Feed aggregator

Israeli motorists could increasingly find traffic tickets arriving in the mail without ever having been stopped by a police officer, as new enforcement methods allow officers to watch municipal surveillance cameras and issue citations based on what they see, according to Israeli traffic attorney Nir Shalom.

Shalom, a specialist in traffic law, discussed the changes during an interview with Kikar HaShabbat, warning that a broad overhaul of traffic enforcement is significantly changing how violations are detected and adjudicated in Israel.

According to Shalom, increased camera enforcement means that violations involving far more than speeding can now be detected remotely, including drivers using cellphones or failing to wear seat belts.

“The work of the police officers has become much easier,” Shalom said. “Police officers sit in the traffic division, connect live to the municipality’s security cameras, see a violation, and generate a ticket. Drivers have already come to me with tickets that state explicitly: ‘I watched the municipal camera, observed a violation committed in such-and-such vehicle — boom, ticket.’ Every innocent municipal camera intended for city security can potentially become a full-fledged police traffic camera.”

Shalom said the implications extend to a wide range of everyday driving violations. A driver may not know that an alleged infraction was observed until the citation arrives.

At the same time, he said, major changes are taking place in the process through which motorists contest certain traffic tickets.

According to Shalom, offenses that previously allowed motorists to request proceedings in traffic court are increasingly being moved into an administrative framework.

In the past, a motorist who believed that a ticket was unjustified could request a trial, appear before a judge and prosecutor, explain unusual circumstances, or challenge errors or technical deficiencies in the citation.

Under the new administrative system described by Shalom, much of that interaction has been replaced by written proceedings.

“They abandoned the criminal process and moved to an administrative process. Administrative adjudicators were appointed, administrative prosecutors were appointed, and there is no longer a judge,” Shalom said. “Today, everything is conducted in writing. You send a letter, the adjudicator sits and reads it like someone reads an email. There is no emotion, no looking someone in the eye, and no possibility of conducting a real hearing.”

Shalom also pointed to what he described as an important change in the evidentiary standard applied to such cases.

“In a criminal proceeding, it was enough for the defense attorney to raise a slight doubt — an error in the vehicle number, a mistake in the ID number, an inaccuracy in the location — and there was already room for an acquittal or an agreement. In an administrative proceeding, we move to a ‘balance of probabilities.’ The driver has to prove a greater than 50% probability that the ticket is wrong. The doors have simply been locked in the face of the ordinary citizen.”

Shalom also warned motorists about changes involving Israel’s speed-camera network.

According to him, whereas speed cameras were previously calibrated so that enforcement generally began only after a more significant departure from the posted speed limit, the threshold has been lowered considerably, potentially resulting in tickets for motorists traveling only several kilometers per hour above the legal limit.

He said this has resulted in longtime motorists with otherwise clean driving records receiving citations for relatively small speeding violations.

Another development expected to affect drivers is the introduction of average-speed enforcement cameras along stretches of roadway, similar to systems already used in parts of Europe.

Instead of measuring a vehicle’s speed at a single location, the system records the vehicle at one point and again farther down the road, then calculates its average speed over the entire distance. Such a system would eliminate the familiar practice of slowing down immediately before passing a speed camera and then accelerating afterward.

Shalom said the increased enforcement could have particularly serious consequences for professional drivers and others whose livelihoods depend on retaining their licenses.

He cited delivery drivers as an example.

“Take delivery drivers, for example. A driver unloads merchandise at one stand, gets into the vehicle and drives 100 meters to the next stand. During that short distance, he forgot to put on his seat belt. He gets a ticket once, gets another one a few months later — and suddenly he is accumulating points. In the past, you would come to court, explain that this involves his work and a continuous process of unloading and loading, and they would take it into consideration. Today, accumulating 36 points within four years results in an automatic three-month license suspension by an official, without discretion.”

Shalom concluded with a warning about what motorists say when they are personally stopped by a police officer.

He said drivers frequently believe that apologizing or explaining why they committed an alleged violation will persuade an officer to show leniency. Instead, he warned, their words can become evidence against them.

“An encounter with a police officer in the field is a criminal investigation in every respect. The biggest mistake drivers make is trying to appease the officer and saying: ‘I’m sorry, I didn’t notice, I was on my way to the doctor/I was under pressure.’ Drivers think the officer will have mercy on them, but in practice, the officer simply writes it down under ‘driver’s statement.’ Once the ticket reaches the administrative adjudicator, the adjudicator sees that you wrote ‘I’m sorry’ — and views it as a complete admission of guilt. From there, there is no way to cancel the ticket. It is better to remain composed, not rush to admit to an offense, and calmly examine the legal options.”

{Matzav.com}

Rebbetzin Freidel Schneebalg a”h, the longtime matriarch of a distinguished Torah family and the widow of Rav Shraga Feivish Schneebalg zt”l, the renowned Vizhnitzer rov in London and author of Shraga Hameir, was niftar suddenly in London at the age of 91.

The Rebbetzin was born in Mykolaiv, Ukraine, where her father, Rav Moshe Mund zt”l, served as rov. During the horrors of World War II, her father succeeded, b’chasdei Hashem, in escaping the inferno of Europe together with several of his children, including his young daughter Freidel.

The family attributed their miraculous survival to a remarkable bracha that Rav Moshe had received from his rebbe, the Belzer Rebbe, Rav Aharon Rokeach zy”a. After escaping Europe, the family eventually established itself in London.

Upon reaching marriageable age, Rebbetzin Freidel married Rav Shraga Feivish Schneebalg zt”l, who would become a prominent rov and posek and serve as rov of the Vizhnitzer chassidim in London. Rav Shraga Feivish was the son of Rav Dovid Tzvi Schneebalg zt”l, the gaavad of Machzikei Hadas in Manchester.

Throughout the decades of their marriage, the Rebbetzin devoted herself with extraordinary dedication to enabling her husband to immerse himself in Torah, harbotzas haTorah and the leadership of his kehillah. She stood faithfully at his side as he built his reputation as the author of the multi-volume Shraga Hameir and as a respected halachic authority.

Rav Shraga Feivish was niftar on 20 Sivan 5760.

The Rebbetzin remained remarkably clear-minded until her final moments. Her petirah came suddenly on Monday afternoon, bringing to a close a life that spanned more than nine decades and began amid the upheaval and destruction of prewar and wartime Europe.

The levayah was held Monday in London, followed by kevurah at the Enfield Jewish cemetery.

Rebbetzin Schneebalg was zocheh to leave behind an extraordinary Torah legacy, with hundreds of descendants spanning several generations, including children, grandchildren, great-grandchildren and great-great-grandchildren, continuing in the path of Torah and chassidus.

Her distinguished sons include Rav Eliezer Lieber Schneebalg, av bais din of Machzikei Hadas Edgware and a son-in-law of the Ratzferter Rebbe of Brazil zt”l; Rav Moshe Chaim Schneebalg, av bais din of Shraga Hameir in Monsey; Rav Yitzchok Isaac Shmuel Schneebalg, av bais din of Mykolaiv in Boro Park and a son-in-law of the Alesker Rebbe zt”l; Rav Avrohom Zev Schneebalg, a son-in-law of Rav Moshe Halberstam zt”l, dayan of Bobov in Antwerp; and Rav Dovid Tzvi Schneebalg, dayan of Vizhnitz in Yerushalayim and a son-in-law of the Deesher Rebbe of Yerushalayim zt”l.

Her sons-in-law include Rav Berish Meisels of Tzion-Veitzen in London; Rav Yosef Taubenfeld, av bais din of Chareidim in Monsey and a son of Rav Shmelka Taubenfeld zt”l; Rav Yechiel Michel Rottenberg, a son of the Kossoner Rebbe, Rav Meshulam Feish Rottenberg zt”l; the Strazhnitzer Rebbe of London; Rav Naftali Elimelech Leizer, av bais din of Pshevorsk in London and the eldest son of the Pshevorsker Rebbe; and Rav Yosef Halperin, a son of the gaavad of Hendon in London.

Over the years, the Schneebalg family became connected through marriage with numerous prominent chassidishe dynasties. These included the Satmar Rebbes; the Pshevorsk, Toldos Avrohom Yitzchok, Slonim and Machnovka-Belz courts; the Vizhnitzer Rebbes of London and Montreal; the Chernobyler Rebbes of Bnei Brak, Boro Park and Ashdod; as well as the Krechnif, Rachmastrivka Lakewood, Bohush and Kaliv dynasties, among others.

Yehi zichrah baruch.

{Matzav.com}

Following widespread tefillos on their behalf, the Vizhnitzer Rebbe and the Modzitzer Rebbe both underwent successful cardiac procedures on Tuesday, as Klal Yisroel continues to be mispallel for their complete refuos.

The Vizhnitzer Rebbe underwent the successful implantation of a cardiac pacemaker at Hadassah Ein Kerem Medical Center in Yerushalayim, while the Modzitzer Rebbe underwent a successful cardiac catheterization at Mayanei Hayeshua Medical Center in Bnei Brak.

The Vizhnitzer Rebbe’s procedure was performed by Dr. David Luria, director of the Heart Rhythm Disorders and Pacemakers Unit at Hadassah Medical Center, and was completed successfully. The Rebbe was expected to remain at the hospital for observation and continued monitoring by his doctors.

Following the procedure, the Rebbe‘s home issued an update expressing gratitude for the positive outcome.

“The medical treatment of Maran Rabbeinu shlita was completed, b’siyata d’Shmaya, to the satisfaction of the doctors. The tzibbur of Anash and the multitudes of Acheinu Bnei Yisroel are asked to continue being mispallel on his behalf, for the health and complete recovery of the Rebbe, Rav Yisroel ben Leah Esther, so that he may return to his strength, b’siyata d’Shmaya,” the statement said.

The tzibbur is asked to continue saying Tehillim and being mispallel for Rav Yisroel ben Leah Esther, l’refuah sheleimah.

Meanwhile, the Modzitzer Rebbe successfully underwent a cardiac catheterization at Mayanei Hayeshua Medical Center in Bnei Brak.

The Rebbe had been transported to the hospital on the first night of Rosh Hashanah for medical examinations. He subsequently returned and was able to go before the amud and lead the tefillos.

On Tuesday, the Rebbe underwent the planned catheterization, which, b’chasdei Hashem, was completed successfully.

The tzibbur is asked to continue being mispallel for Rav Chaim Shaul ben Beila Rochel, l’refuah sheleimah b’soch she’ar cholei Yisroel.

Both Rebbes are members of the Moetzes Gedolei HaTorah of the Chassidishe Agudas Yisroel faction of UTJ.

{Matzav.com}

The penny is another major step closer to disappearing permanently from American commerce after the House of Representatives passed legislation that would formally end production of the 1-cent coin and establish nationwide rules for rounding cash transactions to the nearest nickel.

The House on Monday approved the bipartisan Common Cents Act without opposition. The measure would codify the end of penny production for general circulation while allowing the U.S. Mint to continue producing limited quantities for collectors. Existing pennies would remain legal tender.

Under the legislation, cash purchases would generally be rounded to the nearest five cents when the exact total cannot be paid without pennies. Transactions made electronically, by credit card, check or other non-cash methods would continue to be calculated to the exact cent.

The bill contains a separate provision covering wages paid in cash. If the amount owed to an employee cannot be divided evenly into five-cent increments, the payment would have to be rounded upward rather than downward.

The measure would not make the enormous number of pennies already in circulation worthless. Americans would still be permitted to spend and deposit existing pennies, which would continue to be recognized as legal U.S. currency.

The legislative effort follows the U.S. Mint’s decision to stop producing pennies for general circulation in November 2025, bringing an end to 232 years of continuous production of the coin.

But congressional action would make that change permanent. If the legislation is signed into law by President Donald Trump, a future administration would not be able to simply reverse the Treasury Department’s decision and resume routine penny production.

The cost of producing the penny has risen dramatically, reaching several times the coin’s actual one-cent face value. The increasingly expensive production process has been one of the primary arguments cited by lawmakers supporting its elimination.

The Treasury Department has estimated that ending routine penny production would immediately save the federal government approximately $56 million annually.

The legislation was spearheaded in the House by Republican Conference Chair Lisa McClain of Michigan and Rep. Robert Garcia of California, the ranking Democrat on the House Oversight Committee.

The measure builds upon earlier legislation championed by McClain that also called on the federal government to stop producing pennies. That proposal previously cleared both chambers, but it did not contain the detailed provisions governing how businesses should round cash transactions once newly minted pennies are no longer available.

The new legislation attempts to resolve that issue by establishing a uniform system for cash payments, eliminating the need for retailers and consumers to rely on a steady supply of pennies.

Another provision would allow the U.S. Mint to change the materials used to manufacture nickels if a less expensive composition can be found. The goal is to reduce the cost of producing another coin whose manufacturing expenses have risen substantially.

Congress would also require the Treasury Department to monitor the effects of eliminating the penny and introducing cash rounding.

Particular attention would be paid to whether the change creates problems for Americans who rely heavily on cash, including low-income consumers, senior citizens and people who do not have conventional bank accounts.

Existing pennies, meanwhile, would not suddenly disappear. They could continue circulating for years, with consumers free to use them whenever they have them.

The measure would instead ensure that once those pennies gradually leave everyday circulation, businesses and consumers have a permanent system in place that allows cash transactions to continue without the need for the 1-cent coin.

If the legislation completes the congressional process and receives President Trump’s signature, the decision to stop minting pennies for everyday use would become federal law — formally bringing the long era of the American penny to a close.

{Matzav.com}

President Donald Trump renewed his long-running feud with Republican strategist Karl Rove on Monday, delivering a blistering attack on the longtime George W. Bush adviser and accusing him of repeatedly getting major political calls wrong and working against the direction Trump has taken the Republican Party.

“Karl Rove is so bad for the Republican Party, and completely wrong so often. He suffers from a major case of Trump Derangement Syndrome primarily because, for almost 10 years, I beat back and won against so many of the people and things that he wanted and espoused. Why does Fox News and the WSJ keep his RINO Voice alive. The guy is a stone cold loser!” Trump wrote on Truth Social.

The latest broadside was another chapter in a political battle that has stretched back more than a decade. Trump and Rove have repeatedly clashed over Republican candidates, campaign strategy and policy, with Rove criticizing Trump through his appearances on Fox News and his columns in the Wall Street Journal, and Trump frequently firing back publicly.

One of their early confrontations came in July 2015, when Trump branded Rove a “proven loser.” The dispute followed comments from Rove concerning gun violence and the Second Amendment. Trump also criticized Rove’s record of political spending during the 2012 election cycle. Trump described the Second Amendment as “a bedrock natural right of the individual to defend self, family, and property,” while arguing that Rove’s position reflected “a lack of respect for all of the freedoms in our Constitution and a complete ignorance of our shared American inheritance.”

Just two days later, Trump escalated the criticism, telling Breitbart News, “Karl Rove spent $430 million dollars on various campaigns last cycle. Didn’t win one. Which is pretty hard to do.” Rove subsequently disputed Trump’s characterization in a Wall Street Journal column, saying Crossroads organizations had spent $103 million during the 2014 cycle and had helped secure victories in 10 of 12 targeted Senate contests and 10 of 13 competitive House races. Rove also compared the potential effect of Trump’s candidacy on Republicans to the impact of then-Rep. Todd Akin on the party in 2012.

The war of words intensified at a Dallas rally in September 2015, when Trump called Rove a “totally incompetent jerk.” Trump declared, “He’s terrible. He’s terrible. He’s terrible,” and said anyone giving money to Rove and “the group of losers” was also a loser because “they don’t know what they are doing.”

By February 2016, Trump was openly questioning why Fox News continued putting Rove on television. Speaking with Sean Hannity, Trump said, “You’ve got some bad people at Fox,” while noting that the network also employed “some great people.” He specifically pointed to Rove and ridiculed his analysis on election night in 2012, concluding, “He shouldn’t be on the air.”

Another clash erupted in April 2016 after Rove wrote a Wall Street Journal column titled “Vanity Will Be The Donald’s Undoing.” Trump responded by calling Rove a “dishonorable guy” who “shouldn’t be allowed to write for the Wall Street Journal.” He accused Rove of attributing “things I never said” to him and charged, “He’s literally making up quotes.”

Trump said at the time that he believed Rove’s hostility stemmed partly from the knowledge that Rove would have no place in a Trump administration. “Because I want nothing to do with him,” Trump told Breitbart News. “Because I don’t respect him.” Trump further characterized Rove as “out of tune” and “out of touch,” while accusing him of “using language that I never used” and “giving ideas that are not even mine.”

Rove continued taking aim at Trump after Trump entered the White House. During the 2017 controversy surrounding NFL players kneeling during the national anthem, Rove predicted Trump would be “walking away from this a loser in the minds of the American people.” He also argued that Trump could have presented himself as an “aspirational figure” rather than a “condemnatory figure.”

The following year brought additional disagreements. In August 2018, Rove objected to Trump’s use of the term “enemy of the people” in referring to the press, describing it as “over the top” and maintaining that “calling names is not helpful to our country from any side.” Rove said the expression “just grates on me,” explaining, “I grew up during the time of the Cold War. That is a phrase that was used by Stalin against the enemies of the communist regime.” He said Trump would be “well-advised to tone down the rhetoric.”

Later that same month, Rove criticized Trump’s public pressure on the Justice Department, calling it “unwise for any president of any party to look like he is demanding that the Justice Department investigate his political opponents,” and adding, “It is just unseemly.” Rove asked Republicans to consider how they would have responded had Hillary Clinton won the presidency and urged her attorney general to investigate Trump. He concluded, “This isn’t how we do things or should do things in America. The president I think would be well-advised not to be making these kind of demands.”

Following the 2020 presidential election, Rove again criticized Trump, saying, “America likes comebacks, but they don’t like sore losers.” He added that Trump was “on the edge of looking like a sore loser and probably will look like it after January 6.”

Trump revisited his grievances against Rove during his March 2023 appearance at CPAC, placing the strategist among prominent Republicans whom Trump said represented an earlier version of the GOP that his political movement had displaced.

“When we started this journey, a journey like there has never been before, there’s never been anything like this, we had a Republican Party that was ruled by freaks, neocons, globalists, open-borders zealots, and fools, but we are never going back to the party of Paul Ryan, Karl Rove and Jeb Bush,” Trump said.

Their feud carried into Trump’s second administration. In a May 4, 2025 Truth Social post, Trump declared, “I don’t need Karl Rove telling me what to do,” while describing Rove as “a Loser who’s been wrong about almost everything.”

Rove also surfaced as a point of contention during Texas’s 2026 Republican Senate contest. Records publicized by Laura Loomer showed that Rove contributed $7,000 to the Cornyn Lonestar Victory Fund and $3,500 to Texans for Senator John Cornyn Inc. Loomer accused Rove of supporting candidates attempting to “Derail Trump,” while Ken Paxton had previously described Cornyn as “a puppet of the Bush and Karl Rove team.” Cornyn finished narrowly ahead of Paxton in the March primary, sending the contest to a runoff, where Paxton prevailed and became the Republican nominee for the U.S. Senate seat.

The House on Tuesday rejected Democratic Rep. Al Green’s latest effort to impeach President Donald Trump, voting 232-147 to approve a Republican motion that tabled the resolution. Another 47 lawmakers voted present, including members of House Democratic leadership.

Green’s resolution sought Trump’s impeachment over the conduct of Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Customs and Border Protection. In making his case, the Texas Democrat pointed to the deaths of Renee Good, Alex Pretti, Lorenzo Salgado Araujo and Johan Sebastian Duran Guerrero in encounters with federal immigration agents this year.

Democratic leaders did not instruct their members how to vote. However, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, Democratic Whip Katherine Clark and Democratic Caucus Chair Pete Aguilar announced ahead of the vote that they planned to vote “present” on the motion to table Green’s resolution.

Explaining that position, Democratic leaders argued that the extensive groundwork they believe should precede an impeachment effort had not taken place.

“Impeachment is a sacred constitutional vehicle designed to hold a corrupt executive accountable for abuse of power, breaking the law and violating the public trust,” Jeffries said on Tuesday. “The effort traditionally requires a comprehensive investigative process, the collection and review of thousands of documents, an exacting scrutiny of the facts, the examination of dozens of key witnesses, Congressional hearings, sustained public organizing and the marshaling of the forces of democracy to build a broad national consensus.”

“None of that serious work has been done, with the Republican majority focused solely on rubber stamping Donald Trump’s extreme agenda,” he added.

Green brought forward the resolution as he approaches the end of his congressional career. The longtime Houston-area congressman lost the Democratic primary in his redrawn district and is scheduled to leave office in January. He has repeatedly sought Trump’s impeachment over the years and was censured by the House in 2025 after disrupting Trump’s address to a joint session of Congress.

The latest vote also comes as Democrats debate how impeachment should factor into their plans if they gain control of the House. Jeffries has not ruled out pursuing impeachment during the final two years of Trump’s term, while other senior Democrats have said the issue is not currently their leading priority.

That debate includes questions about whether an impeachment drive would draw attention away from Democrats’ economic message and how voters who oppose some Trump policies but do not favor removing him from office would respond.

Some Democrats have also expressed concern that another impeachment effort could energize Trump supporters ahead of the midterm elections. Democratic leaders, meanwhile, have emphasized that any future impeachment push should follow a substantial investigative and congressional process rather than move forward without that groundwork.

House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman James Comer is calling on the Trump administration to publicly release any evidence it possesses concerning allegations that Rep. Ilhan Omar violated US immigration law, saying Congress should be able to consider the information and determine whether further action is warranted.

Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin recently alleged that Omar married her brother as part of an immigration scheme and said the matter is under investigation. Omar has long denied the allegation, which has not been publicly substantiated.

White House border czar Tom Homan has also confirmed that Homeland Security Investigations is conducting an investigation involving Omar. Homan declined to disclose details or say whether investigators have evidence of immigration or naturalization fraud.

“I think they should make it public. Absolutely, make it public,” Comer said Monday night on “Just the News, No Noise.”

“The evidence that I’ve seen would show that. They would be privy to a lot more evidence than I would have. Most of the evidence I have [is] public already, anyway. So, I think it should be made public, and I think the members of Congress should be the judge and the jury in this.

“Let us vote as to whether or not she needs to remain in Congress. If you violated the laws to become a citizen, should that make you ineligible to be a member of Congress? I think so. But put it up for a vote in Congress and let the American people see how their member of Congress would vote on that.”

Under Article I, Section 5 of the Constitution, the House has the authority to expel one of its members with the support of two-thirds of the chamber.

Omar, who was born in Somalia and became the first Somali American elected to Congress, arrived in the United States with her family after they received refugee status. She became a naturalized US citizen in 2000.

For years, Omar has rejected claims that Ahmed Nur Said Elmi, whom she married in 2009, was her brother and that the marriage was undertaken to obtain immigration benefits. No public evidence has conclusively established that Elmi is her brother.

According to Omar’s account of her marital history, she and Ahmed Hirsi married in their Islamic faith tradition in 2002. Although they sought a civil marriage license that year, the civil marriage process was not completed, and the two separated in 2008.

Omar legally married Elmi the following year. She has said that their relationship subsequently ended with a faith-based divorce in 2011, after which she reconciled with Hirsi. Her legal divorce from Elmi was finalized in December 2017, and she legally married Hirsi the next month.

Omar and Hirsi later divorced in 2019. In 2020, she married political consultant Tim Mynett, who had previously worked on her congressional campaign.

Claims that Omar and Elmi were siblings first attracted broad public attention during her 2016 campaign, including through postings on the SomaliSpot online discussion forum. Subsequent reporting examined public records surrounding Omar’s marriage history but did not establish that Elmi was her brother.

The allegation received renewed attention after Minneapolis-based Somali blogger Abdihakim Osman, who described himself as an old friend of the couple, claimed that Omar had presented Elmi as her brother to people in the Somali community during the late 2000s.

“She said she needed to get papers for her brother to go to school,” Osman told the Daily Mail in 2020, according to the Washington Examiner. “We all thought she was just getting papers together to allow him to stay in this country. Once she had the papers, they could apply for student loans.”

Federal law provides criminal penalties for knowingly entering into a marriage for the purpose of evading US immigration laws.

Homan has said that immigration violations, including marriage fraud, should be investigated regardless of an individual’s position, while leaving the specifics of the Omar investigation to Homeland Security Investigations. No charges against Omar in connection with the marriage allegation have been publicly announced.

It is with great sadness that Matzav.com reports the passing of a man whose name may not have been widely known, but whose melody has been sung by generations of Yidden around the world, with the petirah of Tanchum Gershon Portnoy z”l, longtime resident of Lawrence, New York, and composer of the universally beloved tune to “Eitz Chaim Hi.”

Portnoy was 75.

For more than half a century, his haunting and uplifting melody has accompanied one of the most familiar moments in the davening: the return of the Sefer Torah to the Aron Kodesh. In shuls across continents and across the spectrum of Jewish life, a baal tefillah begins the familiar notes, the kehillah joins, and the words “Eitz chaim hi lamachazikim bah” fill the room.

Most of those singing it never knew who wrote it.

It was Tanchum Portnoy.

Remarkably, he was only 22 years old when he composed the melody in the early 1970s. It was recorded on his 1975 album, Tanchumim, with Rabbi Alvin Wainhaus, known musically as Avraham Yanon, singing the piece and Yisroel Lamm arranging and conducting it.

The album listed Portnoy as composer, producer and director. Its title, Tanchumim — consolations — was itself a play on Tanchum’s name.

The song would ultimately travel far beyond the album.

Its simple but deeply stirring structure made it particularly suited to a tzibbur. The phrases were short and memorable, the range accessible, and the melody seemed almost naturally wedded to the words. One person could begin singing and an entire shul could immediately follow.

Over time, congregations developed slight variations. Notes were stretched, rhythms changed and certain turns in the melody were simplified. But wherever it was sung, the tune remained unmistakable.

Eventually, something unusual happened: the melody became so familiar that people began assuming it had always existed.

Music publisher Velvel Pasternak once encountered liner notes that identified Portnoy’s “Eitz Chaim” simply as “traditional.” Pasternak corrected the attribution. But the mistake itself reflected just how thoroughly the song had entered the collective Jewish consciousness.

Portnoy once related that he would travel around the world, enter shuls, and suddenly hear congregations singing the melody he had composed as a young man.

On one occasion, he walked into a shul and heard the congregation singing it precisely the way he had originally intended it to be sung. He stood quietly listening, deeply gratified. Then, rather than announce himself as the composer, he simply joined the congregation, singing and davening alongside everyone else.

The melody was later embraced and popularized by prominent chazzanim and Jewish musicians, including Portnoy’s close friend Reb Shlomo Carlebach. With each passing year, another generation learned it — often without ever knowing there had been a composer at all.

But Tanchum Portnoy’s legacy was about far more than music.

Born on July 22, 1951, in Brooklyn, New York, Tanchum came from a family deeply rooted in Torah. His father, Rav Eliezer Portnoy zt”l, was a talmid of the Mirrer Yeshiva in Europe who played a significant role in the extraordinary efforts that ultimately enabled the yeshiva to escape Lithuania during the Holocaust.

Rav Eliezer had arrived in Mir at just 14 years old, an orphan with neither wealth nor a prominent family background to support him. He threw himself into Torah learning with extraordinary determination and eventually became one of the distinguished members of the yeshiva.

As Europe descended into catastrophe, Rav Eliezer became deeply involved in the desperate efforts to save the Mirrer Yeshiva.

Working with others, he pursued the documents, visas, government permissions and funding necessary to enable hundreds of bnei yeshiva to escape Soviet-controlled Lithuania. Those efforts eventually helped facilitate the Mir’s legendary journey across the Soviet Union on the Trans-Siberian Railway, through Vladivostok and on to Japan.

Rav Eliezer himself dealt directly with Chiune Sugihara, the Japanese diplomat whose transit visas became a critical part of the rescue.

After the American consulate refused visas to the Mirrer talmidim, Sugihara told Rav Eliezer, “The world says that America is civilized. I will show the world that Japan is more civilized.”

Sugihara proceeded to issue hundreds of visas for the Mir.

Obtaining the Japanese documents was only part of the danger. The talmidim still required Soviet permission to leave Lithuania and travel across the USSR, meaning that those attempting to escape had to deal directly with the feared Soviet secret police.

Rav Eliezer put aside his own learning and devoted himself for weeks to the work of pikuach nefesh, traveling between government offices, communal organizations and relief activists in Kovno in pursuit of whatever was needed to save the yeshiva.

He and a companion were among the first to leave Lithuania, around Chanukah of 1940. Rav Eliezer arrived in Kobe, Japan, in January 1941, with the remaining groups of Mirrer talmidim following.

The significance of those efforts was later expressed by Rav Chaim Shmuelevitz zt”l, who had himself escaped with the Mir and would become one of its roshei yeshiva.

“Were it not for Rav Eliezer, we would not be here. Were it not for Rav Eliezer, we would not have escaped the land of blood.”

After the war, Rav Eliezer became a marbitz Torah, teaching at Mercaz HaTorah in Montreal before serving as principal of Yeshivas Rabbeinu Chaim Berlin and later as a rov in Brooklyn. He passed away in 1975 at just 57 years old.

For decades, much of Rav Eliezer’s remarkable story remained little known.

Late in his own life, Tanchum made preserving that story one of his great missions.

In the summer of 2025, exactly 50 years after his father’s passing, Tanchum and his wife, Sara, published Or Eliezer, an extensive sefer that brought together Rav Eliezer’s Torah writings, hespeidim, photographs, historical documents, family memories and a detailed reconstruction of his role in the Mir’s wartime escape.

Tanchum understood that the generation that had personally known his father was disappearing and that even among Rav Eliezer’s descendants, the full story was becoming increasingly unfamiliar.

He was determined that it not be lost.

Included in Or Eliezer was Tanchum’s own English essay, “A Son Reflects,” in which he described his father’s extraordinary transformation from a lonely 14-year-old orphan into a Torah leader whose actions helped save hundreds.

“This is the story of my father — a man who arrived at the gates of the Mir Yeshiva at fourteen years old, utterly alone, and declared he would create his own lineage. It is the story of a boy who went hungry more often than not, moving from family to family for meals, bearing the physical scars of malnutrition beneath his collar. But more than that, it is the story of how one young man’s relentless pursuit of greatness positioned him to save an entire world.”

Tanchum wrote movingly about the lesson he drew from his father’s actions during the Holocaust: Emunah did not mean passivity. His father believed in miracles, but understood that human beings sometimes had to become the instruments through which those miracles occurred.

Describing his father’s memories of young men from other yeshivos desperately trying to escape Vilna without the necessary documents, Tanchum wrote that they “had trusted in miracles; he had trusted in miracles too, but understood that sometimes G-d’s miracles come through human hands holding pens and passports.”

For Tanchum, his father had done more than save hundreds of individual lives. By helping save the Mir, he had helped preserve a Torah world that would be rebuilt after the Holocaust and spread across the globe.

Rav Eliezer had once told his son that as an orphaned teenager, he had gone to Mir determined “to make his own lineage.”

Tanchum concluded his reflection with a powerful observation:

“He used to tell me he came to Mir to make his own lineage. He did much more than that. He ensured that hundreds of others would live to create their own.”

There was a striking symmetry between father and son.

Tanchum spent his final years working to ensure that the name of his father would not disappear from a story that remained alive.

His own story unfolded in almost the opposite way.

Tanchum’s name gradually disappeared from a melody that remained vibrantly alive.

He had composed “Eitz Chaim” at 22. More than five decades later, children who had never heard his name were singing it because their fathers sang it, and their fathers had heard it from their fathers or rebbeim. It had ceased to feel like a composition and had begun to feel like an inheritance.

The words themselves could hardly be more fitting.

“Eitz chaim hi lamachazikim bah, v’somcheha me’ushar. Deracheha darchei noam, v’chol nesivoseha shalom.”

And then:

“Hashiveinu Hashem eilecha v’nashuvah; chadeish yameinu k’kedem.”

Tanchum Portnoy was niftar over Rosh Hashanah, as Klal Yisroel entered the Aseres Yemei Teshuvah, the days whose very essence is teshuvah — return.

“Hashiveinu Hashem eilecha v’nashuvah.”

Return us, Hashem, and we will return.

“Chadeish yameinu k’kedem.”

Renew our days as of old.

His melody is not ancient. Its origins are known. The original recording survives. His name appears on the album. And yet, for countless Yidden, the tune already belongs to the kedem of their memories. They cannot necessarily remember learning it. They simply remember knowing it.

Away from his musical legacy, Tanchum is remembered by family, friends and members of the Five Towns community as a man of tremendous warmth, kindness and generosity.  A longtime resident of Lawrence, New York, he was a beloved member of the Five Towns community.

He is survived by his wife, Sara; his children, Eli, Amichai, Ilan and Gali; and their families.

The levayah was held on Tuesday at Eretz HaChaim Cemetery in Beit Shemesh, where the kevurah took place.

Shivah on Thursday will be held at 1118 Warren Street in New Milford. Selichos and Shacharis will be at 7:15 a.m., with Mincha/Maariv at 6:45 p.m. Visitors are asked not to come between noon and 1 p.m., between 5 and 6 p.m., or after 10 p.m.

Shivah on Wednesday, Friday, Motzoei Shabbos and Sunday will be observed at 148 Sutton Place South in Lawrence, New York. Shacharis on Wednesday, Friday and Sunday will be at 8 a.m., with Mincha/Maariv on Wednesday at 6:45 p.m.

For more than 50 years, Tanchum could enter a shul almost anywhere and hear something he had created as a young man being sung back to him. Sometimes, he would stand quietly and listen. Then he would join in, just another Yid singing as the Torah was returned to the Aron Kodesh.

Now, Tanchum will no longer be standing among those singing.

But the melody will be.

Yehi zichro baruch.

{Matzav.com}

An extraordinary and sensitive operation was completed in Thailand on Tuesday as ZAKA volunteers, Chabad shluchim and members of the local Jewish community successfully relocated four graves from a cemetery near Bangkok after local authorities ordered the burial ground evacuated within just days.

The cemetery had been purchased approximately five years ago by Bangkok’s Jewish community and Chabad. In recent months, however, difficulties arose with local authorities, who declined to renew the cemetery’s burial license.

On Friday morning, Erev Rosh Hashanah, Chabad representatives received a letter from the regional governor ordering them to vacate the cemetery by Tuesday. Four Jewish graves were located on the property, leaving the community with only a matter of days to arrange their relocation in accordance with halachah and with the utmost kavod hameis.

Faced with the urgent situation, Rabbi Nechemia Wilhelm, a Chabad shliach in Bangkok, contacted ZAKA Chief Operating Officer Chaim Weingarten and requested immediate assistance.

ZAKA officials quickly conducted a halachic consultation with the organization’s rabbonim. Immediately after Shabbos, Weingarten and ZAKA volunteer Berale Yakubowitz flew to Bangkok to oversee the delicate operation.

A new burial plot had meanwhile been purchased by Rabbi Yosef Chaim Kantor, chief rabbi of Thailand’s Jewish community, providing a new resting place for the four niftarim.

On Tuesday, Rabbi Kantor, Rabbi Wilhelm, Rabbi Eliezer Ashkenazi and community members Yossi Goldberg and Davidi Haddad joined the ZAKA representatives for the operation.

After hours of painstaking and highly sensitive work, all four graves were successfully transferred intact to the new burial ground. Those involved took meticulous care to ensure that every stage of the operation was carried out in accordance with halachah and with the proper kavod hameis.

“When I received the request on Erev Rosh Hashanah and understood the urgency, it was clear to us that ZAKA would do whatever was necessary to preserve the dignity of the deceased,” Weingarten said. “Immediately after Shabbos, we left for Bangkok, following consultation with the organization’s rabbonim. Today, with the assistance of the Chabad rabbonim and members of the local community, we completed the complex mission and brought the deceased to their eternal resting place with the proper dignity.”

Rabbi Kantor described the situation as both extraordinarily sensitive and exceptionally urgent.

“This was a very complex and sensitive event that we were required to address within an extremely short period of time,” Rabbi Kantor said. “We thank the ZAKA organization and its personnel, who immediately responded to the call and came from Israel to assist us. Their cooperation and dedication made it possible to complete the transfer of the graves with dignity, sensitivity and in accordance with halachah.”

{Matzav.com}

Federal prosecutors have charged five people accused of participating in a Russian intelligence-linked network that allegedly sought to arrange assassinations in the United States and other countries and recruit individuals for violent attacks in European nations supporting Ukraine. All five defendants remain at large.

An indictment made public in Manhattan federal court alleges that people acting on behalf of Russian intelligence offered or attempted to offer payments to individuals in the United States and abroad to monitor selected targets before carrying out killings.

Prosecutors also allege that recruits were approached about conducting terrorist attacks against civilian and military infrastructure in European countries viewed as supportive of Ukraine.

James C. Barnacle Jr., who leads the FBI’s New York office, credited investigators with thwarting the alleged operations through “relentless work” as Russian intelligence personnel and associates “conspired to intimidate, threaten, or murder people on U.S. soil and around the world.”

Darren B. Cox, head of the FBI’s Washington field office, similarly praised the “extraordinary work by multiple FBI field offices, components, and partner agencies that collectively disrupted Russia’s attempts to conduct violent acts in our nation’s capital and throughout the United States.”

Cox said investigators acted immediately after becoming aware of the alleged operation. According to the government’s statement, the Washington field office and other agencies “moved quickly to disrupt the plot and hold the Russian government accountable for its actions.”

Federal authorities said the network has been operating on behalf of Russian Federation intelligence services since at least 2024, allegedly organizing murders and other attacks in multiple countries, including the United States.

Officials characterized the intelligence network as “one arm” of a broader Russian apparatus allegedly used to conduct attacks overseas, including targeted killings.

According to authorities, the operation had previously concentrated on Russian dissidents and defectors. Its alleged targets have more recently expanded to include individuals and infrastructure in countries regarded by Moscow as supporting Ukraine.

Investigators said members of the network have also recently sought to recruit people located inside the United States.

During the summer, according to federal authorities, the network enlisted an individual in the United States to conduct surveillance on a prominent Russian dissident before allegedly offering that person $40,000 to kill the intended victim.

The indictment identifies the recruited person only as “U.S. Resident-1.” Prosecutors said the individual was directed to visit two locations connected to the intended target and received “explicit instructions on how to conduct surveillance” along with a promise of payment.

After carrying out the surveillance and sending photographs and video of locations linked to the target to one of the defendants, the US resident rejected an alleged $40,000 offer to “eliminate” or “disappear” the intended victim.

Prosecutors allege that after the individual refused the offer, the intelligence operative behind it attempted to recruit several other people in the United States, offering substantial payments in an effort to have someone else carry out the killing.

Alan Dershowitz says the Supreme Court’s decision preventing President Donald Trump’s new mail-ballot rules from taking effect before November’s midterm elections does not necessarily determine how the underlying legal dispute will ultimately be resolved. The Harvard Law professor emeritus described the ruling as “just the beginning” of the litigation.

Speaking Tuesday on “The Record With Greta Van Susteren,” Dershowitz emphasized that the justices were considering an emergency request to allow the US Postal Service regulations to take effect while litigation continues. The court declined that request Monday, leaving a lower-court injunction against the rules in place.

“The ballot issue will not affect the midterms,” Dershowitz said. “That’s what the Supreme Court held.”

Dershowitz argued that the opinions accompanying the court’s order contain indications that the administration could receive a more favorable hearing when the underlying legal issues are considered outside the immediate pressures surrounding the November election.

Justice Brett Kavanaugh agreed that the rule should remain blocked for the upcoming election but wrote separately that there is “at least a fair prospect that the final rule falls within the Postal Service’s statutory authority.” He nevertheless concluded that implementing the requirements at this late stage would be “arbitrary and capricious.”

Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas dissented. Alito’s opinion argued that the government had satisfied the requirements for a stay and was likely to succeed on the merits of its appeal.

Dershowitz interpreted the positions of Kavanaugh, Alito and Thomas as giving the administration a potential foundation for a future Supreme Court victory. He said Kavanaugh had indicated that the administration “has the better of the legal argument,” although that wording was Dershowitz’s interpretation and does not appear in Kavanaugh’s opinion.

He also suggested that other justices who declined to permit the regulations to take effect immediately could nevertheless reach a different conclusion when considering the merits of the broader case.

“It’s certainly possible that the Trump administration could get five votes,” he said.

Dershowitz said Congress could address some of the controversy by establishing federal minimum requirements while leaving states with their constitutionally assigned role in administering elections.

He said a federal statute requiring voters to demonstrate citizenship “would probably be upheld as constitutional,” arguing that legislation could settle at least part of the legal dispute over federal election standards.

“Cheating in elections is as American as apple pie, unfortunately,” Dershowitz said, referring to historical allegations surrounding the 1960 presidential election in Illinois and the ballot controversy in Palm Beach County during the 2000 election. He also reiterated his view that Trump won the 2020 presidential election. Dershowitz’s statement about 2020 is his position; official results and subsequent certification established Joe Biden as the winner of that election.

Monday’s Supreme Court order keeps intact a federal judge’s preliminary injunction preventing implementation of the Postal Service regulation. The rule would require ballot-mail envelopes to meet specific design and scanning requirements, including a specialized barcode for each voter, and would require states to upload specified voter information to a Postal Service portal.

The court’s unsigned order said the government was “unlikely to succeed on the merits” in its request for emergency relief. Kavanaugh’s separate opinion, however, distinguished the immediate dispute from the broader statutory issue and said there was a fair prospect that the Postal Service possessed authority to issue such a rule.

Dershowitz said the litigation will now proceed beyond the emergency stage, while cautioning against assuming how individual justices would ultimately rule once the underlying legal questions are fully presented.

The United Nations on Tuesday called for international investigators to receive access throughout the Gaza Strip “to assist with evidence-gathering,” as hundreds of bodies and human remains continue to be recovered from buildings destroyed during the war.

The UN human rights office said the discoveries raise concerns that war crimes may have occurred and asserted that many of the recovered bodies were those of women and children.

“The remains of what appears to be entire families are now being unearthed at locations that were pulverized by Israeli attacks,” UN rights chief Volker Turk said in a statement.

Turk cautioned that the remains found to date might represent only a fraction of those still buried beneath destroyed structures. “I worry the remains recovered so far may only be the tip of the iceberg,” he said, noting that “much of Gaza has been flattened by Israeli bombing or demolition and clearing by heavy machinery and explosives.”

He also accused Israeli forces of continuing demolition work in areas under their control without adequately safeguarding remains beneath destroyed structures. “Today, many areas in Gaza where the Israeli military is deployed continue to be leveled by bulldozers with no respect for the dead under the rubble,” he said.

Against that backdrop, the UN human rights office urged that “international investigators to be allowed into all parts of Gaza to assist with evidence-gathering.”

According to the UN office, the Hamas-run Gaza civil defense agency says more than 630 bodies and other human remains have been retrieved from beneath ruined buildings across the enclave since November.

The UN cited the civil defense agency as estimating that more than 8,000 people remain missing beneath the destruction, saying it “estimates the total number of missing under the rubble at over 8,000.”

Turk called for systematic efforts to identify the dead and preserve potential evidence. He said “every feasible effort must be taken to document and identify these victims, preserve forensic information and biological samples, record their burial locations and inform their families.”

“The discovery of extensive remains under the rubble in Gaza City resurfaces concerns of war crimes and other atrocity crimes,” Turk said.

A majority of Israelis described Jewish rioters involved in a recent violent incident in the West Bank village of Qusra as either “Israeli terrorists” or “nationalist criminals,” according to the September Israeli Society Index published by the Jewish People Policy Institute. The poll found that 33% selected the first description and 18% the second.

The findings came after dozens of masked Israeli civilians arrived in Qusra in pickup trucks and threw stones at Palestinian residents. According to JPPI’s account of the incident, some of the rioters entered a Palestinian home and barricaded themselves inside while residents were present. Several Palestinians were injured, including a woman who required medical treatment. The rioters fled when Israeli security forces arrived, and no arrests were made.

The survey found relatively little support for the most sympathetic descriptions of the group. Just 13% of Israelis chose either “young people who sometimes go too far” or “the salt of the earth.”

Responses differed sharply according to political identification. Among respondents on the left, 63% characterized the rioters as “Israeli terrorists,” while another 31% selected “nationalist criminals.” In the political center, 49% chose the terrorist designation and 31% described them as nationalist criminals.

The pattern was markedly different among respondents on the right. Only 3% used the description “Israeli terrorists,” while 22% called those involved “a handful of rioters” and 20% chose “a violent minority.” Another 12% selected “the salt of the earth.”

The poll also revealed a substantial difference between Jewish and Arab Israelis. Fifty-five percent of Arab respondents characterized those involved as “Israeli terrorists,” compared with 27% of Jewish respondents.

JPPI said the findings reflect a pronounced ideological divide over violence associated with fringe elements of the settlement movement. The institute noted that a separate question posed in its previous monthly survey concerning West Bank farms and outposts produced a similarly sharp split along ideological lines, while cautioning that the two questions were different and should not be directly compared.

The September Israeli Society Index was based on data collected from September 1 through September 3. The survey included 663 Jewish respondents from the Madad.com panel and 206 Arab respondents surveyed by Afkar Research, approximately half online and half by telephone. JPPI said the results were weighted by voting patterns and religiosity to represent Israel’s adult population.

{Matzav.com}

Elon Musk, the world’s richest person, is temporarily living in an Airstream trailer in Memphis, Tennessee, as he personally oversees the rapid expansion of xAI’s massive computing infrastructure, continuing his longstanding practice of sleeping close to the workplace when one of his companies is racing to complete a major project.

Musk revealed his unusual living arrangement during an appearance on the All-In podcast alongside SpaceX President and COO Gwynne Shotwell. Speaking remotely from Memphis, Musk jokingly described the trailer as his “palace.”

“This is coming to you from my, the palace that I live in in Memphis, which is an Airstream trailer,” Musk said.

Shotwell immediately confirmed that Musk was not joking about staying near the project, saying that his presence at the construction site reflected a side of his management style that outsiders often do not see.

“This is Elon, by the way, doing what people don’t believe he does. He sleeps on the factory floor. He’s in Memphis, helping build buildings,” Shotwell said.

Musk is in Memphis as xAI pushes ahead with an enormous expansion of its computing capacity. The city has become a key hub for the company’s artificial-intelligence infrastructure, including its Colossus supercomputer operation. Colossus was originally constructed beginning in 2024 to supply the computing power required for Grok, xAI’s artificial-intelligence model, with the initial buildout reportedly completed in just 122 days.

The company has continued expanding aggressively. In July, plans were announced for another Memphis data center known as Minihard, adding to the growing collection of facilities being developed in the area. Musk’s decision to remain in Memphis puts him close to the enormous number of GPUs and other infrastructure being installed as the company increases its AI computing capacity.

During the podcast conversation, Shotwell jokingly told Musk that he needed to remain focused on the Memphis operation.

“I actually think he needs to spend more time in Memphis,” Shotwell said. “Yes, obviously, I know you’re in Memphis. You need to be working, getting those GPUs up.”

Near the end of his appearance, Musk made clear that the work awaiting him was not merely theoretical.

“Yeah, I gotta go fix some GPUs here in Memphis,” he said.

The arrangement fits a pattern Musk has followed repeatedly throughout his business career: when a company faces an intensive development or production push, he has often chosen to sleep at or extremely close to the workplace rather than commute to a conventional residence.

That habit dates back to his earliest years as an entrepreneur. According to Walter Isaacson’s biography of Musk, Musk and his brother Kimbal slept in the small Palo Alto office of their first startup, Zip2, for roughly six months, showering at a local YMCA. After receiving $22 million when Zip2 was sold to Compaq, Musk continued sleeping under his desk on many nights while working to launch X.com, the online financial company that eventually became part of PayPal.

The same approach resurfaced years later at Tesla. During the company’s difficult Model 3 production ramp in 2017 and 2018, Musk frequently remained at the factory as Tesla struggled to reach its production targets, sometimes sleeping only several hours a night.

Musk repeated the practice after purchasing Twitter in 2022. During the intense restructuring of the social-media company, which was subsequently renamed X, he slept on a couch in the library at the company’s San Francisco headquarters. Musk said at the time that the company was facing what he considered a “code-red situation.”

His current accommodations are somewhat more comfortable than a factory floor. Airstream is famous for its distinctive aluminum travel trailers, some of which fit sleeping quarters, a kitchen and bathroom into relatively compact spaces. Musk did not identify which Airstream model he is using in Memphis.

The trailer arrangement also stands in sharp contrast to some of the luxurious properties Musk has owned in the past. In 2012, he purchased a Bel Air mansion for $17 million that included seven bedrooms, 11 bathrooms, a tennis court and a two-story library. He also owned a Mediterranean-style Silicon Valley estate reportedly worth $32 million and purchased the former home of actor Gene Wilder.

But Musk publicly announced in 2020 that he intended to sell most of his physical possessions, including his houses. He subsequently relocated to Texas and lived for a period in a small home near SpaceX’s Starbase operation that he said he rented from the company for about $50,000.

His latest temporary home now places him close to one of the most important projects in his sprawling business empire.

Memphis has become increasingly central to xAI’s effort to compete in the global artificial-intelligence race, where access to enormous amounts of computing power has become critical. Training and operating increasingly sophisticated AI systems requires huge clusters of specialized processors, enormous quantities of electricity and extensive data-center infrastructure.

For Musk, the immediate solution to keeping close tabs on that expansion appears to be characteristically unconventional: rather than spending significant time traveling back and forth to the construction site, he has simply moved into a trailer nearby.

And despite his extraordinary wealth, Musk seems amused by the contrast between his financial resources and his current accommodations.

For now, the billionaire’s Memphis “palace” is an Airstream trailer — close enough to the construction and GPUs that he can remain personally involved as xAI races to expand its computing infrastructure.

{Matzav.com}

LISTEN:

​​For more info, email bitachon4life@gmail.com.

LISTEN:

The House of Representatives voted Tuesday for a third time to restrict President Donald Trump’s ability to continue US military action against Iran, with seven Republicans joining Democrats in supporting the measure as the war becomes an increasingly prominent issue ahead of November’s midterm elections.

The measure passed with backing from seven Republican lawmakers, three more than supported the House’s previous resolution concerning the conflict. Democrats have characterized the latest action as their most substantial attempt so far to push back against Trump’s handling of the war, particularly with Congress nearing its final votes before the elections.

House Republican leaders have not formally directed GOP members on how to vote on the Iran resolutions. Trump, however, has publicly criticized Republicans who have broken with his position on the conflict, underscoring the importance he has placed on maintaining congressional support.

In July, the House approved a nonbinding resolution urging Trump to bring US military operations against Iran to an end. That measure passed by a 214-208 margin, with four Republicans joining all Democrats who voted in favor.

A separate joint resolution was later blocked in the Senate in a 47-49 procedural vote. Unlike the House measure, the Senate proposal would have carried the force of law if enacted, though it likely would have faced a presidential veto had it passed Congress.

The House has repeatedly sought to place restrictions on Trump’s military authority in connection with Iran. Lawmakers pursued another effort in June to limit the administration’s authority, but that measure ultimately failed after White House pressure prompted a Republican senator to change his vote.

It remains uncertain whether Senate Democrats can attract enough support to move another attempt forward. They are expected to try again later this week as the congressional debate over US military operations against Iran continues.

Thousands gathered at the main Dushinsky bais medrash in Yerushalayim on Monday night to hear the annual Shabbos Shuvah drashah of Rav Moshe Sternbuch, who delivered a forceful address focusing on the draft of yeshivah bochurim, chareidi military programs, the dangers of internet use and the need to strengthen shemiras Shabbos and regular study of its halachos.

The massive crowd included admorim, rabbonim, roshei yeshivah, dayanim, marbitzei Torah and members of the broader Yerushalayim Torah community. Dozens of prominent rabbonim and morei horaah were seated along the eastern wall as the bais medrash filled with people who had come to hear Rav Sternbuch’s traditional pre-Yom Kippur address.

Rav Sternbuch opened by addressing what he described as the struggle facing Torah Jewry against those seeking to undermine the Torah world and its institutions.

“The wicked are plotting to completely destroy us, to demolish the fortresses of Torah and the holy yeshivos, and to turn us into a nation like all other nations and a people like all other peoples. However, regarding this, the posuk has already promised us and Hakadosh Boruch Hu has declared: ‘That which enters your minds shall not come to pass!’ Our obligation at this time is to shake ourselves free and distance ourselves completely from the secular, not to look toward them at all, not to associate with them and not to participate with them in any matter whatsoever, because it is specifically in this separation that the foundation of our success and continued existence lies.”

To underscore the point, Rav Sternbuch cited an explanation from Rav Yehoshua Leib Diskin regarding a passage recited during the Hoshanos.

“Rav Yehoshua Leib explained our plea, ‘Hoshana, three hours, Hoshana,’ that during the final three hours before the arrival of the righteous redeemer, a terrible and frightening spirit of heresy and impurity will blow through the world. He further warned with holy foresight: Only one who completely separates and distances himself from the wicked will merit to be saved and to see the light of redemption.”

Rav Sternbuch then turned to the ongoing controversy surrounding the draft of yeshivah bochurim and the arrests of those who have refused to enlist, declaring, “The blood of our brothers is not hefker!”

“To our sorrow, during Rosh Hashanah, eighty precious bochurim sat in prison, despite having committed no sin or wrongdoing, other than their intense desire to cling to Hashem and toil in Torah, and their refusal to enlist in an army filled with impurity and heresy. Over this we protest with all our strength and cry out: The blood of our brothers is not hefker! Chazal have already said, ‘One who causes another to sin is worse than one who kills him,’ and this terrible decree hanging over the yeshivah bochurim is truly comparable to a death sentence, because without Torah we have no life at all. May Hakadosh Boruch Hu frustrate their counsel and disrupt their plans, and in the merit of the mesirus nefesh of those who learn Torah, may the decree soon be annulled.”

Rav Sternbuch also issued a strong warning against military programs marketed specifically toward chareidi men, including programs offering limited working hours and substantial financial compensation while promising an environment geared toward religious participants.

“To our sorrow, they have opened programs supposedly adorned in ‘chassidishe clothing,’ through which they entice the public to work a few hours and receive large amounts of money, thereby trapping the yeshivahleit in their net. Therefore, the obligation of the hour is to warn loudly: It is forbidden to go to them under any circumstances! The very foundation of the army is built upon heresy, and their entire aim and objective is simply to connect us with them so that we become like them, chas v’shalom.”

Turning to technology, Rav Sternbuch described internet use as one of the defining spiritual challenges confronting the current generation and urged the public to distance itself as much as possible.

“The obligation of the hour is to awaken people regarding the danger of the internet, which is the most difficult nisayon of the generation and leads to the ultimate source of impurity. Fortunate is one who does not use it at all, even ‘filtered internet,’ for as we say to the nazir, ‘Go around, go around; do not approach the vineyard.’ Boruch Hashem, today there are already holy groups in every community whose members undertake to distance themselves from all these things, and they should be called holy for overcoming the challenges of the times with strength.”

Rav Sternbuch devoted another portion of his drashah to Shabbos, noting that the first day of Rosh Hashanah fell on Shabbos this year and that Klal Yisroel therefore did not perform the mitzvah of shofar on that day. He said this makes strengthening shemiras Shabbos particularly important.

“This year Rosh Hashanah fell on Shabbos and we did not merit the mitzvah of shofar, and in such a year we need the merit of Shabbos to stand on our behalf and sweeten the judgments. Therefore, we must strengthen ourselves especially in observing Shabbos, so that it will serve as an advocate for us before the Throne of Glory. Chas v’shalom, if we do not observe it properly, it could instead become a source of prosecution, rachmana litzlan.

“Every single person should undertake to learn the halachos of Shabbos on a regular basis, as well as to protest against the increasing desecration of Shabbos. If we do what is incumbent upon us, Shabbos will stand as our advocate, and the words ‘If I safeguard Shabbos, Hashem will safeguard me’ will be fulfilled for us, and Hakadosh Boruch Hu will save us from all harm.”

At the conclusion of the lengthy address, thousands filed past Rav Sternbuch in an orderly procession to receive his brachah for the new year. Among the first to approach were the Dushinsky Rebbe and the Skulen Yerushalayim Rebbe.

Another notable scene unfolded afterward as the rabbonim of the Eidah Hachareidis passed before Rav Sternbuch and received his brachah together with a special Yom Tov gift of $1,000 apiece. More than $100,000 was distributed at the gathering through Rav Sternbuch’s Kupas Tomchin D’Oraisa, continuing his longstanding financial support for rabbonim, roshei kollel and avreichim throughout the year.

Moved by the occasion, Rav Yehudah Fisher, a member of the Badatz of the Eidah Hachareidis, rose and expressed the appreciation of the assembled rabbonim to Rav Sternbuch for carrying the needs of the community and assisting its members both spiritually and materially.

Following the gathering, large crowds accompanied Rav Sternbuch from the Dushinsky bais medrash through the streets of Yerushalayim, escorting him with great honor as far as Shmuel Hanavi Street. From there, Rav Sternbuch returned to his home in Har Nof.

{Matzav.com}

With 42 days remaining until Israel’s election for the 26th Knesset, a new Channel 14 poll released Tuesday night shows the right-wing bloc retaining a 64-seat majority, while the left-wing bloc receives 44 seats and the two Arab lists combine for 12. The overall bloc breakdown is unchanged from Channel 14’s previous survey on September 9.

Likud remains the largest party in the poll with 30 seats, down one from the previous survey. Gadi Eisenkot’s Yashar party also loses one seat, falling from 22 to 21. Shas remains unchanged at 10 seats, while the Democrats rise by one to nine.

Naftali Bennett’s Beyachad, United Torah Judaism, Otzma Yehudit and the Religious Zionism-Zehut alliance each receive eight seats. Beyachad and United Torah Judaism each gain one seat from the previous Channel 14 poll, while Otzma Yehudit and Religious Zionism-Zehut remain unchanged.

Among the remaining parties, the Joint List rises from six seats to seven, while Avigdor Lieberman’s Yisrael Beytenu drops from seven to six. Ra’am falls from six seats to five. Together, the two Arab lists continue to account for 12 seats.

Several parties remain below the electoral threshold. Ofer Winter’s Amcha Yisrael increases slightly from 2.1% to 2.3%, while the Reservists-Economic Party rises from 1.4% to 2.1%. Blue and White receives 0.4%, Noam 0.3%, and the Haredi Public Party 0.2%. None would enter the Knesset based on this survey.

The poll also asked respondents which of several candidates they considered most suitable to serve as prime minister. Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu received 51%, unchanged from the previous Channel 14 survey. Eisenkot received 35%, up one percentage point, while Bennett fell two points to 9% and Lieberman rose one point to 5%. These figures represent responses to this specific Channel 14/NEXT DATA survey rather than a forecast of the election result.

In a separate head-to-head question asking respondents to choose between Netanyahu and Eisenkot, 53% selected Netanyahu and 47% selected Eisenkot, the same breakdown recorded in the previous survey.

The poll was conducted on September 15 by NEXT DATA among 483 adults from the general population, with the results analyzed by pollster Shlomo Filber.

{Matzav.com}

The mother of a married avreich who was arrested at the Taba border crossing while traveling to Uman has accused Israeli military authorities of denying her son and other detained yeshivah bochurim basic rights, including telephone calls, family visits, access to lawyers and proper personal supplies.

Speaking in an interview with Kol Chai’s Central Edition, the mother described the ordeal her family has faced since her son was detained last Thursday and transferred to Military Prison 10. She said the family was never formally notified of his arrest and was forced to determine his whereabouts on its own.

“We live in a democratic country, not a Third World country where people are kidnapped by a military junta in the dead of night. No authorized official informed me that my son had been arrested and was in Prison 10. Because of a phone call his wife received, I was forced to begin tracing his steps and searching for where my son was being held.”

The mother said many of the young men now facing arrest had previously attempted to resolve their military status through official channels, only to encounter repeated bureaucratic obstacles.

“They tried to resolve the matter and leave legally, but all of their requests on the websites were rejected. They sent young men from the Yerushalayim area all the way to recruitment offices in Be’er Sheva or Haifa, and when they arrived, they were told that they were late. Bureaucratic callousness.”

She went on to allege that the treatment of the detainees following their arrests has included the denial of telephone access and personal necessities, along with expedited disciplinary proceedings conducted without legal representation.

“To this day, I have not received even one phone call from him to know that he is under arrest. The supplies we sent him to the prison disappeared along the way, and basic requests for hygiene supplies were denied. They brought them supplies in garbage bags in a horrifying manner. They have all already been tried without legal advice and without a lawyer. They are pressured to stand trial immediately, the judging officer sentences them to days of confinement at his discretion without a written explanation and without protocols that can be appealed. The rights of these young men are simply being erased.”

She added that her son’s status as a married man should entitle him to additional rights while in custody, but claimed those requests had also been rejected.

“We are talking about a married man, and according to the law he is entitled to rights such as a family visit, but they denied all the requests.”

Concluding the interview, the mother issued an emotional appeal to the authorities, contrasting what she described as the treatment afforded to imprisoned Nukhba terrorists with that received by the chareidi detainees.

“Nukhba terrorists walk around the prison and they check whether they have fruit or not, and my son isn’t allowed a single phone call! If you established a special task force to arrest them – it is your obligation to give them the rights they are entitled to under the law.”