Feed aggregator
Video Shows Ukrainian Forces Destroy Russian Convoy in Donetsk
Trump to Address Nation Tomorrow at 9 PM ET
ZAKA Deploys to Sydney to Ensure Proper Kavod Hameis for Bondi Beach Victims
Netanyahu Urges Western Governments to Act Against Global Antisemitism
FBI Did Not Believe It Had Probable Cause To Raid Mar-A-Lago For Classified Documents, Bombshell Files Show
Internal FBI communications released by Sen. Chuck Grassley on Tuesday reveal that bureau officials did not believe they had established probable cause to seek a search warrant for President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate ahead of the August 2022 raid.
One internal record, written by an unidentified assistant special agent, stated that the FBI’s Washington Field Office “does not believe (and has articulated to DOJ [counterintelligence]) that we have established probable cause for the search warrant for classified records at Mar-a-Lago.” The memo added that “DOJ has opined that they do have probable cause,” and was “requesting a wide scope including residence, office, storage space.”
According to the same FBI official, agents spent roughly six weeks attempting to build a probable cause case, an effort described internally as “counterproductive.” Interviews conducted during that period also failed to produce evidence that sensitive intelligence materials remained at Trump’s Palm Beach, Florida, property after documents were returned on June 3, 2022.
Additional emails included in the release show that, just one week before the Aug. 8, 2022, search, senior FBI officials were exploring alternative approaches. In one message, Washington Field Office counterintelligence chief Tony Riedlinger wrote that the bureau was seeking “a second path” related to the search warrant.
Riedlinger and Washington Field Office head Steven D’Antuono were also copied on correspondence indicating the FBI hoped any search would be carried out “in a professional, low-key manner … mindful of the optics of the search.” That strategy included an attempt to secure cooperation from one of Trump’s attorneys, a step FBI officials cautioned “may not go well at DOJ.”
Grassley, the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, made the documents public and described them as deeply troubling. In a post on X, he wrote that the records were “shocking,” asserting that the “FBI DID NOT BELIEVE IT HAD PROBABLE CAUSE to raid Pres Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home but Biden DOJ pushed for it anyway.” The Iowa Republican further argued that the emails and memos demonstrated a “miscarriage of justice” directed at Trump.
The disclosure comes after special counsel Jack Smith charged Trump in June 2023 with dozens of counts tied to allegations that classified materials were improperly stored in various locations at Mar-a-Lago, including a bedroom, bathroom, ballroom, and basement. That case was later dismissed by South Florida U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, who ruled that Smith had been unlawfully appointed without congressional authorization.
{Matzav.com}
DRAMA IN OLAM HATORAH: Yeshiva Bochur Arrested By IDF Police After Chanukah Candle Lighting
Stolen Ferrari Crashes Into Utility Pole in Miami
Tucker Carlson Being a Regular Antisemite
Zohran Mamdani Eyes Controversial Lawyer Ramzi Kassem for Top City Hall Post
Retired FBI Agent James Gagliano Discusses Search for Brown University Shooting Suspect Footage
VP Vance: Fewer Illegal Aliens Buying Homes Will Help Americans Afford Housing
Australian Police Determine Sydney Chanukah Celebration Massacre Was An ISIS-Inspired Terrorist Attack
Catskills Multi-Vehicle Crash on Broadway in Monticello, Injuries Reported
Heavy Rain Turns Waters Around Iran’s Hormuz Island Red
VP JD Vance: Biden Inflation Cost Average Family $3,000
Declassified Emails Reveal FBI Concerns Over Mar-a-Lago Search Warrant
Mike Johnson Defends Timing of Healthcare Action After Shutdown
Trump’s $300M White House Ballroom Makeover Faces Court Challenge
A federal judge is set to hear arguments today in a lawsuit aimed at stopping President Donald Trump’s proposed $300 million ballroom on the White House grounds, marking the first court challenge to the ambitious construction project.
The case was brought by the National Trust for Historic Preservation, which argues that the administration moved ahead with plans for the 90,000-square-foot ballroom without completing mandatory reviews or securing required approvals. U.S. District Judge Richard Leon scheduled the hearing for 3:30 p.m. (2030 GMT).
According to the lawsuit, the administration bypassed laws requiring consultation with the National Capital Planning Commission and the Commission of Fine Arts before dismantling the East Wing and beginning work on the new structure. The preservation group said it filed suit to compel the government to comply, at the very least, “with the procedural requirements that inform and protect the public’s opportunity to comment on the Ballroom Project.”
Opponents of the project say visible construction activity around the White House’s 120-year-old East Wing has already raised alarms and triggered backlash, with critics contending the scope of the work goes beyond what a president is permitted to undertake unilaterally.
“No president is legally allowed to tear down portions of the White House without any review whatsoever — not President Trump, not President Biden, and not anyone else,” the National Trust’s lawsuit said.
The organization is asking the court to issue a temporary restraining order to pause construction while the case proceeds, claiming the work has already inflicted what it calls “irreversible damage” on the White House and its surrounding grounds.
In court filings submitted Monday, the administration pushed back, asserting that the project is lawful and consistent with historical precedent. Government lawyers pointed to prior presidential renovations, including Franklin D. Roosevelt’s addition of the East Wing itself, and argued that the new ballroom is necessary to accommodate official state functions. They also said the design is still being refined and that above-ground construction is not expected to begin until April, making emergency judicial intervention unwarranted.
“The President possesses statutory authority to modify the structure of his residence, and that authority is supported by background principles of Executive power,” the filing said.
Since returning to office in January, Trump has overseen a series of high-profile changes to the White House, including adding gold accents to the Oval Office and replacing the Rose Garden lawn with a paved patio reminiscent of the setting at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida.
The outcome of today’s hearing could determine whether the ballroom project proceeds as planned or is put on hold while the legal challenge moves forward.
{Matzav.com}
