Matzav

Helicopter Crashes into NYC’s Hudson River

A helicopter went down in the Hudson River on Thursday afternoon, officials have confirmed.

The New York City Fire Department reported that the aircraft crashed into the water close to Pier 40, near the intersection of West Houston Street and West Street, at approximately 3:15 p.m. Emergency crews rushed to the site and launched rescue efforts.

People who saw the crash and shared their experiences online mentioned hearing a “loud thumping noise” at the moment of impact, and said the helicopter seemed to have a damaged propeller.

According to officials, FDNY’s Land and Marine units quickly arrived and began conducting rescue operations at the location.

At this time, authorities have not released information regarding any injuries or fatalities.

{Matzav.com}

Hundreds of Air Force Reservists Face Expulsion After Opposing Gaza War

The IDF declared on Thursday that it plans to dismiss several hundred reservists from the Air Force who had signed a public letter urging a halt to the ongoing military campaign.

This marks a shift in approach from former military leaders like ex-IDF chief Herzi Halevi and former defense minister Yoav Gallant, who, despite disapproving of such actions, were willing to tolerate reservists’ protests as long as they reported for duty. In contrast, current IDF Chief of Staff Lt.-Gen. Eyal Zamir is adopting a stricter stance, aligning with Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu’s views on the judicial reform issue.

Zamir maintains that regardless of the debate surrounding Netanyahu’s judicial policies, these are decisions made by Israel’s democratically elected government, and the military—including its reservists—must not engage in public opposition to them.

While Halevi and Gallant strongly objected to attempts to leverage reservist service to sway government decisions, they also feared that alienating reservists could damage the military’s readiness. This concern led them to tolerate some degree of public dissent, as long as service obligations were met.

Under their leadership, only a few reservists were discharged—and even then, only after repeatedly refusing to respond to call-up orders, not merely for making public threats to avoid service.

Those leaders believed that this balanced approach prevented the military from unraveling during the political upheaval of 2023. They also laid blame on Netanyahu’s judicial overhaul for weakening military preparedness in the months leading up to the October 7 Hamas attack.

On Thursday, the IDF noted that most of the reservists being dismissed are not currently on active duty. Officials downplayed the impact of the move, insisting that the Air Force remains robust, supported by tens of thousands of personnel.

However, the IDF did not disclose how many of those being removed are serving in an active capacity.

The military also avoided questions about how this move compares to the previous administration’s policies, nor did it comment on Netanyahu’s recent clash with Shin Bet Director Ronen Bar—a confrontation many within the defense community view as undue political interference. The IDF also sidestepped addressing pilots’ growing fears that the judicial changes are exposing them to increased legal risks, especially in relation to potential prosecution by the International Criminal Court.

Meanwhile, a group of current and former Israel Air Force pilots took out paid newspaper ads on Thursday to issue a public call for the immediate rescue of hostages held in Gaza—even if that means halting combat operations.

“The war serves political and personal interests; only an agreement will ensure the safe return of the kidnapped,” they stated.

Reacting to the statement, Defense Minister Yisroel Katz said, “I completely reject the letter of air force reservists and the attempt to harm the legitimacy of this just war which the IDF is leading in Gaza in order to free the hostages and to defeat the murderous terror organization Hamas.”

“I trust the discretion of the IDF chief and the air force chief and am sure they will deal with this improper phenomenon in the right way.”

{Matzav.com}

IDF Admits That Kicking Hamas Out of Gaza May Take Years

Though the IDF continues to make strides in its battle against Hamas across multiple areas, military officials admitted to The Jerusalem Post on Wednesday that fully dismantling the terror group could take a year—or possibly several.

The conversation began with mention of the IDF’s recent achievement in eliminating 300 Hamas operatives, and a cumulative total of between 18,000 and 20,000 killed before the January 19 ceasefire. However, those numbers must be considered alongside estimates that Hamas still has over 25,000 fighters, and that the IDF’s current main effort is centered on clearing out the group’s remaining forces in Rafah.

In essence, although the IDF has wiped out a significant portion of Hamas’s fighters and few remain from the estimated 4,000 to 8,000 that were originally based in Rafah, the largest remaining concentrations consist of only several hundred. Going up against a network that might still have 25,000 members scattered across Gaza makes the goal of total elimination a daunting and time-intensive task.

While there are hopes among some in Israel that Hamas might collapse soon and that its leadership might agree to go into exile, if that does not occur—and if no permanent ceasefire is brokered involving moderate Sunni allies to reconstruct Gaza—then the conflict risks dragging into a prolonged, grinding campaign.

Some military leaders accept this possibility and predict that the war effort could extend over several years, involving the meticulous unearthing and destruction of isolated terror cells that have taken refuge in civilian sites like schools.

Elements of the IDF’s recent briefings about its gains in Rafah have also raised eyebrows.

During Jerusalem Post visits to Rafah in June, August, and September 2024, and based on multiple briefings and official statements at the time, it was asserted that Hamas’s Rafah-based units had been decisively beaten.

Officials were particularly confident that forces stationed in the Shaboura sector had been entirely dismantled.

Yet IDF representatives now reveal that key Hamas battalions remained embedded in Shaboura, contradicting the earlier narrative. They explained this by noting that the IDF had not yet conducted a full-scale incursion into that area.

Pressed on this inconsistency, IDF spokespeople suggested that prior comments may have referred solely to the Shaboura refugee camp—a smaller subsection—while the broader Shaboura zone had not been fully penetrated.

This kind of caveat was missing from previous statements by the IDF and other senior officials. The more recent clarifications, however, may offer a more honest and precise account, implying that the earlier descriptions of victory were overstated.

Another noticeable shift has been the tone adopted by current IDF commanders.

Whereas under former Chief of Staff Herzi Halevi and ex-Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, some IDF figures occasionally expressed views diverging from Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu’s positions, the military leadership now appears more aligned with the political leadership’s messaging.

Previously, officials under Halevi and Gallant acknowledged that applying military pressure might help secure the release of hostages, but they also warned that such pressure could backfire—potentially endangering hostages if they were mistakenly targeted during an assault on what was believed to be a safe zone.

At present, there appears to be near-unanimity among IDF officials that increasing military pressure will yield only positive results in terms of rescuing captives.

Defense Minister Yisroel Katz, speaking to The Jerusalem Post on Wednesday, strongly emphasized the necessity of retaining control over the Philadelphi Corridor.

Katz revealed that newly discovered smuggling tunnels running between Gaza and Egypt had come to light, warning that without an IDF presence in the corridor, Hamas could initiate a large-scale effort to restock its weapons.

This statement marks a stark contrast to what top IDF officials said during a September 2024 tour of the corridor. At that time, they claimed there were no more than ten tunnels, all of which had been sealed. They also asserted that Hamas had not been using them to bring in fresh weapons during the war, but only for moving existing munitions within Gaza.

Instead, senior officers stated that most of Hamas’s arsenal had been brought into the Strip long ago, primarily through the Rafah crossing when Egypt’s inspections were lax and failed to prevent smuggling above ground.

{Matzav.com Israel}

NJ Gov. Orders Local Police to Stop Working with Immigration Officials

New Jersey’s Democrat governor has instructed law enforcement across the state to cease cooperation with federal immigration authorities.

The directive was issued jointly by Governor Phil Murphy and Attorney General Matt Platkin and aligns with the state’s Immigrant Trust Directive, Shore News Network reported.

Murphy’s decision came shortly after the Trump administration added 27,000 “Outstanding Administrative Warrants for Removal from the United States” to the FBI’s National Crime Information Center (NCIC), in line with the former president’s immigration enforcement agenda.

“These Administrative Warrant messages appear in NCIC in a method that ALL members are to note they are NOT to be broadcast as ‘NCIC Hits,’” wrote Colonel Patrick Callahan of the New Jersey State Police in a department-wide internal memo. “NJDSP members are NOT permitted to contact ICE via the phone numbers provided.”

However, U.S. Attorney for the District of New Jersey, Alina Habba, pushed back, voicing her disapproval on X and issuing a stern reminder to state officials. “Let me be clear: Executive Orders will be followed and enforced in the State of New Jersey.”

Callahan’s directive reinforces the stipulations of New Jersey’s 2018 Immigrant Trust Directive, which restricts state police from assisting federal immigration enforcement bodies.

He further clarified that even when officers encounter individuals flagged on the list during routine policing, they are still barred from alerting ICE, as compliance with NCIC warrants in these situations violates state policy.

Callahan wrote in the memo: “A sample of how these Administrative Warrant messages appear in NCIC is attached. ALL members must be aware they are NOT to be broadcast as ‘NCIC Hits,’ which would lead our members to believe they are required to arrest the subject. As the Attorney General’s Immigrant Trust Directive outlines, we are NOT to arrest subjects on the ‘Outstanding Administrative Warrant’ entries, even if no other entries are provided. Also, upon receiving notification of an ‘Outstanding Administrative Warrant,’ NJSP members are NOT permitted to contact ICE via the phone numbers provided.”

He added: “Members of PSTS must pay particular attention to the wording of ‘Outstanding Administrative Warrant’ in the NCIC message so they adhere to the Attorney General’s Directive 2018-6.”

The memo concluded with a final warning: “Taking law enforcement action by arresting a subject based solely on an ‘Outstanding Administrative Warrant’ would violate the Attorney General’s Immigration Trust Directive referenced above.”

{Matzav.com}

Rubio Urges Hamas Disarmament In Talks With Saudi Foreign Minister

U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio met with Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Faisal bin Farhan Al Saud in Washington on Wednesday.

According to State Department Spokesperson Tammy Bruce, they discussed diplomatic efforts in Gaza aimed at releasing hostages and establishing a durable ceasefire, emphasizing the necessity for Hamas to be completely disarmed and disempowered. ​

Rubio expressed gratitude for Saudi Arabia’s efforts to facilitate peace between Russia and Ukraine, enhance economic and defense cooperation, eliminate the Houthi threat to the region and restore freedom of navigation in the Red Sea. ​

Both officials agreed on the importance of the Sudanese Armed Forces and Rapid Support Forces returning to peace talks, protecting civilians, opening humanitarian corridors and returning to civilian governance. ​

They also reaffirmed the significance of the U.S.-Saudi relationship and committed to exploring ways to further strengthen their partnership. JNS

{Matzav.com}

IDF To Evacuate Rafah, Create Buffer Zone Along Gaza-Egypt Border

The Israel Defense Forces is finalizing plans to evacuate Rafah city and establish a strategic buffer zone along Gaza’s southern border, in what Israeli officials describe as a critical step in the dismantling of Hamas’s military presence in the area.

The plan centers on the construction of the Morag Corridor—a new security strip extending from the Mediterranean coast in the west through the former settlement of Morag, and connecting to the Philadelphi Corridor along the Egyptian border, according to Hebrew media reports. The corridor is expected to stretch up to 5 kilometers (3.1 miles) into Gaza, effectively encircling Rafah.

Israeli Defense Minister Yisroel Katz stated earlier this week, “Rafah will be evacuated. This area will become a buffer zone to eliminate Hamas’s ability to regroup or smuggle weapons through the southern border.”

The corridor’s establishment comes amid increasing IDF activity in southern Gaza, with updated evacuation maps showing expanded clearance zones near the border. Israeli officials emphasize that this buffer is necessary to prevent the reconstitution of Hamas forces and the use of smuggling tunnels that run between Gaza and Egypt.

“This operation is not only tactical but strategic. Control of Rafah and the Philadelphi Corridor will close off Hamas’s last remaining external supply routes,” said an IDF source cited by Ynet.

While the IDF has yet to officially launch a full ground operation in Rafah, preparations are underway, and officials have reiterated that the offensive will move forward once civilian evacuation is complete. JNS

{Matzav.com Israel}

How China Has Amped Up Its Factories and Is Threatening To Crush US Industry With a New ‘Tsunami’ of Cheap Products

A flood of Chinese investment—totaling a staggering $1.9 trillion—is rapidly transforming global manufacturing, posing a serious threat to industries across the world, especially in the United States, the NY Post reports.

The Chinese government has funneled enormous sums into boosting factory output over the last four years, launching a massive expansion effort aimed at saturating international markets with low-cost products.

In response, former President Donald Trump on Wednesday announced a sweeping 125% tariff on all Chinese goods entering the U.S.—while suspending similar duties on most other nations—marking his latest move to shield American industries from the impact of China’s aggressive export strategy.

Governments around the world are taking similar steps. In recent months, countries like the European Union, Mexico, Brazil, and Thailand have either introduced new trade barriers or are actively considering tariffs to guard against a surge of Chinese goods flooding their markets.

“The tsunami is coming for everyone,” said Katherine Tai, trade representative for former President Joe Biden, told The New York Times.

In a strategic pivot, China has redirected financial resources previously allocated to housing development toward expanding its industrial base. State-run banks have extended nearly $2 trillion in additional loans to manufacturers since 2020, according to new figures obtained by The New York Times from China’s central bank.

Factories are popping up across the country at a breakneck pace, while existing plants are being upgraded with advanced machinery to churn out massive quantities of everything from consumer electronics to automobiles and agricultural chemicals—primed for export.

Among China’s most ambitious projects is the construction of two enormous auto manufacturing plants by carmaker BYD, each of which is on track to surpass the size of the Volkswagen facility in Wolfsburg, Germany—the largest car factory in the world.

China’s exports surged by double digits in the past two years, with a 13% increase in 2023 followed by 17% growth in 2024. Exports now make up about one-fifth of China’s entire economy.

By contrast, the U.S. has seen its export figures shrink. Once at record highs a decade ago, American exports now represent just 11% of the GDP, down from 13.6% in 2012.

Trade with China has been especially hard-hit. U.S. exports to the country dropped nearly 3% last year, falling to $144 billion, according to data from the U.S. Trade Representative’s office. At the same time, the trade deficit with China ballooned to $295 billion.

Despite some previous declines, Chinese imports into the U.S. bounced back last year, climbing almost 3% to reach nearly $440 billion.

Faced with China’s growing dominance in manufacturing, nations are racing to fortify their own markets. Brazil enacted higher tariffs on metal and fiber optic products from China in 2023. The EU slapped Chinese electric vehicles with tariffs exceeding 45% to help safeguard European carmakers.

Mexico has considered aligning its trade policies with U.S. measures by adopting matching tariffs, while Thailand is exploring changes to its free trade agreements that would introduce a 7% tax on inexpensive Chinese imports.

Trump’s dramatic new tariff is aimed at creating a strong protective barrier around U.S. industries in anticipation of the economic pressure heading America’s way.

In some sectors, steep tariffs have already proven effective—particularly on Chinese electric vehicles, which might otherwise have overwhelmed American automakers.

However, for some global competitors, China’s momentum has already had devastating effects. According to ASEAN Briefing, Chinese imports caused manufacturing output in Thailand to plummet by half last year.

{Matzav.com}

Migration Activists Sue to Block Trump from Deporting Alleged Illegal Alien Gangs

Immigration rights groups have launched a legal challenge to stop former President Donald Trump from deporting Venezuelans suspected of gang involvement by relying on a rarely used wartime law.

The Trump team turned to the Alien Enemies Act of 1798, an old statute originally created for national security in wartime, to remove undocumented individuals — particularly those it links to criminal organizations like Tren de Aragua and MS-13.

The Supreme Court upheld the administration’s ability to use the Alien Enemies Act to deport undocumented Venezuelans accused of gang ties. However, the justices made clear that before any deportations proceed, those targeted must be granted a chance to legally contest the action under the provisions of the Act.

A spokesperson for Trump’s Justice Department emphasized, “The department has vigorously defended President Trump’s policies and will continue to do so whenever challenged in federal court by rogue judges who think they can control the President’s foreign policy and national security agenda. The Supreme Court’s recent decisions have validated the DOJ’s ongoing arguments to this end in court.”

Lee Gelernt of the American Civil Liberties Union pushed back, saying, “Contrary to the administration’s wishful characterization, the Supreme Court emphatically rejected the government’s position that they could whisk people away without giving them an opportunity to challenge their removal to a foreign prison.”

Gelernt continued, “The Court simply issued a technical ruling that the challenges should be by habeas corpus, but in no way remotely suggested the Trump administration would win these challenges.”

In response, the ACLU and allied groups have filed additional motions aiming to prevent the federal government from invoking the Alien Enemies Act at all.

Should that legal maneuver not succeed, the organizations point out that the Supreme Court’s decision still mandates that detainees be officially informed they’re being classified as “enemies” under the law — and be given the opportunity to fight that label in court. The Court did not address whether Trump’s use of the act was legally sound.

This could force immigration officials to present their rationale for designating certain individuals as gang-affiliated and eligible for expedited deportation. Until now, the administration has declined to provide names or evidence, though it claims some of those deported committed serious offenses.

According to one analyst from the Migration Policy Institute, the ruling ensures that due process protections must be extended to these individuals.

“ICE’s position so far has been, ‘We decide that these people are aliens, and we can just remove them. We get to decide who is an enemy and who is not,’ and that, I think, has been set aside by the Supreme Court. That’s the good part. The bad part is that, to use the due process that the Supreme Court said they’re entitled to, is now a much more tedious and difficult hurdle to cross,” said Muzaffar Chishti, a senior fellow at the institute.

{Matzav.com}

Iran’s President Insists Tehran ‘Not After Nuclear Bomb,’ Invites US Investors

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian stated on Wednesday that his country has no intention of building a nuclear weapon and even opened the door to potential U.S. economic involvement, should a nuclear agreement be reached.

His remarks came ahead of anticipated negotiations in Oman this past weekend concerning Iran’s controversial nuclear ambitions. The talks follow U.S. President Donald Trump’s return to office and his ongoing warnings that he would take military action against Iran to stop it from acquiring nuclear arms if needed.

“We are not after a nuclear bomb,” Iran’s President Masoud Pezeshkian said in a speech in Tehran. “You [in the West] have verified it 100 times. Do it 1,000 times again.”

Despite its denials, Iran — which has openly vowed to eliminate Israel — has significantly increased its uranium enrichment, reaching 60 percent purity, a level that has no civilian use and is widely seen as a step toward weapons-grade material. The regime has also restricted access to its nuclear sites by international inspectors.

Pezeshkian added that “his excellency has no opposition to investment by American investors in Iran,” referring to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. “American investors: Come and invest.”

This proposal marks a notable shift from Tehran’s previous posture following the 2015 nuclear accord, when Iran attempted to purchase U.S.-made aircraft but did not allow broader American commercial entry into its markets.

Such an offer could be appealing to President Trump, who pulled out of the 2015 agreement during his first administration and has made clear he is pursuing a new deal with Tehran.

Pezeshkian, elected last year on a promise to strengthen ties with Western countries, also said that the discussions scheduled for Saturday in Oman between Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi and U.S. Mideast envoy Steve Witkoff would be “indirectly” conducted.

The upcoming negotiations were first disclosed by Trump on Monday. He has repeatedly said he’s willing to order strikes against Iran if it refuses to come to terms and has described the discussions as direct — a possibility Iran has not entirely dismissed following initial engagement.

Still, Iranian officials told Reuters on Tuesday that Tehran is approaching the Oman talks with caution, expressing deep distrust of U.S. motives and minimal hope that the negotiations will lead to real progress.

{Matzav.com}

House Approves Senate Blueprint For ‘Big, Beautiful’ Trump Budget Bill After Conservative Rebellion

House Republicans narrowly passed a long-awaited budget framework on Thursday, finally paving the way for them to begin crafting President Trump’s ambitious legislative proposal, often referred to as his “big, beautiful” agenda.

The budget plan was approved in a tight 216–214 vote, with Republican Representatives Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Victoria Spartz of Indiana breaking ranks and voting against the resolution.

Although this represents a crucial procedural step forward, internal party divisions over federal spending levels continue to pose major challenges for advancing Trump’s signature policies.

“We want to make sure we’re delivering on our shared goals in the budget resolution process,” House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) said to reporters before the vote. “Our two chambers are directly aligned also on a very important principle: And that is the principle of fiscal responsibility.”

“We’re going to protect the essential programs for everybody that’s eligible to receive those.”

In order to begin the reconciliation process—which allows for legislation to pass the Senate with a simple majority and sidestep a Democratic filibuster—both chambers of Congress had to approve the same budget resolution.

With Republicans holding 53 seats in the Senate, the reconciliation path is crucial to enacting Trump’s legislative priorities on tax reform, energy expansion, military funding, and securing the border.

The Senate had already signed off on the compromise resolution the week before.

For weeks, House and Senate Republicans had been locked in a standoff over how aggressively to slash government spending in the budget blueprint that would support Trump’s key initiatives.

Unable to reach a unified stance quickly, the Senate moved ahead with its own version last week, which included dual sets of reconciliation instructions: one aligned with the House’s earlier February plan calling for at least $1.5 trillion in reductions, and another far less aggressive option that proposed just $4 billion in cuts tailored specifically for the Senate.

{Matzav.com}

EU Will Put Tariff Retaliation on Hold for 90 Days to Match Trump’s Pause

The European Union’s top governing body announced Thursday that it would freeze its planned retaliation against new U.S. tariffs for a period of 90 days, aligning its response with President Donald Trump’s decision to temporarily suspend the tariffs. The pause is aimed at allowing space for talks that could lead to a diplomatic resolution.

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen confirmed that the Commission, which oversees trade for all 27 EU nations, “took note of the announcement by President Trump.”

She stated that the EU would delay the imposition of tariffs on $23 billion worth of American goods for 90 days, explaining that the decision was made because “we want to give negotiations a chance.”

However, she cautioned that this delay is not indefinite: “If negotiations are not satisfactory, our countermeasures will kick in.”

Trump recently instituted a 20% tariff on European imports, part of a wider campaign of trade restrictions aimed at addressing U.S. trade imbalances. He announced, however, that these would be paused for three months to enable discussions with affected countries.

While von der Leyen expressed appreciation for Trump’s move to suspend most of the new tariffs, she refrained from confirming whether the EU would follow through with its planned retaliatory tariffs. “I have authorized a 90 day PAUSE,” Trump said, referencing over 75 nations that had entered trade negotiations with the U.S. without retaliating against his latest tariff hikes. During this pause, countries covered by the suspension will face a 10% tariff. The EU’s initial tariff rate was 20%, though it’s unclear exactly how the 27-member bloc will be affected.

Notably, China was excluded from the pause, and Trump raised tariffs on Chinese imports to a staggering 125%.

Von der Leyen referred to the suspension of retaliatory tariffs as “an important step towards stabilizing the global economy. Clear, predictable conditions are essential for trade and supply chains to function.”

Prior to Trump’s announcement on Wednesday, EU nations had voted to enact their own tariffs targeting $23 billion worth of U.S. goods, in response to his 25% duties on imported steel and aluminum. The EU had criticized those measures as “unjustified and damaging.”

The EU’s tariffs were designed to roll out in phases, with certain levies taking effect on April 15, others on May 15, and the final batch on December 1. The European Commission has yet to disclose the full list of impacted products. In recent weeks, the bloc’s lead trade negotiator has been making frequent trips between Brussels and Washington in an attempt to prevent a major trade fallout.

Despite Trump’s pause, von der Leyen has not indicated any change in the EU’s timeline. Commission spokesperson Olof Gill said that the EU “will now take the necessary time to assess this latest development, in close consultation with our member states and industry, before deciding on next steps.”

EU countries reiterated their preference for a negotiated solution to the growing trade dispute. Von der Leyen reaffirmed that goal, stating the EU seeks a resolution “with the goal of achieving frictionless and mutually beneficial trade.”

Nevertheless, von der Leyen emphasized that the EU remains committed to broadening its trade relationships globally.

She affirmed that the EU will continue “engaging with countries that account for 87% of global trade and share our commitment to a free and open exchange of goods, services, and ideas,” while also working to eliminate barriers to trade within its own internal market.

“Together, Europeans will emerge stronger from this crisis,” von der Leyen said.

{Matzav.com}

US Stocks Plunge After Record Rally On Trump’s Tariff Pause

U.S. markets tumbled sharply Thursday morning, reversing the dramatic upswing sparked by President Trump’s declaration of a three-month halt on most import tariffs.

By 10 a.m. Eastern Time, the Dow Jones Industrial Average had shed 836 points, a 2.1% drop, after an extraordinary leap of 2,962.86 points the day before — the biggest single-day point increase on record.

Meanwhile, the S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100 also turned negative, retreating 2.7% and 3.3% respectively in the wake of Wednesday’s monumental rally.

The previous day saw Wall Street reach new heights, with the S&P 500 surging more than 9%, marking its third-largest daily percentage rise since World War II, and the Nasdaq Composite experiencing its second-strongest session in history.

{Matzav.com}

Turkey Confirms Coordination With Israel In Syria To Avoid Military Clashes

Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan confirmed on Wednesday that Turkey is working with Israel at an operational level in Syria to ensure that military activities do not clash, according to Reuters.

His statement came after a spike in Israeli air raids within Syria, which Israeli authorities said were aimed at stopping a Turkish military operation in the area.

As reported by Reuters last week, Turkey had conducted reconnaissance missions over several airbases in Syria as part of early-stage plans for a possible joint defense strategy. Those same locations were later struck by Israel.

“While we are conducting certain operations in Syria, there needs to be a deconfliction mechanism with Israel, which flies aircraft in that region, similar to mechanisms we have with the U.S. and Russia,” Fidan said during an interview with CNN Turk on Wednesday.

He clarified that the communication between the two nations is purely logistical. “There are technical contacts to prevent combat elements from misunderstanding each other,” he explained, adding that such coordination occurs “when needed.”

Fidan was quick to point out that this coordination should not be seen as a step toward broader political engagement. “These talks are limited to deconfliction in Syria,” he stated.

Ankara has become increasingly vocal in condemning Israel’s military actions. Just last week, Turkey’s Foreign Ministry slammed Israel for its strikes on Hezbollah sites in Lebanon.

“These attacks have once again exposed Israel’s flagrant disregard for international law and its ongoing threat to the region’s security and stability. The international community must stand united against Israel’s efforts to create a perpetual state of conflict in the region,” the ministry said.

In a strongly worded rebuttal, Israel’s Foreign Ministry responded, “While violently suppressing his own citizens and carrying out mass arrests of political opponents, [President Recep Tayyip] Erdogan presumes to preach lofty values to the international community.”

“In Erdogan’s Turkey, there is no justice, no law, and no freedom. Israel does not need Erdogan’s ridiculous moral sermons. Israel acts to defend itself and its citizens against real threats and actual attacks — and it will continue to do so,” the statement added.

Since the war in Gaza began on October 7, 2023, Turkish President Erdogan has ramped up his rhetoric against Israel. Prior to that date, both countries were in the process of mending their long-frayed relationship.

Most recently, Erdogan labeled Israel a “terror state” after it carried out a surprise assault on terrorist infrastructure in Gaza.

{Matzav.com}

COMING THIS CHOL HAMOED: Watch the Livestream Premiere of “Leave it to Kletzkin”!

[COMMUNICATED]

Get ready for 40 minutes of comedy gold!

This Chol Hamoed, join us for the livestream premiere of “Leave it to Kletzkin,” the must-see, hilarious comedy film for the whole family. 

Featuring the Stars of Bardak – starring in their first English Film.

Save the Date: Get your unique access code now for the livestream premiere on Motzei Yom Tov Rishon, April 14th at 9:30 PM EST.

Don’t Miss Out!

Vote and Get Your Access Code Now! – Click Here 

Presented by Eretz Hakodesh – Slate 11

Hamas Seeks Legal Removal From UK Terror List, Claims Proscription Unjust

Hamas, the group responsible for the deadly October 7, 2023, attack in southern Israel, has begun a legal push to overturn its classification as a terrorist organization in the United Kingdom, The Guardian reported on Wednesday.

The challenge was submitted to the UK Home Office and includes a formal witness statement from senior Hamas figure Mousa Abu Marzouq, who is disputing the group’s current banned status, the report said.

In his statement, which was published by Drop Site News, Abu Marzouq declared, “The British government’s decision to proscribe Hamas is an unjust one that is symptomatic of its unwavering support for Zionism, apartheid, occupation and ethnic cleansing in Palestine for over a century. Hamas does not and never has posed a threat to Britain, despite the latter’s ongoing complicity in the genocide of our people.”

Hamas contends that it is not a terrorist entity but rather a “Palestinian Islamic liberation and resistance movement whose goal is to liberate Palestine and confront the Zionist project.”

The Home Office declined to issue a comment on the matter, citing its policy of not speaking on ongoing legal proceedings.

The UK first added Hamas’s armed wing, the Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades, to its list of proscribed terror groups in 2001. That designation was expanded in 2021 to include Hamas’s political division, with then-Home Secretary Priti Patel stating that the distinction between the two was meaningless and that Hamas functions as one unified terrorist body.

Under British law, any organization labeled as a terrorist group is banned entirely, making it a crime to belong to it, support it, or publicly display its insignia.

Hamas’s legal filing further argues that the UK’s stance has chilled free expression and stifled open conversation.

“Rather than allow freedom of speech, police have embarked on a campaign of political intimidation and persecution of journalists, academics, peace activists and students over their perceived support for Hamas,” their lawyers wrote. “People in Britain must be free to speak about Hamas and its struggle to restore to the Palestinian people the right to self-determination.”

The legal documents also claim that the proscription violates international legal commitments, including Britain’s responsibilities to prevent genocide and challenge what Hamas describes as Israel’s “illegal occupation” of Palestinian land. Hamas is described in the brief as “the only effective military force resisting” such actions.

Responding to the challenge, Shadow Foreign Secretary Priti Patel stood by her original position, saying, “Hamas is an evil Iranian-backed terrorist organisation, which kidnaps, tortures and murders people, including British nationals. They pose an ongoing threat to our security and to the peace and stability of the Middle East… They show no respect for human rights, life and dignity and have oppressed people living in Gaza for too long.”

{Matzav.com}

Canadian Liberal Leader On Israeli ‘Genocide’ Remark: I Didn’t Hear That Word

Canadian Liberal leader Mark Carney is stepping back from comments made during a recent campaign rally in Calgary, where he appeared to affirm a crowd member’s allegation that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza, according to a report from CBC.

As Carney was preparing to address attendees at the event, someone from the audience shouted, “Mr. Carney, there’s a genocide in Palestine!” Though the speaker wasn’t shown on camera, the outburst was clearly audible.

Carney responded, “I’m aware. That’s why we have an arms embargo,” which prompted the crowd to erupt in chants of his name, effectively cutting off any further discussion at that moment.

Speaking to the press the next day, Carney attempted to clarify his response, explaining that he hadn’t heard the specific accusation involving the word “genocide” and had only meant to acknowledge the existing Canadian arms policy.

“I didn’t hear that word,” Carney said while campaigning in Calgary, according to CBC. “It’s noisy. If you’re up there you hear snippets of what people say and I heard Gaza, and my point was I’m aware of the situation in Gaza.”

He elaborated further, saying, “Canada does … have restrictions, probably from January 2024, on arms exports, or permits for arms exports to Israel with the sole exception of the Iron Dome which protects them more broadly.”

Since being chosen last month to succeed former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau as head of the Liberal Party, Carney has spoken out about conditions in Gaza. He criticized the decision to halt electricity to the territory, though he avoided naming Israel specifically in his remarks.

“It has been more than two days that the supply of electricity to Gaza has been shut off,” Carney said. “It must resume. Essentials including food, electricity and medical supplies should never be used as political tools.”

He also urged international cooperation to support legal and humanitarian principles in the region, saying, “Canada must work with our allies to stand up for international law to promote sustainable peace and security in the Middle East and to support full access to humanitarian aid for Palestinian families.”

Carney called on both sides to make progress, stating that efforts should focus on “the return of all hostages and the completion of the ceasefire agreement.”

During the initial stages of the Israel-Hamas war following the October 7, 2023 attack, then-Prime Minister Trudeau supported Israel’s right to defend itself and endorsed a joint international statement emphasizing both that right and the importance of civilian protection.

However, Trudeau later condemned Israel’s conduct in Gaza, saying the “killing of women, of children, of babies” had to stop.

Canadians will head to the polls for a federal election on April 28.

{Matzav.com}

Trump On Iran: If It Requires Military Action, Israel Will Be the Leader of That

President Donald Trump stated on Wednesday that should it become necessary to take military steps against Iran’s nuclear development, Israel will be a key participant and may even spearhead the action.

“With Iran, if it requires military, we’re going to have military. Israel will be the leader of that. But nobody leads us, we do what we want to do,” Trump said during remarks from the Oval Office.

When asked how long he would give Iran to come to the table with a deal, Trump said, “I can’t really be specific, but when you start talks, you know if they’re going along well or not, and I would say the conclusion would be when I think they’re not going along well.”

While Trump has consistently voiced a preference for diplomacy over conflict, he has also made it clear that he won’t hesitate to use force if needed to prevent Iran from becoming a nuclear threat.

Earlier in the week, Trump announced during a meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu that the U.S. planned to engage Iran in discussions over the weekend about its nuclear ambitions.

Even though Trump indicated that these would be direct talks, Iranian authorities clarified that any interaction would be indirect, not in-person negotiations.

Tehran had recently turned down Trump’s invitation for direct dialogue, declining the proposal delivered in a letter addressed to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

Trump later issued a strong warning, cautioning that serious consequences would follow if Iran did not commit to a nuclear deal.

He followed up with an even more severe threat, saying, “if they don’t make a deal, there will be bombing — and it will be bombing the likes of which they have never seen before.”

{Matzav.com}

Trump Signs Executive Order Undoing ‘Dumb’ Obama-Biden Showerhead Regulation: ‘Makes America’s Showers Great Again’

President Trump issued a new executive order on Wednesday targeting federal water-use restrictions, specifically those implemented during the Obama and Biden administrations. He promoted the move with the slogan that it would help “Make America’s Showers Great Again.”

“Overregulation chokes the American economy and stifles personal freedom. A small but meaningful example is the Obama-Biden war on showers,” Trump declared in the executive order.

The directive eliminates lengthy federal guidelines—thousands of words long—set by the Obama-era Department of Energy, which redefined what constitutes a “showerhead.” These rules were brought back under Biden after Trump had previously eased them during his presidency.

“To the extent any definition is necessary for this common piece of hardware, the Oxford English Dictionary defines ‘showerhead’ in one short sentence,” Trump noted in the order. He instructed Energy Secretary Chris Wright to “immediately rescind the overly complicated” Obama-Biden regulations.

The administration confirmed that the rule change would restore the long-standing 2.5-gallons-per-minute water flow limit that had been in effect since 1992.

“President Trump is restoring sanity to at least one small part of the federal regulations,” the White House said in a statement.

“The Order frees Americans from excessive regulations that turned a basic household item into a bureaucratic nightmare,” the statement added. “No longer will showerheads be weak and worthless.”

The administration criticized the previous policy, claiming it was driven by “a radical green agenda that made life worse for everyday Americans” and even rendered certain multi-nozzle shower designs “illegal.”

The scope of the new executive order also extends to other household fixtures such as sinks and dishwashers.

“No market failure justifies this intrusion,” the White House said, referring to the rescinded water-use regulations. “Americans pay for their own water and should be free to choose their showerheads without federal meddling.”

“President Trump is slashing red tape and ending Biden’s dumb war on things that work.”

{Matzav.com}

The Essence of Pesach

By Rabbi Pinchos Lipschutz

The essence of the Haggadah and Pesach is the relationship between father and son and the obligation for a father to transmit to his son the story of the geulah from Mitzrayim. The Torah and Chazal prescribe different ways to speak to different children and lay out the format for the Seder evening conversation.

Rav Yitzchok Zilberstein related the following story.

One Shabbos morning a few years ago, an old man and his son entered a shul in Petach Tikvah. They stood frozen at the door, gazing at the people davening Pesukei Dezimra. Finally, they felt comfortable enough to find themselves seats and sit down. There was no need for a siddur, because they both couldn’t daven, as they had been locked behind the Iron Curtain for many years.

The older man paid attention to the chazzan and seemed to enjoy his tunes and chanting, while the younger man waited for his father to lose interest so they could leave and return home. He’d have to wait.

As the laining progressed, the old man started paying particular attention. All of a sudden, he started screaming towards the gabbai in a beautiful Litvishe Yiddish, “I must have an aliyah. Please, I must have an aliyah.” The kind gabbai acquiesced and called the senior guest to the Torah at the next opportunity.

The old man borrowed a tallis and a yarmulka and made his way to the bimah. He pushed away the siddur that was given to him to read the brachos and, with a deep and emotional voice, he began to slowly recite the brocha, saying each word with meaning.

When the baal korei finished his portion, the scene repeated itself, as the man cried his way through the words of the second brocha. There was utter silence in the shul, as everyone fixed their eyes on the old man standing at the bimah crying.

After davening, people approached the guest. They asked him questions, intending to elicit his story.

“I was born and bred in Vilna,” he began. “When I was 12-1/2, my parents started arguing about where I should go to school. My mother wanted me to continue in yeshiva, but my father wanted me to go to the gymnasia school of the Maskilim. He said that this way, I would learn a trade and how to maintain my Yiddishkeit while living among goyim.

“My father won and I was sent to that school. I began focusing on the studies, which brought my father much satisfaction.

“My bar mitzvah celebration was held in the large Vilna shul. I was given the aliyah for maftir, made the birchos haTorah and lained the haftorah. My father was beaming, while my mother was upstairs in the ezras noshim weeping.

“As I came down from the bimah, Rav Chaim Ozer Grodzensky came over and shook my father’s hand, wishing him mazel tov. And then he said to my father, ‘For your benefit, let me warn you that if you do not remove your son from the gymnasia school, generations will pass before your son will be called to the Torah a second time!’

“My father did not obey the rov.

“Today, for some reason, I felt a pull to the shul,” the man said as he began to weep once again. “When the baal korei began to read the parsha, I remembered that this is my bar mitzvah parsha.”

He raised his voice and said, “Yidden, her vos ich zog eich. From that Shabbos of my bar mitzvah, when I had an aliyah to the Torah, until today is exactly seventy years [two generations]. Today is the first time since my bar mitzvah that I received an aliyah!

Ay, iz der gaon geven gerecht. Woe is to me, what the great rov said was so true.”

His father, back in Vilna, might have meant well. He wanted the best for his son and thought that the Haskalah school would provide for him the best of both worlds. But he should have listened to the rov, because if you want nachas from your children, the way to achieve that goal is by following the Torah, as interpreted by the gedolei olam, our leaders, the people such as Rav Chaim Ozer Grodzensky with whom Hashem blesses us in every generation. Those who think they understand better and ignore the warnings of the rabbonim gedolim jeopardize their ability to succeed in this world and the next.

Pesach is an intrinsic part of our fiber. Its mitzvos, rituals, liturgy and special foods enrich and enhance our souls year after year.

While the Yom Tov has a special effect on children, as we grow older we perceive new depths. Chag hacheirus becomes more meaningful, as we appreciate its valuable messages in a different, richer way. We increasingly realize how Pesach is meant to equip us with new resolve to rid ourselves of chometz and cheit, villains and tormentors. It drives us to pine ever more for the geulah, so that we might merit visiting the home of Hashem, offering korbanos to Him.

We recognize that we can only arrive at cheirus and geulah by doing what is incumbent upon us and fulfilling our missions as best as we can. We reach our potential by delving into the study of Torah and seeking messages from great men whose lives are totally devoted to Torah and nothing else. Sometimes, they tell us to act, and other times, they say to desist. Those who seek the brachos of the Torah follow it and don’t follow the path of greater personal benefit or enjoyment, whether they understand or not.

At the time of Krias Yam Suf, the Jews were afraid that the Mitzriyim would catch up to them and destroy them. They cried out to Moshe for a plan. Instead, they were told, “Hashem yilocheim lochem ve’atem tacharishun. Your job at this time is to remain silent and do nothing. Hashem will fight for you.”

Chazal state that this advice is eternal. There are times when we must speak up and times when we must remain silent, times to do battle and times to be passive. Our limited human intelligence is not always able to figure out the proper course of action. How we are to act in all times is prescribed by the Torah, as is so beautifully expressed by Shlomo Hamelech in Koheles: Eis livkos, ve’eis lischok… Eis le’ehov, ve’eis lisno, eis milchomah, ve’eis shalom.” How we are to act in each “eis,” or time, is determined by the Torah.

The Torah is constant, but people change. Every generation is different. We have a generational obligation to speak to our children in a language and voice that they will understand, respect and follow. What worked in the past does not necessarily work now, and to assume that it does, risks losing touch with those whom we love and whom we wish will follow in our ways.

After his arrival in Eretz Yisroel, Rav Elozor Menachem Man Shach lived in a small apartment in the Kerem Avrohom neighborhood of Yerushalayim. The diminutive, humble man kept to himself, engaging in Torah learning all the time and rarely opening his mouth to express an opinion on issues of the day. His acquaintances in the Kerem shul saw him as a talmid chochom, but few foresaw a position of leadership for the scholar.

Eventually, the poverty-stricken Rav Shach accepted a position as a maggid shiur in Tel Aviv, grateful for the chance to teach Torah and earn an income. Within weeks of starting the new job, however, he detected that the leader of the place possessed an outlook that was contrary to the views of gedolei Yisroel.

When he came upon that realization, Rav Shach immediately resigned his position and returned home, settling back into his corner of the small neighborhood shul where he once again spent his days and nights learning.

His rebbi, the Brisker Rov, encouraged him that he acted properly by leaving his job and told him that a better position would come along. “Someone who forfeits parnossah because of principle will see brachos,” he told him.

In time, the Ponovezher Rov discovered Rav Shach, and after living in virtual anonymity for so long, the rosh yeshiva’s rise to leadership began, ushering in the glory era for the olam haTorah.

He was an exceedingly humble man, but when the Torah demanded strength from him, he was strong as a lion.

Some years ago, I wrote of a dream I had before Pesach that year. In the dream, I gained a new understanding of the posuk, “V’acharei chein yeitzu b’rechush gadol,” in which Hashem foretold to our forefather Avrohom the future course of Jewish history. Hashem told Avrohom that after being enslaved for many years, the Jewish people would be freed and would depart their host country with a great treasure.

The common understanding is that the promise of “a great treasure” was fulfilled with the vast quantity of belongings the Jews received from the Mitzriyim prior to being sent out.

In the dream, I thought that the rechush gadol the Jews received was the matzoh that baked on their backs as they left b’chipazon. Matzoh is not simply a physical food. It possesses spiritual qualities and is a gift to the Bnei Yisroel. Only we have the ability to take flour and water and transform them into a cheftzah shel mitzvah.

The Netziv of Volozhin, in his peirush on Shir Hashirim titled “Rinah Shel Torah,” comments in his introduction on the posuk which states, “Sheishes yomim tochal matzos uvayom hashevi’i atzeres l’Hashem Elokecha lo sa’aseh melacha – You shall eat matzos for six days and on the seventh you shall rest for Hashem and you shall not do any work” (Devorim 16:8). He explains that on the first day of Pesach, the obligation to eat matzoh is to remember that we left Mitzrayim in such haste that the bread the fleeing Jews took along for the journey had no time to rise. He says that the obligation related to the consumption of matzoh the first six days of Pesach recalls the eating of the korban mincha by the kohanim. The korbanos mincha were brought of matzoh breads and were never made of chometz. That was to teach the Jewish people that in order to draw closer to Hashem and achieve a higher level of holiness, they must reduce their involvement in the pursuits of Olam Hazeh.

On Pesach, we sustain ourselves with matzoh for six days for that same higher purpose. On Pesach, a Jew attempts to rise spiritually and become closer to Hashem.

Therefore, on the seventh and final day of the Yom Tov, we are commanded to refrain from work and to internalize the message of the six days of eating matzoh.

Abstaining from chometz is meant to affect us in a fundamental way. It is supposed to change our outlook on life and remind us of our purpose here. Eating matzoh for seven days is not something we do to fill ourselves physically. The change in diet is meant to bring about a spiritual change in our souls.

This message supports the idea that the matzoh is a rechush gadol. Matzoh is a gift from Hashem that enables us to elevate our rote observance of mitzvos to a higher dimension of avodas Hashem. Partaking of matzoh for a week is meant to reduce our drive for physical gratification. If we heed its message, it is truly a gift, a rechush gadol, which has the power to uplift and purify us and draw us closer to our Creator.

I found a similar idea in the words of the Ramchal in Derech Hashem (4:8). He says that as long as the Jews were enslaved in Mitzrayim and living amongst the pagan population, their bodies were darkened by the poison of impurity that overwhelmed them. When they were finally delivered from that society, goy mikerev goy, their bodies underwent a purification process so that they would be able to accept the Torah and mitzvos.

This is the reason they were commanded to refrain from consuming chometz and to eat matzoh. The bread that we eat all year is prepared with yeast and rises. Easier to digest and tastier, it is the natural food of man. It feeds man’s yeitzer hora and more base inclinations.

Klal Yisroel was commanded to refrain from eating chometz for a week in order to minimize the power of the yeitzer hora and their inclination towards the physical, and to strengthen their attachment to the spiritual.

It is impossible for people to live on this diet all year round, but that is not Hashem’s intent. If we maintain this diet for the duration of Pesach while incorporating the lessons of matzoh, it will energize us spiritually for the remainder of the year.

The Ramchal connects this to the dictum of the Rambam in Hilchos Dei’os (2:1) that a person seeking to rectify his conduct should go to the opposite extreme of his natural inclination, and he will then end up in the middle, where Hashem wants us to be.

The Rambam continues (3:1) that a person should not reason that since kinah, taavah and kavod – jealousy, evil desires and the craving for honor – lead to man’s demise from this world, he should therefore adopt the extremes of self-denial, refusing to eat meat or drink wine, marry, live in a nice house or wear nice clothes. According to the Rambam, it is forbidden to follow this path; one who does is called a sinner.

The Netziv’s and the Ramchal’s understanding of Pesach is in accord with the words of the Rambam. While it is undesirable for people to live this way all year round, if someone takes a temporary turn to the extreme, it will help him return to the middle, where we all belong.

The Yom Tov of Pesach provides a respite from the pressures that govern our daily lives. Pesach is one week of the year that frees us from the yeitzer hora and the pursuits that drive us throughout the year, which lead to dead ends, disappointment and sadness.

Matzoh is indeed a rechush gadol, a treasure of the Jewish people. Matzoh weakens our evil inclinations and strengthens our inherent goodness. Matzoh has the ability to raise us above our preoccupation with the mundane.

Pesach is not meant to be a holiday of gorging and self-indulgence. On the contrary, Pesach is the time given to us to refrain to a certain degree from such pursuits and to absorb the lesson of the matzoh.

Following a week of such elevated behavior, we continue along that pattern as we count to Shavuos, when we mark the acceptance of the Torah as the ultimate gift from G-d to man. It is only after the week of matzoh and seven weeks of Sefirah that we can achieve the highest possible levels of spiritual accomplishment.

If we take the words of the great Netziv and Ramchal to heart and properly observe the mitzvos of Pesach, and we review the lessons the matzoh can teach us, its influence and inspiration will long remain with us, giving us the strength to rise above whatever challenges we face throughout the rest of the year.

Gedolim such as Rav Chaim Ozer, Rav Shach, the Brisker Rov, the Netziv and the Ramchal light up our way and provide direction and inspiration for us to follow if we wish to enjoy life the way Hashem intends us to and if we wish to be successful in all we do.

Despite all we have been through, a constant in Torah life is that those who seek lives of blessings follow the words of Torah giants. In our day as well, despite the prevalence of so much superficiality, cynicism, pessimism and negativity, when it comes to the bottom line, people who adhere to Torah know that wisdom is found by those who dedicate their lives to the pure pursuit of Torah and mitzvos.

It was Erev Pesach in the Bergen-Belsen concentration camp. A couple of weeks before Yom Tov, the Bluzhever Rebbe, Rav Yisroel Spira, placed his life in jeopardy and approached the murderous head of the camp, Commandant Hass. He asked permission for forty men to bake matzoh for Pesach. He asked the Nazi to supply them with wheat, and in return they would forgo their daily ration of bread for eight days.

Surprisingly, the Nazi examined the request seriously, without issuing any threats of punishment. However, he said that since the German Reich was run in a very orderly fashion, he would have to get clearance from Berlin. A week later, the response came from Berlin and the request was approved.

After returning to the camp from their body-breaking labor, the rebbe and his group assembled a small oven and began grinding wheat kernels to make flour. They mixed the flour with water and quickly kneaded the mixture, rolling out matzos to bake in their tiny oven. Flames danced atop the branches fueling the oven and the holy work of baking matzos for Pesach in Bergen-Belsen was underway.

Suddenly, the commandant burst into the room, screaming at the Jews like a wild man and breaking everything he saw. His eyes fixed on those of the rebbe and he beat him to a pulp. When he was done, the 56-year-old rebbe was barely hanging on to life.

The historic attempt ended disastrously.

The next night, the people sat down to a “Seder” in the rebbe’s barracks. They had everything – well, almost everything. The rebbe knew the Haggadah by heart, and he was going to lead the Seder. For wine, they were going to drink the slop the Nazis called coffee. There was no shortage of maror, with bitterness everywhere. The rebbe let it be known that he was able to retrieve and save a very small piece of matzoh. They were set.

When it came time at the Seder to eat matzah, everyone assumed that the rebbe would be the one to perform the mitzvah and eat the small piece he had rescued. After all, he was the oldest, it was his idea to bake matzos to being with, and he had risked his life to obtain permission for it. Not only that, but he was a tzaddik, he was leading the Seder, and he was the one who had saved the piece. But they were wrong.

After proclaiming “motzie matzah,” the rebbe looked around the room, as if he was trying to determine who is the most appropriate person to eat the matzoh. A widow, Mrs. Kotziensky, stood up and said, “Since upon this night we engage in transmitting our traditions from one generation to the next, I propose that my young son be the one to eat the matzoh.”

The rebbe agreed. “This night,” he said, “is all about teaching the future generations about Yetzias Mitzrayim. We will give the boy the matzoh.”

After they were freed, the widow approached the Bluzhever Rebbe. She needed help. Someone had proposed a shidduch for her, but she had no way to find out about the man. Maybe, she said, the rebbe could help her. “Can you find out who he is? Can you see if he is appropriate for me and if I am appropriate for him?”

“What is his name?” asked the rebbe.

The woman responded, “Yisroel Spira.”

The rebbe said to her, “Yes, I know him well. It is a good idea that you should get to know him.”

She returned to the shadchan and gave her approval to set up the match. When the woman showed up at the right address, standing before her was none other than Rav Yisroel Spira, the man she knew as the Bluzhever Rebbe!

A short time later, they married, and the little boy who ate matzah in Bergen-Belsen became the rebbe’s son and eventual successor.

Which spiritual attributes did the rebbe see in that woman that led him to marry her? When asked, the rebbe answered that in the cauldron of Bergen-Belsen, where the horizon was measured in minutes and the future was a day at a time, a woman who believed in the nitzchiyus of Am Yisroel, that our people is eternal, and who worried for the future generation, was someone with whom it was worthy to perpetuate the golden chain.

Thankfully, we aren’t tested the way those holy people were that night in Bergen-Belsen. Our matzos come easy. For a few dollars, we can have as many as we want. We don’t have to pay for them with our lives. We can drink wine without fearing a pogrom. We can eat maror and not live it. We don’t have to make the awful choices our forefathers were forced to make.

We can sit as kings and queens at the Seder, surrounded by different generations, concentrating on doing our best to transmit our glorious heritage to the future generations, ensuring that they know the story of Yetzias Mitzrayim and Avodim Hayinu.

May we merit much nachas and simcha, cheirus and freedom, kedusha and mitzvos, at the Seder and every day of our lives.

May we merit that this be the last Pesach in golus.

{Matzav.com}

“Safe Streets”: Mayor Adams Reveals Name Of The Independent Party He’s Running Under As Part of Reelection Bid

Eric Adams has revealed the new political banner he’ll campaign under as he mounts an uphill fight for reelection: Safe Streets, Affordable City.

Speaking to 1010Wins on Wednesday afternoon, the former Democrat shared that he intends to appear on that line in the general election, having opted not to participate in the Democratic primary this time around.

“Those are the issues that are important to New Yorkers,” Adams said of his third-party name. “They want a safe city. They want an affordable city. And I want them to know that is what I produced for them.”

Adams had already declared last week that he would launch an independent campaign, setting the stage for what could become a crowded race. Other likely contenders include Democratic frontrunner Andrew Cuomo, expected Republican nominee Curtis Sliwa, the Working Families Party—possibly represented by Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani or Comptroller Brad Lander—and attorney Jim Walden.

Still, Adams emphasized during Tuesday’s interview that he hasn’t abandoned his party affiliation, even though he’s criticized it publicly on multiple occasions.

Hizzoner’s decision to run independently came just one day after prosecutors officially dropped a long-running corruption probe that had hovered over his administration.

{Matzav.com}

Pages