Senate Republicans Block Effort to Force Trump to End Iran War
Senate Republicans on Thursday voted down an effort to advance legislation that would have required President Trump to withdraw U.S. forces from the conflict with Iran, signaling continued support for the administration’s military campaign despite growing unease among some GOP lawmakers over rising casualties and the length of the war.
The Senate rejected a procedural motion to bring the War Powers Resolution out of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, defeating it by a vote of 47-49.
Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) broke with most Republicans by joining Democrats in favor of advancing the measure, while Sen. John Fetterman (D-Pa.) was the lone Democrat to oppose it.
Several senators did not participate in the vote, including Republicans Rand Paul of Kentucky and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, both of whom have previously supported efforts to limit President Trump’s authority as commander in chief. Senate Republicans Mitch McConnell of Kentucky and Katie Britt of Alabama were also absent.
Although he missed the vote, Paul reiterated this week that he believes the conflict has weakened the United States rather than strengthened it.
“I think the Iran war has not been a success. I’ve been opposed to the Iran war from the beginning. I think by any objective measure we’re worse off than we were before the war,” Paul said after a Senate hearing.
Other Republican senators also expressed concern about the direction of the conflict, citing increasing civilian casualties and uncertainty over the administration’s long-term strategy.
“There’s got to be an off-ramp, that’s all there is to it,” said Sen. Jim Justice (R-W.Va.).
“Naturally all of us are concerned because we’ve lost three wonderful, wonderful service people in the last little while,” he said, referring to three U.S. service members who were killed in the past week.
On Wednesday, President Trump warned that if Iran attacks ships transiting the Strait of Hormuz, the United States would respond by striking civilian infrastructure, including bridges and power plants around Tehran.
The conflict has now claimed the lives of 18 American service members.
Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), who introduced the resolution, argued that Congress needed to reassert its constitutional role as the war continues to expand following the collapse of the ceasefire between the United States and Iran.
“It’s the first resolution since shipping in the Strait of Hormuz has once again been ground to a halt,” he said. “More civilians have been killed as well, and the United States and Iran are now deliberately targeting civilian infrastructure.”
Speaking against the proposal, Sen. Tim Sheehy (R-Mont.), a former Navy SEAL, insisted that Iran’s ruling regime remains a grave threat that must be confronted militarily rather than restrained by congressional action.
“This regime that we are fighting does not care about our partisan politics. They don’t care who you voted for, who you pray to, or where you live. They want to kill all of us and they don’t just say it, they actually do it,” he said.
The Senate vote followed action earlier Thursday in the House of Representatives, where four Republicans joined Democrats in approving a separate War Powers Resolution directing President Trump to remove U.S. troops from the conflict unless Congress specifically authorizes military action.
The House approved the resolution by a vote of 214-208. Republicans Tom Barrett of Michigan, Warren Davidson of Ohio, Thomas Massie of Kentucky, and Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania joined Democrats in supporting the measure.
The latest congressional debate comes after lawmakers approved another House-backed concurrent resolution in June calling on President Trump to end military operations against Iran. That vote prompted a contentious meeting at the White House on June 24 between the President and Senate Republicans.
Following that earlier vote, President Trump sharply criticized Republican senators who supported the resolution, directing particular frustration toward Rand Paul, Lisa Murkowski, and Bill Cassidy of Louisiana.
After that meeting, both Cassidy and Paul altered their positions. Senate Republicans subsequently defeated another war powers measure sponsored by Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.) that sought to require an end to U.S. military involvement in the conflict.
Cassidy voted against Kaine’s proposal after receiving a White House briefing from Vice President JD Vance on the war, while Paul voted “present,” explaining that he wanted to “give the president more space and leverage to negotiate a lasting peace.”
Unlike the concurrent resolution approved in June—which carried no legal force and did not require the President’s signature—the legislation considered Thursday would have been legally binding if enacted into law.
Cassidy again voted against advancing the proposal on Thursday. Even if Congress had approved the measure, it would still have required President Trump’s signature before taking effect.
{Matzav.com}
