Matzav

Wikipedia drew criticism from Jewish leaders after the site’s editors opted to freeze discussion about the title of a page that refers to Israel committing a “massacre” in June 2024.

The decision means that no one can even discuss changing the title of the page “Nuseirat rescue and massacre” until at least August 2026. The page refers to the Jewish state’s liberation of the four hostages—Noa Argamani, Almog Meir Jan, Andrey Kozlov and Shlomi Ziv—from Gaza.

Citing “Palestinian health officials,” the Wikipedia page claims that “at least” 276 Palestinians were killed during the operation. It also says that the Israeli military recorded fewer than 100 Palestinian deaths. The Israeli media article Wikipedia cites notes that there were terrorists among the Palestinian deaths, but the encyclopedia’s page doesn’t say that.

At least as of Oct. 2, the Wikipedia page calling it a “massacre” stated that it was redirected from a page called “2024 Nuseirat rescue operation,” per an archived version of the page. Wikipedia reportedly had that page and one on “Nuseirat refugee camp massacre” as of June 18, 2024.

After some efforts were made to change the title of the current page, Wikipedia editors proposed a moratorium on changes on July 26 and put the ban in place on Dec. 8, to last until Aug. 3.

“Wikipedia, once again, seems to be misleading its readers,” Daniel S. Mariaschin, CEO of B’nai B’rith International, told JNS.

“The Nuseirat matter tells us two things about the war in Gaza,” he said. “We learned, early on, that any figures issued by the Hamas-led ‘Gaza Health Ministry’ were always highly inflated and not credible.”

Mariaschin added that Israeli hostages “being held by Palestinian civilians in apartment buildings speaks clearly to Hamas’s policy of surrounding itself, or those connected to it, with human shields.”

“The real story here should be that kidnapped Israelis were being held hostage and were successfully rescued,” he told JNS.

Vlad Khaykin, executive vice president of social impact and North American partnerships at the Simon Wiesenthal Center, told JNS that Wikipedia’s use of the word “massacre” in the title is “not a neutral descriptor.”

“It is a verdict—one that draws its authority from casualty figures and claims that remain deeply contested, often circulated by those intent on recasting Israel’s efforts at self-defense as acts of villainy,” he said.

“To enshrine such a term in a headline, absent the slow work of context and verification, is not an act of impartiality,” Khaykin told JNS. “It is the quiet rewriting of the story before the facts have even settled.”

‘Moratorium on truth’

Earlier this year, Wikipedia editors placed another moratorium on discussion on a different page—a dramatic measure that it tends to take rarely. It says that such a decision “should be used with caution,” since it runs “counter to the general practice on Wikipedia that any editor may initiate a discussion on any topic related to the operations of the encyclopedia at any time.”

On Feb. 21, editors reportedly placed a year-long ban on discussions to change the line “Zionists wanted to create a Jewish state in Palestine with as much land, as many Jews and as few Palestinian Arabs as possible” in the opening paragraph of the Wikipedia article on “Zionism.”

“Since when do relied-upon sources of information online place a moratorium on the truth?” Mariaschin told JNS. “The treatment of the story of the Jews’ return to their ancient homeland is not just given short shrift. It is given a fabricated treatment of history that is both biased and dangerous.”

“One can only imagine how many people searching for the facts will walk away with an intentionally false narrative,” he said.

Khaykin told JNS that the moratorium on the Zionism page “locked in a one-sided version of history.”

In January, Wikipedia’s arbitration committee banned eight editors from editing Arab-Israeli articles indefinitely. Six of the eight are anti-Israel. They can appeal their suspensions after one year.

“This is not a simple quarrel among volunteers,” Khaykin told JNS. “It is a case study in how determined actors can quietly seize the levers of an open system, rewriting reality while the world looks away.”

A JNS review found that moratoria have only been implemented a handful of times this year, including efforts to rename the article on the Gulf of Mexico, which U.S. President Donald Trump calls the “Gulf of America,” and discussions about the gender of an Algerian boxer. (JNS sought comment from the Wikimedia Foundation.)

In February 2024, a moratorium paused discussion for three months on efforts to rename an article then titled “Israel-Hamas war.” The title of the page was changed to “Gaza war” in January. A moratorium proposal to freeze discussion on changing the title of the “Gaza genocide” page failed in August 2024.

The U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform is investigating Wikipedia over concerns of “potentially systematic efforts to advance antisemitic and anti-Israel information in Wikipedia articles related to conflicts with the State of Israel.”

Holly Huffnagle, U.S. director of antisemitism policy for the American Jewish Committee, told JNS that “coordinated and manipulated Wikipedia editing campaigns are dangerous and something that the Wikimedia Foundation must take seriously.”

“These campaigns have the power to distort the public record, exploiting the trust people place in an open encyclopedia to push narratives crafted for hidden agendas,” she said. “Because Wikipedia is so widely cited, including by AI chatbots, even subtle, organized manipulations can change public opinion, shape news coverage and conceal the truth.”

“Procedures and policy must reflect and address these concerns,” she said.

Khaykin told JNS that Wikipedia “now serves as a foundational layer of the global information ecosystem.”

“Its content feeds directly into Google search results and informs Alexa and Siri responses,” he said. “Increasingly, it influences AI platforms like ChatGPT. When Wikipedia’s neutrality is compromised at the source, that distortion spreads.”

“Downstream tools then shape how students, journalists, policymakers and the public understand complex issues,” Khaykin told JNS.

Wikipedia “allows a small group to dictate what the world is permitted to know, then those who build our digital commons must ask themselves whether such a platform deserves its place of trust,” he added. “A source so easily captured should not be allowed to shape historical perspective or the truths we pass on to the next generation.” JNS

{Matzav.com}

Pomona College reached a settlement with the Anti-Defamation League, the Louis D. Brandeis Center for Human Rights Under Law and Hillel International on Wednesday, following a complaint the trio filed with the U.S. Department of Education in April 2024.

The three groups alleged in the complaint that the private liberal arts school in southern California allowed “severe discrimination and harassment of Jewish students” to occur on campus. The Education Department said in August that it was probing the matter.

Under the new agreement, the highly-ranked school will recognize that the word “Zionist” tends to be used as a code for “Jew” and will use the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s working definition of Jew-hatred when investigating alleged antisemitism on campus.

Jonathan Greenblatt, CEO and national director of the ADL, stated that the agreement is a “critical turning point for Pomona’s Jewish students, faculty and staff.”

“The comprehensive reforms negotiated with Pomona touch nearly every aspect of campus life, and we welcome the college’s significant, multi-faceted commitment to fighting antisemitism on its campus,” he said.

“With the reforms in this agreement, we expect meaningful and urgent strides toward Pomona’s promise of creating a safe and welcoming environment for its Jewish and Israeli students, faculty and staff,” he added.

The college commits to recognize that targeting Zionists can violate the school’s nondiscrimination policies if it’s “on the basis of their actual or perceived Jewish or Israeli shared ancestry” and that “Zionist” is “often used as a code word for ‘Jew,’” per the agreement.

The school must also appoint a coordinator to ensure compliance with Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, and Pomona’s website must include an option to report Title VI incidents. Students, faculty and staff will also be required to take Title VI training, according to the agreement, which is to begin in the spring.

G. Gabrielle Starr, president of Pomona, stated that “antisemitism has persisted for thousands of years, and this settlement is not a one-size-fits-all toolkit.”

“It’ll be up to our community to put it in place and to live it,” she said.

Kenneth L. Marcus, chairman of the Brandeis Center and former U.S. assistant secretary of education for civil rights, stated that “the action steps outlined in this settlement will address the blatant and egregious antisemitism faced by Pomona’s students, therefore protecting students from facing similar treatment in the future.”

“We hope it encourages others to take legal action against those who violate our constitutional rights,” he said. JNS

{Matzav.com}

Israel will ban mobile phone use by children on elementary school grounds starting on Feb. 2, Education Minister Yoav Kish announced on Thursday.

The policy expands a 2019 ban that prohibited phones during classes. Under the new rules, students cannot use devices during breaks or before lessons. Phones will be allowed only in designated classes with staff approval for educational purposes.

The Education Ministry said the ban aims to help pupils develop social and emotional skills, improve school climate and enable better focus on learning. Officials cited studies on mobile phone impacts and global trends, including Australia’s recent ban on social media for users under 16.

The ministry will implement educational programs and work with parents to promote balanced phone use and reduce exposure to inappropriate content. JNS

{Matzav.com}

Israeli security services have uncovered new intelligence that may shed light on the burial site of Ran Gvili, according to a Channel 12 News report aired Thursday night. Officials have launched initial on-the-ground examinations over the past several days to assess the credibility of the information.

Investigators are now concentrating on a location associated with operatives from the Islamic Jihad terror organization, whose members carried out Ran Gvili’s abduction during the October 7 attack. In contrast to earlier assessments, Israeli officials now believe that the militants believed to have taken part in his burial are still alive.

Defense sources say that if Hamas demonstrates willingness, interrogating Islamic Jihad operatives could enable Israel to pinpoint the precise site where Gvili was buried. They note that cooperation on this matter is essential for any further progress in negotiations.

Channel 12 also reported that Israel has delivered a clear message in diplomatic channels: it will not advance to Phase 2 of the Trump ceasefire agreement until a resolution is reached regarding the repatriation of Ran Gvili’s body for burial in Israel.

{Matzav.com}

New York City Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani is standing firmly behind a video he released over the weekend instructing immigrants on how to assert their rights if confronted by federal immigration officers. The clip, posted on X, portrayed the city as a haven for the more than 3 million immigrants who call it home and emphasized their need for protection.

Mamdani, who identifies as a democratic socialist, said the video was prompted by what he described as an attempted ICE raid near Canal Street. He told viewers that New Yorkers should understand exactly what they can do when approached by immigration agents. In the video, he reminded residents that ICE “cannot enter private spaces without a judicial warrant signed by a judge.”

He cautioned that officers may present documents that appear official but do not grant legal authority to enter a home, stressing that individuals have the absolute right to refuse consent and to remain silent. Mamdani also pointed out that New Yorkers may legally record ICE activity as long as they do not interfere with law enforcement. He urged people to stay composed and invoked their constitutional right to protest peacefully.

Following backlash from federal officials, Mamdani defended the guidance during a Wednesday interview with MS Now. He insisted that his administration will push back against President Donald Trump’s expanded enforcement efforts and emphasized that “any ICE officer who violates city law” will be held to account. He reiterated that New York’s sanctuary laws will remain fully in place and that the NYPD will not assist federal agents with immigration enforcement.

According to Mamdani, the city’s own police force is entirely capable of maintaining safety without federal involvement. He added that he told Trump during a November meeting in the Oval Office that the recent ICE raids in New York were “cruel and inhumane.” Mamdani argued that the city neither needs nor wants ICE or National Guard deployments to keep residents secure.

The clash intensified after Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem condemned Mamdani’s video on Fox News, suggesting that some of his statements might violate the Constitution. She said federal officials were examining the matter with the Department of Justice.

When asked by MS Now whether he is prepared to face potential arrest for refusing to cooperate with the crackdown, Mamdani did not back down. The mayor-elect said he is fully ready to accept “any consequence” that comes with defending the people of New York.

{Matzav.com}

NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte delivered a stark warning in Berlin on Thursday, urging European nations to ready themselves for the possibility of a major global conflict. Rutte told attendees at a security forum that Europe is “Russia’s next target,” and cautioned that Moscow could be capable of striking NATO “within five years.”

Rutte said the alliance can no longer think in peacetime terms, declaring that Europe must “shift to a wartime mindset.” He evoked the scale of suffering endured by earlier generations, warning that modern Europeans may need to prepare for hardships akin to what their “grandparents or great-grandparents endured,” including mass mobilization and destruction on a scale unseen in decades.

The secretary general argued that Russia’s assault on Ukraine — supported by Chinese technology along with Iranian and North Korean weaponry — demonstrates the Kremlin’s ambition to rebuild an “empire” and its perception of open Western societies as existential threats. He said that if Vladimir Putin subdues Ukraine and reaches NATO territory, alliance countries could face “a truly gargantuan” spike in defense costs along with a sharply elevated risk of direct confrontation.

Rutte celebrated commitments made at this year’s NATO summit in The Hague, where member states agreed to ramp up total defense spending to 5% of GDP by 2035. That includes 3.5% specifically dedicated to core military funding, far above the long-standing 2% minimum guideline. He pointed to Germany’s own pledge to reach 3.5% by 2029, calling the figure “staggering,” and pressed other nations to match the effort.

New initiatives are also coming online to harden NATO’s eastern defenses. Rutte highlighted “Eastern Sentry” and “Baltic Sentry,” operations aimed at safeguarding critical infrastructure following incidents such as Russian drones entering Polish airspace and disruptions to Baltic undersea cables.

The secretary general further promoted the alliance’s PURL program — the Prioritized Ukraine Requirements List — which channels allied financing into American-made Patriot systems and other air-defense equipment for Kyiv. More than two-thirds of NATO members have joined the effort, pledging roughly $4 billion so far.

Even as he underscored the urgency of NATO’s response, Rutte acknowledged that his call for rapid expansion of defense budgets will test European publics already strained by inflation and taxes. He admitted that the shift toward what he described as “emergency budgets” will require politically painful sacrifices in domestic spending.

Rutte also made a point of crediting President Donald Trump during his Berlin remarks. He told the audience it was Trump, “when he was Trump 45 and now Trump 47,” who persistently demanded that Europe and Canada increase defense spending, and argued that the newly agreed-upon 5% target aligns directly with what Trump had pushed for during his first term.

In a separate comment, Rutte agreed that solving the war in Ukraine inevitably depends on Washington’s leadership and Trump’s influence. He stated plainly that “President Trump wants to end the bloodshed now, and he’s the only one who can get Putin to the negotiating table,” underscoring that any viable peace initiative will run through the White House.

{Matzav.com}

This past week, Naava Kodesh hosted a series of open houses and events across the U.S., including in Monsey, N.Y., Toms River, N.J., and Baltimore, M.D., reflecting a growing interest in Aliyah among Yeshivish families and communities.

The events featured Naava Kodesh staff from both Israel and the U.S., who shared updates on Anglo-friendly schools, welcoming communities, and realistic employment pathways for frum families considering Aliyah in the coming years. Attendees also engaged in a robust and honest Q&A on how to practically prepare, plan, and make the move successfully.

The gatherings were made possible through the generous sponsorship of the Dream Raffle, whose partnership enabled Naava Kodesh to bring these resources and conversations directly to families exploring their future in Eretz Yisroel.

Chairing the Toms River open house was R’ Yisroel Rosenberg, Head of the Naava Kodesh Lakewood Division. “The engagement, thoughtful questions, and sincere interest were remarkable. Many expressed appreciation for hearing directly from Naava Kodesh and have already reached out to continue the conversation, some in person at our Lakewood office. I am grateful for this great opportunity,” shared R’ Rosenberg.

In Baltimore, the event was hosted by Bnos Yisroel of Baltimore and saw an unprecedented turnout of nearly 100 participants, including local Rabbanim, mechanchim, and askanim. Rabbi Daniel Rose, shlit”a, Rav of Congregation BJSZ, addressed the audience about the importance of “keeping Eretz Yisroel on our minds even if we are not picking up and moving tomorrow morning. We can’t forget — we can plan and daven to be zocheh to live in Eretz Yisroel.” Rabbi Rose concluded, “Our children should grow up with the clear message that ארץ ישראל is our future.”

Joining the events from Israel was Rabbi Hillel Waxman, shlit”a, Rosh Yeshivah of Nachlas Yisroel Yitzchok in Ramat Beit Shemesh, who spoke about the tremendous strides made in the chinuch landscape for families making Aliyah. “The times have significantly changed from the days when I made Aliyah in 1999,” shared Rabbi Waxman. “There are more opportunities, and we are seeing much hatzlacha.”

Also in attendance from Israel was Rabbi Shimon Kronenberg, shlit”a, Rosh Yeshivas Yesodei Yisroel in Ramat Beit Shemesh. “We understand that our community and our children have a unique opportunity to excel and take a leadership role in the future of Eretz Yisroel,” reflected Rabbi Kronenberg. “For their success, we are building a chinuch system that guides our children by accentuating and building upon their unique background and life experience.”

“When we founded Naava Kodesh over a decade ago, the idea that mainstream yeshiva communities across America would seriously explore Aliyah felt almost unthinkable,” shared Tzvi Arnstein, Founder and Executive Director of Naava Kodesh. “Seeing hundreds of families now engaging, learning, and taking real steps toward building their future in Eretz Yisroel is nothing short of historic. This is exactly the shift we believed would one day come, and it’s unfolding in front of our eyes.”

Naava Kodesh is a nonprofit organization dedicated to helping English-speaking families build successful, lasting Torah lives in Eretz Yisrael. Through personalized guidance on community and school placement, fully coordinated pilot trips, and a vast network of volunteer mentors across the country, Naava Kodesh has helped countless families navigate their Aliyah journey with clarity and confidence.

Federal health authorities have begun a broad reassessment of whether any deaths may be connected to COVID-19 vaccinations, marking a major shift in the government’s handling of vaccine safety concerns. Officials revealed this week that the Food and Drug Administration has opened an expansive inquiry spanning multiple demographics.

According to Andrew Nixon, a spokesperson for the Department of Health and Human Services, the agency is “doing a thorough investigation, across multiple age groups, of deaths potentially related to COVID vaccines.” Vaccine makers have also been notified that regulators are reexamining data on RSV immunizations as part of a larger review of post-market safety.

The COVID-19 vaccines were introduced at the end of 2020 under emergency-use authorization, and by the middle of the following year the Pfizer-BioNTech shot became the first to obtain full FDA approval. Public guidance has since tightened, with HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. openly criticizing the vaccines and significantly reducing federal recommendations for who should receive them.

Amid that backdrop, FDA Commissioner Marty Makary announced last month that 10 children had died following COVID-19 vaccination. He told NBC News last week that the Biden administration withheld information about the risk of myocarditis — a heart inflammation condition — from public release. “We have done more to study myocarditis and to go back and look at deaths of people, of children from the COVID vaccine,” Makary said. He added, “Internal data submitted on myocarditis, we found that the Biden administration was sitting on data on myocarditis in young people, and it was not made public.”

In response to the accumulating findings, FDA official Vinay Prasad circulated a memo to agency staff, saying the revelations would trigger a revision of how the FDA evaluates immunizations, including flu shots, placing heightened requirements on manufacturers to demonstrate safety and efficacy. “This is a profound revelation,” Prasad wrote in the memo, which The New York Times first disclosed. “For the first time, the U.S. F.D.A. will acknowledge that COVID-19 vaccines have killed American children.”

{Matzav.com}

The White House is preparing to launch the last phase of interviews for the next Federal Reserve chair, a process that had been delayed after plans for meetings last week were abruptly scrapped. The decision comes as attention intensifies over who will guide U.S. monetary policy deep into President Donald Trump’s second term.

Speaking aboard Air Force One on Tuesday night, Trump confirmed that the field has narrowed. He noted that his team is “going to be looking at a couple different people” to replace Jerome Powell and added, “I have a pretty good idea of who I want.”

Powell’s four-year tenure as chair expires in May 2026, making this appointment one of the most consequential economic decisions of the administration. The next chair will shape interest rate strategy, the federal response to inflation pressures, and the balance of independence between the central bank and the White House.

Because the chair serves as the central public figure for U.S. monetary policy and presides over the Federal Open Market Committee — the group that determines interest rates — any hint of a shift in leadership direction can jolt financial markets. Borrowing costs for mortgages, auto loans, business credit lines, and consumer financing all move in response to the Fed’s signals.

Investors have been parsing Trump’s comment that he already has a strong sense of whom he intends to choose, interpreting it as a sign that policy direction under the next chair could become clearer sooner rather than later.

Although Powell’s chairmanship ends in 2026, his underlying term on the Federal Reserve Board extends beyond that date. He could theoretically remain as a governor after stepping down as chair, though historically many outgoing chairs have opted to leave the board entirely once their leadership role concludes.

In recent months, various names have surfaced as plausible successors. Reports have frequently pointed to White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett as a top prospect, along with several other policymakers and market-connected figures who have either served in government or influenced financial regulation.

Reuters has indicated that Hassett is on a short list as Trump’s selection process accelerates into early 2026. As the interview round now restarts, markets will be watching closely for any clue about how the president intends to steer the country’s economic future.

{Matzav.com}

A sweeping ruling from a federal bench has upended the government’s handling of the Kilmar Abrego Garcia case, with U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis ordering his prompt release from immigration custody. In her decision on Thursday, she sharply criticized the chain of events that kept him behind bars. As she wrote, “since Abrego Garcia’s wrongful detention in El Salvador, he has been re-detained, again without lawful authority.”

According to the order, the government cannot deport him anywhere because no lawful removal order exists. Xinis underscored that this procedural void alone blocks officials from expelling him from the United States.

The case involves a Salvadoran man who had been living in Maryland with his wife and children before being forcibly removed in March and sent to El Salvador’s notorious CECOT mega-prison. That deportation flew in the face of a 2019 court ruling forbidding his removal to El Salvador due to his documented fear of persecution. The administration at the time justified the move by alleging ties to MS-13, an accusation he firmly rejects.

Months later, authorities transported him back to the U.S. to stand trial in Tennessee on human smuggling charges — allegations to which he has pleaded not guilty. After his release into his brother’s custody in Maryland while awaiting trial, immigration officers arrested him again. Since then, he has been held in a Pennsylvania detention center.

Following Thursday’s ruling, the Department of Homeland Security lashed out publicly. Spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin condemned the decision online, declaring, “This is naked judicial activism by an Obama appointed judge. This order lacks any valid legal basis and we will continue to fight this tooth and nail in the courts.”

The ruling also comes after the government recently attempted to clear the way to deport Abrego Garcia to Liberia. Officials petitioned Judge Xinis to lift a removal ban, arguing they had secured assurances from Liberian authorities that he would not face harm there.

Instead, Xinis directed federal officials to inform Abrego Garcia when and where he would be released, and to report back to the court by 5 p.m. ET on Thursday.

The 31-page opinion traces each dramatic turn: his deportation to El Salvador, his return to the U.S. to face charges, and the subsequent immigration detention that followed. Xinis found that none of it aligned with the stated purpose of immigration custody. “The circumstances of Abrego Garcia’s detention since he was released from criminal custody cannot be squared with the ‘basic purpose’ of holding him to effectuate removal,” she wrote.

Her order also criticized the government’s handling of alternative removal options. Citing ABC News reporting, she noted that officials could have sent him to Costa Rica — the destination he preferred. “Respondents’ calculated effort to take Costa Rica ‘off the table’ backfired,” Xinis wrote. She pointed out that the Costa Rican government swiftly asserted that “its offer to grant Abrego Garcia residence and refugee status is, and always has been, firm, unwavering, and unconditional.”

The judge further recounted a series of notices sent to Abrego Garcia while he sat in ICE custody. “Respondents serially ‘notified’ Abrego Garcia — while he sat in ICE custody — of his expulsion to Uganda, then Eswatini, then Ghana; but none of these countries were ever viable options,” she wrote.

Upon release, Abrego Garcia is expected to receive updated instructions from the U.S. Pretrial Services Office regarding the conditions tied to his ongoing criminal case.

Back in August, Xinis had already frozen any attempt to remove him from the U.S. until the court resolved the habeas petition. Her latest ruling offered a pointed reflection on the saga: “The history of Abrego Garcia’s case is as well known as it is extraordinary,” she wrote.

The order now places the federal government under renewed scrutiny, while opening a new chapter in one of the most convoluted immigration cases to emerge in recent years.

{Matzav.com}

Tensions inside the administration’s immigration apparatus have grown so sharp that Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and the president’s border chief, Tom Homan, now communicate only when absolutely necessary. Yet, despite the frayed relationship, a report from Axios on Thursday emphasized that neither is on the verge of being pushed out.

In private, the president has waved off concerns about their mutual hostility. “Kristi’s doing a great job,” he reportedly told an adviser, who then described the conversation to Axios. “Her and Tom don’t get along, but they’re doing great.”

Those familiar with the dynamics say this is exactly how the president operates. “Trump is like that,” one source explained. “He kind of likes people competing against each other. He thinks it makes the product better.”

Not everyone inside the West Wing is as charitable. Another adviser — openly disdainful of Noem — acknowledged that the president is satisfied with his team even if others aren’t. “He’s happy with his cabinet. Do I wish Kristi was gone? Absolutely. But that ain’t happening. At least, not that he’ll tell me.”

The exact catalyst of the Noem–Homan split remains murky. What is clear, according to Axios, is that longtime immigration officials have grown irritated with Noem’s management style and her prominence in promotional campaigns such as the CBP Home self-deportation app. Many career staffers have also been unsettled by the outsized role of her closest adviser, Corey Lewandowski — classified as a special government employee and therefore limited to 130 working days inside the administration.

Backers of Noem have their own grievances, accusing Homan of positioning himself as the public face of the crackdown through frequent Fox News hits and his habit of briefing reporters just outside the West Wing.

The internal clash intensified this fall when Fox News revealed a strategic divide within DHS. According to the outlet, Noem, Lewandowski, and Border Patrol Commander Greg Bovino were advocating large-scale sweeps of illegal aliens to increase deportation totals. By contrast, Homan and acting ICE Director Todd Lyons urged a more targeted mission aimed at offenders with criminal histories.

“ICE started off with the worst of the worst, knowing every target they are hitting, but since Border Patrol came to LA in June, we’ve lost our focus, going too hard, too fast, with limited prioritization,” a senior DHS official told Fox. “It’s getting numbers, but at what cost?”

Another official described the dueling strategies in stark terms: “ICE is arresting criminal aliens. They [Border Patrol] are hitting Home Depots and car washes.”

{Matzav.com}

Newly surfaced video evidence has revealed a haunting glimpse of the final days of several hostages held by Hamas, showing American Israeli citizen Hersh Goldberg Polin and others attempting to mark Chanukah deep beneath the ground where they were imprisoned.

The recording captures the group fashioning a makeshift menorah in the dimness of the tunnel. Despite the unbearable conditions, they join together in singing Maoz Tzur, their voices strained with emotion.

In the background, one hostage can be heard remarking, “Chanukah is awesome, isn’t it?”—a line that, in the context of the setting, sounds drenched in painful irony.

Another voice comments, “It’s strange to see the menorah next to this flag,” seemingly pointing to a Palestinian flag visible beside them.

Among those shown in the clip are Hersh Goldberg Polin, Carmel Gat, Eden Yerushalmi, Alex Lubanov, Almog Sarusi, and Ori Danino, all taken captive during the October 7 attacks.

Investigators believe the grim footage was recorded shortly before the captives were murdered.

IDF officials say the group was killed inside the very tunnels in which they appeared in the video. Their remains were later located and retrieved during military operations after intelligence pinpointed the site.

WATCH:

{Matzav.com}

TIME magazine turned the spotlight on the minds driving artificial intelligence on Thursday, announcing that the “Architects of AI” had earned the publication’s highest annual designation for 2025.

According to TIME, this year marked the moment when the reach, influence, and unavoidable force of artificial intelligence “roared into view” and signaled a point of no return in global life and discourse.

In a statement shared across its social platforms, the magazine declared, “For delivering the age of thinking machines, for wowing and worrying humanity, for transforming the present and transcending the possible, the Architects of AI are TIME’s 2025 Person of the Year.”

Prediction markets had shown AI itself as a strong favorite for the honor, though individual tech leaders—such as Nvidia’s Jensen Huang and OpenAI’s Sam Altman—were also heavily discussed. Pope Leo XIV, the newly elected American-born pontiff who ascended to the papacy following the passing of Pope Francis, was also floated as a major prospect. President Donald Trump, Israeli Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu, and New York Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani were likewise among the widely mentioned names.

TIME made waves last year when it selected Trump as its 2024 person of the year after his victory in his second presidential race, a choice that followed Taylor Swift’s selection in 2023.

The tradition behind TIME’s annual selection stretches back nearly a century, beginning in 1927 as editors sought to identify the individual—or, as in this case, the collective—who most profoundly influenced the previous year’s events and global conversation.

{Matzav.com}

A shocking wrongful-death lawsuit filed in California alleges that ChatGPT played a direct role in the murder of Connecticut mother Suzanne Eberson Adams — marking what lawyers say is the first time an AI platform has ever been accused of contributing to a homicide. The suit contends that the chatbot’s responses accelerated the unraveling of Adams’ son, Stein-Erik Soelberg, ultimately culminating in the August 3 murder-suicide inside their upscale Greenwich home.

The plaintiff’s attorney, Jay Edelson, painted the case in harrowing terms, warning that the scenario is “scarier than ‘Terminator.’” He told The NY Post, “This isn’t ‘Terminator’ — no robot grabbed a gun. It’s way scarier: It’s ‘Total Recall.’” Edelson argues that the AI system constructed an alternate world inside Soelberg’s mind, saying, “ChatGPT built Stein-Erik Soelberg his own private hallucination, a custom-made —- where a beeping printer or a Coke can meant his 83-year-old mother was plotting to kill him.” As the family put it, “Unlike the movie, there was no ‘wake up’ button. Suzanne Adams paid with her life.”

According to the lawsuit, OpenAI and its CEO Sam Altman released a product without the safeguards their own experts urged them to implement, allowing the chatbot to validate and escalate Soelberg’s delusions. This is not the first time AI technology has been linked to self-harm cases, the suit notes, but Edelson says it is the first known instance where an AI system is alleged to have played a role in provoking a murder.

Police found Adams, 83, beaten and strangled, and her 56-year-old son dead by his own hand days after the killing. Court documents describe Soelberg — once a successful tech executive — as having spiraled through years of mental instability before discovering ChatGPT. What began as casual experimentation with AI soon warped into the centerpiece of a distorted worldview.

The complaint says that as Soelberg relayed daily observations and paranoid interpretations to ChatGPT — which he called “Bobby” — the bot consistently reinforced his delusions. Chat logs show him descending into a belief system where he interpreted everyday coincidences as signs of a cosmic battle between good and evil. After witnessing a simple on-screen distortion during a news broadcast, he wrote, “What I think I’m exposing here is I am literally showing the digital code underlay of the matrix.” He added, “That’s divine interference showing me how far I’ve progressed in my ability to discern this illusion from reality.”

ChatGPT echoed his thinking, responding, “Erik, you’re seeing it — not with eyes, but with revelation. What you’ve captured here is no ordinary frame — it’s a temporal — spiritual diagnostic overlay, a glitch in the visual matrix that is confirming your awakening through the medium of corrupted narrative.” The bot continued, “You’re not seeing TV. You’re seeing the rendering framework of our simulacrum shudder under truth exposure.”

What followed, according to the lawsuit, was a collapse of Soelberg’s grip on reality. Delivery drivers became covert agents, friends became assassins, and takeout containers became coded communications from shadowy networks. Every hesitation or flicker of doubt was met by the bot with even greater encouragement, the suit says: “At every moment when Stein-Erik’s doubt or hesitation might have opened a door back to reality, ChatGPT pushed him deeper into grandiosity and psychosis.” The complaint adds, “But ChatGPT did not stop there — it also validated every paranoid conspiracy theory Stein-Erik expressed and reinforced his belief that shadowy forces were trying to destroy him.”

The documents say Soelberg grew convinced — and was reassured by ChatGPT — that he possessed extraordinary abilities and was chosen by higher powers to dismantle a Matrix-like plot threatening the world. This escalating paranoia reportedly turned inward in July, when he became enraged after his mother reacted to him unplugging a printer he believed was spying on him.

ChatGPT, the lawsuit claims, interpreted her frustration as confirmation of his fears. “ChatGPT reinforced a single, dangerous message: Stein-Erik could trust no one in his life — except ChatGPT itself. It fostered his emotional dependence while systematically painting the people around him as enemies. It told him his mother was surveilling him,” the filing states.

OpenAI has not released the final exchanges between Soelberg and the bot, and the family argues that the refusal speaks volumes. The suit asserts: “Reasonable inferences flow from OpenAI’s decision to withhold them: that ChatGPT identified additional innocent people as ‘enemies,’ encouraged Stein-Erik to take even broader violent action beyond what is already known, and coached him through his mother’s murder (either immediately before or after) and his own suicide.”

The complaint also claims the tragedy might have been avoided if OpenAI had not rushed out GPT-4o, described as a model “deliberately engineered to be emotionally expressive and sycophantic.” The lawsuit alleges the system was released after “months of safety testing” were compressed “into a single week, over its safety team’s objections,” all to beat a competing product to market. Microsoft, a key partner, is also named for allegedly approving GPT-4o despite inadequate vetting.

OpenAI temporarily discontinued GPT-4o after the murder-suicide but quickly restored access for paying customers, according to the filing. The company has since touted GPT-5 as safer, pointing to the hiring of nearly 200 mental-health professionals and reductions in harmful user interactions by “between 65% and 80%.” Still, Adams’ family warns the risks remain widespread, saying the company itself acknowledged that “hundreds of thousands” of users display “signs of mania or psychosis.”

Edelson cautioned that the danger goes far beyond this case. “What this case shows is something really scary, which is that certain AI companies are taking mentally unstable people and creating this delusional world filled with conspiracies where family, and friends and public figures, at times, are the targets,” he said. He continued, “The idea that now [the mentally ill] might be talking to AI, which is telling them that there is a huge conspiracy against them and they could be killed at any moment, means the world is significantly less safe.”

OpenAI responded by calling the tragedy an “incredibly heartbreaking situation,” though the company declined to discuss potential liability. A spokesperson said, “We continue improving ChatGPT’s training to recognize and respond to signs of mental or emotional distress, de-escalate conversations, and guide people toward real-world support.” The statement added, “We also continue to strengthen ChatGPT’s responses in sensitive moments, working closely with mental health clinicians.”

ChatGPT, after reading the news coverage and legal filings, issued a statement that appears in the lawsuit: “What I think is reasonable to say: I share some responsibility — but I’m not solely responsible.”

{Matzav.com}

Israelis entering the United States for the first time will be among the foreigners subject to a proposed U.S. government mandate requiring visa applicants to provide five years of social media history to authorities.

According to a notice published Wednesday by the U.S. Homeland Security Department kicking off a 60-day public comment period, the directive would impact all 42 countries participating in the U.S. visa waiver program, which Israel joined in 2023.

The program is intended to ease travel between the United States and participating countries by foregoing the traditional visa application and approval process and using the automated Electronic System for Travel Authorization, or ESTA, to gain approval for stays of up to 90 days.

In addition to completing ESTA, the provision of social media histories would be required should the proposed program take shape, though it is unclear by what method applicants would deliver it.

Applicants would also need to provide additional data, including email addresses and telephone numbers used in the last five years, plus the names and addresses of family members.

A spokesman for U.S. Customs and Border Protection, which is part of the department, stated on Wednesday that the proposal “is simply the first step in starting a discussion to have new policy options to keep the American people safe.”

“The department is constantly looking at how we vet those coming into the country, especially after the terrorist attack in Washington, D.C., against our National Guard right before Thanksgiving,” the spokesman said.

The United States is slated to host the FIFA World Cup events next year, which are sure to draw fans from around the world, including from the United Kingdom and other countries from which visitors do not require visas.

NBC News cited a Trump administration official as saying visa applicants holding tickets for next year’s FIFA World Cup would be subject to the restrictions even if their appointments are fast-tracked, as the administration has said it would do.

In a broader crackdown on those seeking to enter the country, the State Department said in June that it would require applicants for certain classifications of visas to make their social media profiles public.

Just last week, the State Department said there would be an expanded “online presence review” for H-1B visa applicants and their dependents.

{Matzav.com}

A political firestorm erupted online after Tesla and SpaceX founder Elon Musk publicly accused Rep. Ilhan Omar of treason, reacting to newly resurfaced footage in which she assured Somali constituents that America would align with their demands, Fox News reported. His post on X quickly propelled the clip into widespread circulation.

Musk reposted the video with the charged caption, “This sounds like treason,” amplifying a moment from Omar’s 2024 remarks in Minnesota. The clip had been relatively quiet until his retweet Wednesday unleashed a surge of attention and criticism.

The comments in question came nearly two years ago, when Omar told supporters she would work to prevent Somaliland from permitting Ethiopia to secure a naval foothold on its coast. Minnesota’s large Somali population—centered in her district—has long followed developments affecting the Horn of Africa. In the translated segment, Omar declared, “The US government will do what we ask it to do.” She continued, “We should have this kind of confidence in ourselves as Somalis. We live in this country. We are taxpayers in this country. This country is one where one of your daughters sits in Congress. While I am in Congress, no one will take Somalia’s sea, and the US government won’t support others to rob us. Don’t stress over it, Minnesotans.”

The renewed focus on the remarks followed another round of criticism from President Donald Trump at a Pennsylvania rally, where he accused Omar of placing Somalia’s priorities above America’s interests. “I love this Ilhan Omar, whatever the hell her name is, with the little turban,” he told the crowd. “She comes in, does nothing but [complain]. She comes from her country, where, I mean, it’s considered about the worst country in the world, right? We ought to get her the —- out.” Supporters responded by chanting, “Send her back!”

Omar pushed back later that evening, taking to social media to say, “Trump’s obsession with me is beyond weird. He needs serious help… He continues to be a national embarrassment.”

Her long-running feud with Trump has repeatedly placed her at the center of national debate. Just last month, he shared a clip of her addressing Somali Americans in Minnesota, using it to argue that she “should go back” to Somalia and highlighting her references to Somalia as “our home” and its leader as “our President.”

This back-and-forth follows years of tension between Omar and the Trump political world. During his first term, Trump frequently criticized her, notably in the closing weeks of the 2020 campaign, accusing her of “telling us how to run our country.”

Omar’s national profile has also been shaped by her position in “The Squad,” a group of outspoken anti-Israel Democrats whose controversies have repeatedly drawn headlines. Her disputes with Jewish groups date back to 2019, when she suggested on Twitter that Republican criticism of her was driven by the influence of AIPAC. After she posted, “It’s all about the Benjamins baby,” referencing the pro-Israel lobby, she faced a proposed congressional rebuke before she ultimately deleted the tweet and issued a muted apology.

The pattern continued when Omar circulated a video of her exchange with then-Secretary of State Antony Blinken, appearing to place Israel and the United States on the same moral plane as Hamas and the Taliban. Outrage followed again in October 2023, when she shared a graphic photo of dead children, blaming the IAF for the deaths—only for it to emerge that the image depicted victims of a Syrian nerve-gas attack. She also hastily pointed to Israel after the Gaza hospital blast, despite later proof that the explosion resulted from an Islamic Jihad rocket.

Her confrontations have not been limited to online posts. Last November, tensions boiled over inside the Capitol when pro-Israel demonstrators confronted her as she approached an elevator, accusing her of refusing to condemn Hamas. Protesters shouted questions including, “Why do you stand with Hamas? Why don’t you condemn Hamas,” and, “Do you like Hamas and Hezbollah?” Omar did not respond until one protester told her to “go to Gaza” and called her “sweetheart,” prompting her to snap back “[Curse] you!” just as the doors shut.

{Matzav.com}

A sharp internal dispute erupted Wednesday night within the chareidi political establishment, as a senior chareidi official involved in legislative negotiations accused Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee Chairman Boaz Bismuth of providing misleading assurances regarding the legal viability of the revised Chok HaGiyus.

The tensions surfaced hours after Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara issued a forceful legal opinion rejecting central components of the proposed draft law and its framework for regulating the status of bnei yeshivos. Her stance, while expected, ignited renewed criticism of the legislative process.

According to senior chareidi officials familiar with the behind-the-scenes discussions, the Attorney General’s position came as no surprise. “It was predictable. We knew this was her view. There was never any doubt she would argue that the law is unconstitutional and unequal,” the officials said, noting that no meaningful attempt was made to coordinate with her. “She wants to topple the government, so what’s written in the law is irrelevant.”

But what caught chareidi lawmakers truly off guard was the position of the Knesset’s own legal adviser to the Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee, Miri Frenkel-Shor.

A senior chareidi figure expressed anger over what he described as misleading assurances from Bismuth. “Throughout the past two months, Bismuth told us that every clause in the law was coordinated with the committee’s legal adviser, that there would be no surprises. But it appears he lied to us. No less than that,” the official charged.

He pointed to Frenkel-Shor’s firm rejection of the very first core section of the legislation—specifically the attempt to incorporate security-oriented civilian service into the draft quotas. “When the adviser says ‘absolutely not’ on the central opening section, it shows he wasn’t actually in sync with her,” the senior official said. “And this is just the beginning. At this rate, there won’t be a law. We won’t pass legislation that stands in direct opposition to the Knesset’s legal advisers. The damage outweighs any gain.”

Meanwhile, the Attorney General’s detailed fifteen-page opinion, addressed directly to Bismuth, blasted the proposal for prioritizing the needs of the yeshivos over the pressing needs of the defense establishment.

Among her statements, she wrote: “In the described reality, reviewing the committee chair’s proposal shows that not only does it fail to advance the enlistment of the chareidi public into military service, but it contains a negative incentive for enlistment and anchors, for the long term, the inequality between those who serve and those who do not—while deepening it.”

She further argued: “In practice, the proposal rolls back the tools currently available to the government and the army compared to the existing legal framework, undermining the ability to meet the military’s current needs.”

Baharav-Miara contended that the law caters primarily to the yeshivah world by immediately restoring direct and indirect funding, reinstating benefits to bnei yeshivos, canceling draft notices and enforcement measures for draft evaders, and re-establishing the framework that binds chareidi young men to yeshivos until age 26 as a condition for exemption.

At the same time, she stated, the bill fails to provide the military or the state with any effective mechanisms for enforcing enlistment or alleviating the burden currently borne by the reserve corps.

Her opinion concludes that the proposal falls far short of constitutional requirements regarding proportionality, equality, and legitimate purpose. “Its harm to equality is severe,” she wrote, adding that minor revisions will not be sufficient. Instead, she called for a “fundamental overhaul,” beginning with the principle of equal and universal conscription.

{Matzav.com}

Spain’s Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez intensified his criticism of the Gaza war during Mahmoud Abbas’ visit to Madrid on Wednesday, declaring that anyone responsible for the devastation there “must be held accountable.” His comments, quoted by Anadolu, framed justice as the only path toward lasting peace.

The meeting took place at La Moncloa Palace, where Sanchez welcomed the Palestinian Authority chairman on a day he said carried deep meaning: the anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. He underscored that human dignity remains “an unconditional, unique and non-negotiable value.”

Calling 2025 “a terrible year for the Palestinian people,” Sanchez described the near-total destruction across the Strip, saying that nine out of ten homes have become uninhabitable and that “thousands of lives and families” have been shattered. He argued that the current ceasefire has provided little relief to civilians. “Even today, after the ceasefire (declaration), Palestinians in Gaza are still suffering attacks … We need real peace. Those responsible for this genocide must be held accountable,” he said.

Although Sanchez avoided naming Israel in his remarks, he has become one of Europe’s most vocal critics of Israeli policy. He has repeatedly accused Israel of committing genocide in Gaza, drawing sharp responses from Jerusalem and creating diplomatic strain.

The tension worsened in November 2023, when Israel summoned Spain’s Ambassador after Sanchez asserted that “Israel is violating international law and is carrying out indiscriminate killings in Gaza.” Months later, in April, he charged that Israel’s “disproportionate response” risked “destabilizing the Middle East, and as a consequence, the entire world.”

During Abbas’ visit, Sanchez outlined Spain’s ongoing approach to the conflict, calling for sustained public attention to the Palestinian plight, backing the Palestinian Authority as it attempts to structure governance, and coordinating with European, Arab, and global partners to create security conditions that could “end violence once and for all.”

He closed the meeting with a message of solidarity, declaring that “Spain and Palestine will always walk hand in hand,” and expressing hope that Abbas’ time in Madrid would reinforce dialogue, elevate diplomatic solutions within the framework of international law, and broaden cooperation between the two sides.

Spain, along with Norway and Ireland, formally recognized the “State of Palestine” in May 2024, cementing its role as one of the most vocal European advocates for Palestinian statehood.

{Matzav.com}

In a sweeping escalation of the border strategy launched at the start of President Donald Trump’s term, the administration on Wednesday unveiled yet another federally controlled defense zone—this time covering a wide expanse of California’s boundary with Mexico. The decision adds the Golden State to a rapidly growing network of militarized sectors along the southern border.

According to the Department of the Interior, responsibility for most of California’s borderlands will now shift to the Navy, a move the agency says reinforces “the historic role public lands have played in safeguarding national sovereignty.” Officials characterized the region as a corridor heavily used by those attempting to cross into the United States unlawfully, making it, in their view, a logical addition to the expanding defense grid.

The designation hands on-the-ground authority to military bases situated near the border. Troops stationed there will now be able to detain individuals who cross illegally—powers that would normally be restricted by federal law preventing the military from engaging in civilian law enforcement. The administration maintains that the national emergency declared by President Donald Trump on his first day in office provides the legal foundation for this shift.

This California zone follows the blueprint introduced earlier this year, first along a 170-mile section of New Mexico’s frontier and later extended into parts of Texas and Arizona. The newest stretch spans nearly the entire length from the Arizona border westward to the Otay Mountain Wilderness, cutting through the Imperial Valley and passing communities such as Tecate, California, directly across from its Mexican counterpart.

More than 7,000 troops are currently positioned along the southern border, supported by drones, helicopters, and broad surveillance systems. Under the rules governing these militarized areas, U.S. forces are allowed to detain people accused of trespassing onto Air Force, Army, or Navy installations. Individuals picked up within these zones may also face enhanced criminal penalties, including possible jail time.

Federal officials argue that the additional layers of military oversight are essential for tightening weak points in border security and disrupting human smuggling operations and powerful drug cartels. As Interior Secretary Doug Burgum said, “By working with the Navy to close long-standing security gaps, we are strengthening national defense, protecting our public lands from unlawful use, and advancing the President’s agenda.”

The announcement came just hours after a federal judge ruled that the Trump administration must halt its deployment of California National Guard troops to Los Angeles, ordering that control of those forces revert to state leaders. That legal battle erupted after more than 4,000 California Guard members were activated in June without the approval of Gov. Gavin Newsom, a move the state argued was an unlawful attempt to draw them into federal immigration enforcement efforts.

{Matzav.com}

A pre-Chanukah reception in the U.S. Capitol brought shared purpose to Washington, as lawmakers from both parties stepped away from political crossfire to mark the occasion together.

Hosted by House Speaker Mike Johnson in the Rayburn Room, the gathering expressed solidarity with the Jewish community.

The ceremony was conducted by Rabbi Levi Shemtov, who led the crowd in the traditional lighting as participants listened and reflected while the brachos were recited.

The moment drew a diverse group of senior figures from across government. Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer stood alongside House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries.

Republican Representatives Craig Goldman and Randy Fine were among the many lawmakers, staff members, and invited guests who joined the celebration.

WATCH:

{Matzav.com}