Supreme Court Tosses Louisiana House Map In Major Voting Rights Act Win for GOP Ahead of Midterms
The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday invalidated Louisiana’s congressional map, ruling that the state improperly created a second majority-Black district, a decision expected to influence how districts are drawn in upcoming elections.
Louisiana had previously redrawn its map in 2024 after lower courts required the state to add another majority-Black district in order to comply with Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which is intended to prevent the weakening of minority voting power.
The revised map was challenged by the Trump administration along with state officials, who argued that the redistricting relied too heavily on race and therefore violated the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which guarantees equal protection under the law.
The Supreme Court sided with that argument, as all six conservative justices voted to overturn the 2024 map.
At the same time, the majority opinion authored by Samuel Alito did not go so far as to strike down Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act itself, a result that many observers had been watching closely.
“If these were white Democrats, there’s no reason to think they would have a second district, none,” principal deputy solicitor general Hashim Mooppan told the court during oral arguments this past October.
“And so what is happening here is, their argument is, ‘Because these Democrats happen to be black, they get a second district.’ If they were all white, we all agree they wouldn’t get the same.”
About one-third of Louisiana’s population is African American, and the state’s two Democratic members of Congress — compared with four Republicans in the House — both represent majority-Black districts.
The justices originally heard the case during the 2024–25 term, but in an unusual step, they later asked both sides to revise their arguments to address not only the Fourteenth Amendment but also the Fifteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which bars racial discrimination in voting rights.
That move led many to believe the Court might be preparing to scale back Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.
In his opinion, however, Alito wrote that “[c]ompliance with [Section] 2, as properly construed, can provide such a reason [for race-based redistricting]. Correctly understood, [Section] 2 does not impose liability at odds with the Constitution, and it should not have imposed liability on Louisiana for its 2022 map.”
An analysis from Democratic-aligned organizations Fair Fight Action and Black Voters Matter Fund suggested that, as a result of the ruling, Republican-led states could redraw up to 19 congressional districts across the South and Midwest in ways that would likely benefit the GOP.
It remains uncertain, however, whether states will be able to act quickly enough for such changes to significantly affect the 2026 midterm elections, in which Democrats are currently seen as having a favorable path to reclaim control of the House.
{Matzav.com}