President Donald Trump sharply escalated his criticism of Mexico on Monday, alleging that the country is violating its decades-old water-sharing obligations and depriving Texas agriculture of essential resources. He charged that Mexico has fallen drastically short of delivering the water owed under the 1944 U.S.–Mexico Water Treaty and declared that he is prepared to slap an additional 5% tariff on Mexican goods if the situation is not remedied at once.
The treaty requires each country to send designated amounts of river water across the border—Mexico must transfer 1.75 million acre-feet from the Rio Grande over every five-year cycle. Trump argued on Truth Social that the current cycle has ended with Mexico “owing” roughly 800,000 acre-feet, an amount he says represents a blatant breach of the agreement. “Mexico continues to violate our comprehensive Water Treaty, and this violation is seriously hurting our BEAUTIFUL TEXAS CROPS AND LIVESTOCK,” he wrote, insisting that the deficit accumulated entirely “over the past five years.”
Trump demanded that Mexico begin by releasing 200,000 acre-feet before Dec. 31, stressing that the remainder must follow shortly afterward. He lamented that Mexico has not addressed the problem: “As of now, Mexico is not responding, and it is very unfair to our U.S. Farmers who deserve this much needed water.” He then announced a retaliatory step, saying, “That is why I have authorized documentation to impose a 5% Tariff on Mexico if this water isn’t released, IMMEDIATELY. The longer Mexico takes to release the water, the more our Farmers are hurt. Mexico has an obligation to FIX THIS NOW. Thank you for your attention to this matter!”
This is not Trump’s first warning. In an April 10 Truth Social post, he raised similar concerns, contending that Mexico had repeatedly shorted its treaty commitments. By late April, Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins stated that Mexico had agreed to increase deliveries in an effort to shrink the shortfall, noting that the arrangement provided immediate relief for the growing season while also laying out near-term commitments through the close of the five-year cycle in October.
Yet frustrations in Texas have only intensified. Last month, Gov. Greg Abbott again blasted Mexico for what he called chronic noncompliance. “Mexico must be held accountable for their continued breaches of our long-standing water agreement,” he said, arguing that farmers in the Rio Grande Valley are suffering the consequences. Abbott warned that “Texas farmers are enduring preventable hardship and an erosion of the agricultural viability of the Rio Grande Valley,” citing “almost 2 million acre-feet” in missing water across more than two years’ worth of obligations. He also emphasized that “The breach of the 1944 Water Treaty violates foundational elements of international law and diplomacy and must be corrected immediately.”
The treaty imposes reciprocal responsibilities: the U.S. must send 1.5 million acre-feet from the Colorado River to Mexico annually, while Mexico must fulfill its Rio Grande deliveries in cumulative five-year blocks. The most recent cycle fell so far short that Mexico delivered less than half of its promised supply.
Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum, speaking on Oct. 30, insisted her administration intends to meet the treaty’s terms. “There will be a delivery of water now that there are more resources, without putting human consumption and agriculture at risk,” she said, according to El País.
{Matzav.com}
President Donald Trump on Monday offered his most detailed explanation yet for why U.S. forces launched a second missile at a drug-smuggling vessel in the Caribbean, arguing that the two men who survived the initial strike were attempting to overturn their capsized boat. He said the military could not allow them to restore the vessel because “that boat was loaded up with drugs,” framing the follow-up strike as a necessary step to stop narcotrafficking at its source.
Trump also shifted his tone regarding public release of the classified footage. Days earlier, he told reporters he saw “no problem” with making the video public. On Monday, however, he insisted that the matter rests entirely with War Secretary Pete Hegseth. “Whatever Pete Hegseth wants to do is OK with me,” he said when pressed about the apparent change. He later rejected the idea that he had previously endorsed disclosure, despite having said last week, “Whatever they have we’d certainly release.”
Lawmakers, especially from the Democrat side, are demanding full visibility into the Sept. 2 mission. The operation, which unfolded in the Caribbean Sea, left nine people dead in the first strike and two more in the second. It marked the beginning of a months-long U.S. campaign targeting cartel-linked smuggling vessels across the Caribbean and eastern Pacific, a campaign that has now resulted in at least 87 fatalities across 22 acknowledged strikes. Congress is tightening its demands, inserting language into the upcoming $900 billion defense bill requiring the Pentagon to provide “unedited video of strikes” or face cuts to a quarter of Hegseth’s travel funding.
The Pentagon has yet to comment on Trump’s assertion that the survivors were trying to restore the overturned craft, nor has it addressed where Hegseth’s review stands. Over the weekend, Hegseth told Fox News that officials were still examining the footage, cautioning that “Whatever we were to decide to release, we’d have to be very responsible” about the implications of doing so.
Trump continues to frame the maritime strike campaign as integral to stopping fentanyl and other dangerous narcotics from reaching American shores. He has repeatedly said the United States is engaged in armed conflict with “narco-terrorists,” portraying the strikes as part of a broader national-security strategy that targets cartel networks tied to governments such as that of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro.
On Capitol Hill, reactions to the classified footage diverged sharply along party lines. Sen. Tom Cotton, who leads the Senate Intelligence Committee and was fully briefed by the Navy admiral overseeing the missions, said the video raised no concerns for him. “It’s not gruesome. I didn’t find it distressing or disturbing,” he said, adding that it resembled “any number of dozens of strikes we’ve seen on jeeps and pickup trucks in the Middle East over the years.” He has no objection to the footage being released to the public.
Democrat lawmakers who viewed the same material described the scenes very differently. Rep. Jim Himes said the footage “was profoundly shaking,” while Rep. Adam Smith said it “did not appear that these two survivors were in any position to continue the fight.” Both argued that the circumstances surrounding the second strike require further scrutiny, particularly regarding compliance with the laws of armed conflict.
Their concerns intensified after reports emerged about Adm. Frank “Mitch” Bradley’s testimony. Bradley told members of Congress that there was no directive from Hegseth to “kill them all,” but the full video sequence raised enough questions that lawmakers demanded additional explanations. Some legal scholars also weighed in, warning that killing survivors adrift at sea could constitute a breach of wartime legal standards.
Others, however, countered that interpretation, arguing that because the operation is classified as part of an armed campaign against narco-terrorist groups, those aboard the vessel were lawful combatants. Under this legal framing, even survivors of an initial attack can still be considered active threats, capable of calling for backup, salvaging drugs, or renewing hostilities — making them legitimate military targets rather than shipwrecked civilians.
{Matzav.com}
Israel’s healing cannot begin until Police Master Sgt. Ran Gvili is brought home — alive or in body — his mother insists, saying any next steps in a peace framework must wait until her son’s return. “We’re at the last stretch and we have to be strong, for Rani, for us, and for Israel. Without Rani, our country can’t heal,” Talik Gvili told Reuters.
Gvili was among the 251 Israelis kidnapped during the Hamas onslaught in southern Israel on October 7, 2023, the attack that plunged Israel into war in Gaza. Though Israeli officials declared him dead in January 2024, his family continues to cling to a sliver of hope. “We want to feel him, we want to feel some tiny doubt [that he died],” his mother said. “It might just be wishful thinking.”
His hometown of Meitar is covered in posters bearing his face — a constant reminder of the young officer who vanished into Gaza. On the day of the massacre, he had been recuperating from a broken collarbone. Despite the injury, he threw on his uniform and raced to help defend Kibbutz Alumim, where he was gravely wounded. According to Israeli authorities, he did not survive long after being dragged into Gaza.
When Israel and Hamas reached their US-brokered truce-hostage agreement on October 9, 20 captives were still alive and 28 were believed to be dead. Within three days of Israel’s partial withdrawal from Gaza on October 10, the living hostages were freed. In return, Israel released nearly 2,000 Palestinians from custody, including approximately 250 convicted terrorists serving life sentences for the murders of dozens of Israeli civilians.
Over the following two months, Hamas gradually transferred the bodies of 27 deceased captives — including a soldier killed back in the 2014 Gaza war. Hamas claimed battlefield conditions made it difficult to locate all remains. Under the terms of the deal, Israel agreed to return the remains of 15 deceased Gazans for each Israeli hostage declared dead.
Now that the hostage exchanges are nearing their conclusion, President Donald Trump’s ceasefire roadmap envisions negotiations over Gaza’s long-term governance, reconstruction, and disarmament, coupled with deeper Israeli withdrawals and expanded humanitarian access. But asked whether those discussions should begin without her son being brought home first, Talik Gvili was unequivocal: “No way. We won’t let that happen.”
The struggle to bring back the captives sparked a nationwide movement. Hostage posters covered highways and storefronts, and thousands gathered weekly in Tel Aviv’s Hostages Square in unified demand for their return. For Gvili’s family, that solidarity has been a lifeline. “We’re not alone,” his mother said, expressing appreciation for support from Israelis of all political backgrounds.
She described her son as someone whose instinct was always to protect others — strong, compassionate, and attentive to anyone more vulnerable than himself. “We’re happy everyone has returned, except for Rani. We have become one big family, so every hostage who returned brought relief, closure. But somebody had to be last, and it looks like that was our fate,” she said. “But that was his thing, to make sure everyone else was okay first.”
{Matzav.com}
Florida took an aggressive new stance on Monday as Governor Ron DeSantis declared that the Muslim Brotherhood and the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) will now be treated by the state as foreign terrorist organizations. Announcing the decision, DeSantis stated, “Florida agencies are hereby directed to undertake all lawful measures to prevent unlawful activities by these organizations, including denying privileges or resources to anyone providing material support.”
The governor’s announcement comes just after Texas executed a similar move. Governor Greg Abbott recently categorized both the Muslim Brotherhood and CAIR as foreign terrorist organizations as well as transnational criminal organizations, a step that carries sweeping enforcement implications and blocks the groups from acquiring land anywhere in Texas.
These measures arrive amid a broader national push led by President Donald Trump, who two weeks ago signed an executive order kickstarting a formal federal review of various Muslim Brotherhood branches. His executive action mandates the State Department and the Treasury to present, within 45 days, a comprehensive determination of which specific entities meet the legal qualifications to be designated as Foreign Terrorist Organizations (FTOs) or Specially Designated Global Terrorists (SDGTs).
Should federal authorities approve such listings, the consequences would be immediate and far-reaching, including sanctions, frozen assets, and strict cuts to international funding streams, all of which would dramatically impede the organizations’ activities worldwide.
The Muslim Brotherhood has pushed back hard against the unfolding federal process, dismissing the president’s initiative as “detached from reality” and insisting that Trump’s claims of terrorist involvement are “unsupported by evidence.”
{Matzav.com}
UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres delivered a forceful rebuke on Monday after Israel Police entered the shuttered UNRWA compound in Shimon HaTzadik, blasting the move as a violation of UN protections.
Guterres insisted that “This compound remains United Nations premises and is inviolable and immune from any other form of interference,” declaring that Israel had crossed a red line. He pointed to international agreements in place for decades, emphasizing, “As recently confirmed by the International Court of Justice, any executive, administrative, judicial or legislative action against United Nations property and assets is prohibited under the Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations.”
Demanding corrective action, he urged Israel “to immediately take all necessary steps to restore, preserve and uphold the inviolability of UNRWA premises and to refrain from taking any further action with regard to UNRWA premises, in line with its obligations under the Charter of the United Nations and its other obligations under international law, including those concerning privileges and immunities of the United Nations.”
The site in question has not been used by UNRWA since Israeli lawmakers outlawed its work last year, effectively shutting down the agency’s presence in the country. Still, the compound remained under UN designation, prompting the uproar when Israeli forces arrived Monday, conducted searches, and confiscated equipment. Israel Police officials later stated that the operation was part of enforcing a property seizure order tied to unpaid debts.
A video from the scene circulated shortly after the raid, showing officers raising a large Israeli flag atop the building, further inflaming tensions.
UNRWA, already under intense scrutiny for years over its entanglements with Hamas, has faced a surge of criticism since Israel disclosed in 2024 that agency employees took part in the October 7, 2023 Hamas atrocities. Those revelations prompted Guterres to set up a special review panel led by former French Foreign Minister Catherine Colonna. The team concluded that it found neutrality-related issues” within the agency but claimed that Israel had yet to supply proof that large numbers of staff were active members of terrorist groups.
Despite Israeli evidence tying UNRWA to Hamas, the International Court of Justice ruled recently that humanitarian aid must continue to flow into Gaza via UN channels—including UNRWA—drawing objections from both Israel and the United States.
The sharp statement issued Monday adds to a long series of clashes between Guterres and Jerusalem, as the UN leader has repeatedly condemned Israeli military action against Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Houthis. Just last week, he criticized Israel’s war effort in Gaza in an interview with Reuters, asserting that something was “fundamentally wrong” in how the campaign was being run. Asked whether war crimes had taken place, he said, “There are strong reasons to believe that that possibility might be a reality.”
{Matzav.com}
