US Judge Blocks Trump Administration’s Push to End Legal Status of 8,400 Migrants
Federal court action has halted the Trump administration’s effort to revoke the legal standing of more than 8,400 relatives of U.S. citizens and permanent residents who entered the country from seven Latin American nations.
U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani in Boston issued a preliminary injunction late Saturday barring the Department of Homeland Security from terminating humanitarian parole protections for individuals from Cuba, Haiti, Colombia, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras.
Those individuals were admitted to the United States through family reunification parole programs that were established or updated during President Joe Biden’s administration, allowing relatives to live in the country while awaiting immigrant visas.
After President Donald Trump took office, his administration sharply expanded immigration enforcement, allocating roughly $170 billion for immigration agencies through September 2029, marking an unprecedented level of funding.
The reunification initiatives permitted U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents to sponsor family members in the seven countries, enabling them to reside in the United States temporarily as their visa applications moved through the system.
On December 12, the Department of Homeland Security announced it would shut down the programs, arguing they conflicted with Trump’s enforcement priorities and had been exploited to allow “poorly vetted aliens to circumvent the traditional parole process.”
The department planned to end the programs on January 14, but Talwani first stepped in with a 14-day temporary restraining order while she weighed whether a longer injunction was warranted, a decision she finalized Saturday.
In her ruling, Talwani said the agency, under Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, failed to substantiate claims of fraud or to address whether affected individuals could realistically return to their countries of origin after selling homes or leaving jobs.
“The Secretary could not provide a reasoned explanation of the agency’s change in policy without acknowledging these interests,” Talwani wrote. “Accordingly, failure to do so was arbitrary and capricious.”
The Department of Homeland Security declined to comment on the decision.
The case was brought as a class action by immigrant rights groups challenging the administration’s broader effort to roll back temporary parole protections for large numbers of migrants.
Earlier in the same litigation, Talwani had blocked the administration from ending parole for about 430,000 Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans, and Venezuelans, though that order was later lifted by the Supreme Court and ultimately overturned by an appeals court.
{Matzav.com}
