Feed aggregator

The negotiations over Israel’s controversial draft law remain deadlocked as efforts to reach a compromise continue to falter. Three weeks after assuming his role as chairman of the Knesset’s Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee, MK Boaz Bismuth is working behind the scenes to revive the legislation, opting for discreet, closed-door discussions rather than public confrontation.

So far, only one open session has taken place. Bismuth plans to present a “principles document” next week — a roadmap meant to outline a workable formula for the law. Yet, insiders admit that few genuinely believe the plan has a realistic chance of success.

A central sticking point is Ariel Atias, the key chareidi representative in the negotiations. Last week, Atias had pledged to draft the agreed-upon terms reached with Knesset Speaker Yuli Edelstein before the Iranian strike. However, an entire week has passed and no draft has materialized.

As of now, no principles document has been finalized ahead of next week’s resumed committee discussions, despite last week’s understanding between Bismuth and the chareidi factions that such a draft would be ready by then.

Chareidi sources are increasingly candid about their frustration: “Atias is exhausted, pessimistic, and doesn’t want his name attached to any version of the law. He’s dragging his feet, and there’s no way to get him to commit to a final position,” one insider admitted.

Officials in the Prime Minister’s Office share this sentiment, suggesting that Atias is deliberately stalling rather than working toward a resolution. “We felt this already back in Edelstein’s time in July,” a senior official said. “People sit with Atias for hours, but nothing comes out of it. No document, no progress.”

{Matzav.com Israel}

Two Microsoft employees who occupied Microsoft President Brad Smith’s office in Redmond, Washington on Tuesday and refused to leave have been fired, Reuters reported. A Microsoft spokesperson says the workers were terminated following “serious breaches of company policies and our code of conduct” stemming from “the break-in at the executive offices.” The No Azure For Apartheid protest group issued a statement saying that Anna Hattle and Riki Fameli received voicemails notifying them of their termination. “We are here because Microsoft continues to provide Israel with the tools it needs to commit genocide while gaslighting and misdirecting its own workers about this reality,” Hattle said in a statement. Bloomberg reported on Tuesday that Microsoft asked the FBI to investigate certain current or former employees connected to the protests. The group has been protesting against the company for months, demanding it cut ties with Israel and pay reparations to Palestinians. (YWN Israel Desk—Jerusalem)

Prime Minister Netanyahu joined the condemnations against the far-left Haaretz newspaper, which published an op-ed calling IDF general Avi Bluth a “Nazi officer” and “war criminal.” It should be noted that the self-hating Jews at Haaretz have caused Israel immense damage, as proven by a study by the Im Tirtzu NGO, which showed how Israeli sources, including Haaretz and various left-wing organizations, repeatedly appear in claims, decisions, and reports published against Israel in the international arena since the October 7 attack. Levy wrote outrageous and hateful comments about Bluth, including an antisemitic reference to his kippah, in response to Bluth’s comments that the Palestinian village of al-Mughayyir would “pay a heavy price” in the wake of a shooting attack carried out by one of its villagers. Levy wrote, “Uberkommandant (Nazi general) Avi Bluth, the head of the army’s Central Command, decided that he’ll show them. With his military kippah perched on his head, his blood-curdling sharp tongue, boundless arrogance, and sick double standards of morality, he ordered ‘redesign operations’ to be implemented so that ‘everyone will be deterred.'” Levy continued by claiming that Bluth and “the settlers are from the same village—the same hairstyle and the same kippah worn at an angle. When they appoint an officer like Bluth to the Central Command, they are appointing a settler’s aide.” Levi added, “How do you sleep at night, General, with this racist morality? This is what Bluth learned in Eli: the Jews are the masters of the land. The settlers are allowed to ignite, destroy, uproot, and murder as they please. Every man has a name, given to him by G-d. This ‘blood general’ is now transforming the face of the West Bank and the moral image of the entire country. Maybe he will be appointed commander of the next genocide, after Gaza.” The statement from Netanyahu said, “Prime Minister Netanyahu strongly rejects the despicable accusations against the commander of Central Command, Maj.-Gen. Avi Bluth and the settlers in Yehudah and Shomron. This is an anti-Semitic blood libel characteristic of our enemies throughout the world.” “The prime minister expresses his support for Maj.-Gen. Bluth and the IDF soldiers who work day after day to eradicate terrorism in Yehudah and Shomron. They do so with determination and uncompromising morality, and we all salute them.” Defense Minister Yisrael Katz also published a condemnation: “I reject with disgust the despicable attacks by Haaretz on Central Command chief Avi Bluth…who acts decisively to protect the Jewish settlers and the security of the State of Israel in accordance with government policy—an activity that has led to a decrease of about 80% in terrorist attacks in Yehudah and Shomron and has saved many lives.” Blue and White chairman Benny Gantz also slammed Haaretz, writing, “I have known Avi Bluth for many years, since he was a young officer and later as my chief of staff. He is a professional officer, working around the clock to save lives, always adhering to the laws of war and the values of the IDF.” “Avi is an officer that everyone in the IDF and the country can be proud of, and the incitement against him is shameful and should be condemned. Avi, you are a soldier of the country, and we are proud of you.” (YWN Israel Desk—Jerusalem)

North Korean leader Kim Jong Un will make his first visit to China in six years to attend a military parade next week, the two countries said Thursday, in an event that would bring him together with a large group of world leaders for the first time since taking office in late 2011. With Russian President Vladimir Putin also coming for the parade, the event will likely underline the three-way alignment among Beijing, Moscow and Pyongyang in the face of a U.S. push to bolster its alliances with South Korea and Japan. North Korea’s state media said Kim was invited to visit China by President Xi Jinping. Kim will be among 26 foreign leaders who attend next Wednesday’s parade in Beijing to mark the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II and China’s resistance against Japan’s wartime aggressions, China’s foreign ministry said. “We warmly welcome General Secretary Kim Jong Un to China to attend the commemorative events,” Hong Lei, China’s assistant minister of foreign affairs, told a press conference. “Upholding, consolidating and developing the traditional friendship between China and the DPRK is a firm position of the Communist Party of China and the Chinese government.” DPRK refers to the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, North Korea’s official name. Kim’s first attendance of a multination event Since inheriting power upon his father’s death in December 2011, Kim has met Xi, Putin, U.S. President Donald Trump, former South Korean President Moon Jae-in and others. But all those summits were bilateral meetings and Kim hasn’t attended any big multilateral events with foreign leaders. “Given that other leaders attending are mostly from pro-Russia and pro-Chinese countries, Kim likely intends to form solidarity with those Global South countries while showing he’s leader of a normal country,” said Moon Seong Mook, an analyst for the Seoul-based Korea Research Institute for National Strategy. Observers say Kim is likely emboldened by his country’s expanding cooperation with Russia, which has helped him bear the brunt of U.S.-led sanctions and break out of diplomatic isolation. North Korea has been supplying troops and ammunition to support Russia’s war against Ukraine in return for economic and military assistance. Others coming for the parade include the leaders of Iran, Belarus, Serbia, Cuba, Indonesia, Myanmar, Pakistan and Malaysia. No leaders from major Western countries including the U.S. are expected to attend, in part because of their differences with Putin over the war in Ukraine. The parade is expected to feature some of China’s newest weaponry and a speech by Xi. It’ll the first time Xi, Kim and Putin gather at the same event China, North Korea and Russia are embroiled in separate confrontations with the U.S., but they haven’t formed a clear three-way alliance so far. Xi, Putin and Kim haven’t met in trilateral formats, though they’ve met one another bilaterally. “Kim’s attendance is significant for his own international stature, but it also holds weight in the balance of alliances between the U.S. and China,” said Soo Kim, a former CIA analyst. “Xi, Putin, and now Kim attending the parade cements a visible statement about the alignment between the three countries.” The three leaders likely share desires to check the strengthening cooperation among the U.S., South Korea and Japan, which have been meeting regularly and expanding trilateral military exercises. Despite their shared goal, it’s not clear how far China, North Korea and Russia will go to further cement ties. […]

[COMMUNICATED]

A leaf written in the holy handwriting of the Kabbalist Rabbi Chaim Vital (the Maharchu), foremost disciple of the Arizal, containing: divine names, amulets, incantations, medical prescriptions, and more.

Among the wondrous segulos found on the present leaf is a segulah for livelihood, ensuring that one’s sustenance shall not be lacking, achieved through the recital of a divine name or its contemplation in thought (see section 403).

27th of Av, 5785

A Talk on Current Matters: From a Shmuz Delivered by HaGaon Rav Chaim Mendel Brodsky Shlita

Rosh Yeshiva, Yeshiva Gedolah of Toronto

Delivered before a group of talmidim

To preserve the form of the words as they were spoken without any changes that might cause the intent to be imprecise, we have tried to bring it in writing word for word in the form of the spoken words at the time:

We live in a time when the outside world has corrupted its ways and has descended dramatically in all concepts of human dignity, menschlichkeit, and every form of humanity. We should not think that this does not affect our world. Baruch Hashem, we are fortunate that we have our world—the world of Torah—but we must guard it above all else so that these influences do not penetrate it, and preserve with all dearness the understanding of the foundations of Yiddishkeit so that they do not cool or become degraded.

I am expressing the thoughts of my heart, and what I am about to say is not for a newspaper, I am speaking here as a father speaking to his sons around his table. This is what I feel here—a relationship of a father to his sons, and we are speaking “among ourselves.”

At a time when the winds of the world penetrate our camp, winds that are very strange to the Yiddishkeit that we know.

There is a concept of “losing the sense of smell”, and when it comes to Ruchniyus, we must not lose our “sense of smell”. We were not born today, and we were privileged to see great people and what the form of Yiddishkeit was like for them, and when there are certain things that don’t smell right, it’s hard to remain silent

I am not a person to speak publicly, and I speak only within my own dalet amos, and here this is my dalet amos. A person has the right at his own table to express the feelings of his heart, and he expresses them to those close to him.

When one needs to speak, even if speaking to understanding people, there is a possibility that the words will reach the ears of someone who will not understand them properly and will interpret them according to his own desire and not according to our intention. However, we find at the time of the creation of Adam that Hashem Yisbarach said, “נעשה אדם,” and the Midrash says: רבי שמואל בר נחמן בשם רבי יונתן אמר בשעה שהי’ משה כותב את התורה הי’ כותב מעשה כל יום ויום כיון שהגיע לפסוק הזה שנא’ ויאמר אלוקים נעשה אדם בצלמנו כדמותנו אמר לפניו  רבון העולם מה אתה נותן פתחון פה למינים אתמהא. אמר לו כתוב והרוצה לטעות יטעה אמר לו הקב”ה משה, האדם הזה שבראתי לא גדולים וקטנים אני מעמיד ממנו שאם יבוא הגדול ליטול רשות מן הקטן ממנו והוא אומר מה אני צריך ליטול רשות מן הקטן ממני והן אומרים לו למד מן בוראך שהוא ברא את העליונים ואת התחתונים כיון שבא לבראת את האדם נמלך במלאכי השרת, עכ”ל.

What is Hakadosh Baruch Hu saying? That one must speak with derech eretz, and regarding the concern that some will err, on that it is said, whoever is a “רוצה לטעות” and wishes to err, let him err. And there is no shortage of those who are “רוצה לטעות”, and we speak to those who are not “רוצה לטעות”. And if, Chas V’shalom, it reaches the ears of someone who is a רוצה לטעות, that is their issue, and we do not need to concern ourselves with them. In the commentary of the מהרז”ו on that Midrash he explains, “‘לאיש כזה אין לנו לחוש לטעותו שהרי יטעה עכ”פ,” when there is an agenda, he will err anyway, and nothing will help.

There are certain things that we have never seen, and we must never see them. We cannot justify such conduct by attributing it to ירידת הדורות. These are things that are the opposite of everything that we understand in Yiddishkeit

That there could be a reality where ehrliche Talmidei Chachamim and chashuva Talmidei Chachamim that go into an Inyan for a צורך with an Achrayus, and with Ehrlechkeit, and I am not talking שלא בידיעה, I KNOW WHAT I AM TALKING ABOUT. [On a blatt Gemara I can’t say I know what I am talking about, but on this I can say “I know what I am talking about”] and now they are pursued and degraded, and a metzius is created where there is an chasuve beis din of important Talmidei Chachamim, and they can degrade such a beis din [certainly there are sometimes instances of what is called a “rogue beis din” There are sometimes people that are אנשים שאינם מהוגנים that make themselves into a beis din, and there we must be careful], but to attack a Chasuva beis din and degrade them and make them into nothing?!

When there is a halachic discussion, there can be two opinions, and there are many rulings issued by important batei din in the previous generation where there is room for a Torah scholar to disagree with them as is darkah shel Torah. And if they do not reach agreement, even to write an entire book with Torah words based on which he rules differently. In this case, they can do the same. But with that, one dismisses and makes a beis din into nothing? Chalila! Such a thing has not been heard, such a thing should not be heard.

And also that it becomes a topic in the street, and everyone becomes a מאן דאמר on it, learning from this and thinking that it is permitted to do so!

I say to you, such a thing could not have happened in the previous generation in any place, not here and not in any place—this is a הימעל’ס געשריי!

“את ה’ אלוקיך תירא לרבות תלמידי חכמים,” which Shimon HaAmsuni was פורש so that one should not include another יראה, until Rabi Akiva came and said that this includes the honor of Talmidei Chachamim, that it is not another fear, but harming a Talmid Chacham is harming the honor of Hashem, for the honor of Hashem in the world is founded on the honor of Talmidei Chachamim, as Rabbeinu Yonah writes. And to make the honor of Talmidei Chachamim degraded among people, so that it becomes a mockery in everyone’s mouth, this is harming the honor of Hashem and Yiras Shamayim.

Certainly, the seriousness of halacha must be guarded above all, and here everything WAS done with great Achrayus. If they want to write a Tshuva, let them write a sefer about it, and that is the way of Torah. I am not coming to protest; I sit in my house, but I want our people, our B’nei Torah who have straight understanding, not to be confused by this.

And here the degradation is of Talmidei Chachamim on both sides, and everyone can sense that other forces are involved here—gangsterism—and there are hooligans involved here who are turning the wheels.

This is a cry to the heavens!

And we have a problem: how do we process such a thing, that they use the names of great people.

How do we relate to this?… I want to say something about this, and it is an Eidele refined thing. I am saying this in this room “to our people.” There is no need for the great people to be degraded by anyone from either side of the matter. We are talking here about great people, כולם אהובים כולם ברורים. There is an important point, and I want to tell you a story to highlight this point. Everyone knows that there was at that time a sharp controversy in Eretz Yisroel where Rav Yosef Chaim Sonnenfeld had to wage a sharp campaign against Rav Kook. Others, when they hear sharp criticism, think that this means the person becomes “written off.”

I will tell you an incident that happened to me when I was a yungerman. There was a period when I was close to Rav Elyashiv, and it was Chol HaMoed Sukkos, and I was sitting in his sukkah. In the middle, his mechutan, Rav Shlomo Zalman came to visit him, and I tried to leave the sukkah, thinking it was not my place to stay. However, Rav Elyashiv commanded me to stay, and I had the opportunity to observe. The entire visit, they spoke words of Torah and important stories, and it all revolved around Rav Kook, saying things over from him and they said in his name what he showed from a certain Tosafos. I am telling you this as an introduction to the following story that Rav Chaim Nussbaum shlita of Toronto told us. His great-grandfather was present at ברכת החמה that was in Yerushalaim around the year 5680 in the Old City, and it was about two weeks before Pesach. After ברכת החמה, the people greeted each other that we should be zoche to return here in two weeks to bring the Korbon Pesach with the coming of Moshiach. One of the people there called out to Rav Yosef Chaim, “And what will you do if Rav Kook will be the Kohen Gadol?” [Loaded question], And Rav Yosef Chaim answered, “A Kohen Gadol he should be, just not the Rav of Yerushalaim.” We see here the form of a controversy in its proper format, that at the same time one needs to wage a very sharp campaign, there is the distinction that “Kohen Gadol he should be, just not the Rav of Yerushalayim.” The person remains in his full importance, to the point that he could be the Kohen Gadol who enters the Kodesh Hakadashim and is the most Heilig person in all of klal Yisrael, upon whose Avoda the entire Jewish people depends. But there is a campaign with full firmness that he should not be the Rav of Yerushalayim. Is this called harming and degrading when speaking like this? There is such a reality. This is how a controversy once looked, where they knew how to “appreciate” even when there is criticism; it is not a contradiction. There is no need for anyone’s Kavod to be degraded here. And it is not degradation to say that he should be Kohen Gadol, just not the Rav of Yerushalayim.

But this “plague” should not creep in among us, there can be such a metzius. Now is a time when the outside world is a crazy world, and when there is such a situation, something of it penetrates into us, and we must guard against it very much so that we are not harmed by it and that the yashrus of our intellect is not damaged.

When I speak, who am I to speak? I am speaking to myself. My job is to transmit the mesorah as I saw from my father and the Mesorah I saw from my father-in-law [Rav Nochum Partzovitz Zatzal]. And I can say with full confidence that I know how my father-in-law, would relate to this, and how [my grandfather] Rav Chaim [Shmulewitz] would relate to this—there is no question.

Once we spoke about the Dubner Maggid, and it is worth repeating how he explains the words of the Midrash on the verse ” אחות לנו קטנה ושדיים אין לה מה נעשה לאחותינו ביום שידובר בה “We have a little sister”—this is Avraham Avinu, the pasuk speaks at the time when Hakadosh Baruch Hu came to rest His Shechina upon Avraham, and this pasuk revolves around that. There was a doubt; the Malachim doubted if they could build upon him the entire klal yisral. And on this it is said, if she is a door, meaning he is not founded in his place but turns on his hinge, he is not worthy to build upon, he endures only for a time. But if she is a wall, meaning he establishes things like a wall, then he is worthy to build upon a silver palace, meaning they can build upon him the entire klal yisrael. And on this Avraham answered, “אני חומה ושדי כמגדלות,” meaning I will in the future establish groups upon groups of Talmidei Chachamim who will nurse the entire klal Yisrael. And it was explained here that there was a doubt about Avraham Avinu that “שדים אין לה” and it is not worthy to build upon him the entire Klal Yisrael, and on this Avraham answered, “אני חומה ושדי כמגדלות.” What was the discussion here?

The Dubner Maggid explains that the doubt of the Malachim was that Avraham Avinu elevated the world to high perceptions, and even though there was a mesorah from Shem and Ever, but Avraham achieved much more than that. And on this the malachim doubted “ושדים אין לה”—from where does he draw his foundations and who are his rabeim on this, without “rebbes” is not a wall, and they cannot build upon him, because today one can think thus and tomorrow think differently. A “wall” is only when it comes from “rebbes” and there is a mesorah on it from generation to generation. And this is what they doubted: who are his rebbes on this? And Torah that has no rebbes is not a wall, and they cannot build upon it. So what is really the answer to this?

We found a solution to this in the Midrash Shocher Tov on the pasuk ” אברך את ה’ אשר יעצני אף לילות ייסרוני כליותי” the Midrash explains that this speaks of Avraham Avinu: “‘אין לי בכל אלה לא מפי רב ולא מפי מורה”. Avraham avinu was saying that he has no Rebbe, ברך ה’ אשר יעצני” שעשה ה’ שני כליותי כמעיין המתגבר, Hashem himself was his rebbe. Avraham avinu could be a talmid and hear the shiur directly from Hakodosh Baruch Hu Himself, and we need Avraham Avinu and his talmidim so that we can hear the shiur. But this is Torah from a “rebbe”! And Torah needs to be from a “rebbe,” and this is what Avraham Avinu means that I establish groups upon groups of Talmidei Chachamim who will nurse the entire klal Yisrael, that the type of Torah I establish is Torah that does not change, Torah that is transmitted from generation to generation, and it is Torah of rebbes transmitted from rebbe to student.

There is Torah with a mesorah from a “rebbe,” and there is Torah without a “rebbe,” and one can distinguish and recognize the difference between them. And what I came to say here is that we have Torah from rebbes, and one can be great to the heavens, but everything needs to be as the rebbes would do. And our rebbes would not allow seeing such a metzius, and there cannot be a lawless world where the honor of Talmidei chachamim is degraded, who are pursued, and those rolling the wheels are of the underworld, figures who do things with cunning, how they sell us everything under a mask…

One should not speak too much. We are talking here about the יראת שמים of every yid, the יראת שמים of the entire klal Yisrael. I would prefer to remain silent, but one cannot remain silent when there is something that harms the ציפור הנפש of כבוד שמים and the honor of the Torah of the entire klal Yisrael.

May hashem help that the Yashrus of intellect and clarity of mind not be harmed, and that we merit the elevation of the Keren of Torah, and that the honor of all Talmidei Chachamim and all the gedolim of the world be preserved in its full form, and that we merit siyata d’shmaya, and that we merit to be נכתב ונחתם for a good year of life and peace and all good.

HEBREW:                                                                                                                                                                                                    כ”ז מנ”א תשפ”ה

שיחה בעניני השעה

מתוך שיחת מוסר שנאמרה ע”י הגאון רבי חיים מענדל בראדסקי שליט”א

ראש הישיבה, ישיבה גדולה ד’טאראנטא

נמסר בפני קבוצת תלמידים

כדי לשמור על צורת הדברים כפי שנאמרו בלי שום שינויים שאולי היו גורמים שהמכוון לא יהא מדוייק, לכן ניסינו להביאו עלי כתב מלה במלה כצורת אמירת הדברים בשעתו

אנו חיים בתקופה שהעולם בחוץ השחית דרכו, וירד פלאים בכל המושגים של כבוד האדם ומענטשליכקייט ובכל צורת האנושיות, ואין לנו לחשוב שאין זה משפיע על עולמנו, וב”ה אשרנו שזכינו שיש לנו עולמנו עולם התורה אבל צריכים לשמור עליו [מכל משמר] שלא יחדרו לתוכו השפעות אלה, ולשמור בכל היקרות את ההבנה ביסודות של אידישקייט שלא יתקררו ולא יזדלזלו.

הנני מביע מהרהורי לבי, ומה שאני עומד לומר אינו בשביל עיתון, אלא אני מדבר פה כאב המדבר לבניו סביב לשולחנו, שזהו מה שאני מרגיש פה יחס של אב לבניו ואנחנו מדברים “צווישען זיך”.

בשעה שהרוחות של העולם חודרות לתוך מחננו, רוחות שהם זרות מאד [very strange] ל”אידישקייט וואס מיר ווייסען”.

יש מושג של איבוד של חוש הריח וכשמגיע לרוחניות אסור לנו לאבד את חוש הריח. לא נולדנו היום, וזכינו לראות אנשים גדולים ומהו הצורה של אידישקייט אצלם, וכשיש דברים מסויימים “that don’t smell right, it’s hard to remain silent”.

איני אדם לדבר בשער, ואיני מדבר אלא בד’ אמות שלי וכאן זה הד”א שלי, ויש לאדם ‘רעכט ביי דער אייגענע טיש’ להביע רגשי לבו והוא מביע אותם לאנשים הקרובים אליו.

כשצריכים לדבר, ואפי’ שמדברים אל אנשים מבינים, יש אפשרות שהדברים יגיעו לאזני מי שלא יבינם כראוי ויפרשם לפי רצונו ולא כפי כוונתנו, אמנם מצינו בשעת בריאת האדם שאמר הקב”ה ‘נעשה אדם’ וז”ל המדרש: רבי שמואל בר נחמן בשם רבי יונתן אמר בשעה שהי’ משה כותב את התורה הי’ כותב מעשה כל יום ויום כיון שהגיע לפסוק הזה שנא’ ויאמר אלוקים נעשה אדם בצלמנו כדמותנו אמר לפניו רבון העולם מה אתה נותן פתחון פה למינים אתמהא. אמר לו כתוב והרוצה לטעות יטעה אמר לו הקב”ה משה, האדם הזה שבראתי לא גדולים וקטנים אני מעמיד ממנו שאם יבוא הגדול ליטול רשות מן הקטן ממנו והוא אומר מה אני צריך ליטול רשות מן הקטן ממני והן אומרים לו למד מן בוראך שהוא ברא את העליונים ואת התחתונים כיון שבא לבראת את האדם נמלך במלאכי השרת, עכ”ל. מה אומר הקב”ה שכך צריכים לדבר ממידת דרך ארץ, ועל החשש שיש שיטעו, ע”ז נאמר הרוצה לטעות יטעה, ולא חסר כאלה שרוצים  לטעות, ואנחנו מדברים לכאלה שאינם רוצים לטעות, ואם חלילה יגיע לאזני מי שרוצה לטעות, הרי זה ענין שלהם ואין לנו לחוש להם ועיי”ש בפי’ הרז”ו שמפרש ‘לאיש כזה אין לנו לחוש לטעותו שהרי יטעה עכ”פ’ כשיש agenda יטעה עכ”פ ולא יעזור שום דבר.

יש דברים מסויימים שמעולם לא ראינו ואסור לנו אף פעם לראותם, ואין לנו לתלות ולהצדיק הנהגה זאת בירידת הדורות, אלו דברים שהם ההיפך מכל מה ‘וואס מיר פארשטייען אין אידישקייט’.

שיהי’ יכול להיות מציאות, שיהיו עהרליכע תלמידי חכמים וחשוב’ע תלמידי חכמים, שירדו לדון בענין לצורך באחריות ובעהרליכקייט, ואני יודע זאת בידיעה ברורה איך שטפלו בענין במלוא האחריות [אויף א בלאט גמ’ קען איך זאך נישט איינרעדען אז איך ווייס וואס איך זאג בברירות, אבער דא זאג איך יע בברירות] ועכשיו ירדפו אותם ויזלזלו בהם, ונעשה מציאות שיהי’ בי”ד חשוב של ת”ח חשובים ושיוכלו לזלזל כך בבי”ד חשוב [בודאי יש מציאות לפעמים של מה שנקרא ‘בי”ד rogue‘ של אנשים שאינם מהוגנים שעושים עצמם לבי”ד ומהם צריכים מאד להשמר] אבל להתקיף בי”ד חשוב ולזלזל בהם ולעשותם לכלום?!

כשיש נידון בהלכה, יכול להיות שיהיו שני דיעות, ויש הרבה פסקי דינים שנפסקו בבתי דינים חשובים בדור הקודם, שיש מקום לתלמיד חכם לחלוק עליהם כדרכה של תורה, ואם לא הגיעו לעמק שוה אף לכתוב ספר שלם בדברי תורה שעל פיהם יוצא לפסוק אחרת, ואף כאן יכולים לעשות כן.

אבל ‘מיט דעם שאפט מען אפ און מען מאכט צו גארנישט א בי”ד’? חלילה! ס’נישט געהערט געווארען אזא זאך, ס’טאר נישט געהערט ווערען אזא זאך’.

וגם שיהי’ נושא ברחוב, וכל אחד נעשה מאן דאמר על זה, שלומדים מזה וחושבים שמותר לעשות כן!

אני אומר לכם, דבר כזה לא הי’ יכול לקרות בדור הקודם בשום מקום, לא פה ולא בשום מקום, זה זועק עד לשמים! [ס’איז א הימעל’ס געשריי]

“את ה’ אלוקיך תירא לרבות תלמידי חכמים”, ששמעון העמסוני פירש, שאין לרבות עוד יראה אחרת, עד שבא ר”ע ואמר שנתרבה בזה כבוד ת”ח, שאי”ז יראה אחרת, אלא פגיעה בת”ח הרי”ז פגיעה בכבוד שמים, שכבוד שמים בעולם מיוסד על כבוד תלמידי חכמים, כמו שכתב רבינו יונה, ולעשות שיהא מזולזל אצל אנשים כבוד תלמידי חכמים שיהא למשל ולשנינה בפי כל אחד הרי”ז פגיעה בכבוד שמים וביראת ה’.

וודאי הכבדות של הלכה צריכים לשומרו מכל משמר, וכאן נעשה הכל באחריות גדולה, אם רוצים לכתוב מערכה שיכתבו ספר ע”ז, וכך היא דרכה של תורה. איני בא לעשות מחאה, אני יושב בביתי, אבל אני רוצה שאונזערע מענטשען אונזערע בני תורה שיש להם שכל הישר שלא יתבלבלו מזה.

וכאן הזלזול בת”ח הוא בתלמידי חכמים משני הצדדים, ויכול כל אחד להריח שמעורבים פה כוחות אחרים ‘גאנגסטעריי’ ויש פה ‘חוליגאנעס’ שמעורבים פה ומסבבים בגלגל.

דאס איז א הימעל’ס געשריי!

ויש לנו בעי’ how do we process such a thing, שמשתמשים בשמות של אנשים גדולים.

איך מתייחסים לזה?

הריני רוצה לומר דבר בזה, והוא “א איידעלע זאך”. הריני אומר זאת בחדר זה “צו אונזערע מענטשען”, לא צריך שיזדלזלו האנשים גדולים מאף אחד מצדדי המערכה. מדובר פה באנשים גדולים, שכולם אהובים כולם ברורים. יש נקודה ואני רוצה לומר לכם סיפור להבליט נקודה זו. כולם יודעים שהי’ בזמנו מערכה חריפה בא”י שהוצרך הרב יוסף חיים זוננפעלד לערוך מערכה חריפה כנגד הרב קוק. אחרים כששומעים ביקורת חריפה, סוברים שפירושו שבזה נעשה האדם “אפגעשאפען”.

אספר לכם מעשה שבדידי הוי עובדא כשהייתי אברך הי’ תקופה שהייתי מקורב להרב אלישיב, והי’ זה חוה”מ סוכות וישבתי בסוכה אצלו, ובאמצע הגיע מחותנו הרב שלמה זלמן לבקרו, ואני נסיתי לצאת מן הסוכה, שחשבתי שאי”ז מקומי להישאר, אמנם הרב אלישיב צווני להישאר והי’ לי אז הזדמנות to observe, וכל הביקור דברו בו דברי תורה ומעשיות חשובות, וכולו הי’ מוסב על הרב קוק, שאמרו ממנו דברים ואיך שאמרו בשמו איך שהראה מתוס’ פלוני. וזה אני אומר לכם בתור הקדמה למעשה הבא שסיפר לנו הרב חיים נוסבוים שליט”א מטאראנטא איך שסבו [עלטער זיידע שלו] שהי’ נוכח בברכת החמה שהי’ בירושלים בתר”פ’ס בעיר העתיקה, והי’ זה כשבועיים לפני פסח, ואחרי ברכת החמה, בירכו האנשים איש את רעהו שנזכה לחזור לפה בעוד שבועיים להקריב קרבן פסח בביאת המשיח, וקרא שם אחד מהאנשים להרב יוסף חיים ‘און וואס וועט איהר טאהן אז רב קוק וועט זיין כהן גדול’? [Loaded question] וענה על זה רב יוסף חיים ‘כהן גדול זאל ער זיין, נאר נישט ירושליימער רב’. רואים כאן צורה של מערכה כמתכונתו, שבו זמנית שצריכים לערוך מערכה חריפה מאד יש את ההבחנה ש’כהן גדול זאל ער זיין, נאר נישט ירושליימער רב’, האדם נשאר במלוא חשיבותו, עד כדי שיהי’ יכול להיות כהן גדול שנכנס לפני ולפנים והוא האדם המקודש ביותר בכלל ישראל וואס אויף זיין עבודה שטייט דער כלל ישראל, אבל יש מערכה במלוא התקיפות שלא יהי’ ירושליימער רב, האם זה נקרא לפגוע ולזלזל כשמדברים כך? יש כזה מציאות. כך נראה מערכה פעם שידעו ‘אפצושאצען’ אפי’ כשיש ביקורת, אין זה סתירה. לא צריך שיזדלזל פה כבודו של אף אחד. ואי”ז זלזול לומר שיהי’ כה”ג רק לא ירושליימער רב.

אבל ‘נגע’ זה זאל נישט אריינקריכען ביי אונז א כי הוא זה אז זאל קענען געמאלט זיין אזא מציאות, כעת הוא זמן שהעולם בחוץ הוא ‘א מעשוגענע וועלט’ וכשיש מצב כזה, משהו מזה חודר לתוכינו וצריכים להישמר מזה מאד שלא ניפגע מזה ושישרות השכל לא ייפגע.

כשאני מדבר מי אני לדבר אני מדבר לעצמי my job is להעביר את המסורה איך שראיתי אצל אבי מורי והמסורה שראיתי אצל מורי חמי, ויכול אני לומר בפה מלא שאני יודע איך שמורי חמי הי’ מתייחס לזה ואיך שרבי חיים הי’ מתייחס לזה ס’קיין שאלה נישט.

פעם דברנו מהדובנער מגיד וכדאי לחזור עליו איך שהוא מבאר את דברי המדרש, על הפסוק “אחות לנו קטנה ושדיים אין לה מה נעשה לאחותינו ביום שידובר בה” אחות לנו קטנה זה אברהם שהפסוק מדבר בשעה שבא הקב”ה להשכין שכינתו על אברהם שע”ז מוסב פסוק זה, והי’ ספק שפקפקו מלאכי השרת אם יכולים לבנות עליו את הכלל ישראל, וע”ז נאמר אם דלת היא שאינו מיוסד במקומו רק מסתובב על צירו אינו ראוי לבנות עליו שאינו מתקיים אלא לשעה אבל אם חומה היא שמעמיד דברים כחומה ואז ראוי לבנות עליו טירת כסף ויכולים לבנות עליו את הכלל ישראל וע”ז ענה אברהם אני חומה ושדי כמגדלות שעתיד אני להעמיד כתים כתים של תלמידי חכמים שייניקו את הכלל ישראל, ומבו’ פה שהי’ פקפוק על אברהם אבינו של שדיים אין לה ואין ראוי לבנות עליו הכלל ישראל ועל זה ענה אברהם אני חומה ושדי כמגדלות. מה הי’ פה הנידון?

ומבאר הדובנער מגיד שפקפוקם של מלאכי השרת היתה שהרי אברהם אבינו העלה את העולם להשגות גבוהות ואף שהי’ מסורה משם ועבר אבל א”א השיג הרבה יותר מזה, ועל זה פקפקו מלאכי השרת ‘ושדיים אין לה’, מאין ינק יסודותיו ומי הם רבותיו על זה, שזה בלי “רביים” אי”ז חומה ואין יכולים לבנות עליו שהיום יכולים לחשוב כך ולמחר לחשוב אחרת. ‘חומה’ הוא רק כשזה בא מ”רביים” ויש ע”ז מסורה מדור דור. וזהו שפקפקו מי הם הרביים שלו על זה, ותורה שאין ע”ז רביים אינה חומה ואין יכולים לבנות עליו. ומה הוא באמת התשובה על זה?

ומצאנו פתרון דבר זה במדרש שוחר טוב על הפסוק “אברך את ה’ אשר יעצני אף לילות ייסרוני כליותי” ומבארת המדרש שמדבר פה אברהם אבינו ‘אין לי בכל אלה לא מפי רב ולא מפי מורה’ ומי הוא ה”רבה” שלי?  הרבש”ע בעצמו הוא ה”רבה” שלי, “אברך ה’ אשר יעצני” שעשה ה’ שני כליותי כמעיין המתגבר, אברהם אבינו הי’ יכול להיות תלמיד ולשמוע השיעור direct מהרבש”ע בעצמו ואנחנו צריכים אברהם אבינו ותלמידיו כדי שנוכל לשמוע השיעור, אבל זה תורה מ”רבה”! ותורה צריכה להיות  מ”רבה” וזהו כוונת אברהם אבינו שאני מעמיד כתים כתים של ת”ח שייניקו את כלל ישראל, שהסוג תורה שאני מעמיד הוא תורה שאינה משתנית, תורה שתימסר מדור לדור והוא תורה של רביים הנמסר מרב לתלמיד.

יש תורה עם מסורה מ”רבה” ויש תורה בלי “רבה” ויכולים להבחין ולעמוד על ההפרש ביניהם. ומה שבאתי לומר כאן שיש לנו תורה מרביים ויכולים להיות גדולים עד לשמיים אבל הכל צריך להיות כמו שהיו הרביים עושים, והרביים שלנו לא היו מניחים לראות בכזו מציאות ולא יכול להיות הפקר’וועלט שיהי’ מזדלזל כבוד ת”ח שנרדפים רדיפות שמגלגלים בגלגל אונטערוועלטניקער’ס שעושים בערמה איך שמוכרים לנו הכל במסוה…..

מ’דארף נישט רעדען צו פיל, מדובר פה על היראת שמים של יעדער איד, היראת שמים של כלל ישראל. הייתי מעדיף להישאר בשקט אבל אין יכולים להישאר בשקט כשיש דבר שפוגע בצפור הנפש של כבוד שמים וכבוד התורה של כלל ישראל.

זאל דער אייבישטער העלפען שישרות השכל ושצלילות הדעת לא תיפגע ושנזכה להרמת קרן התורה ושכבוד כל התלמידי חכמים וכל הגדולי עולם תישמר במלואה כצורתה ושנזכה לסייעתא דשמיא ושנזכה לכתיבה וחתימה טובה לשנת חיים ושלום וכל טוב.

{Matzav.com}

A horrific school shooting at a Minneapolis Catholic school left at least two children dead and more than a dozen injured Wednesday. The suspected gunman, identified as Robin (formerly Robert) Westman, was found dead of a self-inflicted gunshot wound at the scene. As the community reeled from the bloodshed at Annunciation Catholic School, MSNBC host and former Biden White House spokeswoman Jen Psaki reacted by dismissing both the power of prayer and President Donald Trump’s anti-crime crackdown in Washington, D.C. “Prayer is not freaking enough. Prayers do not end school shootings. Prayers do not make parents feel safe sending their kids to school. Prayer does not bring these kids back. Enough with the thoughts and prayers,” Psaki posted on X. Psaki doubled down in a follow-up post, mocking Trump’s D.C. crime crackdown, which has seen the National Guard deployed and the federal government assume direct oversight of the Metropolitan Police. “When kids are getting shot in their pews at a Catholic school Mass and your crime plan is to have National Guard put mulch down around DC maybe rethink your strategy,” she wrote. Law enforcement sources confirmed the shooter as Robin Westman, whose legal documents show a gender change in 2019 from the name Robert. The shooter was also a rabid antisemite. In a manifesto, Westman discussed his desire to murder “filthy Zionist Jews” and wrote slogans such as “Free Palestine.” “If I will carry out a racially motivated attack, it would be most likely against filthy Zionist jews,” he wrote in one stomach-churning entry. “I hate those entitled, penny-sniffing kikes,” he wrote elsewhere in the journal. Westman also wrote that “six million wasn’t enough” and mused about killing President Trump and Jews, but settled on killing “children of innocent civilians,” which he wrote would bring him “the most joy.” “I don’t want to [do] it to spread a message. I do it to please myself. I do it because I am sick,” he wrote. (YWN World Headquarters – NYC)

Israeli intelligence provided crucial assistance to Australia’s security agency with its probe into Iranian-backed antisemitic terror attacks on Australian soil, Sky News Australia reported Wednesday, citing sources familiar with the matter. According to the report, Jerusalem provided information—or a critical lead—regarding one of the explosive devices tied to Tehran’s plots, despite recent strains between the two governments. While most of the investigation was carried out by the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO), which analyzed the complex network surrounding the attacks, the agency ultimately concluded on its own that Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps was behind the attacks. On Tuesday, ASIO head Mike Burgess hinted that a possible “tip” from Israel may have played a role in the investigation. (YWN Israel Desk—Jerusalem)

A new Harvard/Harris survey conducted in August found that while most Americans believe Gaza is experiencing a famine, the majority place the blame on Hamas. The poll comes as reports of worsening conditions in Gaza continue to dominate headlines across the United States.

According to the findings, 69% of respondents accepted claims that a famine exists in Gaza. Among them, 78% of Democrats said they believed the reports, compared to 65% of Republicans and Independents who agreed.

When asked who was at fault for the famine, 61% of participants pointed to Hamas. Democrats were split on the issue, while a significant 74% of Republicans and 60% of Independents said the terror group was primarily responsible.

The generational divide was also notable. A slim majority of younger respondents placed the blame on Israel, but those over the age of 25 overwhelmingly said Hamas was responsible for the crisis.

Opinions were also divided on whether criticism of Israel during the war stems more from antisemitism or from genuine concern for Palestinian civilians, showing deep polarization on the issue.

The same split was seen regarding accusations of genocide. Americans were evenly divided over whether Israel is committing genocide in Gaza, with younger voters and Democrats more likely to accept the claim.

Despite these divisions, 60% of respondents said they support the U.S. providing both offensive and defensive military aid to Israel.

The poll also revealed a sharp generational difference in attitudes toward Hamas. Among Americans aged 18 to 24, 60% sided with Hamas over Israel. Past surveys from the same pollster have reflected similar results within this age group. By contrast, all other demographic groups expressed greater support for Israel. Overall, U.S. backing for Israel dropped three points compared to July’s results.

Across all respondents, 26% said they favored Hamas over Israel.

Additionally, 58% of Americans said Israel should only agree to a hostage-release deal if Hamas withdraws completely from Gaza, reflecting widespread skepticism of any compromise with the terror group.

The Harvard/Harris poll, released on Monday, surveyed 2,025 registered voters on August 20–21 and carries a margin of error of 2.2 percentage points. It was conducted by Harvard University’s Center for American Political Studies in collaboration with The Harris Poll.

In a separate poll released Wednesday by Quinnipiac University, 37% of Americans said they sympathized more with Palestinians, while 36% aligned with Israel. This marked the highest level of U.S. sympathy for Palestinians and the lowest for Israel since Quinnipiac began asking this question in 2001.

The Quinnipiac findings also showed that 60% of respondents opposed additional U.S. military aid to Israel for the ongoing war against Hamas, while 32% supported it. Unlike the Harvard/Harris survey, Quinnipiac specifically asked about aid tied directly to fighting Hamas, whereas the Harvard/Harris poll addressed military assistance more broadly.

Quinnipiac’s data further revealed that half of Americans believe Israel is committing genocide, while 35% disagreed and the remainder were unsure or declined to answer.

Among Democrats, 77% said they believe Israel is guilty of genocide, compared to just 20% of Republicans.

The Quinnipiac survey included 1,220 registered voters and was conducted between August 21 and 25, with a margin of error of 3.4 percentage points.

{Matzav.com}

The immigration detention center in the Florida Everglades dubbed “Alligator Alcatraz” must keep moving toward shutting down operations by late October, a judge has ruled, even as the state and federal governments fight that decision. U.S. District Judge Kathleen Williams late Wednesday denied those requests to pause her order to wind down operations at the facility, which has been plagued by reports of unsanitary conditions and detainees being cut off from the legal system. The facility was already being emptied of detainees, according to an email exchange shared with The Associated Press on Wednesday. In a message sent to South Florida Rabbi Mario Rojzman on Aug. 22 related to providing chaplaincy services at the facility, Florida Division of Emergency Management Executive Director Kevin Guthrie said “we are probably going to be down to 0 individuals within a few days,” implying there would soon be no need for the services. The detention center was quickly built two months ago at a lightly used, single-runway training airport in the Everglades. State officials signed more than $245 million in contracts for building and operating the facility, which officially opened July 1. President Donald Trump toured the facility last month and suggested it could be a model for future lockups nationwide as his administration races to expand the infrastructure needed to increase deportations. Attorneys for the U.S. Department of Homeland Security said in their request for a stay that Williams’ order last week, if carried out, would disrupt the federal government’s ability to enforce immigration laws. But the judge in Wednesday night’s order noted that the detainee population already was dwindling at the facility, and that the federal government’s “immigration enforcement goals will not be thwarted by a pause in operations.” Florida Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis’ administration is preparing to open a second immigration detention facility dubbed “Deportation Depot” at a state prison in north Florida. Williams said in last week’s order that she expected the population of “Alligator Alcatraz” to decline within 60 days through the transferring of the detainees to other facilities, and once that happened, fencing, lighting and generators should be removed. She wrote the state and federal defendants can’t bring anyone other than those who are already being detained at the facility onto the property. Environmental groups and the Miccosukee Tribe had argued in their lawsuit that further construction and operations should be stopped until federal and state officials complied with federal environmental laws. Their lawsuit claimed the facility threatened environmentally sensitive wetlands that are home to protected plants and animals and would reverse billions of dollars spent over decades on environmental restoration. A second lawsuit also was filed by civil rights groups last month against the state and federal governments over practices at the Everglades facility, claiming detainees were denied access to the legal system. Another federal judge in Miami last week dismissed parts of the lawsuit which had been filed in Florida’s southern district and then moved the remaining counts against the state of Florida to the neighboring middle district. Civil rights groups last Friday filed a third lawsuit over practices at the facility in federal court in Fort Myers, asking for a restraining order and a temporary injunction that would bar Florida agencies and their contractors from holding detainees at “Alligator Alcatraz.” They described “severe problems” at […]

By Rabbi Pinchos Lipschutz

With the paper closed for two weeks to give everyone here a chance to reinvigorate themselves, I decided to take a trip to Europe. I had only been there once and thought that it might be nice to visit Paris, London, or other cities to see how Jews live there and to tour the historic sites, famous buildings, and towers.

But more than that, I wanted to visit the shtetel where my mother was born, a small place called Vashki, where her father and grandfather served as the town’s rabbonim. From what I’ve read, the houses still look exactly as they did when my mother lived there. Maybe I’d even be able to find her family’s home and see if it still had the same dirt floors she once walked on.

I imagined walking those same roads, picturing how my ancestors lived, and spending time in the shtetel that was once theirs.

I would visit the cemetery and daven at the kever of my great-grandfather, whose kesovim I later published. I’d also go to the kever achim, where the cursed Nazis murdered the town’s Jews in cold blood. I would think about what was done to them and thank Hashem that my mother’s family survived.

I thought about the awful churban that took place in that shtetel, and in every Lithuanian town and city. I thought about the lives cut down, the Jews slaughtered simply for being Jews, and the nations that stood by and did nothing. Six million murdered, not only by the Nazis, but often aided by their neighbors.

I had the whole trip played out in my mind.

And then I thought better of it.

Why should I travel to a country whose soil is soaked with Jewish blood? Why spend a single penny there? Why reward them for their complicity?

No, no. I would not go.

And then I asked myself: Why would I even want to go to France, a capital of Jew-hatred? Why support them? Why admire their architecture, their history?

No, I decided. I won’t go. I won’t see the Eiffel Tower, or Versailles, or the changing of the guard at Buckingham Palace.

I won’t experience the angry stares in Paris or the nasty looks in London.

I’ll go to Yerushalayim, where I belong. The city at the heart of the Jewish people. I’ll daven at the Kosel, spend Shabbos in the holy city, and travel around Eretz Yisroel, gathering mitzvos with every step. I’ll meet family and friends, and the avira d’ara d’Yisroel will uplift and invigorate me.

So, off to Israel we went.

But our plans changed soon after we arrived. We landed at 4 a.m. on Tuesday, and as we stepped outside to find a taxi to Yerushalayim, it felt as though we had walked into an oven. The heat was stifling — 100 degrees and rising. That oppressive heat lasted through the week. We ventured out only in the early mornings and late evenings, spending the sweltering days indoors.

But it wasn’t just the heat that cast a shadow over our trip.

There were levayos.

Soon after we arrived, we learned that Rav Shmuel Deutsch had been niftar. He was a towering talmid chochom, a gaon hagaonim who seemed to know kol haTorah kulah. I had known him for 43 years.

My mother was a special woman who passed away way too young. After I got married, I decided to publish a sefer l’illui nishmasah. Her father, Rav Leizer Levin, gave me teshuvos that had been written to his father-in-law, Rav Avrohom Hoffenberg. He had brought them with him when he left Lita. I thought that publishing them as a Sefer Zikaron would be a proper tribute. I had no experience publishing seforim or deciphering rabbinic handwriting, but I was determined.

My interest in seforim led me to befriend Rav Yosef Buksbaum, head of Machon Yerushalayim. I consulted with him about aspects of publishing a sefer, but the teshuvos touched on some sugyos I was not well versed in, and I lacked the marei mekomos needed to properly understand them.

Rav Buksbaum said to me, “There’s a talmid chochom in your neighborhood who can help you. His name is Rav Shmuel Deutsch. He lives right near you in Ezras Torah, on Rechov Even Ha’azel.”

I asked around and was told that he was a prized talmid of Rav Shach and Rav Berel Soloveitchik. I’d often see him after davening, talking with Rav Shimon Moshe Diskin, another talmid chochom muflag. I was too intimidated to approach him. Who was I, a young American yungerman, to ask for help with matters that must have been elementary to him? Surely, I thought, he’d look down on me or dismiss me.

But actually, from the first time I stepped into his home, he was warm and welcoming.

I visited him often. Anytime I had trouble reading a manuscript, understanding a rov’s intent, or tracking down marei mekomos, I turned to him. And he always helped, quickly and with clarity. He could decipher any handwriting, identify every source, and explain the most complex topics in minutes.

We became close. As long as I lived in Yerushalayim, I would visit him regularly.

Rav Deutsch earned renown as a rosh yeshiva at Kol Torah and as a close talmid of Rav Shach, instrumental in founding Degel HaTorah and other key initiatives.

When I returned to America, I’d visit him whenever he came to Monsey and then we lost touch for a while but reconnected when he opened his yeshiva. The last time I saw him was in Lakewood, where he was recovering from an illness in his son’s home.

I was deeply saddened by his passing, as was the Olam HaTorah, which mourned the loss of a rosh yeshiva, moreh derech, and oveid Hashem.

In the Olam HaTorah, it was known that from his youngest years, Rav Shmuel was immersed in an atmosphere of Torah greatness. His profound connection with Rav Shach shaped his life. Rav Shach saw in him not just a sharp, brilliant mind, but also a rare sense of humility and responsibility. With Rav Shach’s guidance, Rav Deutsch combined harbotzas Torah with powerful leadership.

For over 40 years, he served as a rosh yeshiva in the famed Yeshiva Kol Torah, inspiring thousands of talmidim with his depth in lomdus, his personal warmth, and his sincere care for their growth. To his talmidim, he wasn’t just a rebbi. He was a father figure, a mentor, and a role model whose influence continued long after they left yeshiva.

Beyond the bais medrash, he played a key role in shaping Torah policy in Eretz Yisroel through Degel HaTorah and later the Peleg Yerushalmi. Yet, despite his stature, he remained a man of quiet humility, focused on Torah and his talmidim.

His levayah was a manifestation of kavod haTorah, and we were blessed to be in Yerushalayim for it.

We visited some family and friends, and davened at the Kosel a few times. But most people, including many of my rabbeim, were away.

Still, Shabbos in Yerushalayim is always special. Some members of my wife’s family joined us. The oppressive, historic heat finally lifted, and we basked in the warmth of a Yerushalayimer Shabbos.

But when Shabbos was over, I was struck by the cold reality of life: I learned that my dear, beloved uncle, Rav Berel Wein, had been niftar over Shabbos.

Rav Berel Wein wasn’t just beloved by me. He was cherished by the entire Jewish world. His life embodied Torah scholarship, insight, and timeless mentchlichkeit.

He was a briach hatichon, a central pillar, heir to an illustrious rabbinic family and student of the great transplanted Lithuanian roshei yeshiva. From them, he absorbed Torah, hashkofah, and what the Slabodka mussar tradition refers to as gadlus ha’adam, the greatness of man. Though they taught in Yiddish and heavily accented English, he translated their values into the clear, modern language of American Jewry and transmitted their timeless wisdom to generations of baalei batim, talmidim and the many other people who fell under his influence.

With dazzling brilliance, eloquence, and clarity, he brought hundreds of thousands closer to Torah, to Hashem, and to a deeper understanding of what it means to be a Jew.

Although he was a distinguished rov, rebbi, and rosh yeshiva, he became renowned as a historian almost by accident. He had begun giving a weekly Jewish history class in his shul, which became popular. He recorded the classes and sold them — “Rabbi Wein’s History Tapes” — as a fundraiser for his yeshiva, Shaarei Torah.

The rest, as they say, is history.

His breadth of knowledge and unique ability to convey eternal Torah truths with clarity, warmth, and relevance drew countless listeners. With masterful storytelling and a warm, engaging, Chicago-accented voice, he became the storyteller of Jewish destiny.

He brought Jewish history alive, not as a list of facts and dates, but as a living saga of the Jewish people. He transformed it from something distant into something vibrant and deeply personal. He helped his listeners feel part of a nation with a noble past and an enduring mission. He taught us to be proud of our people, to draw strength from their trials, and to see ourselves as links in an unbroken chain stretching back to Har Sinai.

As a maggid shiur and rosh yeshiva, he was revered for his penetrating lomdus and for the personal guidance he offered with humility and care. As a rov and communal leader, he combined halachic integrity with deep sensitivity, standing as a spokesman for Klal Yisroel and a representative of Torah Jewry in the modern world.

At heart, Rabbi Wein was a gentleman, a beautiful human being: approachable, gracious, and filled with quiet dignity. A man of few words, he always had the perfect vort, story, or quip — sharp, thoughtful, and on point. He wore the mantle of Torah leadership and scholarship with grace. He never sought honor for himself; instead, he elevated those around him.

He was a personal inspiration to me, a model of what one can become when G-d-given talents are used in service of the greater good. For as long as I can remember, he was always teaching and guiding me, through his words, his presence, and his example. He never imposed, never lectured. It was all so natural that I often didn’t realize how much he was being mechaneich me — in Yiddishkeit, in public life, and in service to others — until much later.

And one more thing: When he spoke publicly, he took my breath away. Literally. He would deliver a drosha or a speech, and when he was done, I just sat there, frozen in place, wishing he would go on. His brilliance, his depth, and the way he conveyed his message left me speechless.

His teachings, seforim, and books are an enduring legacy. His voice will continue to guide. His stories and insights will continue to inspire generations to come.

I was privileged to be at his levayah, and as I sat there, I realized that Hashem had brought me to Eretz Yisroel — for no apparent reason — so that I could be there to say goodbye to my last surviving uncle.

The last time I saw him was this past Shavuos. As always when we were in Yerushalayim, we went to visit him. It was a typical family visit, warm and familiar. He told me that he had published a new book and wanted to give me a copy. Though he could no longer see, he reached for a book, then for a pen, and said he wanted to autograph it, which he did.

Then he said, “It was so nice of you to come. I love you — and I’ve loved you for many years. I wish you well.”

He wasn’t one to express emotion openly, so the words struck me. And then he said: “This is not my last book. I have one more coming, and that will be it.”

And then, without drama or sadness, he added: “And that book has already been written.”

His tone was so matter-of-fact. I searched for something to say, but the right words didn’t come. I finally asked, “Uncle, why do you speak that way?”

And he said: “Pinny dear, that is what life is all about. Eventually, it comes to an end.”

And once again, for one final time, he left me speechless.

• ● ●

I had come to Eretz Yisroel with a vague plan and no clear reason, only to realize that Hashem had brought me there not just to daven at the Kosel or escape the blood-stained soil of Europe, but to say goodbye. To be present for the final chapter of a man who shaped my life and the lives of so many others.

In a land soaked with kedusha, during days scorched by sun and softened by Shabbos, I found myself standing at the crossroads of history, family, and Torah. I came to walk in the footsteps of ancestors, and instead, I found myself walking alongside giants of my own lifetime.

Rav Shmuel Deutsch and Rav Berel Wein were unique individuals who shaped generations through their brilliance in learning. Though they were very different from each other, each taught in their own way that Torah is not only learned, but lived and given over.

And so I left Eretz Yisroel not only with memories of unbearable heat and unexpected levayos, but with something deeper: a renewed understanding of what it means to be part of the unbroken chain of our people — to carry memory, to honor legacy, and to live a life that gives back more than it takes.

Yehi zichrom boruch.

{Matzav.com}

Israeli Prime Minister Binyomin Netanyahu’s office issued a firm denial on Wednesday night regarding reports that Israel had considered a U.S.-backed proposal to transfer control of Mount Dov and the Shebaa Farms to Syria in exchange for Damascus giving up its claims to the Golan Heights.

“The report claiming that Israel is considering ceding Mount Dov is totally fake news,” said a statement released by the Prime Minister’s Office.

According to Kan 11 News, the alleged American proposal surfaced during past negotiations between Israel and Syria. Talks eventually collapsed after Sunni militias and Syrian government forces carried out massacres against Druze residents in the Suweida region. Still, the report suggested that the possibility of reviving discussions in the future had not been ruled out.

The Kan report further indicated that Israel had internally assessed the political viability of such a deal, given that any territorial concession would legally require either a nationwide referendum or majority approval in the Knesset.

The outlet cited a source close to the Syrian government who acknowledged that a future security agreement between the two countries could potentially link the status of Mount Dov with that of the Golan Heights. However, he denied that this issue was actively being negotiated at present.

The same source maintained that while the topic could become relevant at a later stage, it was not currently part of the ongoing discussions. Another individual familiar with the diplomatic contacts confirmed to Kan 11 News that the matter is not on the agenda at this time and would only be addressed in subsequent rounds if talks resume.

Separately, i24NEWS reported on Monday that the Trump administration has been working behind the scenes to facilitate a preliminary security framework between Israel and Syria ahead of the upcoming United Nations General Assembly session in September.

However, U.S. envoy to Syria Tom Barrack clarified later that there is still significant ground to cover before an agreement can be reached.

Speaking with Axios’ Barak Ravid, Barrack stated, “They have mutual intent and desire but at the moment, there is still more work to do.”

{Matzav.com Israel}

President Donald Trump’s administration has asked a military base outside Chicago for support on immigration operations, the base said Thursday, signaling a push to expand its law enforcement crackdown to other cities. The Department of Homeland Security has asked Naval Station Great Lakes for “limited support in the form of facilities, infrastructure, and other logistical needs to support DHS operations,” said Matt Mogle, spokesperson for the base 35 miles (56 kilometers) north of Chicago. He said no decisions have been made on the request and that the base has not received an official request to support a National Guard deployment. The request shows the Republican administration’s desire to move beyond Washington as it ramps up immigration operations. Trump has threatened to deploy National Guard troops to Chicago and other Democratic-led cities after he called up troops to target crime, immigration and homelessness in Washington. Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker, a Democrat, told The Associated Press that the nation’s third-largest city doesn’t need or want military intervention to fight crime. The Chicago Sun-Times first reported about the Trump administration’s request. (AP)

CLICK HERE  THE ENTIRE ELUL IN RIBNITZ FOR JUST $180 – GRAB IT NOW. CLICK HERE   Elul has started.  Entire Sefer Tehillim.  Said every morning. At the tziyon of the Ribnitzer Rebbe, zy”a. One name. One request. One powerful 40-day connection.  $180 = 40 days of protection, tefillah, and heartfelt Tehillim for your name.  Get yours now. Secure your name today. Don’t wait — start yours now. CLICK HERE  CLICK HERE  THE ENTIRE ELUL IN RIBNITZ FOR JUST $180 – GRAB IT NOW. CLICK HERE   Elul has started.  Entire Sefer Tehillim.  Said every morning. At the tziyon of the Ribnitzer Rebbe, zy”a. One name. One request. One powerful 40-day connection.  $180 = 40 days of protection, tefillah, and heartfelt Tehillim for your name.  Get yours now. Secure your name today. Don’t wait — start yours now. CLICK HERE 

WATCH:

WATCH:

A dramatic emergency conference took place on Wednesday evening, attended by over 100 leading Breslover Rabbanim and community leaders from throughout Israel to reach a decision on the issue of 10,000 chassidim who are at risk of arrest by military police if they travel to Uman for Rosh Hashanah. For over an hour, representatives from the organizations that advise bnei yeshivos about conscription issues presented all the relevant considerations and details regarding conscription, the detention centers, and the army. Senior Breslover Rabbanim, including HaGaon HaRav Yaakov Meir Shechter, HaGaon HaRav Moshe Kramer, and HaGaon HaRav Natan Libermansch, then convened at the home of HaRav Shechter for about three hours and issued a final decision on the matter. The Rabbanim stated that since “the conscription decree is a gezeiras sh’mad, no one should consider falling into the IDF’s trap by agreeing to join one of the conscription tracks in any way, shape, or form, or to sign any conscription or recruitment track they offer, including national or civil service. Reality proves beyond any doubt that such a step is the precursor to great sins and apart from the obvious and well-known fact that their promises are worthless, the very act of service is חתיכא דאיסורא, as all the Gedolei Yisrael have already unanimously paskened and instructed, and there is no heter to do so for any reason, no matter how great.” “Although the great obligation and necessity to travel to Rosh Hashanah to Uman is known to us all, about which Rebbe Nachman said that ‘there is nothing greater than this,’ it is clear and pashut that all this is when the matter does not involve isureh Torah, all the more so an issur chamur like this, which is unparalleled.” “In order to distance themselves from the danger of arrest, which involves many and severe spiritual dangers and stumbling blocks, each and every person should guard their soul and do everything possible not to reach a state of arrest, chalilah, והחכם עיניו בראשו.” “And it is pashut that anyone who has an actual arrest warrant should not try to leave the borders of the country because he puts himself in danger of arrest, and whoever violates this is פורץ גדר חייו. Rabbanim and educators have a responsibility to instruct their followers according to these instructions and to ensure that young Breslov chassidim do not not expose themselves to spiritual dangers and stumbling blocks.” (YWN Israel Desk—Jerusalem)

Russia launched a major air attack early Thursday on Kyiv that included a rare strike on the city center, killing at least 18 people, wounding 48 and damaging European Union diplomatic offices, authorities said. The bombardment of drones and missiles was the first major Russian attack on Kyiv in weeks as U.S.-led peace efforts to end the three-year war struggled to gain traction. Britain said the attack sabotaged peace efforts, while top EU diplomat Kaja Kallas summoned Russia’s EU envoy to Brussels over the strikes that damaged EU offices. Ukraine on Thursday requested an emergency meeting of the U.N. Security Council to discuss the overnight bombardment, while two of Ukraine’s top envoys were set to meet Friday with the Trump administration regarding mediation. The Kremlin said Russia remained interested in continuing peace talks despite Thursday’s air attack, which was one of the war’s biggest since it began in 2022. Among the dead were four children between 2 and 17, said Tymur Tkachenko, the head of Kyiv’s city administration. The numbers were expected to rise. Rare attack on center of Kyiv The attack was one of the few times Russian drones and missiles have penetrated the heart of Kyiv since the start of the full-scale invasion. Ukraine’s Air Force said Russia launched 598 strike drones and decoys and 31 missiles of different types across the country early Thursday, most of them striking targets in Kyiv. At least 33 locations across all 10 of the city’s districts were directly hit or damaged by debris, Tkachenko said. Thousands of windows shattered as nearly 100 buildings were damaged, including a shopping mall in the city center. Oleksandr Khilko arrived at the scene after a missile hit the residential building where his sister lives in the capital’s Darnytsia district. He heard screams from people who were trapped under the rubble and pulled out three survivors, including a boy. “It’s inhuman, striking civilians,” Khilko said, his clothes covered in dust and the tips of his fingers black with soot. “With every cell of my body I want this war to end as soon as possible. I wait, but every time the air raid alarm sounds, I am afraid.” Sophia Akylina said her home in Kyiv’s Holosiivskyi district was damaged. “It’s never happened before that they attacked so close,” the 21-year old said. “Negotiations haven’t yielded anything yet, unfortunately people are suffering.” EU and UK summon Russian envoys after strikes hit their buildings European Commission President Ursula Von der Leyen said two strikes landed 20 seconds apart about 50 meters (165 feet) from the EU Mission to Ukraine building in Kyiv. She said no staff were injured in the strike. “No diplomatic mission should ever be a target. In response, we are summoning the Russian envoy in Brussels,” Kaja Kallas, the European Union’s top diplomat, said Thursday in a post on X. The British Council, which promotes cultural relations and educational opportunities, also said its Kyiv office had been “severely damaged” in the attack and was closed to visitors until further notice. The organization posted a photo showing the building with its windows and entrance smashed open and surrounded by glass and debris. A guard was injured and is “shaken but stable,” council chief executive Scott McDonald posted on X. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said Russian President […]

LISTEN:

https://matzav.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Bitachon4Life-Shiur-1580-Tocheles-Part-100-Amount.mp3

​​For more info, email bitachon4life@gmail.com.