Feed aggregator

A young boy miraculously escaped without injury after being struck and run over by a moving vehicle in Bnei Brak in what witnesses described as an extraordinary act of Divine protection.

The frightening incident occurred at the intersection of Kahaneman Street and Kibbutz Galuyot Street as the child was crossing the road alongside his older sister, who was pushing a baby stroller.

tHE boy’s yarmulke suddenly fell off his head while the siblings were in the middle of the crosswalk. Without warning, the child turned back toward the center of the roadway to retrieve it.

At that very moment, a vehicle entered the intersection and struck the child before continuing forward, passing directly over him.

Bystanders rushed to the scene, fearing the worst after seeing the car drive over the young boy.

To the amazement of everyone present, the child got up on his own moments later and appeared to be completely unharmed. Witnesses described the incident as nothing short of miraculous.

Emergency responders were called to the scene to examine the child, who, according to sources, did not suffer any apparent injuries despite the terrifying ordeal.

WATCH:

{Matzav.com}

[COMMUNICATED]

No matter where you live, the word “cancer” is a frightening reality for all too many of your neighbors, r”l. This dreadful disease and its treatment regimens afflict men, women, teenagers, even young children, of all ages and backgrounds – as well as their family and friends. 

In our communities, virtually every one of these suffering souls relies on RCCS as a lifeline – the one-stop resource that guides them from diagnosis through recovery and makes sure that everyone has access to the absolute best medical care available anywhere in the world. 

One recent case illustrates just how life-changing RCCS’s work can be. 

A young patient with a specific strain of colorectal cancer was referred by RCCS to an experimental study of a new drug that seemed hopeful. To be eligible for this study, patients needed to have a specific biomarker that is only found in 5% of patients with this strain of cancer. He was one of only 12 patients accepted into the study, where patients received three doses of the experimental treatment over the course of 12 weeks. 

The results were astounding and the treatment so effective that the pharmaceutical company decided to commission a second study that would be open to patients with colorectal cancer, even without the indicated biomarker, with the hopes that the same efficacy could still be achieved. Although there was concern that the results would not be as good as the previous results of the first experimental treatment, it was a hopeful development nonetheless for patients stricken with this cancer. 

A while later, when 35-year-old Shloimy was diagnosed with stage 3 colorectal cancer, the RCCS Patient Department was hopeful that he could be referred to this study and receive this potentially lifesaving treatment. 

Unfortunately, the study was not going to be open and available for some time. Being a stage 3 diagnosis, on the verge of metastasizing, the cancer needed to be treated immediately, before it risked spreading to other areas of the body. 

RCCS refers many colorectal cancer patients to a top specialist at Cornell Medical Center to undergo surgical removal of the tumorous tissue before undergoing chemotherapy. After meeting with the doctor, Shloimy’s prognosis was bleak. He was told that surgery must be performed immediately. There were numerous roadblocks in the way, but RCCS managed to get all the necessary testing, imaging and paperwork done and schedule the surgery for the next Monday. 

Having lost his father at a young age, the prognosis was devastating for Shloimy. On the day of his father’s Yahrzeit, which happened to fall out a few days before his surgery and treatment was scheduled to commence, he went to the kever and cried and davened. On that very day, RCCS unexpectedly received the amazingly good news that the second phase of the experimental trial treatment was now open. 

It was determined that the patient was a candidate and could join, but only before undergoing the surgery. On this experimental drug, he would receive three infusions over eight weeks. The subsequent surgery would then have a good chance for a vastly better outcome, while also negating the need for chemotherapy. 

10 weeks later, Shloimy came out of surgery. The specialist reported that it appeared to be a great success, as only the cancerous tissue had to be removed, preserving the healthy surrounding tissue. It was clear that the experimental drug was helping. 

Baruch Hashem, Shloimy is now in remission! 

The work of RCCS is extremely broad. They provide medical referral and support, getting each patient into the best doctor for their diagnosis; this includes handling their medical records and expediting appointments. To this end, they conduct extensive medical research to provide patients with the most cutting-edge medical treatment. They provide crucial financial support to cover insurance premiums and other out-of-pocket expenses. In essence, they serve as the patient’s virtual “back office” from beginning to end. 

They arrange insurance guidance and advocacy, helping a patient navigate the complex world of insurance and advocating for them when an insurer rejects a claim. They ensure that finances never stand between a patient and world-class treatment.  

RCCS is having their annual online campaign this week, and everyone is urged to please support it generously. All funds raised go to support their incredible work – giving Jewish cancer patients the best possible chance of recovery and survival.  Please visit dryveup.com/rccs to participate. 

A large-scale Immigration and Customs Enforcement operation officially got underway in New York City on Monday, marking the launch of the enforcement surge that President Donald Trump’s border czar, Tom Homan, vowed would target the city’s sanctuary policies.

Homan first announced plans for the expanded ICE presence last month but did not specify when the operation would begin.

During a June 8 appearance on Fox & Friends, Homan issued a direct warning to New York Gov. Kathy Hochul, saying, “You’re going to see more ICE agents than you’ve ever seen in New York City, and it’s coming.”

His comments followed the passage of additional sanctuary-state legislation by New York’s Democrat-controlled Legislature. The new measures further limit cooperation between state and local law enforcement agencies and federal immigration authorities.

At the time, Homan said the increased ICE presence was a direct response to those policies.

“I’m keeping my promise: We’re going to send more ICE agents to New York because you took away the efficiencies of safer arrests at county jails,” Homan added in June.

According to NewsNation, that promise began taking shape Monday as ICE formally launched its expanded enforcement effort across New York City.

The first wave of the operation was concentrated in Queens, with plans to broaden the effort into additional boroughs in the coming days.

For now, the operation is being carried out by ICE personnel already assigned to New York. Officials have not announced any plans to supplement the mission with agents from other regions.

Homan indicated that the immigration enforcement surge could remain in effect for more than a month, though he did not disclose additional details regarding the scope or duration of the operation.

{Matzav.com}

Newly released diary entries from Dr. Anthony Fauci suggest that, behind closed doors, many leading scientists considered a laboratory origin for COVID-19 to be a real possibility, even as Fauci publicly dismissed the theory as a conspiracy. The diary excerpts were made public by Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), chairman of the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.

One of the key entries, dated January 2020, recounts a conference call Fauci held with a group of prominent scientists and public health officials from the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, Australia, and the Netherlands. Participants included then-NIH Director Francis Collins, Wellcome Trust Director Jeremy Farrar, U.K. Chief Scientific Adviser Patrick Vallance, Scripps Research scientist Kristian Andersen, German virologist Christian Drosten, University of Sydney professor Edward Holmes, University of Edinburgh professor Andrew Rambaut, Dutch virologist Ron Fouchier, Tulane University virologist Robert Garry, University of Dundee professor Mike Ferguson, and Erasmus Medical Center virologist M.P.G. Koopmans.

In his notes, Fauci acknowledged that there was considerable concern among those on the call about whether the virus could have been engineered. He wrote, “There was not total agreement about the likelihood of deliberate insertion,” referring to the possibility that the virus had been created in a laboratory. According to the diary, only two participants argued strongly that the virus almost certainly arose naturally, while the remaining scientists believed a laboratory origin was a plausible explanation.

The discussion took place in January 2020, before governments imposed COVID lockdowns and before the World Health Organization officially declared the outbreak a global pandemic.

Fauci elaborated on the differing views among the scientists, writing:

“Ron Fouchier said he was sure that this could occur naturally and we should not waste our time and divert effort to pursue this. This is expected of him since he was the original GOF person with Yoshi Kawaoka. Also, Christian Drosten was with Ron; the rest felt that deliberate insertion was possible and given the fact that Dr. Zheng-Li Shi at the University of Wuhan has been working for years in GOF in coronaviruses to allow adaptation of the spike protein to bind to the human ACE2 receptor, we could not let this go. We decided to have Jeremy with Francis to contact Tedros with Stewart Simonson’s help (I arranged this) to see if Tedros would convene experts.”

Despite those private discussions, Fauci would go on to spend years publicly rejecting the lab leak theory as a conspiracy, even while his own diary reflected a more cautious view. In later entries, he repeatedly acknowledged that the origin of the virus remained uncertain.

Writing in May 2021, Fauci addressed criticism that he had changed his position on the issue:

“The situation continues to get “out of control” with regard to the press reports concerning my ‘flip flopping’ concerning the theory of the origin of the virus. I had always said that the very highly likelihood is that the virus originated naturally from an animal reservoir jumping to a human. However, over the past couple of days given the amount of speculation about the possibility of a lab leak I have been saying that no one is 100% certain of the origin including me and so I am calling for a thorough investigation.”

Another diary entry, dated June 7, 2021, appeared to revisit the January 2020 conference call. In it, Fauci claimed that the participants had been evenly divided over whether COVID originated naturally or may have been engineered. That account appears to conflict with his earlier notes, which indicated that only two scientists favored a natural-origin explanation while the rest viewed a laboratory origin as a realistic possibility.

He wrote:

“Scott Gottlieb had appeared on Face the Nation and mentioned in an attempt to help me then I had actually gone to Europe in Jan/Feb. 2020 to brief health ministers about the possibility that the virus could have been constructed an escape from the laboratory. He did this to indicate that I was not hiding anything because I already knew that this was a possibility and so I didn’t change my mind currently by saying that a lab leak is a possibility since I was talking about it openly back then. As it turns out, he was a little bit mixed up because on January 31st, 2020 I received a call from Jeremy Farrar who conferenced in Christian Andersen to tell me that Ed Holmes and Christian had seen a copy of the sequence of the virus and felt that there was a possibility that because of the unusual furin cleavage site that this could possibly have been a constructed virus. as indicated in my notes of January 31st and February 1st , 2020, since I am not an evolutionary biologist I called together by phone a group knowledgeable scientist together with Francis Collins and a few other people to discuss this. After a considerable amount of discussion about half of the people felt that this was possibly a constructed virus and the other half were convinced that this was a natural occurrence. A few weeks later Christian Andersen got together with Bob Garry and Andrew Rambaut to examine this more carefully and they came to the conclusion that they were convinced that this was a natural occurrence and a jump from the animal reservoir. They published their data in a preprint server in February followed by a nature paper in March of 2020 . That is the reason why it appears that a I briefed people which I did not. I was briefed by them. Scott had said that I had briefed a group of international health people he seemed to have gotten some of the story wrong , but overall he was correct.”

As the pandemic continued, Fauci’s diary entries took a far more dismissive tone toward the lab leak theory. He praised media reports criticizing the hypothesis, writing, “Great Article in Politico that describes the lies of the Trump people about the ‘lab leak’ theory,” and also commended similar reporting by The Guardian.

In another entry, Fauci accused conservatives of promoting politically motivated conspiracy theories surrounding the virus’s origin. He wrote, “The conspiracy of the far right and the trump loyalists continues. Recently representative Mike McCall the minority On the House Foreign Affairs Committee released a report by the panel’s republican staff essentially saying that the lab leak was the cause of COVID-19 and hinting the NIH’s role in creating the virus.”

He continued:

“This is based on no new information or no new data. It is very clear what is going on and it needs to be called out. It is all part of “The Big Lie”. First, trump actually won the election; next, January 6th was a friendly visit to the capital book shop; next trump was right and China caused the virus; next Fauci and the NIH helped the Chinese create the virus; next, discredit Fauci and it looks like trump is telling the truth. It is plain and simple a concerted effort aimed at getting trump re-elected and exonerating him from any blame in the complete mess up of his response to COVID-19.”

Since leaving government service, Fauci has continued to reject allegations that he misled the public regarding gain-of-function research or the origins of COVID-19. At the same time, the Trump White House has updated its official coronavirus webpage to state that a laboratory leak is the most likely explanation for the pandemic’s origin.

The updated White House page argues that “‘The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2’ publication — which was used repeatedly by public health officials and the media to discredit the lab leak theory — was prompted by Dr. Fauci to push the preferred narrative that COVID-19 originated naturally,” adding that the virus “possesses a biological characteristic that is not found in nature” and that “Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) researchers were sick with COVID-like symptoms in the fall of 2019, months before COVID-19 was discovered at the wet market.”

Fauci is scheduled to appear before the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs on Wednesday, where he is expected to face questions about the newly released diary entries and his handling of the pandemic’s origins.

{Matzav.com}

Former FBI Director James Comey is asking a federal judge to dismiss the criminal case accusing him of threatening President Donald Trump, arguing that his now-deleted social media post featuring seashells arranged to read “86 47” was political expression protected by the First Amendment rather than a genuine threat of violence.

In court filings submitted Monday, Comey’s legal team contended that prosecutors cannot establish that the Instagram photo amounted to a “true threat” against the President. The filing argues that the post represented political speech, not an intent to encourage or commit violence against Trump, who dismissed Comey as FBI director in 2017 and has repeatedly called for him to face prosecution.

Comey’s attorneys noted that the phrase “86” has long been used to mean removing, rejecting, or getting rid of someone or something, adding that “86 47” has appeared on countless products sold online and has frequently been displayed during political demonstrations.

“But the government now singles out Mr. Comey to prosecute one of the President’s most prominent critics for publishing another person’s statement of political opposition,” his attorneys wrote. “That attempt to suppress core political speech contravenes both the statutes at issue and the First Amendment.”

The prosecution marks the second criminal case brought against Comey within a matter of months. He has remained a frequent target of President Trump, who has repeatedly denounced the former FBI director, once calling him a “corrupt piece of garbage.”

A separate prosecution in Virginia alleging that Comey lied to Congress was thrown out last November after a federal judge ruled that the prosecutor who brought charges against both Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James had not been lawfully appointed.

The longstanding conflict between Trump and Comey dates back to the early stages of the FBI’s investigation into whether Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign coordinated with Russia to influence that year’s election.

Federal prosecutors have charged Comey in a two-count indictment, alleging that he “knowingly and willfully” threatened “to take the life of, and to inflict bodily harm upon” President Trump and that he transmitted a threat across state lines.

According to Comey’s lawyers, however, the indictment contains no evidence demonstrating that he intended to threaten the President. Instead, they argue, prosecutors rely only on the theory that “a reasonable recipient who is familiar with the circumstances would interpret” the post as threatening.

The controversy began after Comey posted the seashell image on Instagram, prompting an interview with the Secret Service after Trump administration officials asserted that the message advocated the assassination of Trump, the nation’s 47th president. Comey later removed the post and explained his decision, writing: “I didn’t realize some folks associate those numbers with violence” and “I oppose violence of any kind so I took the post down.”

“Even if ’86 47′ could implausibly be read to suggest violence, a reasonable observer would still understand Mr. Comey’s post as mere political hyperbole, not a true threat,” Comey’s attorneys wrote. “The Supreme Court has rejected threats prosecutions based on speech far more directly threatening than Mr. Comey’s seashells post here.”

The Justice Department has not publicly detailed the evidence it intends to use to establish Comey’s intent. Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, however, said earlier this year that intent would be demonstrated through testimony, documents, and other admissible evidence.

“And that’s how we’ll prove intent in this case,” Blanche said in April after assuming leadership of the Justice Department following Pam Bondi’s dismissal.

President Trump has maintained that the meaning of the message was unmistakable. Speaking in a Fox News interview last year, he insisted Comey fully understood the significance of the numbers.

“A child knows what that meant,” Trump said. “If you’re the FBI director and you don’t know what that meant, that meant assassination. And it says it loud and clear.”

{Matzav.com}

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has taken an early lead in the race for the 2028 Democrat presidential nomination in New Hampshire, according to a new poll, though one political analyst believes her ultimate goal may be a high-profile challenge to Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer rather than a campaign for the White House.

Patrick Allocco, founder of the Zoose Political Index, told Newsmax on Monday that Ocasio-Cortez’s strong showing in the latest University of New Hampshire Granite State Poll highlights the growing influence of the Democratic Party’s progressive wing.

“If there’s one thing that you can be certain of, anything can happen in today’s Democratic Party,” he said. “That poll shows exactly where the progressive base is headed.”

The survey placed Ocasio-Cortez at the top of the prospective Democrat field with 22% support among likely New Hampshire Democratic primary voters for 2028. Former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg followed closely with 21%, while Sen. Mark Kelly of Arizona finished a distant third at 9%. California Gov. Gavin Newsom received 8%.

Allocco said his firm has been watching Ocasio-Cortez’s rise for quite some time and believes her current standing is no surprise.

“We’ve been saying since last year that AOC was the one to watch when she showed up around 10% in a poll back in May,” he said. “We said that was her floor, not her ceiling.”

According to Allocco, the absence of a deep roster of nationally recognized Democratic contenders has helped elevate Ocasio-Cortez’s position within the party.

“Since the Democrats have a spectacular bench problem, that puts her in real play,” Allocco said.

Even so, Allocco expressed skepticism about whether Ocasio-Cortez is prepared to serve as president, citing her performance at this year’s Munich Security Conference.

“She proved in Munich, however, she lacks experience to be president,” he said.

Rather than pursuing the Oval Office, Allocco believes Ocasio-Cortez may ultimately set her sights on unseating Schumer in New York, using a presidential campaign as leverage within the party.

“We believe she’ll choose to take on Schumer instead,” he said. “But the presidency could be her 2028 bargaining chip in the party.”

The University of New Hampshire Granite State Poll was conducted between July 15 and July 20 and surveyed 1,458 New Hampshire residents. Among the 648 likely Democratic presidential primary voters included in the poll, the margin of error was plus or minus 3.8 percentage points, while the overall survey carried a margin of error of plus or minus 2.6 percentage points.

{Matzav.com}

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney has denounced the shootings at two Jewish-owned bakeries in Toronto, calling the attacks deeply disturbing and reaffirming his government’s commitment to confronting antisemitism as police continue to investigate the incidents as possible hate crimes.

In a statement shared on social media, Carney expressed outrage over the attacks on two locations of Kiva’s Bagel Bar, a longtime gathering place within Toronto’s Jewish community.

“I am appalled by the targeting of two Kiva’s Bagel Bar locations – fixtures of Toronto’s Jewish community that have long served as places for people to gather and connect,” Carney said.

The Prime Minister emphasized that Jewish Canadians must be able to live without fear of being targeted because of their faith.

“Jewish Canadians should be able to live, work, and worship free from fear, intimidation, and hate. Canada’s government is absolute in our commitment to combatting the scourge of antisemitism,” he added.

Carney also voiced full confidence in law enforcement officials handling the case, stating, “Law enforcement has my full support as they conduct a thorough investigation and hold those responsible to account.”

Toronto Police were alerted Sunday morning after gunfire struck two separate Kiva’s Bagel Bar locations. Investigators believe the incidents are connected.

The first shooting took place shortly after 11:15 p.m. Saturday at the bakery’s North York location near Bathurst Street and Steeles Avenue West. The business was closed at the time, and no one was injured.

About an hour later, at approximately 12:15 a.m. Sunday, shots were fired at the chain’s second location in midtown Toronto near Yonge Street and St. Clair Avenue West.

On Monday, investigators released a photograph of an SUV believed to have been used in both attacks as they seek help identifying those responsible.

The case is being led by the Toronto Police Integrated Gun and Gang Task Force, with assistance from the department’s Hate Crime Unit.

Following the shootings, B’nai Brith Canada urged authorities to respond forcefully, arguing that such attacks should be viewed not merely as acts of vandalism or violence, but as direct threats to Canada’s national security.

The latest shootings come amid an alarming surge in antisemitic attacks across Toronto and the surrounding region since the October 7, 2023 Hamas massacre in Israel.

Earlier this year, in early March, gunfire struck two synagogues in the Toronto area within the span of several hours. Police later arrested multiple suspects in connection with those attacks.

That same month, Temple Emanu-El in North York was hit by gunfire while congregants were celebrating Purim. Although no one was hurt, the synagogue sustained property damage.

In late April, a man attempted to force his way into an Orthodox synagogue in Thornhill, just north of Toronto, assaulting one individual before fleeing.

Just one day later, a rock was thrown through the window of a Toronto Judaica store, marking the third attack on that same Jewish-owned business.

{Matzav.com}

Senior officials from Israel, Lebanon, and the United States are set to gather in Rome next week for a new round of high-level negotiations aimed at advancing security arrangements in southern Lebanon, resolving disputed border issues, and expanding a U.S.-backed pilot security initiative, according to a State Department official.

The three-day meeting, scheduled for August 4 through August 6 in the Italian capital, will bring together diplomats and technical experts from the three countries as part of ongoing American-led mediation efforts. The talks are expected to center on widening the Israeli military’s withdrawal from southern Lebanon while tackling unresolved territorial disputes along the shared border.

A State Department official told Axios that the negotiations have gained “significant momentum” in recent weeks, pointing to the launch of the first pilot security zone in southern Lebanon as well as Lebanese President Joseph Aoun’s meeting with President Donald Trump at the White House last week.

According to the official, “In Rome, technical groups will focus on advancing the full implementation of the framework agreement. That includes expanding the pilot zone process, resolving all outstanding border issues, and working on a comprehensive peace and security agreement,” Axios reported.

The official also described the pilot security zone as an important opportunity to restore the Lebanese government’s authority in the country’s south, explaining that it “is an opportunity to deliver real progress on the ground, restoring Lebanese state authority through the verifiable disarmament of terrorist organizations and building the confidence needed for next steps.”

Officials believe that experience gained from the first phase of the initiative will help shape future stages of the broader security plan. As the State Department official explained, “The experience of the initial zones will help us perfect pilot-zone implementation so it can expand in a phased manner.”

The Biden administration’s successor has made clear that the trilateral framework remains Washington’s preferred path toward long-term stability between Israel and Lebanon. Emphasizing that commitment, the official stated, “Fully implementing it is in the clear interest of both countries, and the Trump Administration is committed to its success,” according to Axios.

The diplomatic effort stems from a framework agreement unveiled in Washington on June 26 by the United States, Israel, and Lebanon. Under the plan, Israeli forces would gradually withdraw from designated areas in southern Lebanon while the Lebanese army moves in, beginning with two initial pilot zones.

Despite the progress, the agreement faces a significant obstacle. Its implementation depends entirely on the complete disarmament of Hezbollah, a condition the Iran-backed terrorist organization has categorically rejected, along with the broader peace negotiations between Israel and Lebanon.

{Matzav.com}

WATCH:

LISTEN:

​​For more info, email bitachon4life@gmail.com.

LISTEN:

Israel’s High Court of Justice is set to hear arguments Tuesday morning in a closely watched legal challenge to the controversial “Arrest Law,” while the government has taken the extraordinary step of refusing to participate in the proceedings, arguing that the outcome has already been predetermined.

An expanded panel of Supreme Court justices will hear petitions seeking to overturn the temporary law, which was championed by Shas chairman Aryeh Deri and is designed to prevent the arrest of bnei yeshiva who have been designated as military draft evaders for a period of approximately six months.

Supporters of the legislation say the measure was intended to provide temporary protection for Torah students while lawmakers work toward a broader resolution of Israel’s long-running dispute over military conscription for the Chareidi community. The law is meant to remain in effect until a new government is formed and addresses the draft issue through permanent legislation.

In an unusual move, however, the Israeli government will not be represented during Tuesday’s hearing. The decision followed a position advanced by Deri, who argued that there is no point defending the law because the High Court has already made up its mind to strike it down. Last week, the Supreme Court issued an interim order freezing the law before it had even been officially published in Israel’s legal registry or allowed to take effect.

Speaking in an interview with Kikar HaShabbat, Deri defended the government’s boycott of the proceedings.

“We have no trust in the Supreme Court. We already know the outcome in advance. We must not be part of this game, to create the impression that justice is being done. ‘Here, you have a defense, now present your arguments.’ We must not be partners in this show.”

Deri went on to argue that the hearing would amount to little more than a public exercise whose conclusion had already been decided.

“It will be a public discussion, except that the result is already known in advance,” he said. “We need to tell them: ‘We do not recognize your authority. We already know the outcome of this matter.'”

The Shas leader also sharply criticized the interim injunction issued by the court last week, questioning why the justices intervened before the legislation had even become law.

“Someone goes and issues interim orders before the law has even been published in the official registry, before it has even taken effect… What would have happened, for Heaven’s sake, if for one week they didn’t make arrests? Would that have been irreversible? Is that what interim orders are for? On a law that the Knesset passed and worked on for many months and many weeks? It’s obvious—you can already see the outcome in advance. That’s why we must not play this game.”

Meanwhile, legal advisers to both the Knesset and the government have urged the High Court to invalidate the legislation, arguing that it was enacted through a flawed legislative process and violates Israel’s Basic Laws.

The Knesset’s legal counsel joined Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara in contending that the coalition improperly relied on the parliamentary doctrine of “continuity,” a procedural mechanism that allows pending legislation from a previous Knesset to be revived instead of beginning the legislative process from scratch.

According to the Knesset’s legal advisers, lawmakers improperly applied the continuity procedure to a bill that originally addressed an entirely different subject.

“The ‘pipeline’ of continuity that was supposed to connect the original bill with the final law was severed,” the Knesset’s legal opinion stated in its submission to the High Court, adding that the flaw “goes to the root of the legislative process.”

The Knesset’s attorneys further concluded that the temporary measure legally constituted a “new subject,” meaning its passage failed to comply with Knesset rules and, consequently, with Section 19 of Israel’s Basic Law: The Knesset. The opinion was considered especially unusual because the Knesset’s legal advisers generally defend legislation passed by lawmakers rather than argue against its validity.

Attorney General Baharav-Miara also urged the High Court to strike down the law, arguing that it violates the principle of equality and conflicts with Israel’s national security needs.

{Matzav.com}

A rare and emotional visit took place this week at Shawangunk Correctional Facility, a maximum-security prison in Wallkill, New York, when the Satmar Rebbe, Rav Zalman Leib Teitelbaum, traveled to the prison to offer words of chizuk to several Jewish inmates incarcerated there.

The visit was organized and coordinated by the Tzedek Association, an organization that advocates on behalf of incarcerated Jews. Senior officials from Albany also attended the event, creating a unique opportunity for advocates to present the religious needs and concerns of Jewish prisoners directly to state officials.

The program opened with remarks from Reb Anshel Schwartz, a leading activist with the Tzedek Association, who outlined the unique challenges faced by Jewish inmates in the prison system. Addressing the senior government representatives, he emphasized that the accommodations being requested are not luxuries but rather the basic necessities required to enable Jewish prisoners to observe Torah and mitzvos to the greatest extent possible while incarcerated.

Reb Shmuel Binyomin Kramer, also representing the Tzedek Association, addressed the gathering as well. He conveyed special greetings on behalf of the organization’s founder, Mr. Moshe Margaretten, who was unable to attend because he had been called to an urgent meeting in Washington with the director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons.

The emotional highlight of the visit came when the Jewish inmates were individually admitted to meet with the Satmar Rebbe. The Rebbe delivered heartfelt words of chizuk, encouraging them to remain steadfast in their faith and never lose hope despite the difficult circumstances they face. Following his address, each inmate was granted a private audience with the Rebbe, giving them the opportunity to speak openly about their personal struggles and receive his individual brocha.

During the gathering, the Rebbe also joined the inmates in making a l’chaim.

Following the prison visit, representatives of the Tzedek Association and other community activists held a meeting with senior prison administrators and government officials. They discussed a wide range of issues affecting Jewish inmates throughout the New York State correctional system, with the goal of improving religious accommodations and conditions for incarcerated Jews.