Feed aggregator

[COMMUNICATED]

The following is from Rav Yaakov on the Parshah, a new English adaptation of the Torah of Rav Yaakov Kamenetsky zt”l, drawn from his sefer Emes L’Yaakov. This week’s selection is on Parshas Bereishis. For questions, comments or to subscribe email RavYaakovOTP@gmail.com.

בְּרֵאשִׁית בָּרָא אֱלֹקִים אֵת הַשָּׁמַיִם וְאֵת הָאָרֶץ

In the beginning, Hashem created the heavens and the earth. (Bereishis 1:1)

The trop on the very first pasuk of the Torah is unusual.

The word אֱלֹקִים is marked with an esnachta, one of the principal pauses within a pasuk. According to the rules of the trop, such a pause comes only at the conclusion of a complete phrase or thought. Here, however, the words בְּרֵאשִׁית בָּרָא אֱלֹקִים leave the sentence incomplete. Hashem created what? The thought is completed only by the words that follow, אֵת הַשָּׁמַיִם וְאֵת הָאָרֶץ, “the heavens and the earth.” We would therefore have expected a weaker pause after the word אֱלֹקִים.

There are several ways to understand this difficult pause.

Perhaps the trop alludes to Rashi’s explanation that the world was created for the sake of that which is called רֵאשִׁית.[1] According to this reading, בְּרֵאשִׁית בָּרָא אֱלֹקִים, “For the sake of the רֵאשִׁית, Hashem created,” is a complete statement, and an esnachta after these three words is appropriate.

Alternatively, the trop may allude to the idea that the רֵאשִׁית, the beginning itself, was created. This follows the view of Chazal that time itself is a creation (see Moreh Nevuchim 2:30; Shu”t Rashba 1:423; Sforno here). Time is not something that existed before Creation, within which Creation then took place. Time itself is part of what Hashem brought into existence.

The trop can also be understood according to the Ramban (1:8),[2] who explains that the opening pasuk is not the first step in the account of Creation. It is an introduction to it. The Torah never describes how the spiritual worlds were made. It does not tell us how the malachim were created, and certainly not the lofty serafim and other spiritual beings. Yet we must not imagine, chas v’shalom, that any of them existed before Creation or had a part in bringing the world into being. The first pasuk therefore tells us that at the very beginning, Hashem alone brought forth, יֵשׁ מֵאַיִן, from absolute nothingness, two forms of primordial matter: the matter of the heavens, the source of everything spiritual, and the matter of the earth, the source of everything physical.[3] Only with the next pasuk, וְהָאָרֶץ הָיְתָה תֹהוּ וָבֹהוּ, “And the earth was unformed and void,” does the detailed account of Creation begin.

It follows that everything the Torah goes on to describe, even the sky, the sun, the moon, and the stars, belongs to the physical creation and was formed from the matter of the earth. Of the spiritual heavens, the Torah tells us nothing, except that they too were created by Hashem at the very beginning.[4]

This explains the esnachta. If the first pasuk is a declaration rather than the first step of a story, its essential message is that at the very beginning, before anything else existed, it was Hashem, and Hashem alone, Who created. That message is already complete in the words בְּרֵאשִׁית בָּרָא אֱלֹקִים. What He created, the raw matter of the heavens and the earth, follows as a detail. The major pause after אֱלֹקִים is exactly where it belongs.

The Ramban’s approach carries a far-reaching implication. If the sun, the moon, and the stars belong to the physical creation, then they are physical bodies, formed from the same matter as the earth. The Rambam, however, held otherwise. He writes that the moon possesses a spiritual form, and that the stars and spheres possess a soul, knowledge, and intellect. They are alive and recognize the One Who spoke and brought the world into being, and each, according to its greatness and level, praises and glorifies its Creator, like the malachim (Hilchos Yesodei HaTorah 3:9; see also Moreh Nevuchim 2:5).

These words of the Ramban came to mind when I saw with my own eyes men descending by ladder from their spacecraft onto the surface of the moon. Here were human beings standing on the moon itself. What, I wondered, would the Rambam answer now?

It seemed that Kabbalah had defeated philosophy. The Ramban was among the masters of Kabbalah, and on this matter he possessed a received tradition. The Rambam’s view followed the philosophers, who had no such tradition and concluded on their own that the heavenly spheres possess intelligence and are not made of the same elements as the earth.[5] The moon landing seemed to prove the Ramban right, and I took comfort in his words.[6]

But that comfort raised a far more serious difficulty.

We approach the words of the Rishonim with the conviction that they fall within the framework of אֵלּוּ וָאֵלּוּ דִּבְרֵי אֱלֹקִים חַיִּים. Even if the halachah does not follow the Rambam on this point, we cannot accept that the Rambam’s words were simply an error. If the Rambam could have been mistaken in Hilchos Yesodei HaTorah, why should he not be mistaken in other areas of halachah, such as Hilchos Shabbos?

The answer lies in a difficulty within these very chapters of the Rambam.

The first four chapters of Hilchos Yesodei HaTorah describe Hashem’s existence, the malachim, the heavenly spheres, and the elements of the physical world. The Rambam himself identifies their subject: the first two chapters deal with Maaseh Merkavah, and the third and fourth with Maaseh Bereishis (ibid. 2:11; 4:10). At the end of the fourth chapter, he adds that these are the subjects the early Sages called Pardes (ibid. 4:13). This refers to the Gemara’s account of four great Tannaim who “entered the Pardes,” the “orchard” of the Torah’s deepest secrets. Of the four, only Rabbi Akiva emerged unharmed (Chagigah 14b).

These are precisely the areas of Torah that Chazal guarded most closely. The Gemara teaches that Maaseh Bereishis may not be taught publicly, and Maaseh Merkavah not even to a single student unless he is wise and understands on his own (Chagigah 11b). These matters were never written down; they were transmitted orally. The Rambam himself records this halachah (ibid. 4:10). How, then, could he write them in a sefer meant for all of Klal Yisrael?[7]

We must therefore conclude that in these chapters the Rambam did not record the actual secrets of Maaseh Bereishis and Maaseh Merkavah at all. What he wrote there comes from his own broad knowledge of the sciences of his day. It is not drawn from the wisdom of the Torah; it is philosophy.[8]

That is why these chapters stand apart. The Rambam wrote them only as an introduction to the Yad HaChazakah.[9] The work itself begins with the fifth chapter: כָּל בֵּית יִשְׂרָאֵל מְצֻוִּין עַל קִדּוּשׁ הַשֵּׁם, “All of Klal Yisrael is commanded to sanctify Hashem’s Name” (ibid. 5:1).

A mistake in these chapters therefore cannot be compared to a mistake in halachah. The two do not come from the same source.

Notes

[1] Rashi writes that this pasuk calls out to be expounded: the world was created for the sake of the Torah, which is called רֵאשִׁית דַּרְכּוֹ, and for the sake of Klal Yisrael, who are called רֵאשִׁית תְּבוּאָתֹה.

[2] The heavens mentioned in the first pasuk are the upper heavens, above the spheres and the Merkavah. The Torah does not describe their creation, just as it does not mention the malachim, the chayos of the Merkavah, or any being without a body. It states only that the heavens were created, meaning they did not exist eternally.

[3] The Ramban explains that in Lashon HaKodesh, the only term for bringing something into existence from nothing is בָּרָא. From absolute nothingness, Hashem brought forth a very fine substance with no tangible existence, a potential ready to receive form, which the Greeks called hyle. The heavens and everything in them come from one such matter, and the earth and everything in it from another. These two alone were created from nothing, and everything else was made from them. In Lashon HaKodesh this primordial matter is called תֹהוּ.

[4] The Ramban demonstrates this from Tehillim 148. The heavens at the beginning of that mizmor, הַלְלוּ אֶת ה׳ מִן הַשָּׁמַיִם… הַלְלוּהוּ כָל מַלְאָכָיו, are the upper heavens, where Hashem’s Throne is. From the sun and the moon onward, including שְׁמֵי הַשָּׁמָיִם, the mizmor is speaking of the earthly creation. Accordingly, the heavens mentioned later in the account of Creation, in וַיִּקְרָא אֱלֹקִים לָרָקִיעַ שָׁמָיִם (1:8), וַיְכֻלּוּ הַשָּׁמַיִם וְהָאָרֶץ (2:1), and בְּיוֹם עֲשׂוֹת ה׳ אֱלֹקִים אֶרֶץ וְשָׁמָיִם (2:4), were all formed from the matter of the earth. The exception is at Matan Torah: אַתָּה הָרְאֵתָ לָדַעַת כִּי ה׳ הוּא הָאֱלֹקִים אֵין עוֹד מִלְּבַדּוֹ… בַּשָּׁמַיִם מִמַּעַל וְעַל הָאָרֶץ מִתָּחַת אֵין עוֹד (Devarim 4:35, 39). At that time all the heavens were opened, and Klal Yisrael saw that even in the upper, spiritual heavens there is none besides Him.

[5] This is stated explicitly by the Maharal (Gevuros Hashem, second introduction). One should pay no attention to the philosophers who say that the sun and moon are living, intelligent beings. A tzaddik stands above the sun, because his neshamah is separate from physicality, while the sun is essentially physical. The Maharal repeats this view in Derech Chaim (Avos 1:16) and Nesivos Olam (Nesiv HaShalom, ch. 2).

[6] That the Ramban disagrees with the Rambam fits well with the Ramban’s explanation of הַשָּׁמַיִם מְסַפְּרִים כְּבוֹד אֵ־ל in his derashah Toras Hashem Temimah. According to the Rambam, the heavens themselves praise their Creator, like the malachim. According to the Ramban, the heavens move constantly, and anything in motion requires something that moves it. In that sense the heavens attest that there is a God Who drives them by His power. This is consistent with the Ramban’s commentary here.

[7] See Emes L’Yaakov, Vayikra 23:24, regarding Hoshana Rabbah: when Chazal wanted to keep something hidden from the public, they did not write it explicitly. Here the Rambam appears to do the opposite.

[8] R’ Tzadok HaKohen (Sefer HaZichronos, p. 12) made this point earlier. He writes that the Rambam understood Maaseh Bereishis as the natural sciences and found them useful for ahavas Hashem and yiras Hashem. Yet these matters come from the wisdom of the nations, not from the Torah, and much of what the Rambam wrote is no longer accepted even by their own scholars. The Gra, too, criticized the Rambam for having been swayed by philosophy (Biur HaGra, Yoreh Deah 179:13).

[9] The intent appears to be as follows. In these opening chapters, the Rambam explains the mitzvos of the heart, the חוֹבוֹת הַלְּבָבוֹת: knowing Hashem, His unity, and fearing and loving Him. But how can a person come to love and fear a Creator Who has no form and no body? The Neviim and Chazal transmitted Maaseh Bereishis and Maaseh Merkavah for precisely this purpose, but these may not be taught publicly. The Rambam therefore portrayed the wonders of Creation according to the philosophical and scientific understanding of his era. As R’ Avraham ben HaRambam writes (Maamar al HaAggados), his father relied on the scientists of his time regarding nature. Even contemplation from that perspective can bring a person to marvel at Creation and so to ahavas Hashem and yiras Hashem. This is what the Rambam writes (Hilchos Yesodei HaTorah 2:2, repeated in 4:12): when a person contemplates Hashem’s great and wondrous works and sees in them a wisdom without measure or end, he immediately loves, praises, and glorifies Him, שֶׁמִּתּוֹךְ כָּךְ אַתָּה מַכִּיר אֶת מִי שֶׁאָמַר וְהָיָה הָעוֹלָם.

READ MORE HERE

For questions or to subscribe: RavYaakovOTP@gmail.com

Republican New York gubernatorial candidate Bruce Blakeman is calling on Jewish voters across the state to mobilize ahead of the November 3 election, warning that Gov. Kathy Hochul has failed to confront New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani and arguing that his election is essential to combating rising antisemitism.

Speaking Wednesday evening at a gathering of the Bukharian Jewish Congress in Forest Hills, Queens, marking the third anniversary of the October 7 Hamas massacre in Israel, Blakeman delivered an impassioned appeal to Jewish New Yorkers, urging them to become actively involved in the race for governor.

“There is only one person that can stop Zohran Mamdani and that is the governor of the state of New York,” Blakeman, who is Jewish, told the gathering.

Blakeman, the Nassau County executive, accused Hochul of lending political support to Mamdani despite the mayor’s repeated criticism of Israel and statements that have generated outrage among Jewish leaders and residents.

“And this governor will not only not stop him, she is encouraging him,” Blakeman said of Hochul. “She’s campaigning with him. She endorsed him.

Wearing a yarmulke during his address, the 71-year-old Republican framed the election as a battle over the future of Jewish families in New York, speaking as both a political candidate and a father and grandfather concerned about the next generation.

“I’m here today as a father, a grandfather,” added Blakeman, who is Jewish and wore a kippah during his remarks. “I am going to fight for my children and my grandchildren. I am going to fight for your children and your grandchildren. But I can’t do it alone… You need to get into this fight.”

The remarks came as Blakeman seeks to strengthen his support among Jewish communities in New York City, particularly in Queens, where concerns about antisemitism and Mamdani’s positions on Israel have become significant political issues.

Queens is home to a large Bukharian Jewish population, estimated at approximately 70,000, with substantial communities in Forest Hills, Rego Park and Kew Gardens. Many families trace their roots to Uzbekistan and other countries of Central Asia and the former Soviet Union.

During last year’s New York City mayoral election, many members of the Bukharian community supported former Gov. Andrew Cuomo rather than Mamdani, who ultimately won the race. Blakeman is now hoping to attract those same voters in his effort to unseat Hochul.

The Republican faces a difficult electoral landscape in a state where Democrats hold a considerable registration advantage. His campaign is seeking to make gains in traditionally Democratic areas by appealing to voters dissatisfied with the political establishment’s response to antisemitism and the policies of the Mamdani administration.

Blakeman devoted a portion of Wednesday’s speech to the October 7, 2023, Hamas terrorist attack, in which approximately 1,200 people were murdered in Israel. He described the brutality of the massacre before criticizing Mamdani’s public statement commemorating its third anniversary.

Mamdani had used the occasion to accuse Israel of committing “genocide” in Gaza, drawing criticism from those who viewed the statement as an inappropriate response to an anniversary dedicated to remembering the victims of Hamas terrorism.

“The antisemitism is out of control,” Blakeman, 71, said. “We have a mayor of New York City who who put a statement just today, on Oct. 7, where he makes a moral equivalence between the attack on Oct. 7 and the Palestinian cause, whatever that cause may be.”

Blakeman has repeatedly charged that Mamdani’s rhetoric toward Israel crosses the line into antisemitism, and he has suggested that a governor willing to exercise the powers of the office could take action against the mayor.

In a recent interview with Jewish News Syndicate, Blakeman said he would directly confront Mamdani over statements he considers hostile to Jewish New Yorkers.

“I wouldn’t let Zohran Mamdani get away with the virulent antisemitic comments he’s made,” Blakeman recently told JNS.com. “I would tell him to stop or, if he didn’t, take action against him, which the governor has the power to do.”

Mamdani has rejected allegations that his opposition to Israel reflects hostility toward Jews. The mayor maintains that his criticism is directed at Israeli government policies and the treatment of Palestinians, while insisting that he supports Jewish New Yorkers and opposes antisemitism.

Hochul, meanwhile, has sought to maintain her longstanding support for Israel while preserving her political relationship with Mamdani. The governor traveled to Israel shortly after the October 7 massacre in 2023 to express solidarity with Israelis and meet those affected by the terrorist attacks.

Although Hochul has generally avoided joining Mamdani’s attacks on Israel, she has also declined to engage in sustained public criticism of the mayor. Last month, she defended Mamdani after Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu accused him of encouraging hostility toward Jewish New Yorkers.

On Wednesday, Hochul issued her own statement commemorating the October 7 massacre, emphasizing the suffering of the victims and the continued resilience of the Jewish people. She also ordered flags at state government buildings lowered to half-staff in remembrance of those murdered.

“The pain of that dark day has not faded. But neither has the strength, resilience and enduring hope of the Jewish people,” Hochul said in a statement on Wednesday, as she directed flags on state buildings to be flown at half-staff in solidarity with the Israeli people.

“Today, we remember the innocent lives stolen, stand with the survivors and the families forever changed, and pray for a lasting peace,” she said.

Hochul also attended the United Jewish Appeal’s October 7 memorial gathering Wednesday night, where the anniversary was marked by members of New York’s Jewish community.

Her campaign pushed back against Blakeman’s criticism, pointing to the governor’s record of providing security assistance and combating antisemitic incidents throughout the state.

A campaign representative said Hochul had introduced a statewide initiative against antisemitism and directed $130 million toward efforts to prevent hate crimes and strengthen protections for vulnerable communities.

“She was the first American official to visit disaster sites in Israel in the wake of the October 7th attack — she will never stop fighting back against antisemitism every time it rears its head and she will never stop standing up for Jewish New Yorkers,” spokesperson Sarafina Chitika said.

Hochul assumed the governorship in 2021 following Cuomo’s resignation amid allegations of sexual harassment, which he has denied. She subsequently won a full term in 2022 and is now campaigning for another four years in Albany.

Recent polling underscores the challenge confronting Blakeman, although the numbers also reveal areas of potential opportunity for the Republican challenger.

A Marist survey released Wednesday found Hochul leading statewide by 53% to 42%, an 11-point advantage. Among independent voters, however, Blakeman was ahead by 49% to 42%, while the candidates were tied at 48% apiece among suburban voters.

The same survey showed Hochul maintaining a substantial 69% to 24% advantage in New York City, highlighting why Blakeman is making an aggressive effort to reach communities that have traditionally voted Democratic.

Another survey, conducted by Emerson College and PIX11, found Hochul ahead statewide by 52% to 40%, but showed Blakeman holding an even larger, 21-point lead among independent voters. The poll surveyed 900 likely voters from October 3 through October 5.

Blakeman also faces a considerable financial disadvantage. Hochul and the New York State Democratic Party entered the closing stretch of the campaign with approximately $33 million available between their respective campaign accounts, providing substantial resources for advertising and voter outreach.

The state’s voter registration figures present another obstacle. Democrats number approximately six million registered voters, substantially outnumbering Republicans, while millions of additional New Yorkers are registered without a party affiliation.

With Election Day less than four weeks away, Blakeman’s appearance before the Bukharian Jewish Congress reflected his campaign’s determination to compete for voters in New York City who may disagree with Mamdani’s positions on Israel and question Hochul’s willingness to challenge him.

{Matzav.com}

Vice President JD Vance announced Thursday that the Trump administration is investigating nine major American universities over allegations that they have been exploiting a federal visa program to hire foreign researchers and graduate students at lower salaries than their American counterparts, potentially depressing wages and undermining employment opportunities for U.S. citizens.

The investigation focuses on the J-1 exchange visitor visa program, which permits foreign nationals to enter the United States for educational, research, and other approved exchange activities. Administration officials suspect that some universities have been using the program to obtain cheaper labor for research projects, including work financed by federal grants.

Speaking at a news conference devoted to alleged fraud and abuse in employment visa programs, Vance identified Harvard University, Yale University, Stanford University, Brown University, the University of Pittsburgh, Arizona State University, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, the California Institute of Technology, and the University of California, Davis, as the institutions under scrutiny.

“Elite universities bring in foreigners to undercut the wages of American residents,” Vance said at a press conference regarding fraud and abuse in work visa programs. “There are nine universities in particular we believe merit an investigation.”

Vance pointed to what he described as a substantial disparity between compensation paid to American researchers and foreign nationals working under J-1 visas.

“What we see is when you employ an American worker as a graduate student as a researcher, they are making about $20,000 more than someone brought in under a J-1 visa and, importantly, these universities are employing J-1 visas for federally funded grants at a rate of 61 percent,” Vance said.

According to the vice president, the proportion of J-1 visa holders working on federally supported research at the nine institutions is considerably higher than the national average.

“The national average is 38 percent, so something weird is going on at these universities. They are using these visas way too much. They are using them to undercut the wages of American grad students and American researchers, and it simply has to stop,” he added.

The Labor Department has already begun taking investigative action. Anthony D’Esposito, the department’s inspector general, confirmed during the same news conference that “subpoenas have been served” and “investigations are underway.”

The subpoenas are intended to obtain information relevant to the universities’ use of the visa program. The administration has not publicly established that any of the nine institutions violated federal law, and the investigation remains ongoing.

Several of the universities responded by defending their employment practices and emphasizing the contributions of international researchers to American higher education.

Brown University confirmed that it had received a subpoena and stressed that its “international scholars, students and employees make essential contributions on our campus, including to teaching and research that advances American innovation, competitiveness and economic vitality.”

Stanford University likewise indicated that it intends to cooperate with federal investigators, maintaining that it “complies with all applicable visa laws” and “will cooperate with the investigation.”

Arizona State University issued a more extensive defense of its research and employment practices, arguing that its large scientific workforce plays an important role in the American economy.

“As one of the largest research universities in the United States, Arizona State University educates more stem majors than any other university and employs one of the largest technical and scientific workforces in the country,” a spokesperson for Arizona State University said. “This benefits both the Arizona and the United States economies and in doing so, ASU has hired the talent needed to perform these functions and done so in complete compliance with existing United States policy and law.”

MIT confirmed that it was examining the federal demand for records and noted that foreign researchers admitted under the J-1 program had already received authorization from federal authorities.

A university spokesperson said MIT is “in the process of reviewing this very broad subpoena” and that all J-1 visa holders at the institution have “been vetted and authorized to come here by the U.S. government.”

Yale University also emphasized its commitment to following federal immigration requirements.

“Yale is committed to full compliance with federal rules concerning visas, including the requirements for J-1 visas. The university will review the documents concerning this investigation once they are received,” a spokesperson said.

The University of Pittsburgh, Harvard, the University of California, Davis, and Caltech had not provided responses to requests for comment at the time of the initial report.

Beyond the wage allegations, federal investigators are examining whether universities have improperly used taxpayer-supported research programs or exposed sensitive American scientific work to foreign influence.

D’Esposito specifically raised concerns about China and the possibility that foreign governments could gain access to federally financed research through academic institutions.

“If an American university is breaking the law to save a dollar while exposing American research to a foreign adversary that is not academic excellence it is institutional betrayal,” D’Esposito said.

The investigation is part of a broader immigration enforcement initiative announced Thursday by the Trump administration. At the same news conference, officials revealed that Microsoft, Adobe, and several major technology outsourcing companies were being suspended from a federal labor certification program used to sponsor foreign employees for permanent residency.

The companies affected by that separate action include Cognizant, Infosys, Tata Consultancy Services, Wipro, HCL Technologies, and Capgemini. Administration officials accused employers of exploiting immigration programs to reduce labor costs and disadvantage American workers.

The university investigations also come as the Department of Homeland Security advances a proposal to impose a $70,000 fee on employers sponsoring international students for employment through the Optional Practical Training program, which allows eligible foreign students to gain work experience related to their studies.

The administration has not publicly released the underlying methodology supporting Vance’s wage and visa-use comparisons, and the investigations have not yet resulted in findings of wrongdoing against the nine universities.

D’Esposito said investigators intend to pursue the allegations regardless of the institutions’ prestige, declaring that “subpoenas have been served” and “investigations are underway.”

Michigan Democratic Senate nominee Abdul El-Sayed has accused President Donald Trump of deliberately targeting his Muslim identity after the president referred to him as “Mohammed El-Sayed” and labeled him a “RADICAL Extremist, Terrorist Sympathizer” in a social media attack ahead of a closely watched Senate debate.

El-Sayed, who is seeking the seat being vacated by retiring Democratic Sen. Gary Peters, responded Thursday by accusing Trump of intentionally misrepresenting his name and attempting to use his religion as a political weapon.

“He knows my name is Abdul. He says it everyday,” El-Sayed wrote on X Thursday morning. “But he’s not just attacking me. He’s attacking all of us.

“He thinks so low of us,” El-Sayed continued. “He thinks he can use my name and my faith to distract us from the suffering his policies are inflicting on us at the pump, at the grocery store, and at the doctor’s office. He thinks we don’t know any better. It’s time for change.”

The confrontation began Wednesday evening when Trump posted his criticism of El-Sayed on Truth Social, portraying the Democratic nominee as a dangerous extremist. The president has endorsed Republican Rep. Mike Rogers, who is running against El-Sayed in Michigan’s Senate race.

El-Sayed, whose full name is Abdulrahman Mohamed El-Sayed, was born in Michigan to Egyptian immigrant parents. A physician and former director of Wayne County’s Department of Health, Human and Veterans Services, he has emerged as a prominent figure on the progressive wing of the Democratic Party.

Earlier this year, El-Sayed defeated Rep. Haley Stevens, a more centrist Democrat, in Michigan’s Senate primary, setting up the general election contest against Rogers.

His campaign has emphasized a progressive economic agenda that includes establishing “Medicare for All,” raising taxes on billionaires, prohibiting political spending by political action committees, and reducing household expenses.

Trump’s latest attack came one day before El-Sayed and Rogers were scheduled to meet Thursday evening in their first debate of the general election campaign, placing the controversy over the president’s remarks at the center of the race.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer also entered the dispute Thursday, condemning Trump’s comments and predicting that El-Sayed would win the Michigan contest.

“Abdul El-Sayed is on the road to being the next Senator from Michigan no matter how much bigoted bulls— a weak and desperate Donald Trump throws at him,” Schumer wrote on X.

Trump has made El-Sayed’s background and religious identity recurring themes in his attacks on the Democratic nominee. The president’s latest remarks are part of a broader Republican effort to portray El-Sayed as too radical for Michigan voters, particularly over his political associations and positions on Israel.

Republicans have also raised concerns about El-Sayed’s relationship with political commentator Hasan Piker, whose statements about Israel and other issues have generated controversy. During a September television forum in Detroit, El-Sayed faced questions about Piker’s rhetoric, his own views on Israel, and his associations with democratic socialist organizations.

The president previously targeted El-Sayed in August by publishing a photograph of himself alongside First Lady Melania Trump next to an image of El-Sayed and his wife. Trump captioned the comparison “Two VERY DIFFERENT America’s” and included the Democratic candidate’s full name.

El-Sayed responded during an interview with CNN’s Jake Tapper by acknowledging that the two photographs represented contrasting political visions.

“So yes, you’ve got two different visions of America,” he said. “Donald Trump’s vision is the one you’re living in right now. Can you afford gas? Can you afford your groceries? Do you believe, when you look your kids in the eye, that they’re going to have a better future than you did?”

The Michigan contest has become one of the country’s most closely watched Senate races, with both parties investing heavily in the battle for Peters’ open seat. El-Sayed narrowly won the Democratic nomination over Stevens, while Rogers, who previously lost a Senate race to Democrat Elissa Slotkin in 2024, secured the Republican nomination without opposition.

Rogers has recently sought to distinguish himself from Trump on several major policy questions, including the war with Iran and tariffs on Canada. He has called for the Iran conflict to end quickly and released an advertisement urging an end to the trade dispute with Canada, an important economic partner for Michigan.

The two candidates were scheduled to debate Thursday evening in Grand Rapids, with a second debate planned for October 21, ahead of the November 3 election.

{Matzav.com}

Rav Yitzchok Yosef, the former Sephardic Chief Rabbi of Israel, has issued another sharp condemnation of National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir, accusing him of openly disregarding the psakim of Gedolei Yisroel by ascending Har Habayis and warning the public against giving political support to someone who acts in defiance of Daas Torah.

In his remarks, Rav Yosef criticized politicians who win over younger voters with fiery rhetoric and catchy slogans while accomplishing little of substance.

“There are people who talk and attract young people with all kinds of slogans, but what do they actually do? Nothing. Just talk, talk, and the young people get excited.”

Rav Yosef then turned directly to Ben Gvir’s repeated visits to Har Habayis, which he said were carried out in deliberate disregard of the clear psak of leading poskim prohibiting Jews from entering the sacred area.

“I have warned several times that it is forbidden to ascend the Temple Mount… The very next day, deliberately, that Ben Gvir went up to the Temple Mount, against the opinion of all the leading Torah sages from every community.

“How can anyone give power to a person like that, who openly, arrogantly, and contemptuously defies and disrespects all the leading Torah sages and ascends the Temple Mount like that? God forbid that anyone should support such a person.”

The issue of ascending Har Habayis has long been a serious halachic concern. The Chief Rabbinate of Israel has maintained a prohibition against entering the site because of the severe restrictions governing entry into areas of the Mokom Hamikdash while in a state of tumah. Numerous Gedolei Yisroel across the generations have strongly warned against ascending Har Habayis, even for individuals who claim to have undergone the necessary preparations.

Rav Yosef’s latest remarks come amid an escalating confrontation between Ben Gvir and the chareidi political parties, with the minister accusing their leadership of failing to protect the interests of bnei yeshiva during the ongoing military draft crisis.

In a sharply worded open letter addressed to the leadership of United Torah Judaism and other chareidi representatives, Ben Gvir accused them of attempting to shift responsibility for what he called their “colossal failure” to resolve the enlistment issue.

Ben Gvir argued that the chareidi parties had spent the past four years failing to secure meaningful protections for the Torah world, resulting in the suspension of funding for yeshivos, arrest warrants against bochurim who have not reported for military service, and continued uncertainty surrounding the status of bnei yeshiva.

He accused chareidi political representatives of making him a convenient target rather than acknowledging that “for four years they did nothing to take care of their community.”

The minister also criticized the chareidi parties’ dealings with Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara, claiming that their opposition to his efforts to remove her had contributed to the present situation.

“At the beginning of the term, I was the one who demanded that the Attorney General be dismissed, while you, the representatives of the Haredi parties, opposed it. You explained that you knew how to make deals with her. You thought you were smarter, and you gambled on her in order to obtain her approval for appointments – and now we have reached the current disgraceful situation.”

Addressing the draft controversy, Ben Gvir accused chareidi party leaders of pursuing what he termed the “ostrich policy of the community’s leadership.”

He maintained that the establishment of appropriate military service frameworks for young chareidi men who are not learning in yeshiva could have helped safeguard the position of those genuinely devoted to full-time Torah learning.

As an example of what he considered a workable approach, Ben Gvir pointed to specially adapted chareidi service programs in the Israel Police and Israel Prison Service, which he said have already accepted thousands of young men from the community.

He further accused chareidi politicians of refusing to support initiatives that could benefit their own constituents, citing legislation designed to permit gender-separated academic studies.

Ben Gvir also claimed that substantial private discussions had taken place between himself and chareidi representatives in an effort to coordinate political and communal matters.

According to the minister, he possesses sensitive information concerning criticism of chareidi political operatives expressed by senior rabbonim and admorim, but has refrained from making that material public.

“Every time the rabbinical courts approached me in anger over the political operatives, I could have used it, but I didn’t because I love you,” he wrote.

Concluding his letter, Ben Gvir accused chareidi party leaders of misleading their own voters by blaming him for the difficulties confronting the community.

“The truth is that you know perfectly well that everything I have written here is true. When you tell your public that I am to blame, you are primarily revealing just how much you despise them and insult their intelligence. The Haredi public deserves more respect from you, rather than being sold such low-grade lies.”

{Matzav.com}

The Pentagon has developed plans for a sweeping new military offensive against Iran that could involve three days of intensive American airstrikes against missile facilities, drone installations, Revolutionary Guard headquarters and critical energy infrastructure, even as President Donald Trump has rejected multiple proposals for renewed attacks and announced that no strikes will take place before the November 3 midterm elections.

According to a report published Thursday by The New York Times, American military commanders are preparing for the possibility of a major escalation in the conflict with Tehran, with the United States moving toward a deployment of three aircraft carriers in the Middle East. The buildup would represent one of the largest concentrations of American naval power in the region in recent years.

The military planning is continuing despite Trump’s reluctance to approve another major offensive. Administration officials told the newspaper that the president has requested additional military options targeting Iran while repeatedly declining to authorize the operations presented to him.

Senior Pentagon officials and White House national security advisers have reportedly submitted five separate proposals involving substantial attacks against Iranian military assets or the Iranian-backed Houthi terrorist organization in Yemen. Trump turned down all five.

Nevertheless, the administration has continued examining possible courses of action should diplomatic negotiations fail or Iranian attacks prompt a change in American strategy.

Vice President JD Vance led a meeting of senior national security officials at Camp David last Friday, where the latest military proposals were reviewed. The discussions focused on potential targets, the scope of an American response and the consequences of another major confrontation with Iran.

One option reportedly calls for a concentrated offensive lasting approximately 72 hours, during which American forces would seek to inflict extensive damage on Iran’s military capabilities.

Among the targets under consideration are Iranian ballistic missile stockpiles, drone production and storage facilities, and military infrastructure that the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps has rebuilt since the war began.

The Pentagon is also examining possible attacks on Iranian energy facilities, Revolutionary Guard command centers and other military headquarters that play important roles in coordinating the country’s operations.

Axios previously reported on aspects of the administration’s renewed military planning, which comes amid increasing concern over Iran’s attacks on commercial shipping and its ability to threaten American installations throughout the Middle East.

The military preparations are unfolding alongside diplomatic contacts intended to bring the conflict to an end. American officials have expressed cautious encouragement about negotiations conducted through intermediaries, although substantial disagreements remain between Washington and Tehran.

A central obstacle is Iran’s nuclear program. The Trump administration wants Tehran’s nuclear activities addressed as a priority in any comprehensive agreement, while Iranian negotiators have insisted that nuclear issues should be handled only during the concluding phase of discussions.

Iran has also resisted American demands that it relinquish its uranium stockpile or abandon enrichment activities, leaving a major divide between the two governments despite continuing diplomatic exchanges.

On Thursday, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi confirmed that Tehran was reviewing Washington’s response to a proposal submitted through mediators. Iranian officials indicated that they expected to provide a further response within days.

The Iranian proposal reportedly includes relief from American economic sanctions and the naval blockade, along with the release of frozen assets, in exchange for steps toward reopening the Strait of Hormuz and pursuing broader negotiations.

Trump has rejected Iran’s latest offer, but administration officials have continued working through diplomatic channels in an effort to find an agreement.

The American military, meanwhile, is confronting an Iranian adversary that intelligence officials believe has adapted its tactics during the months of fighting.

According to the Times report, Iranian improvements in missile and drone operations have forced American forces to use larger numbers of defensive interceptors than earlier in the conflict, creating additional pressure on already strained ammunition supplies.

The concern extends beyond the immediate cost of defending American bases. Military planners are weighing whether another prolonged confrontation could further reduce the stockpiles needed to protect U.S. forces and allies against future attacks.

American intelligence assessments also indicate that Iran has improved its targeting capabilities with assistance from satellite imagery provided by Chinese companies. That information has reportedly helped Iranian forces identify and target American military installations with greater precision.

At sea, Iran has continued attacking commercial vessels despite the absence of another major American offensive.

British maritime monitoring authorities have recorded at least 13 attacks against ships since the last significant exchange of American and Iranian strikes in September, while U.S. intelligence officials believe the actual number may be closer to 20.

The situation has become particularly dangerous around the Strait of Hormuz, a strategic waterway through which a substantial share of the world’s oil shipments ordinarily passes.

Recent attacks have disrupted commercial shipping and driven up global energy prices, with Brent crude climbing above $105 per barrel Thursday amid renewed fears about the security of oil supplies.

Shipping volumes through the strait have fluctuated sharply as commercial operators contend with the threat of Iranian missiles, drones and other attacks. The disruption has also contributed to higher fuel costs and broader economic uncertainty.

The United States has maintained a naval blockade intended to prevent Iranian oil exports while allowing shipments from other Gulf producers to continue.

American military officials say their operations have helped secure major shipping routes, clear mines from key transit lanes and protect commercial vessels moving through the region.

U.S. Central Command said Thursday that American forces had facilitated the movement of more than 1.25 billion barrels of crude oil from Gulf partners in recent months while preventing Iranian oil exports under the blockade.

The American naval buildup is expected to include the USS Theodore Roosevelt, which is reportedly scheduled to reach the region later this month, adding another carrier strike group to the substantial forces already operating in and around the Middle East.

The deployments are intended to provide American commanders with additional offensive and defensive capabilities, including aircraft that could participate in strikes against Iranian targets if Trump authorizes renewed military action.

Despite the preparations, the president publicly ruled out another American attack before Election Day.

“We are having productive discussions with the Islamic Republic of Iran,” Trump wrote on Truth Social.

In his announcement, Trump described Iran as facing severe economic and military difficulties and made clear that Washington would maintain its naval blockade while negotiations continued.

He said that approximately 22 million barrels of oil had moved through the Strait of Hormuz the previous night, with none of the shipments originating in or destined for Iran. The figure was presented by the president and was not independently verified.

Trump explicitly declared that American forces would not resume attacks against Iran before the November 3 congressional elections, while reiterating his determination to prevent Tehran from obtaining nuclear weapons.

The announcement came after months of intermittent military confrontations following the American and Israeli strikes against Iran in February, which triggered a wider conflict involving Iranian retaliation, attacks on shipping and repeated diplomatic efforts to halt the fighting.

A temporary ceasefire reached in June subsequently collapsed, and hostilities intensified again in September, when American strikes against Iranian military installations were followed by retaliatory missile attacks against U.S. bases in the region.

The continuing conflict has also become a major domestic political issue as Americans face higher gasoline prices and concerns about the economic consequences of prolonged fighting.

Recent polling has reflected public dissatisfaction with the administration’s handling of the war, adding to the political pressures surrounding the president’s decisions in the final weeks before the midterm elections.

Nevertheless, Trump’s announcement does not mean that the Pentagon is suspending preparations for possible military operations after November 3.

According to the Times, American commanders are maintaining plans that would allow them to begin a major offensive within days if the president changes his position and authorizes renewed strikes.

The newspaper emphasized that preparing military options does not establish that an attack will occur. Trump has repeatedly sought additional proposals while declining to approve them, and senior officials continue to weigh the dangers of escalation against the potential consequences of allowing Iran to rebuild its military capabilities.

One of the most serious concerns remains the strain on American defensive missile inventories. Officials fear that another large-scale confrontation could require extensive interceptor use, potentially reducing the military’s ability to protect American bases, personnel and regional allies against further Iranian retaliation.

For now, the administration is pursuing negotiations while maintaining its blockade and strengthening the American military presence in the region, leaving the Pentagon prepared for a substantial new campaign without an order from the president to launch one.

{Matzav.com}

Israeli authorities are preparing to introduce advanced surveillance technology and redesigned border-control gates at Ben Gurion Airport after discovering that 64 chareidi young men classified as military draft evaders managed to leave the country for Uman despite being subject to travel restrictions. Their departures were not recorded by the border-control system, and the irregularities were discovered only when they returned to Israel.

According to a report by Kan News, the Population and Immigration Authority is developing a major upgrade to its border-control infrastructure, incorporating artificial intelligence, surveillance cameras, and two-stage automated passage gates intended to prevent travelers from bypassing immigration checks.

The new equipment is expected to be introduced at entry checkpoints during 2026, while installation at departure checkpoints, where the recent breaches occurred, is scheduled for 2027.

The planned changes follow an investigation into how dozens of chareidi travelers managed to depart for Uman during the Yom Tov season without their exits appearing in official immigration records, despite outstanding orders prohibiting them from leaving the country.

Police investigators suspect that some of the individuals used a method known as tailgating, in which a person follows closely behind another passenger through an automated border-control gate, passing through before the barrier closes.

Security camera footage reportedly enabled authorities to identify several of those involved. All 64 cases were referred to Ben Gurion Airport police on suspicion of violating Israel’s Entry Law.

Some of the young men have already been questioned under caution, while the remainder are expected to be summoned for questioning.

Figures presented during discussions concerning the military draft controversy showed that 188 individuals had been arrested at Ben Gurion Airport in connection with their military status. Of those, 64 were identified only after returning from overseas, having previously left Israel without their departures being properly registered.

Additional figures emerged during a meeting chaired by Deputy Attorney General Gil Limon, where officials reviewed enforcement activity against individuals classified by the military as draft evaders or deserters.

According to the data presented, 212 young men were arrested at border crossings during September on account of their military status. Approximately 163 of those arrested were members of the chareidi community.

The discussions also revealed that authorities had generally refrained from carrying out proactive arrest operations during the Yom Tov period. The IDF is now preparing to resume such operations during October.

The report emerged amid another day of widespread unrest over the arrests of bnei yeshiva, as hundreds of Peleg Yerushalmi demonstrators blocked major roads in Yerushalayim and near Bnei Brak on Thursday afternoon.

Protesters shut down sections of Route 4 and the entrance to Yerushalayim for approximately two hours, leading to serious traffic disruptions and confrontations with police attempting to reopen the roads.

In another incident during the demonstrations, police were called upon to extract Shas chairman Aryeh Deri and Minister Michael Malkieli after protesters gathered around a building hosting a Shas party event.

{Matzav.com}

Arkansas Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders reaffirmed her state’s support for Israel as she welcomed her father, U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee, back to Arkansas on for a series of commemorations marking the third anniversary of the October 7 Hamas massacre.

The governor and her father joined Jewish leaders, elected officials and community representatives in Little Rock to remember the approximately 1,200 people murdered by Hamas terrorists on October 7, 2023, and to honor the victims, survivors and families whose lives were devastated by the attacks.

Sanders used the occasion to deliver a public declaration of solidarity with Israel, emphasizing that Arkansas would continue to support the Jewish state and ensure that the experiences of those affected by the massacre remain at the forefront of public remembrance.

“In Arkansas, we make no apology for standing with Israel. We lift up the voices that matter: the victims, the people of Israel, and those who stood beside them through some of their darkest days. Glad to have my dad Ambassador Mike Huckabee back home to mark this solemn day,” Sanders wrote in a public statement.

The commemorations included a ceremony at the Arkansas State Capitol, where Ambassador Huckabee, who previously served as governor of Arkansas, spoke about the continuing consequences of the October 7 attacks and the broader threat posed by terrorist organizations operating in the Middle East.

Huckabee recalled being in Israel when the attacks occurred three years earlier, describing how he sheltered in a bunker while maintaining communication with President Donald Trump. He said the devastation caused by the terrorists remains visible in parts of Israel, where buildings and communities continue to bear the scars of the massacre and subsequent war.

The ambassador also reflected on the challenges of representing the United States in Israel during a period of continuing regional conflict, saying that despite the dangers and pressures associated with the assignment, he considers it a privilege to serve.

“I sometimes ask the president, what did I do to you? You send me to one of the most intense places on earth, but I tell you, I wouldn’t be anywhere else right now, to serve my country, my flag, and to serve a president who had the courage to recognize the threat to America and the American people and to say enough,” Huckabee told those assembled.

The event brought together several prominent Arkansas officials, including Secretary of State Cole Jester and Attorney General Tim Griffin, who joined the governor and ambassador in condemning the Hamas attacks and expressing support for Israel.

Representatives of the Jewish community also addressed the gathering, including Rav Pinchus Ciment, regional director of Lubavitch of Arkansas, and Harry Ehrenberg of the Arkansas Jewish Federation. Albert Veksler, director of the Jerusalem Prayer Breakfast, participated as well, speaking about the events of October 7 and their continuing impact.

The commemoration was hosted by Jason Rapert, founder and president of the National Association of Christian Lawmakers, which organized the ceremony in cooperation with state officials. Rapert thanked participants for speaking out against antisemitism and supporting Israel.

The gathering concluded with a prayer led by Pastor Happy Caldwell, a member of the association’s governing board, who prayed for peace in Israel and for families still suffering from the consequences of the terrorist attacks.

The State Capitol ceremony was followed by an Arkansas Remembers reception at the Governor’s Mansion, held in the Janet M. Huckabee Grand Hall, named for the ambassador’s wife and the governor’s mother.

The anniversary observances also coincided with a development in Arkansas’ role in Israel’s defense. Earlier Wednesday, Sanders joined Sen. Tom Cotton and Rep. Bruce Westerman at the Raytheon-Rafael Protection Systems facility in East Camden, where officials marked the first shipment of Tamir interceptor missiles manufactured in the state for Israel’s Iron Dome missile-defense system.

The $63 million manufacturing facility, which opened in November 2025, is expected to generate as many as 60 jobs. It will also produce SkyHunter interceptors, an American version of the Tamir missile, for the U.S. Marine Corps.

For Sanders, the project has particular personal significance because her parents reside in Israel, where Mike Huckabee serves as America’s ambassador.

“Today is even more special to me, because my own parents are some of those who the Iron Dome protects, along with 250,000 other American citizens who call Israel home,” Sanders said.

“They spent most of last summer huddled in a bunker,” she added. “They saw what Hamas and Iranian missiles would do if not taken out, and they’re alive today because of the Iron Dome.”

During his visit, Ambassador Huckabee also drew attention to the suffering of Israeli families who have lost loved ones in the war, including the family of Israeli Ambassador to the United States Yechiel Leiter.

Leiter had been expected to participate in the Arkansas commemorations but remained in Israel at the bedside of his son, Neria, who was critically injured in a terrorist vehicle-ramming attack in September.

“The reason that Ambassador Leiter is not here is because his son was brutally attacked by Palestinian terrorists who rammed a vehicle into him,” Huckabee explained. “He’s in very critical condition, and so Ambassador Leiter obviously is at his bedside.”

The Leiter family had already suffered a devastating loss when another son, Major Moshe Yedidya Leiter, was killed while fighting Hamas in Gaza in November 2023.

Huckabee also emphasized that Americans were among the victims of the October 7 massacre and warned against viewing the terrorist attack as a tragedy affecting Israel alone.

“Too many Americans forget that there were 46 Americans murdered that day,” he said.

The ambassador further argued that the conflict with Iran and its terrorist proxies has direct implications for American national security, rejecting the suggestion that the United States’ involvement in the region is solely about protecting Israel.

“If everybody thinks this is about Israel, they’re not paying attention,” Huckabee said. “It was never just about Israel. It was always about the United States.”

“This is absolutely putting America first,” he added. “None of the actions are taken to benefit anybody other than America and the American people.”

The Arkansas events thus brought together the state’s political leadership, Jewish community representatives and American officials serving in Israel, with the governor and her father emphasizing both remembrance of the October 7 victims and the continuing American-Israeli security relationship.

President Donald Trump declared Thursday that the White House considers anyone who continues using the term “artificial intelligence” instead of his preferred designation, “super intelligence,” to be an enemy of the administration, escalating his campaign to change the name of one of the world’s fastest-growing technologies.

In a post on Truth Social, Trump issued an extraordinary warning to individuals and organizations that have not adopted the terminology he recently introduced through an executive order.

“The White House considers anyone that uses the term, ‘Artificial Intelligence,’ as opposed to the highly accepted new and more accurate term, ‘Super Intelligence,’ THE ENEMY!” Trump wrote.

The statement follows Trump’s September 29 executive order directing federal departments and agencies to replace the familiar terms “artificial intelligence” and “AI” with “super intelligence” and “SI” in government communications, websites, reports, policy documents and other materials.

Trump has repeatedly argued that the word “artificial” inaccurately characterizes the technology, suggesting that it is fake or inferior when, in his view, the systems represent an extraordinary technological achievement.

During a White House gathering with leading technology executives on September 29, the president defended his proposed terminology change.

“It’s not artificial. We all agree on that,” Trump said.

He had introduced the proposed change during his September 22 address to the United Nations General Assembly, arguing that the technology deserved a name reflecting its capabilities.

“It makes it sound fake, and it is not fake. It’s actually amazing,” Trump said.

The executive order applies to federal government communications and does not establish penalties for private citizens, businesses or organizations that continue using the established terminology. Trump’s Thursday declaration did not explain what consequences, if any, would follow from being characterized as an enemy of the White House.

The administration’s effort has also encountered resistance from the technology industry, where artificial intelligence and superintelligence have long carried different meanings.

Artificial intelligence generally refers to computer systems capable of performing tasks associated with human intelligence, including generating text, analyzing information, recognizing images and making predictions.

Superintelligence, by contrast, traditionally describes a hypothetical level of machine intelligence that surpasses human capabilities across virtually every intellectual field. Researchers generally do not consider existing AI systems to have reached that threshold.

Despite the distinction, Trump’s executive order applies the new label to technologies already covered by the federal government’s existing definition of artificial intelligence.

The order also requires the president’s science and technology adviser to develop proposed legislative language within 60 days to establish a formal federal definition of super intelligence and determine whether existing statutory terminology should be revised.

Some prominent technology figures have begun embracing Trump’s preferred language. Elon Musk has indicated that his company’s AI operation would adopt the name SpaceXSI, replacing the AI abbreviation with SI.

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang also used the administration’s new terminology during the September 29 White House event, referring to data centers as “superintelligence factories.”

Other major technology companies have continued using artificial intelligence in their public communications, even as they pursue the development of more advanced systems.

The White House itself has not fully abandoned the old terminology. Government websites and materials from the Office of Science and Technology Policy have continued referring to artificial intelligence despite the president’s directive.

California Governor Gavin Newsom has also rejected the terminology change, directing state agencies to retain the established term.

Trump’s push comes as his administration seeks to accelerate American technological development and maintain an advantage over China in advanced computing.

Earlier this month, the president announced the creation of a federal Super Intelligence Force, headed by Director of National Intelligence Jay Clayton, to coordinate government policy concerning the technology.

The task force is expected to examine the opportunities and risks associated with increasingly capable AI systems, including national security concerns, while developing recommendations intended to preserve American technological leadership.

On Thursday, the task force’s four senior leaders were scheduled to meet, with a gathering of the full committee expected the following week.

{Matzav.com}

Zionist Organization of America President Morton Klein has called for New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani to be removed from office, accusing him of displaying hostility toward Jews after the mayor issued a statement marking the third anniversary of Hamas’ October 7 massacre that condemned Israel for alleged genocide while failing to mention Jews.

Speaking Thursday on Newsmax’s “Bianca Across the Nation,” Klein delivered a blistering attack on the Democratic socialist mayor, arguing that his remarks and longstanding positions on Israel should disqualify him from continuing to lead New York City.

“I call him mayor jihadist Jew-hater. That’s what he is,” Klein said.

The controversy erupted after Mamdani released a statement Wednesday describing the October 7, 2023, Hamas atrocities as “horrific war crimes” and expressing sympathy for families who lost loved ones in the terrorist assault.

However, Mamdani also asserted that the suffering “did not begin nor end that day” and accused Israel of an “ongoing genocide in Gaza,” along with allegations of war crimes, occupation, and apartheid.

The statement drew immediate criticism from Jewish organizations and Israeli representatives, who objected to the mayor’s decision to combine his acknowledgment of the Hamas massacre with sweeping accusations against Israel.

The Anti-Defamation League pointed out that Mamdani’s statement did not explicitly mention Jews, despite the anniversary commemorating the deadliest attack on the Jewish people since the Holocaust.

The mayor also encountered a hostile reception Wednesday evening when he appeared at an October 7 memorial gathering in Union Square, where demonstrators booed him.

Klein cited Mamdani’s previous refusal to condemn the slogan “globalize the intifada,” a phrase that Jewish organizations and other critics have warned encourages violence against Jews around the world.

During his 2025 mayoral campaign, Mamdani declined to denounce the expression, maintaining that he did not personally use it. He subsequently indicated that he would discourage others from employing the slogan.

“He wouldn’t condemn it. This guy is simply a Jew-hater,” Klein said. “We really need the major newspapers and more politicians condemning him.”

The ZOA president argued that Mamdani’s behavior warranted consequences extending beyond public criticism, insisting that the mayor should be compelled to leave office.

“His actions are so heinous, so hateful, that he really should be impeached,” he said. “If he was making similar comments against Blacks or gays, it would be absolutely intolerable, and he would be forced to resign. He should be forced to resign.”

Although Klein called for impeachment, New York City’s governing charter does not establish an impeachment procedure for removing a mayor.

New York’s governor does possess the authority to remove a sitting mayor under a separate legal process, which requires that charges be presented and that the mayor receive an opportunity to respond.

Mamdani assumed office on January 1, 2026, becoming New York City’s first Muslim mayor. His election followed a contentious campaign in which his statements about Israel, the Gaza war, and antisemitism repeatedly drew objections from Jewish organizations, including the ADL.

Since entering City Hall, Mamdani has sought to engage with Jewish communities by meeting with rabbonim, attending shul services, and promising to confront antisemitism.

His statements surrounding October 7, however, have remained a source of controversy.

On the second anniversary of the Hamas massacre in 2025, Mamdani characterized the terrorist assault, which killed approximately 1,200 people and resulted in more than 250 hostages being abducted into Gaza, as a “horrific war crime.”

In that same statement, he also demanded an end to what he described as Israel’s “genocidal war” in Gaza, prompting Israel’s Foreign Ministry to condemn his remarks as “shameful.”

On Thursday, Mamdani stood by his handling of the anniversary despite criticism from Jewish leaders and pro-Palestinian demonstrators. At a news conference in Brooklyn, he declined to condemn the protesters who had disrupted the Union Square gathering, where some participants chanted in support of Hamas.

The vigil, organized by Israelis for Peace, was intended to commemorate those murdered in the October 7 attacks as well as Palestinians killed during the subsequent war. Anti-Israel demonstrators converged on the gathering, shouting at participants and accusing Mamdani of betraying their cause by attending.

The backlash against the mayor also included criticism from Israel’s consul general in New York, Ofir Akunis, who condemned Mamdani’s anniversary statement as an insult to the memory of the October 7 victims.

New York Board of Rabbis representative Joe Potasnik likewise objected to the mayor’s decision to use the anniversary to level accusations against Israel, arguing that the Jewish community should have been allowed a day of mourning without another political confrontation.

{Matzav.com}

The renowned Brisk Yeshiva in Yerushalayim, headed by Rav Avrohom Yehoshua Soloveitchik, is reportedly preparing to accept approximately 300 to 400 bochurim for the upcoming winter zman, marking a significant reopening of admissions after several zmanim during which the yeshiva did not take in new talmidim.

According to sources, the decision comes amid changes in the yeshiva’s student body, with a substantial number of existing bochurim having departed or preparing to leave for other yeshivos, including Bais Medrash Govoha in Lakewood.

The anticipated admissions would represent a major development for Brisk, which has long been regarded as one of the most sought-after destinations for advanced American yeshiva bochurim spending their years of learning in Eretz Yisroel.

Under the leadership of Rav Avrohom Yehoshua Soloveitchik, a son of Rav Berel Soloveitchik and grandson of the Brisker Rov, the yeshiva has maintained its distinctive approach to learning, with particular emphasis on the rigorous analytical method associated with the Brisker tradition.

Admission to the yeshiva has historically been highly competitive, with demand frequently exceeding the number of places available. Its reputation has made acceptance into Brisk an important milestone for many American bochurim seeking to continue their learning in Yerushalayim.

The yeshiva has experienced periods of restricted admissions in the past. A historical account published more than two decades ago described a previous year in which Rav Avrohom Yehoshua declined to accept new students because of overcrowding, before eventually admitting approximately 200 American bochurim following appeals from American roshei yeshiva.

The latest reported reopening, however, would involve a considerably larger incoming group, with estimates placing the expected number of new students between 300 and 400.

{Matzav.com}

[Videos below.] Massive demonstrations organized by Peleg Yerushalmi brought major highways in Yerushalayim and central Israel to a standstill Thursday afternoon, as hundreds of protesters blocked roads for approximately two hours in opposition to the renewed arrests of yeshiva bochurim over military enlistment. The protests erupted into confrontations with police, who deployed stun grenades and batons, while footage showing officers violently removing demonstrators, including a policewoman tearing a protester’s tzitzis, generated widespread attention.

The demonstrations, which began at approximately 4 p.m., shut down Route 4 near Bnei Brak and the main entrance to Yerushalayim near the Chords Bridge. The disruptions caused extensive traffic congestion, interfered with light rail operations in the capital, and prompted warnings to travelers heading to Ben Gurion Airport.

The protests followed the arrests of two chareidi men in Be’er Sheva and Eilat earlier in the week after authorities determined that they were wanted for failing to report for military service. According to additional reports, two yeshiva bochurim were sentenced to 20 days in military detention, further intensifying anger within Peleg Yerushalmi.

Rav Azriel Auerbach, a leading figure in Peleg Yerushalmi, issued a call for widespread demonstrations in response to the arrests. The appeal was directed to the broader membership of the movement, rather than only those activists who ordinarily participate in highway blockades.

The Committee to Save the Torah World, an organization associated with the movement, accused military authorities of arresting bnei yeshiva because of their continued Torah learning and called for large-scale protests throughout the country.

In Yerushalayim, hundreds of demonstrators gathered near the Chords Bridge, occupying the roadway and blocking one of the city’s principal entrances. Additional protesters assembled along Bar Ilan Street, where traffic was also disrupted.

Police redirected motorists to alternative roads as traffic backed up across the surrounding area. The demonstrations also forced interruptions to the Yerushalayim light rail system, particularly near the Central Bus Station, with some services suspended and others operating along shortened or divided routes.

One of the most serious incidents occurred when a chareidi IDF soldier driving through the area found himself surrounded by demonstrators. Protesters blocked his vehicle, prompting police to intervene and extract him from the crowd.

Officers deployed stun grenades and other crowd-control measures during the rescue operation. Video footage from the scene showed police attempting to force demonstrators away from the vehicle as the confrontation intensified.

Other recordings from the Yerushalayim protest showed officers striking demonstrators with batons while attempting to clear the roadway.

In one widely circulated video, a female police officer was seen grabbing the tzitzis of a protester lying on the road and pulling on them until they tore. The footage drew particular attention because of the religious significance of the garment and the force used against the demonstrator.

Another recording appeared to show a police officer throwing a stun grenade directly toward the upper body of a protester, raising questions about whether the device was used in accordance with appropriate safety procedures.

A separate confrontation near the Chords Bridge involved a vehicle that began moving while demonstrators were gathered around it. A protester was dragged or struck by the vehicle, and reports indicated that a yeshiva bochur suffered minor injuries.

Police rejected allegations that the driver had deliberately attempted to run over the demonstrator. Authorities maintained that the protester had grabbed onto the vehicle and said they possessed footage supporting their account.

Meanwhile, in the Bnei Brak area, hundreds of demonstrators entered Route 4 near the Coca-Cola Bridge, sitting across the traffic lanes and bringing traffic to a halt in both directions between the Aluf Sadeh and Em Hamoshavot interchanges.

Protesters chanted, “We will die rather than enlist,” as police attempted to clear the highway.

The closures created major traffic backups along Route 4 and nearby roads. Congestion had already begun developing before the scheduled start of the demonstrations, as authorities prepared for the anticipated disruptions.

Israel’s National Roads Company reported heavy traffic stretching from the Rishon LeZion area toward Givat Shmuel, while Route 1 experienced significant congestion between Latrun and Shoresh and between Motza and the Harel interchange.

The Israel Airports Authority advised passengers traveling to Ben Gurion Airport to leave earlier than usual because of the possibility of serious delays on surrounding roads.

Police declared the demonstrations unlawful after protesters refused instructions to leave the roadway. Mounted officers and other police units were deployed to remove demonstrators, resulting in further confrontations.

Police said some protesters shouted “Nazis” at officers and physically confronted motorists attempting to pass through the affected areas.

Initial reports indicated that two demonstrators had been arrested on suspicion of assaulting police officers. A subsequent police update reported three arrests on Route 4 on suspicion of attacking officers, with additional arrests reported in Yerushalayim.

Police Commissioner Daniel Levy instructed officers to disperse demonstrations involving roadblocks and public disturbances.

“Protest is a right; disturbing public order is not,” Levy said in a statement issued during the unrest.

The protests came after several unsuccessful attempts by military police to arrest chareidi men wanted for failing to report for enlistment.

In Modi’in earlier in the week, military police attempting to arrest a bochur at a residential building were surrounded by hundreds of protesters after activists circulated an emergency alert.

Demonstrators entered the building and reportedly reached the apartment itself, gathering around the wanted man and preventing officers from taking him into custody.

Police reinforcements were eventually called to extract the military personnel, who left without making the arrest.

A similar incident unfolded Thursday morning in Bat Yam, where military police arrived at the residence of another wanted chareidi man. Activists associated with the emergency alert network known as Tzeva Shachor summoned protesters, and the officers ultimately withdrew without arresting him.

During Thursday’s demonstrations, protesters also surrounded a building in Modi’in Illit where Shas was holding an election campaign gathering. Shas chairman Aryeh Deri was present at the event, according to a party spokesperson.

The protests therefore extended beyond the principal highway blockades, with demonstrators also directing their anger toward political figures amid the continuing controversy over the military draft of bnei yeshiva.

Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu condemned the highway closures, arguing that the demonstrators did not represent the broader chareidi community.

“These blockades do not represent the overwhelming majority of the chareidi public; an extremist faction of Kaplan, Kaplan, is organizing this,” Netanyahu said, referring to the anti-government protest movement associated with Kaplan Street in Tel Aviv.

By approximately 6:30 p.m., police reported that the main demonstrations had ended and that Route 4 near Bnei Brak and the entrance to Yerushalayim had reopened to traffic.

VIDEOS:

{Matzav.com}

Lakewood’s Board of Education has reinstated free courtesy busing for more than 300 public school students following protests by parents, even as thousands of families sending their children to yeshivos and private schools are being required to pay $675 per child for the same category of non-mandated transportation.

The decision, approved unanimously in a 9-0 vote, commits approximately $245,000 in district funding to restore transportation for 307 public school students who had lost the service because of budget cuts. The reversal came after parents and students packed a contentious Board of Education meeting and demanded that the district restore their children’s bus routes.

The development has intensified a controversy that has gripped Lakewood since the beginning of the school year, raising questions about why public school students are receiving taxpayer-funded transportation while private school families, many already struggling with substantial tuition bills and rising living expenses, must pay hundreds of dollars per child.

The Asbury Park Press reported that the board reversed its earlier decision after dozens of parents and students pressed officials to restore the service at Wednesday’s meeting. The unanimous vote authorized the district to cover the transportation expense rather than leave the affected families responsible for arranging their own rides.

For Lakewood’s Orthodox Jewish community, however, the decision has highlighted a disparity that has been at the center of the transportation debate for weeks. Parents of non-mandated yeshiva students are still being charged $675 per child through the Lakewood Student Transportation Authority, known as LSTA.

For a family with four children requiring non-mandated busing, the annual cost amounts to $2,700. A family with five children faces a $3,375 transportation bill, in addition to school tuition, property taxes and other household expenses.

The distinction involves students who live close enough to their schools that New Jersey law does not ordinarily require publicly funded transportation. Under state regulations, elementary school students generally qualify for mandated transportation when they live more than two miles from school, while the threshold for high school students is more than two and a half miles.

Children living within those distances are classified as non-mandated. Transportation for them is considered a courtesy service, although local officials have historically provided subsidies to help families obtain busing.

For years, Lakewood Township helped finance courtesy transportation for both public and nonpublic school students. Public school students received the service without a direct charge, while parents of non-mandated private school students paid a subsidized fee through LSTA.

That arrangement was thrown into turmoil this summer when township officials eliminated funding for the program amid a municipal budget shortfall.

The township had previously contributed approximately $1.4 million toward courtesy busing for public school students and $2.75 million toward subsidies for non-mandated private school students.

With those contributions eliminated, LSTA initially announced that the annual charge for non-mandated transportation would rise from $385 to $945 per child for the 2026–27 school year.

The announcement, made shortly before the start of the school year, triggered widespread anger among parents who suddenly faced hundreds or thousands of dollars in additional transportation expenses.

Following negotiations involving LSTA, local officials and community representatives, the fee was subsequently reduced to $675 per child. Although that represented a substantial reduction from the initially announced $945 rate, it remained $290 higher than the previous year’s $385 charge.

Meanwhile, Lakewood’s public school students initially faced the complete elimination of courtesy busing after the township withdrew its financial support.

The Board of Education voted in August to discontinue the service, but state-appointed fiscal monitor Louise Davis subsequently directed the district to continue transporting non-mandated public school students whose walking routes crossed roads classified as hazardous.

Approximately 80% of Lakewood’s 1,475 non-mandated public school students qualified under that exception, leaving roughly 300 children without transportation.

The remaining families continued demanding that the district restore the service, culminating in the board’s decision to approve funding for those students as well.

The controversy extends beyond the 307 students whose transportation has now been restored. According to figures reported by The Voice of Lakewood, approximately 12,952 non-mandated private school students reside in the district, compared with 1,475 non-mandated public school students.

An estimated 98% of those private school students must cross at least one road designated as hazardous by the Lakewood Police Department on their way to school. Nevertheless, their parents have not been granted the same publicly funded hazardous-route transportation that the district has provided to qualifying public school students.

The Board of Education attempted to address that disparity at a special meeting on September 9, voting to extend hazardous-route transportation to eligible nonpublic school students. The proposal carried an estimated cost of $14.9 million.

Davis, who exercises state oversight of the financially troubled school district, placed the resolution under advisement, preventing it from taking effect while she reviewed its financial implications.

In a subsequent written decision, the monitor rejected the proposal, citing the district’s lack of available funding and the additional borrowing that would be required.

“There is no available funding,” Davis wrote.

Her decision noted that the district had already sought more than $132 million in state loans for the current school year. Providing hazardous-route transportation to nonpublic school students would require an additional $14.9 million.

Yet when the board voted to restore courtesy transportation for the remaining public school students, Davis allowed the measure to stand.

That distinction has become a central point of contention among board members and community representatives, who argue that the district is applying different standards to children based on whether they attend public or private schools.

Board President Moshe Bender acknowledged that members had expected the monitor to block the public school transportation resolution as well.

“She surprised us when she allowed the resolution to stand, but we really had nothing to lose either way,” Bender told The Voice of Lakewood.

“Now that she allowed the resolution to pass, it’s a win for us because it shows how she is willing to give the public-school students courtesy busing—which is like a treat, which no one is legally entitled to—while denying nonpublic-school students busing even if they have a hazardous route to school.”

The board also renewed its effort to secure hazardous-route transportation for private school students, approving a revised resolution and authorizing borrowing to cover the proposed $14.9 million cost. Davis again placed the measures under advisement.

The dispute has raised legal questions about the district’s transportation policies. Board members have challenged the legal reasoning behind the monitor’s decision, while the district’s attorney has warned that providing hazardous-route transportation to public school students but withholding it from similarly situated private school students could expose the district to litigation.

At an earlier meeting, Assemblyman Avi Schnall sharply criticized the distinction, arguing that the safety of a child’s walking route should not depend on which school the child attends.

“This is appalling—that we have someone who’s willing to say that that [public school] child cannot walk on dangerous roads, and that [private school] child could, to me, is a shame. And [it’s] shameful that this is what’s being promoted from a state-appointed monitor,” Schnall said.

The transportation controversy is unfolding as Lakewood homeowners contend with a substantial increase in property taxes. Residents have reported annual increases of approximately $700 to $900, adding to frustration over municipal spending and the loss of transportation subsidies. The precise increase varies by property, and the reported range does not represent a uniform charge on every household.

For many families, the combined financial burden is considerable. A household facing an $800 annual property tax increase and paying $675 each for four children’s non-mandated busing would incur $3,500 in combined annual property tax increases and transportation charges.

Even measured against last year’s subsidized transportation rate, that same family would be paying $1,160 more for busing alone.

The financial situation has also renewed attention to Lakewood’s unusual school enrollment structure. While the township has one of New Jersey’s largest school-age populations, the overwhelming majority of its children attend private schools and yeshivos.

Local officials have long argued that the state’s school funding formula does not adequately account for the transportation and other obligations associated with such a large nonpublic school population.

The district has accumulated substantial debt to the state over years of borrowing to cover operating shortfalls, a situation that led to the appointment of a state fiscal monitor with authority over major financial decisions.

The latest vote has now created a situation in which all 1,475 non-mandated public school students are again eligible for district-funded transportation, while thousands of non-mandated private school students remain dependent on a paid LSTA program.

The dispute may ultimately be decided in court. Parents of yeshiva students are considering legal action challenging the monitor’s refusal to authorize comparable hazardous-route transportation for nonpublic school children.

For now, the Board of Education’s decision means that 307 public school students who had lost their bus service will once again receive transportation at public expense, while Lakewood’s private school families continue paying $675 per child and await a resolution to the dispute over hazardous-route busing.

{Matzav.com}

The IDF announced Thursday evening that Captain Eliav Chaim Tzapalamus, a 21-year-old combat engineering officer from Haifa, was killed when a military Humvee overturned during an operational mission in southern Lebanon. Three other Israeli soldiers were lightly injured in the accident.

The fatal incident occurred Thursday afternoon in the vicinity of the Litani River, where Israeli troops from the 7th Armored Brigade were carrying out military operations. Tzapalamus served in the Combat Engineering Corps’ 603rd Battalion, operating under the 7th Brigade within the IDF’s 36th Division.

According to preliminary military findings, the Humvee carrying the soldiers overturned during the operation. Tzapalamus was killed, while the three other soldiers sustained minor injuries and were transported to a hospital for medical treatment. Their families were subsequently informed.

The IDF has opened an investigation into the circumstances surrounding the accident. Military officials have not yet disclosed what caused the vehicle to overturn.

Tzapalamus was the son of Heli, an employee of the Haifa Municipality, and Benny, who works for Israel Railways. His death prompted an outpouring of grief in Haifa, where Mayor Yona Yahav issued a statement mourning the young officer and extending condolences to his family.

“Eliav went out to defend his people and his country and will not return. He was part of the generation of heroes of the State of Israel – a generation of young people with dreams, aspirations, and an entire future ahead of them, who carry on their shoulders an enormous responsibility for the security of the country and the safety of its citizens. A generation that reminds us all what duty, dedication, and love of the land mean.”

The mayor also addressed Tzapalamus’ mother directly, acknowledging her connection to the municipal workforce and the grief being felt by her colleagues.

“Eliav is the son of Heli, an employee of the Haifa Municipality, and Benny. Dear Heli, all of us – your friends and colleagues at the Haifa Municipality – are devastated and heartbroken,” he wrote.

Tzapalamus’ levayah is scheduled for Friday, October 9, at 1 p.m. at the military cemetery in Haifa.

The tragedy occurred as Israeli forces continued operations in southern Lebanon despite the withdrawal of some troops from the area. IDF units remain active in a security zone, conducting operations to seize weapons and strike terrorist infrastructure.

Earlier Thursday, residents of communities in the northern Galilee were advised that explosions could be heard as a result of military activity across the border. Airstrikes were also reported in several areas of southern Lebanon.

Tzapalamus’ death follows other fatal operational accidents involving Israeli forces in recent months. On September 24, two reservists, Master Sgt. Nadav Keli, 24, of Har Halutz, and Master Sgt. Ofek Mualem, 23, of Yerushalayim, were killed when an Israeli military explosive drone malfunctioned during an operation in northern Gaza.

Earlier, Major Harel Birenstock, 34, of Nokdim, and Master Sgt. Tamir Vaknin, 33, of Eilat, were killed by an explosive device in the southern Lebanese village of Majdal Zoun. Both were serving with the Paratroopers Brigade’s 55th Brigade.

In June, Master Sgt. Basel Sweid, 32, of Peki’in, was killed when a military fuel truck overturned in the southern Lebanese area of Rab Thalathin. Another soldier was moderately injured in that accident.

According to Israeli military casualty figures reported Thursday, 971 IDF personnel have been killed since the beginning of the war, including 88 soldiers who fell in southern Lebanon.

{Matzav.com}

[Video below.] Israeli police have completed an investigation into the deliberate burning of a sukkah in central Yerushalayim during Sukkos, with prosecutors preparing to indict a 52-year-old Arab resident of the Old City in what authorities suspect was a racially motivated attack.

The incident occurred on Sunday, September 27, in the Agrippas Street area, near Yerushalayim’s bustling Machane Yehuda market. Police believe the suspect intentionally set fire to the sukkah during the Yom Tov.

On Thursday, police announced that investigators from the Lev Habira station had completed their investigation and assembled evidence against the suspect. A prosecutor’s declaration was submitted to the court on Wednesday, signaling the intention to file a formal indictment in the coming days.

The case began when police received a report that a sukkah had been set on fire in the center of the city. Officers immediately opened an investigation to determine the circumstances of the blaze and identify whoever was responsible.

Detectives from the Lev Habira station worked alongside surveillance personnel from the Yerushalayim District, examining available evidence and conducting intelligence and operational activities.

Investigators soon concluded that the fire was suspected to have been deliberately set rather than caused by an accident. Evidence gathered during the investigation also raised suspicions that the act was motivated by racial hatred.

Police subsequently identified a 52-year-old resident of the Old City as the suspect. He was located and arrested shortly after the incident and taken for questioning.

The suspect was brought before a court, which extended his detention on several occasions while investigators continued gathering evidence and examining the circumstances surrounding the fire.

Following the completion of the investigation, prosecutors submitted a formal declaration stating their intention to pursue criminal charges.

The suspected arson occurred during Chol Hamoed Sukkos, when Jewish families spend time eating and gathering in their sukkos in fulfillment of the mitzvah of the Yom Tov.

The location of the incident, in the heavily traveled Agrippas Street area, added to the seriousness of the case. The street runs through one of central Yerushalayim’s busiest commercial districts, surrounded by residential buildings, stores and pedestrian traffic.

The suspected racial motive is a central component of the investigation, with police treating the burning of the sukkah as a possible hate-motivated offense rather than an ordinary property crime.

Authorities have not publicly disclosed whether anyone was inside the sukkah when the fire was started, whether there were injuries, or the full extent of the damage.

Police also released footage connected to the incident as they announced the conclusion of the investigation.

The suspect’s identity has not been publicly released. As of Thursday’s announcement, the anticipated indictment had not yet been filed, and the allegations remain subject to court proceedings.

The case now moves toward prosecution, with the police investigation completed and the state preparing to bring formal charges over the burning of the sukkah during Sukkos.

{Matzav.com}

[Video below.] An Egyptian pilot reportedly employed by EgyptAir has sparked fresh aviation security concerns after posting footage of an Israeli El Al passenger jet at an airport in Italy, accompanied by a recording of former Egyptian President Anwar Sadat declaring, “An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth, and violence for violence.”

The video, posted Wednesday by Osama Mansour, who identifies himself on social media as an EgyptAir pilot, shows an El Al aircraft parked at an Italian airport as an EgyptAir plane moves into view nearby. As the Egyptian aircraft approaches, the soundtrack plays an excerpt from Sadat’s 1973 wartime speech threatening retaliation against Israel.

The recording includes Sadat’s declaration: “Let the Israelis remember what I always said: ‘An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth’.”

The video was shared on Mansour’s Instagram and Facebook accounts, accompanied by an Arabic caption that translates roughly as “A surprise entry disrupts the course of events.”

The footage quickly circulated across Israeli social media Thursday, drawing particular attention because it was posted just days after the attempted terrorist attack aboard a FlyDubai passenger flight bound for Israel.

The FlyDubai incident involved an Omani co-pilot who allegedly attacked the aircraft’s Indian captain and attempted to seize control of the plane. The confrontation prompted renewed scrutiny of airline personnel, security screening and the potential dangers posed by radicalized individuals with access to passenger aircraft.

Against that backdrop, Mansour’s decision to combine footage of an Israeli civilian airliner with a speech invoking retaliation and violence raised questions among Israeli aviation observers about the appropriateness of such messaging by someone identifying himself as a commercial airline pilot.

Israeli aviation journalist Itay Blumental was among those who publicized the footage, questioning whether European airports and international aviation authorities should permit pilots displaying potentially violent attitudes to operate passenger aircraft.

The recording attracted unusually widespread attention compared with Mansour’s previous social media activity. By Thursday evening, the Instagram video had accumulated more than 6,200 likes, while most of his earlier posts had received between 20 and 100 likes. Other reports indicated that the footage had been viewed more than one million times across social media.

The controversy also comes at a particularly sensitive moment in Egyptian-Israeli relations, with the video appearing during the anniversary of the 1973 Yom Kippur War, which Egypt commemorates annually on October 6.

Sadat, who led Egypt during that war, subsequently became the first Arab leader to sign a peace treaty with Israel. The 1979 agreement established formal diplomatic relations between the countries and resulted in Israel’s withdrawal from the Sinai Peninsula.

The speech selected for Mansour’s video, however, comes from the earlier period of military confrontation between the two countries.

Egyptian media coverage has presented the footage in a different light, describing it as a patriotic video marking the anniversary of Egypt’s 1973 military campaign. That interpretation contrasts with concerns expressed in Israel over the use of violent wartime rhetoric alongside images of an Israeli passenger aircraft.

The video itself does not contain an explicit statement by Mansour threatening to attack the El Al aircraft or its passengers, and there is no publicly established evidence that he intended to carry out an act of violence.

Although Mansour identifies himself as an EgyptAir pilot, independent confirmation of his current employment status has not been publicly established. No official response from EgyptAir regarding the video had been reported as of Thursday.

The incident follows another controversy involving an airline pilot whose social media activity raised concerns about extremist rhetoric.

Israeli media reported Thursday that United Airlines had suspended Captain Ibrahim R. Muslim following renewed complaints about social media posts praising the Oct. 7 massacre. According to those reports, the pilot had previously been suspended in November 2023 over similar material before eventually returning to work.

A United Airlines flight attendant told Israeli media that employees had raised concerns about the pilot following the 2023 massacre and renewed their complaints after the FlyDubai incident.

The latest episode has added to the growing debate over how airlines assess the conduct of flight crews outside the cockpit, particularly when their public statements involve violent political rhetoric or hostility toward countries whose citizens may be aboard their aircraft.

{Matzav.com}

New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani was loudly heckled and confronted by pro-Palestinian demonstrators Wednesday evening as he attended a candlelight vigil in Manhattan marking the third anniversary of the Oct. 7 Hamas massacre. Some of the protesters carried Hamas and Hezbollah flags while accusing the mayor of abandoning the Palestinian cause since taking office.

The confrontation erupted in Union Square, where the organization Israelis for Peace had arranged a memorial honoring Israelis murdered in the Oct. 7, 2023, terrorist attack and Palestinians killed during the subsequent war in Gaza. Demonstrators who had gathered earlier outside City Hall marched to the memorial, where their shouting disrupted the proceedings and drew attention away from the commemorative gathering.

Mamdani, holding a candle and standing alongside former City Comptroller Brad Lander, remained largely expressionless as protesters directed a barrage of insults and accusations toward him. Several demonstrators wearing keffiyehs shouted at the mayor, demanding that he take a stronger position against Israel.

“You coward!” some protesters yelled. “How do you let this happen?”

Other demonstrators repeatedly chanted, “Zohran you can’t hide, we charge you with genocide,” while additional slogans included “Mayor Mamdani take a stand. Stop the sale of stolen land” and “Shame on you.”

The disruption came as an unusual public rebuke of Mamdani from activists who have generally shared his outspoken criticism of Israel. The protesters accused him of failing to translate his political positions into sufficient action since becoming mayor, and some objected to his participation in a memorial organized by an Israeli group.

For those attending the vigil, the confrontation turned an already emotional anniversary into an especially painful evening. Tamar Glazerman, co-founder of Israelis for Peace, described the gathering as “a difficult night, heckled by a few hundred counter-protesters.”

“Verbally, it was very violent,” she said, adding “what I think is unfortunate is the lack of listening.”

Glazerman said the demonstrators appeared unwilling to hear the message of the memorial, which sought to acknowledge the suffering of both Israelis and Palestinians.

“Because the only thing that matters is that we had Israelis in our name,” she said. “Not a word that we said had mattered.”

Another woman who participated in the candlelight ceremony said she “felt it was emotionally difficult” to witness the protesters interrupting an event intended to remember people who had lost their lives.

“It was like, are they even listening to what’s happening over here?,” the woman, who declined to identify herself, said.

“Because if they were listening, they might even hear that actually might even [hear] some points of agreement.”

The attendee criticized the demonstrators for displaying “zero nuance when lots of nuance is needed.”

“So it was extremely painful and very jarring personally,” she added.

The confrontation followed a demonstration earlier in the day outside City Hall, where approximately 125 pro-Palestinian activists assembled to denounce what they described as Mamdani’s “betrayal” of Palestinian interests.

“Mayor Mamdani, take a side, justice for Palestine,” the protesters chanted during the earlier gathering.

One participant displayed an image depicting Mamdani welcoming Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu with a red carpet, apparently criticizing the mayor in connection with Netanyahu’s visit to New York the previous month.

After the City Hall demonstration, protesters made their way to Union Square, where their arrival created a tense atmosphere around the memorial. Images from the scene showed at least one individual displaying a Hamas flag, while other demonstrators carried signs criticizing Mamdani and Israel.

The mayor remained at the vigil despite the interruptions and did not publicly engage with those shouting at him. Following the gathering, he traveled uptown to Hinds Hall by Ayat, a Palestinian restaurant recognized by the Michelin Guide, where he met with Palestinian families, according to people familiar with his movements.

The incident occurred amid a separate controversy surrounding Mamdani’s official statement commemorating the third anniversary of the Oct. 7 massacre, in which approximately 1,200 people were murdered and 251 were abducted into Gaza.

Although Mamdani acknowledged the Hamas atrocities, his statement devoted considerable attention to criticizing Israel’s military campaign in Gaza, prompting objections from Jewish organizations and Israeli representatives who argued that he had used the anniversary to advance his political agenda.

The mayor referred to the “unthinkable loss” suffered when “Hamas killed more than 1,100 Israelis and abducted 251 others” on Oct. 7, 2023.

He then accused Israel of committing “war crimes” and carrying out an “ongoing genocide” in Gaza.

“The suffering did not begin nor end that day. It instead continued through the Israeli government’s devastating, ongoing genocide in Gaza,” Mamdani wrote, referring to Palestinian casualties during the war that followed the Hamas attack.

Jewish leaders responded by accusing the mayor of diminishing the significance of the massacre and failing to give adequate recognition to the Jewish victims on the anniversary of their deaths.

Anti-Defamation League CEO Jonathan Greenblatt sharply criticized Mamdani’s statement, pointing out that the mayor had not explicitly identified Jews as the targets of the Oct. 7 atrocities.

“Not once do you say “Jews,” Greenblatt wrote. “On Oct. 7, Hamas-led attackers murdered civilians, committed … violence, mutilated bodies and took hostages.”

“You are weaponizing a day meant for mourning the worst massacre of Jews since the Holocaust to recycle your usual anti-zionist talking points,” Greenblatt continued.

Israel’s ambassador to the United Nations, Danny Danon, also condemned the mayor’s approach, accusing him of redirecting attention away from the victims of Hamas on a day designated for remembering the massacre.

Danon said Mamdani was attempting to “hijack the only day we have for the victims of survivors.”

“He’s trying to hijack the day to talk about attacking Israel,” Danon said, adding “It’s like on 9/11 you talked about victims and al-Qaeda terrorists.”

“He’s dangerous and sophisticated,” the ambassador said of Mamdani. “He will go to both ceremonies and try to say he feels for both losses of life.”

The controversy comes amid continuing concerns about antisemitism in New York City. Police Commissioner Jessica Tisch recently reported that antisemitic incidents accounted for approximately 53% of confirmed hate crimes in the city during the first nine months of 2026, despite Jewish residents comprising roughly 10% of the population.

Mamdani has maintained that his administration is committed to protecting Jewish New Yorkers and combating antisemitism while continuing to oppose Israeli government policies. His handling of the issue has nevertheless drawn criticism from Jewish community leaders who believe his rhetoric has contributed to an increasingly hostile atmosphere.

Wednesday’s events also exposed tensions between the mayor and segments of the pro-Palestinian movement, with demonstrators accusing him of failing to deliver on their expectations even as Jewish leaders criticized his statements about Israel.

At Union Square, those tensions played out in full view of mourners who had gathered to commemorate the victims of Oct. 7, only to find their memorial disrupted by protesters directing chants and accusations at the mayor.

President Donald Trump announced Thursday that the United States will not launch military strikes against Iran before the November 3 midterm elections, even as Washington maintains its blockade of the Islamic Republic and continues applying economic and military pressure on Tehran.

The president made the announcement in a social media statement in which he reported progress in negotiations with Iranian officials, described Iran as facing severe economic and military difficulties, and reiterated that the United States would not permit Tehran to acquire nuclear weapons.

“We are having productive discussions with the Islamic Republic of Iran,” Trump wrote at the beginning of a statement posted on his social media platform.

Trump indicated that the ongoing negotiations had not led Washington to ease its pressure campaign. He described Iran’s position as increasingly difficult, pointing to the country’s economic problems and weakened military capabilities.

The president emphasized that the American blockade would remain in effect while diplomatic discussions continued, signaling that the administration intended to maintain its leverage over Tehran despite the temporary commitment to refrain from military action.

He also highlighted the volume of oil shipments passing through the Strait of Hormuz, the strategically important waterway connecting the Persian Gulf with international shipping routes.

According to Trump, approximately 22 million barrels of oil traveled through the strait overnight, with none of the shipments originating in Iran or intended for Iranian destinations.

The president cited those figures as evidence that international oil transportation was continuing at substantial levels while restrictions affecting Iran remained in place.

Trump then addressed the possibility of additional American military operations against the Islamic Republic, establishing a specific timetable tied to the upcoming congressional elections.

“We will not attack Iran at any time before the midterm elections in the United States on November 3.”

The declaration provides a public commitment that the administration will refrain from initiating attacks against Iran during the remaining weeks of the election campaign. It does not, however, establish what military options Washington might consider after November 3.

The announcement follows reports that the Trump administration had been reviewing plans for possible renewed military strikes against Iran before Election Day. The Pentagon had reportedly been instructed to prepare options for additional operations, although no final decision to launch an attack had been announced.

The United States and Israel began their military campaign against Iran in late February, triggering a wider confrontation that disrupted shipping through the Strait of Hormuz and sent energy prices sharply higher. Since then, Washington has sought to pressure Tehran through a combination of military deterrence, economic restrictions and negotiations.

The American blockade of Iranian ports has become a central element of that strategy. Washington has sought to prevent Iranian oil exports while allowing shipments from other countries to continue moving through the waterway, which carries a significant portion of the world’s petroleum supplies.

Iran and the United States have exchanged proposals in recent weeks aimed at ending the conflict and restoring normal maritime traffic. Trump rejected a recent Iranian offer, however, and significant disagreements remain over Tehran’s nuclear program, sanctions and control of shipping routes.

Among the unresolved issues is Iran’s refusal to abandon uranium enrichment or surrender its existing stockpile, despite American demands for substantial restrictions. Iranian officials maintain that their nuclear activities are intended for peaceful purposes, while Washington and Israel continue to warn about the possibility of an Iranian nuclear weapon.

The president’s announcement also comes as the Iran conflict increasingly influences the American midterm election campaign. Rising gasoline prices and concerns about the cost of military operations have become major political issues, with Republican candidates facing pressure over the administration’s handling of the war.

A recent Reuters/Ipsos survey found that 60% of Americans disapproved of Trump’s handling of the Iran conflict. The war has also become a significant concern for Republicans seeking to preserve their congressional majorities in the November elections.

Oil markets reacted to Thursday’s announcement, with crude prices retreating from earlier gains as traders assessed the reduced likelihood of immediate American military action. Brent crude moved toward $103 per barrel following the president’s statement, while U.S. benchmark crude fell to approximately $90.

Nevertheless, tensions in the Persian Gulf remain elevated. Recent attacks involving commercial vessels and threats to shipping routes have continued to raise concerns about the security of international energy supplies, even as American officials maintain that substantial volumes of oil are moving through the Strait of Hormuz.

Trump’s pledge applies specifically to the period before November 3. He did not say whether the United States would resume military operations after the elections if negotiations fail, leaving the administration’s longer-term intentions unresolved.

{Matzav.com}

The IDF announced Thursday that it had eliminated two Hamas terrorists in separate airstrikes in Gaza earlier this week, including a battalion commander who was involved in holding Israeli hostages Emily Damari, Romi Gonen and Matan Angrest during their captivity. The military said both terrorists had recently been involved in planning attacks against Israeli soldiers and civilians while working to rebuild Hamas’ military capabilities in violation of the ceasefire.

The first operation took place Monday in the Gaza City area, where the Israeli Air Force targeted and killed Muhammad Muhsen Nimr Yazji, a commander in Hamas’ Shati Battalion.

According to the IDF, Yazji played a role in holding Israeli captives in the Gaza City Brigade’s area of operations during the war. Among those held under the terrorist organization’s control were Damari, Gonen and Angrest, three Israelis whose abductions and captivity drew widespread attention.

Damari and Gonen were abducted during the Hamas-led massacre on October 7, 2023, while Angrest, an IDF soldier, was captured during the fighting that day.

In a separate operation Tuesday, Israeli forces carried out an airstrike in the Sabra neighborhood of Gaza City, killing Muhammad Fawzi Muhammad Awad Gamal, a member of Hamas’ Daraj Tuffah Battalion.

The IDF said both men had remained involved in terrorist activities despite the ceasefire agreement, including efforts to organize attacks targeting Israeli troops and civilians.

Military officials also accused the two operatives of participating in attempts to restore Hamas’ operational capabilities, activities the IDF described as repeated breaches of the ceasefire.

The military said the airstrikes were carried out to eliminate the threats posed by the terrorists and prevent them from advancing additional attacks.

Before carrying out the strikes, the IDF said it implemented measures intended to reduce the possibility of civilian casualties. These included employing precision-guided weapons and conducting aerial surveillance of the targeted locations.

The military did not provide specific details about the attacks the two terrorists were allegedly preparing, nor did it disclose whether additional Hamas operatives were present at the locations when the strikes occurred.

The announcement comes amid continuing Israeli operations against Hamas members accused of attempting to reorganize the terrorist group’s military infrastructure despite the ceasefire. Israeli officials have repeatedly warned that Hamas operatives are seeking to rebuild their forces and prepare additional attacks.

In another operation disclosed Wednesday, the IDF said it had eliminated two Hamas terrorists after they emerged from Kamal Adwan Hospital in northern Gaza. According to the military, one of the men subsequently planted explosive devices near the ceasefire line in an attempt to target Israeli soldiers. The second was identified as Muhammad Tammous, a Hamas sniper who also worked in Gaza’s civil defense services.

The latest operations also follow the IDF’s announcement last month that it had eliminated Mahmoud Abd al-Fattah Awad, another Hamas commander accused of participating in the captivity of Israeli hostages. The military identified seven former captives connected to that case: Daniella Gilboa, Karina Ariev, Doron Steinbrecher, Naama Levy, Ziv Berman, Omri Miran and Eitan Mor.

Under the ceasefire arrangement, Israeli forces remain deployed in designated areas of Gaza, with the military maintaining that it retains the authority to respond to immediate threats against its personnel and Israeli civilians.

The IDF said troops operating under Southern Command remain positioned in accordance with the agreement and will continue taking action against threats identified in the area.

{Matzav.com}

Sen. Chris Coons (D-Del.) is calling for a broad reassessment of America’s military relationship with Israel, raising the possibility of reconsidering weapons transfers, joint defense technology projects, and other longstanding elements of security cooperation between the two countries. His remarks signal that even military programs developed jointly by Washington and Yerushalayim could face renewed scrutiny as debate over American support for Israel continues in the Senate.

Appearing Wednesday on Bloomberg’s “Balance of Power,” Coons said that “we should have a re-examination of our relationship” between the United States and Israel. He specifically identified shared military development initiatives as an area requiring closer examination, declaring that “part of our re-examination needs to be looking at what weapons systems we’re developing jointly, what technology we’re developing jointly.”

The Delaware Democrat also indicated that the discussion should extend across a wide range of American exports to Israel, including equipment designed for civilian purposes that can also be used militarily. Referring to debates already taking place on Capitol Hill, Coons said, “we have hotly debated in the Senate over the last year, things from purely civilian items, but with military applications, like bulldozers, and things with purely military applications…I think all of that has to be reconsidered and debated.”

Bloomberg co-host Kailey Leinz pressed Coons on whether his proposed review could eventually translate into restrictions on American arms shipments, particularly if Israel’s military operations in Gaza and Lebanon continue without a diplomatic resolution. She also raised the prospect of Coons becoming chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in a future Senate.

Leinz asked, “Well, and if you potentially become the chair of the Foreign Relations Committee in the new Senate, as you talk about a re-examination of this relationship, could that also mean re-examining the arms that are provided to Israel if there is no peace solution by that time and they’re continuing to prosecute, not just what is happening in the Gaza Strip, but elsewhere as well, including Lebanon, could you see yourself deciding that there should be restrictions around what is provided?”

Coons responded by pointing to discussions about the future structure of American military assistance to Israel, including comments by Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu suggesting that the two countries consider moving away from direct military grants as they negotiate their next long-term security assistance agreement.

“Look, Prime Minister Netanyahu himself has suggested that, as we negotiate the next MOU between the United States and Israel, we should seriously consider ending the direct donation to Israel of American military aid. We sell weapons, sophisticated, advanced weapons, to dozens and dozens of countries. Israel is and will remain our ally. And I think — I’ll stand by what I said, we should have a re-examination of our relationship.”

The memorandum of understanding, or MOU, governing American security assistance to Israel currently provides for $38 billion in military support over ten years, covering fiscal years 2019 through 2028. That framework includes $33 billion in foreign military financing and $5 billion for missile defense cooperation. Negotiations over a successor agreement will help determine the future of the security partnership.

Coons emphasized that reviewing the relationship would also require examining collaborative defense projects that have delivered important technological and strategic benefits to both countries. He cited the missile defense systems used to protect Israel from Iranian attacks as an example of the value of such cooperation.

“I think a part of our re-examination needs to be looking at what weapons systems we’re developing jointly, what technology we’re developing jointly. Some of the missile defense systems that have largely defended Israel from Iran were jointly developed between the United States and Israel, and there is real benefit to the American people in that.”

American-Israeli missile defense cooperation includes programs such as Arrow and David’s Sling, alongside extensive American support for Iron Dome. These systems have become central components of Israel’s defense against rockets, missiles, and other aerial threats, while joint development has also contributed to American defense capabilities.

The senator then turned to the controversial issue of heavy American-made bombs supplied to Israel during its war against Hamas. Coons alleged that 2,000-pound bombs had been used extensively against civilian targets in Gaza, and he linked that concern to the Biden administration’s earlier decision to suspend a shipment of such munitions.

“These 2,000-pound bombs have overwhelmingly been used on civilian targets in the war against Hamas in Gaza. And I think that was partly the cause for the pause by the Biden administration on their transfer. I thought that what was notified by the Trump administration was broader than just that transfer. And we have hotly debated in the Senate over the last year, things from purely civilian items, but with military applications, like bulldozers, and things with purely military applications, like the bombs you’re referencing. I think all of that has to be reconsidered and debated.”

Coons’ allegation about the use of heavy bombs against civilian targets was presented without supporting evidence in the interview. Israel has maintained that its military operations target Hamas terrorists and military infrastructure, and that Hamas’ use of civilian areas for military purposes has complicated efforts to avoid civilian casualties.

The Biden administration halted a shipment of 2,000-pound bombs in 2024 amid concerns over Israel’s military campaign in Rafah. President Trump’s administration subsequently reversed the hold in 2025, restoring the transfer of the munitions.

Coons did not announce a specific proposal to prohibit arms sales or terminate joint military projects. His comments nevertheless made clear that he wants Congress to revisit the full range of American military cooperation with Israel, from advanced weapons and missile defense development to equipment with potential battlefield applications.

The debate comes as Israel has already begun exploring a different model for its future relationship with Washington. In January, Netanyahu said he wanted Israel to gradually eliminate its dependence on American military aid over the next decade. Israeli defense officials have also discussed placing greater emphasis on joint research, weapons development, and strategic cooperation in a successor agreement, rather than relying primarily on direct financial assistance.

That distinction could become particularly significant if lawmakers pursue the broader review advocated by Coons. While Netanyahu’s proposal would reduce Israel’s reliance on American funding, Coons is suggesting that even the collaborative defense initiatives expected to play a larger role in the future relationship should be subject to congressional examination.

{Matzav.com}