uranium stored beneath damaged nuclear facilities would be removed or destroyed.

According to regional sources, Iran has signaled a willingness to discuss options to “dilute or remove” the uranium. Whether Tehran ultimately agrees to such measures remains uncertain, particularly given resistance from hard-line factions within the country. Vice President JD Vance said Monday that international nuclear inspectors would return to Iran as the agreement advances.

Trump also indicated he would be willing to submit the developing agreement to Congress for review.

Speaking during the Group of Seven summit in the French Alps, Trump said, “I like the idea, send it to Congress please.”

He added, “I mean who wouldn’t approve it.”

Republican lawmakers have urged the administration to provide additional details about the agreement, with some expressing doubts that the proposed framework will be sufficient to prevent Iran from eventually obtaining a nuclear weapon.