Feed aggregator
Iran’s Pezeshkian Calls for Multilateral Currency Fund, Reduced Dollar Dependence at SCO Summit
Iran, Russia, China Reject EU Snapback Sanctions in Joint Letter
Iran’s Pezeshkian Meets Putin in China
Trump Urges Drug Companies to Prove COVID-19 Treatment Effectiveness
Modi, Putin Showcase ‘Special’ Ties as India-U.S. Relations Strain Over Russian Oil
Trump Administration Suspends Visas for Palestinian Passport Holders
Houthis Release List of 12 Officials Killed in Israeli Strike on Sanaa
IDF Destroys 8 km of Hamas Tunnels, Secures Khan Younis Route
Crowd at Houthi Leaders’ Funeral Chants Anti-US, Anti-Israel Slogans
Houthis Claim Missile Hit on Israeli Tanker, UKMTO Reports Miss
Afghanistan Earthquake Death Toll Rises to 509, Over 1,000 Injured
IDF to Crack Down on Chareidi Draft-Dodgers Ahead of Travels to Uman
Houthis Hold Mass Funeral for PM and Cabinet Killed in Israeli Airstrike
JEWS CONTROL THE WEATHER?: Storm Forces Largest Gaza Flotilla Back to Barcelona, Delaying Departure.
UPDATE: Levaya of Viznitzer Rebbetzin A”H Set for 11:15 AM in Gibbers
IDF Probe Reportedly Concludes Israel Committed ‘Every Conceivable Error’ in Latest Gaza Campaign
A confidential army assessment has determined that Operation “Gideon’s Chariots,” the large-scale campaign launched in May against Hamas and concluded last month, fell short of its intended goals, according to a report released Sunday, Times of Israel reports.
Channel 12 news published portions of the internal document, which bluntly states that the mission did not accomplish either of its stated aims — removing Hamas from power or securing the release of hostages. The assessment was circulated last week by the Operational Information Center within the IDF ground forces and has already reached multiple brigades, the network said.
Commanders who went over the material voiced concerns that the findings cast a shadow over the army’s upcoming offensive in Gaza City planned for October, questioning whether the necessary lessons had been absorbed in time.
Although IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir and other top brass have spoken positively about Gideon’s Chariots in public forums, the internal review was far harsher, stating that “Israel made every possible mistake” in carrying out the mission, the report noted.
The document faults the army for acting “contrary to its own military doctrine” by allowing humanitarian supplies to strengthen the enemy, failing to create pressure with time constraints, misallocating resources, and ultimately draining its own troops while diminishing international backing.
It further observes that Hamas continues to benefit from everything it needs to persist and declare victory: access to supplies, safe territory, and a fighting strategy suited to its needs.
The analysis argues that Israel leaned on “deterrence logic rather than decisive victory,” seeking to extend combat until a truce and hostage-release arrangement could be reached — a tactic that Hamas was able to take advantage of in recent months.
The report also highlights what it describes as “incompetence” in handling and delivering aid, claiming that this gave Hamas the ability to mount a successful international narrative portraying Israel as deliberately starving Gaza’s civilians.
Other criticisms in the document point to the army repeatedly maneuvering in the same zones at a sluggish tempo, placing the avoidance of casualties ahead of achieving objectives. It cites factors such as attrition, troop exhaustion, worn-down equipment, and inadequate preparation for guerrilla fighting as major contributors to the shortcomings.
Still, the document concedes that many in uniform credit the campaign with pushing Hamas to lower its demands in negotiations, noting that the military pressure may have increased the number of hostages the group is prepared to release.
The IDF, for its part, rejected the conclusions, asserting that the army did meet the stated goals of the operation and is continuing efforts to fulfill the broader objectives of the war.
In its response, the military also emphasized that the paper in question was “distributed without permission or clearance from the relevant authorities. The issue is being probed.”
{Matzav.com}
Iran Arrests Eight Accused of Passing Military Intel to Mossad During June War
Matzav Inbox: Chesed Wedding Halls – Why Does Chesed Mean Second-Class?
Dear Matzav Inbox,
It’s very nice that some wonderful, generous people have recently decided to build chesed wedding halls in our various communities. Really, it is. The idea is noble: help struggling families make simchos without drowning in debt. But tell me: Why does “chesed” automatically mean small, squashed, and second-rate?
Why, just because someone is paying a discounted rate, does the hall have to be the size of a large shul simcha hall?
Why does the food have to look like it was thrown together by a camp kitchen on a rainy Thursday night — a few leaves of lettuce, a couple croutons, and two cherry tomatoes pretending to be an appetizer? [Evidence: Real photo above.]
Why does the schedule of the wedding have to unravel into chaos, just because the hall carries the holy label of “chesed”?
Let’s not kid ourselves. Millions were spent on these buildings. Millions. Would it really have killed someone to make them the size of a normal, mainstream hall that could comfortably seat a regular crowd? Just something normal? Something where a chosson and kallah don’t feel like they’re making their simcha in a glorified bar mitzvah hall?
And don’t tell me it’s about saving money. The money was already spent! The walls are already up, the hall is already standing. So why the decision to make them sub-par from the get-go? Who decided that people who need help automatically deserve less? Why do we build for them an experience that feels like a cut-rate version of a real wedding, instead of just giving them what every other family has?
If this is chesed, then it’s a strange kind of chesed. Real chesed is about dignity. Real chesed is about making sure the families don’t feel like second-class citizens on the happiest night of their lives. Real chesed doesn’t embarrass. It uplifts. It doesn’t scream “discount wedding.” It says, “Your simcha matters just as much as anyone else’s.”
But instead, we’ve built halls that practically announce: “This is the budget option. This is the place where you settle for less. This is where you celebrate your wedding like a shalom zachor — squish into the kabbolas ponim if you can, clear all the table and amke room for one big circle during dancing, and leave your dignity at the door.”
Why? Why do we do such dumb things? Why do we pour millions into projects that miss the whole point? If we’re going to do chesed, then do it right. Build normal halls. Serve decent food. Run a wedding like a wedding, not like a communal potluck. Give people pride, not pity.
Because at the end of the day, just because I’m using a discounted wedding hall does not mean my wedding has to look and feel discounted. My simcha should be celebrated like anyone else’s — with kavod, with joy, and with dignity. That’s the kind of chesed our community deserves.
A Frustrated Baal Simcha
To submit a letter to appear on Matzav.com, email MatzavInbox@gmail.com
DON’T MISS OUT! Join the Matzav Status by CLICKING HERE. Join the Matzav WhatsApp Groups by CLICKING HERE.
The opinions expressed in letters on Matzav.com do not necessarily reflect the stance of the Matzav Media Network.
{Matzav.com}
Former Columbia U. President, Forced Out Over Shameful Israel-Hamas Protest Response, Named UK PM’s Economic Adviser
Pages
