Israeli Chareidi Newsline Operator Arrested for Protest Call; Judge Frees Suspect and Rebukes Police
A chareidi operator of a news hotline was arrested by police on the claim that he was “sending thousands into the streets,” but a Yerushalayim judge ordered his release and sharply criticized law enforcement’s conduct.
The case, reported by Ynet police correspondent Liran Tamari, has raised serious questions about freedom of expression and police handling of the chareidi community. Tamari wrote that the incident resembled actions more typical of non-democratic regimes, arguing that “if the detainee had not been chareidi, this event would have sparked a public outcry.” He added that regardless of the protest’s subject, arresting a person solely for calling for a demonstration crosses a red line, noting that “detaining someone for calling for a protest is a different kind of event altogether.”
During the court hearing, the policing theory behind the arrest came into focus. A representative of Israel Police sought to extend the suspect’s detention, telling the court: “This is a person who serves as an executive arm that creates and organizes the call for protest. It is a communications line that the respondent operates, through which he sends thousands into the streets via a phone call.” The argument suggested that the mere capacity to mobilize a mass protest constituted grounds for arrest, even absent any explicit call to violence.
The arrest followed violent disturbances in the chareidi sector during Chanukah, when demonstrators overturned a police vehicle and injured 15 officers. Despite those events, police chose to detain the hotline operator and attribute the full slate of offenses committed on the ground to him, despite the fact that he was not physically present at the disturbances. According to the report, pressure from above played a role: the police commissioner demanded results and vowed to “settle accounts” with rioters, leading investigators to pursue what critics described as the easiest target—someone who called for a protest but did not take part in it.
Criticism of the move was swift and severe. Tamari warned of the danger inherent in such an approach, writing that “this is policing befitting dark regimes….regimes we do not want to resemble.” Turning a legitimate communications operator who encouraged people to exercise their right to protest into a scapegoat for violence he did not commit, critics say, reflects an attempt to intimidate protest organizers and exact a price “at any cost,” even if that means trampling basic rights.
Ultimately, the judiciary drew a clear line. Yerushalayim Magistrate’s Court Judge Gad Arenberg rejected the police request outright and ordered the suspect released. In his decision, the judge punctured the police’s core premise, writing: “It should be noted that in the respondent’s call to go out and protest, there was no call to carry out illegal actions.”
{Matzav.com}
