Feed aggregator

For the first time in Israel’s history, IDF soldiers serving in military operations beyond the country’s borders will be able to cast ballots while remaining in their operational positions, as the military prepares an extensive voting operation ahead of the October 27 elections.

The unprecedented arrangement is part of a major logistical effort intended to ensure that soldiers on active duty and reservists can exercise their voting rights despite the ongoing fighting and the complicated security situation in several operational sectors.

The IDF is completing preparations to establish approximately 850 polling stations across military bases, units, and operational areas, a substantial increase from the 700 polling stations deployed during the previous election.

Military officials attributed the expansion to the increased number of reservists currently serving and the changing deployment of Israeli forces across different regions.

Voting within the military will begin on the evening of October 20, a full week before the general election, and continue throughout the following seven days.

The extended voting period is designed to accommodate soldiers whose assignments, operational responsibilities, or locations may prevent them from reaching a polling station on Election Day itself.

Under the new arrangements, even troops conducting cross-border operations will be provided with opportunities to vote, marking the first time the military has extended its election infrastructure to personnel serving in such circumstances.

Approximately 75 percent of the polling stations will operate from fixed locations, while the remaining 25 percent will be mobile units capable of traveling between military positions.

The mobile polling stations, numbering roughly 210, will play a particularly important role during the early voting period, allowing election personnel to reach soldiers stationed in remote areas or engaged in demanding operational assignments.

Rather than requiring soldiers to travel to central voting locations, these mobile stations will move between units according to schedules established in advance.

Each mobile polling committee will be accompanied by an armed officer or noncommissioned officer responsible for providing security throughout the operation.

Special procedures have also been established to safeguard the ballot boxes while they are transported between military units.

During transit, the secondary cover of each ballot box will remain locked to protect the integrity of the voting process and prevent unauthorized access.

Soldiers will be permitted to vote either at a military polling station or at their designated civilian polling station near their registered residence, provided they cast only one ballot.

To prevent duplicate voting, military ballots will be submitted using a double-envelope system. This procedure allows election authorities to verify each voter’s eligibility and ensure that no soldier has voted more than once while preserving the secrecy of the ballot.

The IDF has also clarified that soldiers who know they will be deployed on operational missions during Election Day may be able to vote in advance, beginning at 10 p.m. on October 20, subject to authorization for early voting at their particular unit.

Soldiers will receive information about the locations and operating hours of their polling stations through their commanders and unit election officers.

Responsibility for overseeing the entire military voting operation has been assigned to Colonel Vered Ben Yehuda, who ordinarily serves as head of the IDF Civilian Employee Employment Center and has now been appointed the military’s chief elections officer.

Ben Yehuda will supervise an extensive administrative network involving hundreds of election officers and approximately 3,000 soldiers who have received specialized training to serve on polling committees.

Each polling committee will generally consist of four IDF personnel trained in the procedures governing identification, ballot handling, voting secrecy, and the proper operation of polling stations.

Because of the unusual operational circumstances, special arrangements will also allow career soldiers and reservists to serve on polling committees in certain cases, subject to individual approval.

The military is coordinating the arrangements with Israel’s Central Elections Committee to ensure that the early voting process complies with election regulations.

Unlike civilians, IDF soldiers will not receive a general day off for the election. Military operations will continue as usual, with commanders responsible for arranging opportunities for eligible personnel to cast their ballots without interfering with operational requirements.

The military is also taking steps to ensure that the election campaign does not interfere with its nonpartisan character.

The IDF Education and Youth Corps has distributed informational materials and guidance to commanders explaining the voting procedures and emphasizing the prohibition against partisan political campaigning on military bases.

Military officials stressed that the responsibility of the election apparatus is strictly administrative: to provide soldiers with access to the ballot box and ensure that the voting process is conducted properly, without involvement in political arguments or attempts to influence voters.

The expanded voting arrangements come as Israeli forces remain deployed across several sensitive operational fronts, including areas along the Lebanese and Syrian borders and in Gaza.

The number and locations of polling stations may be adjusted as operational needs change, with mobile teams expected to provide flexibility for units whose deployment schedules cannot be determined far in advance.

The operation is scheduled to culminate on October 27, when the rest of Israel goes to the polls to elect the 26th Knesset.

{Matzav.com}

Direct flights between Israel and Morocco could once again be suspended, just weeks after Israeli airlines resumed service to Marrakesh following a nearly three-year interruption. New security requirements reportedly being imposed by Israel’s Shin Bet security agency have raised concerns that airlines may be unable to continue operating the routes.

The development threatens to disrupt the renewed air connections between the two countries at a time when Israeli carriers have been working to restore service and expand their schedules.

Although no official decision has been announced to suspend the flights, uncertainty surrounding the latest security demands has raised questions about the future of the routes currently operated by Arkia and Israir, as well as planned service by Sun d’Or, a subsidiary of El Al.

Arkia became the first Israeli airline to restore direct flights to Morocco when it resumed service between Israel and Marrakesh on August 24, ending a suspension that had lasted almost three years.

The airline introduced two weekly flights after an extended period of discussions with Israeli security authorities aimed at obtaining the approvals necessary to resume operations.

The return of direct service was considered an important development for travelers seeking to visit Morocco, particularly those who previously had to rely on connecting flights through other countries.

Israir subsequently resumed flights to Marrakesh as well, although its return was complicated by difficulties securing the necessary authorization from Moroccan authorities.

During September, those complications became serious enough that the airline considered discontinuing the route.

However, following intervention by senior officials, the required approvals were obtained, allowing Israir to announce that it would continue operating flights to the Moroccan destination.

Meanwhile, Sun d’Or, which operates under the El Al Group, has announced plans to introduce its own direct service to Marrakesh beginning November 16.

The airline intends to operate two flights per week, provided it receives all necessary regulatory and security approvals.

Those expansion plans could now be affected by the additional security conditions reportedly being introduced by the Shin Bet.

At this stage, the precise nature of the new requirements has not been disclosed. It remains unclear whether the restrictions apply equally to all Israeli airlines serving Morocco, whether they involve additional screening procedures or operational security measures, and whether any formal instructions have already been issued to carriers.

The uncertainty has prompted concerns that airlines could encounter difficulties maintaining their existing schedules or proceeding with plans to increase service.

Direct flights between Israel and Morocco were suspended following the outbreak of the war in October 2023, amid heightened security concerns and travel warnings affecting Israeli citizens.

The interruption ended a period of expanding aviation ties that followed the normalization of diplomatic relations between Israel and Morocco in December 2020, under the Abraham Accords framework.

The resumption of direct flights this past summer restored a convenient connection between Israel and Marrakesh, allowing passengers to reach the Moroccan city without traveling through a third country.

Morocco remains a significant destination for Israelis, particularly those with family roots in the country and visitors traveling to historic Jewish communities and the kevarim of tzaddikim.

The country’s longstanding Jewish heritage, including historic shuls, cemeteries, and pilgrimage sites, has made it an important destination for Jewish travelers.

For passengers planning upcoming trips, another suspension of direct flights would likely mean returning to connecting itineraries, potentially increasing travel times and costs.

The latest concerns come amid heightened Israeli scrutiny of international aviation security following recent incidents involving flights bound for Ben Gurion Airport.

Nevertheless, there has been no official announcement from the Shin Bet or the airlines indicating that the Morocco routes have been canceled or that a suspension has been ordered.

For now, the flights remain subject to the existing approval arrangements, while the airlines await clarification regarding the new security requirements and their potential impact on future operations.

{Matzav.com}

Visitors planning to daven at the Kosel in Yerushalayim are being advised to prepare for changes to the usual entrance and exit arrangements, as the Western Wall Heritage Foundation begins an extensive renovation project at the main entrance to the Kosel Plaza near Shaar Ha’ashpos, the Dung Gate.

The construction work, which is expected to continue until Shavuos, will involve significant improvements to the entrance area, including upgraded security screening facilities, renewed infrastructure, improved accessibility, and changes designed to make pedestrian traffic safer and more orderly.

The Western Wall Heritage Foundation announced that the project is part of its ongoing efforts to improve conditions for the millions of mispallelim and visitors who come to the Kosel throughout the year.

The renovations will focus on the main access point leading from Shaar Ha’ashpos into the Kosel Plaza, one of the busiest entrances to the site and the location of security checkpoints used by large numbers of visitors.

As part of the project, crews will replace and upgrade existing infrastructure, carry out maintenance work, and introduce improvements to the security and safety arrangements in the entrance complex.

The plans also include refurbishing the appearance of the entrance and reorganizing pedestrian passageways to provide a more efficient flow of people entering and leaving the plaza.

Particular attention will be given to accessibility, with improvements intended to make the entrance easier and more convenient to navigate for elderly visitors, people with disabilities, and others who may have difficulty moving through crowded areas.

The entrance serves enormous numbers of people throughout the year, with particularly heavy pedestrian traffic during Yomim Tovim, major tefillah gatherings, and other occasions when tens of thousands of Yidden converge on the Kosel.

Foundation officials said the improvements are intended to accommodate those crowds more effectively while preserving the special character and dignity of the Kosel and its surroundings.

Because the work will be carried out in stages, the existing entry and exit arrangements will be subject to temporary changes throughout the construction period.

Visitors should therefore not assume that the routes they ordinarily use to enter or leave the plaza will remain available. Access arrangements may be adjusted as different sections of the entrance undergo renovation.

Signs have already been installed in the area, including directional arrows guiding visitors toward the appropriate entrances, exits, and pedestrian routes.

The public is being asked to pay close attention to the posted instructions and cooperate with ushers and other personnel stationed at the site to direct pedestrian traffic.

The Western Wall Heritage Foundation emphasized that it is making efforts to minimize disruption during the months of construction and maintain safe access to the Kosel Plaza while the improvements are underway.

Foundation officials thanked the public for its patience and cooperation, explaining that the project is intended to provide a safer, more accessible, and more dignified entrance for the countless people who come to daven at the Kosel.

The renovations are scheduled to be completed by the upcoming Shavuos, when large crowds traditionally gather at the Kosel for tefillos.

{Matzav.com}

President Donald Trump declared Monday that the approaching November 3 midterm elections will not influence his administration’s strategy toward Iran, predicting that the ongoing conflict will conclude in the near future and that oil prices will plunge once the fighting ends.

Speaking with reporters before departing for a campaign rally in Ohio, Trump expressed confidence that the confrontation with Tehran was nearing its conclusion, despite continuing uncertainty over whether Washington will pursue a diplomatic agreement or launch additional military strikes.

“As soon as the war ends with Iran, which will be very soon, oil will drop like a rock. And it’s going to end very soon,” Trump told reporters.

The president’s remarks came amid mounting regional tensions, including a series of missile attacks by Iranian-backed Houthi terrorists in Yemen against targets in Saudi Arabia. Recent strikes have reportedly targeted Saudi airports, with one attack resulting in the death of an American citizen.

Asked how the United States intends to respond to the Houthi attacks, Trump sharply criticized the terror group’s conduct but did not announce any immediate retaliatory measures.

“Well, the Houthis are misbehaving very badly. No good.”

The comments come as the Trump administration weighs its next steps against Iran, with the possibility of renewed American military action remaining under consideration even as diplomatic contacts continue.

Last Thursday, Trump indicated that the United States would refrain from launching further attacks against Iran until after the November 3 congressional elections, a decision that raised questions about whether domestic political considerations were influencing the timing of American military operations.

“We are having productive discussions with the Islamic Republic of Iran,” Trump wrote on Truth Social.

At the same time, the president portrayed Iran as a country under extraordinary pressure, pointing to its weakened military capabilities and deteriorating economic circumstances. He indicated that Washington had no intention of easing its demands simply because negotiations were underway.

During an appearance at the White House on Friday, Trump again suggested that the conflict could be brought to a conclusion within a relatively short period, making clear that the administration was prepared to employ either diplomatic or military means to achieve its objectives.

“We can do it either way, but it’s very simple – one way or another it’s gonna be over soon,” he declared.

Behind the president’s public statements, American military planners have continued preparing detailed options for a possible return to major combat operations against Iran. According to a New York Times report, the Pentagon has developed plans for attacks on Iranian missile stockpiles, drone production and deployment facilities, energy installations, and military command centers.

One proposal under consideration involves a concentrated bombing campaign lasting approximately three days, with the objective of severely weakening Iran’s ability to conduct further missile and drone attacks. Senior administration officials, including Vice President JD Vance, reportedly reviewed the options during discussions at Camp David.

The military preparations have been accompanied by a significant American buildup in the Middle East, with three aircraft carriers expected to be deployed to the region. The deployment would give Washington substantial additional capabilities should Trump authorize another round of strikes.

According to the report, the president has rejected five previous proposals for major military operations against Iran or the Houthis in recent months, choosing instead to maintain military pressure while leaving room for negotiations.

The diplomatic effort has nevertheless encountered significant obstacles, particularly over Iran’s nuclear program. American negotiators have sought to make restrictions on Tehran’s nuclear ambitions a central component of any agreement, while Iranian representatives have resisted addressing that issue before other disputes are resolved.

The continuing confrontation has also placed substantial pressure on global energy markets. Oil prices climbed above $100 per barrel amid renewed Iranian attacks on commercial shipping and the latest Houthi strikes against Saudi Arabia, underscoring the economic consequences of the conflict as Americans prepare to vote in November.

Iranian attacks in the Strait of Hormuz have further complicated efforts to stabilize the region, disrupting shipping through one of the world’s most important energy corridors. The United States has increased naval operations to protect commercial vessels, although the threat to maritime traffic has persisted.

Meanwhile, the recent Houthi attacks on Saudi Arabia have added another potential flashpoint. The strikes have raised concerns that the confrontation could expand beyond Iran and draw additional regional countries into the fighting, even as Washington continues exploring a negotiated end to the war.

A preliminary investigation into the deadly explosion on the Ramim Ridge in northern Israel has revealed that the students involved in the tragedy were hiking along a trail where a warning sign prohibited entry, raising serious questions about how the school outing was permitted to proceed. The explosion, believed to have been caused by an unexploded cluster munition left behind during the war, killed one student and injured 23 others.

Following the tragedy, Israel’s Education Ministry announced Monday evening that school trips scheduled for Tuesday and Wednesday in areas near the northern border and the northern Golan Heights would be diverted to alternative locations.

School groups already hiking in the affected areas were instructed to leave their routes in coordination with the Education Ministry’s field trip coordination center.

The restrictions were introduced after the explosion during an outing involving students from the ORT Ma’alot Yeshiva High School on the Ramim Ridge, an area near Israel’s northern border that was subjected to extensive rocket and missile fire during the war.

According to initial findings, investigators believe the explosive device was a cluster munition that landed in the area sometime between mid-March and early April.

Students who witnessed the incident reportedly told emergency personnel that they had seen additional unexploded munitions scattered in the vicinity, adding to concerns about the dangers remaining along hiking routes in the region.

Israeli Northern Command officials estimate that thousands of unexploded explosive devices may still be lying across northern Israel as a result of the war, with most believed to have originated from Hezbollah rocket and missile attacks.

The discovery has heightened concerns about the safety of outdoor activities in areas that experienced sustained bombardment, particularly locations where unexploded ordnance may remain concealed among rocks, vegetation, and other natural features.

Education Minister Yoav Kisch initially considered imposing a broader temporary suspension of school excursions throughout northern Israel. Following consultations, officials instead decided to redirect trips away from designated high-risk areas over the next two days.

One of the most troubling findings emerged in a report by Kan News, which revealed that the hiking trail used by the students had a warning sign installed by Keren Kayemeth LeIsrael, the Jewish National Fund.

The sign prohibited entering or remaining on the trail and in surrounding forest areas because restoration work was underway.

KKL-JNF confirmed that the warning remained in effect at the time of the incident, meaning that the restriction had not been lifted when the students from Ma’alot-Tarshiha entered the area.

Despite the posted prohibition, the school’s outing went ahead along the route, and the students were hiking there when the fatal explosion occurred.

The revelation has raised questions about the approval process for the excursion, including whether the school and relevant authorities were aware that the trail was officially closed.

However, a separate report indicated that the students entered the area through another access point where no warning sign had been posted. The Education Ministry maintained that the excursion had been approved as part of the Israel National Trail, adding another layer to the questions surrounding the incident.

Police Commissioner Danny Levy told reporters that, based on his understanding, the school trip had received authorization from the appropriate agencies.

Levy said he was also considering recommending a suspension of school outings in the affected region while investigators determine how the tragedy occurred and whether additional safety measures are necessary.

Further details about the moments preceding the explosion have emerged from accounts provided by students and their families.

According to testimony reported by Ynet, several students discovered the unexploded munition during the hike and began handling it. Some reportedly posed for photographs with the object before the explosion.

Eliyahu Galil, whose son participated in the outing, said his son sent him a photograph of the munition after the incident.

Galil explained that the boys had apparently become excited upon finding the unusual object. According to his understanding of the events, one of the students subsequently placed it inside a backpack, where the explosion later occurred.

Other accounts indicated that the munition may have been handled or partially dismantled before detonating. Investigators are examining the precise sequence of events and the actions that may have triggered the blast.

The explosion set off a major emergency response involving Magen David Adom personnel, police, firefighters, military medical teams and IDF helicopters. Rescue workers faced the additional danger that other unexploded devices might be present nearby.

IDF combat engineering specialists, including personnel from the Yahalom unit, were dispatched to search the surrounding terrain for additional explosive remnants.

IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir subsequently instructed Northern Command chief Maj. Gen. Rafi Milo to investigate the circumstances of the explosion and submit his findings as quickly as possible.

The military inquiry is expected to examine the origin of the munition, the presence of additional unexploded devices in the area, and the circumstances that allowed civilians to enter terrain potentially contaminated by wartime explosives.

The tragedy has also renewed attention to warnings issued by State Comptroller Matanyahu Englman concerning Israel’s handling of unexploded ordnance and hazardous areas. A May 2025 report identified deficiencies in planning, funding and the clearance of dangerous explosive materials, although its principal focus was on military and industrial sites rather than open hiking trails affected by rocket fire.

Prime Minister Binyomin Netanyahu visited wounded students at Rambam Hospital in Haifa on Monday evening, accompanied by Education Minister Kisch, meeting with injured youngsters and their families.

The investigation remains ongoing, with authorities now facing the task of determining how an approved school outing entered a restricted area and what measures will be required to prevent another tragedy involving the thousands of unexploded munitions believed to remain across northern Israel.

{Matzav.com}

On Thursday, September 3, Parshas Nitzavim-Vayeilech, a historic Chanukas HaBayis was held for the new Rofeh Cholim Cancer Society (RCCS) building in central Yerushalayim.

RCCS, founded by R’ Hershel Kohn nearly 30 years ago, is renowned worldwide for supporting thousands of Jewish families facing serious illness, providing comprehensive medical, financial, and emotional assistance.

Based in New York, RCCS opened a branch in Yerushalayim about 15 years ago. Though it began on a smaller scale, it quickly became a vital resource for families in need. As the number of patients has grown each year, the organization has steadily expanded its lifesaving work.

To meet the myriad of unique needs patients and their families experience when coping with illness in Israel, a major initiative was launched: establishing a medical center on Sarei Yisrael Street in Yerushalayim. The new facility will bring various service departments together under one roof, enabling RCCS to raise and broaden its medical support and services offered in Eretz Yisroel.

Many distinguished donors from the United States who partnered in the project traveled to attend the dedication. Among them were the building’s patron Reb Beri Weiss, and his brother-in-law and partner, Reb Ari Weiss, in whose honor the building is named the “Weiss Family Building.”

The dedication event was attended by many rabbanim and community leaders, who despite the busy period before Selichos and the Yomim Noraim, made time to come and personally thank the organization’s administration and partners for the profound impact RCCS has on their kehillos, neighborhoods and communities.

Several Rabbanim, Roshei Yeshiva, and Admorim addressed the gathering, often sharing stories of how RCCS has helped families they are personally close with.

During the event, founder R’ Hershel Kohn shared that over the past year, RCCS has assisted more than 7,000 families of cholei Yisrael worldwide, including 2,700 in Eretz Yisroel. He stressed the need to continue expanding so that no one is ever turned away, and expressed hope that with the coming of Moshiach, the organization will no longer be needed.

The event concluded with spirited dancing and heartfelt brachos from the attending Gedolei Yisrael for the continued success of RCCS, and for the speedy refuah and yeshuah of all cholei Yisrael.

To learn more about RCCS or to support our work, please visit: https://www.rccscancer.org/

Barack Obama has formally endorsed Democratic Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed in Michigan, releasing a campaign advertisement Monday urging voters to support the progressive candidate in his November 3 contest against Republican Mike Rogers, even as Rogers intensifies his criticism of El-Sayed over alleged family connections to the Muslim Brotherhood.

The endorsement places Obama behind El-Sayed in one of the country’s most closely watched Senate contests, with the former president portraying the Michigan election as part of a broader struggle over the direction of the United States.

“America was founded on a simple idea. This country belongs to all of us,” Obama said in the video. “Not just the wealthy, not just the well-connected — everyone.

“Today, that idea is under attack. And Michigan is where we fight back. That’s why I’m asking you to support Abdul El-Sayed for the United States Senate.”

Obama praised El-Sayed’s record in public health and his progressive economic agenda, presenting him as a candidate willing to challenge powerful interests on behalf of working Americans.

The former president said El-Sayed has “taken on special interests to fight for good jobs, better healthcare, and lower costs.”

Among the positions Obama highlighted were El-Sayed’s advocacy for Medicare for All, his decision not to accept contributions from corporate political action committees, and his opposition to American involvement in foreign wars.

El-Sayed previously served as the health director of Wayne County, which includes Detroit, and has emphasized his background in public health throughout his political career.

Although some coverage has described him as a physician, El-Sayed’s professional qualifications have drawn closer scrutiny. He earned a medical degree from Columbia University but does not hold a license to practice medicine, according to reporting by Bridge Michigan.

The endorsement had been anticipated after Obama and El-Sayed announced plans to appear together at a campaign event in Detroit later this month. Until Monday, however, Obama had not publicly issued a formal endorsement.

The announcement comes as El-Sayed attempts to consolidate Democratic support following a competitive primary contest against Representative Haley Stevens of Michigan.

El-Sayed must now persuade Stevens’ supporters and other Democratic voters to unite behind his candidacy while also appealing to independents in a state where statewide elections have frequently been decided by narrow margins.

The endorsement arrives at a politically sensitive moment for El-Sayed, who has recently attempted to distance himself from harsh criticism he directed at Obama earlier in his career.

In a 2012 opinion piece, El-Sayed sharply questioned Obama’s record on immigration, healthcare, civil liberties, and American military involvement overseas. Those criticisms resurfaced ahead of the planned joint campaign appearance.

During an interview Sunday on NBC’s Meet the Press, El-Sayed attributed his earlier remarks to his “younger” and “angry self.”

“You grow up, you start to appreciate just how hard change is and how important it is to pick up and push,” El-Sayed said.

He explained that his views had evolved as he gained experience in public service and came to better appreciate the difficulties of achieving major policy changes. El-Sayed also suggested that progressive Democrats had drawn important lessons from Obama’s presidency, even where they continued to disagree with aspects of his record.

Meanwhile, Rogers has been pursuing a sharply different campaign strategy, focusing attention on El-Sayed’s political positions and raising allegations about his family’s purported connections to Islamist organizations.

In a Monday post on X, Rogers made no reference to Obama’s endorsement. Instead, he repeated an allegation concerning El-Sayed’s family.

“According to his own sister, Abdul El-Sayed’s family has ‘long been’ Muslim Brotherhood,” Rogers wrote. “Abdul needs to be honest with Michiganders about he and his families ties to terrorism.”

El-Sayed has denied that he or members of his family have connections to the Muslim Brotherhood. Rogers has not publicly provided evidence establishing the alleged ties, and the accusations remain disputed.

The allegations had already surfaced during the candidates’ October 8 debate in Grand Rapids, where Rogers repeatedly raised questions about El-Sayed’s background and associations. El-Sayed accused his Republican opponent of attempting to make his Muslim identity an issue in the election.

The debate also exposed substantial differences between the candidates over Israel and American foreign policy. El-Sayed has opposed continued American military assistance to Israel, while Rogers has criticized that position and portrayed his opponent’s foreign policy views as a national security concern.

Rogers, who previously chaired the House Intelligence Committee, has emphasized his background in national security and law enforcement. His campaign has also targeted El-Sayed over policing, crime, and government spending.

El-Sayed, meanwhile, has campaigned on expanding healthcare access, reducing household expenses, limiting corporate influence in politics, and changing American foreign policy priorities.

The two candidates are competing for the Senate seat being vacated by Democrat Gary Peters, who is retiring. With Republicans currently holding a 53–47 Senate majority, Michigan is among the states receiving intense attention from both national parties.

Obama’s scheduled October 24 appearance in Detroit will also feature Democratic gubernatorial candidate Jocelyn Benson and other party leaders. The event coincides with the beginning of early in-person voting in Michigan.

The location is significant for El-Sayed, who struggled in Detroit during the Democratic primary, losing the city to Stevens by a substantial margin. His campaign is now seeking to bring those voters into the Democratic coalition for the general election.

Rogers has simultaneously attempted to appeal to voters dissatisfied with both parties, including by publicly opposing aspects of President Trump’s tariff policy toward Canada and calling for changes in American policy toward Iran.

In a new advertisement released Monday, the Rogers campaign featured Detroit residents criticizing El-Sayed, including one voter who said, “I voted for Barack Obama, but this year I’m voting for Mike Rogers.”

Obama’s endorsement is part of a wider round of campaign activity ahead of the midterms. On Monday, he also released a video supporting Democratic Senate candidate Scott Colom in Mississippi, where Colom is challenging Republican Senator Cindy Hyde-Smith.

The former president’s Michigan appearance later this month will bring him directly into the contest between El-Sayed and Rogers, with both campaigns continuing to focus on voter turnout, economic concerns, and sharply contrasting positions on national security.

{Matzav.com}

President Donald Trump is renewing his promise to provide $5,000 payments to every adult American citizen if Republicans retain control of Congress in November, presenting the proposal as a major financial benefit of a Republican victory even as lawmakers within his own party question its cost and potential economic consequences.

In a campaign advertisement posted Monday on X, Trump promoted the proposed payments while warning that Democratic control of Congress would result in higher taxes and serious economic difficulties.

“I’m going to give all adult citizens of the United States of America $5,000. Democrat policies won’t allow this to happen,” Trump said in the advertisement.

“In fact, the opposite. They’re going to raise your taxes,” he continued.

“If the Democrats win, you will have an economic depression. If the Republicans win, you will each have $5,000 in your pocket and economic success for our country like we have never ever seen before.”

The renewed promise comes just weeks before the November 3 midterm elections, when Republicans will attempt to maintain their majorities in both the House of Representatives and the Senate.

Trump has sought to make the proposed payments a prominent feature of the Republican campaign, arguing that continued GOP control would allow his administration to deliver direct financial benefits to American households.

However, the proposal has already encountered resistance among fiscally conservative Republicans, some of whom argue that distributing thousands of dollars to millions of Americans would significantly increase federal spending and could undermine efforts to control inflation.

The president initially introduced the $5,000 dividend proposal during the Republican National Committee’s midterm convention in Dallas on September 9.

Since that announcement, questions have persisted about how the payments would be financed, whether they would require additional federal borrowing, and how the administration would structure the program.

Representative Chip Roy, a Texas Republican known for his opposition to expanding federal spending, criticized the proposal on the grounds that direct government payments could encourage Americans to become more dependent on Washington.

“[S]ome of us think dependency is evil & soul-sucking in all its forms,” Roy wrote on X.

Representative Ralph Norman of South Carolina, another conservative Republican and a member of the House Freedom Caucus, also expressed reservations about the initiative.

Norman cited “serious concerns” involving the federal debt and what he described as “pay-to-play politics,” raising questions about the wisdom of linking a major government payment proposal to the outcome of an election.

The criticism reflects broader divisions within the Republican Party over the appropriate role of government spending and whether direct cash payments are consistent with the party’s stated commitment to fiscal restraint.

The debate has revived comparisons with the stimulus checks issued during the COVID-19 pandemic, when Congress approved several rounds of direct payments to help households cope with widespread economic disruptions.

Although those payments were initially introduced under Trump’s administration, subsequent rounds of federal assistance were enacted under President Joe Biden, contributing to a broader debate over government spending and its relationship to inflation.

One individual who previously served as a senior official in Trump’s White House argued that the pandemic-era payments ultimately produced little political benefit for Republicans while opening the door to additional federal spending.

“We all remember how that turned out,” the official said. “Didn’t help our team at all, and it set the stage for [former President Joe] Biden to do it again — and plunged us straight into inflation hell.”

Trump, however, has continued to defend his proposal as an affordable way to share what he describes as the economic gains generated by his administration’s policies.

During his September announcement, the president said the payments would be known as the Trump Dividend and compared the concept to a corporation distributing profits to its shareholders.

He also specified that recipients would be required to spend the money within the United States, an additional condition intended to ensure that the payments stimulate domestic economic activity.

The president has pointed to tariff revenue and increased investment in the American economy as reasons he believes the federal government can afford the initiative. In subsequent campaign remarks, he estimated the program’s cost at approximately $1 trillion.

Independent analyses have placed the potential cost closer to $1.2 trillion, based on the number of adult American citizens who would qualify. Fact-checkers have questioned whether tariff collections could finance the payments without additional borrowing or other sources of revenue.

Another unresolved question is how the government would enforce Trump’s requirement that the money be spent domestically. Administration officials have not publicly outlined a mechanism for tracking purchases or restricting how recipients use the funds.

The White House formally promoted the proposal in September, presenting it as a dividend tied to the administration’s economic policies and emphasizing that it would depend on Republicans maintaining control of both chambers of Congress.

The $5,000 pledge has also become part of a broader series of financial initiatives announced by the administration ahead of the midterms, including targeted payments or refunds for certain Medicare beneficiaries and Americans enrolled in federal health insurance programs.

Those measures differ from the proposed Trump Dividend because they involve specific existing programs or smaller groups of recipients, while the $5,000 initiative would extend to every adult American citizen.

For a married couple in which both spouses are adult U.S. citizens, the proposed payments would total $10,000. The president has not announced an income limit that would exclude higher-earning Americans.

Despite Trump’s repeated assurances, the dividend remains a proposal rather than an approved federal benefit. Congress would need to authorize the payments, and no legislation establishing the program has been enacted.

With the November 3 elections approaching, the president is continuing to promote the checks as a central part of his economic message, even as Republican lawmakers debate whether the federal government can afford the commitment and how it would be implemented.

{Matzav.com}

Shas chairman Aryeh Deri has acknowledged that there is no realistic solution to the ongoing dispute over drafting chareidi yeshiva students into the IDF, revealing during a closed-door gathering in Modiin Illit that the instructions he received from senior rabbonim were to prolong the political process and gain as much time as possible.

The remarks, disclosed Monday evening by Israel’s Channel 13 News, have drawn attention because they present a different picture of Shas’s strategy from the message the party has recently emphasized in its public election campaign.

According to the report, Deri told participants at the private gathering that the dispute over military conscription could not be resolved under the existing circumstances and that the rabbinic leadership had directed him to focus on delaying developments rather than expecting a comprehensive legislative settlement.

“You cannot solve the problem. The instruction from the rabbonim was to buy time,” Deri was quoted as saying, according to an English translation of the Hebrew remarks reported by Channel 13.

The disclosure comes as Shas has been working to broaden its appeal ahead of Israel’s upcoming elections, highlighting the party’s identification with the State of Israel and expressing appreciation for IDF soldiers.

That public messaging has attracted particular attention because the party’s rabbinic leadership continues to maintain strong opposition to the compulsory enlistment of yeshiva students.

The newly reported remarks suggest that Deri views the political negotiations over a draft law primarily as a means of protecting the chareidi community from immediate enforcement measures while postponing a confrontation that he believes cannot presently be resolved.

The Channel 13 report did not establish when the private gathering took place or provide the full recording and surrounding context of Deri’s remarks. It also did not identify which rabbonim issued the instructions he described.

The comments nevertheless add another dimension to the long-running struggle over military service, which has become one of the most contentious issues in Israeli politics.

For years, chareidi parties have sought legislation protecting the ability of yeshiva students to continue learning without being required to enlist in the IDF. Those efforts have repeatedly encountered legal challenges and opposition from political parties demanding a broader distribution of military obligations.

The dispute has become especially intense since the outbreak of the war following the October 7, 2023, Hamas attacks, as the military has faced increased manpower requirements and reservists have been called up for extended periods.

The IDF has maintained that it urgently needs additional soldiers, while chareidi leaders insist that the preservation of full-time Torah learning is an essential religious responsibility.

Deri has previously expressed skepticism that the military genuinely wants to accommodate chareidi recruits who insist on maintaining their religious standards.

During a September interview with Kol Berama radio, the Shas chairman rejected suggestions that he should personally call upon chareidi men who are not learning full-time to enlist.

He argued that the military was capable of addressing its own recruitment difficulties and accused the IDF of failing to provide adequate frameworks for chareidi soldiers.

Deri also maintained that the army’s preference for a secular military environment was incompatible with the requirements of many chareidi recruits, although the IDF has established dedicated service frameworks, including the Chashmonaim Brigade, specifically intended to accommodate chareidi religious observance.

Those earlier comments drew criticism from political opponents, including former IDF Chief of Staff Gadi Eisenkot and former Prime Minister Naftali Bennett, who argued that the growing burden on serving soldiers required greater participation from the chareidi population.

The latest disclosure comes against the backdrop of a change in Shas’s public campaign strategy.

Recent party messaging has placed greater emphasis on solidarity with soldiers and their families, reflecting an effort to appeal to voters who identify with the military and the broader Israeli national experience.

At the same time, senior rabbonim associated with Shas have continued to speak against the drafting of yeshiva students, with some rejecting military enlistment even for young men who are not actively studying in yeshiva.

The contrast between those positions has raised questions about how Shas intends to reconcile its public expressions of support for soldiers with its continued opposition to compulsory chareidi enlistment.

Deri’s remarks at the Modiin Illit gathering indicate that, at least in the private discussion reported Monday, he was candid about the limits of what political negotiations could accomplish.

His acknowledgment that the rabbonim had instructed him to gain time also echoes an earlier position he expressed during a visit to Rav Meir Tzvi Bergman in January 2025.

At that meeting, Deri indicated that he did not see a practical solution to the draft controversy and spoke about awaiting the arrival of Moshiach rather than expecting the political system to resolve the matter.

The current dispute has also involved repeated attempts by the governing coalition to advance legislation that would regulate the status of chareidi yeshiva students and restrict enforcement measures against those who have not reported for military service.

In July, the coalition attempted to introduce a temporary suspension of arrests of chareidi draft evaders, but the High Court intervened before the measure could take effect.

The legal proceedings have further complicated efforts to reach an agreement acceptable to both the chareidi parties and lawmakers demanding greater enlistment.

An Ethiopian Airlines cargo aircraft traveling from Addis Ababa to Ben Gurion Airport was forced to reverse course after Israeli authorities discovered that one of the pilots was an Indonesian national, prompting the airline to return the plane to Ethiopia and replace the crew member before continuing to Israel.

The unusual incident occurred overnight Monday, when the cargo flight had already departed Ethiopia and was making its way toward Israel. The problem emerged after authorities received the aircraft’s crew manifest, which reportedly had not been submitted until after the plane was airborne.

During a review of the documentation, officials discovered that one of the pilots held Indonesian citizenship. Because Indonesia does not maintain diplomatic relations with Israel, the aircraft was denied permission to proceed with that crew member aboard.

The plane had been flying for approximately an hour and was still within Ethiopian airspace when instructions were issued for it to return to its departure airport.

The aircraft subsequently landed in Addis Ababa, where Ethiopian Airlines arranged for the Indonesian pilot to be replaced.

Once the crew change was completed, the cargo plane departed Ethiopia a second time and continued to Ben Gurion Airport, where it landed without further reported complications.

Ethiopian Airlines attributed the disruption to an administrative error, explaining that the company had not realized the Indonesian pilot would be unable to participate in a flight destined for Israel.

Indonesia, the world’s most populous Muslim-majority country, has no formal diplomatic relations with Israel. The two countries have maintained limited unofficial contacts over the years, but Indonesia does not recognize Israel diplomatically.

The incident highlights the importance of advance crew documentation on international flights, particularly those operating between countries with complicated diplomatic relationships or heightened security requirements.

The incident occurred amid a tightening of Israel’s aviation security procedures following the recent attempted attack aboard a Flydubai flight bound for Ben Gurion Airport.

In that case, an Omani copilot allegedly attempted to seize control of the aircraft and crash it at the airport. The incident prompted Israeli authorities to review how foreign airline personnel are screened before being permitted to operate flights into the country.

Under the strengthened requirements, foreign carriers must conduct updated security background checks on flight crews and avoid assigning personnel holding citizenship, including dual citizenship, from countries without diplomatic relations with Israel.

The new procedures reportedly extend beyond pilots to other flight crew members, reflecting concerns about the potential security risks posed by personnel with access to aircraft cockpits and sensitive aviation operations.

In the Ethiopian Airlines incident, Israel’s screening system successfully identified the Indonesian crew member and prevented the aircraft from reaching Israeli airspace. However, the fact that the information was received only after departure has raised questions about whether crew manifests should be submitted earlier.

Unlike passenger information, which is generally transmitted to authorities before flights depart, crew information can sometimes reach screening systems shortly before takeoff or even after an aircraft is airborne.

Israeli aviation officials are examining the gap between the introduction of stricter screening requirements and the procedures used to enforce them before aircraft leave their departure airports.

The broader security review has also led Israeli airlines to undertake additional screening of foreign flight personnel employed on chartered aircraft.

According to Israeli reports, local carriers have begun using Israeli cybersecurity companies to examine the backgrounds of approximately 2,500 foreign pilots and flight attendants, including reviews of their publicly available social media activity and statements.

The additional scrutiny comes as investigators in the United Arab Emirates continue examining the attempted Flydubai attack. Emirati authorities have reportedly confirmed that the Omani copilot intended to carry out a suicide attack at Ben Gurion Airport.

Investigators also reported that the suspect had undergone a process of radicalization beginning in 2017 while living in Australia, despite subsequently passing the professional and security checks required when he joined the airline in January 2026.

The Ethiopian cargo flight ultimately reached Israel after the crew member was replaced, but the incident has placed renewed attention on the timing of security checks and the need for airlines to submit complete crew information before departure.

{Matzav.com}

New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani has directed the NYPD to undertake its first comprehensive examination of police use-of-force policies in a decade, while introducing new measures intended to prevent officers accused of serious misconduct from avoiding disciplinary proceedings by retiring before their cases are completed.

The mayor announced the changes Monday following controversy surrounding the death of Win Rozario, a 19-year-old Queens resident who was fatally shot by police in March 2024 after calling 911 during a mental health crisis. One of the two officers facing departmental charges in connection with the shooting retired before his disciplinary hearing could begin.

“When the government uses force against a New Yorker, the standard for accountability must be at its highest,” Mamdani said in a statement.

“We have an obligation to Win’s family and to every New Yorker who calls for help in a moment of crisis.”

The administration said the NYPD will spend the coming months reviewing its existing rules governing officers’ use of force, with the process including opportunities for community members to provide input.

The initiative will examine departmental procedures that have not undergone a similarly extensive review in approximately ten years, according to City Hall.

Mamdani also announced an additional $2.6 million for the Office of the Inspector General for the NYPD, an independent oversight body responsible for examining the department’s policies, practices, and operations.

The new funding is intended to triple the office’s current staffing, bringing its workforce back to the highest level it has previously maintained.

A central element of the administration’s changes involves disciplinary cases in which officers seek retirement while facing allegations of misconduct.

The NYPD has established a new notification process designed to alert relevant officials when an officer facing disciplinary proceedings is preparing to retire, allowing the department to make greater efforts to resolve the case before the officer leaves.

The department will also formalize procedures for notifying New York State criminal justice authorities when an officer retires while facing a formal misconduct accusation.

Those notifications will include the submission of records for possible decertification, a process that can prevent an officer from obtaining another law enforcement position elsewhere in New York.

The changes are intended to address concerns that officers facing serious allegations can leave the department before disciplinary findings are reached and potentially pursue employment with another police agency.

The mayor’s office also announced new requirements concerning the information provided to families and the public following serious incidents involving police officers.

Under the revised procedures, the NYPD will establish more consistent practices for releasing information after critical incidents, including providing families with final reports prepared by the department’s Force Investigation Division when those reports are requested.

The department also committed to complying with state reporting requirements concerning deaths involving police officers.

The policy announcement follows the March 27, 2024, shooting of Rozario inside his family’s apartment in Ozone Park, Queens.

Rozario had called 911 himself while experiencing a mental health emergency. Officers Salvatore Alongi and Matthew Cianfrocco were dispatched to the residence.

According to the officers’ accounts and body-camera footage, Rozario approached police while holding a pair of scissors and failed to comply with instructions to put them down.

The officers initially deployed their Tasers, but the encounter escalated and Rozario was shot five times in the presence of his mother and brother.

The New York State Attorney General’s Office subsequently investigated the shooting and declined to file criminal charges against the officers. Investigators also recommended expanding the city’s program for responding to mental health emergencies without police involvement.

Although prosecutors did not pursue criminal charges, the Civilian Complaint Review Board brought departmental disciplinary charges against both officers.

Rozario’s family has continued to demand that both officers be dismissed from the NYPD.

The recent retirement of Officer Salvatore Alongi before his disciplinary trial could proceed intensified the family’s objections and prompted questions about the department’s handling of pending misconduct cases.

The NYPD has attributed the failure to prevent the retirement to a notification error, and Commissioner Jessica Tisch has acknowledged the need for improved internal procedures.

Officer Matthew Cianfrocco remains subject to disciplinary proceedings.

The Police Benevolent Association, which represents rank-and-file NYPD officers, has disputed the allegations against the officers and criticized the administration’s response.

Union representatives argue that the officers were confronting an armed individual during a rapidly developing emergency and that the proposed changes risk placing additional burdens on officers making split-second decisions.

Police Benevolent Association President Patrick Hendry also accused Mamdani of responding to pressure from political activists rather than addressing the operational needs of law enforcement.

The announcement comes amid broader disagreements over Mamdani’s approach to policing. Progressive organizations have pressed the mayor to adopt more extensive changes to the NYPD, while police unions have warned against reforms they believe could undermine officer effectiveness and public safety.

Mamdani has retained Jessica Tisch as police commissioner despite criticism from some of his political supporters, who have called for a more substantial overhaul of the department’s leadership and operations.

The mayor’s latest initiative will now place the NYPD’s use-of-force standards under formal examination while expanding independent oversight and changing the procedures governing officer retirement, disciplinary cases, and the disclosure of investigative findings.

A 14-year-old yeshiva student injured in the deadly explosion during a school trip in northern Israel told Prime Minister Binyomin Netanyahu on Monday that the disaster occurred after another student began handling an unexploded munition and unscrewed part of it, triggering a blast that killed one boy and wounded 24 others.

The harrowing account was provided by Eitan Masaori, a student at ORT Ma’alot Yeshiva High School, during Netanyahu’s visit to Rambam Hospital in Haifa, where several of the injured students were receiving treatment.

Masaori, who suffered a shrapnel wound to his neck, described the terrifying moments when the explosive device detonated during the school’s outing along the Ramim Ridge in the Upper Galilee.

According to his account, one of the students had discovered an unexploded munition in the area and began playing with it. The boy reportedly attempted to unscrew a component of the device, after which it exploded.

“Guys were thrown through the air, some fell into the bushes. There were two seconds of shock,” Masaori told the prime minister.

The injured student recalled the confusion that followed the blast, as classmates struggled to understand what had happened and began searching for their wounded friends.

Despite sustaining an injury himself, Masaori said his immediate concern was helping another student who had been hurt.

“I realized I was injured. I saw that a friend was hurt, and I tried to help him,” he recounted.

Netanyahu visited the hospital together with Education Minister Yoav Kisch, meeting injured students and their families and hearing firsthand descriptions of the tragedy.

The explosion claimed the life of a boy approximately 14 years old and left 24 others injured. Two of the wounded were reported to be in serious condition, ten sustained moderate injuries, and another twelve suffered light injuries.

Israeli military officials believe the explosive device was a cluster munition fired by Hezbollah during the war that had landed in the area without detonating.

Such unexploded munitions can remain dangerous long after the fighting has ended, particularly when disturbed or handled by civilians who are unaware of the threat.

The students had been hiking in an area that had previously been exposed to rocket and missile fire from Lebanon, raising renewed concerns about unexploded ordnance remaining in open areas of northern Israel.

The deadly incident has prompted an urgent examination of how a school group came to be hiking in an area where dangerous remnants of Hezbollah rocket fire may still be present.

Preliminary findings indicate that the students were taking a break near the Mitzpe Pe’er lookout when one of them discovered the munition. Investigators believe the device was picked up and placed in a backpack before detonating several minutes later. Masaori’s testimony that a student had unscrewed part of the object provides another account of what occurred immediately before the explosion.

Military investigators believe the object was a submunition from a Hezbollah rocket. During the fighting, Hezbollah fired rockets containing smaller explosive devices designed to scatter across wide areas. Some failed to explode on impact, leaving dangerous remnants in fields, forests, and other open areas.

Following his conversations with the injured students, Netanyahu instructed the commander of the IDF Home Front Command to strengthen public warnings about unexploded ordnance and reinforce instructions prohibiting civilians from touching suspicious objects.

He also called for extensive searches in areas where additional unexploded munitions might remain, particularly in locations frequented by hikers and other civilians.

Education Minister Yoav Kisch announced that he had ordered a 48-hour suspension of school trips in the northern border region and the Golan Heights. Schools planning outings in those areas were instructed to arrange alternative routes while authorities reviewed the safety situation.

Kisch said an initial review indicated that the ORT Ma’alot trip had received the necessary approvals, that the hiking route had been inspected, and that the required safety procedures had been followed.

He added that the students had been specifically warned about unexploded ordnance during the safety briefing preceding the outing.

“This will probably be with us for a long time to come,” Kisch said, referring to the danger posed by explosive remnants of the fighting.

Separate reporting raised questions about the route’s accessibility. Warning signs prohibiting entry had reportedly been posted at one approach to the area, although the school group entered from another direction where no such sign was present. Authorities are examining the circumstances surrounding the route’s approval and the warnings available to hikers.

The IDF dispatched bomb-disposal specialists from its elite Yahalom combat engineering unit to examine the explosion site and search the surrounding terrain for additional explosive devices.

Military helicopters and emergency medical teams were also deployed to evacuate the wounded, with casualties transported to Rambam Hospital in Haifa, Ziv Medical Center in Tzefas, and the Galilee Medical Center in Nahariya.

Emergency responders described finding injured students scattered across the trail, with some children attempting to assist their classmates before professional medical personnel reached them.

Medical teams treated shrapnel wounds of varying severity, while rescue personnel worked to stabilize the seriously injured and evacuate them from the mountainous area.

The explosion occurred during an annual outing involving students and teachers from ORT Ma’alot Yeshiva High School. Other groups from the same school were hiking along separate routes nearby and were evacuated as a precaution after the blast.

[COMMUNICATED]

👑 WIN $65,000 ROLEX PRESIDENTIAL 👑

DAY-DATE – 18K EVEROSE GOLD

Every entry helps build Mikvah Yona, giving Toms River families a dignified local Mikvah Taharah.

CLCIK HERE!!

⌚ Chocolate Dial – Most Wanted Color

⌚ Full President Bracelet 

⌚ 18K Everose Gold

⌚ Ref. 228235

🎟️ TICKETS STARTS AT JUST $1!!!

For $1 you could be wearing a $65K Rolex…

Every entry helps build Mikvah Yona, giving Toms River families a dignified local Mikvah Taharah.

CLCIK HERE!!

👑 WIN $65,000 ROLEX PRESIDENTIAL 👑

DAY-DATE – 18K EVEROSE GOLD

Every entry helps build Mikvah Yona, giving Toms River families a dignified local Mikvah Taharah.

CLCIK HERE!!

⌚ Chocolate Dial – Most Wanted Color

⌚ Full President Bracelet 

⌚ 18K Everose Gold

⌚ Ref. 228235

🎟️ TICKETS STARTS AT JUST $1!!!

For $1 you could be wearing a $65K Rolex…

Every entry helps build Mikvah Yona, giving Toms River families a dignified local Mikvah Taharah.

CLCIK HERE!!

👑 WIN $65,000 ROLEX PRESIDENTIAL 👑

DAY-DATE – 18K EVEROSE GOLD

Every entry helps build Mikvah Yona, giving Toms River families a dignified local Mikvah Taharah.

CLCIK HERE!!

⌚ Chocolate Dial – Most Wanted Color

⌚ Full President Bracelet 

⌚ 18K Everose Gold

⌚ Ref. 228235

🎟️ TICKETS STARTS AT JUST $1!!!

For $1 you could be wearing a $65K Rolex…

Every entry helps build Mikvah Yona, giving Toms River families a dignified local Mikvah Taharah.

CLCIK HERE!!

Israeli Defense Minister Yisroel Katz declared Monday that he will not permit the High Court of Justice to interfere with the IDF’s continued deployment in three Palestinian refugee camps in northern Shomron, warning that he is prepared to pursue special legislation in the Knesset if necessary to preserve the military’s presence.

Katz’s forceful response followed a High Court ruling directing the government to prepare a plan and timetable for the possible return of displaced Palestinian residents to the Jenin, Tulkarm, and Nur Shams refugee camps. The defense minister insisted that allowing residents to return under current conditions would jeopardize the security gains achieved by Israeli forces and potentially expose soldiers and civilians to renewed terrorist attacks.

The ruling came in response to a petition submitted by Palestinian residents against the IDF’s Central Command chief, the defense minister, and the national security minister. The petitioners sought a framework that would enable them to return to their homes after being displaced during Israeli military operations.

The court instructed the state to formulate a plan addressing the residents’ return, taking into account operational requirements and the prevailing security situation. The directive did not require an immediate, unconditional withdrawal of Israeli forces or an immediate return of all displaced residents.

Nevertheless, the decision prompted a sharp response from Katz, who argued that questions concerning the IDF’s deployment in active security zones should remain under the authority of Israel’s military and political leadership.

“The High Court must refrain from involving itself in IDF operational activities in Judea and Samaria that are intended to protect the lives of soldiers and civilians,” Katz declared.

The case was considered by a three-justice panel consisting of Supreme Court President Isaac Amit and Justices Alex Stein and Khaled Kabub.

Katz explained that the prolonged Israeli military deployment in the camps was the result of a deliberate change in security policy that he developed with Prime Minister Binyomin Netanyahu after becoming defense minister.

Under the previous approach, Israeli forces would enter terrorist strongholds to conduct arrests and counterterrorism operations before withdrawing, leaving open the possibility that armed groups could reestablish themselves.

The revised policy replaced those recurring incursions with an extended military presence intended to prevent terrorist organizations from rebuilding their operational networks.

As part of that strategy, the IDF established control over the Jenin, Tulkarm, and Nur Shams camps, which Katz described as major centers of terrorist activity supported by Iran.

“The Jenin, Tulkarm, and Nur Shams refugee camps had become terrorist strongholds, where Iran-backed jihadist terrorist battalions operated and launched attacks throughout Judea and Samaria and inside Israel,” he said.

According to the defense minister, approximately 40,000 residents left the three camps during the operations, while Israeli troops carried out extensive efforts to dismantle terrorist organizations and destroy infrastructure used to prepare and launch attacks.

Katz said the military eliminated terrorists, demolished terrorist facilities, and removed explosives concealed in residential structures and narrow passageways.

He emphasized that numerous buildings and streets had been converted into dangerous operational environments through the placement of explosive devices, requiring substantial military engineering work to neutralize the threats.

Rather than withdraw once those operations were completed, Israeli forces remained deployed in the camps to prevent armed groups from returning.

Katz credited the policy with a dramatic improvement in the security situation, asserting that terrorist activity in Yehuda and Shomron had declined by approximately 80%, reaching what he described as its lowest level.

He also maintained that the ability of terrorist organizations operating in the region to carry out attacks inside Israel had been significantly weakened.

“Many lives have been saved and many injuries prevented – but the challenges remain considerable,” Katz said.

The defense minister said the IDF’s continued deployment was essential because terrorist organizations remained interested in reestablishing their presence in the camps, including groups receiving assistance from Iran and the Muslim Brotherhood.

He warned that Israel could not afford to allow the area to become a staging ground for attacks resembling the Hamas massacre of October 7.

Katz described the military’s presence as “not a legal matter, but an operational and security necessity” and argued that the courts should not substitute their judgment for that of commanders responsible for protecting Israeli lives.

“It is not the High Court’s place to intervene in security considerations of this kind, just as it is not its place to intervene in operational activities in Gaza, Syria, Lebanon, or Iran,” he added.

The confrontation centers on Operation Iron Wall, the large-scale counterterrorism campaign launched in northern Shomron in January 2025. Israeli forces entered the three camps, dismantled armed infrastructure, and maintained positions in areas from which tens of thousands of Palestinians had fled.

Additional reporting on the court proceedings indicates that the petition was brought by six displaced Palestinian residents together with the Association for Civil Rights in Israel. The petitioners sought permission to return to their homes, a mechanism for other displaced families to return, and measures addressing their humanitarian needs while they remain unable to do so.

The court’s directive, issued Sunday, also requires the government to explain whether preparations for the residents’ return can be accelerated and to address complaints about inadequate humanitarian assistance.

The state has been given until November 23, 2026, to submit its response. The judges did not order an immediate return of residents or require the IDF to withdraw from the camps.

The justices acknowledged that security conditions were not yet suitable for the residents’ return, but sought a clearer account of the measures necessary to make that possible and the timetable for completing them.

Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich also denounced the court’s intervention, accusing the justices of jeopardizing Israel’s security.

Smotrich called on Prime Minister Netanyahu and Katz to direct the IDF not to cooperate with the court’s order, arguing that allowing residents back prematurely could enable terrorist organizations to rebuild their infrastructure.

His position went further than Katz’s public statement by explicitly urging the government to disregard the judicial directive.

The dispute has brought renewed attention to the tension between the judiciary’s responsibility to examine government actions and the defense establishment’s authority to make operational decisions during ongoing counterterrorism operations.

For the displaced Palestinian residents, the proceedings concern their ability to return to homes they have been unable to occupy since the military campaign began. For Katz, the central issue is preserving the security arrangements he credits with preventing further terrorist attacks.

The defense minister concluded by making clear that he would seek legislative intervention if necessary to prevent a judicial decision from undermining the military’s long-term deployment.

“I do not intend to compromise on this matter, even if it requires special legislative procedures in the Knesset. This is our duty to our soldiers and citizens, and we will fulfill it,” Katz declared.

Comedian Jerry Seinfeld turned the tables on an anti-Israel protester who interrupted his stand-up performance in Chicago over the weekend, announcing that he would donate the price of her ticket to Israel after she accused him of supporting the war in Gaza.

The confrontation unfolded when a woman in the audience stood up during Seinfeld’s performance and began shouting accusations about Israel, Palestinian casualties, and American taxpayer funding. Rather than engage in a prolonged argument, the Jewish-American comedian responded with a pointed remark that drew attention to the protester’s decision to purchase a ticket to his show.

“I’m going to find out how much your ticket was. I’m sending it to Israel,” Seinfeld told the woman.

WATCH:

מהומה בהופעתו של ג'רי סיינפלד: מפגינה פרו-פלסטינית קטעה את המופע שקיים הקומיקאי בסוף השבוע בשיקגו והטיחה בו האשמות בנוגע למלחמה בעזה. סיינפלד השיב כי יתרום לישראל את עלות הכרטיס שרכשה, והיא הוצאה מהאולם על ידי המאבטחים@alon_fruchter (צילום: USPCN) pic.twitter.com/3vJjJrXh8X

— כאן חדשות (@kann_news) October 12, 2026

The exchange took place as the heckler repeatedly attempted to disrupt the performance, accusing Seinfeld of making jokes while Palestinians were being killed in Gaza.

“74,000 Palestinians have been killed with our taxpayer money,” the woman shouted.

“You are genocide apologists,” she declared.

The woman continued yelling despite Seinfeld’s response, directing further accusations at both the comedian and Israel.

“74,000 Palestinians have been killed by the racist state of Israel,” she shouted.

She then personally challenged Seinfeld, accusing him of supporting the killing of Palestinian children.

“You support genocide, Jerry? Shame on you. Shame on you.”

Security personnel eventually intervened and escorted the protester from the venue, bringing the disruption to an end. Seinfeld resumed his performance after the woman was removed.

The incident was the latest in a series of confrontations between Seinfeld and anti-Israel activists who have targeted his public appearances because of his outspoken support for Israel.

Seinfeld has repeatedly expressed solidarity with Israel since the Hamas terrorist attacks of October 7, 2023, and has faced protests at comedy performances and other public events.

His response in Chicago reflected an approach he has taken during previous disruptions, using humor to address hecklers while refusing to allow their demonstrations to derail his shows.

Additional footage of the confrontation showed that several activists were involved in disrupting the performance at the Chicago Theatre on Friday night. The demonstrators were associated with the Chicago branches of the US Palestinian Community Network and the Anti-War Committee, which subsequently circulated footage of the incident on social media.

At one point, a male protester accused Seinfeld of racism and repeated allegations about Palestinian casualties. Seinfeld responded sarcastically, “I am a racist,” prompting a reaction from the audience.

The comedian also made a mocking dance-like gesture onstage as security personnel moved to remove one of the demonstrators. In another exchange, he sarcastically embraced the accusations being directed at him, making clear through his tone and gestures that he was ridiculing the hecklers rather than agreeing with their claims.

Video of the confrontation showed audience members cheering Seinfeld’s response and calling for the protesters to leave the theater.

Following his remark about sending the ticket proceeds to Israel, Seinfeld added another joke, saying, “No, I won’t, I’m keeping it.”

Tickets for the Chicago performances reportedly ranged from approximately $103 to $157, meaning the protesters had paid to attend the very show they intended to disrupt.

Seinfeld’s support for Israel has been particularly visible since the Hamas massacre of October 7, 2023. In December of that year, he traveled to Israel with his family, visiting Kibbutz Be’eri, one of the communities devastated in the attacks, and meeting survivors and relatives of hostages.

His public position has repeatedly made him a target of anti-Israel demonstrators, including protesters who have interrupted his comedy performances.

During a June 2024 show, protesters began chanting, “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free.”

Seinfeld responded by treating the interruption as another opportunity for comedy.

“Oh, you’re back. The protesters are back! I missed you,” he told them.

He then mocked the demonstrators for spending money on tickets to attend a performance by a Jewish comedian.

“I think you need to go back and tell whoever is running your organization, ‘We just gave more money to a Jew.’ That cannot be a good plan for you. You’ve got to come up with a better plan.”

{Matzav.com}

Hundreds of young children from Breslover chadorim across Eretz Yisroel gathered Monday outside Military Prison 10 at Beit Lid for a large tefillah gathering protesting the imprisonment of yeshiva bochurim and avreichim arrested in connection with Israel’s military draft laws. The gathering, attended by the elderly Breslov mashpia Rav Yaakov Meir Shechter, brought together children from numerous communities to daven for the release of those being held.

The gathering was organized following a wave of arrests involving Breslov chassidim who had attempted to travel to Uman for Rosh Hashanah or were detained upon returning to Israel. Organizers said more than 250 bochurim and avreichim had been arrested during Elul and Tishrei, although that figure includes arrests over the broader period rather than the number currently imprisoned.

Children arrived aboard organized buses from Yerushalayim, Tzefas, Beit Shemesh, Beitar Illit, Modiin Illit, Tel Aviv and other communities. In several locations, the children reported to their regular chadorim in the morning before boarding buses with their rebbeim and school staff for the trip to the military prison.

The event, publicized under the Hebrew title “Tzaakas Halev,” was intended to strengthen the imprisoned bochurim and avreichim while bringing together tinokos shel bais rabban for a public gathering of tefillah and chizuk.

Outside the prison, organizers arranged hundreds of chairs and distributed refreshments to the children. Loudspeakers were set up for tefillos, divrei Torah and singing.

During the gathering, Rav Yoel Fuchs, a Breslov educational administrator, read aloud the names of imprisoned bochurim. After each name, the assembled children repeated it and called out, “Chizku v’imtzu!” — Be strong and courageous.

The gathering included emotional tefillos for the release of the prisoners and for the ability of bnei yeshivos throughout Eretz Yisroel to continue learning Torah without interference.

Nachman Koenig, the director of a Breslov cheder in the Brachfeld neighborhood of Modiin Illit, explained that the children had come primarily to daven for the yeshiva bochurim.

He said the purpose of the gathering was to ask that the bochurim be permitted to continue their Torah learning and that the chareidi community be allowed to maintain its longstanding way of life.

Koenig described the gathering as an organized expression of tefillah and unity, bringing children together to call out to the Ribbono Shel Olam on behalf of those imprisoned.

Attorney Nosson Rosenblatt, a Breslov chossid involved in assisting detained bochurim, said approximately 30 to 40 young men connected to the Uman travel arrests were currently being held in the military prison.

He emphasized that the event was intended as a gathering of prayer rather than a conventional political demonstration.

According to Rosenblatt, the children had come to daven for the prisoners’ release and to express concern over the incarceration of young men whose desire, he said, was to continue learning Torah.

He also questioned the effectiveness of the arrests, arguing that the military was devoting considerable personnel and resources to detaining bochurim who had no intention of enlisting.

Rosenblatt maintained that the arrests had failed to persuade those detained to join the military and were instead deepening the confrontation between the authorities and the chareidi community.

The event also drew attention from Israel’s Education Ministry, which criticized the participation of schoolchildren in demonstrations during regular school hours.

In a statement, the ministry said that involving students in political protests as part of school activities was improper and prohibited under ministry regulations.

Officials said instructions had been issued to the chareidi education district to investigate the circumstances surrounding the children’s participation and take appropriate action if violations of the regulations were established.

The ministry’s response came after reports that administrators and teachers from participating chadorim had organized transportation and accompanied the children to the prison.

The gathering followed a series of demonstrations across Eretz Yisroel protesting the arrest of bnei yeshivos over military service requirements, including recent protests that disrupted traffic in Yerushalayim and along Highway 4.

According to figures submitted to Israel’s Supreme Court last week by Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara, 64 chareidi men were arrested at Ben Gurion Airport after returning from overseas during the Yom Tov period, many of them Breslov chassidim returning from Uman. Additional arrests occurred among those attempting to depart Israel before Rosh Hashanah.

Monday’s gathering outside Prison 10 was accompanied by extensive singing and tefillos, with the children joining their rebbeim in calling for the release of the imprisoned bochurim.

מחאה של ילדי ברסלב מול כלא 10צילום: שמואל דריי מחאה של ילדי ברסלב מול כלא 10צילום: שמואל דריי מחאה של ילדי ברסלב מול כלא 10צילום: שמואל דריי

מחאה של ילדי ברסלב מול כלא 10צילום: שמואל דריי מחאה של ילדי ברסלב מול כלא 10צילום: שמואל דריי מחאה של ילדי ברסלב מול כלא 10צילום: שמואל דריי מחאה של ילדי ברסלב מול כלא 10צילום: שמואל דריי מחאה של ילדי ברסלב מול כלא 10צילום: שמואל דריי מחאה של ילדי ברסלב מול כלא 10צילום: שמואל דריי מחאה של ילדי ברסלב מול כלא 10צילום: שמואל דריי מחאה של ילדי ברסלב מול כלא 10צילום: שמואל דריי מחאה של ילדי ברסלב מול כלא 10צילום: שמואל דריי מחאה של ילדי ברסלב מול כלא 10צילום: שמואל דריי מחאה של ילדי ברסלב מול כלא 10צילום: שמואל דריי מחאה של ילדי ברסלב מול כלא 10צילום: שמואל דריי מחאה של ילדי ברסלב מול כלא 10צילום: שמואל דריי מחאה של ילדי ברסלב מול כלא 10צילום: שמואל דריי מחאה של ילדי ברסלב מול כלא 10צילום: שמואל דריי מחאה של ילדי ברסלב מול כלא 10צילום: שמואל דריי מחאה של ילדי ברסלב מול כלא 10צילום: שמואל דריי מחאה של ילדי ברסלב מול כלא 10צילום: שמואל דריי מחאה של ילדי ברסלב מול כלא 10צילום: שמואל דריי מחאה של ילדי ברסלב מול כלא 10צילום: שמואל דריי מחאה של ילדי ברסלב מול כלא 10צילום: שמואל דריי מחאה של ילדי ברסלב מול כלא 10צילום: שמואל דריי מחאה של ילדי ברסלב מול כלא 10צילום: שמואל דריי מחאה של ילדי ברסלב מול כלא 10צילום: שמואל דריי מחאה של ילדי ברסלב מול כלא 10צילום: שמואל דריי מחאה של ילדי ברסלב מול כלא 10צילום: שמואל דריי מחאה של ילדי ברסלב מול כלא 10צילום: שמואל דריי מחאה של ילדי ברסלב מול כלא 10צילום: שמואל דריי מחאה של ילדי ברסלב מול כלא 10צילום: שמואל דריי מחאה של ילדי ברסלב מול כלא 10צילום: שמואל דריי מחאה של ילדי ברסלב מול כלא 10צילום: שמואל דריי מחאה של ילדי ברסלב מול כלא 10צילום: שמואל דריי מחאה של ילדי ברסלב מול כלא 10צילום: שמואל דריי מחאה של ילדי ברסלב מול כלא 10צילום: שמואל דריי מחאה של ילדי ברסלב מול כלא 10צילום: שמואל דריי מחאה של ילדי ברסלב מול כלא 10צילום: שמואל דריי

{Matzav.com}

Former Israeli Attorney General Avichai Mandelblit acknowledged Monday that investigators pursued certain investigative steps connected to the corruption case against Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu without his knowledge, as a heated courtroom confrontation raised new questions about whether authorities exceeded their authorization while building Case 4000.

The dramatic exchanges unfolded during Mandelblit’s second day of testimony at the Yerushalayim District Court, where Netanyahu’s attorney, Amit Hadad, challenged the former attorney general over investigative actions taken in 2017, months before formal authorization was granted to investigate the prime minister in the Bezeq-Walla affair.

Hadad presented documents, correspondence and investigative records that he argued demonstrated that Securities Authority investigators were already pursuing allegations involving Netanyahu while operating under the authority of a separate investigation into the Bezeq telecommunications company.

According to the defense, investigators used the Bezeq inquiry to gather evidence concerning Netanyahu before receiving the legally required approval to investigate a sitting prime minister.

Hadad confronted Mandelblit with a memorandum indicating that the relevant authorization process began in October 2017, several months after investigators had already collected materials that would later become central to Case 4000.

When asked whether authorization had been granted to investigate Netanyahu in June 2017, Mandelblit acknowledged that the memorandum suggested it had not.

Hadad argued that investigators had effectively developed the case without informing the official whose approval was required.

The defense attorney also questioned Mandelblit about a 2015 newspaper article alleging that Netanyahu had received favorable coverage from the Walla news website in exchange for regulatory benefits benefiting businessman Shaul Elovitch, who controlled Bezeq and Walla.

Mandelblit said he was aware of the article but could not recall whether he had read it when it was published. He acknowledged learning later that the article had helped prompt investigative interest in the allegations.

Hadad then presented records indicating that investigators had collected Walla articles and other materials connected to the allegations during the summer of 2017.

Mandelblit said he had not been informed of several of those actions and explained that an attorney general does not personally authorize every individual document collection or investigative step.

However, he emphasized that any deliberate investigation targeting a sitting prime minister would have required his approval.

The questioning also focused on emails involving former Walla CEO Ilan Yeshua and Ze’ev Rubinstein, an associate of Netanyahu and Elovitch, which investigators had reportedly obtained during the Bezeq investigation.

Hadad argued that the correspondence concerned allegations involving Netanyahu rather than the original Bezeq investigation and therefore should not have been collected without additional authorization.

Mandelblit responded that he had not approved an investigation of Netanyahu at that stage, although he stressed that he did not personally supervise the collection of every email.

The former attorney general also acknowledged that he had not been aware of certain search warrants and investigative materials presented by the defense.

Hadad questioned him about a search involving Iris Elovitch’s telephone and whether investigators had exceeded the scope of the original Bezeq inquiry.

Mandelblit said he did not recall the particular warrant and explained that the underlying Bezeq investigation did not initially fall into the category of investigations requiring his personal authorization.

Prosecutor Yehudit Tirosh strongly objected to Hadad’s interpretation, arguing that the materials were obtained as part of a legitimate investigation into Bezeq and its controlling shareholder.

She disputed the defense’s assertion that the collection of those materials constituted an unauthorized investigation of Netanyahu.

The defense also raised questions about the dates on which certain documents had been collected and subsequently entered into investigative records.

Hadad alleged that materials gathered in July 2017 were formally marked as evidence only in November, creating what the defense described as a misleading impression about when the information had actually been obtained.

Tirosh rejected the allegation that the documents had been deliberately misdated or concealed.

Another significant exchange concerned instructions reportedly issued to investigators in July 2017 directing them to avoid asking specific questions about Netanyahu or then-minister Tzachi Hanegbi.

Hadad argued that investigators nevertheless pursued information concerning Netanyahu indirectly, without explicitly mentioning his name.

Mandelblit said he had not been familiar with the particular instructions and indicated that deliberately circumventing restrictions in that manner, if established, would be problematic.

The former attorney general also faced questions about discussions involving investigators and prosecutors concerning the possibility of securing the cooperation of Shlomo Filber, a former senior Communications Ministry official who later became a state witness.

Hadad presented material concerning discussions about the potential terms of Filber’s cooperation, suggesting that investigators had considered what benefits might be offered in exchange for information.

Mandelblit said he was unfamiliar with some of the specific conversations but explained that discussions about possible cooperation agreements could involve assessing the value of information a witness might provide.

Throughout the questioning, Mandelblit repeatedly distinguished between investigative actions requiring his approval and routine investigative procedures handled by police, prosecutors and other authorized officials.

He maintained that although certain actions had not been brought to his attention, that did not necessarily establish that investigators had acted unlawfully.

Mandelblit also rejected the suggestion that prosecutors had deliberately concealed information from him, saying he would be very surprised if such conduct had occurred.

The courtroom proceedings became increasingly tense as Hadad pressed the former attorney general over discrepancies between his recollection and the investigative records.

At one point, Mandelblit complained about remarks directed toward him from individuals attending the hearing, prompting a sharp exchange with Hadad.

The confrontation eventually became heated enough that the proceedings were briefly interrupted.

Monday’s testimony followed Mandelblit’s appearance Sunday, when he acknowledged that investigators had undertaken certain serious actions without his personal approval.

The defense has sought to establish that the investigations leading to Netanyahu’s indictment were compromised by procedural irregularities and unauthorized investigative activity.

Prosecutors maintain that the investigations were conducted lawfully and that the defense is mischaracterizing investigative procedures and the scope of the approvals that were required.

Case 4000 concerns allegations that Netanyahu provided regulatory benefits to Bezeq’s controlling shareholder in exchange for favorable coverage on the Walla news website. Netanyahu has denied wrongdoing and maintains that the charges against him are unfounded.

Mandelblit, who served as attorney general from 2016 until 2022, authorized the investigations that ultimately led to Netanyahu’s indictment in Cases 1000, 2000 and 4000.

His testimony is particularly significant because he was called as a witness by Netanyahu’s defense, which is attempting to establish that critical investigative decisions were made without the knowledge or approval of the official legally responsible for authorizing investigations of a sitting prime minister.

The court has not determined that the disputed investigative actions were unlawful, and the legal significance of the evidence presented during the cross-examination remains contested.

President Donald Trump is reportedly having second thoughts about allowing the execution of convicted Fort Hood mass murderer Nidal Hasan to be broadcast live, following criticism from Republican and Democratic lawmakers and concerns raised by members of his own administration.

Hasan, a former U.S. Army major who murdered 13 people and wounded 32 others in a 2009 shooting rampage at Fort Hood, Texas, is scheduled to be executed by firing squad on December 3. Although Trump initially supported making the execution available for public viewing, he has since indicated that he may reverse course.

According to a report published Monday by Axios, four individuals who have spoken with the president said he has privately expressed reservations about the proposed broadcast. A senior administration official indicated that Trump has received considerable “negative input” about the idea.

During a private conversation with someone outside the administration, Trump reportedly acknowledged that the livestream “might not happen.”

“He didn’t sound particularly enthusiastic” about moving forward with the broadcast, the individual said.

The controversy began Thursday when War Secretary Pete Hegseth announced that Hasan’s execution would be livestreamed, arguing that the public should witness the consequences of carrying out a mass-casualty attack against American military personnel.

Hegseth maintained that allowing Americans to watch the execution would send a powerful warning to anyone contemplating similar violence.

“We’ll make sure that people are able to watch it — that it’s public — because people need to understand that there’s serious consequences for these types of things,” Hegseth said.

Trump initially embraced the proposal when questioned by reporters Friday, offering an unequivocal endorsement.

“Absolutely, I approve,” the president said.

By Saturday, however, his position had become less definite. Speaking with reporters, Trump acknowledged that competing arguments were being presented to him and indicated that he would personally determine whether the execution should be televised.

“There are two thoughts: Don’t show it and show it,” Trump said. “By showing it, maybe other people won’t be doing what he did.”

The president’s remarks suggested that he was weighing the possible deterrent effect of a public execution against concerns about broadcasting the death of a condemned prisoner.

Vice President JD Vance also expressed uncertainty about whether the proposed livestream would ultimately take place.

“I don’t know if that’s actually going to happen,” Vance said Friday, adding that he had no intention of watching the execution himself.

The proposal has generated criticism from Republican lawmakers who support Hasan’s death sentence but question whether turning the execution into a public broadcast would serve the interests of justice.

Rep. Austin Scott of Georgia argued that the United States should not adopt practices associated with terrorist organizations.

“livestreaming executions is what jihadists do. America is better than that,” Scott said.

Rep. Rob Bresnahan of Pennsylvania similarly warned against allowing the execution to become a spectacle, emphasizing that the focus should remain on the victims and their families rather than on creating a widely viewed event.

Other Republicans defended the administration’s emphasis on accountability. Rep. Matt Van Epps of Tennessee was among those who expressed support for ensuring that Hasan faces the consequences of his actions.

The dispute has also attracted attention from religious leaders and human rights organizations, some of whom have warned that a publicly broadcast execution could undermine the dignity traditionally associated with the administration of capital punishment.

Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina called the proposed livestream “beyond disgusting,” despite supporting Hasan’s execution. Sen. John Curtis of Utah likewise argued that broadcasting a person’s death would diminish the country rather than provide an effective deterrent.

The proposal has even drawn international objections. Australian officials and lawmakers have raised concerns that footage of the execution could circulate on social media and become accessible to children. Questions have also emerged about whether major technology platforms would permit such a broadcast.

Hasan, now 56, was an Army psychiatrist stationed at Fort Hood when he carried out one of the deadliest attacks on an American military installation.

On November 5, 2009, he opened fire inside the base’s Soldier Readiness Processing Center, killing 13 people, including a pregnant woman, and wounding 32 others.

The attack shocked the military community and prompted investigations into how Hasan’s increasingly extremist views had escaped intervention before the shooting.

A subsequent Senate investigation criticized military officials for failing to adequately respond to warning signs of Hasan’s Islamist radicalization.

Hasan was convicted by a military court in 2013 of 13 counts of premeditated murder and 32 counts of attempted murder and was sentenced to death.

His execution is scheduled to take place at Fort Hood, now officially known as Fort Cavazos, on December 3.

If carried out, it would be the first execution conducted by the United States military since 1961, when Army Private John Bennett was hanged following his conviction for rape and attempted murder.

The Pentagon has confirmed that Hasan is scheduled to die by firing squad, a method approved by Trump following a recommendation from Hegseth.

Military officials have said the execution will proceed regardless of whether the administration ultimately permits the public to watch it.

The planned livestream would represent an extraordinary departure from established American execution procedures, under which attendance is generally limited to designated witnesses, including representatives of victims’ families, officials, and selected journalists.

Legal experts have also noted that Hasan could potentially seek additional judicial intervention before the scheduled execution, although the Pentagon has continued preparing for the December date.

The decision about broadcasting the execution remains unresolved, with Trump reportedly consulting advisers and weighing the objections raised by lawmakers and other officials.

A senior administration official told Axios that the president had been receiving considerable criticism of the plan, while another person familiar with his thinking said he appeared increasingly reluctant to proceed with the livestream.

The president has not publicly withdrawn his earlier approval, but his latest comments indicate that the final decision will be his.

Administration officials stressed that the debate over public access should not be confused with the decision to carry out Hasan’s sentence.

“Hasan will be executed for his crimes,” one official told Axios, “and that’s what matters.”

Afrah lepumei.

Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich ignited a storm of criticism in the chareidi community on Monday after declaring that he davens for Maran Hagaon Rav Dov Landau, Rosh Yeshivas Slabodka.

The disgusting remark came during an interview at an Arutz Sheva conference in Ofra, where Smotrich, chairman of the Religious Zionist Party, discussed the ideological differences between the national-religious and chareidi communities, the controversy surrounding military conscription, and recent statements attributed to Rav Landau concerning Zionism and religious soldiers.

Asked why he had refrained from publicly responding to Rav Landau’s remarks, Smotrich explained that his silence should not be interpreted as agreement. Rather, he said, he was reluctant to enter into a public confrontation with a talmid chochom.

Smotrich invoked the warning of Chazal to exercise caution when dealing with Torah scholars, explaining that he did not believe publicly challenging Rav Landau would accomplish anything constructive.

He then added that the Rosh Yeshiva’s views caused him considerable pain and that he was praying for a change in his outlook.

“It pains me, and I pray to Hashem that He brings him, too, to repentance,” Smotrich said, referring to Rav Landau.

The statement immediately drew sharp criticism in chareidi media, where commentators expressed outrage that a government minister would speak about one of the generation’s leading gedolei Torah in such terms.

The controversy followed the release last week of recordings in which Rav Landau, 96, was heard expressing fierce opposition to Zionism and the religious Zionist worldview.

The recordings, broadcast by Channel 12 on October 5, reportedly originated from a private discussion held at the Rosh Yeshiva’s home approximately a year and a half earlier.

In the conversation, Rav Landau criticized the establishment of the State of Israel, argued that Zionism had brought serious difficulties upon the Jewish people, and rejected the religious Zionist understanding of the state’s establishment as part of the process of geulah.

The recordings also included sharp criticism of religious Zionist rabbonim and their approach to military service, particularly the participation of religious soldiers in Israel’s wars.

Those comments provoked condemnation from several Israeli politicians, including figures who accused the chareidi leadership of failing to recognize the sacrifices of religious soldiers.

Smotrich, however, initially avoided directly criticizing Rav Landau, citing his respect for Torah scholars despite his fundamental disagreement with the Rosh Yeshiva’s views.

During Monday’s interview, journalist Chagai Segal pressed Smotrich on the matter, pointing out that Rav Landau had characterized the state and its founders in exceptionally harsh terms.

Smotrich responded by distinguishing between the views of individual figures and the broader communities they represent, arguing that an entire population should not necessarily be judged by the statements or conduct of particular individuals.

When Segal emphasized that Rav Landau was a leading figure in the chareidi world, Smotrich acknowledged his distress over the remarks but reiterated that he would not engage in a direct public confrontation with the Rosh Yeshiva.

His subsequent reference to praying for Rav Landau to do teshuvah became the central focus of the controversy.

Smotrich also used the interview to level broader criticism at the chareidi community’s longstanding opposition to Zionism.

He argued that the success of the Zionist movement and the development of the State of Israel should be understood as evidence of Divine intervention in Jewish history.

“I think the chareidim are ungrateful to Hashem, and we have a sharp disagreement with them over their attitude toward the state and the process of redemption,” Smotrich said.

He went further, questioning how the chareidi worldview could remain unchanged in light of Israel’s achievements.

“I don’t understand how it is possible to be chareidi today. The Zionist enterprise has succeeded. Is there greater proof of redemption than that?” he asked.

Those statements highlighted the longstanding ideological divide between the religious Zionist movement, which generally regards the modern State of Israel as possessing religious significance, and the chareidi worldview, which rejects the identification of the secular Zionist movement with the promised geulah.

Smotrich insisted that his own ideological position was firmly grounded in Torah and would not change because of criticism from chareidi leaders.

He described the religious Zionist approach as one that combines Torah learning with participation in the practical responsibilities of national life, including military service.

Turning to the contentious issue of drafting chareidi men into the IDF, Smotrich argued that the government’s failure to advance proposed conscription legislation approximately two years ago had been a serious mistake.

According to the finance minister, the legislation could have created a framework under which thousands of chareidi men would already have entered the military with the approval of their communal leadership.

He maintained that such a framework would have allowed the government to develop a broader national program for increasing chareidi enlistment while reducing resistance within the community.

Smotrich nevertheless acknowledged that compulsory enlistment could not succeed through coercion alone.

He argued that meaningful change would require persuasion, cooperation, and an approach that recognizes the particular concerns of the chareidi population.

He also expressed appreciation for positive qualities within the chareidi community and praised those individuals who have already taken steps toward military service.

The minister’s comments come amid an increasingly heated national debate over the draft, with chareidi leaders maintaining their opposition to compulsory military service for yeshiva bochurim and government officials facing pressure to address the burden carried by serving soldiers and reservists.

The issue has become a major point of contention ahead of Israel’s November 3 Knesset elections, with parties across the political spectrum attempting to define their positions on military service, Torah learning, and the relationship between religion and the state.

The dispute surrounding Rav Landau has also drawn attention because of his central role in the leadership of Degel HaTorah and his considerable influence over the chareidi political establishment.

Earlier criticism of Rav Landau’s recorded statements prompted explanations from those close to the Rosh Yeshiva that his remarks concerning military operations were being interpreted outside their original halachic context.

Smotrich had previously addressed similar remarks by Rav Landau in July, saying at the time that he faced a difficult dilemma between the need to respond to statements he found objectionable and the obligation to show respect toward talmidei chachomim.

A federal judge in New York has ordered the Trump administration to immediately stop airing television advertisements featuring President Donald Trump that were financed with taxpayer money, handing a victory to organizations challenging the use of federal funds for what they contend amounts to political campaigning ahead of the November midterm elections.

U.S. District Judge Jennifer Rochon issued the temporary restraining order Sunday evening, directing the administration to cancel any remaining advertisements and prohibiting further government spending on the disputed campaign for the next two weeks.

The advertisements, which began appearing on television in late September, were funded through approximately $20 million allocated by the Department of Homeland Security. They featured Trump discussing his administration’s policies and accomplishments, prompting allegations that government resources were being used to promote his political agenda.

The ruling came in response to a lawsuit brought by Common Cause, a government watchdog organization, together with the Service Employees International Union Local 32BJ, its political action committee and Robert Hunter, a Democratic candidate for the Alabama state legislature.

The plaintiffs argued that the advertisements violated federal restrictions against using congressionally appropriated money for unauthorized publicity or propaganda. They also maintained that the campaign improperly blurred the distinction between official government communications and political advertising.

In granting the emergency order, Rochon prohibited the administration from entering into new agreements or extending existing arrangements connected to the advertisements.

“Defendants shall not enter into, renew, or expand any agreement authorizing the development, creation, dissemination, placement, or airing of the challenged advertisements,” the judge wrote.

The restrictions will remain in effect for 14 days while the litigation proceeds. The order does not constitute a final determination that the administration violated federal law.

The administration had argued that judicial intervention was unnecessary because the advertising campaign was already scheduled to conclude.

In a court filing submitted Saturday, Justice Department attorneys maintained that the challenged activity would end the following day, making an emergency restraining order unnecessary.

President Trump had previously defended the advertisements as a legitimate means of informing Americans about his administration’s work.

In an October 5 social media statement, Trump described the advertisements as “rather standard” and indicated that future advertising of this kind could be financed through political fundraising rather than taxpayer money.

The White House referred reporters seeking comment on the ruling to that earlier statement.

The advertisements have generated controversy because of their timing, appearing just weeks before the November 3 congressional elections, when control of Congress will be decided.

Critics contend that the commercials resemble campaign advertisements and were designed to benefit Republicans politically. The administration has maintained that the broadcasts were legitimate government communications highlighting its policies.

The dispute also concerns the source of the funding. The Department of Homeland Security used money made available for government purposes, raising questions about whether those appropriations could legally be used to produce and distribute advertisements prominently featuring the president.

The plaintiffs welcomed Sunday’s ruling, arguing that it would prevent additional taxpayer funds from being spent on what they characterize as political messaging.

“We are pleased the court acted swiftly to prevent more taxpayer dollars from being used for such blatantly unlawful political propaganda,” the organizations said in a joint statement.

The legal challenge is one of several disputes arising from the advertising campaign. The Democratic National Committee has also filed a separate lawsuit challenging the administration’s use of government resources for the commercials.

The controversy has attracted attention from both Democrats and some Republicans, with questions raised about the propriety of taxpayer-financed advertisements that closely resemble political promotions.

It remains unclear how much of the original $20 million allocation has already been spent and whether the administration will ultimately be required to account for or reimburse any of the money used.

For now, the court’s order prevents the administration from continuing the disputed advertising campaign with federal funds while the legal challenge moves forward.