Feed aggregator

Amid intensifying criticism over the IDF’s conduct in southern Lebanon and reports alleging significant limitations on military operations, Prime Minister Binyomin Netanyahu, Defense Minister Yisroel Katz, and IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir released an unusual joint statement Monday evening seeking to reaffirm Israel’s commitment to aggressive action against Hezbollah threats.

The statement came after the three senior leaders held consultations with Northern Command chief Maj. Gen. Rafi Milo. Following the discussion, they emphasized that “the IDF will continue to act decisively to thwart threats against our soldiers and citizens, destroy terrorist infrastructure, and maintain the security zone in southern Lebanon.”

The statement also underscored that “the Prime Minister, Defense Minister, and Chief of Staff made it clear that the safety of Israeli citizens and IDF forces will continue to be their absolute priority, without compromise.”

Despite the strong public message, questions continue to swirl regarding the extent of operational freedom available to Israeli forces beyond Lebanon’s so-called Yellow Line. Military officials cited in recent reports maintain that significant restrictions have been imposed on activities that were once approved at lower command levels.

According to those sources, many operations now require authorization from the highest levels of the military hierarchy, a shift that critics argue has constrained Israel’s ability to act swiftly against Hezbollah.

The reported limitations are said to affect offensive operations deeper inside Lebanese territory, particularly strikes targeting Hezbollah command centers, weapons stockpiles, production facilities, force-buildup efforts, and other terrorist infrastructure that is not deemed an immediate danger to troops currently deployed in the field.

The joint statement was issued after a series of media reports suggested that Israeli forces are largely confined to responding to active or developing threats rather than exercising the broader operational latitude they possessed during earlier stages of the conflict.

One report published by The New York Times claimed that troops operating in southern Lebanon are now governed by tighter rules of engagement, under which the use of force is generally limited to situations involving an imminent threat or requires explicit approval from the Chief of Staff.

The report further stated that soldiers are not permitted to open fire on civilians returning to their homes unless those individuals approach Israeli positions in a manner considered threatening.

According to the same report, proactive actions within the security zone—including the demolition of structures and infrastructure—cannot be carried out without authorization from senior military leadership, further fueling debate over whether Israel’s deterrence posture in Lebanon has been significantly curtailed.

{Matzav.com}

Vice President JD Vance said Monday that the opening round of talks between the United States and Iran yielded significant progress, pointing to agreements involving maritime security, regional stability, nuclear inspections, and the handling of frozen Iranian assets. At the same time, he stressed that Washington remains deeply skeptical of Tehran’s intentions and will judge Iran by its actions rather than its promises.

Speaking to reporters as he departed Switzerland following the negotiations, Vance characterized the discussions as “very productive” and outlined what he described as several concrete accomplishments achieved during the meetings.

Among the key outcomes, Vance said negotiators established a framework designed to keep the Strait of Hormuz open, a critical shipping corridor through which a significant portion of the world’s energy supplies pass.

He also announced that the talks produced an arrangement intended to preserve the ceasefire across the region, including in Lebanon. “We feel great about that. We’re working with our allies from the Israelis to the Gulf Arabs to make sure that sticks.”

Vance further stated that Iran has agreed to admit international nuclear inspectors into the country, a move the administration views as essential to preventing Tehran from advancing toward a nuclear weapon. “We are going to bolster that inspection regimen to make sure they don’t have a nuclear weapon.”

Despite highlighting these developments, the vice president repeatedly cautioned that the United States remains wary of Iranian assurances and intends to closely monitor compliance with any commitments made during the negotiations.

“You can’t trust anybody’s words, you have to trust what they actually do. Letting the inspectors in is a big deal, but again, we’re going to see what they actually let the inspectors do once they’re in the country. That’s going to continually be part of our negotiation. The President asked us to verify more of what they are doing and focus less on what they are saying.”

Vance also revealed that negotiators reached an understanding regarding Iranian funds that may be released in the future. Under the proposed mechanism, the United States and Qatar would oversee the funds once they are unfrozen, with the money directed toward the purchase of American agricultural products, including corn, soybeans, and wheat, for distribution to the Iranian population.

The vice president presented the arrangement as a way to ensure that any released assets are used for humanitarian purposes while maintaining oversight by U.S. allies and partners.

{Matzav.com}

Jewish Canadian Michael Mizrahi was identified as the civilian who lost his life in Monday’s deadly shooting in Montreal, an incident that also claimed the lives of a police officer and the gunman responsible for the attack.

The emergency response organization ZAKA confirmed Mizrahi’s identity but said significant questions remained unanswered. Investigators had not yet determined whether Mizrahi was struck by gunfire from the attacker or was accidentally hit during the police response, as some reports suggested.

Moshe Blech, an Israeli resident of Montreal for the past two years and a volunteer with ZAKA’s emergency response team, described Mizrahi as a cherished member of the local community. According to ZAKA, Blech said Mizrahi “was known and beloved, a man who prayed with us at synagogue. We join the family in its sorrow and are awaiting the results of the investigation which will make clear the circumstances of the incident.”

Blech added that once authorities granted access to the scene, ZAKA personnel would enter the area to recover the victim’s remains and carry out preparations for burial.

Although the motive behind the attack had not yet been established, early indications suggested that the Jewish community was not specifically targeted. Rabbi Motti Seligson, a Chabad spokesman based in New York, told the Jewish Telegraphic Agency that information relayed by Chabad representatives in Montreal indicated the shooting did not appear to have been directed at Jewish residents.

In the aftermath of the violence, many Jewish residents living along the affected street remained under shelter-in-place orders. Two community members told JTA that, based on everything they knew, there was no indication that Jews had been singled out in the attack.

Blech recounted that he was standing outside his home with his eight-year-old daughter when the gunfire suddenly erupted.

Yitzhak Rosenblum, a member of the local Chevra Kadisha, described hearing the chaos unfold while at work. He said he was in his office “when I heard a bunch of cops flying by and I heard some gunshots.”

The shooting occurred in Côte-des-Neiges, a neighborhood with deep roots in Montreal’s Jewish history. Following World War II, the area became a major destination for Jewish families who were moving westward from the St. Laurent Boulevard district as they entered the middle class. Known for its tree-lined streets, duplex homes, and modest apartment buildings, the neighborhood developed a welcoming atmosphere and was largely free of the discriminatory restrictions that existed in some of Montreal’s wealthier areas during that era.

{Matzav.com}

A wave of concern has swept through the Torah world following a deterioration in the condition of Brisker Rosh Yeshivah, Rav Avrohom Yehoshua Halevi Soloveitchik, who was transferred back to the intensive care unit at Hadassah Ein Kerem Hospital on Monday.

The development comes after what had appeared to be encouraging progress in recent days. Family members and medical staff had reportedly been considering the possibility of the Rosh Yeshivah‘s discharge from the hospital following a period of improvement.

As previously reported here on Matzav, Rav Soloveitchik underwent a complex heart procedure approximately two weeks ago at a hospital in central Israel. About a week later, after experiencing health complications, he was readmitted to Hadassah Ein Kerem.

Despite signs of recovery during the past week, his condition suddenly worsened in recent hours, prompting doctors to transfer him once again to the intensive care unit for close monitoring and treatment.

News of the setback spread quickly, prompting special tefillos in the main bais medrash of Yeshivas Brisk in Yerushalayim. Talmidim and family members gathered to recite Tehillim, while transportation was arranged for groups traveling to Kever Rochel to daven on his behalf.

Additional gatherings and hisorerus events have been organized in communities across Eretz Yisroel and around the world.

All are urged to continue davening for Rav Avrohom Yehoshua ben Ettil.

{Matzav.com}

Chaim Karelitz of Ezram U’Magenam, an organization that assists and advises bnei yeshiva dealing with military-related issues, said Sunday evening that approximately 50 bochurim are currently being held in military prison. He emphasized that most were not arrested during police operations, but rather became entangled in the system after appearing at military induction offices.

Speaking with Avi Mimran on Kol Chai’s HaMahadura HaMerkazit, Karelitz explained that the majority of those currently incarcerated were not picked up in street arrests. Instead, they arrived at induction offices under various circumstances and later found themselves facing detention.

Karelitz said that in recent months there has been a noticeable decline in arrests carried out by the Israel Police, which he attributed to changes in military policy. Aside from a handful of exceptional cases, he said there have been relatively few significant arrest incidents lately.

At the same time, he noted that many of the bochurim currently in military prison sought assistance from private individuals, attorneys, or various intermediaries in hopes of resolving their status. In many cases, however, those efforts ultimately led to legal complications that resulted in their arrest.

Karelitz explained that the primary mission of Ezram U’Magenam is to provide information, guidance, and basic legal direction to bnei yeshiva. He noted that military procedures and the timelines available for students to address their status have changed considerably in recent years, making it increasingly important to understand the regulations and their legal implications.

“Our role is not to set policy or involve ourselves in the disputes between the political leadership, the courts, and the military,” Karelitz said. “Rather, we help bochurim understand how to act properly as long as there is no clear and lasting resolution to the situation.”

He stressed that anyone who is detained or arrested should avoid unnecessary arguments and refrain from providing information that is not required until proper guidance has been obtained.

Karelitz recounted one case in which a detainee told prison authorities that he was considering harming himself, believing that such a statement would result in his immediate release. Instead, the individual was placed under special supervision.

Concluding the interview, Karelitz urged anyone facing detention or arrest to contact qualified professionals immediately for guidance and assistance. He noted that Ezram U’Magenam operates a hotline around the clock to provide support, information, and direction to those navigating these challenges.

{Matzav.com}

A rare red heifer born recently at a religious kibbutz in northern Israel has generated significant interest among researchers, poskim, and those involved in matters relating to the Beis Hamikdash. While the animal appears to meet one of the most important requirements of a parah adumah, a newly emerged halachic question may determine whether it can ultimately be deemed valid.

Speaking on the Kol Chai radio program Hafuch Al Hafuch, Rav Yehuda Ben Tzvi of the National Center for Red Heifer Research revealed that the calf, named “Temimah,” was born shortly before Shavuos and possesses an exceptionally rare characteristic: every hair on its body is completely red.

“We saw potential red heifers that were brought from Canada several years ago, but over time white hairs began to grow,” he said. “Here we have a calf that was born in Israel, and from head to tail all of its hairs are red.”

Despite the excitement, a serious question arose shortly after the animal’s birth.

According to Rav Ben Tzvi, identification tags were attached to the calf’s ears, leaving holes that may constitute a mum capable of disqualifying it from serving as a valid parah adumah.

“A worker at the dairy farm placed two identification tags in its ears, and in doing so may have caused a blemish,” he explained. “When we arrived, we realized that the central issue had become a halachic one: Is this a temporary condition that can heal, or is it a permanent blemish that invalidates the animal?”

The matter is currently being studied by a special panel of approximately 20 poskim from both the religious Zionist and chareidi communities. Their findings will eventually be presented to leading Torah authorities for a final ruling.

During the interview, host Rav Moshe Ben Lulu noted that if the poskim determine the blemish is not disqualifying, there may already be a suitable candidate for a kosher parah adumah.

“The Ribbono Shel Olam awakens us during historic periods,” Rav Ben Tzvi responded. “There is a feeling that Hashem is drawing us closer to revisiting these subjects once again.”

He explained that the National Center for Red Heifer Research has spent more than a decade examining both the practical and halachic aspects of raising red heifers and preparing for the requirements associated with them.

Among the issues explored by researchers is the possibility of using laser hair-removal technology should a small number of white hairs emerge, a topic that has parallels in the Mishnah and later halachic literature.

Rav Ben Tzvi, who is also involved with educational programs focusing on the Beis Hamikdash, said the calf’s birth has captured the imagination of students and young people.

“When I teach children about the Beis Hamikdash and the parah adumah, and they hear that a red heifer has been born in Eretz Yisroel, they understand that we are truly living in a generation of geulah. It is inspiring and moving.”

For now, officials are refusing to disclose the calf’s exact location. They have confirmed only that it is being housed at a dairy farm in a religious kibbutz in northern Israel and remains under close supervision.

The calf was given the name “Temimah,” reflecting the hope that it will continue to satisfy all of the necessary halachic requirements and remain completely red until a final determination is reached.

{Matzav.com}

Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir is openly challenging the notion that fighting in Lebanon has entered a new phase of restraint, insisting there is effectively no ceasefire and urging Prime Minister Binyomin Netanyahu to make that message clear to President Trump, Arutz Sheva reports.

In a wide-ranging interview, Ben Gvir expressed concern that diplomatic pressure from Washington could limit Israel’s military freedom of action against Hezbollah and undermine gains achieved during the war.

“There is reason for concern. I have a son in Lebanon, and we are committed to him and to all IDF soldiers. I am telling Prime Minister Netanyahu – you have done wonderful things, you have friendly relations with Donald Trump, you need to go to him and tell him the truth. We cannot cease fire, we cannot restrict ourselves. All of Lebanon needs to be our ‘playground.’ It cannot be that IDF commanders have to calculate – in one area we attack and in another we do not,” he said.

Ben Gvir also rejected claims that Israeli forces currently enjoy unrestricted operational authority in Lebanon, contradicting recent statements from Defense Minister Israel Katz.

“Soldiers can respond when they are fired upon – but that is not enough. It is not true to say there are no limitations. The IDF cannot operate everywhere – and that is a limitation.”

At the same time, the minister defended Katz personally, arguing that responsibility for any restrictions ultimately rests elsewhere.

“I must say about Minister Katz: he is fighting for responses and strikes to be carried out. He is not the problem. The finger needs to be pointed at the Prime Minister,” he added.

The minister said many on the Israeli right are worried that the American administration could pressure Jerusalem into concessions that would weaken Israel’s strategic position and affect the country’s domestic political landscape.

Addressing reports of a possible Israeli withdrawal from areas in Lebanon, Ben Gvir said he is actively lobbying Netanyahu to reject such a move.

“I very much hope that does not happen. I am doing everything to convince Benjamin Netanyahu that this would be a mistake. We need freedom of action everywhere – in Dahiyeh, in Beirut. I am telling the Prime Minister: let’s not go backward.”

Ben Gvir argued that the ultimate decisions belong to Israel’s leadership and should not be dictated by any foreign government, regardless of how close the alliance may be.

“With all due respect to Trump – he is not the story. The story here is Benjamin Netanyahu. Israel is not another star on the American flag. Our Prime Minister needs to make decisions, and it depends on him. There is no situation in which we begin acting according to dictates from a friend – even if he is a great friend.”

While emphasizing his appreciation for President Trump, Ben Gvir said American interests do not always align perfectly with Israel’s security needs.

“Trump loves Israel and is a great friend of Israel – but he has other considerations. I do not want to be ungrateful, because Trump has done great things and we need to thank him for that. But there is no reality in which we implement pre-October 7 concepts in Lebanon. All of Lebanon needs to be in our sights. There cannot be even one place where Hezbollah terrorists have immunity. I do not trust the Lebanese, and they too need to pay the price.”

The minister also pushed back against comments made by Vice President JD Vance, who recently suggested that certain members of Israel’s government were contributing to rising tensions in the region.

“He would never allow an organization like Hezbollah to be on the border. They would never allow their freedom of action to be restricted. That is exactly what I want from the Vice President. As far as I am concerned, with all due respect to Vance, IDF soldiers come first.”

Turning to Iran, Ben Gvir voiced deep skepticism about diplomatic efforts to curb Tehran’s nuclear ambitions and warned that Israel may eventually have to act independently.

“The Americans are very naïve if they think the Iranians will abandon their nuclear plans and cancel and stop all their dreams of destroying Israel. I think the moment is approaching when the State of Israel will understand that it is our responsibility to deal with the threat and act against it on our own.”

The minister also weighed in on the evolving political landscape ahead of Israel’s next elections, particularly speculation that former Brig. Gen. Ofer Winter may launch an independent political campaign.

Ben Gvir urged Winter not to run alone and instead encouraged him to join forces with Religious Zionism chairman Bezalel Smotrich.

“I think Bezalel Smotrich should run on a joint list with Ofer Winter that appeals to the part of the religious-Zionist public that does not vote for me.”

He argued that an independent Winter candidacy could ultimately weaken the broader right-wing bloc.

“Winter does not pass the electoral threshold and knows that every vote that goes to him if he runs independently will go to Bennett or Eisenkot. I very much hope Winter internalizes that he cannot run if he does not pass the threshold. He should try to join another party. I also faced this situation and joined Bezalel in the past, and there is no reason Winter should not learn from that experience,” he concluded.

{Matzav.com}

A major police operation unfolded today in Montreal’s Côte-des-Neiges neighborhood after gunfire erupted in an area with a large Jewish population, with local reports indicating that Jewish-owned businesses were the intended targets.

Shortly before noon local time, Montreal police issued an urgent warning advising residents that an armed and dangerous suspect was active in the Côte-des-Neiges sector. Witnesses reported hearing between 20 and 30 gunshots in the neighborhood, which is home to numerous kosher establishments and other Jewish communal institutions.

Authorities urged people nearby to remain inside their homes and secure their premises while officers responded to the rapidly developing situation.

Initial reports indicated that at least two police officers and one civilian were wounded during the attack. Police confirmed that one suspect had been neutralized, while media outlets in Montreal reported that one officer succumbed to his injuries. The operation remained active as authorities worked to secure the area.

Footage circulating from the scene appeared to show two individuals lying on the ground. One of the alleged attackers, described by witnesses as apparently Caucasian, was seen face down wearing camouflage clothing. A rifle believed to be an SKS was also visible nearby.

“We are asking everyone to avoid the sector. The situation is not under control,” said Jean-Pierre Brabant, a spokesperson with Montreal police.

Two shooters were neutralized and that one police officer remained in critical condition.

According to reports in the local media, one of the suspects allegedly prepared a manifesto before carrying out the attack and distributed it to multiple news organizations prior to the shooting.

The Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs (CIJA) said it is closely following the situation, adding “thoughts first go to all those affected by this incident, as well as to all the police officers mobilized to ensure the safety of citizens.”

{Matzav.com}

A Massachusetts middle school principal is facing criticism after issuing an apology to students following complaints that a mandatory lesson on the Holocaust and antisemitism left some Arab, Muslim, Palestinian, and Lebanese students feeling excluded.

The controversy centers on an email sent to seventh-grade students by the principal of William Diamond Middle School in Lexington. The message was distributed after school officials received feedback from families regarding a required educational program about the Holocaust and antisemitism.

According to the email, the lesson was designed to connect students’ classroom study of the Holocaust with present-day issues by helping them “recognize hate, understand where it comes from, and encourage you to speak up against it.”

However, after discussions with families, school administrators concluded that some students felt the presentation failed to acknowledge their own backgrounds and experiences.

The email explained that some students “felt unseen,” believed that “your own history, your identity, or your community was left out or erased,” and that some participants left the program “feeling less safe, not more.”

School officials responded with an apology, stressing that their concern was not with the subject matter itself but with how some students experienced the lesson.

“We are sorry,” the email states. “Not because the topic was too hard; hard conversations are part of growing up and part of what we do here at Diamond. We are sorry because every one of you deserves to walk into this school and feel that who you are matters; Arab students, Jewish students, Lebanese students, Muslim students, Palestinian students, every student. And in this case, we missed the mark and did not achieve what we hoped to do.”

The principal also pledged that the school would work with educators and parents to develop future programs that incorporate a broader range of perspectives and experiences.

The email states that the school will collaborate with teachers and families “to build something better – a way of learning about hate, prejudice, and justice that includes all of our communities and all of our histories.”

In addition, administrators said students would be given an opportunity to help shape future discussions and were encouraged to speak with teachers, counselors, or school leaders if they wished to share concerns.

The apology drew a sharp response from the Stop Antisemitism organization, which published the email and questioned why Holocaust education required an apology in the first place.

“Since when is teaching historical fact something that requires an apology?” the organization wrote.

“And why is a school principal validating outrage over Holocaust education instead of defending it?”

The incident has fueled a broader debate over how schools should teach difficult historical subjects while addressing the concerns of students from diverse backgrounds and communities.

{Matzav.com}

The IDF and Shin Bet announced that they eliminated a Hamas terrorist who participated in the October 7 massacre and was involved in holding hostage Omer Shem Tov captive in Gaza, as part of a series of targeted operations against terror operatives in the northern Gaza Strip.

According to the military, Sabai Zaher Abd al-Hamid Abu Hasna, a member of Hamas’ elite Nukhba force, was killed in a precise strike carried out in northern Gaza. The IDF said Abu Hasna played an active role throughout the war, including planting explosive devices and recently attempting to orchestrate attacks against Israeli forces operating in the area.

The military stated that Abu Hasna crossed into Israeli territory during the October 7 assault and later took part in the captivity of Omer Shem Tov while he was being held hostage by Hamas.

The strike also killed Ahmed Samir Muhammad Washah, whom the IDF identified as a Hamas military operative. According to the military, Washah simultaneously worked as a photojournalist for the Al Jazeera network while also serving as a Hamas sniper.

In a separate operation in northern Gaza, Israeli forces targeted and eliminated three additional Hamas terrorists who were allegedly preparing attacks against IDF troops deployed in the area.

The military said extensive precautions were taken before the strikes to minimize civilian casualties, including the use of precision-guided munitions and real-time aerial surveillance.

The IDF emphasized that forces operating under Southern Command remain deployed in accordance with the ceasefire arrangement and will continue taking action against emerging threats.

“IDF troops under Southern Command remain deployed in the area in accordance with the ceasefire agreement and will continue to operate to remove any immediate threat,” the military stated.

British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer announced Monday that he is stepping down as leader of the Labour Party and prime minister, bringing a dramatic end to a premiership that lasted less than two years after his party’s landslide election victory.

The 63-year-old leader unveiled a timetable for his departure amid growing unrest within Labour following disastrous local election results last month, which saw the party lose more than 1,000 council seats across the country.

Starmer acknowledged that many within his own party no longer believed he was the right person to lead Labour into the next general election, which is required to take place before July 2029.

“I have heard the answer of my parliamentary party to that question, and I accept that answer with good grace,” Starmer said outside 10 Downing Street in London.

“Every decision I’ve taken has been about putting the country I love first. That is why I will resign as leader of the Labour Party. I have spoken to his majesty the king this morning to inform him of my decision.”

The prime minister became visibly emotional as he brought his remarks to a close, paying tribute to his wife, Victoria, for supporting him throughout his political career.

“When I leave the biggest job in the country, I shall spend more time on the most important job, being the best husband I can to my fantastic wife, Vic,” he said. “And being the best dad I can to my beautiful children, who are my pride and joy.”

After the speech, Starmer and his wife embraced outside the prime minister’s residence before walking back into Number 10 hand in hand.

Starmer said the process of selecting a new Labour leader will begin on July 9, with a successor expected to be chosen before Parliament’s summer recess.

The timetable opens the door either to an uncontested succession or a leadership contest in which Labour members will determine both the party’s next leader and the nation’s next prime minister.

Among the names already being discussed as possible successors, former Greater Manchester mayor Andy Burnham has emerged as the leading contender.

Burnham’s standing received a boost following last week’s by-election victory in Makerfield, a traditionally pro-Brexit constituency in northwest England, where he defeated Reform UK by nearly 20 percentage points.

Recent polling suggested Burnham would have comfortably defeated Starmer in any leadership contest, despite the prime minister insisting as recently as Friday that he intended to remain in office.

Whoever succeeds Starmer will become the seventh person to occupy Downing Street since the 2016 Brexit referendum. At the same time, pressure is mounting for an early national election.

Although the next general election is not legally required until 2029, critics argue that a new prime minister who was not chosen by voters in a nationwide election lacks a mandate to pursue policies that differ substantially from Labour’s 2024 platform.

Calls for Starmer’s resignation intensified after Labour suffered crushing defeats at the hands of Nigel Farage’s Reform UK party throughout many of England’s former industrial strongholds.

“Starmer isn’t the first Prime Minister I’ve deposed, and he won’t be the last. David Cameron. Theresa May. Rishi Sunak. And next up – Andy Burnham. The reason each leader has failed is the same,” Farage wrote in a Substack post Monday.

“What the political class fails to understand is that the electorate won’t accept being taken for fools. They cannot continue to take the votes of the people who supported them for granted, only to betray them upon having gained power. Politics is about trust.

“That is why I am calling for a general election at the soonest possible date. You know as well as I do that the country cannot afford to waste another week drifting from crisis to crisis.

“That’s why millions of you turned out in the local elections to vote for Reform councillors, and it’s why we have led in more than 300 opinion polls for well over a year.”

Labour’s difficulties extended beyond England. The party also suffered significant setbacks in Scotland and Wales, including losing control of the Welsh Senedd for the first time since the devolved legislature was established in 1999.

The election losses were followed by a cascade of resignations from senior government officials, further weakening Starmer’s position.

Among those departing was Health Secretary Wes Streeting, who publicly declared that he no longer had confidence in the prime minister’s leadership.

“But where we need vision, we have a vacuum. Where we need direction, we have drift,” he wrote in his resignation letter.

Only days earlier, Defense Secretary John Healey also resigned, citing frustration over defense spending and national security priorities.

“You have been unable, and the Treasury has been unwilling, to commit the resources that the nation needs to defend the country at this time of rising threats,” Healey told Starmer in his resignation letter.

Starmer’s standing with voters had steadily deteriorated amid a series of policy reversals, controversies, and unmet promises. Critics pointed to repeated changes in direction on welfare reform, sluggish economic growth, and the government’s inability to ease Britain’s ongoing cost-of-living crisis.

His administration also faced criticism over the appointment of Peter Mandelson as Britain’s ambassador to Washington, a decision that generated significant political backlash.

The resignation marks a stunning reversal for a leader who entered office with overwhelming momentum and a commanding parliamentary majority, only to see his government unravel in less than two years amid mounting political, economic, and electoral pressures.

{Matzav.com}

The chareidi community’s campaign against the arrest of bnei yeshiva is set to escalate this week with a massive nationwide vehicle procession to a military prison, organizers announced after days of planning, consultations, and logistical preparations.

According to the organizers, the demonstration is intended to give voice to the anguish felt throughout the Torah world and to express solidarity with bochurim and avreichim who have been imprisoned because of their refusal to enlist and their commitment to Torah learning.

The convoy is scheduled to begin on Wednesday at 4:00 p.m., with vehicles departing in organized groups from numerous locations throughout Eretz Yisroel. Participants will travel toward the military prison in what organizers hope will become one of the largest protest actions yet in response to the ongoing arrests.

Reports published early this morning in the chassidic party-affiliated press stated that the initiative is being conducted with the brochos and guidance of prominent rabbonim, community leaders, and roshei yeshiva, who have been closely involved in directing the organizing committee’s efforts.

Organizers said that in recent days they finalized a comprehensive list of departure points in cities and chareidi population centers across the country, enabling members of the public to join the protest in an orderly and accessible manner.

At the same time, extensive logistical work has been underway regarding travel routes, convoy coordination, departure schedules, traffic management, guidance systems, and instructions for both drivers and passengers.

The organizing committee emphasized that while the protest is expected to be large in scale, it is being carefully planned and structured. They said the goal is to send a clear public message opposing the imprisonment of bnei Torah while maintaining order throughout every stage of the event.

A dedicated hotline has been established for registration and additional information. Members of the public wishing to participate can call 03-550-10-44.

The initiative comes amid continuing controversy surrounding the arrests of bnei yeshiva and growing chareidi opposition to what community leaders describe as the persecution of Torah learners.

Organizers expressed hope that the vehicle procession will serve as a powerful demonstration of unity and determination, conveying the Torah community’s protest while showing support for those currently being held in custody.

{Matzav.com}

As he departed for the United States to participate in the concluding phase of the Keren Olam HaTorah campaign, Rav Moshe Hillel Hirsch issued an extraordinary appeal to tens of thousands of avreichim across Eretz Yisroel, urging them to undertake a daily taanis dibbur during the opening half-hour of each learning session from now through the end of the Yamim Nora’im.

The special letter, released shortly after the rosh yeshiva left for America, was distributed to roshei kollel throughout the country. It comes against the backdrop of the ongoing challenges confronting the Torah world, including the draft decrees and the loss of critical yeshiva funding.

In the letter, Rav Hirsch presents what he describes as a powerful spiritual response to the current struggle facing lomdei Torah.

The rosh yeshiva emphasized that the very difficulty of maintaining such a commitment is what gives it its unique value and power.

“It appears proper that every avreich, from now until the end of the Yamim Nora’im, should be careful to begin each seder with a half-hour taanis dibbur,” Rav Hirsch wrote. “This is something very difficult, and precisely because it is difficult and constitutes a form of mesirus nefesh, it will bring tremendous kavod Shamayim.”

According to Rav Hirsch, this act of self-sacrifice will generate a special closeness between Klal Yisroel and the Ribbono Shel Olam.

“As a result, HaKadosh Boruch Hu will draw closer to us, and then we will merit a special siyata diShmaya from Him,” the rosh yeshiva explained. He stressed that “without this special siyata diShmaya, it will not be possible to prevail against those who are fighting against us.”

Rav Hirsch expressed confidence that the acceptance of this kabbalah would not only help secure victory in the current battle facing the Torah world, but would also elevate participants to unprecedented spiritual heights.

“Through this, we will merit special siyata diShmaya and we will be victorious in this struggle,” he wrote. “Moreover, it will bring us to extraordinarily high levels that we have not previously attained.”

The letter concludes with a request that roshei kollel actively encourage their avreichim to embrace the initiative.

“It is appropriate that roshei kollel speak about this matter,” Rav Hirsch wrote, underscoring the importance he places on ensuring that the message is translated into practical action.

The letter was released at a particularly significant moment, coinciding with Rav Hirsch’s departure for the historic concluding events of the Keren Olam HaTorah campaign in the United States. The rosh yeshiva embarked on a whirlwind three-day trip intended to bring the organization’s fundraising efforts to a close.

Last Friday, an emotional Tzeischem L’Shalom gathering took place at Rav Hirsch’s home, attended by dozens of roshei kollel representing tens of thousands of avreichim throughout Eretz Yisroel. During the event, the roshei kollel expressed gratitude for the rosh yeshiva’s tremendous efforts in establishing Keren Olam HaTorah and for his tireless work on behalf of bnei Torah.

{Matzav.com}

In response to the ongoing crisis in Eretz Hakodesh and the draft decree targeting bnei Torah, the Dushinsky Rebbe has instructed the establishment of continuous Torah-learning shifts throughout the chassidus’ yeshivos, with learning taking place uninterrupted from 6:00 a.m. until midnight. The call has been met with an overwhelming response from the bochurim, who have eagerly enlisted in the initiative.

The directive comes as the Rebbe continues to stress the vital importance of strengthening Torah learning during this difficult period facing the Torah world.

Last week, the Dushinsky Rebbe paid an uplifting visit to Bnei Brak, where he joined the talmidim of Talmud Torah Maharitz Dushinsky for Mincha.

The Dushinsky Talmud Torah in Bnei Brak, which has been operating for nearly fifty years, is among the city’s most established Torah institutions. It was founded by the Dushinsky Rebbe, Rav Meir Moshe Dushinsky, Gaavad of Yerushalayim, as the first institution of the chassidus outside Yerushalayim. From that beginning emerged the broader network of Dushinsky educational institutions throughout Eretz Yisroel and around the world.

The Rebbe, who frequently speaks about the extraordinary power of the tefillos of tinokos shel bais rabban, went specifically to daven together with the children.

Following the tefillah, the Rebbe delivered brief remarks, encouraging the talmidim to return to their studies with even greater hasmadah. At the conclusion of the gathering, the mashgichim and mechanchim involved in the sacred work of educating the children passed before the Rebbe to receive his brachos.

Meanwhile, the Rebbe addressed the bochurim of the chassidus’ yeshivos with words of chizuk.

Referring to both the difficult situation facing Eretz Hakodesh and the threat posed by the draft decree hanging over Klal Yisroel, the Rebbe urged the bochurim to strengthen themselves through increased diligence in Torah study. He emphasized that the Ribbono Shel Olam uses such challenges to awaken the tzibbur and encourage greater dedication to Torah learning.

Accordingly, the Rebbe directed that continuous learning shifts be maintained in the yeshiva halls, ensuring that Torah study continues without interruption from six in the morning until midnight.

In the days since the announcement, all of the talmidim in the chassidus’ yeshivos have signed up to learn for at least one uninterrupted hour as a personal commitment dedicated solely to kavod Shamayim.

The result has been an inspiring sight throughout the yeshiva world of Dushinsky. The halls of learning are now filled with the powerful sound of Torah, as the kol Torah resounds with renewed strength and intensity, continuing day and night without pause.

Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa moved to clarify comments made by President Donald Trump regarding Syria’s potential role in dealing with Hezbollah, insisting that Damascus has no intention of waging war in Lebanon and suggesting that Trump’s remarks had been widely misinterpreted.

Speaking publicly for the first time since Trump floated the idea at the G7 summit, al-Sharaa emphasized that Syria is interested in helping Lebanon achieve stability but not through military intervention or by assuming responsibility for Lebanon’s affairs.

“President Trump expressed concern about what is happening in Lebanon and wants to stop the war there,” al-Sharaa said. “He spoke about Syria’s role in finding a safe solution, but the statement was misinterpreted as though Syria is preparing to invade Lebanon tomorrow morning.”

The Syrian leader acknowledged longstanding tensions between Damascus and Hezbollah but stressed that Syria does not want to see Lebanon descend further into conflict.

“We have a deep problem with Hezbollah, but we do not want all of Lebanon to die,” he said.

Al-Sharaa argued that Lebanon is trapped between dangerous alternatives and warned against forcing the country into another destructive confrontation.

“Lebanon cannot remain trapped between the options of civil war and war with Israel,” he said. “The Shiites in Lebanon need calm, not more fears and confrontations.”

The remarks came days after Trump surprised observers at the G7 summit by suggesting that Syria could take the lead in confronting Hezbollah as fighting between Israel and the Iranian-backed terror group continues to threaten regional stability.

Asked whether the new U.S.-Iran agreement could survive if Israel expands military operations in Lebanon, Trump responded that it could, while pointing to Hezbollah as a continuing obstacle.

“Yes, it can. But we have that same little problem that keeps popping up again and again, and that is Hezbollah,” Trump said.

The president then suggested that Syria’s leadership might be better positioned than Israel to confront the Lebanese terror organization.

“I had a lot of influence over what happened in Syria, and the man who runs Syria today is someone I helped bring to power together with President Erdogan and others,” Trump said. “He has done an amazing job unifying the country, and he is very tough on Hezbollah. He doesn’t like them.”

Trump went on to reveal that he had discussed the idea directly with Israeli officials.

“I suggested to Israel that they let Syria deal with Hezbollah because, frankly, I think they would do it better,” he said.

{Matzav.com}

Israeli Communications Minister Shlomo Karhi’s proposed communications reform is facing mounting opposition after newly revealed recordings showed senior rabbinic leaders affiliated with Shas strongly objecting to the legislation, potentially placing its future in doubt as lawmakers race to advance it through the Knesset.

The controversy erupted as a Knesset committee continued marathon discussions aimed at approving the bill before any possible dissolution of the government. The recordings suggest that several leading rabbinic figures believe the proposal could lead to a significant increase in Sabbath desecration.

The reform would replace the aging “Idan Plus” television system with a free, government-operated streaming platform.

Under the plan, viewers would be able to access all major Israeli television channels, including Keshet, Reshet, Kan, Channel 14, Channel 15, Channel 16, and others, through smartphones, tablets, and smart televisions without requiring antennas, converters, or monthly subscription fees.

According to recordings aired by Channel 12 News, members of Shas’ senior rabbinic leadership are deeply concerned that the ease of access provided by the new platform will encourage greater viewing of television programming on the Sabbath.

Rav Reuven Elbaz delivered one of the most forceful criticisms of the proposal.

“Opening a channel (an application), so that people will begin watching movies on Shabbos and watching games on Shabbos — that is absolute zero. It is not the way of the Jewish people. In my opinion, whoever did such a thing, I fear will not escape judgment.”

Rav Elbaz also argued that the proposal would undermine efforts to bring Jews closer to religious observance.

“It does not allow repentance to be complete,” Rav Elbaz said. “Tell him (Minister Karhi) that as far as my people are concerned, I will under no circumstances agree, and I will publicly declare that under no circumstances is this permissible. It is forbidden to do such a thing.”

He further dismissed any attempt to defend the measure based on outward appearances or symbols of religiosity.

“He can wear a kippah on his head, a sackcloth, I do not care what he wears. Let him wear a fool’s hat, let him wear a kippah — that is nonsense. It is absolutely and completely forbidden for a person to do such a thing. That is all.”

Another senior Shas rabbinic leader, Rav Shlomo Machpud, was also recorded expressing strong opposition to the legislation.

“Heaven forbid, heaven forbid. Something like this creates Shabbos desecration on an unprecedented scale. It cheapens the sanctity of Shabbos.”

The recordings surfaced as opposition to the reform continues to grow. Earlier, a rabbinical committee issued a sharply worded letter urging lawmakers to oppose the measure and warning of its potential consequences.

Karhi has repeatedly rejected the criticism and recently defended the proposal during a heated television interview, arguing that the reform would actually reduce Sabbath desecration rather than increase it.

According to the minister, the existing Idan Plus system costs the government approximately 40 million shekels each year and requires technicians to maintain the network around the clock, including on the Shabbos.

“Today, the Idan Plus system costs the state 40 million shekels a year. The system employs technicians 24 hours a day who maintain it even on Shabbos. We are eliminating that. It becomes an internet site, like any government website or religious website that does not shut down its servers on Shabbos, but there are no technicians actively desecrating Shabbos.”

{Matzav.com}

Historian Victor Davis Hanson is pushing back against criticism of the newly signed U.S.-Iran framework agreement, arguing that many opponents are overlooking how much leverage Washington gained through the recent conflict and how weakened Iran has become.

Appearing on Fox News’ “Jesse Watters Primetime,” Hanson challenged claims that Tehran emerged from the war in a stronger position and said the destruction inflicted on Iran has dramatically altered the balance of power.

“They’ve suffered probably a half a trillion dollars to their nuclear military industrial complex that took them 50 years to build,” Hanson said in response to what he called “unhinged” arguments that Iran is better off now than before the conflict.

His remarks came days after the Trump administration released the memorandum of understanding it signed with Iran, outlining a 60-day ceasefire and establishing a framework for broader negotiations.

The agreement has sparked criticism from both supporters and opponents of the administration, with detractors arguing that it does not immediately eliminate Iran’s nuclear infrastructure or require the removal of its stockpile of enriched uranium.

Hanson also rejected arguments that the United States effectively gave up ground by negotiating over access to the Strait of Hormuz after Iran disrupted shipping in the region.

“They keep saying, ‘Well, the strait was open before, and now it was closed, and now we had to negotiate to get it open.’ It was only open because they chose not to cause trouble,” he said.

According to Hanson, Iran enjoyed freedom of action for years because previous administrations were unwilling to confront its nuclear ambitions directly.

“They chose to not cause trouble because the last seven presidents said, ‘We don’t dare touch you. We’re not [going to] interfere with your nuclear programs.'”

He maintained that sanctions and restrictions on Iranian oil exports continue to place significant economic pressure on the regime and strengthen America’s bargaining position.

“They think time is on Iran’s side. Time is not on Iran’s side,” Hanson said, referencing the burden imposed by sanctions.

Hanson further argued that Tehran’s leaders are closely watching political developments in the United States, including upcoming midterm elections and celebrations marking America’s 250th anniversary.

In his view, Iranian officials fear that President Trump could have even greater freedom of action if he emerges politically strengthened after the midterms.

“They are terrified that if he wins the midterms and the price of gas goes down, he’s got a free hand, and he already has a free hand now,” Hanson said.

He concluded by arguing that Iran—not the United States—is under the greatest pressure from the passage of time.

“They are afraid that Donald Trump is [going to] drag it out because if he drags it out after the midterm, after the 250th anniversary, he’s [going to] have a lot more options than he does now when he’s worried about gas and the midterm. So the dynamic is all upside down. They are the ones that have the time clock.”

Sen. Lindsey Graham said Sunday that he expects the newly signed U.S.-Iran framework agreement to unravel and warned that President Trump is prepared to use military force to take control of the Strait of Hormuz if diplomacy fails.

The South Carolina Republican made the remarks during an appearance on CBS’s “Face the Nation,” as Vice President JD Vance began a new round of nuclear negotiations with Iranian officials at a resort in the Swiss Alps.

Graham, who said he spent four-and-a-half hours meeting with Trump on Friday, expressed skepticism that the memorandum of understanding signed last week will ultimately succeed.

“If you don’t have a diplomatic path through the MOU, then you have to go to war or some other form of coercion,” Graham said. “Let’s try this. Let’s try a diplomatic solution. I think it’s going to fail.”

According to Graham, the administration already has a contingency plan in place should the negotiations collapse.

He said that if talks break down, “President Trump is going to take the Strait of Hormuz over by force. The United States will control the Strait of Hormuz. We’ll charge a fee for all those who go through to pay for the operation.”

The senator also delivered a stark warning to Iran regarding the fighting involving Hezbollah in Lebanon, suggesting that Washington is prepared to respond directly against Tehran if attacks continue.

“If Iran continues to attack Israel and Lebanon, the new policy will be, we’ll hit Iran,” he said. “When you use Hezbollah to attack Israel, I think the new policy will be, we will attack Iran.”

Graham further escalated his rhetoric by warning that any Iranian effort to challenge American control of the strategic waterway would be met with overwhelming force.

He added that if the Iranians contest U.S. control of the strait, “we will obliterate them.”

The senator also revealed that he has softened his earlier opposition to a proposed $300 billion reconstruction initiative for Iran, a plan he had previously criticized in harsh terms.

Earlier, Graham had compared the proposal to “a Marshall Plan with a Nazi still in charge for Germany.”

He now says his view depends largely on the source of the funding.

“Before, I thought the money was coming from the West,” he said. “Can you imagine if Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates invest $300 billion in Iran? That would tell me that Iran has changed.”

Even so, Graham said he remains doubtful that the Gulf states will actually commit such an enormous amount of money.

President Trump has publicly distanced the United States from the reconstruction proposal.

While attending the G7 summit in Evian, France, on Wednesday, Trump told reporters, “We are not investing in it, and we do not have a fund,” adding that Washington has not requested financial contributions from Gulf nations.

The 14-point memorandum signed in Islamabad calls on the United States, working alongside regional allies, to develop a reconstruction plan valued at no less than $300 billion for Iran.

The negotiations now underway in Switzerland mark the beginning of the 60-day period established by the agreement to address Iran’s nuclear program and a series of unresolved regional disputes.

Energy Secretary Chris Wright said Sunday that maritime traffic through the Strait of Hormuz remains largely stable despite the tensions.

According to Wright, 67 vessels passed through the waterway on Saturday and another 55 on Friday under U.S. military escort along a southern route, with oil shipments remaining “about equal to where we were before the war.”

Those comments came after Iran announced on Shabbos that it was once again closing the strategic passage, citing ongoing Israeli military operations in Lebanon as the reason for the move.

{Matzav.com}

Alan Greenspan, the influential economist who led the Federal Reserve for nearly two decades and became one of the most powerful figures in global finance, died Monday morning at the age of 100.

His wife, veteran NBC News journalist Andrea Mitchell, told CNBC that Greenspan died from complications of Parkinson’s disease. The couple, who married in 1997, had been together for nearly three decades.

Greenspan served as Fed chairman from 1987 to 2006 under four presidents — Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton and George W. Bush.

Former Vice President Mike Pence has broken with the Trump administration over its newly signed memorandum of understanding with Iran, arguing that the agreement fails to eliminate the threats posed by Tehran and grants the regime valuable economic relief without securing meaningful concessions.

Writing in an opinion piece published by The Wall Street Journal, Pence applauded President Donald Trump for confronting Iran aggressively and responding forcefully to the regime’s actions against American interests and allies.

At the same time, however, he sharply criticized the framework agreement reached last week.

“But the memorandum of understanding with Iran signed last week falls well short of what is required to end the Iranian threat,” Pence wrote.

Pence, who served alongside Trump during the president’s first term, said the agreement resembles the type of approach the administration once opposed.

“It smacks of the kind of appeasement the president rightly rejected during our first term,” Pence added. It isn’t the deal a defeated Iran should be getting. It isn’t even a deal — it’s a plan to make a plan.

According to Pence, the framework does not require Tehran to dismantle its nuclear infrastructure and leaves open the possibility that Iran could continue advancing its nuclear ambitions.

“It neither requires that Iran verifiably dismantle its nuclear weapons program nor prohibits continued enrichment of uranium,” Pence wrote. “Instead, the agreement largely repeats promises Iran has made before.

“The central lesson of the past 47 years is that the Iranian regime doesn’t keep its word,” Pence added.

He argued that anything short of a complete and enforceable dismantling of Iran’s nuclear capabilities leaves the door open for the regime to restart its program at a later date.

“Anything less than complete, verifiable dismantlement of its nuclear program leaves the regime able to restart the program when circumstances become more favorable,” Pence continued.

Pence also faulted the agreement for failing to address Iran’s ballistic missile program and for not compelling the regime to halt its support for terrorist groups throughout the region.

He further warned that the arrangement provides Tehran with substantial financial benefits through eased sanctions and renewed energy exports while postponing decisions on key security issues.

While the agreement’s timeline delays resolution of major nuclear concerns, it immediately grants economic incentives through partial sanctions relief and expanded energy sales that could provide the Iranian government with an estimated $5 billion each month.

“That gets the sequence backward. The U.S. shouldn’t provide economic relief first and seek security concessions later. We should secure the concessions first,” Pence wrote.

The former vice president laid out what he believes should be Washington’s non-negotiable demands in any agreement with Tehran.

“U.S. policy should be simple and direct: Dismantle the nuclear program, dismantle the ballistic-missile program, end support for terrorism, cease hostilities against America and Israel, and restore freedom of navigation in the Strait of Hormuz — or face the full force of the American military,” Pence added.

“These demands are the minimum requirements for a durable peace,” Pence continued.

Despite his criticism, Pence stressed that he remains supportive of Trump’s broader effort to secure stability in the region and prevent Iran from threatening the United States and its allies.

“Peace through strength requires strength all the way to the finish line,” Pence wrote. “The regime is desperate for a lifeline. We shouldn’t throw them one so haphazardly.”