Feed aggregator

President Donald Trump said this weekend that he is willing to dispatch National Guard units to New York City if the situation warrants it, framing the option as part of his broader readiness to use federal forces to confront the country’s growing urban crime crises.

Speaking briefly with reporters, Trump emphasized that New York remains on his list for potential deployment. “If they need it. Right now, other places need it more,” he said, noting that decisions would be made based on where the urgency is greatest.

His comments reflect the same approach that has already led him to green-light Guard deployments and federal law enforcement activity in cities such as Washington, D.C., and Los Angeles. Those moves align with his crime-focused platform, which prioritizes aggressive intervention in areas struggling with public disorder.

Domestic activation of the National Guard has historically been reserved for moments of major unrest or natural disaster, often triggered by a governor’s request or by local authorities unable to maintain control. In New York, however, state leaders and city lawmakers have made clear their opposition to federal intervention.

Back on Oct. 23, the New York City Council and a coalition of clergy held a press conference warning that the introduction of “military or federal teams” would “undermine public safety and the city’s economy.” Gov. Kathy Hochul has reportedly been in communication with Wall Street executives as she seeks to dissuade Washington from sending troops into the city.

The legal landscape surrounding Guard deployments differs across jurisdictions. In Washington, D.C.—which has no governor—the National Guard operates under federal command. That structure recently contributed to a court ruling deeming one such deployment “unlawful” because it exceeded the president’s statutory limits. In states like New York, by contrast, Guard control typically rests with the governor unless the units are federalized.

For that reason, any federal move to send troops into New York raises questions about state consent, the Guard’s appropriate role in policing, and the boundaries set by constitutional and statutory law. Legal scholars warn that placing Guard members into a civilian law-enforcement role without specific authorization may violate those restrictions.

From a policy perspective, Trump’s latest remarks suggest he is prepared to extend the model he used in D.C. to other large Democratic-run cities—setting the stage for another potential clash between federal and state authorities over law-and-order strategy.

{Matzav.com}

Two senators who lead a bipartisan antisemitism task force said Friday they want more information from the U.S. Coast Guard about how it will investigate incidents of swastikas, nooses or other hate symbols being displayed in its ranks. The Coast Guard late Thursday released a new, firmer policy addressing the display of such hate symbols, […]

American far-right commentator Candace Owens ignited international uproar Saturday after posting a sweeping, unverified allegation on X accusing French President Emmanuel Macron and First Lady Brigitte Macron of ordering an assassination plot against her — and claiming an Israeli operative was part of the team allegedly sent to kill her. In a message marked “URGENT,” […]

President Donald Trump sharpened the pressure on Ukraine over the weekend, telling reporters that if Volodymyr Zelenskyy refuses the U.S.-crafted peace blueprint to halt the conflict with Russia, he is free to, as Trump put it, “continue to fight his little heart out.” His remarks landed as European allies warned that the proposal could leave Ukraine exposed down the road.

While speaking to the press as he left the White House, Trump pushed back on criticism surrounding the 28-point American plan, saying it should not be viewed as his “final offer.” His comments aired live on Newsmax as he again lamented the war’s existence. “We’d like to get the peace. It should have happened a long time ago,” he said, later adding, “The Ukraine war with Russia should have never happened,” and insisting, “One way or the other, we have to get it ended. If I were President, [the war] never would have happened.”

According to officials briefed on the draft, the proposal would force Kyiv to relinquish more territory, permanently shelve any intentions of joining NATO, and accept strict limits on its military size. Trump set a Thanksgiving deadline for Zelenskyy to deliver his answer.

Kyiv announced that its representatives will soon sit down with American officials in Switzerland to hash through the details. Zelenskyy acknowledged the gravity of the choice, saying the deal makes him consider “the loss of our dignity or the risk of losing a key partner,” a line that reflects the immense political strain surrounding the decision.

Earlier in the day, nine European heads of state expressed misgivings about aspects of the U.S. plan, especially the proposed restraints on Ukraine’s armed forces. Those military caps, they argued, “would leave Ukraine vulnerable to future attack.”

Russia, which launched what it calls its “special military operation” in February 2022, continues to assert its goals of “denazification” and demilitarization of Ukraine. Along with curbing Kyiv’s military and blocking NATO membership, Moscow is still pushing for legally protected status for the Russian language within Ukraine.

{Matzav.com}

President Donald Trump struck a triumphant tone as he highlighted new polling that he says shows him reaching “the highest poll numbers of my political career,” crediting his standing to what he describes as major successes on the economy, global stability, border control, and crime reduction.

On Truth Social, Trump enthusiastically declared, “I HAVE JUST GOTTEN THE HIGHEST POLL NUMBERS OF MY ‘POLITICAL CAREER.’ While my great work on the Economy has not yet been fully appreciated, it will be! Things are really Rockin.’ Stopping WARS and Foreign Relations seems to be a strong suit.” His message underscored his belief that voters are beginning to fully recognize the impact of his policies.

Fresh data from the Rasmussen Reports Daily Presidential Tracking Poll placed Trump at 47% approval among likely voters. For context, Joe Biden held a 42% average approval rating around the same point in November 2021, marking a clear contrast that Trump’s team has eagerly emphasized.

Trump also spotlighted what he considers key pillars of his administration’s record. He again praised his immigration strategy, pointing to his efforts to choke off illegal crossings at the southern border, while also applauding initiatives aimed at reducing crime in urban centers.

His message closed with another burst of confidence: “Also great, The Border and Stopping Crime. I predict that the Economy, with the already HIGHEST STOCK MARKET, EVER, and prices coming sharply down from the Biden disaster, will soon be at the top of the list. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!”

Trump’s upbeat pitch suggests he sees the improving numbers as validation of his agenda — and a sign that his political momentum continues to build.

{Matzav.com}

The IDF on Sunday attempted to eliminate Hezbollah leader Ali Tabatabai, one of Hezbollah’s most prominent figures and currently the terror group’s de facto chief of staff. The airstrike was carried out in the Dahiya quarter of Beirut at about noon, the IDF spokesperson confirmed. It is the first time that Israel has carried out […]

A motorist in western North Carolina escaped injury when the carcass of a cat crashed into the passenger side of her front windshield along a highway near the Great Smoky Mountains National Park. In a call to 911, the unidentified driver on U.S. Route 74 in Swain County, near Bryson City, told a dispatcher that […]

Tucker Carlson released a new interview with 24-year-old Nalin Haley, reigniting controversy just weeks after his episode with extremist Nick Fuentes. The two spent much of their discussion attacking dual citizenship, railing against legal immigration, and accusing Israel of swaying American policymaking.

Their conversation quickly pivoted to Israel, with Carlson and Haley ridiculing what they described as an American political “obsession” with the Jewish state. They labeled that focus “weird” and “unhealthy,” echoing claims Carlson has made repeatedly in recent months. Haley’s appearance followed the highly publicized GOP primary challenge his mother, Nikki Haley, mounted against US President Donald Trump in 2024.

Carlson has faced mounting backlash over his increasingly conspiratorial commentary about Israel. He has floated baseless suggestions about hidden Israeli links to the 9/11 attacks and Jeffrey Epstein, claimed Israel prosecutes war in Gaza over notions of “blood-guilt,” and accused Jerusalem of mistreating Christians amid its battles with the Palestinians.

In that same vein, he has repeatedly portrayed Ben Shapiro — an Orthodox Jewish commentator and outspoken defender of Israel — as someone whose loyalty belongs to Israel rather than the United States, even asserting Shapiro has failed to oppose “usury.” Critics have identified these claims as textbook antisemitic rhetoric.

The segment with Haley veered into these themes after a broader foreign-policy exchange. Carlson pressed him on what he described as the persistent push for “another regime change war, in whatever country,” a remark widely interpreted as an Iran reference. Trump had openly supported Israel’s aggressive stance toward Tehran’s nuclear program, a position Carlson has derided, prompting Trump to label him “kooky.”

Haley responded, “I don’t think they’re advocating for it just because they’re advocating for it, I think there’s interest groups that are pushing them to advocate for it.” Carlson immediately agreed: “Clearly there are, we’ve learned a lot about that recently.”

Carlson then introduced what he termed “the Israel question,” and Haley described it as “the question no one wants to ask.” Carlson added, “I never felt it was as central as it turned out to be.”

That led to a reference to Nick Fuentes. Carlson noted that the far-right figure “is famous for saying naughty things, but also saying a pretty straightforward critique of the control that Israel has over the United States. Is that view widely shared, do you think?” Fuentes, whom Carlson interviewed earlier in the month, is openly agnostic on whether the Holocaust happened, calling it a pillar of Jewish identity and tying Jewishness to anti-white animus. Carlson introduced that interview by claiming Fuentes’s popularity stems from racism against white Americans.

Haley avoided addressing Fuentes’s ideology directly, but agreed with Carlson’s description of younger Americans as “increasingly skeptical, if not hostile,” toward Israel. He argued, “I don’t think it’s anything we’ve done. I think it’s all reliant on Israel. That’s on them, actually not us.”

He added that “the reality is, they’re just another country,” insisting he did not consider Israel “evil,” but maintaining that “if they want a better relationship with the United States, they need to stop interfering in our politics.”

Haley emphasized that his criticisms extended to all foreign governments, not only Israel. He argued that all foreign aid and all foreign lobbying should be eliminated, saying, “It is a lot of other countries that do that. And it’s just as much a problem.”

The United States has long had strong pro-Israel advocacy networks, but many other states invest far more heavily in Washington influence campaigns. Among them is Qatar — a patron of Hamas — whose lobbyists maintain ties across partisan lines. According to filings with the US Justice Department, a Qatar-connected firm even facilitated Carlson’s interview earlier this year with the Qatari prime minister.

From there, the discussion shifted to immigration, where Haley insisted that dual citizenship should be outlawed, that Americans should not serve in foreign militaries, and that naturalized citizens should be barred from public office. Carlson said he hosted Haley as part of a broader effort to understand why so many young men are gravitating toward Fuentes’s movement.

Carlson’s earlier Fuentes interview triggered an uproar inside the Heritage Foundation, where a wave of resignations followed the organization’s leader declining to condemn the appearance. The fallout has highlighted a growing divide on the American right over Israel, antisemitism, and the ideologies that Carlson is increasingly platforming.

{Matzav.com}

A violent eruption in downtown Chicago Friday night — where a protest spiraled into a full-scale riot — had President Donald Trump sharply condemning the city’s Democratic leadership yesterday. His criticism came less than 24 hours after his unexpectedly warm Oval Office meeting with democratic socialist New York City Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani.

Trump took to Truth Social as reports of shootings and injured officers poured in. “Massive crime and rioting in the Chicago Loop area,” he wrote. He added grim details: “Multiple Police Officers attacked and badly injured. 300 people rioting, 6 victims shot, one critical and one DEAD.”

According to ABC7, gunfire erupted in two different parts of the Loop, prompting crowds of visitors to flee. One teenager was fatally struck after being hit by at least one bullet. The scenes of confusion and panic quickly reignited debate over Chicago’s approach to public safety.

Trump seized on the unfolding violence to accuse Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker and Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson of allowing disorder to spiral by rejecting federal support. “In the meantime, Governor Pritzker and the Low IQ Mayor of Chicago are refusing Federal Government help for a situation that could be quickly remedied,” Trump wrote, finishing with a jab at local leadership: “The people are chanting, BRING IN TRUMP!!!”

Early reports described up to 300 teenagers flooding the Loop, instigating confrontations that escalated into attacks on police. Alderman Brian Hopkins, who was on the ground, shared what he saw: “300 juveniles rioting in the Loop now, at least 5 victims shot, one critical with life threatening gunshot wound to torso.” He then added, “Multiple police officers attacked and injured with mace and stun guns, at least one PO hospitalized.”

ABC7 noted that investigators believed two separate shooting incidents unfolded in the area. The Loop — Chicago’s central business district named for the elevated trains encircling it — saw ambulances racing to tend to a range of injuries. Fox 32 reported victims included a 13-year-old girl, shot in the leg and listed in fair condition, and a 17-year-old boy also treated for a leg wound.

Authorities had not released details about the teen who died, and by yesterday afternoon, Chicago police had not confirmed whether the two shootings were linked. No arrests or suspect descriptions had been announced as detectives worked to piece together the night’s eruption of violence.

{Matzav.com}

When Russians look back at 2025, they might remember it as the year when the government took even tighter control of the internet. Credit cards that won’t buy a ticket on public transport. ATMs that don’t connect to a network. Messaging apps that are down. Cellphones that don’t receive texts or data after a trip abroad. Mothers […]

Border Police forces were astounded to find a high-ranking IDF officer in uniform after stopping a suspicious vehicle at the Ofer checkpoint near the security barrier on Motzei Shabbos. The incident began when reconnaissance soldiers from a combat intelligence unit spotted a suspicious car stopping near the security barrier on Highway 443. Two suspects entered the […]

A Washington state resident is believed to be the first person to die from a rare strain of bird flu, but state health officials said Friday the risk to the public is low. The person, an older adult with underlying health conditions, was being treated for a bird flu called H5N5 after becoming seemingly the […]

In this episode, Rabbi Reinman relates the story of the translation of the Torah into Greek, and he explains why the Sages considered that event a day of darkness.

WATCH:

Read full chapter and earlier chapters at www.rabbireinman.com.

Chapter Thirty-nine: Dark Days in Alexandria

For two decades after his death, Alexander’s generals fought each other for control of Alexander’s vast empire in a series of four wars, known as the Wars of the Successors. In 302 b.c.e., the final division of the Alexandrine Empire emerged.

Lysimachus became king of the lands in Europe and Asia Minor. Seleucus became the king of the Near East and Mesopotamia. Ptolemy became king of Egypt. These states were politically independent and militarily aggressive. Each of them was driven by the ambition to become dominant over the others and reconstitute Alexander’s world empire under their leadership. And so, they fought each other endlessly with none of them ever emerging fully victorious.

Judea sat at the crossroads of the Greek world. After the division of the empire, Judea came under the control of the Egyptian Greeks. But the Syrians Greeks also coveted this small but important prize. The two kingdoms would fight over Judea for over a hundred years …

Ptolemy I Soter was the first Greek king of Egypt. For its entire centuries-long existence centuries, the kings of this dynasty would almost always be called Ptolemy but with an added epithet. The capital city of his kingdom was the cosmopolitan port of Alexandria, which was founded by Alexander. The city had become populous even during Alexander’s lifetime as people poured in from all parts of the empire, including many thousands of Jewish immigrants. In the decades after his death, it became a great commercial and industrial center. The Gemara relates that craftsmen in Alexandria were commissioned to manufacture the ornate doors of the Heichal and that Alexandrian expert bakers and perfumers were consulted in the Beis Hamikdash.

Ptolemy Soter aspired to make Alexandria the cultural and intellectual center of the Hellenistic world. One of his ideas was to build a library that would be a repository of all the knowledge of the civilized world. It was an enormously ambitious plan. Ptolemy Soter did not live long enough to execute it, but Ptolemy II Philadelphus, his son and successor, made the dream come true.

The library of Alexandria was a stunning achievement. At that time, books came in the form of handwritten papyrus scrolls, with some spanning several scrolls. All scrolls were copied by professional scribes.  Agents of the library scoured the world for books worthy of a place in the library. They also boarded all ships docking at the port of Alexandria and took possession of any books they found. Their scribes would copy the books, keep the originals and return the copies to the owners. In this way, the library amassed hundreds of thousands of different books, a phenomenon unheard of in the ancient world …

In the year 250 b.c.e. or thereabouts, Ptolemy II Philadelphus ordered a copy of the Torah in the Greek language for his magnificent library. The story behind this command is told by Josephus, a Jewish historian who lived three hundred years later. The works of Josephus are among the richest sources for the history of the ancient Western world. He will be discussed at length in the chapters on the first century of the common era when he lived and wrote.

According to Josephus, one of Ptolemy’s ministers urged him to acquire for his library a copy of the Jewish Bible. The absence of this important book was a glaring omission. Although the book is written in a different language and different writing, it would be worthwhile to have it translated into Greek so that it would be available to the rest of the world. In order to ensure that the translation was accurate, Ptolemy brought seventy elders from Judea and installed them in separate rooms on the island of Pharos, each to make his own translation. In the end, all the translations were essentially identical, and the Septuagint, the Greek version of the Torah, was born.

The Greek translation was welcomed with rejoicing in the great Jewish community of Alexandria … The Sages, however, had a different reaction to the translation. The day of the completion of the translation is remembered as one of three days of darkness in the month of Teves. On 8 Teves, the Torah was translated to Greek. On 9 Teves, Ezra died, and prophecy came to an end. On 10 Teves, the Babylonians breached the walls of Yerushalayim.

We can easily understand why 9 Teves and 10 Teves are considered days of darkness, but what was so monumentally tragic about the translation of the Torah into Greek? …

LISTEN:

https://matzav.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Bitachon4Life-Shiur-1637-Chikuy-Part-37-Advance.mp3

​​For more info, email bitachon4life@gmail.com.

 

 

Hamas’s military intelligence unit, numbering about 2,500 terrorists, spent five years systematically collecting information in preparation for the October 7 attack, Army Radio reported. According to IDF assessments, Hamas began this effort in 2018, monitoring nearly 100,000 soldiers and officers on social media. Hamas didn’t limit itself to public accounts. It created fake “avatar” profiles […]

LISTEN:

https://matzav.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Stories4Life-Shiur-504-Chased-Brisker-Rav.mp3

Ministers in Israel’s security cabinet have warned that if Hamas’s military buildup continues, Israel will have no choice but to launch another operation in Gaza. According to a Kan News report, defense officials presented evidence of Hamas’s increased military and political strength at a cabinet meeting on Thursday. A senior Israeli official told Kan, “If […]

A major initiative proposed by the IDF together with the Finance and Defense Ministries—intended to cancel extended emergency call-ups (known as “Tzav 8”) and cap annual reserve service at approximately 70 days—is now at risk of collapse. The plan has been halted by Attorney General Gali Baharav-Meara, who insists that no change to the reserve system can move forward unless it is directly tied to a new draft law that requires equal military service for chareidim.

According to officials involved in the discussions, the attorney general warned that pushing through a quick amendment to the Reserve Duty Law as part of the government’s economic legislation would violate constitutional principles of equality set by Israel’s High Court.

Legal Dead End: Reserve Duty Law Linked to Draft Law

In meetings between government ministries and the Attorney General’s Office, legal advisers said that there is a severe legal obstacle to modifying the reserve system without addressing the long-standing exemption for chareidi men.

The attorney general’s position is firm: allowing reservists to be called for up to 70 days a year—far longer than the norm in most Western armies—cannot be justified while one segment of the population remains fully exempt from service. In her view, increasing the burden on those who currently serve while maintaining a sweeping exemption for chareidim is unconstitutional.

Budget Battle: 60,000 Reservists and a Massive Cost Dispute

This legal confrontation is unfolding alongside a fierce budget fight between the Defense and Finance Ministries over the needs of the 2026 fiscal year.

The IDF is asking for funding for 60,000 reservists, estimating the cost at 37 billion shekels. The Finance Ministry argues the number is inflated, noting that only 50,000 were planned for 2025, and claims the real cost should be between 10 and 15 billion shekels.

The National Security Council is now reviewing the numbers. Whatever number they settle on will determine how many days each reservist will need to serve—bringing the question of unequal burden back to the center of the debate.

Smotrich Attacks: “A Political Decision With No Authority”

In response to the attorney general’s refusal, Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich launched a blistering attack, accusing her of overstepping her authority and harming national interests.

He stated that “in a political decision she is harming the army, harming reservists, and harming the state budget and the country’s economy, without having any authority.”

Smotrich added that “there is not a single serious legal expert who believes the Knesset lacks the authority to legislate limits on reserve duty.” He claimed the attorney general’s position would force Israel to continue unlimited emergency mobilizations, asking, “How does she dare take responsibility for the economy and security when she has no authority?”

He vowed to bring the law to the cabinet and the Knesset despite her objections, arguing she has “gone beyond her authority.”

Headed Toward a Supreme Court Showdown

With the attorney general blocking the reform, the changes to reserve duty will likely be removed from the government’s economic legislation package. That will force the Finance Ministry to find another immediate path to move the plan forward.

The disagreement now seems poised to end up before the Supreme Court, which may need to untangle an unprecedented clash involving military needs, economic pressures, and the long-running issue of chareidi enlistment.

{Matzav.com}

A growing number of yeshivos across the tri-state area in particular are reshaping their academic calendars this year, choosing to end the spring/summer period earlier and begin the next school year in mid-August, weeks ahead of the traditional start.

The shift, which is beginning to emerge in yeshivos both large and small, appears to be driven by a mix of logistical concerns, curriculum planning needs, and feedback from administrators and parents alike. While each institution has its own reasoning, the pattern points to a noticeable change in how mosdos are structuring their yearly cycle.

One example comes from Yeshiva Orchos Chaim, which informed parents this week of a significant adjustment to the yeshiva’s summer timeline. The announcement stated that, after much deliberation, the yeshiva decided to modify its summer calendar, officially ending the school year on Thursday, July 9th (כ”ד תמוז). The notice further explained that the new school year would begin on Wednesday, August 19th (י’ אלול), markedly earlier than in previous years. Families were urged to jot down this change on your long-term calendar and plan your summer accordingly.

Sources in several communities say these changes are not isolated. Administrators from multiple yeshivos indicate that starting the new year earlier allows for a more consistent and uninterrupted Elul zman, giving talmidim additional time to settle in before the Yamim Noraim. Others noted that the unusually early Rosh Hashanah on the calendar this year left limited space for a meaningful zman unless adjustments were made.

Parents have expressed mixed reactions. Some appreciate the more structured summer and the smoother transition into Elul, while others are scrambling to adjust travel plans and camp schedules that were arranged months in advance.

Yeshiva leaders say the decision to bump up the calendar was not taken lightly. Several roshei yeshiva and principals describe long internal discussions about balancing academic goals with family needs. Nevertheless, more institutions are concluding that the benefits outweigh the complications.

{Matzav.com}

A group of senators pushed back hard today against claims that President Donald Trump is behind a leaked 28-point proposal to end the Russia-Ukraine war, insisting the document came straight from Moscow and not from the administration.

According to PBS NewsHour’s Nick Schifrin, Sen. Mike Rounds said Secretary of State Marco Rubio personally reached out to several lawmakers, stressing that what they received was simply a transmission of someone else’s ideas. As Rounds put it, Rubio wanted it “very clear to us that we are the recipients of a proposal that was delivered to one of our representatives. It is not our recommendation, it is not our peace plan.”

Rounds emphasized that the document wasn’t crafted or released by U.S. officials, describing it as something that arrived through diplomatic channels and was passed along only because Ukraine deserved to see it. “It is a proposal that was received. And as an intermediary, we have made arrangements to share it. And we did not release it. It was leaked. It was not released by our members or our representatives… This is an opportunity to receive it and that it has been utilized and delivered to the Ukrainians, and that they will have an opportunity to respond. And in doing so, you now have one side being presented and the opportunity for the other side to respond.”

Independent Sen. Angus King echoed that point, saying — according to Schifrin — that the document does not reflect the White House’s stance at all, describing it instead as “essentially the wish list of the Russians.”

The senators made these remarks on the sidelines of the Halifax International Security Forum, where the leaked plan dominated much of the conversation. Secretary Rubio has so far remained silent publicly, offering no clarification on X or in other statements.

Their remarks arrived in the wake of an Axios report from November 18 claiming the administration “has been secretly working in consultation with Russia to draft a new plan to end the war in Ukraine,” a report that cited both American and Russian officials. A Washington Post story published Friday added fuel to the controversy, saying the proposal called for Ukraine to give up large portions of territory — including areas of Donetsk — and to significantly shrink its military. President Zelensky hinted in his Friday national address that he is far from enthusiastic about the terms.

Speaking to reporters this morning, President Trump did not deny that he has encouraged Ukraine to consider the deal in the near term. He remarked that if Zelensky refuses the terms, he can “fight his little heart out.” And when asked whether this proposal represented his “final offer,” the president responded, “No, we’d like to get to peace.”

{Matzav.com}