Feed aggregator
AND YOU THOUGHT IT’S OVER: A Covid Summer Uptick Is Underway As Flirt And LB.1 Variants Ascend
Three years after President Biden hoped July 4, 2021, would mark the country’s independence from covid, the coronavirus is still here as new variants drive yet another summer uptick.
The country is indeed free from the waves of mass death that once overwhelmed hospitals and morgues, as well as policies restricting how Americans had fun and went to school and work.
But just as the American Revolution didn’t fully eradicate the British threat (see: the War of 1812), the coronavirus remains a public health issue, inflicting milder but disruptive illness on most people and posing a greater danger to the medically vulnerable.
If you’re hearing about more people testing positive or getting sick, it’s no surprise, as data shows another wave forming, especially in the West. Here’s what to know about the latest with the coronavirus:
– – –
What’s the latest covid data this summer?
Coronavirus infections are likely growing in 44 states and territories as of June 25, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Nationally, coronavirus activity in wastewater remains low but is increasing; it is highest and rising most sharply in the West, according to the CDC. June data may be incomplete because of reporting delays.
Jasmine Reed, a CDC spokesperson, said the recent increases are happening after a spring where the United States experienced the lowest coronavirus activity since the first pandemic wave.
“Covid-19 is expected to continue to have periodic surges as new variants emerge; immunity from previous infections and vaccinations also decreases over time,” Reed said in an email.
Experts say wastewater data is best interpreted as a way of understanding which way the virus is trending.
“We have consistently seen over the past three years that there is a winter surge and there is also a summer surge,” Marlene Wolfe, program director for WastewaterSCAN, a private initiative that tracks municipal wastewater data, and an assistant professor of environmental health at Emory University’s Rollins School of Public Health. “Right now we are waiting to see whether we actually will see a downturn over the next couple of weeks and we’ve hit the peak here, or whether those levels will actually go up.”
The CDC no longer tracks comprehensive covid hospitalization data, which served as a good barometer for the virus’s severity. Agency officials said the data it does have shows recent increases in covid hospitalization rates among seniors in some parts of the West.
The death toll of the ongoing summer uptick is not clear because fatality data takes several weeks to become accurate. In May, weekly deaths involving the coronavirus hovered in the low 300s, according to the CDC.
– – –
Which variants are now circulating?
The coronavirus is constantly evolving to overcome the immune defenses of a population in which nearly everyone has antibodies from vaccinations or previous infections.
Nearly two-thirds of infections are caused by KP variants dubbed FLiRT (named after the locations of their mutations, not anything romantic), according to CDC data as of June 22. A similar variant called LB.1, which has an additional mutation than the FLiRT variants, is on the rise and accounted for 17.5 percent of cases.
They are all descendants of the JN.1 variant, which drove the winter wave and was significantly different from the dominant variant that preceded it.
– – –
What do we know about the FLiRT and LB.1 variants?
These new variants don’t mark a significant evolutionary leap or seem to cause more severe disease and death.
“So much of this is at the molecular level. The clinical difference is minor, if any,” said Preeti Malani, an infectious diseases physician at the University of Michigan. “It’s important to track these from a public health standpoint, but to me, this is normal expected evolution.”
The Infectious Diseases Society of America offers a detailed examination of the preliminary research findings on each of these new variants, cautioning much of the data has not been peer-reviewed or corroborated by real-world studies of how the virus operates outside labs where they are researched. Here are the key takeaways:
— The most common FLiRT variants have mutations that can more efficiently infect people who have been vaccinated and spread more easily than JN.1.
— LB.1 appears to be even more infectious than FLiRT variants and more adept at overcoming immunity conferred by vaccines.
— Vaccination still produces antibodies that can recognize the latest variants and effectively defends against severe disease.
— Paxlovid, the antiviral treatment, is still effective against the new variants and tests can still detect it.
– – –
What’s happening with vaccines?
The coronavirus vaccine currently on the market is designed to target defunct XBB variants, but it still confers some protection against the latest variants. An updated vaccine is expected to hit the market in late summer or fall and will be promoted as part of a broader respiratory virus vaccination campaign.
CDC Director Mandy Cohen last week recommended everyone six months and older to receive that new vaccine. The Food and Drug Administration urged manufacturers to target the KP.2 variant.
Reed of the CDC said the new vaccine should be effective against the other common variants, citing early lab studies, because they are closely related.
People who are 65 and older or are immunocompromised qualify for a second dose of the existing vaccine. If they haven’t already received an additional dose, it’s worth consulting a doctor whether to get one now while covid is on the rise or wait until the updated vaccine hits the market.
Health insurers are supposed to cover coronavirus vaccines at no costs, and the hiccups that led to denials last fall should have been resolved. But people without health insurance will no longer be able to get free shots through the CDC’s Bridge Access Program, which ends in August because of a lack of funding.
– – –
What are the latest isolation guidelines?
If you contract covid-19, the CDC now advises people isolate until their overall symptoms have improved and they have been fever-free for 24 hours without the use of fever-reducing medication. The agency also advises precautions such as wearing masks and improving air circulation for an additional five days. This guidance applies to all respiratory illness regardless of whether you test positive for covid.
This change in guidelines has been widely cited by institutions who have dropped special isolation requirements for people who have covid.
Noelle Ellerson Ng, associate executive director for advocacy and governance at the School Superintendents Association, said isolation policies have largely shifted to pre-pandemic protocols that emphasized improving symptoms.
“Districts are trying to balance the appropriate focus on containing or limiting contagious germs with minimizing chronic absenteeism,” Ellerson Ng said.
– – –
What’s happening with long covid?
With hospitalizations and deaths sharply declining and largely concentrated in elderly and severely immunocompromised people, long covid has become the largest threat to the general public. Long covid encompasses symptoms lasting weeks to years, including debilitating fatigue or brain fog and persistent coughing and chest pain.
Anyone who gets covid can develop long covid, even otherwise healthy people who had mild cases. But the risk increases for people who experienced severe illness, have never been vaccinated, have underlying conditions or are 65 and older. Long covid has become less common than earlier in the pandemic.
Long covid activists have criticized public health officials for treating covid like the flu, arguing the lasting damage of the virus merits a more aggressive response to minimize transmission.
(c) 2024, The Washington Post · Fenit Nirappil
OpenAI was Hacked But Never Told FBI
Hackers breached ChatGPT creator OpenAI’s internal messaging system in 2023–but the company never told the FBI, the New York Times reported Thursday. During the hack, chats between employers were accessible to the intruders, but not the company’s most prized asset, the code which it uses to build artificial intelligence.
The hack prompted concerns that Sam Altman’s AI company could be vulnerable to intrusions by some of the U.S.’s foreign adversaries. According to sources close to the incident who spoke with the New York Times, the hacker was able to access a company forum where employees talked about the development of AI in April 2023. The hack was never reported to law enforcement.
One employee, Leopold Aschenbrenner, raised concerns with the company’s board, warning that adversaries such as China might be able to access its systems. Aschenbrenner was later let go from OpenAI, a move that OpenAI spokesperson, Liz Bourgeois, told the New York Times was unrelated to his memo. OpenAI and other artificial intelligence development firms such as an Anthropic have commissioned studies on the potential national security risks posed by their systems being accessed, according to the New York Times. Read more at New York Times.
Ukraine’s Army Retreats As Russia Gets Closer To Seizing Strategically Important Town
Biden’s Omnipresent Accessory, Even In Your Living Room: A Teleprompter
PALO ALTO, Calif. – President Biden was in a multimillion dollar home here, standing in an open kitchen as donors sat on couches and chairs arranged around the adjacent living room. Everything about the scene spoke to the kind of intimate setting that donors pay thousands of dollars to attend, with a chance to have a small interaction with the world’s most powerful officeholder in someone’s home.
But there was a discordant addition to the cozy gathering where about 30 people had assembled: At the front of the room, where the president spoke, stood a podium and a teleprompter, two large screens hovering about six feet high.
It was a physical manifestation of the type of accommodation that White House officials over the past year have come to make for an aging president. But while most of the changes have been aimed at addressing his physical ailments – tennis shoes and shorter steps to Air Force One so he doesn’t trip; smaller distances to cover so his short shuffle isn’t as pronounced; having his wife nearby to assist on stairs – the teleprompter has been the primary accommodation to assist a president whose speech can meander and who can seem to lose his train of thought.
For much of his political career, one of Biden’s hallmarks has been his plain-spokenness, his identity as an off-the-cuff pol who did little to shield his real thoughts. He was a self-professed “gaffe machine,” a trait that endeared him to voters even if it gave his advisers heartburn.
“No one ever doubts I mean what I say,” the president has often said. “The problem is, I sometimes say all that I mean.”
In recent years, his aides have tried to rein him in more, especially as he ascended to a position where a small verbal misstep can have global impact.
Even so, early in his presidency, he remained largely unscripted during fundraisers, when he was speaking to his biggest fans and offered a more unvarnished window into the presidential mind. Such settings are where he disclosed fundraising figures earlier than advisers wanted him to, where he offered blunt assessments of foreign adversaries like Russian President Vladimir Putin, where he let slip candid comments about Donald Trump at a time when he was otherwise rarely speaking of his predecessor.
But recently that, too, has been altered, as teleprompter Joe replaced the off-the-cuff president. And that has not gone unnoticed by donors who increasingly are treated not to informal private remarks from the president, but to the same scripted comments he makes in public. And now, some donors fret that his advisers are providing these scripts in part to avoid the sort of moments the public saw during the presidential debate, a rare event when Biden could not read notes and did not have the benefit of a teleprompter.
Before news conferences, his staffers call reporters in an effort to ferret out what questions they might ask, a practice that was not typical in earlier presidencies. For some major interview opportunities like the Super Bowl, Biden’s team has simply declined, giving up an opportunity that most politicians would grasp at eagerly.
In the past year, Biden has almost never appeared in public without the use of the teleprompter. The rare exception are news conferences, which have been few and far between, and media interviews, which he has granted more rarely than any recent president, according to tallies.
Biden’s staff argues that teleprompters are now routine equipment for any politician, given the need to juggle endless meetings and responsibilities and the lack of time to rehearse before every appearance.
“Look, it is not unusual for a president to use a teleprompter. It is not unusual,” White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said this week, when asked about the president’s reliance on scripted remarks. “That is something that presidents have done in the past.”
The Biden campaign said the president does much of his delicate, demanding work behind the scenes without a teleprompter or any other such aid.
“The President regularly does engagements without a teleprompter, not the least of which are contentious, high stakes negotiations with world leaders and Republican leaders in the House and Senate,” said campaign spokeswoman Lauren Hitt.
“By Republicans’ own accounting at the time, he handles those negotiations more than adeptly, using his experience and acumen to avoid multiple government shutdowns, deliver aid to Ukraine and stand up to Putin, passing the first bipartisan gun reform in 30 years, and finally delivering much needed funding for our nation’s crumbling infrastructure,” she added.
A teleprompter can only do so much work, and Biden is still capable of veering from it, sometimes offering comments that stray from the official line of his own White House. He commented that Putin “cannot remain in power” as an ad-libbed line at the end of a speech in Poland, for example, forcing his aides to clarify that the U.S. policy had not changed to include regime change in Moscow.
Biden’s reliance on a teleprompter has become increasingly problematic, some aides and donors say, at high-dollar fundraisers, where supporters are paying thousands of dollars for a private audience with the president, often in intimate settings. The campaign fielded a flurry of concerns in particular after an April fundraiser in Chicago at the home of Michael Sacks, a major Democratic donor.
Biden only spoke for 14 minutes, took no questions and then left, frustrating donors who wanted more opportunities to engage with the president, according to people familiar with the event, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss a sensitive issue. Even with the teleprompter, Biden struggled with his delivery, and some donors said they had trouble hearing him. After the event, several donors in attendance grumbled to campaign officials about Biden using a teleprompter in an intimate space like the Sacks’s living room.
Biden himself worries frequently about being prepared, aides and associates say. The president, who overcame a childhood stutter that still occasionally resurfaces, spends significant time working on speeches and, particularly during his campaign four years ago, he would say, “The words of a president matter.” He fine-tunes his phrases, and is wary of making any mistake. And, in what may be a lingering effect of a 1988 presidential campaign that was derailed when he was accused of plagiarism, now sometimes attributes even mundane phrases to other sources.
“As the old saying goes, ‘Give me a break,’” he said while campaigning in August 2020.
But Biden throughout his career has resisted staying on message, and teleprompters have been a way for his exasperated aides to try to keep him on track.
When he was vice president, the military officers who ran the device would often find it challenging to keep up since Biden would veer so often from the text he was supposed to be reading. Once, the teleprompter unexpectedly rebooted toward the end of a speech, forcing Biden to ad-lib while his speechwriter at the time, Dylan Loewe, frantically retyped the ending in real time.
“When it was over, I thought he’d be mad,” Loewe recounted in an earlier interview. “But he came over and high-fived me and said, ‘That was the most fun I’ve had all day.’ ”
“Some of his worst moments have happened when he’s veered off script,” he added. “But most of his best moments have happened that way, too.”
In addition to the reliance on a teleprompter, donors have also grown frustrated by Biden’s refusal to take questions at his fundraisers.
One business executive who organized a fundraiser in the past year said some donors pulled out, declining to donate or attend the fundraiser after learning they could not ask questions. Many of them had been writing large checks of $100,000 or more. The executive said that when they helped raise money for Biden in 2020, it was clear he was “fragile,” but that he was sharp and charming and “seemed with it.”
“The donors I’m talking to, they are depressed,” this person said, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss a sensitive matter. “It’s just a total mess. Everyone knew that he wasn’t as sharp as he used to be, but the debate truly shocked people.”
In the days since the debate, Biden and his team have sought to reassure Democrats his performance last week was an aberration. But his appearances at a slew of fundraisers in the days since have done little to reassure them.
“The thing that pissed people off, they waited for three hours, and he spoke for [eight] minutes,” said a donor who attended a fundraiser in East Hampton, N.Y., on Saturday. “It was a teleprompter. No questions. He was out of there. They were disappointed with the brevity of his remarks, the lack of his interaction with the crowd, that he didn’t take any questions.”
The donor said they had probably attended 10 or 15 fundraisers with Biden in the past, and the “problem in the past is you couldn’t get him to stop taking questions. He’d stay forever. He’d never leave. He’d work the line and shake every hand, he’d want to take more questions than the audience even had.”
On Tuesday, after months of relying on a teleprompter and with criticism mounting, Biden’s aides finally decided he would appear without one. When he walked to the front of a living room in McLean, Va., he stood in front of a large fireplace and spoke to several dozen people.
He workshopped a new line, suggesting that his busy schedule and foreign travels were a reason for his poor debate performance and adding a punchline. “I came back and nearly fell asleep onstage,” Biden said to some laughter.
But he was also soft-spoken at times, with several lines hard to hear from the back of the room. After about six minutes, he wrapped up.
(c) 2024, The Washington Post · Matt Viser, Tyler Pager, Josh Dawsey
Man Charged Over Murder Of R’ Shloimy Lonner Z”L Of Lakewood
Report: Biden Says He Had a Medical Checkup After Disaster Debate
President Joe Biden admitted in a Wednesday night meeting with more than 20 Democratic governors that he received a medical checkup after his disastrous presidential debate against Donald Trump last week. Three unidentified sources “with knowledge of the discussion” revealed the conversation to Politico, adding that Biden told those present at the gathering that he is fine.
The meeting–after which Wes Moore, Maryland’s first-term governor, Minnesota’s Tim Walz and New York’s Kathy Hochul performed interviews in a show of support for the embattled Biden—went for approximately an hour. One unidentified governor reportedly asked point blank about Biden’s physical condition.
Biden then mentioned his recent checkup, and, according to Politico, maintained he was in good health and “knocking on wood for effect, according to two of those people, who were granted anonymity to describe a private meeting.”
Quizzed by reporters earlier Wednesday, press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said, “The president has regular annual physicals that we release in a thorough report. We’re going to continue to do that.” Read more at Politico.
GAME OVER: The Economist Slams Biden With BRUTAL Magazine Cover And Editorial
Venezuelan Strongman Nicolas Maduro Facing First-Ever Serious Electoral Fight
Watch: Rabbi Yaakov Yosef Reinman: Episode #14 – Babylonians and Hittites
In this episode, Rabbi Reinman discusses the Babylonian invasion of Sodom and the reasons for the choice of a circuitous route of approach.
Chapter Fourteen: Babylonians and Hittites
As we follow Avrohom into Canaan, we enter the world of the biblical narrative. It is not our purpose here to retell the story of the patriarchs, which is already very familiar to almost everyone who resides in the House of Classical Judaism. Rather, our purpose is to describe the political landscape of the land; to demonstrate the authenticity of the biblical narrative; and to identify the events that would shape the historical destiny of the nascent Jewish nation.
Abraham entered Canaan with Sarah, his wife, and Lot, his nephew, accompanied by hundreds if not thousands of followers and disciples, whom we’ve discussed in Chapter 12, numerous attendants and shepherds and large flocks of sheep and other livestock. Lot also had considerable flocks and his own retinue of attendants and shepherds. The need for pastureland made living in proximity impractical, and Abraham and Lot agreed to part ways but to be there for each other in case of need…
Read full chapter and earlier chapters at www.rabbireinman.com.
UK’s Labour Sweeps To Power In Landslide Election Win, Keir Starmer Becomes New Prime Minister
Listen: Daily Zera Shimshon Shiur On Matzav with Rav Dovid Goldwasser
Watch: 7-Minute Iyun Shiur on Daf Yomi – Bava Basra 10
WATCH:
Man Who Nearly Assassinated South Korean Opposition Leader Gets 15 Years In Prison
Listen: The Daily “Bitachon 4 Life” Burst of Inspiration on Matzav.com: Can I Come Back?
LISTEN:
https://matzav.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Bitachon4Life-Shiur-1256-Tikvah-Part-51.mp3For more info, email bitachon4life@gmail.com.
Listen: The Daily Tefila4Life Shiur On Matzav.com: Is It Good?
Listen: Daily Menuchas Hanefesh with Rav Aryeh Leib Zell
H’YD: IDF Announces Death Of Soldier, Killed In Gaza City
U.K. Election Exit Poll Projects Big Win for Labour, End To 14 Years of Conservative Rule
LONDON – The United Kingdom’s center-left Labour Party appears to have defeated the center-right Conservative Party in a historic landslide, according to exit polls. Former lefty lawyer turned ruthless centrist Keir Starmer of the Labour Party is expected to become the nation’s next prime minister, relegating incumbent Rishi Sunak’s Conservatives to official-opposition status.
In an election that was more about mood than policy, voters appear to have conveyed their frustration with the Conservative Party and a willingness to give a chance to a renewed Labour Party, purged of its hard-left elements and socialist rhetoric.
Sunak’s campaign had been dogged by gaffes and micro-scandals. Voters appear impatient with Tory promises of a sunlit tomorrow. They are ready for Labour.
The results are expected to shift into the formalities of a government transition Friday, with the blessing of King Charles III.
Voters in this election say the issues they care most about are the economy and health care. Labour is seen as stronger on both counts. Keir Starmer wants to shore up the British economy and address people’s sense that everyday costs have become unmanageable. He wants to cut soaring electricity costs – with a new state-run green utility company. He wants to cut wait times for medical and dental appointments.
Britain’s foreign policy hardly ever changes under a new government. Tony Travers, a politics expert at the London School of Economics, said foreign policy would remain “amazingly unaltered” by a shift from Conservative to Labour rule. Starmer has said Britain will remain a strong member of NATO; will back Ukraine in its war against Russia; and will support Israel’s right to defend itself against Hamas, while calling for a cease-fire. Although Brexit is seen as a flop, and there is no enthusiasm for another referendum, Britain under Starmer will probably seek a closer relationship with the European Union.
YouGov predicted in its final poll, conducted between June 19 and July 2, that Keir Starmer’s Labour Party will win 431 seats, Rishi Sunak’s Conservatives 102 seats and Ed Davey’s Liberal Democrats 72 seats. Nigel Farage’s right-wing Reform UK party is predicted to win three seats.
If these numbers are accurate, the election would give Labour its largest majority in modern history – bigger even than Tony Blair’s 1997 landslide victory.
While all the polls suggest Labour is set to trounce the Conservatives, there is variation in the polls. Different pollsters use different methodologies and there are also a sizable number of people who tell pollsters they “don’t know” how they are going to vote.
This could be a historically big win for Labour. The final poll from YouGov, which was conducted between June 19 and July 2, projected Labour will win 431 seats, the Conservatives 102 and the Liberal Democrats 72. Tony Blair’s party won 418 seats in what was considered a landslide in 1997.
Conservatives have tried to rev up their voters by warning of a Labour “supermajority,” but that isn’t a term that has real meaning in Britain’s parliamentary system. Legislation passes as long as just over 50 percent of lawmakers vote for it. And as long as Labour wins a simple majority of seats, it can form a government and expect to pass much of its program. Governing parties seek to maintain strict discipline in the House of Commons by sending written instructions to lawmakers indicating how they should vote. On important bills, lawmakers who rebel can be kicked out of the party as punishment, or “lose the whip.”
(c) 2024, The Washington Post · Washington Post staff
U.K. Election Exit Poll Projects Big Win for Labour, End To 14 Years of Conservative Rule
LONDON – The United Kingdom’s center-left Labour Party appears to have defeated the center-right Conservative Party in a historic landslide, according to exit polls. Former lefty lawyer turned ruthless centrist Keir Starmer of the Labour Party is expected to become the nation’s next prime minister, relegating incumbent Rishi Sunak’s Conservatives to official-opposition status.
In an election that was more about mood than policy, voters appear to have conveyed their frustration with the Conservative Party and a willingness to give a chance to a renewed Labour Party, purged of its hard-left elements and socialist rhetoric.
Sunak’s campaign had been dogged by gaffes and micro-scandals. Voters appear impatient with Tory promises of a sunlit tomorrow. They are ready for Labour.
The results are expected to shift into the formalities of a government transition Friday, with the blessing of King Charles III.
Voters in this election say the issues they care most about are the economy and health care. Labour is seen as stronger on both counts. Keir Starmer wants to shore up the British economy and address people’s sense that everyday costs have become unmanageable. He wants to cut soaring electricity costs – with a new state-run green utility company. He wants to cut wait times for medical and dental appointments.
Britain’s foreign policy hardly ever changes under a new government. Tony Travers, a politics expert at the London School of Economics, said foreign policy would remain “amazingly unaltered” by a shift from Conservative to Labour rule. Starmer has said Britain will remain a strong member of NATO; will back Ukraine in its war against Russia; and will support Israel’s right to defend itself against Hamas, while calling for a cease-fire. Although Brexit is seen as a flop, and there is no enthusiasm for another referendum, Britain under Starmer will probably seek a closer relationship with the European Union.
YouGov predicted in its final poll, conducted between June 19 and July 2, that Keir Starmer’s Labour Party will win 431 seats, Rishi Sunak’s Conservatives 102 seats and Ed Davey’s Liberal Democrats 72 seats. Nigel Farage’s right-wing Reform UK party is predicted to win three seats.
If these numbers are accurate, the election would give Labour its largest majority in modern history – bigger even than Tony Blair’s 1997 landslide victory.
While all the polls suggest Labour is set to trounce the Conservatives, there is variation in the polls. Different pollsters use different methodologies and there are also a sizable number of people who tell pollsters they “don’t know” how they are going to vote.
This could be a historically big win for Labour. The final poll from YouGov, which was conducted between June 19 and July 2, projected Labour will win 431 seats, the Conservatives 102 and the Liberal Democrats 72. Tony Blair’s party won 418 seats in what was considered a landslide in 1997.
Conservatives have tried to rev up their voters by warning of a Labour “supermajority,” but that isn’t a term that has real meaning in Britain’s parliamentary system. Legislation passes as long as just over 50 percent of lawmakers vote for it. And as long as Labour wins a simple majority of seats, it can form a government and expect to pass much of its program. Governing parties seek to maintain strict discipline in the House of Commons by sending written instructions to lawmakers indicating how they should vote. On important bills, lawmakers who rebel can be kicked out of the party as punishment, or “lose the whip.”
(c) 2024, The Washington Post · Washington Post staff
Pages
![Subscribe to NativUSA Portal aggregator](https://portal.usanativ.com/misc/feed.png)