Bombshell House Report: Biden’s Putrid Debate Performance Sparked Civil War Among Embattled Prez’s Top Brass
The fallout from President Biden’s disastrous debate with Donald Trump sent shockwaves through his inner circle, triggering days of chaos, panic, and finger-pointing, according to a damning new report from the House Oversight Committee, the NY Post is reporting.
The report paints a picture of senior aides torn between loyalty and political reality as doubts over the president’s future reached a boiling point.
Behind closed doors, Biden’s most trusted advisers admitted to investigators that the June 27, 2024, debate had shattered morale and forced urgent conversations about whether he could continue as the Democratic nominee. “It is fair to say within a few days after the debate, he was aware of my view that I thought it was prudent to consider getting out of the race,” testified Jeff Zients, Biden’s former White House chief of staff.
Zients said his concerns weren’t about Biden’s capacity to govern but about whether the aging incumbent could realistically defeat Donald Trump in a grueling general election. As questions about his mental sharpness intensified, Zients revealed that other top officials quietly began to share the same doubts.
Among those alarmed were then–Secretary of State Anthony Blinken, National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan, Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo, and Veterans Affairs Secretary Denis McDonough, according to Zients. Their private misgivings added to the growing tension engulfing the administration.
“The fact of the matter was that President Biden was underwater across his administration, the caucus, donors, and the American people,” the House GOP report declared, summarizing the grim political outlook that gripped the White House.
Zients went on to acknowledge that Biden’s memory lapses had become more noticeable over time. “I think it’s always been a challenge, as it can be for a lot of busy people,” he told the committee. “He might have that challenge more than others. And I would say, like the stumbling over words, I’d say there’s been some trend of that being more common across time.”
Even as some aides began to waver, Biden’s most devoted loyalists refused to entertain the idea of withdrawal. Senior adviser Mike Donilon and counselor Steve Ricchetti urged him to stay the course, believing the storm would eventually pass.
Zients said Anita Dunn, one of Biden’s most influential communications strategists, expressed concern about his electability but ultimately sided with those who believed he could still win. “She was worried about whether he could win re-election,” Zients recalled. “But I don’t recall — in fact, I’d be very surprised if there was any absolute statement that he can’t, because she believed he could.”
As the internal fight raged, aides agreed that Biden had to appear in public more often to calm the electorate’s fears. “The plan was about, ‘How do we get him out there more?’” Zients explained. “He did a lot of different things, but — were meant to build back public confidence that he was the right person to be the next President of the United States.”
Others tried to downplay the disaster altogether. “It isn’t how the country perceived it. That just isn’t true,” Ricchetti insisted, rejecting claims that the debate exposed deep cognitive decline. Donilon — who admitted he earned $4 million for his work on Biden’s campaign and stood to receive another $4 million if Biden won reelection — defended his boss, saying, “I do not believe with the voters that it produced a substantial change in the horse race.”
Still, the damage proved irreversible. On July 21, 2024, just over three weeks after the debate, Biden bowed out of the race, ending his campaign in an extraordinary moment of political collapse.
The Oversight Committee’s report didn’t stop at recounting the chaos; it also accused White House physician Dr. Kevin O’Connor of helping conceal Biden’s mental deterioration. Along with deputy chief of staff Annie Tomasini and Anthony Bernal, Jill Biden’s chief of staff, O’Connor invoked the Fifth Amendment and declined to answer key questions about the president’s cognitive state.
The committee’s scathing findings, released as part of its broader investigation into Biden’s use of an autopen for official documents, recommended that O’Connor face a probe by the D.C. Board of Medicine for what it called a “coordinated” cover-up of the president’s decline.
{Matzav.com}
