Satmar Prevails: Meron Guesthouse Prices Will Remain at Original Rates
A Beis Din ruling in Bnei Brak has handed a decisive victory to Satmar in a high-profile dispute with guesthouse owners in Meron, determining that lodging contracts for a major Shabbos gathering will remain unchanged and that concealing the identity of the renters to prevent price-gouging was entirely legitimate, Matzav.com has learned.
The financial saga began ahead of a massive Shabbos Hisachdus in Meron, where the Satmar Rebbe of Kiryas Yoel, Rav Aharon Teitelbaum, was scheduled to spend Shabbos together with thousands of chassidim who had arrived in Israel. Demand for accommodations in the area surged, prompting Satmar organizers to secure dozens of guesthouses and rental units near the kever of Rabi Shimon bar Yochai.
To prevent extreme price inflation, Satmar enlisted an outside production company and instructed it to quietly reserve every available unit in the Meron region without disclosing that the Rebbe and thousands of followers would be arriving. Organizers feared that revealing this information would trigger massive price hikes from property owners.
After the reservations were finalized, however, one guesthouse owner discovered who the tenants really were and claimed that he could have charged far more had he known. He sought to cancel the agreement entirely. Several additional landlords joined him, filing a formal claim against both Satmar and the production company, alleging that essential information had been withheld during the booking process.
The case was brought before the Beis Din Tzedek of Bnei Brak, founded by Rav Nissim Karelitz zt”l and widely regarded as one of the most respected monetary botei din in the chareidi world. The panel consisted of Dayanim Rav Shalom Mordechai HaLevi Segal, Rav Binyomin Yechiel Posen, and Rav Mordechai Silman, highly experienced arbitrators in financial disputes. The ruling attracted unusual public interest due to the scale of the rentals involved, which included dozens of apartments and lodging complexes.
In their clear and unequivocal ruling, the dayanim upheld the original contracts in full, determining that the guesthouse owners had no basis to void the agreements. The fact that demand later proved higher than anticipated, they ruled, does not constitute any form of “mistaken transaction” and does not justify canceling a freely signed agreement. They emphasized that fluctuating market conditions are not grounds for retroactively altering a deal.
The ruling stated that “there is no flaw whatsoever in the conduct of the community and of the defendants,” adding that renters are not obligated to disclose information that might encourage unfair price gouging. The dayanim further wrote that “they are entitled to act wisely in order to obtain lodging services at reasonable prices.”
As a result, all rental agreements remain binding, leaving the disappointed Meron property owners required to honor the original rates.
{Matzav.com}
