RFK Jr. Challenges Journal Over Removal of Vaccine Study on Infant Deaths
Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is pressing a scientific publication for answers after it removed a controversial study that examined reports of sudden infant deaths following vaccination, arguing that the decision warrants a full public explanation.
According to The Hill, Kennedy sent a letter on Thursday to Lawrence H. Lash, editor of Toxicology Reports, seeking clarification about the removal of a 2021 paper entitled “Vaccines and sudden infant death: An analysis of the VAERS database 1990-2019 and review of the medical literature.”
The study was authored by Neil Z. Miller, a medical research journalist known for his writings that raise concerns about vaccine safety and question the effectiveness of certain immunization programs.
While Kennedy acknowledged that journals may sometimes retract or remove research when significant problems are identified, he argued that such actions must be accompanied by transparency and a clear explanation of the reasoning behind them.
“As you may know, research integrity and academic freedom have been important issues to me for decades in my private career and continue to be important to me in government service,” Kennedy wrote.
In his letter, Kennedy requested details about the review process that led to the paper’s removal, including who participated in evaluating the study and what standards were applied in determining that its findings were not reliable.
Kennedy asked the journal to provide its response by June 25.
The study returned to the spotlight after attorney Aaron Siri referenced it during a presentation before a federal vaccine advisory panel, which subsequently approved revisions to the childhood vaccination schedule.
Those changes, along with actions taken by the panel, were later halted by a federal judge.
Elsevier, the publisher of Toxicology Reports, defended the removal, stating that the paper’s conclusions were not adequately supported by the methods used in the research.
In its formal notice, the publisher pointed specifically to limitations within the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, or VAERS, a passive surveillance database that records health events reported after vaccination but is not designed to determine whether vaccines caused those events.
Elsevier maintained that the available data and research methods did not justify the study’s conclusions and cited concerns about the broader implications such findings could have for medical decision-making.
The publisher also noted that Miller disputes the journal’s decision and rejects the rationale offered for removing the paper.
Although Miller’s research concluded that reports of sudden infant deaths following vaccination reached statistical significance, the study itself stated that it did not establish a causal link between vaccines and sudden infant death.
{Matzav.com}
