Feed aggregator

Trump Can’t Stop Calling Kennedy Center’s Maintenance Guy

Matzav -

President Donald Trump is taking a direct and deeply involved role in efforts to remake the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts, reportedly going so far as to personally contact the facility’s maintenance chief for updates on repairs and improvements.

According to The Wall Street Journal, the 79-year-old president has obtained the cellphone number of the head of building maintenance and “calls regularly for updates on fixes at the venerated cultural institution.” The report describes Trump as intensely focused on transforming the iconic Washington arts venue as part of a broader MAGA-driven restructuring.

Plans under discussion would close the Kennedy Center for two years beginning in July, allowing what administration officials describe as a “complete rebuilding” and modernization of the complex. The proposed shutdown is intended to facilitate sweeping renovations and structural changes.

The initiative has generated unease among segments of the public and the arts world. In December, The Athletic reported that the Trump administration takeover has “horrified many in the arts community.” Some performers chose to withdraw from scheduled appearances in protest, while certain longtime patrons opted not to attend events.

The reaction appears to have had a measurable impact. The Wall Street Journal reported that ticket sales earlier this year dropped by 70 percent compared with the same timeframe over the previous three years.

Russia Attempts to Block WhatsApp, Pushes Domestic Messaging App

Yeshiva World News -

Russia has tried to fully block WhatsApp in the country, Meta said, as authorities continue encouraging users to switch to domestically developed platforms. WhatsApp states that this move is part of Russia’s effort to steer users toward a state-supported rival app. Russian officials have promoted a new messaging service called MAX, which state media claims […]

YouTube Lawyer Sees No Addiction From Half-Hour of Videos

Matzav -

The 20-year-old woman at the center of a landmark trial over social media addiction used YouTube for an average of just 29 minutes per day over the last five years, a lawyer for Google told jurors.

Moreover, the woman identified in court filings as K.G.M. and in the courtroom as Kaley said in pretrial testimony last year she didn’t consider herself at the time to be an addict, and neither her mental health therapist nor her father saw her as one, attorney Luis Li said Tuesday in his opening statement.

“She says she’s not addicted, her dad said she’s not addicted, her doctor says she’s not addicted,” Li said. “Her medical records in 10,000 pages don’t say she’s addicted. Her behavior doesn’t seem like she is addicted. So why are we here?”

Kaley, from Chico, California, was presented by her lawyers at the start of the trial against Google and Meta Platforms Inc. as the face of a scourge that has allegedly poisoned millions of American youths – overconsumption of social media.

The trial set to play out in Los Angeles Superior Court until the end of March will serve as a critical test for thousands of similar lawsuits that target not only Meta and Google, but also TikTok Inc. and Snap Inc. The latter two companies aren’t participating in the current case because they reached confidential settlements with the woman’s lawyers at the Seattle-based Social Media Victims Law Center shortly before trial.

The first witness called by Kaley’s lawyers voiced doubt about whether she would have even recognized if she was addicted.

Anna Lembke, a professor of psychiatry and addiction medicine at Stanford University, provided jurors with details about the nature of addiction and about her clinical experience treating patients hooked on social media. She said it is “very uncommon” for a child to be able to self-identify that they are struggling with any kind of addiction, including social media.

“There is a saying about why middle-aged folks come in for treatment. It’s a phrase from Alcoholics Anonymous: ‘I’m sick and tired of being sick and tired’,” Lembke said. “Teenagers are not often sick or tired, not yet. They have poor insight generally on their addiction and are typically reluctant to get treatment.”

Earlier, lawyers for Meta and Google took turns pushing back aggressively on the allegations that their companies designed their products to foster addiction at the expense of the well-being of young users.

Li denied claims that YouTube employed tools like “infinite scroll” and “autoplay” to hook young people. He said the video platform has numerous features that allow users to customize their experience, including turning off functions that automatically suggest new content at the conclusion of a video.

“All of those sorts of things – they can be disabled,” Li said. “If you don’t like it, turn it off. It’s that simple. The only tool that works is the one you use.”

In his opening statement, Kaley’s lawyer Mark Lanier accused the platforms of “building machines designed to addict the brains of children” by introducing features that keep them constantly engaged.

“Imagine a slot machine that fits into your pocket,” he told the jury of six women and six men. “It doesn’t require you to read or type, it only requires one physical motion. For a child like Kaley, this motion is the handle of a slot machine. Every time she swipes, she’s gambling. Not for money, but for mental stimulation.”

Both companies deny wrongdoing and emphasize that they have rolled out tools and resources to support parents with teens. But if they lose early trials, they will face pressure to change the way minors interact with social media and reach settlements with other plaintiffs that could total billions of dollars – a scenario that could be akin to the deals that tarnished the tobacco and opioid industries.

Lanier said that in a quest to make “trillions of dollars,” the companies intentionally engineered the platforms to “trap” children by stimulating their developing brains to crave rewards.

“They use the science of the human brain and my experts will liken it to building a Trojan horse,” Lanier said as he showed the jury slides displaying the companies’ internal documents. “YouTube and Google will tell you they are just a streaming service, a digital library. Harmless. But that’s not what the evidence shows.”

Li countered by pointing out that going back to 2020, Kaley’s average viewing on YouTube was 29 minutes per day. She watched an average of 4 minutes and 9 seconds of videos suggested by autoplay on a daily basis. During the same time period, she also averaged 1 minute and 14 seconds per day spent watching YouTube Shorts, or vertically oriented videos.

“Folks, when you strip away all of the rhetoric and the blocks and the pounding, when you strip that away, what you are left with is a simple truth: Infinite scroll is not infinite,” he said. “In some cases, in this case before this court and before you the jury, it is as little as a minute and 14 seconds. It is not social media addiction when it is not social media and it is not an addiction.”

Li noted that data was not available on Kaley’s YouTube usage prior to when she was about 15 because she had deleted the history.

Kaley’s time spent on platforms was a data point cited by all the attorneys in opening statements.

Her own lawyer, Lanier, said data from Instagram showed that she spent hours scrolling on the platform every day, with her highest usage recorded as 16.2 hours on a single day in March 2022.

“Kaley will tell you: she was trapped,” Lanier said. “She told her sister that she can’t get off and she wished she never downloaded it.”

Meta attorney Paul Schmidt said Monday that data compiled by an expert witness showed how frequently Kaley interacted on each social media platform – interacting being clicking “like” on a post, making a comment or sending a post as a message to another person.

He said the data revealed that 71% of Kaley’s interactions online were on TikTok, 15% were on Snapchat, 12% were on Instagram and 2% were on YouTube.

Schmidt said there’s no dispute that Kaley suffered psychological distress and sought treatment to recover. But he argued that the sources of her trauma came from family turmoil, physical and verbal abuse and bullying at school.

“If you took Instagram away, and everything else was the same in Kaley’s life, would her life be completely different or would she still be struggling with the same things she is today?” Schmidt said.

Kaley hasn’t been identified by her full name because she was a minor throughout much of the period described in her lawsuit, which alleges that her nonstop use of social media caused her anxiety, depression and body dysmorphia.

Lanier said he plans to call Kaley as a witness, along with her sister and mother, but won’t make her listen to other testimony. She made a brief appearance in court on Monday to greet jurors, but Lanier said that in her fragile state, she needs to be spared from hearing advocates and experts dissect and debate her mental health struggles over the next several weeks.

Schmidt said that social media is often beneficial to young people – and has been so for Kaley. When lawyers asked about her social media habits, she said spending time on her phone was a coping mechanism, one that allowed her to “avoid everything.”

She also described social media as a creative outlet, and acknowledged that it provided her with a way to communicate about her feelings, according to Schmidt.

He said Kaley told company lawyers she was still actively using Instagram, YouTube and TikTok and that she hoped to find a job that would allow her to pursue her passion for editing videos.

Schmidt said medical records show Kaley had been through more than 260 mental health treatment sessions and that she didn’t spend that time talking about social media addiction.

“You’ll not see more than twenty of those records that even reference social media, good or bad,” Schmidt told the jury. “You’ll see ones that reference other things going on.”

Similarly, Li noted that in the thousands of pages of medical records about Kaley’s treatment, YouTube is mentioned only once, when a therapist notes that she “shared that she has been using a YouTube video to assist with sleep at night when feeling anxious.”

Instagram head Adam Mosseri is set to testify on Wednesday. Meta Chief Executive Officer Mark Zuckerberg and YouTube boss Neal Mohan are expected later in the proceedings. Jurors also will hear from dueling expert witnesses in child psychology and related research fields.

(c) 2026, Bloomberg 

Amtrak’s New Trains Are Arriving Soon. Here’s What To Expect.

Matzav -

This summer, if all goes well, Amtrak will roll out the first clutch of trains in its shiny new Airo fleet, an $8 billion project that the company hopes will usher in a more modern, comfortable and accessible age of rail travel.

It’s a big order, in many ways.

In August, the company launched the NextGen Acela, an upgrade of the high-speed train that, when it launched in December 2000, offered travelers a racehorse alternative to the workhorses along the Northeast Corridor.

For the Airo fleet, the company ordered 73 trains from Siemens in June 2021 and later added 10 more. Eight six-car trains will serve the Cascades route, which runs from Vancouver, British Columbia, to Eugene, Oregon. Next in line is the Northeast Corridor. The remainder of trains will hit the tracks from North Carolina to Maine, including routes in New York state and Pennsylvania, Amtrak President Roger Harris said at a Tuesday preview at Union Station in Washington, D.C. The company said it plans to integrate Airo into Northeast Regional service in 2027.

Amtrak executives said the project is on budget and on schedule.

The timing of Airo is opportune. Amtrak said ridership has been steadily climbing over the last three years. A record 34.5 million travelers logged trips last year, a 5.1 percent increase over 2024.

“The Airo fleet will set a higher standard for regional and inner city travel, replacing trains that are up to 50 years old,” Harris said. “Our North Star for this whole project can be summarized in two words: the customer.”

If the customer experience truly was the company’s guiding light, did Amtrak succeed? During a sneak peek of the train, we reclined seats, unfolded tray tables and nearly performed cartwheels in the bathroom to determine whether Airo is really built for us.

– – –

Green is the new silver

With its forest green and bark brown exterior, Airo evokes the woodsy landscape and outdoorsy lifestyle of the Pacific Northwest. The image of a snowy mountain is open for interpretation: Is it Mount Hood, Mount Rainier or Grouse Mountain – or all of the above?

Though the interior isn’t plaid flannel, the color palette is soothing with a touch of hygge. The seats are the light gray of a brightening overcast sky. A pop of green peeks out from behind the headrest like a Douglas fir treetop rising between buildings. The tables and trays resemble the blond wood hue popularized by Scandinavian designers.

The aesthetic is unique to the Cascades, however. Amtrak executives said the trains on the East Coast will stick to the standard tricolor of red, white and blue.

– – –

Upgraded seats

The train feels more spacious and filled with light, thanks to taller ceilings and large panoramic windows. Travelers can enjoy a full of view of the passing landscape, not the truncated scenery of the old bifurcated window design.

The seats – 317 total on a six-car train, with 72 in each coach car and 50 in business class – are not as cushy or wide as the older models. You won’t sink into them, but on the plus side, you’ll have better posture.

The small, thoughtful touches really shine. The tray table components intuit a traveler’s ever-changing wants and needs. You can pull out the small shelf and watch a movie on your gadget, accompanied by a beverage stored between sips in a separate cup holder. For a meal and a movie, you can employ the full tray plus the ledge with a latch that holds a tablet in place. A personal light attached to the seat keeps the cone of illumination on you and not slumbering passengers. Best of all, each seat has its own outlet in the middle console, so no more bugging your window-seat neighbor for some juice.

Being on the receiving end of a reclining passenger can quickly lower your quality of travel. Problem solved. The seats slide forward, not back, so you don’t infringe on anyone’s personal space except your own.

– – –

Accessible corridors and seat configurations

The Airo pushes accessibility to the forefront, from sweeping design changes to the smallest details, such as adjustable tables and braille seat numbers.

“All of our new trains are highly accessible, and we’re spending $2 billion on making our stations more accessible,” Harris said. “It’s really a core theme for Amtrak.”

Starting with the boarding process, coach cars are equipped with integrated wheelchair lifts, which are essential for navigating low-level platforms. Once on board, travelers with mobility issues can move more fluidly through “accessible corridors,” which at 32 inches are wider than standard passageways. The entryways and bathrooms offer a 60-inch radius of turning space, ample enough to rotate a wheelchair, according to Amtrak.

The new seat configurations cater to individuals who use mobility devices. For instance, by the bathrooms, a window seat paired with an open aisle “seat” can accommodate a passenger traveling with a wheelchair and a companion; it also provides extra room if they wish to transfer to the seat. Two large buttons – one to call for assistance, another for the light – are within easy reach. One seating arrangement can accommodate two people in wheelchairs, with a table between them for a picnic purchased in the cafe car or delivered by a food cart.

– – –

A bathroom you’ll want to use

Normally, I’d rather abstain from beverages for the entire train trip than use the on board outhouse – I, mean, restroom. The Airo’s facilities, by comparison, are pure luxury.

First, you could hold a dance party inside the spacious lavatory. All of the features are touchless, so you will no longer have to flush the toilet with your foot or close the door with your elbow.

Set against an entire wall, the baby changing table allows parents to switch out diapers without having to torque their bodies. In a touch of civility, a little shelf holds small bags and comes with three hooks for coats or other hanging accessories. There are several hand grips, in case the train jostles while you are taking care of business. In case of emergency, you can “press” the call button.

– – –

Dining in . . . your seat

The cafe car is strictly for ordering. With no tables, the message is to grab your goodies and go back to your seat.

Amtrak said the menu, still a work in progress, will incorporate regional flavors and brands. I didn’t see any salmon or Stumptown coffee in the sample cantina, but I did notice Tim’s Cascade-Style Potato Chips, Bob’s Red Mill oatmeal and Alki Bakery Cinnamon Rolls and grilled chicken Caesar salad.

A service cart is also in development, though Amtrak could not say whether passengers will be able to order the items on an app or during the cart’s rounds.

One of the nicest additions to the railway’s food-and-beverage scene are the filtered water dispensers, a staple in airports. The refillable bottle service, which pairs well with the renovated restrooms, is an amenity I would use without hesitation.

(c) 2026, The Washington Post 

She Bounced A $25 Check In 2014. ICE Tried To Deport Her.

Matzav -

One evening last summer, Donna Hughes-Brown was handcuffed and led into a filthy holding cell somewhere in Kentucky, where insects crawled out of a drain and feces streaked the walls.

The Missouri grandmother’s life had taken an unrecognizable turn days earlier, when federal agents pulled her off an arriving flight at Chicago’s O’Hare International Airport, arrested her and told her she would be deported.

Her crime? Writing two bad checks, for a combined total of less than $75, more than a decade earlier.Hughes-Brown, a lawful permanent resident of the United States since she was a child, would go on to spend 143 days – nearly five months – in detention. She was only released at the end of last year after an immigration judge granted an application to stop her removal. Her story underscores just how far the Trump administration is willing to go in its quest to boost deportations, extending its dragnet to people who are legally present in the country with minor offenses from years earlier.

For those swept up in the expanding deportation drive, it is also increasingly difficult to win release, resulting in lengthy detentions such as the one Hughes-Brown experienced. In November, the number of people released from Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention into the U.S. fell about 70 percent from a year earlier, according to a recent report from the American Immigration Council.

When asked about Hughes-Brown, Tricia McLaughlin, assistant secretary at the Department of Homeland Security, defended her agency’s handling of the case. A conviction for passing bad checks does “not make for an upstanding lawful permanent resident,” McLaughlin said in an email. A spokesperson for ICE did not respond to a request for comment.

Hughes-Brown, 59, is an Irish citizen and green-card holder who immigrated to the U.S. with her parents in 1978. Before last year, she never imagined she would become a target of the administration’s clampdown on immigration, she said, and she believed that everyone should come to the country legally, like she did.

Now back home in small-town Missouri, Hughes-Brown said she thinks constantly of the women she left behind in detention: Jeimy, a 25-year-old from Guatemala who is married to an American citizen; Grace, a woman from Venezuela with a congenital heart condition; Beata, a Polish green-card holder with two convictions for minor retail theft more than a decade ago, her story an echo of Hughes-Brown’s.

“It was the intent for this to happen to so many people,” Hughes-Brown said. “It doesn’t really matter how you got here, the end result is the same.”

– – –

A $25 mistake

Hughes-Brown’s ordeal began last July, when she made her first overseas trip in almost a decade. Her aunt had died, so Donna and her husband, Jim Brown, traveled to Ireland, gathering with family at a lighthouse overlooking an estuary as they spread her aunt’s ashes.

At the airport in Dublin, Donna and Jim precleared U.S. Customs and Immigration. Officers pulled Donna aside and asked questions about her travel history. Then they let her proceed to her flight, she said.

As the plane was approaching Chicago’s O’Hare airport, the flight attendant announced that all passengers would be required to show their passports as they exited. That’s odd, Donna thought. Exiting the plane, she saw armed officers waiting on the jet bridge. They were there for her.

After a night in a cell at O’Hare, Donna received paperwork explaining why she had been apprehended. She was flummoxed. Back in 2015, she pleaded guilty to passing a bad check the previous year, a misdemeanor. The check was for $25, court records show, and made out to Krazy Korner, a gas station and convenience store.

She was living paycheck to paycheck and didn’t realize the check would bounce, Donna says. After it did, court records show, she paid restitution of $80 plus court fees of $117 and served a year of probation. She stabilized her finances, building a career as a home health care aide. She was certain that chapter was closed.

The government also cited a separate 2012 misdemeanor conviction for passing a bad check. Records from that case are not available to the public because the case was either dismissed or expunged, a county official in Missouri said. Donna barely remembered it; she believes it was for less than $50 at a grocery store.

While lawful permanent residents have considerably more protection from deportation than visa holders, the government can seek to deport green-card holders for certain nonviolent offenses. One such situation: crimes of “moral turpitude,” which include offenses with an intent to steal or defraud.

But the government has an “immense amount of discretion” in deciding whether to exercise such powers and whether to detain someone, said César Cuauhtémoc García Hernández, a law professor and immigration expert at Ohio State University. In the past, he said, he would have expected DHS to exercise its discretion favorably in Donna’s case, given her “half a century in the United States with only one or two extremely minor hiccups.”

To assert that passing a bad check more than a decade ago “makes you unworthy of living in the U.S. – that’s a policy decision,” García Hernández said. What’s more, detaining someone for months is “neither easy nor cheap.”

The average cost to house an ICE detainee per day was $187, according to the most recent figures available. At that rate, detaining Hughes-Brown cost taxpayers about $27,000.

– – –

‘Hell from both sides’

In early August, Donna and several other detainees were handcuffed and loaded into a van for the six-hour drive from Illinois to Campbell County Detention Center, a local jail in Kentucky that also houses ICE detainees. Four hundred miles from home, she lived in a pod with dozens of other women, she says, sleeping on metal bunks with only a thin mat and toilets that were clogged for days.

One of the women was Beata Siemionkowicz, a lawful permanent resident from outside of Chicago who has lived in the U.S. since 1995. Federal agents arrested her at her daughter’s house in August, her lawyer, George Gomez, said, and told her they were launching deportation proceedings. The reason: two misdemeanor cases for retail theft in 2005 and 2011.

Meanwhile, Donna’s husband, Jim, was doing everything he could think of to get her released. They’d met online and married seven years before, building a life in Cyrene, a tiny town south of Bowling Green, where they keep three horses and are active in their church. After Hurricane Helene, they twice filled a 30-foot horse trailer with supplies and drove it to North Carolina to help disaster victims.

A combat veteran turned CT technologist, Jim describes himself as a conservative Christian and voted for Trump in 2024. He’s not against immigration: He grew up around migrant workers in Texas, hard-working people who paid taxes into the system.

When Donna was detained, Jim wrote to every member of Missouri’s congressional delegation. He struck out, but then help came from an unexpected place: Rep. Seth Magaziner, a Democrat who represents Rhode Island. Magaziner brought Jim to Washington to speak at a panel on Trump’s immigration crackdown. At the event, Jim was asked why he had voted for Trump. He paused. “Because I was an idiot,” he answered.

The partisan backlash has been swift, he said. Longtime friends in the ruby-red county where the couple lives have turned their back on him because he criticized Trump. Meanwhile, more liberal neighbors have said his wife’s ordeal is a fitting consequence of his vote.

“My family and I have got hell from both sides,” Jim said.

In December, Magaziner also asked Homeland Security Secretary Kristi L. Noem about Donna’s case during a hearing on Capitol Hill. “The Trump Administration claimed it would target the ‘worst of the worst,’ but no one understands how false that promise was more than Jim and Donna Brown,” Magaziner said in a statement.

As the months rolled by, Donna spent two stints in an isolation cell, where the only book allowed was the Bible and she was permitted an hour outside every other day. Her requests to be released on bond were rejected by an immigration judge. But on Dec. 18, after a hearing during which family members talked about how devastating her deportation would be, the judge granted her application to cancel removal proceedings. DHS declined to appeal the decision.

Still, Donna doesn’t intend to take chances. Her passport and green card were finally returned to her last week after the Irish consulate intervened. “I’m not even getting close to the border,” she said.

These days, she senses an awkwardness with some friends. They’re sorry for what happened to her but still support the administration’s efforts. That’s their right, she says, and she’s not interested in cutting people off because they disagree with her.

But she does want to talk to them. About how helpless she felt in her darkest moments in detention – labeled a criminal, locked away and unsure if she would ever return to her life in Missouri. She’s determined to fight for the women she met there.

“I’m going to keep on keepin’ on,” Donna said. “Because it is not right. It is not right.”

(c) 2026, The Washington Post 

FDA Won’t Review Moderna Application For First mRNA-Based Flu Vaccine

Matzav -

The Food and Drug Administration has declined to review Moderna’s application for the first mRNA-based flu vaccine, a decision that shocked the company and that comes as the agency plans to tighten federal vaccine approvals.

The nation’s top vaccine regulator, Vinay Prasad, told Moderna that it lacked an “adequate and well-controlled” study, the company said in a news release Tuesday. In a large clinical trial, the vaccine was compared with Fluarix, an approved standard-dose flu vaccine. Prasad’s letter did not detail concerns with the safety or efficacy of the vaccine, which Moderna was aiming to target for adults ages 50 and older.

Moderna President Stephen Hoge said that the company had previously engaged with the FDA on the trial design and that the agency had indicated it would be acceptable.

“We’re trying right now to reach out to the FDA and understand what would be necessary for them to start reviewing the submission,” Hoge said in an interview.

Companies conduct clinical trials with the oversight of the FDA, which offers feedback on the design of the trials. Moderna indicated that in April 2024, the FDA provided feedback saying the agency agreed Moderna’s trial design was “acceptable,” though it recommended that the investigational drug be compared against a higher-dose flu shot for those 65 and older.

Andrew Nixon, a spokesman for the Department of Health and Human Services, said in a statement Wednesday that the application was rejected because “the company refused to follow very clear FDA guidance from 2024.”

“Moderna exposed participants aged 65 and over to increased risk of severe illness by giving them a substandard of care against the recommendation of FDA career scientists,” Nixon said. “The most protective flu shots for seniors are a subset of high dose flu shots.”

Last fall, Prasad laid out a stricter approach for federal vaccine approvals, alarming a dozen former FDA leaders who said the change risks undermining the nation’s ability to fight diseases. In a November internal email, Prasad urged the agency to rethink its framework for annual flu shots, examine whether Americans should receive multiple vaccines at the same time and require larger studies to net approval for certain shots.

Moderna has requested a formal meeting with the agency. It said the vaccine has been accepted for review in the European Union, Canada and Australia.

Several vaccine experts said the decision raises questions for vaccine-makers about shifting guidance from the FDA, which could deter future investments in expensive clinical trials.

Jesse Goodman, one of Prasad’s predecessors as head of the agency’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, said Moderna’s vaccine appeared “promising.” He questioned why the FDA would not go forward with a full review, identify any gaps in the data and have a public discussion about the vaccines.

MRNA technology was lauded during the covid-19 pandemic for being developed at record speed and saving millions of lives. President Donald Trump in his first term called mRNA vaccines a “modern-day miracle.”

Leaders in the Trump administration’s second term, however, have expressed broader skepticism of mRNA technology, chilling the vaccine industry that has been researching the technology’s possible use for cancer, other diseases and future pandemics. In August, HHS announced the “wind-down” of $500 million in mRNA projects supported by the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), the government’s biodefense agency. Last May, the agency pulled funds for Moderna to develop a vaccine against bird flu.

“We’re moving beyond the limitations of mRNA and investing in better solutions,” Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said in a statement when the mass termination of mRNA projects was announced in August.

A senior FDA official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity under ground rules set by HHS, told reporters that Kennedy was not involved in, nor was he informed in advance, of the Moderna decision. The official declined to predict the next steps.

In January, at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, Moderna’s chief executive, Stéphane Bancel, told Bloomberg TV that the company would stop investing in late-stage vaccine trials that are a crucial part of the approval process.

“You cannot ‍make a return on investment if you don’t have access to the U.S. market,” Bancel said.

Moderna conducted two late-stage, “Phase 3” trials (one of the final steps before seeking drug approval) designed to test the safety and effectiveness of its mRNA flu vaccine, enrolling more than 43,000 adults age 50 or older. In one trial, more than 40,000 participants received either a dose of the experimental mRNA flu vaccine or a standard dose of an existing flu shot. In another, participants received a dose of the mRNA vaccine, a standard shot or a high-dose influenza shot recommended for adults 65 and older.

Moderna said the FDA notified the company of its decision on Feb. 3 in a “refusal to file” letter stating that the company’s application was, “on its face, inadequate for review.”

Refuse-to-file letters are infrequently used by U.S. regulators, according to a study published in JAMA Internal Medicine. Over a decade, that study found, only 4 percent of nearly 2,500 applications received such letters.

(c) 2026, The Washington Post 

In Rebuke, House Votes to Roll Back Trump’s Tariffs On Canada

Matzav -

Six Republicans joined Wednesday night with Democrats in the House in voting to end President Donald Trump’s stepped-up tariffs on Canada, rebuking the president in the first of what could be several congressional challenges to his trade policies.

The measure is largely symbolic and is not likely to succeed in overturning tariffs on the major U.S. trading partner, because Trump could veto the resolution if it clears the Senate as well. It would require a two-thirds majority vote in both chambers to override his veto.

But the action showcases the long-standing frustration some congressional Republicans have with Trump’s controversial trade policies, and it’s the latest evidence of the difficulties House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana) is having managing his razor-thin majority.

The resolution from Rep. Gregory W. Meeks (D-New York) would end the “national emergency” underpinning Trump’s tariffs on Canada, which were first announced in February 2025. Wednesday was the first time that the House has considered a challenge to Trump’s tariffs. The Republican-controlled chamber had used procedural moves to preemptively muzzle opposition to the administration’s trade policy since March.

“Will you vote to lower the cost of living for the American families? Or will you keep prices high out of loyalty to one person?” Meeks said in a floor speech ahead of the vote Wednesday afternoon, arguing that the tariffs have pushed costs up for consumers.

The latest prohibition on voting on legislation to challenge Trump’s tariffs expired at the end of January, and Johnson attempted to renew it through July as part of a procedural vote Tuesday night. The House rejected that attempt, opening the controversial policy up for reversals for the first time in nearly a year.

Sixty percent of Americans disapprove of Trump’s increased tariffs, while 37 percent say they approve, according to a February survey from the Pew Research Center.

The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the House’s action, but the administration has argued that the tariffs are necessary to rebalance trade deficits and incentivize U.S.-based manufacturing, though manufacturing employment has declined since April.

Three House Republicans – Thomas Massie (Kentucky), Don Bacon (Nebraska) and Kevin Kiley (California) – voted with all of the chamber’s Democrats to block the prohibition Tuesday.

The Senate has previously voted to end the administration’s tariffs on multiple occasions, but those efforts couldn’t move forward under the House’s ban on considering such measures.

Most Canadian products that do not qualify for tariff-free treatment under the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), which Trump signed in his first term, are subject to a 35 percent tariff.

Trump imposed the tariffs that the House disapproved Wednesday in response to what he described as Canada’s failure to prevent the flow of illicit opioids and other drugs into the United States.

But the president’s broader objective with his tariff campaign is boosting domestic manufacturing production and hiring.

The results so far are mixed. Factory output is up about 2.5 percent since Trump returned to the White House, but it remains below levels reached under President Joe Biden.

The number of factory jobs increased in January for the first time in more than a year. But the 5,000-person increase did little to offset the earlier manufacturing shrinkage that defied the president’s “America First” ambitions.

Manufacturing now employs 313,000 fewer Americans than it did three years ago, at the Biden-era peak of 12.9 million in early 2023. Since April, when Trump declared a national emergency over the trade deficit and imposed his historic import taxes, 72,000 factory positions have vanished.

Administration officials insist that the economy this year will surge. Trump has said that tariffs are the key to his promised “Golden Age,” saying they will encourage new investment in manufacturing and provide the federal government with more revenue.

Importers have paid more than $133 billion in Trump’s emergency tariffs, including $2.4 billion on products from Canada, according to U.S. Customs and Border Protection.

The president claims that foreigners pay these costs, and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent claims that overseas manufacturers are absorbing tariff costs to maintain their foothold in the U.S. market.

Most independent assessments disagree, finding that American companies and consumers are paying the price.

“Higher tariffs directly increase the cost of imported goods, raising prices for U.S. consumers and businesses,” the Congressional Budget Office said Wednesday in its latest assessment of the U.S. economy.

Americans are paying 95 percent of the tariffs, while foreign companies swallow the remainder, the independent budget office said.

The CBO analysis echoed the findings of a December study by economists at Harvard University and the University of Chicago, which concluded that 94 percent of the tariffs imposed last year were passed on to U.S. importers.

(c) 2026, The Washington Post 

IRS Improperly Disclosed Confidential Immigrant Tax Data To DHS

Matzav -

The Internal Revenue Service improperly shared confidential tax information of thousands of individuals with immigration enforcement officials, according to three people familiar with the situation, appearing to breach a legal fire wall intended to protect taxpayer data.

The erroneous disclosure was only recently discovered, the people said. The IRS is working with officials from the Treasury Department, Justice Department and Department of Homeland Security on the administration’s response.

The IRS confirmed The Washington Post’s reporting in a court filing Wednesday afternoon. Dottie Romo, the tax agency’s chief risk and control officer, wrote in a sworn declaration that the IRS provided confidential taxpayer information even when DHS officials could not provide sufficient data to positively identify a specific individual.

The erroneous disclosure was only recently discovered, the people said. The IRS is working with officials from the Treasury Department, Justice Department and Department of Homeland Security on the administration’s response.

The IRS confirmed The Washington Post’s reporting in a court filing Wednesday afternoon. Dottie Romo, the tax agency’s chief risk and control officer, wrote in a sworn declaration that the IRS provided confidential taxpayer information even when DHS officials could not provide sufficient data to positively identify a specific individual.

But in a controversial decision, Treasury, which oversees the IRS, in April agreed to provide DHS with the names and addresses of individuals the Trump administration believed to be in the country illegally, pursuant to DHS requests.

Federal courts have since blocked the data-sharing arrangement, holding that it violates taxpayers’ rights, though the government appealed those rulings.

Before the agreement was struck down, DHS requested the addresses of 1.2 million individuals from the IRS. The tax agency responded with data on 47,000 individuals, according to court records.

When the IRS shared the addresses with DHS, it also inadvertently disclosed private information for thousands of taxpayers erroneously, a mistake only recently discovered, said the people familiar, who spoke on the condition of anonymity for fear of retribution.

Romo, in her declaration, did not state when the IRS learned of its error. She said the agency notified DHS on Jan. 23, to begin taking steps to “prevent the disclosure or dissemination, and to ensure appropriate disposal, of any data provided to ICE by IRS based on incomplete or insufficient address information.”

She declined to state if the IRS would inform people whose data was illegally disclosed to immigration officials, and said DHS and ICE had agreed to “not inspect, view, use, copy, distribute, rely on, or otherwise act on any return information that has been obtained from or disclosed by IRS” because of the pending litigation.

The affected individuals could be entitled to financial compensation for each time their information was improperly shared. And government officials can personally face stiff civil and criminal penalties for sharing confidential tax information.

Charles Littlejohn, an IRS contractor, pleaded guilty in 2023 to leaking the tax returns of President Donald Trump and other wealthy individuals.

Littlejohn was sentenced to five years in prison. Trump in January sued the IRS for $10 billion in damages related to the Littlejohn leak.

In a statement, a DHS spokesperson said that under the data-sharing agreement, “the government is finally doing what it should have all along.”

“Information sharing across agencies is essential to identify who is in our country, including violent criminals, determine what public safety and terror threats may exist so we can neutralize them, scrub these individuals from voter rolls, and identify what public benefits these aliens are using at taxpayer expense,” the spokesperson said.

There is little evidence that undocumented immigrants have attempted to participate in U.S. elections, nor is there a link between undocumented immigrants and higher levels of crime.

“With the IRS information specifically, DHS plans to focus on enforcing long-neglected criminal laws that apply to illegal aliens,” the DHS spokesperson said.

Treasury and Justice Department spokespeople declined to comment, citing agency policies not to comment on active litigation. The Office of the Deputy Attorney General is monitoring the ongoing litigation, but the office is not making any decisions on the matter, according to a person familiar with the matter who was not authorized to comment publicly.

When the IRS began conversations with DHS over data sharing shortly after Trump returned to the White House, senior IRS employees warned administration officials that the program was likely illegal and could sweep up misidentified people, The Post has reported.

During early meetings on the project, one agency staffer asked immigration authorities how many people with the same name may live in the same state, according to one of the people, illustrating how easy it would be for the Trump administration to inadvertently breach taxpayers’ privacy, including those who are not targets of immigration investigations.

The IRS’s privacy department was largely sidelined from the talks, two of the people said, and its IT department took over implementing the data sharing. That team had largely been taken over by officials from Trump’s U.S. DOGE Service, the White House’s “efficiency” office charged with shrinking the federal government.

Treasury officials justified the data-sharing agreement by arguing immigration enforcement was pursuing individuals who had violated criminal statutes, though immigration violations are generally civil, not criminal.

Under the arrangement, DHS would provide the IRS with the name and address of a taxpayer. The IRS would then cross-reference that information with its confidential databases and confirm the taxpayers’ last known address.

Immigration officials said the procedure was necessary because DHS lacked reliable information to locate individuals the Trump administration wanted to detain and deport, according to numerous IRS and DHS officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to publicly discuss the matter.

“This allegedly unauthorized viewing involves personal information that taxpayers provided to the IRS pursuant to a promise that the IRS would prioritize keeping the information confidential,” Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia wrote in a November order. “A reasonable taxpayer would likely find it highly offensive to discover that the IRS now intends to share that information permissively because it has replaced its promise of confidentiality with a policy of disclosure.”

(c) 2026, The Washington Post 

US Official: Gaza Ceasefire Holding, Hamas Disarmament To Begin In March

Matzav -

A senior official connected to US President Donald Trump’s Board of Peace initiative said Wednesday that the effort to dismantle Hamas’s military infrastructure in Gaza is moving forward as planned, even as questions persist about the durability of the ceasefire, Ynet reported.

According to the official, claims that the ceasefire is unraveling are unfounded. He pointed to several milestones that have already been achieved, including the release of hostages, the reopening and functioning of the Rafah crossing, and the formation of a technocratic administrative committee that is expected to enter Gaza in the near future.

The next phase, the official explained, centers on completing arrangements for Hamas’s disarmament, a process scheduled to begin in March. Once that stage gets underway, an international stabilization force is anticipated to broaden its footprint inside Gaza.

Addressing a report in The New York Times suggesting that Washington may permit Hamas to keep light weapons, the official clarified that the disarmament plan is structured in phases, with small arms to be handled last. He said Hamas has objected to surrendering its entire arsenal immediately, contending that competing clans in Gaza could attack its members if it disarms all at once.

Under the framework currently taking shape, the first step would involve neutralizing and dismantling tunnels. That would be followed by eliminating weapons production sites, then removing rocket-propelled grenades and mortars, and only afterward addressing small arms, according to Ynet.

The official said the aim is to implement the process through broad agreement in order to balance effectiveness with sustainability. He noted the difficulty of the task, observing that even the Israeli military has not yet succeeded in destroying every tunnel in areas under its control.

On the question of the proposed international stabilization force, the official confirmed that Indonesia has publicly stated it is prepared to send up to 8,000 troops. Several other nations have signaled general support for participating as well. Still, he added, many governments are conditioning their involvement on a clear and binding agreement regarding Hamas’s disarmament before any deployment takes place.

Hamas has consistently rejected calls to lay down its arms, despite Trump’s peace proposal requiring the organization to do so. The group maintains that its weapons serve what it describes as “self-defense against the occupation.”

This week, senior Hamas figure Khaled Mashaal reiterated the organization’s opposition to disarmament, declaring, “As long as our people are under occupation, talk of disarmament is an attempt to turn our people into victims, to make their elimination easier and to facilitate their destruction at the hands of the Israeli side, which is armed with every international means of warfare.”

Trump said last week that Hamas must relinquish its weapons, cautioning that failure to do so would lead to its destruction.

“Now [that the war has ended] they have to disarm,” Trump stated. “Some people say they won’t, but they will, and if they don’t, they’re gonna not be around any longer. But they agreed to disarm.”

Black Glove Recovered Near Nancy Guthrie’s Home as FBI Intensifies Kidnapping Probe

Matzav -

Federal investigators have recovered a black glove from a roadside not far from Nancy Guthrie’s residence, a development that could mark a significant turn in the investigation into the disappearance of the 84-year-old mother of “Today” show host Savannah Guthrie, according to The NY Post.

Law enforcement officials located the glove roughly a mile and a half from the victim’s home. The item appears similar to gloves worn by the masked, armed individual captured on surveillance footage near the property.

Images and video from the scene show a member of the FBI’s Evidence Response team retrieving the glove from sparse desert brush in the quiet Tucson-area neighborhood where Guthrie lives.

Authorities have yet to name a suspect in what they believe was a violent abduction. Investigators have indicated that Guthrie may have been forcibly removed from her home, where blood was reportedly left behind.

On Tuesday, the FBI released video showing a man wearing black gloves, a ski mask, and a holstered firearm vandalizing the security camera mounted on Guthrie’s front door.

The newly released footage represents the first substantial update shared publicly since the investigation began 10 days ago.

Also Tuesday, agents detained a person of interest near the U.S.-Mexico border for questioning. That individual was released early Wednesday morning without any charges filed.

The glove was recovered during what the FBI described as an “extensive search” of the surrounding area, with agents canvassing nearby roads and desert terrain.

“We appreciate the assistance and support we have received from the Tucson community,” the FBI said in a statement reminding the public of the $50,000 reward for information leading to Nancy Guthrie’s recovery.

Investigators declined to provide additional details when asked about the evidentiary significance of the glove.

The individual briefly taken into custody Tuesday was identified as Carlos Palazuelos, a delivery driver from Rio Rico, a border town south of Tucson. He was handcuffed following a traffic stop in the area.

After being released, Palazuelos denied any involvement in the disappearance. According to WDBJ, he said he had never heard of Guthrie and called on authorities to apologize.

In a separate development, TMZ received a new letter Wednesday morning demanding a Bitcoin payment in exchange for information about Guthrie’s alleged captor.

TMZ reported that the $67,000 payment would be in exchange for the “name of the individual involved.”

The message is reportedly the third note sent since Nancy was last seen on Jan. 31. TMZ host Harvey Levin said during an appearance on Fox News’ “America Newsroom” that the letter included details for an active Bitcoin address.

That address differs from the one included in an earlier ransom message sent last week to two Tucson television stations and TMZ.

In that earlier communication, individuals claiming responsibility for the kidnapping demanded millions of dollars in cryptocurrency and set a deadline of Monday, Feb. 9.

To date, however, those claiming involvement have not offered proof that Nancy Guthrie is alive or provided additional substantiating information, despite Savannah Guthrie publicly stating that her family would comply with payment demands if it ensured her mother’s safe return.

Bondi Explodes At Dems On House Judiciary Panel In Fiery Clash Over Epstein File Drop: ‘Washed Up, Loser Lawyer’

Matzav -

Attorney General Pam Bondi combatively defended her leadership at the Justice Department to House lawmakers on Wednesday amid sharp criticism that she botched the release of the Epstein files and has wielded the nation’s most powerful law enforcement agency to heed President Donald Trump’s calls to prosecute his political foes.

In exchange after exchange, Bondi lobbed brash insults when Democratic lawmakers questioned her decisions and repeatedly portrayed the expansive Justice Department as unfairly maligned by Democrats and those who dislike Trump.

In her opening remarks before the House Judiciary Committee, Bondi – highlighting her allegiance to the president – thanked Trump for his investment in fighting violent crime and said the Justice Department is working to advance the president’s priorities. The attorney general blamed the Biden administration for politicizing the department and, echoing claims from conservative activists, said it is fighting against “liberal activist judges” working to stymie the president’s agenda.

“America has never seen this level of coordinated judicial opposition to a presidential administration,” Bondi said.

Wednesday’s hearing played out at a pivotal moment for the Justice Department, which in recent months has drawn criticism from Democrats and others over its handling of the congressionally compelled release of millions of documents from its investigation of Jeffrey Epstein, its deployment of thousands of agents across the country to assist in immigration enforcement and its continued efforts to prosecute Trump’s perceived political adversaries.

The attorney general did not buckle in her defense of the department and frequently attempted to shift attention to its efforts to reduce violent crime, a topic that earned her praise from Republicans.

Bondi came armed with scripted insults for Democrats.

“I’m not going to get in the gutter with these people,” Bondi said repeatedly in response to pointed questions. She lashed out when the committee’s top Democrat, Rep. Jamie Raskin, directed her to respond to the panel’s inquiries.

“You don’t tell me anything, you washed-up loser lawyer,” she said. “You’re not even a lawyer.”

Raskin, a lawmaker from Maryland, denounced Bondi for her handling of the Epstein files, the department’s response to deadly shootings by federal personnel in Minneapolis and her oversight of cases involving people whom Trump has publicly called to prosecute.

“Trump orders up prosecutions like pizza, and you deliver every time,” Raskin said. “You replace real prosecutors with counterfeit stooges. Nothing in American history comes close to this complete corruption of the justice function and contamination of federal law enforcement.”

Just hours before Bondi addressed the committee, the department had sought to secure an indictment against six Democratic lawmakers who produced a video urging military service members not to follow “illegal orders.” But a federal grand jury in Washington refused to back those charges – a remarkable rebuke of the department’s efforts.

“You’ve turned the people’s Department of Justice into Trump’s instrument of revenge,” Raskin said.

The committee’s Republicans, led by Chairman Jim Jordan (Ohio), largely praised Bondi for the work of her first year in office. They credited her and FBI Director Kash Patel with reducing violent crime across the country, a trend that began under the final years of the Biden administration and has continued under Trump.

“What a difference a year makes,” Jordan said at the top of the proceedings. “Under Attorney General Bondi, the DOJ has returned to its core missions – upholding the rule of law, going after the bad guys and keeping Americans safe.”

Tension erupted almost immediately as Democrats repeatedly pressed Bondi on the Justice Department’s failure to fully redact the names and identifications of Epstein’s victims from the files it released last month. More than a dozen of his victims were at the hearing and, when prompted by a Democratic lawmaker, raised their hands to indicate that they had never spoken to representatives of Bondi’s Justice Department.

As Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Washington) asked Bondi to apologize to the victims in the audience for her handling of the investigation, the attorney general deflected and asked why former attorney general Merrick Garland didn’t apologize.

“I’m not going to get in the gutter for her theatrics,” Bondi said. She defended her career fighting for victims as a prosecutor.

“I am deeply sorry for what any victim has been through, especially as a result of that monster,” she said. “I want you to know that any accusation of criminal wrongdoing will be taken seriously and investigated.”

Bondi said that Epstein’s associate Ghislaine Maxwell “hopefully will die in prison.” Maxwell’s attorney has said that the defendant, who was convicted in 2021 on trafficking charges, is seeking clemency from the president.

Bondi also said that she was unaware that Maxwell was being transferred to a minimum-security prison camp until after the transfer occurred in August. The Justice Department has faced pushback over that move, with critics saying that it is an example of the Trump administration being lenient to people involved in the Epstein case.

In an effort to pivot the conversation away from Epstein, Bondi said that instead of focusing on Maxwell, the lawmakers should be asking about Iryna Zarutska – the 23-year-old Ukrainian refugee who was brutally killed by a homeless man with mental illness while riding public transit in North Carolina.

Bondi took heat from Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Kentucky), a frequent Trump critic, who asked why more men with ties to Epstein weren’t under investigation. Justice Department officials have said that the files do not contain information that would lead to other people being charged.

She dodged Massie’s question and said he was only focused on the Epstein files because Trump is named in them, accusing him of having “Trump derangement syndrome.”

Bondi, likewise, refused to engage in second-guessing of the Justice Department’s handling of the recent fatal shootings of Renée Good and Alex Pretti by federal personnel amid the Trump administration’s immigration enforcement crackdown in Minneapolis.

She hinted of further investigations of Trump critics in the works.

Asked by Republicans whether John Brennan, CIA director during the Obama administration, would soon be indicted as part of an investigation into the intelligence community’s assessment of Russian efforts to interfere in the 2016 presidential election, Bondi declined to confirm an investigation – then added: “No one is above the law.”

Brennan’s lawyers said in December they had been informed that he is the target of an criminal probe underway in Florida. He has denied any wrongdoing.

At every turn, Bondi never missed an opportunity to praise Trump for his leadership.

“That’s why today, the other side sits here, they yell, cut me off,” she said. “They want to yell. They want to ask a question and don’t want answers, because they want to distract from all the great things that this president and this administration are doing.”

When Rep. Sydney Kamlager-Dove (D-California) cited a conspiracy theory that Trump has pushed about a federal investigation and asked Bondi whether she thinks the president is honest, the attorney general responded: “Of course I do. He is the commander in chief.”

(c) 2026, The Washington Post 

Pages

Subscribe to NativUSA Portal aggregator