Federal Judge Rules Trump Admin’s SNAP Benefits Cutoff ‘Likely Unlawful’
A federal judge in Massachusetts has ruled that the Trump administration’s decision to halt Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) payments for tens of millions of Americans during the ongoing government shutdown likely violates federal law — though she declined to compel the administration to immediately reinstate the benefits.
In a detailed 15-page opinion issued Friday, U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani in Boston instructed the Department of Agriculture to clarify by Monday whether it could “authorize only reduced SNAP benefits” using disaster-response funds or instead “authorize full SNAP benefits” through both those funds and “additional available funds.” Her order left open the question of whether emergency reserves could be tapped to continue providing aid to families in need.
The lawsuit that led to Talwani’s ruling was filed earlier in the week by a coalition of 25 Democrat-led states and the District of Columbia. Their attorneys argued that the administration’s suspension of the program — which supports over 42 million Americans — directly contradicts the Food and Nutrition Act’s clear directive that “assistance under this program shall be furnished to all eligible households.” According to the complaint, the USDA had warned that “the well has run dry” and that funding could no longer be maintained during the shutdown.
If the payments lapse, it would mark the first time in six decades that SNAP funding has been interrupted, a situation the suing states said would harm vulnerable families who depend on the program for basic nutrition.
Earlier Friday, Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins told reporters that the department’s contingency funds couldn’t be used to bridge the gap — even if officials wanted to. “There is a contingency fund at USDA, but that contingency fund, by the way, doesn’t even cover, I think half of the $9.2 billion that would be required for November SNAP,” Rollins explained. “It is only allowed to flow if the underlying program is funded. If Hurricane Melissa or one of the hurricanes hits, that’s the contingency fund that we would use to send more money into the vulnerable communities that are harmed by a specific event, like a hurricane — but it is a contingency fund that can only flow if the underlying appropriation is approved.”
With the shutdown dragging on and federal food assistance hanging in the balance, the court’s order stops short of mandating relief but places mounting legal and political pressure on the administration to find a way to keep SNAP benefits flowing.
{Matzav.com}
