Feed aggregator

A new Washington Post analysis has reignited concerns about political bias in artificial intelligence, finding that several of the most widely used AI chatbots were significantly more likely to generate responses categorized as left-leaning when addressing controversial political topics.

The newspaper evaluated leading AI systems developed by OpenAI, Google, Anthropic, Elon Musk’s xAI, and other companies. Using a set of political prompts created by researchers, the study examined how the chatbots responded to divisive policy questions and whether those responses reflected left-leaning viewpoints, right-leaning viewpoints, or arguments from both sides.

Among all the models tested, ChatGPT from OpenAI displayed the strongest tendency toward responses classified as left-leaning, according to the Post’s findings.

The analysis found that ChatGPT offered exclusively left-leaning arguments in 80 percent of its answers, while only 3 percent of its responses contained solely right-leaning arguments. The remaining 17 percent included perspectives from both sides of the debate.

The trend was not limited to ChatGPT. DeepSeek, an artificial intelligence platform developed in China, also produced a substantial majority of responses that were categorized as left-leaning. According to the analysis, 70 percent of its answers fell into that category, compared with 7 percent that were exclusively right-leaning and 23 percent that incorporated both viewpoints.

Even Gab AI, a chatbot associated with the conservative-oriented social media platform Gab, generated more responses classified as left-leaning than right-leaning. The Post reported that 50 percent of its answers were categorized as left-leaning, while just 3 percent were deemed exclusively right-leaning. Another 47 percent presented arguments from both perspectives.

Anthropic’s Claude also showed a tendency toward left-leaning responses, though to a lesser degree. Researchers determined that 43 percent of its answers reflected left-leaning viewpoints, while 57 percent included arguments representing both sides of an issue.

According to the Post, only two of the AI models tested regularly provided responses that approached political questions with a broader balance of viewpoints.

Google’s Gemini included arguments from both sides in 93 percent of its responses. Meanwhile, Elon Musk’s Grok produced left-leaning responses 40 percent of the time, right-leaning responses in 33 percent of cases, and balanced responses in 27 percent.

The findings arrive as President Donald Trump has increasingly focused on concerns surrounding ideological bias in artificial intelligence systems.

Earlier this year, Trump signed an executive order requiring that AI technologies used by federal agencies operate as “neutral, nonpartisan tools.”

Google defended Gemini’s results in the study. A company spokeswoman told the Post that the chatbot was intentionally designed to provide responses that remain balanced and avoid favoring any particular political viewpoint.

Anthropic likewise rejected claims that its system exhibits political bias.

A company spokesman told the newspaper that Claude is trained to treat different political viewpoints equally and undergoes extensive testing before new versions are released to the public.

To conduct the analysis, the Post instructed each chatbot to answer political questions in 30 words or fewer, with personalization features disabled.

Researchers then reviewed the responses and classified them according to whether they reflected left-leaning arguments, right-leaning arguments, or a combination of both viewpoints.

{Matzav.com}

President Donald Trump declared Wednesday that Iran has assured the United States it is not imposing any tolls, insurance fees, or other charges on vessels passing through the Strait of Hormuz, while warning that inaccurate reporting on the issue could derail ongoing negotiations between Washington and Tehran.

In a post on Truth Social, Trump sharply criticized media reports suggesting that Iran was seeking to profit from or restrict commercial traffic through the critical maritime corridor, insisting that Iranian officials had conveyed the opposite message to the United States.

“Iran has informed the U.S. that, despite troublemaking Fake News reporting to the contrary, there are ‘NO TOLLS, NO INSURANCE COSTS, & NO OTHER CHARGES OF ANY KIND BEING SOUGHT OR RECEIVED BY IRAN ON SHIPS TRAVELING THE STRAIT OF HORMUZ,'” Trump wrote.

Trump indicated that the accuracy of that assurance is essential to the future of diplomatic discussions between the two countries, making clear that any deception would have immediate consequences.

“If this is false information, negotiations would end, immediately!” Trump said.

The Strait of Hormuz remains one of the most strategically significant waterways in the world, serving as a key route for global shipments of oil and natural gas. A substantial portion of the world’s energy supply passes through the narrow passage linking the Persian Gulf with international shipping lanes.

Because of its importance to global commerce, any uncertainty surrounding access to the strait has the potential to unsettle energy markets and trigger fears of disruptions to worldwide supply chains.

Trump’s remarks came as his administration continues diplomatic engagement with Iran after a period marked by escalating tensions, military conflict, and regional instability.

Administration officials have repeatedly stated that the objective of the negotiations is to establish lasting regional stability while ensuring that Iran is unable to threaten its neighbors or international security.

The president also sought to dispel reports that the United States had recently transferred funds to Iran or released assets directly to the Iranian government.

“Additionally, no money has been given to Iran, or released from their money to them, by the U.S.,” Trump wrote.

Instead, Trump outlined a plan under which Iranian funds currently controlled by the United States would be used to purchase American agricultural products intended for humanitarian relief.

“We will be releasing some of their money, that is totally controlled by us, to our Farmers and Ranchers, for the purchase of Corn, Wheat, Soybeans, and more,” Trump said.

“Food is desperately needed in Iran, and we will be purchasing it for them exclusively from the United States.”

Under the proposal described by Trump, the funds would be directed toward the purchase of American-grown food products rather than being handed over directly to Iranian authorities. The approach could provide economic support to U.S. farmers while helping address food shortages inside Iran.

The president’s comments underscored the delicate state of the negotiations, as both sides continue discussions aimed at easing tensions while avoiding renewed conflict in one of the world’s most strategically important regions.

A federal judge on Wednesday struck down major portions of President Donald Trump’s executive order aimed at tightening election procedures, including a provision that would have required prospective voters to present documentary proof of U.S. citizenship when registering to vote.

The ruling arrives as Trump is mounting an aggressive push on Capitol Hill for the SAVE America Act, legislation that would impose many of the same citizenship-verification requirements through congressional action rather than executive order.

U.S. District Judge Denise Casper ruled that the president exceeded his constitutional authority when he attempted to implement the election-related measures unilaterally. According to reports from Newsweek and The Associated Press, Casper concluded that the Constitution assigns responsibility for regulating federal elections primarily to Congress and the states.

Casper, who was appointed to the federal bench by President Barack Obama, determined that the executive branch does not possess the authority to independently establish such election requirements.

The executive order at the center of the case was signed in March and formed part of a broader White House initiative focused on strengthening election-security measures across the country.

According to administration officials, the directive sought to require proof of citizenship for federal voter registration and instructed federal agencies to adopt additional safeguards designed to protect election integrity.

Wednesday’s decision is not the first legal setback for the order. Several federal courts have already halted portions of the directive, concluding that Congress never granted the president the authority to impose such requirements through executive action.

The ruling came on the same day Trump traveled to Capitol Hill to rally support among Senate Republicans for the SAVE America Act.

Under the proposed legislation, individuals seeking to register for federal elections would be required to provide documentary evidence of citizenship, including items such as passports, birth certificates, or naturalization documents.

The measure would also direct states to implement systems for verifying the citizenship status of individuals listed on voter rolls.

Current federal law already bars noncitizens from participating in federal elections, and voter-registration forms require applicants to certify, under penalty of perjury, that they are American citizens. Critics of the SAVE America Act argue that illegal voting by noncitizens is already rare and contend that additional documentation requirements could make registration more difficult for eligible voters.

According to Reuters, Trump urged lawmakers to prioritize passage of the bill despite uncertainty over whether it can secure enough support in the Senate.

The president also raised the pressure on Congress by withholding his approval of a major bipartisan housing package, indicating that he would not sign the legislation unless lawmakers advance the SAVE America Act. The move effectively linked an unrelated housing measure to his election-security agenda.

Backers of the SAVE America Act maintain that congressional approval would provide the legal foundation necessary for citizenship-verification requirements that courts have repeatedly ruled cannot be imposed solely through presidential action.

As a result, Wednesday’s court ruling may strengthen Trump’s argument that any lasting election-security changes must come from Congress rather than the White House.

The decision comes at a politically important time for the administration, which has placed election integrity at the center of its domestic policy priorities ahead of the 2026 midterm elections.

Democrats and voting-rights organizations continue to oppose the legislation, arguing that requiring citizenship documents could create obstacles for otherwise eligible voters who may not have immediate access to the necessary paperwork.

With the executive order now significantly curtailed by the courts, the battle over the SAVE America Act is expected to take on even greater importance as Trump intensifies his efforts to secure election-security legislation before voters head to the polls in next year’s midterm contests.

{Matzav.com}

Postmaster General David Steiner delivered a stark warning to lawmakers on Wednesday, telling Congress that the United States Postal Service is facing a financial crisis and may soon be unable to sustain operations without significant reforms and federal assistance.

Appearing before a Senate committee, Steiner argued that the Postal Service’s longstanding financial challenges have reached a critical point and called on Congress to intervene to stabilize the agency’s future.

In prepared testimony, Steiner painted a troubling picture of USPS finances, saying the organization is relying on extraordinary measures simply to remain operational.

“The bottom line is that we are out of cash. We are borrowing from our employees’ retirement funds to continue operations,” Steiner’s written testimony before a Senate committee said, warning it could run out of operating funds in months if ⁠it stopped deferring obligations.

Steiner said the agency’s difficulties stem from deeper structural issues that lawmakers must address.

“The Postal Service has a broken business model, and action is needed by Congress to fix it,” he emphasized.

Among the changes he is seeking, Steiner urged Congress to reimburse USPS for services that consistently lose money and to pursue additional reforms aimed at restoring long-term financial stability.

The Postal Service has already begun taking steps to confront its mounting fiscal problems. Earlier this year, Steiner announced that USPS had retained restructuring advisers to help evaluate options for addressing the agency’s worsening financial condition.

One of the central questions facing the organization, according to Steiner, is whether it can continue maintaining six-day-per-week delivery service to approximately 170 million addresses nationwide. He noted that the current system costs roughly $3.4 billion each year and that nearly 70 percent of delivery routes operate at a loss. He also pointed out that about 58 percent of the nation’s 18,000 post offices are unprofitable.

The financial pressures have been building for years. Since 2007, the Postal Service has accumulated approximately $120 billion in losses. Much of that decline has been driven by the steep reduction in first-class mail volume, historically the agency’s most lucrative product, as consumers and businesses increasingly rely on digital communication while USPS continues to maintain its extensive nationwide delivery network.

Last month, the Postal Service announced a series of cost-cutting measures, including a pause on nonessential expenditures related to travel, office supplies, and consulting services.

In a memo distributed to postal officials, Steiner said the spending restrictions were necessary “to protect core operations and ensure we can continue meeting all essential obligations.”

The agency has also taken steps to conserve cash by temporarily suspending certain employer contributions to a federal pension program. In addition, USPS plans to increase the price of a first-class postage stamp from 78 cents to 82 cents beginning July 12.

Postal officials estimate that delaying pension contributions will preserve approximately $2.5 billion through the end of the current fiscal year on September 30. Over a longer period, the move could generate savings of as much as $15 billion through 2030.

Steiner’s testimony highlighted the urgency of the situation, placing renewed pressure on Congress to decide whether to pursue major changes to the Postal Service’s business model or risk further financial deterioration at one of the nation’s oldest and most widely used public institutions.

{Matzav.com}

President Donald Trump directed the Department of Justice on Wednesday to examine whether major oil companies are unfairly keeping gasoline prices elevated despite a sharp decline in crude oil costs following the recent U.S.-Iran peace agreement.

The move comes as gasoline prices, while significantly lower than their spring highs, remain well above levels seen before the conflict with Iran began. Trump argued that consumers are not receiving the full benefit of falling oil prices and accused the industry of failing to pass savings on to drivers.

In a post published early Wednesday on Truth Social, Trump expressed frustration that gasoline prices have not dropped more rapidly in response to the decline in global oil markets.

“The big Oil Companies are not dropping their price at the pump commensurate with the sharply lower prices they are paying for Oil,” Trump wrote.

“Those prices are dropping like a rock! In other words, customers are being ‘gouged.’ I have instructed the DOJ to immediately start looking into this. Gasoline prices better start going down a lot faster than what I’m seeing!”

The president did not identify any specific companies in his remarks.

National average gasoline prices currently stand at approximately $3.91 per gallon. While that figure is substantially below the highs reached during the conflict with Iran, it remains roughly $1.14 higher than the average price recorded in January, before American military operations began.

Market data show that gasoline prices have been falling steadily for six consecutive weeks. According to figures compiled by GasBuddy, average pump prices have dropped more than 14 percent since reaching their peak in May.

Crude oil, however, has fallen much more sharply over the same period. U.S. benchmark crude has declined about 23 percent in recent weeks and is down roughly 40 percent from the highs reached earlier this year.

Trading on Wednesday reflected that continued weakness. Brent crude for August delivery slipped 0.91 percent to $76.38 per barrel, while West Texas Intermediate declined 0.94 percent to $72.52 per barrel.

Oil markets have been retreating rapidly since President Trump and Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian signed a 14-point memorandum of understanding in Versailles last week. The agreement formally ended the war that erupted on Feb. 28 and reopened the Strait of Hormuz to international shipping.

The accord extended the existing ceasefire for an additional 60 days, ended the American naval blockade, authorized renewed Iranian oil exports, and launched negotiations regarding Tehran’s nuclear program. Prior to the conflict, nearly 20 percent of all seaborne oil shipments passed through the strategically vital waterway.

During the war, energy markets reacted dramatically. West Texas Intermediate surged to $119.47 per barrel on March 9, while Brent crude climbed to $126.41 on April 30, its highest level in more than four years. The spike came amid Iranian mining operations in the Strait of Hormuz and the U.S. blockade of Iranian ports.

Gasoline prices followed suit, climbing above $4.50 per gallon during the Memorial Day holiday period, according to AAA tracking data.

Energy experts caution, however, that fluctuations in crude oil prices do not immediately translate into lower prices at gas stations.

Karen Young, a senior research scholar at Columbia University’s Center on Global Energy Policy, characterized Trump’s comments as “political theater” during an interview with CNBC. She noted that refining costs, transportation expenses, taxes, and other factors all affect how quickly changes in crude markets are reflected at the pump.

Research cited by Fortune suggests that only about 13 percent of a decline in crude prices is typically passed on to consumers within a week, with roughly half of the savings eventually reaching motorists over a longer period.

The issue carries significant political implications as Republicans prepare for November’s midterm elections. Although prices have retreated from their wartime highs, gasoline remains approximately 41 percent more expensive than it was before the conflict began.

Trump’s directive also places new scrutiny on an industry that he frequently courted during the campaign, potentially signaling a tougher federal antitrust posture toward major energy companies.

As of Wednesday evening, the Department of Justice had not announced any formal investigative actions, legal theories, or timetable related to the president’s request.

{Matzav.com}

The chassidic world is mourning the loss of R’ Betzalel Alter HaKohen Dim, a renowned badchan whose wit, Torah knowledge, and unique ability to bring joy to countless celebrations made him one of the most beloved figures in the world of chassidus. He passed away on Wednesday at the age of 74 following a prolonged illness.

For decades, R’ Betzalel was a familiar presence at simchos throughout the chassidic community, where he captivated audiences with his clever rhymes, humorous observations, and Torah-infused performances. His passing leaves a void in a field in which he was considered one of the true veterans and masters.

The levayah was scheduled to take place Wednesday night at 10:15 p.m. from the Munkatcher beis medrash on Ohr HaChaim Street in Bnei Brak. The procession was set to continue via the Makova beis medrash on Rabbeinu Tam Street and the Satmar beis medrash in the Shikun neighborhood before proceeding to the cemetery in Elad for burial.

Born in the United States, R’ Betzalel was raised in the Munkatcher chassidus by his father, R’ Meir Dim. Even during his younger years in America, he began receiving invitations to perform at weddings and celebrations, quickly developing a reputation for his talent in bringing joy to others.

Over the years, he became one of the most respected and sought-after badchanim in the chassidic world. Those who listened carefully to his humor recognized that behind the laughter stood a genuine talmid chacham. Many of his jokes and observations were rooted in obscure midrashim, passages of Gemara, and Tosafos, woven seamlessly into performances that entertained while reflecting deep Torah scholarship.

Whether at a wedding, a sheva brachos, or another communal gathering, R’ Betzalel had a remarkable ability to transform a room. Audiences would be left roaring with laughter as he delivered elegant wordplay, sharp humor, and uplifting messages.

For more than three decades, he devoted himself passionately to the art of bringing simchah to others. During that time, he appeared before countless leading rabbinic figures and admorim, including the Nadvorna, Biala, Kaliv, and Shomrei Emunim Rebbes of previous generations, as well as, yibadlu l’chaim tovim, the Vizhnitz, Sanz, and Makova Rebbes, the Shevet HaLevi, and many others.

What distinguished him from many others in the field was his ability to blend divrei Torah, humor, stories of tzaddikim, and refined satire into a single performance. Yet despite his talent and confidence on stage, he maintained profound reverence for Torah leaders and was known to carefully tailor his remarks whenever performing before rabbanim and admorim.

A significant portion of his repertoire was inspired by R’ Chaim Mendel Marmelstein of the United States, one of the most celebrated badchanim of the previous generation, from whom he drew much inspiration and material.

Although he spent time among many chassidic courts, R’ Betzalel was deeply devoted to Satmar throughout his life. In a gesture that reflected both his generosity and dedication to the mosdos, he personally donated all of the tables and chairs used by the Satmar yeshivos in Bnei Brak.

During his final illness, numerous admorim and rabbinic leaders visited him at the hospital. Among those who came to offer encouragement and support was Rav Shimon Zev Meisels, Rav of the Yismach Moshe beis medrash in Kiryas Yoel-Monroe and son-in-law of the Satmar Rebbe, Rav Aharon Teitelbaum.

He is survived by his wife, son, and daughters, along with countless friends, admirers, and members of the chassidic community who benefited from his warmth, scholarship, and ability to bring happiness to others.

Tehei nishmaso tzerurah b’tzror hachaim.

The Chernobyler chassidus was plunged into mourning on Wednesday with the tragic news of the sudden passing of R’ Akiva Rand z”l, a young avreich and devoted member of the community, who was killed in a traffic accident in Moldova. He was just 29 years old.

R’ Akiva had traveled to Moldova together with a group of Chernobyler chassidim to visit the kever of Rav Yechiel Heshel of Krilovitz, a grandson of the Apta Rov and son-in-law of Rav Yehoshua of Belz. The visit coincided with the yahrtzeit, observed on the 9th of Tammuz.

According to reports, R’ Akiva was driving when his vehicle veered off the road and plunged into a ditch. He was killed in the accident. Several companions traveling with him sustained injuries and were transported to a local hospital. Authorities have launched an investigation into the circumstances surrounding the crash.

Members of ZAKA are working to expedite the transfer of his body to Eretz Yisroel for burial.

The pilgrimage had special significance for members of the Chernobyler chassidus. The gravesite had recently undergone restoration, and the Rebbe had originally planned to travel there two years ago. That trip was canceled because of the war. The Rebbe was also unable to attend this year’s visit due to ongoing health concerns and physical weakness.

R’ Akiva was born in London to his father, Rabbi Mordechai Dovid Rand, a respected member of the Chernobyl community in the city, and to his mother, Mrs. Rand.

As a bochur, he studied in the Chernobyler yeshivah, where he became especially close to the rosh yeshivah, Rav Binyamin Yonah Zev Rechnitzer, and was known for carefully recording and preserving his shiurim.

Following his marriage, he settled in Yerushalayim with his wife, the daughter of Rav Yosef Mordechai Weiss, the Rav of Machzikei Hadas in Zurich, Switzerland, and a grandson of Rav Yonasan Binyamin Weiss, the longtime Rav of Montreal.

In Yerushalayim, R’ Akiva devoted himself to Torah study in Kollel Nachalas Akiva. In the afternoons, he learned with bochurim at Yeshivas Kochav MiYaakov–Tchebin. He also served as one of the gabbaim of the Chernobyl beis medrash on Tuval Street.

Friends and acquaintances describe him as an exceptionally refined individual, a talmid chacham, and a sincere yerei Shamayim who was beloved by all who knew him.

His passing is especially heartbreaking in light of the personal challenges he had endured. For five years after his marriage, he and his wife waited to be blessed with children. In recent years, they merited to welcome two children into their family.

The tragedy has sent shockwaves through the Chernobyl community. Just two weeks ago, R’ Akiva played a central role in organizing a special Shabbos at the Kosel in support of efforts to purchase a permanent home for the Chernobyl beis medrash in Yerushalayim. Participants recalled that much of the planning and logistics for the historic event were handled by him.

Friends also noted that only six weeks ago he celebrated the birth of his daughter and hosted a kiddush in honor of the joyous occasion.

R’ Akiva is survived by his parents, his wife, and two young children, who are now left without their devoted father.

His untimely passing has left family members, friends, and fellow chassidim struggling to come to terms with the loss of a young man whose life revolved around Torah, avodah, and service to others.

Tehei nishmaso tzerurah b’tzror hachaim.

{Matzav.com}

Thousands of vehicles from 19 cities across Israel took part today in a massive convoy protest against the imprisonment of bnei Torah detained over military draft-related issues, bringing major highways to a standstill and drawing support from senior rabbinic and political leaders.

The demonstration, organized by a coalition of chareidi groups, began at approximately 4:00 p.m. as convoys departed from dozens of gathering points throughout the country. Organizers estimated that tens of thousands of drivers ultimately joined the protest, which was intended to show solidarity with yeshiva bochurim currently being held in military detention facilities.

While the original plan called for convoys to converge near Prison 10, one of the primary military detention facilities, organizers later clarified that participants would stop and spread out along Highway 57 rather than proceed all the way to the prison itself.

By evening, major traffic arteries throughout central Israel had been severely disrupted. Highway 1 was temporarily closed in both directions, while significant backups were reported on numerous roads as thousands of vehicles moved slowly through the country.

At approximately 9:00 p.m., Highway 1 was again shut down in both directions, creating some of the most severe traffic disruptions of the day.

The protest concluded shortly after 9:00 p.m., with organizers announcing that participants had begun returning home following what they described as a highly successful event.

One of the most emotional moments of the evening came when a recorded message from Rav Meir Tzvi Bergman was broadcast over powerful loudspeaker systems near Prison 10 so that detained bnei Torah could hear his words of encouragement.

“I want to join and strengthen the bochurim who were arrested because they sit and learn Torah,” Rav Bergman said. “Ashreichem she’nitpastem al divrei Torah. You are giving strength to all of us and to the future of Klal Yisrael.”

The rosh yeshivah repeated the message with visible emotion, telling the detainees that their sacrifice was providing inspiration for the entire Jewish people.

The day was also marked by a series of violent incidents involving protest participants.

In one of the most alarming episodes, video footage circulated online showing an individual allegedly drawing a handgun and pointing it toward demonstrators on Highway 1. The circumstances surrounding the incident were not immediately clear.

Earlier in the evening, a woman was reported to have been seriously injured during protest-related events on Highway 1. Additional details about the circumstances of her injuries were not immediately released.

In Beitar Illit, Deputy Mayor Gedalyahu Eisenstein, chairman of the city’s chasidic faction, was reportedly attacked during the convoy. Witnesses alleged that another driver intentionally struck his vehicle before physically assaulting him and attempting to choke him.

Additional confrontations broke out in Arad, where clashes were reported between local secular residents and members of the Ger chasidus participating in the protest.

A separate incident occurred on the Ayalon Highway near Tel Aviv, where participants alleged that a truck driver exited his vehicle and approached one of the convoy cars armed with a knife and clubs. According to those inside the vehicle, the driver struck the car and pounded on its windows while the occupants remained inside. Police were notified and launched a review of the incident.

Throughout the evening, organizers accused law enforcement authorities of attempting to suppress the protest by issuing citations and taking steps they claimed interfered with participants’ right to demonstrate.

The organizing committee said it had received numerous reports from drivers alleging police efforts to hinder the protest.

“This constitutes a serious attempt to violate a fundamental right in a democratic state, and we will not remain silent,” organizers said, adding that their legal team would pursue all available avenues to challenge what they described as infringements on freedom of expression and protest.

The committee also expressed appreciation to non-chareidi Israelis who spontaneously joined the demonstrations.

According to organizers, many drivers from the broader Israeli public chose to participate in solidarity with the struggle against the imprisonment of bnei Torah, contributing both to the size of the convoys and to the public attention generated by the protest.

Political reactions were swift and sharply divided.

Shas formally joined the protest after calls from senior gedolei Torah urging public demonstrations against the arrests. Senior party figures, including MK Michael Malkieli, Health Minister Uriel Busso, and MK Yonatan Mashriki, attended portions of the convoy.

Speaking at the event, Malkieli declared, “In the State of Israel, they are supposed to protect Torah learners and not persecute Torah learners.”

MK Meir Porush also strongly defended the protesters and condemned attacks against participants.

“We are following with concern the reports of harm to protest participants and call on the police to act forcefully against anyone who uses violence against the chareidi public,” Porush said.

He further charged that inflammatory rhetoric from public officials had contributed to the atmosphere surrounding the demonstrations.

Opposition politicians, meanwhile, sharply criticized the protest.

Yisrael Beiteinu chairman Avigdor Liberman accused chareidi political leaders of “holding the chareidi public hostage” and blamed them for widespread traffic disruptions throughout the country.

National Unity leader Gadi Eisenkot similarly condemned the demonstrations, accusing the chareidi parties and Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu of enabling what he described as the paralysis of the country’s working population.

Despite the criticism, organizers declared the protest a success, citing the large turnout and broad participation from communities across Israel.

Moti Babchik, one of the event’s organizers, said the demonstration had generated tremendous public support.

“The event was successful,” Babchik said, pointing to what he described as an exceptionally strong response from the public.

As thousands of vehicles made their way home late Thursday night, organizers said the message had been delivered loud and clear: the arrests of bnei Torah remain one of the most volatile and emotionally charged issues confronting Israel’s chareidi community.

Israeli Prime Minister Binyomin Netanyahu delivered a forceful defense of Israel’s wartime strategy on Wednesday, declaring that the country’s military successes were achieved because it ignored calls for restraint and acted decisively in Gaza, Lebanon, Syria, and Iran. He also revealed that while he informed President Donald Trump before launching Israel’s operation against Iran, he never sought American approval.

Addressing the Federation of Local Authorities in Israel Conference, Netanyahu argued that Israel’s willingness to take bold military action fundamentally altered the strategic landscape and prevented far greater threats from materializing.

Focusing first on Lebanon, Netanyahu said Israel’s campaign against Hezbollah has transformed conditions along the northern border and created a buffer against future attacks.

“It’s true, Hezbollah is still in Lebanon, but there is something else there now. Today, there is a security zone there that prevents Hezbollah and its remnants from invading the Galilee, because that was the plan,” Netanyahu said.

According to the prime minister, Israeli forces have been systematically dismantling Hezbollah’s underground infrastructure, dramatically reducing the terror group’s capabilities.

“We are destroying all of this underground infrastructure. I was there in southern Lebanon and I saw it; it’s unbelievable. It is simply different,” he added.

Netanyahu acknowledged that significant security threats remain, pointing specifically to the growing danger posed by armed drones, which he described as one of the next major challenges facing Israel.

“We still have work to do, especially on what I call the ‘Manhattan Project’ – we will be the first in the world to solve the explosive drone problem, which is a global issue, and we are solving it,” he stated.

The prime minister argued that Israel’s battlefield accomplishments were possible only because it rejected demands to halt military operations before key objectives had been achieved.

“If we had followed your suggestion to stop at Rafah, we would have gotten nada, zero, gornisht, nothing. Zero. That is not who we are,” he said.

Turning to Syria, Netanyahu said critics had similarly urged Israel to avoid intervention there, advice he said would have been a mistake.

“They told us not to enter; they said it wasn’t wise. We entered with all our might, and we also saved our Druze brothers, whom I salute,” he said. “We will protect our Druze brothers and we will never abandon them.”

Netanyahu devoted considerable attention to Iran, describing the effort to prevent Tehran from obtaining nuclear weapons as the central mission of his political life.

“Over the years, I have dedicated most of my adult life to preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons; I saw it as an existential threat to our survival,” he said.

“I do not want the thousands-of-years-old existence of the Jewish people to be cut short by these Ayatollahs acquiring nuclear weapons.”

While highlighting years of covert Israeli activity inside Iran, Netanyahu said he eventually concluded that direct military action was necessary despite fierce opposition from skeptics.

“They told us: ‘A military operation in Iran? You are forbidden from doing that. Eliminating the leadership of Iran? No, no, not that.’ So I did not listen to them, and I led Operation Rising Lion,” Netanyahu said.

The prime minister said he personally selected the name of the operation to reflect what he views as the determination and courage of the Israeli people and military.

“I chose this name, ‘A people shall rise like a lion’ – because we have a nation of lions and an army of lions.”

Netanyahu also disclosed details of his communication with Trump before the operation began, stressing that Israel acted independently.

“I told him: ‘We are going into Iran, because I am not waiting for these oppressors who declare openly that they want to destroy us. I will not let that happen. Therefore, we are taking action.’ I didn’t ask for permission; I simply informed him of our plan,” he said.

The prime minister compared that decision to his earlier dispute with the Biden administration over Israel’s operation in Rafah, recalling warnings that military aid could be suspended if Israel proceeded.

“When they told me, ‘Do not enter Rafah,’ the President of the United States said he would halt the weapons supply,” Netanyahu said. “I said I respect him very much, and he even came here at the beginning of the war, but we have no choice, we will enter – and if we must, we will fight with our fingernails.”

Netanyahu said moments arise when Israel must stand firm regardless of outside pressure, even from its closest allies.

“Because there are moments when you must know how to tell even the President of the United States what we stand for,” he added.

The prime minister concluded by criticizing opponents who, he said, spent months urging Israel not to act and are now complaining that military victories were incomplete.

“The very same people who told us don’t enter Gaza, don’t enter Rafah, don’t enter Lebanon, don’t enter Syria, don’t enter Iran… today, they come and tell us, ‘But you didn’t finish the job,'” he said.

Arguing that critics would never have supported the operations that produced Israel’s gains, Netanyahu added: “They, who wanted zero, come and tell us, ‘You didn’t achieve 100%, only 80-90%.'”

{Matzav.com}

Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Wednesday that Israel’s continued military operations in southern Lebanon are solely a response to Hezbollah attacks, while emphasizing that the United States is working to strengthen Lebanon’s ability to police its own territory and prevent future threats against Israel.

Speaking to reporters before departing Kuwait, Rubio discussed ongoing American-mediated talks between Israel and Lebanon, describing the negotiations as part of a broader effort to reduce Hezbollah’s influence and expand the authority of Lebanon’s official government and military.

“The whole purpose, the only reason Israel is in Lebanon is because Hezbollah launches rockets and drones from there,” Rubio said. “The reason why they’re involved there is because territory of Lebanon is being used to launch drones and missiles against Israel.”

According to Rubio, the long-term objective is to place more areas of southern Lebanon under the control of the Lebanese Armed Forces rather than Hezbollah.

“Our hope [is] that the Lebanese armed forces and the legitimate, sovereign Lebanese government will continue to be able to control and secure more and more of their own territory, because that’s who needs to control Lebanese territory, not a terrorist group like Hezbollah,” he stated.

While expressing confidence in the intentions of Lebanon’s government, Rubio acknowledged that its military still requires significant development before it can fully assume responsibility for security in the region.

“We have to build up that capacity. That’s been a longstanding challenge. I think the willingness is there. I think we need to help build up that capacity,” he said.

Rubio explained that current discussions include the possibility of establishing limited “pilot zones” where Lebanese forces would first assume responsibility before the concept is expanded elsewhere.

“This is not going to happen overnight,” he said.

The secretary also stressed that Israel has no desire to retain Lebanese territory and has repeatedly conveyed that its presence is tied exclusively to security concerns.

“I want to reiterate what the Israelis have told us, and that is the only reason why they’re there is because Hezbollah’s launching against their people. If Hezbollah wasn’t launching against them, they wouldn’t be there,” Rubio said.

A substantial portion of Rubio’s remarks focused on the ongoing diplomatic effort between Washington and Tehran.

Asked about the administration’s decision to provide a temporary 60-day waiver easing certain sanctions on Iranian oil exports, Rubio characterized the move as a tactical element of the negotiation process rather than a permanent policy shift.

“Anytime you enter into a negotiation, it’s a process of give and take. This is a temporary measure. It’s for 60 days,” he said.

Rubio warned that the sanctions relief is contingent on Iran honoring commitments it made during recent discussions in Switzerland and suggested that President Donald Trump retains a wide range of options if Tehran fails to comply.

“We expect them to live up to the commitments they made in Switzerland,” he said. “If they don’t live up to those commitments, the President has a lot of options at his disposal, including, I’m not saying he’s going to do it, I’m saying including reversing these sanctions.”

Emphasizing the administration’s expectations, Rubio added, “They’ve made very straight-up commitments in Switzerland, and the President has been very clear they need to keep those commitments.”

When asked about the timeline for allowing international inspectors access to Iran’s nuclear facilities, Rubio indicated that inspections should begin immediately.

“As soon as possible.”

“That needs to happen. That’s a commitment they made, and it’s one they need to keep,” he said.

Rubio also made clear that any eventual agreement must be comprehensive and enforceable, signaling that Washington will not settle for a symbolic arrangement.

“If we’re going to get a deal, it has to be a real deal, and it has to be a good deal,” he said. “If Iran wants to make a good and real deal, the United States is open to that. If they’re not, then, of course, the President has options.”

The secretary dismissed speculation that Israel is attempting to derail the current memorandum of understanding that governs the negotiations, insisting that Jerusalem remains fully informed regarding the administration’s efforts.

“We’re working on this. The Israelis exactly know what we’re working on. All of our partners in the region know what we’re working on. Everybody understands what the President’s red lines and positions are on this,” he said.

Rubio further revealed that negotiations will continue next week, with technical experts scheduled to resume discussions as diplomats work through a range of complex issues.

“The technical group will return on the 30th next week to continue those talks,” he said, explaining that the negotiations have been divided into multiple tracks addressing different components of a potential agreement.

Addressing concerns among Gulf Arab nations, Rubio pledged that the administration would remain in close contact with regional partners and would not pursue an arrangement that jeopardizes their security.

“We’re not going to do anything that undermines the security of our allies, our long-standing allies in the region,” he said.

{Matzav.com}

Sen. Rand Paul is intensifying his long-running battle with Dr. Anthony Fauci, accusing the former top federal health official of wielding extraordinary influence over government research, scientific publications, and intelligence assessments during a decades-long tenure in Washington that Paul says amounted to a massive abuse of power.

Speaking with Miranda Devine on “Pod Force One” in an interview released Wednesday, the Kentucky Republican argued that Fauci built an extensive network of allies throughout the federal government during his more than four decades at the National Institutes of Health and related agencies.

According to Paul, Fauci’s reach extended far beyond overseeing medical research grants. The senator pointed to whistleblower accounts and internal government communications that have emerged since the COVID-19 pandemic, alleging that Fauci played a significant role in shaping scientific discourse surrounding the coronavirus and influencing government efforts to determine how the outbreak began.

“People talk about J. Edgar Hoover,” Paul said. “J. Edgar Hoover has nothing on Anthony Fauci — 40 years of placing all his lieutenants in all the positions, and then after 9/11, the funding for bio-research and bio-terrorism went through the roof, and he became the kingpin that had access to all of that money.”

Fauci previously told lawmakers that he maintained a “pretty high level” security clearance beginning in 2004 while helping establish federal biodefense programs following the anthrax attacks. He also acknowledged that, during his tenure as director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases from 1984 through 2022, he possessed broad authority to approve thousands of government-funded research grants each year.

One of the central disputes between Paul and Fauci has involved research conducted at China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology and whether U.S.-funded experiments there constituted gain-of-function research that could have contributed to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Fauci has consistently rejected suggestions that American-funded research in Wuhan triggered the global outbreak and has maintained that the virus most likely emerged naturally through animal-to-human transmission.

During a contentious Senate hearing in May 2021, Fauci firmly rejected Paul’s allegations, stating: “The NIH has not ever and does not now fund gain-of-function research in the Wuhan Institute.”

That assertion later became the subject of renewed scrutiny during a May 2024 House hearing, when NIH Principal Deputy Director Lawrence Tabak offered a different assessment of the issue.

“It depends on your definition of gain-of-function research,” Tabak answered. “If you’re speaking about the generic term, yes, we did.”

“This is research, the generic term [gain-of-function], is research that goes on in many, many labs around the country. It is not regulated. And the reason it’s not regulated is it poses no threat or harm to anybody,” he added.

Supporters of the lab-leak theory have argued that such distinctions are significant. Among them is former CDC Director Dr. Robert Redfield, who has contended that even projects that do not receive direct funding can sometimes be pursued under broader grants that receive federal support. Redfield made those remarks during a biosecurity panel discussion in October 2024.

Paul has repeatedly maintained that Fauci misled Congress during their early exchanges over gain-of-function research. The senator has twice referred Fauci to the Department of Justice for possible prosecution, alleging both false testimony and improper handling of federal records.

When Fauci appeared before a House subcommittee in June 2024, he again rejected the characterization that certain NIH- and USAID-funded experiments met the definition of gain-of-function research, which generally refers to work that increases a virus’s transmissibility or infectiousness.

Paul’s allegations regarding federal records stem from emails he obtained showing Fauci directing then-NIH Director Francis Collins to “delete this e-mail after you read it.”

“I referred him twice to the DOJ under Biden for criminal prosecution. They never acted on it. I referred him twice to the Trump DOJ without action on it,” Paul said.

Despite his frustration with the lack of action, Paul indicated that questions remain about whether Fauci could still face legal jeopardy because of a pardon granted by President Joe Biden shortly before leaving office.

“They may say because of his pardon, they can’t prosecute him. I think that’s an open question. I think the courts, in all likelihood, probably will side with the pardon, but there are some questions.”

On his final day as president, Biden granted Fauci a sweeping pardon, praising him as a dedicated public servant and shielding him from prosecution for potential federal offenses dating back more than a decade.

The pardon provided Fauci with a “full and unconditional pardon” covering “for any offenses against the United States which he may have committed or taken part in” between Jan. 1, 2014, and Jan. 19, 2025.

Paul questioned whether such a broad grant of clemency could withstand legal scrutiny.

“Can you pardon somebody for a nonspecific crime? Is it too vague to say, ‘I’m going to not prosecute you and pardon you for anything you did in the last ten years?’ I think there’s a possibility the court says that’s vague and not specific, and you can’t give people some kind of pardon for everything and over such a long period of time,” Paul mused.

“I think there’s a chance we’d win that. I think it ought to be fought,” he added.

The senator is now pressing forward with additional congressional scrutiny. On Monday, Paul issued a subpoena compelling Fauci to testify before the Senate Homeland Security Committee, which Paul currently chairs.

The move followed the release of a collection of internal government emails by Paul and outgoing Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard. According to Paul, the communications suggest Fauci worked alongside scientists and senior government officials to minimize discussion of the lab-leak theory and suppress concerns raised by a whistleblower.

Paul argued that the newly disclosed records reinforce his belief that Fauci played a central role in shaping both scientific and intelligence narratives surrounding the pandemic.

“Anthony Fauci has been influencing the process, and from the very beginning, it looks like his interference in a lot of different segments — his interference in the scientific journal articles, interference in intel — but he had a 40-year abuse of power career,” Paul said.

“Really, he orchestrated a cover-up that involved, if not dozens, hundreds of people in government that were loyal to him that went to bat because they also were part of the funding stream going to Wuhan, China, and they would suffer the same sort of culpability.”

{Matzav.com}

United Torah Judaism chairman MK Yitzchak Goldknopf has significantly intensified his criticism of Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, declaring that he no longer believes promises regarding legislation protecting bnei yeshivah from military conscription and warning that future coalition negotiations will require concrete guarantees rather than commitments.

In an interview with Avi Mimran on Kol Chai’s Hamehadurah Hamerkazis, Goldknopf explained why he did not attend the recent meeting between Netanyahu, Shas chairman Aryeh Deri, and Degel HaTorah chairman MK Moshe Gafni.

“I said that I do not view this meeting as a real meeting, but rather a meeting for a photograph or to make a joke out of us,” Goldknopf said.

Expressing frustration over the repeated delays surrounding draft legislation, he added, “They have given us nothing until today. Apparently there are still those who have hope. I have lost my confidence and hope in those promises.”

Goldknopf suggested that, from his perspective, the current government has effectively reached the end of its lifespan.

“Let’s not throw sand in anyone’s eyes. This term is over,” he said, referring to growing discussions about dissolving the Knesset and heading to new elections.

While emphasizing that he would support any genuine legislative progress, Goldknopf made clear that he is no longer interested in symbolic gestures or political theater.

According to the UTJ leader, Agudas Yisroel remains firmly opposed to any draft legislation that includes sanctions or penalties against Torah learners.

“We did not support this draft law at all, and we will not support it in the next term either,” he said.

Looking ahead to future coalition negotiations, Goldknopf said the chareidi parties will insist on securing legislation before agreeing to join a government.

“In the next term we will demand a guaranteed check for the draft law. Before the government is formed, a draft law will pass—and if not, we will not enter any government.”

He further indicated that his party does not view itself as permanently committed to any particular political bloc.

“If someone comes and gives us the draft law before the government is formed—we will not hesitate,” he said, suggesting that support could be extended to whichever coalition is prepared to satisfy the demands of the Gedolei Yisroel.

Goldknopf also criticized what he described as a steady stream of measures targeting the chareidi community.

“Without sanctions, without beatings, without daycare cuts, without cuts to yeshivos, without removing Section 46, tax credits and municipal tax benefits. Where are we today?” he asked.

Responding to concerns that leaving the coalition could result in a government less favorable to the chareidi public, Goldknopf expressed confidence that the Torah community would endure regardless of political developments.

“Hashem will not abandon His people and will not forsake His inheritance. We have faced stronger threats than these. ‘Give me Yavneh and its sages’ remained and will remain.”

Toward the end of the interview, Goldknopf acknowledged what he sees as a major weakness in the chareidi community’s public-relations efforts.

“We lack public relations, and we also lack funding for public relations,” he said.

He added that discussions are underway about raising resources, including from supporters abroad, to build a broader campaign aimed at explaining the importance and value of Torah study to the wider public.

{Matzav.com}

President Donald Trump today took aim at what he described as disproportionate media attention surrounding New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani, while highlighting what he said was a near-perfect record of success for candidates he endorsed in recent elections.

In a post published on Truth Social, Trump contrasted the widespread coverage of Mamdani’s recent political success with what he characterized as a lack of media interest in his own influence on Republican primary races across the country.

“Mayor Mamdani pulled through 3 solid Communists, and has received loud and universal applause from the Fake News Media,” Trump wrote. “Congratulations Mr. Mayor!”

Trump then shifted focus to a slate of primary elections held Tuesday night, claiming that all 16 candidates he backed emerged victorious.

“I went 16-0 last night, helping to elect wonderful American Patriots, and the Media doesn’t say a word,” he wrote.

The president further argued that his endorsements have consistently translated into electoral success over the past two years, citing a record of 259 primary victories.

“Over the last two years, my endorsement has netted 259 Primary WINS, and almost no losses, with Zero media attention!!!” Trump stated.

The post concluded with one of Trump’s longstanding criticisms of mainstream news outlets, writing simply: “FAKE NEWS. President DJT.”

{Matzav.com}

Aviel Cohen, the yungerman whose arrest by military authorities sparked widespread public outcry, has spoken publicly for the first time since his release from military prison, describing the dramatic moments of his detention, the challenges he faced behind bars, and the faith that sustained him throughout the ordeal.

Cohen, who was released on Erev Shabbos after spending four days in military custody, shared his story in an interview with Nati Kalish on Chadashos Anash on Kol Chai. Looking back on the experience, he said he felt as though he had been forcibly taken away without warning.

“That’s how I would describe it—that I was simply kidnapped,” he said.

According to Cohen, the arrest occurred while he was traveling with his wife near Netivot on his way to arrange enrollment in a new kollel. He said that after noticing a police checkpoint, he altered his route and was later stopped near the Gilat Junction by traffic police and military police officers.

“Within seconds they took my ID card, driver’s license, and phone. They put handcuffs on me, and I didn’t even have a chance to say goodbye to my wife,” he recalled.

Cohen further alleged that when his wife attempted to notify family members about what had happened, one of the officers threatened to confiscate her phone as well.

He said he was initially transported to a military facility in southern Israel and later transferred to military prison, remaining handcuffed for extended periods throughout the process.

According to Cohen, the journey was accompanied by difficult conditions, including going an entire day without food and experiencing repeated difficulties obtaining permission to stop for a restroom break.

“They told me it was procedure and that they couldn’t stop,” he said.

Once inside the prison, Cohen said one of the most difficult aspects of his confinement was not knowing what had happened to his wife after the arrest.

“The last time I saw her was at the Gilat Junction, and after that I had no idea what was happening with her,” he said.

He also recounted that during the early days of his incarceration, detainees were not permitted to participate in a minyan. According to Cohen, one prison guard bluntly told him, “You’re in prison, not in yeshivah.”

Despite those challenges, Cohen said conditions later improved, allowing detainees to organize prayer services, learn Torah together, and provide spiritual encouragement to fellow inmates.

He described his release as a personal miracle. Cohen said he had prayed intensely to be freed before Shabbos so he could spend time with his wife during their first year of marriage.

According to Cohen, he was unexpectedly informed that he would be released the following morning.

Following his release, he expressed gratitude to Hashem, to his wife for tirelessly advocating on his behalf, to his family members, and to those who assisted him throughout the process. He specifically thanked attorney Rabbi Shlomo Haddad and MK Moshe Abutbul, whom he credited as being among the key figures who worked for his release and even visited him while he was incarcerated.

Concluding the interview, Cohen offered words of encouragement to others facing similar circumstances.

“The first days are difficult, but with faith and joy you can get through anything. Someone who remains steadfast in his path can make it through.”

{Matzav.com}

Thousands of vehicles poured onto roads across Israel this afternoon as large-scale protest convoys departed from 19 cities nationwide toward Military Prison 10, in a mass demonstration against the arrest of bnei Torah who have been detained over military draft-related issues.

Organizers estimated that tens of thousands of drivers would ultimately participate in the coordinated protest, which began at approximately 4:00 p.m. and quickly led to major traffic disruptions on key highways throughout the country.

According to figures released by the protest organizers’ command center, more than 7,000 vehicles had already joined the demonstrations by 5:00 p.m. Heavy congestion was reported on Highway 1, Highway 6, Highway 4, Highway 2, and numerous additional routes as convoys made their way toward the military detention facility.

The protest was organized following calls from leading gedolei Torah to publicly demonstrate against the imprisonment of yeshivah students classified by authorities as draft evaders. Convoys departed from cities including Yerushalayim, Bnei Brak, Ashdod, Beitar Illit, Kiryat Gat, and others.

Several senior chareidi political figures joined the demonstrations. Housing Minister Yitzchak Goldknopf led the Yerushalayim convoy, while MK Meir Porush and Deputy Minister Yisrael Eichler participated from other protest hubs. In Bnei Brak, former MK Moshe Shimon Roth joined the convoy departing from the city.

Earlier in the day, organizers announced that Slabodka Rosh Yeshivah Rav Moshe Hillel Hirsch had given his blessing to participants. Shas also formally joined the protest after statements from senior Torah leaders emphasizing the obligation to demonstrate against the arrests.

At one protest gathering, MK Meir Porush declared, “Only in the State of Israel are Torah learners arrested. We must protest.”

Members of Shas, including MK Michael Malkieli, Health Minister Uriel Bussu, and MK Yonatan Mashriki, attended one of the convoys and voiced support for the campaign. Malkieli stated, “In the State of Israel, they should protect Torah learners, not persecute Torah learners.”

As the convoys progressed, several incidents of violence were reported.

One of the most serious occurred on Highway 7 near Ashdod, where participants alleged that a motorist blocked a protest vehicle, attempted to assault the driver, and then smashed a window after the driver closed it. Protesters further claimed that threats were made against the vehicle’s occupants. No injuries were immediately reported.

Another confrontation took place on the Ayalon Highway near Tel Aviv. According to participants, a truck driver exited his vehicle and approached one of the convoy cars while allegedly carrying a knife and clubs. Protesters claimed he struck the vehicle and pounded on the windows while the occupants remained inside. Police were notified, and the incident remains under investigation.

In Beitar Illit, Deputy Mayor Gedalyahu Eisenstein, who also heads the city’s chasidic faction, was reportedly attacked during the convoy. Witnesses claimed that an individual rammed his vehicle and then physically assaulted him, including attempting to choke him.

Additional clashes were reported in Arad, where confrontations broke out between local secular residents and members of the Ger chasidus participating in the demonstration.

The organizing committee accused police of attempting to undermine the protest by issuing traffic citations to participants. In a statement released during the evening, organizers said they had received multiple reports from drivers alleging interference with their right to protest.

“This constitutes a serious attempt to infringe upon a fundamental right in a democratic state, and we will not remain silent,” the committee said, adding that its legal team would pursue all available avenues to combat what it described as a violation of freedom of expression and protest.

The organizers also expressed gratitude to non-chareidi Israelis who spontaneously joined the convoys.

“We are receiving moving reports about many drivers and members of the general public who are not part of the chareidi sector but chose to identify with the struggle, join the vehicle protest, and strengthen it,” the committee said. “Their participation increases the public impact of the demonstration. We thank them deeply for their solidarity at this critical moment for the honor of Torah.”

Israeli police, meanwhile, warned that some protesters were not adhering to agreements reached in advance with organizers. Authorities reported significant traffic congestion and stated that in some locations demonstrators had exited their vehicles and entered active traffic lanes, creating safety hazards.

Police emphasized that while the roads had not been completely shut down at that stage, the demonstrations were causing substantial disruptions to traffic flow. Authorities reiterated that they respect the right to protest but warned that unlawful road blockages or dangerous conduct would result in enforcement measures, including fines, towing of vehicles, digital enforcement tools, and other tactical responses.

Political reactions were swift and sharply divided.

Yisrael Beiteinu chairman MK Avigdor Lieberman blasted the chareidi leadership, accusing Shas and United Torah Judaism officials of “holding the chareidi public hostage” and creating resentment among the broader population.

National Unity leader MK Gadi Eisenkot also criticized the demonstrations, stating that “the non-working and non-serving public is paralyzing the state and shutting down the working and serving sector at the end of the workday,” while blaming Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu and chareidi party leaders for the situation.

Porush responded by accusing government officials and public figures of contributing to hostility against the chareidi community. Referring to reports of attacks on demonstrators, he called on police to act forcefully against violent individuals and said the incidents were the result of ongoing incitement against bnei Torah.

By early evening, highways throughout central Israel remain heavily congested as thousands of vehicles continue their slow march toward Prison 10, turning what organizers described as a protest for the rights of Torah learners into the largest vehicle demonstrations the chareidi community has mounted in recent years.

{Matzav.com}

A sharp dispute has emerged within Israel’s law-enforcement leadership following last week’s violent clashes between police and chareidi protesters at the entrance to Bnei Brak, with Police Commissioner Danny Levy publicly backing local commanders even as National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir considers removing those involved.

The controversy follows widespread outrage over footage showing officers using force against demonstrators during anti-draft protests. Despite mounting criticism from politicians and community leaders, Levy indicated Tuesday that he supports the decisions made by commanders on the scene.

In a statement released by police, the commissioner said he had spoken with both the district commander and the station commander, reviewed the circumstances of the incident, and accepted their assessment that strong police intervention had been necessary.

According to the statement, Levy agreed “that under the circumstances of the serious incident, during which a major traffic artery was blocked during the early morning hours, causing disruption to public order and affecting the daily lives of tens of thousands of citizens, significant police action was required to restore public order.”

At the same time, police said the commissioner had instructed officials to conduct a professional review of the incident, as is customary following major operational events.

The statement further emphasized Levy’s support for officers and commanders operating in the field.

“The commissioner expressed his appreciation and support for the commanders and officers working on the ground to protect public safety and maintain public order, while making real-time decisions in a complex operational environment, and will continue to stand by them in carrying out their duties on behalf of the citizens of Israel.”

The commissioner’s remarks came just hours after Ben Gvir sent a letter demanding a thorough review of the incident and signaling that disciplinary action could follow.

In his letter, the minister cited video footage that allegedly shows officers deploying stun grenades contrary to police regulations, using excessive force against demonstrators, and humiliating civilians. Ben Gvir argued that the allegations warrant a comprehensive investigation and accountability for anyone found to have violated procedures.

The minister stressed that while he fully supports police officers who act courageously in defense of public safety, there can be no tolerance for excessive force or conduct that violates the law or the values of the police service.

As part of that review, Ben Gvir announced that he is considering using his legal authority to permanently remove officers and commanders involved in the incident, including the commander of the Bnei Brak–Ramat Gan police station, should the investigation confirm serious misconduct.

Ben Gvir is expected to convene an emergency meeting on the matter later this week before making a final decision.

“My duty is to support police officers who work to protect the public,” Ben Gvir said, “but also to act decisively when officers cross the line and harm citizens. No one is above the law, and commanders will also be required to answer for their actions.”

The episode has intensified criticism of police conduct within the chareidi community, where anger has been building over law-enforcement responses to demonstrations against the draft decree.

For many, the scenes captured in Bnei Brak—where officers were filmed tearing protesters’ pants and using what critics described as excessive force—marked a breaking point.

In response, United Torah Judaism faction chairman MK Uri Maklev has launched an effort to establish a parliamentary commission of inquiry into police conduct during anti-draft protests.

For the first time, political observers believe the proposal may have a realistic chance of passing, as opposition lawmakers who have clashed with Ben Gvir could potentially join chareidi parties in supporting the initiative.

In the explanatory notes accompanying the proposal, Maklev wrote that recent incidents demonstrated that “all red lines have been crossed” and described the police response as “severe, unrestrained and deliberate brutality against civilians.”

The proposed inquiry would examine the chain of command behind the operations, the directives issued to officers in the field, and broader policies governing the use of force against demonstrators.

Maklev has also accused authorities of selective enforcement against the chareidi public and argued that existing oversight mechanisms, including the Police Internal Investigations Department, have failed to adequately address complaints.

A recent investigative report published by Matzav.com alleged that police have repeatedly violated operational procedures during chareidi demonstrations, including the improper use of stun grenades and the direct deployment of such devices toward protesters.

{Matzav.com}

Two young chareidi women from Israel were arrested at Poland’s Krakow Airport after authorities allegedly discovered approximately 50 kilograms of khat in their luggage, exposing what advocates say is a growing pattern of young Israelis being recruited as drug couriers by smuggling networks.

The women, ages 23 and 24, arrived on a direct flight from Israel and were detained immediately upon landing Friday, according to a report published Tuesday. They now face criminal proceedings in Poland, which is considered among the strictest European countries when it comes to the importation of khat, a substance classified there as an illegal drug.

The incident has once again drawn attention to criminal organizations that reportedly target young men and women—often from the chareidi community—and persuade them to transport khat into Europe, where demand for the plant remains high and profits can be substantial.

According to reports, recruiters entice potential couriers by offering free airfare and promising cash payments of roughly 5,000 shekels in exchange for carrying luggage containing the substance.

To ease concerns, the organizers allegedly assure participants that the risks are minimal, claiming that even if they are stopped by customs officials, the worst outcome would be the confiscation of their luggage or a relatively small fine that the smuggling network would cover.

Attorneys familiar with such cases say those promises bear little resemblance to reality.

Attorney Mordechai Tzivin, who has represented Israelis arrested in Europe on khat-smuggling charges, told Ynet that “the concept of ‘at worst they’ll confiscate my suitcase and send me home’ has completely collapsed in recent years.”

According to Tzivin, Poland and several other European countries treat the importation of khat as a serious criminal offense. Once suspicious luggage is discovered, suspects are often arrested immediately and held in detention facilities for extended periods—sometimes weeks or even months—before formal legal proceedings begin.

Legal experts say Polish authorities intentionally employ lengthy pretrial detention as both a deterrent and a punitive measure aimed at discouraging future smuggling attempts from Israel.

For those who agree to participate in such operations, the consequences can be devastating. Many find themselves isolated from their families, incarcerated in a foreign country under difficult conditions, and confronting an unfamiliar legal system, only to realize too late that they were lured into a scheme that may permanently alter the course of their lives.

{Matzav.com}

Supreme Court Deputy President and Central Elections Committee Chairman Justice Noam Solberg said that postponing national elections during an extreme emergency could be justified under certain circumstances, while emphasizing that any such move would require strict safeguards and oversight.

Speaking at a closed conference hosted by Hebrew University, Solberg disclosed that election officials are actively examining emergency scenarios in which free and accessible elections may become impossible to conduct. In such cases, he said, a limited and carefully supervised postponement of elections could be warranted.

The remarks came during a presentation of a joint academic paper authored by Solberg and Central Elections Committee Acting Director-General Attorney Din Livneh. The paper examines how democratic elections should be managed during severe national crises and emergency situations.

According to Solberg, any decision to postpone elections must be governed by six strict principles designed to ensure that such an extraordinary measure cannot be exploited for political purposes. He stressed that the primary objective is to prevent election delays from becoming a tool that allows a government to prolong its time in power.

Under the first principle, which Solberg referred to as the “principle of necessity,” the burden of proof rests entirely on those seeking to postpone elections. He explained that the existence of a national crisis alone would not be sufficient justification. Rather, it would need to be demonstrated that the emergency substantially impairs the ability to hold free, fair, and equal elections.

Solberg also outlined what he called the “principle of temporariness,” under which any postponement would have to be limited in duration and accompanied by a specific and clearly defined replacement election date.

One of the most important standards, according to Solberg, is the “principle of last resort.” Before considering a postponement, authorities would be required to exhaust every available alternative, including early voting, mobile polling stations, and special voting arrangements for soldiers, evacuees, and other affected populations.

He emphasized that because delaying elections is such a significant step, any decision would have to be accompanied by complete transparency, including publicly available facts and explanations that would allow for rigorous public and judicial scrutiny.

Toward the end of his remarks, Solberg revealed that the Central Elections Committee has already begun preparing for a range of emergency scenarios behind the scenes.

“To minimize harm and prepare properly, we are thinking in the committee, and practicing, different scenarios and responses, including elections during an emergency.”

He explained that the committee is examining some of the most complex constitutional and logistical questions that could arise during a national crisis. At the same time, Solberg expressed hope that Israel would never find itself in a situation requiring such contingency plans to be implemented.

{Matzav.com}

A legislative initiative championed by Shas chairman Aryeh Deri to end the arrest of bnei yeshivah is facing significant legal obstacles, with senior legal officials reportedly expressing skepticism that the proposal can withstand judicial scrutiny.

According to a report by Kan News, legal experts believe the proposed legislation fails to meet the legal standards and principles required for proper lawmaking. As a result, there is growing speculation that the Knesset’s legal advisers will decline to support the measure.

“This legislative move has no legal viability and is not expected under any circumstances to withstand a High Court challenge,” legal sources reportedly assessed. Based on that evaluation, officials believe the Knesset’s legal counsel is unlikely to back the proposal, which is expected to be advanced as a temporary emergency measure.

The issue of arrests has become a central point of contention between the chareidi parties and Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu. On Monday, a high-stakes meeting took place between Deri, Degel HaTorah chairman MK Moshe Gafni, and Netanyahu, during which the two chareidi leaders demanded rapid advancement of both the Basic Law protecting Torah study and legislation designed to halt the arrests of Torah learners.

During the meeting, Deri and Gafni reportedly pressed Netanyahu for an explicit commitment that sufficient support would be secured to pass the legislation in the Knesset. The two leaders also warned that if the government failed to move forward immediately on the chareidi legislative agenda, their parties would support dissolving the Knesset and triggering new elections.

At the conclusion of the meeting, Deri and Gafni issued a joint statement declaring: “Today we met with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and conveyed to him, in the name of the Gedolei Yisroel, an unequivocal demand to immediately advance the Basic Law of Torah Study and the law to halt the arrests of Torah learners, by convening the Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee and the House Committee already this week.

“We made it clear that if we do not see practical action as we demanded, we will support dissolving the Knesset as early as next week. The Prime Minister made clear during the meeting that he is committed to approving the laws and will act to advance them quickly.”

As previously reported, Deri has spent recent weeks promoting a plan aimed at stopping the arrests by separating portions of the draft law and advancing temporary transitional provisions through expedited legislation.

Under the proposal, the draft law currently before the Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee would be split, with a one-year temporary measure enacted containing only the transitional provisions. Those provisions would preserve existing economic sanctions while ending arrests and criminal enforcement actions.

According to the Shas proposal, criminal proceedings against Torah learners would be frozen, addressing the situation in which many bnei yeshivah have become classified as lawbreakers due to the absence of legislation regulating their status. Supporters of the plan argue that, given the current political reality, no comprehensive draft law is likely to pass during the coming year and that the issue will ultimately be left for a future government formed after elections.

Deri hopes to advance the temporary measure by splitting it from the broader draft legislation already moving through the legislative process. By doing so, supporters believe the proposal could proceed directly to its final readings in the Knesset rather than beginning an entirely new and potentially lengthy legislative process.

Conservative commentator Mark Levin, known as “The Great One,” launched a fierce attack Tuesday against the new U.S.-Iran agreement, arguing that the deal would funnel enormous sums of money to Tehran while weakening Israel’s position and security.

In a social media post, Levin contended that the financial benefits Iran stands to receive under the agreement far exceed the aid Israel receives from the United States over an extended period.

“The Iranian regime will now receive more money from this deal in a single year than Israel receives in 10 years (nearly all of which buys military equipment from American companies),” Levin wrote in a post on social media.

Levin went on to praise Israel’s efforts to reduce its dependence on foreign support, while expressing frustration with what he views as the country’s treatment by allies and critics alike.

“Israel is actively and aggressively focused on complete economic and military independence. It does not want to be treated as a sterling partner in war but a belittled punching bag the rest of the time.”

He also voiced concern over what he described as growing hostility toward Israel from various political and media figures, while warning about closer ties with several Middle Eastern countries involved in regional diplomacy.

“Just listen to what’s said about Israel by Democrats, Woke Reich podcasters, TV hosts, and even some of our friends. I fear we will regret this as we grow closer to countries like Qatar, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and Pakistan and go down a narrow and dark path,” concluded Levin.

Earlier in the day, Levin directed his criticism at diplomatic discussions involving Hezbollah, questioning why Israel and Lebanon were reportedly not participating directly in talks that could significantly affect their future.

“Has anybody ever heard of a negotiation where the two countries directly affected, Israel and Lebanon, are left out of the negotiation?” Levin wrote, referring to what he described as a Hezbollah renewal negotiation involving Qatar, Pakistan, and the United States.

According to Levin, any agreement reached through such negotiations would effectively be imposed on Israel and Lebanon without their direct involvement. He also questioned the wisdom of pressuring a democratic ally to accept outcomes that could threaten its citizens.

“Have we ever forced a democratic ally to endanger its own citizens by supporting a terrorist organization that has murdered Americans?”

Levin did not hide his outrage over the reported diplomatic efforts.

“Honestly, this is an abomination. What kind of [rubbish] is this,” he continued.

The longtime broadcaster further accused negotiators of disregarding Israel’s security concerns while allowing Iran to maintain and expand its influence in Lebanon through Hezbollah.

“Even worse, we are smearing Israel for refusing to abandon its security, we ensure Iran’s control over Lebanon via Hezbollah, and we have done absolutely nothing over the 45 year period Hezbollah has slaughtered Americans,” he wrote. “Only Israel has. Why are we helping Hezbollah? Pure appeasement to Iran.”

Levin also suggested that lawmakers in Washington should closely examine the negotiations and their implications, expressing skepticism that the matter would avoid congressional scrutiny.

“I wonder how many congressional Republicans support this? No way this escapes scrutiny. Something is going on here that stinks to high heaven,” he wrote.

{Matzav.com}