Constitutional Showdown: Attorney General Slams Government After It Defies Supreme Court
A major political and legal confrontation erupted on Sunday after the Israeli government unanimously approved an unprecedented decision refusing to recognize a ruling by the Supreme Court regarding the Second Authority for Television and Radio. The move has dramatically escalated tensions between Israel’s executive and judicial branches.
The government’s decision drew immediate and fierce criticism from Deputy Attorney General Dr. Gil Limon, who accused the coalition of attempting to undermine the rule of law. He described the measure as “an attempt to normalize a systematic violation of the law.”
According to Limon, “The government has submitted a proposed resolution that explicitly ignores an interim order of the Supreme Court, with the goal of declaring that it will not accept claims based on judicial decisions.”
‘A Red Line That Must Never Be Crossed’
President Isaac Herzog also strongly condemned the government’s decision, warning that defying the nation’s highest court threatens the country’s democratic foundations.
In an official statement, Herzog declared that “Noncompliance with a Supreme Court ruling is a red line that must never be crossed under any circumstances.” He added that “Statements advocating disobedience of Supreme Court rulings strike at the very heart of national unity.”
The controversial resolution was jointly introduced by Communications Minister Shlomo Karhi and Deputy Prime Minister and Justice Minister Yariv Levin. It states that as long as the Second Authority Council does not meet the minimum legal requirements established by law, every decision, appointment, approval, or action taken by the council is to be considered legally void from the outset.
According to the government’s position, any court ruling that directly contradicts the clear language of the law is itself invalid.
Attorney General: ‘A Serious Attempt to Undermine the Court’
Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara submitted her official response to the Supreme Court, sharply criticizing the government’s action. She argued that it represents “a serious attempt to thwart the decisions of the court and intimidate those who seek to carry them out.”
Israel Bar Association chairman Amit Becher also denounced the move, calling it “a complete destruction of the rule of law and democracy in Israel.”
“The attempt to ignore the court’s ruling comes alongside efforts to destroy freedom of the press,” Becher said. “A government cannot violate a court ruling, and a government that is not subject to the law betrays its duty and rebels against the state and its people.” He urged opponents to resist the decision “by every legal means.”
The dispute stems from a Supreme Court ruling issued in mid-June that reinstated the Second Authority Council appointed under the previous government. The court allowed the council to continue functioning even though its membership had fallen below the legal minimum of two-thirds of its full complement, as specified in the governing statute.
The government, however, maintains that once the council no longer satisfies the legal quorum required by law, it loses the authority to act. Ministers further argue that even the Supreme Court lacks the power to issue rulings that conflict with explicit legislation.
The resolution adopted Sunday emphasizes that the rule of law binds every branch of government, including, according to the government’s position, the judiciary itself.
{Matzav.com}