Noose Pins Spark Uproar as Otzma Yehudit Pushes Death Penalty Bill
A legislative committee session erupted in controversy Monday after members of Otzma Yehudit arrived wearing lapel pins shaped like nooses, a dramatic show of support for their effort to impose the death penalty on terror convicts. The display immediately drew fierce criticism from across the political spectrum.
The pins, metallic and gold-colored, resembled the yellow ribbons worn by most Israeli officials since October 7 in solidarity with the hostages. But Otzma Yehudit said the symbolism here was deliberate and stark. According to National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir’s office, the nooses represent the party’s “commitment to the demand for the death penalty for terrorists” and deliver “a clear message that terrorists are deserving of death.”
Ben Gvir and four of his party’s lawmakers wore the pins as they entered the National Security Committee meeting, where their contentious death penalty legislation was again under discussion. That bill, which passed its first reading in November, would allow capital punishment for those convicted of deadly terror attacks — something Israel has historically reserved for only one case, the 1962 execution of Nazi war criminal Adolf Eichmann.
During the hearing, Ben Gvir told the committee that the noose was merely one illustration of how such executions could be carried out. “One of the options through which we will implement the death penalty law for terrorists,” he said of the symbol. He continued, “Of course, there is the option of the gallows, the electric chair and also the option of euthanasia.”
Despite the Israeli Medical Association’s stated objection to the proposal, Ben Gvir insisted there is support within the healthcare community. He claimed he has received “100 calls from doctors who said: ‘Itamar, just tell us when.’”
Opposition figures reacted sharply. Yair Lapid told his Yesh Atid faction that the display was severely damaging Israel’s already strained image abroad. “Pictures of the pins with a noose are spreading throughout the world and causing indescribable damage,” he said.
Democrats party leader Yair Golan denounced the spectacle as well, warning that it signaled something far darker than a policy debate. “A noose on a minister’s lapel is not a policy statement — it’s a declaration of intent,” he posted on X. “When a government uses the imagery of death to project strength, it is no longer fighting terrorism; it’s rehearsing dictatorship.”
Legal experts expressed similar alarm during the committee session. Gil Shapira of the Public Defender’s Office urged lawmakers to halt the bill, arguing that “A great many countries in the world do not implement it, and the trend is in fact to abolish it.” A written advisory from the committee’s legal counsel also warned that key components of the legislation may violate constitutional standards.
The counsel’s memo stressed that while capital punishment is not rejected categorically, its use must be strictly limited and demonstrably deterrent — not punitive. “In light of the inherent difficulty in the death sentence, in which there is no going back from, and in order to limit — if not prevent entirely — the possibility that innocents will be convicted and sent to their death, it is in our opinion correct to tighten the conditions for using the death penalty,” it read.
The legal team cited several problems: mandatory sentencing provisions that could strip judges of discretion; the sweeping and ambiguous definition of the offense; and applicability to Palestinians under military rule, raising potential conflicts with international treaties. The draft text states that capital punishment would apply to anyone who “intentionally or recklessly” causes the death of an Israeli citizen in an act intended to harm “the State of Israel and the rebirth of the Jewish people in their homeland.” Advisers noted that the vagueness of this wording would likely make the law difficult to interpret.
Another flaw, according to the memo, is that the proposed law would not apply when victims are permanent residents or foreign nationals — a gap that could create inconsistency in terror-related sentencing.
As debate swirled, Ben Gvir seized the moment to boast about deteriorating conditions for Palestinian security inmates since he took office, referencing recent reporting on prisoner deaths. “This morning, I saw that it was published that under Itamar Ben Gvir, 110 terrorists have died. They said there has never been anything like this since the state’s founding,” he said.
He dismissed a damning Public Defender’s Office audit describing hunger, overcrowding, scabies outbreaks, and violent abuse in Israeli detention facilities. While denying that the Prison Service contributed to the deaths — claiming inmates “arrived sick or died from various injuries” — he made clear he had no regrets. What he called the “summer camp” conditions that allegedly existed before his tenure, he said, are now over.
{Matzav.com}
