Feed aggregator

Israel’s High Court of Justice is set to hear arguments Tuesday morning in a closely watched legal challenge to the controversial “Arrest Law,” while the government has taken the extraordinary step of refusing to participate in the proceedings, arguing that the outcome has already been predetermined.

An expanded panel of Supreme Court justices will hear petitions seeking to overturn the temporary law, which was championed by Shas chairman Aryeh Deri and is designed to prevent the arrest of bnei yeshiva who have been designated as military draft evaders for a period of approximately six months.

Supporters of the legislation say the measure was intended to provide temporary protection for Torah students while lawmakers work toward a broader resolution of Israel’s long-running dispute over military conscription for the Chareidi community. The law is meant to remain in effect until a new government is formed and addresses the draft issue through permanent legislation.

In an unusual move, however, the Israeli government will not be represented during Tuesday’s hearing. The decision followed a position advanced by Deri, who argued that there is no point defending the law because the High Court has already made up its mind to strike it down. Last week, the Supreme Court issued an interim order freezing the law before it had even been officially published in Israel’s legal registry or allowed to take effect.

Speaking in an interview with Kikar HaShabbat, Deri defended the government’s boycott of the proceedings.

“We have no trust in the Supreme Court. We already know the outcome in advance. We must not be part of this game, to create the impression that justice is being done. ‘Here, you have a defense, now present your arguments.’ We must not be partners in this show.”

Deri went on to argue that the hearing would amount to little more than a public exercise whose conclusion had already been decided.

“It will be a public discussion, except that the result is already known in advance,” he said. “We need to tell them: ‘We do not recognize your authority. We already know the outcome of this matter.'”

The Shas leader also sharply criticized the interim injunction issued by the court last week, questioning why the justices intervened before the legislation had even become law.

“Someone goes and issues interim orders before the law has even been published in the official registry, before it has even taken effect… What would have happened, for Heaven’s sake, if for one week they didn’t make arrests? Would that have been irreversible? Is that what interim orders are for? On a law that the Knesset passed and worked on for many months and many weeks? It’s obvious—you can already see the outcome in advance. That’s why we must not play this game.”

Meanwhile, legal advisers to both the Knesset and the government have urged the High Court to invalidate the legislation, arguing that it was enacted through a flawed legislative process and violates Israel’s Basic Laws.

The Knesset’s legal counsel joined Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara in contending that the coalition improperly relied on the parliamentary doctrine of “continuity,” a procedural mechanism that allows pending legislation from a previous Knesset to be revived instead of beginning the legislative process from scratch.

According to the Knesset’s legal advisers, lawmakers improperly applied the continuity procedure to a bill that originally addressed an entirely different subject.

“The ‘pipeline’ of continuity that was supposed to connect the original bill with the final law was severed,” the Knesset’s legal opinion stated in its submission to the High Court, adding that the flaw “goes to the root of the legislative process.”

The Knesset’s attorneys further concluded that the temporary measure legally constituted a “new subject,” meaning its passage failed to comply with Knesset rules and, consequently, with Section 19 of Israel’s Basic Law: The Knesset. The opinion was considered especially unusual because the Knesset’s legal advisers generally defend legislation passed by lawmakers rather than argue against its validity.

Attorney General Baharav-Miara also urged the High Court to strike down the law, arguing that it violates the principle of equality and conflicts with Israel’s national security needs.

{Matzav.com}

A rare and emotional visit took place this week at Shawangunk Correctional Facility, a maximum-security prison in Wallkill, New York, when the Satmar Rebbe, Rav Zalman Leib Teitelbaum, traveled to the prison to offer words of chizuk to several Jewish inmates incarcerated there.

The visit was organized and coordinated by the Tzedek Association, an organization that advocates on behalf of incarcerated Jews. Senior officials from Albany also attended the event, creating a unique opportunity for advocates to present the religious needs and concerns of Jewish prisoners directly to state officials.

The program opened with remarks from Reb Anshel Schwartz, a leading activist with the Tzedek Association, who outlined the unique challenges faced by Jewish inmates in the prison system. Addressing the senior government representatives, he emphasized that the accommodations being requested are not luxuries but rather the basic necessities required to enable Jewish prisoners to observe Torah and mitzvos to the greatest extent possible while incarcerated.

Reb Shmuel Binyomin Kramer, also representing the Tzedek Association, addressed the gathering as well. He conveyed special greetings on behalf of the organization’s founder, Mr. Moshe Margaretten, who was unable to attend because he had been called to an urgent meeting in Washington with the director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons.

The emotional highlight of the visit came when the Jewish inmates were individually admitted to meet with the Satmar Rebbe. The Rebbe delivered heartfelt words of chizuk, encouraging them to remain steadfast in their faith and never lose hope despite the difficult circumstances they face. Following his address, each inmate was granted a private audience with the Rebbe, giving them the opportunity to speak openly about their personal struggles and receive his individual brocha.

During the gathering, the Rebbe also joined the inmates in making a l’chaim.

Following the prison visit, representatives of the Tzedek Association and other community activists held a meeting with senior prison administrators and government officials. They discussed a wide range of issues affecting Jewish inmates throughout the New York State correctional system, with the goal of improving religious accommodations and conditions for incarcerated Jews.

A new batch of internal Slack messages obtained as part of Sen. Rand Paul’s investigation is renewing debate over the origins of COVID-19, revealing that several authors of the highly influential 2020 paper rejecting the laboratory-leak theory privately continued discussing evidence they believed pointed toward a possible lab accident. The disclosures have intensified scrutiny of the scientific study that shaped public opinion and government messaging during the pandemic.

The newly released communications, highlighted in a report by The Federalist, show that multiple contributors to the landmark “Proximal Origin” paper were privately expressing concerns about a potential laboratory origin even after publishing research that concluded such a scenario was not plausible.

The latest revelations build on messages previously released by the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic in 2023. Those earlier communications showed lead author Kristian Andersen privately describing a laboratory origin as “friggin’ likely.”

In another internal conversation, Andersen wrote, “The main issue is that accidental escape is in fact highly likely — it’s not some fringe theory,” while another co-author acknowledged that COVID-19 “easily could have” leaked from a laboratory.

Despite those private discussions, the paper published in Nature Medicine on March 17, 2020, concluded that a laboratory origin was not plausible. The study quickly became one of the most frequently cited scientific papers during the COVID-19 pandemic and played a major role in shaping public understanding of the virus’s origins.

After the earlier messages became public, Andersen maintained that the comments reflected the normal scientific process, explaining that his initial concerns had been resolved before the paper was ultimately published.

According to The Federalist, however, the newly disclosed Slack conversations call that explanation into question.

One message sent by Andersen in June 2020—months after the paper appeared in print—suggested he still harbored significant doubts.

“Gotta say — some smoking(ish) guns starting to appear that I’m not comfortable with.”

Rather than publicly revising their conclusions, the researchers instead discussed privately how to continue defending the natural-origin theory despite lingering questions, according to The Federalist’s report.

The report also revisits the origins of the “Proximal Origin” paper itself, noting that it was drafted after a February 1, 2020 conference call organized by Dr. Anthony Fauci, then director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, as questions mounted over whether the virus could have originated from a laboratory.

According to The Federalist, Fauci’s role in helping initiate the effort was not disclosed when the paper was published. The report further notes that Fauci later cited the study after President Donald Trump publicly argued that COVID-19 may have escaped from a laboratory.

The newly released communications also indicate that Fauci remained in contact with Andersen after publication.

In a Slack message dated May 23, 2021, and cited by The Federalist, Andersen wrote: “Just had a meeting with Fauci and his team this morning. They get it and deeply appreciate what we’re doing, so we’ll keep dancing.”

The messages further reveal that the researchers revisited several of the paper’s key scientific arguments as new information emerged.

In one exchange, Andersen acknowledged: “In our paper we argue against (a) manipulation and (b) tissue culture. Our main arguments were that manipulation is hard. But the Germans came out and created a reverse genetics system of SARS2 in less than two weeks, so clearly it’s not that hard.”

Another discussion reportedly included Andersen acknowledging that the paper overstated how widespread certain coronavirus research actually was.

“We describe this in the paper and say that this work is performed ‘all [over] the world,’ but that isn’t true — it has exclusively been going on at WIV [Wuhan Institute of Virology].”

The latest disclosures are expected to intensify the ongoing debate surrounding the origins of COVID-19 as congressional investigators continue examining the pandemic, the federal government’s response, and the scientific research that heavily influenced public policy during one of the most consequential public health crises in modern history.

MK Uri Maklev of Degel HaTorah launched a sharp attack Monday on the Religious Zionist philosophy of combining full-time Torah study with military service, calling it the greatest ideological threat facing the chareidi community. His remarks quickly drew a pointed response from Rabbi Chaim Navon, who accused Maklev of ignoring an explicit Gemara.

Speaking before a group of yeshivah bochurim, Maklev argued that the primary challenge confronting the chareidi world is not external pressure but the message promoted by leaders within the Religious Zionist camp.

According to Maklev, public figures advocating the integration of Torah learning with military service have caused profound spiritual harm by presenting the two pursuits as compatible.

“Some political figures said that it is possible to have Torah study while also pursuing other endeavors – this is the approach of Religious Zionism, and for this they will not be forgiven,” Maklev said. “People introduced this idea and said, ‘We study Torah, but it is also possible to do so alongside service.’ This concept, this great damage – this is what we are dealing with.”

Rabbi Chaim Navon responded forcefully, rejecting Maklev’s characterization and arguing that the underlying idea predates Religious Zionism by centuries, citing a well-known teaching from Chazal.

“A thousand apologies, Maklev, but we did not say this; rather, Rabi Yossi said it in Maseches Yevamos: ‘Anyone who says, “I have only Torah,” does not even have Torah.’ What we did was open the Gemara and expose your bluff – and for that, we apologize.”

President Donald Trump said Monday that the United States is engaged in what he described as “very friendly negotiations” with Iran, while making clear that his administration remains prepared to use military force to prevent Tehran from obtaining a nuclear weapon.

Speaking at a campaign rally in Michigan, Trump said Iran had spent decades threatening both its neighbors and the United States, but indicated that relations have recently shifted toward renewed diplomatic engagement between Washington and Tehran.

Trump on Iran:

You can't bribe them. You gotta beat them.

And we are beating the hell out of them. pic.twitter.com/Bbf8QHjd6L

— Clash Report (@clashreport) July 27, 2026

Trump also revisited his criticism of the Obama administration, accusing it of rewarding Iran by sending the regime $1.7 billion in cash under the 2015 nuclear agreement.

“You can’t bribe them. You gotta beat them. And we are beating the hell out of them. We’ll see how it turns out,” Trump added.

Referring to recent developments in the conflict, Trump suggested Iran’s behavior had fluctuated in response to American actions.

“The fuel came down for a little while. Then [Iran] didn’t behave, and I had to go back. Now they are behaving again,” he continued.

Trump reiterated that preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons remains the central objective of his administration’s policy.

“When somebody comes up and says, ‘Why are we doing this?’ just say, ‘Because we cannot let Iran have a nuclear weapon.’ It’s very simple. It’s all you have to say. There is nothing else you have to say,” Trump stated.

Earlier Monday, while speaking with reporters aboard Air Force One, Trump said Iran had sought renewed negotiations after suffering significant damage from recent U.S. military operations.

“They want to meet, and we’re meeting. We’ll see what happens. There’s a chance we can make a deal,” said the President, adding that Tehran’s willingness to negotiate was the direct result of American pressure.

“Without what we did, they wouldn’t even be talking to us,” he said. “They requested a meeting through their surrogates and directly and we’re meeting.”

Asked how long he was willing to continue negotiations, Trump indicated he was in no rush to make a decision.

“I have plenty of time. The whole shoreline is wiped out. The Strait is in very good shape. And we’re talking right now.”

Trump expressed optimism that diplomacy could still produce an agreement but warned that military operations could quickly resume if talks fail.

“We’re having good talks, so we’ll see what happens. I think there’s a good chance something could happen. And if it doesn’t, we go back to doing what we were doing two days ago.”

Over the weekend, reports indicated that Trump delayed a significant expansion of the military campaign against Iran while diplomatic efforts to reopen the Strait of Hormuz continued and administration officials assessed the impact such an operation could have on U.S. weapons stockpiles.

Trump dismissed reports that concerns over dwindling munitions influenced his decision, telling The Wall Street Journal that “we have far more munitions than anyone in the world, and far more than we need.”

An Orthodox Jew, without prior political experience, has thrown his yarmulka into the race for Denver’s 1st Congressional District, running as an independent against Melat Kiros, an anti-Israel democratic socialist.

Dr. Shimon Blau told JNS on Monday that he wouldn’t go into details about what inspired him to run or about his positions on Israel. His campaign launched officially on Sunday, and he and his team are “refining my talking points,” he told JNS.

Blau, 50, who is known as Shimi, is a lifelong Denver resident and a medical doctor, who specializes in interventional spine treatments and pain management.

He left Denver as a young man to study at yeshivas, including Ner Israel Rabbinical College in Baltimore, and returned to his home city for a fellowship after graduating from medical school at the University of Maryland and practicing in Florida for a year.

An observant Jew, Blau was raised in a religious family on Denver’s west side and belongs to an Orthodox shul which, for security reasons, he declined to name.

He told JNS in a brief conversation that he and his wife of 18 months, Ricki, have no children “yet.”

JNS asked about his views on arms embargos of the Jewish state. “I’m running as a pro-Denver candidate on what I can do to make life better for people in Denver on a day-to-day basis,” he said.

He told JNS that there are about 90,000 Jews in the metro Denver area.

Blau’s campaign website states that he is liberal on social issues and conservative on fiscal policies and isn’t accepting money from PACs or special interest groups.

Rabbi Yossi Serebryanski, of Chabad of South Denver, told JNS that if Blau didn’t decline PAC money, “the first thing Kiros’s campaign would have done would have been to label him ‘the AIPAC candidate.’”

Blau told JNS that it is “tragic” that some have turned “AIPAC” into a slur in primary campaigns. He declined to elaborate beyond adding, of Kiros, that “we are facing a rabid antisemite.”

Kiros, a 29-year-old lawyer who unseated 15-term incumbent Rep. Diana DeGette (D-Colo.) by almost 13.5 points in the Democratic primary election in Colorado, made accusations of Israeli “genocide” and “ethnic cleansing” in Lebanon a central part of her candidacy.

She has also said that Hamas’s Oct. 7 massacre was the “inevitable consequence of apartheid.” She said something similar about the Sept. 11 attacks. “We destabilized a lot of the Middle East,” she said. “That forced people to believe that another act of violence was the only response.”

Kiros also refused in an interview to say if she thought the 2025 firebombing of marchers in Boulder, Colo., who were calling for the release of hostages held by Hamas, was antisemitic. The attacker killed an 82-year-old woman and injured others.

Blau writes on his campaign site that “my father was a Holocaust survivor from Poland who served in the U.S. Army during the Korean War before earning an engineering degree from Columbia University. He helped build bridges, contributed to the Apollo space shuttle program and later transitioned into the real estate business.”

“He loved Denver deeply, especially the mountains that surround our city. He skied well into his 80s, and the outdoors remained one of his greatest joys throughout his life,” Blau writes. “My mother was from France and worked alongside him while creating a home defined by generosity, hospitality and the belief that there was always room for one more at the table.”

That “love for Denver was expressed in countless ways, from supporting the arts and cultural institutions that make this city special to donating benches throughout the community, quiet reminders of their belief that public spaces belong to everyone and should bring people together,” he stated. “They also taught me to value civic engagement, philanthropy and service to others.”

If elected, Blau writes that he would caucus with the Democrats.

“I am neither a socialist nor MAGA,” he writes. “I reject the ideological extremes on both the left and the right, because I believe most people are looking for practical solutions, respectful dialogue and leaders willing to put the country ahead of partisan politics.”

“Caucusing with a party does not mean surrendering my independence,” he added. “I will support ideas that are good for Colorado and oppose policies that are not, regardless of which party proposes them.”

Colorado’s attorney general certified late last week that Blau collected enough signatures to get on the ballot. JNS

{Matzav.com}

Beginning August 1, restaurants and other food establishments across New Jersey will no longer be permitted to automatically include plastic utensils with takeout and delivery orders under the state’s new “Skip the Stuff” law, a measure aimed at reducing plastic waste and litter.

The law applies to restaurants, food trucks, cafeterias, cafés, and other establishments serving prepared food. Instead of automatically providing plastic forks, knives, spoons, or similar disposable utensils, businesses will be required to distribute them only when specifically requested by customers.

State officials say the initiative is intended to reduce the amount of single-use plastic entering landfills, waterways, and the environment, building on New Jersey’s previous efforts to curb plastic waste, including the statewide ban on single-use plastic shopping bags.

Customers who want plastic utensils will still be able to receive them. The new law does not prohibit their use or distribution altogether; it simply requires consumers to ask for them rather than having them included automatically with every order.

Businesses that fail to comply will initially receive a warning. A second violation can result in fines of $100 per day until the business comes into compliance, while a third or subsequent violation may carry penalties of $250 per day until the violation is corrected.

Supporters of the law argue that reducing unnecessary plastic waste will benefit the environment by cutting down on litter and pollution throughout the state.

At the same time, some business owners and industry advocates have expressed concern that the new requirements may create additional burdens for restaurants and other small businesses, which are already navigating rising operating costs and increased regulatory requirements. While many acknowledge the environmental goals behind the legislation, some worry it will add another operational challenge for food service establishments across New Jersey.

Newly released audio recordings from Joe Biden’s conversations with the ghostwriter of his 2017 memoir capture him discussing classified materials, warning that some documents may contain sensitive information, and at times appearing to lose his train of thought. The recordings, which surfaced Monday after a lengthy legal battle, were previously reviewed during Special Counsel Robert Hur’s investigation into Biden’s handling of classified documents.

The heavily redacted recordings, totaling roughly 70 hours, were released to the House Judiciary Committee and the conservative Oversight Project after two years of litigation. The conversations were recorded while Biden worked with ghostwriter Mark Zwonitzer on his memoir, Promise Me, Dad: A Year of Hope, Hardship, and Purpose.

The recordings had already been examined by former Special Counsel Robert Hur during his 2023-2024 investigation into Biden’s retention of classified records following the end of his tenure as vice president in 2017.

In one portion of the recordings, Biden appears to discuss discovering classified materials among his personal papers, saying, “So this was, I early on, um, in ’09 I just found all the classified stuff downstairs.”

At another point, Biden cautions Zwonitzer about documents they were reviewing together, saying, “Some of this may be classified so be careful with it. I’m not sure … It’s not marked classified but —”

According to Hur’s final report, Biden read “nearly verbatim” from notebooks containing sensitive national security and foreign policy information while working with Zwonitzer on the memoir.

The recordings also capture Biden apparently realizing in real time that some of the documents in front of him contained classified information. In one exchange, he says, “The next thing I have here is, um, this is classified …”

According to CBS News, which first reviewed the tapes, Biden also discussed White House meetings that may have involved classified information, including what he described as “a big meeting with the CIA and everyone,” “a big meeting down in the Situation Room,” and “a long meeting where DOD brief … POTUS.”

One recording dated October 10, 2016, includes Biden speaking about notes he had retained without others realizing it.

“I have extensive notes over this period of time … They didn’t know I have this,” he said.

The newly released audio also includes several moments in which Biden appears to struggle to recall information or loses his train of thought during conversations with his ghostwriter.

At one point, Biden says, “Alright — what was I going to ask you? Something else … Uh… um. Oh gosh. I can’t think of anything else.”

In another exchange, Biden pauses to review his papers, telling Zwonitzer, “Hang on a second,” before later adding, “Um … it’s confusing me.”

Hur ultimately concluded that Biden “willfully retained and disclosed classified materials” after leaving office as vice president. However, he declined to pursue criminal charges, writing that Biden would “likely present himself to a jury, as he did during our interview of him, as a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory.”

After enduring two years of captivity in Hamas terror tunnels, former hostage Rom Breslavski marked a deeply emotional milestone by completing the final letter of a Sefer Torah that had been left unfinished until the day of his release.

The Sefer Torah had been commissioned specifically as a zechus for Breslavski’s safe return from Gaza. Its completion, with Breslavski himself writing the final letter, became a powerful symbol of emunah, hope, and survival, drawing an emotional response from those in attendance.

Breslavski shared footage of the ceremony on social media, revealing that the Sefer Torah had been commissioned while he was still being held captive by Hamas. Throughout his imprisonment, those behind the project refused to complete it, believing and praying that he would one day return to finish it himself.

The initiative was led by Tzachi Amoyal, who dedicated the Sefer Torah to Breslavski’s safe return. Demonstrating extraordinary faith and patience, Amoyal intentionally left the final letter unwritten, insisting that no one else would complete the Sefer Torah until Breslavski was freed.

Despite moments when he considered finishing the Sefer Torah himself, Amoyal remained steadfast in his commitment, waiting two full years for Breslavski to return and complete the sacred task. His decision ultimately became a remarkable expression of unwavering faith.

During the ceremony, Breslavski explained that Amoyal had refused to finish the Sefer Torah until he emerged from what he described as “the house of slavery.” Video from the event shows Breslavski writing the final letter before emotionally announcing that a Sefer Torah now bears his name.

“Father, thank You so much for the privilege of being the owner of a Sefer Torah,” Breslavski said, directing his words to Hashem. His brief but heartfelt expression of gratitude reflected his appreciation not only for surviving captivity, but also for returning to his family, his people, and a life centered on Torah.

Since his release, Breslavski has undertaken a highly public spiritual journey that has resonated with many across Israel.

Several weeks ago, he removed a tattoo from his arm that had identified him as Jewish in the eyes of his Hamas captors. According to Breslavski, the tattoo led the terrorists to force him to wear a jacket in the sweltering Gaza heat in order to conceal it.

He has also begun wearing a large yarmulka covering most of his head, describing the decision as another meaningful step in his renewed spiritual commitment.

“Call me a crazy Jew. I decided to take this upon myself,” he wrote at the time.

{Matzav.com}

Israeli Prime Minister Binyomin Netanyahu is expected to present President Donald Trump with new Israeli intelligence indicating that Iran is expanding activity at its deeply buried Pickaxe Mountain nuclear facility and is using ongoing negotiations with the United States to conceal continued advances in its nuclear program, according to a source in Yerushalayim.

Netanyahu is scheduled to meet with President Trump on Monday, with Iran’s nuclear ambitions and the recent conflict with the Islamic Republic expected to dominate the discussions.

According to the source, the Israeli delegation intends to share intelligence showing that Tehran has continued advancing its nuclear program while falsely portraying itself as committed to diplomatic negotiations. Israeli officials are expected to argue that Iran is not negotiating in good faith.

Israel has reportedly obtained evidence showing that nuclear centrifuges have recently been transported to the highly secretive Pickaxe Mountain complex—the first known transfer of such equipment to the site since construction began in 2020, according to a report in The Wall Street Journal.

The underground installation is located more than 300 feet beneath Kolang Mountain near Iran’s Natanz nuclear facility and has long been suspected of serving as a key component of the regime’s nuclear infrastructure.

Until recently, there had been no publicly known evidence of active nuclear operations at the facility. President Trump previously cited the lack of such evidence as one reason the site had not been targeted during earlier military operations against Iran.

Last week, Trump also sought to dismiss reports of activity at the facility, telling reporters that the United States had no information confirming such developments.

More recently, however, the president has indicated that he would be willing to authorize military action against the mountain complex. Reports have also suggested that American forces have prepared contingency plans for a possible ground operation aimed at securing hundreds of pounds of enriched uranium believed to be stored deep inside the underground facility.

The source added that Israel also plans to present intelligence indicating that Iran has already begun rebuilding portions of its missile and drone programs, which suffered extensive damage during repeated American airstrikes.

Israeli officials believe the intelligence demonstrates that Iran has no intention of abandoning either its nuclear ambitions or its missile program despite participating in ceasefire negotiations with the United States.

President Trump recently decided to suspend what had been planned as a nearly two-week bombing campaign against Iran after new diplomatic efforts emerged in an attempt to halt Tehran’s attacks in the Strait of Hormuz.

In addition to discussing Iran’s latest military and nuclear activity, Netanyahu is also expected to update President Trump on efforts to preserve the ceasefires in Lebanon and Gaza, where Iranian-backed terrorist organizations continue to operate.

Netanyahu is expected to remain in Washington through Tuesday, when he will join President Trump and other world leaders in paying their respects at memorial events honoring the late Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina.

{Matzav.com}

President Donald Trump said Monday that he intends to confront Russian President Vladimir Putin over allegations that Moscow has been supplying Iran with intelligence used to target American military installations in the Middle East. While Trump said he wants to determine whether the claims are accurate, he added that any such assistance has done little to alter the outcome because of the devastating blows inflicted on Iran by recent U.S. military action.

Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One, Trump was asked about reports that Russia may be sharing intelligence with Tehran. He responded that he plans to raise the issue directly with Putin.

“Well, we’ll find out if that’s true,” Trump told reporters Monday on Air Force One. “I’ll ask Putin about it.”

The renewed scrutiny follows remarks by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who announced Saturday that his government intends to provide the Trump administration with evidence it says shows Russia has been assisting Iran through satellite surveillance of U.S. military sites and Gulf nations.

“Since the beginning of July, we have recorded active Russian satellite surveillance of the Gulf states and U.S. military facilities located there,” Zelenskyy said on X.

“These images subsequently appear in Iran. At the same time, there is a clear correlation between Russia’s satellite imagery of these sites and Iranian strikes — both before the attacks, in preparation for them, and afterward, to assess the damage inflicted.”

Trump said that even if Zelenskyy’s allegations prove accurate, the intelligence sharing has had little practical effect because of the extensive damage inflicted on Iran.

If Zelenskyy is right, Trump told reporters, it “hasn’t had much impact because we’ve knocked the hell out of” Iran.

Trump’s latest comments come just days after he publicly downplayed suggestions that Russia or China had been providing meaningful military or intelligence support to Tehran, a position that appeared to differ from testimony offered by Secretary of War Pete Hegseth.

Appearing before the Senate Appropriations Committee last Tuesday, Hegseth acknowledged that there were “ways in which both of those countries” were “enabling” Tehran “at different levels.” When pressed on how “enabling” differed from direct assistance, Trump later dismissed the distinction.

Speaking from the Oval Office last week, Trump said he had received assurances from both Chinese President Xi Jinping and President Putin that they would not become involved.

“Well, I don’t know that they’re enabling. I mean, I will tell you that [Chinese] President Xi [Jinping] said he will not partake, and President Putin said the same thing … I trust them,” Trump said in the Oval Office.

Trump concluded by acknowledging that some limited activity may have occurred but maintained that it has not significantly affected the conflict, adding that he believes neither leader wants to jeopardize America’s confidence in them.

“There could be some things you do, but thus far, at least, [it] has not been major. I don’t think they’d want to have me disappointed,” Trump added.

{Matzav.com}

Johnson & Johnson announced Monday that it has reached a $5.5 billion settlement to resolve tens of thousands of lawsuits claiming its talc-based baby powder and other products caused ovarian cancer, marking a major step toward ending years of high-profile litigation against the healthcare giant.

According to the company, the agreement resolves approximately 69,000 lawsuits that have been consolidated in federal court in New Jersey, along with related state court cases. Altogether, the settlement covers 99.75% of the remaining talc-related claims currently pending against the company.

Attorneys representing the plaintiffs confirmed the agreement on Monday, describing it as a positive resolution following a legal battle that has stretched on for roughly a decade. The settlement still requires approval from the federal judge overseeing the multidistrict litigation.

Erik Haas, Johnson & Johnson’s vice president of litigation, maintained that the allegations against the company were unfounded but said settling the cases was the best way to finally bring the dispute to an end.

“While we are confident the company would have ultimately prevailed with further litigation, as it has in the vast majority of cases tried to date, this resolution allows the company to put this matter behind it and remain focused on its mission to develop medicines and devices that save lives,” Haas said.

The settlement follows a significant legal victory for Johnson & Johnson last week, when a federal judge questioned whether individual plaintiffs could demonstrate that talc itself specifically caused their ovarian cancer.

Throughout the litigation, Johnson & Johnson has consistently denied that its talc products were responsible for causing cancer, asserting that its talc was safe and free of asbestos contamination. The company discontinued sales of its talc-based baby powder in the United States in 2020 and replaced it with a cornstarch-based version.

The lawsuits resumed in March 2025 after remaining on hold for more than three years while Johnson & Johnson unsuccessfully attempted to resolve the claims through the bankruptcy of a subsidiary created to handle the litigation.

Unlike the company’s earlier bankruptcy proposals, the newly announced settlement applies only to existing lawsuits and does not resolve or limit any future talc-related claims that may be filed.

{Matzav.com}

The Trump administration on Monday asked the U.S. Supreme Court to step into the ongoing legal battle over President Donald Trump’s executive order tightening restrictions on mail-in voting, seeking emergency relief just 99 days before the November midterm elections.

The request follows a 2-1 ruling by a federal appeals court on Shabbos that left in place an injunction blocking significant portions of Trump’s March executive order. The order instructs federal agencies to compile voter eligibility lists and authorizes new limits on the U.S. Postal Service’s handling of mail ballots that are not connected to those lists.

A coalition of 23 states has challenged the executive order, arguing that President Trump does not have the constitutional authority to establish federal election rules governing voting systems that are administered by state and local governments.

The Department of Justice contended that the lawsuit was filed too early because federal agencies have not yet finalized the policies necessary to implement the executive order. The 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals disagreed, concluding that the states are already being forced to prepare for election changes that could significantly affect the upcoming vote.

In its majority opinion, the appeals court warned that the executive order would create “unprecedented levels of involvement by federal officials in how states administer elections” and could lead to voter confusion while increasing the risk of disenfranchisement.

The ruling is limited to the 23 states participating in the lawsuit. However, a separate federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., recently lifted a nationwide injunction involving the Postal Service provision, leaving open the possibility that the agency could enforce the ballot restrictions in other parts of the country.

President Trump and his supporters have defended the voting changes as necessary measures to protect election integrity and prevent illegal voting. Democrats and voting-rights organizations, meanwhile, argue that the restrictions could make it more difficult for eligible voters to receive and return mail ballots.

The executive order is part of a broader push by President Trump to overhaul election procedures ahead of the Nov. 3 midterm elections. In addition to the mail-in voting changes, he has urged Congress to approve legislation establishing a nationwide voter identification requirement and requiring proof of citizenship for voter registration.

Under the U.S. Constitution, primary responsibility for administering elections rests with the states rather than the federal government, a central issue at the heart of the legal dispute now before the Supreme Court.

{Matzav.com}

Ashley L. Jackson, the daughter of “civil rights leader” and infamous anti-Semite Rev. Jesse Jackson, has revealed that she has converted to Judaism following what she described as a deeply personal spiritual journey spanning several years.

In an opinion essay published in The Washington Post, Jackson wrote that she formally completed her conversion – a non-Orthodox conversion – on June 12 after years of study, personal reflection, health challenges, and an ever-deepening connection to Jewish life.

Jackson, a writer, producer, and founder of the nonprofit Push The Next Generation, recalled a memorable moment two years before her father’s passing, when he accompanied her to Shabbos services at her synagogue. Despite being a lifelong Baptist minister, she said he embraced the experience with warmth and enthusiasm.

She wrote: “As the Saturday morning service proceeded, my father sat in the front row – holding my hand, dancing to prayers in a language he did not speak, eating the Sunkist candies the congregation had tossed to celebrate a bar mitzvah.”

Explaining why she ultimately chose Judaism, Jackson said she discovered a religious tradition that reflected the principles she had been taught throughout her upbringing.

“I was raised to believe that faith must lead to action,” she wrote. “In Judaism, I found an enduring expression of this belief.”

She said she was especially drawn to Judaism’s emphasis on lifelong learning, meaningful ritual, and the ideal of Tikkun olam—repairing the world. Jackson added that hearing the shofar for the first time on Rosh Hashanah left a lasting emotional impression on her.

Jackson also reflected on what it means to identify as both Black and Jewish, acknowledging that the intersection of those identities can bring unique struggles while also offering opportunities for greater understanding.

She wrote that “racism and antisemitism can surface in even the most intimate and familiar spaces”, but also described “the meeting of two diasporas” and the shared histories of Black and Jewish communities.

In her essay, Jackson argued that relations between the African American and Jewish communities have become increasingly strained in recent years, even though both groups have long shared a commitment to justice, equality, and human dignity.

“About 1 percent of American Jews identify as Black,” she wrote. “Their experience – my experience – shows that the alienation between these two communities can be overcome.”

She also recounted the emotional reception her father received during his synagogue visit after the rabbi invited him to come forward for a blessing.

“Before she could speak, the congregation was already on its feet,” Jackson wrote. “My father – one of the most recognizable Baptist ministers in America – wept as the congregation offered him a spontaneous ovation.”

After completing her conversion, Jackson chose the Hebrew name Miriam Yiskah. She explained that the name Yiskah was selected as “a feminine echo of Jesse”, serving as a lasting tribute to her father’s memory.

Closing her essay, Jackson said she hopes her own story will help strengthen ties between communities during a period marked by growing antisemitism and anti-Black prejudice.

“I feel as though I have been entrusted with a sacred charge,” she wrote. “Amid widespread concerns about antisemitism and anti-Blackness, it is necessary to recall that our differences do not preclude unity.”

{Matzav.com}

President Donald Trump said Monday that while he and Israeli Prime Minister Binyomin Netanyahu have “some disagreements,” the United States and Israel remain closely aligned on confronting Iran. Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One, Trump also asserted that Tehran only agreed to negotiations after suffering devastating military losses in recent U.S. strikes and expressed optimism that a deal could still be reached.

While traveling aboard Air Force One en route to Waterford Township, Trump said Iran’s willingness to negotiate is a direct consequence of the damage inflicted by recent American military operations. He argued that the regime would never have sought talks had the campaign failed.

Speaking about Netanyahu, Trump praised the Israeli leader’s wartime leadership, saying, “I think he’s done a great job. We’ve pretty much destroyed their military.”

Trump said diplomatic contacts with Iran are now underway, though he cautioned that the outcome remains uncertain.

“They want to meet, and we’re meeting. We’ll see what happens. There’s a chance we can make a deal.”

According to Trump, Iran’s outreach came only after the United States demonstrated overwhelming military strength.

“Without what we did, they wouldn’t even be talking to us,” he said. “They requested a meeting through their surrogates and directly and we’re meeting.”

He added that investors have reacted positively to the developments, pointing to gains in the markets and falling energy prices.

“Oil dropped very big today. Stock markets as of about an hour ago was like through the roof.”

Asked whether he was prepared to wait for results from the negotiations, Trump indicated he was in no rush.

“I have plenty of time.”

Describing the impact of the military campaign, Trump said Iran’s strategic coastline had been severely damaged while maritime navigation through the Strait remained secure.

“The whole shoreline is wiped out. The Strait is in very good shape. And we’re talking right now.”

Trump also revealed that Iranian officials had appealed to Washington to stop additional strikes.

“Their people said, please don’t drop, don’t shoot.”

While expressing hope that diplomacy would succeed, Trump warned that military action could quickly resume if negotiations fail.

“We’re having good talks, so we’ll see what happens. I think there’s a good chance something could happen. And if it doesn’t, we go back to doing what we were doing two days ago.”

Reflecting on the recent conflict, Trump said Iran’s armed forces had suffered extensive damage.

“Iran took a beating over the last 14 days, and they asked us very nicely, please stop.”

Addressing concerns about America’s military readiness, Trump dismissed suggestions that U.S. stockpiles were running low.

“We have plenty. We have a lot of ammunition.”

He said the administration is rapidly rebuilding inventories after, in his view, the previous administration depleted supplies by sending large quantities of weapons to Ukraine.

“When I left, the cupboards were full,” he said. “We’re building it very rapidly. Plants are being built, the Patriots in particular.”

Turning to his relationship with Netanyahu, Trump acknowledged there have been occasional differences but emphasized that both governments remain largely in sync regarding Iran.

“We have a little difference, but pretty close.”

Trump argued that American intervention prevented a far greater threat to Israel by crippling Iran’s nuclear ambitions.

“If I didn’t get involved, if I didn’t blow up those nuclear essentially soon-to-be nuclear weapons… Israel would have been terminated.”

Asked about reports that Russia may have supplied Iran with intelligence on U.S. military installations, Trump said he intends to investigate the matter.

“We’ll find out if that’s true. I’ll ask Putin about it.”

Even if the reports prove accurate, Trump maintained they made little difference on the battlefield.

“It hasn’t had much impact because we’ve knocked the hell out of it.”

Trump also suggested that Iranian assets under U.S. control could ultimately be used to compensate for damage caused by Iran.

“We’re going to use Iran’s money to pay for the damage they did.”

Shifting to domestic issues, Trump said the American economy continues to strengthen, highlighting what he described as a resurgence in manufacturing.

“The car companies are doing better than they’ve ever done,” he said, adding that new factories were being built and claiming Toyota was shifting operations from Mexico because of tariffs.

Trump also declared that inflation is declining while blaming the previous administration for creating the economic problems he inherited.

“I inherited the worst inflation in history from Biden. But costs are going down rapidly.”

He reiterated his call for the Federal Reserve to cut interest rates, arguing that doing so would accelerate economic growth.

“Rates should be lowered. This country could be at 8%, 9%, 10%, 12% GDP.”

Defending his overall economic agenda, Trump said the United States is stronger than ever and pointed to Netanyahu’s upcoming visit as further evidence of the close U.S.-Israel relationship.

“The strongest we’ve ever been,” he said, adding, “Israel. Bibi’s coming. He’ll tell you.”

Discussing relations with Turkey, Trump described President Recep Tayyip Erdogan as a personal friend while recognizing Ankara’s strained ties with Israel.

“Turkey has been a tremendous ally for me,” he said, while acknowledging Ankara “is not a big fan of Israel” or Netanyahu.

Asked whether diplomacy or additional military action represented the better path forward with Iran, Trump again praised Netanyahu’s leadership during the conflict.

“Bibi has been great. He’s a wartime prime minister. We did very well together.”

Turning to Congress, Trump criticized senators for leaving Washington before approving the SAVE Act.

“The SAVE Act has to be done. They shouldn’t leave town.”

He also accused Democrats of opposing voter identification requirements and proof of citizenship while supporting higher taxes, transgender athletes competing in women’s sports, and open borders.

“The Democrats are going to vote 100% against voter identification and proof of citizenship,” he said.

Trump concluded by expressing confidence that the United States continues to lead the world in artificial intelligence development.

“We’re leading now China substantially in AI and we’re going to keep it that way.”

Ending on an optimistic note, Trump declared that America’s position remains unmatched.

“We’re leading everybody and everything. We have a country that’s doing well.”

{Matzav.com}

President Donald Trump is urging Congress to permanently eliminate the twice-yearly clock changes, calling on the Senate to approve legislation that would put an end to daylight saving time shifts after the House already passed the measure.

Speaking at a July 27 rally at a General Motors plant in Michigan, Trump encouraged lawmakers to scrap the longstanding practice of moving clocks ahead in the spring and back in the fall.

President Donald Trump voiced his support for ending the mandatory clock changes, arguing that Americans should no longer have to reset their clocks twice each year.

“Let’s get rid of daylight saving time stuff, OK?” Trump said July 27 at a rally at a General Motors plant in Michigan.

Trump noted that the House has already approved legislation allowing states to stop changing their clocks, and said he hopes the Senate will now send the bill to his desk. The Senate previously passed similar legislation in 2022.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-South Dakota, has acknowledged that the proposal’s path forward remains uncertain, saying it is unclear whether supporters can secure the 60 votes necessary to overcome procedural hurdles.

“Hopefully, the Senate is going to approve that one,” Trump said. “The House approved it and we’re going to get rid of that.”

Under the current system, most Americans set their clocks ahead by one hour each March and turn them back one hour each November. The seasonal time change is intended to provide more evening daylight during the warmer months while shifting additional daylight to the morning during the winter.

Backers of ending the biannual time change argue that repeatedly disrupting sleep schedules contributes to health problems and increases the risk of traffic accidents.

Arizona and Hawaii, along with the U.S. territories of Guam and Puerto Rico, already do not observe daylight saving time. Another 19 states have passed legislation that would eliminate the clock changes once federal law allows them to do so, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.

“Locking the clock all year long would have positive impacts on sleep schedules, energy conservation, motor vehicle safety and our economy,” Rep. Brett Guthrie, R-Kentucky, said July 13.

The proposal, however, continues to face opposition in the Senate. Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Arkansas, has argued against making daylight saving time permanent and could use Senate procedures to slow or block the legislation. He contends the sun would rise at “dangerously late hours” if daylight saving time were adopted year-round.

{Matzav.com}

The U.S. Department of Justice has opened a criminal grand jury investigation into Simad Holdings and its controlling shareholders, brothers Michael and David Shabsels, according to a filing submitted to the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange, marking a dramatic escalation in the company’s unraveling, The Real Deal reports.

The investigation is being led by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of New York. As part of the criminal probe, federal prosecutors have requested that Simad produce company records and other documents.

In addition to the criminal investigation, Simad disclosed that it is also aware of a separate civil investigation by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York involving alleged fraud connected to the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP). The company said it is cooperating with both investigations.

The latest developments significantly intensify the legal and financial crisis surrounding Simad, which operated 30 well-known summer camps across the United States, and the mounting legal troubles facing its founders, David and Michael Shabsels.

The company raised approximately $200 million from Israeli bondholders in December but failed to make its first scheduled bond payment in May. Simad later disclosed that roughly $34 million belonging to bondholders had been transferred to companies controlled by the Shabsels brothers. Although the company demanded repayment of the $34 million, along with accrued interest, and the brothers initially agreed, Michael Shabsels later informed the company that he was unable to return the funds.

Both Simad and the Shabsels brothers filed for bankruptcy protection in June. Since then, the company has been placed under the management of a restructuring officer and has previously disclosed that it is also the subject of a criminal investigation by the Israel Securities Authority. As part of its restructuring efforts, Simad is selling off several of its camp properties, including Mohawk Day Camp, Camp Chen-A-Wanda, and Camp Achim.

According to the filing, the Justice Department’s criminal investigation encompasses Simad, the two brothers, and a network of companies under their control.

Over the years, David and Michael Shabsels established dozens of corporate entities tied to both their summer camp operations and broader real estate investments.

The brothers amassed a real estate portfolio of more than 80 properties, including shopping centers, apartment buildings, office properties, and SplashDown Beach Water Park in New York’s Hudson Valley. Their financing strategy relied heavily on creating separate ground leases, allowing them to own both the land beneath a property and the property itself while obtaining loans against each interest separately. The approach was designed to maximize borrowing capacity and secure financing approaching the full value of the assets.

Israeli Prime Minister Binyomin Netanyahu emerged victorious in a high-stakes internal Likud showdown on Monday after party members overwhelmingly approved his controversial proposal to expand the number of reserved slots under his control on the party’s Knesset list.

Nearly 3,400 members of the Likud Central Committee participated in the vote, deciding on three proposals advanced by Netanyahu. The centerpiece of the package was his request to increase the number of reserved positions on the party’s electoral slate.

Voting began at 11:00 a.m. and continued until 8:00 p.m. By the close of polling, 3,387 Central Committee members had cast ballots, representing 72.7 percent of those eligible to vote.

At the heart of the contest was Netanyahu’s proposal to increase the number of reserved slots from five to eight within positions 2 through 29 on the Likud list for the next Knesset election. When the ballots were counted, the proposal passed by a wide margin, handing the prime minister a decisive win.

The additional reserved positions are widely viewed as a way for Netanyahu to strengthen the party’s slate ahead of the next election. Although the proposal generated significant debate within Likud, most ministers and Knesset members avoided publicly opposing it. The lone prominent exception was MK David Bitan, who released a video before the vote urging party members, saying, “Vote against the proposals.”

Central Committee members also considered a separate proposal allowing incumbent Likud lawmakers to compete in the party’s regional districts. The measure is expected to benefit lawmakers such as Avichai Boaron and others whom Netanyahu hopes will secure places on the party’s election list through district races.

That proposal narrowly passed by just six votes. The razor-thin outcome immediately sparked allegations of voting irregularities, with opponents raising the possibility of legal challenges in court.

Committee members also approved an additional amendment to the party’s constitution.

In the days leading up to the vote, the Prime Minister’s Office mounted an intensive campaign to rally support, with ministers and Likud lawmakers releasing videos urging Central Committee members to back Netanyahu’s proposals.

The Mamdani administration is facing mounting backlash after New York City published a searchable online database listing the names and home addresses of property owners whose residences could be subject to the state’s new pied-à-terre tax. Critics say the move unnecessarily exposed the personal information of hundreds of thousands of New Yorkers and raised serious concerns about privacy and public safety.

The city’s Department of Finance released the database, identifying what it says are non-primary residences across the five boroughs valued at more than $1 million. The public list includes both the names of the owners and the addresses of the properties, making the information easily searchable by anyone.

Council Minority Leader David Carr blasted the decision, arguing that many of the listed properties may not even qualify for the tax and that numerous owners are likely to challenge their inclusion.

“It’s a reckless and foolish move, especially considering there are potentially thousands of properties on this list that do not qualify as second homes or whose owners will successfully dispute their inclusion,” Carr, a Republican representing Staten Island whose own home appears in the database, told The Post.

The release follows Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s recent social media message alerting affluent homeowners that notices about the new tax were on the way. In the post, he appeared to warn owners to expect official correspondence regarding the levy.

“Check your mailbox when you’re back in the five boroughs, because you’ve got mail,” Mamdani wrote.

Explaining the rationale behind the tax, the mayor added, “The best city in the world deserves the best parks, libraries, and schools in the world. That’s only possible when we all pay our fair share.”

Mamdani has made taxing wealthy New Yorkers a central part of his agenda and has championed the pied-à-terre tax approved by Gov. Kathy Hochul and the Democratic-controlled Legislature. Opponents, however, have warned that the measure could depress the city’s luxury real estate market and discourage investment.

Earlier this year, Mamdani also proposed increasing New York City’s property taxes by 9.5 percent unless Albany approved additional taxes targeting wealthy residents. At the time, he cited a projected $12 billion budget shortfall, a figure that was later revised downward to approximately $5.4 billion.

City Hall has projected that the pied-à-terre tax will generate roughly $500 million annually. However, New York City Comptroller Mark Levine’s office estimates the actual revenue will likely fall between $340 million and $380 million per year, with collections potentially declining over time.

The database includes numerous well-known New Yorkers, among them filmmaker Woody Allen, longtime Vogue editor Anna Wintour, and actress Cynthia Nixon, who has publicly supported Mamdani.

Even more surprising than the celebrity names was the sheer scope of the list. The Post counted more than 960,000 residences and property owners included in the database, despite the tax originally being presented as applying to only about 31,000 homes.

The list also appears to include numerous modest middle-class neighborhoods that bear little resemblance to the luxury second homes the tax was intended to target. Among them are approximately two dozen homes on Chaffee Avenue in the Bronx’s working-class Throggs Neck neighborhood.

Another neighborhood with dozens of listed properties is Challenger Drive on Staten Island, where many homes appeared in the database despite no clear indication that they are second residences.

The average home values on Chaffee Avenue and Challenger Drive generally range from the mid-$500,000s to the low $800,000s, far below the multimillion-dollar vacation homes many believed the tax would target.

The database also includes at least one clearly unusual entry: the Breezy Point Shopping Center in Queens, a commercial shopping plaza that is plainly not a vacation residence.

Carr argued that the administration’s policy could ultimately drive affluent homeowners and investment out of New York.

“All the mayor is doing is tanking the luxury home market in NYC and sending millions of dollars in real estate business to other states. But the upside is Mamdani is a shoo-in for ‘Realtor of the Year’ in Texas and Florida,” Carr railed.

Steven Fulop, president and CEO of the Partnership for New York City, said the publication of homeowners’ personal information extends far beyond a debate over taxation and creates unnecessary risks.

“Publishing individual property owners’ names and home addresses raises real safety and privacy concerns that go well beyond the tax debate itself. Transparency about how a new tax is administered doesn’t require putting private citizens’ addresses into a searchable public database that can put people in harm’s way,” he said.

“In a political climate this polarized, the mayor didn’t need to invite that kind of risk — we should be looking for ways to dial down tensions, not heighten them. We’d urge the administration to revisit this approach.”

The controversy comes as Mamdani continues advancing an aggressive tax agenda aimed at funding major spending initiatives. Since taking office, he has backed approximately $23 billion in tax increases and has begun a sustained campaign in Albany seeking additional taxes on property owners and other high-income New Yorkers.

Iran’s anti-American propaganda campaign has taken a disturbing new turn, with a newly released video reportedly encouraging supporters of the Islamic regime to assassinate First Lady Melania Trump while also threatening the President’s son, Barron Trump. The video follows a series of threatening displays in Tehran directed at President Donald Trump and members of his family amid soaring tensions between Washington and Tehran.

The propaganda video, titled “How to Kill Melania Trump,” reportedly features images of the First Lady traveling in her motorcade and visiting various locations throughout New York City. It also identifies several high-end designer stores she is known to frequent, a detail that has heightened concerns over the video’s explicit nature.

Toward the conclusion of the video, the threats expand to include Barron Trump, 20, making him the latest member of the President’s family to be singled out in the regime’s propaganda campaign.

The video comes just days after massive billboards appeared across Tehran displaying calls for the deaths of President Trump and several of his family members, including Melania Trump, Barron Trump, and Ivanka Trump. The displays were part of an increasingly aggressive messaging campaign that has featured images and slogans threatening retaliation against the President and his relatives.

Melania Trump has maintained a relatively low public profile in recent weeks. She did not attend Friday night’s White House Correspondents Association dinner, with a source close to the First Lady telling the New York Post that she had a “scheduling conflict.”

{Matzav.com}