Feed aggregator

As the number of bnei yeshiva currently held in Israel’s military prison reportedly stands at 46, a former inmate has offered a firsthand account of daily life behind bars, describing an environment centered around tefillah and Torah learning and insisting that incarceration is “not scary at all.”

Speaking with Betzalel Kahn on Israel’s Kol Chai Radio, 24-year-old Shmaryahu Greineman, who was imprisoned in the military jail in recent months, shared details about the prison routine and conditions. He said that during his incarceration there were only six bnei yeshiva in the facility.

Greineman explained that inmates are divided among four different companies based on the length of their sentence and the nature of their offense. According to him, bnei yeshiva are generally assigned to Company A, which houses prisoners serving relatively short terms.

He said the spiritual center of prison life is the beis medrash and shul.

“It’s either being inside your cell or being in the shul,” he said.

Greineman noted that the prison provides a wide range of seforim, including Shas, Chumashim, Tanach, Mishnayos, and Mishnah Berurah. Prisoners are also permitted to bring books back to their cells during lockdown periods.

He added that inmates are given opportunities to daven three times each day and that military regulations require prison officials to accommodate regular davening times and the laying of tefillin.

“On Shabbos they give even more time, and the religious needs are respected,” he said.

Discussing contact with family members, Greineman explained that each inmate is allotted seven minutes of telephone time per day.

“After seven minutes, the call disconnects automatically,” he said.

He noted, however, that conversations with attorneys are not subject to any time limit and added that bnei yeshiva entering prison generally receive assistance and guidance from various organizations.

Asked whether imprisonment was frightening, Greineman answered without hesitation.

“Not at all.”

He added that the presence of other bnei yeshiva makes the experience significantly easier, allowing them to learn together throughout the day.

“If I were there today among the 46 bochurim, it would actually be much easier,” he said.

Greineman also described what he called a unique phenomenon within the prison, referring to it as a place “where people learn emunah.”

He said that many secular soldiers begin moving closer to Judaism during their time in prison.

“Suddenly, people with tattoos begin coming to the shul, putting on tefillin, keeping Shabbos, and listening to words of Torah,” he said, describing what he believes is a widespread and meaningful spiritual transformation experienced by many inmates.

President Trump on Friday sharply criticized Iran after acknowledging that the regime launched a drone attack against a commercial vessel in the Strait of Hormuz, calling the strike a violation of the ceasefire established under the US-Iran memorandum of understanding.

In a post on Truth Social, Trump revealed that Iranian forces launched multiple attack drones at ships traveling through the strategic waterway.

“The Islamic Republic of Iran shot at least four One Way Attack Drones at Ships transversing the Strait of Hormuz,” the president wrote. “One of the Drones solidly hit the upper deck of a large and very expensive Cargo Carrying Ship. Damage was done, but the Ship was able to proceed on its way.”

Trump added that US forces intercepted the remaining drones before they could reach their targets.

“We knocked down three other Drones. Obviously, this is a foolish violation of our Ceasefire Agreement,” he added.

The president’s remarks came a day after the attack, when the White House initially took a more measured approach, saying only, “We are aware of these reports and looking into them.”

The incident has raised fresh concerns about the stability of the already fragile ceasefire while complicating ongoing efforts to ensure the safe movement of commercial shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world’s most critical maritime trade routes.

Reaffirming the administration’s position, the White House stated, “President Trump has been clear that Iran cannot subvert the free flow of traffic in the strait.”

[Video below.] Maran Rav Dov Landau publicly declared Thursday night that street protests are not the proper path in response to the gezeiras hagiyus and the arrests of bnei yeshivah.

Rav Landau’s statement has stirred considerable discussion, coming only days after the large vehicle convoy protest that took place on highways throughout Eretz Yisroel.

The remarks were delivered during a gathering at Rav Landau’s home in Bnei Brak attended by dozens of roshei yeshivah from across the country.

The meeting had originally been convened to review the recent historic Keren Olam HaTorah fundraising mission to the United States, during which leading gedolei Torah sought support to help offset government cuts to yeshivah funding. During the gathering, however, Rav Landau shifted the focus to the growing trend of public demonstrations.

Referring to the recent protests, Rav Landau told the assembled roshei yeshivah, “All kinds of other protests that we did not hear about from our rabbeim in previous generations are not our way.”

He continued by expressing concern over the effect such demonstrations can have on the image of the chareidi community.

“Very often these protests cause serious damage to the chareidi public’s image. We must remember that the most important thing is dedication, toil, and immersion in Torah study. That is the greatest sanctification of Hashem’s Name, and there is no doubt that strengthening Torah study within the botei medrash is what will help counter these decrees and difficulties.”

Rav Landau also spoke about his recent trip to the United States and the ongoing dispute over government funding for yeshivos. He emphasized that Eretz Yisroel has become the world’s central hub of Torah learning and serves as the spiritual heartbeat of the entire Jewish world.

According to Rav Landau, supporters overseas recognize that any weakening of Torah learning in Eretz Yisroel would have consequences for Klal Yisroel worldwide. He said that this understanding has led philanthropists to generously support bnei Torah.

WATCH:

{Matzav.com}

The man accused of assassinating conservative commentator Charlie Kirk remains eligible for the death penalty after a Utah judge ruled Friday that, although prosecutors violated a court-imposed gag order, the misconduct did not justify removing capital punishment from the case.

Judge Tony Graf found prosecutor Christopher Ballard in civil contempt for making comments to members of the media about the case involving defendant Tyler Robinson. However, the judge declined the defense’s request to strike the death penalty as a sanction.

The dispute stemmed from a defense filing that suggested the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives had concluded that the bullet fired from the weapon Robinson allegedly used did not match the projectile recovered from Kirk’s body.

According to Robinson’s attorneys, prosecutors should be penalized for responding publicly to that filing, arguing that their statements violated the court’s gag order.

The defense filing sparked widespread online speculation and conspiracy theories about the circumstances surrounding Kirk’s death.

Judge Graf acknowledged that Robinson’s legal team had effectively “initiated the media frenzy” by filing documents that prompted inaccurate reports suggesting ATF evidence cleared Robinson of responsibility for the killing.

While Graf concluded that Ballard did not improperly discuss the forensic evidence when responding to those reports, he ruled that the prosecutor crossed the line when he told certain media outlets that his office possessed sufficient evidence to secure Robinson’s conviction.

Even so, the judge determined that the defense’s request to eliminate the possibility of capital punishment was “disproportional” to Ballard’s actions and “legally prohibited.”

Instead, Graf ordered the prosecution to reimburse Robinson’s legal team for the attorney’s fees incurred while pursuing the contempt motion.

To safeguard Robinson’s right to a fair trial, Graf also announced additional measures for the jury selection process. The court will summon a larger pool of prospective jurors and expand the screening process by adding more written questionnaire items as well as additional in-court questioning designed to identify potential bias stemming from the prosecutor’s public remarks.

{Matzav.com}

Iran sharply escalated its rhetoric on Friday, warning that it will not tolerate what it described as threatening Israeli military activity in the region, while state media also claimed Iranian forces intercepted foreign tankers attempting to transit the Strait of Hormuz without authorization.

In a statement, Iran’s Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters alleged that Israeli military aircraft flying through the airspace of neighboring countries on missions toward Iran represent “a dangerous move and a threat against the Islamic Republic.”

The military command warned that if Washington fails to restrain Israel, Tehran reserves the right to respond.

“We announce that if the United States is unable to restrain and control the Zionist regime, the Islamic Republic of Iran will not tolerate any threat against it and considers itself entitled to respond to these dangerous actions.”

Separately, Iranian state television reported that three foreign oil tankers attempted to pass through the Strait of Hormuz without obtaining authorization but were halted after receiving warnings from the naval forces of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.

The report comes despite repeated statements by President Donald Trump asserting that the IRGC no longer possesses an operational navy.

Meanwhile, The Wall Street Journal reported that damage sustained by the U.S. Navy base in Bahrain during the recent conflict with Iran was significantly greater than the Pentagon has publicly disclosed.

According to the report, U.S. officials are now weighing the possibility of shifting some American military assets from bases in Saudi Arabia and Kuwait to Israel in an effort to make them less vulnerable to potential Iranian attacks in the event of another regional conflict.

{Matzav.com}

A light sport aircraft crashed into Beijing’s tallest skyscraper on Friday, scattering wreckage from the 109-story tower and prompting an emergency evacuation as dramatic videos of the incident rapidly spread across social media.

According to CNN, the crash was particularly striking given Beijing’s strict security environment and tightly controlled airspace. Footage from the scene showed debris strewn around the base of the building, including the rear section of the aircraft.

A CNN reporter at the scene said the skyscraper was evacuated following the impact, with large numbers of occupants gathering outside the building on nearby streets as emergency crews responded.

Photos circulating online, including images showing the aircraft’s registration number, identified the plane as a Chinese-built Sunward SA60L Aurora light sport aircraft operated by a local aviation company.

Flight-tracking information published online by Flightradar24, though not independently verified, indicated that the aircraft veered significantly off its intended route before crashing into the building.

The incident also drew attention to Beijing’s stringent aviation restrictions. Reports noted that since May 1, residents of the Chinese capital have been prohibited from purchasing, renting, or operating drones within the city without prior government authorization.

{Matzav.com}

John Bolton, who served as President Donald Trump’s national security adviser, pleaded guilty Friday to one federal charge of unlawfully retaining national defense information while serving in the White House, exposing the 77-year-old to a possible prison sentence of up to 10 years.

Bolton, a longtime Republican foreign policy figure, former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, and outspoken Iran hawk, entered the guilty plea during a brief appearance in federal court outside Washington, D.C.

The plea resolves a criminal case that began after a federal grand jury indicted Bolton last October on 18 felony counts related to the alleged retention and transmission of classified material. Had he been convicted on all counts, Bolton faced the possibility of spending the remainder of his life behind bars. Federal agents searched both his Maryland residence and his Washington office on Aug. 22, 2025, as part of the investigation.

Authorities said the searches uncovered numerous sensitive government documents, including files concerning weapons of mass destruction, internal strategy discussions, classified travel memoranda, and materials related to the U.S. mission to the United Nations.

Prosecutors alleged that Bolton used email and various messaging applications to transmit documents classified up to the “top secret” level to individuals, exposing intelligence related to prospective U.S. military operations, foreign adversaries, and sensitive diplomatic matters.

Investigators also accused Bolton of sending more than 1,000 pages of personal diary-style notes and policy assessments through his private AOL email account to two people who allegedly lacked the necessary security clearances. Those recipients are widely believed to have been his wife and daughter.

According to investigators, that information was later compromised when Iranian-linked hackers breached Bolton’s AOL account in July 2021.

Bolton has remained a target of Iranian threats since the January 2020 U.S. strike that killed Iranian military commander Qassem Soleimani.

Friday’s guilty plea brought to a close an investigation that began during the closing months of President Trump’s first administration. According to FBI sources previously cited by The New York Post, the probe was later mysteriously “shelved” during the administration of President Joe Biden.

Separately, Bolton came under scrutiny in 2020 over his handling of classified information connected to his bestselling White House memoir, The Room Where It Happened, which chronicled his 17 months as national security adviser.

At the time, the Trump administration argued that publication of the manuscript could jeopardize national security. Bolton’s legal team maintained that the book was released only after a White House National Security Council official who had worked extensively with Bolton informed him that the manuscript no longer contained classified material.

Bolton’s attorney, Abbe Lowell, also argued that many of the documents seized during the August 2025 searches had previously been reviewed and cleared through the government’s pre-publication process for The Room Where It Happened. He further contended that many of the records were decades old and stemmed from Bolton’s lengthy career in public service.

The Chernobyler Rebbe has issued an emotional appeal to Klal Yisroel, urging Jews around the world to intensify their tefillos for the swift release of the body of R’ Akiva Rand z”l, the yungerman who was tragically killed in a devastating traffic accident in Moldova earlier this week.

Despite ongoing efforts by askanim in both Moldova and Eretz Yisroel, Moldovan authorities have not yet released the body, delaying plans to bring him to kevurah in Eretz Yisroel.

As previously reported, the fatal accident occurred Wednesday near Kishinev, Moldova, as a group of avreichim was traveling to the kever of the tzaddik Rav Yechiel of Krylovitz, zya, together with many Chernobyler chassidim. The pilgrimage had been organized in conjunction with the Chernobyler Rebbe, who ultimately did not make the trip.

R’ Akiva Rand, z”ל, one of the prominent Chernobyler chassidim in Yerushalayim, was killed in the horrific crash. Despite extensive efforts by numerous askanim, both locally in Moldova and in Israel, authorities have yet to authorize the release of his body for burial.

In response, the Chernobyler Rebbe instructed that all chassidim worldwide be asked to storm the heavens in davening on behalf of the departed, R’ Akiva ben yblch”t R’ Mordechai Dovid, beseeching Hashem that the body be released without further delay so that he may be brought to his final resting place in Eretz Hakodesh.

A Honduran illegal alien has been sentenced to eight years in federal prison after admitting his role in an $89 million payroll fraud operation that enabled illegal alien construction workers and their employers to evade payroll taxes and other legal requirements.

Announcing the sentence, Assistant Attorney General Colin McDonald said the case exposed a far-reaching scheme that cost taxpayers tens of millions of dollars while facilitating the employment of illegal aliens.

“Today, we held an illegal alien from Honduras accountable for a brazen scheme that stole more than $38 million from American taxpayers to facilitate the employment of illegal aliens,” Assistant Attorney General Colin McDonald said.

“This case exposes how unchecked illegal immigration fuels widespread payroll tax fraud and underground economies that harm American workers and taxpayers,” McDonald said. “This sentence sends a strong message: Those who exploit our open borders, cheat the U.S. Treasury, and violate federal laws will face justice.”

According to the Department of Justice, Mario Flores, an illegal alien from Honduras, conspired with others between 2015 and 2022 to establish a network of shell companies that operated an illegal check-cashing and cash courier business.

Federal prosecutors said the companies processed approximately $89 million in checks for construction subcontractors, charging fees for converting the checks into cash. Authorities said the arrangement allowed contractors and subcontractors to pay workers off the books, avoid withholding payroll taxes, and employ individuals without regard for whether they were legally authorized to work in the United States. Investigators also alleged that Flores caused false tax documents to be filed with the IRS to conceal the operation.

Prosecutors further said Flores and his associates defrauded workers’ compensation insurance carriers by leasing insurance certificates to contractors and providing insurers with false information, including inaccurate figures regarding the number of employees covered and the wages they received.

“Homeland Security Investigations is committed to protecting the integrity of our financial system and enforcing our nation’s laws,” HSI’s John Condon said. “Those who orchestrate large-scale payroll tax fraud and facilitate the illegal employment of unauthorized workers will be held accountable.”

Flores pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to defraud the United States and one count of conspiracy to operate an unlicensed money-transmitting business.

Three of Flores’ co-conspirators—Iris Villafranca, Osman Zapata, and Francisco Alvarez—had already been sentenced in the case. Their prison terms ranged from four years to 17 years.

{Matzav.com}

The federal trial over the devastating January 2025 Los Angeles wildfires hit a major obstacle Thursday when jurors informed the court they were unable to reach a unanimous verdict after two days of deliberations.

The deadlocked jury notified U.S. District Judge Anne Hwang that it could not agree on whether Jonathan Rinderknecht, 30, is guilty of the three federal arson charges he faces. Those charges include arson involving property used in interstate commerce, destruction of property by fire, and setting timber afire. Rather than declaring a mistrial, Hwang instructed the jurors to return Friday and continue their deliberations.

Defense attorney Steve Haney urged the judge to deliver an Allen charge, a special instruction encouraging jurors to continue discussing the case in an effort to reach a unanimous decision.

Federal prosecutors contend that Rinderknecht deliberately ignited the Lachman Fire on New Year’s Day. According to their theory, the blaze continued to smolder underground for nearly a week before reigniting as the catastrophic Palisades Fire six days later.

Rinderknecht has pleaded not guilty and insists he did not start the fire. If convicted on all counts, he faces up to 45 years in federal prison. Prosecutors built their case around surveillance video, cellphone location data, and what they described as incriminating online activity, including ChatGPT searches asking whether a cigarette could ignite a wildfire. They argue the evidence places Rinderknecht at the fire’s point of origin shortly before smoke was first reported.

The government also called witnesses who testified about Rinderknecht’s actions before the fire and introduced recordings of interviews he gave to investigators.

Haney countered that prosecutors failed to produce any physical evidence connecting his client to the fire’s origin. He argued that the Lachman Fire and the later Palisades Fire were unrelated events and maintained that fireworks—not Rinderknecht—were responsible for igniting the blaze.

The defense further argued that Rinderknecht behaved like someone trying to help rather than someone attempting to conceal a crime. Attorneys pointed to the multiple 911 calls he made and emphasized that he remained at the scene instead of fleeing. They also presented a witness who testified that he heard an explosion near the area before observing four men leave the location.

Earlier in the week, Judge Hwang rejected the defense’s request to dismiss the case after prosecutors presented expert testimony supporting their claim that the Palisades Fire originated from the earlier Lachman Fire. The Palisades Fire ultimately claimed 12 lives and destroyed nearly 7,000 homes and other structures.

{Matzav.com}

Sen. Bernie Sanders on Thursday unveiled a collection of internal Health and Human Services emails that he says show HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. intervening in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s vaccine policies and communications.

According to Sanders, the emails suggest Kennedy directed the CDC’s vaccine advisory committee to limit vaccine availability, authorized researchers to examine confidential information in an effort to support the disputed claim that vaccines cause autism, and altered federal COVID-19 vaccine recommendations without consulting the CDC.

Another set of emails indicates that Kennedy’s then-chief of staff, Matthew Buckham, contacted then-CDC Director Susan Monarez in August 2025, instructing that major agency actions undergo political oversight before being finalized.

The email stated there was a need for a “political review of major decisions at CDC … to ensure that [the Immediate Office of the Secretary] and the CDC political leadership all have eyes on the decisions for approval/changes before they go into effect.”

Sanders said Monarez was dismissed less than a week later after refusing to endorse recommendations issued by the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices.

In a statement, Sanders called Monarez’s termination “outrageous,” arguing that she lost her position “for her commitment to public health and vaccines.” The Vermont senator urged Congress to conduct a bipartisan investigation into the firing and renewed his call for Kennedy to step down.

The emails also appear to show that Kennedy ordered the cancellation of federal influenza vaccine advertising campaigns. In one message, a CDC employee informed her supervisor that Andrew Nixon, HHS communications director, had instructed her to immediately halt all flu vaccine promotional efforts.

“He said this request came directly from the Secretary,” the staffer wrote. “I noted that these have been paid for and are in flight and he acknowledged and asked that we work right away on things that are on social/online, magazines, and then will eventually need to do items that may be on bus stops or benches (if it includes those type of things).”

A separate email from Nixon, which Sanders also released, reiterated that the directive “was a direct ask from Secretary Kennedy.”

Sanders said the emails were provided to the Senate committee by Dr. Debra Houry, the CDC’s former chief medical officer.

The senator, who serves as the ranking Democrat on the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, has repeatedly urged Chairman Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) to hold hearings examining Kennedy’s statements about vaccines. Kennedy was a longtime vaccine skeptic before being nominated by President Trump to lead HHS, and Sanders has accused him of spreading misinformation while serving as secretary.

In an April letter to Cassidy, Sanders wrote, “The reality is that since Secretary Kennedy has been in office, he has continued his longstanding crusade against vaccines and his advocacy of conspiracy theories that vaccines cause autism — all of which have been repeatedly rejected by scientists,” Sanders wrote in his letter to Cassidy in April.

A federal judge has ordered Tesla CEO Elon Musk to give sworn testimony in two lawsuits accusing him and his political action committee of misleading voters in key battleground states through a high-profile $1 million giveaway ahead of the 2024 presidential election.

U.S. Magistrate Judge Susan Hightower of the Western District of Texas ruled Thursday that Musk must appear for a deposition in a lawsuit filed by two Arizona women. The plaintiffs allege that America PAC fraudulently obtained voters’ personal information by promoting a contest that promised to award $1 million each day in the lead-up to Election Day.

The controversy stems from remarks Musk made during an October 2024 town hall event in Pennsylvania, where he announced that participants who signed America PAC’s petition could receive the cash prize.

“The only thing we ask for the million dollars is that you be a spokesperson for the petition,” Musk told a recipient he handpicked from the audience at the time.

According to Reuters, Judge Hightower said there remains a factual question over whether Musk acted recklessly by describing the prize selection as “random.” In her ruling, she cited testimony from America PAC director Christopher Young, who said during a February 2026 deposition that he had been “surprised” by Musk’s characterization of the giveaway.

The plaintiffs, Joy Harvick and Jacqueline McAferty, contend that Musk and America PAC deceived voters in seven battleground states by encouraging them to sign the petition under the impression that winners would be selected at random. They argue that the 19 recipients were instead chosen because, as one of Musk’s attorneys reportedly stated, they would serve as effective spokespeople for the organization.

Musk promoted similar giveaway campaigns in several other states, including Michigan. In October 2025, Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner filed suit against Musk and America PAC, alleging the promotions amounted to “illegal lotteries.” Musk subsequently sought to have that case transferred to federal court.

Rick Hasen, a political science professor at the University of California, Los Angeles School of Law, said federal law draws a distinction between paying someone to sign a petition and paying someone in connection with voter registration.

“If all he was doing was paying people to sign the petition, that might be a waste of money. But there’s nothing illegal about it,” Hasen told the Associated Press in October 2024. “The problem is that the only people eligible to participate in this giveaway are the people who are registered to vote. And that makes it illegal.”

{Matzav.com}

New York City’s Rent Guidelines Board voted Thursday to adopt Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s proposal to freeze rents for approximately one million rent-stabilized apartments, handing the new mayor one of the most significant policy victories of his administration.

The independent board, whose members are appointed by the mayor, approved the measure by a 7-1 vote. The freeze applies to rent-stabilized units in buildings constructed before 1974, as well as certain properties that receive qualifying tax incentives.

Under the new policy, rents will remain unchanged beginning October 1 and continuing through September 30, 2027.

Rent freezes are not unprecedented in New York City. The board approved similar measures during the administration of Mayor Bill de Blasio before later authorizing rent increases under Mayor Eric Adams.

Following Thursday’s vote at El Museo del Barrio in East Harlem, supporters celebrated outside the venue. According to The New York Times, activists marked the occasion with music and pizza, while Queen’s anthem “We Are the Champions” played in the background.

Mamdani hailed the decision as a major milestone in his effort to reduce housing costs across the city.

“I’ll continue working to deliver a more affordable city by building and preserving affordable housing, lowering building operating costs like insurance, and ensuring tenants know their rights,” he said.

Keeping rents frozen was a centerpiece of Mamdani’s mayoral campaign as he sought to address New York City’s escalating housing costs. Throughout the race, he repeatedly criticized Eric Adams for approving annual rent increases during his four years in office.

Research from the nonprofit newsroom Community Service Society found that rent-stabilized tenants experienced a cumulative increase of 12.6 percent during Adams’ tenure—exceeding the total rent hikes approved during Michael Bloomberg’s administration.

The rent freeze has also long been a signature priority of the Democratic Socialists of America, which has argued that preventing rent increases is essential to keeping working-class residents from being priced out of the city.

The board’s vote came just days after a series of candidates endorsed by Mamdani defeated incumbent Democrats in congressional primaries across New York.

Among the victors were Democratic socialist candidates Claire Valdez and Darializa Avila Chevalier, both backed by Mamdani. Avila Chevalier’s victory drew particular attention after she unseated Rep. Adriano Espaillat (D-N.Y.). Former mayoral candidate Brad Lander, another Mamdani ally, also defeated Rep. Dan Goldman (D-N.Y.) by a comfortable margin.

Despite those political successes, Mamdani continues to face resistance from several prominent Democratic leaders, particularly lawmakers who are strong supporters of Israel.

Speaking Wednesday on MS NOW, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries acknowledged the ideological divisions within the Democratic Party while urging members to unite after the primary season.

“I think for us as House Democrats, we’re just hopeful that everybody recognizes once we get through this primary season, that the enemy is Donald Trump and MAGA extremism,” Jeffries said on MS NOW.

{Matzav.com}

Iran sharply escalated its rhetoric against Israel on Thursday, with a senior military commander warning that Israeli forces must leave Lebanon immediately or face what he described as a humiliating military defeat.

The warning was delivered by Brigadier General Esmail Qaani, commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps’ Quds Force, in remarks carried by Iranian state media.

“You must leave all of Lebanon,” Qaani said, adding, “This land is a field of steadfastness and resistance, not a playground for occupiers.”

He went on to warn that Israel’s opportunity to withdraw voluntarily is rapidly disappearing.

“If you do not withdraw of your own accord today, tomorrow you will be forced to flee in humiliation and defeat.”

The Quds Force serves as the primary arm of Iran’s efforts to direct and support allied militant organizations throughout the Middle East. Among its most significant partners is Hezbollah, which receives substantial Iranian funding, sophisticated missile and drone technology, as well as strategic guidance from Tehran. Iran considers the Lebanese terrorist organization a central component of its regional deterrence against Israel.

Qaani’s remarks came as Iran continues to press its demands during ongoing diplomatic negotiations with the United States aimed at bringing the conflict to a permanent end.

After Washington and Tehran recently drafted an interim Memorandum of Understanding, Iranian officials insisted that any final ceasefire arrangement must include a complete Israeli withdrawal from Lebanese territory. Israeli leaders, however, have resisted that demand, maintaining that a security zone in southern Lebanon remains essential to protect northern Israeli communities.

Qaani assumed command of the Quds Force in 2020 after his predecessor, Qassem Soleimani, was killed in a U.S. drone strike near Baghdad International Airport.

Last June, reports circulated claiming that Qaani had been killed by Israel during Operation Rising Lion inside Iran.

Those reports were later contradicted when Iran’s Tasnim news agency released video footage showing Qaani attending a public celebration in Tehran marking what the Iranian regime described as its “victory” over Israel.

LISTEN:

​​For more info, email bitachon4life@gmail.com.

LISTEN:

Knesset Legal Adviser Sagit Afik has sharply criticized the legislative process surrounding the proposed Basic Law: Limud HaTorah, warning that the bill was advanced through the wrong committee and that the procedural defects could undermine the legislation as it moves forward.

In a formal letter issued following a heated meeting of the Knesset House Committee, Afik argued that the proposed Basic Law should have remained under the jurisdiction of the Knesset Constitution, Law and Justice Committee rather than being transferred to the House Committee.

Afik warned that routing the legislation through a different committee could create significant legal and procedural problems.

The controversy stems from a House Committee meeting held on June 22, during which members considered a request by the chairman of the Constitution Committee to transfer the bill to his committee. Instead, the House Committee voted to recommend that the legislation remain under its own jurisdiction, a recommendation that was approved by the Knesset plenum later that same day.

In her letter, Afik made clear that she had advised lawmakers that the Constitution, Law and Justice Committee was the only appropriate body to deliberate on a new Basic Law.

“I made clear that my position was that the committee authorized to discuss the bill was the Constitution, Law and Justice Committee, as originally determined,” Afik wrote.

She cautioned that “transferring the bill to another committee would create significant difficulties that would further complicate and cast a shadow over the continuation of the legislative process.”

Afik also rejected the argument that the Constitution Committee’s heavy workload justified moving the legislation elsewhere.

“Workload considerations in the authorized committee are not grounds for transferring the bill, particularly when the Knesset is approaching the end of its term, and especially when we are dealing with a new Basic Law,” she wrote.

Responding to questions raised by MKs during the committee debate, Afik noted that legal guidance for the legislation would nevertheless be provided by Dr. Gur Bligh, the legal adviser to the Constitution Committee, because of “the expertise required in formulating a new Basic Law and his familiarity with the subject.”

At the same time, she stressed that assigning the Constitution Committee’s legal adviser to the bill does not eliminate the underlying procedural concerns.

She wrote that doing so “does not lessen the fundamental difficulty created by holding discussions on the bill in a committee that lacks jurisdiction,” adding that “the continuation of the legislative process must meet an especially high standard of procedural integrity.”

Afik further revealed that after the Knesset approved transferring the legislation, she learned that the House Committee intended to conduct an accelerated series of marathon discussions on the proposal.

She noted that the Constitution Committee is already engaged in deliberations on several major and complex legislative initiatives being handled by Dr. Bligh. Because of that workload, attorney Esther Chen from the Knesset Legal Department will be assigned to assist in the deliberations.

Concluding her letter, Afik urged committee leaders to ensure that the remainder of the legislative process adheres to the highest procedural standards despite the political decision to transfer the bill.

“You will have to exercise even greater care to ensure a legislative process of an especially high standard, both with respect to hearing invited guests, outside representatives, members of Knesset, and diverse viewpoints, as well as regarding the manner in which the meetings are conducted and their frequency… This is necessary in order to remedy the defect and the harm to the legislative process that I pointed out during the House Committee discussion.”

{Matzav.com}

Amid growing public interest and numerous inquiries, Israel’s Ashkenazi Chief Rabbi, Rav Kalman Meir Bar, has published a comprehensive halachic essay addressing the kashrus status of various types of whiskey, clarifying the significant differences between American, Scottish, Irish, and Canadian whiskeys and explaining the halachic concerns surrounding barrels previously used for non-kosher wine.

The detailed article, published on Rav Bar’s online shu”t website, examines the widespread practice of aging whiskey in barrels that once contained stam yeinam, a subject that has long been discussed by contemporary poskim.

Rav Bar distinguishes between the various categories of whiskey based on the production regulations governing each country.

Regarding American bourbon, he writes that there is generally little cause for concern because U.S. law requires bourbon to be aged exclusively in new oak barrels, eliminating the issue of previously used wine casks.

The primary halachic concern, he explains, involves Scotch and Irish whiskeys, whose producers commonly age their products in used barrels that previously held wines such as sherry and port in order to impart distinctive flavor, aroma, and color.

Canadian whiskey, Rav Bar notes, raises an even greater concern because Canadian regulations permit the addition of flavoring agents that may, in some cases, include actual wine.

The Chief Rabbi then explores the halachic analysis in depth, presenting numerous grounds for leniency cited by leading poskim, including the Minchas Yitzchak and Igros Moshe. Among the issues discussed is the principle that wine absorbed into the walls of a barrel may become batel in a ratio of six—or according to other opinions, sixty—parts whiskey.

He further explains that the objective of barrel aging is not to impart the flavor of the wine itself, but rather to soften the harsh qualities of the wood. As such, the absorbed wine is not considered an ingredient intentionally added for flavor (avid l’taama). Rav Bar also discusses an additional basis for leniency regarding whiskey aged in second-fill and later-use barrels, since much of the absorbed wine has already been extracted by the first spirit aged in the cask.

Beyond the issue of wine casks, Rav Bar cautions that certain industrial additives used in whiskey production—such as blending agents—may contain non-kosher ingredients and therefore warrant careful scrutiny.

He also raises the separate concern of chametz she’avar alav haPesach in the case of distilleries owned by non-observant Jewish proprietors.

In his conclusion, Rav Bar writes that although there are substantial halachic arguments supporting leniency with respect to many whiskeys, “the one who fears the word of Hashem should not, l’chatchilah, rely on these grounds for leniency.”

Accordingly, he urges consumers to purchase only whiskey that bears the certification of reliable kashrus agencies. Rav Bar adds that the Chief Rabbinate will continue its longstanding policy of withholding approval for the importation of alcoholic beverages unless they have undergone thorough kashrus inspection and received proper certification.

A Yerushalayim Magistrate’s Court judge on Thursday ordered the release to house arrest of a driver accused of brandishing a handgun at chareidi protesters during Wednesday’s vehicle protest, a decision that drew sharp criticism from chareidi political leaders and protest organizers.

The incident occurred during one of the demonstrations in which protesters blocked roadways to protest the arrest of bnei Torah. Organizers noted that the demonstration had been coordinated with and approved by police.

According to reports, Magistrate Judge Ariel Ehrlich also criticized police in his ruling, pointing to what he described as the unusual circumstances surrounding the incident.

In his decision, Judge Ehrlich wrote: “The circumstances of the incident are unique. The alleged offense occurred in a situation of tension and panic, while law enforcement authorities were not providing a response. The roadblock created a serious hazard, which in itself posed significant danger to the public.”

The judge’s remarks came despite the fact that the demonstration had received prior police authorization.

Shas MK Meir Porush sharply condemned the ruling, arguing that it sends a dangerous message to the chareidi community.

“The release from custody of a person who drew a handgun toward participants in yesterday’s protest is, in essence, a message that the blood of the chareidi public has been deemed permissible.

“There is no doubt that Judge Ehrlich’s approach is influenced by the outlook of Justice Solberg, Attorney General Baharav-Miara, and Police Commissioner Levy, an outlook that has filtered down to the so-called ‘gatekeepers’—the judges and the police officers.

“We all saw on camera last week how police officers, who are supposedly ‘gatekeepers,’ beat chareidim until they bled.

“There is serious concern that officials within the Justice Ministry, who are also called ‘gatekeepers,’ act with the same malice, only behind robes, neckties, and closed doors without cameras.

“Sadly, all of these people are called ‘gatekeepers,’ yet among them are those whose hatred of lomdei Torah leads them to harm the chareidi public—whether through physical violence, judicial decisions, or by abandoning their safety.”

The incident took place during the vehicle protest on Route 1, the main highway connecting Yerushalayim and Tel Aviv. According to protest organizers, one of the drivers allegedly drew a handgun while approaching a group of chareidi demonstrators standing on the roadway.

Video released by protest organizers appeared to show the driver moving slowly in his vehicle while holding what appeared to be a handgun pointed in the direction of several protesters.

Protest organizers described the incident as “a threat of murder” and called on police “to act immediately against those inciting and carrying out violence. Enough with the violence.”

No shots were fired during the incident.

Police later announced the driver’s arrest. Following Thursday’s court hearing, however, the suspect was released to house arrest pending further proceedings.

{Matzav.com}

Israel’s Judicial Ombudsman, retired Judge Asher Kula, has dismissed complaints filed against Judge Michael Karshan, who signed a court ruling on Shabbos, and Judge Yifat Mishori, whose home was used for a gathering alleged to be political in nature. While rejecting both complaints, Kula recommended that similar situations be avoided in the future and sharply criticized the growing practice of filing public complaints based solely on media reports.

In the case involving Judge Karshan, Kula rejected the complaint concerning the judge’s issuance of a court decision on Shabbos and took the opportunity to criticize what he described as the phenomenon of “public complainants” filing complaints without conducting any independent inquiry or consulting those directly affected.

At the same time, Kula also dismissed the complaint against Judge Mishori, which stemmed from allegations that her husband hosted a political gathering at their home.

Although both complaints were rejected, the ombudsman emphasized that greater caution should be exercised to prevent similar incidents from occurring in the future.

Addressing the complaint against Judge Karshan, Kula noted that four nearly identical complaints had been submitted, all based exclusively on media reports and simultaneously circulated to news outlets before any official investigation had taken place. He warned that such coordinated complaints and their publication prior to review undermine the integrity of the complaint process.

Kula wrote that the time has come to apply principles of good faith to complaints filed by members of the public. He proposed that such complaints should meet two conditions before being considered: first, the matter must genuinely raise an issue of significant public importance, and second, where there is a directly affected individual, that person should first be contacted and asked whether he supports the filing of the complaint on his behalf.

Because only one of the complaints included the position of the attorney directly affected by the incident, Kula considered that complaint while dismissing the others outright.

The complaint alleged that Judge Karshan’s decision to sign a ruling on Shabbos violated the sanctity of the day. As part of the review, the ombudsman’s office sought the position of a Shomer Shabbos attorney involved in the case.

The attorney explained that while serving in reserve military duty he was required to keep his phone available. When he received an alert from Israel’s electronic court system on Shabbos, he assumed it related to an operational military matter and opened the notification, only to discover that it was a routine technical court decision. He described feeling hurt that his religious sensitivities had been affected but stressed that he held no personal grievance against the judge and sought only to prevent similar situations in the future.

In his response, Judge Karshan explained that he is not Shomer Shabbos and occasionally works on Saturdays because of his heavy caseload. He said the decision in question was merely technical and that he signed it without realizing Shabbos had not yet ended. He expressed regret that the attorney received the notification during Shabbos and suggested that a system-wide solution be implemented to prevent non-urgent decisions from being distributed on Saturdays.

Kula ruled that the judge should have considered the possibility that Shomer Shabbos attorneys would receive such notifications. Nevertheless, he accepted the judge’s explanation that the incident resulted from an unintentional oversight rather than deliberate conduct.

In his concluding remarks, the ombudsman emphasized the importance of preserving Shabbos within the judicial system and reaffirmed the principle that non-essential judicial decisions should not be issued during Shabbos. However, because the judge apologized, acknowledged the significance of the issue, and accepted the underlying principle, Kula concluded that the complaint should not be upheld. Instead, he recommended that the Director of the Courts once again remind judges not to sign non-essential decisions on Shabbos except when absolutely necessary.

In a separate decision released Thursday, Kula also dismissed the complaint filed against Judge Mishori following reports that a political gathering had taken place in her home.

That complaint likewise relied entirely on media reports. After reviewing the matter, Kula accepted Judge Mishori’s explanation that the event was not political, contained no political elements, and was attended by no political figures. He did note, however, that the Judicial Branch’s public response had not argued that the event was non-political, but only that the judge herself had been unaware it was taking place.

Although he rejected the complaint, Kula observed that, as a general rule, political gatherings should not be held in the home of a sitting judge. He recommended that such events be avoided even in circumstances where the judge neither attended nor participated in organizing them, in order to preserve public confidence in the judiciary’s impartiality.