Feed aggregator

As Israel heads toward national elections scheduled for later this year, a new public opinion survey points to significant erosion in confidence in the integrity of the electoral process and in the willingness of the public and political parties to accept the results.

Findings from the Israeli Society Index published by the Jewish People Policy Institute (JPPI) show that while a majority of Israelis still express trust in the elections, a large and meaningful minority harbor doubts about both their fairness and their aftermath. The skepticism cuts across political camps and population groups.

According to the survey, about two-thirds of Israelis (65%) believe the upcoming elections will be free and fair. At the same time, 31% say they are not convinced the elections will meet those standards.

Distrust is particularly pronounced among Arab citizens of Israel. Among Arab respondents, roughly 51% said they are not convinced the elections will be fair and free, compared to 43% who expressed confidence in the process. Among Jewish respondents, 70% said they trust the fairness of the elections, while 27% said they do not.

Political affiliation plays a decisive role in attitudes toward election fairness. A clear majority of respondents identifying with the right (85%) and the center-right (78%) said they believe the elections will be conducted fairly. By contrast, an exceptionally high share of those identifying with the left — 78% — said they are not convinced the elections will be fair.

JPPI noted that this finding reflects an unusually deep level of suspicion and highlights a profound divide between political camps over the perceived legitimacy of the democratic process itself.

Beyond concerns about fairness, the survey uncovered even greater anxiety regarding the period after Election Day. While 57% of respondents said they believe the public and political parties will accept the election results, 38% — nearly four in ten Israelis — said they are not convinced this will happen. Within that group, 11% said they are “not convinced at all” that the results will be accepted.

Overall, the data indicate that nearly four in ten Israelis doubt that the election results will be broadly accepted by both the public and the political system.

Here too, differences emerged between Jewish and Arab respondents. Among Arab citizens, 45% believe there is a real risk that the election results will not be accepted. Among Jewish respondents, 59% said they believe the results will be accepted, while more than a third — 36% — expressed uncertainty.

Interestingly, unlike the sharp ideological polarization seen on the question of election fairness, skepticism about acceptance of the results appears to be widespread across the political spectrum. Comparable levels of concern were recorded among respondents identifying with the right, center, and left.

Commenting on the findings, Yedidia Stern, president of JPPI, warned that the data should be viewed as a serious warning sign.

“The findings are a warning signal for all of us,” Stern said. “Without agreed-upon and stable rules of the game, Israeli democracy will continue to erode. For some time now, there has been a significant decline in public trust in state institutions, but this survey shows that distrust is now spreading to the most basic democratic process — elections.”

He added that democracy cannot function properly if a substantial portion of the public suspects the fairness of elections or hesitates to accept their outcomes. “The survey points to the possibility of a storm that could threaten all of us after the elections, regardless of the results,” Stern said.

Stern also argued that advancing what he described as a broadly agreed-upon “lean constitution” could help ease extreme suspicion between political camps, strengthen trust in state institutions, and stabilize Israel’s political system. Such a framework, he said, is essential for safeguarding the country’s democratic resilience.

{Matzav.com}

Iran moved Wednesday to temporarily restrict its airspace, halting most flights as unrest inside the country continued and tensions with the United States remained elevated, according to flight-tracking data and official aviation notices.

Tehran issued a Notice to Air Missions shortly after 5 p.m. ET, blocking all air traffic except for international flights entering or leaving Iran with special authorization, FlightRadar24 reported.

The restriction was set to remain in effect for just over two hours, according to the notice.

At the moment the warning took effect, only five aircraft could be seen operating within Iranian airspace, the flight-tracking website showed.

The brief shutdown followed remarks from President Trump indicating that he believed the Iranian government had paused executions of anti-government demonstrators and suggesting that immediate U.S. military action against Iran was unlikely.

“We’ve been told that the killing in Iran is stopping. It’s stopped. It’s stopping, and there’s no plan for executions,” Trump said in the Oval Office.

“So I’ve been told that a good authority — we will find out about it. I’m sure if it happens, we’ll all be very upset… but that’s just gotten to me, the information that the killing has stopped, that the executions have stopped, they’re not going to have an execution.”

Trump added that he had received information from what he described as “very important sources” inside Iran indicating that the regime was easing its crackdown on protests that have spread across the country.

Around the same time Iran imposed the airspace restriction, the United Kingdom issued a separate advisory warning against “all but essential” travel to Israel, citing heightened tensions across the Middle East.

{Matzav.com}

President Donald Trump said Tuesday that his administration plans to stop sending federal money to jurisdictions designated as sanctuary cities, setting up another confrontation with Democratic-led states and municipalities over immigration enforcement.

Speaking during an economic address in Detroit, Trump said the cutoff would begin at the end of the month and would also include warnings to certain states that seek reimbursement from Washington for migrant-related expenses.

Trump said his administration has issued “90-day notices” to states such as California that submit bills to the federal government to cover costs tied to housing and caring for newly arrived migrants.

“Additionally, starting February 1, we’re not making any payments to sanctuary cities,” Trump said. “They do everything possible to protect criminals at the expense of American citizens, and it breeds fraud and crime and all of the other problems that come.”

The federal government routinely sends money to states and cities to support programs ranging from health care and education to transportation and public works. It was not immediately clear which specific funding streams Trump was referring to, and a White House spokesperson declined to provide further clarification.

The remarks reflect the administration’s broader strategy of using federal funding as leverage against local governments that oppose its policies, including on immigration enforcement and diversity initiatives. The comments also come as states and cities across the country are preparing budgets for the next fiscal year.

According to the Department of Justice, the federal government currently classifies 12 states, four counties, 18 cities, and the District of Columbia as sanctuary jurisdictions.

Trump has raised similar threats in the past. In April, he called on social media for federal payments to be suspended, and during his first term, the administration pursued comparable measures that were ultimately blocked by federal courts.

Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson responded sharply, calling the latest warning “blatantly unconstitutional and immoral.” He said the city intends to fight back in court. “We will be relentless until we restore every dollar.”

In Denver, a spokesperson for Mayor Mike Johnston dismissed the announcement as “nonsense,” arguing that the president lacks the authority to withhold money approved by Congress. San Francisco City Attorney David Chiu echoed that position.

“We have already taken legal action to protect our federal funding, and we will continue to do so,” he said in an emailed statement.

The dispute is the latest episode in months of clashes between the White House and mostly Democratic state and local leaders, many of whom have pushed back against Trump’s mass deportation policies. Recently, the administration dispatched dozens of immigration officers to Minnesota, highlighting cases involving Somali immigrants accused of defrauding federal assistance programs.

During his remarks Tuesday, Trump framed deportations as a tool to ease economic pressures, arguing that fraud by immigrants was “bleeding American taxpayers absolutely dry.”

He also said he would move to “revoke the citizenship of any naturalized immigrant from Somalia or anywhere else who is convicted of defrauding our citizens.”

Democratic governors, including Minnesota’s Tim Walz and California’s Gavin Newsom, have condemned fraud where it occurs but accused the administration of targeting their states politically by threatening cuts to essential funding.

Trump’s comments came as part of a broader effort to promote his economic agenda to voters frustrated by high living costs. The president has rolled out a series of announcements in recent weeks, many of which have generated attention but have yet to be fully implemented.

Earlier, Trump said he would unveil “even more plans” soon to address affordability and reiterated his goal of pushing oil prices lower.

“I’m going to provide much more detail about our housing policies, so that every American who wants to own a home, will be able to afford one,” Trump said.

He added that a “health care affordability framework” aimed at lowering insurance premiums and prescription drug prices would be announced later this week, and said he would outline additional proposals at the World Economic Forum in Davos, including efforts to block institutional investors from buying homes and to cap credit card interest rates.

At the same time, Trump faces growing scrutiny over whether those promises will translate into concrete action. Open enrollment for Obamacare plans is set to end this week without an agreement to extend key subsidies, and the White House has not yet detailed how proposed limits on home purchases or credit card rates would be enforced. Trump also reiterated a threat to impose a 25% tariff on countries trading with Iran, claiming the policy was already in place despite a lack of explanation or implementation.

Roughly half an hour into the speech, Trump turned directly to affordability, saying prices were falling and that economic indicators were strong.

The address, delivered to an audience of about 500 people, also veered into familiar territory for the president, including complaints about the 2020 election, jabs at Joe Biden, criticism of Republicans who oppose his agenda, and comments about transgender women competing in sports.

Trump’s visit to Michigan — a battleground state he narrowly won in 2024 — followed recent trips to Pennsylvania and North Carolina and is part of a broader push by the White House ahead of the midterm elections.

Before the speech, Trump toured a factory producing Ford Motor Co. F-150 pickup trucks and highlighted previously announced plans by the company to expand manufacturing in the United States.

Michigan currently has one of the highest unemployment rates in the country, though it has eased somewhat in recent months. The jobless rate stood at 5% in November, down from 5.5% in April, according to Bureau of Labor Statistics data. That improvement was partly the result of a shrinking labor force, with more than 55,000 fewer people working or seeking work over that period.

Inflation in the Detroit metropolitan area rose in December after earlier declines. Consumer prices increased 2.1% from a year earlier, BLS data show. Researchers at the University of Michigan project inflation will climb into the 2.9% to 3% range in 2026 as tariffs begin to affect consumer costs.

{Matzav.com}

Tesla is eliminating the one-time purchase option for its Full Self-Driving feature and will require drivers to pay a monthly fee to access the system beginning February 14.

Until now, customers could either buy the software outright for $8,000 or subscribe for $99 per month, Bloomberg reported. Tesla CEO Elon Musk disclosed the change on Wednesday in a post on the social media platform X, which he owns, but offered no explanation for the shift.

Tesla’s website describes the technology by stating that “Autopilot is an advanced driver assistance system that assists your vehicle with steering, accelerating and braking for other vehicles and pedestrians within its lane.”

Bloomberg also reported that reaching 10 million active Full Self-Driving subscribers is one of the benchmarks Tesla must meet for Musk to qualify for additional stock awards under a compensation plan approved by shareholders in November.

The company says Full Self-Driving subscriptions “are currently available for eligible vehicles in the United States, Canada, Mexico, Puerto Rico, Australia and New Zealand.”

Automated driving systems have faced heightened attention in recent months after reports of traffic violations and crashes involving vehicles operated by Tesla as well as those from companies such as Waymo and Lyft.

In November, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration opened an investigation into Tesla’s self-driving software after a number of incidents in which “the inputs to the dynamic driving task commanded by FSD induced vehicle behavior that violated traffic safety laws.”

{Matzav.com}

New York City officials unveiled plans Wednesday to dramatically scale up the use of red light cameras, aiming to curb dangerous driving by vastly expanding automated enforcement across city streets.

At present, red light cameras operate at 150 intersections citywide. Transportation officials said that number will increase fourfold by year’s end, with cameras added at roughly 50 intersections each week over the next five weeks. The full rollout is expected to reach 600 intersections within about 10 months.

The program itself is not new. New York began using red light cameras in the 1990s, making it one of the earliest cities in the nation to adopt automated ticketing for drivers who run red lights. However, state law capped the system for years at 222 cameras spread across 150 intersections, a ceiling that has remained unchanged since 2009, according to the Department of Transportation.

That cap was lifted in 2024, after state lawmakers approved legislation—pushed in part by then-Mayor Eric Adams—authorizing camera placement at up to 600 intersections. Despite the change in law, no new cameras were installed last year. Transportation officials said that period was used to secure contracts and complete the technical groundwork needed to expand the system.

With that preparation complete, Transportation Commissioner Mike Flynn said the city is now ready to move forward aggressively.

“Red light running is one of the most dangerous behaviors on our city’s streets and puts all New Yorkers at risk. That is why we are taking immediate action to ramp up the city’s red light camera program,” Flynn wrote in a statement. “These cameras have reduced red light running 73% in the intersections where they are installed, and we will pair this heightened enforcement with ambitious street redesigns to make our streets safer.”

Transportation Department spokesperson Vin Barone said the agency will not publicly identify the locations of the new cameras, arguing that the initiative works best when drivers are unsure where enforcement is in place. He added that installation decisions will focus on intersections with a history of frequent crashes.

Motorists caught by the cameras running a red light receive a $50 ticket. City figures show the program generated $20 million in net revenue in 2024.

DOT statistics indicate significant safety improvements at camera-equipped intersections, including a 65% drop in T-bone collisions and a 49% reduction in rear-end crashes. City officials say the expanded network is intended to rein in the most dangerous driving behavior and make streets safer for everyone.

{Matzav.com}

For home cooks, bakers, and anyone who refuses to compromise on quality, a long-awaited product has finally arrived: Cholov Yisroel Heavy Whipping Cream that combines rich, authentic flavor with unmatched convenience.

This premium heavy cream delivers the full, indulgent taste you expect from top-quality dairy, while offering a practical advantage that makes it ideal for today’s busy kitchens. Thanks to ultra-pasteurization, the cream is shelf-stable and requires no refrigeration until opened, making storage easy and reducing last-minute grocery runs.

Crafted for true creaminess, this heavy cream whips beautifully, adds depth to sauces and soups, and elevates desserts, coffee, and baked goods. Whether you’re preparing a Shabbos dessert, enhancing a weekday recipe, or keeping essentials on hand for unexpected needs, this product offers reliability without sacrificing taste.

Another major benefit is accessibility. The cream is available online with Amazon Prime next-day delivery, allowing customers to enjoy fresh dairy without waiting or searching store shelves. It’s a convenient solution for families, hosts, and anyone who values both quality and efficiency.

With its smooth texture, rich flavor, and shelf-stable design, this Cholov Yisroel Heavy Whipping Cream sets a new standard for kosher dairy products—bringing together tradition, taste, and modern convenience in one carton.

Order today and experience the difference HERE.

{Matzav.com}

NASA and the Department of Energy revealed plans to jointly develop and install a nuclear power reactor on the lunar surface, with the project targeted for completion within the next several years.

The initiative was announced Tuesday as part of President Donald Trump’s broader push under what officials described as his “America First Space Policy.” NASA and DOE said they have formalized their cooperation by signing a new memorandum of understanding aimed at fast-tracking a “fission surface power system” capable of supporting extended missions on the moon and, ultimately, future expeditions to Mars.

Under the agreement, the agencies are working toward having a functional nuclear reactor operating on the moon by 2030, a goal they say is tied to maintaining American leadership and what they characterized as U.S. “space superiority” in exploration, technology, and commercial activity.

Energy Secretary Chris Wright, in a DOE statement, likened the undertaking to historic moments of national mobilization, pointing to the Manhattan Project and the Apollo program as examples of what can be accomplished when American scientific and engineering capabilities are fully engaged.

Wright said the collaboration with NASA and private-sector partners will focus on what he described as one of the most ambitious technical efforts ever attempted in the fields of nuclear energy and space exploration.

NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman explicitly linked the project to the administration’s space agenda, stating that the United States is committed to returning to the moon, establishing a lasting presence there, and investing in the capabilities needed for “the next giant leap to Mars and beyond.”

In NASA’s announcement, Isaacman said that “achieving this future requires harnessing nuclear power,” adding that the new agreement allows NASA and DOE to work more closely in developing the technology needed to meet those goals.

From an operational standpoint, officials argue the case for nuclear power is straightforward. Solar energy is unreliable during the moon’s two-week-long nights and in permanently shadowed regions, while a compact nuclear reactor could supply consistent electricity for years without the need for refueling.

According to the agencies, a fission surface power system would provide “safe, efficient, and plentiful” energy, making it possible to sustain operations regardless of darkness or extreme temperature fluctuations.

NASA has already been advancing related work through its Fission Surface Power program, which is intended to underpin a future lunar economy and ensure uninterrupted power for surface missions.

The agency has also noted that such systems are capable of producing tens of kilowatts of electricity, enough to support essential life-support systems, research activities, and other critical functions at a crewed lunar base.

The announcement also reflects growing geopolitical considerations in space exploration.

China and Russia have openly discussed their own long-term plans for the moon, including concepts involving nuclear power to support a future international lunar research station, according to reporting by the South China Morning Post.

U.S. officials frequently cite those developments as evidence that the United States cannot afford to lose ground in advanced space technologies.

For years, conservatives have argued that domestic opposition to nuclear energy risks undermining American innovation and competitiveness overseas.

The NASA-DOE agreement is being framed as a reversal of that trend, emphasizing dependable power, U.S. technological leadership, and a space strategy grounded in strength.

Officials have also indicated that the long-term vision extends beyond the lunar surface, with nuclear power potentially playing a role in future orbital platforms as well.

{Matzav.com}

President Trump said this afternoon that Iranian authorities have stopped killing anti-government protesters, a striking assertion delivered as speculation swirls over whether the United States could be preparing military action against Tehran.

Speaking in the Oval Office, Trump said he had been briefed that the violence had eased and executions were no longer moving forward. “We’ve been told that the killing in Iran is stopping. It’s stopped. It’s stopping, and there’s no plan for executions,” Trump said.

He cautioned that the information was still being verified. “So I’ve been told that a good authority — we will find out about it. I’m sure if it happens, we’ll all be very upset… but that’s just gotten to me, the information that the killing has stopped, that the executions have stopped, they’re not going to have an execution.”

Trump’s comments suggested reduced urgency for US intervention on behalf of protesters. Still, they came against the backdrop of his decision last June to launch airstrikes on Iran’s nuclear program after public signals that appeared to downplay the likelihood of an attack.

The president said his assessment was based on reports from influential contacts inside Iran who claimed the government was stepping back from its harsh crackdown.

“We have been informed by very important sources on the other side, and they said the killing has stopped and the executions won’t take place,” Trump said.

He added that executions expected to occur imminently had been called off. “There was supposed to be a lot of executions today, and that the executions won’t take place. And we’re going to find out. I mean, I’ll find out after this, you’ll find out. But we’ve been told on good authority, and I hope it’s true.”

Trump acknowledged uncertainty about the situation. “Who knows, right? Who knows? It’s a crazy world. You’ve seen that over the last few days [Iranian officials] said people were shooting at them with guns, and they were shooting back. It’s one of those things, but they told me that there’ll be no executions, and so I hope that’s true.”

While stopping short of committing to or ruling out force, Trump said Washington would continue monitoring developments. “We are going to watch and see what the process is — but we were given a very good statement by people that are aware of what’s going on.”

How the Iranian messages reached the White House was unclear. An Iranian official contacted US special envoy Steve Witkoff last weekend to suggest diplomatic talks, briefly raising expectations of a US-Iran meeting. That opening closed quickly after Trump canceled the idea as reports indicated the protest death toll had climbed past 2,000 this week.

Before Trump’s remarks, Iranian officials were preparing to execute a 26-year-old protester, Erfan Soltani, for his alleged role in a January 8 demonstration, prompting widespread international condemnation.

A source close to Soltani’s family told IranWire that a relative who is an attorney attempted to intervene but was blocked during the expedited legal process. According to the source, officials said, “There is no file to review. We announced that anyone arrested in the protests would be executed.”

Trump’s suggestion that Iran might receive a reprieve came despite multiple indicators pointing toward possible escalation, including a reduction of US personnel at a base in Qatar, the temporary closure of the British embassy in Tehran, and reports of quiet US outreach to Hezbollah urging restraint should Iran be attacked.

At the same time, Iranian leaders have escalated their public threats against Trump. On Wednesday, Iranian state television aired what appeared to be an assassination threat, displaying an image of Trump bloodied after surviving a 2024 shooting in Butler, Pennsylvania, alongside the message: “This time it will not miss the target.”

Such threats are not new. In 2022, the regime released a video depicting an assassination attempt against Trump at one of his golf courses.

Trump downplayed those warnings last July after a senior Iranian official suggested he could be targeted by a drone while sunbathing. “It’s been a long time. I don’t know, maybe I was around seven or so. I’m not too big into it,” the president said.

He added, “I guess it’s a threat. I’m not sure it’s a threat, actually, but perhaps it is.”

{Matzav.com}

Michigan Sen. Elissa Slotkin has been notified that the Trump administration is investigating her after she organized and appeared in a video with other Democrats urging military service members to resist “illegal orders.” Slotkin, a former CIA analyst, said in a video statement released Wednesday that prosecutors were investigating her over the 90-second video she […]

100% employment rate 2025 Final Open House – Thursday, January 15 at 7:30 PMPCS Desktop & Network Support Course 100% employment rate from the previous classPrepare for the #2 Job of 2025 by U.S. News & World Report Location: In Person: 1771 Madison Ave, Executive Center, Lakewood Remote: Click link to preregister  Program Highlights: Hands-on […]

The Trump administration is moving to temporarily stop visa processing for people seeking entry to the United States from dozens of countries, according to a statement issued Wednesday by a State Department spokesperson.

Details of the decision were not provided by the spokesperson. The policy was first disclosed by Fox News, which reported on the development after reviewing a State Department memorandum.

According to that report, the suspension is scheduled to take effect on Jan. 21.

Fox News said the list of impacted countries includes Somalia, Russia, Iran, Afghanistan, Brazil, Nigeria, and Thailand, among others.

The memo instructs U.S. embassies and consulates to deny visa applications under existing legal authorities while the State Department conducts a review of its vetting and processing procedures. The document does not specify how long the reassessment will take.

The reported pause aligns with the broad immigration enforcement push President Donald Trump has pursued since taking office last January.

During a speech in November, Trump said he would “permanently pause” migration from all “Third World Countries” after a shooting near the White House carried out by an Afghan national that resulted in the death of a National Guard member.

{Matzav.com}

Conservative commentator Mark Levin warned President Donald Trump on Wednesday that time is running out for the United States to intervene as Iran’s government intensifies its crackdown on nationwide anti-regime protests. In a post on X, Levin said he had spoken with a contact who recently reached Iraqi Kurdistan and relayed grim accounts from inside […]

REPORTER: “It sounds like you are saying that you would potentially acquire Greenland by force…” TRUMP: “No, you’re saying that. I didn’t say it…” REPORTER: “What are the options right now?” TRUMP: “Well, I wouldn’t be telling you…”

As his long tenure at City Hall comes to an end, Jersey City Mayor Steven Fulop has moved to lock in policies he believes will help safeguard the city’s Jewish residents, issuing executive actions intended to outlast his administration, JTA reports.

After nearly 13 years as mayor, Fulop signed two executive orders on December 22. One bars Jersey City from taking part in initiatives that seek to “boycott, divest from, and sanction the State of Israel,” while the other establishes protections for houses of worship and those attending them against protests.

In explaining the move, Fulop said the goal was to ensure continuity after his departure and to prevent policy shifts he believes could harm certain communities. He said the measures were designed so that the “next administration doesn’t go in a direction that I think is adverse to some of the communities in Jersey City.”

James Solomon, who won the mayoral election in November and is scheduled to be sworn in on Wednesday, has not publicly staked out positions on Israel or the Gaza war. Fulop said, however, that he expects the incoming mayor will soon encounter “pressures from a lot of different people, including the city council.”

Those pressures could be amplified by the makeup of the new city council. Among the members elected last month are Jake Ephros and Joel Brooks, both affiliated with the Democratic Socialists of America, an organization that has been sharply critical of Israel. Ephros, who is Jewish, has been an outspoken pro-Palestinian activist and helped organize an October 2023 letter titled “Not in Our Name! Jewish Socialists Say No to Apartheid and Genocide,” which drew attention for likening Israel to Nazi Germany.

Fulop said his intent was to set a clear direction regardless of shifting political dynamics. “For me, it was important to set Jersey City in a place that, even with a new council coming in, that it was set on a path to protect a large and growing Jewish community in Jersey City so that they do not feel that there’s any discrimination,” he told the Jewish Telegraphic Agency.

The executive orders mirror steps taken in New York City by then-Mayor Eric Adams, who issued similar directives banning BDS activity and regulating protests near synagogues shortly before leaving office, anticipating that his successor, Zohran Mamdani, would take a more adversarial stance toward Israel. Mamdani overturned Adams’ orders within hours of assuming office earlier this month.

Fulop said he remains unsure where Solomon stands on the issue. “There isn’t a lot that he said on it, so how he views this, and if he views it as something that he’s going to engage in in Jersey City, is unclear,” he said. “But it doesn’t change the fact that you see a trend nationally that definitely is leaning more into antisemitic rhetoric, and I think we need to be conscious of that.”

Solomon did not reply to requests for comment. In a 2021 interview, he described his background as being raised “half-Catholic, half-Jewish, and mostly confused,” noting that his family observes Easter, Christmas, Hanukkah, and Passover.

Fulop opted not to seek a fourth term as mayor last year. Earlier this year, he pursued the Democratic nomination for governor of New Jersey but was defeated in June by Mikie Sherrill, who went on to win the general election in November.

Jersey City, which has a population of roughly 300,000 and sits just across the Hudson River from Manhattan, is home to an estimated 6,000 Jewish residents, according to a 2018 study by the Berman Jewish DataBank. The city includes about seven synagogues and several kosher restaurants, and its Jewish population has expanded over the past decade, partly as Orthodox families look for more affordable housing options outside New York City.

Fulop gained national prominence in 2019 when he was among the first state and local officials to publicly characterize a fatal shooting at a kosher supermarket in Jersey City as an antisemitic attack.

“The governor and attorney general were reluctant to call it an antisemitic attack, and I pushed publicly,” Fulop said. “I got criticized for it, but I thought it was important at the time to recognize what it was while the world and the country was watching how we respond to make sure that it is clear that it was an antisemitic attack because we can’t be dismissive of these sort of things.”

That period also coincided with rising tensions tied to demographic changes in the city, as an increasing Jewish presence fueled debates over gentrification. Fulop said his administration focused on outreach to ease friction among communities.

“There was a lot of strain between the African American community and the Jewish community, a lot of misunderstanding between the two communities,” he said. “We did our best to facilitate conversations between leadership in both those communities in order to build bridges. I think we did a good job.”

Fulop’s approach to combating antisemitism has sometimes diverged from the views of other Jewish leaders in New Jersey. Last year, he announced his opposition to adopting the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s definition of antisemitism at the state level, arguing that New Jersey already has robust hate-crime laws and that safeguarding free expression is essential. Critics of the IHRA definition have objected to its inclusion of certain forms of criticism of Israel.

“I think that specific definition is counter productive,” Fulop said at the time, as lawmakers debated whether to adopt it statewide. He added, “I say this in the context of someone who is Jewish, as someone who has a Jewish education, as someone who is a descendent of Holocaust survivors. as someone who is continued supporter of the NJ-Israel Commission and someone that opposes BDS legislation.”

The New Jersey Legislature declined last week to move forward with a bill adopting the IHRA definition, prompting criticism from the state’s five Jewish federations, including the federation that serves Jersey City.

While Fulop said Jersey City has not seen the same level of synagogue protests or BDS-related activity that has occurred recently in New York, he believes proactive steps are still warranted and described the executive orders as protective “guardrails.”

“Historically, antisemitism kind of creeps up in a lot of different places when it’s unexpected, and from my standpoint, even when you’ve seen it in other cities across the country, even though it hasn’t been in Jersey City, putting those guardrails in place and those protections were important,” he said.

As he prepares to take on his next role as president and CEO of the Partnership for New York City, Fulop said he hopes the measures will ultimately assist the incoming administration rather than constrain it.

“I view this as helpful for him, ultimately, that it sets up principles that protect everybody, and you’re not going to discriminate against anybody,” he said. “That was how we looked at it.”

{Matzav.com}

The State Department said Wednesday it will suspend the processing of immigrant visas for citizens of 75 countries, including Afghanistan, Iran, Russia and Somalia, whose nationals the Trump administration has deemed likely to require public assistance while living in the United States. The State Department, led by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, said it had […]

REPORTER: Who told you that the killing in Iran has stopped? TRUMP: “We have been informed by very important sources on the other side that the killing has stopped and executions won’t take place.”

REPORTER: “Are you willing to leave the NATO alliance in order to get what you want with Greenland?” TRUMP: “Well, I wouldn’t be telling you what I’m willing to do, certainly.”

As Verizon grappled with a sweeping nationwide service outage on Wednesday, rival carrier T-Mobile seized the moment to reassure its own customers that its network was functioning normally, while openly attributing connectivity issues to Verizon’s problems.

“T-Mobile’s network is keeping our customers connected, and we’ve confirmed that our network is operating normally and as expected. However due to Verizon’s reported outage, our customers may not be able to reach someone with Verizon service at this time,” the company posted on X as Verizon’s network melted down.

At the same time, Verizon subscribers across the country turned to Downdetector in droves, registering a surge of complaints describing prolonged service disruptions. Many reported their phones stuck in SOS mode for hours, with calls failing to connect and mobile data entirely unavailable.

“I have been in and out of SOS mode for 3 hours now…my family was all fine but now they are getting outages/SOS mode too,” one Maryland customer wrote.

Anger and frustration mounted among affected users, with at least one Verizon customer in Mobile, Alabama, declaring that the situation was “getting ridiculous” and saying the outage had pushed them to consider switching carriers.

Reports also poured in from major population centers and smaller cities alike, pointing to the broad scope of the disruption.

“Down in Dallas TX. Almost 2 hours now. Ugh!!!!” one user posted, while another in Waco, Texas, put it more simply: “Waco TX down.”

Several customers said the outage was intermittent, with brief flashes of restored service followed by another collapse.

“Still down (2 hrs now). Came on for a few mins and then back to SOS,” a user in Chesapeake, Virginia, wrote, while a customer in Southern New Hampshire complained their phone was “going in and out of SOS every few mins” without allowing calls to go through.

The problems were not confined to any single region, with users reporting outages in Florida, Tennessee, North Carolina, Arkansas, Maine, New Jersey, and Colorado. One customer in South Texas contrasted the situation by noting, “My AT&T mobile is working fine,” as Verizon service remained unavailable.

At the height of the outage, Downdetector logged more than 175,000 reports nationwide. The disruption was serious enough to trigger emergency alerts in New York City and Washington, DC, cautioning that some Verizon customers might have difficulty contacting 911.

Verizon acknowledged the ongoing service failure but stopped short of providing specific details about the cause or a timeline for full restoration.

“Verizon engineering teams are continuing to address today’s service interruptions,” a company rep told The Post.

“Our teams remain fully deployed and are focused on the issue. We understand the impact this has on your day and remain committed to resolving this as quickly as possible.”

While isolated reports suggested that service was beginning to return for some customers, many others continued to report outages as the situation remained unresolved.

{Matzav.com}

A 45-minute meeting took place this evening at the Slabodka Yeshiva complex, where rebbes met with the roshei yeshiva to discuss a united response to Israel’s proposed draft law.

Participating in the discussion were the Sanzer Rebbe and the Modzitzer Rebbe, who met with Rav Dov Landau and Rav Moshe Hillel Hirsch.

The talks followed a recent session of the Moetzes Gedolei HaTorah of Agudas Yisrael, which ended without a definitive decision on how to proceed regarding the draft legislation. In the aftermath, it was decided to coordinate positions with the leading Litvishe gedolim, a move first reported by Matzav.com.

To that end, the Sanzer and Modzitzer Rebbes were selected to conduct the consultations. The two had already held a preliminary meeting earlier in the week, and the Modzitzer Rebbe also met separately with the Gerrer Rebbe. Tonight, the rebbes arrived at Slabodka to continue those efforts.

The meeting was described as focused and substantive. During the 45-minute discussion, the gedolim addressed the need for a unified front in confronting the draft law and aligning approaches across the chareidi spectrum.

Matzav.com will continue to follow developments and provide updates as they emerge.

{Matzav.com}

A widespread outage has disrupted Verizon’s wireless network this afternoon, leaving tens of thousands of customers without voice, text, or data service and causing many phones to display an “SOS” indicator instead of normal signal bars.

Reports of service failures began climbing shortly before 12:30 p.m. ET, according to outage tracking site Down Detector, with complaints quickly surging into the tens of thousands. Affected users across multiple states reported losing cellular connectivity entirely, with iPhones and other devices defaulting to emergency or satellite-based modes.

Verizon confirmed the issue shortly after 1 p.m. ET, acknowledging that its network was experiencing a significant disruption. In a statement, the company said, “We are aware of an issue impacting wireless voice and data services for some customers. Our engineers are engaged and are working to identify and solve the issue quickly. We understand how important reliable connectivity is and apologize for the inconvenience.” The carrier did not provide an estimated time for full service restoration or disclose the cause of the outage.

The disruption appeared to affect major regions including New York and New Jersey, the Carolinas, Texas, Florida, Nevada, and parts of the Midwest and Southeast. Customers reported that phones showed an SOS icon even in areas with normally strong coverage, indicating an inability to connect to Verizon’s core network despite being within range of cell towers.

New York City officials warned that the outage could interfere with emergency calls for customers on Verizon. The city’s emergency notification system advised residents experiencing difficulties dialing 911 to use a landline, another mobile carrier, or go directly to a police precinct if urgent assistance is needed.

Some customers reported brief signs of recovery, with service intermittently returning before dropping again. In New York City, a small number of users saw limited bars and 5G service after restarting their phones, though connections were described as unstable and short-lived.

The outage did not appear to impact other major carriers. T-Mobile said its network was operating normally but cautioned that customers might have trouble reaching Verizon subscribers. In a post on social media, the carrier said its systems were functioning as expected despite the reported Verizon disruption.

Verizon-owned Visible, a mobile virtual network operator that uses Verizon’s infrastructure, continued to show service for some users, adding to confusion about the scope and technical nature of the outage.

Down Detector reports peaked at nearly 180,000 complaints before gradually declining, though numbers remained far above normal levels as of mid-afternoon. Verizon’s own network status checker did not initially reflect widespread issues, and some users reported difficulty accessing the tool.

As of the latest update, Verizon said its engineers were still investigating and working to restore full service. Customers continued to report inconsistent connectivity, with many phones remaining stuck in SOS mode hours after the outage began.

{Matzav.com}