A tense exchange erupted today in the Knesset’s Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee as the panel discussed whether to count national-civilian service toward the IDF’s draft targets, an issue that has become central in the emerging conscription legislation.
Committee legal adviser Miri Frenkel issued a sharply critical legal opinion earlier in the day rejecting the inclusion of national service in the draft quotas. When the matter came up in the committee session, she confronted IDF representative Brig. Gen. Shay Taib over the army’s position.
Taib warned that the proposal, as currently written, would not help the IDF meet its operational needs. “As the law is drafted right now, the people who go to national civilian service do not assist us in any parameter,” he told the committee. “At present, the mechanism written here does not provide the turnover we need. Of the 12,000 soldiers the army requires, at least 6,000 must be combat troops.”
Frenkel challenged him directly. “One thing is difficult to understand in your position,” she said. “On the one hand, the IDF says it is short 12,000 soldiers, some of them combat personnel. You also say that every chareidi man can serve in the IDF. So I don’t understand why you agree to transfer soldiers into a civilian-security service framework.”
Taib pushed back: “I didn’t say I agree.”
Frenkel insisted that the army must present a clear position. “This is not a matter of agreeing or not agreeing—you need to state your stance,” she said. “What I understand from your words is that you do agree. The question is a principled one. It’s not just about manpower management. You cannot say, ‘I need 12,000 combat troops,’ and at the same time support opening national service as an alternative.”
Taib reiterated that the army does not back the proposal: “There is a clause in the bill that is before us. We do not agree with it. Within this clause, I am suggesting not to accept the ages of 19–20 that were written here, but to raise them.”
Frenkel pressed further: “This isn’t only about combat soldiers. It also includes combat-support roles.”
Taib bristled at the line of questioning: “I’m responding to the clause in front of me. Do you want to dictate my position? You’re so focused on arguing that you’re not listening to what I’m saying.”
{Matzav.com}