Maklev Blasts Funding Disparity, Says Religious Councils Face Unfair Budget Burden
United Torah Judaism chairman MK Uri Maklev sharply criticized Israel’s funding model for religious councils during a heated Finance Committee meeting Tuesday, arguing that religious services are subjected to an unfair budget structure not imposed on other public services.
What began as a technical discussion regarding local government participation rates quickly evolved into a broader debate over the status and funding of religious services in Israel.
Earlier in the day, the Finance Committee approved participation rates for local authorities in funding religious councils, including a redistribution plan under which approximately NIS 36 million will be transferred from financially stronger municipalities to weaker ones.
During the discussion, Maklev questioned why religious services receive significantly less state support than other public sectors.
“Is there any other field in which the state’s participation is so low?” Maklev asked.
He argued that while the government covers the overwhelming majority of costs in education, welfare, and other public services, local authorities continue to shoulder a substantial portion of the expenses associated with religious services.
According to Maklev, the arrangement has existed for years and has created ongoing challenges for the development and expansion of religious services throughout the country.
“When it comes to education, welfare, and other public services, the state funds most of the costs,” he said. “Yet when it comes to religious services, we find ourselves fighting every year for budgets and even for the continued existence of those services.”
Maklev warned that the impact is felt most acutely in financially struggling municipalities that have difficulty meeting their required share of the funding burden. In many cases, he said, this hampers the day-to-day operation of religious services and limits their ability to expand.
During the hearing, Maklev sought clarification on how municipal participation rates are determined and what criteria are used to allocate responsibility among local governments.
Government representatives responded that the formula is established by law and is determined jointly by the Finance Ministry, Interior Ministry, and Ministry of Religious Services.
Maklev, however, maintained that the funding mechanism itself is fundamentally flawed.
“Marriage services, burial services, mikvaos, kashrus, and rabbinical services are not luxuries,” he stressed. “These are basic services to which every citizen is entitled. There is no reason the state should treat them as less important than education or welfare services.”
At the conclusion of the session, the Finance Committee approved the 2026 funding guidelines for religious councils. Under the arrangement, roughly NIS 36 million will be redistributed from wealthier municipalities to weaker ones while maintaining the overall budget framework.
Under the approved formula, stronger municipalities will contribute a larger percentage toward the budgets of their religious councils, while weaker municipalities will contribute less, with local participation rates ranging from 25% to 75%.
UTJ officials noted that the approval follows extensive work with government ministries aimed at ensuring the continued operation of religious councils nationwide.
Still, Maklev’s central question remained unresolved: Why are religious services funded under a model that differs so dramatically from virtually every other public service provided by the state?
{Matzav.com}