Study: Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens Obsessed with Jews
A newly released study warns that hostile discourse toward Israel is gaining traction within segments of the American Right, driven in part by prominent media influencers whose reach shapes public opinion well beyond fringe circles.
According to the research, the intensification of anti-Israel messaging is no longer confined to far-left or activist environments. Instead, it is increasingly penetrating populist right-wing and MAGA-aligned audiences through high-profile commentators, marking a notable shift in where such rhetoric is taking hold.
The report highlights that language once primarily associated with far-left discourse—most notably the term “genocide”—is now appearing with growing frequency among influential figures on the Right.
“Even on the American far Right, antisemitism is already visible, and ‘on the table,’” JPPI Director-General Shuki Friedman said.
“The data should serve as a glaring warning light for Israel and the Israeli leadership regarding the support it can mobilize from the right, today and certainly in the future. Only decisive action that provides a counterweight to this extremism can preserve this vital base of support in the US,” he added.
The findings are based on an artificial intelligence-driven analysis conducted by the Jewish People Policy Institute, which examined thousands of social media videos published by Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens. The study, released Sunday, found a substantial increase in both the volume and intensity of negative commentary about Israel in recent months.
Researchers concluded that both figures sharply expanded their focus on Israel, Jews, and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, with those topics appearing more frequently than discussions of other global issues such as the Ukraine-Russia war, tensions with China, or Iran.
Israel emerged as a “central, and at times dominant,” theme in their content, with Owens’ shift beginning in February and Carlson’s becoming pronounced in August.
The analysis showed that Carlson’s rate of negative commentary about Israel rose significantly over the past six months compared to the previous half-year. While the study did not find that Carlson consistently crossed into explicit antisemitism under the IHRA definition, it noted that he regularly provides a platform to known antisemitic figures, including Holocaust deniers and extremists such as Nick Fuentes, without drawing firm lines or offering substantive criticism of their views.
Owens’ content, by contrast, was described as more overt. The study found that more than 96% of her references to Israel were negative, often employing aggressive and hostile language.
In examining overall trends, JPPI emphasized that the main shift was quantitative rather than stylistic: the number of negative posts increased substantially, even if the proportion framed negatively remained relatively stable.
The content flagged by researchers included material comparing Israel to Hamas, the use of the term “genocide,” accusations that Israel deliberately kills children, and the promotion of conspiratorial claims about Israeli or Jewish influence over the US government.
When the focus turned explicitly to Jews, the findings were even more stark. The analysis found that 45% of videos mentioning Jews carried an antisemitic angle, a figure that climbed sharply in the past six months, reaching approximately 75%.
Examples cited in the study included sweeping generalizations about Jews, descriptions of Jews as a “cult,” allegations of “Jewish supremacy,” and recurring claims of control, deceit, and manipulation. The report also noted repeated assertions that accusations of antisemitism are merely a “Zionist diversion tactic.”
Overall, the study concludes that the growing prominence of such narratives among influential right-wing figures represents a significant and troubling development, with potential long-term implications for public discourse and Israel’s standing among key segments of the American political landscape.
{Matzav.com}
