Feed aggregator

U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee forcefully rejected Iranian demands that Israel pull its forces out of Lebanon and halt military operations against Hezbollah, proposing instead that members of Hezbollah and Hamas be expelled to Iran if Tehran truly wants peace in the region.

Responding Wednesday on the social platform X, Huckabee mocked Iran’s position and suggested a dramatic solution to eliminate the threat posed by its proxy groups.

“Iran demands @Israel cease defense of border against Hezbollah,” Huckabee wrote on the social platform X. “Gaza peace plan depends on Hamas disarming. Idea: EVERY member of Hezbollah & Hamas DEPORT to ‘Mothership’ in Iran. Result? Lebanon & Israel free from Iran terror proxies. Give PEACE a chance!”

Huckabee has previously argued that Hezbollah is not covered by the 14-point memorandum of understanding intended to formalize the end of the conflict involving the United States, Israel, and Iran. While the agreement makes no direct mention of the Iranian-backed terrorist organization, it does contain language that “declare[s] the immediate and permanent termination of military operations on all fronts, including in Lebanon.”

Iranian officials, however, have interpreted the agreement as directly applying to the situation in Lebanon.

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said the ceasefire arrangement carries “particular emphasis on Lebanon.”

“Any continued occupation of Lebanese territory will be regarded by us as a violation of the memorandum of understanding,” Araghchi told diplomats in remarks played on Iranian state media Tuesday, according to CBS News.

Tehran’s military establishment echoed that warning. The Khatam Al-Anbiya Central Headquarters, which serves as the operational command center of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, cautioned Israel against continuing military activities in Lebanon.

The command warned Israel to stop “repeated ceasefire violations in Lebanon or face a harsh response from Iran’s Armed Forces,” according to a report published Tuesday by the state-run Fars News Agency.

Huckabee has consistently maintained that Israel retains the right to defend itself regardless of Iranian objections, previously stating that Israel “does not need Iran permission to defend itself.”

President Trump also expressed confidence this week that the broader agreement would remain intact despite ongoing Israeli military actions in Lebanon. Speaking Tuesday, he dismissed Hezbollah as “that little pinprick out there that constantly rears its head.”

At the same time, Trump suggested that the conflict with Hezbollah has dragged on too long and criticized tactics that have resulted in significant civilian casualties.

“Israel is fighting Hezbollah too long, and too many people are being killed,” the president added while at the Group of Seven (G7) summit in Évian-les-Bains, France. “And you don‘t have to knock down an apartment house every time you‘re looking for somebody, because there are a lot of people in those apartment houses, and they‘re not all Hezbollah, that I can tell you.”

Israeli leaders have made clear they do not intend to comply with demands for a withdrawal from territory captured during recent fighting. Officials stated Monday that Israeli forces will remain in strategic areas of Lebanon.

Defense Minister Yisroel Katz said Israeli troops will continue operating in Lebanon, Syria, and Gaza until all remaining “terrorist infrastructure” has been eliminated.

National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir also rejected any suggestion that Israel is obligated to follow terms negotiated by Washington.

“Trump’s agreement does not bind us,” Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir wrote Monday on the social platform X in a post translated from Hebrew. “Israel is not subject to the United States, and we are an independent and sovereign nation!”

{Matzav.com}

[Video below.] Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.) sharply criticized President Trump’s newly announced agreement with Iran on Wednesday, arguing that the proposed deal could leave Tehran in a stronger position and provide the regime with additional resources to expand its military capabilities.

During an appearance on MS NOW’s “Money, Power, Politics,” Kelly expressed concern that the agreement may ultimately benefit Iran rather than constrain it.

“Well, I think it emboldens the Iranians and makes them more powerful, it gives them resources to build more ballistic missiles and may leave them with the ability to develop a nuclear weapon,” Kelly told Stephanie Ruhle.

The criticism comes just days after Trump revealed that Washington and Tehran had reached an accord aimed at ending a conflict that had dragged on for three months. The fighting caused extensive destruction throughout the region, rattled global financial markets, and contributed to rising energy prices worldwide.

Kelly suggested that the framework being discussed bears little resemblance to the type of agreement critics of previous administrations would have accepted.

“What I’m hearing and seeing so far in this plan, this is like total capitulation. Imagine if Joe Biden or Barack Obama signed this deal, what Donald Trump would say about it, and so if this is his plan, I think at least if Congress gets a say, this thing’s a nonstarter,” Kelly said.

Trump has maintained that the final details of the agreement will remain private until U.S. and Iranian representatives formally sign the document later this week. Nevertheless, several media organizations have reported obtaining what they describe as a 14-point memorandum of understanding outlining the proposed terms.

The White House disputed those reports Wednesday. Communications Director Steve Cheung said the document circulating publicly was inaccurate and insisted that the reported version “does not reflect the language of the actual MOU.”

According to reports about the alleged framework, the agreement would require an end to military operations on “all fronts,” including in Lebanon, where Israel has been engaged in efforts to dismantle Hezbollah’s military infrastructure.

The reported terms also call for the restoration of commercial shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, with both sides committing to return maritime traffic to prewar levels within 30 days after the agreement is signed.

As debate over the proposal intensifies, critics and supporters alike are awaiting the release of the final text to determine whether the agreement represents a diplomatic breakthrough or a concession that could reshape the balance of power in the Middle East.

WATCH:

{Matzav.com}

President Trump said Wednesday that the 60-day negotiation period outlined in the newly signed memorandum of understanding with Iran should not be viewed as a strict deadline, suggesting the talks could continue beyond that timeframe if progress is being made and Iran complies with its commitments.

Speaking to reporters in Paris, Trump dismissed the notion that the two-month window represented a final cutoff point for reaching a comprehensive agreement with Tehran.

“No, I don’t. [It] could take longer,” Trump said in Paris when asked if 60 days marked a final deadline.

The president indicated that the pace of negotiations was less important to him than Iran’s conduct during the process.

“I don’t view it as hard,” he continued. “Just as long as they’re behaving, I really don’t care that much.”

Trump’s remarks came shortly after senior administration officials released the full text of the memorandum to the press. According to the agreement, Washington and Tehran pledged “to negotiating and achieving the final deal in a maximum 60 days extended with mutual consent.”

Despite the breakthrough, Trump emphasized earlier in the day that the memorandum is merely a preliminary framework and should not be mistaken for a completed agreement.

“No, it’s not final. It’s a memorandum of understanding, and if I don’t like it, we’ll go back to shooting at them, dropping bombs on their head,” he said.

The president also warned that military action remains an option if Iran fails to meet expectations during the negotiation period.

“If they don’t behave, we’ll go back to dropping bombs right smack in the middle of their head,” he continued, adding “they’ve misbehaved for 47 years.”

Under the framework agreement, Iran would pledge never to develop a nuclear weapon, a commitment similar to provisions included in the Obama-era nuclear accord that Trump later withdrew from. However, the memorandum leaves unresolved several major issues involving Tehran’s nuclear infrastructure, including the fate of its stockpile of enriched uranium.

Trump suggested Wednesday that securing control over Iran’s enriched nuclear material was not his primary concern, arguing that preventing the creation of a nuclear weapon was the more important objective.

“Because it’s very hard to get it. I don’t think anybody could get at. We could get at it with great work and a lot of time,” he said.

His comments underscored the administration’s position that the ultimate measure of success will be ensuring Iran remains unable to build a nuclear bomb, even as negotiators continue to work through the unresolved details of a final agreement.

{Matzav.com}

A growing number of Republican lawmakers are sounding the alarm over President Trump’s newly unveiled agreement with Iran, arguing that the deal grants sweeping concessions to Tehran while offering too little in return. Leading the criticism on Wednesday was Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas, who warned that the president is being poorly advised and is pursuing a dangerous course.

“History teaches that giving billions of dollars to theocratic lunatics who want to murder us is not a good idea. I think the president is receiving some very poor advice on this deal,” Cruz told The Hill.

His criticism came shortly after the administration released the complete text of the memorandum of understanding designed to reopen the Strait of Hormuz and end hostilities between Washington and Tehran. Under the proposal, sanctions on Iranian oil exports would be removed, and Iran would gain access to a reconstruction fund valued at approximately $300 billion.

According to the document, the United States would be required to “terminate all types of sanctions against the Islamic Republic of Iran, including the United Nations Security Council resolutions, I.A.E.A. Board of Governors resolutions, and all unilateral U.S. sanctions, primary and secondary, in an agreed-upon schedule as part of the final deal.”

The agreement also includes a declaration from Iran reaffirming its longstanding claim that it does not seek to acquire or manufacture nuclear weapons.

In addition, the two countries agreed to address Iran’s existing stockpile of enriched nuclear material. The memorandum specifies that Iran would be required to “down-blend” or dilute any weapons-grade nuclear material currently in its possession.

Cruz is not alone in his objections. Several prominent Republicans have sharply criticized the proposal, arguing that it rewards Tehran after years of confrontation and pressure.

Among the most vocal critics is Sen. Bill Cassidy of Louisiana, who denounced the agreement on Wednesday as the “worst foreign policy blunder in decades.”

“Reagan is rolling over in his grave. Iran’s nuclear ambitions were not curbed, and they have learned that threatening the Strait of Hormuz works and will undoubtedly leverage it in the future. Now, Iran gets to build brand-new infrastructure under this deal,” Cassidy posted on the social platform X.

The backlash highlights a widening divide within Republican circles as lawmakers debate whether the agreement represents a diplomatic breakthrough or a costly concession that could strengthen Iran economically and strategically for years to come.

{Matzav.com}

President Trump warned Wednesday that oil supplies could have been exhausted within a matter of weeks if the Strait of Hormuz had remained closed, arguing that the newly reached agreement with Iran prevented what could have become a global energy catastrophe.

Speaking in France during the Group of Seven summit, Trump emphasized the importance of restoring maritime traffic through the strategically vital waterway, saying the world was facing a looming shortage of available oil.

“We run out of reserves at about four weeks,” Trump said while discussing the memorandum of understanding reached with Iran. “You know, there are reserves all over the world, and we would really run out, and there’ll be a time when you wouldn’t be able to get it.”

Trump painted a dire picture of what could have happened had oil supplies continued to tighten, warning that widespread disruption would have followed.

He said it would be “bedlam” if the oil ran out.

Defending the agreement with Tehran, Trump argued that reopening the shipping lane was essential to stabilizing energy markets and ensuring the continued flow of crude oil around the globe.

“What this does is it allows the ships to go,” he said of the Iran deal. “If we keep bombing, those ships won’t be going.”

It was not immediately clear whether the president’s remarks referred specifically to American petroleum reserves or to worldwide oil stockpiles. White House officials declined to provide additional clarification, directing inquiries back to Trump’s public comments.

Concerns about shrinking inventories have been growing in recent weeks. The International Energy Agency, which represents many of the world’s major oil-consuming nations, has repeatedly cautioned that reserves have been declining as the conflict disrupted supplies.

Last month, IEA Executive Director Fatih Birol said emergency reserve releases had helped maintain market stability, while warning that those stockpiles could not support demand indefinitely.

At the time, Birol suggested that the closure of the Strait of Hormuz and the ongoing conflict had reduced available commercial inventories to only a few weeks’ worth of supply.

The agency also issued projections in May indicating that global oil consumption was expected to outpace production during the current year.

When the war began, the United States joined other IEA member nations in announcing coordinated releases from strategic petroleum reserves in an effort to offset supply disruptions. Combined, those measures added roughly 400 million barrels of oil to global markets.

As part of that effort, the Trump administration committed to releasing 172 million barrels from the U.S. Strategic Petroleum Reserve over a period of 120 days.

At the time of the announcement, America’s reserve contained approximately 415 million barrels. A release of 172 million barrels would ultimately reduce that total to roughly 243 million barrels, barring any additional purchases or withdrawals.

New figures released this week show the Strategic Petroleum Reserve has fallen to approximately 340 million barrels, its lowest level since 1983.

Before the conflict erupted, nearly 20 percent of the world’s oil consumption passed through the Strait of Hormuz. Its closure triggered sharp increases in oil prices over recent months, a surge that also translated into higher gasoline costs for consumers around the world.

{Matzav.com}

A new Rasmussen Reports survey indicates that American voters are increasingly skeptical of the U.S. military campaign against Iran, with more respondents viewing the war as unsuccessful than successful. The poll also found that nearly half of voters want military operations halted immediately, while only about one-third support continuing the conflict until Iran’s ruling regime is overthrown.

The findings come as the war appears to be approaching a diplomatic conclusion. President Donald Trump and Iranian officials have been advancing toward a memorandum of understanding that was electronically signed on Sunday and is scheduled to be formally signed in person Friday in Switzerland.

The survey, conducted among 1,032 likely voters on June 11, 14, and 15, showed that 44% of respondents regarded the conflict, which began in February, as successful. Of those, 19% described it as very successful.

At the same time, 48% said the military effort had failed to achieve its objectives, including 27% who characterized it as not successful at all.

When voters were asked whether the United States should stop military action now or continue fighting “until the Islamic regime in Iran is completely destroyed,” nearly half opted for ending the war immediately. Thirty-five percent favored continuing the campaign until regime change was achieved, while 16% remained undecided.

The latest numbers reflect a significant change in public opinion compared to earlier this year.

A Rasmussen survey conducted in mid-March found considerably stronger support for the conflict. At that time, 61% said the war had been successful, including 35% who called it very successful. Only 29% viewed the campaign as unsuccessful, while 12% said it was not successful at all.

The movement from 61% approval of the war’s success to just 44% represents a 17-point decline in support over roughly three months. The percentage of voters who viewed the campaign as very successful also dropped dramatically during that period.

Polling began after Trump terminated a previous ceasefire arrangement and authorized renewed military action against Iran, arguing that the country had “taken too long to negotiate a deal.” The survey was conducted before Trump, Vice President JD Vance, and Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf formally completed the electronic signing of the MOU on Sunday.

Public opinion was closely divided regarding Trump’s decision to resume military operations. Forty-five percent approved of ending the ceasefire and restarting strikes, including 29% who strongly approved.

Meanwhile, 46% opposed the decision, with 33% expressing strong disapproval. Although overall support and opposition were nearly identical, stronger feelings were concentrated among those who opposed the move.

Political affiliation revealed much sharper differences than the overall results suggested.

Among Republican voters, three-quarters supported the renewed strikes. Support fell to 39% among independents and just 24% among Democrats. More than half of Democratic respondents, 53%, said they strongly disapproved of the decision.

Views on regime change followed a similar partisan pattern. Fifty-eight percent of Republicans favored continuing military action until the government in Tehran was eliminated. That position was supported by only 18% of Democrats and 31% of independent voters.

The survey also found a significant gap between supporters of the two major 2024 presidential candidates. Seventy-one percent of Trump voters considered the war successful, compared with only 20% of voters who backed Kamala Harris.

Differences also emerged across demographic categories.

Male voters were more likely than female voters to view the military campaign positively, with 49% of men calling it successful compared with 38% of women.

Voters age 65 and older produced one of the survey’s more unusual findings, as they were both the group most supportive of continuing the fight to achieve regime change and the group most likely to say the war had been unsuccessful.

Racial and ethnic responses showed somewhat narrower differences. Support for ending military operations immediately ranged from 47% among white voters to 58% among voters in other minority groups. Black voters registered 51% support for withdrawal, while 48% of Hispanic voters favored ending the conflict. Hispanic respondents were also the demographic group most likely to describe the war as successful.

The survey reported a margin of sampling error of plus or minus three percentage points at a 95% confidence level. The margin of error for individual demographic and political subgroups was higher.

{Matzav.com}

Blue and White chairman MK Benny Gantz issued a stark warning about rising tensions between Israel’s secular and chareidi communities during a wide-ranging interview with Yishai Cohen on Kikar HaShabbat’s studio program, while also sharply criticizing Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu over the emerging U.S.-Iran agreement and addressing the recent clashes surrounding chareidi draft protests.

Gantz said the events of October 7 fundamentally changed Israel’s security outlook and argued that the country can no longer tolerate the emergence of threats on its borders.

“After October 7, there is a new reality,” Gantz said. “We are no longer prepared to allow a threat to be built up against us and wait for it to explode. That will not happen again.”

Addressing concerns in Israel over the developing agreement between the United States and Iran, Gantz said the deal should be judged primarily by its impact on Iran’s nuclear program and Israel’s ability to defend itself.

“We need to examine what happens with the Iranian nuclear program, because that is the greatest threat,” he said. “Military action was taken, and now we need to see what the diplomatic component will be.”

Gantz stressed that any agreement must preserve Israel’s freedom to act against future threats.

“The next critical element is ensuring Israel’s freedom of action to defend itself—not only once a threat has developed, but to prevent it from developing in the first place,” he said.

He then placed responsibility for the agreement squarely on Netanyahu.

“This is Netanyahu’s failure,” Gantz declared. “He should have been sitting in rooms and holding discussions with President Trump over an extended period and not allowing this to take shape. This is not a matter of Right or Left. We all need to be working on this issue.”

Turning to the contentious debate over chareidi military service and the recent demonstrations on Highway 4, Gantz took a nuanced position, criticizing excessive police force while also expressing concern about growing societal divisions.

“I saw some footage and heard about the incident,” he said. “Unlike the military, which must use all necessary force against its enemies, the police, when dealing with its own citizens, should use the minimum amount of force possible—not the maximum.”

At the same time, Gantz emphasized that public demonstrations must comply with police instructions.

“The assumption is that when a police officer tells someone to move from one place to another, that person complies,” he said. “Public protests naturally create inconvenience and disruption, but at a certain point the police say, ‘That’s enough, clear the road.’ What we are seeing here is something entirely different. Extremists are threatening the majority from which they emerged.”

Gantz then directed a personal appeal to chareidi leadership, saying he is deeply concerned by what he sees developing in Israeli society.

“What worries me most—and I say this to the leaders of the chareidi community—is that hatred of chareidim is developing,” he said. “That is not good, and it should not be this way. We need to live together. You cannot separate a sector from society and at the same time not be part of the broader public.”

He stressed that his support for military service is not motivated by hostility toward the chareidi community.

“I discuss the issue of military service without incitement against chareidim,” Gantz said. “I am speaking in favor of service and enlistment not in order to incite, but because it is necessary for the country and beneficial for society. Ultimately, it is also what will help preserve the chareidi community.”

Addressing the arrest of yeshiva students who fail to comply with draft orders, Gantz said he is willing to show patience but not to abandon enforcement measures.

“I am prepared to be patient, but I am not willing to give up on sanctions,” he said. “When my son received a draft order, if he had failed to report, he could have been arrested. How is this any different? I am not saying every person should be arrested, but there must be consequences.”

Despite recent polls showing Blue and White hovering near the electoral threshold, Gantz expressed confidence that his party will remain politically relevant.

“I think our situation is not good, but it is better than people describe it,” he said. “I am convinced that we will pass the threshold and become stronger. We are focused on establishing a government of national unity.”

Gantz also made clear that he does not believe Netanyahu should continue serving as prime minister.

“Netanyahu must conclude his role,” he said. “He is responsible for what has happened here, for both the good and the bad. He has been prime minister for many years. This is a government, not an empire.”

Asked whether Gadi Eisenkot or Naftali Bennett would be better suited to serve as prime minister, Gantz declined to choose between them.

“I won’t answer that,” he said. “What matters even more than who serves as prime minister is what kind of government is formed. Israel needs a government of national unity.”

{Matzav.com}

A chareidi man who was arrested following a protest outside the home of Supreme Court Justice Noam Sohlberg says he and other detainees were subjected to difficult conditions, including lengthy confinement without basic necessities and repeated transfers between detention facilities.

The man, identified only as Shlomo, shared his account during an interview on the “News of Anash” program on Kol Chai, where he recounted the events that led to his arrest and the week he spent in custody.

According to Shlomo, he was unaware that the protest was being held outside the justice’s home until he arrived at the scene.

“There were notices in the shul and we went,” he said. “Only when I got there and heard that it was the home of Justice Sohlberg was I shocked. If I had known in advance that we were going there, I probably would not have come.”

Shlomo said the demonstration itself lasted only a few minutes and insisted that he played no active role in any disruptive behavior.

“I stood on the side. I wasn’t violent, I didn’t block any roads, and I didn’t do anything unusual,” he said. “After a few minutes we returned to the buses, and then the police closed off the bus and took us to the police station.”

He claimed that those detained were kept for extended periods without access to basic accommodations.

“We sat for a long time without air conditioning, without water, and without restrooms,” he said. “Only after we called for help did they agree to provide minimal conditions.”

Shlomo also described what he said were prolonged transfers between detention facilities.

“They put us on a transport vehicle, and we were there for many hours without knowing where they were taking us,” he said. “It was extremely hot and crowded, and people fainted. Only afterward were we transferred elsewhere.”

He further alleged that he witnessed other detainees being treated improperly during the course of their detention.

According to Shlomo, one detainee who lost consciousness in a holding cell did not initially receive adequate medical attention. In another incident, he said, a detainee suffering from a panic attack was forced to wait a significant amount of time before receiving treatment.

Shlomo said he fully cooperated with investigators and provided all requested personal information. Nevertheless, he claimed he remained in custody for approximately a week despite not being accused of any violent conduct.

“This was the first time I was ever arrested,” he said. “I told the investigators that I hadn’t done anything, but it didn’t change the situation.”

Reflecting on the experience, Shlomo said he remains deeply frustrated by what he and other detainees endured.

“I never believed we would reach a situation like this,” he said. “I’m considering filing a lawsuit over what we went through, but I don’t know whether it will change anything.”

During the interview, host Nati Kalish noted that he had spoken with other individuals arrested in the same incident and said they provided accounts that were broadly similar regarding both the circumstances of their arrests and the conditions under which they were held.

{Matzav.com}

As tensions between Israel’s chareidi community and the broader public continue to intensify, a series of dramatic developments—including mass protests, allegations of police brutality, and calls for an economic boycott of major consumer brands—are reshaping the public debate surrounding the arrest of bnei Torah and the ongoing draft controversy.

One of the most striking scenes unfolded today when more than 10,000 Gerer chassidim, led by the Gerrer Rebbe, gathered outside Military Prison No. 10 in a powerful show of solidarity following the arrest of a member of the chassidus.

At the same time, what began as a spontaneous protest movement among members of the Peleg Yerushalmi and the so-called “Ratzfanik” faction in support of imprisoned bnei Torah escalated into a confrontation with police that participants described as unprecedented in its severity. Protesters alleged that officers used excessive force, resulting in injuries, torn clothing, the use of stun grenades, and numerous physical altercations.

The images emerging from the demonstrations have fueled a broader discussion about the limits of police authority when dealing with ideological protests and have become a rallying point for critics of law enforcement’s handling of the events.

Leaders of the Peleg Yerushalmi argue that police conduct crossed every acceptable boundary and have reportedly begun considering legal action against authorities. Members of the movement say they are exploring a range of options for future demonstrations, amid growing fears that continued confrontations could eventually result in serious injuries or worse.

Among the ideas reportedly under discussion is a strategy aimed at disrupting major transportation routes while avoiding direct clashes with police. According to proposals circulating within activist circles, demonstrators would stage a series of rotating road blockages at different points along the Ayalon Highway. Under the plan, one group would temporarily shut down traffic before dispersing moments before police arrived, while another group would simultaneously launch a new blockade elsewhere, creating a continuous cycle of disruptions throughout the morning.

While protest activity continues on the streets, another campaign is emerging behind the scenes—one focused not on demonstrations, but on economic pressure.

Activists within the chareidi community have begun promoting a boycott targeting companies connected to businessman Dudi Wertheim, whom some blame for what they view as hostile media coverage of the chareidi public. The campaign specifically focuses on products manufactured by companies under the umbrella of the Central Bottling Company, which holds the Israeli franchise for Coca-Cola and owns a number of other major brands.

Supporters of the initiative argue that consumers should not financially support corporations linked to media outlets they believe are contributing to anti-chareidi sentiment.

“It is unacceptable that they incite against our community while continuing to profit from our purchases,” organizers of the effort have reportedly argued.

Wertheim’s business interests include Coca-Cola Israel, dairy producer Tara, beverage brands Carlsberg and Tuborg, fruit juice manufacturer Prigat, and bottled water company Neviot, among others.

Those promoting the boycott believe that economic pressure may prove more effective than public criticism in influencing media policy. Their goal, they say, is to send a clear message that negative portrayals of the chareidi community carry financial consequences.

The campaign has gained momentum in recent days, with boycott appeals spreading rapidly through chareidi email networks and messaging groups that serve as major sources of information for many avreichim and bnei Torah.

Meanwhile, prominent roshei yeshivah have continued addressing the growing anxiety surrounding arrests and military enforcement measures.

Rav Yehoshua Eichenstein, rosh yeshivah of Yad Aharon, recently delivered a strongly worded address to talmidim of Yeshivas Chayei Daas during the institution’s relocation to its new campus in Yerushalayim’s Beis Yisrael neighborhood. A central theme of his remarks was reassuring young avreichim and yeshivah bochurim who fear arrest due to their draft status, encouraging them not to allow anxiety to overwhelm them.

In another notable development, MK Yaakov Asher delivered an unusually sharp speech in the Knesset, condemning police conduct toward demonstrators. Observers noted that his remarks made him the first Lithuanian chareidi lawmaker associated with Degel HaTorah to publicly criticize police actions against protesters from the Ratzfanik camp.

The White House has secured an additional $351.6 million for security-related upgrades, raising fresh questions about whether any of the money could ultimately support President Trump’s controversial ballroom project, which is being planned on the former site of the East Wing.

The funding was authorized Friday by the Office of Management and Budget. According to federal records, $340.8 million was directed to a “Procurement, Construction, and Improvements” account, while another $10.75 million was allocated to an “Operations and Support” account maintained by the Secret Service.

The newly released funds originate from the One Big Beautiful Bill, approved through the budget reconciliation process last July. That legislation provided the Secret Service with $1.7 billion earmarked for staffing, training facilities, technology upgrades, operational programs, retention incentives, and recruitment bonuses.

Whether the latest $351.6 million allocation will be used in any way for the White House ballroom initiative remains uncertain. The project is currently the subject of ongoing legal challenges.

Responding to questions from Fox News Digital, White House spokesman Davis Ingle said the East Wing redevelopment effort is closely linked to presidential protection requirements.

“The East Wing Modernization Project is inextricably tied to the security of the President, the White House grounds and the certain security infrastructure assets”

Ingle noted that security agencies have been involved in planning the facility from the outset.

“The press release announcing the construction of the ballroom highlighted coordination with the White House Military Office and the United States Secret Service regarding design features and planning,” he said. “President Trump and generous American patriots are funding the ballroom to the tune of approximately $400 million, which will be a secure and appropriate venue for Presidents for generations to come.”

He also pointed to recent security concerns as evidence that the project is necessary.

“The events over the weekend and the foiled attack on the historic UFC Freedom 250 event at the White House proves exactly why the East Wing Modernization Project is severely needed for large scale events, which include drone proof structures and drone ports among other critical security enhancements,” Ingle added.

The Secret Service did not immediately respond to requests seeking clarification about the funding.

Trump has described the planned development as far more than a ceremonial event space. According to the president, the ballroom will sit atop an extensive six-story underground complex housing a military hospital, research facilities, conference areas, and advanced systems designed to defend against drone and missile threats.

In remarks delivered in late May, Trump estimated the project’s price tag at roughly $400 million and reiterated that private donors—not taxpayers—would finance the construction.

That claim has been challenged by a report published Tuesday by The Washington Post, which cited a contractor’s estimate placing the total cost at approximately $600 million. According to the report, taxpayers could end up covering more than half of the final bill.

For years, Trump has argued that a White House ballroom would significantly improve security for major presidential events. His argument gained renewed attention after federal authorities announced Sunday that they had disrupted an alleged plan to launch explosive-equipped drones at buildings near the UFC Freedom 250 event held at the White House.

Construction plans required the demolition of the East Wing in October 2025, a move that sparked legal action from the National Trust for Historic Preservation. The organization contended that the administration sidestepped required review procedures and lacked congressional approval for the project.

The legal battle intensified in March when U.S. District Judge Richard Leon concluded that the administration likely exceeded its authority and ordered all above-ground construction activity suspended.

That setback proved temporary. On April 17, a three-judge panel of the D.C. Circuit Court put Leon’s ruling on hold, allowing work to continue while the appeal process moves forward.

Security concerns resurfaced only days later when a gunman opened fire at Secret Service personnel stationed at a security checkpoint outside the White House Correspondents’ Dinner at the Washington Hilton.

Following the arrest of the suspect, Cole Tomas Allen, Trump and his supporters renewed calls for construction of the ballroom, arguing that a secure White House venue would reduce vulnerabilities associated with off-site events.

Another violent incident occurred on May 23, when a shooting took place outside the White House, prompting Trump to again make the case for the project.

“This event is one month removed from the White House Correspondent’s Dinner shooting, and goes to show how important it is, for all future Presidents, to get, what will be, the most safe and secure space of its kind ever built in Washington, D.C. The National Security of our Country demands it!” he wrote on Truth Social on May 24.

{Matzav.com}

A prominent activist assisting bnei yeshiva facing draft-related issues is warning bochurim and avreichim not to rely on private attorneys who promise to secure military exemptions for large fees, claiming that some bochurim ultimately end up arrested despite paying thousands of shekels for legal assistance.

Rabbi Ezra Ben Shimon, one of the leaders of the Chayei Olam organization, issued the warning during an interview on Kol Chai Radio’s “Central Edition” program hosted by Avi Mimran.

According to Rabbi Ben Shimon, some attorneys offer what appear to be quick solutions to students seeking to resolve their military status, but the results can be devastating.

“There are lawyers who tell a bochur: Bring me 5,000 or 7,000 shekels and I’ll arrange an exemption for you. In practice, they lead him to report, and then he gets arrested. The bochurim not only paid a deposit, but also found themselves in prison.”

He claimed that a significant number of those currently detained followed legal advice that ultimately resulted in their arrest.

Rabbi Ben Shimon urged students not to take any action without first consulting rabbanim and qualified advisers familiar with the issue.

“Don’t be tempted by promises,” he said. “There are attempts and tactics that simply do not work, and in the end the one who pays the price is the bochur.”

Beyond legal matters, Rabbi Ben Shimon described the support his organization provides to families of detainees, including legal assistance, emotional support, and practical help with daily needs.

As an example, he pointed to the case of an avreich from Ofakim who was recently arrested. He said Chayei Olam volunteers assisted the man’s blind mother, his wife, and his children, helped provide groceries and food, and filed an appeal against the 14-day jail sentence that had been imposed.

“The emotional and physical support for the families falls upon us,” he said. “You cannot leave a wife and children alone. Sometimes you even need to arrange a babysitter so the wife can visit her husband in prison.”

Rabbi Ben Shimon said many families, particularly within the Sephardic community, are increasingly anxious about the situation. He noted that concerns are especially pronounced in peripheral areas and mixed neighborhoods, where families fear the possibility of unexpected encounters with law enforcement.

To address those concerns, he said the organization operates a 24-hour assistance hotline that helps connect parents and students with rabbanim, advisers, and other professionals.

He also revealed that Yeshivas Be’er HaTalmud is considering organizing a major gathering of tefillah and chizuk outside Prison 10, with hundreds of students expected to participate.

“The bochurim need to know that there are people standing behind them and looking out for them,” he said.

{Matzav.com}

Behind the scenes of Israel’s ongoing draft crisis, Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich has presented Prime Minister Binyomin Netanyahu with a legislative proposal aimed at stopping the arrests of bnei yeshiva classified as draft evaders, as the government seeks to defuse growing tensions and repeated protests across the country.

According to a report aired Tuesday evening on i24NEWS, Smotrich recently approached Netanyahu with a new framework designed specifically to address the issue of arrests, which have become a flashpoint in the escalating dispute over the military status of Torah students.

The initiative comes after months of arrests involving bochurim who did not report to draft offices in accordance with the directives of leading Torah authorities and were subsequently designated as draft evaders. Those arrests have sparked major demonstrations and clashes in multiple locations throughout Israel.

According to the report by Amiel Yerachi, Smotrich believes the most effective approach is a narrowly tailored legal solution that directly addresses the arrest issue itself. Supporters of the proposal argue that the current situation has generated significant political and social unrest and that a direct remedy is preferable to indirect efforts focused on economic benefits or sanctions.

The proposal reportedly mirrors frameworks that have been discussed publicly in recent days and is part of a broader effort to find a workable solution before the political crisis deepens further.

The move follows reports that Netanyahu has held a series of urgent consultations on the matter. According to i24NEWS, the prime minister instructed Cabinet Secretary Yossi Fuchs to immediately begin coordinating with relevant government officials to advance the process.

At the same time, the issue remains legally complicated. Any proposal affecting the status of bnei yeshiva and draft evaders is expected to face intense scrutiny from the Attorney General’s Office and other legal authorities, making the path forward far from simple.

The framework currently under consideration would reportedly take the form of expedited emergency legislation enacted as a temporary measure. Coalition leaders hope to fast-track the proposal through the legislative process before the anticipated dissolution of the Knesset next month.

Supporters of the initiative argue that passing the temporary measure before new elections are called could immediately halt the ongoing arrests of bochurim who refuse to report for military service and prevent further confrontations on the streets.

Meanwhile, a separate controversy involving the Daycare Law continues to generate friction within the coalition. The legislation has encountered growing resistance from within the government, with Welfare Minister Ofir Sofer reportedly threatening to resign if the measure advances. As a result, the bill has, for now, been removed from the legislative agenda.

{Matzav.com}

The closely guarded agreement between the United States and Iran was made public Wednesday, shedding new light on the terms that ended weeks of speculation about what concessions were included in the accord and whether Tehran received significant economic benefits.

The disclosure came three days after the agreement was formally signed electronically, when a senior U.S. official publicly outlined the contents of the 14-point memorandum of understanding during a conference call with reporters.

According to the official, the agreement commits the United States to immediately end its blockade measures against Iran and suspend sanctions affecting Iranian oil exports while negotiations toward a permanent arrangement continue.

Additional economic rewards for Iran, including the full lifting of broader sanctions, are not scheduled to take effect immediately. Instead, those benefits are being held in reserve and would only be implemented after the parties finalize a comprehensive agreement.

The release of the long-awaited document brings clarity to days of conflicting reports, political spin, and intense debate over the contents of the deal, particularly amid concerns from critics that Iran may have secured overly favorable terms in exchange for its commitments.

1. The United States of America and the Islamic Republic of Iran and their allies in the current war, by signing this MOU, declare the immediate and permanent termination of military operations on all fronts, including in Lebanon, and undertake from now on not to initiate any war or any military operation against each other, and to refrain from the threat or use of force against each other, and ensuring the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Lebanon. The final deal will confirm the permanent termination of the war on all fronts, including in Lebanon, and other provisions of this paragraph.
2. The United States of America and the Islamic Republic of Iran undertake to respect each other’s sovereignty and territorial integrity and to refrain from interfering in each other’s internal affairs.
3. The United States of America and the Islamic Republic of Iran commit to negotiating and achieving the final deal in maximum 60 days expendable with mutual consent.
4. Immediately upon the signing of this MOU, the United States of America will begin the removal of its naval blockade and any disturbances or impediments against the Islamic Republic of Iran, and will fully end the naval blockade within 30 days. During this period, the traffic of vessels will be in proportion to the numbers of pre-war traffic being restored by the Islamic Republic of Iran. The United States of America further undertakes to remove its forces from the proximity of the Islamic Republic of Iran within 30 days after the final deal.
5. 5. Upon the signing of this MOU, Islamic Republic of Iran will make arrangements using its best efforts for the safe passage of commercial vessels with no charge for 60 days only from the Persian Gulf to the Sea of Oman, and vice versa, the traffic of commercial vessels will immediately start, and considering the need for removing the technical and military obstacles and demining by the Islamic Republic of Iran will be instated within 30 days. The Islamic Republic of Iran will conduct dialog with the Sultanate of Oman to define the future administration and maritime services in the Strait of Hormuz in discussion with other Persian Gulf or [Gulf] states in line with the applicable international law and the sovereign rights of coastal states of the Strait of Hormuz.
6. United States of America undertakes with regional partners to develop a definitive, mutually agreed plan with at least USD $300 billion for the reconstruction and economic development of the Islamic Republic of Iran. The mechanism for the implementation of this plan will be finalized as part of a final deal within 60 days. All required licenses, waivers, and permissions needed for the relevant financial transactions will be granted by the United States of America.
7. The United States of America undertakes to terminate all types of sanctions against the Islamic Republic of Iran, including the United Nations Security Council resolutions, i.e. a Board of Governors resolutions, and all unilateral US sanctions, primary and secondary, in an agreed upon schedule as part of the final deal. The Islamic Republic of Iran and the United States of America acknowledge the critical importance of the sanctions termination issue above mentioned and expressed their intentions to immediately address these issues in the negotiations in order to achieve mutual agreement on them to paragraph eight. Islamic Republic of Iran reaffirms that it shall not procure or develop nuclear weapons. United States of America and Islamic Republic of Iran have agreed to resolve the disposition of stockpile enriched material pursuant to a mechanism that will be mutually agreed upon in accordance with the schedule mentioned in paragraph seven, with the minimum methodology to be down blending on site under the supervision of the IAEA.
8. The two parties also agreed to discuss the issue of enrichment and other mutually agreed matters related to the Islamic Republic of Iran’s nuclear needs, based on a satisfactory framework being agreed upon in the final deal. The final deal will confirm the provisions of this paragraph. The United States of America and the Islamic Republic of Iran acknowledge the critical importance of the nuclear issues above mentioned and express their intention to immediately address these issues in the negotiations in order to achieve mutual agreement on them.
9. Pending the final deal, the United States of America and Islamic Republic of Iran agree to maintain the status quo. The Islamic Republic of Iran will maintain the current status quo of its nuclear program and the United States of America will not impose any new sanctions and will not deploy additional forces in the region.
10. The United States of America undertakes that immediately upon the signing of MOU until the termination of sanctions, US Department of Treasury will issue waivers for the export of Iranian crude oil, petroleum products, and derivatives, and all associated services, including banking transactions, insurances, transportation, etc.
11. The United States of America undertakes to make fully available for use the frozen or restricted funds and assets of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Upon the implementation of this MOU, the United States of America and the Islamic Republic of Iran will mutually agree on the procedures related to the release of these funds during the negotiations. Such funds, whether retained in the original account or transferred, shall be made fully usable for payment to any ultimate beneficiary designed by the Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran. The United States of America undertakes to issue all necessary licenses and authorizations accordingly.
12. The United States of America and the Islamic Republic of Iran agree that an executive mechanism will be established to monitor the successful implementation of this MOU and the future compliance of the final deal.
13. After signing this MOU, and subject to the beginning of the implementation of paragraphs 1, 4, 5, 10, and 11 of the MOU, and the continuing implementation of these measures, the United States of America and the Islamic Republic of Iran will start negotiations regarding the final deal exclusively on the other paragraphs.
14. The final deal will be endorsed by a binding UNSC resolution.

{Matzav.com}

[Photos below.] Thousands of Gerer chassidim gathered Wednesday outside Military Prison No. 10 at Beit Lid for a mass protest against the arrest of yeshivah bochurim and, in particular, the detention of Gerer chassid Yechiel Kotainer, who was taken into custody at a military induction office.

Kotainer had reportedly arrived at the enlistment office to arrange a medical exemption when he was arrested and transferred to Prison No. 10. Despite the fact that his family recently suffered the tragic loss of a son, Rafael Ari a”h, who was killed in a serious accident just a few weeks ago, appeals on his behalf were unsuccessful, and he was incarcerated.

The demonstration was organized on short notice and was led by the Gerrer Rebbe, who made a special trip from Yerushalayim to attend the gathering at the prison gates.

Thousands of participants assembled outside the facility as the protest began with Minchah. The davening was led by Motty Babchik, who is currently observing the year of aveilus following the passing of his father. Following the davening, Tehillim were recited by MK Yitzchak Goldknopf, and words of chizuk and protest were delivered by the prominent Gerer leader, Rabbi Moshe Chaim Denderowitz.

In his remarks, Rabbi Denderowitz declared that the gathering was rooted in the belief that all of Klal Yisrael stood together at Har Sinai, including those who today oppose Torah study.

“We believe that all of Klal Yisrael was present at Matan Torah,” he said. “Even those who are now fighting against us over Torah, their ancestors also stood at Har Sinai, and they too heard the words, ‘Woe to those who insult the Torah.’ We did not come here with violence. We came with tefillos, to ask HaKadosh Baruch Hu that these people also return in teshuvah and stop bringing disgrace upon the Torah.”

Rabbi Denderowitz sharply criticized law enforcement authorities, arguing that their priorities are misplaced.

“There is so much theft and so much destruction in this country,” he said. “The police do not go to such lengths to stop the thieves. But what do they devote all their efforts to? The small sheep. The police found time to concern themselves with those who learn Torah—the small sheep. They say that we are evading a duty imposed upon us. Our bochurim and avreichim are devoted and bound to Torah. We are the ones evading?”

He continued by rejecting accusations that yeshivah students are shirking responsibility.

“We are not evading the first obligation placed upon us,” he said. “Yet all around us are masses of people who have evaded the obligations of Toras Yisrael, of Shabbos observance, and of mitzvos—and they call us draft dodgers. They are the ones evading avodas Hashem.”

Drawing a comparison to the persecution of religious Jews under Communist regimes, Rabbi Denderowitz recounted a story about a rabbi imprisoned during the Soviet era.

“In Communist countries under Lenin and Stalin, people who sat and learned Torah were sent to prison,” he said. “Once, one of the rabbanim was arrested and told, ‘We want a list of everyone working on your behalf to teach Torah.’ The rav replied, ‘I will not give you a list.’ The commander told him, ‘We have dealt with many wise men like you and they all surrendered. Now we will see about you,’ and he pulled out a rifle.

“The rav answered him, ‘Do you know who is afraid of your rifle? Someone who has only one world. We have two worlds—this world and the Next World. We are not afraid of your rifle.’ We strengthen those who have been imprisoned, and we stand beside them.”

Prior to the protest, Ger’s leadership issued instructions to participants urging them not to clash with police officers, to remain patient and orderly, and to avoid entering private property during the demonstration.

{Matzav.com}

President Donald Trump announced Wednesday that the United States and Iran have reached a sweeping agreement aimed at ending the conflict that erupted on February 28, 2026, reopening the Strait of Hormuz, and ensuring that Tehran never acquires nuclear weapons. Speaking at the G7 Summit in Evian, Trump hailed the accord as a major diplomatic and economic victory.

“On Sunday, we reached an agreement with Iran that achieves everything we set out to accomplish,” Trump began, “ending the current conflict, reopening the Strait of Hormuz, and preventing Iran from ever obtaining a nuclear weapon.”

Trump pointed to the financial markets as evidence of confidence in the agreement, saying investors reacted positively while energy prices declined following the announcement.

“If we didn’t do this deal, we could have dropped bombs for another three weeks, two weeks, four weeks, two years. You would never have the Hormuz Strait open. You would never have success. Your market, instead of going up at levels that no one has ever seen before, would go down at levels that nobody ever saw before,” he said.

The president argued that the agreement was the result of years of pressure and strategic decisions rather than a rushed diplomatic effort.

“This wasn’t a three-month deal. This was years in the making. And you know why? Because I was the one who killed General Soleimani. If I didn’t kill General Soleimani, we probably wouldn’t be talking about this deal right now, because he was a mad genius. They never were able to replace him.”

Trump said discussions with world leaders over the last several days reinforced international support for the accord.

“The past two days have provided a chance to discuss the details of this historic agreement with many of our closest friends and allies, including the G7 nations and many presidents and prime ministers,” he said. “They are thrilled that we made a deal. There’s not one nation that came to us and said, ‘Please, sir, keep dropping bombs on them.’ Stupid people say that.”

Discussing Iran’s postwar leadership, Trump said the officials who emerged after the conflict are more pragmatic than those who previously led the country. He described recent developments as a type of “regime change” and predicted that Iran’s conduct would shift significantly after the heavy losses it sustained.

Trump emphasized that avoiding a severe global economic shock was one of his chief objectives throughout the conflict.

“The one thing I didn’t want to see is economic catastrophe,” he said. “If you kept this going, this could have happened. But all I know is that every time we talked about the possibility of peace, the stock market shot up like a rocket ship.”

Reflecting on the economic consequences of prolonged instability, Trump remarked that “the one President I did not want to be was the late, great Herbert Hoover,” referencing the president associated with the onset of the Great Depression after the 1929 stock market collapse.

Trump also disclosed that Israel had received a copy of the Memorandum of Understanding reached with Iran.

Turning to earlier U.S. policy, Trump sharply criticized the Obama-era nuclear agreement, arguing that it failed to stop Iran’s nuclear ambitions and instead enabled them. He also praised Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, describing him as a “very good man” and “an amazing prime minister.”

The president acknowledged occasional disagreements with Netanyahu, particularly concerning Israeli military operations in Lebanon.

“We had a little dispute over Lebanon,” Trump said of his relationship with Netanyahu. “I said, ‘You can do a little softer touch, Bibib. You don’t have to knock down a building every time somebody walks into it that’s from Hezbollah.’ It’s been an amazing partnership. But he will say, we’re the big partner and they’re the very small partner, and that’s true.”

At the same time, Trump suggested Israel could be more aggressive in confronting Hezbollah.

“They could do a much better job on Hezbollah,” Trump said of Israel.

Highlighting what he sees as a key difference between the new agreement and the JCPOA, Trump stressed that the current arrangement includes a strict deadline and the possibility of renewed military action.

“It’s a Memorandum of Understanding. If it doesn’t get done in 60 days, that’s alright – we go back to bombing. I don’t want to do that because it’s so good, but we might have to because we’re never going to let them have a nuclear weapon. But they’ve agreed not to, and you’ll see that very clearly in the agreement.”

The president said immediate negotiations would begin regarding the removal of Iran’s enriched uranium reserves.

“Technical discussions on the removal of all stockpiles of enriched materials will begin immediately.” He added, “And unlike Barack Hussein Obama, who sent Iran pallets of cash, any relief they receive under this deal, they’ll have to get based on merit-and it won’t be from us.”

Trump argued that previous administrations failed to halt Iran’s nuclear progress and claimed that his approach succeeded where others fell short.

“Every administration, for decades, has sought to get Iran to relinquish its nuclear ambitions, but the threat only got bigger… What I’m doing-and what I did-should’ve been done years ago… but it wasn’t,” Trump said. “No President in history has ever been tougher on Iran than I have – and they know that. If they don’t honor the agreement… we’ll probably go back to bombing them until they honor it.”

Concluding his remarks, Trump said the agreement goes further than prior nuclear arrangements by addressing both the development and acquisition of nuclear weapons.

“Iran agreed that they will neither produce nor procure nukes,” he said, contrasting that formulation with previous formulations that only included language on the building of nuclear weapons but would technically allow Iran to purchase nuclear weapons from third parties.

{Matzav.com}

A rare albino water buffalo in Bangladesh has been spared from ritual slaughter and relocated to the national zoo after capturing worldwide attention for a distinctive blond tuft of hair that many people said resembled President Donald Trump’s signature hairstyle.

The unusual animal, which weighs nearly 1,540 pounds, had already been sold ahead of the Eid al-Adha holiday and was destined for sacrifice. But after images and videos of the buffalo spread across social media, public fascination grew rapidly, ultimately prompting government intervention.

In Bangladesh, where livestock markets play a major role in holiday preparations, the buffalo became an unlikely celebrity. Nicknamed “Donald Trump” because of its striking blond forelock, the animal quickly transformed from a market-bound farm animal into a national curiosity.

During the days leading up to the holiday, crowds flocked to the farm where the buffalo was being kept. Social media users were captivated by its unusual appearance—a light-colored body, golden hair, and remarkably calm temperament. Before long, the animal had become a viral sensation.

The buffalo’s owner, Ziauddin Merida, said the nickname originated with his younger brother, who noticed what he believed was a humorous resemblance between the buffalo’s hair and Trump’s well-known hairstyle.

According to Merida, the buffalo is notable not only for its appearance but also for its gentle nature. He said the animal requires significant attention, including regular feeding, close care, and frequent bathing.

As public interest intensified, Bangladeshi authorities decided to step in. According to reports from Sky News and Reuters, Home Minister Salahuddin Ahmed ordered that the buffalo not be sacrificed, directed that the purchaser be reimbursed, and arranged for the animal to be transferred to the National Zoo in Dhaka.

A government official said the decision was made because of security concerns and the extraordinary level of public attention surrounding the case, ensuring that the now-famous buffalo will remain alive as one of the country’s most unusual animal attractions.

MK Meir Porush, chairman of the Shlomei Emunim faction, delivered a fiery warning to Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara on Tuesday, threatening an escalation of protests if authorities continue pursuing the arrest of bnei yeshiva over military draft issues.

Speaking at a gathering of Shlomei Emunim representatives in Beitar Illit, Porush told dozens of local officials from across the country that the chareidi community must prepare for an intensified public campaign against what he described as the persecution of Torah learners.

During his remarks, Porush issued his sharpest warning yet, declaring: “If she does not stop persecuting Torah learners, there will be no choice but to use Ehud Barak’s words and drive her out with sticks and stones.”

The meeting, hosted by Beitar Illit Mayor Meir Rubinstein, focused on organizing broader protest efforts in response to the arrests of bochurim and avreichim. Porush said he had specifically convened the gathering to discuss preparations for demonstrations that would, in his words, “shake the foundations.”

Porush pointed to recent efforts led by Rubinstein and other chareidi municipal leaders to suspend cooperation with police authorities, describing the move as a powerful example of what coordinated action can achieve.

“We recently saw the power of united action,” Porush said. “It echoed from one end of the country to the other, and we saw how quickly it caused senior police officials to stop and reconsider their conduct.”

Despite those developments, Porush made clear that he remains deeply dissatisfied with the current situation.

“Can I tell you that I’m satisfied? Calm? Far, far from it. This disgrace of arresting people for learning Torah is a stain and an accusation against us all,” he said.

Porush told attendees that the community must be prepared for what he described as a difficult and prolonged struggle.

“This is a battle over our existence as a nation of Torah,” he said, adding that the community may ultimately need to sever cooperation with additional government agencies and consider economic measures capable of exerting significant pressure.

Referring to past comments by former Prime Minister Ehud Barak about removing Benjamin Netanyahu “with sticks and stones,” Porush said he viewed those remarks as setting a precedent.

“I want to thank Barak for his honesty,” Porush said. “People always say that what is permitted for them is forbidden for us, but no longer. Once a war was declared against the Torah world, everything that is permitted for them is permitted for us, and if necessary, even more than that.”

Porush acknowledged that he would not have spoken in such terms a year ago, but argued that circumstances have changed dramatically.

“A year ago I would not have dared say such things,” he said. “But today there is no alternative: If the attorney general does not stop persecuting Torah learners, there will be no choice but to use Ehud Barak’s words and drive her out with sticks and stones.”

At the same time, Porush stopped short of calling for immediate action, emphasizing that he was speaking about preparation rather than implementation.

“So I’m not yet telling you to prepare sticks and stones,” he said. “But I brought you here to discuss the fact that we must be ready. We must be prepared to lead protest actions that will shake the foundations.”

Porush also revealed that economic pressure is among the options being discussed and presented to senior Torah leaders.

He pointed to the anti-government protests surrounding judicial reform, arguing that their effectiveness stemmed from a combination of public demonstrations and economic leverage.

“We saw during the judicial reform how the Kaplanists brought the government to its knees through two central tools: the protests in the streets, including at Ben Gurion Airport, and the economy,” he said.

Highlighting the size of Israel’s chareidi population, Porush cited official statistics estimating that nearly 1.45 million chareidim lived in Israel in 2025.

“I repeat that this is a dramatic figure,” he said. “The chareidi public today numbers nearly one and a half million people. That is 14.3 percent of the entire population.”

He then issued another warning directed at officials in the Justice and Finance Ministries.

“I strongly advise our pursuers in the Justice Ministry and the Finance Ministry not to test the economic price of one and a half million people deciding that they have reached their breaking point and are prepared to do whatever is necessary to stop this campaign of persecution against Torah learners,” Porush said.

Toward the end of his speech, Porush compared what he sees as threats from secular activists to Israel’s external security challenges.

“I am chareidi, you are chareidi representatives, and we are concerned about Arab terrorism,” he said. “But we are no less concerned about the Kaplanists led by Ehud Barak and those like him.”

He concluded with a particularly sharp comparison.

“The truth is that they want to beat us with sticks and stones and dismantle the Torah world in Eretz Yisroel,” Porush said. “Chazal teach that causing someone to sin is worse than killing him. The Arabs want to kill our bodies; the Kaplanists and the legal establishment want to kill our souls.”

{Matzav.com}

[COMMUNICATED]

by Rabbi Eliezer Sandler

The concept of the Yissachar-Zevulun Torah Learning Pact goes back well over 3,500 years, to the time of Yaakov Avinu and his sons. It is named for the Torah pact between two of his sons – Yissachar the scholar and Zevulun the merchant. Not only was it an equal pact but, Chazal explained, the deed of Zevulun/the Sponsor is considered even greater than that of Yissachar, because without the support of Zevulun, Yissachar would not have had the wherewithal to study Torah undisturbed.”

It is well-known that when it comes to learning Torah, people who sponsor the learning, often do so, not just as a donation. By financially supporting specific Torah scholars, they enter into a binding, written, signed and sealed learning partnership pact whereby the Sponsor (the Zevulun) is deemed by Halacha as if he personally studied the Torah completed by the Scholar (the Yissachar). (See below.) 

Thus, those who support the Talmidei Chachomim at Shas Yiden via a Yissachar-Zevulun Pact merit a portion in every daf of the entire Talmud Bavli and associated texts that they study, and complete the entire cycle in the space of ONE year. Some of the Sponsors opt to continue sponsoring repeat cycles of Shas which accrue to them.

Sar Hatorah, Maran Hagaon Harav Chaim Kanievsky, zt”l, Nasi Shas Yiden, emphasized: The most mehudar Yissachar-Zevulun pact to support in our times is that offered by Shas Yiden – it comprises the entire Shas, Rashi and Tosfos – all in just one year!

Rav Chaim explained why this pact with Shas Yiden is the most mehudar. Chazal say that the highest level of learning is when one understands what he is learning b’iyun u’ve’amkus. However, even higher than that is when one remembers b’al peh all what he has learned. I have farhered the Shas Yiden avreichim geonim many times and can attest ZEI KENNEN SHAS (they know Shas)!

YES! YOU CAN MAKE

The Yissachar-Zevulun Pact in Halacha

The Shulchan Aruch in Yoreh De’ah Chapter 246 regarding the efficacy of the Yissachar-Zevulun Sponsorship Pact for the Zevulun (the Sponsor) states clearly:  It is deemed as if he (the one sponsoring the learning) himself learned all the Torah studied under the pact. 

All the learning under the Shas Yiden Yissachar-Zevulun Pact is yours בעוה”ז ובעוה”ב (in both This World and the World to Come)! Concerning this, the Netziv of Volozhin comments that in Olam Habah, the Zevulun sponsor will sit together with the Gedolei Torah of the past and merit to participate in their discussions and pilpulim on all the Torah learned.

Achieve Almost 7 million Mitzvos in One Year

The Vilna Gaon in Shnos Eliyahu Pe’ah 41 states that one should hold precious every word of Torah that he learns because each word is considered a mitzvah of its own. 

Thus, since in Talmud Bavli, Rashi and Tosfos there are 6,608,891 words, that translates into almost 7 million mitzvos accruing through Yissachar-Zevulun at Shas Yiden. 

Official Shtar from Shas Yiden

Each Yissachar-Zevulun pact is confirmed by an official contract (shtar) from Shas Yiden specifying the learning of the entire Shas, and is witnessed by talmidei chachomim.

All who wish to enter into a Yissachar-Zevulun Pact for the entire Shas during ONE year should contact Shas Yiden to make arrangements: 718-702-1528.

The opportunity to complete the entire Shas has been a cherished way to honor family members and others as a prized achievement. It has also proven to be a source of comfort for mourners to obtain such a zechus for their dear ones during the year of mourning – a siyum of the entire Shas can be completed on the yahrzeit!

Yissachar-Zevulun Pact –

The legendary visionary and “Father of Yeshivos”, Reb Chaim of Volozhin, was the founder of the famous yeshiva in the town of Volozhin and the beloved talmid of the Vilna Gaon. 

Reb Chaim had an ongoing Yissachar-Zevulun pact with a local shoemaker – a man who was not learned but who dearly valued Torah learning. They had a ‘deal’ whereby the shoemaker would pay the monthly financial support needed for Reb Chaim and his family. For this financial support, the shoemaker would have an equal share in all Reb Chaim’s daily Torah study – both in the mitzvah of Torah study בעוה”ז and that the knowledge of the Torah learned would continue to be his בעוה”ב (in the World to Come).

One day the shoemaker passed away suddenly. During the shiva period, Reb Chaim was facing a perplexing halachic question and researched high and low for a solution. That night the shoemaker appeared to him in a dream and gave him the full solution that he sought. Reb Chaim was amazed and commented, “Azoi gich, Azoi Gich – So quickly, so quickly has he acquired the zchus and knowledge of the Torah that I have studied!”

In the words of Gedolei Torah:

Maran Hagaon Harav Chaim Kanievsky, zt”l, Nasi Shas Yiden:

“In just ONE year, through Yissachar-Zevulun at Shas Yiden, you can be zoche to the entire Shas forever – בעוה”ז ובעוה”ב (in olam hazeh and olam habah).

“Moreover, whoever supports Shas Yiden is zocheh to fulfill both Yissachar-Zevulun and support of aniyei (the poor of) Eretz Yisroel in the fullest sense of the word.

“Those who support Shas Yiden will be saved from chevlei (the travails of) Moshiach – spiritually and materially, and will be zoche to have ehrlicher bonim u’vanos yir’eishomayim ”

Maran Hagaon Harav Dov Lando, shlit”a, Rosh Yeshiva, Slabodka:

“Who compares to the Shas Yiden? Incredible talmidei chachomim geonim who raised the bar in limud Hashas b’iyun u’v’amkus. Blessed are those who enter a Yissachar-Zevulun pact with them.”

Hamashpia Hagadol Reb Meilech Biederman, shlit”a:

 “Yissachar-Zevulun at Shas Yiden – best possible deal, and in just 1 year! 100% partnership! 100% Shas x 5 times! 100% Shisha Sidrei Mishna – בעוה”ז ובעוה”ב”

Sanzer Rebbe, shlit”a:

“A first in 2000 years of Jewish history! Until Shas Yiden, never a Torah institution where ALL the avreichim metzuyonim v’geonim know the entire Shas by heart”

Harav Yaakov Hillel, shlit”a:

“Therefore, the great mitzvah to support the efforts [of the Talmidei Chachomim] with generous donations in order that they should continue diligently with their studies to enhance the greatness of the Torah and its glory. 

ShasYiden.com

A major legislative effort aimed at ending the arrests of bnei yeshiva is expected to move forward as early as next week after senior Shas representatives met with Cabinet Secretary Yossi Fuchs to finalize a framework for the proposal.

Former minister Ariel Atias and MK Yinon Azoulay held discussions with Fuchs in recent days in an effort to advance legislation that would stop criminal proceedings against Torah students. According to reports, the meeting concluded with an agreement to begin advancing the measure through the Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee next week.

Under the emerging plan, committee chairman MK Boaz Bismuth is expected to convene the committee to begin deliberations on the legislation.

Senior coalition officials say Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu has assured supporters of the proposal that it will have sufficient backing within the coalition and can be approved in the coming days. At the same time, some lawmakers remain skeptical, noting that Netanyahu previously pledged support for the so-called Daycare Law before ultimately freezing that legislation.

As previously reported, Shas chairman Aryeh Deri has been leading an intensive effort in recent weeks to stop the arrests of bnei Torah by separating portions of the draft law and advancing temporary transitional provisions through emergency legislation.

Deri’s proposal calls for splitting off part of the draft legislation currently under discussion in the Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee and passing a one-year temporary measure containing the law’s transitional provisions.

Under the framework being advanced by Shas, existing economic sanctions would remain in place, but the criminal enforcement measures that have led to arrests would be suspended.

The proposal would effectively freeze criminal proceedings against Torah students who have found themselves classified as lawbreakers due to the absence of legislation governing their status. Supporters of the plan argue that the current situation was created because there is no active law regulating the issue and because political realities make it unlikely that a comprehensive draft law of any kind can be passed before the next election and the formation of a new government.

Deri is seeking to accomplish this through a procedural split of the existing draft bill, allowing the temporary measure to move directly toward second and third readings rather than requiring an entirely new and lengthy legislative process.

{Matzav.com}

Mosab Hassan Yousef, the former Hamas insider known as the “Green Prince,” launched a sharp public attack on President Donald Trump, accusing him of undermining Israel’s military efforts and then criticizing the Jewish state for the results.

“You cannot sabotage a campaign and then blame Israel for the outcome,” Yousef wrote in response to Trump’s recent criticism of Israel’s operations against Hezbollah in Lebanon.

Yousef is the son of Hamas co-founder Sheikh Hassan Yousef and spent roughly a decade working covertly for Israel’s Shin Bet security service. After leaving that role, he converted to Christianity, relocated to the United States, and authored the book Son of Hamas. His nickname, “Green Prince,” reflects both his roots in Hamas’s leadership circles and the movement’s symbolic color. Over the years, he has become one of Hamas’s fiercest critics and a prominent voice on issues involving Gaza and Israel.

In his remarks, Yousef argued that whenever Israel gained significant military momentum—whether in Gaza, Lebanon, or against Iran—Trump stepped in and halted operations at critical moments.

According to Yousef, those interventions prevented Israel from turning battlefield successes into lasting strategic victories.

He singled out Israel’s pager operation against Hezbollah for praise, describing it as “a masterpiece of modern warfare.” He also argued that Israel’s campaign against Iran left the regime reeling after the elimination of senior figures and severe damage to its infrastructure, but claimed the effort was halted before sustained pressure could produce a decisive outcome.

Yousef further asserted that Trump had been advised that defeating Iran would require at least a year of continuous pressure. Instead, he said, the president sought quicker results, altered the original strategy, and transformed what could have become a strategic victory into a strategic setback.

“Now, after signing a humiliating deal that buried the nuclear threat instead of eliminating it, you blame Israel for taking too long and for the way it fought,” Yousef wrote.

He also rejected criticism regarding civilian casualties in Lebanon, arguing that responsibility rests with Hezbollah because the terror group operates from within civilian population centers and uses noncombatants as human shields.

Yousef’s comments came in response to statements Trump made during the G7 summit, where he said Israel’s conflict with Hezbollah had dragged on too long and resulted in excessive loss of life. The president criticized strikes on residential buildings and said Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu should exercise greater restraint in Lebanon.

{Matzav.com}