Feed aggregator

President Donald Trump has reportedly pressed Israeli Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu to limit Israel’s military operations in Lebanon and shift toward diplomatic engagement, according to a report.

CNN, citing a U.S. official and another source familiar with the matter, reported that the conversation took place on April 8. During the discussion, Trump encouraged Netanyahu to reduce the intensity of Israeli strikes in Lebanon and instead pursue negotiations with the Lebanese government aimed at addressing the disarmament of the Iran-backed Hezbollah terrorist organization.

It is not clear whether Netanyahu agreed to the proposal or merely took note of it.

An Israeli official quoted in the report indicated that a ceasefire is not currently being considered, emphasizing that any diplomatic track would move forward “under fire.”

At the same time, Israeli military operations in Lebanon have continued, including strikes carried out on Thursday. Residents in Beirut’s southern suburbs were instructed to evacuate ahead of expected military action.

Israel’s latest strikes have drawn criticism from several European nations, with reports indicating that the operations have caused civilian injuries and casualties.

Separately, signals from Iran suggest it may reevaluate its understandings with the United States if Israeli attacks in Lebanon persist.

A federal immigration appeals panel has issued a final removal order against Mahmoud Khalil, an anti-Israel protest figure and Columbia University graduate, moving forward the Trump administration’s effort to deport him, according to his attorneys.

The Justice Department’s Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) on Thursday rejected Khalil’s request to throw out the proceedings, a decision that marks a major step in the government’s attempt to remove him from the United States.

Khalil, 31, a lawful permanent resident, has become a central figure in a wider federal effort targeting noncitizens involved in anti-Israel demonstrations on college campuses connected to the Gaza conflict. His arrest was the first publicly known case tied to that broader initiative.

His legal team strongly criticized the ruling, calling it “baseless and politically motivated,” and maintaining that the government is punishing him for his speech without sufficient evidence.

“In all my decades as an immigration lawyer, I have never seen such a baseless and politically motivated decision,” Khalil’s lead attorney, Marc Van Der Hout, said in a statement issued by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). “The BIA’s decision has absolutely no support in the record, violates a federal court order, and we’ll be fighting it until the end.”

Officials in the Trump administration have contended that Khalil’s protest activities were “aligned with Hamas,” a position cited by the Department of Homeland Security and other authorities, though they have not publicly outlined detailed proof connecting him to the terrorist organization.

Khalil has rejected claims of antisemitism. Authorities have also relied on a little-used foreign policy provision in immigration law, sometimes referred to as a “Rubio determination,” as well as alleged discrepancies related to his green card application.

Despite the appeals board’s decision, Khalil’s attorneys argue that he cannot be deported while a separate federal habeas case continues to be litigated.

A federal judge in New Jersey had earlier ruled that the government’s basis for holding Khalil was likely unconstitutional and ordered that he be released.

Following his arrest, Khalil spent 104 days in immigration custody, during which time he missed the birth of his first child before being freed under the New Jersey court order.

He later encountered a setback when a U.S. appeals court panel determined that the New Jersey judge exceeded his authority by ordering his release. In a 2-1 ruling, the panel said the case must proceed through immigration court channels before being reviewed in federal court.

His legal team is now asking the full appellate court to revisit that decision and has requested that one of the judges recuse himself due to his previous role in the Justice Department involving investigations of student demonstrators.

Khalil has continued to deny any wrongdoing, describing the case as an effort to silence his views.

“I am not surprised by this decision from the biased and politically motivated Board of Immigration Appeals. I have committed no crime. I have broken no law. The only thing I am guilty of is speaking out against the genocide in Palestine — and this administration has weaponized the immigration system to punish me for it,” Khalil said in a statement released by the ACLU.

“My family is here. My life is here. I reject any attempt to intimidate me out of my home based on lies and ideological attacks,” he said. “This is not justice. This is just another attempt to retaliate against me.”

Khalil, who helped organize anti-Israel demonstrations at Columbia University in 2024 and is now facing deportation efforts by the Trump administration, was first taken into custody in 2025 at his university-affiliated apartment in New York City.

At the time of his arrest, Homeland Security Investigations, part of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, informed him that his green card was being revoked, according to his attorney, Amy Greer. He was later transferred to a detention facility in Louisiana.

He was a leading figure in protests against Israel that shook Columbia University in 2024 and represented Columbia University Apartheid Divest, a coalition urging the school to cut financial ties with Israel, in discussions with university officials. He completed his master’s degree requirements at Columbia later that year.

Born in Syria, Khalil is the grandson of Palestinians who were displaced from their homeland, according to court filings. His wife, an American citizen, gave birth to their child while he remained in detention.

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt previously defended the administration’s actions following Khalil’s March arrest, alleging that he distributed pro-Hamas propaganda materials on campus.

“This administration is not going to tolerate individuals having the privilege of studying in our country and then siding with pro-terrorist organizations that have killed Americans,” Leavitt told reporters at a White House press briefing at the time, noting that on her desk were the “pro-Hamas propaganda fliers with the logo of Hamas” on them that Khalil allegedly was distributing.

“We have a zero-tolerance policy for siding with terrorists, period,” she said.

{Matzav.com}

President Donald Trump said Friday that the United States is preparing for the possibility of renewed military action against Iran, as high-stakes negotiations get underway in Pakistan following a temporary ceasefire.

In remarks to The New York Post, Trump indicated that U.S. naval forces are being equipped with advanced weaponry in case diplomatic efforts collapse. The comments came shortly after Vice President JD Vance departed aboard Air Force Two for Islamabad, where he is set to join special envoy Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner in an attempt to broker a lasting agreement after the two-week pause in fighting announced earlier in the week.

“We’re going to find out in about 24 hours. We’re going to know soon,” Trump told The Post in a phone interview when asked if he thought the talks would be successful.

He underscored that the U.S. is preparing for all outcomes. “We have a reset going. We’re loading up the ships with the best ammunition, the best weapons ever made – even better than what we did previously and we blew them apart,” he said.

Trump reiterated the point, emphasizing the scale of the military preparations underway. “But we’re loading up the ships. We’re loading up the ships with the best weapons ever made, even at a higher level than we used to do a complete decimation.

“And if we don’t have a deal, we will be using them, and we will be using them very effectively,” he stated.

Iran is expected to send Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi to the talks in Islamabad, along with Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf. Araghchi had previously maintained, even before the recent conflict, that Iran holds an unassailable right to continue enriching uranium.

Trump expressed skepticism about Iran’s intentions. “You’re dealing against people that we don’t know whether or not they tell the truth,” Trump told The Post.

He continued, questioning the consistency of Tehran’s messaging. “To our face, they’re getting rid of all nuclear weapons, everything’s gone. And then they go out to the press and say, ‘No, we’d like to enrich.’ So we’ll find out.”

Later, Trump posted additional comments on his Truth Social platform, criticizing Iran’s messaging strategy. “The Iranians are better at handling the Fake News Media, and ‘Public Relations,’ than they are at fighting!”

In a follow-up post, he added, “The Iranians don’t seem to realize they have no cards, other than a short term extortion of the World by using International Waterways. The only reason they are alive today is to negotiate!”

Negotiators are expected to focus on several core issues, including Washington’s demand that Iran relinquish roughly 1,000 pounds of enriched uranium believed to be stored deep underground, as well as ensuring continued access through the Strait of Hormuz for global shipping. Trump has made clear that reopening the waterway is a central condition for any long-term ceasefire.

Additional topics likely to be addressed include Iran’s backing of regional proxy groups, the future of its ballistic missile program, and Tehran’s push for relief from U.S. economic sanctions.

{Matzav.com}

Israel has moved to exclude Spain from participating in a key coordination hub tied to President Donald Trump’s regional initiative, citing what it describes as persistent hostility from Madrid toward Israeli policy and interests.

Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar made the decision on Friday in consultation with Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu, determining that Spain will no longer be allowed to take part in the Civil-Military Coordination Center (CMCC) located in Kiryat Gat, a body established within President Trump’s peace framework.

In a statement explaining the move, the Foreign Ministry said the step was taken due to “the anti-Israel obsession of Prime Minister Sánchez’s government and its serious harm to Israeli (and also American) interests, including during the war against Iran.”

Sa’ar elaborated on the government’s position, stating: “The Sánchez government’s anti-Israel bias is so egregious that it has lost all capability to serve as a constructive actor in implementing President Trump’s peace plan and in the CMCC operating under that plan.”

Spanish officials have already been formally informed of the decision.

Washington was also notified ahead of time about Israel’s intention to remove Spain from the coordination mechanism.

Later in the day, Netanyahu addressed the issue directly, saying: “Israel will not remain silent in the face of those who attack us. Spain has defamed our heroes, the soldiers of the IDF, the soldiers of the most moral army in the world.”

He continued by announcing concrete action: “Therefore, I have instructed today to remove Spain’s representatives from the coordination center in Kiryat Gat, after Spain has chosen repeatedly to stand against Israel. Those who attack the State of Israel instead of terrorist regimes will not be our partners regarding the future of the region.”

Netanyahu added a sharp warning: “I am not willing to tolerate this hypocrisy and hostility. I do not intend to allow any country to wage a diplomatic war against us without paying an immediate price.”

The backdrop to the decision is a growing confrontation between Israel and Spain in recent weeks, as Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez has taken a leading role among European leaders criticizing Israel’s actions and the joint U.S.-Israel military campaign targeting Iran. Sánchez has repeatedly labeled the campaign unlawful and cautioned that it could further inflame tensions across the Middle East, urging a diplomatic route rather than continued military operations.

Madrid has backed up its rhetoric with policy steps, declining to permit U.S. forces to utilize Spanish bases for operations connected to strikes on Iran and scaling back cooperation tied to the conflict. According to reports, Spain has also limited the use of its airspace for aircraft involved in such missions.

At the same time, Sánchez has voiced strong opposition to Israel’s broader military activity, including operations in Lebanon, warning that they could result in destruction on a scale similar to Gaza. Spanish officials, however, have pushed back against Israeli claims that their stance aligns them with Iran, maintaining that their position is rooted in opposition to escalation and a commitment to international law.

A tragic incident unfolded Friday at Tzanz Beach in Netanya when two brothers were caught in the water, leaving one in critical condition and the other unaccounted for as rescue teams continue searching.

ZAKA’s diving unit was called in to aid efforts to locate the missing teen, as emergency crews intensified their operations along the shoreline and surrounding waters.

Paramedics from Magen David Adom treated the brother who had been pulled from the sea after he was found unresponsive. He was transported to Laniado Hospital in Netanya while undergoing ongoing life-saving measures.

Senior MDA medic Yosef Friedman described the scene, explaining that emergency personnel reached the beach using a specialized off-road ambulance and discovered the victim lying on the sand after being removed from the water, unconscious and without vital signs. “We began advanced resuscitation efforts and continued CPR during evacuation to the hospital,” he said.

Authorities are still working to determine exactly what led to the brothers being swept into danger, even as search teams remain focused on finding the missing sibling.

The incident follows another recent drowning tragedy, in which a 48-year-old father lost his life in the Jordan River after trying to save his 9-year-old son, who had been carried off by powerful currents. Rescue personnel later declared the father deceased, while the child was taken to Ziv Hospital in Tzefas in light condition.

The Artemis II mission was set to conclude Friday with a dramatic splashdown in the Pacific Ocean, bringing to a close humanity’s first crewed journey to the moon in more than half a century.

Inside Mission Control, tension steadily increased as the spacecraft carrying four astronauts drew closer to Earth. Engineers and flight teams focused intently on the capsule’s heat shield, a critical component designed to endure extreme temperatures during reentry. During a previous uncrewed test in 2022, the shield returned heavily scarred, raising heightened attention for this mission.

Commander Reid Wiseman, pilot Victor Glover, mission specialist Christina Koch, and Canadian astronaut Jeremy Hansen approached Earth traveling at roughly Mach 32, a speed not experienced since the Apollo era. Their Orion capsule, named Integrity, was designed to operate autonomously, with the crew prepared to intervene only in the event of an emergency.

As the spacecraft entered its final phase, mission leaders braced for the most nerve-wracking moments of the descent, including a communications blackout lasting several minutes before parachutes were expected to deploy. Lead flight director Jeff Radigan acknowledged the anxiety surrounding that period, saying he expected some of that “irrational fear that is human nature.” Recovery teams, including the USS John P. Murtha and supporting aircraft, stood ready to retrieve the astronauts upon landing.

The return marked the first collaboration between NASA and the U.S. military for a lunar crew recovery since Apollo 17 in 1972. The capsule was expected to reenter at speeds exceeding 23,000 miles per hour before slowing dramatically to a controlled splashdown.

Since launching from Florida on April 1, the crew had successfully completed a series of milestones, demonstrating key capabilities for NASA’s renewed lunar program aimed at eventually establishing a sustained presence on the moon.

Although Artemis II did not land on the lunar surface or enter orbit, it surpassed previous records, traveling farther from Earth than any human mission before it. At its peak, the crew reached a distance of 252,756 miles. During one of the mission’s most emotional moments, the astronauts requested permission to name two lunar craters in honor of their spacecraft and Wiseman’s late wife, Carroll.

The mission also provided rare and stunning views of the moon’s far side, along with a total solar eclipse visible from space. Reflecting on the experience, Glover said the eclipse “just blew all of us away.”

Images captured during the mission captivated audiences worldwide, including a view of Earth setting behind the lunar horizon, echoing the iconic Earthrise image from Apollo 8. The crew’s reflections and discoveries reignited global fascination with space exploration.

“It just makes you want to continue to go back,” Radigan said on the eve of splashdown. “It’s the first of many trips and we just need to continue on because there’s so much” more to learn about the moon.

The mission drew attention and praise from global leaders and public figures, including President Donald Trump, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, Britain’s King Charles III, and prominent actors such as Ryan Gosling, Scarlett Johansson, and William Shatner.

Despite its successes, the nearly 10-day journey encountered several technical challenges. Issues arose with the spacecraft’s water and propulsion systems, and a malfunctioning toilet forced the crew to rely on backup methods for much of the flight.

The astronauts downplayed the difficulties, emphasizing the importance of pushing forward despite setbacks. “We can’t explore deeper unless we are doing a few things that are inconvenient,” Koch said, “unless we’re making a few sacrifices, unless we’re taking a few risks, and those things are all worth it.”

Hansen echoed that sentiment, noting, “You do a lot of testing on the ground, but your final test is when you get this hardware to space and it’s a doozy.”

Looking ahead, NASA’s Artemis program will continue to build on this mission. Artemis III is expected to involve docking exercises in Earth orbit, while Artemis IV aims to land astronauts near the moon’s south pole by 2028.

For Wiseman and his crew, the mission carried a deeper purpose beyond its technical achievements. “But we really hoped in our soul is that we could for just for a moment have the world pause and remember that this is a beautiful planet and a very special place in our universe, and we should all cherish what we have been gifted,” he said.

It is with great sadness that Matzav.com reports the petirah of Rav Chanoch Friedman zt”l, a distinguished talmid chochom and marbitz Torah who served as Rosh Kollel and Av Beis Din of Beis Yechiel in Har Nof.

Rav Friedman zt”l devoted his life to harbotzas haTorah and psak halacha, guiding talmidim with clarity, depth, and unwavering dedication to the truth of Torah. In his role at Beis Yechiel, he helped shape a generation of bnei Torah, instilling in them a love for learning and a commitment to living lives guided by halacha. As Av Beis Din, he was sought after for his wisdom and fairness, adjudicating matters with sensitivity and precision.

Rav Friedman grew up in Chicago, a son of Mr. and Mrs. Yosef Friedman, and later learned at Bais Medrash Govoah in Lakewood under Rav Aharon Kotler.

Those who knew him describe a figure of quiet greatness, whose anavah matched his scholarship. He carried himself with dignity and warmth, offering guidance and encouragement to all who turned to him. His influence extended far beyond the walls of the kollel, reaching mishpachos and communities both in Eretz Yisroel and abroad.

Rav Friedman was the brother of Rav Avraham Friedman, Rosh HaYeshiva Emeritus of Hebrew Theological College, as well as Mrs. Debbie Greenspan.

The levaya will take place today, Erev Shabbos, Friday, April 10, at 2:00 p.m. at Congregation Adas Yeshurun, located at 3050 West Touhy Avenue in Chicago, and on Sunday in Lakewood. From there, arrangements will be made for kevurah in Eretz Yisroel.

Yehi zichro boruch.

Former Vice President Kamala Harris indicated Friday that she is considering another run for the White House in 2028, telling attendees at a major civil rights gathering that the idea is very much on her mind.

Speaking at the 2026 National Action Network Convention, Harris responded to a question from Rev. Al Sharpton about her future political plans by saying, “Listen, I might, I might. I’m thinking about it. I’m thinking about it.” Harris previously served as the Democratic nominee in the 2024 presidential race.

Her remarks come as speculation intensifies regarding her next steps following the release of her campaign memoir in late 2025 and a nationwide tour promoting the book.

Harris is also expected to participate in a series of Democratic Party events across four Southern states later this month, according to prior reports.

Although she told CBS host Stephen Colbert in August 2025 that she did not “want to go back in the system,” Harris later suggested she had not closed the door on future ambitions, telling the BBC’s Laura Kuenssberg: “I am not done.”

At Friday’s event, Harris was met with enthusiastic support from the audience, with chants of “run again” breaking out and briefly interrupting her speech.

“I am thinking about (running again) but let me also say this. I served for four years being a heartbeat away from the presidency of the United States,” Harris said. “I spent countless hours in my West Wing office, footsteps away from the Oval Office. I spent countless hours in the Oval Office, in the Situation Room. I know what the job is. And I know what it requires.”

As she weighs a potential third presidential bid, Harris outlined what she described as urgent national priorities, noting dissatisfaction among many Americans.

“I’ve been traveling the country the last year, I’ve been spent a lot of time in the south and many other places. And the one thing I’m really clear about also, is the status quo is not working, and hasn’t been working for a lot of people for a long time,” the former nominee said.

Vice President JD Vance departed Friday for high-stakes negotiations with Iran, cautioning Tehran against attempting to manipulate the United States as efforts intensify to bring the ongoing war to a close.

President Donald Trump has assigned Vance—who has often expressed reservations about the conflict—to spearhead the diplomatic push aimed at ending the six-week war and avoiding the realization of Trump’s stark warning about destroying Iran’s “whole civilization.”

Known for his skepticism toward prolonged foreign military involvement, Vance is now leading mediated discussions in Islamabad, Pakistan, as part of a renewed diplomatic effort.

As he boarded Air Force Two en route to Pakistan, Vance struck a cautiously optimistic tone, telling reporters, “We’re looking forward to the negotiation. I think it’s gonna be positive. We’ll of course see.”

Referencing Trump’s position, he added, “If the Iranians are willing to negotiate in good faith, we’re certainly willing to extend the open hand.” At the same time, he issued a warning: “If they’re gonna try and play us, then they’re gonna find that the negotiating team is not that receptive.”

Vance said the president had provided “pretty clear guidelines” for the talks, though he declined to offer specifics and did not take further questions from reporters traveling with him.

His trip comes at a moment when the fragile ceasefire appears increasingly unstable, with deep disagreements between Iran and the U.S.-Israel alliance over key terms. Domestically, Vance also faces growing political and economic pressure to help bring the conflict to an end.

Joining him in the negotiations are Trump’s special envoy Steve Witkoff and senior adviser Jared Kushner, both of whom participated in earlier rounds of indirect discussions with Iranian representatives before the war began on February 28. Those talks focused on Iran’s nuclear and ballistic programs as well as its backing of regional proxy forces.

The White House has offered few details about how the upcoming negotiations will be structured, including whether they will involve direct engagement or continue through intermediaries, and has not outlined clear expectations.

Still, Vance’s presence marks a rare instance of senior U.S. officials engaging directly at a high level with Iranian counterparts, something largely absent since the 1979 Islamic Revolution. The last comparable contact occurred in 2013, when President Barack Obama spoke by phone with Iranian President Hassan Rouhani regarding Tehran’s nuclear program.

Tensions over the ceasefire emerged almost immediately after it was announced Tuesday evening, with conflicting interpretations of its scope.

Iran has maintained that halting Israeli military activity in Lebanon was part of the agreement. However, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Trump both stated that Lebanon was not included, and Israeli operations there have continued.

At the same time, Washington has insisted that Iran must reopen the Strait of Hormuz, which Tehran had shut down in response to intensified Israeli strikes against Hezbollah in Lebanon.

Trump voiced frustration Thursday over Iran’s handling of shipping traffic, saying the country was “doing a very poor job” and posting online, “That is not the agreement we have!”

White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly said that Vance, Witkoff, Kushner, and Secretary of State Marco Rubio “have always been collaborating on these discussions,” adding that Trump remains hopeful a lasting agreement can be reached during the two-week ceasefire.

“President Trump has a proven track record of achieving good deals on behalf of the United States and the American people, and he will only accept one that puts America first,” Kelly said.

The negotiations represent a significant test for Vance, who until recently played a quieter role within the administration as other senior figures took more visible advisory positions.

However, his responsibilities have expanded rapidly—from tackling domestic issues like government fraud to now taking a leading role in resolving a complex international conflict.

Despite his military service in Iraq as a Marine and his time in the Senate representing Ohio, Vance has relatively limited diplomatic experience.

Addressing speculation earlier in the week that Iran had requested his involvement, Vance dismissed the idea, saying, “I don’t know that. I would be surprised if that was true. But, you know, I wanted to be involved because I thought I could make a difference.”

Analysts say his selection could be strategic. Jonathan Schanzer, a former Treasury official and current executive director of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, noted that Vance’s skepticism toward foreign interventions might appeal to Iranian negotiators.

“I think they probably prefer him knowing that his perspective on foreign intervention is one of skepticism,” Schanzer said of the Iranians. “I do think that he’s going to need some help. I don’t think he’s ever been engaged in negotiations with this kind of weight, this kind of seriousness. This is as serious as it gets.”

The White House has rejected suggestions that Iran specifically sought Vance’s participation, framing such claims as potentially harmful to the negotiation process.

While officials have confirmed that Vance, Witkoff, and Kushner will attend, Kelly said personnel from the National Security Council, State Department, and Pentagon will also “play a supportive role.”

Earlier rounds of talks drew criticism from Democrats and nuclear policy experts, who questioned whether Kushner and Witkoff possessed sufficient technical expertise. The administration has not clarified whether nuclear specialists were involved.

Experts note that vice presidents have occasionally been tasked with significant diplomatic missions, but rarely in circumstances involving active wartime negotiations.

Joel Goldstein, a law professor at Saint Louis University who studies the vice presidency, said, “I don’t recall a situation where a vice president has been sent to negotiate a ceasefire or peace in connection with a war the United States was involved with.”

Vance, along with Rubio, is widely viewed as a leading contender for the Republican presidential nomination in 2028, though neither has publicly committed to a run.

According to a source familiar with internal discussions, Vance’s team is focused on the immediate diplomatic mission rather than any future political considerations.

Still, his visible role in the negotiations could carry long-term implications. As Goldstein noted, “The fact that he’s involved in the negotiations in a very visible way, that means that, if things go south, that people will be pointing fingers at him.”

At the same time, he added, “If things go well, then it will be something that he could point to.”