[Video below.] Senior lawmakers from both parties warned Sunday that any attempt by President Donald Trump to use military force to seize Greenland would have far-reaching consequences, including the possibility of a direct conflict with NATO, even as the president escalated pressure on European allies with new tariff threats tied to the issue.
Rep. Michael McCaul of Texas said that while diplomatic efforts or negotiations are one matter, military action would cross a dangerous line that could unravel the alliance structure that has governed transatlantic security for decades. Speaking on ABC’s “This Week With George Stephanopoulos,” McCaul cautioned that an invasion would amount to a fundamental breach of NATO principles.
“If he wants to purchase Greenland, that’s one thing,” McCaul said. “For him to militarily invade would turn Article 5 of NATO on its very head, [and] in essence, put us at war with NATO itself.”
Trump has refused to rule out the use of force as part of his effort to acquire Greenland for the United States. On Saturday, he announced that beginning Feb. 1, the U.S. will impose 10% tariffs on imports from Denmark, Germany, the United Kingdom, France, and other European countries. The president said those tariffs would increase to 25% on June 1 unless an agreement is reached to purchase the semi-autonomous island from Denmark.
McCaul acknowledged Greenland’s strategic importance, noting that U.S. interest in the territory long predates Trump’s presidency. “Greenland has been looked at by presidents since we purchased Alaska,” he said. “It’s very strategic from a national security standpoint against China and Russia.”
Despite that, McCaul argued that there is no justification for acquiring the territory outright, pointing to existing agreements between the United States and Denmark that already grant Washington broad military access. “The United States,” he said, “has full military access.”
“If we want to put more military in there, we can,” McCaul added. “We don’t have to invade it.”
He also questioned whether any deal to purchase Greenland is even feasible. “If he wants to buy it, that’s fine. I don’t see a willing seller right now,” McCaul said.
Democratic Sen. Chris Van Hollen of Maryland echoed McCaul’s concerns during the same program, while accusing Trump of misrepresenting his motives. Van Hollen said claims that the push for Greenland is driven by national security do not hold up under scrutiny.
“Denmark and Greenland have both said to the United States, ‘You can take what measures you need to protect the security of the United States and, of course, the NATO alliance,’” Van Hollen said. “We have a base there already, and we can expand that base.”
Van Hollen argued that the president’s true objective is economic, not strategic. “This is about a land grab,” he said. “Donald Trump wants to get his hands on the minerals and other resources of Greenland, just like the real reason he went into Venezuela had nothing to do with stopping drugs from coming.”
Calling for congressional action, Van Hollen urged lawmakers to use their authority to rein in any unilateral military move by the administration. “We could, for example, cut off any funds that could be used for military purposes with respect to Greenland; we could take action under the war powers resolution,” he said.
“But a lot of our Republican colleagues talk big until it comes time to vote … they have to stop giving Donald Trump a blank check.”
WATCH:
{Matzav.com}