Feed aggregator

LISTEN:

A seaplane carrying eight people made an emergency landing in New York City’s East River on Sunday afternoon, prompting a rapid response from emergency crews. All eight occupants were safely rescued, and only two people suffered minor injuries.

The aircraft came down near the NY Skyport Seaplane Base, the city’s only seaplane terminal, along the East River near East 23rd Street and the FDR Drive. Firefighters and marine rescue units arrived within minutes and pulled everyone from the aircraft before it was towed back to the dock.

According to the New York City Fire Department, the emergency call came shortly after noon. Responders found the aircraft floating upright in the water, allowing rescue crews to evacuate the passengers quickly and safely. Two people sustained minor injuries but declined transportation to a hospital.

The Federal Aviation Administration identified the aircraft as a Kodiak 100 seaplane. Preliminary information indicates that a wing strut snapped during the hard landing, leaving the aircraft disabled in the river. The flight had departed from East Hampton on Long Island and was approaching the Manhattan seaplane terminal when the incident occurred.

The cause of the emergency remains under investigation. Air traffic control recordings indicate the pilot declared a “Mayday” shortly before landing in the river, while NYPD helicopters were dispatched after reports that an aircraft had gone down in the water.

Videos from the scene showed firefighters, police boats, and other rescue vessels surrounding the partially submerged aircraft as passengers were evacuated one by one. After the rescue operation concluded, the plane was righted and towed to a nearby dock while authorities secured the area and began their investigation.

{Matzav.com}

[Video below.] NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman warned that the United States is once again engaged in a fierce race to the moon, saying China is advancing rapidly and could soon establish its own human presence on the lunar surface unless America moves first.

Appearing Sunday on CBS News’ Face the Nation, Isaacman said the competition with Beijing has become one of the nation’s top strategic challenges.

“The Chinese are moving at incredible speeds, and they are certainly capable of doing what the Soviets were not during the first space race,” Isaacman said. “The Chinese will land their taikonauts on the moon. There’s no question.”

While expressing confidence in China’s capabilities, Isaacman said the more pressing issue is whether the United States can beat China back to the moon and establish a permanent foothold there.

“The question is, will the United States return before them, and will we do so in a different way this time, when we build a base, establish that enduring presence? I think the answer is yes.”

NASA has continued making progress toward that goal. Following the successful Artemis II mission in April, during which four astronauts circled the moon, the agency recently announced the crew for the next Artemis mission, scheduled for next year.

The Artemis III mission is expected to play a critical role in preparing for America’s return to the lunar surface in 2028 by testing key landing technologies and systems.

Isaacman explained that Artemis III will involve a complex series of operations designed to validate the equipment needed for future lunar missions.

“You’re going to see the three most powerful rockets in the world … And then you’re going to have the landers come together in Earth orbit, test out their capabilities, very a la Apollo 9, give us the confidence in our landers for Artemis IV in 2028. This is an achievable plan to put astronauts back on the surface of the moon.”

Beyond returning astronauts to the moon, Isaacman said NASA intends to begin creating a permanent lunar outpost. He said the agency plans to launch missions at an almost monthly pace during 2027 to establish what he described as a proving ground for future exploration of Mars.

Looking ahead, Isaacman predicted construction of the lunar base could begin as early as next year. By the time astronauts return to the moon in 2028, he said, they should find the first elements of a permanent settlement already in place.

“There’s going to be a buggy there, a lunar terrain vehicle, there’s going to be a start of infrastructure … [and] I would say, early 2030s, the moon is going to be like the International Space Station.”

He added that astronauts will eventually spend extended periods living and working on the moon as NASA gains experience operating in the lunar environment before undertaking future missions to Mars.

“You’re going to have crews that are there on pretty extended periods of time, as we learn in that environment and prepare for Mars.”

WATCH:

{Matzav.com}

A federal appeals court has cleared the way for the Trump administration to reinstall revised historical exhibits at the site of President George Washington’s former Philadelphia residence, rejecting an effort to block displays that critics argue soften the history of slavery in early America.

The interpretive panels are slated to be placed at the President’s House site, just steps from where the Declaration of Independence was adopted on July 4, 1776. The National Park Service did not immediately respond to a request for comment Friday.

The updated displays are intended to replace exhibits installed in 2010 that focused on the lives of the nine enslaved people who lived in the household of George and Martha Washington during the 1790s, when Philadelphia served as the nation’s temporary capital.

The changes were prompted by President Donald Trump’s 2025 executive order directing federally owned historic sites to avoid presenting material that would “disparage Americans past or living” and instead emphasize the “greatness of the achievements and progress of the American people.”

Friday’s decision by a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit was procedural in nature, allowing a ruling issued last month to take effect. The appellate court sits directly across the street from the President’s House historic site.

The earlier ruling—issued by a panel consisting of one judge appointed by Trump, one appointed by President George W. Bush, and one appointed by President Barack Obama—held that a lower court had improperly ordered the federal government to remove the revised exhibits.

On Thursday, the administration asked the court for permission to immediately reinstall the panels, arguing that they were ready to be put in place and should be installed “without further delay.” Court filings submitted by the administration maintain that the new exhibits continue to address the subject of slavery.

Historians, academics, preservation advocates, and public officials have expressed concern for months that the revised presentation, drafted to comply with Trump’s executive order, minimizes the brutality of slavery in favor of a more celebratory account of American history.

Images posted on a government website show that the replacement panels still discuss the enslaved people who lived at the President’s House and include information about the abolitionist movement, the Constitution’s treatment of slavery, the abolition of slavery in Pennsylvania, the views and actions of George Washington and President John Adams regarding slavery, and the Civil Rights movement of the 20th century. However, the new displays omit some material that appeared on the earlier panels, including a map of the transatlantic slave trade, a slavery timeline, and headings such as “The Dirty Business of Slavery.”

The City of Philadelphia, which sued after the original exhibits were removed, continues to fight the changes. On Friday, city attorneys asked the appeals court to temporarily withdraw its order, at least long enough for the city to formally respond to the administration’s request filed the previous day.

In its filing, Philadelphia argued that allowing the new panels to be installed would cause harm, stating: “The President’s House is a site of exceptional importance to Philadelphia and the Nation, developed through years of federal-local collaboration to tell a historically significant and long-suppressed story.”

Roughly half of the original interpretive panels had already been reinstalled earlier this year before a court order halted that effort.