PORUSH BRUSHES OFF NEW CHAREIDI PARTY: “Who Are They Connected to?” UTJ Leader Dismisses Moti Leitner’s Election Challenge
MK Meir Porush, chairman of Agudas Yisroel’s Shlomei Emunim faction, has dismissed the newly established Chareidi Public party headed by Moti Leitner, insisting that the movement poses little threat to United Torah Judaism and questioning whether its supporters ever voted for the established chareidi parties in the first place.
In an interview with Yishai Cohen of Kikar HaShabbat, Porush was asked about the growing attention surrounding Leitner’s party, particularly after hundreds of supporters attended an election gathering at Binyanei HaUma in Yerushalayim over the weekend.
The interviewer suggested that the turnout demonstrated that the movement could no longer be dismissed as a political gimmick, with hundreds of chareidim openly expressing dissatisfaction with the existing political establishment.
Porush was unimpressed.
“You can ignore it,” he responded. “If you’re asking whether I saw people in the pictures who are identified with our party, with Agudah, I didn’t see any. Not from Degel HaTorah either.”
Porush suggested that the new party’s supporters may have come from outside United Torah Judaism’s traditional voter base.
“It could be that these people voted for Ben-Gvir until now. It could be that they didn’t vote at all,” he said.
He also expressed skepticism about Leitner’s chances of winning representation in the next Knesset, saying that even the party’s supporters understood the difficulty of crossing the electoral threshold.
“They know very well, and so do you, that in the end they aren’t getting in,” Porush said. “Whoever wants to vote for them… I don’t want to speak about anybody. I’m looking for votes for United Torah Judaism.”
Asked what he would tell chareidim who say they are dissatisfied with the existing political parties and want something different, Porush offered a sarcastic response.
“What can you do? You would also like to be a Knesset member, wouldn’t you?” he asked the interviewer. “There are people you know who want to be Knesset members. Do they all get into the Knesset? Not everybody gets in. Some people say, ‘I’ll try. What’s the harm? I’ll try.’”
The interview also touched on the fact that Leitner’s party has included a chareidi woman among its Knesset candidates, a departure from the longstanding practice of the established chareidi parties.
Porush rejected the suggestion that the development was relevant to United Torah Judaism.
“Where? In United Torah Judaism?” he asked. “You’re talking again about the Chareidi Public party. What does that woman have to do with us? How many times do I have to tell you the same thing in one interview?”
The Chareidi Public party has been attempting to attract voters who believe the established chareidi political parties have failed to adequately address their concerns. Its campaign has generated considerable attention, particularly because of its willingness to challenge traditional political arrangements within the community.
Porush, however, maintained that the party’s emergence should not be interpreted as evidence of significant defections from Agudas Yisroel or Degel HaTorah.
His remarks came during a broader interview in which he addressed the upcoming elections, the military draft controversy and the conditions under which United Torah Judaism would consider joining the next government.
On the draft issue, Porush acknowledged that the chareidi parties had made a serious mistake during the outgoing government’s term by allowing other coalition partners to advance their legislative priorities while the status of yeshiva students remained unresolved.
He said that legislation concerning Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, Aryeh Deri, Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich had moved forward, while the chareidi parties were repeatedly told that their own legislation would come later.
“And we agreed, and we were nice, and we didn’t make a fuss,” Porush said, describing what he considered a major political error.
He insisted that United Torah Judaism would not repeat that mistake after the elections and that any future coalition agreement must include a firm arrangement protecting the status of full-time Torah learners.
Porush also addressed internal developments within Agudas Yisroel, including the administrative separation between Shlomei Emunim and the party’s Central Faction. He maintained that the arrangement concerned campaign financing and did not represent an electoral split, emphasizing that the factions would continue running together on the same United Torah Judaism ballot.
In a notable comment about internal party governance, Porush expressed support for holding primary elections within Agudas Yisroel, pointing out that the party’s regulations permit representatives to be selected either through primaries or through its national council.
“I wish they would hold primaries!” he said, adding that he would be prepared to work toward implementing such a process.
Despite his criticism of Leitner’s independent campaign, Porush stressed that his own priority was strengthening United Torah Judaism’s representation in the Knesset.
He said he was personally contacting voters, explaining the stakes of the election and urging participation among those whose rabbinic leadership permits voting.
“Only a strong United Torah Judaism will be able to stand up for the Torah world,” Porush said.
{Matzav.com}
