Feed aggregator

A recording from a private meeting between Republican New York gubernatorial candidate Bruce Blakeman and prominent chassidic community leaders in Williamsburg has ignited a political controversy after Blakeman warned that violent rioters could target yeshivos, shuls and Jewish homes, while questioning whether New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani would intervene to protect the community.

Blakeman, the Nassau County executive who is challenging Democratic Governor Kathy Hochul in November’s election, made the remarks during a closed-door gathering aimed at securing support from Brooklyn’s chassidic communities.

In the recording, Blakeman described a hypothetical outbreak of anti-Jewish violence in New York City, raising the possibility of widespread destruction and attacks against Jewish institutions and residents.

“If there are riots here, if they burn down your yeshivos and shuls, burn down your homes, do you think Zohran Mamdani will stop them?” Blakeman asked those assembled.

The Republican candidate argued that Mamdani could not be relied upon to respond forcefully to such violence, pointing to the mayor’s political positions and statements concerning Israel and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Blakeman also invoked the 1991 Crown Heights riots, during which Yankel Rosenbaum, a Jewish student visiting from Australia, was fatally stabbed amid several days of violent unrest in Brooklyn.

The candidate suggested that a future outbreak of anti-Jewish violence could be even more severe than the Crown Heights disturbances, a comparison that immediately drew criticism from several Jewish community figures.

The meeting was part of Blakeman’s efforts to expand his support among Orthodox Jewish voters, a constituency that has played an important role in New York elections and whose political backing is actively sought by candidates from both parties.

Blakeman faces a difficult statewide contest against Hochul, with polling cited in the report placing the incumbent governor ahead by approximately nine to 19 percentage points.

The release of the recording brought renewed attention to Blakeman’s criticism of Mamdani, who has faced sustained scrutiny from Jewish organizations and political opponents over his positions on Israel and his responses to rhetoric associated with anti-Israel demonstrations.

Blakeman did not dispute the authenticity of the recording or retreat from the substance of his remarks. Instead, he defended his warning by pointing to what he described as Mamdani’s refusal to condemn slogans associated with terrorist organizations.

Mr. Moshe Indig, a prominent Satmar community figure who is a major supporter of the anti-Semitic Mamdani, rejected Blakeman’s comments, characterizing them as irresponsible political fearmongering rather than a realistic assessment of the city’s security situation.

New York City Comptroller Mark Levine likewise criticized the remarks, disputing the suggestion that the city would fail to protect Jewish residents and pointing to the work of municipal authorities and law enforcement agencies in addressing antisemitic threats and hate crimes.

Both argued that inflammatory predictions about attacks on Jewish institutions risk generating unnecessary anxiety within communities already concerned about antisemitism.

Other Jewish leaders defended Blakeman’s concerns.

Dovid Katz of the Israel Heritage Foundation expressed support for the Republican candidate, arguing that Mamdani’s positions toward Israel have created legitimate apprehension among Jewish New Yorkers about the city’s political climate and the protection of their communities.

Mamdani’s representatives rejected Blakeman’s accusations, accusing the gubernatorial candidate of exploiting fears about antisemitism for political purposes and encouraging hostility toward Muslims.

The controversy spilled into Tuesday night’s only scheduled gubernatorial debate, when Blakeman was directly questioned about his recorded remarks. He defended his warning and clarified that he was referring to anti-Israel demonstrators who had participated in disruptive protests at universities and elsewhere in New York.

“They are the professional protesters that took over Columbia University, that blocked our bridges and our roadways, and the lawlessness that took place while Kathy Hochul wouldn’t protect Jewish students,” Blakeman said.

He also returned to the 1991 Crown Heights riots, accusing the administration of then-Mayor David Dinkins of failing to intervene quickly enough to halt the violence.

Blakeman argued that elected officials could undermine public safety when they interfere with law enforcement decisions, and he maintained that his concerns about Mamdani stemmed from the mayor’s political positions and his handling of anti-Israel activism.

During the debate, Blakeman explicitly accused Mamdani of antisemitism and anti-Christian bias, accusations that the mayor and his supporters reject.

Hochul challenged Blakeman’s suggestion that Jewish neighborhoods might be left unprotected, arguing that his remarks unfairly questioned the commitment of New York City police officers and Police Commissioner Jessica Tisch.

“He had a secret meeting where he basically said that NYPD, under the leadership of Jessica Tisch, would not respond to this neighborhood if there are women being raped and people being murdered and riots in the street,” Hochul said.

“He would not trust them to show up. I stand with the men and women in blue every day of the week. I know how hard they work. They put their lives on the line. And I support the leadership of Jessica Tisch.”

Blakeman responded that he had confidence in Tisch and praised Mamdani for retaining her as police commissioner despite pressure from some progressive activists to replace her.

“I have a lot of confidence in Jessica Tisch — matter of fact, if there’s a compliment I could give to Zohran Mamdani, it’s in keeping her as the police commissioner,” he said.

The private Williamsburg meeting took place Sunday at the home of prominent Satmar philanthropist Yoely Landau. It was arranged with the involvement of Rav Dovid Katz, executive director of the Israel Heritage Foundation.

Blakeman’s campaign had initially described the gathering as an opportunity to discuss issues affecting Williamsburg families, including housing affordability, the preservation of yeshiva education, school choice and neighborhood safety.

Landau, a well-known supporter of communal institutions and charitable initiatives, has reportedly pledged his support to Blakeman’s gubernatorial campaign.

Mamdani’s administration, meanwhile, has pointed to its own efforts to combat antisemitism, including funding for hate-crime prevention. His supporters argue that political disagreements over Israel should not be treated as evidence that the mayor would tolerate violence against Jewish residents.

The dispute comes shortly after Mamdani faced criticism from Jewish leaders over his statement marking the third anniversary of the October 7 Hamas massacre. Although the mayor condemned Hamas’s atrocities, his decision to also accuse Israel of genocide in Gaza drew objections from Jewish organizations and elected officials who believed the statement diminished the significance of the anniversary.

Blakeman has repeatedly made Mamdani’s relationship with Hochul a central issue in his campaign, arguing that the governor’s political alliance with the mayor reflects broader disagreements over public safety and the handling of antisemitism.

Hochul has defended her administration’s record on protecting Jewish communities, while maintaining that political differences over Israel do not justify questioning the city’s commitment to enforcing the law.

With the November 3 election approaching, the dispute has placed divisions within New York’s Jewish leadership into sharp focus, particularly over how best to address antisemitism and public safety concerns while navigating the state’s increasingly contentious political environment.

A Jewish passenger at London’s Farringdon railway station was allegedly threatened with removal from the station after questioning why an employee was wearing a pro-Palestinian political badge, prompting a supervisor to launch into a confrontation in which he accused Israel of responsibility for much of the October 7 massacre.

The incident, which was captured on video by the passenger, has prompted UK Lawyers for Israel (UKLFI) to demand an urgent disciplinary investigation into the conduct of Thameslink railway employees. The organization has written to Thameslink CEO John Whitehurst, raising concerns that the treatment of the passenger may constitute unlawful harassment under Britain’s Equality Act 2010.

The confrontation reportedly occurred over the weekend when the Jewish passenger noticed a station employee wearing a badge expressing solidarity with Palestine alongside an insignia representing the Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers’ Union (RMT).

WATCH:

The passenger approached railway staff to ask whether employees were permitted to display political symbols while on duty. What began as a question about the company’s uniform and political neutrality policies quickly escalated into a heated exchange.

A station supervisor who identified himself as Simon intervened and defended the employee’s decision to wear the badge, describing it as a “human rights badge” rather than an inappropriate political statement.

During the recorded confrontation, the supervisor allegedly accused Israelis of being “busy massacring civilians” and advanced the claim that most of the Israelis killed during the Hamas-led October 7, 2023, attacks had actually died at the hands of Israeli forces.

He invoked the Israeli military’s controversial Hannibal Directive, a procedure historically associated with efforts to prevent the capture of Israeli soldiers, to support his allegation that Israeli forces were responsible for the deaths of their own citizens.

The claim that the IDF carried out the October 7 massacre is not supported by the established evidence. Hamas terrorists and other Palestinian attackers carried out coordinated assaults on Israeli communities, military installations and a music festival, killing approximately 1,200 people and abducting 251 hostages. Investigations have examined individual incidents of Israeli fire during the chaotic response, but those incidents do not substantiate claims that Israeli forces perpetrated the massacre.

The supervisor reportedly challenged the passenger to explain the destruction of vehicles during the attacks, asking, “How do you explain all the cars and vans that exploded?”

When the passenger pointed to the use of rocket-propelled grenades by Hamas terrorists, the supervisor rejected the explanation and continued arguing that Israeli forces were responsible.

He also accused Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu of disregarding an advance warning about the October 7 attack that he claimed had been received approximately one month earlier.

The passenger challenged the supervisor’s allegations, describing them as false conspiracy theories. Rather than ending the exchange, the supervisor allegedly accused the passenger of harassing railway employees and ordered him to leave the station immediately.

The passenger refused to leave and continued recording the confrontation until a more senior member of the station staff intervened.

According to the account provided to UKLFI, the senior employee acknowledged that railway personnel were not permitted to wear political badges while performing their duties. However, he also insisted that passengers were expected to treat employees respectfully.

UKLFI subsequently sent a formal complaint to Thameslink’s chief executive, arguing that Jewish passengers should be able to use the railway network without being subjected to offensive conspiracy theories or threatened with expulsion for raising legitimate concerns about employee conduct.

The organization asked the company to investigate the behavior of the employees involved, determine whether disciplinary action was warranted and ensure that staff members understand their responsibilities toward Jewish passengers under equality legislation.

The legal concern centers on whether the supervisor’s conduct created an intimidating, hostile or offensive environment connected to the passenger’s Jewish identity, a question that would require consideration of the circumstances and applicable legal standards.

Thameslink responded that it was examining the allegations and reviewing the video footage. The company said it regarded the matter seriously and remained committed to providing a safe and welcoming environment for everyone traveling on its services.

The incident comes amid continuing concern about antisemitism on Britain’s public transportation network. Campaign Against Antisemitism, which obtained footage of the confrontation, said its polling found that 70% of British Jews would feel uncomfortable openly identifying themselves as Jewish while traveling on public transportation.

The organization criticized the politicization of railway services, arguing that displays of political allegiance by employees can leave Jewish passengers feeling intimidated or unwelcome.

UKLFI has raised similar concerns in previous complaints involving London’s transportation system. In one incident in August 2025, a Transport for London supervisor allegedly defended pro-Palestinian graffiti at a railway station rather than addressing a passenger’s complaint about it.

Following earlier complaints, Transport for London confirmed that uniformed employees were prohibited from wearing unauthorized political badges or other nonuniform insignia, although a single official trade union badge was permitted.

The current Thameslink complaint raises the separate question of whether railway employees are following appropriate standards of conduct when responding to passengers who object to political displays.

As of Wednesday, Thameslink had acknowledged the allegations and confirmed that an investigation was underway. No disciplinary findings or sanctions against the employees involved had been publicly announced.

North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un has unveiled a collection of nuclear-capable missiles and advanced weapons systems, including an intercontinental ballistic missile that Pyongyang claims could strike the American mainland, in a provocative display of military power as President Donald Trump considers renewed diplomatic engagement with the communist regime.

The weapons were exhibited at North Korea’s newly established National Defense Revolution Museum, where Kim personally toured displays highlighting the country’s expanding missile arsenal, attack drones and other military technology.

The exhibition comes at a sensitive moment in relations between Washington and Pyongyang, with Trump having raised the possibility of another meeting with Kim despite North Korea’s continued refusal to negotiate the elimination of its nuclear weapons program.

Among the most prominent weapons on display was the Hwasong-20 intercontinental ballistic missile, a system North Korea has presented as a major advancement in its ability to deliver nuclear warheads over extremely long distances.

Although the missile is believed to have the potential to reach the continental United States, it has not undergone a publicly confirmed flight test, leaving important questions about its operational capabilities unanswered.

The museum also features submarine-launched ballistic missiles, a hypersonic short-range missile and an assortment of smaller cruise missiles, reflecting North Korea’s efforts to develop multiple methods of delivering conventional and nuclear weapons.

Attack drones were also included in the exhibition, demonstrating the regime’s growing interest in unmanned military systems alongside its longstanding investment in ballistic missile technology.

Kim reportedly instructed officials to continue expanding the museum and adding new exhibits documenting the country’s military development, according to North Korean state media.

The precise location of the facility has not been publicly disclosed, and it remains unclear whether ordinary North Korean citizens will be permitted to visit.

The timing of the display has attracted attention because Trump has repeatedly expressed interest in reviving personal diplomacy with Kim, whom he met three times during his first presidential term.

Those meetings included the historic 2018 summit in Singapore, a second summit in Hanoi in 2019 and a subsequent encounter at the Demilitarized Zone separating North and South Korea.

Although the meetings marked an unprecedented level of direct engagement between the leaders, they failed to produce an agreement requiring North Korea to dismantle its nuclear arsenal.

Pyongyang has since hardened its position, insisting that its nuclear weapons are essential to national security and rejecting American demands that it abandon them.

North Korean officials have also indicated that they are unwilling to resume negotiations if Washington continues to make denuclearization a prerequisite for improved relations.

The military display also follows renewed diplomatic friction at the United Nations, where the United States, South Korea and Japan reaffirmed their commitment to the denuclearization of North Korea during last month’s General Assembly.

Pyongyang dismissed that objective as a “daydream,” signaling that it has no intention of surrendering the weapons it considers central to the survival of Kim’s regime.

The museum’s inauguration coincided with celebrations marking the 81st anniversary of North Korea’s ruling Workers’ Party. Photographs released by state media showed Kim inspecting the exhibits alongside members of his family, including his daughter, Kim Ju Ae, who has increasingly appeared at major military events.

The Hwasong-20, a solid-fuel intercontinental missile first publicly displayed in 2025, was exhibited alongside its mobile launching vehicle. Solid-fuel missiles can generally be prepared for launch more quickly than liquid-fueled systems, potentially making them more difficult for opposing forces to detect and destroy before firing.

An examination of the museum’s displays identified more than 25 missile-launching vehicles and approximately 15 types of drones and naval weapons, underscoring the breadth of North Korea’s weapons development under Kim’s leadership.

The regime’s military demonstrations have extended well beyond the museum. On Monday, North Korea fired multiple ballistic missiles toward the waters east of the Korean Peninsula, continuing a series of launches that have alarmed neighboring countries.

South Korea’s military reported detecting the launches at approximately 9:20 a.m. from the Pyongyang area, with at least one missile traveling more than 900 kilometers.

The launches came days after South Korea successfully tested its own domestically developed hypersonic weapon, prompting speculation that Pyongyang was attempting to demonstrate that its missile capabilities remain competitive with those of its southern neighbor.

Earlier this month, North Korea also conducted a test of what it described as an intermediate-range hypersonic missile capable of traveling at least five times the speed of sound and maneuvering in ways that could complicate interception.

North Korean authorities claimed the weapon successfully struck a designated target approximately 1,000 kilometers away, although South Korean and Japanese military assessments reported shorter flight distances.

The conflicting assessments prompted Kim’s powerful sister, Kim Yo Jong, to ridicule the missile-tracking capabilities of the two American allies.

“This just serves as a proof of our perfect missile capability,” she said.

Military analysts caution that North Korea’s claims about its hypersonic technology have not been independently verified. Although such weapons are designed to maneuver at extremely high speeds and potentially evade existing missile defenses, questions remain about whether Pyongyang has mastered the guidance, reliability and operational capabilities required for effective deployment.

The growing confrontation has also accelerated military development in South Korea, where President Lee Jae Myung recently oversaw the country’s first publicly demonstrated test of a domestically developed hypersonic weapon.

Seoul has condemned North Korea’s latest ballistic missile launches as violations of United Nations Security Council resolutions and has strengthened its surveillance and intelligence coordination with Washington and Tokyo.

North Korea’s expanding military relationship with Russia has added another complication to the security situation. Pyongyang has supplied Moscow with large quantities of ammunition and ballistic missiles for its war in Ukraine, strengthening ties between the two governments while drawing international concern about potential military and technological cooperation.

Against that backdrop, Trump’s renewed interest in meeting Kim comes as the North Korean leader appears increasingly determined to negotiate from a position of military strength, with an expanding nuclear arsenal and a growing collection of weapons designed to threaten American forces and allies throughout the Pacific.

Millions of Americans receiving Social Security benefits will see their monthly payments increase by 3.6% beginning in January 2027, federal officials announced Wednesday, providing an average increase of approximately $75 a month as retirees and disabled Americans continue struggling with rising prices for food, healthcare, housing and other necessities.

The Social Security Administration said the annual cost-of-living adjustment, commonly known as COLA, will affect approximately 72 million Social Security recipients and nearly 7.3 million people receiving Supplemental Security Income, although some individuals qualify for both programs.

The increase is intended to help beneficiaries maintain their purchasing power as inflation continues to affect household budgets. However, many older Americans say the additional money will provide little meaningful relief, particularly as Medicare expenses, prescription drug costs and property taxes continue climbing.

The announcement comes just weeks before the November midterm elections, with inflation and the cost of living remaining major concerns for voters across the country.

Under the new adjustment, a beneficiary receiving approximately $2,083 a month would see that payment rise by about $75, bringing the monthly benefit to roughly $2,158. Actual increases will vary depending on each recipient’s existing benefit amount.

Social Security Commissioner Frank Bisignano welcomed the adjustment, saying it would provide beneficiaries with “greater financial stability.”

The annual increase is calculated using a federal inflation measure designed to reflect changes in consumer prices. The formula automatically adjusts benefits to account for inflation, although critics argue that it does not adequately reflect the spending patterns of retirees, who often devote a larger portion of their income to healthcare and housing.

The adjustment comes amid renewed inflationary pressures, including higher energy costs. Government figures released last month showed that inflation accelerated in August as gasoline prices rose following renewed military conflict involving the United States and Iran.

The Social Security Administration also announced that the maximum amount of annual earnings subject to Social Security payroll taxes will increase from $184,500 in 2026 to $192,300 in 2027.

The payroll tax, which is paid by workers and their employers, provides the primary funding for Social Security retirement and disability benefits. Earnings above the annual taxable maximum are not subject to the Social Security portion of the payroll tax.

For some retirees, however, the increase in benefits is expected to be largely consumed by higher medical expenses.

Lorrie Ufkin, a 71-year-old retiree living near Rochester, Minnesota, said the additional Social Security income would do little to offset the healthcare costs she and her husband anticipate facing next year.

Ufkin expressed concern about the scheduled expiration of a temporary Medicare Part D subsidy program at the end of 2026, which she expects will result in higher prescription drug and insurance expenses.

Although the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services has projected relatively modest premium increases for most beneficiaries, Ufkin said her family’s individual circumstances could produce much larger expenses.

The COLA “doesn’t even meet what they’re going to do for changes to Medicare,” she told The Associated Press.

According to Ufkin, a medication taken by both her and her husband is expected to increase in price from $11 per monthly prescription to $200 per prescription.

She described the anticipated increase as “catastrophic.”

Advocates for older Americans say such concerns illustrate why even a relatively substantial annual adjustment may fail to improve the financial circumstances of retirees living on fixed incomes.

AARP CEO Dr. Myechia Minter-Jordan warned that many seniors are entering 2027 with limited savings and growing anxiety about their ability to meet everyday expenses.

“There’s a lot on the line financially right now for older Americans — one in five have no retirement savings, and more people feel financially insecure this year than last. That makes Social Security’s cost-of-living adjustment critically important,” she said.

Another retiree, 68-year-old Jaime Jakubczak of Buffalo, New York, said he had been forced to return to work after retiring at age 55 because his expenses had become increasingly difficult to manage.

Jakubczak pointed particularly to property taxes, which he said have become a significant burden. His community is considering an additional 3.9% property tax increase, further reducing the benefit of the Social Security adjustment.

He described the 3.6% increase as “a pittance,” arguing that the higher payments would be quickly absorbed by rising prices for groceries, gasoline, healthcare and local taxes.

“We were getting ahead a little bit with the COLA based on inflation, but the inflation is so high that it doesn’t offset what our COLA allowance is,” he said.

A September survey conducted by AARP found widespread skepticism among older Americans about whether the annual Social Security increase would adequately compensate for inflation.

Approximately three-quarters of respondents age 50 and older disagreed with the suggestion that a 3.5% adjustment for 2027 would be enough to keep pace with rising consumer prices.

Beyond the immediate debate over the size of the increase, Social Security faces a much larger financial challenge that Congress has yet to resolve.

According to the program’s June 2026 trustees’ report, Social Security’s combined retirement and disability trust fund reserves are projected to run out in 2034 if lawmakers fail to enact changes.

At that point, continuing payroll tax revenue and other income would be sufficient to pay approximately 83% of scheduled benefits, potentially leaving millions of retirees facing significant reductions in their expected payments.

The outlook is even more pressing for the trust fund specifically responsible for retirement and survivor benefits. That fund is projected to exhaust its reserves in 2032, when incoming revenue would cover approximately 78% of scheduled payments.

Lawmakers from both parties have proposed various measures to strengthen Social Security’s finances, although no comprehensive solution has been enacted.

Among the proposals is legislation supported by Democratic Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts and Republican Sen. Bernie Moreno of Ohio that would increase the amount of earnings subject to Social Security payroll taxes.

The senators argued in a June opinion article that eliminating the existing taxable earnings ceiling and treating higher incomes similarly to other wages “would generate substantial revenue that would extend the solvency of Social Security for another generation.”

The proposal would represent a major change to the current financing system, under which earnings above the annual payroll tax cap are exempt from Social Security taxes.

The Peterson Foundation has estimated that eliminating the ceiling could generate approximately $3 trillion in additional revenue over a decade.

Such proposals remain politically contentious, particularly among Republicans who have traditionally opposed tax increases on higher-income Americans.

Recent administrations have also approved measures intended to provide additional financial relief to retirees, although some of those changes have added to the program’s long-term financial obligations.

Under legislation enacted during Trump’s presidency, Americans age 65 and older became eligible for a temporary additional federal income tax deduction, subject to income limitations.

The deduction applies to eligible taxpayers’ income generally, rather than exclusively to Social Security benefits. As a result, retirees whose incomes are already too low to generate federal income tax liability may receive little or no benefit from the provision.

Americans who begin collecting Social Security before age 65 are also ineligible for the age-based deduction, while higher-income retirees may be excluded because of the provision’s income restrictions.

Separately, legislation signed by President Joe Biden in January 2025 eliminated the Windfall Elimination Provision and Government Pension Offset, two longstanding federal rules that had reduced Social Security benefits for certain retirees receiving public-sector pensions.

That change increased payments for approximately 2.8 million Americans, including retired teachers, firefighters, police officers and other public employees whose benefits had previously been reduced.

For recipients preparing for the 2027 increase, the Social Security Administration says personalized notices detailing new benefit amounts will become available online beginning in late November, with mailed notices following in December.

Recipients who maintain a personal my Social Security account can review their adjusted benefits electronically. The agency has also encouraged beneficiaries to enroll in digital notifications by November 18 to receive their information earlier.

The higher payments will begin in January for Social Security beneficiaries, while individuals receiving Supplemental Security Income will receive their first increased payment on December 31, 2026.

The Trump administration announced Wednesday that it has eliminated federally subsidized Obamacare coverage for approximately 189,000 individuals identified as either deceased or already enrolled in other government healthcare programs, a move officials estimate will save American taxpayers roughly $1.5 billion over the coming year.

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services said the latest action is part of a sweeping effort to eliminate improper payments under the Affordable Care Act and ensure that federal subsidies are directed only toward individuals who qualify for assistance.

Federal officials said the affected enrollments included individuals who were simultaneously receiving coverage through Medicare, Medicaid or the Children’s Health Insurance Program, as well as people whose records indicated they had died.

The announcement represents another phase of President Donald Trump’s campaign to reduce waste, fraud and abuse in federally funded healthcare programs, with administration officials blaming years of suspended eligibility reviews under President Joe Biden for allowing hundreds of thousands of questionable enrollments to accumulate.

CMS Administrator Dr. Mehmet Oz sharply criticized the previous administration’s handling of enrollment verification, arguing that the failure to conduct routine checks allowed improper payments to continue at taxpayers’ expense.

“When it comes to program integrity, the Biden Administration was sleeping on the job,” Oz said in a statement released by CMS.

“They paused looking for duplicate Medicaid and Obamacare coverage for four years, creating a backlog of hundreds of thousands of duplicate enrollments.”

According to CMS, the Biden administration suspended periodic reviews designed to identify overlapping Medicaid and Affordable Care Act enrollment between 2021 and 2024, leaving federal officials with a substantial backlog of cases requiring verification.

The Trump administration reinstated those reviews in 2025, when CMS identified approximately 551,000 individuals who were receiving Obamacare subsidies despite already having Medicaid coverage.

Federal officials estimate that terminating those overlapping subsidies produced nearly $4.4 billion in savings during the previous year.

Combined with the projected $1.5 billion in savings from Wednesday’s announcement, the administration says its efforts have already identified almost $6 billion in taxpayer savings across the two rounds of enforcement.

“We’ve already saved nearly $6 billion, and we will continue to work hard to restore taxpayers’ confidence that the programs they fund are spending their hard-earned dollars wisely and efficiently,” Oz said.

Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. defended the crackdown as a necessary step toward preserving federal healthcare assistance for eligible Americans while preventing the government from paying multiple times for overlapping coverage.

“Americans overwhelmingly support protecting access to healthcare for vulnerable Americans, but taxpayers shouldn’t pay twice for the same coverage,” Kennedy said.

The administration says its procedures include safeguards intended to protect eligible Americans from losing assistance because of errors in government records.

Individuals identified as receiving overlapping coverage are notified of the discrepancy and given 30 days to challenge the determination before their Affordable Care Act subsidies are discontinued.

Those who miss the initial deadline may still appeal the decision or demonstrate that their Medicaid or CHIP coverage is ending, potentially allowing them to regain eligibility for subsidized Marketplace insurance.

Similar protections apply when government databases incorrectly list a living individual as deceased. Federal officials contact the person or the individual’s estate and provide an opportunity to correct the record before terminating the subsidy and associated coverage.

Additional details released Wednesday indicate that the latest enforcement effort includes approximately 120,000 people with overlapping Medicaid coverage, 58,000 with Medicare coverage and 11,000 listed as deceased. Federal officials expect to identify approximately 3,500 additional cases before the end of October.

Health officials estimate that the latest actions will prevent approximately $738 million in improper payments during 2026, with annual savings potentially exceeding $1.5 billion thereafter.

The administration emphasized that the savings estimates concern payments to insurance companies for subsidized Marketplace policies. The identification of duplicate coverage does not necessarily mean that the affected individuals personally committed fraud.

Federal authorities have also been investigating improper Obamacare enrollments involving inaccurate income information and allegations that insurance brokers enrolled consumers in health plans without their knowledge or authorization.

The latest announcement follows a separate initiative launched by the White House Fraud Task Force in September, when officials moved to terminate more than 750,000 Affordable Care Act enrollments they identified as potentially fraudulent.

That earlier effort was projected to save approximately $2.2 billion and was presented as another major component of the administration’s campaign to strengthen eligibility verification.

Vice President JD Vance, who helped announce the September initiative, said the government was taking steps to ensure that federal healthcare subsidies were being distributed only to people who qualified for them.

“We’re actually making sure that people receiving Obamacare subsidies are actually entitled to receive them,” Vance said.

“Amazingly, we weren’t doing that before.”

CMS is also preparing additional enrollment-verification measures, including a requirement beginning in January 2027 for states to check Medicaid beneficiaries’ addresses as part of efforts to identify inaccurate or outdated enrollment information.

Violent confrontations broke out near Bnei Brak on Wednesday evening when dozens of extremist anti-draft demonstrators attempted to enter a military facility housing an IDF unit that oversees the integration of chareidi soldiers into the army. Police deployed substantial forces to the location to prevent the protesters from breaching the building, arresting two participants amid the disturbances.

The confrontation unfolded as demonstrators gathered outside the compound and attempted to push their way past security into the facility. Officers were dispatched to secure the premises, disperse the protesters and prevent further attempts to enter the building.

Police remained at the scene throughout the evening, working to restore order as tensions continued around the military installation.

The latest incident follows similar disturbances at the same location last week, when anti-draft activists also attempted to gain entry to the compound. The repeated confrontations have intensified concerns over the increasingly volatile demonstrations surrounding the enlistment of chareidi yeshiva students.

Activists associated with the Jerusalem Faction, which has organized numerous demonstrations against military conscription, have been involved in protests opposing the IDF’s efforts to recruit members of the chareidi community.

The facility targeted Wednesday houses a military unit tasked with facilitating the enlistment and integration of chareidi recruits, making it a focal point for demonstrators opposed to the army’s recruitment initiatives.

The unrest comes against the backdrop of the continuing controversy over the draft of yeshiva students, an issue that has generated widespread protests and political disputes over the status of bnei yeshiva and the government’s efforts to address military manpower requirements.

The attempted intrusion drew sharp criticism from political figures, including Yisrael Beytenu chairman MK Avigdor Liberman, who issued a strongly worded denunciation of the protesters on social media.

“At this very moment, dozens of draft evaders are attempting to force their way into a military base,” Liberman wrote on X.

He called for an aggressive law enforcement response, describing the attempt to enter the military facility as an act warranting immediate arrests and imprisonment.

“Anyone who tries to break into an IDF base is simply a terrorist. They must all be arrested immediately and thrown in jail,” he declared.

The rabbonim of Yeshivas Knesses Yechezkel in Elad have taken the unusual step of vacating their own rooms to make space for bochurim after a significant increase in enrollment left the yeshiva struggling with overcrowded facilities at the beginning of the winter zeman.

The shortage of space developed as the yeshiva welcomed a growing number of talmidim while awaiting the arrival of additional buildings intended to accommodate its expanding student body. Unexpected delays in delivering the new structures have created serious difficulties in providing adequate living and learning accommodations.

Faced with the shortage, members of the yeshiva’s rabbinic staff relinquished their personal rooms so that the available space could be used by the bochurim.

The yeshiva administration is hopeful that the new buildings will arrive within the coming weeks, providing much-needed relief and allowing the talmidim to return to more comfortable living and learning arrangements.

In the meantime, the administration sought to express its appreciation to the bochurim for their patience and dedication to learning despite the difficult conditions.

Each bochur received an individually packaged pastry and a bottle of water, accompanied by a special letter of appreciation and encouragement from the rosh yeshiva, Rav Boruch Mordechai Ettinger.

Rav Ettinger personally signed the letter, praising the talmidim for their commitment to Torah learning despite the cramped conditions and the challenges they have encountered.

The rosh yeshiva emphasized the significance of their continued dedication to learning under difficult circumstances, expressing admiration for the perseverance they have demonstrated during the opening weeks of the winter zeman.

He also expressed hope that the housing shortage would soon be resolved and that the temporary logistical difficulties would not interfere with the continuity or quality of Torah learning in the yeshiva.

{Matzav.com}

President Donald Trump warned Wednesday that Iran would launch nuclear attacks against countries in the Middle East, Europe and potentially the United States within 24 hours of acquiring a nuclear weapon, while predicting that the ongoing war with Tehran would soon come to an end. The president also left open the possibility of additional American military strikes, despite previously indicating that further action would be delayed until after the November 3 midterm elections.

Addressing supporters at a campaign rally in Arizona, Trump portrayed Iran’s leadership as having been devastated by successive American military operations, claiming that repeated strikes had eliminated multiple tiers of senior Iranian officials.

“Their first level leaders are gone, they picked a second level. Their second level leaders are gone, they picked a third level. Half of them are gone. They made me promise not to take out any more and I did. I promised them. But nobody wants to be the president of the Islamic Republic of Iran,” Trump asserted.

Trump: "If Iran had a nuclear weapon, within 24 hours they would use it … they'll start hitting us on the west coast … so this is a very small price people pay. I thought it would go up much higher." pic.twitter.com/mfMt1GvxCR

— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) October 14, 2026

Trump suggested that the conflict was approaching its conclusion, although he did not provide a specific timetable or explain what conditions would bring the fighting to an end.

“That’s going to end very soon.”

The president then issued one of his strongest warnings yet about the consequences of allowing Tehran to obtain nuclear weapons, arguing that the Iranian regime would immediately use such weapons against its enemies.

“if [Iran] had a nuclear weapon, within 24 hours they would use it. They’ll knock out the Middle East, then they’ll start hitting us on the West Coast. They’ll hit Europe – because they’re crazy. They’re crazy people,” Trump said.

Trump maintained that preventing Iran from becoming a nuclear power remained the central justification for the American military campaign, describing the danger of allowing the regime to possess a weapon capable of causing catastrophic casualties.

He said the United States had intervened “because you don’t want them to have a weapon that can blow up millions of people in one shot.”

The remarks came as uncertainty continued over whether Washington would launch another round of attacks against Iranian targets before Americans head to the polls next month.

Trump had announced last Thursday on Truth Social that the United States would refrain from carrying out additional strikes against Iran until after the November 3 elections. His subsequent statements, however, have suggested that the administration could reconsider that timetable.

Speaking to reporters Monday, the president indicated that military decisions involving Iran would be determined by developments on the ground rather than the American election calendar.

At a campaign appearance in Alaska on Tuesday evening, Trump went further, telling supporters that the Iranian regime could soon face another major American military operation.

“Oh, wait till you see what we do to Iran. We’re going to do a number. Wait till you see,” he told supporters.

“They’re just waiting. They’re waiting. Wait till you see what we do to Iran, because we’ve sort of had it. You know, we’ve had it,” Trump continued.

The president also repeated his insistence that Iran would never be permitted to acquire nuclear weapons, pointing to the destruction of Iranian nuclear infrastructure during previous American strikes.

“But, you know, it doesn’t matter. The big thing is they were not going to have a nuclear weapon, and they won’t. That’s buried under thousands of tons of rock.”

Earlier Tuesday, Trump told reporters outside the White House that his administration was nearing a decision on how to proceed with Iran, emphasizing what he described as the country’s worsening financial and military condition.

“They have no economy. They have 300% inflation. They have no money. They’re not paying their troops. They’re not paying anybody. We’ll make a decision on Iran very soon,” Trump said.

The president characterized Iran as a “failed country,” arguing that the regime’s economic difficulties had further weakened its ability to sustain the conflict.

President Donald Trump announced Wednesday that preparations are underway for a massive expansion of oil, natural gas and mineral exploration in Greenland, pointing to what he described as extraordinary untapped energy reserves beneath the Arctic island as the United States moves to strengthen both its economic and military presence in the region.

The announcement comes approximately one month after Washington, Denmark and Greenland reached a landmark agreement expanding American military operations on the island while preserving Danish sovereignty and Greenland’s right to determine its own political future.

Writing on Truth Social, Trump said that “massive” exploration activities were being prepared and suggested that Greenland could possess some of the world’s most accessible petroleum reserves.

The president offered no specific timetable for the proposed exploration, nor did he identify the companies expected to participate, the locations under consideration or the financial arrangements being developed.

However, he pointed to assessments suggesting that Greenland’s energy potential could be substantially greater than previously recognized.

Trump said “there are experts that are saying that ⁠the amount of easily available oil is ​far greater than that of almost any land, ⁠anywhere in the world.”

The remarks represent another significant development in Trump’s longstanding interest in Greenland, which has emerged as a major focus of his administration’s Arctic strategy because of its geographic location, natural resources and growing importance to American national security.

The island occupies a strategically important position between North America and Europe, making it a critical location for monitoring military activity across the North Atlantic and detecting potential threats approaching the United States from the Arctic.

Trump underscored that importance in his Wednesday statement, linking the expanded American presence in Greenland to his administration’s plans for a more advanced national missile defense system.

“Any future ‌attack on the United States will have to come across Greenland, where our Defense ⁠will routinely knock ‌down drones, missiles, ⁠or any other form of weapon not yet ⁠even conceived,” Trump wrote.

The president’s comments follow the September agreement between the United States, Denmark and Greenland, which was intended to resolve months of diplomatic tensions generated by Trump’s repeated demands for greater American control over the territory.

Under the arrangement, Washington is expected to expand its military footprint in Greenland, including the establishment of two additional American military bases and infrastructure connected to the proposed Golden Dome missile defense system.

At the same time, the agreement reaffirms that Greenland remains under Danish sovereignty and recognizes the right of Greenlanders to determine their own political future.

The agreement builds on decades of American military activity in Greenland, where the United States already operates Pituffik Space Base, formerly known as Thule Air Base.

The installation, located in northwestern Greenland, supports missile warning, missile defense and space surveillance operations. Approximately 200 American military personnel are currently stationed there, a much smaller presence than the thousands of U.S. troops deployed across numerous installations during the Cold War.

Under the new security arrangement, the United States is preparing to expand its presence beyond Pituffik, with plans for additional facilities at Narsarsuaq in southern Greenland and Mestersvig in the east.

The September agreement also includes restrictions designed to prevent countries outside NATO and other approved partnerships from gaining sensitive military or strategic economic footholds on the island. Those provisions are particularly relevant as Washington seeks to counter growing Chinese and Russian influence in the Arctic.

Greenland’s mineral wealth is another major factor behind American interest. The island contains deposits of rare earth elements and other critical minerals used in military equipment, electronics, batteries and advanced manufacturing.

American policymakers have increasingly sought alternative sources of those materials as the United States attempts to reduce its dependence on China, which dominates important portions of the global rare earth supply chain.

However, the president’s announcement leaves several major questions unresolved.

Greenland’s government halted the issuance of new oil and gas exploration licenses in 2021, citing environmental concerns and the economic risks associated with petroleum development. The September security agreement did not grant the United States new rights to explore or extract Greenland’s natural resources.

Commercial development also presents considerable practical difficulties. Much of Greenland is covered by an enormous ice sheet, while its remote geography, severe weather, limited transportation infrastructure and high operating costs have complicated previous efforts to develop oil fields and mineral deposits.

The U.S. Geological Survey has identified potentially substantial offshore oil and natural gas resources, but those estimates do not establish how much petroleum could be extracted profitably.

One American company has been exploring the possibility of drilling in Greenland under previously issued permits, with activity potentially beginning in 2027. That project, however, is considerably smaller than the large-scale exploration effort described by Trump.

Greenland’s deputy mining minister, Jørgen Hammeken-Holm, indicated Wednesday that although resource development initiatives are being pursued, the territory remains far from the kind of extensive exploration and production envisioned by the president.

Trump’s announcement nevertheless generated immediate interest among investors, with shares of several companies connected to Greenland’s energy and mining industries rising sharply following his statement.

The administration has presented its Greenland strategy as part of a broader effort to strengthen American energy independence, secure critical minerals and establish a more formidable military position in the Arctic.

Whether Wednesday’s announcement leads to new drilling permits, major investments or actual resource production will depend on further negotiations with Greenlandic authorities, commercial feasibility studies and the willingness of private companies to commit substantial capital to projects in one of the world’s most challenging operating environments.

America’s nine largest federally regulated banks maintained policies that restricted financial services based on customers’ political views, religious beliefs or involvement in lawful industries, according to a major federal investigation released Wednesday that uncovered widespread concerns about politically motivated discrimination in the banking system.

The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency found that all nine institutions had policies in place at various points between 2020 and September 2025 that could prevent individuals, organizations and businesses from obtaining banking services for reasons unrelated to their financial qualifications.

The findings, released as part of an investigation ordered by President Donald Trump, detail instances in which financial institutions closed accounts, rejected credit applications or restricted business relationships involving conservative organizations, religious nonprofits and companies operating in politically controversial industries.

The investigation examined the practices of JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Citibank, Wells Fargo, U.S. Bank, Capital One, PNC, TD Bank and BMO Bank.

Comptroller of the Currency Jonathan Gould sharply criticized the findings, arguing that major financial institutions had improperly used their control over banking services to exclude customers whose beliefs or activities were considered objectionable.

“Today’s report provides irrefutable evidence that the nation’s largest banks have denied, debanked and discriminated against customers and lawful businesses,” Gould said in a statement accompanying the report.

The investigation was conducted under an executive order issued by Trump directing federal regulators to examine whether financial institutions had denied banking services to Americans because of their political affiliations, religious convictions or participation in lawful commercial activities.

Federal investigators reviewed nearly 100,000 complaints and approximately 420,000 pages of internal banking records, providing regulators with an extensive collection of information about how financial institutions evaluated customers and determined which businesses they would serve.

Among the most striking examples involved WePay, a payment-processing company previously owned by JPMorgan Chase, which terminated accounts belonging to merchants selling merchandise supporting Trump and the Make America Great Again movement.

According to the findings, WePay’s screening procedures identified politically associated terms, including “MAGA,” “Make America Great,” and “America First,” as potential grounds for additional scrutiny or account restrictions.

The processor also closed accounts connected to conservative religious organizations, including an organization that had been designated an extremist group by the Southern Poverty Law Center.

Another case involved PNC, where internal communications reportedly showed employees objecting to the political views of a media company’s owners while the bank was considering a request for credit.

The company was ultimately denied a line of credit after employees raised concerns about the owners’ publicly expressed conservative positions.

One PNC employee wrote that the business owners held views “very contrary to PNC’s beliefs/values.”

The report also described allegations involving Wells Fargo, which reportedly pressured a payment-processing company to discontinue its relationship with a religious nonprofit because of the organization’s position on same-sex marriage.

Wells Fargo additionally declined lending opportunities involving firearms-related businesses amid concerns about possible pressure from the Biden administration.

Other institutions imposed restrictions affecting entire categories of otherwise lawful businesses.

Bank of America limited relationships with companies involved in operating private prisons, while various banks maintained restrictions affecting the oil and gas industry, coal companies, firearms businesses and digital-asset firms.

The investigation indicated that political and ideological considerations sometimes became intertwined with financial institutions’ assessments of reputational and regulatory risk, raising questions about whether customers were being evaluated on legitimate banking criteria or on the acceptability of their views and activities.

Although conservative and religious organizations featured prominently in the report, investigators also identified examples involving organizations associated with liberal political causes.

Capital One, for example, declined to provide services to an abortion-rights organization as well as a gun-rights advocacy group, reportedly because of concerns that maintaining those relationships could be interpreted as endorsing the organizations’ positions.

The findings suggest that the issue extended beyond any single political movement, with banks at times avoiding customers whose activities or beliefs were considered controversial.

The OCC acknowledged that its investigation could not establish the complete number of customers affected by discriminatory banking practices or calculate the total financial losses suffered by individuals and businesses denied access to services.

The regulator also distinguished between legitimate financial risk assessments and decisions influenced by subjective judgments about a customer’s reputation, political associations or lawful activities.

JPMorgan Chase responded to the findings by acknowledging problems with WePay’s previous screening practices. The bank said those procedures did not meet its standards and had been corrected before the payment-processing operation was discontinued.

All nine banks informed regulators that they had modified their policies following increased scrutiny of their account restrictions and customer-screening procedures.

Nevertheless, Gould warned that voluntary changes might not be sufficient to prevent similar practices from recurring.

“Notwithstanding certain efforts by the largest banks to rein in these practices, I am not confident that they will be enough,” Gould said, indicating that the OCC would examine further changes to its regulatory and supervisory framework.

The agency has already taken steps to remove broad reputational-risk considerations from certain bank examinations, revise how potentially improper account closures are evaluated during regulatory reviews, and improve the handling of customer complaints.

A separate federal investigation is also being launched by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau to determine whether banks violated consumer financial protection laws through their account-closure and lending practices.

Acting CFPB Director Mark Paoletta condemned the conduct described in the report, saying that financial institutions should not be permitted to penalize Americans for their personal convictions.

“It is appalling that these banks targeted American consumers for their political, social, or religious beliefs,” Paoletta said.

The findings could lead to additional regulatory action as the Trump administration seeks to establish stricter protections against politically or religiously motivated banking restrictions.

Gould emphasized that financial institutions must make decisions based on legitimate banking considerations rather than ideological preferences.

“Fair access to financial services is not a mantra — it is a mandate,” he said.

The IDF announced Wednesday that its 99th Division has concluded a four-month military operation in northern Gaza, during which Israeli forces eliminated more than 100 terrorists, destroyed approximately eight kilometers of underground tunnels and dismantled numerous Hamas military installations.

According to the military, the operation dealt a significant blow to Hamas’s remaining infrastructure in the area, with troops targeting both active terrorist positions and facilities that could be used to rebuild the organization’s fighting capabilities.

Among those eliminated were Hamas terrorists who participated in the October 7, 2023, massacre, individuals involved in holding Israeli hostages captive in Gaza, and terrorists who attempted to plant explosive devices intended to kill or injure IDF soldiers.

The division conducted its operations east of the Yellow Line, concentrating on identifying and destroying terrorist infrastructure above and below ground while preventing Hamas from reestablishing operational positions in the region.

Throughout the four-month deployment, soldiers uncovered and dismantled a network of underground passages extending approximately eight kilometers, or nearly five miles. The tunnels formed part of the infrastructure used by terrorist operatives to move through the area, conceal their activities and prepare attacks against Israeli forces.

The IDF said troops also located and destroyed a Hamas observation and command center that had been used to monitor military activity and coordinate terrorist operations.

Additional structures identified during the operation included buildings used by Hamas operatives to organize attacks and prepare assaults against IDF soldiers stationed in northern Gaza.

The military said its forces encountered terrorists attempting to threaten Israeli positions, including operatives involved in preparing explosive devices for use against troops operating in the area.

The operation formed part of the IDF’s continuing effort to prevent Hamas from restoring the military capabilities it developed before the October 7 attacks, particularly its extensive tunnel system and network of fortified positions.

Israeli military officials have repeatedly identified the destruction of Hamas’s underground infrastructure as a central objective, given the terrorist organization’s reliance on tunnels for movement, concealment, weapons storage and attacks against Israeli forces.

With the 99th Division having completed its assignment, responsibility for continued IDF operations in the sector will pass to the 162nd Division, which will maintain the military’s activities against remaining terrorist threats in northern Gaza.

Colombia officially opened its embassy in Yerushalayim on Wednesday, becoming the tenth country to establish a diplomatic mission in Israel’s capital and marking a dramatic turnaround in relations between the two nations following a two-year diplomatic break.

The opening represents a significant achievement for Israel’s diplomatic efforts, coming just months after Colombia restored relations with the Jewish state following the election of President Abelardo de la Espriella, who had pledged during his campaign to move the country’s embassy to Yerushalayim.

Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar and Colombian Foreign Minister Omar Bula Escobar participated in the inauguration ceremony, during which the embassy’s official sign was unveiled and Sa’ar affixed a mezuzah to the entrance of the building.

Sa’ar hailed the development as another major step in Israel’s efforts to secure international recognition of Yerushalayim as its capital, noting that the number of foreign embassies in the city has doubled during his tenure.

“This is the tenth embassy to open in Jerusalem. When I took office less than two years ago, there were only five. This is an important milestone and a major diplomatic achievement,” Sa’ar said.

The foreign minister praised Colombia’s new president for following through on a commitment he had made before winning the election.

“Colombia’s President, Abelardo de la Espriella, told me long before his election: ‘If I am elected President, I will immediately move Colombia’s embassy to Jerusalem.’ He made a promise, and he kept it.”

Sa’ar emphasized that the decision carries significance beyond the formal recognition of Israel’s seat of government, describing it as an acknowledgment of the Jewish people’s longstanding connection to their capital.

“Opening an embassy in Jerusalem is not only recognition of the simple political fact that Jerusalem is Israel’s capital. It is also recognition of a historical truth that no honest person can deny,” Sa’ar added.

Colombian Foreign Minister Bula described the inauguration as an important step toward repairing the relationship between the countries, saying that the previous diplomatic rupture should never have occurred.

“Today, we are taking a concrete step towards restoring diplomatic relations between our countries, relations that should never have been broken. Israel is a strategic partner. It always has been, and from now on, it will be an even stronger one,” he said.

The ceremony follows a sharp reversal in Colombia’s foreign policy since the departure of President Gustavo Petro, whose administration severed diplomatic relations with Israel in May 2024 in protest of the war against Hamas in Gaza.

Under Petro, Colombia withdrew its ambassador, shut down its embassy in Tel Aviv and suspended several areas of cooperation with Israel. The measures brought a halt to a longstanding relationship that had included substantial economic, security and technological partnerships.

Diplomatic relations were formally restored in August 2026 under President de la Espriella, setting the stage for Wednesday’s embassy opening and a broader effort to rebuild ties between the two governments.

The renewed relationship also received an economic boost on Tuesday, when Israel and Colombia reinstated their free trade agreement, reversing another decision made during Petro’s presidency.

Colombia’s Foreign Ministry issued a statement welcoming the embassy’s inauguration and highlighting the president’s fulfillment of his election pledge. Officials said the new diplomatic mission would serve as a center for expanding cooperation in trade, security, investment, agriculture, scientific research and technology.

The embassy will also provide consular services to Colombian citizens living in or visiting Israel.

Ambassador Tania Gilinski will lead the diplomatic mission and oversee efforts to translate the restored relationship into practical agreements, commercial partnerships and new opportunities for cooperation.

Bula’s visit to Israel, which began October 13 and is scheduled to continue through October 16, includes discussions with senior government officials as well as meetings with representatives of Israel’s technology and innovation industries.

The Colombian foreign minister is also scheduled to meet with families of Colombian citizens murdered in the Hamas terrorist attacks of October 7, 2023, along with survivors of the massacre.

His itinerary includes a meeting with Elkana Bohbot, an Israeli citizen who also holds Colombian citizenship and was held hostage by Hamas in Gaza.

Israeli and Colombian officials are now working to broaden their cooperation in several strategic fields, including defense technology, cybersecurity, artificial intelligence, agricultural development and water management.

Colombia is additionally seeking to expand its commercial presence in Israel, with particular interest in increasing exports of coffee, flowers, agricultural commodities, chemicals and other products.

Four bochurim from the Chevron Yeshiva were released Wednesday after being stopped by police on Highway 1 near Shaar Hagai, despite the reported arrival of military police who had been summoned to take them into custody over their military service status.

The incident occurred as the four bochurim were traveling toward Yerushalayim, setting off a tense confrontation that threatened to trigger widespread demonstrations by opponents of the government’s ongoing arrests of bnei yeshivos.

According to Hebrew media reports, police stopped the vehicle carrying the bochurim and began checking their identities. The officers reportedly discovered that the four were listed as wanted by military authorities because of their failure to report for military service.

Military police were subsequently called to the location to take custody of the bochurim.

Word of the developing situation quickly spread through telephone hotlines used by chareidi activists to publicize arrests and organize demonstrations against the military draft.

The reports prompted concern among police that large numbers of protesters could descend on the area, potentially disrupting traffic along Highway 1, one of Israel’s busiest transportation routes.

Despite the arrival of military police, the four bochurim were ultimately permitted to leave without being transferred into military custody.

The circumstances surrounding the decision remain unclear, although the Hebrew report attributed the release to concerns about the possibility of major protests.

Israeli police have not publicly confirmed that fear of demonstrations was the reason the bochurim were released.

The incident comes amid continuing tensions between the government and the chareidi community over the enforcement of military service requirements for yeshiva students.

In recent months, military police have intensified efforts to locate and arrest bochurim who have failed to comply with draft-related orders.

The arrests have triggered repeated demonstrations in Yerushalayim, Bnei Brak and other chareidi communities, with protesters blocking major highways and gathering outside military facilities.

The Chevron Yeshiva, one of Eretz Yisroel’s most prominent Litvishe yeshivos, has thousands of talmidim and alumni and occupies a central place in the Torah world.

The detention of four of its bochurim therefore carried the potential to generate an especially strong reaction among yeshiva students and supporters.

According to the reports, the incident ended without any of the four bochurim being arrested or transferred to military custody. They were allowed to continue toward Yerushalayim.

The release comes amid increasing pressure on Israeli authorities to enforce military service requirements against yeshiva students classified as draft evaders.

Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara has called for renewed enforcement measures, including proactive arrests of individuals wanted by military authorities.

Those demands have intensified concerns throughout the yeshiva world that bochurim could be detained during routine encounters with police, including traffic stops and identity checks.

Wednesday’s incident illustrates how quickly such encounters can develop into potential flashpoints. Although military police reportedly arrived to take custody of the four students, the attempted transfer was abandoned after news of the situation spread through chareidi protest networks.

The accounts published by Emess and JDN attribute the decision to concerns about demonstrations, but neither establishes that police formally acknowledged that explanation.

No arrests were reported, and the four Chevron Yeshiva bochurim continued on their way.

A prominent hotel in Dublin has come under fire after allegedly canceling reservations for 70 rooms booked for participants in an international conference devoted to combating antisemitism, with Jewish community leaders claiming the hotel withdrew the accommodations after discovering the purpose of the gathering.

The incident involved the Herbert Park Hotel in Dublin’s Ballsbridge neighborhood, where rooms had reportedly been reserved for delegates attending a major European conference bringing together officials responsible for addressing antisemitism.

According to Maurice Cohen, chairman of the Jewish Representative Council of Ireland, the hotel initially accepted the group reservation but subsequently reversed its decision after learning that the guests would be participating in an antisemitism conference.

Cohen disclosed the incident during a reception hosted at Ireland’s Department of Foreign Affairs, where participants and dignitaries had gathered in connection with the international meeting.

The gathering brought together special envoys and coordinators responsible for combating antisemitism from European Union member states, along with other officials involved in addressing threats against Jewish communities.

Cohen said the hotel had also inquired whether the conference had any connection to the Israel Defense Forces, a question he regarded as particularly troubling given that the gathering was a civilian diplomatic event devoted to confronting antisemitism.

The reported cancellation forced organizers to make alternative arrangements for the visiting delegates.

The circumstances have prompted criticism from Jewish community representatives, who questioned why a hotel would withdraw accommodations for an event dedicated to fighting hatred and discrimination.

The conference was the 15th meeting of the Special Envoys and Coordinators Combating Antisemitism, a gathering involving officials from across Europe who work on government responses to antisemitic incidents, Jewish communal security and related policy issues.

Such meetings provide a forum for officials to exchange information, discuss emerging threats and coordinate efforts to protect Jewish communities.

The Dublin gathering took place against a backdrop of growing concern over antisemitism in Ireland and elsewhere in Europe, particularly following the October 7, 2023, Hamas massacre in Israel and the subsequent war.

Jewish organizations have reported heightened hostility toward Jewish institutions and individuals, including incidents involving harassment, intimidation and antisemitic rhetoric.

Ireland has also experienced significant political tensions surrounding Israel, with government officials taking strongly critical positions toward Israeli military operations and the broader conflict.

Cohen’s account of the hotel incident has therefore attracted particular attention because it involves a gathering specifically organized to address antisemitism.

According to the Jewish community leader, the hotel’s questions about possible IDF involvement suggested that its decision may have been influenced by concerns unrelated to the actual purpose of the conference.

However, the hotel has not publicly confirmed that the reservation was canceled because the event concerned antisemitism, and the precise reason for its decision remains disputed.

When approached by reporters Tuesday evening, a hotel manager declined to comment on the allegations.

Additional details have now emerged about the circumstances surrounding the cancellation, including correspondence between the hotel and conference organizers.

According to former Irish Justice Minister Alan Shatter, the hotel confirmed the reservation in April, and organizers met with management on May 7 to discuss conference arrangements.

Following that meeting, management informed the organizers by email on May 8 that the hotel would no longer host the event.

“Further to our meeting and after careful consideration, I’m afraid higher management had decided that we won’t be able to host the event at the hotel on this occasion,” the email stated.

The message did not explain the reason for the decision.

When organizers asked whether their previously confirmed reservation for 70 rooms remained valid, the hotel said the rooms had been released because credit-card information had not been supplied.

Shatter disputed that explanation, saying the hotel had not raised the issue during earlier correspondence or the meeting.

“This was a retrospective excuse for canceling the bookings, basically,” he said.

The organizers ultimately secured alternative accommodations and a separate venue, allowing the conference to proceed as scheduled.

Shatter said the organizers initially avoided publicizing the incident because they feared that a controversy could interfere with the conference itself.

Ireland’s Chief Rabbi, Rav Yoni Wieder, expressed disappointment over the allegations while acknowledging that the hotel’s motivation had not been established.

“If things happened as reported, then it’s a downright disgrace,” he said.

Rav Wieder noted that the Herbert Park Hotel had previously accommodated Jewish visitors, including guests who received kosher meals from a catering company under his supervision.

He said he wanted to know who made the decision to cancel the reservation and why, adding that the possibility of concern over protests or controversy would not justify excluding the delegates.

The European Jewish Congress also condemned the reported incident, describing it as “deeply disturbing” and calling on the hotel to explain its decision.

The organization said the cancellation, together with questions about supposed Israeli military involvement, reflected the very prejudice and suspicion that the conference was intended to confront.

The conference proceeded in Dublin as part of Ireland’s presidency of the Council of the European Union, bringing together government representatives and Jewish communal leaders for discussions about antisemitism and the protection of Jewish communities.

During the gathering, participants met with Irish Prime Minister Micheál Martin and visited the European offices of TikTok and Meta to discuss online antisemitism.

Cohen also drew attention to the experiences of Ireland’s small Jewish community, which numbers approximately 2,200 people.

According to figures he presented, 143 antisemitic incidents were recorded between July 2025 and January 2026.

The Herbert Park Hotel has declined to comment publicly on the allegations. Its management has not provided an explanation establishing why the conference booking and room reservations were withdrawn.

Serious questions are being raised about the safety procedures surrounding a yeshiva outing in northern Israel that ended in tragedy Monday, when Elazar Yair Vilensky z”l was killed and numerous other talmidim were injured in an explosion believed to have been caused by unexploded Hezbollah ordnance.

New reporting has focused on whether the route taken by the students underwent the necessary safety inspections before the outing, and whether the absence of a municipal school security officer contributed to gaps in oversight.

The outing, organized for students of Yeshivas Maalot, took place near Kibbutz Neot Mordechai in the Upper Galilee, an area that has faced extensive rocket and missile attacks during the fighting with Hezbollah.

According to the preliminary findings reported by Israeli authorities, the explosion was apparently caused by unexploded cluster munition left behind during the conflict. Investigators are examining how the students reached the location and what caused the device to detonate.

The latest revelations have added a new dimension to the investigation, shifting attention from the explosion itself to the decisions made before the group entered the area.

According to a report aired by Channel 12, the municipality of Maalot-Tarshiha had been operating without a school security officer after the previous official, Eldad Vaknin, resigned earlier this month.

Vaknin had reportedly raised concerns about failures to follow required school security procedures before leaving his position.

The report raised questions about whether the absence of a designated official responsible for overseeing school security affected the approval and supervision of the outing.

It remains unclear whether the vacancy had any direct connection to the tragedy, and investigators have not established that the presence of a municipal security officer would have prevented the explosion.

The Education Ministry has maintained that the outing received official authorization, but emphasized that the approved route did not include the location where the explosion occurred.

That distinction has become central to the investigation, as authorities seek to determine whether the students deviated from their approved route and, if so, under what circumstances.

The ministry has also said that its safety instructions explicitly prohibit students from touching suspicious objects or unexploded munitions.

However, students who participated in the outing reportedly said they had not received specific warnings about the danger of unexploded ordnance in the area.

Investigators are now examining what instructions were provided to the group before the trip and whether the students and accompanying staff were adequately informed about the hazards remaining from the war.

Another issue concerns the condition of the area where the explosion occurred.

The Jewish National Fund reportedly stated that entry into the location had been prohibited because of wartime damage and related dangers.

Nevertheless, no physical barrier had been installed to prevent people from entering.

The absence of such a barrier has raised questions about whether warning signs and access restrictions were sufficient to protect visitors, particularly school groups unfamiliar with the terrain.

Reports also indicate that no preliminary safety inspection of the actual route taken by the students had been carried out, although the precise circumstances remain under investigation.

The municipality of Maalot-Tarshiha has rejected attempts to connect the resignation of its former school security officer to the explosion before the facts have been established.

Municipal officials have cautioned against drawing conclusions about responsibility while investigators are still examining the incident.

According to the preliminary investigation, one of the students found what is believed to have been a Hezbollah cluster submunition during a stop along the route and placed it inside a bag. The group reportedly continued walking for approximately two hours before the device exploded while the students had stopped to daven.

The explosion killed Vilensky, a ninth-grade student, and injured 24 other students and staff members. Several of the injured suffered serious wounds, requiring emergency evacuation by helicopters and ambulances to hospitals across northern Israel.

The tragedy has prompted conflicting accounts from the Education Ministry and the Jewish National Fund concerning responsibility for approving access to the area.

Education officials maintain that the authorized itinerary did not include the location where the explosion occurred. The Jewish National Fund has said the area was closed to visitors because of wartime hazards and that it had not participated in approving the outing.

A warning sign prohibited entry, but the location was not physically blocked off.

Meanwhile, former municipal school security officer Eldad Vaknin has publicly alleged that he resigned after encountering serious failures to observe security regulations. He specifically accused municipal leadership of permitting unauthorized workers to enter areas occupied by students without proper supervision.

Vaknin said he had raised concerns about security procedures before the tragedy and had faced pressure rather than receiving support.

Those allegations concern broader school security practices and have not been established as contributing factors in the explosion.

The latest reporting has intensified scrutiny of the municipality, the Education Ministry and the procedures used to approve school outings in areas affected by the fighting with Hezbollah.

Police are investigating the circumstances of the explosion, including the students’ movements, the approval process and whether required precautions were followed before the group entered the area.

The findings will be particularly important for schools planning outings in northern Israel, where unexploded rockets, missiles and cluster munitions remain a serious danger long after the original attacks.

The investigation has yet to determine who was responsible for the apparent failures in oversight or whether the tragedy could have been prevented.

[COMMUNICATED]

Three kedoshei elyon had one common concept when it came to learning Torah – they were the Ohr Hachaim Hakadosh (Rabbi Chaim ibn Attar 1696-1743) when he came to Eretz Yisroel; the Ramchal (Rabbi Moshe Chaim Luzzatto 1707-1746) when he lived in Padua, Italy;  and Hagaon, Harav Chaim Volozhiner, (1749-1821) the famous talmid of the Gaon of Vilna.

They each had a yeshiva with ‘around-the-clock’ Torah learning, 24-hours a day, so that there would be no minute when the sound of Torah learning would not be heard in this world. The 24-hour period would be divided into shifts, and as one ended the next would begin.

Torah-24

A “Torah-24” Center has been opened in Yerushalayim and the Nasi is Maran Sar Hatorah, Harav Chaim Kanievsky, zt”l.

• The first “Torah-24” center is in Yerushalayim

• 11 Kollelim with 163 avreichim will be learning at “Torah-24” every day

• Nigleh, Nistar, Chumash and Halacha – All under ONE ROOF

• Talmud Bavli / Yerushalmi – Kabbalah & Zohar – Rambam, Shulchan Aruch & Poskim, Zeraim – Taharos 

• The following SIX kollelim – Kollel Hashkomas Haboker, Kollel Yerushalmi, Kollel Bavli, Kollel Choshen Mishpat/Even Haezer, Kollel Erev Shabbos, Kollel Kabbalah B’Chatzos (Tikun Chatzot, Etz Chaim, Zohar, Tehillim) – are fully operational

• 24 hour תורה learning cycle – 6:00 am to 6:00 am – is divided into different shifts

• Each kollel shift has its own program, Rosh Kollel and avreichim

• Detailed monthly and annual tests – written and oral – for all avreichim 

• Already there are 77 avreichim metzuyonim, and a large number of candidates are vying for the remaining slots in the kollelim. All the avreichim are required to take rigorous monthly tests.

In the words of Gedolei Torah:

“Torah-24 תורה” – where the voice of Torah is not absent from within the walls of the kollelim, not even for a minute…

“The idea … of day and night shifts of non-stop kollelim… the full range of subjects of the Torah… the derech of the Ramchal, the Ohr Hachaim Hakodosh and Hagaon Reb Chaim of Volozhin.”

– Nasi Maran Sar Hatorah, Hagaon Harav Chaim Kanievsky, zt”l

“All who donate to and support “Torah-24 תורה” will merit all the brochos of the Torah, including those for refuos, yeshuos, parnossa tova and nachas from all their descendants, Amen”

– Maran Rosh Yeshivas Ponevez, Hagaon Harav Gershon Edelstein, zt”l

At “Torah-24 תורה”, exceptional avreichim do not pause for a moment while studying all the areas of the holy Torah, with a shift of remarkable scholars studying the holy Zohar and the recitation of Tikun Chatzos at midnight. 

All who donate and support this holy endeavor of “Torah-24 תורה” should see brocha and success … children and grandchildren immersed in Torah and mitzvos… fulfillment of all the hopes of their hearts for good and with brocha. 

– Maran Hagaon Harav Moishe Sternbuch, shlit”a 

I join the esteemed Rabbanim and Gaonim, shlit”a, in endorsing the illustrious “Kollel Kabbalah b’Chatzos” designated for outstanding talmidei chachomim, masters of Torah and yiras Shomayim, who spend their nights in Beis Hashem, engaging deeply in the concealed dimensions of Torah during this auspicious time of Divine Favor…

I hereby call upon my generous brethren to support this endeavor with significant sums, for through this they will attain the great merit of the hidden Torah studied at night. May you all be blessed by Hashem with many blessings in accordance with the greatness of the endeavor that you are supporting!

– Maran Hagaon Hamekubal, Harav Yaakov Meir Shechter, shlit”a

“Support ‘Torah-24 תורה’ where the sound of Torah – nigleh and nistar – all hours of the day and night; and be blessed from shamayim that the Torah should never cease from your mouth; children bnei Torah; abundant parnassa and good health”

– Maran Hagaon Harav Shimon Badani, zt”l
Rosh Kollel Torah V’Chaim, Member Moetzet Chachmei Hatorah

“Torah-24 תורה” – groups of talmidei chachomim geonim in different shifts, delve in the subjects of Torah learning without interruption – Bavli, Yerushalmi, Dalet Chelkei Shulchan Aruch, Rambam, Kabbala, Midrash, Tana”ch and more.  “Torah-24 תורה” is in actuality a wonderful continuation of the heichalei hakodesh and battei midrash of our holy Rabbonim – the Ramchal, the Ohr Hachaim Hakadosh and the Nefesh Hachaim, zy”o. Who would not want to be part of this historical and amazing project “Torah-24 תורה”, and the greatness of its holy impact in both the supernal and lower realms?  “My brocha to all who support “Torah-24 תורה” – You should merit great abundance in both the spiritual and the material – supernal light, peace of mind, tranquility of the soul and bodily health. Only goodness and kindness should pursue you all the days of your lives, and you should dwell securely for your length of days.

– Maran Hamashpia Hagadol, ‘Reb Meilech’ Biderman, shlit”a

“Your kesher with ‘Torah-24 תורה’ will be a true ובהם נהגה יומם ולילה – and we will delve in them by day and by night”

– Maran Hagaon Harav Shraga Steinman, shlit”a – Orchos Torah

 

“Talmidei Chachomim of ‘Torah-24 תורה’ delve into all sectors of Torah – Bavli and Yerushalmi, Dalet Chelkei Shulchan Aruch, Rambam, Kabbalah – Nistar”

– Maran Hagaon Harav Shimon Gallai, shlit”a – Bnei Brak

 

Kollel Kabbalah b’Chatzos” is a precious link in the golden chain of the glorious Torah empire “Torah-24”… bringing tremendous delight to the Ribbono shel Olam. Fortunate are all those who take part in this great and holy endeavor.

– Maran HaMekubal Rav Abish Zehnwirth, shlit”a

 

For more “Torah-24” information click on: www.torah-24.com or call 718-766-5022

Rav Avraham Salim, rosh yeshiva of Yeshivas Maor HaTorah and a member of the Moetzet Chachmei HaTorah of Shas, has sent a personal letter of chizuk to a yeshiva bochur imprisoned by the Israeli military over the ongoing draft controversy, assuring him that the Torah world stands with him and davening for his swift release.

The letter was addressed to Eliyahu Dabada, a talmid of Yeshivas Orchos Meir in Yerushalayim, who is being held at Military Prison 10 in connection with his military service status.

In the letter, dated Tuesday, October 13, Rav Salim expresses his deep pain over the bochur’s imprisonment and offers words of encouragement intended to strengthen him during his ordeal.

Rav Salim invokes the words of Dovid Hamelech in Tehillim, “Gam ki eilech b’gei tzalmaves lo ira ra ki Atah imadi” — Even when I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I will fear no evil, for You are with me.

The rosh yeshiva uses the posuk to remind the imprisoned bochur that the Ribbono Shel Olam remains with a Yid even in the most difficult circumstances, including when he is confined behind prison walls.

He praises the bochur for his dedication to Torah learning and encourages him to remain steadfast despite the difficulties of his imprisonment.

Rav Salim also conveys that the bochur is not facing his ordeal alone, emphasizing the support and concern of the wider Torah community.

The letter concludes with heartfelt brachos that the bochur merit a speedy release and be able to return to his yeshiva and continue his learning in peace.

In his letter, Rav Salim sharply criticizes the government’s treatment of yeshiva students, writing that he was deeply distressed to learn that Dabada had been imprisoned because he was a bochur whose life is devoted to Torah study. He expresses the hope that those responsible for the arrests will do teshuvah.

One of the letter’s central messages is that the Shechinah accompanies the bochur even inside the military prison. Rav Salim tells him that being detained because of his dedication to Torah is a source of spiritual distinction and urges him to remain strong in emunah, Torah and yiras Shomayim.

The letter has also received the support of Rav Yehuda Cohen, rosh yeshiva of Yeshivas Yekirei Yerushalayim and a member of the Moetzes Chachmei HaTorah, who added his signature and a personal message of encouragement.

Rav Cohen writes about the spiritual significance of Torah learning within prison walls, encouraging Dabada to continue learning with diligence and joy even during his confinement. He offers a bracha that the bochur should soon emerge from darkness into light and continue growing in Torah and yiras Shomayim.

Dabada was arrested early Tuesday morning at his parents’ home in Be’er Sheva, according to Hebrew media reports. Military police reportedly arrived at approximately 4 a.m. and took him into custody over his failure to report for military service.

He was initially brought to a military facility in southern Israel before being transferred to Military Prison 10, where he was sentenced to 20 days of detention.

Following his arrest, the bochur’s family contacted the Am Kadosh organization, which arranged legal assistance.

The arrest also prompted a gathering outside the military prison Tuesday evening, organized by Yeshivas Orchos Meir under the leadership of its rosh yeshiva, Rav Meir Vaknin.

Talmidim, rabbonim and alumni assembled outside the prison for tefillos and divrei chizuk, expressing solidarity with their imprisoned fellow talmid and calling for his release.

During the gathering, the yeshiva’s rabbonim encouraged the bochurim to strengthen their commitment to Torah learning despite the continuing arrests.

Former Shin Bet director Ronen Bar has filed a 3 million shekel defamation lawsuit against Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, alleging that he repeatedly warned the government about the growing Hamas threat and recommended targeted assassinations of senior terrorist leaders in the months preceding the October 7, 2023, massacre, but that his proposals were never carried out.

The lawsuit, filed Wednesday, presents a detailed account of security discussions stretching back nearly a year before the Hamas attack. Bar maintains that he advocated a more aggressive policy toward Hamas, including operations against its senior leadership, while Netanyahu repeatedly emphasized the importance of avoiding a broader confrontation in Gaza.

Among the most significant allegations is Bar’s account of a security meeting held on October 1, 2023, just six days before the massacre. According to the former intelligence chief, Netanyahu authorized preparations for targeted strikes against Hamas commanders during that meeting, but no subsequent discussion was convened to advance the plans toward implementation.

Bar’s lawsuit follows public statements by Netanyahu assigning him substantial responsibility for the intelligence and security failures that allowed Hamas terrorists to invade southern Israel on October 7. The former Shin Bet director argues that the prime minister’s accusations misrepresent his conduct before the attack and damage his reputation.

The court filing also raises questions about Netanyahu’s approach to targeted assassinations, including an allegation that the prime minister expressed concern that expanding such operations could expose him personally to retaliatory attacks.

The claims are Bar’s account of events and have not been established as judicial findings. Netanyahu disputes Bar’s characterization of the security failures and maintains that the former intelligence chief failed to alert him during the critical hours before the Hamas invasion.

Early Warnings About Yahya Sinwar

According to the lawsuit, Bar had already recommended eliminating Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar well before Netanyahu returned to the prime minister’s office in late 2022.

During a November 7, 2022, meeting between the two men, Bar reportedly informed Netanyahu that the Shin Bet had developed an operational plan to assassinate Sinwar, who was then Hamas’s leader in the Gaza Strip.

Bar says he had recommended carrying out the operation earlier that year, but the proposal was never advanced.

The former Shin Bet director argued that Sinwar had developed a strategy of directing terrorist attacks in Yehudah and Shomron from Gaza while avoiding significant Israeli retaliation against Hamas inside the Strip.

According to Bar, the absence of a substantial military response allowed Hamas to operate with an increasing sense of immunity. He believed Israel needed to abandon that approach and impose a direct price on the organization’s leadership to restore deterrence.

On January 8, 2023, following another terrorist operation directed from Gaza into Yehudah and Shomron, Bar says he again recommended action against Hamas. That proposal, too, was not implemented, according to his lawsuit.

By April, Bar’s warnings had broadened beyond individual terrorist operations to encompass the overall deterioration of Israel’s security environment.

At an April 19 assessment, he warned that terrorist organizations were increasingly interpreting Israel’s internal political divisions and weakened deterrence as an opportunity to intensify attacks.

He recommended striking terrorist operatives who were directing attacks from Gaza, arguing that they had come to believe they could operate without facing serious consequences.

Netanyahu Allegedly Feared Personal Retaliation

A further confrontation over targeted assassinations allegedly occurred on May 21, 2023, following Israel’s military campaign against Palestinian Islamic Jihad.

During a meeting with Netanyahu, Bar reviewed the lessons of that operation and proposed significantly expanding Israel’s use of targeted killings, including beyond Islamic Jihad and into other terrorist organizations and operational arenas.

According to the lawsuit, Bar presented intelligence suggesting that Sinwar’s ideological outlook was becoming increasingly extreme and that Hamas was moving toward a more dangerous confrontation with Israel.

Bar argued that a precisely executed offensive operation at the beginning of a conflict could potentially shorten the fighting and reduce casualties by eliminating senior commanders before they could direct further attacks.

Netanyahu’s response, as described in the court filing, was to raise concerns about the possibility of personal retaliation against him if Israel broadened its assassination policy.

Bar’s allegation suggests that the discussion extended beyond the military consequences of targeting Hamas leaders to include the potential security risks facing the prime minister himself.

The lawsuit does not establish whether such concerns were the determining factor behind any particular operational decision.

An Unusual Warning Letter

The May discussion followed an earlier written warning that Bar says he delivered directly to Netanyahu on February 13, 2023.

In that letter, the Shin Bet chief reportedly warned that Israel was confronting a dangerous combination of declining deterrence, growing instability in the Palestinian arena, and deepening divisions within Israeli society.

Bar viewed the convergence of those developments as creating an increasingly favorable environment for Israel’s enemies.

According to the lawsuit, Netanyahu responded by emphasizing the Shin Bet’s responsibility for protecting elected officials, including the prime minister and members of his family.

The exchange is cited by Bar as part of his broader argument that the country’s security leadership had repeatedly been informed of the deteriorating situation long before October 7.

Warnings Intensified Before the Yomim Tovim

Bar maintains that the government’s approach toward Hamas remained largely unchanged throughout the summer of 2023, despite repeated assessments warning of a possible escalation.

On August 20, he presented a security assessment covering multiple fronts and warning of a heightened risk of confrontation during the approaching Tishrei Yomim Tovim.

The following day, Bar says he personally warned Netanyahu that terrorist activity directed from Gaza was becoming increasingly severe.

According to the lawsuit, Netanyahu acknowledged the need to address the Hamas command structure responsible for directing attacks from the Strip, but the proposed measures were not advanced.

At a September 12 security cabinet meeting, Bar delivered another assessment describing what he considered an unusually high number of attempted terrorist attacks against Israel.

He argued that Israel could no longer rely exclusively on defensive measures to intercept attacks and arrest operatives. Without offensive action against those organizing the terrorism, he warned, the underlying security situation would remain unchanged.

Netanyahu, according to Bar’s account, stressed the importance of getting through the approaching Yomim Tovim with as little security escalation as possible.

Nine days later, on September 21, the Shin Bet submitted a professional assessment to the prime minister outlining the possibility of a preemptive offensive operation.

The recommendation, however, called for implementing such an operation after the Yomim Tovim, reflecting the government’s stated preference to avoid provoking a confrontation during that period.

At another meeting on September 27, Netanyahu reportedly reiterated that he did not want a major escalation with Gaza and instructed security officials to use force in a measured manner.

The October 1 Meeting

The most consequential discussion described in Bar’s lawsuit took place on October 1, less than a week before Hamas launched its massive assault.

According to the filing, Bar told Netanyahu that terrorist activity being directed from Gaza had reached an exceptional level and warned that Israel could find itself drawn into a confrontation even before the Yomim Tovim concluded.

Bar recommended accelerating preparations for targeted operations against senior Hamas figures responsible for directing terrorist activity.

Netanyahu reportedly agreed that the preparations should move forward.

However, Bar claims that the prime minister’s authorization did not lead to a follow-up meeting or an operational decision to execute the proposed strikes.

The former Shin Bet director presents that failure to advance the plans as a central element of his argument that the government did not adequately respond to his repeated warnings.

Previous disclosures concerning pre-October 7 security discussions have indicated that the Shin Bet also sought to revive plans for a simultaneous operation against Sinwar and Mohammed Deif, Hamas’s senior military commander.

The proposed strategy reportedly envisioned eliminating the two leaders and subsequently striking additional members of the terrorist organization’s command structure.

At the same time, records released by Netanyahu’s office have included instructions to improve operational readiness for targeted assassinations, indicating that preparations for such operations were discussed at the political level.

The disagreement therefore extends beyond whether assassinations were ever proposed. It concerns the precise instructions issued by Netanyahu, whether the intelligence and operational preparations were sufficiently developed, and why no strike ultimately took place.

Authorization to prepare an assassination operation is also distinct from an order to carry it out. Such missions generally require current intelligence concerning the target’s location, operational readiness, and an assessment of the possibility that the strike could trigger a wider war.

Bar’s allegations do not, by themselves, establish that an executable assassination plan was rejected or that eliminating Hamas leaders before October 7 would necessarily have prevented the massacre.

What Happened During the Hours Before the Massacre?

The lawsuit also addresses the events of the night between October 6 and October 7, when Israeli intelligence agencies detected unusual Hamas activity but failed to recognize that a massive invasion was imminent.

Netanyahu has accused Bar of failing to contact him directly despite receiving indications that Hamas was preparing some form of attack.

The prime minister argues that the Shin Bet director had access to secure communications systems and could have reached him immediately through the security personnel assigned to protect him.

Bar rejects the accusation that he deliberately withheld information.

According to his filing, the Shin Bet distributed an intelligence warning at 3:03 a.m. identifying indications of possible offensive activity by Hamas.

Bar also maintains that instructions were issued to notify Netanyahu’s military secretary and that the relevant communications were documented in the Shin Bet’s operational records.

Additional reporting on the lawsuit indicates that Bar personally spoke with Netanyahu on a secure line on July 23, 2023, and delivered what he described as a strategic warning of possible war. He reportedly warned that Israel’s enemies viewed the country’s internal divisions as an opportunity to launch attacks and urged consideration of preemptive military action.

The lawsuit further disputes Netanyahu’s suggestion that the Shin Bet director had authority over all the emergency measures that might have reduced casualties on October 7.

Bar argues that his agency was not responsible for commanding IDF forces, determining the deployment of local emergency response teams, or deciding whether civilian gatherings such as the Nova music festival should be evacuated.

Those responsibilities, he maintains, belonged to other elements of Israel’s military and civilian security establishment.

Bar Acknowledges Shin Bet’s Failures

Despite his accusations against Netanyahu, Bar acknowledges that the Shin Bet failed to provide the intelligence necessary to anticipate the scale and timing of the October 7 assault.

He says he accepted personal responsibility for those failures and ultimately resigned as director of the agency in June 2025.

Bar maintains, however, that accepting responsibility for the intelligence failure does not justify accusations that he knowingly concealed information about an impending massacre.

His lawsuit challenges statements published by Netanyahu on September 28, in which the prime minister accused him of serious failures and misconduct connected to the events preceding the Hamas attack.

Bar is seeking 3 million shekels in compensation, along with legal expenses and a correction or retraction of the disputed statements.

He is also asking the court to require the disclosure of relevant documents and records from the prime minister’s office, potentially bringing previously confidential security discussions into the legal proceedings.

In his filing, Bar connects the dispute to his earlier allegations involving individuals associated with Netanyahu’s office and their reported connections to Qatar, as well as claims that the prime minister sought to involve the Shin Bet in monitoring political demonstrations.

Netanyahu has disputed allegations of improper conduct, and the claims raised by Bar remain contested.

Bar argues that a formal state commission of inquiry should examine the decisions and intelligence failures surrounding October 7. In the absence of such an inquiry, he says the legal proceedings may provide an opportunity to establish a fuller public record.

Netanyahu Fires Back

Netanyahu responded sharply to the lawsuit, rejecting Bar’s explanation for why he did not personally telephone the prime minister during the hours before the attack.

“Ronen Bar, who saw the warning signs on the night of October 7 and did not call me, now says he didn’t have my phone number. Ronen, are you serious?” Netanyahu said.

“You had my secure hotline number, and you could have called me immediately, as all the heads of the security establishment do. The Shin Bet security guards, your subordinates, who are with me 24/7, could have reached me within minutes. How many lives could we have saved if only you had called in time?”

The prime minister’s response places renewed emphasis on the critical hours before the attack, when Israeli security agencies detected suspicious developments in Gaza but did not issue a warning commensurate with the scale of the assault that followed.

Bar’s lawsuit, meanwhile, seeks to broaden the examination beyond those final hours to include the government’s security policy throughout 2023, its handling of repeated warnings, and the decisions that left Hamas’s senior leadership in place.

The dispute now places before the courts competing accounts of the warnings, operational recommendations, and communications that preceded October 7, with Bar seeking the release of documents that he argues will substantiate his version of events.

{Matzav.com}

A Singapore-flagged container ship has sunk in the Strait of Hormuz after being struck by an unidentified projectile, while a second vessel was damaged in another attack and a third ship was reported to be sinking, marking a dangerous escalation in Iran’s campaign against commercial shipping in one of the world’s most strategically important waterways.

The vessel, identified as the GFS Pride, was struck Tuesday, October 13, while traveling through the strait. The impact caused extensive damage and sparked a fire aboard the ship, which subsequently sank.

Singapore’s Maritime and Port Authority confirmed Wednesday that all 21 crew members were safely evacuated and that no injuries were reported.

The ship had a capacity of approximately 2,824 twenty-foot shipping containers and was managed by GFS Ship Management FZE, a company based in the United Arab Emirates.

The sinking comes amid a sharp increase in attacks on commercial vessels near the Strait of Hormuz, as Iran seeks to exert pressure on the United States and its regional allies during the continuing confrontation that began with American and Israeli strikes against Iran on February 28.

Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Navy claimed Wednesday that a container ship carrying more than 2,500 containers had struck a naval mine while attempting to navigate what Tehran described as an unauthorized and dangerous route through the strait.

According to the Iranian account, the vessel caught fire after striking the mine and eventually sank in waters south of the strategic passage.

Iranian authorities warned other ships and local fishermen to exercise caution because shipping containers from the sunken vessel were floating in the surrounding waters.

Maritime security sources, however, reported that the GFS Pride had been struck by a projectile. The precise cause of the sinking has not been independently established, and Iran’s claim that a naval mine was responsible remains unverified.

Pakistan’s hydrographic authorities issued a navigational warning Wednesday advising ships that a commercial vessel had sunk in the area and that floating containers posed a hazard to maritime traffic.

In a separate incident, Singaporean authorities confirmed that another container ship, the GFS Giselle, had been struck by an unidentified projectile Wednesday while passing through the Strait of Hormuz.

The second vessel sustained damage to its hull but remained operational and was able to reach a safe anchorage under its own power.

All 22 crew members aboard the GFS Giselle were reported safe, with no injuries.

Singapore’s Maritime and Port Authority condemned the attacks and expressed alarm over the growing danger to civilian shipping.

“MPA is deeply concerned about the continued attacks on commercial shipping in the Strait of Hormuz,” the authority said.

“Such attacks are unprovoked, unjustifiable, and a breach of international law.”

The agency emphasized that commercial shipping must be protected under international maritime law and that attacks endangering civilian crews cannot be justified.

The sinking of the GFS Pride represents the second confirmed loss of a commercial vessel since the war involving the United States and Iran began in February, according to data from the International Maritime Organization, a United Nations agency.

The Maltese-flagged container ship Safeen Prestige was struck by a projectile in March and subsequently sank north of the Strait of Hormuz.

Wednesday also brought reports that another commercial vessel, the Cape Dao, was sinking after an unsuccessful effort to salvage it.

The Antigua and Barbuda-flagged bulk carrier had been struck by a projectile on September 23 near the Strait of Hormuz.

British maritime security firm Vanguard reported that attempts to save the vessel had failed and that it was now believed to be sinking.

One crew member was reportedly killed in the original September attack.

The Cape Dao, a large bulk carrier with a deadweight capacity of approximately 170,000 tons, was managed by Peonies Shipmanagement FZE, also based in the United Arab Emirates.

The latest attacks come as Iran’s Revolutionary Guards adopt increasingly aggressive tactics aimed at disrupting shipping through the Strait of Hormuz.

The narrow waterway connects the Persian Gulf to the Gulf of Oman and serves as a critical route for global energy supplies. Before the war, approximately one-fifth of the world’s oil and liquefied natural gas trade passed through the strait.

Iran has sought to restrict maritime traffic through the passage as part of its confrontation with Washington, while the United States has imposed a naval blockade on Iranian ports and expanded economic sanctions against Tehran.

Two senior Iranian officials told Reuters that Tehran was employing new tactics against commercial vessels in an effort to keep global oil prices elevated and influence the political climate in the United States ahead of the November midterm elections.

The strategy appears intended to increase the economic consequences of the conflict by threatening international trade and energy supplies.

Although attacks have frequently targeted oil tankers, recent incidents demonstrate that container ships and bulk carriers are also vulnerable.

The Revolutionary Guards have issued increasingly threatening statements toward vessels attempting to navigate the strait without complying with Iranian instructions.

Iranian military officials have also claimed to have deployed additional forces and more advanced weapons in the area, while warning American warships against approaching the passage.

U.S. Central Command has rejected Iranian claims of control over the Strait of Hormuz, maintaining that commercial traffic continues to move through the waterway despite Tehran’s threats.

American military officials have also disputed Iranian assertions about the effectiveness of its naval forces, while continuing operations intended to restrict Iranian maritime activity.

The renewed attacks have raised concerns among shipping companies, insurers and international maritime authorities about the safety of vessels attempting to transit the region.

The danger extends beyond the immediate threat of missiles, drones and naval mines. Damaged or sinking ships, floating containers and other debris can create additional hazards for vessels navigating the already congested waterway.

The attacks also threaten to increase shipping costs as companies confront higher insurance premiums, security expenses and the possibility of losing vessels and cargo.

With two Singapore-registered container ships struck in consecutive days and the Cape Dao reportedly sinking following an earlier attack, maritime authorities are warning that the risks to civilian crews and international commerce are continuing to intensify.

Tosher chassidim around the world have been asked to increase their tefillos for the refuah sheleimah of the Tosher Rebbe, who is scheduled to undergo a planned eye procedure today, Wednesday, at a specialized medical facility in the Fort Lauderdale area of Florida.

The procedure, described as relatively minor, is intended to improve the Rebbe’s eyesight following a period during which he experienced weakness and discomfort affecting his eyes.

The Rebbe, who has been spending recent weeks resting at his residence in Florida, is scheduled to undergo two separate treatments as part of the medical plan recommended by his physicians.

The first procedure is taking place today at a leading ophthalmology clinic near Fort Lauderdale. On Tuesday, the Rebbe visited the medical facility for a series of preliminary examinations and tests in preparation for the treatment.

According to reports, medical specialists who evaluated the Rebbe’s condition recommended a particular procedure that they believe, b’ezras Hashem, will improve his vision and enable him to continue his avodas hakodesh without the discomfort he has recently experienced.

Following the initial procedure, the Rebbe is expected to return to his residence in Fort Lauderdale, where he will remain for rest and recuperation while awaiting the second scheduled treatment.

Once both procedures have been completed and the recovery period has concluded, the Rebbe is expected to return to his home in Kiryas Tosh, Quebec, Canada, where the center of the Tosh chassidus is located.

According to sources, the Rebbe undergoes this type of eye treatment approximately once every 15 years. His father, the previous Tosher Rebbe, zt”l, also underwent similar treatments.