Feed aggregator
“We’re At The Decisive Stage”: Netanyahu, IDF Chief Say Operation To Capture Gaza City Advancing, Forces Now On Outskirts Of Terror Stronghold
Smotrich Threatens To Quit Government Over Hostage Deal
Israeli Finance Minister Betzalel Smotrich has reportedly delivered a blunt ultimatum in recent days, making clear that he will leave the coalition if Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu agrees to any arrangement with Hamas — whether limited in scope or a full accord — according to a Channel 12 report broadcast Wednesday evening.
After the report surfaced, Smotrich’s office released a statement saying, “The Finance Minister does not comment on matters discussed in meetings with bereaved families and the families of hostages.” Still, the message emphasized his firm position: “The minister’s position remains unchanged — there is no justification for a partial deal that leaves some hostages behind and allows Hamas to remain in power. He expects the Prime Minister to clarify his position without ambiguity.”
Echoing Smotrich’s hardline stance, retired Navy commander Eliezer Marom also issued a warning, cautioning against Israel pursuing only a partial agreement with Hamas.
Marom explained that Israel’s offensive in Gaza City had already placed Hamas under significant pressure, even at risk to the captives. “Any partial deal would give Hamas a 60-day window to regroup,” he warned. “What we saw today in Khan Yunis will repeat itself elsewhere if we allow that to happen.”
He concluded that Israel is now confronted with two possible courses of action: either secure a comprehensive, all-encompassing deal, or push forward with a challenging and prolonged military campaign inside Gaza.
{Matzav.com}
JD Vance: Stop Giving Medicare, Social Security to Illegal Aliens, Save Benefits for Americans
Trump Says Ukraine Peace Outcome Could Be Clear Within Two Weeks
New Zealand to Buy U.S. Helicopters, Airbus Jets in $2.7 Billion Defense Package
Suspected Triple-Killer Extradited to Florida to Face Justice
Malaysian FA-18 Fighter Jet Explodes in Fireball During Takeoff
Netanyahu Approves IDF Plans for Gaza City Operation
Netanyahu: Israel Will Conquer Gaza Regardless of Whether Hamas Accepts Hostage Deal
Israeli Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu intensified his criticism of Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese during a Thursday interview, sharply condemning what he called Canberra’s “appeasement” of terrorist groups and their backers in the West. He also pledged to move forward with a complete military takeover of Gaza, even if Hamas agrees to a ceasefire and a deal for the release of hostages.
“I’m sure he has a reputable record as a public servant, but I think his record is forever tarnished by the weakness that he showed in the face of these Hamas terrorist monsters,” Netanyahu said of Albanese in his interview with Sky News Australia.
“When the worst terrorist organization on earth, these savages who murdered women, raped them, beheaded men… when these people congratulate the prime minister of Australia, you know something is wrong.”
For years, Australia has been seen as one of Israel’s closest allies, but tensions between the two nations have deepened since Canberra’s announcement last week that it would formally recognize a Palestinian state.
On Tuesday night, Netanyahu escalated his attacks by taking to X, where he accused Albanese of betrayal and labeled him a “weak politician who betrayed Israel.”
Australia responded forcefully on Wednesday, with Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke countering that strength was not measured by “how many people you can blow up or how many children you can leave hungry.”
In the interview — one of many Netanyahu has conducted with international media outlets supportive of his policies, while largely avoiding critical Israeli press — the prime minister insisted that Israel was “on the verge of completing this war.”
This has been a repeated claim from Netanyahu over the past year and a half. Since February 2024, he has argued that capturing the southern Gaza city of Rafah would bring the conflict to an end within weeks, declaring in April that victory was “a step away.” But after Israeli forces entered Rafah in May 2024, those predictions failed to materialize.
Nearly two years into the war, Netanyahu continues to face mounting domestic and international pressure to negotiate an end to the fighting and secure the release of hostages. Despite this, his government recently signed off on a plan to seize Gaza City in the north, where roughly a million displaced civilians are sheltering. The move has drawn heavy criticism worldwide, and even some Israeli security officials have warned it could put the remaining hostages at greater risk.
Netanyahu has repeatedly portrayed Gaza City as the final bastion of Hamas power, comparing the situation to the Allies’ capture of Berlin to end World War II — a comparison he repeated during Thursday’s interview. Last year, he invoked a similar argument when defending Israel’s push to take Rafah.
The interview appears to have been recorded earlier this week, coinciding with reports that Hamas was close to accepting a U.S.-backed ceasefire proposal previously approved by Israel. Hamas has since publicly stated it has accepted the plan, but Jerusalem has remained silent for at least three days.
When interviewer Sharri Markson asked Netanyahu if Israel still intended to take full control of Gaza and dismantle Hamas even if the terror group agreed to a truce and released hostages, his answer was unequivocal.
“We’re going to do that anyway. That there was never a question that we’re not going to leave Hamas there,” he said, while adding that the war “could end today” if Hamas “lays down its arms and releases the remaining 50 hostages, at least 20 of which are alive.”
Netanyahu pointed to reports of rising resentment toward Hamas among Gazans, saying his aim was not to permanently occupy the Strip but “to free Gaza, free them from Hamas tyranny, free Israel and others from Hamas terrorism, give Gaza and Israel a different future.”
Regarding the growing rift with Australia, Netanyahu expressed regret, emphasizing that there had been a “great underlying friendship there for over a century” which has “gone astray because I think leaders did not show the strength and conviction that they should have when we’re actually fighting the war of Western civilization against these barbarians.”
He linked recent spikes in antisemitic incidents in Australia to broader global extremism, warning that radicals were exploiting democratic freedoms to undermine society from within. He urged Australians to confront this growing threat head-on.
“I’ve seen this tsunami of antisemitism, this racism and this deliberate targeting of the innocents, the burning of a synagogue in Melbourne and so on. These are horrible things and if you don’t stop them when they’re small, they get bigger and bigger and bigger and ultimately they consume your society,” he warned.
“The Western leaders, including unfortunately in Australia, are… trying to feed the crocodile of militant Islam that has claimed the lives not only of Jews, but Christians and Arabs, many Muslims and so on, and they think they’ll pacify, they’ll appease the crocodile,” Netanyahu continued.
“The more you pour fuel into this antisemitic, anti-Israel and anti-Western fire, the greater the fire will grow, it will consume you in the end. You have no protection unless you stand up to it.”
{Matzav.com Israel}
“Secularization” Stand In Bnei Brak Causes Commotion; Activist Arrested
New York Yankees Under Fire After Drafting Player Who Scrawled Swastika On Jewish Student’s Dorm Room
PHOTOS: Satmar Girls Camp in Ulster Heights Welcomes Top Ulster County Officials
California Supreme Court Rejects GOP Effort To Halt Newsom’s Redistricting Push
The California Supreme Court on Wednesday dismissed a petition from Republican state legislators attempting to block Gov. Gavin Newsom’s plan to redraw the state’s congressional map.
“Petitioners have failed to meet their burden of establishing a basis for relief at this time under California Constitution article IV, section 8,” the court wrote in a short order posted on the docket.
Newsom has been pushing back against Republican redistricting maneuvers in Texas by advancing a proposal for a special election this November. The goal is to secure voter approval for a new congressional map that would benefit Democrats ahead of the 2026 midterm elections.
With the court’s decision, the California Legislature can now move forward and is expected to vote as early as Thursday on legislation that would authorize the special election.
At the heart of the Republicans’ challenge was a constitutional rule requiring a 30-day waiting period before lawmakers can pass a newly introduced bill, unless three-fourths of the Legislature agrees to waive the restriction.
Democrats attempted to bypass that requirement by taking bills that had been introduced in February, removing their original text, and replacing it entirely with redistricting provisions.
Four Republican lawmakers — Sen. Tony Strickland, Sen. Suzette Martinez Valladares, Assemblymember Tri Ta, and Assemblymember Kate Sanchez — petitioned the state’s highest court on Tuesday to halt the Democrats’ strategy.
The petition sought to delay the process until at least September 18, which would have made it nearly impossible to prepare for the planned November 4 special election. In their filings, the lawmakers’ attorneys conceded that the case presented a novel legal question but argued that allowing Democrats to move forward would be “comically absurd.”
In a joint statement after the ruling, the four lawmakers criticized the court for offering no explanation and vowed to keep fighting. “This means Governor Newsom and the Democrats’ plan to gut the voter-created Citizens Redistricting Commission, silence public input, and stick taxpayers with a $200+ million bill will proceed,” the statement said.
“We will continue to challenge this unconstitutional power grab in the courts and at the ballot box. Californians deserve fair, transparent elections, not secret backroom deals to protect politicians,” the statement added.
{Matzav.com}
Sales of Previously Owned Homes Climb 2% as Market Shows Signs of Stabilizing
Former Top Aide To Adams Among 7 Facing New Charges In City Hall Corruption Probe
Prosecutors in Manhattan revealed on Thursday that a former senior adviser to Mayor Eric Adams is among seven individuals now facing additional charges in an ongoing corruption probe tied to City Hall, which has been under investigation for the past two years.
Although Adams himself has not been accused of wrongdoing, the case is expected to once again put a spotlight on the allegations surrounding his administration as he works to rebuild public confidence ahead of a highly competitive election in November.
The expanded indictments name Adams’ former chief of staff and longtime ally, Ingrid Lewis-Martin, along with her son Glenn D. Martin, former state Senator Jesse Hamilton, and two of Adams’ campaign donors — siblings Tony and Gina Argento — among those charged.
Lewis-Martin, along with the other defendants, was scheduled to appear before a judge on Thursday.
Her resignation came back in December, prior to a separate indictment alleging that she and her son accepted bribes in return for expediting approvals for construction projects. That case is still moving through the courts. Despite the charges, Lewis-Martin has remained involved with the Adams campaign in a volunteer capacity while awaiting trial.
In the latest development, Lewis-Martin now faces four more counts of conspiracy and accepting bribes, charges outlined in new indictments that Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg characterized as “classic bribery conspiracies that had a deep and wide-ranging impact on city government.”
“As alleged, Lewis-Martin consistently overrode the expertise of public servants so she could line her own pockets. While she allegedly received more than $75,000 in bribes and an appearance on a TV show, every other New Yorker lost out,” Bragg stated.
Her attorney, Arthur Aidala, responded on Thursday, saying she intends to plead not guilty to these new charges. “She has broken no laws, and she is not guilty,” he declared in a statement.
Aidala issued a further statement defending his client, saying: “Ingrid Lewis Martin is facing charges classified at the lowest level of felony in our justice system. Her only so-called ‘offense’ was fulfilling her duty—helping fellow citizens navigate the City’s outdated and often overwhelming bureaucracy. At no point did she receive a single dollar or any personal benefit for her assistance. Yet, the District Attorney seeks to portray a dedicated and honest public servant as a criminal. This is not justice—it is a distortion of the truth and a troubling example of politically motivated ‘lawfare.’ We will vigorously fight these charges and ensure that the facts prevail. The public deserves to know the truth, and we will not allow this injustice to stand.”
{Matzav.com}
Trump’s Massive $500M Civil Fraud Fine In AG Tish James’ Case Thrown Out By NY Appeals Court
A New York appeals court on Thursday tossed out the staggering $464 million judgment against President Trump, which stemmed from a civil business fraud case.
The Appellate Division, First Department, reversed the ruling in which Trump, 79, had been accused of artificially inflating his net worth by billions over a ten-year span to obtain more favorable loan and insurance deals.
If the February 2024 decision by Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Arthur Engoron had remained in place, Trump would have been required to pay more than $500 million, including over $100 million in accumulated interest.
The appeals court ruling followed a dramatic 11-week trial that threatened Trump’s long-cultivated image as a real estate powerhouse and risked labeling him a fraud while he campaigns to return to the White House.
During the trial, prosecutors presented evidence showing that between 2011 and 2021, Trump benefited from lower interest rates by significantly exaggerating the value of assets such as his Manhattan penthouse and Mar-a-Lago estate on official financial documents.
Records showed that Trump’s business claimed his Trump Tower triplex was 30,000 square feet when its actual size is just 11,000 square feet, inflating the property’s worth to $327 million in 2015 after valuing it at $80 million only four years earlier.
The trial also revealed that Trump listed Mar-a-Lago’s value at $517 million on financial statements, despite his own tax adviser noting that its “market value” had been recorded at just $27 million in 2020.
Michael Corbiciero, Trump’s tax representative, testified that the lower figure was used because the estate was classified as a “social club,” which enabled Trump to obtain significant tax benefits.
Evidence presented showed that Mar-a-Lago’s deed restricts its use to a social club and bars Trump from selling it as a private residence.
Nonetheless, Trump informed banks and insurers that the Palm Beach property was worth $517 million and even stated during the trial that he believed its value could reach $1.5 billion — which would make it four times pricier than the country’s most expensive listed home.
“The frauds found here leap off the page and shock the conscience,” Engoron wrote in his original ruling.
The decision from the appeals court came after indications last September that some members of the five-judge panel were skeptical about the lawsuit filed by New York Attorney General Letitia James, which ultimately triggered the trial.
Judge Peter Moulton described the size of the penalty as “troubling” and questioned whether the statute James relied on — which does not require proof that anyone suffered actual harm — had “morphed into something it was not meant to do.”
The lawsuit deeply affected the soon-to-be 47th president, who left the campaign trail several times to personally attend the trial, repeatedly condemning the proceedings as a “political witch hunt” and asserting he had “done nothing wrong.”
Both Engoron and James are elected Democrats, and James had campaigned on a promise to pursue Trump, previously referring to him as a “con man” and a “carnival barker.”
Trump’s attorneys argued that there were no “victims” in the case, emphasizing that “sophisticated” financial institutions like Deutsche Bank performed their own due diligence before entering agreements and that all lenders were repaid in full.
However, James’ team contended that Trump’s manipulated financial statements distorted the broader marketplace — a point Engoron ultimately supported.
“The next group of lenders to receive bogus statements might not be so lucky,” Engoron cautioned in his ruling.
Trump has already posted a $175 million bond while pursuing his appeal and will now take his challenge to New York’s highest court, the New York State Court of Appeals.
{Matzav.com}
Lawyer Calls Trump Case Another Failed “Lawfare” Attempt
Boeing in Talks to Sell Up to 500 Aircraft to China
Trump Claims “Total Victory” After \$515M Fraud Penalty Overturned
Pages
