Feed aggregator

[Video below.] House Speaker Mike Johnson said Sunday that President Donald Trump’s proposal to send $5,000 to American adults if Republicans retain control of Congress would require lawmakers to approve the payments, while describing the President’s plan as a “creative idea” whose details still need to be worked out.

Johnson addressed the proposed “Trump Dividend” during an appearance on CNN’s “State of the Union,” days after Trump unveiled the idea at the Republican midterm convention in Dallas.

Trump announced last week that if Republicans maintain control of both the House and Senate in November, he wants to distribute $5,000 to every adult American citizen. The President compared the concept to a successful corporation sharing its profits with shareholders and said recipients would be required to spend the money inside the United States.

CNN anchor Jake Tapper pressed Johnson on whether Trump could actually distribute the money without legislative action.

“President Trump is proposing to pay every American adult $5,000, but only if Republicans keep control of the House and the Senate. For that $5,000 check, doesn’t the president need Congress to act? And are you going to carry out his wishes?” Tapper asked.

Johnson acknowledged that Congress would have to be involved, while speaking favorably about the concept.

“I would assume, yes, he’d need Congress to act. And that’s a creative idea. He launched it at our convention and got a lot of people excited. Of course, devil’s in the details. We have to figure all that out. But I think what he was articulating there is that he’s saying that if you want more money in your pocket, you have to keep Republicans in charge. Why? Because we’re talking about the record of achievement. Look at what we’ve done since President Trump took over. Republicans have had control of the House and Senate. We have the largest working and middle class tax cut in U.S. history. The average taxpayer in my home state of Louisiana, where I’m sitting this morning, has more than $2,900 in their pocket they didn’t have to send to Washington because of our policies. They also have an additional take home pay an average of $8,000 per filer. By the way, 97% of tax filers got a tax cut this year.”

Johnson’s comments underscored a significant practical issue surrounding Trump’s proposal: the President cannot simply authorize a nationwide payment of that magnitude on his own. Congress holds constitutional authority over federal spending, meaning legislation would be necessary to appropriate the money for the checks.

Trump, however, continued to promote the proposal Sunday while speaking in Ireland, arguing that the federal government could afford the payments because of increased government revenue.

“It’s easy to do,” Trump said when questioned about the cost of the proposal, according to Reuters. “We’re taking in so much money.”

The potential price tag would be enormous. Estimates have placed the cost of sending $5,000 to every American adult at well over $1 trillion, depending on exactly who qualifies for the payment. No detailed legislation establishing eligibility requirements, a funding mechanism or a timetable for distributing the checks has yet been enacted.

Trump first unveiled the proposal during his speech at the Republican convention in Dallas.

“Because we’ve done so well, and because our country is making so much money, only I can make this promise to you, and here is my promise: if the Republicans win the House of Representatives and the United States Senate… I will issue a dividend to every adult citizen in the United States of America for $5,000,” Trump said.

The President said the payments would operate much like a corporate dividend, with Americans effectively sharing in what he described as the country’s economic success. He also said the money would have to be spent domestically.

The proposal has immediately become a subject of debate on Capitol Hill, including among Republicans. Sen. Bernie Moreno of Ohio has said he intends to prepare legislation to implement the dividend if Republicans retain congressional control, while other Republicans have raised concerns about adding such a massive expenditure to the federal deficit and national debt.

Democrats, meanwhile, have sharply criticized Trump for tying the proposed payment to Republican victories in the midterm elections, arguing that the pledge amounts to an improper attempt to influence voters. Republicans and the White House have defended it as a campaign policy proposal aimed at returning the benefits of economic growth to Americans.

The proposal also follows earlier ideas floated by Trump to send direct payments to Americans. In 2025, Trump discussed a potential $2,000 tariff-funded dividend, though those payments were never implemented. He had also previously suggested distributing some of the savings generated by the Department of Government Efficiency to taxpayers.

Nationwide federal payments are not unprecedented. Congress authorized several rounds of direct stimulus payments during the COVID-19 pandemic, including two rounds signed into law by Trump during his first term and another approved under President Joe Biden. Those payments, however, were enacted through legislation passed by Congress.

For now, Trump’s $5,000 dividend remains a proposal rather than an authorized federal benefit. Johnson’s comments Sunday made clear that even if Republicans retain the House and Senate, lawmakers would still have to determine how the program would work, how it would be financed and whether sufficient support exists in Congress to approve the massive expenditure.

WATCH:

President Donald Trump announced Sunday that he plans to eliminate the 10% U.S. tariff on Irish whiskey, unveiling the decision during the trophy ceremony at the Irish Open in Doonbeg after receiving repeated appeals from Irish officials and golfers to remove the levy.

Trump made the announcement as he wrapped up his visit to Ireland, telling spectators that the issue had been raised with him repeatedly, including by Irish Prime Minister Micheál Martin and Irish Open champion Shane Lowry.

“Everybody’s been bugging me” to do it, the Republican president said. “And I said, ‘On behalf of the United States of America, I am going to take the tariffs off’” of Irish whiskey.

Irish whiskey is currently subject to the general tariff Trump imposed on most imports from the European Union. That rate, previously 15%, was lowered to 10% in July.

The issue had become particularly significant for Ireland after Trump announced in April that certain tariffs on whiskey imported from the United Kingdom would be eliminated. Because the U.K. includes Northern Ireland, the change meant Scotch whisky and spirits produced in Northern Ireland received tariff-free treatment while whiskey produced in the Republic of Ireland continued to face a U.S. import duty.

Trump’s unexpected announcement Sunday drew loud cheers and whistles from spectators attending the tournament. The President did not immediately provide details about when the tariff exemption for Irish whiskey would formally take effect.

The move was quickly welcomed by representatives of the spirits industry.

Chris Swonger, president and CEO of the Distilled Spirits Council of the United States, described Trump’s decision as “another positive step toward reducing barriers to spirits trade” and said the change would benefit businesses and consumers as the holiday shopping and hospitality season approaches.

“As U.S. hospitality businesses enter the critical holiday season, this action will provide a welcome boost for retailers, restaurants, consumers and the American economy,” Swonger said.

Ireland’s whiskey industry had been pressing the Trump administration for months to eliminate the tariff. In May, the Irish Whiskey Association publicly called for its removal, arguing that tariffs on Irish spirits also harmed American companies whose portfolios include Irish brands and created additional uncertainty for U.S. consumers.

The United States is a particularly important market for Irish whiskey, accounting for a substantial portion of the industry’s exports. The tariff disparity with U.K.-produced whiskey had therefore generated concern among Irish producers about their ability to compete in the American market.

Trump had previously attributed his decision to grant tariff relief to U.K. whiskey to a White House visit by King Charles III and Queen Camilla.

“The King and Queen got me to do something that nobody else was able to do, without hardly even asking!” Trump posted on social media.

The Scotch Whisky Association subsequently announced on July 24 that the zero-tariff treatment for Scotch had formally taken effect.

Sunday’s announcement would remove the disparity by extending tariff-free treatment to Irish whiskey as well, although the administration had not yet released the details or timetable necessary to implement Trump’s pledge.

The announcement came at the conclusion of the Irish Open at Trump International Golf Links in Doonbeg, where Trump attended the final round and participated in the trophy ceremony. His official schedule listed his attendance at the tournament before his return to Washington.

Lowry, who won the tournament, was among those Trump said had personally raised the whiskey tariff issue with him. The President’s decision therefore provided an unexpected policy coda to the golf tournament: after months of lobbying by Ireland’s whiskey industry and government officials, Trump used the trophy presentation to announce that the 10% levy would be coming off.

[COMMUNICATED]

Yesterday, Eitan did not know Shema. Today, he says it proudly for the very first time. Across Eretz Yisroel, thousands of Shuvu children are discovering Torah, keeping Shabbos and bringing the beauty of Yiddishkeit home to their families. For 35 years, Shuvu has carried forward the special mission established by Rav Avrohom Pam zt”l—changing childhoods, strengthening families and transforming Klal Yisroel.

But today, that mission needs you. The ongoing war in Eretz Yisroel has sharply reduced the government funding received by schools throughout the country, including Shuvu. Please join Shuvu’s largest fundraising campaign of the year on September 14–15 at Charidy.com/Shuvu. For two days only, every dollar will be doubled—giving twice as many children the opportunity to discover Shema, Shabbos, Torah and the Jewish heritage that will remain with them for life.

Russian President Vladimir Putin issued a stark warning to European nations on Friday, declaring that the deployment of European troops to Ukraine would trigger a direct military confrontation with Russia as Western governments discuss possible security guarantees for Kyiv following an eventual end to the war.

Speaking to reporters in New Delhi, where he was attending the BRICS summit, Putin responded to proposals under consideration by European countries to establish an international military presence designed to protect Ukraine following a peace agreement.

“Now, they say they are thinking of how to deploy troops to Ukraine,” Putin said, according to Russia’s state-run TASS news agency. “This would mean a war with Russia.”

The warning followed discussions among Ukraine’s European allies over what security arrangements could be put in place if a ceasefire or peace agreement is ultimately reached.

French President Emmanuel Macron previously announced that 26 countries had committed themselves to providing postwar security guarantees for Ukraine. The countries were considering various forms of assistance, with some prepared to participate in a force operating on land, at sea or in the air, while others could contribute without stationing personnel inside Ukraine.

“The day the conflict stops, the security guarantees will be deployed,” Macron said.

Moscow has repeatedly rejected the prospect of Western forces being stationed inside Ukraine. Putin has previously warned that Western troops deployed there would be considered legitimate military targets by Russia.

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov reinforced Putin’s latest warning on Saturday, saying Moscow had made its position unmistakably clear to European governments.

“It’s not a red line, but Russia’s position that has been conveyed to the whole world, primarily to Europeans, in an extremely specific and clear manner,” Peskov said.

The escalating rhetoric came as fighting continued at high intensity across Ukraine. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said Russia launched nearly 500 attack drones across the country on Saturday, part of a major wave of strikes that hit numerous regions.

Ukrainian officials reported that Russian attacks on Saturday killed 10 civilians and wounded dozens more, damaging residential areas and infrastructure. Among the locations hit were Odesa, Kramatorsk, Kryvyi Rih, Zaporizhzhia and the Zhytomyr region.

The attacks have increasingly extended toward Ukraine’s western frontier with NATO countries. On Sunday, Russia struck a truck near the Dorohusk-Yahodyn crossing on the Polish border, temporarily disrupting operations there. Moscow said the target was infrastructure used to support European military shipments to Ukraine.

Ukraine borders NATO members Poland, Slovakia, Hungary and Romania, as well as Moldova. The possibility that troops from European countries could eventually operate inside Ukraine has therefore become one of the most sensitive questions surrounding efforts to establish lasting security guarantees for Kyiv.

European governments supporting the proposal have described a potential international presence as a postwar deterrent rather than a force intended to enter the current fighting. Planning has focused on what would happen after hostilities cease and how Ukraine could be protected against another Russian attack.

Russia, however, has consistently opposed NATO or other Western military forces operating on Ukrainian territory and has portrayed the issue as a fundamental security concern.

Putin’s latest warning significantly raised the stakes surrounding those discussions, making explicit that Moscow would regard the arrival of European troops in Ukraine as a direct confrontation between Russia and the countries deploying them.

The warning came as diplomatic efforts to end the war continued alongside the fighting. During the BRICS gathering in New Delhi, India and other participating countries renewed calls for negotiations, while Moscow signaled that it remained open to further talks involving Russia, Ukraine and the United States.

For now, however, the gulf between Moscow and Kyiv’s European allies remains substantial. European leaders are attempting to devise guarantees strong enough to deter another Russian offensive after a settlement, while Putin is warning that one of the most significant options under discussion — putting European military personnel on Ukrainian soil — could itself produce a direct war between Russia and Europe.

[COMMUNICATED]

When it comes to an esrog, everybody’s got their thing. Some guy wants a Chazon Ish. Some guy’s holding out for a Teimani. Somebody’s asking about the pitom, somebody wants it greener, somebody’s got a whole opinion about the gartel that most people don’t even understand. It’s personal. 

Most people walking into a store are picking from whatever’s sitting on the table in front of them. That’s it. That’s the selection. EsrogShopper.com does it completely differently. You tell them exactly what you’re looking for, and someone who actually knows esrogim goes and searches for it. Not close enough. Not pretty good. The one you actually had in mind. They’re going through over ten thousand esrogim to find it, and every set comes rabbinically certified and checked.

So if you want an esrog that somebody actually shopped for, instead of one you just settled on, check out EsrogShopper.com, or give them a call at 732-246-6300.

Hiddur. Delivered.

President Donald Trump doubled down Sunday on his pledge to send $5,000 “dividend” checks to American adults if Republicans retain control of Congress in November, declaring that the payments will “happen 100 percent” and arguing that the United States is bringing in enough money to finance them. The proposal, however, would require congressional authorization and could carry a price tag exceeding $1 trillion.

Trump compared the proposed payments to the $1,776 checks distributed to U.S. military personnel last year, telling reporters outside Air Force One that he has encountered similar skepticism about his latest plan.

“The $5,000 is going to happen 100 percent,” he said. “And the reason is because our country is taking in trillions and trillions of dollars. And it’s going to happen.”

Trump said he deliberately does not intend to distribute the money before the midterm elections, tying the proposal to Republicans maintaining control of both the House and Senate.

“I don’t want to do it now, because if the Democrats get it, our country will be in shambles and they won’t be able to do it,” he continued. “If we get in, we’re taking in tremendous amounts of money. We’re taking in over $20 trillion in terms of investment. And with the Democrats, all of that money will be thrown out. If the Democrats get in, they won’t be able to pay it.”

Trump first unveiled the proposed payments last Wednesday during the Republican National Committee’s midterm convention in Dallas, where he said the country’s economic performance would allow his administration to distribute $5,000 to every adult American citizen if Republicans win both chambers. He also stipulated that the money would have to be spent inside the United States.

Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said Thursday that the administration does not envision financing the checks through taxpayer dollars. Instead, he said the administration believes it can generate the necessary funds through other government revenue sources.

Lutnick said the administration could “earn the money that Donald Trump wants to pay out, not from the deficit and not from taxpayers.”

National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett has suggested that Congress could approve the payments through a budget reconciliation package. Under the Constitution, Congress controls federal appropriations, meaning the administration cannot simply distribute public money without legislative authorization.

House Speaker Mike Johnson confirmed Sunday that congressional action would be necessary. Appearing on CNN’s “State of the Union,” Johnson called Trump’s proposal a “creative idea” but said lawmakers would have to determine the specifics.

The President has compared his latest proposal to the $1,776 payments that approximately 1.45 million U.S. military service members received last year. Those checks were funded through a one-time housing supplement included in Trump’s sweeping tax and spending legislation.

Republican Sen. Bernie Moreno of Ohio quickly embraced Trump’s latest proposal, announcing after the President’s Dallas speech that he intends to introduce legislation aimed at putting the $5,000 payments into effect if Republicans retain control of Congress.

The cost of such a program would be substantial. With roughly 245 million adult U.S. citizens, providing each of them with $5,000 would cost more than $1.2 trillion. Other estimates have put the potential price tag at approximately $1.3 trillion, depending on the eligibility rules ultimately adopted.

Paul Berman, a professor at George Washington University Law School, has questioned whether tariff revenue could come close to financing the program. The Hill reported that Treasury data cited by the Bipartisan Policy Center showed approximately $341 billion in net tariff revenue collected since the beginning of 2025 — far below the estimated cost of the proposed checks.

“Even if there were, that’s money that goes back to the public fisc, and then Congress is the one that has the power of the purse to allocate it,” Berman said.

The financing question has become more complicated after the Supreme Court struck down major portions of the Trump administration’s tariff program and ordered refunds of revenue collected under the invalidated tariffs. Independent analyses have likewise concluded that tariff receipts would be insufficient on their own to finance payments of $5,000 to every adult citizen.

Not all Republicans have embraced the proposal. Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis has pointed to the size of the national debt and warned that another massive round of direct payments could contribute to inflation.

Sen. Susan Collins of Maine has also expressed reservations about the potential cost and the absence, thus far, of an income limit determining who would qualify.

“From the few details we have, it seems that the proposed $5,000 dividend would not have an income cap and would be extraordinarily costly,” Collins said about the dividends.

The administration has not yet released a detailed legislative proposal explaining exactly who would qualify, how the checks would be financed, when they would be distributed or how the requirement that the money be spent in the United States would be enforced.

Trump, however, made clear Sunday that he is standing firmly behind the promise. Despite questions about the cost, congressional approval and the source of the funding, the President said there should be no doubt about his intention to deliver the payments if Republicans maintain control of Congress.

“The $5,000 is going to happen 100 percent,” he said.

Sen. Ruben Gallego said Sunday that if he were elected president, he would support undoing many of President Donald Trump’s architectural changes to Washington, including tearing down the new White House ballroom and Trump’s planned 250-foot triumphal arch near Arlington National Cemetery.

The Arizona Democrat, who has not announced a 2028 presidential campaign but has acknowledged considering a run, made the remarks during an appearance on CNN’s “State of the Union.” His comments marked one of the clearest statements yet from a potential Democratic presidential contender that some of Trump’s major construction projects should ultimately be demolished rather than simply inherited by a future administration.

CNN anchor Jake Tapper raised the subject while discussing Trump’s extensive effort to reshape prominent landmarks and public spaces around the nation’s capital, including the White House ballroom, the proposed triumphal arch and changes involving the Kennedy Center and Reflecting Pool.

“President Trump is putting his mark on Washington, DC quite a bit, building a White House ballroom. He plans to build an arch, attempts to rename the Kennedy Center, the reflecting pool, and on and on and on. It seems clear to me that this is going to be a big issue for Democrats running for president in 2028. I know you haven’t made a decision yet about whether or not you’re going to run for president, but if you do, would you advocate for tearing down the ballroom or tearing down the arch?” Tapper asked.

Gallego indicated that he would favor reversing nearly all of the changes.

“I think I’d be advocating for almost all of that. You know, the the real stain that this president has put on this country has been the fact that he eroded democracy, right. Let’s start with January 6. The fact that for the first time ever, a U.S. president attempted an actual coup. That right there is a reason why we should not have anything named toward him. The fact that he has destroyed the institutions that have kept this government together through some of the hardest times, and eroded, for example, our Department of Justice, is another reason why we needs to be taking down all these honorific situations or emblems of him. The fact that he wants to destroy the Kennedy Center, a man that contributed so much to this country, to replace it with his name, who has done everything to destroy this country, is another reason why we have to make sure that we wipe him out. So this is not me trying to get to Donald Trump because I don’t like Donald Trump, it’s because of what Donald Trump has done to this country. And as somebody who visits a lot of my friends at Section 60 of Arlington National Cemetery, the fact that we’re going to have this ugly monstrosity in the view of this very sacred site —”

Tapper interrupted to clarify which project Gallego was referring to.

“The arch?”

Gallego confirmed that he was referring to Trump’s planned triumphal arch.

“The arch is another reason why that needs to be taken care of. Because, again, this man has done nothing but actually destroy the very fundamental things that these men and women have fought for, which is to save this country in continuous democracy.”

Gallego’s remarks came as Trump has moved aggressively ahead with a series of major construction and renovation projects in Washington. The proposed arch is planned for Memorial Circle between the Lincoln Memorial and Arlington National Cemetery and has been envisioned at roughly 250 feet tall. The administration has said the monument would honor American veterans and has compared its design to Paris’ Arc de Triomphe.

The arch has generated both political and legal opposition. Critics contend that the structure would interfere with the historic sight line between the Lincoln Memorial and Arlington House and argue that the administration lacks the congressional authorization required to build it. The administration has disputed those arguments, while the project has yet to receive final approval from the National Capital Planning Commission.

Trump has strongly defended the project, saying of the planned arch, “I think it will be the most beautiful in the world.” He has compared it to the Arc de Triomphe in Paris and said the Washington structure would be of a similar scale, though slightly larger.

The White House ballroom has separately become a major political and legal flashpoint. Construction on the project has continued following litigation over whether congressional approval was required, with the Supreme Court recently allowing work to proceed while the legal battle continues.

Trump has defended the ballroom as both a major improvement to the White House and a project intended to serve future presidents, rather than himself. He has also described the facility as designed with significant security features.

“This is for future presence. This isn’t for me. This is for future presence. And it’s a gift. We’re making a gift to our country, spending hundreds of millions of dollars to build a ballroom,” Trump said last month.

The dispute over what a future administration should do with Trump’s Washington projects has been building for months. Some Democrats have discussed reversing name changes and other alterations, although others have suggested that physically demolishing completed structures would be far more difficult to justify. CNN reported earlier this month that Democrats it had spoken with generally did not expect a future Democratic administration to tear down completed projects because doing so could itself be viewed as destructive.

Gallego, however, went considerably further Sunday, saying he would favor removing much of Trump’s imprint if he eventually reached the White House. His comments were particularly pointed regarding the arch, which he described as an “ugly monstrosity” because of its planned location within view of Arlington National Cemetery.

The Arizona senator tied his opposition to friends buried in Section 60 at Arlington, arguing that Trump should not be memorialized near a site honoring American servicemembers.

Gallego’s remarks also offered a preview of an issue that could become part of the 2028 presidential debate: whether Trump’s physical transformation of Washington should remain after he leaves office or whether a succeeding administration should attempt to reverse it.

[Video below.] Michigan Democratic Senate nominee Abdul El-Sayed escalated his attacks on President Donald Trump on Sunday, calling the President a “barbarian in the White House” during a nationally televised interview on CBS News’ “Face the Nation.”

El-Sayed made the remark while responding to questions about the extraordinary amount of attention Republican leaders have focused on his candidacy ahead of November’s midterm elections. El-Sayed, a physician and former director of the Detroit Health Department, is facing Republican Mike Rogers in Michigan’s closely watched U.S. Senate contest. Republicans have increasingly sought to make El-Sayed and his progressive political views a national campaign issue.

During the interview, CBS host Weijia Jiang noted that El-Sayed had repeatedly been singled out by leading Republicans at the recent Republican National Convention, including President Trump, Vice President JD Vance, House Speaker Mike Johnson and Rogers.

Jiang then played a clip of Johnson warning about El-Sayed and New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani while arguing that Democrats in competitive congressional districts ultimately align themselves with the party’s progressive wing.

“We know who the Mamdanis and the El-Sayeds are, but it’s the Democrats in the swing seats who say one thing and then join forces and vote with the socialists that they’re afraid of. That is the dangerous part. They’re the ones who have let the barbarians inside the gate,” Johnson said.

Asked what he thought about Republicans devoting so much attention to him, El-Sayed immediately turned Johnson’s “barbarians” characterization against President Trump.

“Well, I’ll tell you this: the barbarian is in the White House, and we’re seeing the consequences of that right now,” El-Sayed said.

El-Sayed then accused Republicans of attempting to divert voters’ attention from economic and foreign-policy issues, citing gas and grocery prices, tariffs, the administration’s conflict with Canada, the war with Iran and access to medical care.

“You know, it was not a subject at all of the RNC? the gas prices, grocery prices, these ridiculous tariffs, and this war with Canada that’s raising our prices an average $5,600 a year for the average Michigan family. The war in Iran- didn’t want to talk about any of it. The fact that you can’t see a doctor in the United States. So, they’re going to point to me. They’re going to talk about me. They’re going to point to my name. They’re going to point to our faith. And at the end of the day, they’re doing that so that you don’t pay attention to the fact that you are being nickled and dimed by the barbarian in the White House and by a set of public policies that are not in your interest, but in his.”

The remarks came as El-Sayed has emerged as a major Republican target in the battle for control of the Senate. Republican leaders have portrayed his candidacy as evidence of the Democratic Party’s movement toward its progressive wing, while El-Sayed has sought to make affordability, health care and economic policy central themes of his general-election campaign.

The Michigan contest has attracted national attention in part because of its potential significance in determining control of the Senate. Democrats need a net gain of four seats to take the chamber, making competitive races such as Michigan particularly consequential.

El-Sayed has also faced controversy during the campaign over previous remarks and associations. Earlier this month, he apologized to Michigan’s Jewish Democratic Caucus over comments he made following an attack on Temple Israel in West Bloomfield, Michigan. El-Sayed had said in discussing the attacker that “hurt people hurt people,” while referencing the man’s reported personal losses in an Israeli airstrike. He later said he had intended to provide context rather than justify the attack and acknowledged that it was not the appropriate moment for such analysis.

At the same time, some attacks directed at El-Sayed have drawn criticism for targeting his Muslim faith. Republican figures have made allegations about El-Sayed having ties to terrorism without presenting evidence, while El-Sayed has argued that Republicans are deliberately focusing on his name and religion.

Sunday’s exchange underscored the increasingly personal tone of the Michigan race. Republicans have sought to associate El-Sayed with the Democratic Party’s progressive and socialist wing, while El-Sayed used his CBS appearance to turn one of their most pointed descriptions back on President Trump — twice referring to the President as the “barbarian in the White House.”

WATCH:

{Matzav.com}

Researchers are raising concerns about a rare and potentially fatal neurological disorder that has been reported among some patients using popular GLP-1 weight-loss medications, including Wegovy and Zepbound, with experts warning that severe appetite suppression, vomiting and other gastrointestinal side effects can leave patients dangerously deficient in essential nutrients.

A study published in Clinical Nutrition documented 15 reported cases of Wernicke encephalopathy, a serious brain disorder resulting from a severe deficiency of vitamin B1, or thiamine, among people who had been taking GLP-1 receptor agonists.

The majority of cases were associated with semaglutide, which is marketed under the brand names Ozempic and Wegovy, or tirzepatide, which is sold as Mounjaro and Zepbound.

The researchers identified the 15 cases by reviewing reports contained in the FDA’s Adverse Event Reporting System, previously published medical literature and cases seen at their own medical center.

Many of the patients experienced gastrointestinal or nutrition-related problems, including significant weight loss, vomiting, reduced appetite and malnutrition.

The researchers also found that reports of Wernicke encephalopathy occurred disproportionately among people using GLP-1 drugs compared with patients taking other medications. They cautioned, however, that their findings demonstrate an association and do not establish that the medications themselves caused the disorder.

Vitamin B1 is essential for normal brain function. A severe deficiency can result in confusion, difficulty walking, impaired balance and changes in vision. Without prompt treatment, Wernicke encephalopathy can cause lasting neurological injury and, in severe cases, death.

Karthik Achari, a Chicago-based clinician and founder of PepMD who was not involved with the research, stressed that the findings need to be understood in the context of the enormous number of people now using GLP-1 medications.

“Researchers went through adverse event reports and the medical literature and found a small number of cases, 15, of Wernicke encephalopathy in people taking GLP-1 drugs,” Achari told Fox News Digital. “That’s out of millions of people on these medications. So this is rare.”

“But it’s real, it’s serious, and the mechanism makes sense,” he added.

According to Achari, GLP-1 drugs can substantially suppress appetite and can also trigger nausea and vomiting. In certain patients, that combination could lead to inadequate food intake and eventually a vitamin B1 deficiency.

“The drug shrinks your appetite. It doesn’t shrink your body’s requirements,” he said. “You can now eat very little without feeling it, which is the point of the medication, but your need for protein, vitamins, and fluids didn’t go anywhere.”

Achari said certain groups could be particularly vulnerable, including patients experiencing prolonged nausea or vomiting, those rapidly losing weight while consuming very little food, people who previously underwent bariatric surgery and those who consume alcohol heavily.

Erin Palinski-Wade, a New Jersey-based nutritionist and author of “The Sleepdemic Solution,” similarly emphasized that adequate nutrition and hydration should be an important component of care for patients using GLP-1 medications.

“GLP-1 medications can dramatically reduce appetite, but that also means people may unintentionally under-eat the very things their bodies need most, especially protein, fiber and fluids,” she told Fox News Digital.

Palinski-Wade warned that persistent vomiting or diarrhea can contribute to dehydration and potentially lead to kidney complications. She recommended seeking medical advice when such symptoms continue for approximately 24 hours.

“Don’t assume every side effect is just part of being on a GLP-1,” Palinski-Wade said. “Severe or persistent symptoms deserve attention.”

The study’s authors noted important limitations to their findings, particularly that much of the research was based on adverse-event reports submitted to the FDA. Such reports cannot establish that GLP-1 drugs caused Wernicke encephalopathy. The researchers called for further study, while medical experts cautioned that patients should not discontinue prescribed GLP-1 medications solely because of the new findings.

Blue and White chairman Benny Gantz issued a blistering condemnation of “NAZA,” an anti-Israel film that received an award at the 83rd Venice Film Festival, accusing its creators of falsely depicting Israel as intentionally killing civilians in Gaza.

The film, produced by two Israelis, presents the Gaza war from a pro-Palestinian perspective and portrays Israel and the IDF in a sharply negative and delegitimizing light.

“As a former IDF Chief of Staff and Defense Minister, I state unequivocally: IDF soldiers and commanders are among the most moral, humane and principled fighters in the world. How do I know? Because I was there. I know the IDF’s operations in Gaza in detail – before October 7, and even more so afterward,” Gantz wrote.

Gantz rejected the film’s portrayal of Israel’s conduct in Gaza, arguing that the IDF had gone to extraordinary lengths to uphold ethical standards while fighting in densely populated areas.

“You have to be a liar to portray Israel as deliberately carrying out killings in Gaza. No army in the world has fought in an urban environment while maintaining the purity of arms as the IDF has.”

Gantz also recalled a message he said he delivered to senior American military officials shortly after the October 7 massacre, stressing that Israel’s military campaign was never intended as an act of vengeance.

“In the first days of the war, for example, I told a delegation of American generals that there was no action we could take in Gaza that would make up for the atrocities committed against us on October 7. Therefore, revenge was never the purpose of the fighting. We are fighting to protect Israel’s citizens and to ensure security for the decades to come.”

Gantz’s criticism came after Culture and Sports Minister Miki Zohar denounced the filmmakers in even stronger terms, saying he would seek to have their Israeli citizenship revoked “for betraying the state.”

“The victory of the despicable film NAZA at the Venice Film Festival is appalling,” Zohar said. “The creators’ seething self-hatred, which drives them to harm their homeland in order to receive applause from antisemites around the world, is unfathomable and constitutes a betrayal of the state. This is precisely why I led the important cinema reform – so that Israeli citizens will no longer pay out of their own pockets for attacks on IDF soldiers and the State of Israel. I will work to revoke the citizenship of these contemptible filmmakers.”

{Matzav.com}

President Donald Trump sharply criticized Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani on Sunday after video showed the two Democrats smiling and appearing to laugh during the reading of victims’ names at the 25th anniversary commemoration of the September 11 attacks at Ground Zero. The circumstances of the brief, inaudible exchange have been disputed by a witness who was standing nearby.

“I think it’s terrible,” Trump said when asked about the video of the two Democrats. “It’s not a place to be laughing, especially in that case.”

“I thought it was terrible,” he continued. “The fact that they were laughing together at a very important part of the ceremony was inappropriate.”

Trump’s criticism followed two days of controversy surrounding footage of Mamdani and Ocasio-Cortez at Friday’s ceremony, with the brief clip spreading rapidly across social media and prompting criticism from Republican elected officials and other public figures.

The television feed first showed an emotional young man near the memorial before switching to Mamdani and Ocasio-Cortez, who could be seen smiling and appearing to laugh while speaking with each other. There was no audible recording of their conversation, leaving unclear what the two were discussing.

The exchange occurred during the traditional reading of the names of those murdered in the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks as well as the six victims of the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. Friday marked 25 years since the 9/11 attacks, in which nearly 3,000 people were killed.

As the video circulated online, critics accused Mamdani and Ocasio-Cortez of behaving disrespectfully during one of the most solemn portions of the annual commemoration.

“As the names of Americans murdered on September 11th are read aloud at Ground Zero, AOC and Mamdani are laughing and smiling together,” Rep. Wesley Hunt, R-Texas, wrote on X.

“There is a time and a place for politics. This isn’t it. Ground Zero is sacred ground,” Hunt added. “September 11 is not a photo op, it is not a networking event.”

Meghan McCain was among the other prominent figures who reacted to the footage, writing on X, “Why the f— are these two laughing?”

New York City Councilwoman Inna Vernikov, a Republican who has frequently criticized Mamdani, also condemned what she believed the footage showed.

“After thousands of families of victims of terror beg Mamdani not to show up, he stands there and laughs while families weep,” Vernikov wrote. “This is NYC’s Mayor.”

The controversy followed an already contentious debate over Mamdani’s presence at the anniversary ceremony. Ahead of September 11, a petition calling on the mayor not to attend the Ground Zero observance amassed more than 110,000 signatures. Mamdani nevertheless attended the event and remained through the ceremony.

However, Michael Ragusa, who has worked as an aide to former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani and was standing near Mamdani and Ocasio-Cortez during the ceremony, disputed the characterization of the exchange as the two laughing about the proceedings.

“The videos of [them] laughing are not true. I was standing next to them the whole time,” Ragusa wrote on X.

“The camera just caught her greeting him hello,” he added. “Multiple other politicians were laughing and joking behind me. Republicans and Democrats.”

Ragusa subsequently emphasized that his defense was not based on political sympathy for Mamdani or Ocasio-Cortez, noting that he is a longtime Republican who has been critical of both Democrats. He said he was simply describing what he witnessed while standing alongside them.

Mamdani was also seen behaving somberly during other portions of the ceremony, and reporting from the event noted that he remained through the entire reading of the victims’ names. Exactly what Mamdani and Ocasio-Cortez said to one another during the brief exchange captured on camera remains unknown.

President Donald Trump on Sunday lavished praise on Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff for their diplomatic work surrounding Gaza, crediting the two envoys with helping secure the return of the hostages and advance a ceasefire while pointing to what he described as a sharp reduction in fighting in the Strip.

Trump made the remarks while speaking with reporters aboard Air Force One, where he was asked about the performance of Kushner and Witkoff, who have also been playing central roles in the administration’s efforts to broker an end to the Russia-Ukraine war.

“They’ve done a great job. Look at Gaza for an example. We got all the hostages back,” Trump replied.

He added, “You know, people forget, there’s not a lot of fighting in Gaza. Hamas is now willing to give up their weapons. They’ve done an incredible job. Nobody could’ve done the job they did.”

Q: Do you have concerns about Witkoff and Kushner in their ability to close the deal?

Trump: No, they’re doing a great job. Look at Gaza. pic.twitter.com/rRR03LhpSE

— Acyn (@Acyn) September 13, 2026

Trump’s comments came shortly after Kushner publicly discussed the circumstances that enabled the administration to advance its Gaza agreement, including the diplomatic repercussions of Israel’s September 2025 attempt to assassinate senior Hamas leaders in Qatar.

Speaking remotely Sunday at the Yalta European Strategy conference, Kushner said the Trump administration took advantage of the international backlash that followed the Israeli operation in Doha and used Israel’s growing diplomatic isolation as leverage to press the Israeli government toward an agreement ending the war.

The September 9, 2025, Israeli strike targeted senior Hamas officials gathered in Doha while they were considering an American ceasefire proposal. The senior Hamas figures targeted in the operation survived, while several security personnel were killed.

According to Kushner, the failure to eliminate the Hamas leaders intensified Israel’s international isolation. The administration subsequently used that changed diplomatic environment to increase pressure on Israel to accept the proposed agreement.

Roughly one month after the Doha operation, Israel and Hamas reached a ceasefire and hostage-release agreement. Under the deal, 48 hostages were returned from Gaza, including surviving captives and the bodies of hostages who had been murdered in captivity.

Kushner said Israeli officials initially had significant reservations about the agreement Washington was pressing them to accept, but their view of the arrangement changed after it went into effect.

“Today, they’re quite happy with [the agreement], but at the time, they were uncomfortable with what we were pushing them to do,” he said.

“Ultimately, it turned out to be great for them; it turned out to be great for the people of Gaza, because now we have a new government there that’s obviously looking to take over soon once we advance on the demilitarization.”

Kushner and Witkoff have previously described the Qatar strike as a turning point in their Gaza diplomacy. Kushner said in an earlier interview that the two believed the attack was strategically misguided and decided amid the resulting crisis to combine an earlier ceasefire proposal with a broader plan to end the war.

At the same time, the administration has encountered significant difficulties in implementing the subsequent stages of its Gaza plan, particularly regarding Hamas’ disarmament and the future governing structure for the territory.

Kushner said last week that Israel’s approaching election was complicating efforts to advance the plan, even though he maintained that Washington and Yerushalayim largely agree about their ultimate objectives for Gaza.

“I think we agree with them on the end state,” Kushner said of Israel. “They just have a crazy election and that makes them a little irrational in certain regards but we’re very determined and we’re working through these things.”

The administration is now seeking to move ahead with the establishment of a new governing structure for Gaza while simultaneously implementing the demilitarization of the territory.

Those efforts have been complicated by disagreements over precisely how Hamas would surrender its weapons and when Israel would withdraw its forces. Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu has insisted that Israel will not pull out of Gaza before Hamas disarms.

Hamas has previously rejected demands that it completely surrender its weapons. According to the report, Kushner met last month with senior Hamas official Khalil al-Hayya and warned that any violation of the Trump framework, including an effort to conceal weapons, would bring the diplomatic process to an immediate end and leave Israel free to resume military action.

Hamas officials have reportedly since assured mediators that the terror group will implement all 20 provisions of the framework, including its requirements for disarmament and the demilitarization of Gaza.

Trump’s comments Sunday indicated that he views the Gaza agreement as one of Kushner and Witkoff’s principal diplomatic achievements, particularly the return of the hostages, while the administration continues working to implement the remaining provisions of its plan.

{Matzav.com}

Israeli Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu pushed back Sunday against comments by Jared Kushner, President Donald Trump’s son-in-law and envoy, who characterized Israel’s failed assassination attempt against Hamas leaders in Doha last September as an operational failure that left Israel increasingly isolated and ultimately helped push Yerushalayim toward a deal with Hamas.

In a statement issued by the Likud, Netanyahu’s party argued that precisely the opposite had occurred. It said Netanyahu’s decisions to enter Gaza City and strike Hamas leaders in Qatar, combined with intense pressure applied by President Trump, forced Hamas to abandon its previous demands and agree to release all of the hostages who remained in Gaza.

Kushner made his comments during a video conversation from Malta, where he was involved in White House efforts to bring an end to the war in Ukraine. While there, the American envoy met with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, a day after holding a three-hour discussion in Moscow with Russian President Vladimir Putin.

“It was an operational failure that led to isolation… We used that dynamic to push them into a deal,” Kushner said during the video conversation.

Kushner’s remarks came amid continuing differences between the Trump administration and the Israeli government over the implementation of the U.S.-backed plan for Gaza.

His description of the Doha operation suggested that the diplomatic fallout from the attempted strike created leverage that Washington was subsequently able to use in negotiations. Netanyahu’s Likud, however, maintained that the military pressure itself — including the Gaza City operation and the attempt to eliminate senior Hamas figures in Qatar — was instrumental in breaking Hamas’ resistance.

The disagreement comes as the White House continues pressing Israel to move forward with the next stages of the Gaza plan, particularly the disarmament of Hamas and the reconstruction of the Strip.

Kushner met with Netanyahu for approximately four hours last month as part of the administration’s effort to advance the plan and resolve outstanding disagreements surrounding its implementation.

During that meeting, the sides reached an understanding that reconstruction in Gaza would not proceed without the complete disarmament of Hamas.

Under the framework discussed, the first stage of demilitarizing Gaza would require Hamas to surrender all of its weapons for destruction under the supervision of Gen. Jeffers.

President Donald Trump on Sunday played down a report that Chinese entities provided Iran with high-resolution satellite imagery of an American military base in Jordan before an Iranian missile strike killed three U.S. service members, saying that China conducts intelligence operations against the United States just as Washington spies on Beijing.

The Wall Street Journal reported Friday, citing U.S. officials familiar with the matter, that Iran obtained satellite images of Muwaffaq Salti Air Base in northeastern Jordan from Chinese entities both before and after Tehran’s July 17 attack. U.S. officials have linked the imagery to the strike, although they have not accused the Chinese government itself of directly participating in the attack.

Asked aboard Air Force One on Sunday about the report and whether he intended to raise the matter with Chinese President Xi Jinping, Trump did not directly address the question, instead noting that intelligence gathering is conducted by both countries.

“They basically do what we do,” Trump told reporters.

“You know what they say? That China spies on us,” Trump said.

“I say you’re right, and we spy on them, too,” he added.

Trump also offered a relatively measured assessment of Xi’s conduct amid the tensions between Washington and Beijing.

“I think he’s behaved reasonably well, and we behave reasonably well,” Trump said as he returned to the United States following a weekend trip to Ireland.

The President’s comments came after the Journal reported that U.S. officials believe Chinese-sourced imagery was connected to Iran’s deadly July 17 ballistic missile strike on Muwaffaq Salti Air Base, a major U.S. Air Force hub in Jordan.

Three American service members were killed when Iranian ballistic missiles struck a housing area at the base where U.S. personnel were staying. Four other American troops were wounded.

The three troops killed were First Lt. Tyler James Feehan, 25; Pvt. Isabella Gonzales, 19; and Sgt. Angel Rampersad, 28. They were assigned to missile-defense units at the base.

Iran had already targeted Muwaffaq Salti Air Base in the days preceding the deadly attack. Subsequent visual and satellite analysis showed damage to living quarters, hangars and drone shelters at the sprawling installation.

According to the Journal, Tehran obtained high-resolution imagery of the base from Chinese sources ahead of the attack and additional imagery afterward. U.S. officials reportedly regard the finding as the clearest indication thus far that assistance originating from Chinese entities may have contributed directly to Iran’s ability to strike American forces during the war.

The officials cited by the Journal did not identify the Chinese entities that allegedly supplied the images, and they stopped short of alleging that Beijing itself authorized or participated in providing the intelligence used by Iran. Reuters said it could not independently verify the Journal’s report.

Senior U.S. officials have nevertheless raised the satellite imagery issue directly with Chinese officials. Beijing has rejected the allegations and demanded that Washington provide evidence supporting them.

A spokesperson for the Chinese Embassy in Washington defended China’s relationship with Tehran, saying cooperation between the two countries complies with international law and accusing unnamed critics of “maliciously linking and smearing other countries.” The spokesperson did not specifically address the allegation involving the July 17 strike.

Concerns about Chinese satellite support for Iran had surfaced well before the deadly Jordan attack. According to the Journal, the Trump administration had warned Beijing months earlier that Chinese companies appeared to be supplying Iran with satellite imagery that could be used for military targeting.

The United States also imposed sanctions in May on three Chinese companies over satellite imagery sales to Iran. U.S. officials are now concerned that Chinese-sourced data could also improve Tehran’s ability to locate and target American naval vessels and other U.S. military assets operating in the Middle East.

One element of the relationship under scrutiny involves Iran’s access to Chinese satellite technology. The New York Post, citing the Journal’s reporting, said Tehran acquired the Chinese TEE-01B satellite in 2024 for approximately $36 million and gained access to ground stations operated by Chinese satellite company Emposat. It remains unclear, however, whether those systems supplied the particular imagery connected by U.S. officials to the July attack.

The revelations come at a particularly sensitive moment in U.S.-China relations, with Trump and Xi expected to meet in the United States on September 24. China has not yet officially confirmed the planned summit.

Despite the report about Iran’s use of Chinese-sourced imagery, Trump indicated Sunday that he continues to view his relationship with Xi positively and did not suggest that the allegations would derail the anticipated meeting.

The administration’s response comes as Washington attempts to manage its broader competition with Beijing while simultaneously confronting Iran and scrutinizing the extent to which Tehran has received assistance from China and other foreign sources during the war.

For U.S. officials, the central concern extends beyond the July 17 attack. If Iran is receiving timely, high-resolution commercial satellite imagery from Chinese entities, that information could potentially improve Tehran’s ability to monitor American bases, ships and troop movements throughout the region. The Journal reported that those concerns have become increasingly urgent following the deaths of the three U.S. troops in Jordan.

PHOENIX — A newly unveiled statue honoring slain conservative activist Charlie Kirk was vandalized with red spray paint outside Turning Point USA’s Arizona headquarters early Sunday, just three days after the memorial was installed to mark the first anniversary of Kirk’s assassination.

The eight-foot bronze-colored statue was found covered with red paint Sunday morning, with paint sprayed across Kirk’s face, neck, torso and hand. A frowning face was drawn on the statue’s chest, while a nearby memorial display was also defaced. Phoenix police are investigating and, as of Sunday evening, had not announced any arrests or identified a suspect.

Police said they received reports of vandalism at the memorial shortly after 8 a.m. Sunday. Officers responded to Turning Point USA’s headquarters near 48th Street and Beverly Road, where the statue and a nearby sign had been spray-painted.

Photographs from the scene showed red paint concentrated on several portions of the statue, including Kirk’s neck — the area where he was shot during the September 10, 2025, attack at Utah Valley University. Red paint also covered his face and left hand, while the sad-face image was painted across his torso.

The vandal or vandals also targeted a memorial display positioned near the statue. According to Turning Point USA, Kirk’s face was crossed out on one sign and the name “Jesus” and a cross were also marked over. Turning Point USA Chief Operating Officer Tyler Bowyer said he believed another marking left at the scene spelled “Satan.”

“This morning we woke up to radical criminals vandalizing our Headquarters,” Bowyer wrote. “Crossing over Charlie’s face, scratching out Jesus and the Cross & spraying red paint on his neck. This isn’t the country we want to live in. Arizona is not Gotham.”

Turning Point USA said surveillance footage from the overnight incident was being reviewed and that the organization was cooperating with law enforcement in an effort to identify those responsible. The group said the statue would be repaired and the damaged memorial signs replaced.

“We will restore the statue and replace the signs, but we are also reviewing the footage of the incident and are working with law enforcement to identify who did this and hold them accountable,” the organization wrote. “But vandalism like this is not funny, it’s diabolical. The incident happened in the middle of the night because evil never sleeps. Beyond spray painting on the neck and face, they made the intentional decision to cross out the name of Jesus on a nearby sign.”

Kirk’s widow, Erika Kirk, also responded Sunday, saying the vandalism would not diminish her husband’s influence or the work of the organization he helped build.

“They thought a bullet would silence my husband’s voice but it only made it louder. They think spray paint can obscure his legacy, but it will only spread it further. Every attempt to tear down what Charlie built makes us root deeper and work even harder.”

Maricopa County Attorney Rachel Mitchell condemned the vandalism as well, declaring, “These acts of vandalism will not be tolerated.”

The statue had been unveiled Thursday, September 10, exactly one year after Kirk was fatally shot while speaking at a Turning Point USA event at Utah Valley University. The statue stands eight feet tall and depicts Kirk wearing a T-shirt bearing the word “FREEDOM,” resembling the clothing he wore on the day he was killed.

Utah sculptor Quintin McCann, who created the statue, told FOX 10 that he began working on Kirk’s likeness almost immediately after learning of his assassination.

“Someone’s death, who I’ve never met, has never impacted me so much. And I’m sure many people can agree. And I just stayed at work that evening and just started sculpting his portrait,” McCann said.

Kirk, 31, was speaking before a crowd at Utah Valley University when he was shot in the neck. He was taken to a nearby hospital, where he died. Tyler Robinson was arrested two days later and charged in connection with Kirk’s killing. Robinson has pleaded not guilty, and prosecutors are seeking the death penalty if he is convicted. His next scheduled court appearance is October 23.

Supporters of Kirk who gathered near the vandalized memorial Sunday expressed anger over the attack.

“He was non-violent, so he just died for his beliefs, his challenge to make society better,” Kirk supporter Kyle Elliott said. “Like Turning Point, just like the name of the company, Turning Point USA, so we are at a turning point for sure, and it’s because of Charlie Kirk.”

Police have not publicly identified a motive for the vandalism, and there was no immediate indication that investigators had identified any suspects. Authorities asked anyone with information about the incident to contact Phoenix police or Silent Witness.

[Video below.] House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries declined Sunday to rule out the possibility that Democrats could pursue impeachment proceedings against President Donald Trump if they capture control of the House in the November midterm elections, saying any future action would depend on the facts, the law and the Constitution.

“No, we haven’t ruled anything in and we haven’t ruled anything out in terms of impeachment,” Jeffries said on ABC’s “This Week.”

Jeffries said he would look to Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., and other Democrats serving on the House Judiciary Committee, as well as Rep. Robert Garcia, D-Calif., and Democratic members of the House Oversight Committee, to take the lead in examining potential wrongdoing.

“[And] be guided by the Constitution, and then let the chips fall where they may, in the best interests of the American people, so that the House, once again, can function like a separate and co-equal branch of government and a check and balance on an out-of-control executive branch,” Jeffries said.

Trump was impeached twice by the House during his first term and acquitted by the Senate on both occasions. The President has recently predicted that Democrats would attempt to impeach him again if they regain the House majority.

“They’re going to impeach me. They have no idea why,” Trump said at a rally last week.

Jeffries also promised that a Democratic-controlled House would use its investigative and oversight authority to pursue individuals it determines have engaged in wrongdoing, saying Democrats would “hold the crooks accountable.”

“If someone has been screwing over the American people, shortchanging the American people, or stealing from the American people, they’re going to be held accountable under a Democratic majority,” Jeffries said.

Reuters reported last month that House Democrats have been developing plans for extensive investigations if they regain control of the chamber, focusing in part on companies and financial institutions connected to Trump. According to that report, Democrats involved in the planning were emphasizing investigations rather than an immediate effort to impeach the President.

Despite his sharp criticism of the Trump administration, Jeffries also left open the possibility that a Democratic House majority could work with the President on issues where the two sides find agreement.

“We’ve said from the very beginning of this Congress, if the other side of the aisle is willing to find the common ground necessary to decisively address the fact that everyday Americans are drowning in this Republican economy, working hard, playing by the rules, can’t thrive and can barely survive, then we’re committed to actually trying to find that common ground, as we just recently did with the housing affordability bill that is now law,” Jeffries said.

WATCH:

{Matzav.com}

A new academic study by a Yale University professor concluded that The New York Times’ reporting on Israel’s war against Hamas systematically presented the conflict in ways unfavorable to Israel, including by giving far greater attention to Palestinian suffering than Israeli suffering and minimizing Palestinian violence.

The study was conducted by Edieal Pinker, a professor at the Yale School of Management, and published in the academic journal Studies in Conflict & Terrorism.

Pinker examined 1,559 New York Times articles published between the Hamas-led October 7, 2023, attack on Israel and June 7, 2024. His analysis found that the newspaper frequently left out Israeli military casualties while giving less prominence to acts of violence carried out by Palestinians.

“Personal accounts of Palestinian suffering appear two out of every three days, while comparable accounts of Israeli suffering rarely appear,” Pinker wrote in his study.

According to Pinker’s analysis, the cumulative effect of the newspaper’s reporting was to depict Israel as the “sole aggressor” in the conflict while presenting Palestinians primarily as “passive victims.”

The New York Times rejected Pinker’s conclusions and defended its reporting on the Israel-Hamas war.

“Our editors make careful and deliberate choices about every story we publish to ensure our language, framing, prominence and tone remain true to our mission of independent journalism,” a spokesperson for the Times said in a statement.

“We remain open to good-faith disagreement but will not change our coverage to buttress entrenched perspectives,” the spokesperson added. “Our commitment is to independent reporting that our readers can trust.”

U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee also responded to the study, sharply criticizing the Times and what he described as broader bias in mainstream news organizations.

“When you didn’t think you could have more contempt for the NYT & the bias of MSM, this will solidify your outrage as to how unreliable once respected & now discredited news organizations have become,” Huckabee wrote on X.

A British Breslover, Yitzchok Elmkies z”l, a father of seven, was found dead in a wooded area near Uman over Rosh Hashanah, with Ukrainian authorities investigating the circumstances of his death amid reports that signs of violence were discovered on his body.

Elmkies was approximately 45 to 50 years old and a resident of England and had been staying in Uman in recent months. One report said that he had been living in the Ukrainian city for approximately a year and a half.

According to sources, Elmkies was discovered by Breslover chassidim who had gone into the forest for hisbodedus during Rosh Hashanah. They came across him lying unresponsive and summoned emergency personnel and local authorities. Responders who arrived at the scene were unable to save him and pronounced him dead.

Signs of violence were found on Elmkies’ body, raising the possibility that he had been murdered. Investigators were examining a possible homicide. However, as of Sunday night, Ukrainian authorities had not officially confirmed that Elmkies was murdered, and the precise circumstances surrounding his death remained under investigation.

United Hatzalah confirmed that a Jewish man from England had been found dead in the forest near the tziyun of Rav Nachman of Breslov.

“During the holiday, we dealt with a case involving a person, a Jewish resident of England, who was found lying lifeless in the forest. The circumstances of the incident are under investigation,” said Aharon Ben Harush, director of the United Hatzalah delegation and deputy head of its Uman branch.

Ben Harush said United Hatzalah representatives in Uman were also working with Ukrainian officials in an effort to have the body released as quickly as possible for kevurah.

“United Hatzalah representatives in Uman are working with the authorities to have his body released for burial as soon as possible,” he said.

The discovery occurred during the massive annual Rosh Hashanah gathering in Uman, where tens of thousands of Yidden from Israel, the United States, Britain and countries around the world had traveled to spend the Yom Tov near the tziyun of Rav Nachman of Breslov.

During the two days of Rosh Hashanah, United Hatzalah personnel operating their Uman medical clinic treated dozens of people who became ill or suffered injuries of various kinds.

Elmkies’ death cast a pall over the enormous Rosh Hashanah gathering, particularly as word spread that he had been found by fellow chassidim in a forest used by visitors for hisbodedus.

Ukrainian police were continuing to investigate the case Sunday night and had not yet publicly announced a definitive cause or manner of death. Reports emphasizing the possibility of murder remained based on the reported signs of violence and information from people familiar with the scene rather than an official determination by investigators.

Elmkies is survived by seven children.

Yehi zichro boruch.

{Matzav.com}

Rudy Giuliani said he put aside his sharp disagreements with New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani during an unexpected face-to-face encounter at Friday’s 25th anniversary commemoration of the September 11 attacks, telling Mamdani during their handshake that he regularly prays for him.

“We ended up facing each other. I said, ‘I pray for you all the time,’” Giuliani, 82, told the Post.

Mamdani responded, “Thank you,” according to Giuliani’s account.

The brief interaction came after Giuliani had publicly called on Mamdani not to attend the Ground Zero ceremony, citing his objections to the mayor’s views and associations related to the September 11 attacks.

Giuliani said that once the two men found themselves facing one another, he concluded that refusing to acknowledge Mamdani would have shifted attention away from the victims and their families and turned their political dispute into the story of the day.

“We realized that if either one of us turned our backs [on the other], that would have been the story,” Giuliani told the Post.

“It’s about respect for the families, the solemnity of the occasion,” he added.

Despite their significant political disagreements, Giuliani also had some praise for Mamdani, noting that the mayor remained at the lengthy Ground Zero commemoration through its conclusion.

“He stayed until the very end. I give him credit for that,” Giuliani told the Post, while making clear that the cordial encounter had not altered his broader views of Mamdani.

“Our differences are strong and haven’t changed,” Giuliani said.

Among the issues Giuliani had raised before the anniversary was Mamdani’s association with controversial podcast host Hasan Piker, whose past comments concerning the September 11 attacks have drawn criticism.

“I’m concerned about him hanging around with guys saying 9/11 was our fault,” Giuliani told the Post.

Mamdani, 34, nevertheless attended Friday’s ceremony at the National September 11 Memorial plaza in Lower Manhattan, despite Giuliani and some relatives of 9/11 victims publicly objecting to his presence.

Mamdani said afterward that the anniversary should remain centered on those murdered in the attacks, their families, the first responders and others affected by September 11 rather than on political disputes.

The handshake between the current and previous mayors was captured during the commemoration and quickly attracted attention, particularly because it followed days of public criticism of Mamdani by Giuliani ahead of the 25th anniversary.

Federal health officials have declared the largest cyclospora outbreak in U.S. history over after nearly 20,000 confirmed infections, two deaths and hundreds of hospitalizations — even as authorities investigate a separate salmonella outbreak linked to broccoli sprouts.

The Food and Drug Administration announced Friday that the cyclospora outbreak had ended after confirming that all products covered by the recall had been removed from the market.

But health officials are now warning about another potential threat in the produce aisle.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is investigating a multistate salmonella outbreak associated with broccoli sprouts produced by Evergreen Fresh Sprouts. So far, 22 people have become ill and two have required hospitalization.

Idaho-based Evergreen Fresh Sprouts voluntarily recalled affected cases distributed in Idaho, Montana, Utah and Washington.

Officials are concerned that the sprouts may be contaminated with Salmonella Bovismorbificans, a strain of bacteria that can cause gastrointestinal illness, including bloody diarrhea.

The cyclospora crisis began in July and rapidly grew into an unprecedented outbreak. Federal officials ultimately received reports of nearly 20,000 laboratory-confirmed infections — several times the number recorded during the same period a year earlier — along with more than 6,100 suspected cases.

Two people died and approximately 570 others were hospitalized, according to the CDC. Cyclospora infection can cause severe and prolonged diarrhea as well as vomiting, bloating and other gastrointestinal symptoms.

Investigators linked the outbreak to Mexican operations belonging to California-based Taylor Farms. Taco Bell restaurants were particularly affected, while the widespread publicity surrounding the outbreak also contributed to a major decline in lettuce sales.

Numerous people who later became ill had eaten at Taco Bell locations in Michigan, Ohio and other parts of the country.

At the outbreak’s height, federal officials recorded more than 1,000 infections in a single day. By August, that figure had plunged to fewer than two newly detected infections per day.

Hundreds of people who became sick have filed lawsuits against Taco Bell and Taylor Farms. The Post previously reported that some victims could eventually receive tens of thousands of dollars in compensation for their injuries and suffering.

Taylor Farms initially disputed the government’s conclusion that its lettuce was contaminated and said the FDA “apologized” over conflicting produce test results, maintaining that the agency had made a “mistake.”

The FDA rejected that account, saying it did not apologize to Taylor Farms and pointing out that the company ultimately recalled 236,192 cases of salad products because of possible contamination.

Despite declaring the outbreak over Friday, federal authorities said their investigation into how the contamination occurred was continuing.

Before this year’s unprecedented surge, 2019 had been the second-worst year on record for cyclospora infections in the United States, with approximately 4,700 cases reported nationwide.