Kash Patel: FBI Spent Nearly a Year Probing James Comey’s Post
FBI Director Kash Patel said the bureau spent close to a year examining former FBI Director James Comey’s Instagram post before charges were brought, describing the inquiry as a careful, by-the-book process led by career investigators and prosecutors, according to remarks reported by Mediaite.
Patel explained that the investigation focused on a May 2025 post by Comey showing seashells arranged to read “86 47,” which prosecutors interpret as a coded threat against President Donald Trump, the 47th president. He noted that cases involving potential threats against high-level officials typically undergo lengthy review before any indictment is issued.
“These cases take time,” Patel said, stressing that the matter followed normal procedures and that the work was carried out by seasoned FBI agents and prosecutors rather than political appointees.
He added that agents “call the balls and strikes in the field as they see fit,” emphasizing that decisions were based on evidence and guided by established legal standards, according to Mediaite.
During a separate afternoon briefing, Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche said the indictment represents a straightforward enforcement of federal law prohibiting threats against the president, rather than a dispute over free speech protections, according to reporting from Newsmax.
Blanche acknowledged that prosecutors will need to establish intent in court but maintained that the law clearly does not shield threats directed at the president, noting that a grand jury has already determined there is sufficient evidence to move forward.
Following the indictment, Comey released a video message in which he said, “Well, they’re back,” a remark widely viewed as referencing the renewed legal proceedings, according to The Hill, while asserting that he has done nothing wrong.
Comey said he was surprised by the charges but voiced confidence in the judicial system, adding that he is “not afraid,” and insisted that his post was intended as political commentary rather than a threat, according to comments cited by The Hill.
He has also said the Instagram post was taken down once he realized it could be misunderstood, and his legal team is expected to argue that the case involves protected political expression rather than a genuine threat, raising a First Amendment defense.
At this stage, there is no specific penalty outlined publicly, as the case remains in the indictment phase without any conviction or sentencing determination.
The case sets up a renewed legal clash involving Comey and officials tied to the Trump-era Justice Department, potentially becoming a prominent test of how courts interpret intent and draw the line between protected speech and criminal threats.
“It’s not a very difficult line to look at,” Blanche said. “And it’s not, in my mind, a difficult line for one to cross over one way or the other. You are not allowed to threaten the president of the United States of America. That’s not my decision. That’s Congress’ decision in a statute that they passed that we charge multiple times a year.”
{Matzav.com}