Feed aggregator

Dear Matzav Inbox,

I’m writing this because my heart is heavy, and I suspect I’m not the only one feeling this way.

We just went through another month of Nissan and moved into Iyar. In our circles, this time of year is about Sefirah, about the mourning for the talmidim of Rabbi Akiva who didn’t show enough kavod to one another. We talk about it in every shul, we learn the Gemara in Yevamos, and we warn our children about the dangers of Sinas Chinam.

But then I step outside, or I open a group chat, or I sit at a Shabbos table, and I see a different reality.

I see Yiden—good, erliche Yiden—who can spend three hours debating a Tosafos but can’t spend three minutes acknowledging the neshama of a brother who wears a different colored yarmulke. I see the way we talk about the “other side”—the ones who say Hallel today, or the ones who see the hand of Hashem in the State.

We’ve turned our hashkafic differences into a reason to delegitimize another person’s entire existence. We treat a fellow Jew like a project to be corrected or a threat to be avoided.

I’m not a politician, and I’m not a posek. I’m just a Yid who is tired. I’m tired of the labels. I’m tired of the “Us vs. Them” mentality that has seeped into our kehillos.

How can we look at a fellow Yid—someone who is sincerely expressing Hakaras HaTov to the Ribono Shel Olam, even if it’s in a way our Rabbanim don’t subscribe to—and feel anything but a sense of shared connection? We are so quick to judge the method that we completely ignore the sincerity of the heart. We are so focused on being “correct” that we forget to be “kind.”

The Chofetz Chaim says that the Beis HaMikdash is waiting for one thing: for us to stop being “right” and start being brothers. We are so busy guarding the walls that we’ve forgotten who we’re supposed to be guarding them for.

To my fellow readers who feel this “ache” in the middle: You aren’t alone. It’s okay to love a Jew you don’t agree with. In fact, it might be the only chumra that actually brings Mashiach.

Let’s stop the argument for just a moment. Let’s try to see the Pintele Yid again. Because at the end of the day, when we stand before the Kisei HaKavod, Hashem isn’t going to ask us if we were “right” about the State. He’s going to ask us if we loved His children.

A Pained Reader (Name withheld by request)

To submit a letter to appear on Matzav.com, email MatzavInbox@gmail.com

DON’T MISS OUT! Join the Matzav Status by CLICKING HERE. Join the Matzav WhatsApp Groups by CLICKING HERE.

The opinions expressed in letters on Matzav.com do not necessarily reflect the stance of the Matzav Media Network.

Rav Eliyahu Dermer zt”l, one of the veteran talmidim of Yeshivas Chevron and a central pillar in the kollelim of Meah Shearim and Perushim, has passed away at the age of 93.

Rav Eliyahu was born in Romania on the 13th of Kislev 5693 to his father Rav Mordechai Dermer zt”l and his mother Rebbetzin Rivah a”h. A survivor from the era of the churban in Europe, he came from a lineage tracing back to the Be’er Mayim Chaim.

At the young age of 14, he was deported to a labor camp. After arriving in Eretz Yisroel, he learned in his youth at Yeshivas Knesses Yisroel–Chevron. Upon reaching marriageable age, he married the daughter of Rav Yitzchok Rosenthal zt”l, founder of Kollel Midrash Bnei Tzion and author of the Kerem Tzion on Seder Zeraim.

Throughout his life, he was deeply connected to chinuch and dedicated himself to imparting Toras hamussar with depth and elevated thought. He was known for his unwavering hasmadah in learning, his inner connection to Torah, and his quiet, humble conduct in all his ways.

He was among the longtime members of Kollel Chevron–Bais Medrash Perushim in Givat Shaul, a longstanding pillar in Kollel Meah Shearim, and served as a maggid shiur in the Or HaTorah shul in Maaleh Adumim. He also played a role in establishing Talmud Torah HaMesorah in Yerushalayim and strengthened the field of STa”M together with leading sofrim from the previous dor. Those who knew him describe a person who was maavir al midosav in an exceptional way.

He merited to build a distinguished family.

He was laid to rest on Har HaZeisim.

The family is sitting shivah at his home, 15 Rechov Amos in Yerushalayim.

Tehei nishmaso tzerurah b’tzror hachaim.

Smokers and users of alternative nicotine products in Israel are expected to face higher costs under a proposed tax overhaul that targets vaping devices and tobacco pouches, even as taxes on e-liquid are set to drop significantly.

Under the plan, a new purchase tax will be imposed for the first time on electronic cigarette vaping devices, alongside a levy of roughly 350 shekels per kilogram on tobacco and nicotine pouches. At the same time, the tax on vaping liquid will be sharply reduced to one shekel per milliliter, a move aimed at curbing black market activity while shifting the financial burden toward equipment and newer nicotine products.

According to reports, the draft legislation proposes a one-shekel-per-milliliter tax on vaping liquid, a 10-shekel tax on vaping devices, and a levy of approximately 350 shekels per kilogram on tobacco and nicotine pouches.

The Israel Tax Authority has published the proposal for public comment. Once Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich signs the order, it can take effect quickly without requiring full legislative approval in three readings, as the finance minister holds authority to set tax rates. The only requirement for implementation is approval by the Knesset Finance Committee.

If lawmakers oppose the measure, the full Knesset would need to convene and revoke the order by a simple majority. A similar situation occurred with a previous order adjusting the VAT exemption threshold on personal imports, which was initially canceled before being revised and reissued. In that case, the Federation of Israeli Chambers of Commerce petitioned the High Court of Justice, and the Finance Committee also voiced opposition. The Knesset is expected to revisit that issue in the coming weeks. In contrast, widespread opposition to the new vaping tax proposal is not anticipated.

The legislation also includes tighter oversight of taxation on electronic cigarettes. Originally part of broader budget legislation, it was separated because it was not directly tied to the state budget and will now be reviewed independently by the Finance Committee after the minister signs the order.

In addition, the government is advancing a broader restructuring of how electronic cigarettes and emerging smoking products are taxed, following recommendations from a professional committee and a cabinet decision issued in December 2025. The proposal introduces, for the first time, a purchase tax on vaping devices themselves while significantly lowering the tax on the liquid component.

Until now, tax policy on e-cigarettes has focused mainly on the liquid, similar to traditional cigarettes and rolling tobacco. However, the committee concluded that electronic cigarettes should be treated as a distinct product, with the liquid not representing the primary component in terms of either cost or usage.

The panel highlighted two main reasons: first, the liquid cannot be used without the device; second, the production cost of the liquid is minimal compared to that of the device. As a result, it recommended viewing the product as a combined unit — device and liquid — and adjusting taxation accordingly.

A central goal of the reform is to eliminate the black market. Officials say that the previously high tax on vaping liquid encouraged widespread illegal trade. Lowering the tax on liquid while introducing a levy on devices is intended to draw businesses back into the legal market and improve compliance. Over time, policymakers say, tax rates could be gradually increased once the system stabilizes.

The reform extends beyond e-cigarettes. In response to the growing range of smoking alternatives introduced over the past decade, the proposal also seeks to apply purchase taxes to products containing tobacco, tobacco substitutes, and nicotine — including both tobacco and nicotine pouches. Alongside these tax changes, the government is promoting additional legislation to regulate smoking products for taxation purposes, including updated licensing, reporting, and enforcement requirements across the supply chain. That measure has already passed its first reading as part of the 2026 economic program.

{Matzav.com}

Americans could enter the next respiratory illness season without clear federal direction on COVID-19 shots and updated flu vaccines after a recent court decision disrupted the nation’s vaccine advisory system, raising uncertainty about whether some new immunizations will be covered by insurance.

The ruling, issued by Boston-based U.S. District Judge Brian Murphy, halted the work of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, the panel that provides guidance to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on vaccine use.

Murphy determined that most members of a panel appointed last year by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. lacked proper qualifications and ordered their decisions suspended, effectively reinstating the prior childhood immunization schedule that Kennedy and his allies had sought to overhaul.

As a result, the CDC is currently without a functioning advisory group to issue recommendations on new vaccines or updated uses for existing ones.

“It’s just uncharted territory,” said Dr. Demetre Daskalakis, former director of the CDC’s National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, who left the agency last year in protest over Kennedy’s moves to rewrite U.S. vaccine policies.

Experts warn that without recommendations from the advisory panel, newly approved vaccines and expanded uses—while still legal—may not be covered by insurers or included in federal programs, according to Dr. William Schaffner, an infectious disease specialist at Vanderbilt University and a longtime adviser to the panel.

Kennedy has not yet announced whether he will attempt to restructure the advisory committee under its revised charter, appeal the ruling, or pursue both options.

The Department of Health and Human Services, which Kennedy oversees, did not respond to inquiries regarding the future of the advisory panel or vaccine guidance.

Uncertainty is particularly high surrounding updated COVID-19 vaccines.

Typically, the advisory panel reviews and revises recommendations for flu and COVID shots during its June meeting. Seasonal flu vaccines already carry a long-standing universal recommendation for individuals six months and older, meaning they may not require a fresh vote this year, according to former CDC officials speaking to Reuters.

COVID-19 vaccines may be treated differently, however, because they target a newer virus and have a shorter history of use. Their safety profile has been a central focus of the advisory panel under Kennedy, who has long been associated with vaccine skepticism.

“You could argue that it’s recommended because it’s on the (immunization) schedule, or that it’s not because the previous recommendations were for the 2025-26 vaccine,” said one former CDC vaccine official, who requested anonymity, of COVID shots.

The health insurance industry group America’s Health Insurance Plans has said it will continue covering vaccines that had been recommended by the advisory panel as of September 1, 2025, through the end of 2026, before major revisions to the schedule were proposed.

An industry source said insurers will continue to rely on the latest medical evidence and clinical guidance from professional organizations such as the American Academy of Pediatrics, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

The court’s order has also created uncertainty around Merck’s Enflonsia, a monoclonal antibody treatment designed to prevent RSV infection in infants. The advisory panel had voted in June to recommend the therapy, though Merck has said the product is not central to the legal dispute.

“We have not ⁠heard of any changes to the availability of Enflonsia,” said Claire Hannan, executive director of the Association of Immunization Managers, a national group representing state and local immunization officials.

Several vaccines that have already received approval from the Food and Drug Administration are still awaiting advisory panel recommendations. These include three RSV vaccines for adults ages 18 to 49 at elevated risk: Pfizer’s Abrysvo, Moderna’s mResvia, and GlaxoSmithKline’s Arexvy.

At present, RSV vaccines are recommended only for adults 75 and older, as well as those between 50 and 74 who face higher risk. The advisory panel had also been expected to consider whether seniors who already received an RSV shot should get a booster.

Other ongoing work typically handled by the panel has been stalled as well, including a long-term review examining whether fewer doses of the HPV vaccine could still effectively prevent cervical cancer.

“That’s the type of work the ACIP should be doing,” said Dr. Jose Romero, a former ACIP chair. “They may be derailed from that.”

The disruption could also impact vaccines expected to receive FDA approval later this year.

Under its newly issued charter, the advisory panel is still directed to review vaccines at its first meeting following FDA authorization. Without an active panel, however, newly approved products could remain available without any formal federal recommendation.

That includes Moderna’s experimental mRNA-based flu vaccine, which would be the first of its kind in the United States. A decision from the FDA is anticipated by early August.

Recommendations from the advisory panel would also be necessary if a Lyme disease vaccine being developed by Pfizer and Valneva secures approval. Although the vaccine did not meet its primary endpoint, it demonstrated roughly 70 percent effectiveness in a late-stage trial, and Pfizer has indicated it plans to seek authorization.

“If the vaccine is not fully recommended and it’s a newer vaccine, will the payers pay?” said Michael Osterholm, an infectious disease expert at the University of Minnesota. “We don’t have any guarantee of that.”

{Matzav.com}

Professor Alan Dershowitz announced that he is switching parties after nearly seven decades as a Democrat, saying he plans to register as a Republican.

The longtime Harvard Law School professor emeritus explained his decision in an op-ed published in the Wall Street Journal, pointing to the Democratic Party’s position on Israel as the decisive factor. While noting that he still disagrees with Republicans on issues such as abortion, immigration, healthcare, taxation, and church-state separation, he said he is nonetheless making a full shift.

“By registering as a Republican rather than an independent, maybe I can have some influence on moving some Republican policies toward the center. I have given up on trying to change the Democratic Party,” he lamented.

Reaction from left-leaning figures was immediate and largely celebratory, with little indication of disappointment over his departure.

“I can’t think of anything better for the Democratic Party than Alan Dershowitz not being a part of it,” former Obama national security adviser Ben Rhodes wrote on X.

Others were even more blunt in their criticism. “Good riddance to bigoted Epstein Air frequent flier and atrocity denier Alan Dershowitz,” wrote Dylan Williams, vice president for government affairs at the Center for International Policy.

Some voices on the right also expressed skepticism about Dershowitz’s move. Conservative activist Christopher Rufo characterized him as part of what he called “the Right is a dumping ground for failed celebrities and MeToo cases.”

{Matzav.com}

A moving memorial ceremony was held Tuesday at the cemetery in Kfar HaRif to honor victims of the October 7 massacre, where former hostage Eli Sharabi visited the graves of his wife and daughters, who were murdered in their home, as well as his brother, who was killed in Hamas captivity.

The event took place as part of Israel’s Memorial Day for fallen soldiers and victims of terror. Sharabi paid tribute at the graves of his wife, Lian, and daughters, Noya and Yahli, who were killed during the attack in Be’eri, and at the grave of his brother Yossi, who was abducted and later murdered in captivity.

“The day you were taken in unimaginable cruelty is the day our lives took a turn with no way back,” Sharabi said in an emotional eulogy, adding, “your light has not gone out. It has become a light that leads me, that gives strength even when it’s hard to rise.”

Reflecting on his life with his wife, he said, “we shared the tasks of the home, which were much more than food. They were the smells and tastes of a home, they were a hug.” Speaking about his daughters, he added, “I miss the sounds of you in the house, the footsteps, the laughter, the cries of ‘Abba’ that fill the space.” He explained that “the longing does not weaken, it only changes form. It is present in the quiet of the house, at the Friday table, in the laughter that is no longer heard.”

Sharabi, a resident of Kibbutz Be’eri, was kidnapped during the October 7, 2023 attack carried out by Hamas terrorists. He was freed in February 2025 after 491 days in captivity. During the massacre, his wife and two daughters were murdered, while his brother Yossi, who was also taken hostage, was killed after 100 days in captivity.

In June of that year, Sharabi published a memoir titled “Chatuf” (“Hostage”), recounting his experiences in Hamas captivity. The book quickly became the fastest-selling title in Hebrew publishing history, with more than 20,000 copies sold within five days, earning it “Gold Book” status.

Two months later, the book reached “Platinum Book” status after surpassing 70,000 copies sold, and in September it achieved “Diamond Book” recognition with more than 100,000 copies sold.

An English edition was released on October 7, 2025, and within a week of its publication in the United States, it climbed to fourth place on the The New York Times bestseller list and was included among the 100 books to read in 2025.

Sen. Chris Murphy is facing sharp backlash after reacting positively to a disputed report claiming that dozens of Iranian vessels slipped past the U.S. naval blockade, a response he later said was meant as sarcasm.

The controversy began when Murphy responded on X to a report by Lloyd’s List, a maritime publication, which claimed that at least 26 Iranian “shadow fleet” ships had evaded U.S. enforcement.

“Awesome,” Murphy (D-Conn.) posted on X in response to a report from the shipping journal Lloyd’s List claiming that at least 26 so-called “shadow fleet” vessels had eluded the American shipping siege.

After drawing widespread criticism, Murphy said his comment was not meant to praise Iran or the situation, but rather to criticize the handling of the conflict.

“Ok Twitter, I can’t believe I need to clarify this but obviously Trump’s bungled mismanagement of this war is not ‘awesome,’” Murphy posted on X.

“As I have said a million times here, it’s a disaster and he should end the war immediately. My tweet was something called ‘sarcasm.’”

He later acknowledged the confusion his comment caused, telling a reporter, “I just have to be more careful about sarcasm on Twitter” in the future.

The Pentagon also rejected the underlying report. Chief spokesperson Sean Parnell dismissed it as “false” and criticized Murphy’s reaction as “shameful” in a social media response.

Even within Democratic circles, the post drew criticism. One Democratic staffer told The Post that Murphy’s comment was inappropriate given the seriousness of the issue, saying, “Stupid sarcasm over life or death issues is beneath a senator.”

The same staffer added that while Murphy may have intended sarcasm, the political context made the remark problematic: “Was it sarcasm? Certainly,” the staffer insisted. “But when so many on the far-left have been openly cheering for the Iranian regime (see Calla Walsh), and when Murphy has shown a willingness to play to the far-left when it suits him politically, Republicans can hardly be blamed for taking him at his word.

“If a Republican had posted something like this in reverse, you bet … Dems would be hitting them for it.”

Murphy, a vocal critic of the war with Iran, has repeatedly condemned U.S. policy in recent weeks. During a trip to Spain, he warned that the United States is facing “the most significant threat to American democracy since the Civil War.”

“We are not on the verge of a totalitarian takeover, we are in the middle of it,” he fumed, urging global progressives to “beat back the forces of fascism.”

Murphy serves on several key foreign policy panels, including the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Homeland Security, and had previously been mentioned as a potential secretary of state candidate if Kamala Harris had won the 2024 election.

The initial post triggered a wave of criticism online, with detractors accusing Murphy of appearing to support a hostile regime.

Sen. Rick Scott condemned the remark, calling Murphy an “embarrassment to the Senate” and accusing him of “rooting for enemy terrorists who target and kill Americans.” He added, “He should be stripped of his assignment to the Foreign Relations Committee NOW!”

Republicans echoed that criticism through official channels, writing, “Senate Democrats are expected to disagree with Republicans. But cheering for our enemy, especially for a regime that has killed so many American citizens, is beyond the pale. Democrats in Congress ought to condemn this disgusting remark,” the Senate GOP X account said.

Conservative commentators also piled on. “’Go Iran!’ exclaimed the United States Senator,” wrote pundit Stephen L. Miller. Chaya Raichik added, “You’re a traitor,” while Laura Loomer wrote, “You should be removed from the Senate. You are a national security threat.”

Will Chamberlain commented, “Really is awesome to have an Iranian agent in the United States Senate. Much diversity!” and Ian Miles Cheong added, “I wonder how US troops feel about one of their elected senators actively rooting against them.”

The controversy comes as tensions continue to rise following the U.S. decision to impose a blockade on Iran last week. President Donald Trump ordered the move after Iran disrupted shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, a key global oil chokepoint through which a significant share of the world’s energy supply passes.

{Matzav.com}

International air travel to and from Israel is rebounding, with a growing number of foreign carriers resuming operations at Ben Gurion Airport and restoring competition on key routes for Israeli travelers.

In recent days, the return of overseas airlines has accelerated, as multiple international carriers officially restarted flights connecting Israel with destinations across Europe, Asia, and the Gulf region.

The first foreign airline to resume service was Blue Bird Airways, which relaunched its Tel Aviv–Athens route on April 12.

Two days later, on April 14, additional carriers followed. TUS Airways resumed flights to Larnaca in Cyprus, while Uzbekistan Airways began operating a weekly route to Israel.

On April 15, Etihad Airways reinstated service, now running multiple daily flights between Tel Aviv and Abu Dhabi.

The following day, April 16, Flydubai returned to the Israeli market. Known for being among the first to resume operations after disruptions, the airline is currently offering two daily flights to Dubai.

Alongside these carriers, several others have also resumed activity in Israel, including Sky Express, Ethiopian Airlines, Red Wings Airlines, Hainan Airlines, HiSky, and Belavia.

The renewed presence of these airlines signals a broader reopening of Israel’s skies, significantly expanding travel options and restoring competitive pricing on some of the most in-demand international routes.

{Matzav.com}

President Donald Trump announced Tuesday that the United States will prolong its ceasefire with Iran for an additional period, explaining that the move is justified because Iran’s leadership is “seriously fractured.”

According to Trump, the pause in hostilities—previously expected to expire on Wednesday—will now remain in effect “until such time as” Iranian officials present a “unified proposal” aimed at bringing the conflict with the United States and Israel to an end.

The decision followed developments suggesting a breakdown in diplomatic momentum. Plans for Vice President JD Vance to travel to Pakistan for another round of negotiations with Iranian representatives were reportedly shelved, and Iran’s semi-official Tasnim news agency indicated that Tehran had already signaled it would not participate in additional talks through intermediaries in Pakistan.

“Iran ultimately announced today that under these circumstances, attending the negotiations is a waste of time because the US prevents reaching any suitable agreement,” Tasnim reported.

Earlier in the day, Trump appeared reluctant to extend the ceasefire during an appearance on CNBC’s “Squawk Box,” stating, “I don’t want to do that,” when questioned about whether he would allow more time for negotiations to produce a deal.

In a formal statement later, Trump pointed to both Iran’s internal instability and appeals from Pakistani leadership as factors behind his decision. “Based on the fact that the Government of Iran is seriously fractured, not unexpectedly so and, upon the request of Field Marshal Asim Munir, and Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, of Pakistan, we have been asked to hold our Attack on the Country of Iran until such time as their leaders and representatives can come up with a unified proposal,” Trump said in a statement.

He added that U.S. forces would maintain their current posture while awaiting a diplomatic outcome. “I have therefore directed our Military to continue the Blockade and, in all other respects, remain ready and able, and will therefore extend the Ceasefire until such time as their proposal is submitted, and discussions are concluded, one way or the other,” the president said.

President Donald Trump reiterated Tuesday that the ceasefire extension reflects the fractured state of Iran’s leadership, emphasizing again that the United States will wait “until such time as” a “unified proposal” is submitted before taking further action.

The announcement came amid the same backdrop of stalled diplomacy, including the postponed Pakistan trip by Vice President JD Vance and reports from Tasnim that Iranian negotiators had declined further engagement through intermediaries.

“Iran ultimately announced today that under these circumstances, attending the negotiations is a waste of time because the US prevents reaching any suitable agreement,” Tasnim reported.

Trump had earlier expressed hesitation about prolonging the truce, telling CNBC’s “Squawk Box,” “I don’t want to do that,” when asked about giving negotiations more time.

Reiterating his rationale, Trump again referenced Iran’s internal divisions and the involvement of Pakistani officials. “Based on the fact that the Government of Iran is seriously fractured, not unexpectedly so and, upon the request of Field Marshal Asim Munir, and Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, of Pakistan, we have been asked to hold our Attack on the Country of Iran until such time as their leaders and representatives can come up with a unified proposal,” Trump said in a statement.

He concluded by stressing that U.S. forces remain on alert as the extension takes effect. “I have therefore directed our Military to continue the Blockade and, in all other respects, remain ready and able, and will therefore extend the Ceasefire until such time as their proposal is submitted, and discussions are concluded, one way or the other,” the president said.

New legislation in the New York State Senate would require hospitals, morgues and other institutions to contact Jewish burial organizations before disposing of certain unclaimed bodies.

The bill, S 9930, introduced on April 16 by Democratic state senator Sam Sutton, who is Jewish, is modeled in part on a recently passed Kentucky law. It would require that, if an unclaimed deceased person is known to be of Jewish descent, officials notify organizations such as Misaskim and Chesed Shel Emes to determine whether they are willing to assume responsibility for burial and related costs.

“The legislation was developed after we became aware of the Kentucky bill during discussions with some of our constituents,” Noam Abrahams, Sutton’s communications director, told JNS.

The measure specifies that the legislation would not override prior written directives from the deceased regarding organ donations.

Abrahams said the Kentucky legislation “served as a useful reference point as we explored how to approach this issue in New York. We certainly think it establishes an approach easily adapted to other states.” That law, signed by Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear on April 13, requires officials to consult with religious organizations willing to provide burial before deciding to cremate an unclaimed body, after efforts to locate next of kin.

“Besides the religious significance, the senator believes this bill reaffirms New York’s commitment to accommodating religious practices and cultural traditions, as well as promotes clearer guidelines and consistency for institutions responsible for handling human remains,” Abrahams told JNS.

“We hope this sensitivity will strengthen trust between our state’s communities of faith and public institutions,” he said. “We believe the bill may also reduce public costs associated with burial or cremation.”

Rabbi Shlomo Litvin, director of Chabad of the Bluegrass and a key figure behind the Kentucky legislation, called Sutton’s proposal “a living example” of the teachings of the Lubavitcher Rebbe, Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson.

“One mitzvah in one place helps a Jew across the world,” he told JNS.

The New York bill has been referred to the Senate Health Committee. JNS

{Matzav.com}

U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee has been instructed to return to Washington for high-level talks as tensions involving Iran continue to unfold, according to a Tuesday night report by N12 quoted by the Jerusalem Post.

The development came after President Donald Trump indicated earlier in the day that he is not inclined to prolong the current ceasefire arrangement with Iran. Speaking in an interview with CNBC, Trump dismissed the idea of an extension.

“I don’t want to do that. We don’t have that much time,” Trump said when asked about the possibility of extending the ceasefire.

Meanwhile, Iranian officials struck a combative tone, warning of swift retaliation if hostilities resume. A senior military commander said Tuesday that Iran’s armed forces stand ready to launch an “immediate and decisive response” to any aggression, according to the semi-official Tasnim news agency.

{Matzav.com}

President Donald Trump on Tuesday commended companies that have chosen not to seek repayment of tariffs recently struck down by the Supreme Court, calling their decision “brilliant” and signaling that he is taking note.

During an interview on CNBC, Trump said he plans to keep in mind which American businesses decide against pursuing what could amount to billions of dollars in reimbursements following the court’s decision to nullify tariffs enacted during his administration.

“It’s brilliant if they don’t do that,” Trump said when asked about firms choosing not to seek refunds. “I actually think if they don’t do that, they got to know me very well.

“I’m very honored by what you just said. If they don’t do that, I’ll remember them. I will tell you that because I’m looking to make this country strong.”

His comments come after U.S. Customs and Border Protection launched a system enabling importers to request more than $160 billion in repayments tied to tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.

The Supreme Court’s ruling effectively wiped out those tariffs, prompting major corporations to weigh whether to file claims for reimbursement.

Trump portrayed companies opting not to pursue refunds as demonstrating support for his economic policies, which have consistently relied on tariffs to shield domestic industries and address trade imbalances.

He also delivered sharp criticism of the court’s decision, arguing that it should have included language allowing the government to retain previously collected funds.

“The Supreme Court didn’t want to save our country with one sentence,” Trump said, lamenting that billions of dollars would now be returned, including to foreign entities he described as unfriendly to the United States.

Trump has long promoted tariffs as a central element of his “America First” economic agenda, maintaining that they help counteract unfair trade practices by other nations.

While in office, his administration imposed tariffs on a broad array of imports, particularly targeting goods from China as part of a wider effort to boost domestic manufacturing.

CNBC reported that several major corporations, including Apple and Amazon, have yet to apply for refunds, potentially due to concerns about political ramifications or future trade considerations.

Trump indicated that companies taking that approach would not be overlooked.

Some retailers, however, are expected to gain significantly if they move forward with refund claims.

Businesses such as Levi Strauss & Co. have projected they could recover tens of millions of dollars, while others like Gap Inc. have acknowledged the financial burden of tariffs but remain uncertain about the timing and scope of any repayments.

Despite the court’s ruling, Trump suggested that his administration is already pursuing alternative strategies to maintain a strong trade stance.

“We’re going to end up with the same numbers — actually bigger numbers,” he said, indicating that new tariff mechanisms could replace those struck down by the court.

The dispute over tariffs highlights the ongoing friction between executive trade policy and judicial review, while underscoring the significant financial implications for U.S. companies operating in a shifting economic environment.

{Matzav.com}

Vice President JD Vance has put off a scheduled visit to Pakistan and is instead staying in Washington to take part in policy discussions at the White House, administration officials said Tuesday.

Vance had been set to travel to Islamabad for negotiations that were expected to include Iranian representatives, as the current Middle East ceasefire approaches its expiration. U.S. officials are working to reach either a formal agreement or at least a preliminary framework with Iran, though no specific timeline for the trip or the anticipated meetings has been made public.

Other senior figures who were expected to join the delegation, including special envoy Steve Witkoff and presidential adviser Jared Kushner, are also remaining in the United States for now.

Earlier this month, Vance had traveled to Pakistan alongside Witkoff and Kushner to conduct discussions with Iranian officials.

After those meetings, Vance said Iran refused to make what the U.S. considers a critical commitment: a clear pledge not to pursue nuclear weapons.

The decision to delay the trip comes as negotiations appear to have stalled, with the administration continuing to evaluate its next course of action.

President Donald Trump indicated that the temporary halt in hostilities with Iran is not expected to continue past its scheduled expiration, raising the stakes for ongoing diplomatic efforts to reach a more permanent deal.

In remarks to Bloomberg News, Trump said the two-week ceasefire he announced earlier this month is set to end Wednesday evening and suggested there is little chance it will be prolonged unless negotiators achieve significant progress beforehand.

According to a report by The Hill, administration officials have conveyed that Trump is not interested in extending the arrangement and is instead pushing for a comprehensive agreement rather than another short-term extension.

Trump said, “We’ll see what happens,” but stressed that extending the ceasefire is “highly unlikely,” casting the deadline as a critical test for diplomacy.

He also signaled that U.S. pressure tactics connected to the standoff will remain in place, including measures impacting the Strait of Hormuz, a key artery for global oil transport.

Bloomberg News reported that the uncertainty surrounding the ceasefire has unsettled energy markets, with traders watching closely for signs of renewed instability in a region responsible for a large portion of the world’s oil supply.

Vice President JD Vance is expected to head to Pakistan in an effort to restart negotiations.

Trump said discussions could resume as early as this week as part of a diplomatic effort involving Islamabad.

The current ceasefire came after weeks of escalating tensions and direct military exchanges earlier this year, which had heightened concerns about a wider conflict before the pause in fighting was implemented.

Even with the truce in place, significant disagreements persist between Washington and Tehran over key issues such as Iran’s nuclear program, sanctions relief, and long-term security arrangements.

Bloomberg reported that U.S. officials are insisting on strict curbs to Iran’s nuclear activities, while Iranian leaders have pushed back against what they view as unreasonable demands alongside continued economic pressure.

The Hill similarly reported that the two sides remain far apart, with Iran signaling reluctance to reengage under current conditions and warning it will not negotiate under pressure.

Recent U.S. moves related to sanctions enforcement and maritime security have further strained the talks, with Iranian officials accusing Washington of eroding trust even as negotiations continue.

Trump has continued to say that an agreement is within reach, telling Bloomberg that progress can be made if Iran agrees to U.S. terms, while also warning that military options remain available if negotiations fail.

He has also indicated he may take a more direct role if talks move forward, while expressing doubt about whether Iran is prepared to compromise before the looming deadline.

The mixed messaging has left global markets and U.S. allies uncertain, as optimism for a diplomatic breakthrough is tempered by concerns that the situation could quickly deteriorate.

With the ceasefire set to expire in the coming days, officials and analysts cited by Bloomberg and The Hill say the next stretch of time will be decisive in determining whether negotiations can produce a lasting resolution or whether fighting will resume.

Former Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant said Tuesday that he was not given advance notice of critical warning signs prior to the October 7 massacre, shedding light on what he described as a major failure in communication at the top levels of Israel’s defense establishment.

Speaking in an interview with Channel 12, Gallant recounted what he characterized as a serious lapse on the night the attack unfolded. “They did not alert the defense minister,” he said. “They did not think the intelligence was important, and because of that they did not alert me.”

Gallant said the absence of timely updates directly affected how the situation could have been handled. “If I had been updated,” he said, “I would have asked ‘Let’s assume the assessment is not correct, what are the active measures on the ground?'”

He emphasized that once an attack is underway, even senior leadership has limited capacity to influence outcomes if troops are not already in position. “When forces are not pre-positioned, the Chief of Staff and the division commander have very limited ability to influence events in real time.”

At the same time, Gallant rejected the notion that political leaders simply relied passively on incomplete intelligence. He pointed to his own actions in the days leading up to the attack, describing an effort to personally evaluate conditions near the Gaza border. “Ten days before October 7, during Sukkot, I decided to travel to the Gaza Strip region,” he said. “They told me that the chief of staff and the division commander could not accompany me. I said, whoever is there should come. I stood and looked beyond the fence and asked, what’s happening?”

During that visit, Gallant said he encouraged soldiers to depend on their own observations rather than solely on intelligence briefings. “I told them: look through binoculars, see what’s happening in the west, be vigilant,” Gallant recalled.

Despite his criticism of how information was handled, Gallant acknowledged that responsibility extends beyond any single level of command and called for a formal national inquiry. “There are ten ranks below the defense minister. To say ‘they didn’t tell me’ – that’s shifting the responsibility downward. Hamas began to grow stronger a decade ago. Everyone who held a senior position in those years must come and explain.”

{Matzav.com}

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said Tuesday that the Pentagon will no longer require American service members to receive a yearly influenza vaccine, marking a significant change in military health policy.

In a video shared on X, Hegseth explained that troops will now have the option to decide for themselves whether to get a flu shot, rather than being subject to a blanket mandate across the force.

“The notion that a flu vaccine must be mandatory for every service member everywhere in every circumstance at all times is just overly broad and not rational,” he said.

Hegseth framed the move as part of a broader initiative by President Donald Trump’s administration to shift away from sweeping requirements and return more decision-making to individual service members.

“We’re seizing this moment to discard any absurd, overreaching mandates that only weaken our war-fighting capabilities. In this case, this includes the universal flu vaccine and the mandate behind it,” he said.

A directive signed by Hegseth on Monday formalized the change, stating that “effective immediately, the annual influenza vaccine is voluntary for all Active and Reserve Component Service members” as well as civilian personnel within the Defense Department.

The decision follows a gradual rollback of the military’s strict vaccination requirements. In a May 29, 2025 memo, Deputy Defense Secretary Steve Feinberg indicated the Pentagon would scale back its policy, writing that it would “conserve its resources by requiring seasonal flu vaccination for service members only when doing so most directly contributes to readiness.”

Under that earlier guidance, only reservists called to active duty for 30 days or longer would be required to receive the flu shot. The Pentagon also ended compensation for reservists and National Guard members who previously were paid for time spent obtaining the vaccine on their own.

Despite the policy shift, military health officials have continued to emphasize the importance of vaccination. The Navy and Marine Corps Force Health Protection Command has stated that seasonal flu vaccination “is the most effective control measure to reduce the risk of severe influenza and mission degradation, minimizing the risk to force.” It also cautioned that the virus can spread rapidly, and outbreaks “may be widespread and can adversely impact Navy and Marine Corps force readiness and mission execution.”

During the previous administration, the Pentagon had also imposed a requirement for all service members to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. Approximately 8,700 active-duty and reserve personnel left the military, either voluntarily or involuntarily, after declining the shot before that mandate was lifted in 2023.

After returning to office, President Trump signed an executive order allowing those who were discharged over the COVID vaccine refusal to seek reinstatement. By last August, fewer than two dozen had returned to service, although several hundred applications had been submitted.

Mandatory vaccinations have been part of military life since the early days of the United States. In 1777, George Washington ordered widespread inoculation of the Continental Army to protect soldiers from smallpox, according to a Congressional Research Service report from 2021. Today, the Defense Department continues to require various immunizations, including those for hepatitis B, polio, and measles, mumps, and rubella.

The flu vaccine itself was first required for military personnel in 1945, leading to the immunization of millions of troops. That policy was later dropped in 1949, reinstated in the early 1950s, and remained in place for decades until this latest announcement.

Drawing lessons from the October 7 attacks, the IDF has begun implementing a new approach to defending border communities by introducing light, fast-response vehicles equipped with mounted machine guns, aimed at providing immediate firepower without relying on air or heavy armored support.

The army has established a dedicated conversion line for Isuzu D-Max pickup trucks, outfitting them with mounted MAG machine guns. The initiative is being carried out at the IDF’s vehicle maintenance and upgrade center in Haifa, according to a report by Walla!.

The mounted weapon, installed in the rear of the pickup, will include partial ballistic protection designed to shield the operator from gunfire while still allowing full visibility and operational effectiveness. Until now, such machine guns were primarily deployed on heavy armored platforms, but adapting them to lighter vehicles is intended to provide border units with rapid-response firepower. The goal is to enable forces to react quickly to emerging threats without waiting for armed drones, attack helicopters, or heavy armored vehicles to arrive.

“This is an addition of lethality to border defense,” explained Lt. Col. Sh., commander of the mobility and heavy equipment plant within the IDF’s maintenance system. The concept, he noted, represents a return to earlier military doctrine. Light 4×4 vehicles equipped with machine guns were already in use in 1948 by the “Shimshon’s Foxes,” a well-known jeep unit of the Givati Brigade.

While the IDF’s central facility in Tel Hashomer focuses on producing Merkava tanks and Namer and Eitan armored personnel carriers, the Haifa center specializes in vehicle conversions and engineering equipment. Among its outputs are “Panther” vehicles, based on FMTV trucks, as well as modifications tailored for Israeli use of American-made Humvees and JLTVs. Dozens of vehicles are completed each month at the facility, which is staffed by both soldiers and civilian defense employees, and are then deployed directly to combat units operating in Gaza and Lebanon.

The Joint Light Tactical Vehicle, known in IDF service as the “Pereh,” is also undergoing significant armor upgrades at the site. In cooperation with Israeli companies Plasan and Taavura, a specialized version has been developed to transport up to ten soldiers, alongside another model equipped with a remotely operated weapon station that is already in use along Israel’s eastern border.

The U.S. Congress has approved Israel’s purchase of 3,250 JLTVs, with hundreds already ordered and more than 100 currently in active service.

Engineering design for the upgrades is led by a team headed by Lt. Col. G., which has focused not only on increasing combat effectiveness but also on improving conditions for troops. One key improvement has been reducing the high noise levels inside the vehicles. “We managed to lower the noise level, which also improves the quality of life for the crew so they don’t come out exhausted from the drive,” G. said.

At the same time, the IDF’s Technology and Logistics Directorate is in discussions with the U.S. Army about establishing a joint maintenance forum, modeled after existing cooperation frameworks between the Israeli Air Force and its American and German counterparts.

The Israeli military has taken disciplinary action following an investigation into an incident in southern Lebanon in which a soldier was recorded damaging a Christian symbol, with senior commanders reviewing the findings and implementing sanctions.

The results of the probe, along with recommendations from commanders, were presented Monday night to the commander of the 162nd Division, Brig. Gen. Sagiv Dahan.

According to the inquiry, the episode occurred during IDF operations near the Christian village of Debel. A soldier damaged a Yoshkah statue while another documented the act in a photograph that later circulated. Six additional soldiers were present and neither intervened nor reported what had taken place.

Investigators concluded that the actions of those involved were in complete violation of IDF directives and core values.

The IDF expressed “deep regret over the incident and emphasizes that its operations in Lebanon are directed solely against the Hezbollah terrorist organization and other terrorist groups, and not against Lebanese civilians.”

The military added that “from the moment the report of the incident was received, the IDF has been working to assist the local community in replacing the statue.”

After reviewing the findings, the division commander accepted both the conclusions and the disciplinary recommendations.

As a result, the soldier who damaged the symbol and the one who photographed the act will be removed from combat roles and sentenced to 30 days of military detention. The other soldiers who were present have been called in for clarification hearings, after which further command decisions will be made.

Following the incident, the army reinforced guidelines regarding proper conduct around religious sites and symbols ahead of troop deployments in the area, and said those directives will be reiterated across all units operating there.

The investigation’s conclusions were also submitted to the Chief of the General Staff and the head of the Northern Command.

The Chief of the General Staff strongly denounced the behavior, saying it represented unacceptable conduct and a serious moral failure that goes far beyond acceptable norms and stands in direct contradiction to IDF values and expectations for its soldiers.

By Rabbi Shalom Movshovitz 

The arrival of Argentina’s president into the main bais medrash of Chevron Yeshiva yesterday stirred broad discussion in the Torah community and was widely covered by Israel’s general media as well. There is no doubt that this was a historic moment for the olam haTorah, particularly at a time when it has been facing increasing public and media scrutiny.

The decision of a non-Jewish head of state to enter one of the world’s leading yeshivos while wearing a yarmulka is not something to be taken lightly. It carries symbolic and practical significance, including potential financial implications. The visit was organized by the yeshiva’s leadership, led by the Rosh Yeshiva, Hagaon Rav Dovid Cohen, a member of the Moetzes Gedolei HaTorah.

Precisely for that reason, it was especially disappointing to see members of the Israeli chareidi media themselves publicly rebuking the roshei yeshiva who arranged the visit, doing so from behind their keyboards and phones.

Is this really about concern over bitul Torah? Where does the confidence — or the audacity — come from to criticize gedolei Yisroel in general, and the leadership of a major yeshiva in particular? Do people truly understand the weight of responsibility carried by roshei yeshivos? Do they even understand what bitul Torah means?

When was the last time those offering such criticism sat down to learn a daf Gemara that they now feel entitled to lecture roshei yeshiva and gedolei Torah — individuals whose entire lives are dedicated to teaching and expanding Torah — about bitul Torah? Do they really believe they are in a position to define what Torah study lishmah looks like, while accusing others of neglecting it?

These words are written from pain. This is not an attempt to lecture the chareidi media or to educate anyone. But perhaps it is time to regain a sense of proportion — to recognize our place within the Torah hierarchy — before speaking out against the greatest leaders of the generation. A little humility would go a long way.

Approximately 40 Israeli travelers were detained upon arrival at Moscow’s Domodedovo International Airport, reportedly due to concerns tied to the ongoing conflict with Iran, according to multiple reports.

The passengers, who had flown in from Tel Aviv, included several individuals holding dual Israeli-Russian citizenship. They were held for several hours without access to basic necessities such as food, water, or restrooms, The Jerusalem Post reported.

During the detention, Russian officials allegedly demanded that passengers unlock their mobile phones. When travelers declined, authorities instructed them to power down all devices.

Some of those detained were taken aside for questioning, during which officials reportedly emphasized that Iran is an ally of Russia and suggested that those opposed to Iran are likewise opposed to Russia.

Passengers were also told that their presence in the country was unwelcome and that their trip had been pointless. Following the questioning, individuals were reportedly required to sign documents warning them against violating Russian law before being released.

Despite the situation, one source said officials were “very politely and carefully” processing the paperwork.

An Israeli source speaking to Ynet indicated that the number of detainees may have been slightly lower than initially reported, though still close to the figure cited.

Israel’s Foreign Ministry confirmed it intervened after learning of the incident. A spokesperson told The Jerusalem Post that “As soon as the incident became known, Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar directed ministry staff to act, along with the Russian Foreign Ministry and Israel’s Embassy in Moscow.”

“Following this intervention, the incident was resolved, and the Israelis’ entry was approved,” the spokesperson said.

“It was made clear to the Russians that this conduct was completely unacceptable and Israel views the incident very seriously,” they added.

{Matzav.com}