Feed aggregator

Meta Agrees to Sweeping Teen Limits on Facebook and Instagram — and Pressures Rivals to Follow

Matzav -

Meta has agreed to impose major new restrictions on teenagers using Facebook and Instagram, including a combined two-hour daily limit and an overnight lockout, as part of a landmark settlement with state attorneys general that could ultimately cost the social media giant nearly $18 billion.

Following Wednesday morning’s announcement of the agreement, Meta issued an open letter calling on Snap, TikTok and YouTube to adopt the same protections. The company urged its competitors to join an industry-wide effort to “support teens and empower parents” by embracing what Meta says is its most extensive framework yet for regulating young people’s social media use.

The settlement will cap teens’ combined daily use of Facebook and Instagram at two hours and prevent them from accessing the platforms between midnight and 6 a.m., although messaging functions will remain available. Notifications will also be turned off during school hours. Meta will introduce stronger age-verification measures and new default settings governing beauty filters and the visibility of likes on posts.

The deal marks a significant resolution for Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg and his company, which had faced potentially enormous financial exposure from litigation over allegations that its platforms harmed children.

“We want to ensure teens benefit from this new industry standard, but we cannot do it alone. These protections will only be truly effective if we work with our peers — TikTok and YouTube — to put the same measures in place,” Meta said in its open letter.

The agreement was also deliberately crafted to encourage the 52 state attorneys general involved to pursue comparable settlements with Meta’s largest social media competitors.

Should Snap, TikTok and YouTube, which are confronting their own legal challenges from state attorneys general, accept the same framework, Meta has agreed to subject itself to even tighter rules.

Among those additional concessions would be a further reduction in how much time teenagers can spend on Meta’s platforms. The initial settlement establishes a two-hour daily ceiling, but that limit would fall to only one hour if the other social media companies agree to participate in the framework.

Meta’s public appeal specifically called on Snap, TikTok and YouTube to “support teens and empower parents” by adopting the broad set of safeguards governing social media use.

The company’s financial obligation would increase as well if its competitors join the agreement. Meta’s payout would rise from approximately $12 billion to more than $17 billion under those circumstances.

A person familiar with the agreement acknowledged that offering to accept tougher restrictions and a larger payment if competitors join might appear unusual, but said the arrangement was designed to make the settlement truly industry-wide.

“The rationale is that it’s not a comprehensive agreement unless others sign on, and certainly competitors must match at least a portion of payment if Meta is going to pay out fully … it ensures incentive for continued action on this.”

The settlement’s numbers illustrate both its enormous financial scale and the extent of the changes Meta has accepted.

At roughly $18 billion, the maximum payout would be by far the largest settlement in Meta’s history, vastly exceeding the $5 billion penalty the company paid to the Federal Trade Commission in 2019.

Based on Meta’s $200.1 billion in revenue during fiscal 2025, the company generates approximately $18 billion in just 33 days.

Meta has committed to paying 70% of the potential $18 billion total. The remaining 30% would become due only if TikTok and YouTube collectively agree to pay $5.3 billion and implement comparable changes to their apps.

Teenagers will initially be allowed a maximum of two hours per day across Facebook and Instagram. If TikTok and YouTube agree to equivalent limits, Meta’s cap would be reduced to one hour.

A six-hour overnight “Night mode” will automatically prevent teen users from accessing the platforms between midnight and 6 a.m.

Most of the settlement’s requirements will remain effective for 10 years.

Three particularly significant changes will affect the teen experience on Meta’s platforms. They include prohibiting “cosmetic surgery and extreme makeup filters”; hiding “Likes” and other reactions on teen posts by default; and expanding parental controls and supervision over teens’ use of the apps.

One area left untouched by the settlement is Meta’s recommendation algorithm. Psychologist Jonathan Haidt has criticized that omission, arguing that the system is “engineered to maximize young people’s engagement even with content that harms them.”

One of the central concerns surrounding restrictions imposed solely on Meta is that teenagers who reach their Instagram time limit could simply switch to another social media platform and continue scrolling there.

Meta has maintained that restrictions affecting Facebook and Instagram alone cannot solve the broader problem of excessive social media use among teenagers, which is why the company is pressing its competitors to accept comparable rules.

A second person familiar with the matter told The Post that Snap may be receptive to joining the initiative. There is currently no sign, however, that TikTok or YouTube is preparing to sign on in the near future. Snap, TikTok and YouTube did not provide comments in response to inquiries.

Snapchat, led by Evan Spiegel, could therefore emerge as one of the first competing platforms to voluntarily consider adopting the framework restricting teen social media use.

The settlement ends a multistate lawsuit brought in 2023 by a bipartisan group of state attorneys general. The states accused Meta of deliberately creating addictive platform features that harmed teenagers while also improperly collecting young users’ information.

Settlement payments will be distributed to the states over a 10-year period. Although each state will have discretion over how its share is spent, the money must be directed toward programs involving the “remediation of harms related to youth social media use.” Potential uses include counseling services, wellness initiatives and after-school programs. Individual users will not receive settlement payments.

If Snap, TikTok and YouTube ultimately adopt Meta’s framework, Meta will be required to implement the additional restrictions it has pledged as part of the deal.

The settlement is still awaiting judicial approval. Assuming it receives the necessary signoff, its provisions are expected to be fully put into effect within six months.

For Meta, the agreement brings an end to years of negotiations and litigation that at one point threatened to expose the company to as much as $200 billion in potential costs. Investors appeared to view the settlement favorably: Meta shares initially jumped following the announcement before finishing the trading day approximately 1% higher.

The resolution closes the door on a lengthy and potentially far more damaging legal fight for the social media giant.

“Litigation is over,” a source said. “They are putting it to bed.”

{Matzav.com}

WAR WITH CANADA: Trump Orders Lake Ontario Renamed Lake America ‘Effective Immediately’ — In Jab To ‘Nasty’ Canada

Matzav -

President Donald Trump on Thursday signed documents directing that Lake Ontario be officially renamed “Lake America,” escalating his rhetorical battle with Canada as a tariff dispute between Washington and Ottawa continues to intensify.

“We’re going to be changing the name of Lake Ontario, effective immediately, to Lake America,” Trump told reporters in the Oval Office.

The president held up the signed directive following the announcement, while the White House also released a map reflecting the newly designated name for the Great Lake.

“We filed all the necessary papers, documents, everything else. We notified all of the various people that we have to notify. So we’ve done everything that you have to do, and this is official, effective immediately.”

Trump tied the decision directly to his growing dispute with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney’s government, accusing Canadian officials of treating the United States unfairly and singling out tariffs imposed on American agricultural products.

Trump said that “the Canadian officials have created this very badly. They’re nasty people. They charge our farmers 400% tariffs.”

The Lake Ontario move follows Trump’s decision last year to rename the Gulf of Mexico the “Gulf of America.”

Trump suggested Thursday that he might eventually take his renaming campaign even further, joking that with a gulf and a lake now bearing the America name, an ocean could be next.

“If you think about it, we have a gulf and we have a lake. Now, all we need is an ocean. So maybe we’ll have to change the name of the Atlantic and/or the Pacific,” Trump said Thursday.

{Matzav.com}

New Evidence Delays Lockerbie Bombing Trial, Leaving Victims’ Families Waiting Yet Again for Justice

Matzav -

Nearly 38 years after the bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland, relatives of those murdered in the terror attack are facing another painful wait for justice after the trial of an alleged bombmaker was abruptly postponed because of newly discovered evidence.

Jury selection had been scheduled to begin Wednesday in Washington, D.C., in the case against Abu Agila Mohammad Mas’ud Kheir Al-Marimi, who is accused of constructing the explosive device that killed all 259 people aboard the flight and another 11 people on the ground. Several victims’ relatives had planned to attend the proceedings and “stare down” the accused terrorist in court.

Instead, the emergence of undisclosed new evidence prompted the trial to be delayed, adding yet another unresolved chapter to a case that has stretched across nearly four decades.

“There are some family members that will stare at him — it brings them peace to stare him down,” said Kara Weipz, whose brother, Rick Monetti, was killed in the historic attack. “I don’t care to look at him.”

Monetti was a junior studying communications and was one of 35 Syracuse University students aboard the London-to-New York flight when it was destroyed on Dec. 21, 1988.

Weipz, who was forced to scrap her travel arrangements after Monday’s announcement that the trial had been postponed, said her previous encounters with Al-Marimi during pretrial proceedings left her unsettled by his demeanor.

“He seems very calculating, in my opinion,” Weipz said. “It’s tough, it’s difficult being in the courtroom with him.”

“My purpose for going is to represent my family and learn more about the truth,” said Weipz, who works as a preschool teacher in New Jersey.

For Weipz and other relatives who have spent decades waiting for answers and accountability, the latest postponement represents one more delay in an extraordinarily long legal saga.

“It’s a constant anxiety,” she said of her brother’s death and the ensuing legal battles — which included one conviction in 2001.

“It dredges it all up. You go through a roller coaster of emotions,” she said.

Federal prosecutors allege that Al-Marimi, a onetime Libyan intelligence operative who is now in his mid-70s, traveled to Malta carrying a suitcase containing the bomb. There, according to authorities, he met with fellow conspirators who directed him to program the device’s timer in preparation for the attack.

Authorities contend that Al-Marimi and his alleged accomplices carried out the bombing on orders from Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi, who was overthrown and killed during Libya’s civil war in 2011.

Weipz said she hopes the prosecution of Al-Marimi will finally provide additional answers about the plot that took her brother’s life and establish responsibility for another person allegedly involved.

“[I want] a guilty verdict and to hold another person who played a part in his murder accountable,” she said.

But even a conviction, Weipz said, cannot erase what happened or truly end the grief that has followed her family since 1988.

“There’s no such thing as closure,” she said. “This pain doesn’t go away … The question is can you find more peace?”

The bombing claimed 270 lives in all, including 11 residents of Lockerbie on the ground. Among those killed were 190 Americans.

The attack remains the second-deadliest terrorist attack against Americans, behind only the Sept. 11 attacks, and the deadliest terrorist attack ever carried out in the United Kingdom.

Another of those killed was 20-year-old Alexia Tsairis, a Syracuse University student who was returning home after participating in a study-abroad program. Her mother, Aphrodite Tsairis, has carried the loss for nearly four decades.

“We were left with holes in our hearts,” said Tsairis, 83, of New Jersey. “There will always be an empty seat at our table.”

Al-Marimi is only the third person to have been criminally charged in connection with the bombing.

Two other suspects, Abdel Baset Ali al-Megrahi and Lamen Khalifa Fhimah, went on trial in 2001 before a panel of Scottish judges convened in the Netherlands over their alleged involvement in the attack.

Al-Megrahi was found guilty, while Fhimah was acquitted. In an unexpected development this week, Libyan Airlines announced Tuesday that Fhimah had died, according to the BBC.

Tsairis said the timing of Fhimah’s death caught her attention, particularly because the new evidence emerged at roughly the same time and resulted in the postponement of Al-Marimi’s trial. She wondered whether the two developments could somehow be connected.

“I’m wondering if there’s a connection,” she said. “Maybe he had a change of conscience before his death. Maybe he left a note.”

Tsairis had intended to travel by train to Washington to attend the proceedings. With the case now postponed, the trial is expected to be delayed until approximately January.

“I’d like to see a conviction — but what I really want I can never have back,” she said of losing her daughter.

For Tsairis, the trial offers the possibility of learning more about the people behind the bombing and the motives that led to one of the deadliest terrorist attacks involving Americans.

“My hope is that the trial is going to answer more of the ‘who and why.’ It puts a period at the end of the sentence,” she said.

“I think the world has to know the American justice system will follow you wherever you go.”

If convicted, Al-Marimi faces the possibility of spending the rest of his life in prison.

{Matzav.com}

Mamdani ‘Deeply Saddened’ by Death of Suspect Charged with Cold-Blooded Murder

Matzav -

New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani said he was “deeply saddened” by the death of a Rikers Island inmate who was awaiting prosecution for allegedly murdering a Bronx laundromat owner in a seemingly random meat-cleaver attack.

“I am deeply saddened by the death of a New Yorker in City custody at a jail on Rikers Island early this morning,” Mamdani said. “My thoughts are with his family and loved ones as they grieve this loss.”

The mayor said authorities have not yet established what led to the inmate’s death, while pointing to the broader history of fatalities at the troubled jail complex.

“We do not yet know the cause of death, but we do know that too many New Yorkers have died on Rikers Island,” he said.

Mamdani said the Department of Correction, together with its oversight partners, will conduct an investigation into the death. He also reiterated his administration’s pledge to address conditions in the city’s jails and shutter Rikers Island “as quickly as possible.”

The inmate, Clarence Woodward, was a 39-year-old homeless parolee who had been arrested in connection with the Aug. 8, 2024, killing of 45-year-old Jose Miranda at the 303 Laundromat in the Bronx. Woodward faced charges of murder, manslaughter and assault.

According to police, Woodward entered the 24-hour laundromat at approximately 2:40 a.m. and attacked Miranda and another man without any apparent provocation.

Authorities alleged that Woodward stabbed Miranda in his legs and upper body with a meat cleaver and also wounded the second victim, a 47-year-old man, in the back before escaping from the scene.

Both injured men were rushed to Lincoln Hospital. Miranda succumbed to his wounds, while the second victim survived the attack.

Woodward had reportedly been released from prison approximately one month before the deadly attack.

Mamdani’s statement mourning Woodward’s death quickly drew criticism on X, where users questioned whether the mayor had similarly expressed condolences for Miranda and his grieving family.

{Matzav.com}

The Sugar You Ate As A Baby May Be Affecting Your Health Now, Study Finds

Matzav -

The amount of sugar consumed during the earliest years of life may have consequences that extend well into adulthood, with new research linking lower early-life sugar exposure to reduced rates of several cancers, slower biological aging and healthier eating habits decades later.

The study, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in early August, examined 64,761 people born in Britain between 1951 and 1956. During part of that period, Britain was still rationing sugar and other foods in the aftermath of World War II.

Researchers drew on information from the UK Biobank to examine the long-term health of people whose first 1,000 days of life occurred while sugar rationing was in place and compared them with individuals born after those restrictions ended.

The first 1,000 days encompass the period beginning at conception and continuing through a child’s second birthday, a relatively short window that is considered especially important for growth and development.

It is also during these early years that dietary tastes and preferences begin taking shape, raising the possibility that the foods available during infancy and early childhood could influence eating patterns — and potentially health — many decades later.

Researchers uncovered particularly striking differences when examining cancer rates. Those who experienced sugar rationing during their first 1,000 days had substantially lower risks of developing several forms of cancer compared with those who did not.

The study found a 69 percent lower risk of liver cancer, a 52 percent reduction in prostate cancer risk, a 41 percent lower risk of lung cancer, a 40 percent reduction in rectal cancer risk and a 36 percent lower risk of breast cancer among those exposed to early-life sugar restrictions.

The apparent benefits were not limited to cancer. Researchers also found evidence suggesting that people exposed to sugar rationing early in life experienced slower biological aging.

As part of the analysis, scientists examined telomeres, the protective structures at the ends of chromosomes that have been associated with aging and longevity. Participants who experienced sugar rationing during their first 1,000 days had longer telomeres than those who did not, with researchers estimating that the difference corresponded to slightly more than two additional years of life expectancy.

The study also suggested that the effects of the early dietary environment could be seen in eating behavior more than half a century later. Adults who had been exposed to sugar rationing early in life tended to consume less sugar, eat smaller portions and follow healthier and more varied diets.

Britain’s postwar sugar rationing has previously provided researchers with a natural experiment for examining how sugar consumption during early development might affect health later in life.

In another recently published study, researchers found that individuals who experienced sugar rationing during their first 1,000 days had significantly lower rates of anxiety and depression as adults.

Other research using the same historical circumstances has also linked early-life sugar rationing with lower rates of chronic illness, decreased odds of developing Alzheimer’s disease and improved cardiovascular health.

Despite the substantial differences identified between the groups, researchers emphasized that the findings do not establish a direct cause-and-effect relationship. Because the study was observational, it cannot prove that reducing sugar intake during the first years of life was itself responsible for the better health outcomes seen decades later.

{Matzav.com}

Suspected Shooting Near Modiin Illit Sparks Security Scare: “He Came Out With a Gun and Started Firing”

Matzav -

Security forces launched extensive searches near Modiin Illit on Wednesday evening after reports of gunfire coming from the direction of the Palestinian village of Deir Qaddis, with a resident describing seeing an armed Arab emerge from a building and apparently begin shooting.

Following the report of possible gunfire toward Modiin Illit, the military declared an “Abir Layla Bet” security alert in the city and dispatched forces to search the surrounding area.

A resident who was near the Brachfeld neighborhood, close to the neighboring Arab villages, described witnessing the frightening incident firsthand.

According to the resident, he initially noticed several Arabs in the area. A short time later, he saw a man emerge from a building holding what appeared to be a firearm.

“I hear bangs, I look, I think it’s a rifle. He starts shooting. We ran away. There was some kind of container there, so I ran to the container,” the resident recounted.

He estimated that he and the others with him were only about 200 to 250 meters away from the individuals at the time.

The residents contacted security officials immediately after the incident and provided their location and details of what they had witnessed.

According to the witness, numerous security personnel arrived within minutes, including the local security coordinator, a Shin Bet officer and military vehicles.

Security personnel questioned the witnesses and gathered information about what they had seen and heard. The resident said he later observed forces entering the nearby village and conducting searches of buildings and other structures.

“I see from a distance jeeps entering the village, going into houses with flashlights, entering a pen, checking everything,” he said.

The witness said security personnel did not subsequently inform him whether anything suspicious had been discovered during the searches or whether anyone had been apprehended.

Authorities were continuing to investigate the circumstances surrounding the reported gunfire and whether the incident represented an attempted shooting attack.

{Matzav.com}

Thousands Gather at Belz for Stirring Selichos Led by Rav Yitzchok Yosef and Rav Yitzchok Dovid Grossman

Matzav -

Thousands gathered late Wednesday night in the massive Belzer bais medrash in Yerushalayim for a stirring Selichos gathering attended by the former Rishon L’Tzion, Rav Yitzchok Yosef, and Rav Yitzchok Dovid Grossman, rov of Migdal Ha’emek.

The two rabbonim stood alongside one another for the special recitation of Selichos, which was conducted according to the nusach of Edot HaMizrach.

The Selichos featured the participation of the Belzer Rebbe.

Rav Grossman, the rov of Migdal HaEmek and nosi of the Migdal Ohr institutions, joined Rav Yosef for the late-night gathering as the enormous Belzer bais medrash filled with thousands of chassidim.

The gathering took place during the days leading toward the Yomim Noraim, as the atmosphere of Elul and the approaching Yemei Harachamim V’Haselichos intensifies.

The sight of Rav Yosef and Rav Grossman participating together added a particularly powerful dimension to the occasion, bringing together Torah leaders representing different communities and traditions.

With thousands filling virtually every available section of the vast bais medrash, the emotional recitation of Selichos created an extraordinary scene of tefillah, achdus and hischazkus.

{Matzav.com}

Woman, 38, Posed as 12-Year-Old for 14 Months — Until Police Walked Into Her Bedroom

Matzav -

A bizarre case that has stunned Brazil ended with the conviction of a 38-year-old woman who authorities say spent more than a year living with an unsuspecting couple while pretending to be a 12-year-old girl — speaking in a childlike voice, playing with dolls, using pacifiers and baby bottles, and even celebrating what the family believed was her 12th birthday.

The woman, identified as Amanda Maria Souza de Oliveira, was convicted of fraud and using a false identity. Investigators say the episode was far from an isolated incident, with similar allegations involving different names and identities surfacing in numerous parts of Brazil.

The extraordinary deception in Joinville, in the southern state of Santa Catarina, began when Oliveira appeared in a local evangelical community under the name “Gabriela.” At first, she reportedly claimed to be 18 years old, said she had previously worked in a bakery and explained that she was searching for employment.

Through a local religious leader, she was introduced to a couple who decided to help her.

As their relationship developed, however, “Gabriela’s” story changed dramatically. She told the couple that she was actually much younger and claimed to be a child who had fled an abusive home in Pará, a state in northern Brazil. She also portrayed herself as autistic and suffering from various health problems.

The couple accepted her account and brought her into their home, where she remained for approximately 14 months. They came to regard her as a foster daughter, providing her with housing, clothing, food, medication and medical care. They even prepared a bedroom filled with toys for her.

At one point, the family held a birthday celebration marking what they believed was “Gabriela’s” 12th birthday.

Maintaining the identity involved far more than simply claiming to be a child. According to reports and investigators, Oliveira spoke in a high-pitched, childlike voice, played with dolls and produced drawings resembling those of a young girl. Evidence also indicated that she used pacifiers and baby bottles.

The couple even paid for weight-loss medication for her.

The performance was apparently so convincing that when police ultimately arrived at the house to arrest Oliveira, the woman who had taken her in reportedly struggled to comprehend that the supposed child living in her home was actually an adult.

According to an account published by The Washington Post, officers entered “Gabriela’s” bedroom and found her sitting on the bed eating, surrounded by dolls and drawings.

Local police chief Rodrigo Goss reportedly addressed her by her real name — Amanda — and made clear that the charade was over.

Then came the moment that effectively shattered the identity she had maintained for months.

The woman who had been speaking in a childlike voice suddenly changed the way she spoke. She stood up from the bed and began talking in the voice of an adult woman.

The unraveling of the alleged deception had begun with a relative of the couple who became suspicious that “Gabriela” was considerably older than she claimed.

The relative began searching online and discovered reports about a woman named Amanda who had been connected to a similar case in Rio de Janeiro.

The photographs and other details appeared to match.

Police were contacted, and Oliveira was arrested at the family’s home on June 2. During questioning, she provided her real identifying information and acknowledged using a false name and age.

But investigators soon found that the Joinville case appeared to be only one chapter in a much longer story.

According to Brazilian investigations and media reports, Oliveira allegedly used numerous names and identities over the years, including Gabriela, Ana Clara, Maria Eduarda, Beatriz and Maria Clara. Cases and investigations connected to her reportedly surfaced in several Brazilian states, with Oliveira allegedly portraying herself on multiple occasions as a distressed child or teenager.

The Washington Post reported that Oliveira admitted she had been pretending to be a child for more than 15 years.

The Times, citing court documents, reported cases connected to her in numerous Brazilian states, including Paraná, Rio de Janeiro, Minas Gerais, Goiás, Ceará, Rio Grande do Sul and São Paulo.

In one 2023 case in Rio de Janeiro, Oliveira allegedly called herself “Maria Eduarda.” Two women who believed they were dealing with a vulnerable young girl rented a home for her and purchased clothing, food and personal supplies.

A police examination of her identity eventually revealed that the supposed girl was actually Oliveira, who was 35 at the time.

Another disturbing detail emerged from the account of Renata Magalhães, a nutritionist from Rio de Janeiro who had previously helped Oliveira.

Magalhães said Oliveira approached her seeking assistance, and she eventually became emotionally attached to her, regarding her almost as a daughter.

After suspicions arose, Magalhães began investigating Oliveira’s identity and discovered the alleged deception. She said police later showed her Oliveira’s online search history.

According to The Times, those searches included questions about how an autistic person behaves and how to create drawings that would evoke an emotional response from evangelical Christians.

The latest case culminated in a court ruling last week, when a Santa Catarina court convicted Oliveira, now 38, of fraud and using a false identity.

Her attorneys argued during the proceedings that she suffers from psychiatric problems and requires treatment. The defense also disputed the contention that the family had sustained the type of financial loss necessary to support a fraud conviction.

The court rejected the argument that Oliveira’s condition absolved her of criminal responsibility.

According to the ruling, she knowingly constructed and maintained a false identity in order to persuade the family to believe her story, allowing her to receive her living expenses and other necessities for months. The court also addressed the emotional and familial impact on the couple, who had formed a relationship with someone they believed to be their young daughter.

Oliveira was sentenced to one year, six months and 10 days in prison for fraud, along with another four months and 18 days for using a false identity.

The court ordered her to remain in custody and did not permit her to pursue her appeal while free.

Her defense has already announced plans to appeal the ruling and seek to have the conviction overturned.

For now, the verdict closes the latest chapter in one of Brazil’s most extraordinary impersonation cases.

{Matzav.com}

Jewish Religion Textbooks to Enter German Schools for First Time Since Holocaust

Matzav -

For the first time since the Holocaust era, official textbooks devoted to Jewish religious education are set to be introduced into German schools, with a new series designed for use by both Jewish and non-Jewish students.

The first volume of the series, titled “Da’at HaDorot,” is intended for students between the ages of 10 and 16 and is scheduled to enter classrooms during the coming school year. The inaugural book will focus on the Torah, while seven additional volumes are planned covering Tanach, tefillah, ethics, halachah, Yomim Tovim and Jewish history.

The project was developed jointly by the Central Council of Jews in Germany and the Ernst Klett publishing house. The books are being considered for use in both Jewish and non-Jewish schools and are intended to address a longstanding shortage of organized educational materials that conform to Germany’s official curriculum.

Josef Schuster, president of the Central Council of Jews in Germany, said the initiative marks the first time Jewish religious education in the country is being placed on comparable footing with Christian religious studies.

“This cooperation combines the professional and religious expertise of the Central Council with our didactic and publishing experience,” said Maximilian Schulyok, managing director of Ernst Klett. “The impetus created also enriches the further development of our educational media.”

The series has been designed to serve a broad range of students, including both Jews and non-Jews. Among its features are interactive components such as QR codes, as well as Hebrew terminology accompanied by translations and transliterations.

The initiative carries particular historical significance in Germany. Before the Nazis came to power, organized Jewish religious education existed throughout the country. That system was ultimately destroyed during the Holocaust.

Jewish education was reestablished in Germany after World War II, but the new textbook project represents a major step toward providing standardized Jewish religious materials within the country’s contemporary school system.

{Matzav.com}

FDA Approves Once-Daily Pill For Deadly Cancer After Patients’ Survival Rates Nearly Double

Matzav -

The US Food and Drug Administration on Wednesday approved a new once-daily pill for certain patients with advanced pancreatic cancer after a major clinical trial found that patients receiving the treatment had a median survival of 13.2 months, nearly twice the 6.7 months recorded among patients receiving standard chemotherapy.

The drug, Rasonque, is manufactured by California-based Revolution Medicines and is designed to treat the most common form of pancreatic cancer. Taken once a day, the medication inhibits several forms of the RAS protein, which plays a central role in driving the growth of pancreatic tumors.

Announcing the decision, the FDA described Rasonque as a “new treatment option for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.” The agency granted approval more than six months before the deadline originally set for completing its review.

“Today’s approval provides a critical new option for patients facing an extraordinarily difficult and historically hard-to-treat cancer. It is our fundamental duty to deliver more cures and meaningful treatments to patients as quickly as possible,” acting FDA Commissioner Kyle Diamantas said in a press release.

“I am immensely proud of the dedicated FDA scientists whose fast, thorough review and relentless commitment made this groundbreaking milestone a reality.”

The approval applies to adults with metastatic pancreatic cancer whose disease has failed to respond to at least one previous treatment, as well as patients who are unable to receive certain combinations of cancer medications.

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is among the deadliest cancers in the United States and accounts for as much as 95% of the approximately 67,000 pancreatic cancer cases diagnosed annually, according to National Cancer Institute figures.

Although pancreatic cancer represents only about 3.2% of all cancer diagnoses, it is responsible for a disproportionately large share of cancer deaths. The disease is frequently discovered only after it has reached an advanced stage and is known for its ability to spread rapidly.

The FDA’s approval was based on results from a randomized, open-label study involving 500 patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer who had already received treatment. Median overall survival among those who received Rasonque reached 13.2 months, compared with 6.7 months among patients in the standard chemotherapy control group.

“This drug showed unprecedented results in an area of high unmet need,” said Angelo de Claro, M.D., director of the FDA’s Oncology Center of Excellence.

Rasonque reached approval through several expedited regulatory pathways. The FDA granted the treatment priority review, orphan drug status and breakthrough therapy designation, allowing the agency to accelerate its evaluation of the medication.

The application was also reviewed through the FDA commissioner’s National Priority Voucher pilot program, an initiative intended to speed the availability of treatments considered important to public health.

Even before Wednesday’s formal approval, some patients had been given access to Rasonque. In May, the FDA issued a “safe to proceed” letter permitting an expanded-access protocol through which eligible patients could receive the drug while its final review remained underway.

Clinical-trial safety data identified the most commonly reported side effects as rash, diarrhea, mouth sores, nausea, fatigue, vomiting, abdominal pain, fluid retention, loss of appetite and bleeding.

“Today’s landmark approval is the most significant advance we have seen in the fight against pancreatic cancer, a devastating disease,” said Anna Berkenblit, M.D., chief scientific and medical officer of the Pancreatic Cancer Action Network (PanCAN).

“I believe this drug will transform how pancreatic cancer is treated, giving people the opportunity for more time with loved ones, the possibility of a better quality of life and optimism that continued research may lead to even greater advances.”

{Matzav.com}

A New Halachic Treasure: Ohr Olam Releases “Halachic Discussions for Everyday” by Rabbi Doniel Neustadt Shlita

Matzav -

[COMMUNICATED]

Ohr Olam, a leader in halachic publications, has announced the release of its newest sefer, Halachic Discussions for Everyday, the second volume in the popular Halachic Discussions series by Rabbi Doniel Neustadt shlita. The sefer, published in the Shimoff Edition, is available now.

The new volume follows the tremendous success of the series’ first installment, Halachic Discussions on Hilchos Shabbos, which offered clear, practical answers to real life shailos organized according to the flow of a typical Shabbos, from Friday afternoon through Motzei Shabbos.

Halachic Discussions for Everyday takes that same format and applies it to the full scope of daily Jewish life. The sefer presents practical, sourced questions and answers that introduce readers to the vibrant world of contemporary halachic debate as it plays out from the moment one wakes up in the morning until retiring for the night, and everything in between.

The sefer is designed to be accessible for the layman while remaining rich enough in sourcing to serve talmidei chachomim, rabbanim, and anyone seeking a deeper understanding of the halachic issues that arise in the course of an ordinary day.

Halachic Discussions for Everyday is distributed by Z. Berman Books and is available now wherever Jewish sefarim are sold.

For more information or sponsorship opportunities, contact Ohr Olam at 718.506.0101 or OhrOlamMB@gmail.com, or visit www.ohr-olam.org.

FEMA Crew Broke Federal Law by Skipping Trump-Supporting Homes After Hurricane, Watchdog Finds

Matzav -

A Federal Emergency Management Agency team broke federal law and FEMA rules by deliberately bypassing 11 Florida homes displaying signs supporting Donald Trump while conducting disaster-relief outreach following Hurricane Milton in 2024, according to a Department of Homeland Security inspector general report released Aug. 18.

The watchdog determined that a Disaster Survivor Assistance crew leader directed personnel not to approach residences displaying pro-Trump political signs. Investigators concluded that the instructions violated FEMA policy as well as the Hatch Act of 1939, which generally prohibits federal employees from engaging in partisan political activity while performing their official duties.

In the aftermath of Hurricanes Helene and Milton, FEMA personnel canvassed 744,288 residences and other locations. Agency records showed that workers made no contact at 555,374 of those locations for a variety of reasons, including residents not answering their doors, gated communities and signs identifying property as private.

When investigators examined notes connected to those records, however, they discovered 11 surveys in which FEMA workers specifically identified Trump signs as the reason they had not approached a residence. Every one of those entries came from the same FEMA crew.

The crew leader later maintained that the directive was motivated by safety concerns rather than partisan politics. She said FEMA personnel had encountered hostility while conducting disaster outreach amid the highly charged political atmosphere surrounding the 2024 presidential election.

The first record documenting such an incident was entered on Oct. 19, 2024. Four days later, another note explicitly stated, “did not visit due to Trump flag.”

FEMA’s Office of Professional Responsibility became aware of the matter on Oct. 28, 2024, after the Transportation Security Administration submitted a complaint on behalf of TSA employees who had been deployed to assist with the disaster response.

Separate investigations conducted by FEMA’s Office of Professional Responsibility and the Office of Special Counsel subsequently determined that agency personnel had violated FEMA rules and the Hatch Act.

According to investigators, the practice was able to continue for several days in part because supervisors were not required to examine the notes entered by personnel conducting outreach in the field.

The inspector general also identified shortcomings in FEMA’s training procedures, finding that the agency had failed to ensure that personnel received required instruction on ethics and the Hatch Act before being deployed. Records showed that 60% of a sample of 25 crew members and leaders had not received that training.

The watchdog said it was unable to establish whether FEMA personnel had similarly bypassed homes during other disaster-response operations because investigators no longer had access to the agency’s survey database. That access disappeared after a support contract expired in September 2025. The report attributed the lapse to then-Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem failing to act on a FEMA funding request before the contract ended.

The inspector general ultimately issued four recommendations aimed at preventing similar incidents, including requiring standardized documentation and making ethics training mandatory before personnel are deployed for disaster-response work. FEMA agreed with all four recommendations.

{Matzav.com}

Released Hostage Who Was Forced to Dig His Own Grave Recounts Hamas Horrors: ‘I Could Hear Them Laughing, Eating Cakes’

Matzav -

Evyatar David, who endured 738 days in Hamas captivity before being released, has spoken publicly about his ordeal in an international interview for the first time, describing extreme starvation in Gaza’s tunnels and revealing what happened behind the scenes of the horrifying propaganda video in which he was forced to dig what his captors told him would be his own grave.

David, 25, was released on October 7, 2025, as part of a US-mediated hostage agreement, after spending more than two years in captivity. He had been abducted from the Nova music festival together with his childhood friend Guy Gilboa-Dalal. Speaking to CNN, David described the severe hunger he suffered underground, particularly during the months leading up to the release of the August 2025 Hamas propaganda video that showed him emaciated and holding a shovel as he dug his own grave.

David said his Hamas captors selected him to appear in the propaganda footage after comparing his physical condition with that of Gilboa-Dalal and determining that David looked worse.

“It’s staged, but it’s based on the truth, we didn’t eat for three months,” he recalled.

David described being so physically depleted that even holding the shovel for the staged scene was an enormous challenge. His captors, he said, showed no concern as his body began giving out.

“When I tried to dig the grave, just holding the shovel was almost impossible. When I told my captors that I noticed I was almost collapsing, they ignored me. I could hear them laughing, eating cakes and drinking tea, as if there wasn’t someone walking next to them who looked like a skeleton.”

David said the Hamas terrorists guarding him had access to food, air conditioning and television. Although his captors claimed there was no food available in Gaza, he said the terrorists themselves appeared well-fed and muscular even as the hostages were being starved.

Since returning home, David has faced a difficult and ongoing rehabilitation process. He said he continues to struggle with post-traumatic stress, including flashbacks and nightmares that awaken him at night. According to David, his family and friends were forced to launch a crowdfunding campaign because the assistance being provided by the government to released hostages has been insufficient.

Music has become an important source of comfort and a central part of David’s efforts to cope with the trauma he endured. He now plans to travel to the United States next month with his older brother for a series of public appearances aimed at ensuring that the world does not forget what the hostages suffered during their captivity.

{Matzav.com}

Netanyahu Says No Iran Deal Possible, Told Trump ‘Savages’ Can’t Be Trusted

Matzav -

Israeli Prime Minister Binyomin Netanyahu has voiced strong support for President Donald Trump’s escalating economic campaign against Iran, while making clear that he remains deeply doubtful that Tehran’s current rulers are capable of reaching a meaningful diplomatic agreement.

Netanyahu said the issue was discussed when he met with Trump at the White House on July 28, with the two leaders weighing the possible paths forward in confronting Iran. According to Netanyahu, he told the president during their conversation that he had little confidence that negotiations with the Iranian leadership could succeed.

Speaking at an event in Yerushalayim, Netanyahu recalled expressing that skepticism directly to Trump.

“I doubt, however, that an agreement can be reached with that group there, with those savages,” Netanyahu said.

“I tell you — an agreement cannot be reached,” he added.

Netanyahu made the comments at a gathering for Israeli residents of Yehudah and Shomron. His remarks were reported by AFP and were also independently reported by CBS News, Arab News and the Times of Israel.

According to Netanyahu, his White House discussion with Trump centered on three possible strategies for dealing with Tehran: attempting to negotiate an agreement, returning to military action, or dramatically increasing the economic pressure on the Iranian regime.

Netanyahu said he favored the economic option and applauded Trump for choosing to ratchet up the financial pressure on Tehran rather than immediately embarking on another large-scale military operation.

The prime minister said he had encouraged Trump to “tighten the siege” on Iran and praised the president for implementing that approach “in a very, very, very strong way,” according to the Times of Israel, which reviewed footage of Netanyahu’s comments.

Trump on Monday unveiled what he described as an “economic D-Day” targeting Iran, broadening the administration’s pressure campaign beyond Tehran itself to include foreign businesses and other entities that provide economic support to the Islamic Republic.

Netanyahu said the significance of Trump’s strategy lies in its focus on those helping keep the Iranian regime afloat, rather than restricting American pressure solely to Iran itself.

“Trump decided to tighten the siege on those who assist this regime, this terrible dictatorship,” Netanyahu said, according to AFP.

Netanyahu’s remarks amounted to a forceful endorsement of the Trump administration’s new economic offensive, even as Trump continues to keep diplomacy on the table as a possible path forward.

Trump has repeatedly indicated that he would prefer to resolve the confrontation with Iran through an agreement, while simultaneously warning that additional US military action remains possible if Tehran refuses to accept Washington’s demands.

Iran, for its part, has dismissed the administration’s intensified economic campaign.

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said Wednesday that Washington would achieve nothing through its sanctions offensive, according to AFP reports cited by several news organizations.

Netanyahu has for years been a fierce critic of diplomatic arrangements that, in his view, would allow Iran to retain the ability to eventually restore its nuclear program or rebuild its military capabilities.

His latest comments come as the Trump administration attempts to use severe economic pressure to compel Tehran to make concessions, while stopping short, at least for now, of immediately resuming a broad military campaign.

The standoff also continues to center heavily on the Strait of Hormuz, where the conflict has caused major disruptions to commercial shipping.

Netanyahu’s remarks indicate that he currently views an intensified economic squeeze as the preferable strategy, even as he remains highly doubtful that Iran’s leadership can ultimately be brought into a durable diplomatic accord.

At the same time, Netanyahu’s description of his July 28 meeting with Trump shows that a negotiated solution was among the possibilities the two leaders considered, despite Netanyahu’s warning to the president that he does not believe the Iranian leadership can be trusted to make such an agreement.

{Matzav.com}

Delta Sets September Return to Israel With Daily JFK-Tel Aviv Flights

Matzav -

Delta Air Lines announced Wednesday that it will resume daily nonstop service between New York and Tel Aviv in early September, restoring a major US-Israel air route following a review of security conditions in the region.

The airline said its first flight from John F. Kennedy International Airport to Ben Gurion Airport will depart on September 6 and land in Israel the following morning. Service from Tel Aviv back to New York will begin September 7, with the flight scheduled to arrive at JFK later that day. Delta plans to use Airbus A330-900neo aircraft for the daily route.

“The resumption of service follows a thorough review of the evolving security environment in the region. The safety and security of our customers and employees remain our top priority, and Delta will continue to monitor the situation closely in coordination with aviation authorities and government agencies. Customers are encouraged to check delta.com and the Delta app for the latest flight updates and travel information,” the airline said.

The announcement reverses Delta’s earlier plans to remain out of Israel through September. In March, the carrier said it was suspending flights to Israel through that period based on its assessment of regional security concerns, stressing at the time that protecting passengers and employees was its overriding priority.

Delta had also planned to launch a new route connecting Boston and Tel Aviv in late October, but the airline subsequently postponed the introduction of that service indefinitely.

The carrier was one of many foreign airlines to suspend service to Israel as security concerns repeatedly disrupted international aviation in recent years. More recently, however, signs of a broader recovery have emerged at Ben Gurion Airport, with several international airlines moving to restore or increase their Israel schedules.

United Airlines earlier this month announced that it plans to resume service between Newark Liberty International Airport and Ben Gurion Airport on September 8. United said it intends to operate two flights each day on the Newark-Tel Aviv route.

{Matzav.com}

What Happens Now?

Matzav -

By Rabbi Pinchos Lipschutz

Some things change, while other things remain remarkably the same. What appears to us to be new and unprecedented has often happened before. History has a way of repeating itself, and the Jewish people have learned, sometimes painfully, that the circumstances may change, the personalities may change, and the challenges may take on new forms, but the underlying story is often familiar.

Today, there is understandably deep concern about the situation in Eretz Yisroel. Many are watching the political developments with trepidation, wondering what the future will bring if the polls predicting the political demise of Binyomin Netanyahu prove accurate. There is a fear that the next government will be even less sympathetic, and perhaps openly hostile, to the Torah community and the values that have sustained Klal Yisroel throughout the generations.

The concern is real. The uncertainty is real. But before allowing ourselves to become overwhelmed by the headlines and the predictions, it is worth taking a step back and looking at the larger picture. We have been here before, not necessarily with the same names, the same parties, or the same political circumstances, but with the same fundamental question of what happens when the forces of government turn against the Torah world.

The answer, as Jewish history has taught us repeatedly, is not found merely in political calculations. Governments rise and fall. Coalitions are formed and dissolved. Leaders who seem invincible suddenly disappear from the political stage and those who appear destined for obscurity rise to prominence. But the Torah remains, and so does the eternal commitment of Klal Yisroel to it.

That does not mean that we should ignore the danger or minimize the challenges confronting the Torah community. On the contrary, we must understand them clearly. But we should remember that the Jewish people have survived far more uncertain times and that what looks like an entirely new chapter may simply be another variation of an old story.

We are obligated to remember that Hakadosh Boruch Hu is in charge. Not the polls. Not the politicians. Not the political parties. Not the pundits who confidently predict what tomorrow will bring. The Ribbono Shel Olam runs the world, and every development, even those that appear frightening or incomprehensible to us, takes place under His Hashgocha Protis.

We have a responsibility to be vigilant, to advocate for the Torah community, and to do everything within our ability to protect the interests of Torah and Yiddishkeit. But alongside that hishtadlus is the recognition that the outcome is ultimately not in human hands.

Our obligation is to maintain our emunah and bitachon even when we cannot see how things will work out. It is easy to have bitachon when everything appears to be going our way. The test comes when the polls are ominous, when political alliances seem threatening, and when the future seems uncertain. At those moments, we are reminded that the world does not run according to polls and political predictions. It runs according to the will of Hakadosh Boruch Hu.

And perhaps that is precisely the perspective we need now. We should be concerned, but not frightened; we should be vigilant, but not despairing; we should engage in hishtadlus, but remember Who is directing the outcome.

There is a remarkable story related in the sefer Amudo Shel Olam, a biography of Rav Yosef Shalom Elyashiv, that brings this perspective into sharp focus.

During a particularly bitter Israeli election campaign, the leftist parties had made no secret of their intentions. Among their campaign promises was the drafting of yeshiva bochurim into the army. When the election results came in and those parties emerged victorious, there was apprehension in the religious community. The people who had openly spoken about imposing difficult and potentially devastating decrees on the Torah community were now in a position to carry out their plans.

One of Rav Elyashiv’s talmidim approached him and asked what would happen. The people who hated religion had won. They were about to assume power and would seemingly have the ability to implement everything they had promised during the campaign.

Rav Elyashiv’s response was astonishing in its simplicity.

He told him that thinking about what would happen was bittul Torah.

At first glance, the response is difficult to understand. How could a person be expected not to think about something that potentially threatened the entire Torah community? Surely, it was important to understand the danger and prepare for what might come.

But Rav Elyashiv was teaching his talmid a fundamental yesod in emunah and bitachon. He was telling his questioner that there is a difference between hishtadlus and worrying. There is a difference between doing what must be done as opposed to spending hours imagining everything that might go wrong. A person is obligated to act when action is called for, but once the necessary hishtadlus has been made, there is no purpose in thinking about frightening possibilities.

We do what we can do and the rest is up to Hashem. To discuss it further, to pontificate and fret, and to play out different scenarios in our minds or in discussions with our friends is simply a waste of time. We would be better off spending that time studying Torah.

The question, “What will happen now?” contains within it an assumption that we know what is going to happen. We see a government forming, we see politicians making promises, we read the polls, and we begin constructing a picture of the future. But a Yid knows that the picture we see is not the whole picture.

Politicians can make plans, parties can form coalitions, and governments can announce their intentions, but nothing can happen that Hakadosh Boruch Hu does not allow. What appears to us to be a frightening political development may ultimately lead to an outcome we could never have imagined. And what appears to us to be a setback may contain within it the seeds of a yeshuah.

This is what Rav Elyashiv was reminding his talmid. Don’t spend your time trying to figure out what tomorrow will look like. Your job is to learn Torah, to daven, to do the hishtadlus that is required of you, and to leave the future to the Ribbono Shel Olam.

That message is as relevant today as it was then. In the matter of what is going on here and in Eretz Yisroel, we must always remember that the Aibishter runs the world. We have our tasks, we have our job, we have the reason He placed us in this world, and we should not get sidetracked from our missions.

We must daven. We must strengthen our own study of Torah. That is what we are here for. We do what we can, but we must never allow our concern over what people might do to consume the time and strength that belong to Torah and avodas Hashem.

Rav Elyashiv’s response was a lesson for generations: Do not waste today worrying about a tomorrow that belongs to Hakadosh Boruch Hu. Have faith that you are in good hands and that everything will work out the way Hashem wants it to.

This message was brought home to me in a powerful way by a story Rav Shimon Galei related during his trip to Mexico on Sunday on behalf of Keren Olam HaTorah to raise funds necessary to help support Israeli yeshivos and yungeleit.

In the aftermath of the Holocaust, when the Torah world had been decimated and much of the Torah that had existed in Europe had been lost, many wondered how, and if, it could ever be rebuilt. Generations of talmidei chachomim had been wiped out, yeshivos had been destroyed, and entire communities had disappeared. The devastation was so overwhelming that people feared that the Torah world would not be able to recover.

The Ponovezher Rov, Rav Yosef Shlomo Kahaneman, viewed it differently. He was not worried about whether the Torah world would continue. Hashem promised that Torah would never be forgotten, and a promise from Hashem does not depend upon circumstances.

There was only one question that concerned him: Who would have the zechus to be part of it?

That is a very different way of looking at the present and the future. We are not asked to figure out whether Torah will survive. We are not required to calculate the obstacles or predict how every challenge will unfold. Hashem has already taken care of that.

The calculation we need to make is a much more personal one: Will we be among those who help make it happen? Will we have the zechus to strengthen Torah, to support lomdei Torah, to sustain yeshivos, to give what we can give, and to do what we can do?

We do what is within our power and leave the rest to Hashem. To continue discussing it, pontificating about it, fretting over possible scenarios, and playing out endless versions of what might happen is a waste of time that could be far better spent learning Torah and doing our part to strengthen the Torah world.

The Ponovezher Rov understood that the future of Torah was never in doubt. The only question was who would merit to have a share in it. That question remains ours.

And this is true not only regarding Eretz Yisroel. It is true regarding us here in America, regarding the challenges facing our communities, and certainly regarding the personal challenges that every individual faces.

Nobody escapes having a pekel. Every person has things that don’t go as planned, disappointments that he didn’t anticipate, challenges he would rather not have to deal with, and situations that seem to have no easy solution. Some pekels are heavier than others, but nobody walks through life without one.

The question is not whether we will have a pekel. The question is how we carry it.

Will we allow it to consume us, to fill our minds with endless calculations and what-ifs, and to make us bitter and anxious? Or will we recognize that this, too, is part of the derech that Hashem has chosen for us, do what we can, and then leave the rest in His hands?

The way we relate to our pekel says something profound about who we are. It reveals how much we trust in Hashem, how we respond when life does not conform to our plans, and whether we are able to continue moving forward even when the road takes an unexpected turn.

We cannot choose the pekel we are given, but we can choose how we carry it. And sometimes, the very pekel that we wish we could put down becomes the vehicle through which we grow, become stronger, and discover a deeper emunah in the One Who placed it upon our shoulders.

This week’s parsha, Ki Savo, is fundamentally about emunah and bitachon, about recognizing the Yad Hashem in every aspect of our lives.

The parsha opens with the mitzvah of bikkurim. After a farmer has worked the land and finally sees the fruits of his labor, he brings the first fruits to Yerushalayim. Standing before the mizbei’ach, he recites the pesukim recounting the tzaros of Yaakov Avinu and the suffering of our forefathers in Mitzrayim. He describes how Hakadosh Boruch Hu heard their cries, took them out of Mitzrayim, and brought them to Eretz Yisroel.

He presents the fruits of his labor to the kohein. Then comes the culmination of the mitzvah. The posuk says, “Vesomachta bechol hatov asher nosan lecha Hashem — And you shall rejoice with all the good that Hashem has given you.”

The Torah is teaching us the secret of simcha. Happiness does not come simply from having what we want. It comes from recognizing how we got it and Who gave it to us.

When a person understands that the ultimate determinant of his success is Hakadosh Boruch Hu, he can be fulfilled even when life does not look exactly as he had imagined. And when he recognizes that the One Who created the world created him, knows what is best for him, and has a plan for everything that happens, he can begin to view even difficult circumstances through a different lens.

A person may find himself in a situation he desperately wishes were different. He may have a problem he cannot solve, a disappointment he cannot undo, a pekel he wishes he never had to carry. He has a choice. He can bemoan his fate, wonder why this happened to him, and become consumed by thoughts of how things should have been, or he can remind himself that he is not where he is by accident. Hashem placed him there.

That does not mean that he should be passive. He should do everything within his ability to improve the situation. He should daven, seek advice, make his hishtadlus, and do whatever a responsible person is supposed to do. But once he has done what he can, he should accept it and leave the outcome to Hashem.

He can say to himself, “I am here because Hashem wants me here. There is a reason for this, even if I don’t understand it. My job is to do what I can and wait patiently for Hashem to decide when it is time for me to leave this place.”

He can recognize that Hashem has placed him in this situation, expecting him to strengthen himself, confront the challenge, and do whatever he can to deal with it, rather than allowing himself to become broken and sink into yiush.

That is bitachon. And that is also the path to simcha.

The person who knows that everything is from Hashem does not need everything to be perfect or to change before he can find peace. He can find peace in knowing that his circumstances are being directed by the One Who knows where he needs to be and what he needs to become.

Three times a day, we recite the posuk, “Posei’ach es yodecha umasbia lechol chai ratzon.” At first glance, the posuk seems to be saying that Hashem fulfills the desire of every living creature. But we know that this is not how life appears to work. People have desires that are not fulfilled. They daven for things that do not happen and long for realities that never materialize.

The Tzlach (Brachos 4b) offers a profound explanation. “Posei’ach es yodecha umasbia lechol chai ratzon” does not mean that Hashem gives every person everything he wants. Rather, Hakadosh Boruch Hu gives each person the ability to be satisfied with what he has and to recognize that what Hashem has given him is what is best for him.

That is a much deeper understanding of ratzon. A person can spend his life wishing for what he does not have, or he can develop the understanding that what he has is what Hashem has determined he needs.

Yaakov Avinu lived with this awareness. He was forced by his brother into exile, where he was tormented by Lovon and endured years of deception and hardship. Later, he was forced to descend to Mitzrayim. He certainly did not want these things to happen. Yet, he understood that they were not random misfortunes. They were part of the plan Hashem had prepared for him and for Klal Yisroel.

Yaakov went down to Mitzrayim with relatively little. Yet, that descent became the beginning of the transformation of his family into a great nation. What appeared at first to be another painful turn in his life was actually the beginning of the fulfillment of the promise Hashem had made.

This is the perspective that allows a person to persevere when he finds himself in a place he never expected to be. He may not understand why he is there. He may desperately wish that his circumstances were different. But he knows that he has not arrived there by accident. Hashem has placed him there for a reason, and until Hashem decides that the time has come for him to move on, his responsibility is to strengthen himself, do what he can, and trust that there is a purpose in what he cannot understand.

The mitzvah of bikkurim trains a person to develop this perspective. A farmer can look at the fruit in his hands and think only about the work it took to produce it — the planting, the waiting, the uncertainty, the labor, and the many things that could have gone wrong. Or he can stop and recognize how much he has to be thankful for.

He remembers planting the tree without knowing whether it would take root. He remembers waiting through the seasons without knowing whether the tree would produce fruit. He remembers all the possibilities for failure. And now he is standing in Yerushalayim with the fruit in his hands.

The bikkurim compel him to look at what he has and to recognize and proclaim: This came from Hashem.

That is the beginning of simcha. Not the belief that everything will always turn out exactly as we would like, but the recognition that whatever happens is being directed by Hakadosh Boruch Hu and that what He gives us is ultimately for our good.

Too often, we see the burden and forget the blessing. We complain about the struggle to make a living and forget to thank Hashem that we have a job. We focus on the difficulties of our work and not on the fact that we have an income. We see the labor required to cultivate the orchard and forget the miracle of having an orchard that produces fruit.

Bikkurim teaches us to stop and recognize the good.

And perhaps that is why the Torah describes the culmination of the mitzvah with the words, “Vesomachta bechol hatov asher nosan lecha Hashem Elokecha.” The goal is not merely to acknowledge that Hashem gave us something. The goal is to rejoice in what Hashem gave us.

A person who understands that his life is being guided by Hashem can face even a difficult pekel without being broken. He can continue to make his hishtadlus, continue to daven, continue to learn, continue to serve Hashem, and continue to believe that the situation in which he finds himself is not the end of the story.

He doesn’t have to understand everything in order to have bitachon. He has to know Who is running the world.

This is the lesson we need to take with us from Ki Savo.

We spend so much time wondering what will happen. What will happen to Eretz Yisroel? What will happen to the Torah world? What will happen to our communities? What will happen to our families? What will happen to our finances? And what will happen to us?

There is nothing wrong with making hishtadlus. We have to be responsible, we have to plan, we have to take precautions, and we have to do what we can to improve the situations in which we find ourselves. But once we have done what we can, we have to remember that the future is not in our hands.

That was the great lesson of the Ponovezher Rov. After the destruction of European Jewry, he wasn’t worried about whether Torah would survive. Hashem had promised that it would. His question was only who would have the zechus to be part of its rebuilding.

The same is true in our own lives.

We don’t know how every nisayon we experience will end. We don’t know how every communal challenge will be resolved. We don’t know what twists and turns await us. But we do know that none of it is happening outside the Yad Hashem.

Our job is not to solve the future. Our job is to live properly in the present.

To learn Torah when we can. To daven with kavanah. To do our hishtadlus. To help another Yid. To support Torah. To strengthen our families. To carry our pekelach with dignity and emunah, and never to despair.

The world currently looks very frightening. Our personal circumstances can sometimes appear overwhelming. There may be times when we cannot see a way forward. But we have been here before. Klal Yisroel has stood in places that seemed to offer no future, and from those very places Hashem brought about salvation and growth.

The farmer bringing his bikkurim to Yerushalayim understood that. He did not bring only the fruit. He brought with it the story of the uncertainty, the waiting, the hard work, and the things that could have gone wrong. And then he stood before Hashem and declared that he was thankful for what he had been given.

That is emunah. That is bitachon. And that is the source of genuine simcha.

May we all be written and sealed for a kesivah vachasimah tovah.

{Matzav.com}

Trump in ‘No Hurry’ for Iran Talks, Says War Has No Deadline as Tehran’s Economy Crumbles

Matzav -

President Donald Trump said Wednesday that he is in no rush to reopen negotiations with Iran and has set no timetable for bringing the ongoing conflict to an end, arguing that both military and economic pressure on Tehran have been effective.

Speaking in an interview with Al Jazeera, Trump said he was “not in a hurry” to return to the negotiating table with the Iranian regime and made clear that he is operating without a deadline. “I have no time schedule, none.” The president added that economic measures and military operations against Iran had been “both effective.”

Trump painted a bleak picture of conditions inside Iran, pointing to “massive inflation” and declaring that the Iranian economy was “falling apart.” He also sharply criticized the regime’s treatment of its own population, accusing Iranian authorities of “treating their people very badly, they are killing many, many protesters.”

In a separate appearance Wednesday on The Glenn Beck Program, Trump discussed conflicting reports surrounding the condition of Iranian Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei. The president said he believes Khamenei remains alive, although he indicated that the Iranian leader sustained severe wounds.

“I don’t think he’s dead. He was very seriously wounded,” Trump said. “The left side of his body, the arm, the leg, the whole thing, he was very seriously wounded. But I don’t think he’s dead.”

According to Trump, Iranian officials have continued to conduct themselves publicly as though Khamenei remains involved in the regime’s decision-making process, including seeking his approval on important matters.

“And if he is, they’re putting on a pretty good show because they talk about, you know, going back to talk to him all the time, you know, to get a final blessing on things,” the President said.

Trump also expressed skepticism about whether any agreement ultimately reached with Tehran could be trusted, questioning the reliability of the Iranian leadership when it comes to honoring its commitments.

“You make a deal with them. It’s like not the most honorable group. I will tell you that,” he said.

Talks between Washington and Tehran aimed at reaching a permanent agreement remain at an impasse. Although American military strikes against Iran continued until recently, the Trump administration has also intensified its economic campaign against the Islamic Republic. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent announced “Operation Economic Outcast,” on Monday, a sweeping effort aimed at further isolating Tehran and choking off sources of revenue used to sustain the regime.

While US military operations are currently on hold, Secretary of War Pete Hegseth emphasized Monday that the administration has not ruled out renewed strikes if circumstances warrant them.

“By no means are we foreclosing using kinetic strikes anywhere in the Strait of Hormuz or around Iran,” Hegseth told reporters.

Hegseth also maintained that Iran is not capable of enduring the level of economic pressure now being brought to bear by the United States.

{Matzav.com}

Pages

Subscribe to NativUSA Portal aggregator