President Donald Trump said the United States is closely watching Iran’s nuclear activity and will not tolerate any move toward developing nuclear weapons, cautioning that Washington could respond if Tehran refuses to change course.
“We’re going to find out where they stand right now on nuclear,” Trump said. “They can’t have nuclear weapons. They have to stop,” he told CNBC.
Trump also said Iranian authorities backed away from killing protesters after he publicly warned last week that the United States might resort to military force. He claimed Iran’s leadership had been preparing for mass executions before reversing its plans following his statement.
“They were going to hang 837 people on Thursday,” he said. “I told them, ‘You can’t do that.’”
The president said he hopes no further steps will be required, while alleging that Iranian security forces had been shooting civilians in public areas.
Turning again to Iran’s nuclear efforts, Trump argued that without U.S. intervention last June under Operation Midnight Hammer, Tehran would have achieved a nuclear weapon within weeks.
“We hit them hard with B-2 bombers,” Trump said, adding that the aircraft were undetectable and that every strike reached its intended target. He noted that the United States has since ordered 25 additional bombers.
“They keep experimenting with nuclear, but at some point they’re going to get the idea that they can’t do that.”
{Matzav.com}
A draft arrangement taking shape between the United States and Hamas would center on the group’s disarmament while recasting the process as a political understanding rather than a formal surrender, according to details aired Thursday on i24NEWS.
The report said Hamas would issue a declaration stating that “at Israel’s request, it no longer poses a threat.” The framework would differentiate between heavy, offensive weaponry and lighter, personal, and defensive arms, using definitions to be drafted by Hamas itself.
If finalized, the document would carry the title “Understanding Agreement on the Issue of Weapons,” deliberately avoiding language that frames the move as an outright capitulation.
The outline of the deal was initially disclosed by Sky News Arabic, which reported that Hamas would agree to give up its weapons and hand over maps of tunnel networks in the Gaza Strip in return for recognition as a political entity.
Sources familiar with the talks said the terms would also provide that “the cessation of weapons use will allow some members of Hamas’ leadership, both military and political, to leave the Gaza Strip with an American assurance that Israel will not harm them in the future.”
Those sources added that Washington would permit a limited number of former Hamas police officers and officials to take part in administering a restructured “New Gaza,” contingent on their passing Israeli and American security vetting.
According to the reporting, U.S. officials have told mediators that Israel has expressed concerns about the proposal, particularly over the prospect of Hamas continuing to operate as a political party within the Palestinian Arab political arena.
{Matzav.com}President Trump has launched a $5 billion lawsuit against JPMorgan Chase and its chief executive, Jamie Dimon, accusing the bank of cutting off his financial relationships for political reasons in the aftermath of Jan. 6.
The complaint, filed Thursday in Florida state court in Miami, asserts that the country’s largest bank abruptly terminated long-standing accounts connected to the president and his businesses in early 2021, ending a relationship that had spanned decades.
“JPMC debanked [Trump and his businesses] because it believed that the political tide at the moment favored doing so,” the lawsuit said.
According to the filing, Trump’s attorney Alejandro Brito argues the bank acted “without warning or remedy,” forcing Trump and related entities to relocate hundreds of millions of dollars within weeks and offering no avenue to appeal the decision. The suit contends this conduct ran contrary to JPMorgan’s own internal standards and constituted unfair and deceptive trade practices.
The complaint points to JPMorgan’s publicly stated ethics guidelines, quoting the bank’s code of conduct: “We set high expectations and hold ourselves accountable. We do the right thing — not necessarily the easy or expedient thing. We abide by the letter and spirit of the laws and regulations everywhere we do business and have zero tolerance for unethical behavior,” the lawsuit states, citing the bank’s code of conduct.
“Despite claiming to hold these principles dear, JPMC violated them by unilaterally — and without warning or remedy — terminating several of Plaintiff’s bank accounts,” the lawsuit claims.
The filing alleges the account closures were driven by what it characterizes as “political and social motivations,” asserting that JPMorgan sought to distance itself from Trump and his conservative positions following the Capitol riot on Jan. 6, 2021.
It further claims the bank placed Trump, members of his family, and affiliated businesses on an internal “blacklist” shared with other federally regulated banks, a move the lawsuit says resulted in widespread refusals by other institutions to do business with him and caused extensive financial and reputational damage.
“Given that Plaintiffs have always complied with all applicable banking rules and regulations and their wealth management accounts were in good standing, JPMC’s publication of President Trump, the other Plaintiffs, the Trump Organization and its affiliated entities, and/or the Trump family’s names on this blacklist, is an intentional and malicious falsehood,” the lawsuit states.
Trump alleges that by circulating those names, JPMorgan Chase engaged in “an unfair and deceptive trade practice,” arguing the bank “had no legitimate basis to do so and knew that doing so would induce, and did in fact induce, other banking institutions not to deal with them.”
Responding to the suit, a JPMorgan spokesperson told The NY Post: “JPMC does not close accounts for political or religious reasons. We do close accounts because they create legal or regulatory risk for the company.”
“We regret having to do so but often rules and regulatory expectations lead us to do so,” the spokesperson added.
“We have been asking both this Administration and prior administrations to change the rules and regulations that put us in this position, and we support the Administration’s efforts to prevent the weaponization of the banking sector.”
The lawsuit comes amid a sharp deterioration in the relationship between Trump and JPMorgan, fueled by overlapping political, regulatory, and personal disputes.
In recent months, Dimon has publicly criticized several Trump administration policies, including warning that the Justice Department’s criminal probe into Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell could threaten the central bank’s independence and potentially drive interest rates higher.
JPMorgan has also opposed a White House proposal to cap credit card interest rates at 10% for a year, with executives cautioning that such a move could limit access to credit, harm consumers, and disrupt financial markets.
Tensions resurfaced again after Dimon criticized Trump’s immigration enforcement approach at the World Economic Forum in Davos, urging more restrained rhetoric and questioning aggressive ICE tactics, comments that stood out as one of the clearest public rebukes of the president by a sitting Wall Street chief.
Trump has frequently used the prospect of litigation against entities he views as adversarial.
The president has previously reached settlements with Paramount, Disney’s ABC News, YouTube, and Meta over disputes tied to interviews, broadcast remarks, and the suspension of his social media accounts after Jan. 6.
Those matters were resolved without admissions of wrongdoing, with the companies opting to pay tens of millions of dollars rather than engage in extended court battles.
{Matzav.com}
At a somber asifah held at the Chanichei HaYeshivos beis medrash in the Ramot neighborhood of Yerushalayim, sharp remarks were delivered in the wake of a series of tragedies that struck the local community. The gathering followed the killing of yeshiva bochur Yossi Eisenthal z”l during a protest against the draft, as well as the murder of community members in a terror attack at the Ramot junction.
The central address was delivered by Rav Mechel Zilber, who spoke forcefully about the events surrounding the fatal bus-ramming that claimed the life of the young bochur. His words focused in particular on the minutes leading up to the incident and the behavior of those who surrounded the bus.
“I want to tell you,” Rav Zilber said at the outset, “that the attribute of Divine judgment struck this young boy. This is a heavenly secret. He ascended to the Heavenly Yeshiva. He has no problem. The problem is ours.”
While stressing that responsibility for the act itself rests with the Arab driver, Rav Zilber said that others bore moral responsibility for what unfolded. “The driver is an Arab who was provoked,” he said. “But you should know that anyone who provoked him is a murderer by accident. The Arab—may his name and memory be erased—but after all, they provoked him. Every single one needs to go to his rebbi and ask what kind of tikkun is required for accidental murder.”
Rav Zilber emphasized that his remarks were not directed at specific individuals, but at the broader ציבור. “I know Arabs. I’m from Tiveriah,” he said. “An Arab is willing to kill Jews, but he is afraid. There, they removed his fear because they provoked him. I am not pointing fingers at anyone in particular. I am speaking to all of Klal Yisroel.”
{Matzav.com}In an unusual and symbolic gesture, the Gerer Rebbe recently sent the famed silver bowl that graces his table on Shabbos and at tishen as a personal gift to a leading benefactor in the United States.
The recipient of the rare present is Reb Yosef Aryeh Breiner of Borough Park, a prominent supporter of Torah causes and one of the major backers of the Toraso initiative in Ger. The gift was sent on behalf of the Rebbe by Rabbi Yaakov Eisen, director of the organization.
Within the Gerer chassidic court, outward symbols of royalty are notably restrained compared to other chassidic dynasties. The Rebbe does not don white garments or ornate bekitches, does not carry a silver staff, and does not wear a decorative crown atop his tallis. As a result, the silver bowl that sits on his table has become one of the most recognizable and meaningful symbols associated with the Gerer Rebbe.
The silver bowl is placed before the Rebbe at every tish, on Shabbos and Yom Tov, at family celebrations, and even at simchos held outside the main beis medrash. Over the years, it has become closely identified with the Rebbe’s presence and the avodah of the Gerer chassidus.
The decision to present this historic item to Rabbi Breiner was made as an expression of deep appreciation for his exceptional support of Toraso, an initiative especially dear to the Rebbe. The program spearheads a major effort to strengthen bekius and memorization-based Torah learning among kollel members, while also encouraging thousands of Gerer chassidim who are working baalei batim to master Torah baal peh.
{Matzav.com}
