Netanyahu Tells Knesset Panel Intelligence Gave No Warning of October 7 Invasion
Israeli Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu used a closed session of the Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee on Thursday to again reject personal responsibility for the failures surrounding Hamas’s October 7, 2023, attack, arguing that the intelligence he received did not point to an impending invasion and that earlier efforts to deter Hamas were blocked by senior defense officials.
Leaks from the meeting to Hebrew-language media said Netanyahu told lawmakers that although “there was a serious intelligence failure” ahead of the attack, “there was no treason.”
When questioned by a committee member about allegations of treason — including claims circulated publicly by Netanyahu’s son, Yair — the prime minister said his aim was to clear away the “cloud of treason” hanging over the events of October 7.
During the discussion, Netanyahu also reportedly accused former Shin Bet chief Ronen Bar of falsifying the protocol of a meeting held early on the morning of October 7, shortly before the Hamas assault that sparked two years of fighting in Gaza.
According to Channel 12, Netanyahu said that no one at the time believed Hamas was about to launch an attack that day.
The prime minister pointed to a series of conversations with senior figures, including Bar, former defense minister Benny Gantz and former prime minister Naftali Bennett, which he said demonstrated that they, too, believed Hamas was deterred. Reports did not specify when those discussions took place.
Netanyahu further claimed that he sought to assassinate Hamas leaders in 2014 but was blocked by the security establishment. Channel 12 reported last week, however, that Netanyahu rejected 11 opportunities to kill Gaza Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar in the months preceding October 7.
Netanyahu also told committee members that Bar altered a document from the early hours of October 7 by adding language stating that he had instructed that the prime minister be updated. Bar resigned last year after Netanyahu moved to dismiss him in a dispute that ultimately reached the High Court of Justice.
According to Channel 12, Netanyahu alleged that Bar retroactively changed a clause in the protocol of a Shin Bet meeting held early that morning, before the Hamas invasion, inserting wording indicating that Netanyahu was to be informed of developments. Channel 12 reported, however, that the meeting minutes were entered into Shin Bet systems at 6:06 a.m. with the instruction included, and that Netanyahu’s military secretary was updated by the Shin Bet chief’s bureau chief at 6:13 a.m. — about 16 minutes before Hamas-led terrorists breached the border.
Official minutes from Thursday’s session released by the Knesset Spokesman’s Office said Netanyahu presented lawmakers with materials he had previously submitted to the State Comptroller regarding the period leading up to October 7.
In December, the High Court of Justice ordered the comptroller to suspend his October 7 investigation following petitions arguing that the probe was fundamentally flawed, could compromise evidence and investigative procedures, and that only a state commission of inquiry was suitable to examine the disaster.
The Knesset spokesman said Netanyahu attended the five-hour closed meeting and “responded at length to committee members’ questions,” with the discussion centering on the comptroller’s now-halted investigation.
According to the spokesman, Netanyahu presented “materials relating to the question of when Hamas decided to turn the idea of an attack into an operational plan, and whether internal divisions within Israel were connected to that decision.”
Netanyahu described the High Court’s decision to freeze the comptroller’s investigation just six days after his own testimony as having “unusual timing,” the Knesset spokesman said.
“After two years in which the media has been rewriting history in real time, the prime minister came to the Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee and set the historical record,” said committee chairman Likud MK Boaz Bismuth, a close ally of Netanyahu. “Sometimes the truth is also an option. The question that should concern every household in Israel is why the High Court of Justice halted the state comptroller’s review process.”
Members of the opposition Yesh Atid party walked out of the meeting in protest, with the faction posting on X that it would “not participate in this media circus, which is intended to evade responsibility and turn the committee into an empty PR show.”
“Netanyahu arrived with pre-prepared messages from his office in a desperate attempt to engineer public perception and rewrite history, but no spin will blur the failure: 2,000 Israelis murdered, communities conquered, children burned, and citizens kidnapped on his watch,” the party said. “The faction members will continue to fight against his failed government so that such a debacle never happens again.”
Yesh Atid MK Moshe Tur-Paz wrote on X that Netanyahu had told the committee two months before October 7 that “Hamas is deterred.”
Opposition figures Benny Gantz, Avigdor Liberman and Gadi Eisenkot all sharply criticized Netanyahu on Thursday, accusing him of trying to absolve himself of responsibility for the most severe intelligence and strategic failure in Israel’s history.
Gantz, a former IDF chief of staff and defense minister, wrote on X that in 2014, “when I presented the option of conquering Gaza,” Netanyahu leaked the proposal to the media “to frighten the public.”
“When I proposed taking control of the Netzarim Corridor — you were afraid,” Gantz added, referring to the strip dividing the Gaza Strip. “When I spoke about replacing Hamas, you preferred separation and leaving ‘Hamas deterred and weakened.’”
Eisenkot accused Netanyahu of having a “selective memory” regarding the period before and after October 7.
“In October 2023, we voted together on the decision to destroy Hamas’s rule,” Eisenkot wrote Thursday. “I left the cabinet in June 2024 because you refused to advance its destruction. You are still failing at this task. You are running away.”
Liberman said Netanyahu’s claim that no one anticipated the October 7 attack was false, stating that “as defense minister, in December 2016, I personally handed him a severe warning document that described exactly the scenario that ultimately occurred.”
“He received it, he knew — and he chose to ignore it,” Liberman said. “Unfortunately, Netanyahu is once again fleeing from the truth.”
{Matzav.com}
