Feed aggregator

‘You Talk About Gaza But Won’t Say Hamas’: Danon Clashes With UN Officials in Heated Security Council Showdown

Matzav -

A sharp confrontation unfolded at the United Nations Security Council as Israeli Ambassador Danny Danon accused senior UN officials of ignoring Hamas’s role in the humanitarian crisis in Gaza while directing criticism at Israel.

The dispute centered on remarks by Tom Fletcher, the UN Under-Secretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs, during a discussion on conditions in the Gaza Strip. Danon challenged Fletcher for focusing on obstacles to aid deliveries while, he said, failing to address the role of Hamas.

Addressing Fletcher directly during the session, Danon said: “You spoke about the humanitarian situation in Gaza, criticized Israel and described the obstacles to bringing in aid. But once again you failed to mention the biggest obstacle to improving the humanitarian situation—Hamas. Why do you refuse to call the problem by its name?”

The Israeli envoy went on to argue that no lasting improvement in Gaza is possible as long as Hamas remains armed and in control.

“The humanitarian situation will not improve, Gaza will not be rebuilt, and the war will not end as long as Hamas remains armed.”

His comments reflected Israel’s long-standing criticism that international organizations frequently overlook Hamas’s responsibility for conditions in Gaza while focusing disproportionately on Israeli actions.

Danon also used the session to press the United Nations for answers regarding the dismissal of dozens of employees from the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees, commonly known as UNRWA.

Referring to the agency’s recent personnel actions, he said: “This week UNRWA fired 70 employees, citing ‘safety and security risks.'”

Questioning the explanation, Danon continued: “If there is no terrorism problem in UNRWA, then why exactly were 70 employees fired?”

The ambassador argued that Israel’s warnings about Hamas infiltration within UNRWA had been dismissed for years and said recent developments had validated those concerns.

“For years we warned that Hamas had infiltrated UNRWA. For years the UN denied it. Now even UNRWA is forced to dismiss its own employees. It is time to stop covering up reality and start providing answers.”

Danon’s remarks came amid renewed criticism by Israeli officials of the United Nations, including controversy surrounding comments by Francesca Albanese, the UN special rapporteur on Palestinian issues, who was accused by critics of responding dismissively to a bereaved Israeli mother whose daughter was killed during the October 7 massacre.

The dispute also follows a series of recent Israeli measures targeting UNRWA. In recent weeks, Israel has taken steps against the agency, including cutting water and electricity infrastructure connected to its offices in Yerushalayim, after what Israeli officials say was evidence linking some agency employees to Hamas.

The latest exchange at the Security Council highlighted the continuing tensions between Israel and various UN bodies, with Israeli officials accusing the organization of anti-Israel bias and of failing to adequately confront Hamas’s activities in Gaza.

{Matzav.com}

Yonatan Razel Released From Hospital After Weeks of Treatment for Brain Hemorrhage

Matzav -

Singer-songwriter Yonatan Razel was released Friday morning from Shaare Zedek Medical Center and returned home in good condition after spending several weeks hospitalized following a brain hemorrhage.

The Yerushalayim hospital announced that Razel had completed his hospitalization and was continuing his recovery at home after receiving treatment for the serious medical condition.

According to the medical center, Razel underwent extensive supportive care throughout his stay from multiple teams within Shaare Zedek’s neurological services. His treatment involved doctors and nurses from the Neurological Intensive Care Unit led by Dr. Stefan Mausbach, working together with the Neuro-Radiology Unit headed by Dr. Yaakov Amsalem, as well as the medical and nursing staff of the Neurosurgery Department under the leadership of Dr. Nevo Margalit.

In a statement, the hospital said: “Thanks to the rapid and professional diagnosis and treatment Razel received immediately upon arriving at Shaare Zedek, along with comprehensive care throughout his hospitalization, he has returned to full and normal functioning.

“We congratulate Yonatan and his family on his discharge from the medical center and wish him complete health and continued creativity and contribution to our cultural world.”

Razel’s family also issued a statement expressing gratitude for his recovery and for the outpouring of support they received during the ordeal.

“We are filled with gratitude to Hakadosh Boruch Hu for the open miracles He has bestowed upon us. Thank you very much to the wonderful people of Israel for your prayers and concern for Yonatan’s well-being. And last but certainly not least, a special and heartfelt thank you to the entire staff of Shaare Zedek Medical Center, the doctors and nurses, for their devoted care.”

{Matzav.com}

Huckabee Reassures Israel: Trump Hasn’t Abandoned Jerusalem, He’s Focused on Winning Elections

Matzav -

As criticism mounts in Israel over the Trump administration’s understandings with Iran, U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee publicly endorsed an argument that frames the move not as a retreat from Israel, but as a political calculation aimed at preserving Republican strength ahead of next year’s midterm elections.

According to journalist Ariel Kahana, Huckabee shared comments made by Mike Zell, chairman of the Republican Party in Israel, and wrote, “I couldn’t have said it better myself,” signaling agreement with the analysis.

In the statement cited by Huckabee, Zell argued that President Donald Trump has not altered his commitment to Israel despite concerns surrounding the recent U.S.-Iran understandings.

According to Zell, Trump “has not changed course or abandoned Israel,” and his support for the Jewish state and the Jewish people remains “unquestionable.”

Zell contended that the president’s decisions are being driven primarily by domestic political considerations, particularly the desire to secure Republican victories in the November midterm elections and prevent Democrats from regaining control of Congress.

He argued that Trump believes a Democratic-controlled Congress would spend the remainder of his term attempting to undermine his presidency through investigations, impeachment efforts, and obstruction of both foreign and domestic policy initiatives.

According to Zell’s analysis, American voters are generally more concerned with economic issues such as inflation, energy prices, food costs, and stock-market performance than with security developments in the Middle East.

For that reason, Zell suggested, Trump is seeking to pause the conflict with Iran for the time being in order to lower inflation, stabilize financial markets, and strengthen the economy heading into the election season. He added that this is how the president currently views America’s interests and noted that he personally agrees with that assessment.

Addressing the agreement itself, Zell argued that it should not be viewed as a final settlement but rather as an arrangement designed to facilitate negotiations while maintaining a ceasefire during the current phase.

He maintained that Trump still holds “all the cards” and retains the ability to determine the extent of future American pressure on Iran and its regional proxies.

From Israel’s perspective, Zell said the most important aspect of the arrangement is that Israel is not formally a party to the agreement. In his view, that leaves Israel free to take whatever steps it deems necessary to defend its interests in Lebanon, Syria, and even against Iran itself, whether by prior coordination or as circumstances develop.

At the same time, Zell made clear that he is not entirely satisfied with either the contents of the agreement or some of the rhetoric used by White House officials in defending it.

According to Zell, “this is politics in an election year,” but he stressed that, in his view, the fundamental relationship between Israel and the United States remains strong and unbreakable.

Huckabee’s public embrace of Zell’s analysis comes at a particularly sensitive moment in U.S.-Israel relations. The Trump administration’s agreement with Iran has generated significant criticism within Israel, while reports have emerged that American officials have warned Israeli leaders against publicly attacking the president over the issue.

At the same time, debate over the Iran understandings has not been limited to Israel. Reports from Washington indicate that some Republicans have also expressed reservations about the arrangement, even as White House officials continue presenting it as a policy designed first and foremost to advance American national interests.

{Matzav.com}

Dermer’s Stark Warning to Israel: “Don’t Pick a Fight With Trump”

Matzav -

Former minister Ron Dermer has reportedly delivered an unusually blunt message to Israel’s political and security leadership: avoid attacking the Trump administration and do not allow policy disagreements with Washington to escalate into a public confrontation.

According to a report by Yisroel Hayom, Dermer conveyed the warning amid growing tensions between Israel and the White House following the recent memorandum of understanding between the United States and Iran.

Journalist Dani Zaken reported that two sources said Dermer urged senior Israeli officials to steer clear of an open clash with the administration, fearing such a dispute would further damage relations between Jerusalem and Washington. The warning comes at a time when Israel is seeking to preserve its operational freedom in both Lebanon and Iran while simultaneously facing increasing American pressure on the diplomatic front.

The backdrop to Dermer’s message is criticism recently attributed to U.S. Vice President JD Vance regarding Israel and Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu. According to an earlier Yisroel Hayom report, Vance allegedly pressed President Donald Trump to rein in Netanyahu whenever Israel carried out military actions in Lebanon and accused the Israeli leader of attempting to undermine the emerging agreement with Iran. White House officials have denied those claims.

Dermer’s intervention carries particular weight because of his longstanding role as one of Netanyahu’s closest advisers on U.S.-Israel relations and his deep familiarity with the political landscape in Washington. The report described him as a former minister, a trusted confidant of Netanyahu, and one of the key architects of Israeli policy in recent years.

According to the report, Dermer is advocating a two-track approach. On one hand, Israel should remain firm in defending its security interests and prevent Iran or Hezbollah from exploiting American diplomatic initiatives. On the other hand, he believes Israel must avoid a direct public confrontation with President Trump, particularly at a time when the administration holds significant influence over developments involving Iran, Lebanon, and Congress.

The report also noted ongoing disagreements within the U.S. administration regarding Lebanon. Some officials reportedly favor tying the Lebanese issue directly to the broader Iran agreement, while others—including the State Department under Secretary of State Marco Rubio—support pursuing a separate Israeli-Lebanese arrangement that would establish a framework for an eventual Israeli withdrawal while also reducing Hezbollah’s influence.

Meanwhile, Israeli officials are reportedly working behind the scenes to build support among lawmakers from both parties in Congress. However, according to the report, they are being careful not to frame those efforts as a direct challenge to President Trump.

That, according to Yisroel Hayom, is precisely the point of Dermer’s warning: fight vigorously for Israel’s security interests, but do not turn disagreements with the White House into a full-scale political battle.

{Matzav.com}

Trump Declares Iran ‘Finished,’ Vows Tehran Won’t Receive ‘Ten Cents’ Under New Agreement

Matzav -

President Donald Trump doubled down Friday on his claim that Iran has been severely weakened by recent military action, insisting that Tehran has emerged from the conflict in a dramatically diminished state and will receive no American funds under the newly signed memorandum of understanding between the two countries.

In two posts published on Truth Social, Trump pushed back against Democratic criticism of his administration’s handling of the war with Iran, arguing that U.S. military operations devastated the country’s military capabilities and fundamentally altered the balance of power in the region.

“The War has diminished Iran!” Trump wrote. “It doesn’t, any longer, have an Air Force, a Navy, Antiaircraft Equipment, Radar, or practically anything else, and yet the Dumocrats say that Iran is better off now than it was four months ago.

“Can you imagine getting away with that??? How stupid can some people be???”

Trump’s comments came just days after Washington and Tehran reached a framework agreement intended to halt months of fighting and restore access through the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world’s most strategically important maritime corridors and a key route for global oil shipments.

However, reports emerged Friday evening that Iran had once again shut down the strait, raising fresh questions about the future of the agreement.

The president has repeatedly maintained that the military campaign accomplished its primary objectives, significantly degrading Iran’s military infrastructure and compelling the regime to engage in negotiations.

In a separate Truth Social message, Trump rejected the notion that the United States had entered talks from a position of weakness or urgency.

“We didn’t meet out of desperation, Iran did,” Trump wrote. “They are FINISHED! We’ll play out the 60 days. They get no money, not ten cents!”

Under the terms of the memorandum of understanding, both sides now have a 60-day window to negotiate a broader and more permanent agreement.

Administration officials have said the framework is designed both to ensure the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz and to address concerns surrounding Iran’s nuclear activities, although the final terms of any long-term agreement remain under negotiation.

The accord follows a months-long conflict that began in late February after Trump authorized military strikes against Iran.

During the war, American and allied forces targeted Iranian military installations, missile infrastructure, and nuclear-related facilities, while Iran responded with attacks across multiple locations in the region.

Supporters of the administration contend that the campaign inflicted substantial damage on Iran’s military network and strengthened Washington’s hand at the negotiating table.

Critics, meanwhile, have questioned whether the conflict achieved lasting strategic benefits, arguing that diplomacy might have produced similar outcomes without the costs and risks associated with military action.

Trump has consistently rejected that argument, insisting that Iran is in a far weaker position today than it was before the fighting erupted.

Administration officials have also highlighted declining oil prices following the reopening of key shipping routes in the Persian Gulf, arguing that lower energy costs could provide broader economic benefits for consumers in the months ahead.

{Matzav.com}

Trump Says He Personally Pressed Israel for Lebanon Ceasefire, Predicts Vance Will Join Iran Talks

Matzav -

President Donald Trump revealed Friday that he directly urged Israel to accept a ceasefire in Lebanon, calling the agreement a welcome development as diplomatic efforts continue across the region.

Speaking with NBC News, Trump said he had been in contact with Israeli officials and encouraged them to move forward with a halt in hostilities.

“It’s a positive,” he told the network, adding, “It’s a little icing on the cake.”

Trump declined to say whether he personally spoke with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu during the discussions.

His remarks came shortly after a senior U.S. official told Reuters that Israel and Hezbollah had agreed to a ceasefire that went into effect at 4:00 p.m. local time Friday.

A Hezbollah official, speaking to NBC News, said the terror group intends to honor the ceasefire agreement but alleged that Israeli forces were continuing to fire and attempting to advance farther into Lebanese territory.

Trump also addressed the future of negotiations with Iran, expressing confidence that Vice President JD Vance would eventually travel to Switzerland to participate in peace talks despite Tehran’s decision to cancel Friday’s scheduled round of negotiations following Israeli strikes in Lebanon.

“I think he’s going to end up going back,” Trump said. “Steve Witkoff is going separately. I think JD’s going a little bit later.”

Meanwhile, the United States reportedly informed Iran that Israel was not expected to intensify its military operations in Lebanon, even after a deadly Hezbollah attack in southern Lebanon killed four Israeli soldiers.

The latest ceasefire comes against a backdrop of continued casualties. Since the original truce between Israel and Hezbollah took effect in April, 23 Israeli soldiers and one civilian employee of the Defense Ministry have been killed during operations in southern Lebanon.

{Matzav.com}

U.S. Intelligence Warns Netanyahu Could Derail Trump’s Iran Peace Push

Matzav -

American intelligence officials have reportedly warned the White House that Israeli Prime Minister Binyomin Netanyahu may take steps that could threaten President Donald Trump’s efforts to secure a lasting agreement with Iran, according to a report published Friday by The Washington Post citing classified U.S. assessments.

The intelligence findings underscore growing tensions between Washington and Israel as the Trump administration seeks to advance a diplomatic framework with Tehran while urging restraint in Lebanon. U.S. officials have publicly cautioned Israel against military actions that could jeopardize the fragile negotiations now underway.

According to American officials familiar with the assessment, intelligence analysts concluded that Netanyahu faces significant domestic political pressure ahead of national elections expected later this year. The report reportedly argues that his political future depends heavily on persuading Israeli voters that he will not withdraw forces from Lebanon or ease military pressure on Hezbollah.

The assessment also describes mounting dissatisfaction within Israel over the preliminary terms of the U.S.-Iran understanding. Israeli officials reportedly believe the framework weakens the policy of maximum pressure against Tehran and could restrict Israel’s freedom of action against regional threats. White House officials, however, contend that the agreement still allows Israel to respond when necessary and argue that concerns about reopening the Strait of Hormuz and preventing a broader economic crisis take precedence. According to the report, intelligence analysts believe that any ceasefire or Israeli withdrawal could be viewed by many voters as a political setback for Netanyahu.

Responding to the reported assessment, a senior Israeli official defended Israel’s military operations, stating, “Israeli military activity in Lebanon is for the sole purpose of defending Israeli citizens from continuous attacks by Hezbollah.”

The report surfaced as Israel and Hezbollah moved forward with a ceasefire that took effect at 4:00 p.m. Friday.

Earlier in the day, U.S. officials reportedly informed Iran that Israel was not expected to intensify its military campaign in Lebanon despite the deadly Hezbollah attack in southern Lebanon that killed four Israeli soldiers.

The conflict has continued to exact a toll even since the April ceasefire arrangement. Since that truce went into effect, 23 Israeli soldiers and one civilian employee of the Defense Ministry have been killed during operations in southern Lebanon.

{Matzav.com}

Hezbollah Chief Vows Israel’s Expulsion as Fragile Lebanon Ceasefire Takes Hold

Matzav -

Hezbollah leader Naim Qassem delivered a combative televised speech Friday, declaring that the terror group will ultimately force Israel out of all Lebanese territory and insisting that efforts to weaken Hezbollah have failed despite months of fighting and international pressure.

During his address, Qassem portrayed the current conflict as part of a broad campaign led by the United States, Israel, and their allies to dismantle Hezbollah and erase its influence within Lebanon.

“Today, in Lebanon, we are facing the most dangerous stage in our history and the largest joint American, Israeli, and international conspiracy, which threatens the future of our country and our children,” Qassem claimed. “The main objective of this plan is to uproot and completely eliminate the resistance and its popular base in Lebanon.”

Qassem argued that Israel and its partners turned to what he described as increasingly aggressive methods after failing to defeat Hezbollah militarily.

“To achieve this goal, the enemies first launched a criminal and unrestrained war, killing civilians and carrying out widespread destruction in order to bring the resistance to its knees,” Qassem charged. “In the next step, the United States and the Zionist regime, after witnessing changes in regional equations following developments in Syria, violated previous agreements in order to upset the balance of power in their favor.”

The Hezbollah chief maintained that attempts to destroy the organization have fallen short and vowed that his group will continue its struggle until Israel no longer maintains any presence on Lebanese soil.

“The project to destroy Hezbollah has failed, Israel’s plans have reached a dead end, and the final victory – meaning the complete and definitive expulsion of the occupiers from every last inch of Lebanese territory – is inevitable,” Qassem asserted. “Israel will leave the last inch of Lebanese soil. Be sure of that. Victory in every sense means the expulsion of Israel from our land, which will definitely be achieved. We are not people of surrender.”

His remarks came one day after President Donald Trump publicly expressed optimism that fighting throughout the region, including between Israel and Hezbollah, would soon come to an end.

Writing on Truth Social, Trump stated, “The United States is committed to PEACE, and we encourage everyone in the Middle East Region to maintain their commitment to allowing our negotiations to beautifully unfold. The Markets are loving what is happening with Oil Prices way down, and Stocks way up.”

Trump added: “We expect a complete Ceasefire on all fronts, including Lebanon, Hezbollah, and Israel. Thank you for your attention to this matter!”

The memorandum of understanding recently reached between the United States and Iran states that implementation of the agreement would bring about “the immediate and permanent termination” of hostilities, including the conflict in Lebanon, while also “ensuring the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Lebanon.”

The document further provides that, “The final deal will confirm the permanent termination of the war on all fronts, including in Lebanon, and other provisions of this paragraph.”

Later Friday, Israel and Hezbollah agreed to a ceasefire that took effect at 4:00 p.m., raising hopes that the latest round of violence could be contained.

Before the truce went into effect, U.S. officials reportedly informed Iran that Israel was not expected to broaden its military campaign in Lebanon despite a deadly attack in southern Lebanon in which four Israeli soldiers were killed by Hezbollah fire.

The fighting has continued to exact a heavy toll. Since the original Lebanon ceasefire went into effect in April, 23 Israeli soldiers and one civilian employee of the Defense Ministry have been killed during operations in southern Lebanon.

{Matzav.com}

Meloni Denies Trump’s Claim She ‘Begged’ for Photo at G7

Matzav -

A growing rift between Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni and President Donald Trump burst into public view Friday after Meloni flatly rejected Trump’s claim that she had pleaded for a photograph with him during this week’s G7 summit, calling the story entirely false and expressing shock at his remarks.

The unusually sharp exchange signals a dramatic downturn in relations between the two conservative leaders, whose alliance appeared to be recovering in recent days after earlier disagreements surrounding the conflict with Iran.

Speaking after Trump’s comments were broadcast by an Italian television outlet, Meloni said she was stunned by what she described as an invented account and suggested the president often treats America’s adversaries with greater courtesy than longstanding allies.

The dispute stems from comments Trump made during a brief interview with Italy’s La7 television network following the summit in France. Footage from the gathering showed the two leaders engaged in an extended conversation, but Trump downplayed the interaction and suggested it was of greater importance to Meloni than to him.

“She’s probably happy I talked to her. I didn’t have to talk to her,” Trump was quoted as saying by La7 TV channel in a brief interview, after he himself asked the journalist about Italy’s prime minister.

Trump went even further, claiming the Italian leader had been eager to be photographed with him.

“She begged me to take a picture with her. She wanted a picture with me so badly. I wouldn’t have taken it, but I felt sorry for her,” Trump said, according to La7’s translation.

The network did not release the original recording of the interview and instead aired a dubbed version.

Meloni responded forcefully, dismissing the account outright and questioning why the American president would make such remarks about an ally.

“Donald Trump’s statements are completely made ⁠up. I am frankly astonished. I don’t know why the president of ⁠the United States behaves like this towards his allies: it is not the first time, moreover.”

She then contrasted Trump’s treatment of allies with what she characterized as a softer approach toward hostile foreign leaders.

“I can ⁠only ⁠say it is disappointing that he does not show the same determination with the enemies of the West and of the United States, whose leaders he instead treats with far greater indulgence,” she said, adding: “There is one thing he should remember: neither I nor Italy ever beg.”

The clash is particularly notable given Meloni’s previous support for Trump. She was the lone European head of government to attend his inauguration in 2025 and was widely viewed as one of his closest partners on the continent.

Relations later cooled, however, after Meloni publicly criticized Trump for his attacks on Pope Leo following the pontiff’s condemnation of the Iran war. Her decision to distance herself from the administration’s position triggered a blunt response from Trump, who accused the Italian leader of lacking courage.

Although recent interactions at the G7 summit had suggested a possible thaw in tensions, Friday’s exchange exposed deepening strains and raised new questions about the future of one of the West’s most closely watched political relationships.

{Matzav.com}

Qatari Jet Poised to Fly as Air Force One

Matzav -

After more than three decades transporting American presidents around the globe, the Boeing 747 that has long served as Air Force One returned to Joint Base Andrews before sunrise Thursday, fueling speculation that its reign may soon be coming to an end as a newly modified Qatari-donated aircraft prepares to enter service.

The arrival of the aircraft sparked a wave of tributes from senior Trump administration officials, many of whom appeared to suggest that the venerable jet’s final chapter is near. Nevertheless, the U.S. Air Force stressed that the aircraft is not being retired at this time.

White House Communications Director Steven Cheung shared a photograph on X of VC-25A tail number 92-9000 after it carried President Donald Trump home from the G7 summit in France. Accompanying the image was the message: “Well done, good and faithful servant. The Last Ride.”

White House Deputy Chief of Staff Dan Scavino also marked the occasion, posting video footage of the aircraft and reflecting on his years aboard it.

“I have been fortunate to fly around the world on this iconic plane for 5 1/2 years, of the 35 years it has been serving U.S. Presidents.”

U.S. Chief of Protocol Monica Crowley echoed the sentiment, writing that she had been “honored to be aboard Air Force One last night on its final flight.”

Despite those public tributes, Air Force officials moved quickly to clarify that the aircraft remains in active service.

A spokesperson told The War Zone that the incoming VC-25B Bridge aircraft—the designation assigned to the modified Qatari Boeing 747-8i—will enter the executive airlift fleet “alongside the VC-25A,” adding that both existing VC-25A aircraft will continue operating for the foreseeable future.

The new aircraft recently completed an intensive modification and testing program conducted by L3Harris in Texas. The work, which took roughly a year, wrapped up in early May. The plane is now receiving the distinctive red, white, gold, and blue paint scheme selected by President Trump.

Air Force leaders praised the accelerated effort, highlighting it as an example of streamlined project management.

The service said the project “epitomizes what is possible when clear accountability is placed on one individual,” in a statement from Gen. Dale White, the Air Force official overseeing critical major weapons programs.

Even so, the Bridge aircraft is intended only as an interim solution.

The permanent replacement fleet consists of two specially outfitted VC-25B aircraft being converted by Boeing under a contract awarded in 2018. Those aircraft are now projected to arrive in mid-2028, years later than the original target date of 2024.

Costs associated with the program have continued to rise. The Government Accountability Office estimates the total price tag for the VC-25B program has climbed to approximately $5.6 billion, significantly above the original estimate of $3.9 billion. By comparison, Air Force officials estimate the conversion of the Qatari aircraft will cost less than $400 million.

The arrangement has drawn criticism from lawmakers and analysts across the political spectrum, with opponents raising concerns about both constitutional questions and national-security implications.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth accepted the aircraft as an unconditional gift to the Defense Department, which will oversee its operation and upkeep. Current plans call for the aircraft to be transferred to President Trump’s presidential library once his term in office concludes.

Democrats have sharply criticized the arrangement, characterizing the gift as a bribe and questioning the wisdom of spending public funds to modify an aircraft that may only serve as the presidential transport for the remainder of Trump’s administration.

No official date has been set for the president’s first trip aboard the new aircraft. However, reports indicate that Trump is weighing the possibility of using it for a July 3 visit to Mount Rushmore as part of celebrations marking America’s 250th anniversary.

Reuters previously reported that the aircraft could make its public debut during a Fourth of July flyover, potentially ushering in a new era for presidential travel.

{Matzav.com}

Vance Fires Back at GOP Skeptics: Trump’s Iran Deal ‘Nothing Like Obama’s’

Matzav -

Vice President JD Vance is defending President Donald Trump’s agreement with Iran against criticism from fellow Republicans, arguing that the arrangement bears little resemblance to the 2015 nuclear accord negotiated by the Obama administration and instead reflects a dramatically different strategic reality.

Speaking about the agreement, Vance contended that the circumstances surrounding the two deals could not be compared because Iran’s nuclear infrastructure has already been dismantled and the new framework bars Tehran from enriching uranium.

“You have to remember, in 2015 Iran had built a sophisticated nuclear weapons program with a nuclear weapon stockpile. So the perspective that we came at as the United States was, ‘You already have a really nice nuclear program; we’re going to bribe you with American money in order to stop it,'” Vance said.

He contrasted that approach with the Trump administration’s current position, arguing that Washington is negotiating from a position of leverage rather than trying to halt an active nuclear buildup.

“Our perspective — and where we’re coming at it — is, ‘We already destroyed your nuclear program; and so if you promise and show verifiable pathways to not rebuild it, then we are willing to give you some sanctions relief, and things like that.'”

Vance went on to outline what he described as several key distinctions between the two agreements, maintaining that the new deal imposes stricter limitations on Tehran’s nuclear capabilities while avoiding financial concessions made under the earlier accord.

“Now, there are all these substantive differences as well. The Obama nuclear deal allowed enrichment; ours will not,” Vance said.

He further argued that the Trump agreement takes a tougher stance on Iran’s nuclear materials.

“The Obama deal allowed the accumulation of stockpiled weapons-grade material. Ours is actually leading to the destruction of that stockpile of enriched material,” he continued.

Vance also highlighted what he said was a major financial difference between the two arrangements.

“The Obama deal gave them over a billion dollars of American money. The deal gives them $0 of American money,” Vance said.

Summing up his defense of the agreement, the vice president maintained that the most significant distinction is the position from which the United States negotiated and the support the deal has received from regional allies.

“A lot of substantive differences, but I think the most important differences are where we’re coming at it from: a position of strength, and the fact that our [Persian] Gulf Coast partners love this deal.”

{Matzav.com}

Hunter Biden Challenges Don Jr. to Cage Fight in Unhinged Rant

Matzav -

Hunter Biden launched a blistering attack on the UFC Freedom 250 event held on the White House South Lawn, blasting the spectacle as inappropriate for the historic grounds and ending his lengthy social media post with an unexpected challenge to Donald Trump Jr.: a cage fight.

Framing his comments as an open letter to podcast host Joe Rogan—who had dismissed critics of the event and told those offended by it to “shut … up”—Biden argued that turning the White House into the setting for a combat-sports event undermined the significance of the presidential residence.

“The White House does not belong to Donald Trump. It does not belong to any president. It belongs to the people,” he wrote in the lengthy diatribe.

Drawing repeated comparisons to ancient Rome, Biden contended that the event transformed a national symbol into a stage for political spectacle.

“To treat it as Caesar treated the Colosseum is antithetical to everything our founding fathers fought for.

“This is not Rome. Presidents are not emperors doling out bread and circuses for the peasants,” he said, cloaking his critique in a Roman Empire motif.

Continuing the analogy, Biden accused President Trump of using the White House grounds to project personal power.

“By holding the event on the South Lawn, what he was saying to the rest of us is: ‘This is my house. I own it. I will do with it what I please. I’ll build a colosseum and have the gladiators fight under my gaze.’”

Despite criticizing the White House event, Biden offered praise for Rogan and UFC president Dana White, crediting them with helping transform mixed martial arts into a major American success.

Still, he argued that staging the fights at the White House crossed a line, describing the event as “an exhibition of imperial domination, not a celebration of our 250th anniversary as a democracy.”

Biden concluded his remarks with a warning against elevating the presidency above its constitutional role.

“The president is our servant. Not our Caesar,” he wrote before turning his attention to Trump’s eldest son.

“P.S. Cage match between me and Don. Jr? Your call on the venue. Anywhere but the South Lawn.”

Notably absent from Biden’s comments was any reference to controversies involving his father’s administration and the White House grounds. Critics have pointed to incidents such as the placement of a Pride flag in a 2023 display on the Truman Balcony, a move that generated debate over compliance with the U.S. Flag Code.

{Matzav.com}

NYC Horse Carriage Ban Gains Traction Following Tragic Death of Teen Tourist

Matzav -

The fatal horse-carriage accident that claimed the life of an 18-year-old tourist visiting from India has reignited efforts at City Hall to ban horse-drawn carriage rides in New York City, with several lawmakers suggesting the tragedy could mark a turning point for the long-debated industry.

A number of City Council members said the incident — believed to be the first passenger fatality involving a horse carriage in recent memory — has intensified calls for sweeping changes and may finally generate enough momentum to outlaw the practice altogether.

“Is it the straw that broke the camel’s back? I think so,” said Councilman Frank Morano, a Staten Island Republican and co-sponsor of “Ryder’s Law,” which would outlaw horse carriages in New York City.

“We have an 18-year-old boy who came here to celebrate his graduation who is leaving in a coffin. It’s totally unacceptable,” Morano told The NY Post on Thursday.

Arguing that the industry has exhausted any benefit of the doubt, Morano added, “The time for treating these accidents as isolated incidents is over. It is an industry that no longer makes sense.”

New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani has also voiced support for eliminating horse-drawn carriage rides from Central Park, a position he adopted during his campaign.

“I support removing horse carriages from Central Park,” Mamdani said in January.

The mayor joins predecessors Eric Adams and Bill de Blasio, both of whom backed similar proposals during their administrations, though neither succeeded in pushing a ban through.

Supporters of the carriage industry, including representatives of the drivers’ union, contend that calls for a ban routinely surface after accidents involving horses but fade over time. They argue that investigations have consistently shown the animals receive proper care and that past efforts to outlaw the industry have repeatedly stalled.

Still, advocates for stricter animal-welfare protections believe the current City Council may be more receptive than previous ones. Earlier this year, lawmakers established an animal welfare caucus comprising 20 of the council’s 51 members, including Morano.

Council Speaker Julie Menin has scheduled a hearing next month on Ryder’s Law. The measure is named after Ryder, a carriage horse that collapsed while working in Central Park during a hot day in August 2022. Although the legislation failed to advance last year, supporters hope the latest tragedy will change that.

“In the past two weeks alone, we have seen the tragic deaths of both a horse and now a teenage carriage passenger, Romanch Mahajan,” Menin said, referring to the June 9 death of a carriage horse named Deniz, which authorities believe may have ingested a poisonous plant in Central Park.

“These incidents demonstrate that it’s time to chart a better path forward that addresses animal welfare and public safety, and also ensures the livelihood and economic prosperity of the workers,” Menin said.

Councilwoman Kamillah Hanks, a Democrat from Staten Island, said the latest accident demands action from city leaders.

“Something has to change. This tragedy is a call for the City Council to respond. We have to take an honest and sobering look at the horse carriage industry.”

Not all council members agree that a ban is the appropriate response. Queens Councilman James Gennaro argued that the “unthinkable tragedy” stemmed from “human error” rather than concerns about animal treatment.

Instead of prohibiting carriage rides outright, Gennaro is promoting legislation aimed at strengthening safety measures. His proposal would require designated hitching posts in Central Park so horses can be secured while passengers board, exit, or take photographs, and would also mandate enhanced training requirements for carriage operators.

Meanwhile, industry representatives acknowledged they are facing intense scrutiny in the wake of the fatal accident.

“We’re absolutely gutted and stunned by this tragedy. We’ve never had a fatal accident like this before,” said Alexander Kemp, administrative vice president of Transport Workers Union Local 100, which represents carriage drivers.

Kemp said the industry has temporarily halted operations while conducting an extensive review of safety procedures.

“We have shuttered the stables and ceased operations today while we have extensive internal discussions of safety protocols and how they can be improved,” said Kemp, who supports Gennaro’s bill, not an outright ban on the carriage industry.

Christina Hansen, a carriage driver and TWU shop steward, accused animal-rights groups of using the incident to advance a long-standing political agenda.

“Let’s take a step back and not to rush judgment,” she said.

{Matzav.com}

Second Amendment Advocates Cheer Supreme Court Ruling Striking Down Law Barring Marijuana Users from Having Guns

Matzav -

In a significant Second Amendment ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously sided with a Texas man who challenged a federal law prohibiting unlawful drug users from possessing firearms, concluding that the statute was unconstitutional as applied in his case.

The decision in United States v. Hemani was authored by Justice Neil Gorsuch and garnered agreement from all nine justices on the central outcome, although several members of the Court filed separate opinions debating the broader constitutional implications.

The case stemmed from the experience of Ali Danial Hemani, a dual U.S.-Pakistani citizen who grew up in Texas and lived with his parents in the Dallas area. In 2022, FBI agents searched the family’s residence while investigating possible terrorism-related concerns. According to the Court’s opinion, Hemani cooperated fully with investigators, voluntarily surrendering a firearm, directing agents to marijuana in the home, and acknowledging that he “used marijuana about every other day.”

During the search, agents recovered approximately 60 grams of marijuana, 4.7 grams of cocaine, and a Glock 19 handgun.

Despite the terrorism investigation that prompted the search, neither Hemani nor any member of his family was ever charged with terrorism-related offenses.

More than six months later, however, federal prosecutors charged Hemani under 18 U.S.C. §922(g)(3), a law that makes it a felony for anyone who is an “unlawful user of” or “addicted to” a controlled substance to purchase, own, or possess a firearm. A conviction under the statute carries a potential prison sentence of up to 15 years.

The same federal law attracted national attention during the prosecution of Hunter Biden, who initially signaled that he intended to challenge its constitutionality before ultimately pleading guilty and later receiving a pardon from his father, President Joe Biden.

Hemani sought dismissal of the charges, arguing that the statute violated his Second Amendment rights. A federal district court agreed and threw out the indictment. The government appealed, but the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals likewise ruled in Hemani’s favor. Federal officials then brought the case to the Supreme Court.

“The government’s prosecution of Mr. Hemani under §922(g)(3)’s unlawful user provision is inconsistent with the Second Amendment,” wrote Gorsuch.

In reaching that conclusion, Gorsuch relied heavily on the Supreme Court’s landmark 2022 ruling in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen, which instructed courts to evaluate firearm restrictions by examining historical traditions from the nation’s founding era. Under Bruen, governments need not identify an identical historical law, but must demonstrate that “the challenged regulation is consistent with the principles that underpin our regulatory tradition.”

Federal attorneys argued that early American laws regulating so-called “habitual drunkards” provided a historical analogue. Those laws sometimes authorized imprisonment, commitment to institutions, or the posting of bonds to ensure future good behavior.

Gorsuch rejected that comparison, noting that the government’s reading of the statute would permit prosecution even in cases where there was no evidence that an individual was impaired or dangerous. He pointed out that the law could be applied to “and a college student who routinely uses a friend’s Adderall to cram for exams” or “a husband who regularly takes his wife’s prescription Ambien to sleep,” examples discussed during oral arguments.

The justice also observed that historical laws concerning habitual drunkards generally included procedural safeguards.

Those laws, he wrote, “usually provided some form of process,” including judicial proceedings or bond hearings “before an individual lost any of his liberties, even temporarily.”

By contrast, he said, §922(g)(3) purported to “automatically divest[] an individual of his constitutional right to bear arms the moment he becomes an unlawful user and until he ends his drug use.”

Gorsuch further noted that historical restrictions on habitual drunkards were justified on the grounds that such individuals posed unusual dangers to the public and were more likely to misuse firearms or commit acts of violence.

Yet under the modern statute, he wrote, “[i]t doesn’t matter what controlled substance an individual uses, in what amounts he does so, or whether his drug use has ever made him a danger to himself or others. It doesn’t even matter why he keeps a gun or how safely he does so. And for violating this automatic ban, the government insists, an individual like Mr. Hemani may be sent to prison for up to 15 years and disarmed for life.”

The Court emphasized that its ruling was limited in scope and should not be interpreted as holding that unlawful drug users can never be dangerous.

Instead, Gorsuch said, the Constitution does not permit the government “to conclude that anyone who regularly uses marijuana is categorically violent and dangerous without any further showing,” particularly given recent federal changes acknowledging marijuana’s “currently accepted medical use.”

The opinion also stressed that the ruling does not affect longstanding prohibitions on firearm possession by convicted felons, nor does it prevent prosecutors from pursuing gun charges against individuals whose drug use can be shown to create a genuine danger.

Although the Court agreed on the outcome, several justices offered differing views in separate concurring opinions.

Justice Clarence Thomas argued that the law is unconstitutional for an additional reason, writing that Congress lacks authority “to regulate the possession of firearms solely on the ground that they crossed state lines at some point in the past.”

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, joined by Justice Sonia Sotomayor, used her concurrence to criticize the Bruen framework itself, arguing that it “is unworkable” and “vulnerable to inconsistent and arbitrary application, as judges draw different conclusions from the same historical evidence.”

Justice Samuel Alito, joined by Justice Elena Kagan, agreed with the result but not all of the majority’s reasoning. He concluded that the government had “failed to show that a marijuana user like” Hemani “is incapacitated in a way analogous to the habitual drunkards that the Government’s analogues regulated.”

Gun-rights advocates celebrated the ruling.

“The Supreme Court made the right call,” the National Rifle Association wrote on social media after the decision was released.

The organization’s executive director described the ruling as “a major victory for the Second Amendment and peaceable gun owners across America,” adding that “no one should be deprived of their God-given right to keep and bear arms for engaging in nonviolent conduct, and there is no historical justification for doing so.”

The Second Amendment Foundation, which also supported Hemani before the Court, hailed the decision as another major victory for gun owners.

The organization said the ruling had “secured a victory for Second Amendment advocates and firearms owners nationwide.”

“The Court’s decision today affirms what SAF has argued for some time – there is no historical tradition of permanently disarming law-abiding citizens who use marijuana,” said SAF Executive Director Adam Kraut. “Founding-era laws addressed the dangers of intoxication through temporary restrictions, but not the complete ban on firearms possession for the remainder of the person’s life. We’re thrilled the Supreme Court agrees with us and struck down Mr. Hemani’s unconstitutional conviction.”

SAF founder Alan M. Gottlieb similarly praised the ruling.

“The Court rightly held today that the proper understanding of the Second Amendment only provides for disarming those who are actually dangerous,” said Gottlieb. “Simply being an unlawful user of any drug fails to meet that standard, and today the court concluded that marijuana use, absent any other evidence, was insufficient to show Mr. Hemani was dangerous such that his rights could be constitutionally extinguished.”

The organization subsequently published a series of detailed analyses of the opinion on social media, examining its implications for future gun-rights litigation and other ongoing constitutional challenges.

Supporters of the ruling extended beyond traditional gun-rights groups. Rob Romano of the Firearms Policy Coalition highlighted comments from the American Civil Liberties Union, which represented Hemani in the case.

According to the ACLU, the decision “makes it clear that the government cannot make it a crime for people to own a gun – which the Supreme Court has held is a fundamental constitutional right – simply because they use marijuana.”

The organization also argued that the statute “let the government arbitrarily discriminate against marijuana users and deprive them of their rights,” but now, “[t]he court has sent a strong message that the government cannot criminalize the conduct of large numbers of people by making categorical and unfounded assumptions about whether they are dangerous.”

Summing up the significance of the decision, firearms journalist Stephen Gutowski offered a headline that quickly gained attention online: “The High Court Says Yes to Buds and Bullets.”

{Matzav.com}

“It’s Been a Pretty Long Run”: Rabbi Menachem Genack Retiring from OU Kosher After 45 Years

Matzav -

Rabbi Menachem Genack, 78, had been speaking to JNS for about 45 minutes when, with a smile, he recalled a story about the Ponevezher Rav, who often received backlash for his dream of rebuilding the famed Ponevezh yeshiva after the Holocaust.

“People would tell him, ‘You’re dreaming,’” Genack told JNS. “‘Yes,’ he would reply. ‘But I’m not sleeping.’”

The longtime chief executive officer at OU Kosher, the Orthodox Union’s kashrus division, spoke to JNS two weeks before his planned retirement on July 1 after 45 years at the kosher certifier.

As his time at the OU winds down, Rabbi Genack has been thinking about Rav Kahaneman’s remark about being awake, he told JNS at OU headquarters in lower Manhattan.

“His vision, his determination, what he built,” Rabbi Genack said. “It’s very inspiring.”

The story has stayed with him as he transformed the OU kashrus division from a one-man operation into a global enterprise that today supervises and certifies more than 1.3 million products developed in 105 countries worldwide.

The division also now funds much of the organization’s broader work, including its youth outreach programs and publishing arm, OU Press.

But when Rabbi Genack arrived at the OU in 1980, the organization employed just a handful of people in kashrut. At the time, he was the department’s sole full-time rabbi.

“I wouldn’t say something had to be fixed” at the OU, he told JNS. “It needed to be built.”

Rabbi Genack determined that what the OU needed more than anything was “a clearer articulation of standards.” He assembled a small team to develop an ingredient-review department, establish consistent standards and expand the OU’s reach among major food manufacturers.

“We met regularly to discuss issues, write things down, formulate positions and define what the OU’s standards were,” he said. “At that point, I was the only one. Today, we have more than 50 rabbinic coordinators.”

Rabbi Menachem Genack, CEO of the kosher division at the Orthodox Union. Credit: Courtesy.

Growing up, Rabbi Genack didn’t have a dream job, but in high school, and later as a student of Rav Yoshe Ber Soloveitchik, he discovered a love of Torah learning that would help shape the course of his life.

“There was no one like the Rav,” Rabbi Genack said. “He was an extraordinary pedagogue. He was so generous.”

He recalled spending summers learning with Rav Soloveitchik in Onset, Mass., on Cape Cod after the death of the rabbi’s wife.

“There were just a handful of us there—maybe six or seven,” he said. “I used to stay with one of his daughters, and the Rav would come for the weekend. He’d usually give a shiur and then go back to Boston or Brooklyn.”

Rav Soloveitchik “was just in a class by himself,” Rabbi Genack said, and was someone who could “hold a crowd of well over 1,000 people in the palm of his hand for three or four hours.”

He was not involved personally at the OU but mentored Rabbi Genack as the latter built the organization into what it is today.

“The Rav gave me direction and guided me toward this path,” he said. “One of the things he told me was that he didn’t want to see the OU become an absolute monopoly. He wanted to see the ‘little brothers’ succeed as well.”

“There was a communal responsibility, and we did that,” he told JNS. “If other agencies met high halachic standards, we accepted them.”

At the OU Kashrus Conference, from left: OU Kosher COO Rabbi Moshe Elefant; OU Kosher CEO Rabbi Menachem Genack; OU president Mitchel Aeder; and OU Kosher commission vice chairman Rabbi Yossi Heber. Credit: Courtesy.

Politics, too, was part of Rabbi Genack’s inheritance.

Raised in Forest Hills, Queens, by Holocaust survivors and fervent Zionists, Rabbi Genack grew up in a home where Israel and public affairs were constant subjects of conversation.

When he was 4, his family moved to Israel, but his parents decided that the hardships of the state’s early years made life too difficult.

“There simply wasn’t enough food to go around,” Rabbi Genack said. “It was a difficult time.”

Though his family returned to the United States, his father’s “dominant interests” remained “Israel, Zionism and politics,” Rabbi Genack said.

“Politics was something that was discussed in our house a lot,” he told JNS.

“Especially for Jews,” he came to realize, “we have to have a voice.”

In 1994, he founded NORPAC, a bipartisan political action committee that strengthens support for Israel on Capitol Hill. He also developed a close relationship with former President Bill Clinton, the subject of his 2000 book, “Letters to President Clinton: Biblical Lessons on Faith and Leadership.”

About halfway through the conversation, Rabbi Genack recalled seeing President John F. Kennedy as a child. In September 1963, just two months before Kennedy was assassinated, he said that he saw the president drive near Flushing Meadows Park, where Rabbi Genack was playing.

“They stopped all the traffic on Main Street,” he told JNS. “I was standing on the side of the highway when the president’s car passed by. We waved to him.”

Left to right: OU Kosher ‘s chief operating officer Rabbi Moshe Elefant; managing director of community relations Rabbi Eli Eleff; and chief executive officer Rabbi Menachem Genack, with a group of seminar participants at the ASK OU 2025 Summer Women’s Kashrus Experience. Credit: Courtesy.

As the OU expanded over the decades, Rabbi Genack said that the organization faced countless challenges, from losing access to its offices after 9/11 to adapting to remote work during the Covid pandemic.

One of the ways he kept the organization together, he said, was through a careful and deliberate hiring process.

“The OU was viewed as Orthodox, but limited to a particular constituency,” he said. “I wanted it to speak to the entire Orthodox community, so when I hired people, I looked across different communities—many different yeshivot and backgrounds.”

“I wanted the OU to look like the Orthodox world, so that it could speak to and communicate with the broader American Jewish community and beyond,” he told JNS.

He also focused heavily on establishing trust and credibility.

“Through the quality of the people we worked with, through integrity, through implementing standards consistently,” Jews around the world began to trust the organization’s certifications and decisions, he said.

“Mistakes were undoubtedly made, but you build trust on that basis,” he told JNS.

Although he had a consistent vision for the OU from his first day on the job, Rabbi Genack said that he had no idea it would grow so much.

At the OU Kosher Kashrus Conference, Yeshiva of Paterson rosh yeshiva Rav Elya Chaim Swerdloff (left) joins Rabbi Menachem Genack and Rabbi Moshe Elefant. 

“I couldn’t imagine from where it was when I arrived,” he said. “What I thought about initially was creating a staff that would have credibility beyond a single community. That was the goal.”

Since then, Orthodox Jewry has grown, in his view, “both in strength and in numbers.” But alongside that growth have come challenges for American Jewry that he never expected to confront.

“Especially when you look at places like Lakewood and the yeshiva world, the Orthodox community has become much stronger,” he said. “But the challenges facing American Jewry are also very profound. The risk of rapid assimilation. The level of antisemitism that we’re seeing. The security challenges facing the State of Israel.”

“These are things I never imagined seeing in my lifetime,” he said.

Rabbi Genack told JNS that it wasn’t hard to reach a decision to retire.

“Why not?” he told JNS, when asked for a reason. “It’s been a pretty long run. It’s time.”

Rabbi Moshe Elefant, chief operating officer and executive rabbinic coordinator of OU Kosher, is slated to succeed Rabbi Genack. He told JNS that the transition has been in the works for five years.

“The OU administration has done it in a most sensitive manner,” Rabbi Elefant said. “This whole year, as we lead up to July 1, has really been a year of transition.”

Attending the OU Kosher Kashrus Conference are (from left) OU Kosher chairman Dr. Joshua Penn; OU Kosher vice chairman Rabbi Yosi Heber; OU Kosher COO Rabbi Moshe Elefant; OU Kosher CEO Rabbi Menachem Genack; and OU president Mitchel Aeder. 

The two first met 39 years ago, when Rabbi Genack interviewed Rabbi Elefant for a position at the organization.

“I thought Rabbi Genack would ask a lot of questions about kashrus, about my knowledge of kashrus, which wasn’t very extensive other than that I ate kosher my whole life,” Rabbi Elefant told JNS.

“But he really wasn’t focused on testing me in kashrus. He was trying to figure out who I am, what kind of personality I had, whether I’d fit in with the organization,” he said. “I guess he decided I did.”

Rabbi Genack said identifying a successor was one of the most important responsibilities of his career.

“From the beginning, I always used to say, ‘There’s no success without succession,’” he told JNS. “Early on, I identified someone I thought had real talent—someone accomplished, someone with vision.”

Rabbi Elefant is “absolutely the right person” to lead the organization forward, Rabbi Genack said.

Though the two have drastically different personalities—Rabbi Elefant noted that Rabbi Genack is much more reserved and “scholarly” than he, while he is more “out there”—their relationship has been strong from the beginning.

“I would say, in most of those years, certainly the last 20-plus years, there isn’t a day that we don’t speak multiple times,” Rabbi Elefant told JNS. “Sometimes we may speak to each other more than we speak to our wives.”

Rabbi Elefant said that Genack’s vision from the start was that if “anybody, for whatever reason, wants to keep kosher, wherever they are in the world, because of the OU they’ll be able to do so.”

“That was his vision,” Rabbi Elefant said. “He built it, literally, brick by brick.”

For Rabbi Genack, the work was never only about food certification. It was about making Jewish life easier to sustain in an era of assimilation.

“The OU should be an eloquent spokesman for the principles we represent,” he told JNS. “I hope it continues to grow.”

“Part of the OU’s mission is contained in the word itself—union, unity,” he said. “To promote unity within Orthodox Jewry. That’s something that unfortunately is often lacking.”

“The money we make from kashrut should be used to help people, promote Torah and strengthen Jewish life,” he told JNS. “If kosher products are available in every store with an OU, at the same price, that makes it possible to live as a Jew in the United States.” JNS

{Matzav.com}

Interior Ministry Orders City to Enforce Shabbos Business Ban at Big Glilot

Matzav -

Israel’s Interior Ministry has formally instructed the city of Ramat HaSharon to enforce its municipal bylaw prohibiting businesses from operating on Shabbos, escalating an ongoing dispute over the continued weekend activity at the Big Glilot commercial complex.

The ministry’s intervention comes amid growing controversy surrounding the shopping and entertainment center, which has remained open on Shabbos despite local regulations that prohibit such activity.

The current dispute stems from a petition filed approximately a year ago against the municipality. Petitioners argued that the city had failed to enforce its own bylaws and pointed to statements by Mayor Yitzchak Rochberger suggesting that he intended to allow businesses at the complex to continue operating on Shabbos without imposing penalties or taking enforcement action.

At the same time, the Interior Ministry is reviewing a request submitted by the municipality to amend the existing bylaw. As part of that process, ministry officials have demanded extensive clarification regarding the scope of the proposed changes, including which businesses would be exempted, what services would be permitted, the data used to formulate the proposal, and the preparatory work conducted before advancing the amendment.

In a strongly worded letter, Interior Ministry Director-General Yisrael Ozen sharply criticized the argument that the law should simply be adjusted to reflect the reality that has developed on the ground.

“If the purpose of the amendment is to align the legal situation with the reality currently being practiced, it follows that the actual situation—created through violations of the law—has dictated and shaped the content of the proposed arrangement,” Ozen wrote.

He added that, “There is no place to agree to or accept an improper situation in which a sinner profits from his wrongdoing.”

According to Ozen, the materials submitted thus far by the municipality fail to adequately address a number of key concerns raised by the ministry. He instructed city officials to provide updated data, broader professional analysis, and detailed responses to each of the issues under review.

The letter concludes with a clear warning that any proposed amendment remains legally ineffective unless and until it receives formal approval from the Interior Minister.

“Furthermore, as long as the bylaw has not been approved by the Minister of the Interior, it is not in force and action may not be taken pursuant to it,” Ozen wrote.

The directive means that the battle over Shabbos operations at Big Glilot remains far from resolved. While municipal officials are seeking to create a new legal framework that would permit the current reality to continue, the Interior Ministry is insisting that the existing law remains binding and must be fully enforced. For now, the dispute appears headed for further legal and political confrontation.

{Matzav.com}

Iran Declares the Strait of Hormuz Closed Again After US Lifts Blockade

Matzav -

Iran abruptly reimposed its closure of the Strait of Hormuz on Friday rather than proceeding with planned nuclear negotiations in Switzerland, blaming Israel’s continued military presence in southern Lebanon and the ongoing deployment of American forces throughout the region.

In a message broadcast over maritime communications channels, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps announced that Washington had failed to uphold commitments outlined in the memorandum of understanding signed Wednesday by President Donald Trump and Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian.

“Since Israel’s withdrawal from Lebanon, the complete lifting of the naval blockade, and the withdrawal of American terrorist forces from the Persian Gulf and the region are among the main conditions of the agreement between Iran and the United States, the Strait of Hormuz will remain closed until these conditions are met,” it said. “All ships are requested, for the sake of their security and safety, not to approach the Strait of Hormuz. Any vessel that defies this directive will be targeted.”

The announcement came despite U.S. Central Command’s declaration on Thursday that the two-month blockade of Iranian ports had officially been lifted. Iranian officials did not immediately clarify why they believe the removal of the restrictions remains incomplete.

Moments after Tehran’s announcement, an American official asserted that Israel and Hezbollah had reached a ceasefire arrangement. The claim appeared to conflict with remarks made a day earlier by Israeli Prime Minister Binyomin Netanyahu, who indicated that military operations would continue.

“We will restore security and prosperity to northern towns,” Netanyahu said. “That requires maintaining the security zone in southern Lebanon.”

The Israel Defense Forces also released an updated operational map showing a widened area under Israeli control inside Lebanon. According to the map, Israeli troops are now positioned more than six miles beyond the border, including locations north of the Litani River.

The memorandum signed earlier this week stated that the United States and Iran, “along with their allies,” would respect Lebanon’s sovereignty and territorial integrity while bringing military hostilities there to an end.

Simcha Brodsky, president of the intelligence research group OSINT613, told The Post that Tehran appears to be exploiting both the language of the agreement and the phased timetable for implementing its provisions.

“What we’re seeing is a direct result of the wording in the US-Iran MoU. The deal lifts the US blockade in phases (‘fully within 30 days’), so the US is mid-process by design,” he said. “Iran is using that gap: it says the Strait stays closed until the blockade is ‘completely lifted,’ so it can claim the lift isn’t done and call this a re-closure.”

“Iran has now bolted the Israel-Lebanon fighting onto that pretext to hard-stop the whole deal., roping Israel into an agreement it never approved or negotiated.”

The renewed tensions emerged only hours after the first round of nuclear negotiations between Washington and Tehran, which had been arranged under the new memorandum and scheduled for Friday, was canceled.

American officials have not publicly explained the reason for the postponement.

A regional source said Wednesday that hardline factions within the Iranian government had opposed participation in a now-canceled signing ceremony planned for Friday, insisting that Israel first remove its forces from southern Lebanon.

At the same time, Iran’s newly established Persian Gulf Strait Authority, known as the PGSA, issued a fresh set of regulations governing maritime traffic through the strategic waterway. The authority was recently created by Tehran to oversee operations in the strait and, according to critics, potentially generate revenue through future transit charges.

Although the memorandum bars Iran from collecting fees from shipping companies during the next 60 days, the agreement also specifically notes that Tehran “reserves the right to introduce” such charges at a later date.

The new regulations further require all vessels seeking passage through the Strait of Hormuz to obtain authorization from the PGSA beforehand—a requirement that did not exist before the conflict began on February 28, as the strait has traditionally been regarded as international waters.

{Matzav.com}

Netanyahu Stunned by Newly Revealed Footage of Visit to Lubavitcher Rebbe’s Home

Matzav -

Israeli Prime Minister Binyomin Netanyahu was visibly moved after being shown rare archival footage documenting a visit he made decades ago to the home of the Menachem Mendel Schneerson, a moment he said he had never previously seen captured on video.

The footage was presented to Netanyahu by Rabbi Or Ziv, a Chabad-Lubavitch emissary serving in the Katamon neighborhood of Yerushalayim, ahead of Gimmel Tammuz, the yahrtzeit of the Rebbe.

The video captures Netanyahu participating in Maariv at the Rebbe’s residence, offering a glimpse into a little-known moment from his earlier years.

Recorded 38 years ago on President Street in the Crown Heights neighborhood of New York City, the footage dates to the year of mourning following the passing of Rebbetzin Chaya Mushka, the Rebbe’s wife.

When Rabbi Ziv showed him the video, Netanyahu appeared surprised and emotional. Looking at the footage, he exclaimed, “Wow, where did you get this from? This can’t be.”

He then turned to Rabbi Ziv and requested a copy, saying, “Send it to me, I’ve never seen this before.”

WATCH:

https://matzav.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/whatsapp_video_20260618_at_20.46.10.mp4

{Matzav.com}

Chief Rabbis Stress Torah Guidance in Policing at High-Level Meeting With Police Leadership

Matzav -

Israel’s Chief Rabbis delivered a strong message about the central role of Torah values in law enforcement and public security during a high-level working session this week with the Police Rabbinate and Border Police religious leadership.

The meeting, first reported by the Police Rabbinate, focused on the launch of a new volume in the Hifkadeti Shomrim series, a unique collection of halachic writings addressing the complex religious questions that arise in police work and public security operations.

The newly released volume contains articles authored by police rabbis dealing with the unique challenges faced by officers in the field. It also includes halachic responsa on wartime issues from leading poskim, including Harav Asher Weiss and Harav Yitzchok Zilberstein, addressing difficult questions that have emerged during operational activities.

Particular attention is given to dilemmas that arose during the Swords of Iron War, reflecting the extraordinary circumstances under which police officers and security personnel have operated while safeguarding the public. The volume is dedicated to the memory of Rabbi Yaakov Gross, zt”l, the former Chief Rabbi of the Israel Police, who devoted more than fifty years to harbotzas Torah. The book was edited by his son, Rabbi Shimon Gross.

During the meeting, Rishon Letzion Harav Dovid Yosef emphasized the importance of combining halachic scholarship with professional expertise when rendering rulings on operational matters.

“Halachic rulings on professional matters require a deep understanding of reality,” Rav Yosef said. “Just as a rav relies on the expertise of a physician in medical matters, so too must he rely on the expertise of police officers regarding operational issues. Only a thorough understanding of the facts allows one to reach correct halachic conclusions.”

Participants noted that his remarks reflected a longstanding principle of halachic decision-making: that accurate rulings require a clear and detailed understanding of the practical circumstances involved. In the fast-paced world of law enforcement, where officers are often required to make split-second decisions under pressure, such understanding is especially critical.

Israel’s Ashkenazi Chief Rabbi, Harav Kalman Meir Bar, said the new publication demonstrates that Torah guidance extends to every aspect of life.

“It accompanies a person in every decision and operational activity,” Rav Bar said. He also praised Israel Police Chief Rabbi Rav Rami Berachyahu, describing him as “a living example of a scholar whose character and conduct reflect his Torah values.”

Rav Berachyahu concluded the gathering by highlighting the role of the Police Rabbinate in bringing Torah guidance into the daily work of law enforcement personnel.

“Our role is to bring the world of Torah and spirituality into the sacred work of the police,” he said. “Even during challenging times, we draw strength from our connection to the gedolei Torah, with the goal of strengthening the bond between the values of our nation and the security of the public.”

Observers noted that the meeting reflects a broader trend of increasing cooperation between Israel’s spiritual leadership and its security and law-enforcement institutions. The Hifkadeti Shomrim series has become a practical resource for religious police officers seeking to navigate the intersection of professional responsibilities and halachic obligations, offering guidance on the many questions that arise in the course of their duties.

{Matzav.com}

Unvaccinated Infant Fights for Life After Rare Illness Strikes in Yerushalayim

Matzav -

A one-year-old infant who had not received routine childhood vaccinations was hospitalized in critical condition at Shaare Zedek Medical Center after developing a rare and potentially fatal illness that doctors say has become exceedingly uncommon in the modern era due to widespread immunization.

The child arrived at the Yerushalayim hospital struggling to breathe and in immediate danger. Medical staff initially suspected that he may have swallowed a foreign object, but rapid testing and evaluation revealed a far more serious diagnosis.

Doctors determined that the infant was suffering from epiglottitis, a severe inflammation of the epiglottis, the flap of tissue that covers the airway during swallowing. The condition, which can obstruct breathing within a matter of hours, is most commonly caused by Haemophilus influenzae type B (Hib), a bacterium largely controlled in developed countries through routine vaccination programs.

Medical teams in Shaare Zedek’s pediatric department quickly recognized the severity of the situation and initiated emergency treatment. Thanks to the prompt diagnosis and intensive care, physicians were able to stabilize the child and save his life.

The infant was admitted to the hospital’s pediatric intensive care unit, where he received advanced treatment for several days. After showing significant improvement, he was later transferred to the general pediatric ward for continued care.

Doctors said the child is expected to remain hospitalized for several more days but that the immediate danger has passed.

The case has drawn attention because epiglottitis was once considered one of the most dangerous childhood illnesses, frequently causing life-threatening airway obstruction. Since the introduction of the Hib vaccine into Israel’s national immunization program decades ago, the disease has become exceptionally rare.

Medical experts noted that the dramatic decline in cases is directly attributable to widespread vaccination. While epiglottitis has nearly disappeared in countries with high vaccination rates, isolated cases continue to occur among unvaccinated individuals.

Hospital officials said the incident serves as a stark reminder of the importance of routine childhood immunizations. Physicians emphasized that the Health Ministry’s vaccination schedule is based on extensive scientific research and is designed to protect children from potentially deadly diseases.

According to Shaare Zedek, the infant continues to improve and remains under close medical supervision. Doctors are optimistic that he will be able to return home within the coming days.

{Matzav.com}

Pages

Subscribe to NativUSA Portal aggregator