PRIVACY FIRESTORM: Mamdani Administration Publishes Names and Addresses of Nearly a Million NYC Property Owners
The Mamdani administration is facing mounting backlash after New York City published a searchable online database listing the names and home addresses of property owners whose residences could be subject to the state’s new pied-à-terre tax. Critics say the move unnecessarily exposed the personal information of hundreds of thousands of New Yorkers and raised serious concerns about privacy and public safety.
The city’s Department of Finance released the database, identifying what it says are non-primary residences across the five boroughs valued at more than $1 million. The public list includes both the names of the owners and the addresses of the properties, making the information easily searchable by anyone.
Council Minority Leader David Carr blasted the decision, arguing that many of the listed properties may not even qualify for the tax and that numerous owners are likely to challenge their inclusion.
“It’s a reckless and foolish move, especially considering there are potentially thousands of properties on this list that do not qualify as second homes or whose owners will successfully dispute their inclusion,” Carr, a Republican representing Staten Island whose own home appears in the database, told The Post.
The release follows Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s recent social media message alerting affluent homeowners that notices about the new tax were on the way. In the post, he appeared to warn owners to expect official correspondence regarding the levy.
“Check your mailbox when you’re back in the five boroughs, because you’ve got mail,” Mamdani wrote.
Explaining the rationale behind the tax, the mayor added, “The best city in the world deserves the best parks, libraries, and schools in the world. That’s only possible when we all pay our fair share.”
Mamdani has made taxing wealthy New Yorkers a central part of his agenda and has championed the pied-à-terre tax approved by Gov. Kathy Hochul and the Democratic-controlled Legislature. Opponents, however, have warned that the measure could depress the city’s luxury real estate market and discourage investment.
Earlier this year, Mamdani also proposed increasing New York City’s property taxes by 9.5 percent unless Albany approved additional taxes targeting wealthy residents. At the time, he cited a projected $12 billion budget shortfall, a figure that was later revised downward to approximately $5.4 billion.
City Hall has projected that the pied-à-terre tax will generate roughly $500 million annually. However, New York City Comptroller Mark Levine’s office estimates the actual revenue will likely fall between $340 million and $380 million per year, with collections potentially declining over time.
The database includes numerous well-known New Yorkers, among them filmmaker Woody Allen, longtime Vogue editor Anna Wintour, and actress Cynthia Nixon, who has publicly supported Mamdani.
Even more surprising than the celebrity names was the sheer scope of the list. The Post counted more than 960,000 residences and property owners included in the database, despite the tax originally being presented as applying to only about 31,000 homes.
The list also appears to include numerous modest middle-class neighborhoods that bear little resemblance to the luxury second homes the tax was intended to target. Among them are approximately two dozen homes on Chaffee Avenue in the Bronx’s working-class Throggs Neck neighborhood.
Another neighborhood with dozens of listed properties is Challenger Drive on Staten Island, where many homes appeared in the database despite no clear indication that they are second residences.
The average home values on Chaffee Avenue and Challenger Drive generally range from the mid-$500,000s to the low $800,000s, far below the multimillion-dollar vacation homes many believed the tax would target.
The database also includes at least one clearly unusual entry: the Breezy Point Shopping Center in Queens, a commercial shopping plaza that is plainly not a vacation residence.
Carr argued that the administration’s policy could ultimately drive affluent homeowners and investment out of New York.
“All the mayor is doing is tanking the luxury home market in NYC and sending millions of dollars in real estate business to other states. But the upside is Mamdani is a shoo-in for ‘Realtor of the Year’ in Texas and Florida,” Carr railed.
Steven Fulop, president and CEO of the Partnership for New York City, said the publication of homeowners’ personal information extends far beyond a debate over taxation and creates unnecessary risks.
“Publishing individual property owners’ names and home addresses raises real safety and privacy concerns that go well beyond the tax debate itself. Transparency about how a new tax is administered doesn’t require putting private citizens’ addresses into a searchable public database that can put people in harm’s way,” he said.
“In a political climate this polarized, the mayor didn’t need to invite that kind of risk — we should be looking for ways to dial down tensions, not heighten them. We’d urge the administration to revisit this approach.”
The controversy comes as Mamdani continues advancing an aggressive tax agenda aimed at funding major spending initiatives. Since taking office, he has backed approximately $23 billion in tax increases and has begun a sustained campaign in Albany seeking additional taxes on property owners and other high-income New Yorkers.
{Matzav.com}