Major Setback for Draft Law: Committee Legal Adviser Opposes Including Civil–Security Service in Draft Quotas
Momentum toward passing a new Israeli draft law — intended to formalize the status of yeshiva students and set updated enlistment targets — hit another major obstacle, as the legal adviser to the Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee came out firmly against including civil–security service as part of the draft quotas.
The development follows a report yesterday indicating that the committee’s legal adviser, Miri Frenkel-Shor, had already demanded at least two more months of deliberations on the draft law. Such a delay would push the legislative process dangerously close to the deadline for passing the state budget, creating additional political pressure.
As time goes on, the challenges surrounding the legislation appear only to intensify.
Chareidi parties have insisted that the new draft law recognize civil–security service — work in the police, the Shin Bet, the Mossad, and the Prison Service — as part of the enlistment goals. Their argument is that, given the new targets proposed, these roles must count toward meeting the law’s requirements.
But Frenkel-Shor issued a formal legal opinion rejecting that proposal outright.
In her written assessment to committee members, she stated: “The civil–security service track, which is open only to graduates of chareidi educational institutions, constitutes a violation of equality since the nature of national-civil service is fundamentally different from military service, even if it is considered civil–security service.”
She added further concerns, writing that this service track is significantly shorter, voluntary rather than compulsory, and does not include reserve duty — all of which, she argued, create a substantial disparity between it and actual army service.
According to her, even though civil–security placements may involve some form of security contribution, they “do not currently meet the test of present security needs, which require increasing the number of IDF combat soldiers and personnel.”
The reaction in the chareidi factions has been one of deep concern. There is growing fear that as discussions progress, the legal adviser will object to additional core elements of the bill, making passage nearly impossible.
A senior chareidi figure involved in negotiating the draft law warned: “At this pace, if she indeed opposes the central clauses, we will not be able to amend them, because the rabbanim will not allow it. On the other hand, it would be a mistake to pass a law that contradicts the legal adviser’s position. And if we pass it anyway, it is almost certain to be struck down by the High Court, which would only create a bigger mess. If this continues, there will be no law.”
{Matzav.com}
