Government Secretary Slams Attorney General Over Draft Conscription Law: “You’ve Made It a Habit to Act Only Against the Chareidim”
Government Secretary Adv. Yossi Fuchs sharply criticized Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara on Monday night, accusing her of consistently targeting the chareidi community and of systematically expanding Supreme Court rulings far beyond their original scope, amid the ongoing controversy surrounding the proposed conscription law.
Although Knesset deliberations on the draft law are still underway and the legislation remains in the formulation stage, Baharav-Miara released a legal opinion over the weekend addressing the emerging bill. Her opinion was issued while the law is still being debated in the Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee, chaired by MK Boaz Bismuth.
In her opinion, the attorney general expressed sweeping opposition to the proposed law and stated unequivocally that if the matter reaches the High Court of Justice, she would recommend striking it down. Her remarks came against the backdrop of ongoing committee discussions and various frameworks currently under consideration.
While Baharav-Miara’s position did not surprise political figures, it emerged that during a meeting last week between Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu and the United Torah Judaism faction, chareidi MKs demanded a forceful response to the attorney general’s opinion. They called on Committee Chairman Boaz Bismuth to issue a sharply worded letter rebutting her arguments.
Ultimately, it was Government Secretary Yossi Fuchs who responded. On Monday evening, Fuchs sent a letter of his own to Baharav-Miara, in place of Bismuth, delivering unusually harsh criticism.
In his letter, Fuchs wrote: “You have made it a habit to act only against the chareidim. It is a shame that you did not apply such strict standards to yourself as well, in the case of the Military Advocate General.”
Fuchs went on to accuse the attorney general’s office of operating a calculated and recurring strategy: “You have developed an efficient method. After every High Court ruling, you issue a letter that significantly tightens the ruling far beyond what was actually stated in it. The ‘Movement for Quality Government’ then issues a letter of exhaustion of remedies based on your unfounded claims, files a petition to the High Court, and the Attorney General’s Office sides with the petitioner instead of representing the government.”
{Matzav.com}
