Feed aggregator

Russian President Vladimir Putin has agreed in principle to resume three-way peace negotiations involving Russia, Ukraine, and the United States after November 10, marking a potentially significant development in President Donald Trump’s efforts to bring an end to the war that has devastated Ukraine for more than four years.

The announcement came Wednesday following talks in St. Petersburg between Putin and Trump’s special envoy, Steve Witkoff, who arrived in Russia after meeting Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and European leaders in Norway the previous day.

Kremlin foreign policy adviser Yuri Ushakov told reporters that Moscow was prepared “in principle” to continue the diplomatic process after November 10, indicating that Russia was willing to return to negotiations involving representatives of all three countries.

According to Ushakov, the next round of discussions would concentrate on “building a security system for Russia and Ukraine after the conflict ends,” a central issue in the peace proposal that Witkoff presented to the Russian president.

The development represents a shift in Moscow’s position after Putin repeatedly resisted proposals for direct negotiations involving Trump and Zelensky. Although delegations from Russia, Ukraine, and the United States previously held discussions in the United Arab Emirates, efforts to arrange further high-level meetings had encountered substantial obstacles.

Witkoff’s visit to St. Petersburg followed a meeting Tuesday in Oslo, Norway, where he consulted with Zelensky and European officials about a proposed framework for ending the fighting.

The proposal reportedly addresses several major questions that have complicated previous diplomatic efforts, including long-term security commitments to Ukraine, financial assistance for rebuilding the war-ravaged country, and arrangements intended to prevent another outbreak of hostilities.

After reviewing the proposals with Ukrainian and European representatives, Witkoff traveled to Russia to present the framework directly to Putin and discuss whether Moscow would be prepared to proceed with negotiations.

A source familiar with the discussions indicated that the proposed postwar security arrangements could include Ukraine’s eventual membership in the European Union, an issue that has long figured prominently in Kyiv’s plans for its future relationship with Western countries.

Zelensky emerged from Tuesday’s meeting expressing cautious optimism about the American proposals, describing the security commitments under discussion as “strong” and saying he had received “positive signals” from Washington.

The Ukrainian president’s comments suggested that some progress had been made toward resolving disagreements over the guarantees Kyiv would receive in exchange for accepting a negotiated settlement.

Those assurances remain particularly important to Ukraine, which has insisted that any agreement ending the war must include credible measures to deter future Russian military action.

The diplomatic progress follows a period of increasingly strained relations between Trump and Zelensky, particularly over Ukrainian attacks on Russian energy infrastructure and interruptions affecting Ukraine’s military communications capabilities.

Last week, Trump publicly criticized Zelensky over Ukrainian strikes against Russian oil facilities, which the American president argued were contributing to instability in international energy markets.

The dispute intensified as Ukrainian forces continued targeting Russian energy installations, including refineries and oil terminals, in an effort to weaken Moscow’s ability to finance and sustain its military operations.

A Ukrainian air attack on Sunday struck an oil terminal in St. Petersburg, producing a major fire and underscoring the continuing intensity of the conflict even as diplomatic efforts were underway.

Trump has objected to the economic consequences of such attacks, arguing that disruptions to Russian oil production and exports have contributed to volatility in global energy prices.

On October 9, the president announced an arrangement with Putin involving the suspension of certain American sanctions and the purchase of some Russian oil exports, a move that provided Moscow with economic relief while Washington continued pursuing a negotiated settlement.

The administration’s approach has drawn attention because it combines diplomatic pressure for an end to the fighting with measures that have eased some restrictions on Russia.

Trump also suggested last week that Ukraine could be excluded from a proposed round of international discussions, raising the possibility of a meeting involving the United States, Russia, and China instead.

That suggestion followed the president’s criticism of Zelensky and appeared to cast doubt on whether Kyiv would retain a direct role in the next phase of negotiations.

Wednesday’s announcement from the Kremlin, however, indicated that Moscow was once again prepared to participate in discussions that would include Ukraine alongside the United States.

The diplomatic developments also come amid controversy over restrictions affecting Ukraine’s access to military-grade satellite communications provided through SpaceX technology.

Ukrainian officials reported that access to the Starshield satellite network had been reduced, creating difficulties for military units that depend on the system to coordinate operations and respond to Russian drone attacks.

Starshield, a defense-oriented satellite communications service developed by Elon Musk’s SpaceX, provides capabilities used by Ukraine’s armed forces and is closely related to the company’s commercial Starlink network.

Zelensky raised concerns about the interruptions, which occurred during a period of heightened military activity and growing disagreements between Washington and Kyiv.

Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio denied that the White House had deliberately ordered the restrictions. Defending the administration’s assistance to Kyiv, they maintained that “there would be no Ukraine right now” without American support.

An administration official subsequently told the New York Post that the interruption originated within the Pentagon.

Other accounts, however, suggested that Musk had personally authorized the reduction in service after discussions with Trump and senior administration officials. The competing explanations have left questions about who ordered the restrictions and why.

Meanwhile, additional details emerged Wednesday concerning the meeting between Putin and Witkoff at the Constantine Palace outside St. Petersburg.

The discussions lasted approximately three hours and included Kremlin foreign policy adviser Yuri Ushakov and Russian presidential envoy Kirill Dmitriev. Trump’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner, also participated remotely.

Beyond the proposed resumption of peace negotiations, the participants discussed possible economic cooperation between Washington and Moscow, including Russian energy and fertilizer exports.

Putin also expressed interest in exploring a possible Russian diplomatic role in resolving tensions between the United States and Iran, citing Moscow’s longstanding relationship with Tehran.

Another development during Witkoff’s visit was Russia’s release of Stephen Hubbard, a 74-year-old American who had been imprisoned since 2022 on accusations of fighting for Ukraine.

Hubbard’s release followed a direct request from Trump to Putin and did not require a prisoner exchange. The American was handed over to Witkoff at St. Petersburg’s Pulkovo Airport for his return to the United States.

Despite the renewed diplomatic activity, substantial differences remain between Russia and Ukraine over the terms of a possible settlement.

Moscow continues to demand control over the Donetsk region and opposes Ukrainian membership in NATO, while Kyiv has insisted that any peace agreement must include meaningful security guarantees and protection against renewed Russian aggression.

Earlier rounds of American-mediated negotiations, held in Abu Dhabi and Geneva, produced little progress beyond prisoner exchanges.

The Kremlin also expressed reservations about the latest proposals presented by Witkoff, with Ushakov indicating that Moscow saw limited value in some of the new ideas advanced by Ukraine and European governments.

Zelensky, meanwhile, has said that freezing the existing front lines would represent the minimum step necessary to begin ending the conflict.

Although Putin’s agreement opens the possibility of renewed negotiations in November, no final date, location, or participant list has been formally announced, and the parties have not reached an agreement on the central issues dividing them.

The proposed talks would nevertheless bring Russian, Ukrainian, and American representatives back to the negotiating table after months of stalled diplomacy, as Trump continues pressing for an agreement to end Europe’s deadliest conflict in generations.

Senior officials in Israel’s chareidi political parties are declaring that securing legislation protecting the status of yeshiva bochurim is their overriding objective in the upcoming elections, warning that they will refuse to support any government, approve coalition legislation or advance state budgets until a binding draft law is enacted.

In unusually forceful comments to Kikar HaShabbat, senior figures in the chareidi factions said they have deliberately abandoned the cautious language and political compromises that characterized previous coalition negotiations. They insisted that protecting the Torah world now takes precedence over ministerial positions, government appointments and even the political survival of the right-wing bloc.

The officials said the increasingly explicit declarations by Shas and United Torah Judaism leaders are part of a coordinated effort to establish an unmistakable condition for any coalition negotiations following Israel’s October 27 elections.

“The days when we stammered, concealed our intentions or apologized out of concern that ‘the bloc’ might be harmed are over,” the officials said. “The time has come to remove the masks and state the truth with our heads held high and without blinking: We are in the Knesset for one reason and one reason only — to guarantee the status of yeshiva students and save the Torah world! This is the exclusive mission entrusted to us by our rabbonim, the Gedolei Yisroel.”

They emphasized that their parties would no longer allow coalition considerations to interfere with that mission.

“We are not interested in seats, jobs or honorary titles in the country’s leadership. All of that is meaningless compared to the Torah world, and we will say so loudly and openly,” they added.

The officials then delivered an explicit warning to any party hoping to establish a government with chareidi support after the election.

“And from this comes a sharp and clear ultimatum to anyone dreaming of building a coalition with us the day after the elections: Not even one finger! We will not support any government — not even by abstaining — without explicit and practical legislation of the draft law on the table.”

They said the condition would apply not only to formally joining a coalition but also to parliamentary cooperation that could enable a government to function.

“This is the red line and the first condition: Without a draft law, there are no laws, no budgets and no government. The games are over. We will not repeat the mistakes of the past!”

The officials maintained that the parties’ purpose in seeking reelection was now being communicated directly to voters, without attempting to soften the message for the broader Israeli electorate.

“We are running in the elections only to regularize the status of yeshiva students. That is the truth, and that is why all the leaders of the chareidi parties are declaring it openly and without embarrassment, so that people know what the elections are about.”

The declarations come amid growing frustration within the chareidi community over the continued absence of legislation establishing the legal status of full-time yeshiva students, leaving bochurim vulnerable to military draft enforcement and possible arrest.

A senior United Torah Judaism official told Kikar HaShabbat on Tuesday that an understanding had already been reached with Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu concerning the order of legislative priorities if the right-wing bloc wins enough seats to establish a government.

“There is an agreement with Netanyahu. If he gets 61 seats, the draft law will be the first law that the government under his leadership passes,” the official said. “The first! And there will be no compromises like the ones we made before Iran.”

The official insisted that chareidi representatives would no longer accept promises that the legislation would be addressed at some later stage.

“What was will not be. We will not agree to delays, and Netanyahu understands that. That is why he also conveyed a similar message to our community through the chareidi media.”

The position reflects a series of recent public commitments by the heads of Israel’s major chareidi factions, all of whom have made legislation protecting yeshiva students a nonnegotiable requirement for supporting a future government.

Shas chairman Aryeh Deri made the same demand during an interview with Kikar HaShabbat last week, declaring that his party would neither join nor support any government unless the status of yeshiva students was resolved through legislation.

Deri said the continuing threat of arrests hanging over Torah learners made it impossible for Shas to participate in a government that failed to address the issue.

“We are continuing in the path of Maran. Maran told us to do everything, absolutely everything, to regularize the status of yeshiva students, with the principle being that anyone who studies Torah should continue,” Deri said.

“We declared it, Maran the Rishon Letzion said it in his own voice, and I said it: There will be no government in Israel that Shas supports or participates in without regularizing the status of yeshiva students. How can we accept this sword hanging over them, with the arrests?”

Deri emphasized that the condition would remain in effect regardless of whether Shas was offered positions within the government or asked to provide support from outside the coalition.

United Torah Judaism chairman MK Yaakov Asher delivered a similarly unequivocal message during an appearance in the Kikar HaShabbat studio.

“We, United Torah Judaism, will not enter a government that does not actually pass the law regularizing the status of yeshiva students, known as the draft law. Period!” Asher declared.

“There is no other interpretation: We will not enter or support a government that does not first pass the draft law.”

Asher’s remarks were intended to eliminate any possibility that United Torah Judaism might accept a coalition agreement promising future legislation without requiring the law to be enacted.

MK Meir Porush, chairman of Shlomei Emunim, went even further, stating that his faction would oppose the advancement of other government legislation until the draft issue was resolved.

Asked whether his party would agree to another postponement of the draft legislation, Porush rejected the possibility.

“Will we agree to postpone it? We will not agree to postpone it! Either we have a law and can be properly settled on this matter, or there is no law and we are not involved. This time, we are not making those concessions. We will not even allow laws that the coalition wants to pass until this matter is resolved.”

Porush also offered a direct assurance to United Torah Judaism voters that the party would honor its commitment after the election.

“You voted for United Torah Judaism? You can know that no government of which we are a part will be established here before there is a draft law. We are committed to that!”

The latest statements come as the chareidi parties seek to clarify their position ahead of an election in which their support could prove important to the formation of the next government.

United Torah Judaism has also indicated that it no longer considers itself automatically committed to Netanyahu’s political bloc. Asher recently said that the party would consider its options following the election in accordance with the guidance of the Gedolei Yisroel, while maintaining that legislation protecting full-time Torah learners would remain its central demand.

The question of military service exemptions has become one of the major issues in the election campaign, with opposition figures arguing that the IDF’s manpower requirements make continued sweeping exemptions unacceptable.

For the chareidi parties, however, the message being delivered to voters and potential coalition partners is that their participation in the next government will depend on the passage of legislation protecting the status of yeshiva bochurim, rather than another round of political assurances that the issue will eventually be resolved.

{Matzav.com}

North Korea has released new photographs of dictator Kim Jong Un in an apparent effort to counter widespread rumors that the country’s 42-year-old leader suffered a massive brain hemorrhage and died while receiving medical treatment in China.

The images, distributed by North Korea’s state-run news agency, show Kim touring a clothing and footwear exhibition in Pyongyang alongside his 13-year-old daughter, Kim Ju Ae, who has increasingly accompanied her father at official appearances.

The photographs were released following a wave of reports circulating internationally that Kim had lost consciousness, been secretly transported to a hospital in Beijing and subsequently died.

According to North Korean state media, the photographs were taken Friday, although their release came only after the rumors had spread widely across social media and attracted international attention.

In the images, Kim is seen examining a pink shoe, inspecting rolls of fabric and looking at a women’s coat displayed on a mannequin. His daughter appears beside him throughout portions of the visit.

The allegations concerning Kim’s supposed death originated with Xia Wanjun, a Chinese dissident living in the United States who heads a political movement banned by Beijing.

Wanjun claimed that Kim had suffered a serious cerebral hemorrhage and was rushed to China for emergency treatment. He further alleged that the North Korean leader died at the hospital and that his body was secretly transported back to North Korea.

No independent evidence was presented to substantiate those claims.

South Korean intelligence officials moved quickly to dismiss the reports, stating that they had received no information or indications supporting the allegations concerning Kim’s death or a serious medical emergency.

North Korea did not issue a statement directly addressing the rumors about its leader’s health. Instead, the regime publicized the photographs of his visit to the exhibition, apparently seeking to demonstrate that he remained active and carrying out his official responsibilities.

The BBC also pointed to several reasons for skepticism regarding the claims.

According to the British broadcaster’s analysis, a medical emergency involving the North Korean leader, particularly one resulting in his death, would likely produce unusual activity beyond the country’s tightly controlled borders.

China, North Korea’s principal international ally, might be expected to increase security along their shared border in anticipation of potential political instability or an influx of refugees. Unusual movements could also be expected around North Korean diplomatic missions abroad.

No such developments had been reported.

North Korean defectors living in South Korea, some of whom maintain informal networks capable of obtaining information from inside the isolated country through China, similarly reported receiving no indications that Kim had died or suffered a catastrophic medical event.

Despite the absence of corroborating evidence, the rumors spread rapidly online, fueled in part by the secrecy surrounding North Korea’s leadership and the limited access foreign governments and journalists have to reliable information about Kim’s health.

The latest episode follows a lengthy history of speculation about Kim’s health and whether the North Korean leadership has concealed serious medical problems.

In April 2020, Kim disappeared from public view for several weeks, prompting international reports that he was gravely ill, incapacitated or dead. His absence was particularly conspicuous because he missed celebrations marking the birthday of his grandfather, North Korea’s founding leader Kim Il Sung.

The speculation ended when North Korean state media released photographs showing Kim attending the opening of a fertilizer factory.

A similar episode occurred in September 2014, when North Korean authorities acknowledged that Kim was experiencing what they described as “discomfort.” He subsequently remained out of public view for approximately 40 days, leading to rumors of a military coup and even claims that he was brain-dead.

Kim eventually reappeared publicly, ending the speculation.

His health has remained a subject of international interest because of his reported obesity, smoking habits and the uncertainty surrounding the country’s succession arrangements.

South Korean intelligence officials have previously expressed concern about potential cardiovascular risks, although Kim’s actual medical condition remains closely guarded by the North Korean government.

The increasing visibility of his daughter, Kim Ju Ae, has also fueled speculation that she is being prepared for a future leadership role. She has accompanied her father to military events, weapons-related appearances and other official engagements, an unusual level of public exposure for a member of the ruling family.

The latest exhibition photographs also reportedly showed Kim’s wife, Ri Sol Ju, accompanying the family as they inspected clothing and footwear displays.

North Korean state media said the exhibition visit took place Monday, October 19, and published the images Tuesday. Independent journalists were not permitted to observe the event, and the photographs’ timing and authenticity could not be independently established.

For now, South Korean authorities have reported no evidence supporting the allegations that Kim died in Beijing, while North Korea continues to portray its leader as actively conducting government business.

{Matzav.com}

A complicated international effort to secure a Jewish burial for a ger tzedek who was found dead in his Yerushalayim apartment has reached a breakthrough, after his non-Jewish brothers in Armenia agreed to allow him to be buried in accordance with halacha in Eretz Yisroel rather than have his body returned to Armenia for a non-Jewish funeral.

The deceased, R’ Yirmiyahu Koshchyan z”l, approximately 60 years old, was discovered last week in his apartment in the French Hill neighborhood of Yerushalayim, apparently several days after his passing. His death set off an extensive effort involving ZAKA volunteers, rabbonim, medical professionals, Israeli authorities and representatives in Armenia to establish his identity, locate his relatives and arrange a proper Jewish burial.

The breakthrough came Tuesday evening, following days of negotiations with his two brothers in Armenia, who initially insisted that their brother be brought back to their home country for burial. They ultimately agreed to a Jewish burial in Yerushalayim after arrangements were made to expedite their passports and Israeli entry visas so they could attend the levayah.

The brothers were reportedly traveling to Israel overnight and were expected to arrive early Wednesday morning, ahead of the levayah scheduled for 1 p.m.

R’ Yirmiyahu was found in his apartment on Mevo Nahagei Haperadot Street after an unusual odor prompted concern. The apartment’s owner arrived at the property, noticed the smell and summoned emergency personnel.

Firefighters forced their way into the apartment and discovered the man lifeless. Magen David Adom personnel subsequently confirmed his death.

Volunteers from ZAKA’s Yerushalayim district were dispatched to the scene, where they encountered particularly difficult conditions.

Shuki Becker, a ZAKA Yerushalayim district team leader, together with volunteers Bentzi Leizerowitz and Chaim Landy, described the circumstances surrounding the discovery.

“This was a man of approximately 60 who lived alone and had no family members in Israel. The apartment owner arrived, noticed an unusual odor coming from the apartment and called the emergency services. Fire and rescue personnel broke into the apartment, where the man was found lifeless. Magen David Adom personnel who were called to the scene had no choice but to confirm his death. It was a difficult and complicated scene… Together with additional ZAKA volunteers, we worked there for an extended period to preserve the dignity of the deceased and collect all the remains,” they said.

The circumstances of the discovery were another painful example of what ZAKA has described as a silent epidemic of people living alone whose deaths go unnoticed for days, sometimes until neighbors or property owners become aware that something is wrong.

Following the discovery, the body was transferred to the Abu Kabir Institute of Forensic Medicine for formal identification.

A team of rabbonim and medical professionals became involved in establishing the deceased’s identity, including Rav Asher Landau, the rov of the forensic institute; Rav Moshe Schlesinger of Maccabi; Rav Chezky Braun of Yad Avraham; and Rav Avraham Goldschmidt of the Ministry of Religious Services at Shaare Zedek Medical Center.

Through the use of CT scans and medical records obtained with their assistance, investigators were eventually able to confirm the identity of R’ Yirmiyahu.

With identification completed, attention turned to the question of his burial.

ZAKA’s legal department, operating under the direction of ZAKA Yerushalayim commander Bentzi Oiring, began working to ensure that the deceased would receive a burial consistent with his Jewish status and religious commitments.

Authorities learned that R’ Yirmiyahu had two brothers living in Armenia who were not Jewish. Locating them, however, proved extremely difficult.

Over several days, efforts were made through the police, Interpol, consular officials and diplomatic representatives to establish contact with the family, but those attempts were unsuccessful.

The breakthrough eventually came through the efforts of ZAKA volunteer Yonatan Shor, who managed to locate a social media account belonging to a relative in Armenia.

With the assistance of Rav Gershon Meir Burshtein, Armenia’s chief rabbi and director of the local Chabad House, contact was finally established with the deceased’s brothers.

That discovery, however, led to another obstacle.

The brothers initially refused to authorize a Jewish burial in Yerushalayim, insisting instead that their brother’s remains be returned to Armenia for burial according to non-Jewish practices.

For the rabbonim and ZAKA representatives involved, the dispute presented a particularly sensitive challenge because R’ Yirmiyahu had voluntarily embraced Yiddishkeit and had lived as a Jew for years.

Extensive discussions followed, with ZAKA’s legal team and Rav Burshtein working to persuade the family to respect their brother’s religious identity and allow him to be buried in Eretz Yisroel.

After prolonged negotiations, the brothers agreed, but requested that arrangements be made immediately for the necessary travel documents and entry permits that would enable them to come to Israel for the funeral.

Israeli officials were contacted, and an urgent effort was undertaken to obtain the required passports and visas.

The documentation was reportedly secured in an unusually short period of time, allowing the brothers to begin their journey to Israel and participate in their brother’s final farewell.

R’ Yirmiyahu had immigrated to Eretz Yisroel in 2011 and subsequently underwent a halachically recognized conversion through a bais din.

Following his conversion, he entered the yeshiva of Rav Shlomo Katzin, where he devoted time to Torah learning.

To support himself, he worked as a security guard at educational institutions.

Those who knew him described him as a quiet, unassuming individual who conducted himself with humility and greeted others pleasantly.

Although he had no immediate family in Israel, the efforts undertaken following his passing brought together numerous individuals determined to ensure that his final wishes and Jewish identity would be respected.

The levayah was scheduled for Wednesday, October 21, at 1 p.m., departing from the Shamgar Funeral Home in Yerushalayim and proceeding to Har Hamenuchos, where R’ Yirmiyahu was to be laid to rest.

Talmidim from Rav Katzin’s yeshiva are expected to participate in the levayah, together with their rosh yeshiva, who is scheduled to deliver a hesped.

{Matzav.com}

A Palestinian teacher who spent 15 years working in schools operated by the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) in Gaza has come forward with allegations that educators routinely promoted hatred of Jews and glorified terrorism, revealing that she was threatened with having her tongue cut out after challenging colleagues over the indoctrination of young students.

In an interview with the New York Post, the 40-year-old geography teacher described an educational environment in which, she alleged, children were repeatedly exposed to anti-Jewish incitement and encouraged to embrace violence against Israel. When she objected to what was being taught, she said, a senior school official confronted her while holding scissors and threatened her with serious physical harm.

The newspaper withheld the teacher’s identity because of concerns for her personal safety.

According to her account, the confrontation began when she became involved in a heated disagreement with another teacher over efforts to instill hatred of Jews and support for violence among young female students.

Several days after the argument, she said, a school administrator approached her carrying scissors and issued a chilling warning.

“We will make you wish you were dead. If you don’t stop arguing, we will cut out your tongue,” the official allegedly told her.

The teacher said she had originally joined UNRWA because she believed that working for a United Nations organization would provide an opportunity to protect Palestinian children from the culture of violence promoted by Hamas.

Instead, she claimed, she encountered teachers who openly blamed Jews for Palestinian suffering, celebrated terrorism and encouraged students to view violence against Israel as a legitimate means of achieving political objectives.

Among the incidents she described was a sixth-grade history teacher who allegedly taught students that Jews were responsible for the hardships experienced by Palestinians.

She also recalled a female colleague who urged young girls to continue the struggle against Israel and subsequently boasted to other staff members about the message she had delivered.

The former UNRWA educator said such incidents were part of a broader problem within the school system, where extremist attitudes were allegedly being passed on to children by the very adults entrusted with their education.

She estimated that at least half of the teachers she encountered during her years in Gaza believed violence against Israel was necessary to achieve Palestinian political goals.

According to her account, the problem has become even more serious since the outbreak of the war following Hamas’ October 7, 2023, massacre.

Children who have experienced the trauma of war, displacement and destruction are now particularly vulnerable to teachers who blame Jews and Israel for their suffering while avoiding discussion of Hamas’ responsibility for the conflict, she warned.

The teacher expressed concern that some educators who previously promoted extremist views have already begun returning to classrooms across Gaza, potentially exposing another generation of students to the same messages.

She also offered a troubling assessment of how many Palestinians view the October 7 attacks and the devastating war that followed.

“They hate the consequences of October 7 and the war that came upon them, but they do not hate October 7 itself,” she said.

In her assessment, the attitudes being cultivated among young Palestinians could create the conditions for another major attack against Israel if a future generation acquires the means to carry one out.

The teacher argued that any serious effort to establish lasting stability in Gaza must therefore address the educational system and the messages being conveyed to children.

She called for sweeping changes to Gaza’s schools, including independent oversight of teachers and their classroom instruction, to ensure that students are no longer encouraged to embrace antisemitism and violence.

“This is more important than disarming Hamas or the question of who controls the Gaza Strip, because only this can change the future,” she said.

The allegations add to longstanding controversy surrounding UNRWA and accusations that some of its employees have maintained connections to Hamas or promoted extremist ideology.

A United Nations investigation following the October 7 massacre concluded that nine UNRWA employees may have participated in the attacks. The agency subsequently dismissed those employees.

Separately, a U.S. government watchdog reported earlier this year that more than 100 individuals associated with UNRWA had been identified for possible suspension or debarment from receiving American assistance because of alleged participation in or ties to Hamas. The individuals included teachers, school administrators and other personnel.

The school where the teacher said she was threatened has since closed and been converted into a shelter for displaced Palestinians. She said she initially remained silent because she feared retaliation against herself and her family, particularly given her concerns about possible connections between school officials and Hamas.

UNRWA did not respond to the New York Post’s request for comment on her allegations.

The teacher maintained that changes to Gaza’s educational system, including independent supervision of educators and reforms to classroom materials, are essential to preventing the hatred she witnessed from being passed on to another generation.

{Matzav.com}

Brad Lander, the Democratic congressional candidate for New York’s 10th District and a vocal critic of Israel, was detained by Israeli security forces Wednesday while participating in an olive harvest with Palestinian Arab farmers near Bethlehem, according to accounts provided by Lander and the activist organization that organized the visit.

The former New York City comptroller was among approximately 90 participants, including American rabbis and Israeli activists, who traveled to the Arab village of Nahalin in Judea and Samaria to assist local farmers. The gathering was interrupted when Israeli soldiers and police arrived, declared the surrounding area a closed military zone, and ordered the participants to leave.

Lander publicized the incident on social media, accusing Israeli authorities of detaining people who were engaged in ordinary agricultural work.

“I’ve been detained by the IDF, along with a group of rabbis & volunteers. We were simply harvesting olives in a grove near Nehalim in the West Bank,” Lander wrote on social media.

He followed the announcement with a condemnation of Israel’s presence in Judea and Samaria, presenting the incident as an example of what he considers unjustified Israeli restrictions on Palestinian Arabs.

“The occupation is a crime under international law. Harvesting olives isn’t a crime under any law I know,” he added.

Lander’s initial account contained a geographical mistake. Although he identified the location as Nehalim, that name belongs to a Jewish moshav in central Israel, outside Judea and Samaria. The incident reportedly occurred near Nahalin, an Arab village southwest of Bethlehem.

The operation was organized through the “Protect the Harvest” initiative, which brings Israeli and international volunteers to agricultural areas in Judea and Samaria during the annual olive-picking season.

Rabbis for Human Rights, a left-wing Israeli organization involved in the initiative, said the group included visiting American rabbis, Israeli volunteers, and local Arab farmers.

According to the organization, the farmers had been prevented from reaching their olive groves since the Hamas massacre of October 7, 2023, and the volunteers had come to help them harvest their crops.

The organization said participants had been working for approximately two hours when IDF soldiers, Israeli police, and Border Police officers arrived and informed them that the location had been designated a closed military zone for the next 24 hours.

The activists maintained that they complied with the instructions and began leaving the area, but security personnel nevertheless detained members of the group, examined identification documents, and photographed the passports of foreign participants.

The Israeli volunteers and international visitors were subsequently separated and taken away in different vehicles for additional questioning and processing.

Among those detained was Yehoshua Schoffman, a former Israeli deputy attorney general who had joined the harvesting activity.

“I was just told that I am being detained on suspicion of harvesting olives. On the way to a police station,” Schoffman wrote on social media.

Schoffman said dozens of Israelis and American rabbis had participated in the outing and disputed any suggestion that the group had provoked a confrontation with Israeli authorities.

“There was no confrontation whatsoever with settlers or with the security forces,” he emphasized.

Lander was transported to a police station in Beitar Illit, where he was questioned and later released under caution. Other foreign participants were reportedly taken to Camp Etzion, an Israeli military installation near Bethlehem.

Authorities did not immediately disclose how long Lander had been held, and the initial reports did not establish whether any criminal charges would follow.

The congressional candidate had announced earlier in the week that he intended to participate in the harvesting initiative as part of his advocacy concerning Israeli policies in Judea and Samaria.

He described the trip as an opportunity to support Palestinian Arab farmers while drawing public attention to what he considers restrictions on their access to agricultural land and threats to their communities.

Lander, who has frequently criticized Israeli government policies, is seeking to represent a congressional district that includes substantial portions of Manhattan and Brooklyn.

His involvement in the demonstration comes as the annual olive harvest continues to generate tensions across Judea and Samaria, with Israeli officials and Jewish residents reporting a series of violent incidents involving Palestinian Arabs in agricultural areas.

Last Friday, Arab rioters near al-Mughayyir and Abu Falah in the Binyamin region allegedly attacked Jewish residents by throwing rocks and fireworks and setting fire to Jewish-owned farmland. Several Israelis sustained minor injuries during the disturbances.

The Binyamin Regional Council accused the participants of using the olive harvest as an opportunity to instigate violence against Jewish farmers and residents.

Earlier this month, the council reported another incident near Maoz Tzur in which three Palestinian Arabs participating in an olive harvest allegedly assaulted an Israeli farmer, injured his head, and attempted to take possession of his firearm.

The council has warned that agricultural activities can be exploited to facilitate attacks and has called for increased security measures to protect Jewish communities and farmland.

Those incidents were separate from Wednesday’s activity near Nahalin, and no evidence was presented in the initial reports linking Lander or the volunteers accompanying him to the earlier violence.

The detention also drew criticism from Israeli opposition lawmaker Gilad Kariv, who urged senior military officials to reconsider the use of closed military zone orders against volunteers participating in olive harvesting.

Kariv, a Reform rabbi who has previously worked with Rabbis for Human Rights, contacted senior Israeli officials, including Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar, to raise concerns about the treatment of the participants and the diplomatic implications of detaining American visitors, including a candidate for Congress.

Anton Goodman, the acting executive director of Rabbis for Human Rights, likewise criticized the military’s intervention.

“We came to accompany farmers to land they had been unable to access for three years, and after two hours of peaceful olive harvesting, large numbers of troops arrived and closed off the area. No one could have known about this order in advance. Instead of protecting people working their land, the army is keeping them away from it and detaining those who came to accompany them for identification,” Goodman said.

The incident has attracted attention in New York, where Lander is campaigning for the congressional seat previously held by Rep. Dan Goldman, whom he defeated in the Democratic primary earlier this year.

Lander is also a political ally of New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani and has repeatedly criticized Israel’s military operations in Gaza. He has called for ending American military assistance to Israel and has made opposition to Israeli policies a prominent part of his political platform.

The episode comes amid broader tensions surrounding this year’s olive harvest. Israeli police recently detained ten individuals in connection with suspected attacks against Palestinian farmers, foreign visitors, and journalists in Judea and Samaria, including an assault that injured an American photojournalist.

As of Wednesday afternoon, Israeli authorities had not publicly provided a detailed explanation of the specific security considerations behind the closure of the agricultural area near Nahalin.

Lander was subsequently released with a warning, while the status of several other participants remained under review. Israeli media reported that authorities were considering deportation proceedings against some of the foreign activists.

The incident has added another international dimension to the dispute over Israeli security operations in Judea and Samaria, with an American congressional candidate now directly involved in a confrontation over access to agricultural land and the military’s authority to restrict activity in sensitive areas.

A Jewish cemetery more than a century old in central India has been granted national heritage recognition following a lengthy legal battle, marking a significant victory for the country’s small Jewish community and potentially establishing an important precedent for protecting other endangered Jewish historical sites.

The High Court of Madhya Pradesh upheld an earlier ruling recognizing the Ranital Jewish Cemetery in the city of Jabalpur as a national heritage site, providing new legal protections for a burial ground that has suffered repeated vandalism, destruction of gravestones and alleged attempts by real estate interests to seize the property.

The ruling is particularly significant because Jabalpur, once home to a thriving Jewish community, now has only a handful of Jewish residents remaining. Despite their small numbers, members of the Bene Israel community continued fighting to preserve the cemetery and prevent the disappearance of an important part of India’s Jewish history.

News of the court’s decision was conveyed to Israel through the Jerusalem Post by Rina Pushkarna, a prominent restaurateur who has served for decades as an unofficial liaison between India and Israel.

The legal campaign was spearheaded by members of the Bene Israel community with assistance from attorney Manish Verma, who worked to secure recognition of the cemetery’s historical importance and prevent further damage to the property.

The cemetery, established during the period of British colonial rule, dates back more than 100 years. At the time, approximately 200 Jewish families lived in Jabalpur, and British authorities allocated land to the community for use as a burial ground.

Approximately 100 people are buried at the site, including prominent members of the local Jewish community and Jewish soldiers who served alongside British forces.

Over the decades, the cemetery became increasingly vulnerable as Jabalpur’s Jewish population dwindled. Most of the community’s descendants emigrated to Israel and other countries, leaving only a few Jewish families to maintain the burial ground and protect its historical significance.

The remaining families have reported repeated attempts by real estate interests to take control of the property. According to their allegations, individuals described in Indian media as members of a “land mafia” sought to claim the cemetery as private property.

Community representatives say that some gravestones were damaged and others completely destroyed, allegedly as part of efforts to eliminate physical evidence of the site’s Jewish history and facilitate a takeover of the land.

The campaign to protect the cemetery eventually attracted support beyond the Jewish community, with local municipal officials, preservation advocates, civic organizations and area residents joining efforts to safeguard the property.

Local residents argued that the burial ground represented an important part of Jabalpur’s cultural and historical identity and should be preserved regardless of the small number of Jews who continue to live in the city.

The High Court’s decision now opens the way for restoration work that community members had struggled to undertake while the cemetery’s legal status remained uncertain.

Planned improvements include repairing damaged gravestones, restoring the cemetery’s entrance gates and implementing additional measures to prevent trespassing, vandalism and further destruction.

Jewish community leaders across India welcomed the ruling, describing it as an important achievement for a population estimated at only 4,000 to 5,000 people nationwide.

Although Jews are not included among India’s six officially recognized religious minority communities, the court’s decision demonstrates that Jewish historical properties can nevertheless receive formal recognition and protection.

Community representatives believe the ruling could have implications far beyond Jabalpur, potentially making it easier to obtain legal safeguards for other Jewish cemeteries, shuls and historical landmarks throughout India.

Israeli officials have also expressed interest in assisting with the cemetery’s restoration.

Yaniv Revach, Israel’s consul general in Mumbai, has offered support for efforts to rehabilitate the property and preserve its Jewish heritage.

Chabad representatives, who maintain centers across India serving Jewish residents, business travelers and tourists, are also expected to participate in efforts to preserve the site’s history and support its restoration.

The cemetery’s protection follows a dispute that had already passed through several levels of India’s judicial system. Earlier rulings by a local magistrate and district court had upheld the Jewish community’s rights to the property, but a competing ownership claim brought the case before the High Court.

The dispute attracted international attention during the summer, when Indian Jews living in Israel began calling for intervention to protect the cemetery. Reports at the time indicated that Israeli representatives had raised concerns with Indian authorities about the alleged encroachment and destruction.

Among those who brought attention to the cemetery’s condition was Daniel Ibrahim, a member of Jabalpur’s remaining Jewish community. During a visit to the burial ground in 2021, he discovered damage to its boundary walls and the disappearance of its entrance gate. He subsequently approached police and local authorities, setting in motion efforts to defend the property.

With the latest court ruling affirming the cemetery’s protected status, community members are hopeful that the graves of their ancestors can finally be restored and that the site will remain preserved for future generations.

{Matzav.com}

President Donald Trump announced Wednesday morning that Russia has released 74-year-old American Stephen Hubbard after more than four years in captivity, crediting a personal appeal to Russian President Vladimir Putin for securing his freedom without requiring the United States to release a Russian prisoner in exchange.

Trump celebrated the development as an extraordinary diplomatic achievement, saying Putin agreed to free the retired American teacher following a telephone conversation between the two leaders last week. The president also sharply criticized Joe Biden, accusing his administration of failing to secure Hubbard’s release despite having years to negotiate with Moscow.

Hubbard, a Michigan native and U.S. military veteran who had been living in Ukraine when Russian forces invaded in 2022, was imprisoned after Russian authorities accused him of serving as a mercenary for the Ukrainian military. He was convicted in October 2024 and sentenced to nearly seven years behind bars.

Announcing the release on Truth Social, Trump wrote, “Stephen Hubbard, taken four years ago by Russia during the Biden Administration, was just released from prison, at the request of President Donald J. Trump, made directly to President Vladimir Putin in a telephone conversation last week.”

The president said Hubbard had already begun his journey back to the United States and would soon be reunited with his relatives.

“Stephen is on his way back home and will soon be with his family,” Trump announced, adding that “it’s great to have you back.”

Trump described the circumstances surrounding Hubbard’s freedom as particularly significant because, according to the president, Moscow had agreed to the release without demanding the return of any Russian national imprisoned in the United States.

He characterized the arrangement as “unprecedented,” asserting that Putin had agreed to the request “out of respect for President Trump.”

“There was no ‘swap’ necessary for this release.”

The president then turned his attention to Biden, arguing that Hubbard should have been brought home years earlier and that the previous administration had failed to make meaningful progress in securing his freedom.

“This major return should have taken place long ago through the Biden Administration, which got nowhere in its negotiations with the Kremlin,” Trump wrote.

In another Truth Social message, the president delivered an even more pointed criticism of his predecessor.

“Biden should have done the Hubbard release long ago! What a difference a President makes!” he declared.

Hubbard’s ordeal began shortly after Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. A veteran of both the U.S. Air Force and the National Guard, Hubbard had settled in eastern Ukraine, where he was living with a Ukrainian partner.

In April of that year, Russian troops detained him in the city of Izyum, near Kharkiv, an area that had fallen under Russian occupation during the opening months of the war.

Russian authorities subsequently accused Hubbard of joining a Ukrainian territorial defense formation and participating in military activities against Russian forces.

According to Russian prosecutors, the American had undergone military training, received weapons and ammunition, and agreed to serve in exchange for a monthly payment of $1,000.

The allegations ultimately led to criminal proceedings in Moscow, where Hubbard was tried behind closed doors. In October 2024, a Russian court found him guilty of mercenary activity and imposed a prison sentence of six years and ten months.

Russian state-controlled media reported that Hubbard had admitted guilt during the proceedings, but his American legal representatives later challenged that account and maintained that the allegations against him were untrue.

Martin de Luca, an attorney representing Hubbard in the United States, said in June 2025 that his client had denied ever belonging to a Ukrainian military or combat organization.

According to de Luca, Hubbard described being seized unexpectedly by Russian soldiers at his residence in Izyum, rather than being captured while participating in military operations.

The conflicting accounts raised serious questions about the circumstances of his detention and the credibility of the Russian prosecution, particularly because the trial was conducted without public access.

Hubbard’s detention was further complicated by the Russian government’s refusal to provide American diplomatic officials with regular consular access.

The State Department said Moscow had denied U.S. representatives the opportunity to meet with Hubbard, leaving American authorities and his family struggling to obtain reliable information about his condition and whereabouts.

Reports indicated that he was transferred among at least five Russian detention facilities before his trial, making it particularly difficult for his attorneys and relatives to track his movements.

It was not until April 2025 that his American legal team learned he was being held in a prison facility in Russia’s Mordovia region, east of Moscow, according to de Luca.

By that point, Hubbard had already spent approximately three years in Russian custody, much of it under circumstances that remained largely concealed from the outside world.

In January 2025, Washington formally designated Hubbard as wrongfully detained, a classification that allowed the American government to pursue his case through specialized diplomatic channels dedicated to securing the release of U.S. citizens imprisoned abroad.

Additional reporting Wednesday confirmed that Hubbard’s release coincided with a visit to St. Petersburg by Trump’s special envoy Steve Witkoff, who met with Putin for discussions concerning the ongoing war in Ukraine and broader relations between Washington and Moscow.

During the meeting, Putin announced that Hubbard had been freed and was at St. Petersburg’s Pulkovo Airport. Witkoff thanked the Russian leader for authorizing the release, which came after Trump’s direct intervention.

The development also followed Trump’s decision last week to suspend certain sanctions against Russia shortly before they were scheduled to take effect. Although the president emphasized that no prisoner exchange or formal concession was required to secure Hubbard’s freedom, he subsequently indicated that the sanctions decision had played a role in the negotiations.

The release represents another successful effort by the Trump administration to bring home an American imprisoned in Russia. Earlier in his second term, Trump secured the freedom of American schoolteacher Marc Fogel, who had been serving a lengthy Russian prison sentence on drug-related charges.

Hubbard was the last American in Russian custody who had been formally designated by Washington as wrongfully detained, although other U.S. citizens remain imprisoned in Russia on various charges.

For Hubbard, the announcement ends more than four years of imprisonment that began during the opening months of the Russian invasion of Ukraine and continued through a secret trial, a lengthy prison sentence, and repeated transfers between detention facilities.

His release brings to a close a case that had frustrated American diplomats and left his relatives uncertain about his welfare for years, while giving Trump another opportunity to highlight his personal diplomacy with Putin and contrast his administration’s record with that of Biden.

Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu ordered the Israeli military to prepare for a major new offensive against Iran earlier this month, including strikes on nuclear facilities, power stations and Iranian regime targets, but the operation was called off after President Donald Trump opposed resuming the war ahead of the November 3 U.S. midterm elections, according to a report published Wednesday by the Financial Times.

The British newspaper, citing three individuals familiar with the discussions, reported that Israeli military planners had developed an extensive aerial campaign intended to unfold over several days, with the operation initially scheduled to begin during the weekend of October 10.

The proposed offensive would have targeted a broad range of Iranian infrastructure, including civilian electricity facilities, nuclear installations and sites associated with the country’s ruling regime.

Despite preparations by the Israel Defense Forces, the operation was ultimately shelved, largely because Trump was unwilling to support renewed military action against Iran at this stage.

The president has made clear that he does not intend to launch additional American strikes against Iran before the congressional elections, even as Washington continues applying military and economic pressure on Tehran.

On October 8, Trump publicly stated that the United States would refrain from attacking Iran until after November 3. He also indicated that diplomatic contacts with Iranian officials were continuing, suggesting that his administration was still exploring the possibility of reaching an agreement.

The Financial Times report follows earlier reporting by Axios that Netanyahu had personally discussed the possibility of renewed strikes with Trump amid mounting Israeli concerns over Iran’s efforts to rebuild its damaged nuclear infrastructure.

Israeli officials have reportedly been particularly concerned about the possibility that Tehran could resume uranium enrichment at a deeply buried underground installation known as Pickaxe Mountain.

The facility has attracted attention because of concerns that Iran could use underground infrastructure to protect sensitive nuclear activities from future military attacks.

According to the reports, Netanyahu viewed the possibility of Iran restoring its nuclear capabilities as a serious threat requiring additional military action, while Trump favored delaying any new offensive until after the American elections.

The decision to postpone the operation does not mean that the military option has been abandoned.

Both Netanyahu and Trump have continued issuing warnings to the Iranian leadership, and military preparations reportedly remain in place should a decision be made to resume hostilities.

The Financial Times indicated that Israeli and American military officials are continuing to evaluate possible developments, with operational plans remaining under consideration.

White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly, responding to questions from the newspaper, emphasized that Iran is facing substantial economic and military difficulties.

She said American pressure on Iranian ports, together with efforts to maintain the flow of oil exports from the Persian Gulf, has been producing results.

Kelly also reiterated the administration’s position that the United States would not carry out additional strikes against Iran before the November 3 midterm elections.

Meanwhile, the IDF has been placed on heightened alert amid the possibility of further regional escalation.

According to the report, the Israeli military ordered the cancellation of leave for all soldiers beginning Thursday and continuing until after Israel’s October 27 elections.

IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir explained that the heightened readiness was intended to ensure that the elections could proceed safely and on schedule, despite the tense security situation.

The Prime Minister’s Office declined to respond to questions from the Financial Times regarding the reported plans and the discussions with Washington.

The reported disagreement comes as Washington continues pursuing diplomatic contacts with Tehran, while maintaining pressure on Iran through sanctions and restrictions affecting its maritime trade and oil exports.

Trump has described the discussions with Iran as productive, although no agreement has been announced that would resolve the underlying disputes over the country’s nuclear activities and regional conduct.

For now, the planned October offensive remains on hold, with neither Washington nor Yerushalayim announcing a timetable for any renewed military operation against Iran.

{Matzav.com}

Authorities in France and Italy are preparing for another round of potentially violent demonstrations this weekend, deploying military personnel, strengthening police operations and introducing emergency security measures following days of unrest that have left businesses vandalized, stores looted and hundreds of people detained.

The disturbances began as protests against the rising cost of living, with demonstrations in France also fueled by dissatisfaction among high school students over conditions in the education system. What initially began as public demonstrations escalated over the weekend into violent confrontations with police, property destruction and widespread disorder that continued into the beginning of this week.

Both governments have responded by announcing additional security measures ahead of the weekend’s planned protests, amid concerns that the violence could intensify.

In Paris, police announced that a nighttime curfew would remain in effect for another night, with the possibility of further extensions depending on developments. French Interior Minister Laurent Nuñez confirmed that personnel from Operation Sentinelle, the country’s domestic military security mission, would be mobilized to take over certain security responsibilities, freeing police officers to concentrate on controlling the demonstrations.

French Prime Minister Sébastien Lecornu also pledged to parliament that authorities would carry out a “massive” police deployment on Shabbos, with the objective of achieving an “immediate return to order.”

In Italy, Milan has emerged as the principal center of the disturbances, prompting the government of Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni to dispatch 500 soldiers to the city. The deployment is intended to demonstrate what officials described as a “firm response by the state” to the violence.

The Italian government is also reportedly seeking expedited approval of tougher security legislation aimed at preventing further disorder. The proposed measures include extending preventive detention periods for minors, strengthening enforcement against violent youth gangs and restricting gatherings involving individuals considered threats to public order.

The consequences of the unrest have already become visible throughout Milan’s prominent shopping districts, where several internationally recognized luxury retailers have taken extraordinary precautions to protect their merchandise.

Chanel, Tiffany & Co. and Dior were among the brands that reportedly emptied their display windows and kept their stores closed amid fears of additional attacks and looting.

The precautions followed a weekend in which branches of Decathlon, Arc’teryx and Vodafone were reportedly targeted by looters during the disturbances.

Much of the violence occurred after masked individuals joined otherwise peaceful demonstrations and began confronting police officers. Rioters set garbage containers ablaze, shattered storefront windows and damaged property, including in the vicinity of Milan’s famous cathedral.

Police responded with tear gas and water cannons in an effort to disperse the crowds and restore order.

According to the reported figures, authorities detained 271 young people in connection with the disturbances. Of those, 32 were arrested, including 23 minors. The report also identified 13 foreign nationals among those involved, although it did not clearly specify whether they were included among the 32 arrests or the larger group of detainees.

Another 28 individuals were referred to judicial authorities for further proceedings.

Italian authorities have also confirmed that 14 police officers were injured during the Milan clashes. The violence extended beyond Milan, with disturbances reported in Bologna, Brescia, Bergamo and Turin, where police made additional arrests.

The unrest has been particularly severe in France, where violent demonstrations have spread beyond Paris to Marseille, Lyon and other cities. French authorities have reported more than 2,400 arrests, while nighttime curfews and restrictions on gatherings have been imposed in several affected areas.

Luxury businesses in France have also suffered extensive damage. Stores operated by major fashion houses, including Louis Vuitton, Dior, Celine and Saint Laurent, were among those targeted by looters, prompting retailers to strengthen security and remove valuable merchandise from vulnerable locations.

In Milan, a group calling itself the October 17 Movement has vowed to continue organizing demonstrations every Shabbos, raising the possibility of further confrontations between protesters and security forces.

The governments in Paris and Rome are now preparing for the next scheduled demonstrations as police and military personnel work to prevent a repetition of the widespread looting and destruction witnessed over the weekend.

{Matzav.com}

President Donald Trump is declining to commit to supporting Vice President JD Vance in the 2028 presidential election, saying that any discussion of who should succeed him is premature and that his administration’s immediate priority is getting through the upcoming midterm elections.

Trump made the remarks Tuesday during an appearance with Vance in the Oval Office, where reporters questioned him about whether he intended to endorse his vice president for the Republican presidential nomination in 2028. Although Trump spoke highly of Vance, he stopped short of promising him his backing.

“He’s a very talented person and he’s a very good person,” Trump said when asked about a possible endorsement.

The president then revealed that he and Vance had not even discussed the possibility of the vice president running to succeed him.

“I don’t think we’ve ever talked about it,” Trump said, looking toward Vance.

“No, sir. I said that too,” Vance responded.

Trump appeared amused that the subject had not come up between them, particularly given the widespread speculation about Vance’s political future.

“Who would believe that?” Trump said, “I don’t talk about it with him. He doesn’t talk about it [with me]. It’s early. We have to get through the midterms. We’ll see how it goes.”

The comments came just one day after Vance publicly expressed confidence that Trump would support him if he ultimately decided to pursue the presidency, while acknowledging that the president might prefer to remain neutral during the early stages of a Republican primary contest.

Speaking Monday with journalist Mark Halperin on the 2Way platform, Vance discussed the possibility of entering the 2028 race and the considerable influence Trump’s endorsement would carry among Republican voters.

“I think I would get his endorsement, but I also think there’s something to be said for people actually running their own race,” Vance said. “And because the president’s endorsement is so dispositive, you could absolutely see a scenario where the president says, ‘You know what? We need to let like this race play out and not preemptively prejudge the results.’”

Vance also conceded that there were significant unknowns about how he might perform as a presidential candidate, including the intense scrutiny and demands that accompany a national campaign.

“Like sometimes you know media scrutiny, pressure, policy. I can be terrible at it, and that is the sort of thing that maybe you know, so I don’t know,” he continued.

Despite his expectation that Trump would eventually support him, Vance stressed that the two men had reached no private understanding concerning the 2028 election.

“if I run, I think the president would endorse me. But I also haven’t talked to him about it yet.”

The vice president has repeatedly avoided making a firm commitment about his political plans, leaving open the possibility that he might not seek the Republican nomination at all.

During a CBS News town hall in Michigan, Vance was asked directly whether he could envision deciding against a presidential campaign.

“Of course there’s a chance,” he replied.

Vance pointed to his family as a major factor in that decision, explaining that his wife, Usha, and their four young children would have to weigh heavily in any consideration of another demanding national political campaign.

“We’ve got four little kids, my wife has never loved politics. She loves public service,” Vance said.

“I think you know you can do a lot of good in this job, and I’ve tried to do as much good as possible.”

The vice president also described himself as someone who prefers to put off major personal decisions, indicating that he is in no rush to begin considering the demands of another campaign.

“The way that I think about life, big life decisions – my wife will tell you this: I’m a procrastinator. I hate thinking about it,” he said.

Vance suggested that he would begin giving the matter more serious consideration following November’s congressional elections, allowing him to concentrate for now on his responsibilities in the Trump administration.

Trump has previously identified Vance as his “most likely” successor, placing him in a prominent position among Republicans discussed as potential presidential contenders. Nevertheless, the president has yet to formally endorse Vance or anyone else for the party’s 2028 nomination.

The latest exchange underscores the distinction between Trump’s favorable assessment of his vice president and his willingness to make an early commitment in a presidential contest that remains more than two years away.

Other reporting has also identified Secretary of State Marco Rubio as a possible contender for the 2028 Republican nomination. Trump has previously described Vance and Rubio as a potential “dream team,” without specifying which of the two he would prefer to see leading a future presidential ticket.

Vance nevertheless remains an early favorite among Republican voters. A RealClearPolitics polling average cited this week placed him at 39.1% support in the prospective Republican primary field, compared with 23.8% for Rubio and 11.1% for Donald Trump Jr.

{Matzav.com}

Federal authorities have charged the operator of an Illinois medical laboratory with orchestrating a massive COVID-19 testing fraud scheme that allegedly generated more than $66 million in bogus government claims, including charges for at least 380,000 tests that prosecutors say were never performed.

Rajesh “Raj” Patel, 52, of Schaumburg, Illinois, was indicted by a federal grand jury on five counts of wire fraud. Each charge carries a maximum sentence of 20 years in federal prison if he is convicted.

Investigators allege that Patel, who served as co-owner and chief operating officer of a laboratory in the Chicago metropolitan area, took advantage of federally funded pandemic testing programs by submitting claims for nonexistent tests and collecting tens of millions of dollars in reimbursements.

“This defendant allegedly exploited a global crisis for personal gain, fabricating hundreds of thousands of COVID-19 tests, then billing the taxpayer for it,” said Assistant Attorney General Colin M. McDonald, head of the Justice Department’s Fraud Division.

According to the indictment, the operation began taking shape around March 2021, when Patel’s laboratory entered into arrangements with a medical staffing company that was supposed to collect COVID-19 specimens and provide the corresponding patient information.

The laboratory paid the staffing business tens of millions of dollars for those services. Federal investigators, however, contend that a substantial number of the purported patients either did not exist or had never provided specimens for testing.

Prosecutors say Patel subsequently generated fabricated test results to support claims for laboratory services that had never taken place. Between May 2021 and April 2022, the laboratory allegedly produced false negative COVID-19 results for at least 380,000 tests that were never conducted.

Those manufactured results were then used to seek reimbursement through a federal program established to cover COVID-19 testing for uninsured individuals during the pandemic.

Authorities estimate that the laboratory submitted approximately $66.2 million in fraudulent claims and received roughly $44.1 million in government payments. Of that amount, prosecutors allege, Patel personally obtained approximately $28 million.

The FBI said the allegations illustrate how programs intended to provide medical assistance during a national emergency became targets for individuals seeking to exploit government funding.

“Pandemic assistance programs were designed to provide a lifeline to vulnerable members of society,” said Ryan Whalen, special agent in charge of the FBI’s Chicago office. “Those who are entrusted with federal healthcare dollars have a responsibility to bill honestly and accurately.”

The prosecution comes amid continuing federal efforts to investigate and recover money allegedly stolen through COVID-era assistance programs, many of which distributed enormous sums under emergency procedures designed to get financial help to businesses, healthcare providers and individuals as quickly as possible.

Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach, discussing pandemic fraud during a Newsmax interview last month, said the rapid distribution of government assistance created opportunities for widespread abuse.

“We all remember during COVID how it was … it really was like a piggy bank,” Kobach said during an appearance on “National Report.”

Kobach specifically pointed to the Paycheck Protection Program, which provided federal assistance to businesses struggling during the pandemic, as an example of a program in which he believed insufficient safeguards allowed fraudulent applications to slip through.

“This PPP program, I heard from various businesses how easy it was and how little checking there was when the money was handed out,” Kobach recalled, referring to the Paycheck Protection Program for small businesses. “And I think many people just assumed they were going to get away with it.”

Although identifying the overall scope of pandemic-related fraud is relatively straightforward, Kobach said the more difficult challenge involves tracking down individual offenders, bringing criminal charges and recovering money that has already been distributed.

“But the hard work of actually prosecuting the cases, doing the investigations, and then getting the money back is what’s happening right now,” he said.

“It’s something that’s going to take many years, multiple administrations to start clawing all this money back,” he added, “and then create an atmosphere of deterrence so that the fraudsters say, ‘Hey, you know what, my buddy’s in jail right now and I’m not going to be able to get away with this.'”

The Justice Department said the case is being investigated by the FBI’s Chicago field office and the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General. Trial attorney Claire Sobczak Pacelli of the department’s Health Care Fraud Section is handling the prosecution.

Federal officials also pointed to the broader crackdown on healthcare fraud. Since 2007, the Justice Department’s Health Care Fraud Strike Force program has charged more than 6,200 defendants accused of collectively billing federal healthcare programs and private insurers over $45 billion.

The Patel indictment follows other major pandemic-related fraud prosecutions in Illinois. In June 2025, Chicago laboratory owner Zishan Alvi was sentenced to seven years in federal prison for a separate COVID-19 testing scheme that resulted in more than $14 million in improper government payments. Alvi was also ordered to pay restitution and forfeit millions of dollars in assets.

The Justice Department has additionally established a National Fraud Enforcement Division to pursue fraud involving federal benefits and assistance programs, working alongside the Trump administration’s broader initiative to identify and combat misuse of taxpayer funds.

Patel has not been convicted, and the charges against him remain allegations. He is presumed innocent unless proven guilty in court.

{Matzav.com}

Elon Musk reportedly directed SpaceX to restrict a military satellite communications service used by Ukrainian forces, interfering with drone missions against Russia and raising serious questions in both Kyiv and Washington about who authorized the decision and whether President Donald Trump knew about it in advance.

According to a report published Tuesday by The Wall Street Journal, the restrictions took effect on October 14 and reduced the speed and operational capabilities of Ukrainian drones relying on Starshield, a military communications system developed by Musk’s SpaceX.

The move reportedly affected Ukrainian forces conducting both offensive strikes and defensive operations, adding another complication to Kyiv’s military campaign against Russia.

The Journal, citing American officials and individuals familiar with the circumstances, reported that Musk and Trump spoke by telephone shortly after news of the restrictions emerged. One person familiar with their discussions indicated that the two had also addressed the matter before the limitations were implemented.

Those accounts have prompted questions about the administration’s prior knowledge of the decision and the extent to which it was coordinated with senior American officials.

According to the report, some officials believed Musk had acted independently in ordering the restrictions, while others indicated that he had consulted high-ranking administration figures before taking action.

The system involved is Starshield, SpaceX’s specialized satellite communications platform designed for national security applications and licensed for use by the United States government. It is distinct from the company’s conventional Starlink internet service, which has also played an important role in maintaining communications in Ukraine.

Musk has previously maintained that decisions governing the military use of Starshield ultimately fall under the authority of the American military and the president. Trump, meanwhile, said Friday that he did not believe either he or Musk was responsible for limiting Ukrainian access in a manner that disrupted battlefield operations.

The controversy comes during an increasingly strained period in relations between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, with disagreements emerging over military strategy, American assistance and Washington’s efforts to negotiate an end to the war with Russia.

Trump has criticized Ukrainian strikes against Russian oil refineries as his administration attempts to address rising energy costs. Washington’s efforts to loosen restrictions affecting Russian diesel supplies have also contributed to tensions with the Ukrainian government.

Satellite communications have become indispensable to Ukraine’s military since Russia launched its full-scale invasion in February 2022. Ukrainian troops have used satellite connectivity to coordinate battlefield movements, communicate between units and operate unmanned aerial systems.

The reported Starshield restrictions have consequently intensified Ukrainian concerns about the dependability of American military support at a time when the Trump administration is pursuing a diplomatic settlement with Moscow.

Ukrainian officials have separately expressed unease about the continuity of American intelligence assistance, although U.S. officials have rejected allegations that Washington deliberately suspended intelligence sharing.

Ukrainian officials have provided additional details about the battlefield consequences. Presidential adviser Serhiy Beskrestnov said the restrictions interrupted connections to military-grade terminals traveling at high speeds, with service reportedly cut off above approximately 100 miles per hour. He said Ukrainian forces received no advance warning, resulting in disrupted missions.

“Our defence forces did not receive a warning about this limitation, and this led to the disruption of several missions,” Beskrestnov said.

Ukraine’s 7th Rapid Reaction Corps also reported that some operations had to be canceled because of the connectivity problems. Ukrainian officials said the disruption affected drones used both to strike Russian targets and to intercept incoming attacks.

The controversy has also produced conflicting explanations from Washington. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth reportedly denied issuing an order to restrict the service, while Musk has pointed to the American government’s authority over military applications of Starshield. CBS News separately reported that Musk had held several discussions with administration officials before the decision, seeking to understand Trump’s position.

Musk, SpaceX and the White House did not immediately respond to Reuters requests for comment on the Journal’s findings, which Reuters said it could not independently confirm.

The restrictions emerged as Russia continued launching missile and drone attacks against Ukrainian cities and energy infrastructure, leaving large numbers of residents without electricity. Ukrainian officials warned that disruptions to satellite communications could further weaken their ability to defend against those attacks.

The dispute has also drawn attention to Ukraine’s dependence on technology controlled by a private American company. With no immediately available European replacement offering comparable capabilities, Ukrainian military planners face difficult questions about maintaining critical battlefield communications if access to Starshield becomes unreliable.

Meanwhile, Ukraine indicated Tuesday that American intelligence sharing had resumed following separate concerns about interruptions in the flow of information. The restoration came as Washington continued diplomatic efforts to secure a negotiated settlement, with American envoy Steve Witkoff preparing for discussions with Russian President Vladimir Putin.

{Matzav.com}

U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth has publicly confirmed for the first time that he made an unannounced visit to Israel earlier this week and held discussions with Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, but declined to disclose what the two men discussed, amid growing speculation about possible renewed military action against Iran.

President Donald Trump also refused to elaborate on the visit when questioned by reporters, adding to the uncertainty surrounding the high-level meeting, which took place as Washington and Yerushalayim continued intensive consultations over Iran’s nuclear activities and the possibility of another military confrontation.

Speaking overnight Tuesday into Wednesday, Hegseth acknowledged that he had traveled to Israel and met with Netanyahu during the visit.

“I was there to visit our troops, and I had an opportunity to speak with the prime minister,” Hegseth said.

Asked about the substance of their conversation, the defense secretary made clear that he would not disclose the details.

“Of course, the contents of our conversation are not something I can discuss, but they have been good partners, and I appreciate that,” he said.

The visit reportedly took place Monday, October 19, just eight days before Israel’s scheduled October 27 elections. It was conducted without a public announcement, and neither the Pentagon nor Netanyahu’s office initially provided information about the trip.

The unusual secrecy surrounding the visit has attracted attention because of its timing, coming amid reports of disagreements between Washington and Yerushalayim over whether Israel should resume large-scale attacks against Iran before the American midterm elections.

Trump was also questioned about Hegseth’s brief trip and whether he could reveal what had been discussed during the meeting with Netanyahu.

“I can’t do that right now, no,” the president replied.

Neither Trump nor Hegseth indicated whether the talks involved specific military plans, Iran’s nuclear program or the ongoing diplomatic contacts between Washington and Tehran.

The confirmation comes alongside a Financial Times report that Netanyahu had recently instructed the IDF to prepare for an extensive military offensive against Iran, only for the operation to be postponed following opposition from Trump.

According to that report, Israeli military planners had developed plans for several days of aerial strikes beginning around the weekend of October 10, with potential targets including Iranian nuclear installations, power infrastructure and facilities associated with the regime.

Trump reportedly opposed launching another round of attacks ahead of the November 3 congressional elections, while leaving open the possibility of further military action afterward.

The White House has maintained that the United States does not intend to carry out additional strikes against Iran before the midterms, even as American military forces remain prepared for possible developments.

Against that backdrop, Hegseth’s previously undisclosed meeting with Netanyahu has raised questions about whether the administration is reviewing military options or coordinating its approach with Israel in anticipation of developments after the elections.

There has been no official confirmation that the meeting involved any decision regarding future attacks.

At the same time, diplomatic efforts aimed at preventing renewed hostilities are reportedly continuing through regional intermediaries.

According to the Arabic-language newspaper Al-Araby Al-Jadeed, Pakistan and Qatar have been facilitating indirect contacts between Washington and Tehran in an effort to prevent another outbreak of fighting.

The reported proposal would involve transferring approximately $6 billion in interest accrued on Iranian funds frozen in Qatari banks, in exchange for an Iranian measure concerning international oversight of its nuclear program.

The details of the arrangement have not been independently confirmed, and there has been no announcement of an agreement between the United States and Iran.

Meanwhile, Netanyahu delivered a pointed warning to Israel’s adversaries during a visit this week to an Israeli Air Force base, emphasizing the military’s readiness to respond if necessary.

“We have the readiness, the determination and the capability to strike our enemies the moment it becomes necessary,” Netanyahu declared.

The prime minister’s remarks came as the Israeli military maintained heightened readiness amid concerns about possible escalation involving Iran.

Trump has also continued addressing the Iranian situation publicly, indicating that his administration is considering how best to achieve its objectives in its confrontation with Tehran.

“We are making very good progress with Iran,” Trump said. “We just have to make a final decision about how we want to win. Do we want to win the nice way, or the not-so-nice way?”

Additional reporting has identified the location of the meeting as the Ovda Air Force Base in southern Israel, where American fighter jets and refueling aircraft are stationed. Netanyahu’s spokesman, Doron Spielman, confirmed that the discussions addressed regional threats and cooperation between the two countries on both offensive and defensive military operations.

Israeli Defense Minister Yisroel Katz reportedly attended the meeting as well. According to Israeli media reports, IDF Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir and several other senior officials were not included in the discussions, apparently because of the sensitive nature of the visit.

Spielman also said Hegseth thanked Israel for hosting thousands of American military personnel and discussed the close relationship between Trump and Netanyahu.

The visit took place one day after Trump publicly endorsed Netanyahu ahead of the Israeli election, describing him as “a Great Warrior Prime Minister, and an even greater Partner for Peace in combatting the Islamic Republic of Iran.”

Despite confirmation that Iran and regional security were discussed, American and Israeli officials have not disclosed whether the meeting produced any new military agreements or decisions concerning future operations against Tehran.

{Matzav.com}

WATCH:

LISTEN:

​​For more info, email bitachon4life@gmail.com.

LISTEN:

Iran has flatly rejected American demands that it surrender its stockpile of enriched uranium, with senior Iranian official Mohsen Rezaei declaring Tuesday that Tehran will retain all of its nuclear material and will refuse to resume negotiations with Washington unless the United States first meets Iranian conditions.

Rezaei delivered the uncompromising message during discussions in Tehran with Pakistani army chief Asim Munir, whose visit is part of Pakistan’s efforts to mediate between the United States and Iran as fears grow of another military confrontation in the region.

“Not even a tiny bit of enriched nuclear material will leave Iran. Such materials constitute a major asset and national wealth for the Iranian people, intended for use within the country,” Rezaei said, according to Iranian state television.

The Iranian official also made clear that Tehran has no intention of returning to the negotiating table without preliminary concessions from the Trump administration.

“There will be no negotiations until America takes steps to build trust – a process that must begin with the fulfillment of Iran’s conditions.”

The latest declarations highlight the considerable distance separating the two countries on one of the most contentious issues in their nuclear dispute: whether Iran can retain possession of uranium it has already enriched.

Washington has insisted that Iran’s enriched uranium be removed from the country under any prospective arrangement intended to address concerns about its nuclear program. Iranian officials, however, have consistently characterized the material as a national asset that must remain under Tehran’s control.

The disagreement has persisted despite earlier suggestions from President Donald Trump that Iran was prepared to accept American demands. In April, Trump asserted that Tehran had “agreed to everything” and would cooperate with the removal of its enriched uranium.

Iran’s Foreign Ministry subsequently challenged that characterization. Spokesman Esmail Baghaei maintained that “the transfer of uranium to the US has not been presented as an option.”

Baghaei went further in describing the importance Tehran attaches to retaining its nuclear stockpile.

“Iran’s enriched uranium is as sacred to us as the soil of Iran and will under no circumstances be transferred anywhere,” he said at the time.

The renewed Iranian refusal comes as Pakistan attempts to establish a diplomatic channel capable of preventing the confrontation from deteriorating further. Munir arrived in the Iranian capital Tuesday with a Pakistani delegation for meetings with senior officials, as Islamabad seeks to encourage renewed communication between Tehran and Washington.

Pakistan’s diplomatic involvement comes against a backdrop of heightened military tensions involving Iran, the United States and Israel. Iranian media have reported missile launches and military exercises in recent weeks, contributing to concerns that the confrontation could develop into another round of hostilities.

The developments also follow an unannounced trip to Israel by U.S. Secretary of War Pete Hegseth, who met Monday with Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu.

Hegseth acknowledged the visit Tuesday but declined to disclose what he and Netanyahu discussed, offering only a general description of his meetings in Israel.

“I was there visiting our troops, (and) had a ‌chance ‌to talk to the ‌prime minister. ‌Of course, the nature of our conversation is not ‌something I would talk about, but they’ve been good partners, and I appreciate that,” Hegseth told reporters.

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian reinforced the demands during his own meeting with Munir, insisting that Washington must first lift its blockade of Iranian ports, ease restrictions on Iranian oil exports and end military hostilities before meaningful negotiations can resume.

Iranian parliamentary speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf also pressed Pakistan to secure American acceptance of a seven-point Iranian proposal intended to serve as the basis for renewed negotiations.

Pakistan previously helped arrange a ceasefire and hosted discussions that produced an understanding in June aimed at easing the conflict, reopening the Strait of Hormuz and addressing outstanding economic and nuclear disputes. That diplomatic initiative subsequently stalled as disagreements between Washington and Tehran remained unresolved.

The nuclear dispute is particularly sensitive because Iran has enriched uranium to 60% purity, a level approaching the 90% generally associated with weapons-grade material. Tehran continues to maintain that its nuclear activities are intended for peaceful purposes, while Washington has demanded substantial restrictions on the program.

The latest Iranian declarations leave Pakistan facing another difficult diplomatic challenge, with Tehran demanding American concessions before talks can begin and Washington continuing to insist on significant changes to Iran’s nuclear activities.

Shas launched a blistering attack on Israeli Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara on Tuesday, accusing her of attempting to influence the upcoming Knesset elections through the arrest of yeshiva bochurim, after 42 Chabad students returning from New York were detained by Military Police at Ben Gurion Airport.

The party condemned the arrests and announced that MK Yinon Azoulay, acting on instructions from Shas chairman Aryeh Deri, had begun contacting senior IDF officials to demand the immediate release of the bochurim.

The incident occurred just one week before Israel’s October 27 elections, amid mounting tensions over military conscription and the detention of chareidi yeshiva students who have not reported for service.

In its statement, Shas accused the attorney general of engaging in “blatant and unprecedented political interference in the election campaign” by allegedly directing enforcement actions against yeshiva bochurim.

The party further accused Baharav-Miara of ordering “violent arrests of yeshiva students,” despite temporary legislation that Shas said had been enacted to prevent political interference during the election period.

Shas said it “strongly condemns the arrest this morning of Chabad yeshiva students at Ben Gurion Airport.”

The party did not provide evidence that Baharav-Miara had personally ordered Tuesday’s arrests. Earlier this month, however, the attorney general instructed the IDF to resume enforcement against individuals who had failed to comply with military enlistment orders.

Following the arrests, Azoulay, who chairs the Shas Knesset faction and serves on the Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee, began intervening with senior military officials.

According to the party, Deri personally instructed Azoulay to pursue the matter and demand that the bochurim be released without further delay.

The controversy began Tuesday morning when dozens of Chabad bochurim landed in Eretz Yisroel after spending the previous year studying at the central Chabad yeshiva at 770 Eastern Parkway in Crown Heights, Brooklyn.

The students had participated in the traditional year of study known as kevutzah, during which bochurim from Eretz Yisroel spend an extended period learning at Chabad’s international headquarters.

After passing through passport control, the returning students were detained by Military Police because their military-service status had not been properly arranged.

Relatives who had come to the airport to welcome them home were left waiting as the bochurim were taken aside for processing.

Footage circulated from the airport showed the detained students being escorted onto a bus.

The arrests provoked particular anger within Chabad, where arrangements have historically existed allowing bochurim to complete their studies, marry and spend a period learning in kollel before entering military service.

The continuing absence of legislation regulating the status of yeshiva students has complicated those longstanding arrangements.

United Torah Judaism chairman MK Yaakov Asher also condemned the arrests, warning that intensified enforcement against yeshiva bochurim could interfere with the election process.

“There is concern about a deliberate attempt to create chaos and disrupt the elections,” Asher said. “I call on Judge Solberg to intervene immediately and stop the disruption of the elections.”

Asher was referring to Supreme Court Justice Noam Solberg, chairman of the Central Elections Committee.

The UTJ chairman argued that the detention of yeshiva students during the final days of the election campaign could provoke demonstrations and create uncertainty among chareidi voters.

Meanwhile, Shas maintained that the arrests reflected a broader pattern of enforcement actions against Torah learners.

In an interview with Kan Moreshet last week, Deri had already sharply criticized Baharav-Miara over the arrest of yeshiva bochurim.

“You can see that it is all the attorney general, the dismissed anarchist, who wants to forcefully bring down the right-wing government and is trying to intensify this issue with all her might,” Deri said.

Later Tuesday, the IDF released details of the measures taken against the 42 detained Chabad bochurim.

According to the military, 27 of the students expressed willingness to enlist and were found eligible for service. They received suspended sentences and were released, with the expectation that they would begin the enlistment process in the coming period.

Another 13 students declined to cooperate with the enlistment process and were sentenced to military imprisonment.

Two additional bochurim, whose failure to comply with military summonses had continued for more than 540 days, were transferred directly to military prison.

The IDF maintained that the arrests were carried out as part of its regular enforcement of the Defense Service Law and that the detained individuals were processed according to established procedures.

The arrests came as Israel’s chareidi political parties intensified their demands for legislation protecting the status of full-time Torah learners, with Shas and United Torah Judaism both making the issue a central part of their election campaigns.

By Tuesday evening, 27 of the detained bochurim had been released, while the remaining 15 were being held in military custody.

{Matzav.com}

Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu warned Tuesday that Iran may attempt to interfere with Israel’s October 27 parliamentary elections by activating one of its terrorist proxy organizations, saying intelligence gathered by the Mossad indicates that Tehran could seek to disrupt the voting process.

Speaking in an interview with i24NEWS less than a week before Israelis head to the polls, Netanyahu said Israeli intelligence agencies have obtained information suggesting that the Iranian regime is considering using organizations under its influence to interfere in the election.

The prime minister did not identify which Iranian-backed group might be involved or specify what form the attempted interference could take. However, he portrayed the threat as part of Tehran’s broader campaign against Israel, which includes supporting terrorist organizations and spreading anti-Israel propaganda through online platforms.

Netanyahu said Iran’s efforts to undermine Israel extend beyond military confrontation, with the Islamic Republic employing affiliated groups and information campaigns to advance its objectives against the Jewish state.

The prime minister also used the interview to renew his call for the removal of Iran’s ruling regime, arguing that replacing the government in Tehran is essential to permanently eliminating the Iranian nuclear threat.

“That’s the directive I gave to the Mossad and the IDF,” Netanyahu said, describing the objective he has established for Israel’s security services and military.

He maintained that the downfall of the Iranian regime would have enormous implications for its terrorist allies throughout the Middle East, particularly Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in Gaza.

According to Netanyahu, both organizations depend heavily on Iranian support and would be unable to sustain themselves without the regime currently governing Tehran.

He predicted that the organizations would ultimately collapse, “because neither of them will survive once this regime falls.”

Netanyahu’s remarks came amid continuing tensions between Israel, Iran and the United States, with President Donald Trump indicating that Washington is considering its next steps in the confrontation with Tehran.

The prime minister was also questioned about reports that US Secretary of War Pete Hegseth had traveled to Israel on Monday for discussions with senior Israeli officials.

Rather than address the reported visit or reveal the subjects discussed, Netanyahu declined to comment.

“I didn’t say there was such a visit, and I don’t discuss visits, I’m not saying that,” he responded.

The interview also addressed the political unrest in France, where violent disturbances have prompted Netanyahu to criticize President Emmanuel Macron’s handling of radical Islamist movements.

Netanyahu described the scenes unfolding in France as “heartbreaking” and accused the French government of failing to take adequate steps to confront the threat of radical Islam.

“They didn’t prepare, and they simply gave up. They surrendered to the invasion of radical Islam.”

The prime minister recalled a conversation with Macron following the October 7, 2023, Hamas massacre, saying the French president had advocated a diplomatic approach to resolving the conflict.

Netanyahu said he had rejected that proposal, warning Macron that Hamas represented a terrorist threat that could eventually endanger European countries as well.

“‘Emmanuel, that’s not going to happen. What you have here is ISIS. Hamas is ISIS, and in some ways, even worse. And if we don’t eliminate them here, you’ll have them in Paris.’ And that’s exactly what’s happening.”

Netanyahu also defended President Trump’s public endorsement of his reelection bid, rejecting criticism that the American president was improperly involving himself in Israel’s domestic political affairs.

“At least he’s saying it honestly! What did Obama, Clinton, Biden do?” Netanyahu asked, suggesting that previous Democratic administrations had also sought to influence Israeli politics, although they had been less open about their preferences.

Trump’s endorsement has become a significant development in the closing days of the Israeli campaign. The president has publicly backed Netanyahu as the leader best equipped to confront Iran, while Vice President JD Vance has declined to endorse a candidate, saying his immediate political focus remains on the upcoming American midterm elections.

Netanyahu also intensified his criticism of opposition leaders, arguing that they lack the experience and determination necessary to confront Iran and other threats facing Israel.

He singled out former IDF Chief of Staff Gadi Eisenkot, one of his principal political opponents, questioning his approach to the Iranian nuclear program.

“Gadi Eisenkot, who says we need to learn to live with a nuclear Iran?” Netanyahu asked.

The prime minister further argued that an opposition-led coalition would be forced to rely on Arab political parties for parliamentary support, potentially limiting its ability to pursue the security policies he considers necessary.

In a separate interview with i24NEWS several days earlier, Netanyahu had already raised concerns that hostile forces might attempt to manipulate the election by engineering security incidents intended to influence public opinion.

“There will likely be an attempt to interfere in the elections, at least, that is what the signs suggest,” he said at the time.

“They may try to orchestrate security-related incidents in order to convince the Israeli public that the achievements are not all that significant.”

Despite those concerns, Netanyahu insisted that the election should proceed as planned.

“As far as I am concerned, the elections will certainly take place on schedule; however, they are attempting to disrupt, or at the very least, influence the elections.”

Israeli security officials have reportedly been examining potential threats to the election, including terrorist attacks, targeted violence and foreign interference. Netanyahu recently convened senior security officials to review the situation as the country approaches Election Day.

The prime minister’s latest warnings also coincide with renewed American-Israeli consultations over Iran. Hegseth’s previously unannounced visit to Israel has since been independently confirmed, with officials reporting that he met Netanyahu at Uvda Air Force Base in the Negev to discuss regional threats and military cooperation.

With Israelis scheduled to vote on October 27, Netanyahu is presenting the election as a choice over the country’s future security strategy, while his opponents argue that a change in leadership is necessary after years of war and political turmoil.

{Matzav.com}