Feed aggregator

Blue Bird Airways is expected to be summoned to a hearing at Ben Gurion Airport over unusually severe flight delays, with data showing that roughly 80% of flights operated by Blue Bird and TUS fail to depart on time and delays average approximately two hours.

According to a report by Israel’s Channel 13 on Tuesday evening, Blue Bird, currently the fourth-largest airline operating at Ben Gurion Airport, will face scrutiny over its record of delayed departures and arrivals.

Blue Bird and TUS said they had not yet received any official notice from Ben Gurion Airport regarding a hearing.

“We have not received any communication from Ben Gurion Airport. If such a communication is received, it will be reviewed, and we will act accordingly,” the airlines said.

The development comes just two days after Blue Bird passengers endured a particularly difficult delay aboard a chartered aircraft scheduled to fly from Ben Gurion Airport to Crete, Greece.

Passengers had already boarded the plane when they were forced to remain aboard for nearly two hours while the aircraft sat on the tarmac. Compounding the problem, the ventilation system was reportedly not functioning despite the intense August heat.

Several passengers began feeling ill during the lengthy wait, while parents were filmed attempting to cool themselves and their young children with ice and wet wipes.

One passenger described the conditions aboard the aircraft in stark terms.

“We have been inside a closed airplane for an hour and 40 minutes without air conditioning, with small children fainting. I have never seen anything like this in my life,” she said.

The latest controversy comes amid broader disruptions at Ben Gurion Airport during the peak summer travel season.

On Friday, the airport experienced unusually severe congestion, with approximately 90 flights backed up within a period of just three hours.

The Israel Airports Authority attributed those delays to heavy air traffic and restrictions in European airspace, particularly around Greece, as well as the presence and operations of American refueling aircraft.

Airport officials rejected reports that the disruptions were caused by a strike or staffing shortages, maintaining that the delays resulted from air-traffic conditions and other operational constraints.

{Matzav.com}

A legal challenge seeking to halt New York City’s new pied-à-terre tax is expanding, with four additional homeowners joining the case and alleging serious errors in the Mamdani administration’s rollout — including one tax notice that was allegedly sent to a neighbor living 27 floors away.

The new plaintiffs have joined a lawsuit brought by attorney Randy Mastro seeking to suspend the surcharge on high-value second homes in New York City. The case argues that problems with the city’s implementation and exemption system have improperly placed primary residences at risk of substantial new tax bills.

One of the newly added plaintiffs is real estate executive Kenneth Fishel, who says the city Department of Finance notified him that his Upper East Side Park Avenue co-op could be subject to the tax even though he has lived there and paid taxes from the residence for years.

Making matters worse, according to the lawsuit, the Department of Finance incorrectly addressed Fishel’s notice and sent it to a neighbor who lives nearly 30 floors below him.

“Fishel only learned of and obtained a copy of the notice because he ran into his neighbor living 27 floors below him on the elevator,” the suit states.

“If I hadn’t run into him in the elevator, I never would have known, and I would have been billed for the full tax,” Fishel told The Post on Tuesday.

Fishel then encountered another problem when he attempted to request an exemption. According to the lawsuit, the city’s online system indicated that an exemption application had already been submitted for the property — “likely due to the fact that the mailed notice did not even list the correct names.”

The Department of Finance sent approximately 17,000 notices to property owners warning that they could face tax bills reaching five figures unless they successfully sought exemptions. The tax was approved by state lawmakers and Gov. Kathy Hochul earlier this year.

City officials said last week that approximately 4,290 homeowners who received the notices had challenged their inclusion. Of those cases, 1,906 exemption requests had been approved at that point.

The four new plaintiffs, whose primary residences are in Chelsea and on the Upper East Side, all maintain that they have applied for exemptions but have not yet received approval, according to the court filing.

Their lawsuit describes the process as a “tangled morass of an exemption regime,” arguing that homeowners who should not owe the surcharge have nevertheless been forced through a confusing administrative process to prove that their properties are their primary residences.

The tax applies to certain unoccupied properties that are not their owners’ primary residences, including one- to three-family homes worth at least $5 million and condominium and co-op units valued at $1 million or more.

The plaintiffs argue that the city’s “messy, ill-considered, and atextual ‘exemption’ scheme” has failed to promptly remove them from the pool of homeowners potentially facing the surcharge.

Unless the situation is corrected, the plaintiffs say they will “continue to suffer irreparable harm in attempting to apply for an ‘exemption’ to a tax that was not designed to burden them in any way.”

Court filings show that each of the newly added homeowners received notices estimating that they could owe between $45,000 and $58,000 under the pied-à-terre tax.

Among them are Chelsea residents Stephen and Sandra Shore, who say they have occupied their home for more than three decades and consistently paid their taxes, yet still received a notice warning that they could owe the additional levy.

According to the lawsuit, the Shores repeatedly tried to submit an exemption request through the Department of Finance’s system but were unsuccessful. Eventually, they resorted to sending a registered letter “in an attempt to simply submit their application.”

Another plaintiff, Carla Stearns, lives near Mastro in Carnegie Hill and says she and her husband have occupied their brownstone since purchasing it in 2017. The city values the property at approximately $6.8 million.

Although Stearns says she pays city taxes and owns no other property, she was nevertheless notified that she could face roughly $55,000 in additional taxes unless she successfully applied for an exemption.

Fishel sharply criticized the city’s handling of the program after appearing at a City Council oversight hearing focused on the troubled rollout.

“We pay taxes here in the city, and we have for a long time. And the administration of this process has just been horrendous,” Fishel told The Post.

“They’ve totally botched the process,” he said. “They really need to withdraw all the notices and start again.”

The newly added homeowners join the lawsuit’s original plaintiffs: Staten Island residents Rachel O’Brien and Carmine Morano, the wife and father of City Councilman Frank Morano, and Chelsea resident Simon Hedley. Of those three, Hedley was the only one who had received a tax notice.

The litigation previously succeeded in temporarily stopping implementation of the tax when a Staten Island judge issued a pause shortly after the lawsuit was filed earlier this month. Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s administration challenged that decision, and an appellate court subsequently overturned the temporary order, allowing the rollout to proceed while the broader legal fight continues.

Mastro has argued that adding the four homeowners strengthens the case against the city. In a letter to the Staten Island judge overseeing the dispute, he said their participation would “eliminate” the “specious mootness arguments” raised by the city after Hedley, who has described himself as a Mamdani supporter, was granted an exemption following his application.

{Matzav.com}

Israeli Prime Minister Binyomin Netanyahu and U.S. special envoy Jared Kushner were at odds during their Monday meeting over Israel’s determination to keep targeting Hamas terrorists accused of participating in the October 7 massacre, with Netanyahu refusing to commit to ending the strikes despite American concerns, according to an official who attended the talks, the Times of Israel reports.

The disagreement centered on Israel’s ongoing campaign to track down those involved in the October 7, 2023, invasion and atrocities. Earlier this month, Israel publicly confirmed for the first time that it had launched a dedicated operation aimed at locating and killing every Palestinian terrorist who took part in the attack.

Those operations have at times resulted in breaches of the ceasefire agreement reached between Israel and Hamas in October 2025. Until now, however, the U.S.-controlled Board of Peace has largely refrained from forcefully challenging the strikes, particularly when the IDF has maintained that the individuals being targeted presented an immediate danger to Israeli forces.

For months, the Board of Peace concentrated its efforts on persuading Hamas to agree to a framework requiring the terror group to disarm. Hamas ultimately accepted the proposal on July 30.

Under that framework, once implementation begins, both Israel and Hamas are supposed to immediately cease military activity. Netanyahu has opposed that provision, and the official who attended Monday’s meeting said the prime minister specifically raised his objections during his discussion with Kushner.

Kushner told Netanyahu that Washington would not stand in the way of IDF action against individuals who truly present an “imminent threat.” At the same time, President Donald Trump’s son-in-law and senior adviser cautioned Netanyahu against interpreting that exception too broadly, according to the official.

Netanyahu nevertheless maintained that Israel would continue striking terrorists who participated in the October 7 attack, frustrating members of the Board of Peace delegation. The two sides ended the discussion without resolving their differences, the official said.

A second source who was briefed on the discussions corroborated that account of the meeting.

The dispute took on added significance just hours after Kushner departed Israel, when the IDF launched one of its deadliest attacks in months. The military said the strike targeted a gathering of senior Hamas operatives. At least six people were reportedly killed, including a minor, while more than 10 others were wounded.

Netanyahu’s insistence on preserving Israel’s freedom to pursue October 7 terrorists could conflict not only with the Board of Peace’s stalled disarmament framework, but also with President Trump’s 20-point proposal for bringing the Gaza war to an end, which Netanyahu agreed to in September 2025.

Trump’s plan provides that Hamas members who “commit to peaceful co-existence and to decommission their weapons will be given amnesty.”

Another point of contention at Monday’s meeting involved Netanyahu’s refusal to permit recruits for a newly planned Palestinian police force to travel from Gaza to Egypt for training, according to the official who was present.

The Board of Peace’s disarmament framework calls for Hamas to surrender its weapons to a new police force operating under the National Committee for the Administration of Gaza. The International Stabilization Force is expected to facilitate the weapons-transfer process.

Kushner said Monday that he wants Hamas to start turning over its weapons within one month. But that timetable faces a significant practical obstacle: Unless enough Palestinian police recruits are trained and ready to deploy, there will be no sufficiently prepared force to receive the weapons Hamas is supposed to surrender.

{Matzav.com}

Belzer educational institutions in Montreal have won a significant legal victory after Quebec’s Administrative Tribunal overturned a government decision that threatened to revoke their operating licenses and cut off public funding.

The ruling allows the Belzer schools and mosdos to continue operating normally while retaining the full funding necessary to run their educational programs.

Approximately two months ago, Quebec authorities moved to revoke the licenses and funding of the Belzer educational institutions in Montreal, citing alleged failures to meet government requirements governing the amount of instructional time devoted to mandatory secular subjects.

Facing the possibility that the institutions could be forced to close, administrators appealed to Quebec’s Administrative Tribunal and sought to have the government action overturned.

The tribunal has now granted the institutions’ request, canceling the government decision and clearing the way for the schools to open and operate as usual while continuing to receive their funding.

The dispute involves three Belz educational institutions in Montreal serving approximately 600 children and bochurim, including kindergartens, a Talmud Torah and a yeshiva ketana.

The Quebec government had moved to withdraw funding from the three institutions shortly before the beginning of the Elul zman.

Authorities alleged several deficiencies at the schools, including an insufficient number of qualified teachers proficient in English and French, failure to provide the required number of instructional hours for mandatory subjects, the use of educational materials that had not received government approval, and problems involving emergency exits.

Administrators of the Belz institutions strongly rejected the allegations and turned to the Administrative Tribunal seeking an injunction against the government action.

In their legal challenge, the mosdos argued that the government’s decision was based on “incorrect factual assumptions, inconsistent analysis and a disproportionate measure.”

The tribunal ultimately sided with the institutions and overturned the government decision, allowing the approximately 600 children and bochurim to continue their studies in the existing school buildings while preserving the institutions’ licenses and funding.

{Matzav.com}

Israel’s Agriculture Ministry has temporarily blocked the import of frozen chicken from Brazil, removing a Brazilian poultry plant owned by Baladi from the list of facilities approved to export to Israel following a renewed examination of veterinary oversight and production procedures.

Dr. Sergio Dolev, acting director of the Agriculture Ministry’s Veterinary Services, informed Baladi that its Brazilian poultry facility was being removed from the approved list and that Brazil would, for the time being, not be authorized to export poultry meat to Israel.

The ministry said the decision followed a reassessment of the approval process, which determined that imports could not proceed until officials conduct an on-site examination of the production system and determine whether Brazilian authorities are capable of supervising it in accordance with Israel’s stringent requirements.

Agriculture Ministry officials stressed that the decision was based on professional considerations involving public health and animal welfare. Should the approval process be renewed, a team of Veterinary Services experts is prepared to conduct a comprehensive inspection before officials consider allowing Brazilian poultry imports into Israel.

The Agriculture Ministry’s move comes amid a broader dispute that has already reached Israel’s Supreme Court following a petition filed by Baladi concerning the establishment of procedures and kashrus approvals for importing poultry from abroad.

During a High Court hearing last month, the Chief Rabbinate emphasized “the need to establish a measured and orderly halachic and administrative process on which the professional officials at the Chief Rabbinate are working.”

The Chief Rabbinate instructed its professional staff to formulate recommendations and bring them before the Chief Rabbinate Council for approval within 120 days. The judges agreed to the requested timetable.

Kashrus officials welcomed the Agriculture Ministry’s decision to suspend the veterinary approval process, saying it would prevent imports from moving forward before the necessary halachic safeguards are fully established.

According to those officials, shechitah of poultry abroad and the supervision of overseas production involve significant halachic complexities. Suspending the proposed imports, they said, removes pressure to establish arrangements hastily and helps ensure that no products reach Israeli consumers until comprehensive inspections have been completed and a rigorous system of halachic supervision is in place.

Baladi, however, said it intends to pursue available legal avenues in an effort to overturn the Agriculture Ministry’s decision.

Israel’s domestic poultry industry, particularly farms operating in peripheral areas and communities near the country’s borders, is considered an important component of national food security. Israel has one of the world’s highest rates of chicken consumption, with domestic demand currently supplied entirely through locally raised poultry operating under Israeli supervision.

Slaughterhouses throughout Israel also operate under continuous oversight from leading kashrus organizations, creating a supervision chain extending from poultry farms through shechitah and processing until the product reaches consumers.

Kashrus officials stressed that beyond the legal and commercial questions surrounding imported poultry, protecting kashrus standards and consumers must remain the overriding priority.

They said the insistence on thorough examinations without shortcuts—both regarding veterinary and health standards and the detailed halachic requirements governing shechitah performed overseas—is essential to preventing serious kashrus problems for observant and mehadrin consumers in Israel.

{Matzav.com}

[COMMUNICATED]

Are you looking for the right yeshiva?

Yeshiva of Rochester is the place for serious Bnei Torah with outstanding middos, and looking for strong general studies.

To apply, visit https://www.tiuny.org/ or reach out to Rabbi Polatoff at 570.691.8693.

Bank Leumi has filed a NIS 26.6 million lawsuit against Meta, accusing the technology giant of allowing scammers to run fraudulent advertisements impersonating the bank across Facebook and Instagram and alleging that Meta financially benefited from the deceptive campaigns.

The lawsuit, filed in Tel Aviv District Court, claims that users encountered convincing advertisements falsely presented as Bank Leumi promotions. The ads allegedly used the bank’s name, logo and other branding while promising prizes and benefits including gift cards, cars and other giveaways.

According to the bank, users who clicked on the advertisements were redirected to fraudulent websites designed to resemble Bank Leumi’s legitimate online banking site. Victims were then prompted to provide account credentials and verification codes, information that the scammers allegedly used to gain access to customers’ accounts and steal their money.

Bank Leumi argues that numerous warning signs should have made the fraudulent nature of the campaigns readily apparent to Meta. The lawsuit cites suspicious website addresses, spelling errors, poorly written text, anonymous advertising accounts and, in some instances, the use of deepfake technology.

“You don’t need special detective work to identify the suspicious signs,” the lawsuit states.

Bank Leumi goes further, alleging that Meta “knowingly cooperated in defrauding bank customers out of considerations of greed.”

The bank says the alleged scams have already caused substantial financial damage. According to the lawsuit, Bank Leumi has reimbursed affected customers millions of shekels while spending significant resources identifying fraudulent campaigns and attempting to have them blocked. The bank also claims the schemes have damaged its reputation by exploiting its name and image to deceive customers.

Bank Leumi says the problem has intensified dramatically. In July alone, according to the lawsuit, the bank identified 243 fraudulent advertising campaigns on Meta platforms — more than the total number it detected during the entire first six months of the year.

Beyond the NIS 26.6 million in damages being sought, Bank Leumi is asking the court to order Meta to introduce stronger safeguards aimed at preventing similar scams.

Among the measures requested are stricter procedures for verifying the identities of advertisers, clear labels on advertisements published through accounts whose identities have not been verified, and a mechanism allowing Bank Leumi to review campaigns using its name, logo or other identifying symbols before they are published.

Meta, which owns Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp, has not yet filed its response to Bank Leumi’s lawsuit.

{Matzav.com}

A large police force entered Yerushalayim’s Meah Shearim neighborhood on Tuesday evening and raided the offices of an organization that arranges meetings between Jews and Arabs, triggering a disturbance as officers confiscated equipment from the premises.

The unusual operation unfolded in the heart of the staunchly chareidi neighborhood, drawing the attention of local residents as police converged on the organization’s offices. According to initial sources, the group targeted in the raid organizes encounters between Jewish and Arab participants.

Police officers entered the offices as part of the operation and began removing equipment from the site. The precise nature of the materials seized, as well as the legal grounds for the raid, were not immediately disclosed in the initial report.

As word of the police activity spread through the neighborhood, a commotion developed around the scene. Police encountered resistance while carrying out the confiscation, and officers were reportedly attacked during the disturbance.

Footage from the scene showed police forces deployed in the Meah Shearim market area as the operation was underway.

The identity of the organization was not immediately provided in the initial report, nor was it clear whether any individuals associated with the group had been detained or arrested.

Authorities also had not yet publicly detailed what investigators were seeking inside the offices, what equipment was confiscated, or whether the raid was connected specifically to the organization’s Jewish-Arab meetings.

The incident remained developing Tuesday evening, with additional information about the reason for the raid and the findings inside the offices expected to emerge as authorities provide further details.

{Matzav.com}

The traditionally expensive shtreimel market may be facing an unlikely new competitor: a Chinese manufacturer offering Chassidishe shtreimlach online for prices beginning at just $960, far below what many buyers are accustomed to paying in Israel and the United States, Matzav.com has learned.

For generations, shtreimlach have been associated with highly specialized craftsmen, custom fittings and prices reaching thousands — and sometimes tens of thousands — of shekels. But a listing on Alibaba is now offering what it describes as a genuine Chassidish eshtreimel directly from a manufacturer in China.

The product is being sold by Hengshui Fn Fur Trading Co., Ltd., a company based in China’s Hebei province. On Alibaba, the manufacturer is listed with a rating of 4.9 out of 5 based on 13 reviews.

The listing describes the product as a “Streimel Jewish Hasidic Hat” and references sable fur and sable tails, along with fox fur. Current prices range from $960 to $1,350, with a minimum order of two shtreimlach.

According to details of the offer that circulated online, customers can choose among four sizes based on head circumference: 54–56 centimeters, 56–58 centimeters, 58–60 centimeters and 60–62 centimeters.

Perhaps even more intriguing is that the Chinese company is not limiting itself to finished shtreimlach. Its Alibaba listings also offer raw materials used in their production, including Russian and Canadian sable tails, available at wholesale prices of several dozen dollars per piece.

The availability of those materials raises the possibility that the manufacturer has considerable familiarity with the shtreimel production process and may already have connections to businesses within the industry. There is currently no evidence, however, that the Chinese company manufactures shtreimlach for any established producers in Israel or the United States.

The appearance of a Chinese-made shtreimel available for direct purchase at a fraction of the prices commonly charged in much of the traditional market is nevertheless drawing considerable interest — and raising the question of whether established shtreimel machers have reason to be concerned.

The bigger question, however, is what buyers would actually receive for the bargain price. The quality of the fur, craftsmanship, durability, fit and ability to produce the distinctive styles favored by different Chassidishe courts cannot easily be determined from photographs and specifications on an online listing.

For now, the $960 Chinese shtreimel may be more curiosity than industry disruptor. But in a market where a traditional shtreimel can cost many times that amount, its arrival is certainly enough to get shtreimel machers — and their customers — talking.

{Matzav.com}

Nearly 90 years after they were issued in Lithuania, rare historical documents detailing the activities of Rav Yosef Shlomo Kahaneman zt”l, founder of the Ponovezh Yeshiva, have been brought to Israel after being uncovered in Lithuanian government archives.

Lithuanian Ambassador to Israel Audrius Bruzga presented the documents to MK Uri Maklev during a meeting at the Lithuanian Embassy. The ambassador compiled a special binder containing official records he located in Lithuania’s state archives documenting Rav Kahaneman’s activities in the city of Ponovezh during the 1920s and 1930s.

The discovery grew out of Maklev’s ongoing relationship with the Lithuanian ambassador, with the two having worked in recent years on efforts to preserve Lithuania’s Jewish heritage and the remnants of the flourishing Torah world that existed there before the Holocaust.

Approximately eight months ago, Maklev arranged a special visit for Bruzga to the Ponovezh Yeshiva in Bnei Brak, which Rav Kahaneman established after the Holocaust and named for the Lithuanian city where his original yeshiva had stood.

During that visit, Bruzga met with the yeshiva’s president, Rav Eliezer Kahaneman, a grandson of Rav Yosef Shlomo Kahaneman, who shared with him the history of the yeshiva and described its reestablishment in Eretz Yisroel following the destruction of European Jewry.

The ambassador and Maklev subsequently visited the home of Ponovezh Rosh Yeshiva Rav Boruch Dov Povarsky, where their conversation focused on the legacy of Lithuanian Jewry and efforts to preserve Jewish cemeteries throughout Lithuania.

That visit apparently sparked the ambassador’s curiosity about the yeshiva’s Lithuanian roots. Bruzga told Maklev during their latest meeting that he subsequently began searching Lithuania’s official archives for records connected to Rav Kahaneman and his activities in Ponovezh.

The search produced a remarkable collection of historical material, including municipal records, land diagrams, building permits and legal documents bearing Rav Kahaneman’s name.

Among the documents is a 1936 authorization from the municipality of Ponovezh referring to a permit originally granted to Rav Kahaneman on July 13, 1922, allowing him to construct a three-story brick building on property belonging to the Jewish community on Ramygalos Street.

Perhaps the most significant discovery is a district court ruling from Ponovezh dated May 21, 1937. The case dealt with a request to formally recognize Rav Kahaneman’s rights to property located at 34 Ramygalos Street.

According to the ruling, the property covered 1,537 square meters and contained buildings that were used by the local Jewish community.

The court records also trace the history of the property. Documents submitted in the case indicated that before World War I, the land had belonged to a Jewish religious organization known as “Cheder-Kloil.” It later came under the control of the Jewish community of Ponovezh, which maintained continuous possession of the property for more than a decade beginning in 1922.

As part of the legal proceedings, an official notice was published allowing anyone with objections to the claim to come forward. According to the court ruling, no objections were submitted.

After reviewing the documentation and testimony, the court formally recognized Rav Kahaneman’s rights to the property on the basis of the lengthy period of continuous possession.

The collection also includes detailed plans of the property and its buildings, along with additional official records from the Ponovezh municipality. Together, the documents provide a rare glimpse into the scope of Rav Kahaneman’s activities in the Lithuanian city during the years preceding the Holocaust.

The discovery also comes amid an unusual historical coincidence. Questions surrounding rights and control of the Ponovezh Yeshiva in Bnei Brak have recently returned to the headlines following new legal rulings. Now, an 89-year-old Lithuanian court decision has surfaced dealing with the rights of the yeshiva’s founder to property in the original city of Ponovezh. There is no legal connection between the two matters, but the historical parallel is striking.

Only a few years after the 1937 ruling, the Jewish community of Ponovezh was destroyed during the Holocaust. Rav Kahaneman survived and set about rebuilding in Eretz Yisroel the Torah world that had been devastated in Europe, naming the yeshiva he established in Bnei Brak after the Lithuanian city he had left behind.

Maklev thanked Ambassador Bruzga for taking the initiative to search for the records and for the effort involved in locating them. He said the documents constitute historically important material for both the Torah world and the preservation of Lithuanian Jewish heritage.

{Matzav.com}

The family of 24-year-old Katriel Nachman Keinan of Beit Shemesh fears he may have been abducted after disappearing approximately a week ago while traveling between Tiveriah and Tzfas, as police, volunteers and divers continue an extensive search for him.

Keinan’s father, Yossi Keinan, filed a missing-person report with the Beit Shemesh police after his son abruptly vanished and stopped communicating with his family. According to a report by mako, the family has grown increasingly concerned that foul play may have been involved.

“I’m afraid my son was kidnapped. It’s a dangerous area. He didn’t just disappear and stop making contact for no reason. Maybe someone kidnapped him,” his father said. “He is such a good boy that wherever he goes, there is light and positive energy. He was on his way to meet with his rabbi to consult with him.”

Yossi said the last time he personally saw his son was at the entrance to a shul.

“He told me he was going to stop by a friend and didn’t come back. I haven’t seen him since,” he said.

According to his father, Nachman had said that after meeting his friend, he planned to travel from Beit Shemesh to Tzfas for an urgent consultation with his Rav.

The Rav later told the family that Nachman did in fact arrive in Tzfas and spoke with him by telephone at approximately 10 p.m. The Rav explained that he was at a hospital because of a family matter and could not meet him that evening, but offered to see him at 10 a.m. the following morning and even arrange a place for him to sleep. Nachman responded that he would manage on his own and would meet the Rav the next day.

“He never heard from him again. I still managed to speak to him the next morning, but he said his phone battery was about to die, and then he disappeared. That was it,” his father said.

Since Nachman vanished, search teams have concentrated their efforts in locations where investigators believe he may have traveled. Police have also reviewed security-camera footage in an effort to reconstruct his movements.

One surveillance camera from a business in Tiveriah captured Nachman walking in the direction of Gai Beach on the Kinneret, providing investigators with one of the last known images of him before he disappeared.

According to the family, the commander of the Beit Shemesh police station and local officers have been closely involved in the search, together with police forces from the Northern District. Divers have also been searching the Kinneret, but no trace of Nachman has been discovered.

“The station commander in Beit Shemesh is constantly in touch with us. He is helping us and conducting searches in the field with his officers. Divers are also searching the Kinneret. Nobody has found anything. It’s very strange,” Yossi said.

Nachman, a Chabad chossid, spent several years living in the Philippines before returning to Israel. His family continues to hold out hope that he is alive and will soon be found.

“We are davening and believe that Nachman is alive. We hope the police and the many volunteers will find him. He is the light of our lives.”

Nachman was last seen on Monday, August 10, at approximately 6 p.m. in the area of Gai Beach in Tiveriah while reportedly on his way to Tzfas. He has not been seen since.

Nachman is approximately 5 feet 8 inches tall, with black hair, a beard and brown eyes. When last seen, he was wearing a white shirt, black suit and hat and was carrying a black backpack and a dark-brown tefillin bag.

{Matzav.com}

Israel’s attorney general is calling on the IDF and police to resume proactive operations and arrests targeting draft evaders, while also demanding an expansion of economic and personal sanctions, after an annual review found that approximately 80% of those currently classified as draft evaders are members of the chareidi community.

The review covers the military recruitment year that ended in June 2026 and was conducted under the leadership of the attorney general. Representatives from the IDF, Defense Ministry, Finance Ministry, Justice Ministry, Israel Police, Population and Immigration Authority, National Digital Agency and other government bodies participated in the assessment.

Alongside the figures on draft evasion, officials reported an increase in the number of chareidim entering military service. According to the review, the combination of issuing draft orders to all eligible chareidi men, intensifying economic and personal enforcement measures, and adapting military service tracks for chareidi recruits has proven effective in increasing enlistment.

The figures presented during the review indicate that approximately 50,000 chareidim are currently classified as draft evaders, while another roughly 31,000 have been issued what is known as a “Tzav 12.” Since the beginning of the year, 34 indictments have been filed against chareidim for draft evasion.

The data further shows that 679 military deserters have faced disciplinary proceedings since August 2025, while 860 arrests were carried out over the past year.

In addition, 244 individuals were detained by police, while another 1,528 were stopped at Ben Gurion Airport and other border crossings. During the past three months alone, authorities prevented 1,061 deserters from leaving Israel through border crossings.

Justice Ministry officials concluded that additional enforcement measures should be introduced as quickly as possible in order to further reduce draft evasion and address what the government describes as the military’s urgent need for additional manpower.

At the same time, the attorney general determined that the IDF and Israel Police should resume proactive enforcement operations and arrests against draft evaders from all sectors of the population, citing the principle of equal enforcement.

In a response submitted by the attorney general to the High Court, officials acknowledged that carrying out proactive arrests of chareidi draft evaders presents significant practical difficulties because such operations have repeatedly triggered large-scale protests and disturbances.

The filing said military and police officials had pointed to “the significant difficulty that currently exists in carrying out proactive operations and arresting draft evaders from the chareidi community, in light of the large-scale public disturbances accompanying them.”

Authorities also noted that responding to the protests surrounding such arrests requires the deployment of substantial police and security resources.

Despite those difficulties, professional officials maintained that proactive operations and arrests remain important enforcement tools and can serve as a deterrent against draft evasion.

{Matzav.com}

The Justice Department is preparing to dispatch approximately 1,000 election monitors across the country for November’s midterm elections, a major expansion of federal oversight as the Trump administration places increased emphasis on election integrity and public confidence in the voting process.

Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights Harmeet Dhillon disclosed the planned deployment during a Monday appearance on Bloomberg’s “Balance of Power,” saying the effort could significantly increase the number of federal personnel assigned to observe elections around the country.

“We will do it to the tune of approximately 1,000 election monitors in the November election,” Dhillon said, noting that the Civil Rights Division has for decades dispatched personnel to election “hot spots” to address potential problems and strengthen confidence in election procedures.

Federal election monitoring is not new to the current administration. The Justice Department has regularly sent observers and monitors to polling locations under both Republican and Democratic administrations as part of its responsibility to enforce federal voting laws and safeguard the rights of eligible voters.

During the 2024 presidential election, DOJ personnel were dispatched to 86 jurisdictions, while monitors were sent to 64 jurisdictions during the 2022 midterm elections, according to The Washington Post.

Dhillon said officials have not yet determined the final list of locations where the approximately 1,000 monitors will be assigned in November.

Among the jurisdictions that could receive federal monitors are areas where concerns have arisen over access for voters with disabilities or those requiring language assistance, as well as locations where authorities believe voter fraud may be an issue.

The Justice Department has already deployed monitors during primary elections held earlier this year. In Michigan, federal personnel were sent to Detroit, Hamtramck, Lansing and East Lansing.

DOJ officials said the Michigan deployment was designed to promote “transparency, ballot security, and compliance with federal law.”

Federal monitors were also dispatched to polling locations in three Arizona counties during elections held in July.

The planned expansion has prompted concerns from Democrats over the scale and role of the federal presence at polling locations.

A group of Democratic senators recently called on the Justice Department to make certain that federal monitors operate on a nonpartisan basis and refrain from interfering with election administration conducted by state and local authorities.

Dhillon rejected the suggestion that the monitoring initiative represents an unprecedented undertaking by the Trump administration, stressing that observing elections and enforcing federal voting protections have long been responsibilities of the Justice Department.

She said the department is also dealing with disagreements involving the accuracy of voter-registration lists, alleging that some election administrators have failed to remove people who are no longer eligible to remain registered, including noncitizens.

According to Dhillon, voter rolls in states cooperating with the Justice Department include hundreds of thousands of deceased individuals and tens of thousands of noncitizens. She cautioned, however, that additional investigation is necessary before authorities can conclude that any particular individual actually cast an illegal ballot.

“The goal is not so much going after one voter here or there,” Dhillon said. “It is increasing all American citizens’ confidence in our elections.”

{Matzav.com}

President Trump’s job approval has fallen to 33%, the lowest point of his current presidency, as Americans increasingly express concern over the duration of the U.S. war with Iran and the economic fallout from the conflict, according to a new Reuters/Ipsos poll.

The four-day survey found that just one-third of respondents approved of Trump’s performance in office, while 64% disapproved. The 33% figure represents a decline from the 35% recorded in a Reuters/Ipsos survey completed earlier this month and is the lowest of Trump’s current term. It also matches the lowest approval rating recorded during his previous term, reached in December 2017.

Trump returned to the White House in 2025 with an approval rating just below 50%, but his standing has deteriorated this year following his decision to launch strikes against Iran alongside Israel. The resulting war severely disrupted roughly one-fifth of global oil commerce, sending gasoline prices higher and increasing financial pressure on American households. The economic consequences are also creating political difficulties for Republicans seeking to preserve their congressional majorities in November’s midterm elections.

During his campaign, Trump repeatedly pledged to control inflation and keep the United States out of prolonged wars. He initially predicted that the confrontation with Iran would be over within several weeks, but Tehran has continued resisting while keeping much of the oil traffic through the Strait of Hormuz restricted, even as the intensity of the fighting has diminished.

The poll found widespread expectations that the conflict will continue. Approximately 80% of Americans, including 87% of Democrats and 71% of Republicans, believe U.S. involvement in Iran “will go on for an extended period of ‌time.” Only 16% expect the war to conclude within the next several weeks.

At a political rally Friday in Garden City, New York, Trump defended the higher fuel costs associated with the conflict, saying paying “a ‌tiny little bit more for your gasoline” was justified if it prevented “a very evil country” from obtaining a nuclear weapon. Throughout the war, Trump has repeatedly shifted between warning of further military escalation and suggesting that a peace agreement could soon be reached.

The survey found limited public support for the conflict itself. Only about 20% of Americans said they believe the war has been worth its costs, while approximately half of Republican respondents said the same.

The combination of the Iran conflict and rising gasoline prices has heightened Republican concerns ahead of the Nov. 3 midterm elections, particularly as the party seeks to protect its narrow majority in the House. Democrats, meanwhile, increasingly view control of the Senate as potentially within reach.

Recent Reuters/Ipsos polling has also shown a shift in public perceptions of which party would better manage the economy. For the first time in roughly a decade, Democrats have moved ahead of Republicans on the issue. In the latest survey, 38% said Democrats would do a better job handling the economy, compared with 35% who favored Republicans.

Democrats also held an advantage when respondents were asked which party they believed could better address the cost of living.

Immigration has remained a stronger issue for Republicans throughout Trump’s presidency, amid a steep reduction in illegal border crossings and the administration’s nationwide immigration enforcement campaign. However, the Republican advantage has narrowed as concerns have grown over deadly encounters and an increase in the number of people being detained, including children.

Among registered voters, 40% said Republicans have the better approach to immigration, while 38% chose Democrats. The two-point Republican advantage is the smallest recorded during Trump’s current term, representing a dramatic contraction from the 26-point lead Republicans held on immigration in January 2025.

The Reuters/Ipsos survey was conducted online among 1,166 adults across the United States. The poll carries a margin of error of approximately three percentage points in either direction.

{Matzav.com}

The U.S.-led Board of Peace is moving toward a major change in its Gaza disarmament plan, abandoning a phased approach in favor of requiring Hamas and other terror groups to surrender all of their weapons in a single operation before Israel fully withdraws from the Gaza Strip.

Under the emerging proposal, Hamas would no longer be permitted to gradually turn over its weapons as other elements of the Gaza agreement move forward. Instead, the terror group and other armed organizations would be required to complete the disarmament process before a full IDF withdrawal takes place.

The shift reportedly follows a meeting between U.S. special envoy Jared Kushner and Prime Minister Binyomin Netanyahu. A Board of Peace official said the new approach would “reduce the gamble” for the countries participating in the process.

“We want complete disarmament without compromises on the issue and do not intend to allow any kinds of tricks,” the official said, describing the objective as “actual, genuine, complete and rapid disarmament.”

If Hamas refuses to surrender its weapons, the official added, “Israel will have international diplomatic backing to do it by force.”

The Kushner-Netanyahu meeting also produced an understanding that reconstruction of Gaza will not proceed unless Hamas is disarmed throughout the entire Strip.

Netanyahu reportedly insisted that the first step must be the surrender of Hamas’s weapons for destruction. Under his proposal, the arms would be turned over to Gen. Jasper Jeffers, commander of the International Stabilization Force for Gaza, with the process conducted under American supervision.

Kushner, speaking in an interview with Fox News, said Hamas had received a “firm ultimatum” to comply with the agreements it signed and relinquish its weapons. If it refuses, he said, the IDF would carry out the disarmament by force and “finish the job.”

Kushner added that a Hamas refusal to fulfill its commitments would leave Israel with substantially greater international support for renewed military action.

“Israel will have much more support from the U.S. and other countries to go finish the job properly,” he said.

Officials with the Board of Peace say the ultimate objective is now broadly agreed upon: Hamas must be completely stripped of both its weapons and governing authority, Gaza must be fully demilitarized, and only after those conditions have been fulfilled would Israel complete its withdrawal from the Strip.

{Matzav.com}

[COMMUNICATED]

Watch the atmosphere of Haschalas Zman as the Beis Medrash comes alive with the קול התורה at Yeshiva Torah Vodaath.

A glimpse into the excitement and renewed hasmadah as talmidim begin a new zman and prepare for the days ahead.

Israeli airline Israir announced Tuesday that it will launch flights to New York by October.

The much-anticipated move comes as service on the highly lucrative transatlantic route remains limited, with only Israeli carriers currently flying nonstop to and from the United States after all three U.S. legacy carriers froze their flights due to the war with Iran.

While American carriers, led by Delta and United, are scheduled to resume service to Tel Aviv next month, airfares remain stubbornly high throughout the fall due to heavy postwar demand.

Israel’s second-largest carrier said it plans to start its New York flights by Oct. 19 pending final FAA approval, with tickets set to go on sale from next week. It will bring forward the launch date if the final authorization comes in sooner.

Israir did not cite a starting price for the route on Tuesday, but plans on offering economy, premium and business fares.

It is expected to run a daily flight to New York’s John F. Kennedy International Airport this fall, joining competing service by El Al, Arkia United and Delta.

Travel consultants said that the entry of an additional Israeli carrier on the top international route out of Tel Aviv was “significant news” for consumers and is expected to bring down airfares.

“We anticipate that as the supply of direct flights to New York grows, we will see a positive impact on pricing and availability, particularly during periods of high demand,” Yoni Waxman, deputy chairman of Israel’s Ophir Tours, told JNS. “The fact that it is an Israeli carrier offers an additional advantage, especially given how much importance Israeli travelers place on flight continuity and certainty.”

“We have been waiting for quite some time for an additional Israeli airline to compete directly with El Al in flying nonstop to New York,” said Mark Feldman, CEO of Jerusalem’s Ziontours. “If Israir wants to gain market share, they will need to aggressively market – and not match – El Al prices, and then the Israeli public will jump at this option.”

Israir operated transatlantic flights to New York from 2004 to 2008, when rising fuel prices forced it to suspend the route. JNS

The IDF carried out an airstrike Tuesday evening targeting several Hamas commanders gathered at a café in the Gaza City port area, saying the operatives were planning imminent attacks against Israeli troops operating in the Strip.

The strike took place in the Shati area of northern Gaza. According to reports from Gaza, the target was the “Bitter and Sweet” café located inside the port complex. Palestinian channels reported that at least six people were killed and another 10 wounded in the attack.

An Israeli security official said the operation targeted four Hamas terrorists who had gathered at the café, all of whom held command positions within the terror organization. The official said the group included one company commander and three platoon commanders.

The strike was carried out after the threat posed by the Hamas commanders was assessed by the IDF as immediate. The military said the operatives had been preparing attacks against Israeli forces currently deployed inside Gaza.

“The terrorists planned to carry out terror attacks against IDF forces operating in the Gaza Strip. The terrorists were struck from the air in order to remove the threat to the forces,” the IDF said.

Palestinian reports claimed the impact of the strike at the café was particularly powerful and that some of those killed were thrown into the sea by the blast. Israeli authorities have not confirmed those claims.

The IDF stressed that Southern Command forces remain deployed throughout Gaza in accordance with the existing agreement and will continue taking action against immediate threats to Israeli soldiers.

Defense Minister Yisrael Katz said the operation reflected Israel’s standing policy in Gaza, as established by Prime Minister Binyomin Netanyahu and himself.

“Israel’s policy in Gaza, as clarified to the IDF by Prime Minister Binyomin Netanyahu and by me, is clear: We remove threats, eliminate terrorists, and settle accounts with anyone who took part in the October 7 massacre,” Katz said.

“That is how the IDF acted today in eliminating the Hamas terrorists, and that is how it will continue to act with force to protect our soldiers and ensure quiet for the communities of the south — from within the security zone.”

{Matzav.com}

Dear Matzav Inbox, 

A Choshen Mishpat PSA: The Torah prohibition against delaying a person’s wages is far more serious—and far more common—than many people realize.

I work in the Choshen Mishpat world in the tristate area. I’m not formally a dayan, but as a Rabbi with Yadin Yadin, people do come to me with their shailos. Of course, I don’t pasken as a yachid, but I do help clarify the issues, present relevant views from the poskim, and guide people toward a clearer understanding of the situation.

I’ve been involved in this for a while, and I hate to say that there is one issue that is extremely serious and consistently keeps coming up. I feel the need to bring it to public attention as a PSA:

PAY YOUR WORKERS ON TIME.

This, more or less, includes anyone you hire to do work for you in any capacity—babysitters, doctors, dentists, architects, gardeners, tutors, cleaners, contractors, freelancers, and anyone else providing a service. If someone did a job for you, the halachic obligation to pay them properly and on time applies fully, regardless of the type of work or how “informal” the arrangement may feel.

There is an explicit prohibition in the Torah against delaying a worker’s wages. In fact, the Gemara counts five lavin and one asei that can be involved in this area, underscoring its seriousness. While not all of them apply in every single case, ביומו תתן שכרו is an asei, and לא תלין פעולת שכיר is a lav gamur, and these apply with almost every worker.

This is not a joke. The Torah itself explains the seriousness of the mitzvah with the words ואליו הוא נושא את נפשו—he is “carrying his life.” Chazal explain that when you withhold a worker’s wages, you are, in a sense, taking his life from him. Although the lav applies regardless of the worker’s bank account, this is especially real when a poor person is struggling to put food on the table—and you would be surprised how often that is unfortunately the case. I promise you, you have no idea how bad it can get. People who seem like regular workers are often really struggling because they are not being paid.

Of course, this is not an easy mitzvah. Bills are annoying. Life is expensive. Everyone is stretched, everyone is juggling, and most people are genuinely trying their best. It is not easy to keep up with everything, and financial pressure is real. But at the end of the day, none of that changes the basic responsibility: You hired a worker, he did the job, and you are obligated to pay him. Period.

Your worker never asked to be your lender to help you with your cash-flow issues.

To be mekayem the mitzvah, you need to pay right away. The exact details of “right away” vary depending on the type of worker and the terms of employment, but in ordinary contemporary arrangements, the practical rule is: Don’t wait.

There are other important details regarding the timing. For example, halacha takes customary billing and accounting arrangements into account, and בל תלין is triggered when the worker demands payment. But once the bill comes in and payment is due, it becomes an actual aveira. Things get very serious, very quickly.

Pay the worker on time. I can’t say it enough. Before you spend money on a beautiful, upgraded esrog, make sure the person who worked for you has been paid.

This is a very serious matter, and although it should be obvious anyway, I’m afraid it simply isn’t known well enough.

Hence this PSA.

The number of stories I hear is insane. People are literally struggling to put food on their tables, unable to pay their credit card bills, or unable to pay their own workers because they are waiting for money that they honestly earned from people they worked for. These are people who did a good job and helped their clients—their clients are thrilled with the work—but are now being left hanging for weeks or months.

Recently, someone came to me in an absolute mess. More than 50 people had failed to pay him. Some owed him close to $50,000, others closer to “just” $7,000, and altogether he was owed hundreds of thousands of dollars. They were all frum clients.

And now this person was taking tzedakah to pay for a chasunah, for Shabbos, and for Yom Tov—because he had to fight to collect money that was already rightfully his. If two or three more people had followed halacha, he wouldn’t have had to take out a loan to pay for the chasunah!

Of course, he has since become much more careful about things like retainers and payment arrangements. He could have protected himself better. But that does not excuse the people who simply did not pay him. If you hire someone, PAY HIM.

And I don’t mean eventually. I mean pay him on time—on the day his work is completed, when halacha requires it.

If there is a genuine dispute about part of the bill, don’t use the disputed amount as an excuse to hold up money that you clearly owe. Pay the undisputed amount and resolve the remaining issue promptly. Don’t use a dispute over $500 to hold up $5,000 that you know you owe.

I also must add that even if someone already missed the halachic deadline, that does not mean the money is now “okay to owe.” He is still obligated to pay immediately, and continued delay is itself prohibited. Missing the deadline is not a free pass to let the bill sit for another week or month.

None of this is some minor technical halacha buried in Choshen Mishpat. It is a pasuk in the Torah. (Which happens to be in this week’s parsha…)

The Yom HaDin is coming quickly. Having an unpaid worker’s money sitting on your head is not something anyone should want to take with them into Din.

If someone works for you, pay him. Pay him on time. It’s the halacha.

(Sources for those who want: Bava Metzia 110b–112a; Shulchan Aruch CM 339)

M.

To submit a letter to appear on Matzav.com, email MatzavInbox@gmail.com

DON’T MISS OUT! Join the Matzav Status by CLICKING HERE. Join the Matzav WhatsApp Groups by CLICKING HERE.

The opinions expressed in letters on Matzav.com do not necessarily reflect the stance of the Matzav Media Network.

President Trump issued an urgent warning to Alaska voters Tuesday morning, urging them to make certain they cast their ballots for incumbent Republican Sen. Dan S. Sullivan amid an unusual primary featuring another candidate with nearly the identical name.

“ALASKA: Be careful, VOTE FOR THE REAL DAN SULLIVAN TODAY,” Trump posted on Truth Social, once again throwing his support behind Sen. Dan S. Sullivan, who is campaigning for a third term in Washington.

Trump alleged that Democrats were attempting to mislead voters by having another Dan Sullivan appear on the ballot. The second candidate, Dan J. Sullivan, is a retired fifth-grade teacher who describes himself as a pragmatic Republican.

“The Dumocrats know how good he is and have put up an imposter of the same name,” Trump wrote. “Vote for the ‘INCUMBENT SENATOR.’ Don’t let these Fraudsters get away with this HOAX.”

The president also praised Sen. Sullivan’s record representing Alaska, crediting him with helping bring “HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS OF DOLLARS” to the state.

Trump had delivered a similar message Friday, accusing Democrats of engaging in “trickery” and instructing his supporters to vote for “SULLIVAN, DAN S. — REGISTERED REPUBLICAN/INCUMBENT.”

The Alaska Democratic Party and the campaign of ex-Democratic Rep. Mary Peltola, who is viewed as Sen. Sullivan’s leading opponent in the race, have both denied having any involvement in Dan J. Sullivan’s decision to run.

Despite those denials, Republicans have continued raising questions about the circumstances surrounding Dan J. Sullivan’s campaign.

The National Republican Senatorial Committee has cited people associated with his campaign, including adviser Amber Lee and representative Alan Harris, in arguing that the candidacy has connections to Democrats.

Harris previously appeared in an advertisement produced by Majority Forward, a nonprofit organization affiliated with the Democratic-aligned Senate Majority PAC, that attacked Sen. Dan S. Sullivan.

Senate Majority PAC has denied having any communication with Dan J. Sullivan or encouraging him to enter the contest. Dan J. Sullivan has likewise denied coordinating his campaign with Peltola.

Alaska election authorities initially removed Dan J. Sullivan from the ballot after determining that he had not filed his candidacy in good faith and that his campaign was intended to cause confusion among voters.

Superior Court Judge Thomas Matthews subsequently overturned that determination. Matthews ruled that state election officials did not have the authority to create an additional “good-faith” requirement for candidates and concluded that the state had failed to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that Dan J. Sullivan entered the race with the intention of confusing voters.

The Alaska Supreme Court upheld Matthews’ decision, clearing the way for Dan J. Sullivan’s name to appear on Tuesday’s primary ballot.

Alaska uses a nonpartisan primary system in which the four candidates receiving the most votes advance to the ranked-choice general election in November.

With 16 candidates competing for Alaska’s U.S. Senate seat in Tuesday’s primary, it remains possible for both candidates named Dan Sullivan to finish among the top four and advance to the November election.

{Matzav.com}