A frantic effort unfolded Sunday as Secretary of State Marco Rubio and special envoy Steve Witkoff raced to salvage the White House’s contentious 28-point proposal for ending the Ukraine war, a document blasted by critics across the political spectrum as little more than a Russian “wishlist.”
Tensions were high even before talks began in Geneva, with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and multiple European states flagging deep concerns about the draft plan and its sweeping demands that Ukraine surrender large swaths of territory.
Rubio, Witkoff, Army Secretary Dan Driscoll, Jared Kushner, and additional administration officials met face-to-face with Ukraine’s delegation for several hours in what insiders described as an occasionally strained session. By the end of the day, the American team accepted the need to revise parts of the plan. “I’m not going to speculate,” Rubio remarked. “I feel very optimistic that we can get something done here.” He also quipped, “Obviously, the Russians get a vote.”
Confusion over the origins of the proposal—and reports that Kyiv had been warned US aid could be cut off if it refused—continued to overshadow the negotiations.
Rubio spent part of Saturday on the phone with a bipartisan group of senators attending the Halifax International Security Forum, attempting to quell their alarm. Sen. Mike Rounds said Rubio told them, “It is not our recommendation, it is not our peace plan.” Sen. Angus King noted Rubio had implied the draft resembled a “wishlist of the Russians.” The secretary of state later shot back publicly that the document was “authored by the US,” adding, “It is based on input from the Russian side. But it is also based on previous and ongoing input from Ukraine.”
Lawmakers said Rubio offered no clarification on reports that Ukraine had been threatened with a cutoff in assistance. He indicated he was not present for such discussions. Meanwhile, President Trump has openly declared that he wants Ukraine to agree to the framework by Thanksgiving.
On Sunday, Ukraine presented its own counterproposal, and US officials were open to adjusting portions of the 28-point outline, according to Axios. Despite that apparent progress, US negotiators privately accused their Ukrainian counterparts of leaking sensitive details to the American press to spark domestic pushback.
Zelensky, who earlier described the original draft as a bleak “choice between losing our dignity and freedom and losing US support,” publicly expressed gratitude for Washington’s efforts. “Ukraine is grateful to the United States, to every American heart, and personally to President Trump,” he wrote on X, shortly after Trump complained Ukraine had shown “zero gratitude.” Zelensky added, “Thank you to everyone who is helping! Thank you, America! Thank you, Europe! I am proud of our people. Glory to Ukraine!” He has repeatedly insisted that any legitimate peace plan must protect Ukraine’s long-term security and avoid rewarding Russian aggression.
The leaked draft requires Ukraine to relinquish the entire Donbas region—territory Russia has failed to fully control despite years of war. Critics warn that giving up the rest of Donbas would leave Ukraine dangerously exposed, transferring major fortified areas to Moscow and enabling future attacks. Only weeks ago, Trump favored locking in the existing frontlines to sidestep painful territorial talks, but Moscow rejected that outright.
The proposal further demands that Ukraine abandon its pursuit of NATO membership, reduce its military from roughly 900,000 troops to 600,000, and grant sweeping amnesty to all parties involved in the war—effectively shielding Russians from accountability for atrocities. Russian commitments, by contrast, are minimal: avoiding future invasions of neighbors and offering Ukraine limited security assurances. Those assurances fall far short of NATO’s Article 5 mutual defense guarantee, leaving Ukraine vulnerable if Moscow initiates yet another assault.
The political backlash was immediate and fierce, from Democrats and pro-Ukraine Republicans alike.
“Vladimir Putin has never once kept a single promise that he has made regarding Ukraine. Not once. Ever. And he’s not about to start now,” Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick warned. “Any agreement that requires any element of trust placed in Vladimir Putin’s ‘promise’ is not worth the paper it is written on.”
European objections also poured in. A leaked EU peace outline released Sunday appeared to challenge the US draft directly, reaffirming Ukraine’s NATO prospects, preserving its territorial claims, and calling for the current lines of contact to be frozen rather than redrawn.
The result: The administration’s plan now hangs in limbo, reshaped under pressure as all sides brace for another round of negotiations.
{Matzav.com}