Feed aggregator
At NYC Mayor Primary Debate, Cuomo Says He’d Visit Israel, Which Mamdani Won’t Say Is ‘Jewish State’
With five minutes to spare in the two-hour New York City Democratic mayoral primary debate, which NBC carried on Wednesday night, the candidates were asked what their first foreign trip would be as mayor.
“Given the hostility and the antisemitism that has been shown in New York, I would go to Israel,” said Andrew Cuomo, the former New York governor who is trying to make a comeback and who recently scored the Far Rockaway Jewish Alliance’s endorsement.
Zohran Mamdani, an anti-Israel New York state representative who just received the endorsement of far-left, progressive “Squad” member Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), said that he would stay in the city. “My plans are to address New Yorkers across the five boroughs,” he said.
“Can I just jump in?” a moderator said. “Would you visit Israel as mayor?”
“I’ll be standing up for Jewish New Yorkers, and I’ll be meeting them wherever they are across the five boroughs—whether that’s in their synagogues and temples or at their homes or at the subway platform, because ultimately we need to focus on delivering on their concerns,” he said.
“Yes or no?” the moderator asked. “Do you believe in a Jewish state of Israel?”
“I believe Israel has the right to exist,” Mamdani said.
Pressed if he believes it should exist “as a Jewish state,” Mamdani said it ought to “as a state with equal rights.”
“His answer was no, he won’t visit Israel,” Cuomo said. “That’s what he was trying to say.”
“I believe every state should be a state of equal rights,” Mamdani said.
Daniel S. Mariaschin, the CEO of B’nai B’rith International, told JNS that “there is something definitely wrong when a candidate for mayor of New York City, which has the largest Jewish population in the United States, equivocates on Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish state and refuses to say he will visit Israel.”
Morton Klein, national president of the Zionist Organization of America, told JNS that Mamdani “is a frightening, ignorant, bigoted antisemite, who refuses to affirm the right to exist of the Jewish state of Israel, greatest and most reliable ally.”
“He would never oppose the right to exist of Muslim terrorist nations like Iran, Sudan or Syria or enemies of America like China or Russia,” Klein said. “Mamdani is an ugly, Jew hater, who has forfeited his right to public office or even being employed anywhere. He must be shunned and condemned. He has no place in polite company.”
Rabbi Moshe Hauer, the executive vice president of the Orthodox Union, told JNS that “the safety of all New Yorkers—including Jewish New Yorkers—is the solemn responsibility of the mayor of New York.”
“That safety has been deeply impacted by the rhetoric and calls to action of those who deny Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish state,” he said. “We would expect anyone aspiring to serve as mayor of New York to prioritize his responsibility to lead the city to safety by clearly rejecting such rhetoric and the climate of fear and hostility that it has created in our city.”
Several others at the debate said they would plan to visit Israel on their first trip as mayor, including Adrienne Adams, the New York City Council speaker, who said, “I would visit the Holy Land.”
“I’d make my fourth trip to Israel followed by my fifth trip to Ukraine,” said Whitney Tilson, an investor. “Two of our greatest allies fighting on the front lines of the global war on terror.”
Scott Stringer, the former New York City comptroller who is Jewish, said that his goal “would be to take my first trip to Israel.”
“My wife’s life work in this area means a lot to our family, and it could coincide with my young son Miles’s bar mitzvah,” he said. (Tilson and Cuomo wore yellow ribbons in solidarity with the hostages in Gaza.)
“Boy, what Trump is doing to Canada; there’s a lot of opportunities for us to partner better with them,” said Brad Lander, the New York City comptroller who is Jewish, suggesting he would visit the Great White North.
‘Immoral, unlawful’
Some 100 minutes into the debate, the moderators turned to a then-breaking news story—that the Trump administration told the agency that accredits Columbia University that the school should lose its status.
A moderator quoted Linda McMahon, the U.S. education secretary, who stated that “after Hamas’s Oct. 7, 2023, terror attack on Israel, Columbia University’s leadership acted with deliberate indifference towards the harassment of Jewish students on its campus. This is not only immoral but also unlawful.”
“Thirty seconds,” he said. “What’s your reaction to this move?”
Cuomo said that there are two issues. “I do believe there’s been antisemitism in the city. I believe it’s a growing problem,” he said. “I believe the rhetoric about Israel has actually inflamed the antisemitism.”
“Put that aside. I think this is just another overreach of the Trump administration,” he added. “Now he’s going to take over the academic universities in this country. He is literally attacking the foundation of democracy, and he must be opposed at every turn.”
Mamdani said that the decision is “yet another example of a gross overreach of the Trump administration, one that they have shown they will continue to pursue with whichever university they decide to target.”
“It’s been Columbia. It’s been Harvard,” he said. “We need to have a mayor that will actually stand up to Donald Trump. Not one that we have right now that will collaborate with them, and that is who I will be.”
Tilson said that he is “totally appalled” that Columbia and other top schools didn’t do enough to curb the “mobs” that created dangerous environments for Jewish students, including his daughter.
“My wife and children are Jewish,” he said. “This is personal to me.”
Tilson is even more disgusted by the Trump administration “pretending to care about antisemitism and accreditation of universities,” he said.
Michael Blake, a former New York state representative, said that “as a reverend, let’s start from the core—that all hostages have to come back home on both sides. Let’s also be very clear that we have to reject antisemitism and also have humanity what’s happening for the Palestinian people at the same time.”
Although Blake paused briefly at the end of the sentence and began the next sentence with “let’s also be very clear,” he wrote on social media later in the night that “I didn’t say hostages on both sides.”
“I said that hostages need to come home,” he wrote. “Then, separately, we need to honor the pain on both sides. Definitely did not say that Israel has hostages.”
Stringer said that “there’s no question that on so many of these college campuses, the antisemitic anti-Jewish hate is very real, and we have to make sure that we hold universities accountable to make sure every student of all different backgrounds are safe.”
Trump’s move “goes against everything that’s American,” Stringer said, “and if he really wants to help Jewish students and all students, because everybody faces discrimination at some point in their lives, then maybe he would fully fund the civil rights divisions. He would not cut programs that could go a long way to fostering the ability for all different people to work together and come together.”
Adams said that “all New Yorkers deserve to feel safe, no matter who they are.”
Adams said that she allocated more than $18 million to combat Jew-hatred in the city. “As mayor, I will continue to combat antisemitism within the city of New York,” she said.
“This is a frightening time for Jews, and I feel it really personally after the flamethrowing in Boulder, Colo., and the two murders in Washington, D.C.,” Lander said. “I go to a lot of Jewish communal events and you can’t just be looking over your shoulder.”
He added that he has a “really detailed plan” for addressing “hate crimes and antisemitism” in the city.
Jessica Ramos, a New York state senator, said that as mayor, she would “make sure that we are keeping our Jewish students safe, our Muslim students safe and that we are fighting bigotry at every turn.”
“There is no room for the skyrocketing antisemitism that we are seeing in our community, and the xenophobia must end,” she said.
Zellnor Myrie, a New York state senator, said that “there has been a clear and unequivocal rise in antisemitism in this city and across this country.”
“We have to be just as clear and unequivocal in calling it out and rooting it out wherever it wears its ugly head,” he said. “That is what I’m going to do as mayor. But come on, this is New York City. Our Jewish friends and our neighbors, they make our city what it is.”
‘An abomination’
The next question related to Mahmoud Khalil, the Syrian born Columbia alumnus and Algerian national, who was admitted to the country on a student visa. The Trump administration is trying to deport the green card holder, who is married to a U.S. citizen, for his actions as a leader of anti-Israel protests on the Columbia campus.
“He should be set free. He should be at home with his wife Noor and their young child, and the fact that he is still in Louisiana is an abomination,” Mamdani said.
“It’s an attack on our First Amendment, and it is clear another example of Donald Trump weaponizing the very real issue of antisemitism to then throw Palestinian New Yorkers into detention facilities and not even tell us what the crime is that they’re charged with,” Mamdani added.
Cuomo said that “this is a continuation of Trump eroding democracy, chipping away at due process.”
“He should be released. He should be released immediately,” he said. “He shouldn’t have been detained in the first place.”
JNSListen: The Daily “Bitachon 4 Life” Burst of Inspiration on Matzav.com: Who Did It?
LISTEN:
https://matzav.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Bitachon4Life-Shiur-1510-Tocheles-Part-30.mp3For more info, email bitachon4life@gmail.com.
Listen: The Daily Tefila4Life Shiur On Matzav.com: What Is Anava?
Significant Progress Reported on Drafting Consensus Draft Law; Netanyahu’s Office Aims for Agreement Before Shabbos
In a major development amid the ongoing crisis surrounding Israel’s draft law, Israeli Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu’s office announced early Friday morning that “significant progress” had been made in negotiations, with efforts underway to finalize an agreed-upon version of the bill before the start of Shabbos.
The statement came following a high-stakes meeting Thursday night that lasted more than seven hours, attended by Prime Minister Netanyahu, Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee Chairman MK Yoel (Yuli) Edelstein, former Minister Ariel Attias, and Cabinet Secretary Yossi Fuchs.
Sources confirmed that much of the marathon discussion revolved around the sanctions clauses Edelstein had been insisting on as part of the new draft legislation. According to insiders, Netanyahu managed to soften Edelstein’s stance, with some of the proposed sanctions expected to be dropped entirely from the final version. The parties also reached initial agreements on the timing and conditions under which any remaining sanctions would be triggered. One key understanding is that sanctions will not be enforced if the majority of draft targets are being met.
Netanyahu’s office stated: “The meeting between Prime Minister Netanyahu, Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee Chairman MK Yuli Edelstein, former minister Ariel Attias, and Cabinet Secretary Yossi Fuchs regarding the draft law has concluded. Significant progress was achieved. It was decided following the meeting that efforts will be made tomorrow to finalize the remaining outstanding matters.”
The meeting came on the heels of a decision by the Moetzes Gedolei HaTorah of Agudas Yisroel, which convened Thursday night at the residence of the Vizhnitzer Rebbe in Moshav Ora, near Yerushalayim. At the conclusion of the gathering, the Moetzes issued a formal declaration stating that Agudas Yisroel would support a bill to dissolve the Knesset. The decision was read aloud by the Moetzes’ secretary, declaring: “For the people dwelling in Zion in general and the chareidi public in particular, the Moetzes Gedolei HaTorah has determined that it is no longer appropriate to remain in a government that enables the persecution of the Torah world and violates prior agreements. The Moetzes instructs Agudas Yisroel’s Knesset members to present a bill in July to dissolve the Knesset.”
{Matzav.com Israel}
Watch: Watters Says Elon Musk Wants to ‘DOGE’ Trump – Analysis of a Wild Day
Fox News host Jesse Watters gives his take on the ‘big, beautiful beef’ between President Donald Trump and Elon Musk on ‘Jesse Watters Primetime.’
WATCH:
Rav Yitzchok Zilberstein: “The Torah is Weeping Today. It is Truly Degraded.”
Rav Ben Zion Kook paid a visit to the home of the revered posek Rav Yitzchok Zilberstein to offer his brachos in honor of the bar mitzvah of Rav Zilberstein’s grandson. During the visit, the conversation turned to a subject weighing heavily on both rabbanim—the troubling state of the olam haTorah in Eretz Yisroel and the unrelenting decrees being issued against it.
Rav Kook, rosh Beis Hora’ah Haklali in Yerushalayim and rav of Kehillas Avi Ezri in Petach Tikvah, was a close talmid of Rav Zilberstein’s father-in-law, the posek hador, Rav Yosef Shalom Elyashiv zt”l. During the visit, Rav Zilberstein warmly reminisced about the deep admiration Rav Elyashiv had for Rav Kook.
“Rav Elyashiv loved you so much—oh, how he loved you,” Rav Zilberstein exclaimed. “It wasn’t easy to be loved by him, but he truly loved you. That love should be a zechus for you. You come from one of the noble families of the Jewish people.”
The tone of the visit shifted as Rav Zilberstein voiced his anguish over the repeated efforts to undermine Torah life. “Today is a time when the Torah is cast into the corner. They reject this, and that, and that… They take away our livelihood. The Torah is weeping today. It is truly degraded. Its honor has fallen so low. Anyone who belongs to the Torah world must not take anything from this government—not this and not that.”
He continued, delving into a deeper perspective: “The commentaries ask why we don’t specifically pray in our tefillos that Hashem save us from decrees that crush us and deprive us of sustenance. The answer given is that when we say at the end of Shemoneh Esrei, ‘Venafshi ke’afar lakol tiheyeh‘—‘Let my soul be like dust to all’—it already includes that time will come when we will truly be like dust…”
Rav Kook interjected, “But we ask to be like dust?”
Rav Zilberstein explained, “The intention is not that we seek disgrace, but that when they do degrade us, turning us into dust, we should be able to accept it with love… That we should have the strength to endure the humiliation they inflict upon us.”
Rav Zilberstein then added another painful observation: “Besides all the decrees they are placing on bnei yeshivah, they now even forbid travel abroad. If a bochur travels, he is immediately sent to prison…”
{Matzav.com Israel}
Trump Prioritizes Passing “One Big, Beautiful Bill,” Says WH Press Secretary
Stephen Miller Praises “One Big Beautiful Bill” as Transformative, Pro-American Legislation
Bill Clinton Blames Biden Staff for Debate Debacle — ‘Allowed to Happen’
During Thursday’s episode of ABC’s The View, President Bill Clinton came to President Joe Biden’s defense regarding his debated 2024 debate performance, attributing the issue in part to poor scheduling decisions made by Biden’s team.
Co-host Alyssa Farah Griffin posed a pointed question: “Mr. President, I want to ask you, last time you were here, you were actually fiercely defender of President Biden’s when people were questioning whether he should stay in the race and when he decided to step aside. You praised his decision to do so. [T]here have now been a lot of reports, books written with Democratic sources talking about what appeared to be decline while he was in the White House. Do you give any credence to those reports or do you stand by your assessment of the former president?”
In response, Clinton said, “Well, I think you have to pay attention to them, but all I can say is whenever I was around him, his mind was clear, his judgment was good, and he was on top of his briefs. But look what, look at that debate, for example. What happened in the ten days before his debate, and what were the White House staff thinking? He went to Europe and back twice, and then he went to California once. And he was 80 years old. What the heck is he doing that for? So, why was that allowed to happen? So, there’s a lot of questions. All I know is I think we should think less about that and more about the future. We know President Reagan had clear signs of Alzheimer’s in his last two years. We know Woodrow Wilson after his stroke couldn’t make any decisions and his wife made them.”
Clinton’s remarks emphasized both his personal experience with Biden’s mental acuity and his criticism of how Biden’s travel agenda may have impacted his readiness. He also drew historical comparisons to other presidents who showed signs of cognitive decline while in office, suggesting that focusing forward is more important than dwelling on debate-night missteps.
{Matzav.com}
Rav Schreiber: “If Hashem Gave Me a Blow, No One Else Should Suffer”
In an emotional and inspiring address, Rav Yisrael Bunim Schreiber, rosh yeshiva of Yeshivas Nesiv HaDaas and gaavad of Ashdod, returned to his kehillah for the first time since falling ill. Speaking from a place of deep emunah and personal challenge, he delivered words of chizuk to the packed crowd at Beis Medrash Nefesh HaChaim, where hundreds gathered on short notice to hear their rosh yeshiva once again.
Opening his remarks, Rav Schreiber declared, “If Hashem gave me a blow, no one else should have to suffer.”
It was his first public appearance in Ashdod since the onset of his illness, and it came just hours after medical results regarding his condition were received.
A special tefillah gathering will be held tonight at 11:00 PM at the Kosel, where the public is urged to daven for the complete refuah of Rav Yisrael Bunim ben Chaya Roiza.
Prominent rabbanim and roshei yeshiva from across Ashdod graced the event, including Rav Avraham Altman, rosh yeshiva of Ateres Tzvi; Rav Shlomo Dolinger, rosh yeshiva of Pri Eitz Chaim; Rav Meir Dovid Rozovsky of Vilkomer; Rav Yitzchok Novick, rosh kollel of Beis Shmuel; Dayan Y. Abramowitz, and others.
In his speech, Rav Schreiber expounded on the Gemara in Rosh Hashanah which discusses two men ascending the gallows. Though both faced the same judgment, but only one was saved. The Gemara asks: Why was one answered in his tefillah and the other not? It answers that one prayed a tefillah sheleimah—a complete prayer—and was answered, while the other did not.
Rav Schreiber posed a piercing question: How is it possible that a man standing moments from death, with the noose already around his neck, didn’t offer a complete tefillah?
He answered: Of course he prayed—but he still placed hope in human intervention. He relied on advocates, on bribes, on earthly efforts. That lack of total dependence on Hashem rendered his tefillah incomplete.
“A tefillah sheleimah means relying solely on the Ribbono Shel Olam,” Rav Schreiber said. “Of course, we must make our hishtadlus—that is how Hashem runs the world, as it says, ‘U’veirach’cha Hashem Elokecha b’chol asher ta’aseh.’ Our sages explain: not while you’re idle, but ‘asher ta’aseh’—when you act.”
“That’s how it must be,” he continued. “Know that Hashem is guiding you. And if you know that, then—‘Hashem shomrecha, Hashem tzilcha al yad y’minecha’—Hashem is your protector, Hashem is your shadow at your right hand. The more you attach yourself to Hashem, the more Hashem attaches Himself to you.”
{Matzav.com Israel}
AOC on Trump-Musk Rift: “The Girls Are Fighting, This Was Long Time Coming”
Speaker Johnson Calls Elon Musk a Friend, Sends Info via Text Amid Trump Tensions
HISTORIC: Orthodox Majority Secured in WZO Elections as Eretz HaKodesh Soars to Top Tier
In a historic and potentially transformative moment for global Jewry, the preliminary results of the 2025 World Zionist Organization (WZO) elections reveal a seismic shift in Jewish representation and priorities: For the first time in history, Orthodox-affiliated slates have collectively achieved a majority in the WZO. Leading this groundswell is Eretz HaKodesh, which has surged to a commanding position with 29,159 votes.
The WZO elections serve as a democratic vehicle by which Jews from across the globe can influence key decisions affecting Jewish life in Israel and the Diaspora. With funding power in the hundreds of millions and influence over key Zionist institutions such as the Jewish Agency, Keren Kayemet L’Yisrael (JNF), and Keren Hayesod, the composition of the WZO has far-reaching implications.
Eretz HaKodesh’s preliminary showing—29,159 votes—is nothing short of groundbreaking. Launched only a few years ago to give authentic Torah Jews a voice in the Zionist establishment, the slate has now catapulted to one of the leading positions in the entire election, outpacing MERCAZ USA (27,893), the slate of the Conservative movement, and gaining just behind Am Yisrael Chai (31,765), which draws from a broad base of Modern Orthodox and traditional voters.
“This is a moment of kiddush Hashem,” an Eretz HaKodesh activist said. “We entered this space to protect the kedushah and mesorah of Eretz Yisrael. These results prove that the Torah community is ready to stand up and be counted, not only in the beis medrash but also in shaping the institutions that impact the soul of our nation.”
Together with ORTHODOX ISRAEL COALITION – MIZRACHI (26,975 votes), SHAS (2,658), Dorshei Torah V’Tzion (1,946), and other Orthodox-aligned lists such as Achdut Israel (1,592), the Orthodox camp now holds a clear and unprecedented majority within the WZO. This development could dramatically alter the ideological makeup of key Zionist institutions and redirect funding toward religious education, aliyah efforts for Torah communities, and traditional Jewish identity initiatives.
“This is the first time in history that Orthodox slates together make up the majority of the WZO,” said an insider. “This marks a new era.”
Preliminary Vote Breakdown
The full preliminary vote tally is as follows:
- VOTE REFORM – 47,887
- Am Yisrael Chai – 31,765
- Eretz HaKodesh – 29,159
- MERCAZ USA (Conservative Movement) – 27,893
- ORTHODOX ISRAEL COALITION (MIZRACHI) – 26,975
- HATIKVAH (Progressive Slate) – 11,537
- ZOA Coalition – 8,511
- Aish Ha’am – 6,649
- VISION – 6,201
- Israeli American Council (IAC) – 5,344
- Kol Israel – 5,314
- AID Coalition (Americans for Israel Democracy) – 4,880
- Beyachad – TOGETHER FOR ISRAEL – 3,238
- SHAS – 2,658
- Israel365 Action – 2,339
- Dorshei Torah V’Tzion – 1,946
- The Jewish Future – Centrist Liberal Zionism – 1,794
- Achdut Israel – 1,592
- American Forum for Israel – 1,539
- ANU: A New Union – 1,509
- Herut North America – 1,109
- Americans 4 Israel: Strength Through Unity – 385
“The Torah world can no longer afford to be passive,” said one activist. “The future of klal Yisroel, the identity of Eretz Yisrael, and the soul of our people depend on who sits at the table. Baruch Hashem, we now have a seat—and we intend to use it.”
{Matzav.com}
Private Lunar Dream Stalls Again as Japanese Lander Falls Silent During Descent
Doctors, Insurers Confused Over COVID Vaccine Recs
Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s decision to revise COVID-19 vaccine guidance without first consulting the CDC’s established advisory board has caused widespread confusion among doctors, insurers, and health experts, multiple sources told Reuters.
In a video shared on social media last week, Kennedy — known for his long-standing skepticism about vaccines — declared that the government would no longer recommend COVID vaccinations for healthy children or pregnant women.
Soon after the video was posted, the CDC quietly modified its online childhood immunization schedule. The updated version indicated that healthy children can still receive the COVID shot if their parents and physicians believe it’s appropriate. The CDC also removed its prior recommendation for pregnant women to get vaccinated.
This shift bypassed the standard review process led by the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), a group of external experts that typically evaluates evidence in public meetings before making any formal recommendations. Their decisions usually guide what appears in the CDC’s immunization schedule, which influences what vaccines are covered under the Affordable Care Act.
“The surprise announcement has created uncertainty for payers and providers about whether the video posting constitutes an official policy change,” said Sarah Moselle, a principal with the healthcare consulting firm Avalere.
Until ACIP votes at its upcoming meeting from June 25–27, insurance companies are expected to delay any decisions about vaccine coverage, according to Robert Popovian, who leads Conquest Advisors, a healthcare consultancy.
Kennedy’s Department of Health and Human Services has defended the move, with a spokesperson stating that it was legally permissible and reflects a shift toward “clinical-guided decision making.”
The department added that it still values the input of expert panels like ACIP, which is scheduled to meet later this month, with the agenda to be released as is standard practice.
Ultimately, decisions about what is covered will be up to each insurance company, the HHS spokesperson added.
Historically, the CDC had recommended that everyone aged six months and older receive the COVID vaccine.
“This whole thing is so murky,” said a member of ACIP who spoke anonymously. “It’s very unclear whose decision is final.”
Dr. Tina Tan, president of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, warned that the inconsistent messaging is likely to lead to “significant confusion among medical professionals and the public.”
Dr. Matthew Zahn, a public health official in Orange County, California, who also advises the CDC panel, expressed the same concern. “We’re all awaiting clarity.”
“It’s going to be important to understand how these vaccines are insured,” Zahn said. “Specifically, if ultimately there is a recommendation for high-risk populations to be vaccinated, how that is interpreted by insurance companies and thus, how providers can recommend it.”
Zahn said he expects the CDC to provide further clarification soon but could not confirm whether that would happen at the upcoming ACIP meeting.
On Tuesday, Reuters reported that Dr. Lakshmi Panagiotakopoulos, a CDC specialist in pediatric infectious diseases who was deeply involved in coordinating the vaccine advisory group, had resigned. In a message to colleagues, she said she was stepping down because she was “no longer able to help the most vulnerable members” of the population.
Concerns have also been raised by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. On May 27, the group warned that removing the recommendation for pregnant women could make it more difficult for them to access the vaccine, “despite the clear and definitive evidence demonstrating its benefit.”
The CDC website notes that the Affordable Care Act typically mandates insurance coverage for vaccines included in the ACIP schedule.
Popovian warned that if insurers make decisions about coverage without clear guidance from ACIP, they could face significant risks. “It’s a liability,” he said. “Insurers need clarity on what they will be required to cover.”
A source familiar with the situation said the panel is expected to evaluate and vote on COVID vaccines for the fall and winter season at the upcoming meeting. The source also noted that the group has been leaning toward more limited recommendations.
{Matzav.com}
FDNY Commissioner Tucker Visits Boro Park Hatzolah, Shomrim, Chaveirim, Misaskim [PHOTOS]
WATCH: Parshas Naso: What People Need | Rabbi Joey Haber
Shin Bet Slams Avigdor Lieberman Over Leak That Its Arming Anti-Hamas Militias In Gaza
Musk Floats New Political Party Amid Clash With Trump
Elon Musk posed a provocative question to users on X, the platform he owns, suggesting the possibility of starting a fresh political movement as tensions with President Donald Trump grow and disagreements over the House GOP’s budget package continue to mount.
“Is it time to create a new political party in America that actually represents the 80% in the middle?” Musk posted, attaching a poll for users to weigh in. By 4:20 p.m. EDT on Thursday, more than 1.4 million people had voted, with 82.3% responding “yes” and only 17.7% choosing “no.” Musk currently has 220.3 million followers on the platform.
This message was shared not long after Trump voiced dissatisfaction with Musk due to his outspoken opposition to the One Big Beautiful Bill Act—a key piece of legislation the president is working to advance in Congress. Musk has argued the bill is excessive in scope and lacks meaningful fiscal restraint.
Musk’s critiques became more public and pointed toward the end of his time serving in a special government role overseeing the Department of Government Efficiency. That marked the beginning of a clear rift between him and Trump. Musk, who holds the title of world’s wealthiest individual, had previously been a major supporter of Trump, contributing large sums to the 2024 campaign, amplifying Trump’s platform on X, and even joining him on stage at political events nationwide.
{Matzav.com}
Pages
