Feed aggregator

Yankees Face Backlash for Drafting Player with Past Antisemitic Incident

Yeshiva World News -

The New York Yankees are being criticized after drafting shortstop Core Jackson, despite his past admission to drawing a swastika on a Jewish student’s dorm door as a freshman in 2021. Jackson says he was “blackout drunk” and has since undergone community service, sensitivity training, and antisemitism education. The Yankees say they vetted him more thoroughly than any player in years, citing his remorse and efforts to learn. Jackson also faced a DUI charge in 2024, later reduced to impaired driving.

U.S. to Screen Immigrants for Ties to Extremist or Antisemitic Ideologies

Yeshiva World News -

Immigrants applying to live and work in the United States will now be screened for ties to anti-American, antisemitic, or extremist ideologies. The updated guidance instructs officers to weigh whether applicants have endorsed, promoted, or supported such views when deciding on green cards, visas, or other immigration benefits. Officials say the rule applies to all applicants seeking U.S. immigration benefits, including permanent residency and work authorization.

World’s First Spinal Cord Transplant To Take Place In Israel, Could Allow Patients To Walk Again

Matzav -

Israel is preparing to conduct the world’s first-ever human spinal cord implant using a patient’s own cells, a groundbreaking advancement that researchers believe could enable paralyzed individuals to stand and walk again, Tel Aviv University announced on Wednesday. The surgery, expected to take place in Israel within the coming months, represents a historic moment in regenerative medicine.

According to the World Health Organization, more than 15 million people worldwide suffer from spinal cord injuries, the majority of which are caused by traumatic incidents such as falls, traffic accidents, or violence.

Currently, there is no complete cure for spinal cord injuries. Most treatment strategies focus on stabilizing the patient, preventing additional harm, and preserving as much function as possible. Emergency responses often include immobilizing the spine, reducing swelling, and occasionally performing surgery to stabilize fractures or relieve built-up pressure on the spinal cord.

Rehabilitation usually involves a combination of physical and occupational therapy, as well as the use of assistive devices such as wheelchairs and supportive braces. While researchers have been exploring experimental treatments—including stem cell therapies, robotic devices, and neurostimulation—there is still no consistently effective solution for restoring full spinal cord function.

Spinal cord injuries are particularly difficult to treat because, unlike many other tissues in the human body, the spinal cord does not naturally repair itself. The structure of the tissue is extremely complex and highly sensitive, making regeneration even more challenging.

“The spinal cord transmits electrical signals from the brain to all parts of the body. When it is severed by trauma—such as a car accident, a fall, or a combat injury—the chain is broken. Think of an electrical cable that has been cut: when the two ends no longer touch, the signal cannot pass, and the patient remains paralyzed below the injury,” explained Professor Tal Dvir, head of the Sagol Center for Regenerative Biotechnology and the Nanotechnology Center at Tel Aviv University, who is leading the project. Dvir is also the chief scientist at Matricelf, the Israeli biotechnology company behind the development.

Unlike other nerve tissues, spinal cord neurons cannot regenerate on their own, and scar tissue that forms after injury further blocks communication between the brain and the body. The upcoming procedure seeks to replace the damaged portion of the spinal cord with a laboratory-grown implant, allowing the engineered tissue to integrate with healthy nerve fibers above and below the injury. In preclinical trials, rats receiving the implants regained their ability to walk normally.

This medical breakthrough was developed over three years ago when Dvir’s team successfully engineered a personalized, three-dimensional human spinal cord in the lab. Findings published in the peer-reviewed journal Advanced Science showed that mice with chronic paralysis regained mobility after receiving the experimental implants.

The procedure begins by collecting blood cells from the patient and reprogramming them into stem-cell-like cells capable of transforming into any tissue type. Additionally, fat tissue is harvested to create a customized hydrogel scaffold, where these reprogrammed cells are grown into a spinal cord structure. Once fully developed, the engineered spinal tissue is implanted to replace the damaged region and reconnect the nervous system.

Several months ago, Dvir and his team received initial approval from Israel’s Ministry of Health to begin “compassionate use” trials on eight patients, making Israel the first country in the world to attempt this groundbreaking procedure. “This is undoubtedly a matter of national pride. The technology was developed here in Israel, at Tel Aviv University and at Matricelf, and from the very beginning it was clear to us that the first-ever surgery would be performed in Israel, with an Israeli patient,” Dvir said.

The technology was commercialized through Matricelf, a biotech company founded in 2019 under a licensing agreement with Ramot, Tel Aviv University’s technology transfer company.

“This milestone marks the shift from pioneering research to patient treatment. Using each patient’s own cells eliminates key safety risks and positions Matricelf at the forefront of regenerative medicine. This first procedure is more than a scientific breakthrough; it is a step toward transforming an area of medicine long considered untreatable,” said Matricelf CEO Gil Hakim.

He continued, “If successful, this therapy could define a new standard of care in spinal cord repair, addressing a multi-billion-dollar market with no effective solutions today. We are proud that Israel is leading this global effort and are fully committed to bringing this innovation to patients worldwide.”

Professor Dvir expressed optimism about the upcoming trials, stating, “Our goal is to help paralyzed patients rise from their wheelchairs. The animal model trials showed extraordinary success, and we are hopeful that the results in humans will be just as promising.”

{Matzav.com Israel}

Court Rules Trump’s $515M Fraud Penalty “Excessive,” Tosses Verdict

Yeshiva World News -

An appeals court has thrown out the massive civil fraud penalty against President Donald Trump, ruling Thursday in New York state’s lawsuit accusing him of exaggerating his wealth. The decision came seven months after the Republican returned to the White House. A panel of five judges in New York’s mid-level Appellate Division said the verdict, which stood to cost Trump over $515 million and rock his real estate empire, was “excessive.” After finding that Trump engaged in fraud by flagrantly padding financial statements that went to lenders and insurers, Judge Arthur Engoron ordered him last year to pay $355 million in penalties. With interest, the sum has topped $515 million. The total — combined with penalties levied on some other Trump Organization executives, including Trump’s sons Eric and Donald Jr. — now exceeds $527 million, with interest. “While the injunctive relief ordered by the court is well crafted to curb defendants’ business culture, the court’s disgorgement order, which directs that defendants pay nearly half a billion dollars to the State of New York, is an excessive fine that violates the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution,” Judges Dianne T. Renwick and Peter H. Moulton wrote in one of several opinions shaping the appeals court’s ruling. Engoron also imposed other punishments, such as banning Trump and his two eldest sons from serving in corporate leadership for a few years. Those provisions have been on pause during Trump’s appeal, and he was able to hold off collection of the money by posting a $175 million bond. The court, which was split on the merits of the lawsuit and the lower court’s fraud finding, dismissed the penalty Engoron imposed in its entirety while also leaving a pathway for further appeals to the state’s highest court, the Court of Appeals. The appeals court, the Appellate Division of the state’s trial court, took an unusually long time to rule, weighing Trump’s appeal for nearly 11 months after oral arguments last fall. Normally, appeals are decided in a matter of weeks or a few months. New York Attorney General Letitia James, who brought the suit on the state’s behalf, has said the businessman-turned-politician engaged in “lying, cheating, and staggering fraud.” Trump and his co-defendants denied wrongdoing. In a six-minute summation of sorts after a monthslong trial, Trump proclaimed in January 2024 that he was “an innocent man” and the case was a “fraud on me.” He has repeatedly maintained that the case and verdict were political moves by James and Engoron, who are both Democrats. Trump’s Justice Department has subpoenaed James for records related to the lawsuit, among other documents, as part of an investigation into whether she violated the president’s civil rights. James’ personal attorney, Abbe D. Lowell, has said that investigating the fraud case is “the most blatant and desperate example of this administration carrying out the president’s political retribution campaign.” Trump and his lawyers said his financial statements weren’t deceptive, since they came with disclaimers noting they weren’t audited. The defense also noted that bankers and insurers independently evaluated the numbers, and the loans were repaid. Despite such discrepancies as tripling the size of his Trump Tower penthouse, he said the financial statements were, if anything, lowball estimates of his fortune. During an appellate court hearing in September, Trump’s lawyers argued that […]

Report: Freed Palestinian Terrorists to Address Detroit Conference

Matzav -

Two Palestinian terrorists who were freed by Israel during temporary ceasefires with Hamas are expected to speak at a pro-Palestinian conference scheduled for late August in Detroit, Michigan, according to a report from the Jerusalem Post.

The report states that the Detroit People’s Conference for Palestine will feature two controversial speakers: one is a Tanzim operative who was released in February as part of a deal to secure hostages held by Hamas, and the other is a former senior figure in the Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine (DFLP).

One of the speakers, Hussam Shaheen, was once a prominent leader and international coordinator for Fatah’s youth movement before shifting his activities to the organization’s militant wings. According to the book The Rise and Fall of Arab Jerusalem: Palestinian Politics and the City since 1967, Shaheen established a cell of the al-Aqsa Martyrs’ Brigade in Jebl Mukaber and obtained weapons for a planned 2001 attack that was ultimately foiled.

The second speaker, Omar Assaf, has also been tied to terrorism. According to reports from Haaretz and Al Araby, Assaf was an official in the DFLP terrorist organization. The PLO’s own website lists someone by the same name as one of the faction’s original founders. Today, Assaf serves as the coordinator of the executive committees of the Palestinian Popular Conference, a group pushing to restructure the PLO into a far more radical and militant organization.

A campaign in support of Shaheen refers to him as a “political prisoner,” despite his documented ties to violent activity.

Pro-Palestinian gatherings have frequently provided platforms for individuals connected to terrorism. At a 2017 conference in Chicago, Rasmea Odeh, a convicted terrorist, received a standing ovation from attendees. She was later deported from the United States for lying on immigration documents.

Tensions surrounding these events have only deepened since October 7. At a post-attack rally in Dearborn, Michigan, an Arab speaker who mentioned the word “peace” was loudly heckled by the crowd — despite the fact that he was just as openly anti-Israel as the other participants on stage.

{Matzav.com}

Study: Democrats Losing Registration Race in All 30 States that Track Party Affiliation — 4.5 Million-Voter Swing Toward GOP

Matzav -

The Democrat Party is facing a severe collapse in voter support, according to a startling new analysis of national voter registration trends, Breitbart reports.

A report from the New York Times, based on data from L2, a nonpartisan analytics firm, shows that for the first time since 2018, more newly registered voters across the country aligned with the Republican Party than the Democratic Party. The surge has been fueled largely by President Donald Trump’s growing strength among men, younger voters, and Latinos during the 2024 election cycle.

The findings paint a grim picture for Democrats, suggesting that traditional strategies to boost registration and reverse losses are no longer working. Party strategists and political commentators appear increasingly uncertain about how to restore momentum heading into future elections.

“Of the 30 states that track voter registration by political party, Democrats lost ground to Republicans in every single one between the 2020 and 2024 elections — and often by a lot,” the report states. “That four-year swing toward the Republicans adds up to 4.5 million voters, a deep political hole that could take years for Democrats to climb out from.”

The shift spans the entire political map, affecting red, blue, and battleground states alike.

Overall, Republicans gained substantial ground in voter registrations. “All told, Democrats lost about 2.1 million registered voters between the 2020 and 2024 elections in the 30 states, along with Washington, D.C., that allow people to register with a political party,” the report notes. “(In the remaining 20 states, voters do not register with a political party.) Republicans gained 2.4 million.”

The registration imbalance has also significantly reshaped the political landscape. Among the 30 states that register voters by party, Democrats’ advantage over Republicans — once an 11-point lead in 2020 — has dwindled to just over six points in 2024. That steep decline underscores the severity of the situation for the party heading into upcoming contests.

Michael Pruser, director of data science at Decision Desk HQ, summarized the bleak outlook: “I don’t want to say, ‘The death cycle of the Democratic Party,’ but there seems to be no end to this. There is no silver lining or cavalry coming across the hill. This is month after month, year after year.”

Additional figures reinforce the depth of the problem. By 2024, Republicans had overtaken Democrats in the share of new registered voters nationally, improving by nine percentage points since 2018. In the same period, Democrats’ share dropped nearly eight points, further widening the gap between the parties.

This shift is especially pronounced in four key battleground states — North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Arizona, and Nevada — where Republican registration numbers have grown significantly while Democrats have seen sharp declines.

Analysts believe diagnosing the issue will be far easier than solving it. Much of the Democrats’ previous success relied on boosting turnout among racial minorities and young voters, typically through extensive nonprofit registration drives. But as the Times highlights, “For years, the left has relied on a sprawling network of nonprofits — which solicit donations from people whose identities they need not disclose — to register Black, Latino and younger voters. Though the groups are technically nonpartisan, the underlying assumption has been that most new voters registering would vote Democratic.”

Mr. Trump’s growing appeal among working-class minority voters has upended that formula, dismantling Democrats’ assumption that blind registration automatically translates to Democratic votes.

Unlike nonprofit voter registration drives — which are cheap, fast, and tax-advantaged for donors — partisan efforts to locate and recruit specific Democratic voters are significantly more complicated and expensive. Donors who contribute to nonprofits receive tax benefits, but contributions to political action committees or party operations do not qualify for the same write-offs, making sustained funding more difficult.

Even when funding is secured, partisan voter outreach is extremely costly. Locating, contacting, registering, and mobilizing likely Democratic voters requires far more time and money, with estimates showing the cost per additional vote can climb into the hundreds of dollars.

Pouring money into existing infrastructure is unlikely to reverse the trend, and Democrats are struggling without a clear message or unifying leader. Without a significant change in strategy, the party risks falling even further behind.

If President Trump and his allies continue expanding the MAGA coalition across multiple demographic groups, the Democrat Party’s electoral challenges are likely to deepen in the years ahead.

{Matzav.com}

Smartmatic Executives Face Bribery Allegations Tied to LA Voting Machine Contract

Yeshiva World News -

Smartmatic, the elections-technology company suing Fox News for defamation, is now contending with a growing list of criminal allegations against some of its executives — including a new claim by federal prosecutors that a “slush fund” for bribing foreign officials was financed partly with proceeds from the sale of voting machines in Los Angeles. The new details about the criminal case surfaced this month in court filings in Miami, where the company’s co-founder, Roger Pinate, and two Venezuelan colleagues were charged last year with bribing officials in the Philippines in exchange for a contract to help run that country’s 2016 presidential elections. Pinate, who no longer works for Smartmatic, has pleaded not guilty. To buttress the case, federal prosecutors are seeking to introduce evidence they argue shows that some of the nearly $300 million the company was paid by Los Angeles County to help modernize its voting systems was diverted to a fund controlled by Pinate through the use of overseas shell companies, fake invoices and other means. Smartmatic itself hasn’t been charged with breaking any laws, nor have U.S. prosecutors accused Smartmatic or its executives of tampering with election results. Similarly, they haven’t accused Los Angeles County officials of wrongdoing, or said whether they were even aware of the alleged bribery scheme. County officials say they weren’t. But the case against Pinate is unfolding as Smartmatic is pursuing a $2.7 billion lawsuit accusing Fox of defamation for airing false claims that the company helped rig the 2020 U.S. presidential election. Fox says it was legitimately reporting newsworthy allegations. Smartmatic said the Justice Department’s new filing was filled with “misrepresentations” and is “untethered from reality.” “Let us be clear: Smartmatic wins business because we’re the best at what we do,” the company said in a statement. “We operate ethically and abide by all laws always, both in Los Angeles County and every jurisdiction where we operate.” Fox questions Smartmatic’s dealings in LA Still, Fox has gone to court to try to get more information about L.A. County’s dealings with Smartmatic. The network has long tried to leverage the bribery allegations to undermine Smartmatic’s narrative about its business prospects – a key component in calculating any potential damages — and portray it as a scandal-plagued company brought low by its own legal problems, not Fox’s broadcasts. South Florida-based Smartmatic was founded more than two decades ago by a group of Venezuelans who found early success working for the government of the late Hugo Chavez, a devotee of electronic voting. The company later expanded globally, providing voting machines and other technology to help carry out elections in 25 countries, from Argentina to Zambia. It was awarded its contract to help with Los Angeles County elections in 2018. The contract, which Smartmatic continues to service, gave the company an important foothold in what was then a fast-expanding U.S. voting-technology market. But Smartmatic has said its business tanked after Fox News gave President Donald Trump’s lawyers a platform to paint the company as part of a conspiracy to steal the 2020 election. Fox itself eventually aired a piece refuting the allegations after Smartmatic’s lawyers complained, but it has aggressively defended itself against the defamation lawsuit in New York. “Facing imminent financial collapse and indictment, Smartmatic saw a litigation lottery ticket in Fox News’s coverage of the 2020 election,” the network’s lawyers said in a court […]

They Wanted a Place in Yerushalayim—But Everything Felt Too Big Too Crowded Or Too Noisy Until Now

Yeshiva World News -

A rare opportunity just opened in Ramat Eshkol. For years, the idea of owning an apartment in Yerushalayim felt out of reach for many families—especially those looking for something central, calm, and community-oriented. Most new projects are either massive, overcrowded, under construction for years—or far from where you actually want to live. But this is different. In the heart of Ramat Eshkol, two boutique buildings—at 12 Sderot Eshkol and 4 Mishmar HaGvul—offer a smarter, more livable option. You’re walking distance from the light rail, minutes from Geula, near top schools, parks, and shuls—and yet still nestled in a quiet, residential street. This project was designed for Anglo families who want quality, not quantity. Modern layouts. Upgraded finishes. A strong, established community. And the kind of building where neighbors feel like neighbors—not strangers. What’s available right now: – Only 2 apartments still on the market at 12 Sderot Eshkol – Boutique, finished buildings (no construction noise or waiting) – Prime location in one of the most in-demand areas of Yerushalayim Whether you’re planning to move soon, looking for a future home, or want to invest wisely in Israel’s capital—this is the opportunity people have been waiting for. Projects like this don’t sit on the market long. And when they’re gone, they’re gone. Click here now! https://sderoteshkol.co.il/?publisher=YWNA2108Your place in Yerushalayim might be closer than you think.

Musk Ordered to Face Lawsuit for $1 Million Election Lottery

Matzav -

Elon Musk was ordered on Wednesday by a federal judge to defend himself against a lawsuit filed by voters who claim he misled them into signing a petition supporting the U.S. Constitution in exchange for a chance to win his $1 million-per-day giveaway.

U.S. District Judge Robert Pitman, based in Austin, Texas, ruled that Jacqueline McAferty had provided sufficient claims in her proposed class-action lawsuit, alleging that Musk and his political organization, America PAC, persuaded her to give personal identifying details as part of the promotion during the final stretch of the 2024 election season.

Attorneys representing Musk and America PAC did not immediately issue any statements regarding the case.

Musk created America PAC to assist Donald Trump during his successful 2024 presidential campaign.

McAferty, who resides in Arizona, alleges that Musk and America PAC targeted voters in seven key swing states, encouraging them to sign the petition by advertising that $1 million winners would be chosen “randomly,” resembling a lottery — even though participants had little to no genuine chance of receiving the money.

According to her claims, those who signed the petition were also required to provide full names, mailing addresses, email addresses, and phone numbers.

In an effort to have the lawsuit thrown out, Musk pointed to several “red flags” that he argued proved the promotion was not an illegal lottery.

He said this included the fact that the advertisements stated recipients of the $1 million were “selected to earn” the funds and were expected to act as spokespeople for America PAC, which he claimed contradicted the idea that the payment was a “prize.”

However, Judge Pitman pointed to other promotional language suggesting that the defendants were “awarding” $1 million and that the funds could, in fact, be “won.”

“It is plausible that plaintiff justifiably relied on those statements to believe that defendants were objectively offering her the chance to enter a random lottery — even if that is not what they subjectively intended to do,” Pitman wrote in his ruling.

Pitman was appointed to the federal bench by President Barack Obama in 2014.

Musk also disputed the notion that participants suffered harm simply by sharing their personal contact details. However, the judge noted that an expert specializing in political data brokerage could testify regarding the monetary value of voter information collected from battleground states.

The lawsuit was officially filed on Election Day, November 5, 2024.

Just one day earlier, a Philadelphia judge denied a motion to halt Musk’s giveaway, ruling that the city’s top prosecutor had failed to demonstrate that the promotion constituted an illegal lottery.

Musk resides in Texas, and his electric vehicle company, Tesla, operates its headquarters out of Austin.

{Matzav.com}

Immigrants Seeking Entry To The U.S. Face New Anti-Americanism, Antisemitism, And Extremism Screening

Yeshiva World News -

Immigrants applying to live and work in the United States will now face a new layer of scrutiny, as federal officials announced Tuesday that immigration officers will consider whether applicants have promoted anti-American, antisemitic, or extremist ideologies. The updated guidance from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) reflects the administration’s commitment to ensuring that those granted the privilege of living in America embrace its values and freedoms rather than undermine them. “Immigration benefits—including to live and work in the United States—remain a privilege, not a right,” said Matthew Tragesser, a USCIS spokesman. “America’s benefits should not be given to those who despise the country and promote anti-American ideologies.” Officials emphasized that the policy is not about silencing opinions but about protecting the nation’s institutions and security. Applicants found to have endorsed or supported hostile views toward the United States, its allies, or Jewish communities may now see those actions weighed against their eligibility for green cards, visas, or other benefits. Elizabeth Jacobs, director of regulatory affairs and policy at the Center for Immigration Studies, praised the move, noting that it “sends a clear message that the U.S. will be less tolerant of anti-Americanism or antisemitism when making immigration decisions.” She added that officers still retain discretion, but the new policy provides clearer guidance on behaviors that demonstrate hostility to America’s core principles. Critics have voiced concern that the change could lead to subjective decisions. But supporters argue that immigration officers have long been required to make judgment calls, and this policy ensures those judgments are better aligned with American values. “Distance no longer provides the United States the protection it once did,” said one senior official. “This measure helps ensure that people coming into our country are here to contribute, not to tear down.” The change follows earlier reforms such as expanded social media vetting and new standards for determining “good moral character” in naturalization cases—updates that emphasize not just the absence of misconduct but also positive contributions and alignment with America’s principles. While some legal activists are preparing to challenge the policy, immigration attorneys acknowledge the rules are part of a broader effort to safeguard the system from abuse. “This is what was elected,” said Jonathan Grode, managing partner of Green and Spiegel immigration law firm. “The government has every right to interpret immigration policy to ensure our system welcomes people who believe in what this country stands for.” (YWN World Headquarters – NYC)

Pages

Subscribe to NativUSA Portal aggregator