Hamas Slams U.S. Peace Proposal as “Foreign Guardianship Over Gaza”
Hamas spokesperson Hazem Qassem lashed out Sunday at the U.S.-backed resolution set to go before the United Nations Security Council, claiming that it undermines Palestinian autonomy while serving the interests of outside powers. The measure, tied to President Donald Trump’s broader peace initiative for Gaza, is scheduled for a vote this week.
In an interview with Al Jazeera, cited by Israel’s Channel 12 News, Qassem said, “The amendments, additions, and clauses included in this resolution do not serve the goal of continuity and stability in the Gaza Strip, because they grant guardianship to non-Palestinian entities over the Palestinian reality – whether at the level of governance, security, or through interference in internal Palestinian affairs without waiting for any internal Palestinian arrangement.”
He argued that the proposal fails to protect basic Palestinian rights. “We want a Security Council resolution that protects our people’s right to self-determination, that defends their right to establish a state, and that prevents war in Gaza and the continued Israeli aggression against our people – in the West Bank, Gaza, and Jerusalem. There should have been a clear formulation stating that the role of the international force in Gaza is to act as a buffer between the occupation and the besieged civilians,” Qassem stated.
When pressed on the fact that the resolution had garnered significant Arab and Islamic backing, Qassem dismissed that support as irrelevant to Palestinian interests. “Arab agreement does not indicate Palestinian consent to many details of this resolution. When the American president met with Arab leaders in New York before presenting the peace plan, he later presented a version different from what had been agreed upon with them. Even if the resolution is approved and there is agreement on a certain wording – the real obstacles will arise during implementation on the ground. The US is acting to appease several parties through general, non-binding language,” he explained.
Asked about what Hamas would support instead, Qassem proposed a markedly different approach. “There should be a resolution that mandates a ceasefire and establishes an international peacekeeping force to stand between the civilians and the occupation and to maintain the ceasefire. We agreed to the formation of a community aid committee – an Egyptian concept – to manage the Gaza Strip. We also agreed to the possibility of international-Arab oversight of weapons. There are many issues that could be framed positively, unlike the current resolution’s details,” he said.
The U.S. proposal has also drawn backlash inside Israel, where it is viewed as a step toward Palestinian statehood. Late Saturday night, Ministers Itamar Ben Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich publicly urged Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu to reject the resolution outright.
On Sunday, Netanyahu made his stance crystal clear, reiterating Israel’s firm opposition to Palestinian sovereignty west of the Jordan River. “Our opposition to a Palestinian state on any part of this territory has not changed in the slightest,” he declared.
He noted that his position on the matter has remained steadfast throughout years of domestic and international pressure. “I do not need affirmations, tweets, or lectures from anyone,” Netanyahu added.
{Matzav.com}
