Feed aggregator

In response to the ongoing crisis in Eretz Hakodesh and the draft decree targeting bnei Torah, the Dushinsky Rebbe has instructed the establishment of continuous Torah-learning shifts throughout the chassidus’ yeshivos, with learning taking place uninterrupted from 6:00 a.m. until midnight. The call has been met with an overwhelming response from the bochurim, who have eagerly enlisted in the initiative.

The directive comes as the Rebbe continues to stress the vital importance of strengthening Torah learning during this difficult period facing the Torah world.

Last week, the Dushinsky Rebbe paid an uplifting visit to Bnei Brak, where he joined the talmidim of Talmud Torah Maharitz Dushinsky for Mincha.

The Dushinsky Talmud Torah in Bnei Brak, which has been operating for nearly fifty years, is among the city’s most established Torah institutions. It was founded by the Dushinsky Rebbe, Rav Meir Moshe Dushinsky, Gaavad of Yerushalayim, as the first institution of the chassidus outside Yerushalayim. From that beginning emerged the broader network of Dushinsky educational institutions throughout Eretz Yisroel and around the world.

The Rebbe, who frequently speaks about the extraordinary power of the tefillos of tinokos shel bais rabban, went specifically to daven together with the children.

Following the tefillah, the Rebbe delivered brief remarks, encouraging the talmidim to return to their studies with even greater hasmadah. At the conclusion of the gathering, the mashgichim and mechanchim involved in the sacred work of educating the children passed before the Rebbe to receive his brachos.

Meanwhile, the Rebbe addressed the bochurim of the chassidus’ yeshivos with words of chizuk.

Referring to both the difficult situation facing Eretz Hakodesh and the threat posed by the draft decree hanging over Klal Yisroel, the Rebbe urged the bochurim to strengthen themselves through increased diligence in Torah study. He emphasized that the Ribbono Shel Olam uses such challenges to awaken the tzibbur and encourage greater dedication to Torah learning.

Accordingly, the Rebbe directed that continuous learning shifts be maintained in the yeshiva halls, ensuring that Torah study continues without interruption from six in the morning until midnight.

In the days since the announcement, all of the talmidim in the chassidus’ yeshivos have signed up to learn for at least one uninterrupted hour as a personal commitment dedicated solely to kavod Shamayim.

The result has been an inspiring sight throughout the yeshiva world of Dushinsky. The halls of learning are now filled with the powerful sound of Torah, as the kol Torah resounds with renewed strength and intensity, continuing day and night without pause.

Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa moved to clarify comments made by President Donald Trump regarding Syria’s potential role in dealing with Hezbollah, insisting that Damascus has no intention of waging war in Lebanon and suggesting that Trump’s remarks had been widely misinterpreted.

Speaking publicly for the first time since Trump floated the idea at the G7 summit, al-Sharaa emphasized that Syria is interested in helping Lebanon achieve stability but not through military intervention or by assuming responsibility for Lebanon’s affairs.

“President Trump expressed concern about what is happening in Lebanon and wants to stop the war there,” al-Sharaa said. “He spoke about Syria’s role in finding a safe solution, but the statement was misinterpreted as though Syria is preparing to invade Lebanon tomorrow morning.”

The Syrian leader acknowledged longstanding tensions between Damascus and Hezbollah but stressed that Syria does not want to see Lebanon descend further into conflict.

“We have a deep problem with Hezbollah, but we do not want all of Lebanon to die,” he said.

Al-Sharaa argued that Lebanon is trapped between dangerous alternatives and warned against forcing the country into another destructive confrontation.

“Lebanon cannot remain trapped between the options of civil war and war with Israel,” he said. “The Shiites in Lebanon need calm, not more fears and confrontations.”

The remarks came days after Trump surprised observers at the G7 summit by suggesting that Syria could take the lead in confronting Hezbollah as fighting between Israel and the Iranian-backed terror group continues to threaten regional stability.

Asked whether the new U.S.-Iran agreement could survive if Israel expands military operations in Lebanon, Trump responded that it could, while pointing to Hezbollah as a continuing obstacle.

“Yes, it can. But we have that same little problem that keeps popping up again and again, and that is Hezbollah,” Trump said.

The president then suggested that Syria’s leadership might be better positioned than Israel to confront the Lebanese terror organization.

“I had a lot of influence over what happened in Syria, and the man who runs Syria today is someone I helped bring to power together with President Erdogan and others,” Trump said. “He has done an amazing job unifying the country, and he is very tough on Hezbollah. He doesn’t like them.”

Trump went on to reveal that he had discussed the idea directly with Israeli officials.

“I suggested to Israel that they let Syria deal with Hezbollah because, frankly, I think they would do it better,” he said.

{Matzav.com}

Israeli Communications Minister Shlomo Karhi’s proposed communications reform is facing mounting opposition after newly revealed recordings showed senior rabbinic leaders affiliated with Shas strongly objecting to the legislation, potentially placing its future in doubt as lawmakers race to advance it through the Knesset.

The controversy erupted as a Knesset committee continued marathon discussions aimed at approving the bill before any possible dissolution of the government. The recordings suggest that several leading rabbinic figures believe the proposal could lead to a significant increase in Sabbath desecration.

The reform would replace the aging “Idan Plus” television system with a free, government-operated streaming platform.

Under the plan, viewers would be able to access all major Israeli television channels, including Keshet, Reshet, Kan, Channel 14, Channel 15, Channel 16, and others, through smartphones, tablets, and smart televisions without requiring antennas, converters, or monthly subscription fees.

According to recordings aired by Channel 12 News, members of Shas’ senior rabbinic leadership are deeply concerned that the ease of access provided by the new platform will encourage greater viewing of television programming on the Sabbath.

Rav Reuven Elbaz delivered one of the most forceful criticisms of the proposal.

“Opening a channel (an application), so that people will begin watching movies on Shabbos and watching games on Shabbos — that is absolute zero. It is not the way of the Jewish people. In my opinion, whoever did such a thing, I fear will not escape judgment.”

Rav Elbaz also argued that the proposal would undermine efforts to bring Jews closer to religious observance.

“It does not allow repentance to be complete,” Rav Elbaz said. “Tell him (Minister Karhi) that as far as my people are concerned, I will under no circumstances agree, and I will publicly declare that under no circumstances is this permissible. It is forbidden to do such a thing.”

He further dismissed any attempt to defend the measure based on outward appearances or symbols of religiosity.

“He can wear a kippah on his head, a sackcloth, I do not care what he wears. Let him wear a fool’s hat, let him wear a kippah — that is nonsense. It is absolutely and completely forbidden for a person to do such a thing. That is all.”

Another senior Shas rabbinic leader, Rav Shlomo Machpud, was also recorded expressing strong opposition to the legislation.

“Heaven forbid, heaven forbid. Something like this creates Shabbos desecration on an unprecedented scale. It cheapens the sanctity of Shabbos.”

The recordings surfaced as opposition to the reform continues to grow. Earlier, a rabbinical committee issued a sharply worded letter urging lawmakers to oppose the measure and warning of its potential consequences.

Karhi has repeatedly rejected the criticism and recently defended the proposal during a heated television interview, arguing that the reform would actually reduce Sabbath desecration rather than increase it.

According to the minister, the existing Idan Plus system costs the government approximately 40 million shekels each year and requires technicians to maintain the network around the clock, including on the Shabbos.

“Today, the Idan Plus system costs the state 40 million shekels a year. The system employs technicians 24 hours a day who maintain it even on Shabbos. We are eliminating that. It becomes an internet site, like any government website or religious website that does not shut down its servers on Shabbos, but there are no technicians actively desecrating Shabbos.”

{Matzav.com}

Historian Victor Davis Hanson is pushing back against criticism of the newly signed U.S.-Iran framework agreement, arguing that many opponents are overlooking how much leverage Washington gained through the recent conflict and how weakened Iran has become.

Appearing on Fox News’ “Jesse Watters Primetime,” Hanson challenged claims that Tehran emerged from the war in a stronger position and said the destruction inflicted on Iran has dramatically altered the balance of power.

“They’ve suffered probably a half a trillion dollars to their nuclear military industrial complex that took them 50 years to build,” Hanson said in response to what he called “unhinged” arguments that Iran is better off now than before the conflict.

His remarks came days after the Trump administration released the memorandum of understanding it signed with Iran, outlining a 60-day ceasefire and establishing a framework for broader negotiations.

The agreement has sparked criticism from both supporters and opponents of the administration, with detractors arguing that it does not immediately eliminate Iran’s nuclear infrastructure or require the removal of its stockpile of enriched uranium.

Hanson also rejected arguments that the United States effectively gave up ground by negotiating over access to the Strait of Hormuz after Iran disrupted shipping in the region.

“They keep saying, ‘Well, the strait was open before, and now it was closed, and now we had to negotiate to get it open.’ It was only open because they chose not to cause trouble,” he said.

According to Hanson, Iran enjoyed freedom of action for years because previous administrations were unwilling to confront its nuclear ambitions directly.

“They chose to not cause trouble because the last seven presidents said, ‘We don’t dare touch you. We’re not [going to] interfere with your nuclear programs.'”

He maintained that sanctions and restrictions on Iranian oil exports continue to place significant economic pressure on the regime and strengthen America’s bargaining position.

“They think time is on Iran’s side. Time is not on Iran’s side,” Hanson said, referencing the burden imposed by sanctions.

Hanson further argued that Tehran’s leaders are closely watching political developments in the United States, including upcoming midterm elections and celebrations marking America’s 250th anniversary.

In his view, Iranian officials fear that President Trump could have even greater freedom of action if he emerges politically strengthened after the midterms.

“They are terrified that if he wins the midterms and the price of gas goes down, he’s got a free hand, and he already has a free hand now,” Hanson said.

He concluded by arguing that Iran—not the United States—is under the greatest pressure from the passage of time.

“They are afraid that Donald Trump is [going to] drag it out because if he drags it out after the midterm, after the 250th anniversary, he’s [going to] have a lot more options than he does now when he’s worried about gas and the midterm. So the dynamic is all upside down. They are the ones that have the time clock.”

Sen. Lindsey Graham said Sunday that he expects the newly signed U.S.-Iran framework agreement to unravel and warned that President Trump is prepared to use military force to take control of the Strait of Hormuz if diplomacy fails.

The South Carolina Republican made the remarks during an appearance on CBS’s “Face the Nation,” as Vice President JD Vance began a new round of nuclear negotiations with Iranian officials at a resort in the Swiss Alps.

Graham, who said he spent four-and-a-half hours meeting with Trump on Friday, expressed skepticism that the memorandum of understanding signed last week will ultimately succeed.

“If you don’t have a diplomatic path through the MOU, then you have to go to war or some other form of coercion,” Graham said. “Let’s try this. Let’s try a diplomatic solution. I think it’s going to fail.”

According to Graham, the administration already has a contingency plan in place should the negotiations collapse.

He said that if talks break down, “President Trump is going to take the Strait of Hormuz over by force. The United States will control the Strait of Hormuz. We’ll charge a fee for all those who go through to pay for the operation.”

The senator also delivered a stark warning to Iran regarding the fighting involving Hezbollah in Lebanon, suggesting that Washington is prepared to respond directly against Tehran if attacks continue.

“If Iran continues to attack Israel and Lebanon, the new policy will be, we’ll hit Iran,” he said. “When you use Hezbollah to attack Israel, I think the new policy will be, we will attack Iran.”

Graham further escalated his rhetoric by warning that any Iranian effort to challenge American control of the strategic waterway would be met with overwhelming force.

He added that if the Iranians contest U.S. control of the strait, “we will obliterate them.”

The senator also revealed that he has softened his earlier opposition to a proposed $300 billion reconstruction initiative for Iran, a plan he had previously criticized in harsh terms.

Earlier, Graham had compared the proposal to “a Marshall Plan with a Nazi still in charge for Germany.”

He now says his view depends largely on the source of the funding.

“Before, I thought the money was coming from the West,” he said. “Can you imagine if Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates invest $300 billion in Iran? That would tell me that Iran has changed.”

Even so, Graham said he remains doubtful that the Gulf states will actually commit such an enormous amount of money.

President Trump has publicly distanced the United States from the reconstruction proposal.

While attending the G7 summit in Evian, France, on Wednesday, Trump told reporters, “We are not investing in it, and we do not have a fund,” adding that Washington has not requested financial contributions from Gulf nations.

The 14-point memorandum signed in Islamabad calls on the United States, working alongside regional allies, to develop a reconstruction plan valued at no less than $300 billion for Iran.

The negotiations now underway in Switzerland mark the beginning of the 60-day period established by the agreement to address Iran’s nuclear program and a series of unresolved regional disputes.

Energy Secretary Chris Wright said Sunday that maritime traffic through the Strait of Hormuz remains largely stable despite the tensions.

According to Wright, 67 vessels passed through the waterway on Saturday and another 55 on Friday under U.S. military escort along a southern route, with oil shipments remaining “about equal to where we were before the war.”

Those comments came after Iran announced on Shabbos that it was once again closing the strategic passage, citing ongoing Israeli military operations in Lebanon as the reason for the move.

{Matzav.com}

Alan Greenspan, the influential economist who led the Federal Reserve for nearly two decades and became one of the most powerful figures in global finance, died Monday morning at the age of 100.

His wife, veteran NBC News journalist Andrea Mitchell, told CNBC that Greenspan died from complications of Parkinson’s disease. The couple, who married in 1997, had been together for nearly three decades.

Greenspan served as Fed chairman from 1987 to 2006 under four presidents — Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton and George W. Bush.

Former Vice President Mike Pence has broken with the Trump administration over its newly signed memorandum of understanding with Iran, arguing that the agreement fails to eliminate the threats posed by Tehran and grants the regime valuable economic relief without securing meaningful concessions.

Writing in an opinion piece published by The Wall Street Journal, Pence applauded President Donald Trump for confronting Iran aggressively and responding forcefully to the regime’s actions against American interests and allies.

At the same time, however, he sharply criticized the framework agreement reached last week.

“But the memorandum of understanding with Iran signed last week falls well short of what is required to end the Iranian threat,” Pence wrote.

Pence, who served alongside Trump during the president’s first term, said the agreement resembles the type of approach the administration once opposed.

“It smacks of the kind of appeasement the president rightly rejected during our first term,” Pence added. It isn’t the deal a defeated Iran should be getting. It isn’t even a deal — it’s a plan to make a plan.

According to Pence, the framework does not require Tehran to dismantle its nuclear infrastructure and leaves open the possibility that Iran could continue advancing its nuclear ambitions.

“It neither requires that Iran verifiably dismantle its nuclear weapons program nor prohibits continued enrichment of uranium,” Pence wrote. “Instead, the agreement largely repeats promises Iran has made before.

“The central lesson of the past 47 years is that the Iranian regime doesn’t keep its word,” Pence added.

He argued that anything short of a complete and enforceable dismantling of Iran’s nuclear capabilities leaves the door open for the regime to restart its program at a later date.

“Anything less than complete, verifiable dismantlement of its nuclear program leaves the regime able to restart the program when circumstances become more favorable,” Pence continued.

Pence also faulted the agreement for failing to address Iran’s ballistic missile program and for not compelling the regime to halt its support for terrorist groups throughout the region.

He further warned that the arrangement provides Tehran with substantial financial benefits through eased sanctions and renewed energy exports while postponing decisions on key security issues.

While the agreement’s timeline delays resolution of major nuclear concerns, it immediately grants economic incentives through partial sanctions relief and expanded energy sales that could provide the Iranian government with an estimated $5 billion each month.

“That gets the sequence backward. The U.S. shouldn’t provide economic relief first and seek security concessions later. We should secure the concessions first,” Pence wrote.

The former vice president laid out what he believes should be Washington’s non-negotiable demands in any agreement with Tehran.

“U.S. policy should be simple and direct: Dismantle the nuclear program, dismantle the ballistic-missile program, end support for terrorism, cease hostilities against America and Israel, and restore freedom of navigation in the Strait of Hormuz — or face the full force of the American military,” Pence added.

“These demands are the minimum requirements for a durable peace,” Pence continued.

Despite his criticism, Pence stressed that he remains supportive of Trump’s broader effort to secure stability in the region and prevent Iran from threatening the United States and its allies.

“Peace through strength requires strength all the way to the finish line,” Pence wrote. “The regime is desperate for a lifeline. We shouldn’t throw them one so haphazardly.”

A new national survey shows overwhelming support among Americans for bringing the conflict with Iran to a close, as the Trump administration moves ahead with diplomatic efforts following last week’s signing of a framework agreement between Washington and Tehran.

The CBS News/YouGov poll, conducted between Wednesday and Friday, asked respondents what course the United States should take regarding the ongoing confrontation with Iran.

According to the survey, 78 percent of Americans believe the conflict should end immediately, while 22 percent said the United States should continue military and diplomatic pressure until Iran makes additional concessions.

The poll also examined attitudes among Republican voters, including those who identify with the MAGA movement.

Among Republicans overall, 60 percent favored ending the conflict now, while 40 percent preferred continuing it until Iran yields further ground. Among self-described MAGA Republicans, 56 percent backed ending the conflict immediately, while 44 percent supported pressing forward until Iran offers more concessions.

CBS noted that the survey was based on interviews with 2,519 adults nationwide conducted from June 17 through June 19.

“This CBS News/YouGov survey was conducted with a nationally representative sample of 2,519 U.S. adults interviewed between June 17-19, 2026. The sample was weighted to be representative of adults nationwide according to gender, age, race, and education, based on the U.S. Census American Community Survey and Current Population Survey, as well as 2024 presidential vote. The margin of error is ±2.4 points,” the article noted.

The polling results were released days after President Donald Trump and Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian formally signed a memorandum of understanding intended to end hostilities between the two countries.

According to reports, Trump signed the agreement following the G7 summit at the Palace of Versailles on Wednesday, while Pezeshkian signed the document remotely.

Separate polling conducted by Quantus reportedly found broad support among American voters for the preliminary agreement.

Trump confirmed that the memorandum had been signed and indicated that negotiators would spend the next two months finalizing remaining details.

“The deal’s all signed. And the Strait [of Hormuz] is already partially opened, as you know they’re doing a little hunting for a couple of mines that they’ve already found, but it’s essentially ships are starting to go out now; on Friday it will be completely opened,” Trump said.

The president also expressed optimism about the new Iranian leadership and the potential for wider regional stability.

“We got along very well with Iran. It’s a different set of leaders. As you know, the first set is gone, the second set is gone, and we found the third set to be very smart — strong — very smart, but we ended up making a deal. I felt badly that we had to go back on the attack for two nights, and I thought a third, but we made it before that happened. But I think a lot of great things are going to happen with the Middle East right now, and very importantly the oil is plummeting down, and the stock market is shooting up like a rocket, today, like record kind of numbers,” he added.

As diplomatic efforts continue, Vice President JD Vance arrived in Switzerland on Sunday to participate in the first direct negotiations between American and Iranian officials since the memorandum was signed.

The talks are taking place amid continuing uncertainty in the region, with tensions surrounding the Strait of Hormuz and renewed clashes involving the Iran-backed Hezbollah terror group threatening to complicate the diplomatic process.

“The negotiations will play out against a backdrop of rising tensions over the Strait of Hormuz and renewed fighting between the Iran-backed Hezbollah terrorist group and Israel threatened to upend the fragile diplomatic process,” the outlet said.

{Matzav.com}

Los Angeles Dodgers reliever Blake Treinen says Major League Baseball reprimanded him last season after he honored conservative activist Charlie Kirk by displaying his name on his cap during a game.

The controversy traces back to a September 2025 matchup in which Treinen wrote Charlie Kirk’s name alongside two crosses on the side of his hat following Kirk’s death. In interviews with both the Los Angeles Times and The California Post, Treinen said league officials later contacted him and informed him that MLB regulations prohibit players from placing personal messages on their uniforms during games.

“I got chastised by the league when I put Charlie [Kirk]’s name on my hat last year, because a man was murdered in cold blood,” Treinen told Los Angeles Times.

Treinen said the matter did not result in any official discipline, but league representatives made clear that future violations could carry financial consequences.

According to the pitcher, the issue gained renewed attention after several San Francisco Giants relievers were reportedly warned by MLB for displaying Bible verses on their caps during the team’s night festivities.

“Now these gentlemen who are relievers in San Francisco are getting chastised by the league for putting a Bible verse on their hat. It’s crazy to me,” Treinen said.

Major League Baseball acknowledged contacting the players but said the issue involved uniform-policy violations rather than the content of the messages themselves.

“The writing on the cap violates our rules and consistent with normal practice we have warned the players about future violations,” the league said in a statement.

MLB later emphasized that the warning was part of standard enforcement procedures and was not related to the religious or political nature of the messages displayed.

Treinen himself drew national attention earlier this month during the Dodgers’ Pride Night game against the Los Angeles Angels on June 5, when he declined to wear a Pride-themed cap while taking the mound.

Instead, the veteran reliever chose to wear the club’s standard uniform.

“My job is to abide by the rules,” Treinen told the Los Angeles Times. “Ultimately, the only rule we have is to wear our team-issued uniform. So that’s what I chose to do.”

The latest revelations have added fuel to an ongoing debate over personal expression in professional sports, with critics questioning whether leagues apply uniform policies consistently when players display religious, political, or social messages on the field.

{Matzav.com}

LISTEN:

​​For more info, email bitachon4life@gmail.com.

LISTEN:

Former Shin Bet director Ronen Bar and his wife, Dafna Bar-Agassi, were urgently removed from the United Arab Emirates after Israeli security officials received a serious warning regarding their safety, according to a report aired Sunday night.

Bar had traveled to the UAE to participate in a high-level security conference hosted by Emirati Foreign Minister Abdullah bin Zayed. The gathering brought together senior intelligence officials, defense leaders, and policymakers from numerous countries for discussions on regional and global security challenges.

According to the report, Bar’s visit was interrupted when an unusual security alert was received, prompting immediate concern among those responsible for his protection. Following an assessment of the threat, authorities decided that Bar and his wife should leave the country without delay.

The couple was subsequently flown back to Israel aboard a specially arranged flight as part of an emergency extraction operation.

The circumstances surrounding the threat have not been publicly disclosed, and no additional details were released regarding the nature of the warning or the source of the concern.

The incident comes only months after Bar stepped down from his position as head of the Shin Bet, Israel’s internal security agency. Despite leaving office, he has remained active in a variety of public and professional initiatives, including participation in international conferences and security forums.

The reported evacuation is likely to raise questions about the security environment facing former senior Israeli officials abroad, particularly amid ongoing regional tensions.

No statement was issued on Bar’s behalf regarding the incident.

{Matzav.com}

Negotiations between the United States and Iran in Switzerland have reportedly progressed beyond early disputes over implementation issues and are now focusing on the structure of a potential long-term agreement, according to comments released Monday by Iran’s Foreign Ministry.

Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmail Baghaei said the outline for future rounds of diplomacy was developed during approximately 18 hours of intensive discussions involving Iranian and American officials, as well as mediators from Pakistan and Qatar.

One of the most significant developments, Baghaei said, was the establishment of a practical mechanism intended to ensure uninterrupted shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, a vital global energy corridor that has been at the center of recent tensions.

According to Baghaei, the broad understandings reached during the talks will be reflected in a joint document that Qatar and Pakistan are expected to release in the near future.

He added that while the senior negotiating teams have completed the current phase of discussions, technical experts will remain engaged to resolve outstanding questions and work through the details needed to implement the understandings reached so far.

Pakistani Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi had previously indicated that a joint statement was being prepared by the participating parties.

Naqvi stressed that the document would not be made public until all of the countries involved approved its final language, suggesting that negotiations over specific wording and remaining issues are still underway.

Later, Qatar and Pakistan released a joint statement saying that discussions between Washington and Tehran had taken place in a “positive and constructive atmosphere.”

The statement said the talks produced “encouraging progress” and announced the establishment of a framework for continued technical-level negotiations.

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi also offered an optimistic assessment of the discussions, writing on social media: “Tireless Pakistani and Qatari mediation has delivered major progress to end Lebanon War. Oil and petrochem exports are waived, blockade lifted, some frozen assets released, and major reconstruction & development plan launched for Iran.”

He added, “1st real test: Lebanon deconfliction cell.”

Earlier Sunday, a U.S. diplomat told Axios correspondent Barak Ravid that talks between American and Iranian officials had begun that morning and were continuing in multiple formats throughout the day with little interruption.

According to the diplomat, one of the central topics under discussion involved what he described as “deconfliction mechanisms in Lebanon and enforcing the ceasefire”.

The diplomat also said that negotiators addressed the status of the Strait of Hormuz and recent Iranian threats regarding its closure.

“We made clear we want to ensure it remains fully open. We made good progress on that front,” the U.S. diplomat told Ravid.

The source further explained that negotiators spent considerable time discussing “all elements of the nuclear deal” and said conversations regarding implementation of the memorandum of understanding were productive, with participants working to “make sure everyone is on the same page.”

Vice President JD Vance arrived in Switzerland on Saturday to lead the American delegation in the high-stakes negotiations.

Before departing Washington, Vance acknowledged that the diplomatic process remained delicate but expressed cautious optimism.

“I think we’re going to hopefully make progress on the nuclear issue, make progress on the Lebanon ceasefire issue. Those are the two big things that I think we’re to be focused on.”

Preparations for the talks began earlier Saturday when White House envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner arrived in Switzerland, with the Iranian delegation arriving later that day.

Facilitating the discussions is an international mediation team that includes the prime ministers of Qatar and Pakistan, Pakistan’s top military commander, and the director of the International Atomic Energy Agency, all of whom are participating in efforts to move the negotiations toward a broader agreement.

A remarkable display of dedication to Torah unfolded at Yeshivas Kaplan, leaving hundreds of talmidim deeply moved and inspired.

The scene that greeted bochurim in the yeshivah’s main bais medrash on Sunday afternoon was one they are unlikely to forget. Just hours after returning to Eretz Yisroel from an intense week-long international fundraising mission on behalf of Keren Olam HaTorah, Rosh Yeshiva HaGaon Rav Bunim Schreiber arrived at the yeshivah ready to deliver his weekly shiur klali.

Rav Bunim’s flight landed at Ben Gurion Airport at approximately 7:00 a.m. after a demanding journey undertaken to support the ongoing effort to strengthen and sustain the olam haTorah. Yet despite the exhausting travel schedule and the physical weakness he has endured in recent months, the rosh yeshivah never considered canceling his regularly scheduled shiur.

Those close to the rosh yeshivah later revealed that because of the grueling travel itinerary, he had not been able to prepare the shiur klali in his customary manner. Determined to maintain the standard he expected of himself, Rav Bunim arrived at the yeshivah early and spent time in his office reviewing and preparing the material.

As a result, the start of the shiur was delayed by only ten minutes, allowing him the opportunity to ensure that it would be delivered with the depth, clarity, and completeness for which he is known.

What followed left a profound impression on those present.

Weakened both by the journey and by illness, Rav Bunim requested that a chair be brought into the bais medrash before the shiur began. Yet even in that condition, his focus remained entirely on Torah and on his talmidim.

As he entered the bais medrash, he instructed the bochurim not to sing in his honor.

According to talmidim who were present, the rosh yeshivah explained that he did not want even a moment of bittul Torah associated with his arrival.

Without ceremony or fanfare, he immediately began delivering the shiur, immersing himself in the sugya and presenting the material with the same intensity and precision that his talmidim have come to expect.

For many talmidim, the powerful image of their rosh yeshivah—having returned from a week dedicated to raising funds for the survival of the olam haTorah, physically exhausted yet unwilling to compromise on either the preparation or delivery of a shiur klali—became a living lesson in hasmadah, achrayus, and devotion to Torah.

Talmidim described the experience as unforgettable, saying that the message conveyed by Rav Bunim’s actions may have been even more powerful than the words of the shiur itself. His determination to ensure that not a single scheduled shiur klali would be missed or diminished left an enduring impression on all who witnessed it.

Yeshiva Rabbi Chaim Berlin in Flatbush, Brooklyn, NY has announced a new safety policy prohibiting students from traveling to and from yeshiva using any electric mode of transportation, including electric bicycles, electric scooters, hoverboards, Segways, and similar devices.

In a letter sent to parents ahead of the coming school year, the yeshiva administration said the decision was made out of concern for student safety and reflects its broader responsibility to safeguard the well-being of its talmidim.

The letter notes that the recently concluded school year brought significant growth and success for students and states that, as the yeshiva prepares for the coming academic year, it is implementing an important new policy.

“As a Yeshiva, our responsibility extends not only to the ruchniyus growth of our talmidim, but to their physical safety as well,” the administration wrote.

Citing concerns about students traveling to and from school, the yeshiva announced that “The use of any electric mode of transportation by students to and from Yeshiva — including electric scooters, electric bikes, hoverboards, segways, or similar devices — is prohibited.”

Administrators warned that violations of the policy will carry consequences, including confiscation of the prohibited device.

The letter also urged parents to take additional precautions regarding students who use traditional bicycles or non-electric scooters.

“In addition, we strongly implore parents to ensure that any children riding standard bicycles or non-electric scooters to and from Yeshiva do so while wearing a helmet,” the letter states.

The move comes amid growing concern nationwide over accidents involving electric bikes and scooters, particularly among children and teenagers. In New York City, e-bikes and electric scooters have become increasingly common, prompting safety campaigns and heightened scrutiny from schools, parents, and public officials.

Yeshiva Rabbi Chaim Berlin’s new policy appears to be among the more comprehensive measures adopted by a yeshiva to address the issue directly, banning the use of all electric transportation devices by students commuting to and from school.

The letter was signed by Rabbi Mendel Braunstein, menahel of the Upper Division; Rabbi Gershon Eichorn, s’gan menahel of the Upper Division; Rabbi Yitzchok Herzberg, menahel of the Lower Division; and Rabbi Eliyahu Meir Zidele, s’gan menahel of the Lower Division.

{Matzav.com}

In a significant coalition maneuver, the government is preparing to transfer responsibility for the proposed Basic Law: Torah Study from the Knesset Constitution Committee to the House Committee, despite opposition from the Knesset’s legal adviser. The move reportedly comes at the request of Finance Minister Betzalel Smotrich and reflects the Religious Zionism Party’s desire to distance itself from the controversial legislation.

According to reports, the coalition intends to remove the bill from the Constitution Committee, which is controlled by Religious Zionism lawmakers, and place it under the jurisdiction of the House Committee, where the Likud holds greater influence. The change is expected to make it easier for coalition leaders to manage the legislation while reducing the direct involvement of Smotrich’s party.

The decision reportedly stems from growing discomfort within the Religious Zionist camp over the proposed law. While the legislation is strongly backed by the chareidi parties, it has faced resistance among many in the religious-national community, leading party leaders to seek distance from the politically sensitive issue.

The proposal cleared its preliminary reading in the Knesset more than a week ago, passing by a vote of 56 to 43. Even at that stage, however, signs of coalition division were evident. Four coalition lawmakers—Yuli Edelstein, Dan Illouz, Sharren Haskel, and Moshe Solomon—broke ranks and voted against the measure.

According to the bill’s explanatory notes, the legislation is intended to enshrine Torah study as a foundational value of the Jewish people and the State of Israel. The proposal would also formally recognize individuals who dedicate themselves to long-term Torah learning as performing a meaningful service to the State of Israel and the Jewish people.

The expected transfer of the bill to a different committee marks the latest development in the ongoing political battle surrounding the status of Torah learning, a debate that continues to expose deep divisions both within the coalition and across the broader Israeli public.

{Matzav.com}

New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani is facing sharp criticism after remarks he made about the pro-Israel lobbying organization AIPAC, comments that opponents say crossed a dangerous line and further inflamed tensions amid rising concerns about antisemitism.

The controversy stems from a June 18 campaign-style rally featuring Mamdani, Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, and several progressive candidates ahead of Tuesday’s primary elections.

During the event, Mamdani accused AIPAC of undermining democratic processes, arguing that for the organization, “the only thing more frightening than democracy being allowed to run its course is an end to genocide and Netanyahu’s wars.”

He went on to allege that the group spends “millions in dark money to accomplish a single goal, to preserve their power so that they can turn us against one another instead of our leaders turning towards the moral change we all know to be necessary.”

Later in his speech, Mamdani declared, “In the wealthiest city in the wealthiest country in the history of the world, we need not live in fear of monsters any longer.”

The remarks immediately drew condemnation from Rabbi Chaim Steinmetz, senior rabbi of Manhattan’s Kehilath Jeshurun synagogue, who argued that the mayor’s comments amounted to demonization of millions of Americans who support the organization.

“Mamdani is accusing AIPAC of being a monster that subverts democracy, supports genocide and wants to divide Americans,” Rabbi Steinmetz wrote in a social-media post.

“This is pure incitement. It inspires people like Elias Rodriguez to take violent action against AIPAC and its supporters,” added Rabbi Steinmetz, referring to the terrorist responsible for the murder of two Israeli Embassy employees in Washington, D.C., last May.

The rabbi then personalized his criticism of the mayor’s remarks.

“Well, I’m an AIPAC supporter. And Mamdani is inciting hatred against people like me,” he wrote.

Addressing Mamdani directly, Rabbi Steinmetz continued: “Mayor Mamdani: you are speaking about me. About millions of New Yorkers who support the very policies AIPAC advocates for. You are demonizing them. And you are the one who is turning New Yorkers against each other in order to grab power.”

He concluded with a warning about the potential consequences of such rhetoric.

“New York already has an antisemitism problem. Right now, you are pouring fuel on the fire. I shudder to think what happens next. But you will be responsible for it,” Rabbi Steinmetz warned.

The Simon Wiesenthal Center also denounced Mamdani’s statements, drawing parallels between his accusations and longstanding antisemitic tropes directed at Jewish organizations.

“The claim that AIPAC exists not to pursue a political agenda, but to spread discord and wield influence for its own sake, is not new,” said Simon Wiesenthal Center CEO Jim Berk.

“Soviet anti-Zionist campaigns and earlier antisemitic movements similarly portrayed Jewish organizations as pursuing power not to achieve political goals, but because Jews themselves were said to crave influence and control,” Berk continued.

“The suggestion that Jewish political participation is inherently suspect, illegitimate, or secretly manipulative is abhorrent. This is the same old story, retold in a new language.”

Mamdani has long drawn criticism from Jewish groups and pro-Israel advocates over statements and positions related to Israel and the Middle East.

During his campaign, he declined to distance himself from the slogan “globalize the intifada,” a phrase many Jewish organizations have condemned. He also faced backlash for comments criticizing Israel on October 8, 2023, one day after the Hamas massacre in southern Israel.

Throughout his political career, Mamdani has repeatedly accused Israel of committing war crimes in Gaza and has said he would seek the arrest of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu should the Israeli leader visit New York City.

His actions after taking office also generated controversy. On his first day as mayor, Mamdani rescinded several executive orders related to Israel that had been implemented by his predecessor, Eric Adams.

Among the measures he reversed was a June 2025 executive order formally adopting the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s working definition of antisemitism.

He also eliminated an order barring mayoral appointees and city agency personnel from participating in boycotts or divestment efforts targeting Israel.

{Matzav.com}

American radio personality Sid Rosenberg delivered an impassioned defense of President Donald Trump on Sunday in Yerushalayim, urging Israelis not to lose faith in the president despite growing frustration over the recent U.S.-Iran agreement. Speaking at the JNS International Policy Summit, Rosenberg acknowledged concerns about the deal while insisting that Trump remains a steadfast ally of Israel.

Addressing the audience, Rosenberg admitted that criticism of the administration has emerged even among some of Trump’s strongest supporters. “I know a lot of people in Israel are very, very upset with my friend the president,” Rosenberg noted. “And for what it’s worth, me myself, I’ve been critical of President Trump. And my dear friend Mark Levin, who’s coming up next, who is immensely popular. He’s been critical. We’re asking questions. We want to know what’s going on. But I can guarantee you this. At the end of the day, he’s still our friend. So before you turn your backs on President Trump, I would think twice about that.”

Rosenberg argued that, despite disagreements over policy, supporters of Israel should carefully consider the alternatives. He suggested that Jewish communities would face a far more difficult environment under different political leadership and warned that anti-Jewish sentiment has become increasingly mainstream in parts of the United States.

Turning to New York City, where he lives, Rosenberg launched a blistering attack on the city’s leadership, singling out Mayor Zohran Mamdani and accusing him of fostering an atmosphere in which hostility toward Jews has become socially acceptable.

“You know what’s really cool in New York right now? Hate the Jews. That’s cheap. You’re cool. If you don’t like the Jews, you’re cool,” Rosenberg said. “I live in a city that has a mayor who’s a jihadist, a socialist, a communist, a Marxist, an antisemite. Otherwise, he’s not a bad guy. He is the future of this country, my country. So when you talk about the dangers of antisemitism, the United States right now is a tinderbox.”

As part of his warning about rising antisemitism, Rosenberg pointed to comments made by public figures associated with Mamdani, including an incident in which commentator Hassan Piker declared that “America deserved 9/11.” Rosenberg criticized what he described as a failure to forcefully condemn such rhetoric and called on Jewish families to reject intimidation and openly display their Jewish identity.

“Jews are way too OK getting spit at, made fun of, harassed, if not beaten up in the streets, and they don’t do anything about it. They don’t. And I’m sick of it,” Rosenberg stated. “What we’ve got to do in America is train our kids like you guys do here. We’ve got to do it. Because if our kids at some point don’t defend themselves and words, that doesn’t work. OK? I told my son, somebody pushes you or punch you, you punch him back, you punch him harder.”

The veteran broadcaster also recounted a personal encounter on a New York subway in which he stepped in to defend another passenger, using the story to underscore what he sees as the need for greater confidence and resolve among Jews living outside Israel.

Concluding his remarks, Rosenberg urged Jewish communities around the world to adopt the same spirit of determination that he believes characterizes Israeli society.

“So my suggestion, recommendation is don’t be afraid anymore. Don’t. Do what they do here. They come at you, you come twice as hard. That’s my answer to how we stop all this,” Rosenberg said.

{Matzav.com}

President Donald Trump launched a fresh attack on The New York Times on Sunday, branding the newspaper “corrupt” and “failing” after it published an article featuring analysts who questioned whether the chief threats posed by Iran had truly been eliminated following months of conflict involving the United States, Israel, and the Islamic Republic.

The dispute centered on a Times article titled, “What Changed After Almost Four Months of War? Analysts Say Not Much,” which examined competing assessments of the military campaign against Iran and whether its nuclear ambitions, regional influence, and proxy network had been permanently weakened.

In a post on Truth Social, Trump blasted the newspaper’s reporting and rejected suggestions that the war had failed to achieve its objectives.

“The Failing New York Times, which is CORRUPT and writes almost exclusively negative stories about me no matter how successful I am, is at it again,” Trump wrote.

The president reiterated his longstanding contention that Iran suffered a decisive military defeat at the hands of the United States and its allies, arguing that critics and media outlets were refusing to acknowledge the extent of the damage inflicted on the regime.

Trump has repeatedly maintained that U.S. military operations, combined with Israeli strikes, crippled Iran’s military capabilities, devastated key infrastructure, and severely damaged the country’s nuclear program.

The Times article, however, cited analysts who argued that major questions remain unresolved despite the extensive military campaign. According to those experts, Iran continues to possess influence across the region, retains elements of its nuclear infrastructure, and remains capable of projecting power through allied groups and strategic assets.

The publication’s assessment comes amid an ongoing debate in Washington, Yerushalayim, and other capitals over the long-term impact of the war and the recently signed memorandum of understanding between the United States and Iran.

Trump and his supporters have portrayed the conflict as a historic victory that fundamentally altered the balance of power in the Middle East. Critics, meanwhile, have questioned whether Tehran’s ambitions have truly been curtailed and whether the agreement reached after the fighting will produce lasting stability.

{Matzav.com}

Prime Minister Binyomin Netanyahu used a major address at the JNS International Policy Summit on Sunday to highlight what he described as Israel’s unprecedented military achievements against Iran and its regional terror allies, while pledging that Israel will continue acting aggressively to safeguard its security.

At the outset of his remarks, Netanyahu pushed back against competing narratives surrounding his relationship with President Donald Trump, arguing that both leaders make decisions based on their respective national interests rather than acting at one another’s direction.

“In the United States, they say that President Trump does everything that I ask him to do, and in Israel, they say that I do everything he wants me to do. Neither is true,” Netanyahu said. “We’re leaders of independent and proud countries. We stand for our interests. I stand for the interests of Israel and for its security.”

Reflecting on key decisions made during the war, Netanyahu said he repeatedly ignored advice urging restraint and instead chose a more aggressive course of action against Israel’s enemies.

“They told me not to enter Rafah. I entered Rafah. I was told not to strike Hezbollah. We struck Hezbollah. They told me not to confront Iran. We confronted Iran,” Netanyahu said.

The prime minister argued that those actions prevented a catastrophic outcome and eliminated what he viewed as a direct threat to Israel’s survival.

“We prevented Iran from carrying out a plan to annihilate us. And today, they would have had a nuclear weapon, an atomic bomb to do so. We prevented that from happening,” he said.

Netanyahu credited the combined efforts of Israel and the United States with carrying out a historic military campaign that severely damaged Iran’s strategic capabilities. He said the operation targeted nuclear facilities, key scientists, military assets, and critical economic infrastructure.

“We created the conditions for its future fall. That is what will be the real triumph – when the Iranian people take their own destiny in their hands and they knock out this brutal regime that is terrorizing them and terrorizing the rest of the world,” he said.

Turning to Iran’s network of regional proxies, Netanyahu said Israel had fundamentally altered the balance of power by striking major terrorist organizations and eliminating senior leaders.

“We shattered Iran’s terror axis,” Netanyahu declared, noting the elimination of Hamas leaders Yahya Sinwar, Ismail Haniyeh, and Mohammed Deif, along with tens of thousands of terrorists.

Netanyahu also credited Israel’s military operations in Gaza with securing the return of hostages held by Hamas.

“We brought back every single hostage. Every last one of them,” he said. “We got them back because we put our brave soldiers, our incomparably heroic soldiers, right into their stronghold in Gaza.”

Discussing the northern front, Netanyahu pointed to what he described as a devastating blow against Hezbollah’s military infrastructure and operational capabilities.

“We took out Nasrallah. We decimated Hezbollah’s military machine. We prevented the Radwan force from invading the Galilee. We destroyed over 90% of the 150,000 rockets and missiles that Hezbollah amassed against us,” he stated.

The prime minister stressed that Israel has no intention of relinquishing strategically important security zones as long as threats remain.

“We established a security zone in Gaza. We established a security zone in Syria. We established a security zone in Lebanon. And we shall keep it as long as is necessary to protect our people,” he said.

Netanyahu said one of the most significant outcomes of the conflict has been a shift in Israel’s military doctrine, replacing reactive policies with proactive action.

“We changed Israel’s security doctrine. We initiate, we attack, we surprise, and we attack those enemies that seek our destruction before they have a chance to do so,” Netanyahu said.

Speaking shortly after participating in ceremonies marking five decades since the death of his brother, Lt. Col. Yoni Netanyahu, during the Entebbe rescue mission, the prime minister linked Israel’s current struggle with warnings he said his family recognized years ago regarding Iran’s ambitions.

“No matter what happens in the talks, with an agreement, without an agreement, I pledge to you that Iran, as long as I’m prime minister, will never have a nuclear weapon. Never,” Netanyahu said.

He also defended Israel’s continued deployment in southern Lebanon, arguing that any responsible government would take similar steps to shield its citizens from cross-border threats.

“As long as we need to protect our people, we will remain in the security zone in South Lebanon,” he said.

Addressing international criticism of Israel’s military operations, Netanyahu insisted that the IDF goes further than any other military in the world to reduce civilian casualties while targeting terrorists.

“No army goes to such lengths like the Israeli army to target terrorists and minimize civilian casualties. We should be commended for it, not condemned,” he said.

The prime minister argued that no country facing similar attacks would behave differently from Israel and defended the establishment of buffer zones to neutralize threats.

“No country would be asked to do otherwise. Now, you imagine the United States. Across the border, you have thousands, an army of thousands of terrorists who pellet your cities and your towns with rockets and ballistic missiles and killer drones. They kill your soldiers, they kill your citizens, they kill your children. And they threaten them every day. Well, what would America do? Would it say, well, there’s nothing we can do? Let’s hold our fire? Is that what America would say?”

“No, you know damn well what America would do. It would cross the border, create a security zone, kill the terrorists and protect its people until the threat is removed. That’s exactly what we are doing. And let me tell you something else. No country would do it better. No country would do it better because the terrorists do not just target civilians, they also hide among their own civilians,” Netanyahu said.

Concluding his address, Netanyahu turned to the global rise in antisemitism and urged Jews worldwide to respond with confidence and determination rather than fear.

“Stand up. Don’t cower. Don’t be afraid. Fight back, because people will only respect us if we respect ourselves,” he said. “Stand up for the truth. Stand up for Israel. Stand up for the Jewish people. Stand up for the Jewish future.”

{Matzav.com}