Feed aggregator

[Video below.] New Jersey Gov. Mikie Sherrill said Monday that federal officials blocked her from entering the Delaney Hall immigration detention facility in Newark as demonstrations intensified outside the building and detainees inside reportedly launched a hunger strike over conditions.

Sherrill said the refusal to allow access to the facility only deepened concerns about what may be taking place behind closed doors.

“I have long opposed private detention facilities and will continue to advocate for the closure of Delaney Hall and against any expansion of mass detention facilities in New Jersey, like the proposed facility in Roxbury,” Sherrill said in a statement obtained by NewsNation, The Hill’s sister network. “I came today to hear from families and advocates, and what I heard from them was heartbreaking.”

The Department of Homeland Security sharply criticized the visit, accusing the governor of turning the situation into a political spectacle.

A DHS spokesperson told The Hill that Sherrill’s appearance at the detention center was “nothing more than a political stunt on Memorial Day when visitation is currently suspended due to riots outside in the facility.”

Several Democratic officials from New Jersey accompanied Sherrill, including Andy Kim, Rob Menendez Jr., Nellie Pou, and LaMonica McIver. The lawmakers met with demonstrators gathered outside Delaney Hall after confrontations broke out Sunday, during which protesters claimed ICE officers used pepper spray against them, according to WABC.

Federal officials said Kim was eventually permitted to enter the facility after contacting Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin directly. DHS did not clarify whether Sherrill or the other lawmakers were ever granted entry.

Mullin pushed back against allegations surrounding conditions at the center, rejecting claims that detainees had begun a hunger strike and insisting that the facility was not operating under “subprime conditions.” He also accused Democratic officials in New Jersey of “smearing ICE law enforcement.”

Demonstrations outside Delaney Hall began Friday after activist Gabriela Soto arrived at the site during the launch of what organizers described as a hunger and labor strike by detainees, according to The City, a New York-based outlet. Protest organizers said roughly 300 detainees participated, demanding the release of elderly and younger detainees as well as those suffering from medical problems.

Soto said her husband, who has reportedly been detained since February, was confined to a cell for eight hours while being questioned by officers.

“The people inside Delaney Hall are fathers and mothers, sons and daughters, and members of our community,” she said. “In New Jersey, we believe in the rule of law and that everyone deserves to be treated with basic dignity. We have a duty to safeguard the rights, health, and well-being of everyone within our borders.”

DHS officials described the protests as disruptive and aggressive. According to a spokesperson, approximately 125 protesters, “many carrying anti-ICE signs and Antifa flags… formed a human chain around entrances to the facility and set up barricades, blocking all entries and exits.”

The lawmakers accompanying Sherrill also criticized the conditions inside the detention center after attempting an unannounced oversight inspection Sunday night. Menendez said he too was prevented from entering.

“I was told that I would be able to go inside at 8 a.m., but ICE continues to deny entry,” he wrote on social platform X Monday morning.

Pou, Kim, and McIver each posted photographs from the protest scene on X and publicly demanded that Delaney Hall be shut down.

Cory Booker also announced Sunday that he planned to visit the facility.

“Immigrants at Delaney Hall are on a hunger strike because they are fighting for their human rights,” he wrote on X. “The conditions there are deplorable… Enough is enough — not in New Jersey, not anywhere.”

Federal officials defended the detention center’s operations and insisted detainees are receiving proper care. A DHS spokesperson said inmates are given three meals daily along with water, bedding, clothing, and hygiene supplies, adding that ICE “has higher detention standards than most U.S. prisons that hold actual U.S. citizens.”

{Matzav.com}

Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman has reportedly told regional officials in recent discussions that he does not believe a significant diplomatic breakthrough with Israel is possible under the current government led by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

According to a report aired Monday night by Kan News, a regional source familiar with the matter said the Saudis have made clear that any move toward normalization or closer ties with Israel would require a firm Israeli commitment regarding the Palestinian issue.

The report also said Israeli officials were informed in advance about President Donald Trump’s initiative to connect a developing agreement with Iran to a broader expansion of the Abraham Accords that would include Gulf states such as Saudi Arabia and Qatar.

An Israeli source told Kan News that the proposal came up during discussions between Trump and Netanyahu.

At the same time, negotiations between the United States and Iran remain unresolved, with major disagreements still lingering over key elements of the proposed agreement. Qatar has reportedly intensified its efforts to mediate between the sides, and its role in the negotiations has become increasingly central.

Earlier reports indicated that Trump is attempting to transform the Iran talks into a much larger regional arrangement by linking a potential agreement with Tehran to a dramatic expansion of the Abraham Accords involving additional Arab and Muslim nations.

In an unusual post published on Truth Social, Trump wrote that negotiations with Iran are “going very well,” while warning that only two outcomes remain possible: “a great deal for everyone,” or a return to military conflict that would be “bigger and stronger than ever before.”

According to Trump, during conversations held Saturday with leaders from Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Pakistan, Turkey, Egypt, Jordan, and Bahrain, he stressed that after the American effort to “put together the complicated puzzle,” most of those countries should sign onto the Abraham Accords simultaneously.

Trump acknowledged that one or two countries might ultimately choose not to participate, but insisted that “most should be ready, willing and able” to turn a potential Iran agreement into what he described as a far larger historic regional achievement.

{Matzav.com}

Shas chairman Aryeh Deri is reportedly dismissing concerns that a national election scheduled for mid-September could disrupt travel to Uman and negatively impact the chareidi tzibbur, saying the date would actually benefit the broader right-wing bloc.

According to reports from closed-door discussions, Deri argued that elections held on September 15 would not significantly interfere with the annual pilgrimage to Uman surrounding Rosh Hashanah.

“People return immediately after the Yom Tov, it won’t have an impact. It’s a date that is good for the entire right-wing bloc, not just for Shas,” Deri reportedly said.

Sources in Shas emphasized that the final decision ultimately rests with Prime Minister Binyomin Netanyahu, who is expected to discuss the issue further with Deri in the coming days.

At the same time, Netanyahu has reportedly continued telling associates in private conversations over the past 24 hours that he wants to exhaust every possible avenue to delay elections as long as possible, with his preferred target date said to be October 27.

The issue has created growing tension within the coalition, particularly with representatives from United Torah Judaism, who oppose a September 15 election date because it falls during the Aseres Yemei Teshuvah and could interfere with the schedules of talmidei yeshiva.

During the party’s faction meeting Monday, officials from United Torah Judaism reportedly accused Deri of acting on Netanyahu’s behalf in an effort to undermine the possibility of September elections and push the political system toward an October vote instead.

The editorial board of The Wall Street Journal is raising alarm over President Trump’s ongoing negotiations with Iran, warning that easing pressure on Tehran before major nuclear issues are resolved could create dangerous long-term consequences and weaken America’s leverage in the region.

In its coverage and commentary surrounding the negotiations, the Journal warned that sanctions relief and economic concessions could become “difficult to reverse” if Iran later fails to meet verification requirements or refuses to fully dismantle key elements of its nuclear infrastructure.

The paper also described the negotiations as unfinished and unstable, noting that critical questions surrounding Tehran’s nuclear program, sanctions relief, uranium enrichment, and enforcement mechanisms remain unresolved.

One Journal report said the proposed framework would give both sides additional time to negotiate “thorny issues including Tehran’s nuclear program,” while critics quoted by the paper questioned whether the concessions under discussion would be worth the risks.

The Journal additionally highlighted growing concerns among Trump allies and foreign policy hawks that Iran could secure economic relief while maintaining significant leverage and enrichment capabilities. One report noted that “many of Trump’s political allies openly urged Trump to resume strikes on Iran instead of making diplomatic concessions.”

President Trump has continued defending the talks, insisting that any agreement would fully protect American interests and only move forward if Iran accepts strict U.S. conditions. Administration officials have acknowledged, however, that negotiations remain active and that major details are still being worked out.

Trump has also lashed out at critics attacking the negotiations before a final agreement has been completed. According to reports, he argued opponents do not yet know the actual contents of the deal and are reacting prematurely.

Republican lawmakers including Tom Cotton and Lindsey Graham have continued warning that any relaxation of sanctions could strengthen Tehran economically and strategically while undermining years of American pressure efforts.

Former Trump administration officials have also expressed concern. John Bolton and other Iran hawks have repeatedly argued that partial agreements risk leaving Iran’s nuclear infrastructure largely intact while giving the regime badly needed financial breathing room.

Several analysts aligned with pro-Israel security positions have echoed those warnings, arguing that limited agreements lacking aggressive verification systems could allow Tehran to preserve uranium enrichment capabilities while still receiving economic benefits and sanctions relief.

Trump, meanwhile, has rejected accusations that he is preparing to accept weak terms, insisting that he would never agree to “a bad deal” and arguing that many of the loudest critics are reacting without full knowledge of the negotiations themselves.

{Matzav.com}

Senior Likud MK David Bitan said Monday that the controversial draft law regulating the status of yeshiva students no longer has enough political support to pass, while acknowledging that even the chareidi parties themselves are no longer backing the current proposal.

Speaking in an interview on Kol Chai Radio’s main evening program, Bitan painted a picture of a political system already preparing for new elections, with coalition tensions growing over both the draft law and the timing of the next vote.

According to Bitan, the main dispute at the moment revolves around whether elections should be held in September or October.

“We prefer October, while the chareidim prefer September,” Bitan said, adding that “I don’t think elections can be held during the holidays themselves.”

The chairman of the Knesset Economic Affairs Committee also addressed Israel’s ongoing military challenges, saying the country remains deeply engaged in simultaneous conflicts on several fronts, including Lebanon, Gaza, and Iran.

“As the war dragged on, things stopped depending only on us,” Bitan explained.

At the same time, he rejected criticism suggesting Israel entered the fighting unnecessarily.

“I do not accept this claim that we fought for nothing. We absolutely had to fight,” he said.

When asked about the government’s repeated promise of achieving “total victory,” Bitan conceded that Israel has not yet fully reached that objective.

“‘Total victory’ was the intention, but we still haven’t reached that point. It is still a process,” he said.

Bitan argued that the Israeli public understands the complexity of the situation and the enormous challenges facing the country during the current security crisis.

A major portion of the interview focused on the stalled draft law and the growing crisis between the coalition and the chareidi parties. Bitan insisted that responsibility for the deadlock does not rest solely on Likud.

“You can’t come only to Likud with complaints about why the draft law did not advance over these years,” he said. “It is impossible to pass a law that the chareidim themselves currently do not support at all.”

Bitan outlined the series of political and legal obstacles that ultimately derailed the legislation.

“At first there were legal problems that dragged things out,” he explained. “Afterward, some coalition members refused to support the wording, and we reached the point where the law simply no longer has a majority — and now the chareidim themselves no longer want it. Life goes on, and eventually we will arrange a fair law in the next term.”

The veteran Likud lawmaker also addressed the government’s judicial reform efforts, suggesting that Prime Minister Binyomin Netanyahu’s current approach differs from his earlier position on the issue.

“Based on how he behaves today, yes. I think today he wants what he did not want in the past,” Bitan said regarding the possibility of reviving judicial reform legislation.

Still, Bitan cautioned that any renewed effort would need to move gradually rather than all at once.

The interview also touched on growing internal tensions inside Likud surrounding reserved spots on the party’s Knesset slate ahead of the next elections.

Bitan said demands that Netanyahu receive ten reserved slots on the list are unrealistic and noted that past Likud leaders rarely relied heavily on such mechanisms.

“We are a democratic party,” he said, defending the party’s primary system, which allows lesser-known candidates to rise through the ranks.

Bitan additionally rejected criticism from some right-wing figures who argue the current government failed to fulfill major ideological promises.

According to him, the war dramatically reshaped the government’s priorities, though he maintained that the coalition still achieved significant accomplishments.

“A lot of good things happened,” Bitan said, arguing that despite wartime pressures and ongoing legal battles, the government managed to preserve economic stability while also addressing social issues.

Toward the end of the interview, Bitan was asked which parties Likud would refuse to join after the next election. He responded that the party maintains a firm line regarding cooperation with Arab parties and the Democrats party.

“Likud currently will not sit with the Arab parties,” he said, adding that there are also major issues from Likud’s perspective regarding cooperation with the Democrats.

{Matzav.com}

At the close of Shavuos, during the traditional Ne’ilas HaChag Tish attended by thousands of Belzer chassidim, a dramatic public announcement was delivered in the name of the Belzer Rebbe regarding what was described as the growing campaign against lomdei Torah in Eretz Yisroel.

The announcement was delivered by the Rebbe’s longtime mashbak, Reb Shimon Wolf Klein, who spoke emotionally about the mounting financial and legal pressures facing avreichim and bnei Torah throughout the country.

“We are now entering the third year of one of the most difficult battles faced by those who learn and toil in Torah here in Eretz Yisroel,” Klein declared.

“Unfortunately, the latest troubles make people forget the earlier ones. It began with the cancellation of funding that supported Torah learners, and when that was not enough for them, they began imposing additional decrees, intimidation, and various harsh measures — all with one objective: to pressure and make life difficult for Torah learners and, chalilah, uproot the existence of Torah.”

Klein praised Belzer chassidim for what he described as extraordinary dedication and sacrifice in supporting kollel families over the past two years.

“Baruch Hashem, over the past two years Belzer chassidim proved themselves and stood with exceptional mesirus nefesh at the side of the kollel avreichim, serving as an example for communities throughout Eretz Yisroel,” he said.

He noted that the Belzer Rebbe established and strengthened the “Keren Hatzolas HaTorah,” a special emergency fund created to sustain Torah learners facing growing economic hardship.

“We merited that the Rebbe established and built the Keren Hatzolas HaTorah, which undertook the enormous responsibility of raising the massive sums needed to support the kollel avreichim — amounts reaching 12 million shekels each year,” Klein announced.

“Now the fund is taking upon itself another year of sustaining Torah learners in partnership with chassidim from Eretz Yisroel and abroad.”

Toward the conclusion of the announcement, Klein issued a direct appeal to the assembled chassidim to personally sponsor avreichim in the Belzer community.

“The Rebbe calls upon every person to take upon himself support for an avreich at a cost of 900,” he said. “And whoever is able should take upon himself several avreichim, so that the strength of Torah should not weaken.”

Klein added a personal message from the Rebbe to those who assist the campaign.

“The Rebbe asked to add that whoever helps will have the Rebbe’s gratitude, and he and his family will be spared from pain and anguish,” he concluded.

{Matzav.com}

The United States carried out a series of military strikes early Tuesday in southern Iran, targeting Iranian vessels and missile infrastructure that American officials said posed an immediate danger to U.S. forces operating near the Strait of Hormuz.

According to American officials, the action was described as a defensive response intended to neutralize threats coming from Iranian military assets during the fragile ceasefire period.

“US forces conducted self-defense strikes in southern Iran today to protect our troops from threats posed by Iranian forces,” US Central Command (CENTCOM) spokesperson Capt. Tim Hawkins said.

“US Central Command continues to defend our forces while using restraint during the ongoing ceasefire,” he added.

Fox News, citing a senior U.S. official, reported that American forces detected two Iranian boats in the Strait of Hormuz allegedly attempting to deploy naval mines. The same official said U.S. aircraft also came under threat after an Iranian missile installation targeted American warplanes operating in the area.

In response, the U.S. military reportedly destroyed both vessels belonging to Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.

The official also said the United States struck an Iranian surface-to-air missile position in Bandar Abbas after Iranian outlets reported blasts in the city earlier in the day.

Additional explosions were also reported near the coastal areas of Sirik and Jask, both situated close to the strategically critical Strait of Hormuz.

American officials emphasized that the attacks were intended as limited defensive operations rather than a renewed escalation of the broader conflict. One official told Fox News that the mission was “defensive,” while two other sources stressed that the military action should not be interpreted as the collapse of the ceasefire arrangement with Iran.

Reports of explosions across multiple locations near the Strait of Hormuz had already surfaced Monday night, according to Fox. A senior official later told the network that the U.S. military operation was “over for now.”

{Matzav.com}

Degel HaTorah MK Yaakov Asher launched a blistering attack Monday against Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara and Israel’s Supreme Court, accusing the legal establishment of waging what he described as a systematic ideological war against the chareidi public.

Speaking at a conference for chareidi mortgage advisers, Asher warned that growing pressure on the Torah community could eventually trigger widespread backlash across the chareidi sector.

“The chareidi public will not sit quietly,” Asher declared. “In the end, this will turn into some kind of uprising.”

At the center of his remarks was the ongoing legal and political battle surrounding the draft issue and government funding connected to the chareidi community. Asher claimed the judiciary and legal advisers are deliberately targeting chareidim not only politically, but economically and socially as well.

He described the situation as “a legal war of judicial activism by the attorney general,” arguing that the campaign is fueled by both political and ideological motives.

According to Asher, the legal system is attempting “even ultimately to starve the chareidi population, causing disproportionate harm to women, teachers, kindergarten workers, and children.”

The MK accused Israel’s legal establishment of applying double standards when it comes to human rights and civil protections.

“When they need to pass a law to deport terrorists’ families, all the legal advisers are concerned not to violate the rights of those families,” he said.

“All the sensitivity that the attorney general, her colleagues, and the Supreme Court justices have — all the sensitivity regarding human rights — take 10% of that sensitivity and apply it to this public.”

Asher went on to describe what he said are the practical consequences of government policies affecting chareidi families.

“There are children struggling in school who have tutors helping them, and now they wanted to stop funding for those tutors,” he said. “Why? Because maybe one of the tutors earns a living from it and is considered by them to be a draft dodger. So what do you want? That these children fall apart and later end up being treated by social services?”

The veteran lawmaker portrayed the situation as an organized and relentless campaign against the chareidi sector.

“Every day there’s another letter, every day another directive, every day something else,” Asher said. “This is a war against the entire chareidi public. And it’s not just political. In politics, you can maneuver and make different moves. Here, every move you make, the court comes and overturns everything.”

He also argued that government policy toward chareidim is contradictory and economically self-defeating.

“You are harming the economy while at the same time talking about legislation to encourage public transportation,” he said. “And with the other hand, you are making life harder for the very public that uses public transportation more than anyone else.”

Asher stressed that any response from the chareidi community would remain nonviolent and guided by rabbinic leadership, even as frustration intensifies.

“The chareidi public will not sit quietly. In the end, this will turn into some kind of uprising, but of course a legal one. We are not people of violence or things of that nature. Some say it’s a shame, but no — these are the instructions we receive from the Gedolei Torah, and that is how we will act.”

He concluded by saying that the mounting pressure is increasingly uniting all segments of the chareidi community, including both full-time learners and working families.

“In the end — and this is our strength — they are putting everyone into the same category,” Asher said. “Those whose Torah is their profession and those who work as well, because they are also harming their families and their sons who are learning Torah. They are dragging the entire public into this.”

Asher closed with another sharp jab at the legal establishment, accusing it of showing greater concern for Palestinians than for Israel’s chareidi citizens.

“They are causing enormous damage to the State of Israel,” he said, “but they will continue protecting the quality of life of various Palestinians in Area C.”

A storm of controversy and fascination swept through the Jewish music world this week following claims that Yaakov Shwekey incorporated artificial intelligence into parts of his newly released EP, Happiness — a development some insiders are calling a turning point for the entire industry.

The discussion exploded after reports surfaced that the music-identification system used by the Jewish music app Jusic detected audio patterns suggesting possible AI-generated elements within some of the album’s arrangements.

Israeli radio host Menachem Toker described the revelation during his “Zman Avir” program on Kol Chai as a dramatic moment for Jewish music.

“When the biggest singer in the world today uses AI, it’s an absolutely crazy explosion,” Toker said.

The new EP contains four songs, and according to those involved in the discussion, the concerns do not relate to Shwekey’s vocals themselves, but rather to portions of the instrumentation and production.

Producer and arranger Yishai Shin, who works with the Jusic platform, explained on-air that the app’s “smart algorithm” flagged unusual characteristics in the recordings.

“We can see in the song’s characteristics that it contains content that may have been created by AI,” Shin said.

At the same time, he stressed that the album was not entirely AI-generated.

“There are AI motifs in the guitars and in the arrangement,” he explained, adding that other music professionals independently reached similar conclusions after reviewing the tracks.

Participants in the discussion emphasized that the singing itself was not generated through artificial intelligence.

Toker described the development as “an earthquake in Jewish music,” particularly because of Shwekey’s stature as one of the genre’s most influential and recognizable artists.

According to Toker, the decision was not driven by budget limitations or attempts to cut costs, but rather by an intentional embrace of new creative and technological tools.

During the broadcast, it was also reported that individuals connected to Shwekey confirmed that certain portions of the project were indeed created with the assistance of AI technology.

Composer and producer Moishy Woldar defended the move and argued that adapting to emerging technologies is both natural and necessary.

“The greatest move a person can make is knowing how to connect to the right time and the right generation,” Woldar said.

He warned that musicians who refuse to adopt artificial intelligence tools in the future may ultimately fall behind the industry.

Woldar also noted that arranger Ravid Kashti was involved in the production process and argued that AI does not eliminate the need for human professionals, but rather gives them new capabilities and creative options.

Music critic Netanel Leifer also joined the debate, explaining that experienced musicians and studio professionals are often able to identify AI-generated elements, especially in guitar sounds and instrumental textures.

Still, he acknowledged that most ordinary listeners are unlikely to notice any difference at all.

“For the ears of most listeners, they simply don’t care,” Leifer said.

Despite differing opinions over the growing role of artificial intelligence in music production, all of the participants praised Happiness itself and described the EP as a high-quality and impressive musical release.

As hopes fade for passage of a draft law during the current Knesset term, frustration is mounting inside United Torah Judaism, where party leaders are now demanding immediate and tangible achievements for the chareidi public in exchange for continued coalition support.

According to a report published Monday, senior UTJ figures made clear during an internal faction meeting that the party no longer intends to provide automatic backing for coalition legislation without receiving concrete benefits in return.

The growing pressure follows increasing recognition within the chareidi parties that the long-discussed draft law regulating the status of yeshiva bochurim is unlikely to pass during the current government.

During the meeting, MK Meir Porush and Deputy Communications Minister Yisroel Eichler reportedly insisted that every future vote supporting coalition initiatives in the Knesset plenum must now be tied to legislation delivering immediate gains for the chareidi sector.

The strategy is aimed at allowing UTJ to present voters with meaningful accomplishments after efforts to advance the draft law effectively stalled.

As part of the negotiations, the faction reportedly agreed that in exchange for supporting legislation transferring certain Interior Ministry powers to Prime Minister Binyomin Netanyahu, UTJ would demand advancement of the Daycare Law — legislation initiated by the party intended to benefit chareidi families.

The proposal was supposed to move forward this week with preliminary approval in the Knesset. However, according to the report, UTJ ultimately backed away and abstained during the vote on the transfer of powers without securing any concessions in return.

Party officials are also expected to push for additional legislation important to the chareidi public, including an override clause limiting judicial intervention and further measures designed to ease sanctions imposed on yeshiva students and regulate the legal status of lomdei Torah.

At the same time, tensions reportedly continue between Degel HaTorah and Shas over the question of possible election timing. Due to ongoing disagreements between the parties, UTJ lawmakers reportedly agreed that all faction members will present their positions next week regarding when elections should take place in an effort to establish a unified strategy.

Meanwhile, Shas chairman Aryeh Deri reportedly acknowledged during a separate Shas faction meeting that prospects for passing the draft law have effectively collapsed for the foreseeable future.

“Yesterday it became clear that the draft law will no longer pass during the current term,” Deri reportedly told party members.

Despite the pessimism, political insiders say Degel HaTorah’s position does not necessarily mean the party would actively oppose such legislation if Netanyahu somehow succeeds in assembling a majority independently. In that scenario, faction members could still vote in favor of the bill and allow the legislative process to move forward.