State Comptroller: Civil Aviation Unprepared for Prolonged War, Emergency Failures Exposed
A newly released report by Israeli State Comptroller Matanyahu Englman sharply criticizes Israel’s preparedness in maintaining civil aviation services during extended wartime conditions, concluding that both government authorities and the aviation sector were not adequately equipped for a prolonged emergency.
The report states that the recent conflict revealed significant gaps in readiness, particularly regarding long-term disruptions. Englman emphasized, “The wars illustrated the need for a complementary airport — the government’s delays have continued and the airport has still not been established.” He further warned, “The missile fire from Iran and Lebanon during the war illustrated that state authorities must ensure that the aviation system operates properly even in emergencies.”
Among the findings, the report notes that despite government financial support to Israeli airlines from the onset of the COVID-19 crisis through the conclusion of Operation “Am KeLavi,” no binding framework was established to ensure state influence over airline operations during future emergencies. It states that “although the government supported Israeli airlines from the beginning of the COVID-19 crisis until the end of Operation ‘Am KeLavi,’ it did not require the establishment of arrangements that would allow it to influence their activity in future emergencies.”
The review examined aviation services during the Swords of Iron war and the performance of aviation authorities and the Transportation Ministry in addressing passenger needs. It identified a series of failures in how authorities managed the continued fighting across multiple fronts and its impact on the aviation sector. According to the report, the public’s ability to travel by air was “severely impaired” because the state failed to regulate its relationship with airlines “in a way that would allow it to instruct them to carry out certain actions during an emergency.”
Focusing specifically on El Al, the report found that although the state holds a “golden share” in the airline, it made no attempt to activate the so-called “interests order.” While the mechanism was intended to ensure the airline would act in line with national interests even after privatization, in practice it does not give the government authority to direct El Al’s operations during emergencies.
The report details that the state lacks the ability to require the airline to add flights during emergencies, determine destinations, intervene in pricing for consumers, or mandate flights on Shabbos.
It also highlights the lack of effective safeguards against potential price increases during crises. Despite concerns raised by the Consumer Protection Authority, the report notes that only in September 2024 — nearly a year after the war began — did authorities begin reviewing pricing practices in the aviation sector.
Additionally, the report reveals that at the outset of the Swords of Iron war, neither the Transportation Ministry nor the National Security Council had procedures in place to prioritize the return of Israeli citizens stranded abroad “according to their importance to the economy.” As a result, those who were able to return first on commercial flights were primarily individuals who could afford the high ticket prices at the time.
{Matzav.com}
