Senior Degel HaTorah Figure: “Deri in the Opposition? He Still Musters a Majority for Whatever He Wants”
The political rift between the chareidi parties Degel HaTorah and Shas is deepening, as a senior Degel HaTorah official laid out his party’s version of the events that led to the breakdown in relations surrounding the appointment of the chair of the Yerushalayim Religious Council.
Speaking at length, the senior figure said the crisis began with what he described as an attempt at coordination with Shas chairman Aryeh Deri, which initially appeared promising but quickly turned out to be a unilateral move. “I called him and told him I wanted cooperation,” the official said. “Deri said, ‘Excellent, I’m glad you called.’ But immediately afterward, his representatives made it clear to us that they were appointing the chairman that very day and that he would be a Shas person only.”
Within Degel HaTorah, there is anger over what party officials describe as exploitation of the situation, at a time when Degel is preoccupied with the struggle over the draft law and recent arrests. The senior figure rejected Shas’s claim that Degel HaTorah is a small party, arguing that electorally this is simply not true. “We are the largest party in Yerushalayim, whether you count United Torah Judaism with its nine seats or Degel HaTorah on its own. In raw votes, we are larger than Shas,” he said. He added that genuine cooperation cannot amount to “having a Degel HaTorah representative holding flowers in the room,” while substantive positions are taken exclusively by Shas.
Tensions have also spilled over into parliamentary conduct in the Knesset, where Degel HaTorah has refrained from advancing certain legislation. However, the senior official insisted on drawing a clear distinction between the issues. According to him, the current boycott of coalition votes in the plenum is primarily aimed at accelerating legislation on the draft issue in light of the arrests, and did not stem directly from the dispute over the religious councils. Still, he made clear that Degel HaTorah is capable of flexing its political muscle. “Contrary to what they say, we did not vote against transferring the Ministry of Religious Services, but everyone knows that it wouldn’t be difficult for me to recruit one MK to vote with us, and that would have ended it,” he said.
The Degel HaTorah official launched a sharp attack on former Religious Services Minister Michael Malkieli and on the ministry’s director-general Yehuda Avidan, accusing them of refusing even to sit down for substantive negotiations over the identity of the council chair. “He told him, ‘You should know that today I am appointing the head of the appointed committee,’” the official recalled of the tense exchanges.
He also questioned Deri’s past declarations to Shas’s Moetzet Chachmei Hatorah. “Deri told the Moetzet Chachmei Hatorah that he was in the opposition. Is this opposition?” he asked. “So you go and take advantage of the fact that Moshe Gafni is not in the Finance Committee in order to do things there and marshal a majority for whatever you want?”
In closing, the senior Degel HaTorah figure stressed that all of his actions were carried out under close supervision from the party’s rabbinic leadership. He rejected accusations directed at Degel HaTorah and emphasized that harming the party’s representatives amounts to harming the leading Torah authorities themselves. “I didn’t do anything without receiving instructions from the gedolei Torah,” he said. “Whether to vote against, to abstain, or not to enter — I received direct instructions. I was on the line with them all day.”
He concluded by warning that Degel HaTorah will not accept a reality in which religious services are used as a weapon against it, and said the struggle over representation of the Lithuanian ציבור in Yerushalayim will continue “at full intensity.”
{Matzav.com}
