Kamala Harris Goes Scorched Earth On Biden’s Decision To Run For Second Term: ‘Recklessness’
Kamala Harris has delivered a stinging critique of President Joe Biden’s bid for a second term, calling it an act of “recklessness” in her upcoming memoir. She argued that such a decision should never have been “left to an individual’s ego.”
The sharp remarks appear in an excerpt of her book, 107 Days, published by The Atlantic on Wednesday, and represent one of her harshest public assessments of her former running mate.
“Was it grace, or was it recklessness? In retrospect, I think it was recklessness,” Harris writes, reflecting on her choice not to urge Biden to bow out of the 2024 campaign earlier.
“The stakes were simply too high. This wasn’t a choice that should have been left to an individual’s ego, an individual’s ambition. It should have been more than a personal decision.”
Harris said her refusal to weigh in “during all those months of growing panic” about Biden’s fitness for office came from her desire to prove she was a “loyal person.”
But she did not hold back from expressing further grievances. Harris attributed her silence partly to what she described as her “delicate status” within the administration and even accused the White House of stoking negative portrayals of her.
When she was “attacked … on everything from my laugh, to my tone of voice, to whom I’d dated in my 20s, or claimed I was a ‘DEI hire,’ the White House rarely pushed back with my actual résumé,” Harris complained.
“They had a huge comms team; they had Karine Jean-Pierre briefing in the pressroom every day. But getting anything positive said about my work or any defense against untrue attacks was almost impossible.
“Worse, I often learned that the president’s staff was adding fuel to negative narratives that sprang up around me,” she added.
Harris suggested jealousy was a factor, pointing to polling that showed her approval numbers creeping closer to Biden’s.
“Their thinking was zero-sum: If she’s shining, he’s dimmed. None of them grasped that if I did well, he did well. That given the concerns about his age, my visible success as his vice president was vital,” she wrote.
“It would serve as a testament to his judgment in choosing me and reassurance that if something happened, the country was in good hands. My success was important for him.
“His team didn’t get it.”
Even with her criticisms, Harris insisted she did not push Biden to quit, saying, “the American people had chosen him before in the same matchup,” and she left open the possibility that “It was just possible he was right about this, too.”
“And of all the people in the White House, I was in the worst position to make the case that he should drop out. I knew it would come off to him as incredibly self-serving if I advised him not to run. He would see it as naked ambition, perhaps as poisonous disloyalty, even if my only message was: Don’t let the other guy win.”
“’It’s Joe and Jill’s decision.’ We all said that, like a mantra, as if we’d all been hypnotized.”
Harris maintained that she would have intervened had she truly believed Biden was unable to perform his duties.
“Many people want to spin up a narrative of some big conspiracy at the White House to hide Joe Biden’s infirmity. Here is the truth as I lived it. Joe Biden was a smart guy with long experience and deep conviction, able to discharge the duties of president. On his worst day, he was more deeply knowledgeable, more capable of exercising judgment, and far more compassionate than Donald Trump on his best,” she wrote.
“But at 81, Joe got tired. That’s when his age showed in physical and verbal stumbles. I don’t think it’s any surprise that the debate debacle happened right after two back-to-back trips to Europe and a flight to the West Coast for a Hollywood fundraiser.”
“I don’t believe it was incapacity. If I believed that, I would have said so. As loyal as I am to President Biden, I am more loyal to my country,” Harris concluded.
{Matzav.com}