Feed aggregator

New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani is drawing sharp criticism after attending a Ramadan fast-breaking meal with Muslim inmates on Rikers Island, later calling the visit one of the most significant experiences of his time in office.

The mayor reflected on the visit in a post on X, describing the evening in emotional terms following the Monday appearance, which quickly sparked widespread reaction by the weekend. “It was a night that will stay with me for quite some time,” the city’s first Muslim mayor gushed Friday on X about his under the radar and historic visit on Monday, which by Saturday sparked a firestorm of outrage.

Earlier in the week, Mamdani also spoke about the gathering during an interview, emphasizing its personal importance. “This is one of the most meaningful evenings that I’ve had as the mayor of New York City.”

He framed the visit as an expression of his identity and connection to the city’s Muslim community. “This is me just being a Muslim New Yorker,” continued Mamdani, who has made a point to emphasize and promote his Muslim identity as mayor. “And I think there are some for whom that is a political act, and there are a million or so of us here in this city for whom it is simply a day-to-day existence.”

The visit has drawn criticism from law enforcement sources and others who argue the mayor is focusing more on inmates than victims of crime.

One longtime NYPD officer voiced strong objections to the mayor’s priorities. “He actually visited inmates on Rikers but hasn’t visited any victims of the heinous crimes some of these guys have committed,” said an NYPD veteran of 20 years. “I think it’s absolutely disgusting.

“We clearly know he doesn’t like us. He’s already made his stance clear on that. Even after we get clear extensive video of the guy trying to knife the police officers in Queens, he visited the criminal’s family in that case too!,” raged the police veteran.

The officer was referencing Mamdani’s visit last month to the family of Jabez Chakraborty, who was shot by police in Queens after allegedly attacking officers with a large knife.

Another law enforcement source raised concerns about the mayor’s actions in light of recent attacks on police officers. “He can go visit the inmates at Rikers, but he can’t go visit a cop who gets injured? That’s not right,” said another law enforcement source, referring to cops hurt earlier this month responding to an ISIS-inspired attempted terrorist attack outside the mayor’s home at Gracie Mansion.

The same source added a pointed remark about the city’s direction. “I think next year there’ll be nobody to visit because he’s going to let everybody out of jail. Maybe he was going there to tell them we’re reducing everybody’s sentences,” the source said.

The Rikers visit was one of 17 iftar meals the mayor attended across the city through Thursday, marking the first time a sitting New York City mayor has observed Ramadan at the jail complex.

Mamdani shared images from the visit showing him alongside Department of Correction Commissioner Stanley Richards interacting with detainees during the meal. He described the atmosphere in his post. “People sharing what little they have: breaking bread, offering prayer, making space for one another’s dignity even in the hardest place,” Mamdani wrote on X, posting photos alongside Department of Correction Commissioner Stanley Richards, gladhanding with dozens of detainees as they gobbled packaged meals.

Councilman Yusef Salaam, a practicing Muslim and member of the exonerated “Central Park Five,” also joined the mayor for the event.

Public criticism extended beyond law enforcement circles. Author Daniel Friedman questioned the mayor’s judgment in a post online. “You have to be an absolute monster to be sent to Rikers Island these days,” he wrote on X.

He added further criticism of those being held there. “Offenders on Rikers all have long histories of doing things so horrible that even the woke, pro-crime judges and prosecutors in NYC don’t want to be responsible for what they’ll do if they let them go.”

Sam Antar, a convicted fraudster and former executive at electronics chain Crazy Eddie, also criticized Mamdani’s approach. “If you commit a violent crime in NYC, Zohran Mamdani has your back,” he wrote on X,.

City Hall did not respond to requests for comment on the backlash, though the Department of Correction said the event did not cost taxpayers anything, noting that the food served at the gathering had been donated.

Iran is reportedly charging some oil tankers as much as $2 million to pass through the Strait of Hormuz, a move seen as an effort to tighten its grip on one of the world’s most critical maritime routes.

The development was highlighted by Iranian lawmaker Alaeddin Boroujerdi, who told state broadcaster IRIB that the hefty fee represents a shift in how Tehran is asserting control over the strategic waterway, according to Iran International.

Speaking during a televised program, Boroujerdi framed the policy as a demonstration of national strength. “Collecting $2 million as transit fees from some vessels crossing the strait reflects Iran’s strength,” Boroujerdi said during a television program cited by Iranian media.

He added that the policy is already in effect and described it as part of a broader change in how Iran governs the passage after years of relative openness. The member of parliament’s national security committee also said the measure has already been implemented and reflects what he called a new “sovereign regime” in the strait after decades, the outlet said.

Boroujerdi justified the move as a wartime necessity tied to rising costs. “Now, because war has costs, naturally we must do this and take transit fees from ships passing through the Strait of Hormuz,” he said.

His remarks followed a warning issued by President Donald Trump, who said the United States could take military action against Iranian infrastructure if the strait is not fully reopened within a set timeframe.

“If Iran doesn’t FULLY OPEN, WITHOUT THREAT, the Strait of Hormuz, within 48 hours from this exact point in time, the United States of America will hit and obliterate their various POWER PLANTS, STARTING WITH THE BIGGEST ONE FIRST!” Trump said in a post shared on Truth Social.

Iranian officials have meanwhile signaled that access to the strait remains conditional. Tehran’s representative to the International Maritime Organization indicated that passage is permitted only under certain circumstances, while President Masoud Pezeshkian outlined the country’s stance publicly.

“The Strait of Hormuz is open to all except those who violate our soil,” he said.

Industry reports suggest that Iran has effectively created a controlled transit system, offering select vessels passage in exchange for approval and, in some cases, significant payments. According to Lloyd’s List, this arrangement includes a designated “safe” corridor, with “at least one case, a reported $2m payment,” it said.

Multiple countries—including China, India, Pakistan, Malaysia, and Iraq—are reportedly engaged in discussions with Tehran over securing transit access, as Iran’s Revolutionary Guard establishes a system to vet and register approved ships.

Data from maritime intelligence firm Windward AI indicates a sharp decline in activity through the strait, with traffic described as severely reduced in recent days.

“16 AIS-visible crossings recorded over the past seven days.”

The firm also noted that movement through the area is increasingly restricted, with ships rerouting through Iranian territorial waters. Energy exports from the Gulf have dropped, with shipments of crude oil and liquefied petroleum gas reaching low levels.

Despite these disruptions, Iranian exports have continued through alternative channels. “Iranian exports remain active, supported by alternative routing and sustained on-water volumes,” Windward said.

Under normal conditions, the Strait of Hormuz handles roughly 20 million barrels of oil per day and about 20% of global liquefied natural gas shipments. The current situation has driven up transportation and insurance costs, contributed to rising oil prices, and heightened concerns about the global economy.

Windward also noted that Russian oil exports remain high, underscoring the continued importance of maritime routes for global energy supply.

{Matzav.com}

A new statewide survey indicates that California voters are showing little enthusiasm for Kamala Harris as a potential 2028 presidential candidate, while Gov. Gavin Newsom holds an early lead but still faces challenges.

The poll, released Friday by the UC Berkeley Institute of Governmental Studies, found Harris lagging behind several Democratic figures, including Newsom, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York, and former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg. Just 9% of respondents in California named Harris as their top choice for the party’s nomination.

Newsom placed first in the survey, with 28% of voters selecting him as their preferred candidate. Still, analysts say that level of support raises concerns. Mark DiCamillo, who directs the Berkeley IGS Poll, noted to the Los Angeles Times that backing from only about a quarter of voters in his home state is far from overwhelming.

The survey also revealed that fewer than half of Californians currently approve of Newsom’s performance as governor, with his approval rating standing at 48%.

That figure represents a decline from 51% in August, DiCamillo said, while the governor’s disapproval rating has risen by five percentage points over the same period.

Researchers gathered the data from 5,019 registered voters across California, conducting the survey online in both English and Spanish between March 9 and March 14.

The poll’s margin of error is approximately plus or minus 2.5 percentage points for the full sample.

Although Newsom and Harris have never faced each other in a statewide contest, both could end up competing in the Democratic presidential primary in 2028.

When factoring in second-choice preferences, Newsom’s advantage grows even larger. He garners support from 42% of voters when combining first- and second-choice responses, compared to just 20% for Harris.

Neither politician has formally declared plans for a presidential run. Newsom is expected to leave office after the 2026 gubernatorial election, while Harris is currently traveling to promote her book, “107 Days.”

The findings add to growing indications that many Democratic voters are moving on from Harris following her loss to Donald Trump in the 2024 election, which she has attributed in part to having insufficient time to campaign.

This comes despite Harris’ long-standing presence in California politics, where she previously served as attorney general for two terms and later as a U.S. senator for four years.

The poll also found that Newsom outperformed Harris among African American voters, leading her by 12 points, 49% to 37%. His strongest backing came from older voters, Latino voters, and men.

G. Cristina Mora, co-director of the IGS poll, said Newsom’s sharper tone toward Trump may be resonating with Democratic voters.

“The results seem to suggest that Newsom’s more aggressive stance vis-à-vis President Trump, particularly through social media, appears to be resonating with Democratic voters in his home state,” she said.

“Though Californians may hold mixed views on his gubernatorial tenure overall, they do see him as the strongest counter to Trump and MAGA candidates.”

Mora added that Harris’ lower numbers may be influenced by both her previous electoral defeat and broader voter attitudes.

“Harris’ earlier presidential defeat, compounded by what appear to be persistent voter biases against women and candidates of color, may also be shaping these early numbers,” Mora concluded.

New details indicate that Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s wife, Rama Duwaji, played a significant role in a democratic socialist campaign that supported candidates critical of Israel and promoted legislation targeting pro-Israel charities, the NY Post reports.

According to the report, Duwaji—whom Mamdani has insisted is not a public figure—contributed artwork to the New York City chapter of the Democratic Socialists of America during its rollout of a campaign known as “PalestineOnTheBallot.com.”

The initiative encouraged voters to support Democratic primary candidates who rejected financial backing from the American Israel Public Affairs Committee and pledged to endorse the Not on Our Dime Act, a proposal aimed at penalizing or shutting down charities accused of supporting “Israeli settler violence.” The legislation had been introduced by Mamdani during his tenure as a state Assemblyman.

Campaign messaging circulated widely on social media platforms, urging political engagement around the issue. “The Democratic primary is on June 25 and Palestine is on the Ballot, even for your NY State Reps,” the animated message on TikTok and Instagram for the DSA said.

The posts continued with a series of pointed questions directed at voters. “Are your New York Reps pro-ceasefire? Do they want to end subsidies for Israeli war crimes? Are they taking money from AIPAC of NY?”

The campaign materials included an interactive component allowing users to review the positions of their elected officials, alongside stylized visuals credited to Duwaji.

Another message encouraged direct political action. “Go to Palestine.com to see where they stand. Then, make your voting plan and get out the vote for pro-Palestinian socialists who need your support,” the pitch said.

The materials explicitly credited her contribution. “Animation by Rama Duwaji.”

The same campaign website also urged volunteers to assist former Congressman Jamaal Bowman’s reelection bid, which ultimately ended in defeat when he lost the Democratic primary to George Latimer.

The report comes amid renewed scrutiny of Duwaji’s past online activity, including resurfaced social media interactions in which she reportedly engaged with posts supportive of Hamas’ October 7, 2023 attack, praised Palestinian militants, and criticized the U.S. military.

She has also been linked to providing illustrations for an author accused of antisemitism, according to prior reporting.

Critics argue that her involvement in the DSA campaign reflects a broader ideological alignment between her and the mayor. One such critic, former Brooklyn Assemblyman Dov Hikind, spoke sharply about the couple.

“They’re both filled with vile hatred for the Jewish people of Israel,” said Dov Hikind, a former Brooklyn state Assemblyman who represented heavily orthodox Jewish Borough Park and founded Americans Against Antisemitism.

He went further in his criticism of Duwaji’s positions. “The first lady is more radical than Mamdani is and that’s saying quite a lot. She’s dangerous and he’s dangerous. They’re radical Islamists. What a great couple. Mazel Tov!”

Mamdani, who is affiliated with the Democratic Socialists of America, previously held a prominent role within the group during his time in Albany. The organization was also among the first to support his successful mayoral campaign.

Duwaji’s involvement in public political advocacy appears to contrast with Mamdani’s recent assertion that his wife is a private individual, a claim he made earlier this month following reports about her views and affiliations, according to critics.

“Does anybody believe she’s a private citizen?” Hikind said.

Observers say her work on the Palestine on the Ballot campaign demonstrates a visible and active role in political messaging aligned with pro-Palestinian causes, including criticism of Israel and allegations of “war crimes.”

At the same time, Mamdani’s own positions on Israel have drawn continued attention. He supports the boycott, divestment, and sanctions movement targeting Israel, which the Anti-Defamation League has described as antisemitic due to its goal of isolating and weakening the Jewish state.

The mayor has also stated that he would arrest Israeli Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu if he were to visit New York, describing him as a war criminal.

Most recently, during St. Patrick’s Day remarks last week, Mamdani again accused Israel of committing “genocide” in Gaza—just one day after meeting with Orthodox Jewish leaders and pledging to combat antisemitism in the city.

{Matzav.com}

A product recall in Israel has been announced for a Pringles snack after a labeling mistake raised concerns about undeclared allergens that could endanger sensitive consumers.

Ben Shalosh Import and Export Ltd. said the issue was discovered following customer complaints, which revealed that packages of Pringles Chili Cheese Fries were mistakenly labeled in Hebrew as Pringles Original—a product that does not contain milk or soy.

In reality, the Chili Cheese Fries variety does include milk and soy ingredients, making it potentially dangerous for individuals with allergies to those substances. The company emphasized that the problem is limited to incorrect labeling, but due to the possible health risk, the product is being pulled from shelves immediately.

The affected item is Pringles Chili Cheese Fries, 158 grams, barcode 038000279201, with an expiration date of January 1, 2027.

The product is manufactured by Kellogg’s USA and imported by Ben Shalosh Import and Export Ltd.

The Health Ministry is advising consumers who are allergic to milk, gluten, or soy not to consume the product under any circumstances. The company is working in coordination with the Northern District Food Service and is actively collecting all affected units from the market.

Customers who purchased the product and wish to return it for a refund can contact customer service at 052-8194838 or by email at ebshloosh@gmail.com.

{Matzav.com}

U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Mike Waltz said Sunday that the United States is prepared to consider a full range of responses as tensions with Iran intensify, including possible strikes on nuclear facilities and other key infrastructure.

Speaking in an interview on CBS News’ “Face the Nation,” Waltz made clear that no course of action has been ruled out by the administration. “Well, I would never take anything off the table for the president, certainly not on national television,” Waltz told CBS News’ “Face the Nation.”

He noted that Iran maintains multiple significant energy sites that could factor into any future action. “However, there are larger plants,” he added. “There is one outside of Tehran. There are others outside of other cities that are gas-fired, thermal-powered.”

Waltz also pointed to the central role played by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, describing it as a designated terrorist entity with sweeping control over the country’s infrastructure and governance. He emphasized that its influence extends deeply into Iran’s economy and military systems. “So to the extent we are degrading their military capability and their defense industrial base, all options should be on the table, and the president has made that very clear,” Waltz said.

His remarks followed warnings from President Donald Trump, who has called on Iran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz and indicated that failure to do so could prompt U.S. military action targeting strategic infrastructure.

According to Waltz, the administration is combining diplomatic coordination with allies and increased military pressure in response to the situation. “The president has been clear, too,” he said. “He’s going to continue to pound Iran’s capabilities, its missiles, its naval [capabilities], and its drone capability.”

He highlighted growing cooperation from international partners, including European countries and Japan, aimed at safeguarding global energy routes, while underscoring that threats to maritime trade will not be tolerated. “At the same time, the president is not going to stand for this regime, as it has threatened and tried for five decades to hold the world’s energy supplies hostage under its genocidal intent,” Waltz said.

When asked about the legal and humanitarian implications of targeting infrastructure linked to energy or nuclear activity, Waltz argued that Iran’s military and civilian systems are closely intertwined. “When you have a regime that has its grip on so much critical infrastructure, that is using it to further not only the repression of its own people, to attack its neighbors, and in contravention of U.N. sanctions, to march towards a nuclear weapon, then that makes those legitimate targets,” Waltz said.

He cautioned that allowing Iran to advance its nuclear program could have far-reaching consequences for regional stability. “It should petrify every American that you could potentially have a nuclear Middle East awash in weapons,” Waltz said.

Waltz added that the administration is acting proactively to prevent that outcome, rather than waiting until Iran achieves full nuclear capability. “No one should be surprised here. President Trump has said Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon,” Waltz said.

Ben Gurion International Airport will shift to a sharply reduced operating format beginning Monday morning, as continued Iranian missile attacks force Israeli authorities to tighten aviation activity.

Under a plan approved by Transportation Minister Miri Regev, based on guidance from security officials, outbound flights will be capped at just 50 passengers per aircraft. Until now, planes had been permitted to carry between 120 and 150 passengers.

The new restriction applies only to departing flights. Aircraft arriving in Israel will still be allowed to operate with their usual passenger loads.

Alongside the passenger limits, flight activity will also be significantly curtailed. The updated framework permits only one takeoff and one landing per hour, mirroring the limited schedule that was implemented when airspace first reopened under wartime conditions.

The timing of these measures is expected to heavily impact travelers in the days leading up to Pesach. El Al has already confirmed widespread cancellations, suspending service to numerous international destinations through March 27.

The cancellations affect roughly 25,000 tickets, disrupting travel plans for thousands of passengers who had intended to leave the country for the Pesach period.

Rishon LeTzion Rav Dovid Yosef strongly defended the Chief Rabbinate examinations and sharply criticized both the High Court and a recent letter signed by rabbonim in Bnei Brak, as he urged avreichim to proceed with the exams without hesitation.

Speaking during his weekly shiur on Motzoei Shabbos, Rav Yosef addressed the ongoing controversy surrounding the Chief Rabbinate of Israel’s certification exams. He spoke forcefully against the Israeli High Court (Bagatz) over its ruling and dismissed calls by certain rabbonim to boycott the exams.

Referring to a letter published Friday, he expressed frustration that it had been issued without consulting him. “There are those—I don’t know—‘Shamoa bein acheichem u’shefatetem tzedek’—they sign proclamations to cancel all the exams without hearing the other side, without hearing what is being done.”

Rav Yosef emphasized that the integrity of the system would remain intact. “Everything that existed throughout the generations will continue. No one who is not worthy of receiving certification—whether full rabbanus certification or a lower level—will receive such a certificate. It won’t help them. I take responsibility together with my colleague, the Chief Rabbi, Rav Kalman Ber. We know what we are doing. I carry the responsibility on my shoulders. There are 13,000 avreichim taking these exams.”

He also stressed his commitment to maintaining halachic standards. “My father devoted his entire life to the study of halachah, and today we see more and more people learning halachah. On one hand, we want to strengthen this, but on the other hand, we will not give up even a kutzo shel yud. Let it be clear—no one will teach me hashkafah. We will not give up even a kutzoshel yud. B’ezras Hashem, everything will fall into place.”

Addressing the broader issue, Rav Yosef elaborated on the legal challenge brought before the court. “B’ezras Hashem, we intend to hold the exams. I don’t yet know what will be due to the war, but we are speaking about the end of bein hazmanim. There is a group of women who filed a petition to Bagatz. It has been going on for years. The court ruled that the Rabbinate must examine women. Either we examine women, or we will be forced to stop all exams. At present, six women have registered to be tested on the laws of mourning.”

He sharply criticized the court’s approach. “I want to say some very clear things. First of all, the conduct of Bagatz toward anything sacred—we are familiar with it. They are always against us. They do not like Orthodox Jews, including judges who call themselves religious. They hate us, they are biased all along the way, and they rule against us.”

Rav Yosef called for public protest, though he acknowledged current limitations due to the security situation. “I think we need to hold a major protest against them, a real protest. But right now we are in a מצב של מלחמה. There will yet be a time—we will not remain silent. It is impossible to stay silent when they try to secularize the state. In every matter where we rule according to halachah, they rule against us. We will still hold a major protest. We also have the issue of the Kosel—we will not be silent.”

Returning to the controversy over the rabbonim’s letter, he reiterated his position. “Now, regarding the matter itself—I heard that recently some rabbonim issued a letter not to take the exams, to punish ourselves by not participating. I want to say clearly: I am here, I bear the responsibility. There are 13,000 avreichim taking these exams. I examined everything carefully, weighed the situation, and took several very important steps. Based on those actions, I state unequivocally: everything that existed throughout the generations will continue.”

He continued: “No one unworthy—according to our hashkafah and according to halachah—will receive certification. Not Bagatz and nothing else will change that. There is no reason to worry, no concern that anyone unworthy will receive certification. These matters are clear.”

Rav Yosef expressed surprise that some rabbonim signed the letter without clarification. “I am very surprised how rabbonim sign such a letter. Some gedolei Torah approached me to ask what we are doing, and once I explained, they were reassured. They understand that we know what we are doing and that everything will be fine. But there are those—I don’t know—again, ‘Shamoa bein acheichem u’shefatetem tzedek’—they sign proclamations without hearing the other side.”

He concluded with a direct message to avreichim: “I tell you, I take responsibility together with my colleague, the Chief Rabbi Rav Kalman Ber—we know what we are doing. I repeat: whoever is not worthy will not receive certification, and with Hashem’s help we will continue.”

In closing, he urged participation in the exams. “I call on all avreichim not to be afraid of various claims made by those who do not know the facts. Go take the exams, and we will merit to be mekadeish Sheim Shamayim. Amen kein yehi ratzon, amen, amen, amen.”

{Matzav.com}

Amid mounting American concern and ongoing tensions with Iran, Israeli Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu convened an urgent security discussion focused on rising nationalist crime in Judea and Samaria, calling for immediate action to curb the incidents.

According to a report by Kan News, the meeting was triggered after a senior U.S. administration official spoke directly with Netanyahu and expressed alarm over the increase in such incidents. Following that conversation, the prime minister quickly organized a special situation assessment, held by phone earlier this week.

The high-level discussion included Defense Minister Yisroel Katz, National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir, IDF Chief of Staff Zamir, the head of the Shin Bet, and the acting head of the National Security Council.

During the meeting, Netanyahu stressed the urgency of the issue and its broader implications. “I demand that you prevent nationalist crime, this is diverting our attention from Iran to Judea and Samaria.”

Ben Gvir pushed back during the exchange, arguing that enforcement is uneven. “There is crime in many places, only when it involves Jews do you focus on the issue.”

Netanyahu concluded the discussion with a firm directive, emphasizing the need for law and order. “No one should take the law into their own hands, I expect you to act on this matter.”

WATCH:

A funding standoff in Washington is causing widespread disruption at major airports, with passengers in New York facing wait times of up to three hours just to check in, as understaffed TSA checkpoints struggle to keep up with heavy travel volume, the NY Post reports.

At LaGuardia Airport’s crowded Terminal B, delays quickly tested travelers’ patience. Chip B, a 66-year-old from Texas, described the situation after waiting 45 minutes even in the pre-check line. “It’s insane,” stranded Texas traveler Chip B, 66, said Sunday after spending 45 minutes on the pre-check line at LaGuardia Airport’s packed Terminal B. “If this is about getting short-handed with TSA agents, c’mon, let’s get them hired.”

Other passengers voiced even sharper frustration, directing their anger at lawmakers in Washington. Chris, a 54-year-old Connecticut resident, didn’t hold back as he waited to board a flight to Florida. “Get their [stuff] together,” he snapped. That’s what they need to do.

He also criticized the conditions facing TSA workers, pointing to the lack of pay during the standoff. “My big thing is TSA work isn’t a great job in the first place,” he said while trying to board a flight to Fort Lauderdale.

The disruptions are not limited to New York. Airports across the country are dealing with similar slowdowns, as the dispute in Washington has left TSA officers working without pay. As a result, some agents have stopped reporting to work or resigned altogether, even as spring break travel increases pressure on already strained operations.

Those who have continued working missed their first paycheck last week, further worsening staffing shortages at security checkpoints nationwide.

At the center of the impasse is a political battle between Republicans and Democrats. The disagreement revolves around funding for the Department of Homeland Security, which oversees TSA, with Democrats seeking additional oversight of Immigration and Customs Enforcement as part of the deal. Each side has accused the other of prolonging the crisis, while travelers bear the consequences in overcrowded terminals.

For many passengers, the situation is unlike anything they’ve experienced. Jared Everett, visiting New York with his wife, said the delays had already impacted his travel plans, pushing back his afternoon flight. “I’ve never seen anything like it,” Jared Everett, in New York on vacation with his wife, said the mess has already delayed his 4:30 p.m. flight to Charlotte by 40 minutes.

He added that the situation reflects poorly on lawmakers. “This has been pretty irresponsible of our lawmakers to put us in this position,” said Everett, 53. “We deserve better. They’re not the most functional group of people we’ve seen.”

In response, President Trump announced that ICE agents will be deployed to assist at major airports starting Monday in an effort to reduce delays. Some travelers said they are open to any measure that could ease congestion, though they emphasized that the underlying issue remains unresolved.

“Whatever helps facilitate the movement of people,” Chris said. “It’s not their their job. I’d rather have our government get their act together.”