‘Completely Not True’: US Rejects Iran’s Claim of Getting Billions Before Talks
A senior American official is disputing Iranian reports about the newly announced agreement between Washington and Tehran, insisting that Iran will not receive access to billions of dollars in frozen assets before fulfilling its obligations under the deal.
Speaking Sunday to Axios reporter Barak Ravid, the official rejected assertions that Iran would be granted immediate access to $12 billion in blocked funds before the beginning of formal negotiations over a final agreement.
“This is completely not true. This is a pay-for-performance deal and no frozen funds will be released without the Iranians implementing their commitments,” the official stated.
The dispute emerged shortly after President Donald Trump publicly unveiled the agreement Sunday evening. Soon afterward, Iran’s semi-official Mehr news agency released what it described as the 14 core provisions of the arrangement.
According to the Iranian report, the financial component of the agreement requires the United States to approve the release of $12 billion in frozen Iranian funds before substantive negotiations begin. The report further claimed that another $12 billion would become available during a 60-day period designated for negotiating a permanent accord.
The published details also asserted that Washington would suspend sanctions on Iran’s oil and petrochemical industries while dismantling its naval blockade of Iran within 30 days.
Mehr further reported that these measures are intended to occur before final treaty negotiations can move forward. Under the framework described by the Iranian outlet, discussions on a permanent agreement would not commence until the initial $12 billion is released, energy-related sanctions are paused, and maritime restrictions are lifted.
The Biden administration’s characterization of the agreement differs sharply from Tehran’s account, with U.S. officials emphasizing that any financial relief will be contingent upon Iran first meeting its commitments under the deal. The conflicting descriptions underscore the uncertainty surrounding the precise terms of the agreement as both sides prepare for the next phase of negotiations.
{Matzav.com}
