ESPN commentator Stephen A. Smith says he is seriously considering entering the race for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2028, signaling that what once sounded like a joke may now be evolving into a possible campaign.
Over the weekend, Smith revealed that he is “giving strong consideration” to pursuing the White House. His remarks came during an interview broadcast on “CBS Sunday Morning,” where he outlined his current thinking about a potential run.
“I will confess to you, I’m giving strong consideration to being on that debate stage for 2027,” Smith said. “I’ve got this year coming up, 2026, to think about it, to study, to know the issues.”
Smith’s public musings about a presidential campaign stretch back to early 2025. In March of that year, he appeared on “The View” and characterized the idea as only partly serious, though he did not dismiss it outright.
“If you came to me and you told me I had a legitimate shot to win the presidency of the United States of America, I would definitely consider it,” he said then.
Not long after that appearance, Smith indicated that conversations with influential figures had prompted him to reflect more deeply on the possibility of running. He said he had heard from “billionaires,” “elected officials,” “pundits,” and, in particular, his “pastor,” all encouraging him to think about a campaign.
Although Smith has expressed a preference for another candidate to emerge, he has also made clear that he would not rule himself out. Speaking on ABC’s “This Week,” he said he hoped “somebody else would step up that’s more qualified,” but acknowledged that if it ultimately fell to him, “it is something I would consider. Yes, I would,” he said on ABC’s “This Week.”
President Donald Trump even weighed in on the idea during an April 30, 2025, town hall, offering praise for the sports commentator’s on-air presence.
“I love watching him. He’s got great entertainment skills, which is very important. People watch him,” Trump said. “I’ve been pretty good at picking people and picking candidates, and I will tell you, I’d love to see him run.”
Smith responded by saying he appreciated the president’s comments but emphasized that he was not seeking political backing from anyone.
“I wasn’t looking for any kind of endorsement from anybody, especially him,” he said, “but he is the president of the United States. There is a bit of flattery that comes with getting such words from the man who holds the highest office in the land, and I can appreciate that.”
Smith has built a national profile as a longtime ESPN figure and as the outspoken host of “First Take.” Known for his animated delivery and sharp debate style, he has become one of the most recognizable personalities in sports media across television and radio.
The United States has come out forcefully in defense of three mohalim in Antwerp who are facing criminal proceedings, with the U.S. ambassador to Belgium denouncing the case as “absurd and antisemitic” and urging immediate action to safeguard religious freedom.
U.S. Ambassador to Belgium Bill White sharply criticized the ongoing legal case in Antwerp against the three mohalim, who allegedly performed brisos without official state certification.
The case centers on three mohalim who were arrested and later released in May 2024 after a complaint was filed accusing them of conducting circumcisions without formal government authorization. Their circumcision instruments were confiscated, and they were barred from continuing their work pending a final ruling.
Writing on X, White declared that “antisemitism is unacceptable in any form and must be rooted out of our society,” and called on Belgium “to do a far better job on this issue.” He went on to describe the proceedings as “the absurd and antisemitic prosecution of three Jewish religious figures in Antwerp,” stressing that the men are clergy performing an ancient religious tradition.
The ambassador addressed Belgian Health Minister Frank Vandenbroucke directly, demanding that legal provisions be established to allow Jewish mohalim to carry out circumcisions in accordance with the law. “This is done in all civilized countries,” White stated, adding that Belgium must ensure religious freedom for Jewish families in the country.
In a separate post, White personally criticized the minister, claiming that during their first meeting Vandenbroucke refused to shake his hand or pose for a photograph with him. The ambassador also referenced America’s role in liberating Belgium during the World Wars and called for the proceedings to be brought to an immediate end. He announced that he plans to travel to Antwerp next week to meet with the mohalim and their families.
The case has stirred strong reactions among Antwerp’s Jewish residents and revived memories of previous European disputes over circumcision, sometimes framed as matters of “the best interest of the child,” but often accompanied by concerns about infringements on religious freedom.
At this stage, however, community leaders — acting on legal advice — have chosen not to launch a public campaign against the individual who filed the complaint. Their stated goal is to resolve the matter without unnecessary damage and to ensure the continued practice of bris milah for generations to come.
{Matzav.com}Israeli Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee Chairman MK Boaz Bismuth responded to the violent incidents in Bnei Brak, urging decisive progress on the long-stalled enlistment law. He described the events as a “wake-up call” and cautioned that prolonged failure to resolve a major national issue exacts a public price.
“This is a wake-up call. Today we received yet another troubling reminder of the price a country pays when a deep national issue remains unresolved for many long years. Many have spoken about it. Few have truly tried to take responsibility and regulate it,” Bismuth said.
He added that the current reality requires firm decision-making and responsible leadership.
“The gravity of the moment requires resolution. There are times when a multitude of reservations is not a guarantee of responsibility, and professional judgment is measured not only by its caution, but also by its ability to allow for a decision.”
Although Bismuth did not explicitly name any legal or political actors, his remarks appeared directed at all parties involved — both elected officials and professional authorities — to enable movement toward agreed-upon legislation.
He concluded with a symbolic message: “Until white smoke emerges.”
New findings from the scene appear to contradict the IDF’s initial denial regarding the activities of two female soldiers who were attacked in Bnei Brak, with reports indicating that recruitment flyers were in fact distributed at several addresses in the city.
A disturbance broke out Sunday afternoon in Bnei Brak after two female soldiers arrived at multiple locations in the city. According to a report on Army Radio, despite an earlier statement from the IDF Spokesperson denying any flyer distribution, detailed recruitment leaflets were left at at least four addresses. The materials were directed at candidates for military service ahead of their upcoming enlistment at the Chavat HaShomer base.
In a response, the IDF Spokesperson firmly rejected the claims, stating: “The claim that the commanders who were attacked in Bnei Brak arrived in order to distribute recruitment flyers is incorrect. The commanders arrived for a home visit to a candidate for service prior to his enlistment.”
However, documentation from the scene indicates that the flyers addressed prospective recruits scheduled to enlist in March and included extensive information about training conditions, the base’s location, and a list of required equipment — ranging from personal hygiene items to instructions on arranging a bank account and redeeming purchase credits.
The flyer left at the homes also contained detailed social and financial information intended to ease the enlistment process, including guidance related to personal status and eligibility for assistance. Among other things, the young men were asked to prepare medical documentation for family members, proof of financial status, and bank statements from the previous three months.
The unrest began after rumors spread that the soldiers had arrived to distribute draft orders to chareidi youths. The incident escalated on Chaggai Street during the afternoon hours.
Subsequently, the IDF updated its version of events, stating that three female non-commissioned officers serving at the Chavat HaShomer base had come to Bnei Brak to visit a candidate who is expected to enlist soon and serve at the facility. According to the military, the visit was intended as a preliminary meeting to establish familiarity and assess any potential need for social support.
{Matzav.com}
Israeli Cabinet Secretary Yossi Fuchs on Monday outlined a firm diplomatic and security position regarding Gaza, declaring that Israel will not tolerate continued Hamas rearmament and setting a 60-day deadline for the terror group to fully disarm.
Speaking at the Besheva Conference, Fuchs said Hamas must dismantle “all” of its weapons within two months. If it fails to do so, he warned, Israel will take military action.
“Hamas must disarm from all its weapons — everything. If that does not happen, the IDF will be required to ensure that it does,” Fuchs stated. He made clear that absent full disarmament, Israel would resume large-scale military operations in the Gaza Strip.
Addressing the recent unrest in Bnei Brak connected to the ongoing draft law crisis, Fuchs sought to lower the public rhetoric. He argued that the current tensions stem from the expiration of previous legal arrangements and emphasized that for years there had been an agreed-upon framework regulating the status of yeshiva students.
“If we label a ציבור of one and a half million people as criminals, we will push it toward extremism,” he said, adding that in his view the situation reflects a legal vacuum rather than a failure of governance.
Fuchs also commented on negotiations surrounding the draft law, noting that efforts are underway to formulate a version that will receive the backing of the Knesset’s legal advisers, in order to prevent an interim injunction that could freeze the legislation upon passage.
He indicated that from the coalition’s standpoint, a central objective is for the chareidi factions to actively support the bill, as part of a broad agreement that would ensure both its legal durability and political stability.
When asked whether Israel might one day return to reestablish Jewish communities in Gush Katif, which were evacuated under the 2005 Disengagement Plan, Fuchs responded briefly: “With Hashem’s help.”
{Matzav.com}