Elon Musk Plans to End Prisons by Having His Robots Follow Crooks and Stop Them from ‘Doing Crime’
Elon Musk has unveiled yet another eyebrow-raising vision for the future — replacing prisons with robot chaperones. The Tesla CEO suggested that the company’s Optimus humanoid robots could one day be used to shadow and control the actions of ex-convicts, effectively eliminating the need for traditional incarceration.
At a recent Tesla shareholder meeting, Musk shared his latest concept, calling it a “more humane form of containment of future crime.” He described a world where convicted individuals are not confined in prisons but instead monitored by personal robotic guardians programmed to prevent any repeat offenses.
“You don’t have to put people in prisons and stuff,” Musk said. “If somebody’s committed crime, you now get a free Optimus and it’s just gonna follow you around and stop you from doing crime. But other than that you get to do anything. It’s just gonna stop you from committing crime, that’s really it.”
The announcement instantly ignited heated debate, with critics questioning both the practicality and morality of such an idea. Skeptics pointed out that Tesla’s Optimus prototypes have thus far demonstrated only rudimentary functions — such as simple movements and carrying light objects — far from the complex ethical decision-making required to handle human behavior.
“This shows a complete lack of understanding of criminology, the justice system, and frankly, basic human rights,” said Michael Johnson, a legal expert at the Brookings Institution. “The idea that a robot can somehow rehabilitate offenders better than comprehensive support programs is absurd. It comes across as a dystopian surveillance scheme more than anything else.”
Robotics specialists also expressed alarm at the potential for errors and misuse. “These robots simply do not have anywhere near the intelligence or physical capabilities to monitor, let alone restrain, human behavior,” said robotics engineer Sarah Chen. “The risks of false positives, bias, and misuse are immense. What happens when a robot misinterprets a benign situation as a crime? Who is liable?”
Beyond ethical concerns, investors raised doubts about Musk’s focus. Some shareholders questioned why the billionaire continues to float extravagant, sci-fi-like ideas instead of addressing production challenges and delivery targets at Tesla. The same meeting where Musk made his remarks also granted him a staggering $1 trillion compensation package.
Musk’s history of ambitious — and at times bizarre — concepts includes brain-computer interfaces, underground transport tunnels, and dreams of Martian colonies. Still, even longtime followers found this particular proposal startling, seeing it as a leap beyond even his usual boundary-pushing ideas. Whether the “robot parole officer” vision ever materializes remains to be seen, but for now, it’s another entry in Musk’s long list of futuristic provocations.
{Matzav.com}
