Watch: Rav Shmuel Zev Juravel on Vayigash
WATCH:
WATCH:
LISTEN:
https://matzav.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/Bitachon4Life-Shiur-1663-Chikuy-Part-63-Yeshua.mp3For more info, email bitachon4life@gmail.com.
By Jonathan S. Tobin
The most important thing about the Anti-Defamation League’s latest “Mamdani Monitor” is that its results were so unsurprising and generated few headlines in New York or anywhere else. That 20% of New York City mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani’s 400 appointees to various transition committees have ties to anti-Zionist and antisemitic groups—or have engaged in acts of Jew-hatred online—is, in and of itself, an astounding figure. It’s even more astounding when you consider that they are engaged in an effort to govern a city with the largest Jewish population in the world.
But then, what else would you expect from someone whose entire political career is rooted in opposition to the existence of the one Jewish state on the planet?
Mamdani dismissed the ADL’s data as unimportant and claimed that those who accuse him of complicity with Jew-hatred don’t distinguish between “criticism of Israel” and actual antisemitism.
A hostile administration
That isn’t true since the ADL report took into account such a difference. Like Mamdani himself, appointees who had engaged in antisemitism weren’t merely “critical” of Israeli government policies. They seek the destruction of the Jewish state and/or support terrorism against it, as well as acts of intimidation and violence elsewhere aimed at bolstering Hamas’s genocidal goals and silencing Jews who will not renounce their ties and affection for Israel.
The question is: Will the sheer numbers of antisemites in the Mamdani camp overwhelm the ability of those seeking to hold him accountable for his tolerance and encouragement of Jew-hatred? One such appointee, Catherine Almonte Da Costa, who was set to hold the crucial job of director of appointments, was forced to resign after her record of making antisemitic comments on social media was made public.But in an administration where there will be more than 1,200 political appointees, the ADL report points to an obvious problem. It indicates just how prevalent this sort of behavior, which would have been considered aberrant even in the most liberal of governments in the recent past, has become among the Democratic Party activists who will take these jobs after Mamdani takes office on Jan. 1.
Mamdani leapt into prominence from obscurity only after he won the New York City Democratic primary in June. Before then, the 34-year-old was an obscure member of the New York State Assembly and one of many hard-core leftists who make up a body that has a veto-proof Democratic supermajority. In the few months since, he has become not just a leading political figure in New York City, but a national celebrity of sorts that even some on the other end of the political spectrum—such as President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance—have acted as if it was in their interest to ingratiate rather than confront him.
Does it matter?
We have been assured by leading Democrats not to worry about Mamdani endangering the Jews of New York, and he has himself often spoken as if that is not his intention. His stated plan to leave in place New York City Police Commissioner Jessica Tisch, who is Jewish and perceived as a moderate Democrat, is also supposed to demonstrate that Mamdani’s long record of anti-Zionist activism and statements—which is, his disclaimers notwithstanding, indistinguishable from antisemitism—is a mere biographical detail that will have no impact on Jewish life in New York over the next four years.
Indeed, Mamdani is clearly aware that it’s in his interest to disarm Jewish critics.
In the wake of the mass shooting that killed 15 people on the first night of Chanukah in Australia, Mamdani reached out to the Chabad-Lubavitch movement and paid a visit to the grave of the late Lubavitcher Rebbe—Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson—in Queens, N.Y., as a solidarity gesture. In the week before the terrorist attack, he met with prominent rabbis, including some who were deeply critical of him. He also had a friendly meet-and-greet with the anti-Zionist Satmar sect that supported him in the election.
Yet even as he keeps saying that he wants to keep New York Jews safe and is opposed to antisemitism, he hasn’t budged an inch from his position that the Jewish state has no right to exist. And even after Bondi Beach and two years of the surge in antisemitism that followed the Hamas-led Palestinian Arab terrorist attacks in Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, Mamdani still won’t condemn the use of the slogan “Globalize the intifada” from his fellow anti-Israel activists.
As the ADL report indicated, he’s not alone in thinking that way. A significant number of those who are key members of his team and who will govern the city agree. They were among those who were cheering the illegal protests at colleges and universities throughout the five boroughs, where pro-Hamas mobs set up encampments, bullied Jewish students, blocked their entrance to classes and engaged in the violent takeover of buildings on campus.
Mamdani and his liberal media cheering section insist that there’s a difference between anti-Israel agitation and being anti-Jewish. But as his reaction to the siege of Park East Synagogue on Manhattan’s Upper East Side indicated—where a pro-Hamas mob sought to “scare” Jews and prevent them from attending a pro-Israel event—the mayor-elect’s sympathies are with those attacking the Jewish community, not the victims of such attacks.
A hostile environment
As that incident demonstrated, at the very least, his administration will create an atmosphere where those who target Jews in New York for intimidation and support violence against them in Israel will feel empowered. Whether or not Tisch remains police commissioner for long—or even if she is willing to act as a real check on his soft-on-crime and tolerance for antisemitism—the policies he is likely to implement will only exacerbate the problem.
In particular, the shift toward a “community safety” approach to crime that will emphasize social work, rather than police action, is likely to make a city where few feel safe even more dangerous. His determination to eliminate the New York City Police Department’s Strategic Response Unit, which is trained to deal with protests, will also be a gift that is likely to keep on giving to those who chant “Globalize the intifada” in the coming years.
Yet at the most basic level, the statistics about the number of his appointees who have engaged in Jew-hatred point to the real problem.
It’s not just that the election as mayor of someone whose adult life has been dedicated to hatred of Israel is chilling to the overwhelming majority of New York’s Jews, who regard Israel and Zionism as an integral part of their faith and ethnic identity. In his administration, such sentiments will become so commonplace that it won’t be possible to single them out as worthy of condemnation and outrage.
It’s true that Mamdani won’t be able, as he continues to threaten to do, to arrest Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu when he visits the city. And the fact that, unlike every other mayor since it began in 1964, Mamdani won’t march up Fifth Avenue in the annual “Salute to Israel” parade isn’t that big a deal.
Still, such gestures and policies will have a cumulative effect on public life in New York. They will create what in other contexts is easily identified as a hostile environment that will not only put Jews at risk but also make Jewish life more precarious. Outside of interactions with outlier groups like the Satmars or the not-inconsiderable number of (though still a minority) Jews who share the Democratic Socialist’s radical views, Mamdani’s disingenuous attempt to be an open opponent of a key aspect of Jewish identity without being viewed as antisemitic won’t wash.
The lessons of history
The Mamdani administration in New York is likely to teach us a lesson that should have already been obvious from even a cursory glance at Jewish history. Targeting one group of Jews or Jewish beliefs always leads to growing hostility against and ultimately violence against all Jews. And ignoring such problems or complacently wishing for them to go away won’t work.
Such horrors are only averted when societies regard the traditional tropes of Jew-hatred that are employed by left-wing antisemites like Mamdani, as well as the growing number of right-wingers who mimic them, as beyond the pale of civil discourse. Leading media outlets like The New York Times have mainstreamed antisemitic arguments about Israel and the Jews since Oct. 7 in their news coverage and commentary.
However, the election of Mamdani and the inauguration of a city administration where such views will be routine will take this process to the next level.
Though the new mayor will claim to oppose violence against Jews, the presence of so many city officials who have engaged in acts of Jew-hatred will remove any remaining stigma from such actions, no matter who is doing it.
In recent years, under its current CEO and national director, Jonathan Greenblatt, the ADL has seemed to abandon its primary mission of defending Jews against antisemitism in favor of left-wing and partisan activism. While there is still much to criticize in ADL’s approach to the issues, its decision to employ its considerable resources to scrutinize Mamdani is a welcome sign that it is returning to the job the Jewish community needs it to do.
They should not be alone in this.
Understandably, the reaction of most New York Jewish institutions and leaders to Mamdani’s election is to find a way to work with him, and hopefully, to influence the new mayor to abandon his radical past. But Mamdani is no ordinary politician, both in terms of his ability to appeal to young voters and his commitment to the causes that he supports.
Accommodation won’t work
No amount of making nice with the mayor or seeking common ground will ever convince this hard-core ideologue to give up his lifelong commitment to Israel’s destruction. He has made no secret of the fact that his “pro-Palestine” support for the ongoing war on the Jews is non-negotiable. While that won’t stop him from carrying out some of the basic functions of running the city, it is incompatible with Jewish safety.
The ADL report is one more warning to New York’s Jews that the only path forward must involve active resistance to an administration that is determined to marginalize and isolate them, even if it won’t openly back attacks on them. That will mean public protests and activities to confront the mayor and make it clear that business as usual will be impossible if Jew-hatred is tolerated and encouraged. And that will require the kind of courage and chutzpah to which the liberal-leaning Jewish establishment is generally allergic. But it is the only choice if New York is to remain a place where Jews and their families can still feel at home.
Jonathan S. Tobin is editor-in-chief of JNS (Jewish News Syndicate). Follow him: @jonathans_tobin.
{Matzav.com}
The United States remains open to nuclear pact talks with Iran, which again rejected Washington’s advances during a United Nations Security Council meeting.
The session focused on implementing the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, or JCPOA, of 2015 which outlined Iran’s commitments to limit its nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief.
The permanent Security Council members—United States, United Kingdom, France, China and Russia—signed the agreement, as did Germany and the European Union.
Tuesday marked the first council gathering on the nuclear issue since sanctions were reimposed on the Islamic Republic through a so-called “snapback” mechanism, which the United Kingdom, France and Germany—known as the E3—triggered.
Sanctions were reimposed due to Iranian noncompliance with verification measures and limits on uranium enrichment levels.
“The United States remains available for formal talks with Iran but only if Tehran is prepared for direct and meaningful dialogue,” Morgan Ortagus, Washington’s deputy Middle East envoy, told the council.
“We have been clear, however, about certain expectations for any arrangement,” Ortagus said. “Foremost, there can be no enrichment inside of Iran, and that remains our principle.”
Citing its membership in the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, Tehran said that American insistence on a zero uranium enrichment policy was a non-starter in talks.
“We appreciate any fair and meaningful negotiation, but insisting on zero enrichment policy, it is contrary to our rights as a member of the NPT, and it means that they are not pursuing a fair negotiation,” Amir Saeid Iravani, Iran’s U.N. envoy, said.
“They want to dictate their predetermined intention on Iran,” he added. “Iran will not bow down to any pressure and intimidation.”
Washington, which withdrew from the JCPOA in 2018 during U.S. President Donald Trump’s first term, held five rounds of negotiations with Iran over the summer. Those talks did not yield an agreement, and a 60-day window for resolution, which Trump had set to expire in June, expired.
Israel struck Iranian targets, including nuclear facilities, the next day, triggering a 12-day war, during which the United States also bombed Iranian nuclear facilities.
“The lack of implementation by Iran of its international obligations related to its nuclear program constitute a grave threat to international peace and security,” said Jay Dharmadhikari, France’s deputy U.N. ambassador.
Dharmadhikari said that Iran’s uranium stockpile “would be of a sufficient quantity to produce 10 nuclear explosive devices” if increased slightly to military-grade levels.
Most signatories to the JCPOA say that the pact remains in force despite the diplomatic degradation this year. Moscow says the accord is a non-entity.
Vassily Nebenzia, Russia’s U.N. ambassador, lashed out at Slovenia, the current council president, for even scheduling Tuesday’s meeting. He said that the country did not “find the courage to impartially uphold your obligation not to act at the behest of those who insisted on holding a Security Council meeting on a non-existent agenda item.”
Nebenzia said that the EU, which coordinates the JCPOA committee, should not be allowed to brief the council, because the pact “does not exist anymore.”
Iravani agreed, telling the council that the JCPOA, which was put into force through Security Council Resolution 2231, expired on Oct. 18, as the accord states.
The E3 triggered the snapback provision shortly before the expiration date.
The Iranian envoy said that the accord “ceased to have any legal effect or operative mandate” and that there is “no mandate for the secretary-general to submit any report and no mandate for the council to hold discussions on it.”
He said that those who think the pact remains valid are engaging in a “calculated distortion” of the resolution.
Hedda Samson, deputy EU head of delegation, said that “the snapback of sanctions and nuclear restrictions must not be the end of diplomacy.”
“Quite the opposite,” Samson said. She urged Iran to give the International Atomic Energy Agency watchdog verifiable information on its nuclear program. JNS
{Matzav.com}
During a tish at the main beis medrash of the Karlin-Stolin chassidus in Givat Ze’ev, the Stoliner Rebbe addressed one of the most sensitive and widely debated issues in today’s chareidi world: the use of smartphones and modern technology.
Speaking at length, the Rebbe presented an approach that recognizes contemporary reality while insisting on uncompromising vigilance and spiritual responsibility. He began by noting that the world has changed and that technological devices have become deeply embedded in daily life.
“We have reached a situation where no one can honestly say it’s possible to manage without devices,” the Rebbe said. “It’s not possible. We need them. But that is precisely why there must be proper filtering, and they must be used with safeguards.”
The Rebbe rejected the view that a total ban on devices is the sole solution, illustrating his point with a practical analogy. “If someone shouts that it’s dangerous, driving a car is also dangerous,” he said. “There are many things in the world that involve danger. Just as we don’t tell a person not to drive because the road is dangerous, we cannot completely prevent the use of devices.”
At the same time, the Rebbe stressed that recognizing the need for technology does not mean unrestricted use. He directed pointed remarks to young avreichim building their homes, emphasizing that owning a device is not a religious obligation.
“An avreich who has just gotten married does not need to immediately run out and buy a device,” the Rebbe said. “It’s not a mitzvah. Devices should be used only for what is truly necessary—work needs and essential arrangements—not for nonsense or wasting time.”
Concluding his remarks, the Rebbe reminded his chassidim that beyond filters and human effort, a Jew’s greatest protection is tefillah. “We must daven and beg the Ribbono Shel Olam to guard us, our children, and our families,” he said. “We have to live with yosher halev—uprightness of heart.”
{Matzav.com}[Audio below.] The controversy surrounding Israel’s proposed draft legislation intensified Wednesday night after Rav Dovid Cohen, rosh yeshiva of Chevron Yeshiva, issued a sweeping and uncompromising rejection of the Bismuth draft law. In sharp remarks delivered to talmidim at the yeshiva, Rav Cohen ruled out any compromise and declared that even young men who are not currently learning in a yeshiva framework may not be drafted into the army.
A recording of the address, revealed Wednesday evening by journalist Yoeli Brim on Channel 13 News, shows Rav Cohen leaving no room for debate over whether non-learning yeshiva-age men could be conscripted. He framed the issue not as a technical question of manpower, but as a fundamental struggle over the spiritual character of the Jewish people, warning that the draft law represents an attempt to secularize Torah society.
According to Rav Cohen, the current moment constitutes “a war for the very existence of the yeshivos.” He stressed that the discussion surrounding enlistment is not about how many soldiers the army needs, but about a broader cultural battle aimed at uprooting Torah from Klal Yisroel and drawing bnei Torah away from the beis medrash into a secular way of life. “This is a war on multiple fronts,” he said, describing it as an effort “to take us out of the yeshivos and bring us into lives of chilonius.”
In his remarks, Rav Cohen revealed that he had been formally approached with a series of questions regarding the draft, including distinctions between those who are learning and those who are not. He dismissed the entire framework of such inquiries, saying they were designed only to confuse the public. “Anyone who knows that Klal Yisroel has no existence without Torah, and that Torah and Klal Yisroel are embodied in the world of yeshivos, understands that whoever separates from the yeshiva world loses all of his spiritual standing,” Rav Cohen said. “These are not questions. Someone who understands does not ask, and someone who wants answers, I have no answers for him.”
LISTEN:
{Matzav.com}
Health officials are warning that this year’s flu season is being shaped by a particularly transmissible and hard-hitting strain that is rapidly gaining ground across the country.
The surge is being linked to a newly identified offshoot of influenza A (H3N2), known as subclade K. Public health monitoring shows that this mutation has become dominant in recent samples, both internationally and within the United States.
In a recent update, the World Health Organization described subclade K as a significant shift in the evolution of H3N2 viruses, raising concerns among researchers about how closely this season’s flu vaccine matches the circulating strain.
Doctors say patients infected with the K variant are often experiencing more pronounced symptoms than usual. Reported complaints include high fever, shaking chills, head pain, exhaustion, persistent cough, sore throat, and nasal congestion.
Data from the CDC indicates that nearly 90% of 216 recently analyzed H3N2 samples collected since late September were identified as subclade K, underscoring how quickly the variant has taken hold.
Respiratory illness activity is especially elevated in parts of the Northeast and several other regions. Surveillance tracking outpatient visits — not limited to confirmed flu cases — shows very high levels in New York City, New York State, New Jersey, Rhode Island, Louisiana, and Colorado. High activity has also been reported across multiple additional states and in Washington, D.C.
So far this season, federal estimates attribute at least 4.6 million illnesses, roughly 49,000 hospital admissions, and approximately 1,900 deaths to influenza.
Speaking with Fox News Digital, Dr. Neil Maniar, a professor of public health practice at Northeastern University, said early patterns suggest an unusually severe flu season. He noted that areas overseas where subclade K circulated earlier saw substantial illness, a trend that now appears to be emerging domestically as well.
Maniar described the current situation as a “perfect storm,” pointing to a combination of lower overall vaccination rates and uncertainty about how precisely this year’s vaccine targets the mutation. While the vaccine remains strongly recommended, he explained that a less-than-ideal match could be contributing to the intensity of cases being reported.
Despite these concerns, Maniar emphasized that getting vaccinated remains worthwhile, even now. Peak flu activity has not yet arrived, and the vaccine still offers important protection against severe outcomes linked to the K variant.
He also cautioned that flu complications are not limited to high-risk groups. Healthy individuals can become seriously ill, particularly as colder weather and indoor gatherings increase exposure risks. According to Maniar, partial immunity can begin developing within days of vaccination, with full protection generally reached within two weeks — making this an important window for those who have not yet received their flu shot.
{Matzav.com}