Leaked Recording Roils Batei Din as Bitter Battle Over “Stutchin” Name Escalates
A bitter dispute over the right to use the name “Stutchin” has taken a dramatic new turn following the leak of an internal recording that purportedly discusses a strategy to shift an ongoing din Torah from the United States to Israel, replace appointed borerim, and potentially drag out the proceedings for years while continuing to build institutions under the disputed name.
The recording, which surfaced Wednesday from an internal group associated with the Toldos Yehuda community led by the well-known mashpia, Rav Mordechai Menashe Zilber, the Toldos Yehuda Rebbe, known as Reb Mottel, has reportedly caused an uproar among leading batei din involved in the case.
At the center of the controversy is a longstanding dispute between the Stutchin chassidus and Rav Zilber’s community over the latter’s use of the “Stutchin” name.
Rav Zilber has longstanding ties to Stutchin. He grew up and studied in English-speaking, modern-oriented institutions in the United States before being drawn close to chassidus by the previous Stutchiner Rebbe, zt”l. Following the Rebbe’s petirah, however, Rav Zilber established a separate community, with a group of Stutchin chassidim joining him.
In recent years, Rav Zilber’s group began once again operating under the name “Stutchin,” while establishing a community and institutions associated with that name. The move prompted strong opposition from the existing Stutchin chassidus and ultimately led to proceedings before prominent batei din over who has the right to use the name.
The din Torah process began approximately nine months ago, initially before the Hisachdus Harabanim in the United States and later before the bais din of the Eidah Hachareidis in Yerushalayim.
Over the ensuing months, numerous summonses and letters were reportedly sent to Rav Zilber’s representatives directing them to appear for a din Torah. According to those involved in the proceedings, they did not appear, leaving the process at a standstill.
Both Hisachdus Harabanim and the Eidah Hachareidis subsequently issued kisvei siruv and restrictions concerning Rav Zilber’s continued use of the Stutchin name. Those directives, too, were reportedly not acted upon.
Only ahead of Reb Mottel’s visit to Eretz Yisroel did representatives of his community announce that they were prepared to reenter the din Torah process.
The Eidah Hachareidis then directed the two sides to proceed through zabla arbitration, with each side selecting its own borer and a mutually acceptable third dayan. When the parties were unable to agree on the third member, the bais din appointed Rav Shimon Yitzchok Schlesinger to serve in that role.
Stutchin selected Rav Yekusiel Zalman Gross as its borer, while Rav Zilber’s side chose Rav Eliyahu Wydyslawski.
Once the arbitration panel had been assembled, however, the process again stalled. Rav Zilber’s representatives allegedly stopped appearing for proceedings, prompting the Eidah Hachareidis to recently issue another ksav siruv concerning the Stutchin name and impose a deadline for their return to the process.
On the final day of that deadline, representatives of Toldos Yehuda appeared before the bais din. Upon returning to the proceedings, however, they presented a new request: They sought to replace the borer they themselves had previously appointed.
Instead of Rav Eliyahu Wydyslawski, they asked to appoint Rav Chaim Aharon Munderer, the Kossover Rebbe of Beit Shemesh, as their representative on the arbitration panel.
The bais din had determined that the arbitration proceedings would take place in the United States. It is against that backdrop that the newly leaked recording has generated particular controversy.
In the recording, a member of the Toldos Yehuda community is purportedly heard discussing a plan through which the arbitration could ultimately be moved from the United States to Israel.
The speaker reportedly argues that a borer based in Eretz Yisroel might be less familiar with the history of the dispute and with the standing of the Stutchin name in America.
In the United States, he says, the established Stutchin chassidus is widely recognized, the Stutchiner Rebbe enjoys significant support, and there is a general understanding that Rav Zilber does not represent the Stutchin name. In Yerushalayim, by contrast, Rav Zilber enjoys support within certain circles, potentially creating a more favorable environment for his side.
The most explosive portion of the recording reportedly comes later, when the speaker discusses the possibility of replacing the newly appointed borer yet again at a later stage, potentially allowing the proceedings to continue for an extended period.
According to the apparent strategy described in the recording, the Kossover Rebbe could initially be used as the community’s borer while the proceedings are prolonged, after which he, too, could eventually be replaced. Meanwhile, the speaker reportedly suggests, Rav Zilber’s community could continue developing its institutions and conducting its activities under the Stutchin name while the arbitration remained unresolved.
The recording has reportedly generated anger among senior figures in the batei din overseeing the dispute.
A senior rabbinic figure affiliated with the Eidah Hachareidis who heard the recording Wednesday sharply condemned what he described as a deliberate scheme, saying it followed nine months of brazen disregard for and harm to the authority of the batei din.
“לא נעבור על כך בשתיקה” — “We will not allow this to pass in silence,” he warned.
Rav Zilber’s community rejected the allegations, maintaining that the individual heard on the recording is not an authoritative representative of the community and that no such strategy or plan exists.
Stutchin representatives, for their part, said they do not believe the opposing side will go so far as to implement the alleged plan. They added that should any such steps be attempted, they are confident that the batei din overseeing the dispute will intervene and prevent them.
{Matzav.com}
