Feed aggregator

A heartbreaking tragedy has struck the family of an Israeli man murdered in a terrorist attack in Egypt three years ago, with his widow, Mor Shamli, passing away at just 35 after years of profound emotional suffering following the killing of her husband before her eyes.

Mor was the wife of Alon Shamli Hy”d, who was shot dead by an Egyptian police officer during an attack on Israeli tourists in Alexandria on October 8, 2023, just one day after Hamas launched its devastating massacre in southern Israel.

According to her family, Mor never recovered emotionally from the horrific experience of witnessing her husband’s murder and being forced to remain beside him as he lay critically wounded, waiting desperately for medical assistance.

Relatives described the years following the attack as a period of unbearable grief and psychological trauma, saying that although Mor survived the shooting physically, the experience shattered her life.

The attack occurred at Pompey’s Pillar, a popular tourist attraction in Alexandria, where a group of Israeli visitors had been touring when an Egyptian police officer suddenly opened fire at close range.

Alon Shamli, 34, was among those killed, along with fellow Israeli tourists Amnon Bezalel, 64, and Chagai Efrat, 83, as well as Egyptian tour guide Sayed Kamal al-Khawalka.

Mor was standing near her husband when the shooting began. In the chaotic aftermath, she remained beside him as he lay bleeding, reportedly waiting nearly an hour before help arrived.

Her ordeal continued after she was taken to a local hospital in Egypt, where she reportedly waited approximately 12 hours before receiving official confirmation that her husband had died.

The circumstances of the attack, the prolonged uncertainty and the loss of her husband left Mor struggling with severe emotional trauma that continued long after she returned to Israel.

Her parents, Ilan and Shoshi Cohen, described the devastating toll the tragedy had taken on their daughter, saying she was never able to regain the life she had known before that terrible day.

Family members said Mor frequently described herself as feeling alive physically but dead inside, as though a part of her had remained forever at the site of the attack in Alexandria.

“The soul was murdered there in Egypt,” relatives said, describing the depth of the emotional wounds she carried.

Despite her suffering, Mor devoted considerable effort to preserving the memory of her husband, who had been a well-known and beloved sports coach and educator.

Alon was remembered by those who knew him as a dedicated professional who had made a meaningful impact on the young people he worked with. Mor’s efforts to commemorate his life became an important part of her own existence in the years following his murder.

Her uncle, Nachum Yisraeli, published an emotional farewell in which he described the tragedy as having claimed not only Alon’s life but, in a different and deeply painful way, Mor’s as well.

“For three years now, you have been gone. You have had no peace, you have not been present, you have not been yourself. Now, there is peace for you. You died back then, three years ago! When that bullet pierced the heart of your beloved Alon, it pierced yours as well. But now there is peace for you,” he wrote.

Yisraeli described the renewed anguish of a family that had already endured an unimaginable loss and was now confronting another devastating death.

“A huge crack opened in all our hearts three years ago, and now it has grown, widened and deepened. But at least now there is peace for you. We remain here to lick our wounds, mend the broken pieces and hold on to life. And if only now, at least, there is peace for you. Give us a sign so we will know: Is there peace for you now? Mor Shamli, my beloved niece.”

Mor’s passing has brought renewed attention to the lasting psychological suffering experienced by survivors and relatives of terror victims, whose lives can remain profoundly affected long after the initial attack.

The family is now mourning both Alon, whose life was taken in the Alexandria shooting, and Mor, whose final years were marked by the devastating aftermath of that loss.

{Matzav.com}

Americans will gain an extra hour of sleep overnight as daylight saving time comes to an end, with clocks officially turning back one hour at 2 a.m. Sunday, November 1.

At precisely 2 a.m., clocks will move backward to 1 a.m., marking the return to standard time across most of the United States. The change means that Sunday morning will arrive with an additional hour, although the sun will begin setting noticeably earlier in the afternoon.

For residents of New York, New Jersey and most other states, the time change will mean brighter mornings and darker evenings as the country moves into the winter months.

Most smartphones, computers and other internet-connected devices will adjust automatically. However, traditional clocks, watches, ovens, microwaves and some vehicle clocks will need to be reset manually.

The time change is particularly relevant for those who have early morning schedules, as sunrise will occur approximately one hour earlier by the clock. At the same time, sunset will also shift an hour earlier, bringing darkness sooner in the late afternoon.

For the frum community, the return to standard time will also affect daily zmanim, including the clock times for Shacharis, Minchah, Maariv and Shabbos candle lighting. While the actual position of the sun does not change because of the clock adjustment, the times displayed on calendars and schedules will move back by approximately one hour.

The change does not apply everywhere. Hawaii and most of Arizona remain on standard time throughout the year, as do several U.S. territories, including Puerto Rico, Guam and the U.S. Virgin Islands.

Under federal law, daylight saving time begins on the second Sunday in March and ends on the first Sunday in November. The current schedule has been in place since 2007, following legislation that extended daylight saving time by several weeks.

The twice-yearly clock adjustment has remained controversial, with lawmakers repeatedly proposing legislation to eliminate the practice. In July, the House of Representatives approved legislation to make daylight saving time permanent, but the proposal has not secured the necessary support in the Senate.

President Donald Trump has also advocated ending the seasonal clock changes, arguing that Americans should no longer have to adjust their clocks twice a year. However, the existing system remains in effect.

Health experts have warned that even a one-hour time adjustment can temporarily disrupt sleep patterns and daily routines. Although the autumn change provides an additional hour overnight, some people may experience fatigue or difficulty adjusting to the earlier onset of darkness.

Standard time will remain in effect until Sunday, March 14, 2027, when clocks will move forward one hour at 2 a.m., returning the country to daylight saving time.

{Matzav.com}

Luxembourg is moving ahead with legislation that would prohibit the import and sale of products manufactured in Jewish communities in Yehuda and Shomron, pursuing a national boycott despite the fact that its annual trade with those communities amounts to only a few thousand euros.

The small European country, home to approximately 700,000 residents, is advancing the restrictions independently rather than waiting for agreement among European Union member states, according to a report by Ynet.

The Luxembourg government recently approved an amendment to its foreign trade legislation that would permit authorities to impose import restrictions under exceptional circumstances. A separate bill specifically targeting commercial activity involving Jewish communities in Yehuda and Shomron has also been submitted to parliament.

Neither legislative process had been completed as of the end of October, meaning the proposed prohibition has not yet taken effect.

Economic estimates cited in the report place Luxembourg’s annual direct trade with businesses in Yehuda and Shomron at approximately €10,000 to €15,000, equivalent to roughly $11,500 to $17,500. The limited volume of commerce means the proposed ban would have little immediate economic impact, but would deliver a significant political message.

The initiative comes amid growing efforts by individual European governments to impose restrictions on Israeli commerce following the failure of broader sanctions proposals to secure sufficient support within the European Union.

Earlier attempts by the European Commission to suspend certain trade benefits enjoyed by Israel encountered opposition from member states, preventing the measures from obtaining the necessary approval in the EU Council.

Luxembourg is therefore pursuing its own legislative approach, following the example of the Netherlands, which introduced a similar import prohibition in September.

Under existing EU trade arrangements, goods produced in Jewish communities beyond the 1967 lines are already excluded from preferential tariff treatment under the EU-Israel Association Agreement. Luxembourg’s proposed legislation would go considerably further by banning the importation and sale of the products altogether.

The Netherlands’ restrictions, which took effect on September 22, prohibit not only imports but also the purchase, sale and brokering of goods originating in the affected communities. Dutch customs authorities have confirmed that the rules also apply to products carried in travelers’ luggage or ordered online.

Luxembourg’s initiative represents another deterioration in its diplomatic relationship with Israel, a country it historically supported. The grand duchy voted in favor of the United Nations partition plan in 1947 and hosted the signing of the 1952 reparations agreement between Israel and West Germany.

Relations became increasingly strained during the tenure of former Luxembourg Foreign Minister Jean Asselborn, who frequently criticized Israeli government policies.

His successor, Xavier Bettel, initially adopted a more conciliatory approach toward Israel. Bettel visited the country following the October 7, 2023, Hamas massacre and publicly challenged Palestinian narratives surrounding the conflict.

However, Luxembourg’s position hardened as the war continued, culminating in its formal recognition of a Palestinian state in September 2025. At the time, the government also condemned the Hamas atrocities of October 7 and affirmed Israel’s right to security.

The proposed trade restrictions would mark another step in that policy shift, with Luxembourg joining a growing number of European countries seeking to apply direct economic pressure on Jewish communities in Yehuda and Shomron, even where the commercial consequences are negligible.

Violent demonstrations erupted across parts of Germany and France over the weekend, with masked protesters setting barricades ablaze, hurling projectiles at police and turning major city streets into scenes of confrontation. In the French city of Lyon, footage circulating online appeared to show demonstrators burning Israeli and American flags.

The unrest was reported in Hamburg, Paris and Lyon, where demonstrations over military conscription, economic pressures and other political grievances escalated into clashes with security forces.

In Hamburg, a protest march involving young demonstrators ended in disorder after groups of masked individuals erected makeshift barricades in the streets and set them on fire. Videos shared on social media showed burning plastic barriers blocking roadways as fireworks and stones were thrown toward police officers.

German police reportedly responded with crowd-control measures, including pepper spray and water cannons, as they attempted to disperse the rioters and restore order.

The Hamburg demonstration was part of a broader protest movement operating under the name “Gen Z regelt,” which organized activities in more than 30 German cities. Participants voiced opposition to military conscription and demanded greater government spending on education, measures to address rising living costs and stronger action on climate policy.

The demonstrations reflect mounting dissatisfaction among some young Germans over the prospect of expanded military service, as the country debates how to strengthen its armed forces amid continuing security concerns across Europe.

In France, serious disturbances were also reported following a cost-of-living demonstration in Paris. Groups of rioters allegedly threw Molotov cocktails and fireworks toward lines of police officers equipped with protective shields.

Footage from the French capital showed flames spreading across sections of roadway, thick smoke rising above the streets and demonstrators positioning objects to serve as makeshift barriers.

Separate videos reportedly recorded in central Lyon showed protesters setting Israeli and American flags on fire, adding an anti-Israel and anti-American dimension to the scenes of unrest.

The German demonstrations come against the backdrop of a growing youth protest movement opposing the expansion of military service. Germany’s military reforms have generated widespread resistance among students, with previous nationwide strikes drawing tens of thousands of participants. Under the revised system, young men are required to complete military-service questionnaires, and provisions allow for additional compulsory measures if voluntary recruitment fails to meet staffing needs.

The broader movement has also drawn attention to education funding, housing affordability and economic conditions, with youth-led protests spreading across several European countries in recent weeks.

In France, dissatisfaction over living costs has fueled demonstrations, particularly among younger protesters demanding government action on household expenses and economic inequality. The latest reported clashes in Paris follow weeks of heightened protest activity across the country.

The reported burning of Israeli and American flags in Lyon introduced an additional political element to the weekend’s demonstrations. The footage circulated as European authorities continue confronting tensions surrounding Israel, American foreign policy and the war in the Middle East.

Authorities had not provided a confirmed combined total of arrests or injuries from the reported weekend disturbances in Hamburg, Paris and Lyon as of tonight. The precise circumstances surrounding some of the videos circulating online also remained independently unverified.

A disturbing antisemitic incident in Stockholm, Sweden, has drawn condemnation after signs declaring a shoe store a “Jew-Free Zone” were displayed at its entrance, invoking language associated with Nazi Germany and the persecution of European Jewry.

Photographs circulating from the Swedish capital show a sign bearing the English words “Jew-Free Zone” alongside a Magen Dovid. A second sign displayed nearby featured a map of Israel accompanied by the words “Apartheid-Free Zone.”

The signs prompted an angry response from Sacha Roytman, CEO of the Combat Antisemitism Movement, who warned that openly discriminatory messages targeting Jews were once again appearing in European public spaces.

“Europe, 2026. Have we learned nothing from history?” Roytman asked, drawing attention to the historical significance of the terminology used on the storefront.

He pointed to the Nazi expression “Judenfrei,” a German term meaning free of Jews, which was used during the Holocaust to describe locations from which Jewish populations had been expelled or murdered.

“81 years after the defeat of Nazi Germany, we are seeing this language displayed in the storefront of a European shop,” Roytman said.

The Combat Antisemitism Movement leader argued that the placement of the two signs together demonstrated how hostility toward Israel was being used to legitimize explicit discrimination against Jews.

“This is what happens when hatred of Israel becomes a justification for openly targeting Jews. These signs are not criticism of Israel; they are the normalization of Nazi antisemitism under the guise of political activism,” Roytman declared.

However, additional reporting has revealed an important detail about the incident: The “Jew-Free Zone” sign was reportedly placed on the storefront by Dan Park, a controversial Swedish street artist, rather than by the store’s owner. The business had displayed the separate “Apartheid-Free Zone” sign, and Park said his addition was intended as a provocative interpretation of its message.

Park has previously attracted controversy over artwork incorporating Nazi imagery. In 2009, he was arrested following an installation outside the Jewish community building in Malmö that included a swastika and a reference to Zyklon B, the poison used in Nazi gas chambers.

According to Swedish media coverage cited by Ynet, Park has denied being antisemitic or racist, maintaining that his work is intended to provoke thought and challenge prevailing attitudes. Following the public backlash, the shoe store’s owner reportedly removed both signs.

Israel’s ambassador to Sweden, Tammy Rahamimoff-Honig, also condemned the episode, saying that regardless of whether the second sign was intended to expose antisemitism in the first, the controversy demonstrated how normalized anti-Jewish hostility had become.

Roytman, meanwhile, challenged Swedish political leaders to respond more forcefully to antisemitism, arguing that Europe’s commitment to preventing a return to the hatred of the Nazi era was being tested.

“Where are Sweden’s political leaders? Where are those who preach tolerance to the world? Europe once promised ‘Never Again,’ and here we are, watching this language return to the streets. History does not repeat itself by accident, but because too many people choose to look away,” he said.

{Matzav.com}

It is with great sadness that Matzav.com reports the petirah of Rav Mordechai Dov Kreshinsky zt”l, longtime rosh yeshiva of Yeshivas Maayan HaTalmud in Yerushalayim. He was 91 years old.

Rav Kreshinsky was niftar on Leil Shabbos Parshas Vayeira at Hadassah Hospital on Har Hatzofim in Yerushalayim, where he had been hospitalized. His petirah brings to a close a lifetime devoted to harbotzas haTorah, chinuch and the development of generations of bnei Torah.

Born in Yerushalayim to his father, Rav Shalom Hillel Tzvi Kreshinsky z”l, the future rosh yeshiva was raised in an atmosphere steeped in Torah and yiras Shomayim. As a young child, he attended the renowned Eitz Chaim Talmud Torah in Yerushalayim, where he established the foundations of his lifelong dedication to Torah learning.

Upon reaching his teenage years, he entered the Chevron Yeshiva, becoming attached to the great roshei yeshiva and Torah personalities of the previous generation.

Among the figures who had the greatest influence on his development was the legendary mashgiach, Rav Eliyahu Lopian zt”l. Rav Kreshinsky was counted among Rav Lopian’s close and devoted talmidim, absorbing from his rebbi an approach to Torah study, avodas hatefillah and the constant refinement of middos.

When he reached marriageable age, Rav Kreshinsky married his rebbetzin, the daughter of Rav Yitzchok Eliezer Shub zt”l. Together, they established a home centered on Torah and dedicated to the needs of Klal Yisroel.

Throughout his life, Rav Kreshinsky invested extraordinary energy in strengthening Torah education and building institutions that would serve the growing Torah community in Yerushalayim.

He was among the founders of Talmud Torah HaMesorah, one of the early chadorim established for the broader community of bnei Torah in which instruction was conducted in Lashon Hakodesh. The institution became an important part of the developing chinuch infrastructure for Torah families in Yerushalayim.

Approximately 45 years ago, Rav Kreshinsky established Yeshivas Maayan HaTalmud, a yeshiva in Yerushalayim that would become his life’s central undertaking.

From its earliest days, he devoted himself to every aspect of the yeshiva‘s development, assuming responsibility for both its spiritual direction and its practical needs. His dedication extended far beyond delivering shiurim or overseeing the daily seder hayeshiva.

Rav Kreshinsky was known for his deeply personal concern for each talmid, taking an active interest in the growth and development of the young bochurim entrusted to his care. He worked tirelessly to instill within them a genuine love of Torah, strong foundations in learning and a lasting sense of yiras Shomayim.

Over the decades, thousands of talmidim passed through the doors of Maayan HaTalmud, many going on to become accomplished bnei Torah and respected members of Torah communities throughout Eretz Yisroel and beyond.

His approach to chinuch reflected the teachings he had absorbed from Rav Eliyahu Lopian, particularly the importance of developing refined middos and a deep commitment to avodas Hashem alongside excellence in Torah learning.

Even as he advanced in years, Rav Kreshinsky remained closely identified with the yeshiva he had founded, which stood as a testament to his decades of dedication to the next generation of bnei Torah.

He is survived by his rebbetzin, children and grandchildren who continue along the path of Torah and yiras Shomayim that he exemplified throughout his life.

The levayah took place on Motzoei Shabbos at the Ahavas Torah Bais Medrash in Yerushalayim. The procession continued past Yeshivas Maayan HaTalmud at 9 Givat Moshe Street before proceeding to Har Hamenuchos, where the rosh yeshiva was laid to rest.

Yehi zichro boruch.

{Matzav.com}

A political confrontation erupted in Israel on Motzoei Shabbos after Gadi Eisenkot’s Yashar party accused senior Likud figures and Netanyahu allies of contacting its newly elected Knesset members in an apparent effort to persuade them to defect, allegations that two of the individuals named immediately rejected.

The accusations come as Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu and Eisenkot compete to assemble a governing majority following Tuesday’s inconclusive election, with neither political camp holding the 61 seats necessary to form a coalition.

In a statement issued tonight, Yashar alleged that several prominent figures associated with Likud, including Education Minister Yoav Kisch, incoming MK Yaakov Bardugo and MK Almog Cohen, had approached members of Eisenkot’s party in recent days.

“In recent hours, there has been noticeable hysteria in Likud, including phone calls to members of Yashar! from ministers and incoming Knesset members, including Almog Cohen, Yoav Kisch, Yaakov Bardugo and others,” the party declared.

Eisenkot’s party suggested that the alleged outreach reflected an effort to weaken its parliamentary representation and strengthen Netanyahu’s prospects of remaining prime minister.

“The entire public sees your panic over the defeat. We are committed to implementing the public’s decision and establishing a Zionist government that will serve all Israeli men and women,” the statement continued.

The allegations quickly drew denials from two of the figures specifically identified by Yashar.

Bardugo, a prominent political commentator who was elected to the Knesset on Likud’s list, rejected the accusation when contacted by Channel 12 political correspondent Amit Segal.

“I did not contact anyone from Eisenkot’s party,” Bardugo stated.

Cohen responded even more aggressively, directing his criticism at Eisenkot’s political adviser and campaign strategist Ronen Manelis.

“We can smell your fear all the way to Ofakim. Are you already making sure that your party members remain loyal to the Muslim Brotherhood?! Maybe you should have them sign a declaration of loyalty to the supreme leader?” Cohen wrote.

Addressing the allegation directly, Cohen added, “As for the matter itself, I have not spoken to anyone from the Crooked Party. Pure fake news.”

Likud subsequently issued its own response, accusing Eisenkot and Manelis of attempting to divert attention from their plans to cooperate with Arab political factions.

“Gadi and Manelis are under pressure because their plans to cooperate with parties that support terrorism are being disrupted,” the party declared.

The dispute unfolded as Eisenkot outlined four principles that prospective coalition partners would have to accept, including recognition of Hamas as a terrorist organization and a requirement for national service. He also announced plans to use the opposition’s parliamentary strength to advance legislation and potentially replace Knesset Speaker Amir Ohana.

Additional reporting indicated that Religious Zionism Minister Orit Strock had also contacted a member of Eisenkot’s party. Strock acknowledged calling Tal Ohana but said the purpose was to congratulate him, rather than persuade him to defect.

The accusations come amid continuing disagreements within the anti-Netanyahu camp over coalition strategy. Naftali Bennett and Avigdor Lieberman have yet to commit to supporting Eisenkot for prime minister, while opposition parties remain divided over whom to nominate as the next Knesset speaker.

President Isaac Herzog is scheduled to begin consultations with party representatives on Wednesday as the process of selecting a candidate to form Israel’s next government gets underway.

{Matzav.com}

Israeli defense officials believe another military confrontation with Iran is now more likely than a diplomatic agreement, with the IDF having completed extensive preparations for renewed fighting as negotiations between Washington and Tehran remain deadlocked.

According to a report by Ynet on Motzoei Shabbos, Israel’s military is maintaining an exceptionally high level of readiness for both offensive operations and defensive measures, although the decision to launch another campaign is expected to depend primarily on President Donald Trump.

A senior Israeli official described the deteriorating diplomatic outlook, saying, “It seems we are heading more toward war than toward an agreement.”

Israeli officials are closely watching Tuesday’s U.S. midterm elections, which they believe could influence Trump’s calculations regarding military action. One assessment circulating in Yerushalayim suggests that a political setback for the president could increase the likelihood of a military operation intended to demonstrate American strength.

Israeli political and defense leaders have also examined the possibility of attacking Iranian infrastructure, including energy facilities, as part of a broader effort to weaken the regime and potentially accelerate its collapse.

Military planners are reportedly preparing for the possibility that another confrontation would last considerably longer than previous rounds of fighting, rather than ending after several days of airstrikes.

Despite the preparations, diplomatic efforts remain underway. Qatar has been attempting to negotiate an arrangement under which Iran would agree to restrictions on its nuclear program and reopen the Strait of Hormuz, while the United States would ease sanctions, lift restrictions on Iranian ports and release Iranian assets frozen in Western countries.

A Qatari delegation has already held discussions in Tehran, and mediators remain in contact with American officials in an effort to narrow the differences between the two sides.

However, Israeli officials familiar with the negotiations say there has been little meaningful progress, with Tehran showing no indication that it is prepared to make the concessions necessary for an agreement.

One Israeli source said neither Washington nor Tehran is eager for another war, while Gulf countries are particularly anxious to avoid a renewed regional confrontation.

“But there is no choice,” the official said. “Because the negotiations are stuck, especially now. Someone will have to compromise, and the Iranians are not moving toward a compromise.”

Israeli security officials are also considering the possibility that Iran could attempt to strike first, launching an attack before the United States and Israel have an opportunity to carry out their own military operation.

“If all the conditions align, there will be an attack, if only to accelerate the fall of the regime or the negotiations,” the Israeli official assessed.

Meanwhile, Iranian Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei issued another warning Saturday, declaring that Tehran would determine when and under what circumstances any renewed fighting with Israel and the United States would end.

In a statement released following a reported meeting with senior Iranian military commanders, Khamenei said he had ordered an expansion of Iran’s list of potential targets to “ensure that all tangible and intangible assets of the American-Zionist enemy are within the reach of Iranian forces.”

The Iranian leader also instructed commanders to prepare for an intensive confrontation and to ensure that retaliation for any American or Israeli attack would not be restricted by geographical boundaries.

According to Iranian reports, the meeting included Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps commander Ahmad Vahidi, armed forces chief Ali Abdollahi and Iranian army commander Amir Hatami.

The developments come as the Trump administration continues weighing military options while mediators attempt to prevent another round of hostilities. No final American decision to launch an attack has been publicly announced.

The Chareidi Journalists Council is demanding an investigation into the arrest of prominent photographer Dovid Keshet during a protest in Bnei Brak, alleging that police detained him shortly after he recorded officers engaging in apparently violent conduct.

The organization announced on Motzoei Shabbos that it would issue Keshet, a photographer for Yedios Bnei Brak, an official organizational press credential following his arrest Thursday while covering a demonstration in the city.

According to the council, Keshet was taken into custody just minutes after filming what appeared to be excessive force by police officers at the protest. The circumstances have raised concerns among chareidi journalists about possible interference with legitimate news coverage and the treatment of photographers documenting sensitive police operations.

In response, the council sent a formal letter of protest to outgoing Dan District police commander Elad Klein, demanding a detailed explanation of the circumstances surrounding Keshet’s arrest.

Klein had left his position one day before the demonstration, and a replacement had not yet been appointed when the council submitted its complaint.

The organization is seeking clarification regarding the legal grounds for detaining Keshet and whether officers at the scene properly considered his statements that he was working as a journalist.

The council also demanded that police immediately preserve all body-camera footage recorded by officers involved in the incident, ensuring that potentially important evidence is not lost before the circumstances can be independently reviewed.

In addition, the organization called for renewed instructions to police personnel regarding the rights and responsibilities of journalists and photographers covering public demonstrations.

Keshet, a familiar figure in chareidi media circles, was covering a demonstration near the Geha Interchange on Route 4 when the confrontation occurred. The protest, involving members of the Yerushalmi Faction, saw police deploy stun grenades and batons during clashes with demonstrators.

Video footage of Keshet’s arrest reportedly shows plainclothes officers escorting him toward a white civilian vehicle. During the encounter, Keshet can be heard protesting that he had done nothing wrong and had merely been present at the demonstration.

He was released approximately two hours after being detained.

His attorney, Shalom Haddad, condemned the arrest, maintaining that his client had been documenting police actions rather than participating in any disturbance.

“This was a false arrest that should never have happened,” Haddad said. He explained that Keshet had been questioned on suspicion of disturbing public order despite allegedly doing nothing more than recording officers using force against civilians.

Haddad questioned whether the arrest was genuinely connected to suspected criminal activity or whether its purpose was to prevent the photographer from continuing to document events at the protest.

Yedios Bnei Brak also issued a forceful response, raising concerns that officers may have sought to have Keshet delete footage showing police conduct.

“We will not relent, we will not remain silent, and we will not surrender the right to cover, document and report. Freedom of the press is not up for grabs!” the publication declared.

The Chareidi Journalists Council described the detention of a photographer performing his professional duties as a serious violation of acceptable boundaries, warning that arrests immediately following the recording of controversial police activity could discourage journalists from documenting events of public importance.

The organization also pointed to what it described as a longstanding disparity in the treatment of chareidi journalists compared with other members of the Israeli media. It demanded that police apply consistent professional standards to reporters and photographers regardless of their religious background or the publications they represent.

Separately, MK Gaby Lasky of the Democrats reportedly contacted Israel’s police commissioner following the Route 4 demonstration, calling for an investigation into officers’ conduct and demanding an end to the use of stun grenades against protesters.

The council pledged to support Keshet and other journalists working at demonstrations and to pursue measures intended to prevent similar incidents. It is awaiting a police explanation of the arrest and confirmation that the relevant body-camera recordings have been preserved.

{Matzav.com}

The FBI has identified North Korean hackers as the perpetrators of a massive cryptocurrency theft targeting Binance, with more than $6 billion stolen from the world’s largest digital currency exchange in what authorities describe as the biggest cryptocurrency heist ever recorded.

In a public warning issued following Thursday’s attack, federal investigators attributed the breach to TraderTraitor, a North Korean hacking operation previously linked to major cryptocurrency thefts, including the $1.5 billion attack on Bybit in February 2025.

The October 29 breach reportedly resulted in approximately $6.3 billion being removed from Binance-controlled digital wallets, raising fresh concerns about the security of cryptocurrency exchanges and the ability of foreign governments to exploit weaknesses in the digital financial system.

According to blockchain intelligence firm TRM Labs, the attackers transferred an estimated $6.36 billion across 10 different blockchain networks. Most of the stolen cryptocurrency was moved within approximately 20 minutes, highlighting the speed and coordination of the operation.

Federal investigators said the hackers have already begun converting stolen assets into Ethereum, a cryptocurrency that can be transferred through decentralized financial platforms and other services designed to operate without traditional financial intermediaries.

Authorities expect the stolen funds to pass through additional exchanges, digital wallets and cryptocurrency services as the perpetrators attempt to obscure their origins and prevent investigators from recovering the money.

The FBI is coordinating its investigation with the U.S. Secret Service and the Internal Revenue Service’s Criminal Investigation division, with the agencies working to identify the movement of the stolen assets and interrupt attempts to launder them.

In their warning, federal officials called on cryptocurrency exchanges, blockchain monitoring companies and other digital asset businesses to identify and block transactions connected to wallets controlled by the hackers.

Investigators also released an extensive collection of cryptocurrency addresses believed to have received stolen funds or otherwise been associated with the North Korean operation.

Binance announced Friday that approximately $3 billion worth of the stolen cryptocurrency had already been frozen through cooperation with law enforcement agencies, blockchain networks and private-sector partners.

The exchange said it would use its own financial reserves and its Secure Asset Fund for Users to compensate for the losses rather than pass the financial burden on to customers.

“Binance will absorb the financial impact of these stolen funds, not our users,” the company said in an Oct. 30 security update.

Binance reported that it had allocated more than $6.34 billion from corporate resources to replace the missing cryptocurrency, although some of the affected assets had not yet been fully replenished.

The company temporarily halted withdrawals while conducting security checks and investigating how the attackers penetrated its systems. Early findings suggested that a compromised employee laptop may have provided an initial entry point, although investigators subsequently identified additional areas of concern.

Binance said it had not discovered evidence that the private keys used to authorize transactions from its cryptocurrency wallets had been exposed.

The scale of the theft far exceeds the February 2025 breach of Bybit, when North Korean-linked hackers stole approximately $1.5 billion in digital assets. That attack was also attributed to TraderTraitor, which investigators say specializes in sophisticated operations against cryptocurrency businesses.

Independent blockchain analysis firms have reported slightly different estimates of the latest losses. Elliptic placed the total at approximately $6.43 billion and identified about $2.84 billion in frozen assets, while TRM Labs estimated the theft at $6.36 billion.

North Korea has repeatedly been accused of using cryptocurrency theft to generate revenue despite international sanctions, with stolen digital assets providing funds that can be moved outside conventional banking systems.

The FBI urged anyone possessing information about the Binance attack or associated North Korean money-laundering activities to contact a local FBI office or submit a report through the bureau’s Internet Crime Complaint Center at ic3.gov.

{Matzav.com}

U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee said today that Israel’s inconclusive election results have set the stage for a potentially prolonged struggle to form a government, predicting that political leaders could abandon campaign promises and reconsider alliances as coalition negotiations intensify.

Appearing on Newsmax’s “America Right Now” with host Tom Basile, Huckabee discussed the unexpected election outcome, allegations of foreign involvement in the voting process, and the importance of the U.S.-Israel alliance.

The ambassador pointed to the surprising performance of Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu’s political bloc, which emerged with 53 Knesset seats compared with 48 for the bloc led by Gadi Eisenkot. Neither side obtained the 61 seats necessary to command a majority in Israel’s 120-member parliament.

The results contradicted expectations reflected in many pre-election surveys, which had suggested a stronger showing for Netanyahu’s opponents.

“Obviously, they were wrong about that,” Huckabee said, referring to the polling projections.

Huckabee explained that Israel’s parliamentary system makes election night fundamentally different from the American experience, since the final distribution of seats does not necessarily determine who will become prime minister.

“In an American election, on the night of the ballots, you pretty well know who won,” he said. “In Israel, the night of the election is really the beginning, not the end. So now it’s time to see who can form the coalition. That’s going to be the key.”

Under Israeli law, President Isaac Herzog will consult with the elected parties before assigning a Knesset member the responsibility of attempting to establish a government. The designated candidate generally receives 28 days to assemble a coalition, with the possibility of an additional 14 days.

Asked whether Netanyahu and Eisenkot might ultimately reach an agreement on a national unity government, Huckabee suggested that declarations made during an election campaign should not necessarily be treated as permanent commitments.

“Politicians have said throughout this campaign here in Israel, there is no way I’ll sit in the government with Netanyahu, or there’s no way I’ll sit in a government that involves Naftali Bennett or whoever,” he said. “Throw all that out the window.”

The ambassador suggested that politicians who repeatedly ruled out cooperation with their rivals could change their calculations when confronted with the possibility of spending another four years outside the government.

Huckabee also addressed the controversy surrounding the possible participation of Arab political factions in a future coalition. He defended Netanyahu’s refusal to cooperate with certain Arab parties, pointing to representatives who failed to unequivocally condemn Hamas’ October 7, 2023, massacre.

He described such a refusal as “completely reckless,” arguing that anyone seeking a role in governing Israel should be willing to condemn the murder of approximately 1,200 people during the terrorist assault.

The ambassador was also questioned about reports that Israeli intelligence agencies were examining allegations of foreign interference in the election, including claims that money originating in Qatar and Turkey may have been directed toward Arab communities in Israel.

Huckabee emphasized the seriousness of the allegations while acknowledging that investigators had not yet established whether improper foreign involvement had occurred.

“It would be a serious, serious issue that would have a dramatic impact on not only the election outcome, but it would also, I think, really stir up some very strong feelings in Israel,” Huckabee said.

He added that Israelis deserved confidence that the election had been conducted fairly and transparently, describing the need for a process that was “up front, clean and clear.”

Turning to relations between Washington and Jerusalem, Huckabee stressed that American cooperation with Israel extends well beyond political considerations and provides critical national security benefits to the United States.

“What we share in intelligence actually saves American lives almost every day,” he said. “Americans don’t understand that. But it happens.”

Huckabee argued that the intelligence partnership remains valuable regardless of which political party controls Congress, pointing to the two countries’ longstanding cooperation against terrorism and regional security threats.

The ambassador also praised President Donald Trump’s handling of Iran, crediting the administration with confronting a regime that has threatened the United States and Israel for decades.

“Thank God, after 47.5 years of hearing them tell us they’re going to kill us, he’s taken action,” Huckabee said.

He maintained that preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons remains a central American and Israeli security objective, particularly amid continued uncertainty over Tehran’s intentions and the possibility of renewed military confrontation.

“The relationship we have with Israel is very important, both strategically as well as tactically,” Huckabee said.

{Matzav.com}

Israel may be preparing a sophisticated surprise operation against Iran’s most powerful military commanders if fighting resumes following Tuesday’s U.S. midterm elections, potentially employing tactics resembling the devastating 2024 attacks that crippled Hezbollah’s communications network.

According to a report published today by the New York Post, Israeli intelligence could attempt to eliminate senior Iranian military figures through an unconventional operation rather than relying exclusively on traditional airstrikes. The possibility comes as President Donald Trump considers renewed military action against Tehran and American forces strengthen their presence in the Middle East.

The USS Theodore Roosevelt aircraft carrier is reportedly moving toward the region, where it could join the USS George Washington and USS George W. Bush as Washington prepares for a possible escalation.

Speaking Friday to Kansas City radio station KCMO, Trump predicted that the conflict is “going to get wrapped up soon,” without providing additional details about his administration’s plans.

Sen. Roger Marshall, a Kansas Republican, suggested that military operations could begin shortly after Americans cast their ballots Tuesday.

“I’m going to guess about a day or three after this election, I would not want to be anywhere close to Iran,” Marshall said Thursday.

Oded Ailam, a former deputy head of global operations at the Mossad, told the New York Post that Israel possesses the intelligence capabilities to conduct an operation similar to its September 2024 attacks against Hezbollah, when explosive devices concealed inside communications equipment detonated across Lebanon and Syria.

“This is the bread and butter of Israeli strategy, is surprise twists and turns, unexpected moves and I’m absolutely certain that Israel has cards in the sleeve that will be used,” Ailam said.

The Hezbollah operation, carried out on September 17 and 18, 2024, involved thousands of pagers and walkie-talkies that had been secretly modified to contain explosives. The coordinated detonations killed dozens, wounded thousands and severely damaged the terrorist organization’s communications infrastructure.

The attack demonstrated Israel’s ability to infiltrate enemy supply chains and carry out operations that remain undetected until the moment they are activated. Ailam suggested that Israeli intelligence could have developed similarly unexpected methods for targeting Iran’s senior leadership.

According to Ailam, effective control of the Iranian government is concentrated among four powerful military officials: Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps commander Ahmad Vahidi, Basij commander Hossein Taeb, armed forces chief Ali Abdollahi and Supreme National Security Council Secretary Mohsen Rezaei.

He argued that Iran’s civilian leadership exercises little independent authority, while Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei serves primarily as a figurehead for the military establishment.

“The president and foreign minister can’t make decisions. [The military junta] hides behind Mojtaba, but he’s not in charge; he’s a complete puppet,” Ailam said.

“Israel will use its imagination, its intelligence and the ability of the Israelis to surprise and turn the table in ways you can not anticipate,” he added.

Ailam also described growing disagreements within Iran’s leadership over negotiations with the United States, suggesting that hard-line military commanders have repeatedly interfered with diplomatic initiatives.

“They’re not on the same page themselves, we see a lot of friction within the regime, different approaches, agreeing then reneging,” he said.

Retired U.S. Gen. Jack Keane urged Washington to consider a broad military campaign targeting Iran’s senior commanders, nuclear installations, energy facilities and weapons manufacturing infrastructure.

“The intelligence we have now as a result of six months of collection during the on-again, off-again ceasefire is significant,” Keane said.

Ailam suggested that an intelligence operation against Iran’s leadership could produce consequences extending far beyond the elimination of individual commanders, potentially spreading fear and suspicion throughout the regime.

“The effect is enormous, especially on the psychology of the enemy. Imagine after the attack there’s a conversation somewhere in a bunker with the top echelons of Iran and everybody’s looking to the left and to the right and thinking the guy next to him is a spy,” he said.

Other analysts cautioned that an Israeli or American attack could provoke an especially fierce Iranian response, including strikes against neighboring countries and critical energy infrastructure.

“[The regime’s] interest is survival; they’ll fight harder,” said Behnam Ben Taleblu, senior director of the Iran Program at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies.

Former Israeli national security adviser Maj. Gen. Yaakov Amidror warned that Iranian attacks against Gulf oil and gas installations could prompt Israel to retaliate against Iran’s own energy industry on a massive scale.

“If the Iranian retaliation will be to destroy or try to destroy energy facilities in the Gulf countries, that would be a good excuse for Israel to destroy the whole energy infrastructure in Iran,” Amidror said.

“This is something that cannot be rebuilt in a few years, this will send Iran back 50 years,” he added.

Sen. Chris Murphy, a Connecticut Democrat, strongly criticized the possibility of renewed American military operations, warning that another campaign could deepen the conflict and threaten American interests.

“Their plan is insane. It will lead to devastating escalation and the likely destruction of our commitment to the rule of law,” Murphy said Thursday.

“The plan that they have developed will lead in my view to a prolongment and an escalation of this war that in my view will be devastating for our security interests,” he added.

The speculation about an Israeli intelligence operation follows reports that American and Israeli military planners have developed options for a short but intensive campaign against Iran after November 3. Potential targets reportedly include nuclear facilities, ballistic missile and drone production sites, and energy infrastructure.

Meanwhile, Iranian negotiators met with Qatari mediators in Doha today as diplomatic efforts continued to avert another confrontation. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Trump had not decided whether to authorize military action and continued to prefer a negotiated solution.

Iranian Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei, however, warned today that any renewed American or Israeli attack would bring an immediate military response, with Iranian forces instructed to prepare for retaliation beyond the country’s borders.

Despite the possibility of targeting Iran’s military leadership, Amidror maintained that Israel’s primary strategic objectives remain preventing Tehran from developing nuclear weapons and eliminating its ability to threaten Israel with ballistic missiles.

{Matzav.com}

Iran signaled today that it views a new diplomatic approach from the Trump administration favorably, but warned that negotiations with the United States will not resume unless Washington first agrees to a series of demands involving sanctions, American military deployments and shipping through the Strait of Hormuz.

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi made the comments during an interview with Al Jazeera as Iranian representatives continued indirect negotiations in Qatar aimed at preventing renewed hostilities with the United States and Israel.

The latest diplomatic activity follows a letter from Vice President JD Vance to Iranian security official Mohsen Rezaei, an initiative that has prompted speculation about whether Washington is attempting to revive negotiations with Tehran.

“The American side’s attempt to open the door to dialogue and understanding more broadly is a positive step,” Araghchi told Al Jazeera.

The Iranian foreign minister said the message had been examined by senior officials in Tehran, but warned that any American attempt to exploit internal disagreements within Iran would undermine the diplomatic effort.

“If Washington’s goal in sending this letter is to stir up discord, it would be yet another mistake to add to its previous ones,” he said.

Reports in The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal described Vance’s communication as an attempt to explore a possible return to negotiations and avoid another round of American military strikes. President Donald Trump offered a different explanation, saying the letter concerned assistance in obtaining medical supplies for Iran rather than a new peace initiative.

Despite describing the American approach as encouraging, Araghchi made clear that Tehran was not prepared to send officials into direct negotiations.

“We see no need to meet with the Americans at present. Our conditions are clear, and mediators are continuing their consultations regarding them,” he told Al Jazeera.

He rejected reports suggesting that a meeting between American and Iranian representatives was imminent, saying any decision about direct or indirect negotiations would depend on Washington’s response to Tehran’s demands.

Among those conditions are the removal of American sanctions imposed after the Islamabad memorandum of understanding and a reduction in the U.S. military presence across the region.

Iran is also demanding international acceptance of a shipping arrangement for the Strait of Hormuz that Tehran says it developed with Oman. The proposal would establish an approved maritime passage while closing alternative routes through the strategically important waterway.

Araghchi maintained that the Iranian plan remains the only proposal currently available for reopening the strait and suggested that American acceptance could create the conditions for broader negotiations.

The negotiations have also produced movement on the timetable for reopening the Strait of Hormuz. Araghchi said Qatari mediators initially suggested a five-day implementation period, but subsequent discussions reduced the proposed timeframe to just two days. Tehran is additionally seeking the restoration of oil-export waivers and the release of frozen Iranian assets, including funds held in Qatar.

Meanwhile, diplomatic efforts are continuing in Doha following more than 12 hours of meetings between Qatari mediators and Iranian officials in Tehran on Friday. An official familiar with the negotiations told Reuters that the Qatari delegation maintained regular communication with American negotiators throughout the discussions.

“My aide is currently in Qatar to continue consultations. Qatari and Pakistani mediators are continuing consultations regarding our conditions,” Araghchi told Al Jazeera.

The Iranian foreign minister also acknowledged that international mediators had introduced proposals concerning Tehran’s nuclear activities, another major obstacle to an agreement.

“Mediators have presented proposals concerning the nuclear dossier, which we are currently reviewing as part of the second phase,” Araghchi said.

Earlier this week, Reuters reported that Qatari officials had suggested a seven-day arrangement involving reciprocal confidence-building measures, potentially supported by international guarantees. An Iranian official subsequently disputed the characterization of the initiative as a formal proposal, describing the ideas presented by Qatar as unacceptable.

At the same time, Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Mojtaba Khamenei, issued a warning that any renewed American or Israeli military operation would bring immediate retaliation.

During a meeting today with senior military commanders, Khamenei ordered Iranian forces to strengthen their readiness and revise their lists of potential American and Israeli targets. According to Iranian state media, he instructed the military to prepare responses without geographical limitations.

Khamenei assumed leadership following the death of his father, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, during the American-Israeli military offensive against Iran in February.

The warnings come as Washington weighs its next steps. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said President Trump has not made a decision about additional military action and would prefer a diplomatic resolution, although American forces remain prepared to strike if necessary.

Qatari officials are reportedly attempting to secure progress before Tuesday’s U.S. midterm elections, amid concerns that the Trump administration could resume military operations afterward.

{Matzav.com}

Members of Degel HaTorah met on Motzoei Shabbos with Roshei Yeshiva Rav Dov Landau and Rav Moshe Hillel Hirsch as reports intensified that United Torah Judaism could potentially help Gadi Eisenkot establish a minority government in exchange for legislation protecting the status of yeshiva bochurim.

The meeting, officially described by Degel HaTorah as an opportunity for its newly elected representatives to receive the Roshei Yeshiva’s brachos ahead of the upcoming Knesset term, took place amid increasingly complicated coalition negotiations following Tuesday’s elections, which left Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu’s political bloc with only 53 seats.

According to reports published Friday, Rav Landau instructed Degel HaTorah lawmakers to begin discussions with all political factions in an effort to secure an acceptable arrangement regarding the draft status of yeshiva students.

The Rosh Yeshiva was quoted as directing the party to “make every effort to regulate the status of yeshiva students. We are not in anyone’s bloc. We are in the bloc of the Torah world.”

The reported directive followed discussions involving senior figures in the anti-Netanyahu camp about a possible arrangement under which United Torah Judaism would abstain during the parliamentary vote to approve an Eisenkot-led government, allowing it to take office without formally joining the coalition.

Under the scenario being explored, UTJ’s seven seats would no longer be counted among the lawmakers opposing Eisenkot, potentially leaving Netanyahu’s bloc with 46 seats and giving Eisenkot a path to forming a government supported by 55 lawmakers.

In return for such cooperation, UTJ would reportedly demand an agreed-upon draft law establishing the legal status of yeshiva students and protecting their ability to continue learning without military service.

Senior UTJ officials acknowledged that indirect discussions have taken place through intermediaries, although they characterized the likelihood of such an agreement as extremely remote.

However, the office of UTJ chairman MK Yaakov Asher firmly rejected reports that the party had already received instructions to negotiate with the opposition.

“No such instruction was given. We have not yet visited the Gedolei Yisroel since the elections,” Asher’s office stated.

Tonight’s meeting marked the first formal visit by Degel HaTorah’s elected representatives to the Roshei Yeshiva since the election results became known.

The political maneuvering faces a major obstacle from Yisrael Beytenu chairman Avigdor Lieberman, whose party has taken an uncompromising position on the military draft. A senior party official said that Lieberman has insisted the first law passed by any government his party joins must require universal military service.

“Lieberman has made clear that the first law in any government in which he participates will be a draft law for everyone,” the official said.

The official added that the demand was nonnegotiable, even if it meant another election. “This is a statement made after the elections, and it is a central principle from which we will not retreat, even at the cost of elections! We will not sell out the soldiers for power. Conscription for everyone, with zero exemptions.”

Nevertheless, a senior opposition MK said that some members of the anti-Netanyahu camp are prepared to reconsider their positions on the draft in order to establish a government.

“The election results show that the public did not vote against the chareidim,” the lawmaker said. “If we need to compromise on the draft issue in order to form a government, we will seriously consider it. There is an entire world outside Twitter, a world that did not show up at the ballot box when it mattered.”

According to discussions taking place within UTJ, some party officials believe that if an agreement protecting yeshiva students can be reached, Shas could eventually join the arrangement as well. Shas suffered a severe electoral defeat Tuesday, dropping from 11 Knesset seats to just six.

Separately, Channel 14 reported that Degel HaTorah was considering withholding its recommendation for prime minister during President Isaac Herzog’s upcoming consultations, allowing the party to maintain flexibility while negotiations continue.

However, following tonight’s meetings, senior Degel HaTorah figures reportedly clarified that neither support for Netanyahu nor support for Eisenkot had actually been discussed with the Roshei Yeshiva. They maintained that the visits were intended solely to receive brachos ahead of the new parliamentary term, and that no concrete political decisions had been reached.

President Herzog is scheduled to begin consultations with the newly elected Knesset factions on Wednesday, when party representatives will formally recommend whom he should select to attempt to form Israel’s next government.

{Matzav.com}

Yisrael Beytenu chairman Avigdor Lieberman announced Friday that his party will refuse to participate in any Israeli government that includes Arab political factions, dealing another setback to efforts by the anti-Netanyahu bloc to assemble a governing coalition following this week’s Knesset elections.

In a sharply worded Facebook statement, Lieberman accused several Arab lawmakers of making statements sympathetic to terrorism and declared that Yisrael Beytenu would not compromise its position for the sake of forming a government.

“We will not sit with supporters of terrorism.”

Lieberman specifically criticized MKs Ofer Cassif and Yasser Hujirat, along with remarks made by Joint List representative Osama Saadi during celebrations following Tuesday’s election.

Explaining his objections, Lieberman pointed to Cassif’s endorsement of South Africa’s legal case against Israel at the International Court of Justice, which accused Israel of committing genocide during its military campaign in Gaza.

“After October 7, Ofer Cassif supported the proceedings initiated by South Africa against Israel at the International Court of Justice in The Hague, which alleged that Israel was committing genocide,” Lieberman wrote.

He also cited Cassif’s accusation that “the Israeli military carries out acts of terrorism.”

The Yisrael Beytenu leader further criticized Ra’am lawmaker Yasser Hujirat, alleging that the MK had described Hamas as a charitable organization rather than a terrorist group in remarks made several weeks before the election.

Lieberman also took issue with comments delivered by Osama Saadi at Joint List headquarters on election night, when Saadi dedicated the party’s electoral success “to our people in the Gaza Strip, the West Bank, and occupied Jerusalem.”

Taken together, Lieberman argued, the statements demonstrated why his party could not enter a coalition alongside the Arab factions, regardless of the political difficulties confronting the opposition.

“Anyone who wants to rely on supporters of terrorism is welcome to do so. Yisrael Beytenu will not be part of it.”

The announcement comes as opposition leaders struggle to overcome the arithmetic of Tuesday’s election. Netanyahu’s coalition bloc secured 53 seats, while the Jewish-led opposition won 48. The Joint List and Ra’am together captured 19 seats, potentially giving Netanyahu’s opponents a 67-seat majority if they agreed to cooperate with the Arab factions.

Lieberman’s position effectively blocks that possibility as long as Yisrael Beytenu remains part of the proposed coalition. He has also previously rejected joining a government headed by Netanyahu or one that includes Shas and United Torah Judaism, insisting that the next coalition consist exclusively of Zionist parties.

The political confrontation follows another controversy involving the Arab parties. Before the election, Israel’s Central Elections Committee voted to disqualify Ra’am, the Joint List and Cassif from participating. The Supreme Court subsequently overturned those decisions, allowing the parties and Cassif to compete.

With neither political bloc commanding a majority, President Isaac Herzog is expected to begin consultations with party representatives before selecting a candidate to attempt to form the next government. Failure to reach a coalition agreement could send Israel back to the polls.

{Matzav.com}

The identities of two pilots who helped save a Flydubai passenger jet from a potentially catastrophic terrorist attack have been revealed after they received prestigious civilian honors from the United Arab Emirates for their extraordinary actions during the September 30 emergency.

The pilots, Henson Steven of Fiji and Rowan Tooth of South Africa, were traveling aboard the Dubai-to-Tel Aviv flight as off-duty crew members when the aircraft’s co-pilot allegedly attempted to seize control and crash the plane. The two men ultimately took over the controls and guided the damaged aircraft to a safe emergency landing in Saudi Arabia.

The pair were publicly identified following an awards ceremony held Tuesday, October 27, during which UAE President Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan conferred the First Class Order of Zayed II on members of the Flydubai crew. The decorations were presented by Dubai Crown Prince Sheikh Hamdan bin Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum.

The incident occurred aboard Flydubai Flight FZ1073, a Boeing 737 MAX traveling from Dubai to Ben Gurion Airport with approximately 170 passengers and crew members, most of them Israelis.

According to investigators, the aircraft’s Omani co-pilot, Hamam al-Hammami, attacked Captain Smit Machchhar with an emergency axe inside the cockpit in an apparent attempt to take control of the aircraft and crash it into Ben Gurion Airport.

Despite suffering serious injuries, Machchhar fought back and managed to unlock the cockpit door, allowing passengers and other crew members to enter and overpower the attacker.

During the terrifying confrontation, the aircraft plunged approximately 16,000 feet in just 30 seconds, sending passengers into panic as the plane descended at an extraordinary rate.

Several Israeli passengers rushed forward to help restrain the attacker. Among them was Yaniv Hayun, who helped stabilize the aircraft during the emergency before the two off-duty pilots assumed control.

Steven and Tooth, who had originally been aboard the aircraft to operate its return flight, took over the damaged jet and successfully landed at Tabuk Airport in Saudi Arabia. Their intervention, together with the actions of the injured captain and passengers, prevented what authorities believe could have been a mass-casualty terrorist attack.

The UAE subsequently confirmed that its investigation had identified the incident as an attempted terrorist attack. Hammami was taken into custody, while investigators began examining how he had been permitted to serve aboard a flight bound for Israel.

Captain Machchhar was also honored at Tuesday’s ceremony. Photographs showed the Indian pilot with visible scars from the attack, including significant injuries to his head and arm.

The First Class Order of Zayed II is among the UAE’s highest civilian distinctions, recognizing exceptional service and contributions. The presidential recognition acknowledged the crew’s courage and professionalism in protecting everyone aboard the aircraft.

The ceremony also marked the first public identification of Steven and Tooth, whose names had remained largely unknown in the weeks following the incident. Earlier accounts had incorrectly identified one of the pilots as a New Zealand citizen.

Israeli authorities previously honored several passengers who helped subdue the attacker, including Hayun, recognizing their intervention during the desperate struggle inside the cockpit.

The attack has also prompted Israel to tighten aviation security procedures, including requirements for airlines operating flights to and from the country to provide additional crew information ahead of departure.

{Matzav.com}

MK Ahmad Tibi of the Joint List declared tonight that his party will not participate in a government headed by Gadi Eisenkot, even as he signaled a willingness to cooperate with opposition lawmakers seeking to remove Knesset Speaker Amir Ohana following Israel’s elections.

Speaking on the television program “Meet the Press,” Tibi delivered a direct message to Eisenkot, chairman of the Yashar! party, making clear that the Arab faction would remain outside any new governing coalition while potentially supporting parliamentary moves against the current leadership.

“We want to make things easier. We will not be part of the government. We will support replacing the Knesset Speaker.”

Tibi’s remarks come as parties opposed to Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu search for ways to exercise influence in the newly elected Knesset despite failing to secure the parliamentary majority needed to establish a government.

The election results left the anti-Netanyahu parties with just 48 seats, compared with 53 for Netanyahu’s existing coalition bloc, reversing the balance suggested by many pre-election surveys. Neither camp has the 61 seats required for a majority in the 120-member Knesset.

The opposition’s path to power is further complicated by commitments made by nearly all its constituent parties not to depend on Arab factions to establish a government. Democrats chairman MK Yair Golan has been the notable exception, leaving Eisenkot and his potential partners facing a difficult political calculation.

Reports earlier this week indicated that opposition leaders were examining a plan to replace Ohana immediately upon the new Knesset’s inauguration, even without reaching an agreement on forming an alternative coalition. Such a move could give the anti-Netanyahu parties an early parliamentary victory despite their inability to assemble a governing majority.

Meanwhile, Eisenkot met this evening with Yair Lapid, chairman of the Together party, for discussions focused on the election outcome and the opposition’s next steps. The two leaders coordinated their political approach and emphasized their determination to honor the commitments they made to voters.

Tibi’s announcement adds another dimension to those discussions, offering the opposition possible support for changing the Knesset’s leadership without requiring the Arab parties to become formal coalition partners.

Additional reporting indicates that Tibi’s offer extends beyond the election of a new Knesset speaker. He has also pledged not to support no-confidence motions initiated by Likud against a potential alternative government and not to introduce legislation seeking to dissolve the Knesset.

Tibi has indicated that his faction could provide outside parliamentary support in exchange for agreements addressing problems facing Arab communities, including violent crime and the recognition of Bedouin villages. The Joint List won 11 seats in Tuesday’s election, while the separate Ra’am party secured eight, giving the two Arab factions a combined 19 seats.

Israel’s anti-Netanyahu parties are reportedly considering a dramatic change to the country’s electoral system that would allow voters to choose the prime minister directly, potentially enabling a new government to take office without securing the backing of 61 Knesset members.

The proposal, which would revive an initiative advanced by Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu in 2021, is among several options being examined by opposition leaders following an election that left neither political camp with a clear parliamentary majority.

Channel 12 journalist Michael Hauser Tov reported on the Ulpan Shishi program that senior opposition officials have acknowledged discussions about introducing direct elections for prime minister as a possible solution to the political stalemate.

The central objective would be to create a path toward establishing a government without requiring the participation or parliamentary support of Arab parties, an issue that has complicated efforts to assemble an alternative coalition.

Opposition figures have reportedly dubbed the initiative the “Netanyahu 2021 Model,” referring to a plan Netanyahu himself promoted after the 2021 elections produced another divided Knesset.

Under the framework being discussed, Israelis would cast ballots directly for their preferred prime minister. The victorious candidate would then be entitled to establish a government without first obtaining the customary support of a 61-member parliamentary majority.

The idea represents a significant departure from Israel’s existing parliamentary system, under which the president assigns a Knesset member the task of forming a government and that government must subsequently win the confidence of the legislature.

The proposal would also require amending Israel’s Basic Law governing the formation of governments, a legislative change that would need at least 61 votes. Although the Jewish-led opposition parties control only 48 seats, the addition of 19 lawmakers from Arab parties would provide a potential 67-vote majority to approve the legislation.

Israel previously experimented with direct elections for prime minister between 1996 and 2001. Netanyahu became the first prime minister elected under that arrangement when he defeated Shimon Peres in 1996. The system was subsequently abandoned amid concerns that it encouraged political fragmentation and made coalition-building more difficult.

Another unresolved question is whom the opposition would nominate for prime minister. Gadi Eisenkot, Naftali Bennett and Avigdor Liberman have all sought the leadership of the anti-Netanyahu camp, and the parties did not agree on a single candidate before Tuesday’s election.

For now, the direct-election proposal remains an option under consideration rather than an agreed political strategy. No legislation has been formally announced, and opposition leaders have not established whether sufficient support exists to move the initiative forward.

President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu spoke by telephone on Saturday amid escalating tensions with Iran, as Washington considers additional military action against Tehran while pursuing diplomatic efforts to resolve the conflict, according to a report by The Wall Street Journal.

The conversation followed a high-level White House briefing on Thursday during which Admiral Brad Cooper, commander of U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM), presented Trump with potential military options involving Iran.

The briefing, described as unusual, reportedly included Secretary of War Pete Hegseth and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Dan Caine. Officials familiar with the discussions said the meeting focused on possible American military operations as the administration evaluates its next steps.

Trump indicated Friday that Iran was seeking negotiations, suggesting that Tehran’s worsening economic difficulties were increasing pressure on its leadership to reach an agreement.

“There are talks. They want to talk. They keep talking. They’re not paying their soldiers. They’re not paying their police. They’re in a lot of trouble,” Trump told reporters.

The president also suggested that Washington was not operating under an immediate deadline to bring the confrontation to an end.

“We have time, frankly. It’s a war, but it is not a typical war.”

Meanwhile, diplomatic contacts between the United States and Iran have reportedly advanced through mediation efforts in Qatar.

Sources familiar with the negotiations told the Qatari newspaper Al-Arabi Al-Jadeed on Saturday that discussions in Doha had produced progress, with an American delegation expected to participate in talks alongside Iranian representatives.

According to the report, negotiators have reached preliminary understandings concerning several major issues, including restrictions on Iran’s nuclear activities, freedom of navigation through the Strait of Hormuz, and possible economic incentives that could be offered to Tehran as part of an agreement.

The report also indicated that China and Russia could serve as guarantors of a potential arrangement, although no final agreement has been announced.

Despite the diplomatic activity, Iran’s Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei issued a new warning Saturday following a meeting with senior military commanders, threatening an expansive response if the United States or Israel launches additional attacks.

“Every level or type of threat must be met with an immediate and effective response, without geographical restrictions,” Khamenei wrote on social media.

Iranian state media reported that Khamenei also instructed military commanders to expand their list of potential targets to include additional American and Israeli assets, signaling that renewed hostilities could extend well beyond Iran’s borders.

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, meanwhile, described the latest American diplomatic overtures as a positive development but indicated that Tehran was not yet prepared to enter direct negotiations with Washington. He said Iran was reviewing proposals conveyed through mediators, including arrangements that could allow the Strait of Hormuz to reopen within two days.

The competing military threats and diplomatic initiatives have placed the Trump administration at a critical decision point, with American commanders preparing possible operations while mediators attempt to prevent another major escalation in the Middle East.

{Matzav.com}

Russian President Vladimir Putin has warned that Moscow is prepared for a military confrontation with European nations if Western governments continue trying to weaken Russia, raising the possibility of a major conflict and threatening to turn the Baltic Sea into a flashpoint resembling the Strait of Hormuz.

Speaking Thursday at a Russia-Africa summit in Moscow, Putin insisted that his country has no desire to fight Europe but cautioned that continued Western efforts to impose a strategic defeat on Russia could produce consequences far beyond the ongoing war in Ukraine.

According to Russian state news agency TASS, Putin invoked the devastating conflicts of the previous century, referring to “the tragic pages of history” and arguing that Moscow wants to prevent “anything like this happens on a global scale” again.

At the same time, the Russian leader made clear that his military would be prepared for a confrontation if European governments pursued one.

Putin accused unspecified Western countries of seeking to “inflict a strategic defeat on Russia” and questioned whether European military preparations for a possible conflict by the end of the decade were realistic.

“Many people are talking about preparing for war by 2030. Is this right or wrong? First of all, we are prepared, but we don’t want any war with Europe… as for them, if someone wants it, let them prepare. However, they failed to inflict a strategic defeat on Russia this time and it is unlikely to become possible by 2030”.

Putin warned that efforts to defeat Moscow through continued military and financial support for Ukraine could “go too far,” suggesting that a wider conflict would be catastrophic for all parties involved.

He declared that if such a war erupted, “there will be no winners”.

The Russian president also issued a warning concerning the Baltic Sea, suggesting that tensions between Moscow and NATO could create a maritime confrontation comparable to the recent crisis in the Persian Gulf.

The Baltic has become an increasingly sensitive strategic region since Finland and Sweden joined NATO, leaving Russia surrounded by alliance members along much of the coastline. Moscow nevertheless retains important access to the sea through St. Petersburg and the Russian exclave of Kaliningrad, situated between Poland and Lithuania.

Putin suggested that Western pressure on Russian maritime interests could trigger a confrontation resembling the disruption of shipping through the Strait of Hormuz during the recent conflict involving Iran.

“there will be a situation similar to the situation in the Strait of Hormuz. Does anyone want the same situation to develop in the Baltic Sea as in the Persian Gulf or the Strait of Hormuz? I don’t know. We don’t want that… We do not want this. But we will respond to any challenge.”

The remarks appeared intended to warn European governments against measures that Moscow might interpret as interference with Russian shipping or access to Baltic ports, although Putin did not announce any specific military operation.

Putin also addressed recent diplomatic contacts with European leaders, saying Moscow remains willing to restore relations despite the deep divisions created by the war in Ukraine.

The Russian president referred to a telephone conversation earlier this week with Finnish President Alexander Stubb and Norwegian Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre. He defended their decision to speak with him despite criticism from other European capitals, saying dialogue was preferable to continued isolation.

According to Reuters, Putin said Russia supported efforts to reestablish normal diplomatic relations with European countries, whether through the European Union or direct bilateral discussions.

The latest warnings come as European governments continue strengthening their defenses amid concerns about Russian military activity and the possibility of a wider confrontation with NATO.

Moscow has repeatedly accused Western governments of provoking an escalation by arming Ukraine, while European leaders have argued that Russia’s invasion and continued military operations are the principal threats to regional security.

{Matzav.com}