Senate Republicans Push Bill To Authorize $400 Million For White House Ballroom
Senate Republicans Push White House Ballroom Plan Following Security Breach
A group of Senate Republicans, led by Lindsey Graham, is advancing legislation to fund a secure 90,000-square-foot ballroom at the White House, arguing the project is critical for national security in the wake of a gunman’s attempt to breach the White House Correspondents’ Association dinner over the weekend.
Graham and fellow supporters say the proposal would be financed through national park user fees and customs revenue. In addition to the ballroom itself, the plan includes construction of security-focused infrastructure beneath the facility, including space for the Secret Service.
“It’s very difficult to have a bunch of important people in the same place unless it’s really, really secure. The times in which we live are unusual. I’ve been up here for a while now, I’ve never felt the sense of threat that exists today,” said Graham, who was first elected to the House in 1994.
He pointed out that President Trump, Vice President JD Vance, and House Speaker Mike Johnson—second and third in the presidential line of succession—were all present at the dinner when a 31-year-old man armed with multiple weapons attempted to force his way into the ballroom before being subdued by Secret Service agents.
While critics have dismissed Trump’s interest in building a large ballroom near the West Wing as unnecessary or self-serving, Graham said he views it as a practical security measure.
“A meeting space that is secured on the White House grounds that would allow people to do what they did at the Hilton hotel is necessary. I’m convinced that had there been a presidential ballroom adjacent to the White House, the guy would have never gotten in,” he said referring to the assailant.
Graham is working alongside Katie Britt and Eric Schmitt on legislation to authorize the project, which would include a reinforced underground complex designed for emergency use.
Schmitt told reporters that funding mechanisms such as national park fees would help offset the cost of construction.
“Underneath it will be a lot of military stuff. There will be a Secret Service annex and we pay for it by offsetting it with customs fees,” he said. “Private donations can be used but I think they should be used for buying [fine] china and stuff like that.”
Graham said he spoke with President Trump about the proposal on Sunday and indicated that the White House is supportive of the effort.
The South Carolina senator, a close ally of the president, said the ballroom idea frequently comes up in conversations with Trump.
“Every time, all the time. Like, ‘How are you doing?’ ‘Where’s the ballroom?’ ‘How you playin’ [golf?]’ ‘I don’t know, I’d play better if you built the ballroom.’ It’s all the time,” Graham said with a chuckle. “He understands what’s missing.”
He also noted that the timing of the proposal coincides with the visit of King Charles III to the White House, suggesting that a new ballroom would better accommodate such high-profile occasions.
Schmitt, who also speaks regularly with Trump, agreed with the president’s emphasis on the project.
“it’s important,” he said when asked how often the topic has come up in his discussions with Trump.
President Trump himself said during a press conference Saturday night following the shooting that the incident highlighted the need for a secure ballroom at the White House.
Graham said he plans to urge Senate Majority Leader John Thune to fast-track the bill and bring it to the Senate floor for a vote as soon as possible.
Support for the proposal is not limited strictly to Republicans. Senator John Fetterman expressed backing for the idea on Sunday and called on Democrats to reconsider their opposition.
Graham said he has not yet formally presented the plan to his Democratic colleagues but has had informal conversations.
“I’m trying to jumpstart the conversation. I’ve talked to a few of them just out the hall. … Some of them of them were there. They’re rattled like the best of us,” he said.
However, Senate Democratic Whip Dick Durbin indicated he is not currently in favor of the proposal.
“At this point no. There’s obviously a lot of questions about how much it costs, how many people will be accommodated,” he said.
Durbin also raised concerns about the size and practicality of the proposed ballroom, noting it would be significantly smaller than the Washington Hilton, the traditional venue for the Correspondents’ Dinner.
“I have a lot of questions,” Durbin added. “Who’s paying for this? What’s the arrangement? This administration has too many times come up with deferment of payment to special interest sources. We don’t know the details.”
{Matzav.com}
